metropolitan area employment and unemployment: march 2009

Upload: international-business-times

Post on 30-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    1/20

    Bureau of Labor Statistics Washington, D.C. 20212

    Technical information:Employment: (202) 691-6559 USDL 09-0455

    http://www.bls.gov/sae/Unemployment: (202) 691-6392

    http://www.bls.gov/lau/ For release: 10:00 A.M. (EDT)Media contact: (202) 691-5902 Wednesday, April 29, 2009

    METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    Unemployment rates were higher in March than a year earlier in all 372 metropolitan areas, the

    Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Eighteen areas recorded

    jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent, while 15 areas registered rates below 5.0 percent. The nationalunemployment rate in March was 9.0 percent, not seasonally adjusted, up from 5.2 percent a year

    earlier. Among the 310 metropolitan areas for which nonfarm payroll data were available, 282 areas

    reported over-the-year declines in employment, 22 reported increases, and 6 had no change.

    Metropolitan Area Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

    In March, 109 metropolitan areas reported jobless rates of at least 10.0 percent, up from 14 areas a

    year earlier, while 95 areas posted rates below 7.0 percent, down from 329 areas in March 2008. El

    Centro, Calif., recorded the highest unemployment rate, 25.1 percent. The areas with the next highest

    rates were Merced, Calif., 20.4 percent; Yuba City, Calif., 19.5 percent; and Elkhart-Goshen, Ind., 18.8

    percent. Among the 18 areas with jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent, 12 were located in California.Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, La., and Iowa City, Iowa, registered the lowest jobless rates, 3.6 per-

    cent each in March, followed closely by Ames, Iowa, at 3.7 percent. Overall, 158 areas posted unem-ployment rates above the U.S. figure of 9.0 percent, 209 areas reported rates below it, and 5 areas had

    the same rate. (See table 1 and the map.)

    Elkhart-Goshen, Ind., recorded the largest jobless rate increase from March 2008 (+13.0 percentage

    points). The areas with the next largest over-the-year rate increases were Bend, Ore. (+9.2 percentage

    points) and Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, N.C. (+9.1 points). An additional 33 areas registered unem-ployment rate increases of 6.0 percentage points or more, and another 42 areas had rate increases of 5.0

    to 5.9 points.

    Of the 49 metropolitan areas with a Census 2000 population of 1 million or more, Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., and Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif., reported the highest unemployment rates

    in March, 14.0 and 12.9 percent, respectively. Nine additional large areas posted rates of 10.0 percent or

    more. The large areas with the lowest jobless rates in March were New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, La.,5.3 percent, and Oklahoma City, Okla., 5.6 percent. All 49 large areas registered over-the-year unem-

    ployment rate increases of at least 1.9 percentage points. Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, Ore.-Wash.,

    had the largest jobless rate increase from a year earlier (+6.5 percentage points), followed by Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, N.C.-S.C. (+6.2 points) and Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich. (+6.0 points). Seven-

    NewsUnited StatesDepartmentof Labor

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    2/20

    2

    teen additional large areas recorded over-the-year unemployment rate increases of 4.0 percentage points

    or more.

    Metropolitan Division Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

    Eleven of the most populous metropolitan areas are composed of 34 metropolitan divisions, which

    are essentially separately identifiable employment centers. In March, the two divisions that comprise

    the Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., metropolitan area registered the highest jobless rates: Detroit-

    Livonia-Dearborn, 14.9 percent, and Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, 13.4 percent. The divisions withthe next highest rates were Lawrence-Methuen-Salem, Mass.-N.H., 12.2 percent, and Los Angeles-Long

    Beach-Glendale, Calif., 11.3 percent. Bethesda-Frederick-Rockville, Md., reported the lowest unem-

    ployment rate among the divisions, 5.2 percent. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.-Va.-Md.-W.Va., posted the next lowest rate, 6.1 percent. (See table 2.)

    In March, all 34 metropolitan divisions recorded over-the-year jobless rate increases of at least 2.5percentage points. Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, Mich., and Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, Mich., experi-

    enced the largest rate increases (+6.0 percentage points each). Eleven additional divisions reported

    over-the-year rate increases of 4.0 percentage points or more.

    In 4 of the 11 metropolitan areas that contain divisions, the ranges between the highest and lowest

    division jobless rates were 2.0 percentage points or more in March. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, Mass.-

    N.H., posted the largest rate difference among its divisions, 5.7 percentage points (Lawrence-Methuen-Salem, Mass.-N.H., 12.2 percent, compared with Framingham, Mass., 6.5 percent).

    Metropolitan Area Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

    In March, of the 310 metropolitan areas for which data were available, 282 areas reported over-the-year declines in employment, while 22 reported increases. Six metropolitan areas had no change. The

    largest over-the-year decreases in employment were reported in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana,

    Calif. (-221,300), New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. (-219,700), Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. (-157,600), Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. (-136,000), and Detroit-

    Warren-Livonia, Mich. (-135,300). The largest over-the-year percentage decreases in employment

    occurred in Elkhart-Goshen, Ind. (-12.9 percent), Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla. (-9.7 percent), Yuma,Ariz. (-9.5 percent), and Dalton, Ga. (-8.6 percent).

    The largest over-the-year increase was recorded in Austin-Round Rock, Texas (+3,300), followed

    by Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, Texas (+2,300), Champaign-Urbana, Ill. (+2,200), and Odessa, Texas(+2,100). The largest over-the-year percentage gains were experienced in Odessa, Texas (+3.4 percent),

    Midland, Texas (+2.3 percent), and Grand Junction, Colo. (+2.0 percent). (See table 3.)

    Over the year, nonfarm employment fell in 37 of the 38 metropolitan areas with annual averageemployment levels above 750,000 in 2008. The largest over-the-year percentage declines in employ-

    ment in these large areas were posted in Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., and Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale,Ariz. (-7.1 percent each), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. (-6.6 percent), and Charlotte-

    Gastonia-Concord, N.C.-S.C. (-6.1 percent). For the second consecutive month, Austin-Round Rock,

    Texas, was the only one of these metropolitan areas to record an over-the-year increase (+3,300 or +0.4

    percent).

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    3/20

    3

    Metropolitan Division Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

    In March 2009, nonfarm payroll employment data were available for 32 metropolitan divisions,

    which are essentially separately identifiable employment centers within a metropolitan area. Thirty-one

    of the 32 divisions recorded over-the-year employment decreases while 1 area reported an increase. Thebiggest losses were seen in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif. (-149,400), Chicago-Naperville-

    Joliet, Ill. (-142,700), New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J. (-121,000), and Warren-Troy-

    Farmington Hills, Mich. (-91,500). (See table 4.) For the second consecutive month, Bethesda-

    Frederick-Rockville, Md., was the sole metropolitan division reporting an over-the-year increase inemployment (+1,200).

    The largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment among metropolitan divisions wasreported in Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, Mich. (-8.0 percent), followed by Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn,

    Mich. (-5.7 percent), Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, Calif. (-4.8 percent), and Fort Lauderdale-Pompano

    Beach-Deerfield Beach, Fla., Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, Fla., and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, Fla. (-4.7 percent each). For the second consecutive month, Bethesda-Frederick-

    Rockville, Md., was the only metropolitan division to post an over-the-year percentage increase in

    employment (+0.2 percent).

    ________________________________

    The Regional and State Employment and Unemployment release for April is scheduled to be issued on

    Friday, May 22. The Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment release for April is scheduled

    to be issued on Wednesday, June 3.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    4/20

    Technical Note

    This release presents labor force and unemployment

    data from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

    program (tables 1 and 2) for 372 metropolitan statistical areas

    and metropolitan New England City and Town Areas

    (NECTAs), plus 8 areas in Puerto Rico. Estimates for 34

    metropolitan and NECTA divisions also are presented.

    Nonfarm payroll employment estimates from the Current

    Employment Statistics (CES) program (tables 3 and 4) are

    provided for most of the same areas. State estimates were

    previously published in the news release, Regionaland State

    Employment andUnemployment, and are republished in this

    release for ease of reference. The LAUS and CES programs

    are both federal-state cooperative endeavors.

    Labor force and unemploymentfrom the LAUS

    program

    Definitions. The labor force and unemployment data

    are based on the same concepts and definitions as those used

    for the official national estimates obtained from the Current

    Population Survey (CPS), a sample survey of households that

    is conducted for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) by the

    U.S. Census Bureau. The LAUS program measures

    employment and unemployment on a place-of-residence

    basis. The universe for each is the civilian noninstitutional

    population 16 years of age and over. Employedpersons are

    those who did any work at all for pay or profit in the

    reference week (the week including the 12th of the month) or

    worked 15 hours or more without pay in a family business or

    farm, plus those not working who had a job from which they

    were temporarily absent, whether or not paid, for such

    reasons as labor-management dispute, illness, or vacation.

    Unemployed persons are those who were not employedduring the reference week (based on the definition above),

    had actively looked for a job sometime in the 4-week period

    ending with the reference week, and were currently available

    for work; persons on layoff expecting recall need not be

    looking for work to be counted as unemployed. The labor

    force is the sum of employed and unemployed persons. The

    unemployment rate is the number of unemployed as a percent

    of the labor force.

    Method of estimation. Estimates for states, the District

    of Columbia, the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale

    metropolitan division, and New York City are produced using

    time-series models with real-time benchmarking to nationalCPS totals. Model-based estimation was extended to the

    following areas and their respective balances of state in 2005:

    the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL Metropolitan Division;

    Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area;

    Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area;

    Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan Division;

    New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Metropolitan Statistical

    Area; and Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan

    Division. (Model-based estimation of the New Orleans-

    Metairie-Kenner metropolitan area was suspended following

    Hurricane Katrina; the indirect estimation methods described

    below will be used for this area until further notice.)

    Modeling improves the statistical basis of the estimation for

    these areas and provides important tools for analysis, such as

    measures of errors and seasonally adjusted series. For all

    other substate areas in this release, estimates are prepared

    through indirect estimation procedures using a building-block

    approach. Employment estimates, which are based largely on

    place of work estimates from the CES program, are

    adjusted to refer to place of residence as used in the CPS.

    Unemployment estimates are aggregates of persons

    previously employed in industries covered by state

    unemployment insurance (UI) laws and entrants to the labor

    force data from the CPS. The substate estimates of

    employment and unemployment, which geographically

    exhaust the entire state, are adjusted proportionally to ensure

    that they add to the independently estimated state or balance-

    of-state totals. A detailed description of the estimation

    procedures is available from BLS upon request.

    Annual revisions. Labor force and unemployment data

    shown for the prior year reflect adjustments made at the end

    of each year, usually implemented with January estimates.

    The adjusted model-based estimates reflect updated

    population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, any revisions

    in the other data sources, and model reestimation. All

    substate estimates are reestimated and adjusted to add to the

    revised model-based estimates.

