mechanisms of cx43 and cx26 transport to the plasma … · 2005. 9. 13. · cx26, cells were...

IntroductionGap junctions are specialized intercellular channels that allowfor the direct transfer of small signaling and regulatorymolecules between contacting cells (Saez et al., 2003). Theprotein subunits of gap junctions are encoded by the connexin(Cx) gene family and six connexin proteins oligomerize into ahexameric structure called a connexon or hemichannel.Connexons are transported to the plasma membrane and pairwith connexons from contacting cells to form gap junctionchannels (Saez et al., 2003). When channels cluster at the cellsurface into tightly packed arrays, they form a gap junction orgap junction plaque (Saez et al., 2003). Many cell types andtissues are known to express more than one of the 20 membersof the connexin family (Willecke et al., 2002) and all connexinsshare common characteristics in regard to their topology andchannel forming ability (Saez et al., 2003).

Connexins are co-translationally inserted into theendoplasmic reticulum (ER), although cell-free studiesrevealed that Cx26 and Cx43 can also post-translationallyinsert into ER membranes (Ahmad et al., 1999; Zhang et al.,1996), and one report suggests that Cx26 can even directly

insert into plasma membranes (Ahmad and Evans, 2002). It iswell documented that Cx43 and Cx46 oligomerize intoconnexons in compartments that include the TGN (Koval et al.,1997; Musil and Goodenough, 1993), while others have foundevidence that supports Cx32 and Cx26 oligomerizationoccurring primarily within ER membranes (Falk et al., 1997;Falk and Gilula, 1998; Falk et al., 1994). Additional studies inwhich aequorin- or GFP-tagged Cx26 trafficking exhibitedinsensitivity to brefeldin A (BFA) suggested that Cx26 maybypass the Golgi apparatus en route to the cell surface (Evanset al., 1999; George et al., 1999; George et al., 1998b; Martinet al., 2001). These same studies also reported that Cx26transport was sensitive to nocodazole whereas Cx32 and Cx43transport were not. Consequently, it has been proposed thatCx26 has transport and assembly properties that are distinctfrom other connexins. Additionally, fluorescent-protein-taggedCx43 and Cx26 were found to both segregate into sub-domainsand intermix within the same gap junction plaques (Falk,2000). Furthermore, Cx43 and Cx26 do not form heteromericconnexons (Gemel et al., 2004), which reflects possible distinctdifferences in the assembly of connexin isotypes. Nevertheless,

4451

Previous reports have suggested that Cx26 exhibits uniqueintracellular transport pathways en route to the cell surfacecompared with other members of the connexin family. Todirectly examine and compare nascent and steady-statedelivery of Cx43 and Cx26 to the plasma membrane andgap junction biogenesis we expressed fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx43 and Cx26 in BICR-M1Rk and NRK cells.Static and time-lapse imaging revealed that both connexinswere routed through the Golgi apparatus prior to beingtransported to the cell surface, a process inhibited in thepresence of brefeldin A (BFA) or the expression of adominant-negative form of Sar1 GTPase. During recoveryfrom BFA, time-lapse imaging of nascent connexin Golgi-to-plasma membrane delivery revealed many dynamicpost-Golgi carriers (PGCs) originating from the distal sideof the Golgi apparatus consisting of heterogeneous vesiclesand long, tubular-like extensions. Vesicles and tubularextensions were also observed in HBL-100 cells expressinga human, disease-linked, Golgi-localized Cx26 mutant,D66H-GFP. A diffuse cell surface rim of fluorescent-protein-tagged wild-type connexins was observed prior tothe appearance of punctate gap junctions, which suggests

that random fusion of PGCs occurred with the plasmamembrane followed by lateral diffusion of connexins intoclusters. Fluorescence recovery after photobleachingstudies revealed that Cx26-YFP was more mobile withingap junction plaques compared with Cx43-GFP.Intriguingly, Cx43-GFP delivery and gap junctionregeneration was inhibited by BFA and nocodazole,whereas Cx26-GFP delivery was prevented by BFA but notnocodazole. Collectively, these studies suggest that duringgap junction biogenesis two phylogenetically distinctmembers of the connexin family, Cx43 and Cx26, sharecommon secretory pathways, types of transportintermediates and turnover dynamics but differ in theirmicrotubule-dependence and mobility within the plasmamembrane, which might reflect differences in binding toprotein scaffolds.

