minwara 2003 organic mine countermeasures “end to end assessment…” may 2003 capt vito jimenez

MINWARA 2003 Organic Mine Countermeasures End to End Assessment

May 2003CAPT Vito Jimenez

Overview2001 Assessment Results*

Purpose & ProcessShortfallsRecommended solutions

2003 Reassessment Two year hindsightCONOPS developmentShortfalls statusPotential solutionsSummary*This is a top-level brief. The assessment itself developed over 300 slides and numerous analytical work products that cant be shown here due to time constraints and level of detail.

Purpose of E2ETo analytically determine and inform PEO MUW, what the expected capability of OMCM systems is likely to be; as a suite of systems, in the notional 2007 operational environment, per current program planTo determine shortfalls in the program plan or in the suite of systems operational and technical capabilities in support of POM-04 and beyondTo provide quantitative results to support setting realistic expectations of delivered capability to the fleet as OMCM becomes operational

Organic MCM Systems

Key Assumptions & ReferencesSection 2.1.1Appendix FMH-60 ORD (Annex B)CVBG/MIW CONOPSN75 referencesConcept for H-60 Anti-Mine Warfare Operations in the Battle GroupSC21 COEA/Helo Master PlanPMA-299 referencesAppendix GMethodology

BoundariesThe following areas remain for further assessment:Full cost assessmentDedicated MCM forces (capability and interoperability)MiningAllied reinforcement or interoperabilityMCM Explosive Ordnance Disposal unitsReal-time dynamic tasking of ISR assets

E2E Assessment ProcessIntegrate Known Requirements, Concept of Operations and EmploymentOAMCMLMRSRMSSystem Technical ParametersProbability of detection Probability of neutralizationEndurance Other Assessment MethodologyMeasures of effectivenessModelingFleet expertiseReview PanelCommunications / Data flowBaseline Scenario DevelopmentThreats TACSITsEnvironment Asset AvailabilityIdentify Capabilities and ShortfallsPrioritize and Rank Recommendations

CVBG/ARGMIW CONOPSData Flow DiagramsTACSITs with threat & environmentShortfalls Define and bound the problem: Quantify/qualify threat and force protection, define end-end countermeasures and C4I capability Develop scenario and measures, and identify countermeasures systems to be applied as a suite of systems Play scenarios: Assess technical and tactical system capability. Determine effectiveness and efficiency of countermeasures in the notional environment of 2007 Identify holes: Issues, shortfalls, and recommendationsSee appendix G-1 of the report for a full description

Scenario DevelopmentChannel (SLOC): From CVBG/ARG MIW CONOPSOPAREA: From Capstone Requirements Document (Draft)

AssessmentResultsCommunications matrixAppendix ATimelines matrixSection 2.5 Analysis ExcursionsShortfallsExec Summary and Appendix DActionPage ix (Table ES.4)

Results (as stated in 2001)Current suite of systems under development is adequate for the intended applications with various shortfalls, some significantMine HuntingOMCM will be capable of performing the mine hunting role adequatelyLimitations generally result from platform limitations (MH-60S range/endurance, SSN configuration, DDG configuration)Mine SweepingPlatform size/weight restrictions impact the mine sweeping performance capability. Tactical solutions will be necessaryShortfalls: Nine Priority A (significant impact to OMCM)Eight Priority B (moderate impact to OMCM or not well defined)Sixteen Findings (statements of fact, no immediate impact to OMCM)

Communications MatrixGREEN: ALL OMCM COMMUNICATIONS DATA RATE REQUIREMENTS ARE WITHIN CURRENT/NEAR TERM COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIESNumbers in cells are derived data transmission requirements.

Timeline Matrix(1) No appreciable decrease in mission time due to necessity to perform OASIS missions (which are not affected by NOMBO density) after reconnaissance and are daytime-only towing missions.SLOCOPAREABaseline*Excursion 1Excursion 2Excursion 3Normalized Mission TimeX1.55X14.7X22.9X11.5X9.8X1.00X(1)10x10 Box1.64X2.54X1.27X1.09X(2 Lily Pads vice 1)(NOMBO Density = 16)(NOMBO Density = 4)* Baseline Consists of 1 Lily Pad, 2 MH-60S, 1 RMS, 1 LMRS, and NOMBO Density of 80.82XSection 2

Shortfall #1Shortfall: OMCM CVBG cannot meet combined MIW (OMCM and DMCM) timeline requirements outlined in the draft Capstone Requirements Document. CRD does not have OMCM-only requirements definitionDescription: Increasing number of MCM systems and/or capabilities of MCM systems can substantially reduce timeline. Maintaining a rapidly deployable dedicated MCM force remains a necessityAction: PMS210 develop roadmap for dedicated MCM capabilities that includes interoperability with OMCM forces. Recommend to OPNAV to define OMCM-only requirement

Shortfall #2Shortfall: OAMCM missions on MH-60S require lily pad to overcome OAMCM standoff distance and MH-60S range/endurance limitationsDescription: A lily pad ship is required for use by the OAMCM systems. Unless the CV moves closer to the area to be addressed, and thus closer to a potential mined environment, then a lily pad is necessary due to the limited reach of the MH-60S aircraft. In order to increase the number of aircraft in MCM operations, additional ships will need to be tied to the lily pad roleAction: Base some MH-60S aircraft and OAMCM systems (with support) on another platform that can be moved to within 10 nmi of operation area

System 1 does search to low level, then bumper pool to ID each minelike contact3. Time in Field from PMS299 data Tropical Day, 5 sorties per daySystem 2 does sweep to high level, Ship Count = 14. Baseline Case used CV at 50 nm and DDG at 10 nmTime vs Standoff 18.229.210.016.0

Chart2

18.210

20.411.2

22.412.4

25.214

29.216

34.419

System 1

System 2

Host Platform Standoff (nm)

Time to Complete Mission (days)

Sheet1

System 1System 2

1018.210

2020.411.2

3022.412.4

4025.214

5029.216

6034.419

1010

2011.2

3012.4

4014

5016

6019

Sheet1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Standoff

Days

Sheet2

Sheet3

Shortfall #3Shortfall: MH-60S time on station is limited for tow missions in Hot Day (102.9 degrees F, 39.4 degrees C SL). These conditions are not unusual for the areas of interestDescription: MH-60S OAMCM tow operations (AN/AQS-20/X, OASIS) are limited during hot day (102.9 F at SL) conditions. At these conditions, the best-case mission performance on-station time is 30 minutes with 10nm transit radius from Lily-Pad platform. This low on-station time is inefficient and may not be practicalAction: PMS210 develop initial tactics to minimize employment of towed systems in hot day conditions. Other alternative considered: Increase MH-60S tow time under hot day conditions (aircraft improvements)

Hot Day ExcursionTime in Field (Minutes) for 10 nm transitMH-60S time in field is significantly reduced for a hot day (103F) compared to a tropical day (90F). This leads to significant increase in the number of sorties required.For the baseline SLOC, the number of MH-60S tow missions (AQS-20/X and OASIS) increases from 28 to 80.SLOCBaselineHotMH-60 Sorties2880Adds 16 DaysNote 1SLOC with RMS doing all hunting

MH-60S Mission Time on Station vs. RadiusAQS-20/X Towing Mission

MH-60S Mission Time on Station vs. RadiusOASIS Towing MissionTransit Radius - NM

Shortfall #4Shortfall: Influence minesweeping with OASIS requires 53% of all MH-60S sorties flown in baseline End to End scenario (this is one plausible scenario of many options)Description: The OASIS system towed on the MH-60S requires the most sorties of any of the AMCM systems. The number of influence sweeping sorties is relatively insensitive to threat and environmental parameters, and can become the driver in the overall MCM timeline if insufficient AMCM-capable MH-60S aircraft and OASIS systems are not available in the CVBG Action: Brief results to N752 and discuss possible force structure (increase number of OASIS systems on CV and the number of tow-capable aircraft) or sweep doctrine changes Appendix D, Exec Summary

Number of Sorties in the Baseline SLOC scenario from End to End AssessmentWhy such a high number?OASIS: 1) Much smaller A compared to a MK-106 ( to ) coupled with ; 2) Shorter time on station (1.x vs. 4.x hrs)AQS-20A: 1) Highly dependent on RMS hunt contribution on initial around the clock hunt. Without RMS, AQS-20A becomes primary helo resource user until hunt clearance gets to 64%LMRS survey contributes bottom characterization, clutter density and potential contacts of interest and may contribute to clearance levels if surveyed area overlaps MDA and/or established minefields ***