    Employmentfrom the CES program

    Definitions. Employment data refer to persons on

    establishment payrolls who receive pay for any part of thepay period that includes the 12th of the month. Persons are

    counted at their place of work rather than at their place of

    residence; those appearing on more than one payroll are

    counted on each payroll. Industries are classified on the basis

    of their principal activity in accordance with the 2007 version

    of the North American Industry Classification System.

    Method of estimation. The employment data are

    estimated using a link relative technique in which a ratio

    (link relative) of current-month employment to that of the

    previous month is computed from a sample of establishments

    reporting for both months. The estimates of employment for

    the current month are obtained by multiplying the estimatesfor the previous month by these ratios. Small-domain models

    are used as the official estimators for the approximately 44

    percent of CES published series which have insufficient

    sample for direct sample-based estimates.

    Annual revisions. Employment estimates are adjusted

    annually to a complete count of jobs, called benchmarks,

    derived principally from tax reports that are submitted by

    employers who are covered under state unemployment

    insurance (UI) laws. The benchmark information is used to

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    5/20

    adjust the monthly estimates between the new benchmark and

    the preceding one and also to establish the level of

    employment for the new benchmark month. Thus, the

    benchmarking process establishes the level of employment,

    and the sample is used to measure the month-to-month

    changes in the level for the subsequent months.

    Reliability of the estimates

    The estimates presented in this release are based onsample surveys, administrative data, and modeling and, thus,

    are subject to sampling and other types of errors. Sampling

    error is a measure of sampling variabilitythat is, variation

    that occurs by chance because a sample rather than the entire

    population is surveyed. Survey data also are subject to

    nonsampling errors, such as those which can be introduced

    into the data collection and processing operations. Estimates

    not directly derived from sample surveys are subject to

    additional errors resulting from the particular estimation

    processes used. The sums of individual items may not

    always equal the totals shown in the same tables because of

    rounding. Unemployment rates are computed from

    unrounded data and thus may differ slightly from ratescomputed using the rounded data displayed in the tables.

    Labor force and unemployment estimates. Model-

    based error measures are available for states on the BLS Web

    site at http://www.bls.gov/lau/lastderr.htm. Measures of

    nonsampling error are not available, but additional

    information on the subject is provided in Employment and

    Earnings Online at http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/home.htm.

    Employment estimates. Measures of sampling error

    for state CES data at the supersector level and for metro-

    politan area CES data at the total nonfarm level are available

    online at http://www.bls.gov/sae/790stderr.htm. Information

    on recent benchmark revisions for states is available on the

    BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov/sae/.

    Area definitionsThe substate area data published in this release reflect

    the standards and definitions established by the U.S. Office of

    Management and Budget on November 20, 2008

    . Datareflect New England City and Town Area (NECTA)

    definitions, rather than county-based definitions, in the six

    New England States. A detailed list of the geographic def-

    initions is available at http://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm.

    Additional informationMore complete information on the technical procedures

    used to develop these estimates and additional data appear in

    Employment and Earnings Online.

    Estimates of unadjusted and seasonally adjusted labor

    force and unemployment data for states, census regions and

    divisions, and seven substate areas are available in the news

    release, Regional andState Employment and Unemployment.

    Estimates of labor force and unemployment for all states,

    metropolitan areas, labor market areas, counties, cities with a

    population of 25,000 or more, and other areas used in the

    administration of various federal economic assistance pro-

    grams are available on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/lau/.

    Employment data from the CES program are available on the

    BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov/sae/.

    Information in this release will be made available to

    sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone:

    (202) 691-5200; TDD message referral phone: 1-800-877-

    8339.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    6/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    Alabama ... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 2,152.9 2,130.2 2,157.8 2,129.8 93.4 188.3 89.9 192.3 4.3 8.8 4.2 9.0Anniston-Oxford ................................................ 53.7 53.3 54.0 53.3 2.2 4.6 2.2 4.9 4.2 8.6 4.1 9.2Auburn-Opelika ................................................. 64.4 63.2 64.7 63.3 2.6 4.4 2.6 4.7 4.0 7.0 4.0 7.4Birmingham-Hoover .......................................... 527.1 518.1 527.8 515.7 20.3 41.4 19.8 42.8 3.9 8.0 3.8 8.3Decatur ............................................................. 73.4 71.1 72.9 71.1 4.0 6.4 2.9 6.5 5.5 8.9 3.9 9.1Dothan .............................................................. 65.0 63.6 65.1 63.7 2.7 5.1 2.6 5.1 4.1 7.9 3.9 8.0Florence-Muscle Shoals ................................... 67.0 67.1 66.9 67.1 3.3 6.2 2.9 6.3 4.9 9.3 4.4 9.4Gadsden ........................................................... 45.1 45.3 45.4 45.1 2.1 4.4 2.0 4.3 4.7 9.7 4.5 9.6Huntsville .......................................................... 203.4 200.1 204.4 199.4 6.8 13.1 6.4 13.6 3.3 6.5 3.1 6.8Mobile ............................................................... 184.3 184.3 185.2 184.9 8.0 15.6 7.8 16.5 4.3 8.5 4.2 8.9Montgomery ...................................................... 170.3 168.4 170.3 167.9 7.3 14.6 7.3 14.7 4.3 8.7 4.3 8.8Tuscaloosa ....................................................... 98.4 97.2 98.5 97.1 3.7 7.4 3.7 7.7 3.8 7.6 3.8 8.0

    Alaska .................................................................. 351.3 356.0 351.8 355.2 25.7 32.7 24.8 33.0 7.3 9.2 7.0 9.3Anchorage ........................................................ 194.4 197.8 193.9 196.6 11.9 15.4 11.7 15.9 6.1 7.8 6.0 8.1Fairbanks .......................................................... 44.9 44.8 45.3 45.4 2.9 3.8 2.8 3.8 6.5 8.5 6.1 8.3

    Arizona .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 3,076.3 3,147.8 3,085.9 3,124.8 129.2 232.3 134.5 240.0 4.2 7.4 4.4 7.7Flagstaff ............................................................ 70.2 74.0 71.7 73.3 3.2 5.1 3.2 4.8 4.6 6.8 4.4 6.6Lake Havasu City-Kingman .............................. 91.9 93.8 92.7 93.7 5.3 8.7 5.5 8.9 5.8 9.3 5.9 9.5Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale ................................. 2,092.0 2,122.7 2,090.5 2,108.4 78.5 146.6 82.5 152.2 3.8 6.9 3.9 7.2Prescott ............................................................ 96.4 98.8 97.2 98.7 4.2 8.3 4.4 8.7 4.4 8.4 4.5 8.8Tucson .............................................................. 461.3 488.7 468.6 484.1 19.2 32.8 19.8 34.0 4.2 6.7 4.2 7.0Yuma ................................................................ 80.0 79.3 79.5 78.9 7.6 11.6 7.8 12.1 9.5 14.6 9.9 15.3

    Arkansas ............................................................. 1,352.0 1,365.2 1,363.2 1,354.5 71.3 97.9 64.9 91.0 5.3 7.2 4.8 6.7Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers ........................ 226.9 229.5 227.7 227.1 9.0 13.4 8.0 12.2 4.0 5.8 3.5 5.4Fort Smith ......................................................... 137.7 139.1 137.7 137.9 6.6 10.7 6.0 10.1 4.8 7.7 4.3 7.3Hot Springs ....................................................... 41.9 43.0 42.6 43.0 2.3 3.0 2.1 2.7 5.4 7.0 4.8 6.4Jonesboro ......................................................... 56.5 58.0 56.8 57.5 2.9 3.8 2.7 3.6 5.2 6.6 4.8 6.3Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway ............... 337.2 340.7 337.6 337.3 15.2 20.0 13.9 18.5 4.5 5.9 4.1 5.5Pine Bluff .......................................................... 43.6 44.2 44.0 43.8 3.1 3.9 2.9 3.7 7.1 8.8 6.7 8.3

    California ............................................................. 18,180.9 18,556.7 18,244.8 18,580.9 1,130.6 2,037.2 1,178.4 2,131.2 6.2 11.0 6.5 11.5Bakersfield ........................................................ 349.7 372.3 347.7 371.0 34.9 54.7 37.1 59.0 10.0 14.7 10.7 15.9Chico ................................................................ 103.2 107.1 103.1 106.5 8.2 13.7 8.5 14.2 7.9 12.7 8.2 13.3El Centro ........................................................... 69.0 75.1 68.7 72.8 12.0 19.8 12.1 18.3 17.3 26.3 17.6 25.1Fresno .............................................................. 422.7 444.2 423.6 446.1 45.4 72.6 46.8 75.8 10.7 16.3 11.0 17.0Hanford-Corcoran ............................................. 57.1 61.5 58.3 61.4 6.5 10.0 6.6 10.2 11.3 16.2 11.3 16.7Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana ............... 6,582.5 6,611.3 6,596.7 6,612.1 361.9 674.7 380.6 701.7 5.5 10.2 5.8 10.6Madera-Chowchilla ........................................... 65.6 70.5 62.7 68.9 6.1 9.7 6.5 10.6 9.3 13.7 10.3 15.3Merced .............................................................. 102.3 107.7 102.6 108.0 13.9 21.3 14.1 22.0 13.6 19.8 13.7 20.4Modesto ............................................................ 229.2 242.6 231.2 244.0 24.8 40.7 25.8 42.8 10.8 16.8 11.2 17.5Napa ................................................................. 74.2 75.2 75.0 75.5 3.4 6.4 3.4 6.8 4.5 8.6 4.6 9.0Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura ..................... 429.2 436.2 432.4 439.9 23.2 40.6 23.4 42.3 5.4 9.3 5.4 9.6

    Redding ............................................................ 82.1 85.5 82.3 86.1 8.3 13.8 8.4 14.4 10.1 16.1 10.2 16.8Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario . .... ... .... ... ... . 1,784.3 1,810.2 1,793.5 1,816.2 119.8 224.2 125.6 233.5 6.7 12.4 7.0 12.9SacramentoArden-ArcadeRoseville .......... 1,049.7 1,068.5 1,053.7 1,069.0 65.4 115.1 67.5 121.0 6.2 10.8 6.4 11.3Salinas .............................................................. 205.0 216.0 207.0 216.7 22.9 34.8 22.1 34.1 11.2 16.1 10.7 15.7San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos ..................... 1 ,543.0 1,583.0 1,551.5 1,585.3 77.3 140.8 80.8 147.9 5.0 8.9 5.2 9.3San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont ..................... 2 ,238.5 2,290.6 2,246.6 2,293.8 104.5 203.9 110.6 217.1 4.7 8.9 4.9 9.5San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara .................... 890.3 924.0 895.3 924.2 45.5 94.2 47.8 101.5 5.1 10.2 5.3 11.0San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles .......................... 136.6 140.3 137.5 140.0 6.5 11.5 6.9 12.1 4.8 8.2 5.0 8.7Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta .................. 214.8 223.0 217.8 225.3 11.1 18.6 11.2 19.2 5.1 8.3 5.2 8.5Santa Cruz-Watsonville .................................... 145.7 150.0 145.5 150.2 11.9 19.7 12.1 20.4 8.2 13.2 8.3 13.6Santa Rosa-Petaluma ...................................... 260.1 265.0 261.3 266.0 12.9 24.5 13.6 25.9 5.0 9.2 5.2 9.8Stockton ............................................................ 291.7 306.6 293.0 309.0 29.1 48.3 29.8 50.8 10.0 15.7 10.2 16.4Vallejo-Fairfield ................................................. 210.4 216.1 211.7 216.6 12.7 22.5 13.2 23.7 6.0 10.4 6.2 10.9Visalia-Porterville .............................................. 195.2 206.7 195.3 207.5 21.9 34.9 22.7 36.8 11.2 16.9 11.6 17.7Yuba City .......................................................... 68.9 72.8 69.8 73.4 8.6 13.7 8.8 14.3 12.4 18.8 12.7 19.5

