modern philosophy
DESCRIPTION
Modern Philosophy. Part One. Historical & Conceptual Background of the Modern Era. Renaissance Humanism Renaissance Humanism Rebirth of Interest in Greek & Roman Literature Technology Other Trends Protestant Reformation The Church Martin Luther (1483-1546) Social & Political Changes - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Modern PhilosophyPART ONE
Historical & Conceptual Background of the Modern Era
Renaissance Humanism Renaissance Humanism Rebirth of Interest in Greek & Roman Literature Technology Other Trends
Protestant Reformation The Church Martin Luther (1483-1546)
Social & Political Changes Religion Commerce
Background
The Rise of Modern Science Background Copernican Revolution
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) Galileo (1564-1642)
Implications of the New Science Galileo
Primary Qualities Secondary Qualities
Mechanical Explanations Replace Teleological Explanations
Elimination of Final Causes & Good
background
A New Approach to Philosophy Sweeping Away the Past The Search for a Perfect Philosophical Method Rationalism Empiricism
Argument Basics
Argument Concepts Defined General Assessment: Reasoning General Assessment: Are the Premises True?
Deductive Arguments
Introduction to Deductive Arguments Defined Use Assessment Valid/Invalid, Sound/Unsound
Some Common Valid Deductive Arguments Reductio Ad Adsurdum
Defined Form #1/Form #2 Example
Inductive Arguments
Introduction to Inductive Arguments Defined Assessment Strong & Weak Arguments
Analogical Argument
Introduction Definition Uses
Form Informal Strict Form
Premise 1: X has properties P, Q, and R. Premise 2: Y has properties P, Q, and R. Premise 3: X has property Z as well. Conclusion: Y has property Z.
Analogical Argument
Assessment The strength of the argument depends on
The number of properties X & Y have in common. The relevance of the shared properties to Z. Whether X & Y have relevant dissimilarities.
Example
Argument from/by Example
Introduction Defined
Form Informal Form
Premise 1: Example 1 is an example that supports claim P.Premise 2: Example 2 is an example that supports claim P.Premise n: Example n is an example that supports claim C.Conclusion: Claim P is true.
Argument from/by Example
Standards of Assessment Standards
The more examples, the stronger the argument. The examples must be relevant. The examples must be specific & clearly identified. Counter-examples must be considered.
Argument from Authority
Introduction Defined Use
Form Premise 1: Person A is an authority on subject S. Premises 2: Person A makes claim C about subject
S. Premises 3: Therefore, C is true.
Argument from Authority
Assessment Standards
The person has sufficient expertise in the subject. The claim is within the expert’s area of expertise. There is an adequate degree of agreement among
experts. The expert is not significantly biased. The area of expertise is a legitimate area or
discipline. The authority must be properly cited.
Thomas hobbes (1588-1679)background
Background Personal Information Influence: Galileo’s Works Influence: Euclidean Geometry Influence: English Civil War The Leviathan (1651)
Physics & Philosophy Goal & Method Empiricism Metaphysical Materialism God Ontology
Thomas hobbesphysics & Philosophy
Types of Philosophy First Philosophy Special Sciences Political Science
Epistemology & Psychology Thoughts Sensations Imagination & Memory Association
Language Humans Nominalism & Reasoning
Thomas hobbes
Metaphysics Determinism Human Behavior Voluntary Motions Hobbes account of Deliberation
Ethics Morality & Materialism
Thomas Hobbesphysics & politics
View of Politics Experience Conclusions Drawn From Experience Method
The State of Nature State of Nature Egoism
Natural Laws Natural Laws The Laws The Sovereign
Thomas hobbesPhysics & politics
Social Contract The Contract The Sovereign Rights & Morality Reaction
Thomas hobbesimpact & problems
Impact Impact
Problems Perception Consciousness Freedom, Purpose & Values
Rene Descartes (1596-1650)background
Life & Works Life Works
Agenda Motivation Travel Inward Focus Goals
Rene descartesmethod
Methodology Mathematics Intuition Deduction The Meditations on First Philosophy
Rene descartesFirst Meditation
First Part Start & Goal Method
Doubting the Senses Senses Dream Problem Painter Analogy Math: Skeptical Pause
God & The Demon God The Demon
Rene DescartesSecond Meditation
Skepticism & Certainty Method Skepticism The Foundation of Certainty: I am, I exist
The Self Goal Rejected: The Body as Self A Thing That Thinks Rejected
Human Body Air, Wind, Fire, Vapor, or Breath
Rene DescartesSecond Meditation
Knowledge of His Existence is not via the Imagination
Certainty The Wax Example
The Wax How the Wax is Known Language & Errors Perception & Inference The Wax Proves He Exists Conclusion
Rene Descartesthird meditation
Truth & God Standard of Truth: Clear & Distinct External Things God & Deception
Does God Exist? Is God a Deceiver?
Ideas Division of Thoughts Ideas& Truth Source of Ideas Ideas of External Objects
Rene Descartesthird meditation
External Objects: Instructed by Nature External Objects: Ideas do not Depend on His Will External Objects: Resemblance
Ideas, Reality & Causes Ideas & Reality
Objective Reality Principle: The cause must contain at least as much
reality as the effect. Formal Reality Eminent Containment
Causes of Ideas Regress Argument for Archetypes
Rene Descartesthird meditation
Method: Trying to find an idea he cannot be the cause of.
He could be the cause of his ideas of secondary qualities.
He could be the cause of his ideas of primary qualities.
God God Substance & Infinity Argument Infinity, God and Comprehension Descartes considers he might be the cause. Why Descartes cannot be the cause.
Rene Descartesthird meditation
More on God Goal He is lacking, so he cannot be the author of his
own being. Infinite Parts Argument Regress Argument Several Causes Parents Idea of God God is not a deceiver/
Rene DescartesFourth meditation
God & Reason God is not a deceiver. Reason The Cartesian Circle The Possibility of Error Points of Certainty
Rene DescartesFifth meditation
Third Proof of God The Proof Unique to God
Rene DescartesSixth meditation
The External World The Problem Descartes as the cause. God as the cause. External objects cause the ideas. Illusions Nature of Objects
Rene DescartesCartesian dualism
Dualism Substance Two Substances: Mental & Physical Meditations: Doubt Meditations: Different Humans & Animals Dualism
The Cartesian Compromise Reconciliation The Dualist Solution: The Body The Dualist Solution: The Mind
Rene DescartesCartesian dualism
Interactionism Mind-Body Problem Ship & Pilot Analogy The Pineal Gland
Rene DescartesProblems & Impact
Problems Natural Light Principle & Doubt Infinity Contamination Problem Interactionism: Arnold Geulincx (1624-1669)
Parallelism Interactionism: Nicolas Malebranche (1623-1662)
Occasionalism Blaise Pascal
Rene DescartesProblems & Impact
Impact Certainty Universal Science Reconciling Science & Religion Artificial Intelligence