minnesota’s strategies for improving outcomes through child welfare/cbcap coordination
DESCRIPTION
Minnesota’s Strategies for Improving Outcomes through Child Welfare/CBCAP Coordination. Ralph McQuarter [email protected] Bringing Prevention to the Table: Strategies for Improving Outcomes 10/23/08. Minnesota. State-supervised/ County-administered (87 counties) Eleven Tribes - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Minnesota’s Minnesota’s Strategies for Strategies for Improving Outcomes throughImproving Outcomes through
Child Welfare/CBCAP Child Welfare/CBCAP CoordinationCoordination
Ralph McQuarter Ralph McQuarter [email protected]@state.mn.us
Bringing Prevention to the Table: Strategies for Improving Outcomes Bringing Prevention to the Table: Strategies for Improving Outcomes
10/23/0810/23/08
22
MinnesotaMinnesota State-supervised/State-supervised/
County-administered (87 County-administered (87 counties)counties)
Eleven TribesEleven Tribes State with highest share of local State with highest share of local
property taxes for child welfareproperty taxes for child welfare Kids Count rates MN within top 5 Kids Count rates MN within top 5
on child well-being measureson child well-being measures Differential Response Child Differential Response Child
Protection Continuum, Protection Continuum, incorporating Structured incorporating Structured Decision Making SystemDecision Making System
Disproportionately involves poor, Disproportionately involves poor, single mothers and their single mothers and their children; particularly families of children; particularly families of colorcolor
33
Minnesota’sMinnesota’sChild Welfare FindingsChild Welfare Findings
In 2007 In 2007 18,348 reports of child maltreatment were accepted for 18,348 reports of child maltreatment were accepted for
a response involving 24,139 childrena response involving 24,139 children 59% of all accepted reports received a Family 59% of all accepted reports received a Family
Assessment Response (10,934); 41% received an Assessment Response (10,934); 41% received an Investigative ResponseInvestigative Response
Of those receiving an Investigative Response, 50% were Of those receiving an Investigative Response, 50% were substantiated/determined (4,370 out of 7,414 reports)substantiated/determined (4,370 out of 7,414 reports)
71% of all determined reports involved child neglect71% of all determined reports involved child neglect Most prevalent family condition documented in neglect Most prevalent family condition documented in neglect
findings: parenting issues, then mental healthfindings: parenting issues, then mental health 4.5% of children experienced repeat maltreatment4.5% of children experienced repeat maltreatment
44
MN Differential Response ContinuumMN Differential Response Continuum
Family AssessmentFamily Assessment Response for less serious Response for less serious
casescases No determination of No determination of
maltreatmentmaltreatment ComprehensiveComprehensive Strength-based Strength-based
community-focusedcommunity-focused Enhances family stabilityEnhances family stability Focus is on safety Focus is on safety
through engagementthrough engagement
Flexibility is keyFlexibility is key Reports may move Reports may move
between the responses between the responses as neededas needed
Traditional InvestigationTraditional Investigation Response for substantial Response for substantial
child endangerment caseschild endangerment cases Did maltreatment Did maltreatment
occur?occur? Are child protective Are child protective
services needed?services needed? Incident based with a Incident based with a
focus on fact findingfocus on fact finding Forensic in nature; Forensic in nature;
coordinated with law coordinated with law enforcementenforcement
May be perceived as May be perceived as intrusive and adversarial intrusive and adversarial by familyby family
55
Trends in MN Child Trends in MN Child Maltreatment Maltreatment Number of Number of
VictimsVictims
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Alleged Victims Determined Victims Family Assessment
66
Child and Family Service Child and Family Service ReviewReview
Purpose - Purpose - Enables federal Children's Bureau to:Enables federal Children's Bureau to: Ensure conformity with Federal child welfare requirementsEnsure conformity with Federal child welfare requirements Determine what is happening to children/families in child welfare Determine what is happening to children/families in child welfare
servicesservices Assist States to enhance their capacity to help children/families Assist States to enhance their capacity to help children/families
achieve positive outcomesachieve positive outcomes