    Colorado .. ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 2,703.2 2,714.0 2,706.4 2,706.5 124.3 206.5 128.3 213.9 4.6 7.6 4.7 7.9Boulder ............................................................. 178.5 178.0 179.0 177.2 6.9 10.9 7.1 11.2 3.9 6.1 4.0 6.3Colorado Springs .............................................. 313.5 311.5 314.1 310.1 16.7 26.3 17.7 26.7 5.3 8.4 5.6 8.6Denver-Aurora-Broomfield ................................ 1,383.4 1,381.6 1,390.9 1,379.8 63.9 109.2 66.3 113.3 4.6 7.9 4.8 8.2Fort Collins-Loveland ........................................ 172.7 176.7 173.5 176.5 7.3 11.6 7.4 11.9 4.3 6.6 4.3 6.8Grand Junction ................................................. 80.2 84.3 80.1 85.1 3.1 6.1 3.1 7.0 3.9 7.2 3.9 8.2

    Greeley ............................................................. 117.6 120.6 116.9 120.2 6.1 10.1 6.1 10.4 5.2 8.4 5.2 8.7Pueblo .............................................................. 73.1 74.1 73.3 73.9 4.3 6.6 4.4 6.7 5.9 8.9 6.0 9.1

    Connecticut ......................................................... 1,844.0 1,872.2 1,857.0 1,873.6 99.2 148.7 97.3 145.4 5.4 7.9 5.2 7.8Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk ........................... 465.9 470.8 470.2 473.5 22.6 34.8 22.1 34.2 4.9 7.4 4.7 7.2Danbury ............................................................ 90.7 90.6 91.5 91.5 3.9 6.1 3.8 6.2 4.3 6.7 4.2 6.8Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford ............... 582.1 593.0 586.9 592.7 31.9 47.1 31.5 46.3 5.5 7.9 5.4 7.8New Haven ....................................................... 309.2 314.6 310.0 313.3 16.9 24.4 16.6 23.9 5.5 7.8 5.4 7.6Norwich-New London ....................................... 148.5 150.7 149.0 150.3 7.7 12.4 7.5 11.8 5.2 8.2 5.1 7.8Waterbury ......................................................... 100.4 102.6 100.9 102.5 7.5 10.9 7.4 10.8 7.4 10.7 7.3 10.5

    Delaware .............................................................. 439.2 438.1 442.2 435.8 18.4 34.6 18.0 34.6 4.2 7.9 4.1 7.9Dover ................................................................ 74.8 73.5 75.2 73.2 3.1 5.7 2.9 5.6 4.1 7.7 3.9 7.7

    See footnotes at end of table.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    7/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan areaContinued

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    District of Columbia ........................................... 329.3 330.4 332.7 326.0 18.4 33.3 20.6 30.9 5.6 10.1 6.2 9.5Washington-Arlington-Alexandria ..................... 2,992.9 3,007.5 3,012.3 3,001.2 95.9 183.0 98.1 177.6 3.2 6.1 3.3 5.9

    Florida .. .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 9,102.8 9,194.1 9,161.9 9,174.9 438.0 872.9 460.0 874.4 4.8 9.5 5.0 9.5Bradenton-Sarasota-Venice ............................. 315.2 312.4 318.9 313.2 16.8 34.2 17.8 34.0 5.3 10.9 5.6 10.9Cape Coral-Fort Myers ..................................... 289.9 281.0 291.4 279.8 18.4 34.1 19.4 34.2 6.4 12.1 6.7 12.2Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach .......... 252.6 255.3 252.9 255.4 12.8 26.5 13.3 26.7 5.1 10.4 5.3 10.4Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin ............... 93.4 96.0 95.4 96.5 3.6 7.1 3.6 6.7 3.9 7.4 3.8 7.0Gainesville ........................................................ 137.3 139.6 136.2 137.6 4.4 8.7 4.5 8.5 3.2 6.2 3.3 6.2Jacksonville ...................................................... 668.1 680.8 674.1 680.3 30.5 63.8 31.8 63.6 4.6 9.4 4.7 9.3Lakeland-Winter Haven .................................... 269.2 273.8 271.7 273.5 13.3 28.7 14.0 28.8 4.9 10.5 5.1 10.5Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach .......... 2,819.3 2,823.8 2,827.0 2,813.1 128.2 236.0 135.7 239.7 4.5 8.4 4.8 8.5Naples-Marco Island ......................................... 153.1 151.8 154.3 151.0 7.5 14.1 8.0 14.1 4.9 9.3 5.2 9.4Ocala ................................................................ 136.8 140.8 137.9 140.4 8.2 17.4 8.6 17.1 6.0 12.3 6.2 12.2Orlando-Kissimmee ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... . 1,103.8 1,111.7 1,111.7 1,107.9 49.2 109.6 51.8 110.2 4.5 9.9 4.7 9.9Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville ......................... 263.9 265.3 266.1 266.0 13.6 26.9 14.1 26.8 5.2 10.1 5.3 10.1Palm Coast ....................................................... 31.0 32.2 31.2 32.3 2.4 4.6 2.6 4.6 7.9 14.4 8.2 14.3Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach 84.6 87.8 87.4 88.7 3.9 8.7 3.8 8.0 4.6 9.9 4.3 9.0Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent ............................ 204.3 209.6 206.7 209.4 9.3 19.8 9.6 19.2 4.6 9.4 4.6 9.2Port St. Lucie .................................................... 186.0 187.9 187.5 188.0 11.3 22.3 12.0 22.4 6.1 11.9 6.4 11.9Punta Gorda ..................................................... 70.0 69.9 70.8 70.1 4.6 8.3 4.8 8.2 6.5 11.8 6.8 11.7Sebastian-Vero Beach ...................................... 62.4 61.1 62.6 61.5 3.8 7.1 3.9 7.4 6.0 11.6 6.2 12.0Tallahassee ...................................................... 187.4 190.7 188.4 189.8 6.5 13.2 6.8 13.0 3.5 6.9 3.6 6.8Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater .................... 1,302.2 1,321.8 1,312.4 1,316.8 67.0 136.3 70.3 136.9 5.1 10.3 5.4 10.4

    Georgia .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 4,821.6 4,799.0 4,843.1 4,780.0 254.3 448.1 256.9 439.3 5.3 9.3 5.3 9.2Albany ............................................................... 75.8 75.4 76.0 74.7 4.1 6.5 4.1 6.1 5.4 8.6 5.4 8.2Athens-Clarke County ...................................... 108.2 109.1 108.8 107.9 4.4 7.8 4.4 7.3 4.1 7.2 4.1 6.8Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta ... ... ... .... ... .... ... . 2,736.1 2,695.7 2,750.8 2,678.3 140.9 248.1 143.0 244.1 5.2 9.2 5.2 9.1Augusta-Richmond County ............................... 254.5 259.4 256.6 259.0 14.0 23.4 13.7 22.7 5.5 9.0 5.3 8.8Brunswick ......................................................... 53.7 54.4 54.2 53.8 2.4 4.6 2.3 4.4 4.4 8.4 4.3 8.2Columbus ......................................................... 128.4 128.0 128.4 128.0 7.0 11.2 6.8 10.7 5.5 8.7 5.3 8.4Dalton ............................................................... 67.0 65.9 67.4 65.7 4.1 8.5 4.4 9.0 6.1 12.8 6.5 13.7Gainesville ........................................................ 92.4 92.1 92.6 92.0 4.0 8.1 4.1 8.0 4.3 8.8 4.4 8.7Hinesville-Fort Stewart ..................................... 30.5 31.8 30.9 31.5 1.5 2.6 1.5 2.4 5.0 8.1 4.9 7.5Macon ............................................................... 112.6 112.4 113.3 112.3 6.2 10.2 6.2 9.7 5.5 9.1 5.5 8.6Rome ................................................................ 49.9 48.7 49.7 48.3 2.8 4.8 2.7 5.1 5.6 10.0 5.5 10.5Savannah ......................................................... 178.5 178.2 179.7 177.5 8.0 14.1 8.1 13.4 4.5 7.9 4.5 7.5Valdosta ............................................................ 69.3 69.4 68.6 69.0 3.0 5.8 3.0 5.1 4.4 8.3 4.4 7.4Warner Robins .................................................. 68.8 67.7 68.9 67.4 3.1 4.9 3.1 4.6 4.5 7.3 4.4 6.8

    Hawaii .................................................................. 647.6 647.4 653.5 644.9 18.1 41.3 19.0 45.2 2.8 6.4 2.9 7.0Honolulu ........................................................... 449.1 449.3 453.4 447.0 11.6 24.2 11.9 25.9 2.6 5.4 2.6 5.8

    Idaho .................................................................... 746.3 748.1 748.0 745.3 34.6 58.6 35.6 59.0 4.6 7.8 4.8 7.9Boise City-Nampa ............................................. 294.3 286.9 294.4 285.2 12.9 23.9 13.3 24.6 4.4 8.3 4.5 8.6Coeur dAlene ................................................... 69.5 71.5 69.6 71.3 4.2 6.8 4.1 6.1 6.0 9.6 5.9 8.6Idaho Falls ........................................................ 61.0 60.8 61.4 60.5 2.0 3.5 2.1 3.6 3.3 5.7 3.4 6.0Lewiston ........................................................... 29.6 30.8 29.5 31.4 1.6 2.3 1.5 2.3 5.2 7.5 4.9 7.3Pocatello ........................................................... 43.6 45.0 43.6 44.6 1.9 2.8 1.9 2.8 4.3 6.2 4.5 6.3

