modelling for fpso, from engineering · lifecycle aspen hysys modelling for fpso, from engineering...

32
Lifecycle Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS

Upload: dohuong

Post on 28-Nov-2018

235 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Lifecycle Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS

Page 2: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS

Kari Berte Bye (Yinson)Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María Nougués, Jesús Gil, Josep Anton Feliu (Inprocess)

Page 3: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Disclaimer

This document may contain forward‐looking statements with respect to Yinson Holdings Berhad (“Yinson” or the “Group”) future (financial) performance and position. Such statement are based on current expectations, estimates and projections of Yinson and information currently available to the company.

Examples of forward‐looking statements include statements made or implied about the Group’s strategy, estimates of sales growth, financial results, cost savings and future developments in its existing business as well as the impact of future acquisitions and the Group’s financial position. These statements can be management estimates based on information provided by specialisedagencies or advisors.

Yinson cautions readers that such statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and therefore it should be understood that many factors can cause the Group’s actual performance and position to differ materially from these statements.

These factors include, but not limited to, macro‐economic, market and business trends and conditions, (low‐cost) competition, legal claims, the ability to protect intellectual property, changes in legislation, changes in exchange and interest rates, changes in tax rates, pension costs, raw material and energy prices, employee costs, the implementation of the Group’s strategy, the Group’s ability to identify and complete acquisitions and to successfully integrate acquired companies, the Group’s ability to realise planned disposals, savings, restructuring or benefits, the Group’s ability to identify, develop and successfully commercialise new products, markets or technologies, economic and/or political changes and other developments in countries and markets in which Yinson operates.

As a result, Yinson’s actual future performance, position and /or financial results may differ materially from the plans, goals and expectations set forth in such forward‐looking statements.

Yinson has no obligation to update the statements contained in this document, unless required by the relevant law and/or regulations. The English language version of this document is leading.

A more comprehensive discussion of the risk factors that may impact Yinson’s business can be found in the Group’s latest Annual Report, a of copy which can be found on the Group’s corporate website, www.yinson.com.my

Page 3

Page 4: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Yinson and Eni´s OCTP Project

• Motivation for Lifecycle dynamic modelling Phase 1: Process Design & Control ValidationPhase 2: Procedures Verification &

Early Senior CRO´s TrainingPhase 3: ICSS Database CheckoutPhase 4: Operator Training SystemPhase 5: FPSO Start‐up Support

• Operator competency training program

• Yinson´s approach to Lifecycle

• Conclusions

Agenda

Page 4

Page 5: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

5

Page 6: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Yinson Production – Our Fleet

Page 6 6

FPSO NameChartererFieldStorage CapacityProduction Capacity:OilLiquidGas CompressionContract DurationOwnership

FPSO AllanCNROlowi, Gabon1.04 million barrels

35,000 BOPD50,000 BLPD75 MMSCFD2009 – 2019 (2029)100% YINSON

FPSO NameChartererFieldStorage CapacityProduction Capacity:OilLiquidWater InjectionGas CompressionContract DurationOwnership

FPSO AdoonAddax PetroleumBlock OML 123, Nigeria1.7 million barrels

60,000 BOPD140,000 BLPD50,000 BWPD7 MMSCFD2006 – 2018 (2022)100% YINSON

FPSO NameChartererFieldStorage CapacityProduction Capacity:OilLiquidWater InjectionGas CompressionContract DurationOwnership

PTSC Lam SonPetroVietnam Block 1‐2/97, Vietnam350,000 barrels

18,000 BOPD28,000 BLPD15,000 BWPD47 MMSCFD2014 – 2021 (2024)51% PTSC, 49% YINSON

FSO NameChartererFieldStorage CapacityContract DurationOwnership

PTSC Bien Dong 01PetroVietnam Block 05‐2/05‐3, Vietnam350,000 barrels2013 – 2023 (2033)51% PTSC, 49% YINSON

FPSO NameChartererFieldStorage CapacityProduction Capacity:OilLiquidWater InjectionGas InjectionGas ExportContract DurationOwnership

FPSO John Agyekum KufuorENIOCTP Block, Ghana1.4 million barrels

58,000 BOPD75,000 BLPD55,000 BWPD165 MMSCFD210 MMSCFD2017 – 2032 (2037)100% YINSON

FPSO NameStorage CapacityProduction Capacity:OilLiquidGas

Ownership

Four Rainbow600,000 bbls

40,000 BOPD52,000 BLPD10 MMSCFD

51% YINSON, 49% PREMUDA

*For redeployment opportunity

Page 7: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Yinson Production and Eni´s OCTP Project

Yinson Production Pte Ltd (YP) is developingthe Offshore Cape Three Points (OCTP)field, converting a double hull Very LargeCrude Carrier (VLCC) oil tanker to a FloatingProduction Storage and Offloading (FPSO)to be located offshore of the WesternRegion of Ghana.

