mineral rights‐real property disputes · a. c.marcellus i. general ii. ohio b. utica i. general...

48
Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes Presented in Cincinnati, Columbus and Cleveland for North American Title Insurance Company February 7th, 8th, and 10 th 141 E. Town Street Suite 200 Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 228‐6888 Fax (614)228‐6878 Cell (614) 496‐3500 [email protected] www.havenslimited.com

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

MineralRights‐RealPropertyDisputes

PresentedinCincinnati,ColumbusandClevelandforNorthAmericanTitleInsuranceCompany

February7th,8th,and10th

141E.TownStreetSuite200Columbus,Ohio43215(614)228‐6888Fax(614)228‐6878Cell(614)496‐[email protected]

Page 2: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Oil‐GasMineralRightsPropertyDisputes

•  Ohio Overview I.  History of Mineral Industry II.  Current Statistics III.  Regulatory Framework

•  Natural Gas I.  Current Statistics II.  Geology of Natural Gas/Shale III.  Drilling

A.  What is Horizontal Drilling? B.  What is Fracking?

IV.  Shale “Plays in Ohio A.  Marcellus

I.  General II.  Ohio

B.  Utica I.  General II.  Ohio

•  Ohio Investment/Economic Impact/Politics I.  Big Business II.  Taxes and Jobs III.  Environmental Issues

•  Oil and Gas Lease Terms I.  Key Provisions II.  Legal Issues III.  Environmental Issues

•  Title Defects I.  Ohio Law II.  Current Issues III.  Potential Cures IV.  Endorsement Changes

•  Valuation I.  Coverage

A.  Title Policy Terms B.  Underwriter Options

II.  Who Determines A.  Rule 702 B.  MAI-OH Licensed Appraiser-Realtor

III.  Appraisal Methodology A.  Highest-Best Use B.  Cost C.  Income Capitalization D.  Sales Comparison

IV.  Geological Considerations A.  Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract

in question B.  Well Location Map. Tract in Question Located

Here C.  Plat Map of Gilead Township,

Morrow County, Ohio D.  Cross Section Map showing Erosion al Remnants

along Knox Unconformity in Ohio. E.  The Oil Production for the Wells Located in the

Yellow Circle range form 40,000 BO to 70,000 BO. The dry holes that were drilled along the green oval trend contained > 40 feet of Glenwood Shale. Tract in Question is red circle.

F.  Old Shot Point Base Map Shows Location of Seismic and Possible Oil Well located on the Tract in Question.

Page 3: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

OhioOilandGasIndustryOverview

•  History/Statistics

•  TotalMarketValue:$718,089,496(roughlyevenlysplit)–  Non‐fuel:another1.27billion

•  NumberofWellsDrilled:LeadingStates 1. Texas.Nosurprisehere. 2. Oklahoma.Makessense. 3. Pennsylvania.O.K. 4. Ohio.Yep.274,733welldrilled.

•  Regulations

Page 4: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

NaturalGas

•  Characteristics

– “WetGas”(ethane,methane,propane,butane)

•  Geology

– “Conventional”Play

Page 5: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale

•  Geology

•  Domestic“Plays”– Haynesville(TX/LA)– Barnett(TX)– Fayetteville(AR)– MarcellusandUtica(OH/PA)

Page 6: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 7: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 8: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 9: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ShaleDrilling

•  HorizontalDrilling

•  “Fracking”

Page 10: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ShaleDrilling(Cont…)

•  EconomicsofShaleDrilling

– GreaterCost/ReturnfromTechnology

•  WhyOhio?– Shallowdepthofformations

– NGL’s

Page 11: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 12: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 13: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 14: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 15: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOhio:Marcellus

•  Area:95,000squaremiles(estimated)– KY,MD,NJ,NY,OH,PA,TN,VA,WV

•  Depth:4,000–9,000feet

•  MostdrillinginPennsylvania

Page 16: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 17: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOH:Marcellus(Cont…)

•  SoutheastCounties:

–  Belmont–  Carroll–  Columbiana–  Guernsey–  Harrison–  Jefferson–  Mahoning–  Monroe–  Noble–  Washington

•  ShallowerinOH(3,000–4,000feet)butthinner

Page 18: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOH:Marcellus(Cont…)

•  Permits:2010(5);2011(11)