    Illinois .. .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 6,692.5 6,565.5 6,696.2 6,543.3 403.9 606.2 395.0 612.7 6.0 9.2 5.9 9.4Bloomington-Normal ......................................... 91.3 90.2 90.9 89.0 4.7 5.8 4.2 5.6 5.1 6.4 4.6 6.3Champaign-Urbana .......................................... 122.9 123.4 122.6 122.1 6.6 9.0 5.9 8.4 5.4 7.3 4.9 6.9Chicago-Naperville-Joliet .. .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... . 4,926.3 4,838.5 4,926.6 4,834.9 280.4 443.2 278.1 456.9 5.7 9.2 5.6 9.4Danville ............................................................. 37.2 37.4 37.3 37.0 2.9 4.1 2.7 4.0 7.8 11.0 7.3 10.9Davenport-Moline-Rock Island ......................... 205.6 204.6 206.2 204.0 11.0 14.8 10.3 15.0 5.3 7.2 5.0 7.4Decatur ............................................................. 53.9 53.6 54.2 53.0 3.7 5.3 3.5 5.2 6.9 10.0 6.5 9.8Kankakee-Bradley ............................................ 56.1 54.9 56.4 54.2 4.9 6.6 4.6 6.5 8.7 12.0 8.2 11.9Peoria ............................................................... 202.1 203.4 203.8 203.2 11.7 18.5 10.8 18.0 5.8 9.1 5.3 8.9Rockford ........................................................... 175.3 175.8 176.5 173.8 14.3 24.5 14.8 23.5 8.2 14.0 8.4 13.5Springfield ......................................................... 113.6 111.8 114.2 110.3 6.3 7.9 6.0 7.5 5.6 7.1 5.3 6.8

    Indiana . ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 3 ,189.9 3,207.9 3,209.9 3,199.8 171.4 324.3 176.8 339.3 5.4 10.1 5.5 10.6Anderson .......................................................... 59.6 61.3 60.4 60.9 4.1 6.7 4.3 7.0 6.9 10.9 7.2 11.4Bloomington ...................................................... 97.7 98.0 97.3 96.3 5.2 7.4 4.6 6.9 5.3 7.5 4.8 7.1

    Columbus ......................................................... 38.7 39.9 39.1 39.9 1.6 3.4 1.7 3.7 4.1 8.5 4.4 9.3Elkhart-Goshen ................................................. 98.8 98.7 99.2 98.7 5.4 17.8 5.8 18.5 5.5 18.0 5.8 18.8Evansville ......................................................... 178.9 179.7 180.1 178.6 8.9 16.1 8.9 16.2 5.0 8.9 5.0 9.1Fort Wayne ....................................................... 211.9 213.1 212.7 214.3 11.2 21.2 13.4 23.7 5.3 9.9 6.3 11.0Indianapolis-Carmel .......................................... 891.0 888.0 898.3 885.6 41.0 73.1 42.5 77.5 4.6 8.2 4.7 8.7Kokomo ............................................................ 44.5 44.2 44.6 44.1 3.0 5.7 3.2 6.0 6.8 12.9 7.1 13.6Lafayette ........................................................... 97.0 98.9 97.2 98.7 4.5 8.3 4.8 8.6 4.7 8.4 4.9 8.7Michigan City-La Porte ..................................... 51.6 52.9 52.1 52.9 3.3 6.2 3.3 6.4 6.4 11.6 6.3 12.2Muncie .............................................................. 55.4 55.9 55.6 55.4 3.3 5.5 3.8 5.9 6.0 9.9 6.8 10.6South Bend-Mishawaka .................................... 157.8 159.5 159.2 159.0 9.0 17.4 9.5 18.3 5.7 10.9 6.0 11.5Terre Haute ...................................................... 79.1 79.6 79.1 79.0 5.1 8.3 5.2 8.6 6.5 10.5 6.6 10.9

    See footnotes at end of table.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    8/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan areaContinued

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    Iowa ... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 1,663.6 1,659.0 1,666.5 1,666.2 72.2 93.9 70.5 96.0 4.3 5.7 4.2 5.8Ames ................................................................ 49.4 49.6 49.2 49.3 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.8 3.0 3.6 2.9 3.7Cedar Rapids .................................................... 144.0 143.9 144.6 144.0 6.0 7.7 5.8 7.8 4.2 5.3 4.0 5.4Des Moines-West Des Moines ......................... 312.9 309.8 312.1 309.4 12.6 16.1 12.3 16.0 4.0 5.2 4.0 5.2Dubuque ........................................................... 52.2 51.5 52.1 51.2 2.5 3.3 2.4 3.3 4.8 6.5 4.6 6.5Iowa City ........................................................... 90.9 90.1 90.9 90.0 2.7 3.4 2.6 3.2 3.0 3.8 2.8 3.6Sioux City ......................................................... 78.3 77.6 78.5 77.6 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.9 3.8 4.9 3.8 5.0Waterloo-Cedar Falls ........................................ 94.0 94.0 93.8 93.0 3.8 4.6 3.8 4.8 4.1 4.8 4.0 5.2

    Kansas ................................................................. 1,478.4 1,502.3 1,485.9 1,505.3 58.5 92.4 62.2 97.4 4.0 6.2 4.2 6.5Lawrence .......................................................... 62.5 59.4 62.7 61.7 2.3 3.3 2.3 3.4 3.6 5.5 3.7 5.5Manhattan ......................................................... 63.0 72.2 63.5 71.8 2.0 2.8 2.0 2.9 3.2 3.9 3.2 4.0Topeka .............................................................. 120.5 122.4 120.5 122.9 5.5 7.8 5.7 8.3 4.6 6.4 4.8 6.7Wichita .............................................................. 316.8 322.8 316.5 323.7 11.6 19.5 12.5 21.7 3.7 6.0 3.9 6.7

    Kentucky . ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .. 2,008.6 2,060.1 2,023.4 2,070.0 128.6 211.1 127.4 213.9 6.4 10.2 6.3 10.3Bowling Green .................................................. 62.5 64.5 62.8 64.1 3.4 6.7 3.3 6.3 5.4 10.3 5.3 9.9Elizabethtown ................................................... 54.1 56.0 54.6 55.9 3.3 6.0 3.2 6.1 6.1 10.7 5.9 10.9Lexington-Fayette ............................................. 233.1 235.8 234.5 237.8 11.6 19.1 11.4 19.3 5.0 8.1 4.8 8.1Louisville-Jefferson County .............................. 617.1 629.4 621.0 629.9 35.9 63.1 35.9 64.3 5.8 10.0 5.8 10.2Owensboro ....................................................... 55.5 58.0 55.5 58.0 3.3 5.6 3.0 5.5 6.0 9.7 5.4 9.5

    Louisiana . ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .. 2,022.3 2,051.5 2,047.6 2,053.7 69.2 113.6 78.4 116.3 3.4 5.5 3.8 5.7Alexandria ......................................................... 69.5 69.9 70.5 69.7 2.3 3.8 2.6 4.0 3.3 5.5 3.7 5.7Baton Rouge ..................................................... 367.2 373.6 371.1 374.0 12.2 19.2 13.8 19.6 3.3 5.1 3.7 5.2Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux ....................... 103.5 105.0 104.8 105.0 2.5 3.7 2.9 3.8 2.4 3.5 2.8 3.6Lafayette ........................................................... 133.5 133.7 134.7 134.0 3.3 5.2 3.9 5.5 2.5 3.9 2.9 4.1Lake Charles .................................................... 94.7 94.6 95.3 94.5 3.3 4.6 3.5 5.0 3.4 4.9 3.6 5.2Monroe ............................................................. 80.4 81.1 81.3 81.4 3.1 4.7 3.5 5.0 3.8 5.8 4.2 6.1New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner .......................... 515.6 526.5 522.3 525.7 15.7 27.8 17.9 28.0 3.0 5.3 3.4 5.3Shreveport-Bossier City .................................... 181.9 184.2 183.7 183.0 7.2 12.6 8.3 11.7 4.0 6.8 4.5 6.4

    Maine ................................................................... 693.8 698.0 697.2 696.9 38.4 62.4 38.7 62.3 5.5 8.9 5.5 8.9Bangor .............................................................. 72.2 71.9 72.3 71.8 3.6 5.7 3.7 5.8 5.1 8.0 5.2 8.1Lewiston-Auburn ............................................... 57.7 57.4 58.0 57.3 3.1 5.4 3.2 5.4 5.4 9.4 5.4 9.5Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ................... 201.0 200.6 202.0 200.1 8.1 13.9 8.3 14.2 4.0 6.9 4.1 7.1

    Maryland .. ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 2,970.4 2,947.2 2,983.8 2,947.5 112.2 212.9 110.1 206.9 3.8 7.2 3.7 7.0Balt imore-Towson .. .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... . 1,393.7 1,377.5 1,400.9 1,380.1 54.1 104.2 53.5 102.1 3.9 7.6 3.8 7.4Cumberland ...................................................... 49.1 49.1 49.1 48.5 2.9 4.5 2.8 4.3 5.9 9.2 5.7 8.9Hagerstown-Martinsburg .................................. 120.8 119.2 120.8 119.5 6.0 11.5 6.0 11.8 5.0 9.6 4.9 9.9Salisbury ........................................................... 63.2 62.1 63.3 61.7 3.3 5.9 3.1 5.8 5.2 9.6 5.0 9.4

    Massachusetts .................................................... 3,390.0 3,404.2 3,400.1 3,404.5 164.9 282.6 166.4 279.6 4.9 8.3 4.9 8.2

    Barnstable Town ............................................... 123.5 125.8 124.6 126.0 8.0 13.7 7.9 13.0 6.5 10.9 6.3 10.3Boston-Cambridge-Quincy ... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... . 2,481.6 2,485.6 2,487.1 2,485.6 107.1 184.9 107.4 183.7 4.3 7.4 4.3 7.4Leominster-Fitchburg-Gardner ......................... 71.4 71.7 71.7 71.9 4.5 7.6 4.5 7.5 6.3 10.6 6.3 10.5New Bedford ..................................................... 83.7 85.6 84.0 85.0 6.8 10.9 6.6 10.4 8.1 12.7 7.9 12.2Pittsfield ............................................................ 38.2 38.6 38.1 38.5 1.9 3.3 1.9 3.4 5.0 8.6 5.1 8.7Springfield ......................................................... 341.8 344.2 344.5 344.1 19.0 30.7 19.0 29.8 5.6 8.9 5.5 8.7Worcester ......................................................... 290.8 293.1 291.2 293.6 15.1 25.1 15.2 25.2 5.2 8.6 5.2 8.6

