mild combustion of non-conventional and liquid fuelswpage.unina.it/anddanna/capri/capri...

40
Mild Combustion of non-conventional and liquid fuels Marco Derudi – Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica / CFALab

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Mild Combustion of non-conventional and liquid fuelsMarco Derudi – Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica / CFALab

  • 2

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    INTRODUCTION

    � Combustion processes are essential for power generation, thus the development of a combustion technology able to accomplish improvement of efficiency with reduction of pollutants emissions, as NOx and soot, is a main concern.

    � To improve the thermal efficiency of combustion processes, in the ’80 lots of studies were focused on Heat Exchange and Heat Recovery problems.

  • 3

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    THE BIRTH OF MILD COMBUSTION

    Excess enthalpy combustion1

    Heat-recirculating combustion: the exhausts can be used to preheat the reactants upstream the flame region2

    1Lloyed, Weinberg, Nature, 251,19742Weinberg, Combust. Sci. Technol., 121, 1996

  • 4

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    PRELIMINARY ISSUES

    Advantages− Thermal efficiency is increased− Reduced fuel consumption− Possibility to burn low-calorific fuels

    Drawbacks− Very high peak temperatures− High NOx emissions (thermal-NOx)− Critical design of the burner

  • 5

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    NOx CONTROL STRATEGIES

    Flame control- Temperature- Stoichiometry- Species–dilution and scavenging

    Post-flame controlPost-flame NOx reduction by- Reburning- Non-catalytic selective reduction- Catalytic selective reduction (SCR)

    Choi, Katsuki, Energy Conv. Management, 42, 2001

  • 6

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    LOW-NOx BURNERS

    NOx-control strategies by burner design:

    - Staging- Swirling

    - Recirculation

    These techniques effectively control:- Flame core stoichiometry

    - Peak flame temperature

  • 7

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    RECIRCULATION vs FLAMMABILITY

    Wünning & Wünning, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 23, 1997

    UFL

    FP AITT

    %fuel

    AutoIgnition

    LFL

  • 8

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    DILUTION, PREHEATING, HIGH-MOMENTUM JETS

    Derudi et al., 6th HiTACG Symposium, 2005

    Mild

    Traditionalflame

    Milani, Saponaro, La Termotecnica, 1, 2000

  • 9

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    ADVANCED LOW-NOx TECHNOLOGY

  • 10

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    REGENERATIVE BURNERS - 1

  • 11

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    REGENERATIVE BURNERS - 2

  • 12

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    SELF-RECUPERATIVE BURNERS

    recuperator

    combustion chamber

    FLOX burner, WS GmbH

  • 13

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    ONE TECHNOLOGY, MANY NAMES

    • Heat-recirculating combustion

    • Preheated air combustion (PAC)• Diluted Combustion

    • Noiseless combustion• High temperature air combustion (HiTAC)

    • Flameless oxidation• MILD combustion

    (Moderate or Intense Low oxygen Dilution)

  • 14

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    WHY FLAMELESS?

    Fuel

    T=25°C

    Fuel

    Fuel

    T=25°C

    internalrecirculation

    Natural Gas 48MWth

    “TEA” swirl burner(ANSALDO)

  • 15

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    MILD COMBUSTION - DEFINITION

    Derudi, Villani, Rota, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31, 2007

    MILD COMBUSTIONTinlet > TSI and ∆∆∆∆T < TSI [K]

    Cavaliere, de Joannon, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 30, 2004

    = 1500 K

    = 550 K

    = 1000 K

    TSelf-IgnitionTraditional combustion

    ∆∆∆∆T decreases byincreasing dilution

  • 16

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    TYPICAL EXPERIMENTAL TRENDS

    Krishnamurthy et al., Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 2009

    Szego et al., Combust. Flame, 154, 2008

    MILD

  • 17

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    LAB-SCALE MILD BURNER

    Lab-scale burner advantages:low-costlow-timehigh flexibility

    Laboratory-scale burner is constituted by three main sections:feeding and pre-heatingburnersampling and measurements

  • 18

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    LAB-SCALE BURNER: DILUTION RATIO

    Lab-scale burnerIndustrial burner

    ev

    a f

    Mk

    M M=

    +

    Me = recycled exhaust gases stream

    Ma= primary air inlet streamMf = fuel inlet stream

    (1 )

    1 (1 ) (1 )vR SA IA R

    kSA FA SA

    − ⋅ += ++ + ⋅ +

    SA = 2ary/1ary air volumetric ratioIA = inert/1ary air volumetric ratioFA = fuel/air ratioR = recycle factor