Shortfall status

Operationally SignificantSignificantMarginally SignificantAdministrative

Addressed1.333.001.670.19

Unaddressed2.670.000.330.81

Factor4321

Total Number33621

FactorAddressedUnaddressedTotal

Operationally Significant4123

Significant3303

Marginally Significant2516

Administrative141721


Addressed1.002.006.004.00

Unaddressed2.001.000.0017.00

Factor0324250

Total Number3362133

91836100

Shortfall status

1209

21318

602436.3636363636

417250100

Level of impact

Addressed

Unaddressed

Factor

Cumulative percentage of shortfalls

Category of impact

Cumulative percentage

Shortfall Status

Number of sorties

129

2118

6036.3636363636

417100

&A

Page &P

Addressed

Unaddressed

Sheet3

Number of SortiesPercentage of ALMDS + Q-20 sorties

ALMDSAQS-20AAMNSRAMICSOASISRMS

Baseline SLOC458223320%

Baseline SLOC without RMS4908223074%

Oasis vs. MK-105 output550AOASISOpen Loop

Value of Sweeping with OASIS?Why must we sweep? To account for known/possible unknowns1) Buried mines are not huntable (today)2) When bottom conditions preclude efficient hunting3) Mines missed during hunting, which remain after hunting (statistical residue) due to technical limitations (nav error, decoyed mines, oceanographic phenomena, occultation, etc.)What if we dont develop an organic sweep at all and quit at hunting + neutralizing?Weve only dealt with the known problem, ignores the known/possible unknowns piece1) Risk of buried, decoyed or missed mine actuation2) Capability gap in known unhuntable areasOASIS is practically the most critical of the OAMCM weapons suiteto reduce risk

* per Current MCM Procedures Documented in NWP 3-15 (formerly NWP 27-1)Bottom Type Clutter Density plus Bottom CategoryDefinesA B C D 40NOMBOsper nmi21 2 3BottomRoughness(percentage)

< 5 %

5 to 15 %

> 15%Sand RidgeHeight(feet)

< 0.5

0.5 to 1.0

> 1.0BottomProfile

Smooth

Moderate

RoughBottom Category Depends Upon: - Bottom Composition (Sand, Mud/Sand, Mud, Rock) - Percent Mine Case Burial (0, 75) - Bottom ProfileA = Smooth Sand with

Value of sweeping as a function of RiskSweeping is only means to address un-huntable (poor environmental conditions) and buried threats; OASIS is the only organic solutionSweeping is valuable in two situationsHigh clutter density areas. Hunt and ID of a large number of minelike contacts is less efficient than sweep, once the density of the clutter exceeds a threshold In areas with a high fraction of undetectable mines. Hunting alone can only achieve a maximum value that is dependent on the bottom type. The maximum clearance obtainable is 1

Risk

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

Time

(AMCM Mission Days)

0

5

10

15

20

Risk After

Search

Phase

Risk

After

Neutralization

in MDA

*

Risk Level After

Sweeping

MDA

*

Results Based Upon:

3 Helicopter Sorties per Day per

Helo

10% Mine Burial

Representative Ship Class

Representative Mine Type/No.

Risk

with

No MCM

Effort Applied

1.0

= 2 MH-60S, 1 RMS, 1 LMRS

= 3 MH-60S, 2 RMS, 1 LMRS

Low Risk

Medium

Risk

High

Risk

*

*

MDA = Mine

MDA = Mine

Danger

Danger

Area

Area

Simple

Simple

Initial

Initial

Threat

Threat

Progress since 2001Shortfalls and findings:Resolved or reasonably addressed 13 of 33 to dateNo addressable shortfalls in POM-04 or PR05 Exploring effects of changes in Program Plans to expected OMCM capabilityPossible loss of TCDLPotential inclusion of LCS within CSGPotential inclusion of OMCM in ESGValue of sweeping (OASIS contract just awarded)Analytically established that organic mine countermeasures is not a substitute for dedicated mine countermeasures forces, but a complementary force package

More progressCONOPS recognizes stand-off constraints and tactically optimizes platform positioning to maximize MH-60S time on stationPotential LCS force structure may further mitigate this constraining factor (TBD)Modifications to MH-60S planned to improve time on station/stand-off rangeTactics to maximize non-towed missions at longer ranges (ALMDS, AMNS, RAMICS)

Link 16 Comm matrixLINK 16 PROVIDES ESSENTIAL REAL-TIME DATA (FORMATTED TEXT MESSAGE) ON AIRCRAFT TRACK, AREA SEARCHED, CONTACT/ACTUATION LOCATIONS, BUT NO REAL-TIME IMAGERYCV TSC to MH60SMH60S to CV TSCDDG to RMVRMV to DDGUUV to SSNSSN to UUVLOS - TCDL200 kbpsLOS - TCDL 10.71 MbpsLOS 3.15 MbpsOTH 16 kbpsLOS 3.15 MbpsOTH 64 kbpsBRA-34A / USQ-42UHF SAT 32 kbpsBRA-34A / USQ-42UHF SAT 32 kbpsLMRS Dual Quadrifilar Helix Antenna LST-5D transceiver 600 bps600 bps(LMRS antenna) 0.12 Mbits every 9-12 hours Store and forward capability100 kbits mission planRMS LOS UHF: BAE VRC-99B (12-15 nm range) OTH VHF: Harris PRC-117F (surface wave)LOS: 9.6 kbps OTH: 0.8-2.4 kbpsLOS: 2.8 Mbps OTH: 40 kbps ALMDS TCDL Ku Band Rod Antenna:100 kbits mission plan0.448 Mbps nom. 8.0 Mbps maxAN/AQS-20X TCDL Ku Band Rod Antenna:100 kbits mission plan0.012 Mbps nom6.9 Mbps max OASIS TCDL Ku Band Rod Antenna:100 kbits mission plan600 bps (TCDL)Actuation events (voice)RAMICS TCDL Ku Band Rod Antenna:100 kbits mission plan0.58 Mbps Lidar image (no trans req)AMNS TCDL Ku Band Rod Antenna:100 kbitsmission plan5 Mbps video/Ancillary(no trans req)SystemNumbers in cells are derived data transmission requirements.Whats lost?Ability to watch the hunt real-time, and pass video contacts over a net; little if any penalty in actual contact prosecution

Impact of Data Link on E2E Baseline SLOC Timeline When datalink is removed, the timeline doesn't change. Why?Large number of OASIS sorties dictate length of operation. Requires no data link capabilityFew Q-20 and ALMDS sorties to make efficient use of data link. Rapid follow-on not possible (asset limitations) or necessary (OASIS)Tactical implications of not having TCDL and using Link-16 insteadReal-time contact reaction not available at CVTSC. Is it necessary? Not reallyLinks through complete battlegroup (non-video) into an established network

This figure shows timeline using two aircraft with TCDL to clear the SLOC.

MH-60S Time on Station improvementsHot day performance up to 41 min (30 threshold / 45 objective), achieved through: removal of HIRSS and ISD (though the provisions remain), weight reduction throughout the Block 2 and 3A-Kits,weight reduction within the Block 2B-Kit, and implementation of a 10-min rating for the engine Other weight reduction initiatives being explored to gain more margin (not yet implemented) include composite stabilator, crew reduction, improved ECS unit, active vibration,light-weight tow cable, electric winch, etc.A CDL system is in the baseline program of record, scheduled for an 04 start, fielding in 07. Potential savings of 260 lbs if requirement is eliminated (TCDL of questionable tactical advantage)

Status of shortfallsOperationally significant shortfalls directly influence number of sortiesSignificant shortfalls severely complicate MCM executionMarginally significant shortfalls moderately complicate MCM executionAdministrative shortfalls have no direct impact on the number of sorties(A3, A4)(A7)

Summary of E2E (2003)Current suite of systems under development is adequate for the intended applications with various shortfalls, some significantMine HuntingOMCM will be capable of performing the mine hunting role adequatelyLimitations generally result from platform (MH-60S range/endurance, SSN configuration, DDG configuration) limitationsMine SweepingPlatform size/weight restrictions impact the mine sweeping performance capability. A tactical solution will be necessaryAnalytically established that organic mine countermeasures is not a substitute for dedicated mine countermeasures forces, but a complementary force packageNo change to conclusions of 2001, the study stands as previously stated

TechnologyScheduleDec 97Detailed Design Contract AwardNov 99Development Phase Contract AwardApr/May 01OPEVALAug 03MS III Sep 03IOC1st Qtr FY04Production Contract Award

Significantly increased system endurance, 4-5 times silver zinc battery energy densityAdvanced forward look search sonars with CAD/CAC capabilityACOMMs, RF and UHF SATCOM communications between the Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) and SSNSignificantly increased reliability over existing UUV systemsRequirements / Goals/ CapabilitiesEnabler for the submarine to operate in littoralsAddresses enhanced clandestine mine reconnaissanceAutonomous operations with the following measures of effectiveness: ThresholdGoalSingle sortie reach75 nm120nmTotal area coverage400 nm2650 nm2Area coverage rate35 nm2/day50 nm2/dayAN/BLQ-11 (LMRS)

LMRS Simulation Results for SLOCArea Depicted to Represent Approximately Two LMRS Sortiesis Three 1500 yds by 60 nmUsed LMRS to select lane of interestBy FY10, there will be 12 LMRS systemsSynthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) will provide for LMRS a 3-fold improvement in range and a 36x improvement in resolution over the AQS-14A and AQS-20LMRS could provide a search capability approaching that of RMS depending onnumber of SSNs and LMRS assigned to MCMeffectiveness and speed of SAS in providing additional threat informationtactics employed to minimize LMRS localization errors due to inertial navigationWith reasonable assumptions, LMRS should be capable of achieving search clearance levels to 95%.