Goal-Goal- Help States improve child welfare services and achieve Help States improve child welfare services and achieve following outcomes for families/children who receive services:following outcomes for families/children who receive services:
SafetySafety Children are, first and foremost, protected from abuse and neglectChildren are, first and foremost, protected from abuse and neglect Children are safely maintained in their homes whenever possible and Children are safely maintained in their homes whenever possible and
appropriateappropriate PermanencyPermanency
Children have permanency and stability in their living situationsChildren have permanency and stability in their living situations Continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved for familiesContinuity of family relationships and connections is preserved for families
Family and Child Well-BeingFamily and Child Well-Being Families have enhanced capacity to provide for their children's needsFamilies have enhanced capacity to provide for their children's needs Children receive appropriate services to meet their educational needsChildren receive appropriate services to meet their educational needs Children receive adequate services to meet their physical and mental health Children receive adequate services to meet their physical and mental health
needsneeds
77
MN CFSR MN CFSR
Minnesota was one of the first states to undergo Minnesota was one of the first states to undergo federal CFSR and by July 2004 successfully met federal CFSR and by July 2004 successfully met requirements of Program Improvement Plan (PIP). requirements of Program Improvement Plan (PIP).
Fall 2007, second round of federal CFSR of Minnesota. Fall 2007, second round of federal CFSR of Minnesota. Statewide assessment phase and onsite review conducted.Statewide assessment phase and onsite review conducted. Children’s Trust Fund was represented on department’s core Children’s Trust Fund was represented on department’s core
planning and preparation team for CFSR, participated at state planning and preparation team for CFSR, participated at state and county review sites, and involved in PIP development.and county review sites, and involved in PIP development.
PIP submitted in August 2008, still waiting approval. PIP submitted in August 2008, still waiting approval. (Only 2 state PIPs approved so far out of 29 reviews)(Only 2 state PIPs approved so far out of 29 reviews)
88
Key FindingsKey Findings
MN performance impacted by: MN performance impacted by: Older youth, with disabilities, in foster careOlder youth, with disabilities, in foster care Limited identification, engagement and Limited identification, engagement and
provision of services to fathersprovision of services to fathers
MN system did not have major gaps in MN system did not have major gaps in practice or primary service delivery but practice or primary service delivery but rather lacked consistency across state in rather lacked consistency across state in these areasthese areas
99
Primary PIP StrategiesPrimary PIP Strategies
Enhance capacities of families to care Enhance capacities of families to care for their childrenfor their children
Promote child safety and well-being Promote child safety and well-being across the life of the caseacross the life of the case
Locate and support a stable family for Locate and support a stable family for every youth in foster careevery youth in foster care
Promote quality case worker Promote quality case worker supervisionsupervision
1010
State Child Welfare AgencyState Child Welfare Agency DHS has responsibility for: DHS has responsibility for:
Child and Family Services Review (CFSR)Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) Program Improvement Plan (PIP)Program Improvement Plan (PIP) Child and Family Services Plan (CFSP). Child and Family Services Plan (CFSP).
MN adopted federal CFSR review process and brought it to local MN adopted federal CFSR review process and brought it to local county level. county level. These MNCFSR Reviews are conducted by Quality Assurance Unit. These MNCFSR Reviews are conducted by Quality Assurance Unit.
As part of county self-assessment process in preparation for review, As part of county self-assessment process in preparation for review, county describes membership and activities of their Child Abuse county describes membership and activities of their Child Abuse Prevention Council, and how council meets statutory requirement to Prevention Council, and how council meets statutory requirement to submit a plan for prevention of child abuse that includes an submit a plan for prevention of child abuse that includes an assessment and rank order of needed programs and services. assessment and rank order of needed programs and services.