Supplementary material available online athttp://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/118/19/4451/DC1

Key words: Connexin, Gap junctions, Post-Golgi carriers, Time-lapse imaging, Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

Summary

Mechanisms of Cx43 and Cx26 transport to theplasma membrane and gap junction regenerationTamsin Thomas, Karen Jordan, Jamie Simek, Qing Shao, Chris Jedeszko, Paul Walton and Dale W. Laird*Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Western Ontario, Dental Science Building, Rm. 00077, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1*Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected])

Accepted 5 July 2005Journal of Cell Science 118, 4451-4462 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005doi:10.1242/jcs.02569

Research Article

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence

4452

studies from disease-causing human Cx26 mutants haverevealed a steady-state reservoir of Cx26 within the trans-Golginetwork (Thomas et al., 2004) similar to Cx43 (Laird et al.,1995). This collection of studies has resulted in considerabledebate as to how Cx26 is transported within mammalian cellsduring gap junction biogenesis. The importance of this debatehas been elevated in recent years as it appears that themanifestation of human deafness in combination withetiologies of epidermal keratodermas depends extensively onthe trans-dominant interactions of Cx26 mutants with othermembers of the connexin family (Bakirtzis et al., 2003; Forgeet al., 2003; Marziano et al., 2003; Rouan et al., 2001; Thomaset al., 2004), possibly by co-oligomerization of the mutant withwild-type connexins while they co-reside within the sameintracellular compartments. Likewise, the recent identificationof Cx43 point mutations linked to oculodentodigital dysplasia(ODDD) (Paznekas et al., 2003; Richardson et al., 2004) hasraised similar questions as to how Cx43 mutants may crosstalkwith other members of the connexin family, including Cx26.

To date, limited studies have investigated the types oftransport intermediates that deliver connexins to the cellsurface and the dynamic processes of gap junction plaqueassembly in live cells. In the present study, we chose tocompare and contrast the types of transport intermediates andthe process of delivery of GFP-tagged Cx43- and Cx26-containing post-Golgi carriers (PGCs) during nascent andsteady-state gap junction assembly in live BICR-M1Rk andNRK cells.

Materials and MethodsCells and reagentsAll media, sera and reagents were obtained from Invitrogen(Burlington, ON, Canada), BD Biosciences (Mississauga, ON,Canada) or Sigma-Aldrich Canada (Oakville, ON, Canada).Lipofectamine Plus and Lipofectamine 2000 reagents were obtainedfrom Invitrogen. Normal rat kidney cells (NRK-52E) (American TypeCulture Collection, Rockville, MD; 1571-CRL), BICR-M1Rk cells,derived from a rat mammary tumor (Laird et al., 1995), and HBL-100cells (Qin et al., 2001) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10%fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 �g/ml streptomycin and2 mM glutamine. Brefeldin A (BFA) and nocodazole were purchasedfrom Sigma.

DNA, transfections and generation of stable cell linesEngineering of the Cx43-green fluorescent protein (Cx43-GFP) wasas described previously (Jordon et al., 1999). The Cx26-YFP plasmidwas designed as previously described (Laird et al., 2001). Cx26-GFPand Cx26 mutants D66H-GFP and D66K-GFP were prepared asdescribed (Thomas et al., 2004). For preparation of wild-type humanSar1 cDNA, total RNA from a human fibroblast cell line (Hs27) wasisolated using Trizol (Invitrogen). RT-PCR was performed with theSuperscript III One-Step RT-PCR System with Platium Taq DNAPolymerase (Invitrogen). The following primer set was used toamplify Sar1 cDNA: Forward 5�-GATAAGCGCTATGTCTTTCATC-TTTGAGTGG-3�, Reverse 5�-GCTCGAATTCTCAGTCAATATA-CTGGGAGAG-3�. The GTP-restricted amino acid mutation H79Gwas generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChangeSite-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) asdirected. The mutagenesis primer sets were as follows: Forward 5�-CTTTTGATCTTGGTGGGGGCGAGCAAGCACGTCGCG-3� andReverse 5�-CGCGACGTGCTTGCTCGCCCCCACCAAGATCAA-AAG-3�. The mutated nucleotides are underlined. Wild-type and

mutated Sar1 cDNAs were amplified by PCR (using Pfu polymerasefrom Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada) with primers designed toadd restriction enzymes sites for XhoI and EcoRI and to remove thestop codon so that Sar1- or mutSar1-DsRed2 fusion proteins could bedeveloped. Following PCR, Sar1 and mutSar1 cDNAs were clonedinto the XhoI and EcoRI sites of pDsRed2-N1 (Clontech, Palo Alto,CA).

