medusa for egnos sol coverage across euromed january ...galileo.cs.telespazio.it/medusa/public/final...

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 1/26

Recommendations on priorities for the EGNOS SoL geographical coverage needs

across the Euromed region

Prepared by Antonella Di Fazio, MEDUSA project coordinator, email: [email protected]

Background

Further to the requests from the Euromed countries in relation to SoL coverage provision expressed during

the 6th Euromed GNSS WG meeting (Brussels 25 September 2013) and also in occasion of the vis-à-vis

discussions with the countries in the frame of the MEDUSA national workshops, MEDUSA has been

requested by the European Commission to provide recommendations concerning the priorities for EGNOS

SoL geographical coverage of the Euromed countries.

Outcomes

The recommendations are given in the form of three priorities, outlined by the MEDUSA project upon the

criterion to cope with the needs of the Euromed countries for EGNOS SoL coverage, to be possibly used in

the definition of a roadmap for EGNOS SoL service coverage across the Euromed region.

It should be pointed out that EGNOS SoL service coverage is considered from the aviation needs

perspective, and thus in relation to the need to serve a specific airdrome area, meaning that a certain

country do not necessarily need to have the coverage across the whole country territory (naturally in most

of the cases, EGNOS SoL coverage availability over aerodromes ensures EGNOS OS available over a larger

area).

Thus the priorities are defined in terms of the airports of the countries for which EGNOS SoL coverage has

to be ensured in order to allow LPV operations.

Methodology

As above mentioned, these recommendations have been derived by the MEDUSA project considering the

needs of the Euromed countries for EGNOS SoL coverage.

The three priorities are based on the outcomes of the MEDUSA project’s activities, in terms of:

• The inputs of the Euromed countries.

The delegates officially nominated to represent the civil aviation domain for each beneficiary country

have been asked to select their priority aerodromes, featuring favourable conditions for the

implementation of SBAS based APCH procedures (in terms of achievable benefits and/or strategic

reasons).

• The countries’ maturity with respect to the introduction of RNP and specifically LPV operations in terms

of awareness, strategy, stakeholders’ readiness, institutional framework.

• The four necessary phases of the implementation path to be accomplished by countries for the

introduction of LPV operations. As outlined by MEDUSA, such phases are:

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 2/26

1. Getting the necessary knowledge about EGNOS use and understanding/evaluating the relevant

benefits (for all beneficiary countries, but for Libya, this has been done with the support of the

METIS project);

2. Outlining a strategy/triggering the decision-making process in relation to the operational

introduction/adoption of EGNOS (for all the countries including Libya, this is on-going with the aid

of MEDUSA through specific assistance actions);

3. Establishing a bilateral International Agreement between the State and European

Union/Commission (in the frame of MEDUSA, a few countries have already issued an official

request to EC to start this institutional phase);

4. Negotiating and signing a “Letter of Agreement” (EGNOS Working Agreement EWA-like) between

the country’s relevant aviation body and ESSP providing a framework for the exchange of

information regarding SBAS status and performance (one of the technical assistance actions

undertaken by MEDUSA aims at the definition of the “SES regulatory equivalence” on which this

“Letter of Agreement” will be based).

Recommendations

In the following the three priorities are briefly reported, the rationales for the countries/airports

ranking/selection among the different priorities are detailed in the annex 1 to this letter country by

country.

As before detailed, the priorities are derived in terms of the airports on which EGNOS SoL coverage has to

be ensured. Thus for each priority, the list of identified airports per country is provided, with relevant

information:

• Country

• Airport/ICAO code

• RWY (runway)

• ARP (Airport Reference Point, i.e. the coordinates of the airports)

• ID (in the maps included in the annex 2 to give a quick geographical view).

Priority one (ivory)

• North Africa:

− Algeria - selected airports in the North of the country.

− Libya - selected airports in the North of the country;

− Morocco - selected airports in the North of the country;

− Tunisia - all airports;

• Middle East:

− Israel - all airports;

− Lebanon - all airports (the country has only 1 airport/Beirut).