The OCTP block is located in approximately900m of water depth and about 60km fromthe coast.

Page 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mxC1_1B6cM

Page 8: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Extrapolating experiences

Page 8

Page 9: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Motivation for Lifecycle Dynamic Modelling: Challenges 

Page 9

Code is massive in modern ICSS, 

Can we test it in advance? 

Code is massive in modern ICSS, 

Can we test it in advance? 

How to fully test the Operating Procedures?

How to fully test the Operating Procedures?

How to effectively train experienced CRO´s in advance?

How to effectively train experienced CRO´s in advance?

Is the design suitable for all 

potential transients?

Is the design suitable for all 

potential transients?

How will the vendor packages (UCPs) interact 

with the ICSS?

How will the vendor packages (UCPs) interact 

with the ICSS?

Will the Safety System perform well? 

Will the Safety System perform well? 

Can we improve the plant’s availability?

Can we improve the plant’s availability?

Are equipment protected?

Are equipment protected?

How to safely train inexperienced operators? 

How to safely train inexperienced operators? 

Page 10: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

OTS Value Survey

• Increased Safety

• Minimize incidents (28% due to human error)

• Shortening start‐up: around 10‐20 days

• Reducing unplanned shutdowns by 2‐3 per year

• Speeding‐up planned shutdowns/start‐ups by 2‐3days per year

• Increased production by 1‐2%

• Flaring episodes minimized

Page 10

Source: http://hdl.handle.net/10642/1544

15.3 million$ average estimated savings due to OTS15.3 million$ average estimated savings due to OTS

15 MNOK = 2.6 Million$ 200 MNOK = 38.4 Million$

Page 11: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Motivation for Lifecycle Dynamic Modelling: Why Aspen HYSYS?

Yinson conceived the FPSO modelling from a Lifecycle perspective. But, what additional value does Aspen HYSYS provide to the Lifecycle?

Page 11

HYSYS LIFECYCLE PILLARS

Model Consistency

Extrapolation

Growing Detail/Scope

Reusability

Maintainability

Thermo Packages are consistent with the Steady‐Sate Design models. Data is introduced once and the model is used along the phases of the lifecycle.

Detailed Equipment data is available and refined as the project evolves.Additional process units can be incorporated as needed in the application.

Extrapolate process conditions far from nominal. Model will help to determine the settings to maximize production, reduce flaring and improve its controls.

The dynamic model can be re‐used with minor modifications for other purposes

Model update workflow is defined to keep the model alive and synchronized with the process, control and procedure changes.

RigorCRO´s will expect realistic process responses. This is the key to replicate/verify/ improve operating procedures, pre‐tune controllers and define alarms limits.

Page 12: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Motivation for Lifecycle Dynamic Modelling: Why Inprocess?

Yinson chose Inprocess as the company to fully exploit the HYSYS Lifecycle Dynamic Modelling envisioned for the OCTP project.

Page 12

INPROCESS VALUE

ICSS IndependentICSS Independent

Adaptable & AgileAdaptable & Agile

Global playerGlobal player

Talent & ExperienceTalent & Experience

CRO´s training programs

CRO´s training programs

Acting as an independent auditor of the ICSS Database and able to interface all the ICSS emulators in the market

Projects in Africa, Europe, North America, Latin America, Middle East and Asia, including off‐shore stays to conduct training programs

Schedule and scope changes are accommodated along the project to support Yinson in reaching their targets. 

30 OTS, 100+ DSS, former Aspen Senior staff, core‐business: Simulation.Ability to enhance the simulation capabilities by adding extensions.

Experience in developing customized education and competency training programs for Control Room Operators and Operation Staff.