For transient transfections of Cx43-GFP, Sar1-DsRed2 or mutantSar1-DsRed2, BICR-M1Rk cells were plated on glass coverslips andgrown to 50-75% confluence overnight in 35 mm or 60 mm culturedishes or in 35 mm glass-bottom tissue culture dishes (MatTekCorporation, MA). BICR-M1Rk cells were transfected usingLipofectamine PLUS as described (Jordan, et al., 1999) with 1 �g ofCx43-GFP plasmid DNA. In other cases we used 4 �l ofLipofectamine 2000 and 2 �g of Sar1-DsRed2 or mutSar1-DsRed2plasmid DNA per 35 mm glass-bottom tissue culture dish. Cells werethen prepared for immunolabeling or for time-lapse imaging asdescribed below. Retroviral infection of NRK, BICR-M1Rk, or HBL-100 cells with cDNA encoding Cx26, Cx43-GFP, Cx26-YFP, Cx26-GFP, D66H-GFP or D66K-GFP within the AP2 retroviral vector(Galipeau et al., 1999) was performed as described (Mao et al., 2000;Qin et al., 2002; Thomas et al., 2004). Thus, the majority of the datapresented herein were obtained from cell lines stably expressingvarious connexins or Cx-GFPs. Only the images of BICR-M1Rk cellsexpressing Cx43-GFP in Fig. 5A1,A2 and B, and the correspondingtime-lapse images, as well as the expression of Sar1-DsRed2 ormutSar1-DsRed2 were transient transfections.

Drug treatments: BFA and nocodazoleTo analyze ER-to-Golgi connexin transport, BICR-M1Rk cellsexpressing the appropriate connexins were treated for 6 hours withBFA (5 �g/ml). BFA was removed from the culture medium bywashing cells three times with regular growth medium and incubatingfor 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after BFA removal. In the case ofFRAP of NRK cells expressing fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx43 orCx26, cells were pre-treated with 5 �g/ml BFA for 45 minutes andassessed by time-lapse imaging. To analyze the role of microtubulesin vesicular connexin transport, NRK cells expressing fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx43 or Cx26 were first time-lapse imaged (32 secondimage acquisition intervals) for up to 18 minutes. After treating thecells for 45 minutes with nocodazole (10 �M) to disrupt themicrotubules (Thomas et al., 2001), the same field of cells was againtime-lapse imaged over an additional period of up to 18 minutes. LSM510 software was used to calculate the individual vesicle displacementover 1 minute from time-lapse images of cells before and aftermicrotubule disruption as modified from the procedure describedpreviously (Johnson et al., 2002). The movement of 20 randomlychosen vesicles was measured from each of three independentexperiments and the results reported as the average vesicledisplacement ± standard error. This analysis was performed by twoinvestigators who were blinded to the treatment condition. Note thatonly vesicles that remained in z-focus from one time frame to the nextwere quantified. Finally, the Student’s unpaired t-test was performedusing GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPadSoftware, San Diego, CA) to compare the vesicle movement fromcontrol and nocodazole-treated cells.

In other experiments, gap junctions of untreated cells or cells pre-treated with 10 �M nocodazole for 45 minutes were subjected toFRAP analysis. Additionally, microinjection of untreated or BFA-treated (6 hours), Cx26-expressing BICR-M1Rk cells with 5% LuciferYellow was carried out as described previously (Thomas et al., 2004).

ImmunocytochemistryCells were immunolabeled as previously described (Laird et al.,1995). A mouse anti-Cx43 monoclonal antibody was purchased from

Journal of Cell Science 118 (19)

