mini-cex and dops: why and how? - cobatrice · mini-cex / dops • no stand alone • part of an...
TRANSCRIPT
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX and DOPS: Why and How?
Christoph Berendonk MD MME
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Content
Why
How
• Principles of the two instruments
• Thoughts on implementation
www.vaxd.com
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX / DOPS
Mini-CEX Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise
History taking, counseling, physical examination
DOPS Direct Observation of Procedures
Technical interventions
Resident-Patient-Interaction
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Why Mini-CEX / DOPS
• Extrinsic effect
„we learn what is tested“
• Intrinsic effect
„what is being tested is better stored“
assessment drives learning
test-enhanced learning
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Test enhanced learning
73.3
82.8
5 0
7 5
1 0 0
Posttest 14 d nach Kurs
4 h Kurs
3.5 h Kurs +30 Min Test
p< 0 .0 0 1
ES= 0 .9 3
%
• 5th year medical students
• ACLS course
• 30 min theory
• 3 h practice
• Experiment
• Control: 30 min further practice
• Intervention: 30 min test
Kromann. Med Educ 2009
14 days later
4 h course
3.5 h course
+ 0.5 h test
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Why Mini-CEX / DOPS
adapted from John Norcini, Workshop „Research in Medical Educations“, Heidelberg 2009
Medical Expert
Communicator Collaborator Health Advocate
Manager Scholar Professional
1. Written Tests (MCQ, SAQ) +++ + ++ ++ + ++ +
2. Essays ++ + + +++ + + +
3. Oral Exam +++ + + + - - +
4. Mini-CEX / DOPS
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
5. OSCE / SP +++ +++ +++ ++ - - +
6. Multi-source Feedback ++ +++ +++ +++ +++ ++ +++
7. Portfolio ++ ++ + +++ ++ +++ +++
8. Simulations +++ + +++ - ++ - ++
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX / DOPS
Observation Documentation Feedback
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX / DOPS
Observation 10-15 Min
• “We have learned many surprising things about our residents‘ skills and deficiencies not evident at morning report, rounds, or via standardized tests”
• “We also learned that the skills that cause a resident to shine on rounds, such as verbal case presentations and transmission of didactic material, do not necessarily correlate with clinical skills “
ABIM
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX / DOPS
Documentation
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX / DOPS
Feedback 5 Min
motor-talk.de
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Feedback Effects
15.4 15.917
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Unspez. Feedback Konstrukives Feedback
Pretest
Posttest
p post= 0 .0 0 8
ppre= 0 .8 2
• 3rd year medical students
• surgical knot tying course
• 30 min theory
• pre-test
• practical exercise
• Control: unspecific feedback
• Intervention: specific feedback
• post-test
Boehler. Med Educ 2006
Control Intervention
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Feedback
• is planed and expected
• includes a self-assessment
• addresses points of improvement and strengths
• is specific and describes
• focuses on modifiable behaviour
• includes a jointly developed learning goal
adapted from Ende. Jama 1983
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Thoughts on implementation
Mini-CEX / DOPS
• No stand alone
• Part of an educational program
‘Blockpraktika’ Master of
Medicine, Bern University
• 5 clinical rotations each lasting one month
• Bed side teaching
• Case based discussions
• Patient retinue
• …
• One Mini-CEX / DOPS
per student per week
• Final evaluation at the end of each rotation
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Thoughts on implementation
Mini-CEX / DOPS
‘Blockpraktika’ Master of
Medicine, Bern University
• Students get regular and systematic feedback about their performance
• Early identification of students ‘with problems’
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Mini-CEX / DOPS
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Thoughts on implementation
Mini-CEX / DOPS
• Inform all stakeholders about purpose
• Giving feedback is a skill
‘Blockpraktika’ Master of
Medicine, Bern University
• Information:
• face to face
• leaflet
• www
• Teach the teacher workshops
• Hands on practical experience
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Results of cohort 2010
• Feasibility
• 2115 Mini-CEX / DOPS with 141 students
• Number of Mini-CEX / DOPS per student: 15 mean (SD +/- 2.5)
• Response rate: 94%
• Narrative comments
• About 60% of the assessment forms contained information about strengths and weaknesses
• About 40% included specific learning goals
Institut für Medizinische Lehre
Conclusions
• Mini-CEX / DOPS contribute to the educational quality of medical programs
• Adapt the tool for your needs
• Giving and receiving feedback is a skill