moving forward with irbs: best practices chair: philip rubin, haskins labs and yale university...
TRANSCRIPT
Moving Forward with IRBs:Best Practices
Moving Forward with IRBs:Best Practices
Chair: Philip Rubin, Haskins Labs and Yale University
Robert E. Remez, Barnard CollegeRoxane Cohen Silver, U. of California, Irvine
Bennett I. Bertenthal, Indiana UniversityFelice J. Levine, American Educational Research Assoc.
Chair: Philip Rubin, Haskins Labs and Yale University
Robert E. Remez, Barnard CollegeRoxane Cohen Silver, U. of California, Irvine
Bennett I. Bertenthal, Indiana UniversityFelice J. Levine, American Educational Research Assoc.
Symposium Goals:Symposium Goals:
•Disseminate best practices for researchers working with social and behavioral science IRBs
•Examples of specific strategies for working effectively with IRBs from leading scientists
•Change the nature of our approach to IRB relationships, fostering a more conducive atmosphere for research
•Disseminate best practices for researchers working with social and behavioral science IRBs
•Examples of specific strategies for working effectively with IRBs from leading scientists
•Change the nature of our approach to IRB relationships, fostering a more conducive atmosphere for research
Amy Pollick, “IRBs: Navigating the Maze: Practical advice for working with institutional review boards”, November 2007 Observer
APS Members Share IRB Experiences:
Grant Benham, “From Both Sides of the Trenches”
Dick McGlynn, “Let’s Band Together”
B. R. Simon Rosser, “Working Constructively and
Realistically with IRBs”
Jerry Burger, “Mimicking Milgram”, December 2007
Amy Pollick, “Talking with your IRBs about risk: Show them the data”, February 2008
Elena Newman, “Assessing trauma and its effects without distress: A guide to working with IRBs”, May 2008
Share your IRB tips by emailing APS at:Share your IRB tips by emailing APS at:
[email protected]@psychologicalscience.org
•Assuring confidentiality and voluntary participation
•Adjusting the regulatory burden to match the risk of harm
• Improvising
•Grading the review (full board, expedited, administrative)
•Compliance education for applicants
•The status of student projects
•Assuring confidentiality and voluntary participation
•Adjusting the regulatory burden to match the risk of harm
• Improvising
•Grading the review (full board, expedited, administrative)
•Compliance education for applicants
•The status of student projects
Robert E. RemezBarnard College, Columbia University
Robert E. RemezBarnard College, Columbia University