TechnologyScheduleRequirements / Goals / CapabilitiesAN/WLD-1(V)1 Remote Minehunting SystemJun 99System Requirements ReviewNov 99System Design ReviewDec 99Milestone IINov 00Preliminary Design ReviewDec 01Critical Design ReviewAug 04OPEVALFeb 05Milestone IIIJun 05IOC

Surface Launched and RecoveredOver-the-Horizon OperationsIntegrated with AN/SQQ-89(V)15Utilizes AN/AQS-20 Sensor with Electro-Optic IdentificationUnmanned Autonomous Operations Part of the Fleet Engagement Strategy to Mainstream mine warfare. High endurance, offboard system, operated from and maintained aboard surface ship Rapid reconnaissance of bottom and moored mines from the deep water region (greater than 200 feet) to the 30-foot contour of the very shallow water region Inventory Objective - 33 systems Mine Identification

AN/WLD-1(V) Predicted Endurance

Chart1

39.6712.25

38.1211.33

36.5810.4

35.039.48

33.488.55

31.947.63

30.396.7

28.855.78

8-knot Transit & Search Speed

16-knot Transit w/12-knot Search Speed

Transit Distance (nm)

Time in the Area (hours)

Predicted AN/WLD-1(V) PerformanceTime in Area versus Transit Distance

Sheet1

8 Knot Mission:

Fuel Capacity (gal) =282Transit Distance(nm)Transit Time (hr)Gallons to TransitGallons for TripGallons RemainingTime RemainingLinear nm Remaining

00.000.000.00282.0039.67317.4

101.255.5010.99271.0138.12305.0039.67012.25

Speed (knots) :816151.888.2416.49265.5137.35298.81038.121011.33

1.820.94202.5010.9921.99260.0136.58292.62036.582010.4

253.1313.7427.48254.5235.80286.43035.03309.48

Speed (knots) :812303.7516.4932.98249.0235.03280.24033.48408.55

1.130.70354.3819.2438.48243.5234.26274.15031.94507.63

405.0021.9943.97238.0333.48267.96030.39606.7

455.6324.7349.47232.5332.71261.77028.85705.78

506.2527.4854.97227.0331.94255.5

556.8830.2360.46221.5431.16249.3

607.5032.9865.96216.0430.39243.1

658.1335.7371.46210.5429.62236.9

708.7538.4876.95205.0528.85230.8

12 Knot Mission:

Transit Distance(nm)Transit Time (hr)Gallons to TransitGallons for TripGallons RemainingTime Remaining

00.000.000.00282.0012.25196.0

100.6310.6421.28260.7211.33181.2

150.9415.9631.91250.0910.86173.8

201.2521.2842.55239.4510.40166.4

251.5626.6053.19228.819.94159.0

301.8831.9163.83218.179.48151.6

352.1937.2374.47207.539.01144.2

402.5042.5585.11196.898.55136.8

452.8147.8795.74186.268.09129.4

503.1353.19106.38175.627.63122.1

553.4458.51117.02164.987.17114.7

603.7563.83127.66154.346.70107.3

654.0669.15138.30143.706.2499.9

704.3874.47148.94133.065.7892.5

Sheet1

8-knot Transit & Search Speed

16-knot Transit w/12-knot Search Speed

Transit Distance (nm)

Time in the Area (hours)

Predicted AN/WLD-1(V) PerformanceTime in Area versus Transit Distance

Sheet2

Sheet3

MH-60S Mission Time on Station vs. RadiusALMDS Free Flight Mission

Sheet: Sheet9

Sheet: Sheet1

Sheet: MISSION ENDURANCE-HOT DAY

Sheet: MISSION ENDURANCE-TROP DAY

Sheet: MISSION ENDURANCE-STD DAY

Sheet: CYCLE DEFINITIONS

Sheet: MISSION WEIGHTS

Sheet: AMNS-UNTHRD-PLOT

Sheet: ALMDS-PLOT

Sheet: RAMICS-PLOT

Sheet: RADIUS OF ACTION VS TOS-DATA

Sheet: Sheet5

Sheet: Sheet6

Sheet: Sheet7

RAMICS TIME ON STATION VS RADIUS OF ACTION CALCULATED FIGURES

STANDARD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

2.4608

10.0

2.3758

10.0

2.272

10.0

1.468

30.0

2.0987

30.0

1.964

30.0

1.199

60.0

1.6824

60.0

1.5605

60.0

0.793

ALMDS TIME ON STATION VS RADIUS OF ACTION CALCULATED FIGURES

STANDARD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

10.0

3.3467

10.0

3.1483

30.0

3.398

30.0

2.9633

60.0

2.466

60.0

2.388

60.0

2.2033

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

2615.0

2615.0

2615.0

2615.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

FUEL FOR 1.0 MINUTE HOVER

23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8

FUEL FOR OUTBD, INBD RADIUS OF ACTION AND CLIMBS-LB

24.0

182.4

534.4

1061.6

FUEL FOR FIRST CYCLE-LBS

279.8

278.7

276.3

272.7

FUEL FOR LAST CYCLE-LBS

253.1

254.1

256.2

259.6

AVG. FUEL PER CYCLE-LBS

266.45

266.4

266.25

266.15

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

TOTAL FUEL AVAILABLE FOR CYCLES-LB

1534.3

1376.0

1024.0

497.3

NUMBER OF CYCLES

7.758

7.165

5.847

3.865

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3

TOTAL TIME ON STATION-HR

1.59

1.468

1.199

0.793

MISSION:AMNS TETHERED

BEGINNING WEIGHT IN CYCLE 1-LBS

ENDING WEIGHT IN CYCLE N-LBS

FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES

TIME PER CYCLE- MINUTES


MISSION-AMNS UNTETHERED

RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3340.0

3340.0

3340.0

3340.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8


23.6

174.7

510.5

1013.3


384.8

383.8

381.5

378.0


333.4

334.0

335.6

337.0


359.1

358.9

358.6

357.5

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2073.4

1922.7

1587.6

1086.9

NUMBER OF CYCLES

7.7738

7.3572

6.427

5.0402

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3


2.8892

2.7344

2.3887

1.8733

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

21947.0

21947.0

21947.0

21947.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3662.0

3662.0

3662.0

3662.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

FUEL FOR 1.0 MINUTE HOVER-LBS

24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8

FUEL FOR OUTBD, INBD RADIUS OF ACTION-LB AND CLIMBS

23.9

184.9

542.3

1077.5


291.0

289.9

287.4

283.7


251.0

252.0

254.1

257.4

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE-LBS

271.0

270.9

270.8

270.6

RESERVE-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2571.3

2460.4

2053.4

1518.6

NUMBER OF CYCLES

11.488

11.082

9.582

7.6119

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3


2.355

2.272

1.9644

1.5605




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8


23.0

175.0

512.6

1017.8


386.5

385.4

383.4

379.7


331.4

332.1

333.5

335.7


358.95

358.75

358.45

357.7

RESERVE-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2500.3

2348.7

2011.7

1507.9

NUMBER OF CYCLES

8.965

8.546

7.6122

6.2155

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3


3.33199

3.1765

2.8292

2.3101

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

22050.0

22050.0

22050.0

22050.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.3

24.3

24.3

24.3

FUEL FOR OUTBD AND INBD RADIUS OF ACTION AND CLIMBS-LB

23.9

185.3

543.6

1080.1


285.2

284.2

281.7

278.4


246.4

247.3

249.4

252.5

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

265.8

265.8

265.6

265.45

RESERVE FUEL

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2685.2

2524.0

2166.0

1630.0

NUMBER OF CYCLES

12.102

11.496

10.155

8.1495

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.4

12.4

12.4

12.4


2.4608

2.3758

2.0987

1.6824




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8


23.0

176.1

516.0

1024.2


380.0

378.9

376.8

373.6


327.8

328.3

329.8

332.0

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

353.9

353.6

353.3

352.8

RESERVE FUEL

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2509.4

2356.9

2017.6

1510.4

NUMBER OF CYCLES

9.0907

8.665

7.7107

6.281

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.4

22.4

22.4

22.4


3.3938

3.23509

2.8786

2.34497

DESCRIPTION OF CYCLE FOR EACH MISSION

RAMICS: 10 minutes of hover OGE 5 NM between targets at Max Range Speed

AMNS (TETHERED): 15 minutes to engage each target (1 neutralizer per cycle) at hover OGE

7.5 minutes to stream 5 NM between each target at max range speed followed by 7.5 minutes to recover gear.