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 3/26

COUNTRY AIRPORT/ICAO CODE RWY ID (map)

ARP

Airport Reference

Point

Algeria BEJAIA-Soummam-Abane

Ramdane/DAAE

RWY 08

DZA-2 36.7119 N 5.0694 E

RWY 26

Algeria ALGER-Houari Boumediene/DAAG

RWY 05

DZA-1 36.6944 N 3.2164 E

RWY 23

RWY 09

RWY 27

Algeria CONSTANTINE-Mohamed

Boudiaf/DABC

RWY 14

DZA-4 36.28527 N 6.6181 E

RWY 32

RWY 16

RWY 34

Algeria SETIF 8 MAI 45/DAAS RWY 09 DZA-3 36.1786 N 5.3300 E


ARP

Airport Reference

Point

Israel HAIFA/LLHA*

RWY 16

ISR-3 32.8083 N 35.0428 E

RWY 34

Israel TEL AVIV SDE DOV/LLSD

RWY 03

ISR-4 32.1142 N 34.7819 E

RWY 21

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 4/26

Israel TEL AVIV BEN-GURION/LLBG

RWY 08

ISR-1 32.0094 N 34.8828 E

RWY 26

RWY 12

RWY 30

RWY 21

Israel JERUSALEM/LLJR

RWY 12

ISR-6 31.864722 N

35.219167 E RWY 30

Israel OVDA/LLOV

RWY 03 L

ISR-5 29.9402 N 34.9358 E

RWY 03 R

RWY 21 R

RWY 21 L

Israel EILAT/LLET

RWY 03

ISR-2 29.5583 N 34.9589 E

RWY 21


ARP

Airport Reference

Point

Lebanon Beirut Rafic Hariri/OLBA

RWY 16

LBN-1 33.8074 N 35.4860 E

RWY 17

RWY 03

RWY 21

COUNTRY AIRPORT/ICAO CODE RWY ID

(map)

ARP

Airport Reference Point

Libya Tripoli Mitiga/HLLM RWY 11/29 LBY-2 32.894085 N 13.27600 E

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 5/26

Libya El Beida-Labraq/HLLQ

RWY 13/21

LBY-6 32.788673 N 21.964333 E

RWY 06/24

Libya Tripoli International/HLLT

RWY 09/27

LBY-1 32.668922 N 13.148316 E

RWY 18/36

Libya Misurata/HLMS RWY 15/33 LBY-4 32.325 N 15.061 E

Libya Benghazi Benina/HLLB

RWY

15L/33R

LBY-3 32.096786 N 20.269472 E

RWY

15L/33R

Libya Sirte-Ghardabiya INT/HLGD RWY 18/36 LBY-5 31.063457 N 16.595005 E

Libya Zuetinia/HLZU RWY 06/24 LBY-8 30.8700 N 20.0750 E

Libya Marsa Brega/HLMB RWY 15/33 LBY-7 30.378139 N 19.576444 E

COUNTRY AIRPORT/ICAO CODE RWY ID (map) ARP


Morocco Tetouan/GMTN RWY 06/24 MAR-1 35.5944 N 5.3200 W

Morocco Al-Hoceima/GMTA RWY 17/35 MAR-2 35.1797 N 3.8400 W

Morocco Nador El Aroui/GMMW RWY 08/26 MAR-3 34.9894 N 3.0278 W

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 6/26



Tunisia Tabark Ain

Draham/DTKA

RWY 09

TUN-4 36.9800 N 8.8769 E

RWY 27

Tunisia Tunis Carthage/DTTA

RWY 01

TUN-3 36.8511 N 10.2269 E

RWY 19

RWY 11

RWY 29

Tunisia Enfidha-

Hammamet/DTNH

RWY 09

TUN-2 36.0758 N 10.4386 E

RWY 27

Tunisia Monastir/DTMB

RWY 07

TUN-1 35.7581 N 10.7547 E

RWY 25

Tunisia Sfax Thyna/DTTX

RWY 15

TUN-5 34.7206 N 10.6886 E

RWY 33

Tunisia Gafsa/DTTF

RWY 05

TUN-6 34.4156 N 8.8136 E

RWY 23

Tunisia Tozeur Nefta/DTTZ

RWY 09

TUN-9 33.9397 N 8.1106 E

RWY 27

Tunisia Djerba Zarzis/DTTJ

RWY 09

TUN-7 33.8756 N 10.7772 E

RWY 27

Tunisia Gabes Matmata/DTTG

RWY 06

TUN-8 33.7325 N 9.9161 E

RWY 24

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 7/26

Priority two (yellow)

• North Africa:

− Algeria - selected airports located up to the mid of the country;

− Egypt - selected airports located up to the mid of the country;

− Libya - selected airports located up to the mid of the country;

− Morocco - remaining airports;

• Middle East:

− Jordan King Hussein Airport.