    Michigan .. ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 4,925.0 4,821.9 4,932.6 4,819.6 373.7 613.9 388.2 644.2 7.6 12.7 7.9 13.4Ann Arbor ......................................................... 187.2 177.8 186.9 176.7 9.2 13.1 9.4 14.0 4.9 7.4 5.0 7.9Battle Creek ...................................................... 68.9 66.3 69.1 66.3 4.9 7.4 4.8 7.8 7.2 11.2 6.9 11.8Bay City ............................................................ 54.4 53.3 54.4 53.3 4.1 6.0 4.3 6.5 7.5 11.3 7.9 12.2Detroit -Warren-Livonia .. ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... . 2,098.3 2,073.1 2,106.7 2,068.9 157.2 282.1 168.3 290.3 7.5 13.6 8.0 14.0Flint ................................................................... 205.6 195.8 204.8 197.3 18.6 26.9 21.9 30.3 9.1 13.8 10.7 15.3Grand Rapids-Wyoming ................................... 407.5 390.0 406.5 389.2 26.1 41.1 26.0 43.8 6.4 10.5 6.4 11.3Holland-Grand Haven ....................................... 134.9 130.4 134.7 130.2 8.6 15.8 8.4 16.5 6.4 12.1 6.2 12.6Jackson ............................................................ 76.5 74.5 76.6 74.5 6.1 9.4 6.1 10.0 8.0 12.7 7.9 13.4Kalamazoo-Portage .......................................... 173.7 168.6 174.0 168.5 10.8 16.7 10.6 17.6 6.2 9.9 6.1 10.5Lansing-East Lansing ....................................... 251.6 247.4 251.8 245.7 15.5 24.9 15.5 26.2 6.2 10.1 6.1 10.6Monroe ............................................................. 76.1 74.6 76.8 75.3 5.7 9.6 5.8 10.5 7.5 12.9 7.5 13.9Muskegon-Norton Shores ................................. 87.9 86.8 87.8 86.7 6.8 12.4 6.8 12.9 7.8 14.2 7.8 14.9Niles-Benton Harbor ......................................... 78.8 76.7 79.2 77.0 6.1 9.1 5.9 9.6 7.7 11.9 7.5 12.4

    Saginaw-Saginaw Township North ................... 94.9 92.0 95.1 91.9 7.5 10.8 8.2 11.6 7.9 11.8 8.6 12.7

    Minnesota ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .. 2,889.5 2,922.7 2,903.7 2,937.0 151.9 255.5 158.7 260.7 5.3 8.7 5.5 8.9Duluth ............................................................... 143.9 145.8 144.3 145.8 8.9 14.3 9.2 14.7 6.2 9.8 6.4 10.0Mankato-North Mankato ................................... 55.5 56.6 55.9 57.3 2.3 3.7 2.5 4.0 4.1 6.6 4.5 6.9Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington ................... 1,824.5 1,818.7 1,829.6 1,821.3 84.8 148.2 90.0 152.9 4.6 8.2 4.9 8.4Rochester ......................................................... 101.7 103.5 102.3 105.2 4.6 7.4 4.9 7.7 4.5 7.2 4.8 7.3St. Cloud ........................................................... 105.9 109.0 107.2 109.5 6.2 10.7 6.4 10.7 5.8 9.8 5.9 9.8

    See footnotes at end of table.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    9/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan areaContinued

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    Mississippi .......................................................... 1,299.8 1,318.2 1,307.3 1,313.4 76.9 122.4 79.5 122.8 5.9 9.3 6.1 9.4Gulfport-Biloxi ................................................... 111.8 111.3 112.6 111.0 5.6 8.6 5.7 8.7 5.0 7.7 5.1 7.8Hattiesburg ....................................................... 66.0 65.5 65.9 65.0 3.1 4.5 3.2 4.5 4.7 6.9 4.9 6.9Jackson ............................................................ 258.5 258.9 258.8 257.6 12.0 18.9 12.6 19.0 4.6 7.3 4.9 7.4Pascagoula ....................................................... 70.1 70.0 70.4 70.0 3.7 6.1 3.7 5.9 5.3 8.7 5.3 8.4

    Missouri ... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 2,991.0 3,002.2 3,006.8 3,009.1 174.2 272.8 173.1 273.9 5.8 9.1 5.8 9.1Cape Girardeau-Jackson .................................. 51.0 50.3 51.0 50.3 2.6 3.6 2.6 3.7 5.1 7.1 5.0 7.4Columbia .......................................................... 91.3 92.2 92.5 92.6 3.9 5.5 3.9 5.6 4.2 6.0 4.2 6.1Jefferson City .................................................... 77.0 76.9 77.1 77.1 3.6 5.8 3.6 6.1 4.7 7.5 4.7 7.9Joplin ................................................................ 83.7 83.7 84.1 84.1 4.0 6.0 4.2 6.4 4.8 7.2 4.9 7.6Kansas City ...................................................... 1 ,026.1 1,043.5 1,032.8 1,044.2 53.6 87.6 55.0 86.1 5.2 8.4 5.3 8.2St. Joseph ......................................................... 67.8 67.5 67.8 67.7 3.5 5.5 3.5 5.8 5.2 8.2 5.1 8.5St. Louis1 .......................................................... 1,429.8 1,425.0 1,437.9 1,420.5 87.3 131.6 89.6 133.6 6.1 9.2 6.2 9.4Springfield ......................................................... 216.3 216.3 217.4 217.5 10.6 17.5 10.4 18.3 4.9 8.1 4.8 8.4

    Montana ............................................................... 499.9 497.0 502.8 498.0 23.2 34.7 23.6 34.4 4.6 7.0 4.7 6.9Billings .............................................................. 87.0 83.2 86.9 83.8 2.9 3.9 2.9 4.0 3.3 4.7 3.3 4.8Great Falls ........................................................ 39.8 38.9 39.9 38.9 1.7 2.1 1.7 2.1 4.3 5.3 4.2 5.3Missoula ........................................................... 58.4 55.8 58.3 56.1 2.7 3.8 2.6 3.7 4.5 6.9 4.4 6.6

    Nebraska ............................................................. 984.8 985.1 990.2 985.1 31.5 46.4 32.4 48.5 3.2 4.7 3.3 4.9Lincoln .............................................................. 169.0 169.4 169.4 169.9 4.9 7.4 5.1 7.8 2.9 4.3 3.0 4.6Omaha-Council Bluffs ....................................... 454.0 454.3 454.0 451.3 16.2 22.3 16.7 23.2 3.6 4.9 3.7 5.1

    Nevada . .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 1,349.5 1,404.1 1,352.0 1,390.2 72.7 144.9 74.2 146.2 5.4 10.3 5.5 10.5Carson City ....................................................... 28.3 29.7 28.4 29.5 1.8 3.4 1.8 3.3 6.5 11.3 6.5 11.3Las Vegas-Paradise ......................................... 971.8 1,013.0 975.0 1,002.9 49.6 102.3 51.1 104.1 5.1 10.1 5.2 10.4Reno-Sparks ..................................................... 225.1 228.9 224.6 226.4 13.4 25.5 13.4 25.3 5.9 11.1 6.0 11.2

    New Hampshire ................................................... 735.0 738.6 736.9 740.7 29.2 46.6 28.8 48.8 4.0 6.3 3.9 6.6Manchester ....................................................... 107.0 108.2 107.5 108.4 4.2 6.6 4.2 7.1 3.9 6.1 3.9 6.5Portsmouth ....................................................... 43.3 44.0 43.4 43.9 1.6 2.6 1.6 2.6 3.7 5.9 3.6 5.8Rochester-Dover .............................................. 83.7 84.6 84.2 84.5 3.2 5.7 3.2 5.8 3.8 6.8 3.8 6.8

    New Jersey . .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .. 4,467.1 4,494.3 4,479.7 4,527.9 228.4 393.6 226.5 391.7 5.1 8.8 5.1 8.7Atlantic City-Hammonton .................................. 133.4 134.6 134.1 135.2 9.0 15.9 8.7 15.6 6.7 11.8 6.5 11.6Ocean City ........................................................ 49.1 50.8 49.6 51.3 5.5 8.2 5.3 7.7 11.2 16.2 10.8 15.0Trenton-Ewing .................................................. 199.7 200.8 199.9 203.2 8.9 15.2 8.9 15.1 4.5 7.6 4.5 7.4Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton .............................. 69.0 70.7 69.0 70.8 5.5 9.0 5.3 8.6 7.9 12.8 7.7 12.2

    New Mexico ......................................................... 950.9 953.4 950.4 948.0 35.9 54.2 35.3 56.5 3.8 5.7 3.7 6.0Albuquerque ..................................................... 409.6 408.1 409.5 405.1 15.2 24.5 15.0 25.5 3.7 6.0 3.7 6.3Farmington ....................................................... 57.1 57.9 57.7 57.8 1.8 2.8 1.8 3.0 3.2 4.9 3.1 5.2

    Las Cruces ....................................................... 89.5 90.1 89.6 89.5 3.8 5.3 3.8 5.4 4.3 5.9 4.2 6.1Santa Fe ........................................................... 78.2 78.0 78.1 77.3 2.5 4.0 2.4 4.0 3.2 5.1 3.1 5.2

    New York . ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .. 9,581.2 9,720.4 9,608.4 9,727.1 482.6 813.9 482.3 792.0 5.0 8.4 5.0 8.1Albany-Schenectady-Troy ................................ 456.7 457.7 456.1 456.6 23.3 34.7 23.0 33.4 5.1 7.6 5.0 7.3Binghamton ...................................................... 123.7 125.3 123.9 124.9 7.1 11.2 7.0 10.8 5.7 9.0 5.7 8.6Buffalo-Niagara Falls ........................................ 581.0 583.0 581.0 583.3 36.4 55.9 35.5 53.6 6.3 9.6 6.1 9.2Elmira ............................................................... 41.2 42.2 41.2 41.9 2.3 4.2 2.2 4.1 5.5 9.8 5.4 9.7Glens Falls ........................................................ 66.5 67.3 66.1 66.9 4.3 6.7 4.1 6.3 6.5 9.9 6.3 9.4Ithaca ................................................................ 56.9 57.5 56.8 57.3 2.0 3.4 2.2 3.3 3.5 5.9 3.8 5.7Kingston ............................................................ 90.2 90.5 90.5 90.8 5.0 7.5 4.7 7.1 5.5 8.3 5.2 7.8New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island ... 9,380.0 9,501.5 9,419.6 9,537.3 439.4 778.6 443.2 768.5 4.7 8.2 4.7 8.1

    New York City .. ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .. 3 ,908.0 4,001.9 3,928.6 4,008.6 175.5 334.2 182.6 330.0 4.5 8.4 4.6 8.2Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown .............. 324.6 327.6 325.1 327.9 16.5 26.4 16.2 25.5 5.1 8.1 5.0 7.8Rochester ......................................................... 530.7 540.3 530.3 539.2 30.0 46.0 29.9 44.7 5.7 8.5 5.6 8.3Syracuse ........................................................... 329.7 336.0 329.2 334.3 18.9 29.8 18.6 28.3 5.7 8.9 5.7 8.5Utica-Rome ....................................................... 141.2 143.0 141.1 143.2 8.6 12.6 8.3 12.0 6.1 8.8 5.9 8.3

