microscopy & microtechniques

2
INTERNATIONAL LABMATE - APRIL 2016 Flash-and-freeze Electron Microscopy – Adding Motion to Electron Micrographs Shigeki Watanabe 1 * and Cveta Tomova 2 - *Correspondence contact: [email protected] 1. Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-1832 The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-1832 2. Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH, Hernalser Hauptstraße 219, 1170 Vienna, Austria A picture is worth hundreds of words. However, a snap-shot can be deceiving. In an electron micrograph of a synaptic terminal (Figure 1), a membrane invagination is observed among the cluster of synaptic vesicles. Because the size of the invagination is roughly equal to the size of a synaptic vesicle, it is tempting to conclude that this structure represents fusion of a synaptic vesicle. However, it is equally possible that the membrane pit represents an endocytic intermediate. Therefore, it is imperative to know what happened before and what happened afterwards in order to deduce what is going on in a picture. Traditionally, electron microscopy only captures a static image of cells – cells are fixed prior to imaging. Fixation comes in two flavours: chemical cross-linking and cryo- immobilization. First, lipids and proteins can be cross-linked using chemicals such as paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde. These chemicals diffuse into cells, fixing lipids and proteins in place by cross-linking them. The chemical fixation is generally a slow process, and it induces morphological changes as a result of the chemical reaction between the cellular constituents and the fixatives used, as well as osmotic alterations. Alternatively, cells can be immobilized by rapid freezing. Freezing is a physical process, lacking the drawbacks induced by the chemical fixation. In either case, the cells are “fixed” while they are performing their natural functions. Thus, occasionally, interesting structures might be captured, but the nature of these structures cannot be fully determined from these images. One potential solution to this problem is to induce a particular cellular function and fix cells at defined time points from the induction [1]. The chronological compilation of images enables the reconstruction of a flip-book of the cellular event. How can a particular cellular function be induced? In the recent years, light appears to be the solution. Optogenetics is a technique that uses heterologously-expressed light-sensitive proteins to control particular cellular functions [2]. For example, neuronal activity can be induced by activation of light- sensitive cation channels, channelrhodopsin [3]. Lipid composition of plasma membrane can be modified by light-induced recruitment of phosphatidylinositol phosphatase to the plasma membrane [4]. Likewise, many cellular functions can be induced by a flash of light. These techniques can create the time zero in cells of interest. Following the induction of cellular activity, cells must be fixed at the precise time points. To achieve the precise control, we employed a high-pressure freezing technique. High-pressure freezing can immobilize cells instantaneously while minimising the artifact caused by ice crystal formation [5]. However, in the commercial high-pressure freezer, cells or tissues are embedded within a closed compartment, and thus light cannot reach the specimens. Therefore, we modified the existing sample holder and created the light path (Figure 2) [6,7]. This modification allowed us to control the time intervals between light stimulation and freezing at milliseconds time scale and visualize membrane dynamics in electron micrographs. Using this approach, now termed ‘flash-and-freeze’, the Jorgensen laboratory and the Watanabe laboratory are studying membrane trafficking events at neuronal synapses. For neuronal communication, synaptic vesicles are consumed rapidly at synaptic terminals. These vesicles must be recycled locally at synapses because a limited number of synaptic vesicles is available at each terminal and synaptic terminals are located far away from the cell body where the components of synaptic vesicles are synthesised. Based on the morphological studies in the ‘70s and ‘80s, two models for synaptic vesicle recycling were put forward. One model suggests that synaptic vesicles are regenerated slowly via clathrin- mediated endocytosis [8]. Another model suggests that synaptic vesicles are recycled rapidly via reversal of the fusion process [9]. Despite the extensive research over the last 40 years, there is no resolution to this controversy. To test how synaptic vesicles are recycled, we stimulated mouse hippocampal neurons, expressing channelrhodopsin, and froze them at defined time points ranging from 15 ms to 20 s (Figure 3) [6,10,11]. At 15 ms, synaptic vesicles are captured in process of fusing with the plasma membrane. Exocyotsis of synaptic vesicles only occurred in the region, called active zone, which is juxtaposed to the post-synaptic receptive field. At 30 ms, those fusing vesicles are flattened out into the membrane. By 50 ms, no membrane invagination was observed in the active zone. Instead, shallow invagination was observed in the region just outside of the active zone. These invaginations progressively turned into vesicles of about 80 nm in diameter and were fully internalised by 100 ms. The internalized vesicles represent the endocytic intermediates of synaptic vesicles as they are delivered to endosomes, from which synaptic vesicles are regenerated via clathrin scaffolds. These results suggest that synaptic vesicle recycling is a two-step process: rapid internalization of excess membrane followed by slower regeneration of synaptic vesicles from endosomes [12]. The flash-and-freeze approach is thus very powerful for studying membrane dynamics at millisecond temporal resolution. Recently, this approach became more accessible. A high-pressure freezer, EM ICE, from Leica Microsystems**(Figure 4), offers synchronised high-pressure freezing and light stimulation to reveal these intricate changes in fine structure and cellular dynamics. With the development in optogenetic tools, essentially any cellular functions can be manipulated by light in the near future. The flash-and-freeze approach allows visualization of membrane trafficking events underlying these cellular functions at a millisecond temporal resolution and a nanometer spatial resolution. What comes before? What comes after? Obtaining the temporal information in your electron micrograph is within the reach. Figure 1. An electron micrograph of a synapse from mouse hippocampal neuronal cultures. An arrow indicates membrane invagination captured in the active zone. Electron microscopy delineates a detailed topology of cells. However, temporal information is largely missing in electron micrographs. To visualize membrane dynamics, we have developed a novel technique, ‘flash-and-freeze’, that induces particular cellular activity with a flash of light and captures membrane trafficking events at defined time points after the induction by rapid freezing of cells. A time series of snap shots allows reconstruction of a ‘flip-book’ of membrane dynamics. Using this technique, we have characterised membrane trafficking events at neuronal synapses that occur on a millisecond time scale. The flash-and-freeze approach therefore adds a missing piece of information to electron micrographs – time. Microscopy & Microtechniques a