Algeria ANNABA-Rabah Bitat/DABB

RWY 05

DZA-7 36.8222 N 7.8094 E

RWY 23

RWY 01

RWY 19

Algeria BATNA-Mostepha Ben

BOULAID/DABT

RWY 05

DZA-8 35.7591 N 6.3225 E

RWY 23

Algeria ORAN-Ahmed

Benbella/DAOO

RWY 07 L

DZA-6 35.6272 N 0.6113 W

RWY 25 R

RWY 07R

RWY 25 L

Algeria GHARDAIA-Noumérat-

Moufdi Zakaria/DAUG

RWY 18

DZA-12 32.381667 N 3.7994 E

RWY 36

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 8/26

RWY 12

RWY 30

Algeria HASSI MESSAOUD-Oued

Irara-Krim Belkacem/DAUH

RWY 18

DZA-9 31.67386 N 6.1405 E

RWY 36

Algeria BECHAR-Boudghene Ben Ali

Lotfi/DAOR

RWY 18/36

DZA-11 31.6505 N 2.2531 W

RWY 06/24

Algeria ZARZAITINE-In

Aménas/DAUZ

RWY 05

DZA-15 28.0513 N 9.6427 E

RWY 23

RWY 14

RWY 32

Algeria ADRAR-Touat-Cheikh Sidi

Mohamed Belkebir/DAUA

RWY 22

DZA-14 27.8391 N 0.185278 W

RWY 04

Algeria TINDOUF/DAOUF

RWY 26 L

DZA-10 27.7000 N 8.1666 W

RWY 08 R

RWY 26R

RWY 08 L

COUNTRY AIRPORT/

ICAO CODE RWY ID (map)