    North Carolina ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .. 4,493.8 4,555.7 4,509.3 4,526.7 241.5 511.5 237.1 494.9 5.4 11.2 5.3 10.9Asheville ........................................................... 206.7 204.4 206.9 202.7 9.2 19.7 9.0 19.0 4.5 9.6 4.3 9.4Burlington ......................................................... 70.4 70.8 70.6 70.3 3.9 8.4 3.8 8.3 5.5 11.9 5.3 11.8Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord ............................. 853.7 851.9 857.1 845.2 44.6 99.7 44.4 96.7 5.2 11.7 5.2 11.4

    Durham-Chapel Hill .......................................... 259.4 261.1 260.4 258.1 11.0 21.0 10.7 19.7 4.2 8.0 4.1 7.6Fayetteville ....................................................... 150.2 150.6 150.3 149.7 8.3 14.3 8.1 13.6 5.5 9.5 5.4 9.1Goldsboro ......................................................... 53.1 53.2 53.1 52.6 2.6 5.1 2.6 4.8 4.9 9.7 4.9 9.2Greensboro-High Point ..................................... 367.4 362.0 367.6 359.9 19.8 42.0 19.4 40.7 5.4 11.6 5.3 11.3Greenville ......................................................... 89.2 89.4 89.8 89.2 4.7 9.3 5.1 9.3 5.2 10.5 5.6 10.5Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton ................................ 171.8 175.1 172.9 172.2 11.1 27.3 10.9 26.6 6.4 15.6 6.3 15.4Jacksonville ...................................................... 61.0 62.8 61.2 62.6 3.2 5.7 3.1 5.2 5.3 9.0 5.0 8.3Raleigh-Cary ..................................................... 552.2 551.4 552.2 547.7 22.7 48.5 22.3 47.3 4.1 8.8 4.0 8.6Rocky Mount ..................................................... 70.9 71.9 71.3 71.0 4.9 10.4 5.0 10.0 6.9 14.5 7.1 14.1Wilmington ........................................................ 175.7 177.5 177.0 176.0 8.8 19.1 8.3 17.9 5.0 10.8 4.7 10.2Winston-Salem ................................................. 238.9 239.1 239.0 237.8 11.9 24.8 11.6 24.2 5.0 10.4 4.9 10.2

    See footnotes at end of table.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    10/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan areaContinued

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    North Dakota ....................................................... 361.2 364.7 363.4 365.2 12.9 18.9 13.4 18.5 3.6 5.2 3.7 5.1Bismarck ........................................................... 61.4 61.4 61.4 61.4 2.2 3.3 2.2 2.9 3.6 5.4 3.6 4.7Fargo ................................................................ 119.6 119.5 119.9 119.6 3.7 5.8 3.9 6.1 3.1 4.9 3.2 5.1Grand Forks ...................................................... 55.4 55.6 55.7 55.7 2.1 2.9 2.2 3.1 3.7 5.2 4.0 5.5

    Ohio . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 ,889.6 5 ,928.1 5,929.0 5 ,900.6 362.6 607.4 366.5 596.7 6 .2 10.2 6.2 10.1Akron ................................................................ 386.9 385.6 390.4 384.2 22.7 37.3 23.0 37.5 5.9 9.7 5.9 9.8Canton-Massillon .............................................. 203.2 205.1 204.7 204.6 13.3 22.3 13.6 22.4 6.6 10.9 6.6 11.0Cincinnati-Middletown ...................................... 1,108.5 1,113.0 1,119.3 1,111.6 59.1 99.0 59.5 99.7 5.3 8.9 5.3 9.0Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor ................................... 1,072.6 1,065.4 1,076.3 1,056.5 70.4 100.7 69.6 92.3 6.6 9.4 6.5 8.7Columbus ......................................................... 948.3 950.3 955.5 949.2 47.4 75.4 48.0 76.6 5.0 7.9 5.0 8.1Dayton .............................................................. 419.9 422.6 424.3 421.0 25.8 46.9 29.0 46.8 6.2 11.1 6.8 11.1Lima .................................................................. 50.9 52.1 51.4 52.1 3.4 6.3 3.5 6.3 6.7 12.1 6.8 12.2Mansfield .......................................................... 61.4 62.7 61.8 62.9 4.2 7.9 4.4 8.4 6.9 12.6 7.2 13.3Sandusky .......................................................... 39.9 42.7 40.8 42.3 3.1 5.7 3.4 5.2 7.7 13.4 8.2 12.3Springfield ......................................................... 70.8 71.1 71.1 71.2 4.6 7.3 4.4 7.4 6.4 10.2 6.2 10.4Toledo ............................................................... 332.2 328.7 334.6 326.1 24.3 40.7 24.4 39.5 7.3 12.4 7.3 12.1Weirton-Steubenville ........................................ 57.4 58.2 57.6 57.6 3.7 6.2 3.7 6.1 6.4 10.6 6.4 10.5Youngstown-Warren-Boardman ....................... 272.3 278.0 274.3 275.9 18.9 36.8 18.6 35.4 6.9 13.2 6.8 12.8

    Oklahoma ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .. 1,720.2 1,743.1 1,728.7 1,753.3 59.6 104.0 57.3 106.5 3.5 6.0 3.3 6.1Lawton .............................................................. 45.4 44.7 45.5 45.0 1.6 2.2 1.6 2.2 3.6 5.0 3.5 5.0Oklahoma City .................................................. 555.6 565.4 558.6 568.3 19.2 31.2 18.7 32.1 3.5 5.5 3.3 5.6Tulsa ................................................................. 434.7 442.8 434.9 445.8 15.1 27.3 14.5 28.0 3.5 6.2 3.3 6.3

    Oregon . .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 1 ,925.3 1,986.0 1,936.3 1,994.7 115.7 232.6 115.6 256.4 6.0 11.7 6.0 12.9Bend ................................................................. 80.6 85.0 80.9 86.1 6.5 13.5 6.3 14.6 8.1 15.8 7.8 17.0Corvallis ............................................................ 42.8 43.6 43.1 43.6 1.8 3.4 1.8 3.8 4.2 7.9 4.2 8.7Eugene-Springfield ........................................... 182.9 187.8 184.0 189.2 10.4 23.8 10.6 26.7 5.7 12.7 5.8 14.1Medford ............................................................ 100.5 104.9 100.9 105.2 7.4 14.5 7.6 15.6 7.3 13.8 7.6 14.8Port land-Vancouver-Beaverton ... ... ... .... ... .... ... . 1,156.8 1,189.9 1,160.8 1,190.0 61.8 126.6 61.1 140.8 5.3 10.6 5.3 11.8Salem ............................................................... 190.0 197.1 191.6 198.8 11.5 22.2 11.4 24.7 6.1 11.3 6.0 12.4

    Pennsylvania .. ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .. 6,286.5 6,392.9 6,310.8 6,382.2 333.6 527.0 326.6 524.2 5.3 8.2 5.2 8.2Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton ........................... 415.0 420.7 417.5 421.9 23.0 36.7 22.8 36.6 5.5 8.7 5.5 8.7Altoona ............................................................. 63.9 64.1 64.0 64.0 3.4 4.9 3.3 5.0 5.3 7.7 5.2 7.7Erie ................................................................... 139.2 141.3 139.1 140.8 8.3 12.2 8.2 12.4 6.0 8.7 5.9 8.8Harrisburg-Carlisle ............................................ 279.5 284.3 281.6 284.0 12.2 20.4 12.0 20.6 4.3 7.2 4.3 7.2Johnstown ........................................................ 68.2 68.8 68.4 68.9 4.3 6.0 4.2 6.1 6.3 8.8 6.1 8.9Lancaster .......................................................... 265.9 269.4 266.9 268.8 10.7 19.8 10.4 19.7 4.0 7.4 3.9 7.3Lebanon ............................................................ 71.2 72.4 71.4 72.3 3.0 5.2 2.8 5.0 4.2 7.1 3.9 6.9Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington .................... 2 ,948.3 2,984.0 2,961.1 2,984.7 145.1 239.4 143.6 240.3 4.9 8.0 4.8 8.1Pittsburgh .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .. 1,191.0 1,211.0 1,198.5 1,212.7 63.2 91.6 61.1 91.7 5.3 7.6 5.1 7.6Reading ............................................................ 201.4 205.2 202.2 204.2 10.4 18.2 10.2 18.0 5.2 8.9 5.0 8.8

    ScrantonWilkes-Barre ................................... 277.8 283.0 278.5 282.1 17.2 26.2 16.8 26.0 6.2 9.3 6.0 9.2State College .................................................... 74.4 74.9 74.8 75.1 3.1 4.3 3.1 4.4 4.2 5.8 4.2 5.8Williamsport ...................................................... 59.7 59.9 59.8 59.7 3.8 5.7 3.7 5.6 6.4 9.5 6.2 9.4York-Hanover ................................................... 223.8 229.5 225.1 228.8 10.4 18.6 10.1 18.4 4.7 8.1 4.5 8.1

    Rhode Island ....................................................... 563.9 563.4 563.9 560.2 39.0 64.0 39.4 62.3 6.9 11.4 7.0 11.1Providence-Fall River-Warwick ........................ 698.0 698.9 699.1 696.3 48.5 80.7 49.6 79.7 6.9 11.6 7.1 11.4

    South Carolina .. .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .. 2,107.2 2,171.0 2,124.1 2,171.0 121.4 247.5 116.5 243.8 5.8 11.4 5.5 11.2Anderson .......................................................... 84.7 87.2 85.1 87.5 5.1 11.0 4.9 10.4 6.0 12.6 5.8 11.9Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville ....... 311.4 320.9 313.9 319.9 14.3 28.9 13.9 29.1 4.6 9.0 4.4 9.1Columbia .......................................................... 365.6 375.5 367.2 378.2 17.6 32.6 17.5 33.4 4.8 8.7 4.8 8.8Florence ............................................................ 93.5 97.5 93.8 98.2 5.9 11.4 5.7 11.8 6.3 11.7 6.1 12.0Greenville-Mauldin-Easley ................................ 312.1 322.6 314.4 322.3 15.1 31.0 14.5 31.6 4.8 9.6 4.6 9.8Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway ...... 124.8 127.1 128.5 129.7 8.3 18.0 7.4 16.6 6.7 14.2 5.8 12.8Spartanburg ...................................................... 134.9 140.2 136.0 139.6 7.4 16.0 7.1 16.2 5.5 11.4 5.2 11.6Sumter .............................................................. 43.0 42.6 43.3 42.3 3.2 5.8 3.1 5.6 7.5 13.6 7.2 13.3

    South Dakota ...................................................... 436.6 439.8 439.5 443.6 13.4 22.5 13.7 24.0 3.1 5.1 3.1 5.4Rapid City ......................................................... 65.7 66.0 65.8 66.7 1.9 3.3 2.0 3.5 3.0 5.0 3.1 5.3Sioux Falls ........................................................ 129.2 130.1 129.1 130.8 3.5 6.3 3.7 6.7 2.7 4.8 2.9 5.1