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence

4453Delivery of Cx43 and Cx26 to the plasma membrane

Chemicon International (Temecula, CA) and a polyclonal anti-Cx43antibody was obtained from Sigma. Mouse anti-Cx26 antibodies wereobtained from Zymed (San Francisco, CA) and Cx26IL-1 antibodywas acquired from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterAntibody Development Group. The rabbit polyclonal antibodyspecific for a medial Golgi protein, MG160, was a generous gift fromN. Gonatas (The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA)(Gonatas et al., 1989). Finally, the polyclonal GPP130 antibody(medial Golgi apparatus protein) was purchased from CovanceResearch Products (Berkeley, CA). Secondary antibodies includedgoat anti-mouse or donkey anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to TexasRed, AMCA or FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA).Fluorescent samples were analyzed on a Zeiss (Thornwood, NY) LSM410 inverted confocal microscope as previously described (Laird etal., 1995) or a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope. GFP, YFPor FITC were excited using a 488 nm argon laser line and emissionscollected after light passage through a 500-550 nm band pass filter.Texas Red or DsRed2 was excited using the 543 nm helium-neon laserline and emissions collected between 600-650 nm (tunable channel).AMCA was excited using a Chameleon multi-photon laser with theexcitation wavelength set to 720 nm and emissions were collectedafter passage through a 400-450 nm band pass filter. The multi-tracksetting was used to further minimize any potential bleed through ofGFP, YFP or FITC signals into red channels.

Live cell connexin transport assays in BICR-M1Rk cellsBICR-M1Rk cells transiently expressing Cx43-GFP or stablyexpressing Cx26-YFP were plated in 35 mm glass-bottom tissueculture dishes for live imaging (MatTek Corporation, MA). For livecell imaging, culture medium containing BFA was replaced with 2 mlof Hank’s balanced salt solution supplemented with 2 mM glutamine,100 U/ml penicillin, 100 �g/ml streptomycin, 200 �g/ml calciumchloride and 100 �g/ml magnesium sulfate, with either 10 mM Hepesbuffer, pH 7.2, or OptiMEM-I (reagents purchased from Gibco BRLor Sigma Chemical Company). Live cells were placed on a 20/20Technology (Mississauga, ON, Canada) temperature-controlled stagethat maintained cells at 37°C for the duration of live cell imagingduring recovery from BFA treatment. Cells were time-lapse imagedon a Zeiss LSM 410 confocal microscope 10 minutes–2.25 hours afterthe removal of BFA. Cx43-GFP or Cx26-YFP was excited with a 488nm argon/krypton laser line and images were collected using a 63�lens after fluorescent light passage through a 500-550 nm band passfilter. Optical sections were line-scanned continuously at a scan speedof 32 seconds/image and collected for periods of up to 50 minutes.The size of the tubular-shaped post-Golgi carriers (PGCs) containingCx43-GFP and Cx26-YFP were calculated using the measure functionmacro within the LSM 410 software. All focus, contrast andbrightness settings remained constant during imaging acquisition.Time-lapse images were animated using Adobe Premiere software.

Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis ofgap junction regenerationFRAP was performed on a Zeiss LSM 510 META microscope usingthe ‘Edit Bleach’ function in combination with ‘Time Series’ LSM510 software. A region of interest was chosen and 100-150 iterationsof the 488 nm laser line at 100% emission strength were used tocompletely photobleach the fluorescence within the region ofinterest. The progression of FRAP was followed by continuouslyacquiring 4 second images with a time interval of 30 seconds for upto 2 hours of total imaging time. The microscope was equipped withan environmental chamber (Incubator S) with CO2 controller so thatcells were maintained in regular growth medium at 37°C and 5%CO2. The pinhole was set so that 2 �m optical slices were collected.FRAP of HBL-100 cells expressing Golgi-retained D66H-GFP orD66K-GFP was carried out similarly. For FRAP within individual

gap junction plaques composed of Cx26-YFP or Cx43-GFP in BICR-M1Rk cells, 40-60 iterations of the 488 nm laser line at 100%emission strength was used to photobleach the regions of interest

Fig. 1. BICR-M1Rk cells assemble untagged and fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx26 and Cx43 into gap junctions via a trafficking pathwaythat is BFA-sensitive. Wild-type BICR-M1Rk (A,B) or BICR-M1Rkstably expressing Cx43-GFP (C,D), Cx26 (E,F) or Cx26-YFP (G,H)were immunolabeled for either Cx43 (A,B) or Cx26 (E,F);fluorescent-protein-tagged connexins were imaged without furtherprocessing. There was a prominent untagged or fluorescent-protein-tagged paranuclear-localized and plasma membrane-localizedconnexin population in untreated cells (A,C,E,G). However,following BFA treatment, all connexin variants were localized in anER-like pattern (B,D,F,H) and gap junction plaques were not evident.Bar, 10 �m. (I) BFA-treatment of cells co-expressing Cx43 and Cx26(BICR Cx26) dramatically inhibited dye coupling. Data expressed asmean number of cells receiving dye before or after BFAtreatment±s.e.m.