AMNS( UNTETHERED): 5 minute hover OGE to deploy the weapn 15 minutes at Vbe to engage each target

5 NM between targets at VBR and up to 8 total targets.

MISSION GROSS WEIGHTS AND MAXIMUM FUEL ALLOWABLES

AQS-20

OASIS

ALMDS

RAMICS

AMNS(TETHERED)

AMNS(UNTETHERED)

WEIGHT EMPTY-LBS

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

REV. WEIGHT EMPTY-LBS

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

BASIC WEIGHT-LBS

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

OPERATING WEIGHT EMPTY-LBS

17440.0

17440.0

16538.0

17785.0

17440.0

16736.0

USEFULL LOAD-LBS

1322.0

1252.0

800.0

500.0

1007.0

824.0

FUEL(MAIN)

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

FUEL (AUX)

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

TOGW-LBS

22527.0

22457.0

21103.0

22050.0

22212.0

21325.0

MAX. FUEL ALLOWABLE BASED ON TOGW LIMITATION(22,500 LBS-STD DAY;21,947 LBS TROPICAL DAY;20,900 LBS-HOT DAY)

ISA

3738.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

(W/450 LBS RESERVE FUEL AT LNDG)

3288.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

TROP

3185.0

3255.0

3765.0

3662.0

3500.0

3765.0


2735.0

2805.0

3315.0

3212.0

3050.0

3315.0

HOT

2138.0

2208.0

3562.0

2615.0

2453.0

3340.0


1688.0

1758.0

3112.0

2165.0

2003.0

2890.0

USEFUL LOAD DEFINITIONS:

AQS-20

TOWED BODY=1000 LB

TOW CABLE(750 FT)=322

TOTAL=1322 LBS

OASIS

TOWED BODY=930 LB

TOW CABLE=322 LBS

TOTAL=1252 LBS

ALMDS

SENSOR=800 LBS

RAMICS

250 ROUNDS AMMO(30MM)&Can=500 LBS

AMNS(TETHERED)

TOW CABLE(250 FT)=107 LBS

MIR AMNS=500 LBS

4 NEUTRALIZERS=400 LBS

TOTAL=1007 LBS

AMNS(UNTETHERED)

8 VEHICLE AMNS=824 LBS

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

3.3938

3.33199

2.8892

3.23509

3.1765

2.7344

2.8786

2.8292

2.3887

2.34497

2.3101

1.8733

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

3.64

3.52

3.32

3.46

3.3467

3.1483

3.063

2.963

2.77

2.467

2.3883

2.2033

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

2.4608

2.355

1.59

2.3758

2.272

1.468

2.0987

1.9644

1.199

1.6824

1.5605

0.793

ALMDS

CALCULATED FIGURES

STDA DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

10.0

3.3467

10.0

3.1483

30.0

3.063

30.0

2.963

60.0

2.467

60.0

2.3883

60.0

2.2033

RAMICS CALCULATED FIGURES

STD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

2.4608

10.0

2.3758

10.0

2.272

10.0

1.468

30.0

2.0987

30.0

1.9644

30.0

1.199

60.0

1.6824

60.0

1.5605

60.0

0.793

AMNS UNTETHERED CALCULATED FIGURES

STD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

3.3938

1.0

3.33199

1.0

2.8892

10.0

3.23509

10.0

3.1765

10.0

2.7344

30.0

2.8786

30.0

2.8292

30.0

2.3887

60.0

2.34497

60.0

2.3101

60.0

1.8733

MH-60S Mission Time on Station vs. RadiusRAMICS Hover Mission

Sheet: Sheet9

Sheet: Sheet1

Sheet: MISSION ENDURANCE-HOT DAY

Sheet: MISSION ENDURANCE-TROP DAY

Sheet: MISSION ENDURANCE-STD DAY




Sheet: ALMDS-PLOT

Sheet: RAMICS-PLOT

Sheet: RADIUS OF ACTION VS TOS-DATA

Sheet: Sheet5

Sheet: Sheet6

Sheet: Sheet7


STANDARD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

2.4608

10.0

2.3758

10.0

2.272

10.0

1.468

30.0

2.0987

30.0

1.964

30.0

1.199

60.0

1.6824

60.0

1.5605

60.0

0.793


STANDARD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

10.0

3.3467

10.0

3.1483

30.0

3.398

30.0

2.9633

60.0

2.466

60.0

2.388

60.0

2.2033

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

2615.0

2615.0

2615.0

2615.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8


24.0

182.4

534.4

1061.6


279.8

278.7

276.3

272.7


253.1

254.1

256.2

259.6


266.45

266.4

266.25

266.15

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


1534.3

1376.0

1024.0

497.3

NUMBER OF CYCLES

7.758

7.165

5.847

3.865

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3


1.59

1.468

1.199

0.793




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3340.0

3340.0

3340.0

3340.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8


23.6

174.7

510.5

1013.3


384.8

383.8

381.5

378.0


333.4

334.0

335.6

337.0


359.1

358.9

358.6

357.5

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2073.4

1922.7

1587.6

1086.9

NUMBER OF CYCLES

7.7738

7.3572

6.427

5.0402

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3


2.8892

2.7344

2.3887

1.8733

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

21947.0

21947.0

21947.0

21947.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3662.0

3662.0

3662.0

3662.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8


23.9

184.9

542.3

1077.5


291.0

289.9

287.4

283.7


251.0

252.0

254.1

257.4


271.0

270.9

270.8

270.6

RESERVE-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2571.3

2460.4

2053.4

1518.6

NUMBER OF CYCLES

11.488

11.082

9.582

7.6119

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3


2.355

2.272

1.9644

1.5605




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8


23.0

175.0

512.6

1017.8


386.5

385.4

383.4

379.7


331.4

332.1

333.5

335.7


358.95

358.75

358.45

357.7

RESERVE-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2500.3

2348.7

2011.7

1507.9

NUMBER OF CYCLES

8.965

8.546

7.6122

6.2155

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3


3.33199

3.1765

2.8292

2.3101

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

22050.0

22050.0

22050.0

22050.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.3

24.3

24.3

24.3


23.9

185.3

543.6

1080.1


285.2

284.2

281.7

278.4


246.4

247.3

249.4

252.5

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

265.8

265.8

265.6

265.45

RESERVE FUEL

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2685.2

2524.0

2166.0

1630.0

NUMBER OF CYCLES

12.102

11.496

10.155

8.1495

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.4

12.4

12.4

12.4


2.4608

2.3758

2.0987

1.6824




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8


23.0

176.1

516.0

1024.2


380.0

378.9

376.8

373.6


327.8

328.3

329.8

332.0

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

353.9

353.6

353.3

352.8

RESERVE FUEL

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


2509.4

2356.9

2017.6

1510.4

NUMBER OF CYCLES

9.0907

8.665

7.7107

6.281

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.4

22.4

22.4

22.4


3.3938

3.23509

2.8786

2.34497








AQS-20

OASIS

ALMDS

RAMICS

AMNS(TETHERED)

AMNS(UNTETHERED)

WEIGHT EMPTY-LBS

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0


14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

BASIC WEIGHT-LBS

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0


17440.0

17440.0

16538.0

17785.0

17440.0

16736.0

USEFULL LOAD-LBS

1322.0

1252.0

800.0

500.0

1007.0

824.0

FUEL(MAIN)

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

FUEL (AUX)

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

TOGW-LBS

22527.0

22457.0

21103.0

22050.0

22212.0

21325.0


ISA

3738.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0


3288.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

TROP

3185.0

3255.0

3765.0

3662.0

3500.0

3765.0


2735.0

2805.0

3315.0

3212.0

3050.0

3315.0

HOT

2138.0

2208.0

3562.0

2615.0

2453.0

3340.0


1688.0

1758.0

3112.0

2165.0

2003.0

2890.0


AQS-20

TOWED BODY=1000 LB


TOTAL=1322 LBS

OASIS

TOWED BODY=930 LB

TOW CABLE=322 LBS

TOTAL=1252 LBS

ALMDS

SENSOR=800 LBS

RAMICS


AMNS(TETHERED)