ARP


Egypt Mersa Matruh/HEMM RWY 06/24 EGY-8 31.32553 N 27.22168 E

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 9/26

RWY 15/33

Egypt Port Said/HEPS RWY 10/28 EGY-3 31.27944 N 32.2400 E

Egypt Alexandria/HEAX

RWY 04/22

EGY-4 31.183903 N 29.94888 E

RWY 18/36

Egypt Al Alamain/HEAL RWY 13/31 EGY-9 30.92445 N 28.46143 E

Egypt Cairo International/HECA

RWY 05 C

EGY-1 30.1114 N 31.4139 E

RWY 23 C

Egypt El Tor/HETR RWY 10/28 EGY-10 28.20902 N 33.64551 E

Egypt Sharm-Elsheikh/HESH

RWY 04 L

EGY-2 27.9786 N 34.3933 E

RWY 22 R

Egypt Luxor/HELX RWY 02/20 EGY-13 25.67102 N 32.70658 E

Egypt Marsa Alam/HEMA RWY 15/33 EGY-5 25.55711 N 34.5837 E



Jordan King Hussein Airport/OJAQ RWY01/19 JOR-3 29.6116 N 35.0181 E



Libya Zwara/HLZW RWY 06/24 LBY-11 32.952269 N 12.015469 E

Libya Ghadames/HLTD

RWY 06/24

LBY-10 30.151695 N 9.715305 E

RWY 01/19

Libya Dahra/HLRA RWY 15/33 LBY-9 29.472567 N 17.934936 E

Libya Nafoora/HLNR RWY 15/33 LBY-17 29.213194 N 21.592356 E

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 10/26

Libya Hon/HLON RWY 13/31 LBY-16 29.1101 N 15.9656 E

Libya Bu Attifel/HLFL RWY 16/34 LBY-18 28.7954 N 22.0809 E

Libya Giallo/HLGL

RWY 18/36

LBY-19 28.638458 N 21.438042 E

RWY 09/27

Libya Sebha/HLLS

RWY 13/21

LBY-14 26.986964 N 14.472525 E

RWY 06/24

Libya Ubari/HLUB RWY 09/27 LBY-13 26.5674 N 12.8231 E



Morocco Oujda/GMFO RWY 06/24 MAR-4 34.7871 N 1.9239 W

Morocco Rabat/GMME RWY 03/21 MAR-5 34.051467 N 6.751518 W

Morocco Fez Sais/GMFF RWY 09/27 MAR-6 33.9272 N 4.9779 W

Morocco Casablanca Mohammed

V/GMMN RWY 17/35 MAR-7 33.367467 N 7.5899 W

Morocco Bouarfa/GMFB RWY 09/27 MAR-8 32.516111 N 1.9783 W

Morocco Marrakech/GMMX RWY 16/34 MAR-9 31.60686 N 8.036299 W

Morocco Ouarzarzate/GMMZ RWY 12/30 MAR-11 30.9390 N 6.909430 W

Morocco Agadir Al Masira/GMAD RWY 10/28 MAR-10 30.3249 N 9.4130 W

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 11/26

Morocco Zagora/GMAZ RWY 11/29 MAR-12 30.2642 N 5.8544 W

Morocco Tan Tan/GMAT RWY 03/21 MAR-13 28.4481 N 11.1613 W

Priority three (orange)

• North Africa:

− Algeria - remaining airports in the South of the country;

− Egypt - remaining airports in the South of the country;

− Libya - remaining airports in the South of the country;

• Middle East:

− Jordan - remaining airports;

− Syria - all airports.

It should be pointed out that no sound plan can be done for Palestine today.


ARP

Airport Reference

Point

Algeria ILLIZI-Takhamalt/DAAP

RWY 09

DZA-13 26.7236 N 8.6177 E

RWY 27

Algeria TAMANRASSET-Aguenar-Hadj Bey

Akhamok/DAAT

RWY 02

DZA-5 22.8111 N 5.4508 E

RWY 20

RWY 08

RWY 26

COUNTRY AIRPORT/

ICAO CODE RWY ID (map)

ARP

Airport Reference

Point

Egypt Dakhla/HEDK RWY 15/33 EGY-11 25.4116 N 29.0030 E

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 12/26

Egypt Aswan/HESN RWY 17/35 EGY-6 23.96435 N 32.81997 E

Egypt Sharq El Oweinat/HEOW RWY 01/19 EGY-12 22.58567 N 28.71664 E

Egypt Abu Simbel/HEBL RWY 15/33 EGY-7 22.37595 N 31.61172 E


ARP

Airport Reference

Point

Jordan Amman Marka Airport/OJAM RWY

24/06 JOR-2 31.9727 N 35.9916 E

Jordan Queen Alia International

Airport/OJAI

RWY

26L/08R JOR-1 31.7226 N 35.9932 E

RWY

26R/08L

COUNTRY AIRPORT/ICAO CODE RWY ID

(map)

ARP


Libya Ghat/HLGT

RWY 17/35

LBY-12 25.145564 N 10.142647 E

RWY 06/24

Libya Kufra-Al-Jawf/HLFK

RWY 02L/20R

LBY-15 24.178728 N 23.313958 E

RWY 02R/20L



Syria Kameshli/OSKL RWY 03/21 SYR-5 37.020625 N 41.191394 E

Syria Aleppo/OSAP RWY 09/27 SYR-2 36.180675 N 37.2243587 E

Syria Latakia- Bassel al Assad

International/OSLK RWY 17/35 SYR-4 35.401094 N 35.948681 E

Syria Deir Zzor-Al Jafrah/OSDZ RWY 10/28 SYR-3 35.285374 N 40.175961 E

Syria Palmyra/OSPR RWY 08/26 SYR-6 34.5573615 N 38.316889 E

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 13/26

Syria Damascus/OSDI RWY 05L/23R SYR-1 33.410636 N 36.514267 E

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 14/26

Annex 1 – Rationales for the countries/airports ranking/selection among the

different priorities

North Africa

Tunisia

Tunisia is showing the highest level of maturity (among the Euromed countries) in relation to the

operational adoption of EGNOS in aviation, in terms of interest/strategy and commitment. The country

intends to start soon:

• The elaboration of the PBN Plan, envisaging the widespread use of GNSS and particularly of EGNOS;

• The official path towards the bilateral International Agreement with the European Union/Commission

(a cooperation agreement between EU and Tunisia in the field of satellite navigation is already in place

since October 2012).