Quality Assurance teams discuss how information is incorporated Quality Assurance teams discuss how information is incorporated and used in agency’s planning and operations to achieve improved and used in agency’s planning and operations to achieve improved child safety, permanency and well-being outcomes. child safety, permanency and well-being outcomes.
1111
State Child Welfare AgencyState Child Welfare Agency
For each review, the following documents provide For each review, the following documents provide data relevant to each county’s performance:data relevant to each county’s performance: Self assessment: Self assessment:
Systemic factors that are key to providing child welfare Systemic factors that are key to providing child welfare servicesservices
County performance on national standard indicators County performance on national standard indicators County-specific safety, permanency and well-being dataCounty-specific safety, permanency and well-being data
MnCFSR report: Compiles detailed information from self MnCFSR report: Compiles detailed information from self assessment, case reviews and stakeholder interviews assessment, case reviews and stakeholder interviews and identifies areas of strength and areas needing and identifies areas of strength and areas needing improvement. improvement.
PIP prepared by county agencies to address areas PIP prepared by county agencies to address areas needing improvement. needing improvement.
1212
MinnesotaMinnesotaChildren’s Trust Fund MissionChildren’s Trust Fund Mission
The Children’s Trust Fund works in The Children’s Trust Fund works in partnership to serve as a catalyst to partnership to serve as a catalyst to prevent child abuse and neglect by prevent child abuse and neglect by strengthening all Minnesota families and strengthening all Minnesota families and communities.communities.
1313
Organizational StructureOrganizational Structure
Children’s Trust Fund: state-designated Children’s Trust Fund: state-designated Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) program(CBCAP) program
Embedded within Child Safety and Permanency Embedded within Child Safety and Permanency Division Division (child protection/child welfare/children‘s (child protection/child welfare/children‘s research)research)
Within Child and Family Services Administration Within Child and Family Services Administration (child welfare, child care, child support, homelessness, (child welfare, child care, child support, homelessness, TANF, community action programs)TANF, community action programs)
Within Minnesota Department of Human Services Within Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) (DHS) (child and family services, health care, mental (child and family services, health care, mental health, chemical health, disabilities, and aging services)health, chemical health, disabilities, and aging services)
1414
Key Internal PartnershipsKey Internal Partnerships
American Indian Child Welfare InitiativeAmerican Indian Child Welfare Initiative Child Disability/Part C of IDEA Child Disability/Part C of IDEA Child Mortality Review Panel Child Mortality Review Panel Children’s ResearchChildren’s Research Child Safety and PermanencyChild Safety and Permanency Citizen Review PanelsCitizen Review Panels Early Childhood Care/DevelopmentEarly Childhood Care/Development Quality AssuranceQuality Assurance Social Service Information SystemSocial Service Information System Training SystemTraining System
1515
CTF External PartnersCTF External Partners
Minnesota Fathers & Families Network Minnesota Fathers & Families Network Minnesota Office of Pregnancy PreventionMinnesota Office of Pregnancy Prevention Minnesota Department of HealthMinnesota Department of Health
Family Home VisitingFamily Home Visiting Minnesota Early Childhood Comprehensive SystemsMinnesota Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems Sexual Violence PreventionSexual Violence Prevention
Minnesota Department of EducationMinnesota Department of Education PACER – Parent Advocacy Coalition for Educational RightsPACER – Parent Advocacy Coalition for Educational Rights Parent Information and Resources Sharing NetworkParent Information and Resources Sharing Network Prevent Child Abuse Minnesota/Circle of ParentsPrevent Child Abuse Minnesota/Circle of Parents Sexual Violence Prevention Action Council Sexual Violence Prevention Action Council Strong Foundations CoalitionStrong Foundations Coalition Zero to Three/BUILD/Ready 4KZero to Three/BUILD/Ready 4K
1616
What CTF Brings to Child What CTF Brings to Child Welfare Quality ImprovementWelfare Quality Improvement
Enhanced community responsiveness through 51 Enhanced community responsiveness through 51 Child Abuse Prevention CouncilsChild Abuse Prevention Councils
Enhanced service array through community Enhanced service array through community grantees and community initiative networksgrantees and community initiative networks
Service array that supports improved safety and Service array that supports improved safety and well-being outcomeswell-being outcomes
Community partnerships that provide resource to Community partnerships that provide resource to state/ local level child protection state/ local level child protection prevention/intervention effortsprevention/intervention efforts
Access to statewide agency for public awareness Access to statewide agency for public awareness and advocacy for children’s issuesand advocacy for children’s issues
1717
Additional CTF RolesAdditional CTF Roles
CTF supervisor co-facilitated/authored CTF supervisor co-facilitated/authored Minnesota’s 2005-2009 Child and Family Minnesota’s 2005-2009 Child and Family Service Plan, and continued to monitor progress Service Plan, and continued to monitor progress through annual reporting requirement. through annual reporting requirement.