MIR AMNS=500 LBS


TOTAL=1007 LBS

AMNS(UNTETHERED)


1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

3.3938

3.33199

2.8892

3.23509

3.1765

2.7344

2.8786

2.8292

2.3887

2.34497

2.3101

1.8733

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

3.64

3.52

3.32

3.46

3.3467

3.1483

3.063

2.963

2.77

2.467

2.3883

2.2033

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

2.4608

2.355

1.59

2.3758

2.272

1.468

2.0987

1.9644

1.199

1.6824

1.5605

0.793

ALMDS

CALCULATED FIGURES

STDA DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

10.0

3.3467

10.0

3.1483

30.0

3.063

30.0

2.963

60.0

2.467

60.0

2.3883

60.0

2.2033


STD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

2.4608

10.0

2.3758

10.0

2.272

10.0

1.468

30.0

2.0987

30.0

1.9644

30.0

1.199

60.0

1.6824

60.0

1.5605

60.0

0.793


STD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

3.3938

1.0

3.33199

1.0

2.8892

10.0

3.23509

10.0

3.1765

10.0

2.7344

30.0

2.8786

30.0

2.8292

30.0

2.3887

60.0

2.34497

60.0

2.3101

60.0

1.8733

MH-60S Mission Time on Station vs. RadiusAMNS (Tethered) Hover Mission

Sheet: AMNS-T Plot

Sheet: AMNS-T

Sheet: Sheet2

Sheet: Sheet3

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

32.0

60.0

2.457459190915543

2.2531915388191535

1.4928250591016547

2.335326704545454

2.132310553231055

1.372177304964539

2.0600426136363637

1.8640683879972084

1.102628841607565

1.6486458333333331

1.4623719739292365

1.0766666666666667

0.71

Std

Std

Std

Std

Trop

Trop

Trop

Trop

Hot

Hot

Hot

Hot

ROA

TOGW

Warm-up, takeoff

22137.5

22137.5

22137.5

22137.5

21922.2

21922.2

21922.2

21922.2

20876.2

20876.2

20876.2

20876.2

Climb/Cruise out

22124.6

22040.3

21853.6

21575.6

21909.4

21825.5

21639.3

21362.3

20863.3

20781.600000000002

20600.7

20583.2

First Cycle Fuel

Mid-cycle Fuel

No. of Targets engaged

4.564939673527324

4.338068181818182

3.8267045454545454

3.0625

4.185495118549512

3.9609483960948397

3.462665736217725

2.7164804469273744

2.773049645390071

2.548936170212766

2.0482269503546098

2.0

On-Station Time

2.457459190915543

2.335326704545454

2.0600426136363637

1.6486458333333331

2.2531915388191535

2.132310553231055

1.8640683879972084

1.4623719739292365

1.4928250591016547

1.372177304964539

1.102628841607565

1.0766666666666667

0.71

Last Cycle Fuel

18508.6

18586.3

18759.6

19019.6

18508.4

18585.5

18758.3

19017.3

18508.3

18584.600000000002

18756.7

18774.2

Climb/Cruise in

18497.3

18497.2

18497.3

18496.5

18497.2

18497.0

18497.6

18497.1

18497.1

18496.300000000003

18496.5

18496.9

Reserves

OWE/Landing Wt

18047.3

18047.2

18047.3

18046.5

18047.2

18047.0

18047.6

18047.1

18047.1

18046.300000000003

18046.5

18046.9

MH-60S Mission Time on Station vs. RadiusAMNS (Untethered) Free Flight Mission

Sheet: Sheet9

Sheet: Sheet1

Sheet: TOS-HOT DAY

Sheet: TOS-TROP DAY

Sheet: TOS-STD DAY




Sheet: ALMDS-PLOT

Sheet: RAMICS-PLOT

Sheet: ROA VS TOS-DATA

Sheet: GW-FUEL SUMMARY

Sheet: Sheet7


STANDARD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

2.4608

10.0

2.3758

10.0

2.272

10.0

1.468

30.0

2.0987

30.0

1.964

30.0

1.199

60.0

1.6824

60.0

1.5605

60.0

0.793


STANDARD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

10.0

3.3467

10.0

3.1483

30.0

3.398

30.0

2.9633

60.0

2.466

60.0

2.388

60.0

2.2033

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

2615.0

2615.0

2615.0

2615.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8


24.0

182.4

534.4

1061.6


279.8

278.7

276.3

272.7


253.1

254.1

256.2

259.6


266.45

266.4

266.25

266.15

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

SUM OF ABOVE FUEL -AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

1080.7

1239.0

1590.7

2117.7


1534.3

1376.0

1024.3

497.3

NUMBER OF CYCLES

7.758303621692625

7.165165165165166

5.847136150234741

3.868495209468345

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3


1.5904522424469882

1.4688588588588591

1.1986629107981221

0.7930415179410109




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

20900.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3340.0

3340.0

3340.0

3340.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8


24.2

181.0

529.0

1050.3


389.6

388.5

386.1

382.6


350.2

350.9

353.0

355.9


369.9

369.7

369.55

369.25

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

1287.7999999999997

1444.1999999999998

1791.8999999999999

2312.6


2052.2000000000003

1895.8000000000002

1548.1000000000001

1027.4

NUMBER OF CYCLES

7.547985942146527

7.127941574249392

6.189148964957381

4.782396750169262

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3


2.8053347751644595

2.6492182850960244

2.3003003653091603

1.777457458812909

Required

Objective

Threshold

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

30.0

50.0

MISSION:RAMICS

TOGW-LBS

21997.0

21997.0

21997.0

21997.0

21997.0

21997.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3662.0

3662.0

3662.0

3662.0

2769.6

Mission Fuel Required

3430.5

Mission Fuel Required

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8

24.8


23.9

184.9

542.3

1077.5

548.2

902.0


291.0

289.9

287.4

283.7

290.4

287.9


251.0

252.0

254.1

257.4

266.2

259.8


271.0

270.9

270.8

270.6

278.29999999999995

273.85

RESERVE-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

SUM OF FUELS ABOVE

1090.7

1251.6

1608.6

2143.4

1629.6

1974.5

MIDCYCLE FUEL AVAILABLE-LB

2571.3

2410.4

2053.4

1518.6

1140.0

1456.0

NUMBER OF CYCLES

11.48819188191882

10.897748246585458

9.582717872968981

7.611973392461197

6.096298957959037

7.316779258718276

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3

GW-Fuel

GW-Fuel


2.355079335793358

2.234038390550019

1.9644571639586412

1.5604545454545453

1.2497412863816029

19227.4

1.5

18566.5

Reuired

Objective


Threshold

RADIUS OF ACTION

30.0

50.0

TOGW-LBS

21997.0

21997.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

2775.3

Mission Fuel

3429.3

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0


24.8

24.8


548.5

902.6


752.0

745.2


710.0

691.7


731.0

718.45

RESERVE FUEL-LBS

450.0

450.0

2535.3

2864.3


240.0

565.0

NUMBER OF CYCLES

2.3283173734610125

2.7864151993875703

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

32.3

32.3

TOTAL TIME ON STATION_HR

1.2534108527131782

GW-Fuel

1.5000201823369752

GW-Fuel

19221.7

18567.7


Threshold

Objective

RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

30.0

50.0

TOGW-LBS

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3066.2000000000003

required fuel

3884.7999999999997

REQUIRED FUEL

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8

23.8


23.6

181.2

531.3

1054.6

534.2

884.3


391.3

390.2

387.6

384.3

387.6

385.3


348.0

348.8

350.7

353.6

358.8

351.3


369.65

369.5

369.15

368.95000000000005

373.20000000000005

368.3

RESERVE-LBS

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0

SUM OF ABOVE FUEL-AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

1286.6999999999998

1444.0

1793.3999999999996

2316.3

1804.4000000000003

2144.7


2478.3

2321.0

1971.6000000000004

1448.6999999999998

1261.8

1740.1

NUMBER OF CYCLES

8.70445015555255

8.281461434370772

7.340918325883789

5.926548312779508

5.381

6.726

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3

22.3

gw-Fuel

GW-FUEL


3.2351539744803643

3.077943166441137

2.7283746444534747

2.202700456249717

2.0

18258.8

2.5

17440.2

MISSION:RAMICS

RADIUS OF ACTION_NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

22050.0

22050.0

22050.0