    Tennessee .. .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .. 3,008.1 3,023.6 3,020.3 3,018.1 176.9 287.2 180.7 300.1 5.9 9.5 6.0 9.9Chattanooga ..................................................... 262.4 264.3 264.0 263.9 14.1 22.9 14.6 24.0 5.4 8.7 5.5 9.1Clarksville ......................................................... 109.3 108.2 109.5 107.5 7.1 10.8 7.1 10.5 6.5 10.0 6.5 9.8Cleveland .......................................................... 53.7 53.3 54.0 53.6 3.1 4.8 3.2 5.3 5.8 9.0 5.9 10.0Jackson ............................................................ 56.0 56.0 56.3 56.2 3.5 5.1 3.5 5.5 6.3 9.1 6.3 9.8Johnson City ..................................................... 99.4 99.4 99.7 99.2 5.5 8.5 5.6 8.9 5.6 8.5 5.6 9.0

    See footnotes at end of table.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    11/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan areaContinued

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    TennesseeContinuedKingsport-Bristol-Bristol .................................... 145.5 146.2 146.1 146.1 7.1 12.5 7.2 13.0 4.9 8.5 4.9 8.9Knoxville ........................................................... 353.4 354.8 354.0 353.1 16.9 27.9 16.9 29.0 4.8 7.9 4.8 8.2Memphis ........................................................... 608.2 613.9 610.7 612.0 37.0 54.5 38.3 56.0 6.1 8.9 6.3 9.1Morristown ........................................................ 64.5 65.5 64.8 65.9 4.3 7.7 4.2 8.4 6.6 11.8 6.5 12.7Nashville-DavidsonMurfreesboroFranklin 785.6 788.7 789.2 787.1 38.3 65.8 39.6 69.1 4.9 8.3 5.0 8.8

    Texas . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 ,533.8 11,776.4 11,577.8 11,820.1 508.6 782.6 502.8 792.0 4 .4 6 .6 4.3 6 .7Abilene .............................................................. 81.0 82.3 81.3 82.6 2.9 4.1 2.9 4.3 3.6 5.0 3.6 5.2Amarillo ............................................................. 128.3 129.0 128.3 129.2 4.2 5.8 4.1 5.7 3.3 4.5 3.2 4.4Austin-Round Rock ........................................... 859.3 877.0 859.3 881.7 32.7 55.1 32.9 54.5 3.8 6.3 3.8 6.2Beaumont-Port Arthur ....................................... 178.8 181.0 179.2 181.6 10.0 15.4 9.8 15.9 5.6 8.5 5.5 8.8Brownsville-Harlingen ....................................... 145.5 147.2 145.6 147.4 8.6 13.7 8.5 13.4 5.9 9.3 5.9 9.1College Station-Bryan ....................................... 106.0 106.6 106.4 106.6 3.7 5.2 3.7 5.2 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.8Corpus Christi ................................................... 201.1 205.0 203.5 205.7 8.7 12.3 8.5 12.7 4.3 6.0 4.2 6.2Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington .. ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... . 3,103.5 3,141.8 3,106.1 3,146.1 137.6 217.5 136.2 219.7 4.4 6.9 4.4 7.0El Paso ............................................................. 296.9 302.3 298.0 303.6 16.9 24.7 17.0 24.9 5.7 8.2 5.7 8.2Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown ......................... 2 ,737.6 2,793.5 2,747.3 2,803.0 117.7 180.5 116.2 183.5 4.3 6.5 4.2 6.5Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood ................................ 154.9 159.3 155.1 159.6 7.3 9.7 7.1 9.5 4.7 6.1 4.6 5.9Laredo .............................................................. 91.3 94.5 91.7 95.1 4.6 7.0 4.5 7.1 5.0 7.4 4.9 7.5Longview .......................................................... 106.3 109.0 107.0 109.4 4.1 6.5 4.0 6.8 3.8 6.0 3.7 6.2Lubbock ............................................................ 139.9 141.0 139.9 141.3 4.8 6.3 4.7 6.3 3.4 4.5 3.4 4.4McAllen-Edinburg-Mission ................................ 279.1 290.6 280.3 291.4 18.5 28.0 18.0 27.7 6.6 9.6 6.4 9.5Midland ............................................................. 73.6 76.4 74.0 76.8 2.0 3.0 1.9 3.3 2.7 3.9 2.6 4.3Odessa ............................................................. 68.8 73.0 69.2 73.9 2.1 3.9 2.1 4.6 3.1 5.3 3.1 6.2San Angelo ....................................................... 52.5 53.0 52.7 53.3 1.9 2.9 1.9 3.0 3.7 5.4 3.6 5.6San Antonio ...................................................... 930.3 949.8 934.9 953.3 38.6 57.1 37.8 56.5 4.1 6.0 4.0 5.9Sherman-Denison ............................................. 54.7 56.2 55.2 56.6 2.7 4.0 2.7 4.4 5.0 7.1 4.9 7.7Texarkana ......................................................... 62.5 64.1 62.8 63.8 2.8 3.7 2.7 3.5 4.5 5.7 4.2 5.5Tyler .................................................................. 96.8 100.3 97.4 100.9 4.4 6.6 4.4 6.7 4.6 6.6 4.5 6.7Victoria .............................................................. 57.2 57.8 57.7 57.9 2.1 3.4 2.0 3.6 3.6 5.9 3.5 6.2Waco ................................................................ 108.7 111.2 109.5 111.9 4.5 6.4 4.5 6.7 4.1 5.8 4.1 6.0Wichita Falls ..................................................... 72.4 72.6 72.5 72.8 3.1 4.9 3.0 4.8 4.2 6.7 4.1 6.6

    Utah ... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. 1,369.5 1,381.8 1,371.2 1,371.8 46.8 75.9 46.2 74.2 3.4 5.5 3.4 5.4Logan ................................................................ 65.7 68.0 65.7 67.5 1.8 3.0 1.9 3.0 2.8 4.4 2.9 4.4Ogden-Clearfield .............................................. 261.6 264.0 262.9 262.9 9.4 14.8 9.2 14.4 3.6 5.6 3.5 5.5Provo-Orem ...................................................... 228.8 227.2 229.0 225.6 7.6 11.8 7.8 11.5 3.3 5.2 3.4 5.1St. George ........................................................ 62.7 62.6 62.7 62.0 2.5 4.7 2.5 4.4 4.0 7.5 3.9 7.1Salt Lake City ................................................... 612.5 614.8 612.5 609.0 19.6 32.1 19.5 31.6 3.2 5.2 3.2 5.2

    Vermont ............................................................... 352.4 356.1 352.6 357.4 17.0 27.6 17.7 28.4 4.8 7.8 5.0 7.9Burlington-South Burlington .............................. 111.5 112.1 111.2 112.2 4.4 7.4 4.7 7.9 4.0 6.6 4.2 7.1

    Virginia .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .. 4,072.3 4,134.7 4,106.3 4,142.4 145.0 289.2 146.7 288.9 3.6 7.0 3.6 7.0Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford ................. 78.1 81.8 78.6 82.9 3.2 6.5 3.3 7.8 4.1 8.0 4.2 9.4Charlottesville ................................................... 106.5 106.6 107.6 106.8 3.0 6.0 3.1 6.0 2.8 5.6 2.8 5.7Danville ............................................................. 50.6 52.2 51.0 52.2 3.5 6.4 3.5 6.4 6.9 12.3 6.9 12.2Harrisonburg ..................................................... 64.9 65.7 65.6 65.4 2.1 4.3 2.1 4.2 3.2 6.6 3.1 6.4Lynchburg ......................................................... 123.2 126.0 123.9 126.8 4.5 9.4 4.6 9.6 3.7 7.5 3.7 7.6Richmond ......................................................... 645.7 646.2 650.4 648.0 23.8 50.6 24.4 50.8 3.7 7.8 3.7 7.8Roanoke ........................................................... 155.8 158.8 157.0 158.3 5.7 11.7 5.8 11.5 3.7 7.4 3.7 7.3Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News ............. 810.0 823.8 818.3 826.7 31.1 58.6 31.3 57.0 3.8 7.1 3.8 6.9Winchester ........................................................ 64.3 64.2 64.6 64.0 2.6 5.8 2.6 5.6 4.0 9.1 4.0 8.7

    Washington .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .. 3,437.8 3,551.6 3,450.4 3,544.5 181.0 324.8 174.6 344.1 5.3 9.1 5.1 9.7Bellingham ........................................................ 108.2 110.7 108.6 110.4 5.4 8.6 5.1 9.8 5.0 7.8 4.7 8.8Bremerton-Silverdale ........................................ 124.5 124.8 124.4 123.4 5.9 9.4 6.0 10.5 4.8 7.5 4.8 8.5Kennewick-Pasco-Richland .............................. 118.3 124.5 119.0 123.7 7.1 10.3 6.2 10.9 6.0 8.3 5.2 8.8Longview .......................................................... 44.1 46.0 44.3 45.5 3.4 6.4 3.3 6.7 7.8 13.9 7.4 14.8Mount Vernon-Anacortes .................................. 58.6 58.6 58.8 59.1 3.4 5.6 3.2 6.3 5.7 9.5 5.4 10.7Olympia ............................................................ 131.3 136.4 131.6 135.6 6.5 10.2 6.4 11.3 4.9 7.5 4.9 8.3Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue ................................. 1,843.8 1,900.1 1,850.1 1,896.3 79.8 161.6 80.1 167.9 4.3 8.5 4.3 8.9Spokane ........................................................... 239.0 246.6 239.4 245.3 14.7 23.3 13.5 25.6 6.1 9.5 5.6 10.4Wenatchee-East Wenatchee ............................ 58.0 60.2 58.7 60.4 3.8 5.6 3.3 6.1 6.6 9.4 5.7 10.1Yakima .............................................................. 118.1 120.2 120.6 121.0 9.4 12.2 8.4 12.6 7.9 10.1 6.9 10.4

    West Virginia ....................................................... 801.1 788.3 801.0 785.2 40.7 58.3 37.8 60.4 5.1 7.4 4.7 7.7Charleston ........................................................ 138.8 135.5 138.8 135.7 6.1 8.0 5.6 8.8 4.4 5.9 4.0 6.5Huntington-Ashland .......................................... 131.2 131.4 132.3 131.4 6.9 9.8 6.5 10.1 5.2 7.5 4.9 7.7Morgantown ...................................................... 62.7 61.8 63.0 61.8 2.2 2.8 2.1 3.0 3.6 4.5 3.4 4.8Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna ........................... 78.5 78.7 78.8 78.7 4.6 7.1 4.2 7.2 5.9 9.1 5.3 9.1Wheeling ........................................................... 68.2 68.3 68.9 68.1 4.0 5.9 3.9 5.8 5.9 8.7 5.6 8.5