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence

4454

(ROI). A scan was acquired every second during recovery fromphotobleaching. Fluorescence recovery of the mobile fraction wasquantified using the ‘Mean ROI’ function within the Zeiss LSM 510META software package. Fluorescence intensities of ROIs wererecorded at the following time periods: prior to photobleaching (pre-bleach), immediately after photobleaching (t=0 seconds), and at25, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 seconds post-bleach. Post-bleachintensities were corrected for any residual, non-bleachedfluorescence, as described by previously (Lippincott-Schwartz et al.,2001). Averages were taken at each time point and the data plottedusing GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPadSoftware, San Diego, CA). Finally, a non linear regression was usedto create a best fit curve.

ResultsTransport of untagged and fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx43 and Cx26 to the cellsurface requires functional ER-to-GolgideliveryWe previously showed that fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx26 is functional as assessed by dyetransfer studies (Thomas et al., 2004). Likewise,we established that Cx43-GFP localizes to theGolgi apparatus, was efficiently transported tothe cell surface and was assembled into gapjunctions at the plasma membrane (Jordan et al.,1999). In order to further validate the use of GFP-tagged Cx43 in live cell studies, we showed that,in BICR-M1Rk cells, endogenous Cx43 andGFP-tagged Cx43 have comparable intracellularand cell membrane localization patterns and areassembled into similar-sized gap junctions (Fig.1A,C). Likewise, when untagged or YFP-taggedCx26 was expressed in BICR-M1Rk cells, bothmolecules assembled into spatially similar gapjunctions (Fig. 1E,G). We previously showed thatBICR-M1Rk cells efficiently remove Cx43-containing gap junction plaques from the cellsurface within 6 hours of treatment with theprotein trafficking inhibitor, BFA and,importantly, nascent gap junction plaqueassembly can be followed upon the removal ofBFA (Laird et al., 1995). Following 6 hours ofBFA treatment, Cx43, Cx43-GFP, Cx26 andCx26-YFP all exhibited an ER-like localizationpattern with an absence of detectable gapjunction plaques (Fig. 1B,D,F,H). Consistentwith the loss of gap junction plaques, when BFA-treated BICR-M1Rk cells (express endogenousCx43) or BICR-M1Rk cells that express Cx26were microinjected with Lucifer Yellow, dyecoupling was inhibited by over 80% (Fig. 1I).

Cx26 transport to the cell surface isinhibited by expression of a dominant-negative Sar1 mutantWe further tested the necessity of functional ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking for both Cx43 andCx26 delivery to the cell surface by engineeringBICR-M1Rk cell lines that stably express Cx26,

Cx26-YFP or Cx43-GFP to co-express wild-type Sar1-DsRed2or a GTP-restricted mutant form (H79G) of Sar1-DsRed2. Sar1(secretion-associated and Ras-related) is a small GTPase thatcontrols the assembly of COPII protein coats to direct vesiclebudding from the ER (Haucke, 2003). Mutation of Sar1 intothe GDP- or GTP-restricted form inhibits the budding ofCOPII-dependent vesicles from the ER (Aridor et al., 1995;Dascher and Balch, 1994) and hence blocks the classicalsecretory pathway. We first verified that mutSar1-DsRed2inhibited ER-to-Golgi-protein traffic by localizing the residentGolgi protein GPP130 in BICR-M1Rk cells transfected withSar1-DsRed2 or mutSar1-DsRed2 (Fig. 2A-F). Expression ofwild-type Sar1-DsRed2 did not affect the distribution of


Fig. 2. Expression of mutant Sar1 disrupts ER-to-Golgi transport in BICR-M1Rkcells and inhibits Cx26 and Cx43 trafficking to the cell surface. BICR-M1Rk cellswere transiently transfected with either Sar1-DsRed2 (A-C) or mutSar1-DsRed2(D-F), and immunolabeled for the Golgi-resident protein GPP130 (A,D). The Golgiapparatus, as defined by GPP130 localization (arrows), remained intact in thepresence of Sar1-DsRed2 but was disrupted in cells expressing mutSar1-DsRed2.BICR-M1Rk cells stably expressing Cx26-YFP were transiently transfected withSar1-DsRed2 (G-J) or mutSar1-DsRed2 (K-N) and immunolabeled for Cx43. Anti-rabbit AMCA was used to visualize and separate the Cx43 signal from YFP andDsRed fluorescence. Sar1-DsRed2 did not disrupt the localization pattern of Cx43or Cx26-YFP but mutSar1-DsRed2 caused their retention within the ER. Bars, 10�m. WT, wild-type; MUT, mutant.

