monitoring & evaluation of livingwell
DESCRIPTION
Monitoring & Evaluation of Livingwell. Workshop at Annual Conference. Workshop Structure. Part 1: Presentation GHK and this study Challenges facing us Two possible approaches The one we used Part 2: Group Discussion. Who are GHK? What are we doing?. GHK: Employee-owned research firm - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Monitoring & Evaluation of Livingwell
Workshop at Annual Conference
Workshop Structure
Part 1: Presentationo GHK and this studyo Challenges facing uso Two possible approacheso The one we used
Part 2: Group Discussion
Who are GHK? What are we doing?
GHK:o Employee-owned research firmo Multi-disciplinary: work in most policy areaso Specialism in evaluationo Local
Livingwell Project:o WMRAo Quarterly monitoring o Ongoing evaluation o Of projects, but at regional level
Inherent Challenges
All the usual evaluation challenges, plus… Diversity of projects:
o £o target groups o desired outcomeso interventionso contexts o capacity at project level
The need to ‘add it up’ to regional level:o Inputs (£) are easy…outputs more
problematic…outcomes the real challenge
One Possible Response & Our Approach
Possible Response:o Decide what a wellbeing iso Give projects a tool to measure ito Advantage: can add this up easily (compare
approaches??)o Disadvantage: ignores complexity / reality
Our Approach:o From the ‘project up’ (not ‘programme down’)o Based on individual project planso Guidance and support to projects’ self-
evaluation o Backed by some external evaluation
Basis of Approach:Theories of Change
Inputs
(what you have)
Activities
(what you do)
Outcomes
(the effect this has)
Impact
(wider societal change)
Rationale for intervention
(problem / opportunity – and most appropriate response - identified)
Do this for each project, then add-up each element ...
Applying this Model
Project M&E plans:o Project-level theory of changeo Specific quarterly / annual indicatorso Common tools for common outcomes, e.g.
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scaleo Common outcomes at ‘theme’ level o But – not a blanket approach (e.g. adults with
learning difficulties / low project capacity) Where does this leave us?
o Allows aggregation, but retains flexibility o Makes our job more complex, but more like the
real world!
Final Reflections
Needs different skills:o More collaborativeo More facilitative o Understand constraints facing practitioners
Requires a balance between: o Adding things up (quantitative)o Explaining and learning (qualitative)
Overall, a sound approach - given challenges outlined at start
Thank-you for Listening
Questions & Group Discussion