•  Permits:– Monroe=8–  Belmont=6

•  StatusofWells:–  Drilling=1–  Drilled=5–  Producing=3

Page 19: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOH:Utica

•  Area:170,000squaremiles(estimated)– NY,KY,MD,OH,PA,TN,WV,VA(noNJ)

•  Depth:2,000–7,000feetbelowMarcellus

•  GeographicallymoreexpansiveandthickerthanMarcellus

Page 20: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 21: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOH:Utica(Cont…)

•  ShallowerinOH(6,000–9,000feet)

•  ClosertoMarcellus(3,000vs.7,000feet)

•  MoreNGL’sandOilthanMarcellus

Page 22: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 23: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location
Page 24: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOH:Utica(Cont…)

•  Permits:2009(1);2010(2);2011(147)

•  Permits:(Actionintheoverlap)– Carroll=47–  Jefferson=21– Columbiana=17– Mahoning=13– Noble=12– Guernsey=10

Page 25: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Shale“Plays”inOH:Utica(Cont…)

•  WhoisBuying?– ChesapeakeExplorationLLC=112

•  2477filingsinCarrollsince11/2010– AnadarkoE&PCo.LP=18

•  StatusofWells:–  Drilling=26–  Drilled=31–  Producing=4

Page 26: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

UticaImpact

•  Economic•  Revenue/Taxes/Investment

–  ChesapeakeandHessCorpover1bil.each–  34billion(estimated)

•  Jobs(whereneededmost)(204,000estimated)•  State/Countiesaslessors?

•  Environmental/Political– ProposedmoratoriumuntilEPAstudydone– Groundwater/Earthquakes

Page 27: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

OilandGasLeases•  Signingbonus

–  Recent:$2,000‐$4,000/acre

•  Royalties–  Production:usually12.5%(1/8)–  Delay–  Shut‐in(royaltyorrental)

•  Term–  Primary–  Secondary(“producing”“payingquantities”)

•  Pooling/MinimumAcreage

Page 28: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

TitleDefects

•  OhioLaw–  Conveyance(deed;reserve;lease)

•  Mineralsseparatepropertyright(royaltytoo)•  Defaultrule:movewiththesurfacerights

–  Execution/Recording/Assignments•  RC5301.01;5301.09;1509.31

– Whatdoes“minerals”mean?

•  CurrentIssues–  Reservation(separatechain)=needtoreadthedocs– Mechanics’liens(RC1311.021)–  UCCliens(RC1309)

Page 29: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

TitleDefects:CuresDormantMineralAct(RC5301.56)

Background:MarketableTitleAct(RC5301.47‐.56)

Doesnotapplyto: Coal Publicbodies

Rights“abandoned”and“vest”insurfaceownerifchainsilentfor20years

Chainnot“silent”if: Partofarecoded“titletransaction” Actualproduction/withdrawal Usedinundergroundgasstorage Adrillingorminingpermithasbeenissued Apreservationnoticehasbeenfiled Aseparatetaxnumberhasbeencreated

Page 30: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

TitleDefects:Cures(Cont…)DormantMineralAct(Cont…)

Theprocedure/contentsofapreservationnoticearelaidoutinSubsectionC.

Theabandonmentprocedurehastwosteps:

1.  Servicenoticebycertifiedmailtothelastknownaddressoftheholder(ortheirsuccessors/assignees).Ifservicecan’tbemadethisway,publicationisused.TherequiredcontentsaredescribedinSubsectionF.

2. Fileanaffidavitwiththerecorderbetween30and60daysafterthenoticeisgiven.TherequiredcontentsaredescribedinSubsectionG.

Inresponsetothenotice,iftheholder(ortheirsuccessors/assignees)claimstheirinterest,thenithas60daystofilecertainthingswiththerecorderunderSubsectionH(1).Ifnot,thesurfaceownercanhavetherecordermemorializetheabandonmentinthechainoftitleunderSubsectionH(2).Itisthisfilingthatcreatestheabandonment.

Page 31: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

TitleDefects:Cures(Cont…)LeaseForfeiture(RC5309.332)(breach)

When: Noproducingordrilling Lesseebreachedcovenantsinleaseorexpired

Servicenoticebycertifiedmailtothelastknownaddressofthelessee(ortheirsuccessors/assignees).Ifservicecan’tbemadethisway,publicationisused.Therequiredcontentsaredescribed.