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence


GPP130 (Fig. 2A-C, arrows), whereas mutSar1-DsRed2 led tothe loss of paranuclear GPP130 (Fig. 2D-F, arrows). BICR-M1Rk cells co-expressing endogenous Cx43, Cx26-YFP andSar1-DsRed2 revealed typical Cx43/Cx26 gap junction plaquesat intercellular interfaces as well as paranuclear-localized (i.e.Golgi-localized) Cx43 and Cx26 (Fig. 2G-J). Upon expressionof mutSar1-DsRed2, both Cx43 and Cx26-YFP exhibited anER-like pattern (Fig. 2K-N). The punctate structures remainingin Fig. 2K were from a neighboring, non-transfected cell.These results reveal that both Cx43 and Cx26 transport beyondthe ER requires functionally competent Sar1.

Connexin routing and transport intermediates involved innascent gap junction plaque assemblySince both Cx43 and Cx26 transport to the cell surface were

found to be BFA-sensitive and gap junction plaques composedof either connexin could be cleared from the cell surface in thepresence of BFA, we examined the kinetics, transportintermediates and connexin routing during nascent gap junctionplaque formation (Fig. 3). In this case, BICR-M1Rk cells thatco-express endogenous Cx43 and untagged Cx26 were treatedwith BFA for 6 hours and the transport and assembly of bothconnexins were examined simultaneously after BFA wash-out.In untreated cells, Cx26 and Cx43 co-localized within gapjunction plaques at the cell surface (Fig. 3A-C, arrows), as wellas within paranuclear structures representing the Golgi apparatus(Fig. 3A-C, double arrows). After BFA treatment, Cx26 andCx43 were both localized in reticular structures reminiscent ofthe ER (Fig. 3D-F). After BFA was removed for 30 minutes, asubpopulation of both Cx43 and Cx26 was localized to thereforming Golgi apparatus (Fig. 3G-I, double arrows). After 90

minutes, both Cx43 and Cx26 were enrichedin the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 3J-L, doublearrows), there was a diffuse population ofboth Cx43 and Cx26 surrounding the wholecell, including non-cell-cell interfaces (Fig.3J-L, arrow), and gap junction plaques werebeginning to form at cell-cell interfaces (Fig.3J-L, arrowhead). Finally, after 2 hours ofrecovery from BFA treatment, the cellsappeared to reach a steady-state where gapjunction plaques and a Golgi pool of bothCx43 and Cx26 were evident, whichresembled untreated cells (Fig. 3M-O).

Fig. 3. Cx26 and Cx43 exhibit similar kineticsand follow identical pathways during nascentgap junction biogenesis. BICR-M1Rk cellsstably expressing Cx26 were treated with BFAfor 6 hours and fixed at different times followingBFA-washout prior to doubleimmunofluorescently labeling for Cx26(A,D,G,J,M; green) or Cx43 (B,E,H,K,N; red).In untreated conditions, Cx26 and Cx43 oftenco-localized to the same gap junctions (A-C,arrows) and within paranuclear regions of thecells consistent with localization to the Golgiapparatus (A-C, double arrows). Immediatelyafter BFA removal, Cx26 and Cx43 exhibited anER-like localization pattern (D-F; inset in Dreveals a similar distribution of the residentGolgi protein, MG160). At 30 minutes post-BFA washout, Cx26 and Cx43 were localized inthe reforming Golgi apparatus (G-I, doublearrows; inset in G highlights paranuclearMG160), and by 90 minutes there was diffusecell surface fluorescence exhibited by Cx26 andCx43 (J-L, arrow; inset in J reveals paranuclearMG160 localization suggesting a well-organizedGolgi apparatus). Also note the prominentpopulation of Cx26 and Cx43 present within theGolgi apparatus (J-L, double arrows). By 2hours (M-O), Cx26 and Cx43 localization wasbeginning to resemble control cells. Sparselycultured cells were used in this experimental setto allow for the connexin distribution patterns tobe assessed at sites of cell-cell contact and atfree surfaces. Bar, 10 �m.