Page 13: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

HYSYS Lifecycle Dynamic Modelling for the OCTP FPSO

Page 13

HYSYS Dynamic Model

Additional equipment, ICSS/UCP Control Narrative, CEMs, interlocks

ICSS HMI Emulated with Inprocess Instructor Station

Process TrainersProcess Trainers

ICSS HMI displays

ICSS Database Control Logic ICSS CheckoutICSS Checkout

Instructor Station, Training Scenarios,Additional ICSS Consoles

Direct‐Connect OTSDirect‐Connect OTS

ModelAdjust

Engineering StudyEngineering Study

ModelConnectivity

Page 14: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 1: Process Design & Control Validation, DSS model scope

Blue boxes indicate the areas included inthe scope of the Dynamic Simulation Study

Page 14

GAS INJECTION COMPRESSIONDEHYDRATION & TEG 

REGENERATION

HP FLASH GAS COMPRESSION

HHPSEPARATION

HPSEPARATION

PRODUCED WATER & SEA WATER

DSS

Page 15: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 1: Process Design & Control Validation  Dynamic Simulation Study

20 dynamic simulation studies were performed during this phase to analyse the plant’s transient dynamics, the control logicresponse , the procedures and the necessity of additional protective equipment

Page 15

HP Compressor

HP Compressor

Injection CompressorsInjection 

Compressors

Water Injection System

Water Injection System

Blocked InletBlocked Inlet

Blocked OutletBlocked Outlet

ESD tripESD trip

Settle OutSettle Out

Start‐upStart‐up

ASV FailASV Fail

Ramp up/downRamp up/down

Back‐washBack‐wash

VERIFYVERIFY

Max/Min Pressures & TemperaturesMax/Min Pressures & Temperatures

ASV/ASC behaviourASV/ASC behaviour

Pressure Controllers behaviourPressure Controllers behaviour

Hot Gas Bypass requirementHot Gas Bypass requirement

Settle Out ConditionsSettle Out Conditions

Driver Overload protectionDriver Overload protection

Overall OperabilityOverall Operability

Load Sharing & capacity controlLoad Sharing & capacity control

Page 16: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

75.9

69.2

55

60

65

70

75

80

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Pressure [bar_g]

Time [s]

23KA2009A BO ‐ 23KA2009A ‐ Product Pressure

23KA2009A - Product Pressure Max Min PALL PAL PAH PAHH

Phase 1: Process Design & Control Validation  Dynamic Simulation Study

Main findings of dynamic analysis:

‐ Discharge pressure override for throttle valve is required

‐ Settings of the ASC to avoid certain trip conditions

‐ Requirements for additional protection in surge scenarios

‐ No additional torque requirements for start‐up after ESD

‐ Settle out conditions after ESD

‐ Verification of alarms, trip limits and PSVs setting

‐ Gain insight of the timing and procedures

‐ Verification of the 3rd party package procedures

Page 16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4000

4500

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000

7500

8000

8500

9000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

OP [%]

SP & PV [m3/h]

Time [s]

23KA2009A BO ‐ 23FIC2313A ‐ SP, PV & OP

23FIC2313A - SP

23FIC2313A - PV

23FIC2313A - OP

Page 17: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 2: Process Trainer ‐ DSS model scope versus Training model scope

Blue boxes indicate the areas included inthe scope of the Dynamic Simulation Study

Page 17

GAS INJECTION COMPRESSIONDEHYDRATION & TEG 

REGENERATION

HP FLASH GAS COMPRESSION

NAG SLUG CATCHER

NAG SEPARATIONMP FLASH GAS COMPRESSION

LP FLASH GAS COMPRESSION

MP & LP SEPARATIONCRUDE TRANSFER

HHPSEPARATION

HPSEPARATION

PRODUCED WATER & SEA WATER

DSS

Green boxes indicate the areas added tothe HYSYS Dynamic model for training

Training +

HEATING  COOLING MEDIA

MEG REG.SYSTEM

HP & LP FLARE

FG SYSTEM

Page 18: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 1/2: Control Narrative Verification

The HYSYS Dynamic model from the DSS wasexpanded with new units, the latest control logicimplemented and the UCP sequences from thecompressor packages.

The model was used to verify the Control NarrativeSpecifications:

• Control interactions with UCP

• Normal operation

• During non‐design conditions

• During specific procedures

• Understanding the limits of the system

• Alarm & Trip limits

• Controller pre‐setting

• Verify equipment protection

Page 18

Flare Controller Set Points Instrument Ranges &Trip Settings

Calculations & Override Controllers

Selectors & SP strategies

Loops Interactions

Page 19: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 2: Procedures Verification

Page 19

Early verification of Operating Procedures with timing and transitions conditions

Scope:‐ Individual Units‐ Overall Start‐upprocess

Combining Expertise’s:Mix of experienced Engineers / Operators know‐how with realistic response of Process Trainer   

Operating Procedures were drafted and validated ina close interaction between Yinson and Inprocess

Page 20: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 2: Process Trainer ‐ Early CRO´s Training

Using the Inprocess Instructor Stationsoftware, an HMI layer was added on top ofthe HYSYS model using the same displays ofthe ICSS control room.