Fileanaffidavitwiththerecorderbetween30and60daysafterthenoticeisgiven.Therequiredcontentsaredescribed.

Inresponsetothenotice,iftheholder(ortheirsuccessors/assignees)claimstheirinterest,thenithas60daystofilecertainthingswiththerecorder.Ifnot,thesurfaceownercanhavetherecordermemorializetheforfeitureontheleaseitself.Itisthisfilingthatcreatestheforfeiture.

Page 32: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

TitleDefects:Cures(Cont…)

•  Lease“Expiration”(onitsownterms)–  EX.Noproductionin“payingquantities”

•  OSBAStandardsofTitleExamination(section4.4)

–  ProblemA:Shouldanoil,gasorcoalleasebeshownwhensatisfactoryevidenceisfurnishedthatrentalsareindefaultandthatmineralsarenotbeingproduced?

–  StandardA:No,providedfurtherthattheprimarytermoftheleasehasexpired.

Page 33: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

TitleDefects:Cures(Cont…)•  Superpriority(R.C.1509.31(D))(effective6/30/10)

–  Preservesoilandgasleases(etc)frombeingextinguishedinaforeclosure

–  Onlyifrecordedafterthemortgage

•  NewexceptionforScheduleBinloanpolicies: “OilandGasleases,pipelineagreements,oranyotherinstruments

relatedtotheproductionorsaleofoilornaturalgaswhichmayarisesubsequenttotheDateofPolicy.”

Page 34: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

AdditionalResources

•  OhioDepartmentofNaturalResources:DivisionofMineralResourcesManagement

•  OhioStateUniversity:TheSubsurfaceEnergyResourceCenter

•  Geology.com

•  TheOhioEnvironmentalProtectionAgency

•  TheOhioOilandGasAssociation

•  OhioOilandGasEnergyEducationProgram

•  U.S.DepartmentofEnergy/EnergyInformationAgency

•  U.S.GeologicalSurvey

Page 35: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

SUBJECTTOTHEEXCLUSIONSFROMCOVERAGE,THEEXCEPTIONSFROMCOVERAGECONTAINEDINSCHEDULEB,ANDTHECONDITIONS,NORTHAMERICANTITLEINSURANCECOMPANY,aCaliforniacorporation(the"Company"),insures,asaDateofPolicyand,totheextentstatedinCoveredRisks9and10,afterDateofPolicy,againstlossordamage,notexceedingtheAmountofInsurance,sustainedorincurredbytheInsuredbyreasonof:

1.…………..2.AnydefectinorlienorencumbranceontheTitle………..

Page 36: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Underwriter’sfouroptions

5.DEFENSEANDPROSECUTIONOFACTIONS•  Litigateorlegalacttoresolve.7.  OPTIONSTOPAYOROTHERWISESETTLECLAIMS;TERMINATIONOFLIABILITY

•  Paypolicylimittoinsured.

•  Payfairmarketvalueoflosstoinsured.•  Paymoneydirectto3rdpartytoresolve.

Page 37: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

Whoisqualifiedtocalculateorcomputetheamountofloss?

•  EvidR702Testimonybyexperts

•  Awitnessmaytestifyasanexpertifallofthefollowingapply:•  Thewitness'testimonyeitherrelatestomattersbeyondtheknowledgeorexperiencepossessedbylay

personsordispelsamisconceptioncommonamonglaypersons;

•  Thewitnessisqualifiedasanexpertbyspecializedknowledge,skill,experience,training,oreducationregardingthesubjectmatterofthetestimony;

•  Thewitness'testimonyisbasedonreliablescientific,technical,orotherspecializedinformation.Totheextentthatthetestimonyreportstheresultofaprocedure,test,orexperiment,thetestimonyisreliableonlyifallofthefollowingapply:

•  Thetheoryuponwhichtheprocedure,test,orexperimentisbasedisobjectively•  verifiableorisvalidlyderivedfromwidelyacceptedknowledge,facts,orprinciples;•  Thedesignoftheprocedure,test,orexperimentreliablyimplementsthetheory;

•  Theparticularprocedure,test,orexperimentwasconductedinawaythatwillyieldanaccurateresult