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence

4456

In order to further examine nascent Cx43 and Cx26 gapjunction assembly and translate our findings into living cellsand real-time, we first assessed whether the pathways andkinetics of gap junction assembly upon BFA treatment werethe same for GFP-tagged Cx43 and Cx26. To this end, BICR-M1Rk cells were engineered to express either Cx43-GFP orCx26-YFP, and nascent gap junction assembly was re-examined upon BFA washout (Fig. 4). Similarly to untaggedCx43 and Cx26, GFP-tagged connexins were found to clearfrom the cell surface in the presence of BFA, initiallyreorganize to the Golgi apparatus upon BFA washout,randomly distribute to the cell surface 1 hour after the removal

of BFA, and reach a steady-state distribution pattern similar tothat of untreated cells 2 hours after the removal of BFA (Fig.4I-L). The routing and kinetics for nascent Cx26 and Cx43assembly into gap junctions were similar to each other and totheir untagged connexin counterparts, as presented in Fig. 3.Although fluorescent-protein-tagged connexins were detectedat the cell surface approximately 30 minutes earlier than theiruntagged connexin counterparts, upon the removal of BFA, thismay in part reflect an increase in sensitivity of detectingfluorescent-protein-tagged connexins.

Whereas static imaging allows for partial temporal andspatial localization of connexin during their transport to theplasma membrane, real-time imaging is far more effective forexamining active transport processes, including connexintransport carriers. Consequently, continuous time-lapseimaging was performed on BICR-M1Rk cells to assess Cx43and Cx26 transport and assembly upon different recovery timesfrom BFA pre-treatment. Cx43-GFP (Fig. 5A1,A2 andsupplementary material Movie 1) and Cx26-YFP (Fig. 5B1,B2and supplementary material Movie 2) were observed to movefrom the ER to the Golgi apparatus within 30 minutes of BFAwash-out. Following the reformation of the Golgi apparatus,Cx43-GFP (Fig. 5C, arrows and supplementary material Movie3) and Cx26-YFP (Fig. 5D, arrows and supplementary materialMovie 4) were found to exit in the form of tubular extensions.Tubular-shaped extensions were highly dynamic, extendingand retracting many microns in length from the trans-side ofthe Golgi apparatus out towards the cell periphery. We foundthat the Cx43-GFP tubular processes ranged from 3.0 �m to18.0 �m in length, with a mean length of 6.1±2.8 �m (n=51).Cx26-YFP tubular processes ranged from 3.3 �m to 10.8 �min length, with a mean length of 5.8±2.2 �m (n=30). Numerousvesicles containing Cx43-GFP (Fig. 5C, arrowheads andsupplementary material Movie 3) or Cx26-YFP (Fig. 5D,E,arrowheads and supplementary material Movie 4) were alsoobserved and represented the more common transportintermediate. Ninety minutes after BFA wash-out, diffusefluorescence was observed at the cell surface (Fig. 5E, doublearrows). Time-lapse series supplementary material Movie 5shows the appearance of bright Cx26-YFP clusters at regionsof cell-cell contact and diffused cell surface fluorescence.Similar results were observed at 90 minutes for Cx43-GFP(data not shown). Collectively, these data suggest thatconnexins are randomly transported to the cell surface andclustering events occur after arrival at sites of cell-cell contact.


Fig. 4. Nascent assembly of fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx26 andCx43 follow the same kinetics and trafficking routes as untaggedconnexins. BICR-M1Rk cells stably expressing Cx26-YFP or Cx43-GFP were treated with BFA for 6 hours and fixed at different timesafter BFA removal. In untreated cells, Cx26-YFP and Cx43-GFPexhibited a paranuclear and cell surface localization pattern (A,B).Both Cx26-YFP and Cx43-GFP were localized within the ER-likecompartment at 6 hours of BFA treatment and gap junction plaqueswere absent (C,D). At 30 minutes post-BFA treatment, both Cx26-YFP and Cx43-GFP were localized to the reformed Golgi apparatus(E,F) and by 60 minutes they were also detected at the cell surface asa diffuse rim of fluorescence (G,H). At 90 minutes, both connexinswere visualized as cell surface gap junctions while prominentparanuclear populations of both connexins remained (I,J). Two hoursafter BFA washout, Cx26-YFP and Cx43-GFP localizationresembled that of untreated cells (K,L). Bar, 10 �m.