Early CRO´s and Supervisor Training

Knowledge Transfer

• Control Interactions and Issues

• Limits of the system

Training Scope

• ICSS displays familiarization andoperability verification

• Start‐up / Shutdown Procedures

• Trip scenarios

• Disturbances andMalfunctions

Page 20

Page 21: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 3: ICSS Database Checkout

ICSS Vendor

OTS Vendor

Customer

Pre‐FATICSSDatabase v0

Defects R

eport

ICSS FAT

Post‐FATICSSDatabase v1

Post‐FATICSSDatabase v2 OTS 

FATOTS SAT

ICSS SAT

Post‐SATICSSDatabase v3

OTS Delivery

DCS

 delivery

OTSupdate

Start‐up

Defects R

eport

Defects R

eport

Defects R

eport

Defects R

eport

OTSupdate

Page 22: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 3: ICSS Database Checkout

Page 22

STANDARD ICSS FAT ICSS FAT with HYSYS

Hardware Actual ICSS modules Standard PCs or laptops

Software Actual ICSS software ICSS emulator, Aspen HYSYS Dynamics

Location At ICSS vendor Facilities At any location (Inprocess, Customer, EPC, etc)

Timing When ICSS hardware and I/Os modules are available

As soon as ICSS logic and configuration is available

Testing proceeding Limited to the I/O signal introduced by hand

Same as commissioning & start‐up with real plant

Procedures testing Limited verification All procedures and start‐up/shutdown sequences

Loop testing No possible Full, as in real plant

Alarm verification Only non‐time dependent Full, as in real plant

SIS verification Limited, no plant interaction Full, as in real plant

Page 23: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Inprocess Instructor Station (IIS) is the backbone of any Inprocess OTS. IIS is the glue that connects all other data nodes in our OTS solutions. 

IIS allows to load models, navigate through process displays, make parameter changes, save snapshots, launch scenarios, insert malfunctions, log actions and evaluate operator performance, etc.

Furthermore, the instructor is able to see all the process information available to the operator, as well as certain “key” internal process variables.

It is also used as the Field Operated Devices station.

Phase 4: Operator Training System Development ‐ Inprocess Instructor Station

Page 23

Page 24: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 4: Operator Training System Development

Page 24

Real World

ICSS Hardware & Software

ICSS Console & Graphics

Field Operator

Panel Operator

AI, AODI, DO

Control 

System

& SIS

Process

Plant

Human

Machine

Interface

ICSSEmulation Software

Dynamic Simulation Model

Panel Operator

AI, AODI, DO

Direct‐connect OTS

Instructor Station &Field Operator Devices

Instructor Station &Field Operated Devices

Dynamic Simulation Model

AI, AODI, DO

Controls & SIS  also in the Dynamic Simulation Model

Emulated Graphics ConsolePanel Operator

Process Trainer: Emulated OTS

Inprocess Instructor Station connects all these items, and fills some gaps in certain architectures.

Page 25: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 4: Operator Training System Development ‐ Architecture

Page 25

Instructor, Simulation & FOD Station:• Aspen HYSYS® Dynamic Runtime • Inprocess Instructor Station (IIS)• Field Operated Devices (FOD) panel• Malfunctions panel

Operator Console 1:• ICSS Operator Station•ICSS Emulator

EthernetSwitch

OTS replica

In addition to the OTS installed in the onshore Yinson Training Center in Ghana, a full replica is also installed at the FPSO

Page 26: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Yinson, in adherence to their Asset Integrity Management, needed an operators competency development plan, based on a high‐fidelity simulator model, that should involve the pre‐operation, operation and continuous improvements phases of the FPSO:• The program begins with training sessions to get familiarized 

with the system and to identify and understand its limitations. The Process Trainer is used to gain process insight and to verify and improve the operating procedures.