CTF has specific responsibilities outlined in CTF has specific responsibilities outlined in current CFSP for meeting child safety outcomes: current CFSP for meeting child safety outcomes: Increase community awareness of child maltreatmentIncrease community awareness of child maltreatment Design/develop a child protection response continuum Design/develop a child protection response continuum
that increases community involvement in prevention that increases community involvement in prevention and early intervention of child maltreatment.and early intervention of child maltreatment.
CTF works to integrate strengthening families CTF works to integrate strengthening families framework and protective factors across the framework and protective factors across the child welfare continuumchild welfare continuum
1818
Additional CTF RolesAdditional CTF Roles
Participation in ongoing, county level quality assurance Participation in ongoing, county level quality assurance reviews conducted by the Quality Assurance Unit. reviews conducted by the Quality Assurance Unit.
Review of the local Child Abuse Prevention Council’s role in Review of the local Child Abuse Prevention Council’s role in providing input on county agency planning and operations providing input on county agency planning and operations as part of the County Self-Assessment Process. as part of the County Self-Assessment Process.
Description of current CAPC, including rating strength of Description of current CAPC, including rating strength of CAPC’s role and identification of barriers or plans for CAPC’s role and identification of barriers or plans for improvement.improvement.
Provision of county self assessments to CTF for Provision of county self assessments to CTF for identification of successful CAPC’s and to determine plans identification of successful CAPC’s and to determine plans for TA or training. for TA or training.
Involvement of local CAPC in county self assessment can Involvement of local CAPC in county self assessment can achieve a stronger, statewide capacity for child abuse achieve a stronger, statewide capacity for child abuse prevention efforts. prevention efforts.
1919
Example: Example: County Self AssessmentsCounty Self Assessments
F 4. Exploratory Issue: F 4. Exploratory Issue: When applicable, describe the membership and activity of the county-based Child When applicable, describe the membership and activity of the county-based Child Abuse Prevention Council, organized and operating according to state law and policy. Abuse Prevention Council, organized and operating according to state law and policy. Describe how the council meets the statutory requirement to submit a plan for the Describe how the council meets the statutory requirement to submit a plan for the prevention of child abuse that includes an assessment and rank ordering of needed prevention of child abuse that includes an assessment and rank ordering of needed programs and services. programs and services. Discuss how this information is incorporated and used in the agency’s planning and Discuss how this information is incorporated and used in the agency’s planning and operations to achieve improved safety, permanency and well-being outcomes. operations to achieve improved safety, permanency and well-being outcomes. Minnesota Statutes, section 119A.14.Minnesota Statutes, section 119A.14.
Description of County Practice
Exploratory Issue Rating
Barriers Identified/Initial Plans
1 2 3 4
2020
CTF Support of CAPCsCTF Support of CAPCs CTF designed an electronic CAPC Services Survey to assist local CTF designed an electronic CAPC Services Survey to assist local
council members to assess county-wide child abuse prevention council members to assess county-wide child abuse prevention resources. resources.