  • 19

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    DILUTION RATIO - K v

    Dilution ratio induced by the jets as a function of the dimensionless distance from the air nozzle

    SN: 80% of air external to the

    nozzle

    SN: 25% of air external to the

    nozzle F

    A EE

    V m

    dAvk

    &

    ∫=ρ

  • 20

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    HYDROGEN ENRICHED FUELS

    H2-enriched fuels are interesting:� ↓ greenhouse gases� from solid fuels (e.g. coal/biomasses gasification)� byproducts of industrial processes (e.g. coke oven gas)

    BUT… H2 shows properties that make conventional burners unsuited:� alternative technologies (MILD)� need of research (little work on H2 enriched fuels…)

  • 21

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    RESULTS: CH4/H2

    OH(flame marker)

    1390 K

    1270 K

    5.0E-4

    0

    9.3E-5

    0

    TemperatureCH2O

    (ignition marker)

    YOH YCH2O

    13751363

    13681321

    12731279

    PredictedPredictedT [K]T [K]

    MeasuredMeasuredT [K]T [K]

  • 22

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    RESULTS: CH4/H2

    300K 2190 K

    1270 K 2000 K

    1270 K 1440 K

    1270 K 1390 K

    flame

    MILD

    300K 2190 K

    Temperature predicted with EDC and DRM-19

  • 23

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    MILD COMBUSTION OF H2 ENRICHED FUELS: NOx

    Galletti, Parente, Derudi, Rota, Tognotti, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, 2009

    Contribution of different formation routes to the total NO emissions (dry basis) with

    CH4/H2 mixture for different dilution ratios, kv

    NNH intermediate mechanism:

    N2 + H ↔ NNH

    NNH + O ↔ NH + NO

  • 24

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    TOWARD A MILD COMBUSTION OF LIQUID FUELS

    • Retrofit a lab-scale burner developed for mild combustion of gases in order to use liquid fuels

    - Different nozzles configuration- Atomizer for the direct liquid fuel feeding

    • Definition of an experimental procedure for tests with liquid fuels (n-octane, n-dodecane,…)

    • Evaluate main characteristic parameters for mild combustion of liquids → requirements for real-size burners design

    • Preliminary definition of operating maps for pure (n-octane) and practical (kerosene) fuels

  • 25

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    LAB-SCALE MILD BURNER LAYOUT

    Exhausted gases outlet

    Primary air + inert inlet

    Gaseous Fuel inlet

    Secondary air inlet

    Quartz-wool

    insulation

    Preheating oven Refractory insulation

    Upper oven for heat

    maintenance

    Thermocouple

    Liquid Fuel inlet

  • 26

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    LIQUID FUEL ATOMIZATION

    Cooling water inlet Cooling water outlet

    Liquid fuel inlet Nitrogen inlet

    The liquid fuel is sprayed directly into the burner

    A pneumatic atomizer (supported by a nitrogen stream), water-cooled to avoid fuel pyrolysis, was developed to create a short fuel jet

  • 27

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

    1ary air

    Gaseousfuel2ary

    air

    GaseousFuel

    1ary air2ary air

    Kv can be modulated in a wide range

    1 2

    1 2

    ( )a f i a

    a a f

    M M M R MKv

    M M M

    + + ⋅ −=

    + +

    PreheatingB Increase of the dilutionC Transition to mildD

    KV

    Mild clean

    Mixed zone

    Thermal NOx

    Flame Combustion

    Ave

    rage

    Fur

    nace

    Tem

    p.

    Extinction

    Hig

    h C

    O e

    mis

    sion

    sA

    B

    C D

    Firing with CH4 or C2H6A

    The burner cannot be fired directly with a liquid fuel, so the fuel feed is varied once stable mild combustion conditions are achieved with a gaseous fuel (CH4, C2H6).