22050.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


24.3

24.3

24.3

24.3


23.9

185.3

543.6

1080.1


285.2

284.2

281.7

278.4


246.4

247.3

249.4

252.5

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

265.8

265.75

265.55

265.45

RESERVE FUEL

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


1079.8

1241.1

1599.0

2135.3


2685.2

2523.9

2166.0

1629.6999999999998

NUMBER OF CYCLES

12.102332580887884

11.497271872060207

10.156655996987384

8.139385948389528

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

12.4

12.4

12.4

12.4


2.501148733383496

2.3761028535591096

2.099042239377393

1.6821397626671692




FUEL PER CYCLE-LB


NUMBER OF CYCLES




RADIUS OF ACTION-NM

1.0

10.0

30.0

60.0

TOGW-LBS

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

21325.0

MISSION FUEL-LBS

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

FUEL FOR WU/TO-LBS

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0


23.4

23.4

23.4

23.4


22.8

180.8

532.1

1058.0


384.5

383.4

381.1

377.8


343.5

344.2

346.1

348.8

AVG FUEL PER CYCLE

364.0

363.79999999999995

363.6

363.3

RESERVE FUEL

450.0

450.0

450.0

450.0


1274.2

1431.8

1782.7000000000003

2308.0


2490.8

2333.2

1982.2999999999997

1457.0

NUMBER OF CYCLES

8.842857142857143

8.413413963716328

7.4518701870187005

6.010459675199559

TIME PER CYCLE-MIN

22.4

22.4

22.4

22.4


3.3013333333333335

3.1410078797874292

2.7820315364869814

2.2439049454078352








AQS-20

OASIS

ALMDS

RAMICS

AMNS(TETHERED)

AMNS(UNTETHERED)

WEIGHT EMPTY-LBS

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0

13775.0


14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

14191.0

BASIC WEIGHT-LBS

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0

14343.0


17440.0

17440.0

16538.0

17785.0

17440.0

16736.0

USEFULL LOAD-LBS

1322.0

1252.0

800.0

500.0

1007.0

824.0

FUEL(MAIN)

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

2446.0

FUEL (AUX)

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

1319.0

TOGW-LBS

22527.0

22457.0

21103.0

22050.0

22212.0

21325.0


ISA

3738.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0

3765.0


3288.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

3315.0

TROP

3185.0

3255.0

3765.0

3662.0

3500.0

3765.0


2735.0

2805.0

3315.0

3212.0

3050.0

3315.0

HOT

2138.0

2208.0

3562.0

2615.0

2453.0

3340.0


1688.0

1758.0

3112.0

2165.0

2003.0

2890.0


AQS-20

TOWED BODY=1000 LB


TOTAL=1322 LBS

OASIS

TOWED BODY=930 LB

TOW CABLE=322 LBS

TOTAL=1252 LBS

ALMDS

SENSOR=800 LBS

RAMICS


AMNS(TETHERED)


MIR AMNS=500 LBS


TOTAL=1007 LBS

AMNS(UNTETHERED)


1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

3.30133

3.235154

2.805335

3.14008

3.077943

2.649218

2.78203

2.728376

2.3003

2.243905

2.2027

1.777457

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

3.64

3.52

3.32

3.46

3.3467

3.1483

3.063

2.963

2.77

2.467

2.3883

2.2033

1.0

1.0

1.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

60.0

60.0

2.4608

2.355

1.59

2.3758

2.272

1.468

2.0987

1.9644

1.199

1.6824

1.5605

0.793

ALMDS

CALCULATED FIGURES

STDA DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

10.0

3.3467

10.0

3.1483

30.0

3.063

30.0

2.963

60.0

2.467

60.0

2.3883

60.0

2.2033


STD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

2.4608

10.0

2.3758

10.0

2.272

10.0

1.468

30.0

2.0987

30.0

1.9644

30.0

1.199

60.0

1.6824

60.0

1.5605

60.0

0.793


STD DAY

TROP DAY

HOT DAY

1.0

3.30133

1.0

3.235154

1.0

2.805335

10.0

3.14008

10.0

3.077943

10.0

2.649218

30.0

2.78203

30.0

2.728376

30.0

2.3003

60.0

2.243905

60.0

2.2027

60.0

1.777457

Summary of Mission Maximum GW-Fuel Figures and Mission Fuels

T-O

Threshold/

Radius

TOS

TOGW

Fuel

ZFW

Delta

Mission

Objective

NM

Min

lbs

Lbs

Lbs

Lbs

RAMICS

T

O

AMNS Teth.

T

O

AMNS Unteth.

T

O

ALMDS

T

O

Trop Day Towing

T

O

Hot Day Towing

T

O

Shortfalls and FindingsOperational Shortfall Definition: capability or supporting capability not currently in a defined program and whose absence significantly constrains overall OMCM capability POM action recommendedAnalysis Shortfall Definition: deficiency in problem definition, metrics, or analysis methods encountered in the assessment processFinding Definition: finding of fact that should be tracked but that does not require POM actionPriority of Shortfalls:Priority A: Impact on OMCM capability is significant, and the impact is well-defined and understoodPriority B: Impact on OMCM capability is moderately significant, or the impact is not well-defined or well understood

Recommendations-LegendTechnical FeasibilityHIGH indicates recommendation is not difficult to implement.LOW indicates recommendation is more difficult to implement.Affordability

Operational DesirabilityHIGH indicates compatibility with projected fleet implementation.LOW requires additional or unique efforts for fleet integration

Shortfalls: Priority A

Shortfalls: Priority BAppendix D

Recommendations

Findings (1 of 2)

Findings (2 of 2)

Recommended Actions from Findings

Detailed Mission Profile for SLOCBaseline (1 of 3)2.5 HrTransit47 HrSearch Time2.5 HrTransit0.5 HrRecover24 HrPMALMRS UUVs:0.5 HrLaunch8.0 hrPlanningMH-60S(b)AMNS SortiePlanningPlanningLaunch&TransitAN/WLD-1...PlanningAQS-20 SortiesMH-60S(a)LMRS survey

Detailed Mission Profile for SLOCBaseline (2 of 3)...MissionPlanning4.8 HrSearch TimeAMNSSortiesALMDSSortie9.2 HrSearch TimeTransit& RecoverPlanningOASIS SortiesPlanningOASISRAMICSSortieALMDSSortiesAMNSSortiesTransit toNext AreaPlanningOASISSorties4.9 HrSearch TimeTransit& Recover16.4 HrSearch TimeOASIS SortiesDDG-51 Transitsto Maneuver Box(45 nmi @ 10 kts)Launch&TransitLaunch& Transit13.8 HrSearch Time12.4 HrSearch Time4.5 HrSearch Time(MDA 31-34)13.8 HrSearch Time...Transit toNext AreaAMNSSortiesAMNSSortie

Detailed Mission Profile for SLOCBaseline (3 of 3)PlanningOASIS SortiesMissionPlanningAMNSSortiesALMDSSortieRAMICSSortieSLOCCompletedTransit& Recover...Event SequenceIn Hunt only (no revisits or ID)ALMDS ASR is ~10x that of Q-20. Why?Non-tow, higher search speedNo stream/recoveryFaster turn timesLonger search time per sortieHunt followed by revisit (ALMDS) or ID (Q-20)ALMDS faster than Q-20, same areaDepends on # of ALMDS and Q-20 contacts. And # of contacts that can be revisited per sortie. (Time per contact, time on station)Example Assumptions ALMDS contact density of 4/nm2 and Q-20 contact density (B1 bottom) 13/nm2 ALMDS 5 min/contact and Q-20 20 min/contactALMDS time on station 3 hours, Q-20 time on station 1 hour Q-20 Tow during daylight onlyDetails:Single ALMDS revisit sortie can revisit ~35 contacts == 8.6 nm2.8.6 nm2 contains ~112 Q-20 contacts requiring 38 Q-20 revisit sortiesTow only during day >> ALMDS 76x faster than Q-20 when revisit/ID time is included

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (1 of 9)First LMRS UUV launched to search for possible SLOC location. Second UUV launched one hour later. The two UUVs search 3 possible SLOCs.LMRS PMA determines the preferred SLOC location based on clutter density. The mines (named according to their locations: M22 refers to Mile 22) for this SLOC are:Bottom influence: M22, M26, M28, M32.Moored: M25, M29.LMRS PMA detects/classifies/locates M25, M29.

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (2 of 9)AMNS reacquires/identifies/neutralizes the volume objects detected by LMRS, M25, M29. MDA established from 23-31 nm.AQS-20X hunts nm 1-5 to 64%. 17 bottom contacts.RMS hunts MDA nm 23-31 to 95%. Detects/classifies/locates M26, M28, MB.AQS-20X reacquires/identifies the 17 contacts. One identified as mine, MA.