Upload: others

Post on 03-Apr-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Microscopy & Microtechniques

INTERNATIONAL LABMATE - APRIL 2016

Flash-and-freeze Electron Microscopy – Adding Motion to Electron MicrographsShigeki Watanabe1* and Cveta Tomova2 - *Correspondence contact: [email protected]

1. Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-1832 The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-18322. Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH, Hernalser Hauptstraße 219, 1170 Vienna, Austria

A picture is worth hundreds of words. However, a snap-shot can be deceiving. In an electron micrograph of a synaptic terminal (Figure 1), a membrane invagination is observed among the cluster of synaptic vesicles. Because the size of the invagination is roughly equal to the size of a synaptic vesicle, it is tempting to conclude that this structure represents fusion of a synaptic vesicle. However, it is equally possible that the membrane pit represents an endocytic intermediate. Therefore, it is imperative to know what happened before and what happened afterwards in order to deduce what is going on in a picture.

Traditionally, electron microscopy only captures a static image of cells – cells are fi xed prior to imaging. Fixation comes in two fl avours: chemical cross-linking and cryo-immobilization. First, lipids and proteins can be cross-linked using chemicals such as paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde. These chemicals diffuse into cells, fi xing lipids and proteins in place by cross-linking them. The chemical fi xation is generally a slow process, and it induces morphological changes as a result of the chemical reaction between the cellular constituents and the fi xatives used, as well as osmotic alterations. Alternatively, cells can be immobilized by rapid freezing. Freezing is a physical process, lacking the drawbacks induced by the chemical fi xation. In either case, the cells are “fi xed” while they are performing their natural functions. Thus, occasionally, interesting structures might be captured, but the nature of these structures cannot be fully determined from these images.

One potential solution to this problem is to induce a particular cellular function and fi x cells at defi ned time points from the induction [1]. The chronological compilation of images enables the reconstruction of a fl ip-book of the cellular event. How can a particular cellular function be induced? In the recent years, light appears to be the solution. Optogenetics is a technique that uses heterologously-expressed light-sensitive proteins to control particular cellular functions [2]. For example, neuronal activity can be induced by activation of light-sensitive cation channels, channelrhodopsin [3]. Lipid composition of plasma membrane can be modifi ed by light-induced recruitment of phosphatidylinositol phosphatase to the plasma membrane [4]. Likewise, many cellular functions can be induced by a fl ash of light. These techniques can create the time zero in cells of interest.