    GaseousFuel

    Air

  • 28

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    MIXED ZONE: ROAD TO MILD

    Thermal gradients smoothing

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12

    Kv

    Con

    cent

    ratio

    n [p

    pm]

    NO

    CO

    550

    600

    650

    700

    750

    800

    850

    900

    950

    0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0

    Kv

    T [°

    C]

    T top

    T half

    T bottom

    AA

    BBCC

    BB – Transition

    AA –Flame Combustion

    CC – Clean mild combustion

    NO < 30 ppmCO < 50 ppm

    AA

    BB

    CC

  • 29

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    GAS TO LIQUID TRANSITION

    1ary air

    Liquidfuel1ary air

    Gaseousfuel

    Liquidfuel

    PURE METHANE OR ETHANE

    HYBRID FUEL FEED: GAS and LIQUID

    PURE LIQUID FUEL

    Single nozzle (SN)

    Dual nozzle (DN)

    Dual nozzle (DN)

    1ary air

    Gaseousfuel

  • 30

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    n-OCTANE COMBUSTION

    02468

    101214161820

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    % n-octane

    Con

    cent

    ratio

    n [p

    pm]

    NOCO

    750

    800

    850

    900

    950

    1000

    1050

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    % n-octane

    T [°

    C]

    T half

    T top

    Low thermal gradient

    Temperature increase due to the different thermal input

    NO < 30 ppm and no CO emissions during the transition

    Stable Mild clean regime during and after the gas to liquid

    fuel transition

    KV=8.75, air excess=14%, air preheated @ 950°C

    SN DN

  • 31

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    TEMPERATURE PROFILES

    KV=8.75, air excess=14%, air preheated @ 1100°C

    KV=5.6

    KV=2.7

    Exhausts exit

    Preheated air nozzle

  • 32

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    MILD CLEAN REGION: n-OCTANE

    800

    850

    900

    950

    1000

    1050

    0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5

    Kv

    T [°

    C]

    1005°C

    KV =1.5

    840°C

  • 33

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    REFERENCE COMPONENTS IN REAL FUELS

    Ranzi, Energy&Fuels, 20, 2006

    20%iso-Alkanes

    22%n-Alkanes34%

    Cyclo-alkanes

    3%Indanes Indenes

    and Tetralines

    5%2-3 ring aromatics

    16%Alkylbenzenes

    Typical composition of a kerosene

    Concawe, Fuel quality, vehicle technology and their interactions, Report 99-52, 1999

  • 34

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    INFLUENCE OF REFERENCE COMPONENTS

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    liquid fuel (%)

    NO

    x (p

    pm d

    ry)

    n-c8

    n-c8/i-c8 95/5

    n-c8/i-c8 60/40

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24Air excess [%]

    CO

    [ppm

    ]NO Cyc-C6

    10% Cyc-C6

    20% Cyc-C6

    Branched hydrocarbons

    Cyclic hydrocarbons

  • 35

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    KEROSENE

    Kerosene contains not only linear chain and branched molecules, but also alkyl-benzenes and other cyclic compounds.

    GC-MS Analysis

    Main fraction: C 10 - C13 hydrocarbonsC11

    C10

    C12

    C13

    C14

    C9 C15

    C16C8

  • 36

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    KEROSENE COMBUSTION

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    13 15 17 19 21

    Air excess [%]

    CO

    [ppm

    ]

    CO (1100°C)

    CO (950°C)

    KV = 9, air excess=20%, air preheated @ 1100°C

    No CO emissions for air excess larger than 20%

    Lower CO emissions found for lower air preheating temperatures (it is increased the reactants residence time into the combustion chamber)

    OPTIMAL AIR EXCESS

    CH4 to KEROSENE TRANSITION

    NO < 30 ppm and CO < 1 ppmduring the transition

    SOX emissions (max 2 ppm)0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    % kerosene

    Con

    cent

    ratio

    n [p

    pm]

    NOCOSOx

    SN DN

  • 37

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    MILD CLEAN REGION: KEROSENE

    800

    850

    900

    950

    1000

    1050

    1100

    0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0

    Kv

    T [

    °C]

    1060°C

    KV =1.7

    850°C

  • 38

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    CONCLUSIONS

    • Successful retrofit of a mild combustion burner designed for gaseous fuels to operate with liquid fuels.

    • These tests evidenced that it is possible to change, also during a run, the fuel feeding strategy without affecting the mild sustainability.

    • Separated nozzles can help to realize mild combustion at lower Kv with respect to the SN layout, thus foreseeing the possibility to obtain mild combustion of liquid wastes and/or high reactive fuels (at moderate/high air temperatures and velocities) at low dilution ratios.

    Operating parameters for burners design

  • 39

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    DEVELOPMENTS…

    Stadler et al., Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 2009

    Coal mild combustion

    Biomass mild combustion

    Mild combustion of liquid wastes

  • 40

    Marco Derudi - CFALab

    …AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

    OXY-fuel mild combustion

    Kim et al., Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31, 2007

    High-pressure mild combustion (?)

    “OXY-coal” mild combustion (?)