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (3 of 9)AMNS reacquires/identifies/neutralizes M26, M28, MA, MB. (No MDA around non-mine MA.)ALMDS hunts MDA to 95% and revisits all contacts. 1 near-surface mine-like object, NSA. ALMDS hunts nm 1-10 to 64% prior to return.OASIS sweeps half of MDA to 95% (ship count 1). RMS hunts nm 31-64 to 64%. RMS detects/classifies/locates M32, MC, MD.

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (4 of 9)AMNS reacquires/identifies/neutralizes M32 MC MD. MDA established from nm 31-34.RMS hunts MDA nm 31-34 to 95%. OASIS sweeps second half of MDA nm 23-31.RMS hunts nm 5-23 to 65%. RMS detects/classifies/locates M22, ME, MF.

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (5 of 9)AMNS reacquires/identifies/neutralizes M22, ME, MF.MDA established for nm 20-23.RMS hunts MDA nm 20-23 to 95%.RMS hunts half of the maneuver box nm 35-37 to 65%. Detects/Classifies/locates MG, MH.

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (6 of 9)OASIS sweeps MDA nm 20-23 to 95%.ALMDS hunts nm 20-23 to 95%, nm 10-20 to 64%, and nm 31-34 to 95%. Locates one near-surface mine-like object NSB.ALMDS hunts maneuver box to 64%, locates one near-surface mine-like object NSC.AMNS reacquires/identifies MG, MH generated by previous RMS search.VolumeBottomSurface/ near-surface

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (7 of 9)RAMICS reacquires/identifies NSA, NSB, NSC generated by ALMDS.RMS hunts last part of maneuver box nm 37-38 to 64%.OASIS sweeps MDA nm 31-34 to 95%. When OASIS, RMS complete, the DDG advances to maneuver box.RMS hunts nm 46-60 to 64%. Detects/classifies/locates MI, MJ, MK.VolumeBottomSurface/ near-surface

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (8 of 9)AMNS reacquires/identifies MI, MJ, MK.ALMDS hunts nm 38-60 to 64%. Locates one near-surface mine-like object NSD. RAMICS reacquires/identifies NSD.OASIS sweeps nm 50-60 to 64% (ship count 1) because of D1 bottom.VolumeBottomSurface/ near-surface

Baseline SLOC sequence of events (9 of 9)VolumeBottomSummary:Total of 6 mines in nm 0-60 baseline SLOC. All were detected/neutralized by AMNS.Four near-surface non-mine mine-like objects were located by ALMDS, and required RAMICS expenditure.11 non-mine mine-like bottom objects were identified by RMS or Q-20 and required AMNS expenditure.Surface/ near-surfaceReturn

CompletedSummary:Total of 6 mines in nm 0-60 baseline SLOC. All were detected/neutralized by AMNS.Four near-surface non-mine mine-like objects were located by ALMDS, and required RAMICS expenditure.11 non-mine mine-like bottom objects were identified by RMS or Q-20 and required AMNS expenditure.

Number of Mines Remaining (T)Level of Effort (in terms of Percent Clearance) No Mines Detected90%95%Exploratory Reconnaissance PlanningLevel of Effort versus Mine ThreatConfidence Level (CL)63.2If an exploratory mine reconnaissance effort is expended that is equivalent to the number of tracks required to achieve a specified percent clearance level and no mines are detected, then an estimate of the number of mines in the area can be made (with a designated confidence level).

For example, if the exploratory objective is to determine that no more than 2 mines are located within an area (with 95% confidence level), then a level of effort (i.e., number of tracks) equivalent to approximately 64% percent clearance is required with no mine being detected.

Risk ParametersRisk Calculations to Show the Payoff of MCM OperationsSimple Initial Threat of SLOC TACSIT Prior to MCM Effort Then Resultant Risk to First Transitor After the MCM Operation

For OPAREA TACSIT, Risk versus Operating Time in the AreaSimple Initial ThreatEquation(A-59)of PEO(MUW)INST 3370.1:p(t) = (1 - e )-V W t/ATimeTimeRiskRiskShip RandomlyManeuvering:RepresentativeData:

RandomExamples

RaceTrack

Speed(kt):Speed(yd/s):(max=0.39)RandomRandomRandomRandom

52.81255 in 10x105 in 10x1030 in 30x3030 in 60x40donut

105.625Days:Pma:Pma:Pma:Pma:Pma:

158.437500.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000

2011.2510.04360.11180.07600.02920.0257

2514.062520.08230.21100.14620.05750.0500

3016.87530.11670.29920.21100.08510.0731

3519.687540.14720.37750.27100.11180.0951

50.17440.44710.32640.13770.1159

60.19850.50890.37750.16290.1357

Area(nm2):Area(yd2):70.21990.56380.42480.18730.1546

10x1041006250080.23890.61250.46850.21100.1725

20x20164025000090.25580.65580.50890.23410.1895

30x303690562500100.27080.69430.54620.25640.2057

60x409841500000110.28410.72850.58070.27810.2212

120.29590.75880.61250.29920.2359

130.30650.78580.64200.31970.2498

140.31580.80970.66920.33950.2632

150.32410.83100.69430.35880.2759

160.33150.84990.71750.37750.2880

170.33800.86670.73900.39570.2995

180.34380.88160.75880.41340.3105

190.34900.89480.77710.43050.3210

200.35360.90660.79410.44710.3310

210.35760.91700.80970.46320.3405

220.36120.92630.82420.47890.3497

230.36450.93450.83750.49410.3584

240.36730.94180.84990.50890.3667

250.36990.94830.86130.52320.3746

RandomExamples

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

RickvsMOE

L =40nmMOE:ASR =C/[(N/V)+PxZxCxTc)]0.5263157895

C =50nm

N =10Rick:EASR=[(VxC)/N]/[1+PxZxTcx((C/V)/N)]0.5263157895

Z =10per nm2

P =0.68

Tc =0.25hrs

V =1knots

E2E DataSet

W=50 @W=50 @W=50 @W=50 @W=50 @W=50 @

Speed(kt):Speed(yd/s):5 kt in 10x1020kt in 30x3010kt in 30x305kt in 30x305 kt in 10x1020kt in 30x30

52.8125with 1 minewith 1 minewith 1 minewith 1 minewith 2 minewith 2 mine

105.625Days:Pma:Pma:Pma:Pma:Pma:Pma:

158.437500.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000

2011.2510.02920.01310.00660.00330.05750.0260

2514.062520.05750.02600.01310.00660.11180.0513

3016.87530.08510.03870.01960.00980.16290.0760

3519.687540.11180.05130.02600.01310.21100.1000

50.13770.06370.03240.01630.25640.1234

60.16290.07600.03870.01960.29920.1462

Area(nm2):Area(yd2):70.18730.08810.04500.02280.33950.1684

10x1041006250080.21100.10000.05130.02600.37750.1900

20x20164025000090.23410.11180.05750.02920.41340.2110

30x303690562500100.25640.12340.06370.03240.44710.2315

60x409841500000110.27810.13490.06990.03560.47890.2515

120.29920.14620.07600.03870.50890.2710

130.31970.15730.08200.04190.53720.2899

140.33950.16840.08810.04500.56380.3084

150.35880.17920.09400.04820.58890.3264

160.37750.19000.10000.05130.61250.3439

170.39570.20060.10590.05440.63480.3609

180.41340.21100.11180.05750.65580.3775

190.43050.22140.11760.06060.67560.3937

200.44710.23150.12340.06370.69430.4095

210.46320.24160.12910.06680.71190.4248

220.47890.25150.13490.06990.72850.4398

230.49410.26130.14050.07290.74410.4543

240.50890.27100.14620.07600.75880.4685

250.52320.28050.15180.07900.77270.4823

Stages of Risk ReductionInitial searchLeaves false contactsDoes not reduce risk unless all contacts are avoided by all ships in transitDoes not find undetectable mines (buried / disguised)Contact revisit for confirmation / identificationReduces false contactsStill does not reduce risk unless all contacts are avoidedFor bottom mines, requires much greater time than initial searchStill does not find undetectable mines (buried / disguised)NeutralizationIf avoidance is not feasibleOnly after neutralization is the risk in a SLOC reducedDoes not reduce risk against undetectable mines (buried / disguised)After search, undetectable threat remainsrevisit/ID, and neutralize phase is complete there is still a threat from undetectable mines (buried, disguised, decoyed, etc.)Only solution remaining is to sweep

How long do you search before sweep?Risk to transiting shipTime in MCM OperationsSearch is more efficientSweep is more efficientT*Search-ID-Neutralize until the slope of the sweep curve is greater. This is at T*

The slope of the curves is the marginal rate of return

Take the action thatmaximizes the marginal rate of return

Simple rule: maximize rate of return at the margin

Applying the simple rule: in some environments, buried / disguised mines impose a limit on rate of return to Search-ID-Neutralize tactics

What affects the rate of return?Search-ID-NeutralizeSearch time depends mainly on swath width, speed, time on station.ID time depends mainly on number of initial contacts from search, and time needed to revisit these contacts. Depends heavily on bottom type. ID time is typically largest of the three.Neutralize time depends on number of objects identified as mines, time required to neutralize and complete BDA.Percent buried / disguised mines imposes lower limit on risk reduction.SweepDepends on assumed ship count to sweep against.Swath width, speed, time on station

Search-ID-Neutralize TimesRisk to transiting shipTime in Search-ID-NeutralizeLimit of risk reduction due to buried / disguised threatSearchRevisit / ID NeutralizeID time large due to clutter and time required to ID each contactSearch to higher Pdc more clutter detected more ID timeSearch to higher Pdc but remaining threatis undetectable

Sweeping and Ship CountShip count = 1Ship count = 2Ship count = 3Time in SweepIncreasing ship count swept against requires more time.