Survey data compiled into county-specific data/maps for county-by-Survey data compiled into county-specific data/maps for county-by-county comparisons.county comparisons.
CTF developing plan to address high-need communities through CTF developing plan to address high-need communities through direct outreach and technical assistance to local CAPC’s.direct outreach and technical assistance to local CAPC’s.
CTF and local CAPCs continue efforts to: CTF and local CAPCs continue efforts to: Develop future CTF assessments and resourcesDevelop future CTF assessments and resources Evaluate range of needed preventive and voluntary early intervention Evaluate range of needed preventive and voluntary early intervention
servicesservices Help community partners understand and improve adequacy of Help community partners understand and improve adequacy of
Strengthening Families and Child Abuse Prevention resourcesStrengthening Families and Child Abuse Prevention resources Increase collaboration between service providers and community Increase collaboration between service providers and community
stakeholdersstakeholders
2121
Other CTF InitiativesOther CTF Initiatives
Statewide and Community Statewide and Community Strengthening Families NetworksStrengthening Families Networks
Community-Based Strengthening Community-Based Strengthening Families Grants Families Grants
Strengthening Families/Child Abuse Strengthening Families/Child Abuse Prevention Month ActivitiesPrevention Month Activities
Outreach and Support PilotsOutreach and Support Pilots EvaluationEvaluation
2222
Overlay of need and activities:Overlay of need and activities:CTF CAPCs, Grantees and Rates per Thousand CTF CAPCs, Grantees and Rates per Thousand
Total Determined Child MaltreatmentTotal Determined Child Maltreatment
[
[
[
[
[
[ [
[
[
[
[
[
[
St. Louis
Cook
LakeItasca
Cass
Polk
Beltrami
Aitkin
Pine
Koochiching
Otter Tail
Clay
Roseau
Marshall
Becker
Todd
Stearns
Kittson
Swift
Lyon
Pope
Morrison
Wilkin
Renville
Carlton
Martin
Hubbard
Rice
Wright
Norman
FillmoreMower
Crow Wing
Nobles
Murray
Grant
Sibley
Brown
Rock
Redwood
Douglas
Kandiyohi
Jackson
Meeker
Goodhue
Winona
Isanti
Faribault
Dakota
Freeborn
Olmsted
Lincoln
Blue Earth
Scott
Stevens
Anoka
Houston
Steele
Traverse
Dodge
Nicollet
McLeod
HennepinChippewa
Wabasha
Benton
Carver
Pennington
Big Stone
Cottonwood
Yellow Medicine
Red Lake
Sherburne
Lake of the Woods
Clearwater
Mille Lacs
Wadena
Kanabec
Lac qui Parle
Waseca
Chisago
Le Sueur
Mahnomen
PipestoneWatonwan
WashingtonRamsey
Legend
Determinations Rate per 10000.000000 - 0.194553
0.194554 - 0.418191
0.418192 - 0.645161
0.645162 - 1.037293
1.037294 - 1.764170
CTF CAPCsNo CAPC
CAPC in County
CTF Grantees
[ 1
[ 2
[ 3 - 4
2323
CTF-Supported Pilot CTF-Supported Pilot ProgramsPrograms
PARENT SUPPORT OUTREACH PARENT SUPPORT OUTREACH PROJECTPROJECT
Public/private partnership to Public/private partnership to pilot/study impact of early intervention pilot/study impact of early intervention on families at risk of child on families at risk of child maltreatment.maltreatment.
38 pilot counties38 pilot counties Connect screened out families Connect screened out families
with young children to with young children to community-based family support community-based family support services. services.
Intended to impact and decrease Intended to impact and decrease disproportionate number of disproportionate number of families of color reported to child families of color reported to child protection.protection.
