modelling the impact of three sets of future vehicle emission standards on pm concentrations in the...
TRANSCRIPT
Modelling the impact of three sets of future vehicle emission standards on PMconcentrations in the Lower Fraser Valley
Weimin Jiang,
Éric Giroux, Dazhong Yin, and Helmut Roth
National Research Council of Canada
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 2
Outline
Introduction
The modelling scenarios
Impact of the emission standards on PM2.5
Other impacts
Summary and discussions
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 3
Introduction
Objective:
To study the impact of three sets of future vehicle emission standards on ambient PM concentrations in the Lower Fraser Valley.
The modelling system:
• CMAQ version 4.1 with NRC’s modifications
• SMOKE v1.4&2.0; MM5 v3; MCIP v2.2
• NRC’s PMx post-processor (for calculating PMx,ca)
Modelling domain
Nested 15- and 5-km domains focused on Lower Fraser Valley
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 4
Modelling domain
Pacific Ranges
Harrison Lake
CANADAUS
Bellingham
Burlington
VancouverStra ight o f Georg ia
Vancouver Is land
PIM E3
LAN G 3
W H R O 3 C LBR 3
C H IL3
AG G A3U N BC 3
Analysis is focused on the 5 km resolution inner domain.
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 5
Scenarios: BA, FBA, FNM
1. BA: the Pacific ’93 base case scenario
0:00 July 31 – 24:00 August 7, 1993;
2. FBA: the 2020 future base case scenario
BA projected to 2020 without considering the three sets of emission standards to be modelled;
3. FNM: the 2020 future no mobile scenario
FBA – mobile source emissions
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 6
4. ES: the emission standards scenario
FBA + three sets of vehicle emission standards:
1) The light–duty Tier 2 vehicle emission standards to be implemented from 2004;
2) The heavy–duty vehicle NMHC and NOx emission standards to be implemented from 2004;
3) The heavy duty vehicle NOx and PM emissions and low sulphur on–road diesel standards to be implemented from 2007.
Scenario: ES
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 7
Scenario emissions
NOx
0
1000
2000
3000
4000B
A
FB
A
FN
M ES
VOC
0
3000
6000
9000
12000
BA
FB
A
FN
M ES
SOx
0
300
600
900
1200
BA
FB
A
FN
M ES
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
Mobile On-Road CANADA Mobile On-Road USAFugitive Dust Mobile Off-RoadArea PointBiogenic
NH3
0
200
400
600
800
1000
BA
FB
A
FN
M ES
PM2.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
BA
FB
A
FN
M ES
PM10
0
200
400
600
800
1000
BA
FB
A
FN
M ES
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 8
Spatial impact: episode-average PM2.5
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 9
Spatial impact: on-road mobile contributions to episode-average PM2.5
A Mobile–Impacted Area (MIA): on–road mobile
sources contribute at least 0.5 g m-3 to episode–
average PM2.5
% reduction in on–road mobile source
contributions to PM2.5 in the MIA
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 10
Spatial impact: maximum 1-hour PM2.5
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 11
Temporal impact: domain-average PM2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
0:00 7/31
0:00 8/1
0:00 8/2
0:00 8/3
0:00 8/4
0:00 8/5
0:00 8/6
0:00 8/7
0:00 8/8
Pacific Daylight Time, July 31 to aug 7, 1993
Ab
s. D
iff.
[ g
m-3
]
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Rel
. D
iff.
[%
]
Absolute DifferenceRelative Difference
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 12
Significantly impacted location and time
The emission standards tend to cause more significant PM2.5 reductions in places where maximum 1–hour concentrations of PM2.5 are high or the incremental contributions of on–road mobile sources to ambient PM2.5 are more significant.
In general, the PM2.5 reductions due to the emission standards also tend to be more significant at the hours when ambient PM2.5 concentrations are high.
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 13
Magnitude of the impact
Unit Most + Most - Average
g m-3 0.3 -1.9 -0.1
% 1.9 -15.1 -1.2
g m-3 -0.1 -1.9 -0.5
% -10.8 -76.8 -64.0
g m-3 7.4 -11.8 -2.1
% 17.9 -25.2 -3.7
g m-3 0.3 -1.9 -0.1
% 3.9 -6.2 -0.7
Maximum 1-hour PM2.5
Hourly domain-average PM2.5
Impact
Episode-average PM2.5
Mobile contributions to episode-average PM2.5
in the MIA
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 14
Other impacts • Impact of emission projections from BA to FBA;
• Cumulative impact of emission changes from BA to ES impact on (ANH4, ANO3, ASO4), and (AORGPA, AORGA, AORGB, AORG);
• Of note: 1. Interconnected impact of NOx and SOx
emission reductions and NH3 emission increases;
2. Indirect impact of NOx emission reductions on the organic PM groups via O3 increases in some areas;
3. Higher biogenic organic PM species concentrations than anthropogenic organic species due to dominant biogenic VOC emissions.
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 15
Summary and discussions
The emission standards will be effective in controlling on–road mobile source contributions to ambient PM2.5 levels;
The average impact on ambient PM2.5 will vary noticeably with location and time:
• Reductions will be most evident where maximum 1–hour PM2.5 concentrations are high or on–road mobile source contributions are significant, and when domain–average ambient PM2.5 concentrations are high.
• Changes in other areas and hours are expected to be minor, and may dilute or offset the positive impact of the emission standards when averaged over the whole domain or episode;
Uncertainties in PM science and in emissions;
Regional nature of the results.
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 16
Acknowledgements
The Pollution Data Branch, Pacific & Yukon Region, and the Transportation Systems Branch of Environment Canada, Vancouver Regional District (GVRD):
Raw emission inventory data and assistance in modeling and processing the emission data ;
GVRD/Fraser Valley Regional District (FVRD), SENES Consulting Ltd./Air Improvement Resources Inc:
Emission projection factors;
US EPA and CMAS:
The original Models-3/CMAQ system;
Program of Energy Research and Development (PERD), Natural Resources Canada:
Funding support.
2004 Models-3 Conference, October 18-21, 2004 17