EGNOS SoL coverage is already available today in a few airports located in the North of Tunisia. Benefitting

from the support of MEDUSA, Tunisia is already evaluating the necessary steps for the publication of RNP

APCH procedures specifically for the Monastir airport, where the today’s EGNOS coverage makes feasible

the implementation of EGNOS based operations, in particular LPV approach procedures (i.e. EGNOS SoL

service performances, with regards to the APV-I performance requirements, are sufficient to enable the

implementation of EGNOS based operations in line with ICAO prescriptions).

Thanks to this, MEDUSA has selected Tunisia as the study case for the analysis and definition of the “SES

regulatory equivalence”, to act as a basis for the EGNOS Working Agreement for non-EU/Euromed

countries (as afore specified in point 4). Thus it is expected that the Tunisia’s example will drive the process

for the implementation of LPV operations in the whole region.

Morocco

Also Morocco shows a high level of maturity in relation to the operational adoption of EGNOS in aviation. A

cooperation agreement between EU and Morocco in the field of satellite navigation is already in place since

December 2006.

The country has already a good technical experience in relation to SBAS use gathered from EU projects

(such as in procedure design, flights validation), and moreover the present PBN Plan duly considers the use

of GNSS and EGNOS.

In the frame of MEDUSA, Morocco is actively following the activities related to the implementation of

EGNOS-based (i.e. LPV) operations together with Tunisia. In particular, Morocco is tightly looking at the

Tunisia’s example though for the moment there is not the intention to make an official step.

Considering these points, the country needs and the geographical layout, MEDUSA foresees the

deployment of EGNOS SoL coverage across Morocco in two phases:

• In the first phase (priority one), ensuring EGNOS SoL coverage on a few airports in the North of the

country that have been selected by the country delegates;

• In the second phase (priority two), completing EGNOS SoL coverage on the remaining airports.

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 15/26

In this way, the country can follow a gradual approach towards LPV operations, firstly in the airports in the

North in order to build the basis for a suitable decision-making process (also benefitting from the Tunisia’s

example) and then to possibly extend to all airports.

Algeria

Algeria is very promising for the implementation of SBAS based APCH procedures, in terms of possible

benefits thanks to the traffic, typology of aerodromes with favourable conditions, etc.

Yet, the country shows some difficulties primarily in the decision-making process, that slackens the path

towards LPV operations.

Despite this, in the frame of MEDUSA, the country has shown interest towards EGNOS and it has also

expressed its needs in relation to airports expected to benefit a lot from EGNOS introduction. Moreover,

some important progresses have been made by the country, one of the main triggering factors being the

example of neighbouring countries (such as Tunisia and Morocco).


deployment of EGNOS SoL coverage across Algeria in three phases:


country that have been selected by the country delegates (with the exception of the airport of

Tamanrasset that has not been considered, though included in the list of the airports selected by the

Algerian delegates, due to its position in the far Southern part of the country);

• In the second phase (priority two), extending EGNOS SoL coverage on the airports located up to the

mid of the country;

• In the third phase (priority three), completing EGNOS SoL coverage on the remaining airports in the

South part of the country (including the airport of Tamanrasset).

In this way, the country can follow a gradual approach towards LPV operations, starting from the North

while benefitting from the experience of the neighbouring countries to possible support/facilitate the

decision-making process.

Libya

Libya has a scenario for EGNOS similar to Algeria.

The country has started in being involved in EGNOS initiatives only recently in the frame of MEDUSA (Libya

was not included in the Euromed GNSS I/METIS), and thus has to recover this gap in terms of knowhow,

awareness, benefits evaluation, etc.

In the frame of MEDUSA, the country has expressed interest towards EGNOS and a strong commitment to

learn and swiftly implement the necessary steps, including the official ones.

Libya is about to launch the elaboration of the PBN Plan soon and it is expected to duly consider GNSS and

EGNOS.

Considering these points and the country geographical layout, MEDUSA foresees the deployment of EGNOS

SoL coverage across Libya in three phases:

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 16/26


country that have been selected as showing favourable conditions to give the country the opportunity

to becoming familiar with LPV operations and validate the relevant benefits;

• In the second phase (priority two), extending EGNOS SoL coverage on the airports located up to the

mid of the country;

• In the third phase (priority three), completing EGNOS SoL coverage on the remaining airports in the

South part of the country.

In this way, Libya can follow a gradual approach towards LPV operations, aimed at recovering the gap for

not being involved in METIS and gathering the necessary knowledge (also benefitting from the experience

of the neighbouring countries), so that to be ready for the operational introduction of LPV in the whole

country.