CTF supervisor participated in the CTF supervisor participated in the selection of pilot project counties and selection of pilot project counties and in selection of research firm to carry in selection of research firm to carry out independent evaluation. out independent evaluation.
Expected that CTF will contribute to Expected that CTF will contribute to success of the Parent Support success of the Parent Support Outreach Program, and that findings of Outreach Program, and that findings of the pilot project will help inform future the pilot project will help inform future planning for CTF.planning for CTF.
MFIP/FAMILY CONNECTIONS PROJECTMFIP/FAMILY CONNECTIONS PROJECT Three-year pilot program involving 8 Three-year pilot program involving 8
counties to offer voluntary family counties to offer voluntary family support services and coordinated case support services and coordinated case management for Minnesota Family management for Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP) and Food Investment Program (MFIP) and Food Stamp eligible families. Stamp eligible families.
Intended to eliminate/reduce risk Intended to eliminate/reduce risk factors of child maltreatment, improve factors of child maltreatment, improve family stability, and improve child family stability, and improve child well-being in areas of physical and well-being in areas of physical and mental health and school success. mental health and school success. MFIP is state’s primary economic MFIP is state’s primary economic assistance program for low-income assistance program for low-income families. MFIP and Food Stamp eligible families. MFIP and Food Stamp eligible families experience numerous risk families experience numerous risk factors at high incident levels, factors at high incident levels, including poverty, child disability, including poverty, child disability, parent disability, substance abuse and parent disability, substance abuse and mental illness. mental illness.
Pilot targets families with at least one Pilot targets families with at least one child age 10 or under who is at risk of child age 10 or under who is at risk of poor developmental outcomes due to poor developmental outcomes due to poverty and associated risks.poverty and associated risks.
2424
In SummaryIn Summary
Child Welfare/CBCAP coordinationChild Welfare/CBCAP coordination Expands the capacity of the state’s Expands the capacity of the state’s
networknetwork Provides strategic partnershipsProvides strategic partnerships Extends the continuum of servicesExtends the continuum of services Supports the safety, permanency and Supports the safety, permanency and
well-being of childrenwell-being of children
2525
Lead State Agency ContactLead State Agency Contact
CTFCTF Joanne Mooney Joanne Mooney [email protected]@state.mn.us
CFSRCFSR Larry Wojciak Larry Wojciak [email protected]@state.mn.us
PIPPIP Christeen Borsheim Christeen Borsheim
[email protected]@state.mn.us DataData
Carole Johnson Carole Johnson [email protected]@state.mn.us
2626
Child Child MaltreatmentMaltreatment
St. Louis
Cook
LakeItasca
Cass
Polk
Beltrami
Aitkin
Pine
Koochiching
Otter Tail
Clay
Roseau