Following the induction of cellular activity, cells must be fi xed at the precise time points. To achieve the precise control, we employed a high-pressure freezing technique. High-pressure freezing can immobilize cells instantaneously while minimising the artifact caused by ice crystal formation [5]. However, in the commercial high-pressure freezer, cells or tissues are embedded within a closed compartment, and thus light cannot reach the specimens. Therefore, we modifi ed the existing sample holder and created the light path (Figure 2) [6,7]. This modifi cation allowed us to control the time intervals between light stimulation and freezing at milliseconds time scale and visualize membrane dynamics in electron micrographs.

Using this approach, now termed ‘fl ash-and-freeze’, the Jorgensen laboratory and the Watanabe laboratory are studying membrane traffi cking events at neuronal synapses. For neuronal communication, synaptic vesicles are consumed rapidly at synaptic terminals. These vesicles must be recycled locally at synapses because a limited number of synaptic vesicles is available at each terminal and synaptic terminals are located far away from the cell body where the components of synaptic vesicles are synthesised. Based on the morphological studies in the ‘70s and ‘80s, two models for synaptic vesicle recycling were put forward. One model suggests that synaptic vesicles are regenerated slowly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis [8]. Another model suggests that synaptic vesicles are recycled rapidly via reversal of the fusion process [9]. Despite the extensive research over the last 40 years, there is no resolution to this controversy.

To test how synaptic vesicles are recycled, we stimulated mouse hippocampal neurons, expressing channelrhodopsin, and froze them at defi ned time points ranging from 15 ms to 20 s (Figure 3) [6,10,11]. At 15 ms, synaptic vesicles are captured in process of fusing with the plasma membrane. Exocyotsis of synaptic vesicles only occurred in the region, called active zone, which is juxtaposed to the post-synaptic receptive fi eld. At 30 ms, those fusing vesicles are fl attened out into the membrane. By 50 ms, no membrane invagination was observed in the active zone. Instead, shallow invagination was observed in the region just outside of the active zone. These invaginations progressively turned into vesicles of about 80 nm in diameter and were fully internalised by 100 ms. The internalized vesicles represent the endocytic intermediates of synaptic vesicles as they are delivered to endosomes, from which synaptic vesicles are regenerated via clathrin scaffolds. These results suggest that synaptic vesicle recycling is a two-step process: rapid internalization of excess membrane followed by slower regeneration of synaptic vesicles from endosomes [12]. The fl ash-and-freeze approach is thus very powerful for studying membrane dynamics at millisecond temporal resolution.

Recently, this approach became more accessible. A high-pressure freezer, EM ICE, from Leica Microsystems**(Figure 4), offers synchronised high-pressure freezing and light stimulation to reveal these intricate changes in fi ne structure and cellular dynamics.

With the development in optogenetic tools, essentially any cellular functions can be manipulated by light in the near future. The fl ash-and-freeze approach allows visualization of membrane traffi cking events underlying these cellular functions at a millisecond temporal resolution and a nanometer spatial resolution. What comes before? What comes after? Obtaining the temporal information in your electron micrograph is within the reach.

Figure 1. An electron micrograph of a synapse from mouse hippocampal neuronal cultures. An arrow indicates membrane invagination captured in the active zone.

Electron microscopy delineates a detailed topology of cells. However, temporal information is largely missing in electron micrographs. To visualize membrane dynamics, we have developed a novel technique, ‘fl ash-and-freeze’, that induces particular cellular activity with a fl ash of light and captures membrane traffi cking events at defi ned time points after the induction by rapid freezing of cells. A time series of snap shots allows reconstruction of a ‘fl ip-book’ of membrane dynamics. Using this technique, we have characterised membrane traffi cking events at neuronal synapses that occur on a millisecond time scale. The fl ash-and-freeze approach therefore adds a missing piece of information to electron micrographs – time.