Egypt

Egypt belongs to both the North Africa and the Middle East areas of the Euromed region.

Although Egypt is one of the Euromed countries involved since the beginning and the aviation community is

extremely interested to EGNOS, presently the country suffers from the lack of the necessary commitment

at institutional level that is required for the introduction of EGNOS operations (as above detailed in points 3

and 4).

Egypt has almost completed the elaboration of the PBN Plan envisaging the widespread use of GNSS.

MEDUSA has gathered the needs of the aviation community in relation to airports expected to benefit a lot

from EGNOS introduction.


deployment of EGNOS SoL coverage across Egypt in two phases, starting from the priority two:

• In the priority two, ensuring EGNOS SoL coverage on the airports up to the mid of the country, also

including those selected by the Egyptian aviation community;

• In the priority three, extending EGNOS SoL coverage on the remaining airports in the South part of the

country.

In this way, Egypt can develop the preparatory actions necessary for LPV operations, to be ready when

EGNOS SoL will be available across the country for the possible relevant smooth adoption.

Middle East

Israel

Israel has very favourable conditions for EGNOS use, for:

• Technical maturity, awareness and know-how;

• Promising aerodromes for the implementation of SBAS based APCH procedures;

• Present PBN Plan, considering GNSS (and to be updated envisaging also EGNOS as recommended by

the working groups in the frame of the BLUE MED FAB project)

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 17/26

• Institutional framework and commitment (Israel has already a cooperation agreement with EU in the

field of satellite navigation, and additionally the country has also officially made the request to start the

necessary institutional process , Israel is actively involved in the BLUE MED FAB project).

For the above reasons, also considering the country needs and the geographical layout, ensuring EGNOS

SoL coverage across Israel is considered as a priority one (also in coherence with the BLUE MED FAB that

has relation with Israel and Lebanon).

Lebanon

Despite the low level of know-how and awareness, Lebanon is a good candidate in the area for the

introduction of LPV operations:

• The airport of Beirut has a very promising scenario for EGNOS;

• The country aviation community is extremely interested;

• The country has the necessary institutional commitment (Lebanon has also officially made the request

to EC to start the necessary institutional step).

As above mentioned, the country does not show a sound technical maturity, but the Lebanese aviation

community is concretely demonstrating a strong interest to learn and to consider GNSS and EGNOS in their

PBN Plan to be drafted.

Additionally, Lebanon is bordering the BLUE MED FAB airspace.

For the above reasons, also considering the country needs and the geographical layout, ensuring EGNOS

SoL coverage across Lebanon is considered as a priority one. This enables the country to develop the

preparatory actions necessary for LPV operations, to be ready when EGNOS SoL will be available, and in

parallel also to possibly foster Lebanon higher involvement in all BLUE MED activities.

Jordan

Jordan has the necessary technical maturity, awareness and know-how in relation to GNSS and EGNOS. Yet,

due to the requests of the country airspace users (primarily the national carrier) and the perspective of

EGNOS coverage due to the country geographical position, the interest of the country towards EGNOS is

limited:

• Mainly for foreign aircrafts;

• For one airport (i.e. the King Hussein Airport in Aquaba), while for the remaining two airports the use of

GBAS is presently under evaluation;

• To be used in the long-term.

The country is presently developing a PBN Plan considering the use of GNSS and also assisted GNSS, at first

primarily GBAS and EGNOS in the perspective of the necessary service coverage.


deployment of EGNOS SoL coverage across Jordan in two phases, starting from the priority two:

• In the priority two, ensuring EGNOS SoL coverage on the King Hussein Airport in Aquaba;

• In the priority three, extending EGNOS SoL coverage on the remaining airports.

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 18/26

Syria

Due to the present political situation, the only realistic recommendation that can be given is to include

EGNOS SoL coverage across Syria as a priority three.

Annex 2

This annex includes the countries maps showing the geographical pos

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 19/26

Annex 2 - Countries/airports maps

This annex includes the countries maps showing the geographical position of the airports.ition of the airports.

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 20/26

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 21/26

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 22/26

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 23/26

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 24/26

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 25/26

Date: 21/01/2014

Page: 26/26

medusa for egnos sol coverage across euromed january ...galileo.cs.telespazio.it/medusa/public/final...

Documents