    See footnotes at end of table.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    12/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan areaContinued

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State and area

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    Wisconsin ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .. 3,063.1 3,104.7 3,065.6 3,086.6 157.5 273.6 153.8 290.5 5.1 8.8 5.0 9.4Appleton ........................................................... 122.0 123.4 121.8 122.7 6.2 10.6 5.9 11.5 5.1 8.6 4.8 9.3Eau Claire ......................................................... 91.4 91.6 91.0 91.2 4.5 7.4 4.4 8.0 4.9 8.0 4.8 8.7Fond du Lac ...................................................... 54.4 56.4 54.5 56.8 2.9 5.2 2.7 5.9 5.3 9.2 5.0 10.4Green Bay ........................................................ 169.5 171.8 169.9 171.1 8.5 14.5 8.3 15.7 5.0 8.4 4.9 9.2Janesville .......................................................... 83.6 85.6 83.6 85.0 4.8 11.2 4.6 11.5 5.8 13.0 5.5 13.5La Crosse ......................................................... 75.9 76.4 76.1 75.9 3.3 5.3 3.2 5.6 4.4 7.0 4.3 7.4Madison ............................................................ 338.2 336.0 337.5 333.2 12.3 20.4 12.4 21.5 3.6 6.1 3.7 6.4Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis ..................... 800.3 797.9 801.1 788.6 38.7 65.3 38.3 70.7 4.8 8.2 4.8 9.0Oshkosh-Neenah .............................................. 93.7 95.5 93.5 94.4 4.4 7.7 4.2 7.9 4.6 8.0 4.5 8.4Racine .............................................................. 99.7 101.1 99.5 99.7 6.0 10.3 5.7 10.6 6.0 10.2 5.8 10.7Sheboygan ....................................................... 65.3 66.5 65.3 65.9 2.9 6.2 2.8 6.5 4.4 9.3 4.3 9.9Wausau ............................................................ 75.3 75.9 75.6 75.6 3.6 6.6 3.6 7.1 4.8 8.7 4.8 9.4

    Wyoming ............................................................. 287.3 289.4 290.5 289.0 9.5 13.7 10.1 15.2 3.3 4.7 3.5 5.3Casper .............................................................. 39.9 40.8 40.3 40.9 1.2 1.7 1.3 2.0 3.1 4.2 3.2 4.9Cheyenne ......................................................... 42.2 41.9 42.6 41.4 1.7 2.3 1.8 2.3 4.1 5.4 4.2 5.5

    Puerto Rico .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .. 1,374.3 1,342.0 1,361.9 1,320.4 145.4 188.8 125.5 193.8 10.6 14.1 9.2 14.7Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian ..................... 114.4 110.9 113.1 109.5 13.0 16.9 11.2 17.8 11.4 15.3 9.9 16.3Fajardo ............................................................. 28.6 28.9 28.4 28.5 3.7 4.7 3.2 4.8 13.0 16.1 11.3 16.8Guayama .......................................................... 27.4 27.2 27.1 26.7 4.1 5.2 3.6 5.3 15.0 19.1 13.3 19.7Mayaguez ......................................................... 37.5 36.5 37.1 36.0 4.3 5.8 3.7 5.9 11.6 15.8 10.1 16.3Ponce ............................................................... 91.4 89.6 90.6 89.0 9.9 13.0 8.6 13.3 10.8 14.5 9.5 15.0San German-Cabo Rojo ................................... 52.6 51.8 51.9 51.0 5.7 8.0 5.0 8.1 10.9 15.4 9.7 15.9San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo ........................... 921.1 900.2 916.1 884.8 92.0 118.2 79.2 121.0 10.0 13.1 8.6 13.7Yauco ............................................................... 40.2 39.4 39.0 39.0 5.2 6.7 4.6 6.6 13.0 17.0 11.7 17.1

    1 Area boundaries do not reflect official OMB definitions.p = preliminary.NOTE: Data refer to place of residence. Data for Puerto Rico are derived from a

    monthly household survey similar to the Current Population Survey. Areadefinitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 09-01,dated November 20, 2008, and are available on the BLS Web site athttp://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm. Areas in the six New England states are

    Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs), while areas in otherstates are county-based. Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. Theyare listed under the state that appears first in their titles. Davenport-Moline-RockIsland, Iowa-Ill., and Weirton-Steubenville, W.Va.-Ohio, are the exceptions in thatthey are listed under Illinois and Ohio, respectively, for operational reasons.Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month.

  • 8/14/2019 METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT: MARCH 2009

    13/20

    LABOR FORCE DATA LABOR FORCE DATANOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    Table 2. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state, selected metropolitan area, and metropolitan division 1

    (Numbers in thousands)

    State, area, and division

    Civilian labor forceUnemployed

    Number Percent of labor force

    Feb. March Feb. MarchFeb. March

    2008 2009 2008 2009p 2008 2009 2008 2009p2008 2009 2008 2009p

    California .............................................................. 18,180.9 18,556.7 18,244.8 18,580.9 1,130.6 2,037.2 1,178.4 2,131.2 6.2 11.0 6.5 11.5Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana ... ... ... .... ... ... 6,582.5 6,611.3 6,596.7 6,612.1 361.9 674.7 380.6 701.7 5.5 10.2 5.8 10.6

    Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale ... ... ... .... ... ... 4,953.6 4,974.0 4,963.2 4,968.7 292.1 544.3 307.1 562.1 5.9 10.9 6.2 11.3Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine ................................ 1 ,628.9 1,637.3 1,633.5 1,643.4 69.8 130.4 73.5 139.6 4.3 8.0 4.5 8.5

    San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont .. ... ... .... ... .... ... ... 2,238.5 2,290.6 2,246.6 2,293.8 104.5 203.9 110.6 217.1 4.7 8.9 4.9 9.5Oakland-Fremont-Hayward ............................... 1,281.5 1,311.1 1,285.2 1,314.1 65.4 126.6 69.0 134.1 5.1 9.7 5.4 10.2San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City ......... 957.0 979.5 961.4 979.7 39.1 77.3 41.6 83.0 4.1 7.9 4.3 8.5

    District of Columbia .......................................... 329.3 330.4 332.7 326.0 18.4 33.3 20.6 30.9 5.6 10.1 6.2 9.5Washington-Arlington-Alexandria2 ...................... 2,992.9 3,007.5 3,012.3 3,001.2 95.9 183.0 98.1 177.6 3.2 6.1 3.3 5.9

    Bethesda-Frederick-Rockville 3 ......................... 633.1 632.8 634.8 632.6 17.9 34.2 17.4 32.9 2.8 5.4 2.7 5.2Washington-Arlington-Alexandria2 ................... 2,359.8 2,374.7 2,377.5 2,368.6 77.9 148.8 80.7 144.7 3.3 6.3 3.4 6.1

    Florida .. .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... . 9,102.8 9,194.1 9,161.9 9,174.9 438.0 872.9 460.0 874.4 4.8 9.5 5.0 9.5Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach .............. 2,819.3 2,823.8 2,827.0 2,813.1 128.2 236.0 135.7 239.7 4.5 8.4 4.8 8.5

    Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-DeerfieldBeach ............................................................. 997.5 998.5 1,004.1 999.3 40.9 83.9 43.4 85.0 4.1 8.4 4.3 8.5

    Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall .............................. 1,202.7 1,196.3 1,197.4 1,185.0 56.5 90.3 59.5 92.2 4.7 7.6 5.0 7.8West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach 619.1 629.1 625.5 628.8 30.9 61.7 32.8 62.4 5.0 9.8 5.2 9.9

    Illinois .. .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... . 6,692.5 6,565.5 6,696.2 6,543.3 403.9 606.2 395.0 612.7 6.0 9.2 5.9 9.4Chicago-Naperville-Joliet 2 ................................... 4,926.3 4,838.5 4,926.6 4,834.9 280.4 443.2 278.1 456.9 5.7 9.2 5.6 9.4

    Chicago-Naperville-Joliet . ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... 4,145.0 4,057.0 4,140.2 4,059.6 231.7 366.2 231.1 378.8 5.6 9.0 5.6 9.3

    Gary3

    ................................................................ 329.0 334.4 331.4 333.6 19.2 33.5 18.5 35.1 5.8 10.0 5.6 10.5Lake County-Kenosha County 2 ........................ 452.3 447.0 455.1 441.7 29.5 43.6 28.5 42.9 6.5 9.8 6.3 9.7

    Massachusetts ................................................... 3,390.0 3,404.2 3,400.1 3,404.5 164.9 282.6 166.4 279.6 4.9 8.3 4.9 8.2Boston-Cambridge-Quincy2 ................................ 2,481.6 2,485.6 2,487.1 2,485.6 107.1 184.9 107.4 183.7 4.3 7.4 4.3 7.4

    Boston-Cambridge-Quincy ................................ 1,503.0 1,501.7 1,505.7 1,501.4 60.3 104.3 60.3 102.7 4.0 6.9 4.0 6.8Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton ............................ 124.3 124.4 124.9 124.4 6.8 11.6 6.9 11.4 5.5 9.3 5.5 9.2Framingham ...................................................... 146.6 147.3 146.9 147.5 5.6 9.6 5.6 9.6 3.8 6.5 3.8 6.5Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury 2 ................ 120.0 120.5 120.6 120.4 5.7 9.8 5.7 9.9 4.8 8.1 4.8 8.2Lawrence-Methuen-Salem 2 .............................. 69.0 70.7 69.3 70.9 4.9 8.5 5.0 8.7 7.2 12.1 7.3 12.2Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford 2 ............................ 151.7 153.1 151.9 152.9 7.4 13.2 7.4 13.2 4.8 8.6 4.9 8.7Nashua 2 ........................................................... 178.0 178.3 178.5 178.3 7.0 11.4 6.9 11.8 3.9 6.4 3.9 6.6Peabody ............................................................ 126.1 126.4 126.3 126.4 5.9 10.5 6.0 10.5 4.7 8.3 4.8 8.3Taunton-Norton-Raynham ................................. 62.9 63.3 63.2 63.3 3.4 5.9 3.5 5.9 5.4 9.4 5.5 9.3

    Michigan . ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... . 4,925.0 4,821.9 4,932.6 4,819.6 373.7 613.9 388.2 644.2 7.6 12.7 7.9 13.4Det roit-Warren-Livonia ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... 2 ,098.3 2,073.1 2,106.7 2,068.9 157.2 282.1 168.3 290.3 7.5 13.6 8.0 14.0

    Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn ................................... 861.9 859.7 867.0 857.7 71.7 125.5 77.1 127.6 8.3 14.6 8.9 14.9Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills .... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... 1,236.4 1,213.4 1,239.7 1,211.2 85.5 156.6 91.3 162.8