Marshall
Becker
Todd
Stearns
Kittson
Swift
Lyon
Pope
Morrison
Wilkin
Renville
Carlton
Martin
Hubbard
Rice
Wright
Norman
FillmoreMower
Crow Wing
Nobles
Murray
Grant
Sibley
Brown
Rock
Redwood
Douglas
Kandiyohi
Jackson
Meeker
Goodhue
Winona
Isanti
Faribault
Dakota
Freeborn
Olmsted
Lincoln
Blue Earth
Scott
Stevens
Anoka
Houston
Steele
Traverse
Dodge
Nicollet
McLeod
HennepinChippewa
Wabasha
Benton
Carver
Pennington
Big Stone
Cottonwood
Yellow Medicine
Red Lake
Sherburne
Lake of the Woods
Clearwater
Mille Lacs
Wadena
Kanabec
Lac qui Parle
Waseca
Chisago
Le Sueur
Mahnomen
PipestoneWatonwan
WashingtonRamsey
Legend
Total Maltreatment Determinations0 - 42
43 - 101
102 - 356
357 - 987
988 - 2577
St. Louis
Cook
LakeItasca
Cass
Polk
Beltrami
Aitkin
Pine
Koochiching
Otter Tail
Clay
Roseau
Marshall
Becker
Todd
Stearns
Kittson
Swift
Lyon
Pope
Morrison
Wilkin
Renville
Carlton
Martin
Hubbard
Rice
Wright
Norman
FillmoreMower
Crow Wing
Nobles
Murray
Grant
Sibley
Brown
Rock
Redwood
Douglas
Kandiyohi
Jackson
Meeker
Goodhue
Winona
Isanti
Faribault
Dakota
Freeborn
Olmsted
Lincoln
Blue Earth
Scott
Stevens
Anoka
Houston
Steele
Traverse
Dodge
Nicollet
McLeod
HennepinChippewa
Wabasha
Benton
Carver
Pennington
Big Stone
Cottonwood
Yellow Medicine
Red Lake
Sherburne
Lake of the Woods
Clearwater
Mille Lacs
Wadena
Kanabec
Lac qui Parle
Waseca
Chisago
Le Sueur
Mahnomen
PipestoneWatonwan
WashingtonRamsey
Legend
Total Neglect Determinations0 - 25
26 - 77
78 - 141
142 - 756
757 - 2125
St. Louis
Cook
LakeItasca
Cass
Polk
Beltrami
Aitkin
Pine
Koochiching
Otter Tail
Clay
Roseau
Marshall
Becker
Todd
Stearns
Kittson
Swift
Lyon
Pope
Morrison
Wilkin
Renville
Carlton
Martin
Hubbard
Rice
Wright
Norman
FillmoreMower
Crow Wing
Nobles
Murray
Grant
Sibley
Brown
Rock
Redwood
Douglas
Kandiyohi
Jackson
Meeker
Goodhue
Winona
Isanti
Faribault
Dakota
Freeborn
Olmsted
Lincoln
Blue Earth
Scott
Stevens
Anoka
Houston
Steele
Traverse
Dodge
Nicollet
McLeod
HennepinChippewa
Wabasha
Benton
Carver
Pennington
Big Stone
Cottonwood
Yellow Medicine
Red Lake
Sherburne
Lake of the Woods
Clearwater
Mille Lacs
Wadena
Kanabec
Lac qui Parle
Waseca
Chisago
Le Sueur
Mahnomen
PipestoneWatonwan
WashingtonRamsey
Legend
Sexual Abuse Determinations0 - 4
5 - 13
14 - 25
26 - 93
94 - 261
All Forms Neglect
Physical Abuse
Sexual Abuse
St. Louis
Cook
LakeItasca
Cass
Polk
Beltrami
Aitkin
Pine
Koochiching
Otter Tail
Clay
Roseau
Marshall
Becker
Todd
Stearns
Kittson
Swift
Lyon
Pope
Morrison
Wilkin
Renville
Carlton
Martin
Hubbard
Rice
Wright
Norman
FillmoreMower
Crow Wing
Nobles
Murray
Grant
Sibley
Brown
Rock
Redwood
Douglas
Kandiyohi
Jackson
Meeker
Goodhue
Winona
Isanti
Faribault
Dakota
Freeborn
Olmsted
Lincoln
Blue Earth
Scott
Stevens
Anoka
Houston
Steele
Traverse
Dodge
Nicollet
McLeod
HennepinChippewa
Wabasha
Benton
Carver
Pennington
Big Stone
Cottonwood
Yellow Medicine
Red Lake
Sherburne
Lake of the Woods
Clearwater
Mille Lacs
Wadena
Kanabec
Lac qui Parle
Waseca
Chisago
Le Sueur
Mahnomen
PipestoneWatonwan
WashingtonRamsey
Legend
Total Physical Abuse Determinations0 - 5
6 - 16
17 - 33
34 - 181
182 - 376
2727
Thank Thank You!You!
Minnesota’s Children’s Trust FundMinnesota’s Children’s Trust Fund