Microscopy & Microtechniques

Figure 1

a

ILM - Flash Microscopy Article.indd 2 20/04/2016 11:20

Page 2: Microscopy & Microtechniques

81

WWW.LABMATE-ONLINE.COM

Figure 2. Schematic diagrams showing the modifi ed specimen holder of the high-pressure freezer, EM PACT2, with LED turned off (a) and on (b). Specimens are embedded within the metal cup, indicated by yellow. The specimen holder is modifi ed to house an LED inside the holder. A sapphire anvil is placed at the end of the screw to allow light transmission. Wayne Davis in the Jorgensen Laboratory designed the sample holder and wrote a program to interface the light stimulation device with the high-pressure freezer.

Figure 3. Electron micrographs of synapses at defi ned time points after stimulation. (a-d) Exocytosis of synaptic vesicles are observed during the fi rst 30 ms of the stimulus. (e,f) Endocytosis initiates at 50 ms post stimulation and completed by 100 ms after stimulation (g-j). (k,l)The internalized vesicles move away from the plasma membrane (300 ms post stimulus).

Figure 4. (a) Erik Jorgensen and Shigeki Watanabe and (b) with the R&D team involved in the instrument development.

Read, Share and Comment on this Article, visit: www.labmate-online.com/articles

Figure 2

a

b

a

e

i j k l

f g h

b c d

Figure 3

Figure 4

a

b

References1. Heuser, J. E. & Reese, T. S. Structural changes after transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Cell Biol. 88, 564–580 (1981).2. Fenno, L., Yizhar, O. & Deisseroth, K. The development and application of optogenetics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 389–412 (2011).3. Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G. & Deisseroth, K. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268 (2005).4. Idevall-Hagren, O., Dickson, E. J., Hille, B., Toomre, D. K. & De Camilli, P. Optogenetic control of phosphoinositide metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, E2316–2323 (2012).5. Moor, H. in Cryotechiniques in Biological Electron Microscopy 175–191 (Springer-Verlag, 1987).6. Watanabe, S. et al. Ultrafast endocytosis at Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junctions. eLife 2, e00723 (2013).7. Watanabe, S., Davis, M. W. & Jorgensen, E. M. in Nanoscale Imaging of Synapses (eds. Nägerl, U. V. & Triller, A.) 43–57 (Springer New York, 2014).8. Heuser, J. E. & Reese, T. S. Evidence for recycling of synaptic vesicle membrane during transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Cell Biol. 57, 315–344 (1973).9. Ceccarelli, B., Hurlbut, W. P. & Mauro, A. Depletion of vesicles from frog neuromuscular junctions by prolonged tetanic stimulation. J. Cell Biol. 54, 30–38 (1972).10. Watanabe, S. et al. Ultrafast endocytosis at mouse hippocampal synapses. Nature 504, 242–247 (2013).11. Watanabe, S. et al. Clathrin regenerates synaptic vesicles from endosomes. Nature 515, 228–233 (2014).12. Watanabe, S. Slow or fast? A tale of synaptic vesicle recycling. Science 350, 46–47 (2015).

For further details on EM ICE please contact [email protected]

EMC2016 Lyon FranceThe 16th European Microscopy Conference, to be held in Lyon has now opened registration procedures, with early bird rates until 1 June. Held every four years since 2004 and this year organised by the French Society of Microscopy, EMC2016 will cover all kinds of microscopical techniques in both optical and electron microscopy. Organisers are looking to attract an increased number of visitors both from within the european microscopy community and also from outside Europe, making the EMC series a true actor in microscopy at the world scale.

There are 28 scientifi c sessions planned within the 3 main symposiums: Life Sciences, Instrumentation and Methods, Materials Science. The co-chairs of these sessions have contacted more than 80 invited speakers on the basis of their propositions and of suggestions from the EMC2016 Committees. We are also honoured that 5 internationally recognised scientists have already accepted to attend the conference and give plenary lectures. The programme will be completed by the technical exhibit; this event should be very successful according to the enthusiastic participation of our partners.

In parallel to this, EMC2016 will host the SCUR annual meeting and several specifi c workshops and round tables. It will also respect the tradition of the EMC Conference series by proposing pre-congress training sessions, which will be organised by research teams from Lyon, Grenoble and St-Etienne with the participation of well-recognised experts attending the Conference.

Promoting the participation of Young Scientists, the event is also supporting younger colleagues through a scholarship application process and special registration fees.

For further information visit www.emc2016.fr

[email protected]

ILM - Flash Microscopy Article.indd 3 20/04/2016 11:20