Lower rate of return as ship count increases.

Impact of Nav Error on SearchBA0 = std. deviation of nav errorNavigation Error DistributionLateral range curve (or A/B) convolved with Navigation Error. This determines probability of coverage and detection on a given trackPdc given coverProb. Of trackdeviationProb. coverand detect and classifyAccounting for uncorrelated navigational errors in SITAll measures of risk (SIT, probability of mission abort in N transits, etc.) decrease with decreasing probability of detecting and classifying any mine present at least onceThe probability of detecting and classifying any mine present at least once, assuming initial uniform distribution of mines is given by Reber theory, as encoded in UCPLN (MIW NWP)

Nav error increased # tracksNav error

Link 16 Comm Matrix

Shortfall status


Addressed1.333.001.670.19


Factor4321

Total Number33621



Significant3303




Addressed1.002.006.004.00

Unaddressed2.001.000.0017.00

Factor0324250

Total Number3362133

91836100

Shortfall status

000

000

000

000

Addressed

Unaddressed

Factor

Category of impact

Level of Impact

Shortfall Status

Number of sorties

000

000

000

000

&A

Page &P

Addressed

Unaddressed

Sheet3





SystemLINK 16 Communications matrix

MIWC to MH60SMH60S to MIWC

MessagesSizeMessagesSize

ALMDSSearch Mission Plan100 kbitsMine-like contactEnvironment70 bits / wordStandard J message is 1-3 words

Revisit Contact1 kbits

AQS-20ASearch Mission Plan100 kbitsMine-like contactEnvironment70 bits / wordStandard J message is 1-3 words

Revisit Contact1 kbits

OASISSweep Mission Plan100 kbitsActuation eventsJ format message or voice

RAMICSRevisit Contact1 kbitFiring events, BDAJ format message or voice

AMNSRevisit Contact1 kbitFiring events, BDAJ format message or voice

MessageData

Search Mission PlanTrack waypoints, altitude, speed, system parameters

Revisit ContactReference point,latitude/longitude of contact, amplifying information

Sweep Mission PlanTrack waypoints, speed, system parameters

Mine-like contactReference point, hazard-mine, time of report, whether report is new or an update, latitude/longitude of point, and amplifying information (J3.01 message format)

Environment

Details of Significant Shortfalls

Shortfall listing

Category of ImpactAddressedShortfallDescription

Operationally SignificantYesA2OAMCM missions of MH-60S require lily pad to overcome OAMCM standoff distance and MH-60S range/endurance limitations

NoA3MH-60S time on station is severely limited for tow missions in Hot Day conditions. These conditions are not unusual for the areas of interest.

NoA4Influence minesweeping with OASIS requires 53% of all MH-60S sorties flown in baseline End to End scenario.

SignificantYesA1E2E analysis clearly shows that OMCM CVBG alone cannot meet combined MIW (OMCM plus DMCM) timeline Requirements outlined in the draft Capstone Requirements Document. CRD does not have OMCM-only requirement definition.

YesB4Need Requirement for minimum of 4 AMNS rounds to be deployable from MH-60S in a single sortie.

NoA7Cannot swap systems on the lily pad (DDG class) ships.

Shortfall status


Addressed1.333.001.670.19


Factor4321

Total Number33621



Significant3303




Addressed1.002.006.004.00

Unaddressed2.001.000.0017.00

Factor0324250

Total Number3362133

91836100

Shortfall status

000

000

000

000

Addressed

Unaddressed

Factor

Category of impact

Level of Impact

Shortfall Status

Number of sorties

000

000

000

000

&A

Page &P

Addressed

Unaddressed

Sheet3





SystemLINK 16 Communications matrix

MIWC to MH60SMH60S to MIWC

MessagesSizeMessagesSize

ALMDSSearch Mission PlanRevisit Contact1 - 100 kbitsMine-like contactEnvironment70 bits / wordStandard J message is 1-3 words

AQS-20ASearch Mission PlanRevisit Contact1 - 100 kbitsMine-like contactEnvironment70 bits / wordStandard J message is 1-3 words

OASISSweep Mission Plan100 kbitsActuation eventsJ format message or voice

RAMICSRevisit Contact1 kbitActuation eventsJ format message or voice

AMNSRevisit Contact1 kbitActuation eventsJ format message or voice

MessageData

Search Mission PlanTrack waypoints, altitude, speed, system parameters

Revisit ContactReference point,latitude/longitude of contact, amplifying information

Sweep Mission PlanTrack waypoints, speed, system parameters

Mine-like contactReference point, hazard-mine, time of report, whether report is new or an update, latitude/longitude of point, and amplifying information (J3.01 message format)

Environment

Products of Assessment shown by blue arrowsData flow diagrams compare data rate requirement with available capacity.Baseline scenarios compute timelines for preliminary OMCM tacticsShortfalls prioritized and ranked

System requirements and technical parameters system capabilities based on data, modeling, or system ORD requirements used in MIW modeling and timeline generation.Communications and Data Flow size if individual data packets associated with Mission Planning, Mission Execution, and Post Mission Analysis multiplied by the frequency of their transmission to estimate an average data rate.Scenario development referenced similar prior studies and established preliminary concepts for OMCM tactics.Operational timelines allocated assets in an efficient sequence based on the operational time requirement of each system. The solution is not unique.Team method core team reviewed assumptions, identified shortfalls and ranked shortfalls in order of their impact on OMCM capability.Baseline scenarios

SLOC: 60 nmi x 1000 yds Half of the CRD definition of SLOC 120 nmi x 1000 yds is assigned to a single CVBG.OPAREA: 10 nmi x 10 nmi size suitable for single suite of OMCM systems

Environment and Threat Laydown NAVO supplied bottom type information N81 supplied representative mine threat laydown.

Shows communication requirements of all systems.Left column shows system and antenna/transceiverTop row shows direction of message and capacity of link

EXAMPLES:ALMDS mission plan of 100 kbits might be sent from CV TSC to the MH-60S. The capacity of the link is 200 kbps, so the transmission would take 0.5 seconds.Data from ALMDS sent from the MH-60S to the CV-TSC via the TCDL link requires a nominal 0.448 Mbps. The TCDL data link has 10.71 Mbps capacity.

ISSUE:Did not address how much of bandwidth is available to MCM due to competing misions. This table has been normalized. All values were divided by the time to complete the baseline SLOC.

The OPAREA (30 nmi x 30nmi) column is just 9x the 10x10 Box column. EXAMPLEIt takes 64% longer to complete the baseline 10nmi x 10 nmi OPAREA than to complete the baseline SLOC.

It takes the same amount of time to complete the SLOC with NOMBO density of 4 as it does to complete the SLOC with NOMBO density of 8 (baseline).

The greatest impact is on towed systems: AN/AQS-20/X and OASIS.LMRS arrives early and reconnoiters three separate potential SLOC locations to determine the various clutter densities and/or any potentially mined areas.

This information is used to choose which location is used for the SLOC. In this case the rightmost route has the lowest overall clutter density, and is chosen as the preferred route. The generated timelines refer to this route.Costs in FY02 $.Priority A: Impact on OMCM capability is significant, and the impact is well-defined and understood.Priority B: Impact on OMCM capability is moderately significant, or the impact is not we

minwara 2003 organic mine countermeasures “end to end assessment…” may 2003 capt vito jimenez

Documents

countermeasures systems

endend countermeasures

countermeasures end

suite of systems operational

current suite of systems

c4i capability

tactical system capability

end assessmentmay