Page 38: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

HowManyMAIsareinOhioandhowmanyLicensed

AppraisersareinOhio?•  TheAppraisalInstituteoffers3differenttypesofdesignations(i.e.MAI,SRPA,andSRA).Youareableto

getalistofprofessionalsinOhiowithanyofthese3designationsfromtheAIwebsite.Iprintedoffall3listswithadescriptionofthedesignation(seeattachedfolder).Tosummarize,inOhio,thereare:

•  137MAIs;

•  16SRPAs;•  157SRAs•  Ohiooffers3typesofappraiserlicenses/certifications(i.e.“State‐certifiedgeneralrealestateappraiser,”

“State‐certifiedresidentialrealestateappraiser,”and“State‐licensedresidentialrealestateappraiser”).ThesearedefinedinR.C.4763.1(K,L,M)(Seeattachedfolder).Thereisawebsitecalled“OhioDepartmentofCommerceOnlineLicensingwebsite.”Thiswebsitehasacomprehensivelistingofalllicensedrealestateprofessionalsinthestate,includingappraisers.YoucandownloadanExcelSpreadsheetandsortthroughprofessionalsbydesignation,activestatus,etc(note:Ihaveasavedspreadsheetonmydesktopbutdidn’tprintitbecauseitwastoolong).Doingthis,Imadethefollowingfindings:

•  Thereareapproximately738Active“State‐certifiedgeneralrealestateappraisers”inOhio(includesthosewithtemporaryandreciprocallicenses)

•  Thereareapproximately1241Active“State‐certifiedresidentialrealestateappraisers”inOhio(includesreciprocallicenses)

•  Thereareapproximately790Active“State‐licensedresidentialrealestateappraisers”inOhio(includesreciprocallicenses)

•  OrCombingthethreetypes,thereareatotalof2769AppraiserProfessionalsbasedonthisdatabase

Page 39: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

AppraisalMethodology

Highestandbestuseisdefinedas:

1.Thelegalpermissibilityoftheintendedimprovements.2.ThePhysicaladaptabilityofthesite.

3.Theeconomicfeasibilityoftheintendedimprovements.4.Theeconomicprofitabilityoftheintendedimprovementsin

termsoftheircapabilitytogeneratethegreatestamountofnetincometothesite.

AppraisalInstitute,TheAppraisalofRealEstate,ThirteenthEdition(AppraisalInstitute,550WestVanBuren,Chicago,Illinois60607,2008)277.

Page 40: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ValuationProcedure

•  Threegenerallyacceptedtechniquesavailableforestimatingthevalueofrealestate.

1.  CostApproach‐estimatingthereproductionorreplacementcostnew.

2.  IncomeCapitalizationApproach‐Measurevaluebyestimatingthepresentworthofanyanticipatedfutureincomestreamtobegeneratedbyaproperty.Oneyear’sincomeexpectancycanbecapitalizedatamarketderivedcapitalizationratethatreflectsaspecifiedincomepattern,returnoninvestment,andchangeinthevalueoftheinvestment.

3.  SalesComparisonApproach‐Salesofsimilarpropertiesareresearchedandadjustedbasedupontheircomparabilitytothesubjectproperty.

Page 41: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

AssetValuation

Return(Howmuchinterestisexpectedfor

anassetrisk?)

Capitalization

(Howmuchwouldyoupayforastreamofpayments?)

Page 42: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ExhibitA.PlatMapofGileadTownship,MorrowCounty,Ohio

Page 43: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ExhibitB.CloseupofPlatMapShowingLocationofTractinquestion

Page 44: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ExhibitC.WellLocationMap.TractinQuestionLocatedHere

Page 45: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ExhibitD.CrossSectionMapshowingErosionalRemnantsalongKnoxUnconformityinOhio

Page 46: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ExhibitE.TheOilProductionfortheWellsLocatedintheYellowCirclerangeform40,000BOto70,000BO.Thedryholesthatweredrilledalongthegreenovaltrend

contained>40feetofGlenwoodShale.TractinQuestionisredcircle.

Page 47: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ExhibitF.OldShotPointBaseMapShowsLocationofSeismicandPossibleOilWelllocatedontheTractinQuestion

Page 48: Mineral Rights‐Real Property Disputes · A. C.Marcellus I. General II. Ohio B. Utica I. General ... A. Close up of Plat Map Showing Location of Tract in question B. Well Location

ContactUs

HavensLimited141EastTownStreet,Suite200

Columbus,OH43215

(614)228‐6888

JimHavens

AdamSchwartz