• Once the process model is connected to the emulated ICSS, training sessions for all scenarios will commence with the Direct‐Connect OTS solution

• Finally, the need for refreshment and continuous improvement during the operations phase leads to continuous updates in the real ICSS and in the OTS

Operator Competency Development Program 

Page 26

Simulator Model

Familiarization and training with an Emulated OTS ‐

Process Trainer

Full Training Program with a Direct‐Connect OTS

Refresher

Continuous Improvements (tuning and debottlenecking)

Pre‐Operations

Operations

Page 27: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Operator Competency Development Program 

Along three project stages, Yinson will benefit from different project deliverables to develop the skills of the FPSO operators:

Page 27

SIM 3: Direct‐Connect OTS

Handling of Events (SIM 3)

Operation of Controllers(SIM 4)

Refreshment on Unusual Procedures(SIM 5)

SIM 2: Process Trainer

Operational procedures

Normal Operation

SIM 1: DCS Operator Consoles

HMIs awareness Safety systems hierachyfamiliarization

Page 28: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Phase 5: Start‐up Support

‐ Re‐run of low gas production scenarios

‐ Tuning of all controllers

‐ Supporting the instructor during SIM‐3training lessons

‐ Troubleshooting of potential issues withcontrollers tuning, alarms setting, start‐upprocedure, safety system, etc.

Page 28

Page 29: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

Yinson Production’s Quotes after Start‐up

“The preparations through the simulator exercises and pre‐tuning of the controllers really seems to pay off – basically the operators have been running everything in auto since the start‐up. Thank you very much for your effort and dedication to the simulator! Well done!”

Page 29

“We have "produced" for about 40 hrs in auto mode with only some fine tuning here there. What can I say, except so far this model of yours have performed far above all expectations. Very impressive.” 

“We have been running through the oil train with diesel pumped by the diesel circulation pumps, down to the subsea flowlines and up into the oil separation train HP/MP/LP and to Offspec Tank. Looking real good. The variations in flow has been from 5m³/h to more than 230m³/h. All three vessels has a constant level and interface level.”

“They actually managed to start the process in auto, and the oil process has been running smoothly for 3 days now, despite the wells being quite “sluggy”! This is quite extraordinary, and is something Company has never experienced before, according to feedback from start‐up team.” 

Kari Berte Bye, OTS Project Leader at Yinson Production

Page 30: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

ENI’s Press Release after Start‐up

Page 30

Eni has launched production from the Integrated Oil&GasDevelopment Project, in the Offshore Cape Three Points (OCTP) block, off Ghana’s western coast, in just two and a half years, and three months ahead of schedule, reaching another record time‐to‐market "Starting production only two and a half years after the 

approval of the Development Plan – Eni CEO Claudio Descalzi said ‐ is an extraordinary result and a reason for great pride. It certifies our exploration skills and knowledge, as well as our field development vision, and it confirms the effectiveness of our new operational model, where Eni has a central role in project management, aimed at improving time‐to‐market”

https://www.eni.com/docs/en_IT/enicom/media/press‐release/2017/05/PR_First_oil_Ghana.pdf

Page 31: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

HYSYS Lifecycle Dy

namic m

odelling

HYSYS Lifecycle Dy

namic m

odelling

Conclusions

Page 31

Reduce start‐up date delaysReduce start‐up date delays

Shorten start‐upShorten start‐up

Minimize incidentsMinimize incidents

Reduce unplanned shutdownsReduce unplanned shutdowns

Minimize flaringMinimize flaring

Improve plant reliabilityImprove plant reliability

Improve safetyImprove safety

Process TrainersProcess Trainers

ICSS CheckoutICSS Checkout

Direct‐Connect OTSDirect‐Connect OTS

Engineering StudyEngineering Study

Start‐up supportStart‐up support

Discover engineering design issues (Equipmentsizes, Protection Systems, 3rd party packages, …)

Verify Control Narratives specificationsand ICSS UCP interactions

Verify Start‐up/Shutdown/ESD Procedures

Verify CEMs and trip logics specifications

Check out ICSS implemented code and UCPs

Knowledge Transfer Program ‐ Training ofOperators with Process Trainer/OTS

Engineering support for troubleshooting

Pre‐tune Loops and alarm settings

BENEFITSTASKS

Page 32: Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering · Lifecycle Aspen HYSYS Modelling for FPSO, from Engineering Studies to OTS Kari Berte Bye (Yinson) Leonardo Carpio, Sergio Juan, José María

32

Q&A

Inprocess contact:Jesus GilInprocess Technology & Consulting Group, [email protected]

Yinson Production contact:Kari Berte ByeYinson [email protected]