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence


The disease-linked Cx26 mutant exits the GolgiapparatusTo assess the transport carriers and fate of Cx26 mutants, weexpressed a deafness and skin-diseased-linked GFP-taggedCx26 D66H mutant (Kelsell et al., 2001; Thomas et al., 2004)and a conserved charged variant of this mutation (D66K)(Thomas et al., 2004) in HBL-100 cells. As expected, bothmutants were localized to the Golgi apparatus, which wasevident by their co-localization with GPP130 (Fig. 6A-F). Toassess whether these mutants were capable of actively beingdelivered to the Golgi apparatus, D66H-GFP wasphotobleached and a new population of D66H-GFP wasrecruited to the Golgi apparatus within 60 minutes (Fig. 6G),which suggests that there is dynamic regeneration of thisGolgi population of mutant Cx26. Similar results wereobtained for D66K-GFP (data not shown). In other time-lapseimaging movies, volatile long tubular extensions containingD66H-GFP were detected (Fig. 6H, arrows), and regionalFRAP studies revealed highly dynamic post-Golgi carriers(PGCs) exiting the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 6I, arrows andsupplementary material Movie 6). Thus, although the D66Hand D66K Cx26 mutants were principally found in the Golgiapparatus, they consistently exit the Golgi apparatus viaPGCs in the form of vesicles or tubular extensions. Golgi-exported Cx26 mutants may be targeted to the plasmamembrane, where they are unstable and quickly enter adegradation pathway, or retrieved back to the Golgiapparatus. However, we cannot dismiss the possibility thatthe PGCs containing mutant Cx26 are directly targetedto compartments involved in degradation of mis-foldedproteins.

Differential mobility of Cx43 and Cx26 within gapjunction plaquesHaving examined the characteristics of nascent gap junctionformation, we next compared the mobile fraction of Cx43-GFP and Cx26-YFP within gap junction plaques of BICR-

M1Rk cells. FRAP analysis in combination with time-lapseimaging revealed that there was a significantly larger mobilefraction (P

4458

expressing Cx43-GFP or Cx26-GFP were time-lapseimaged during FRAP in the presence of BFA ornocodazole. In the case of Cx26-GFP, a subset of gapjunction plaques (Fig. 8A-C) was photobleached inthe absence of any treatment (Fig. 8D) or in thepresence of the protein transport inhibitor, BFA (Fig.8E) or the microtubule-disrupter, nocodazole (Fig.8F). After 1 hour, regenerated Cx26-GFP gapjunction plaques were readily observed in control(Fig. 8G) and nocodazole-treated (Fig. 8I) cells butnot in BFA-treated cells (Fig. 8H). In control andnocodazole-treated cells, gap junction plaquescontinued to become more apparent but gap junctionregeneration was not evident in BFA-treated cellseven after 2 hours (data not shown). Similarly toBFA treatment of cells expressing Cx26-GFP, FRAPanalysis of Cx43-GFP gap junctions in NRK cellsrevealed that the gap junction plaques requiredcontinuous Cx43 transport for gap junctionregeneration (Fig. 9A-I). In contrast to the findingswith Cx26-GFP, however, Cx43-GFP plaqueregeneration was inhibited by the disruption ofmicrotubules (Fig. 9C,F,I). It is intriguing thatvesicle displacement analysis (Table 1) revealed thatfluorescent-protein-tagged Cx43 and Cx26 exhibitedapproximately the same decrease in the absenceof intact microtubules, whereas Cx43-GFP gapjunction plaque regeneration was more sensitive to nocodazolethan Cx26-GFP. These studies are supported by the previousfinding that microtubules are required for enhanced Cx43gap junction assembly in Novikoff cells and rapidCx43-GFP vesicle movement in MDCK cells (Johnson et al.,2002).

DiscussionWe set out to examine both the delivery of Cx43-GFP andCx26-YFP to the cell surface under nascent and steady-stateconditions, as well as the dynamics and renewal process of gap

junctions in living cells. Here we demonstrate that they sharesimilar routing and transport characteristics to each other aswell as to their untagged counterparts. Our studies revealed thatCx43-GFP and Cx26-YFP, as well as a disease-linked Cx26mutant, exited the trans-side of the Golgi apparatus in vesicularand tubular PGCs. Delivery of wild-type connexins to the cellsurface appeared random and had no obvious preference forlocations of cell-cell contact. Interestingly, movement of Cx26-YFP within a gap junction was more dynamic than Cx43-GFP,which suggests that distinct gap junctions may have differentscaffolding properties or interactions with connexin-bindingproteins.


Fig. 6. Golgi-apparatus-localized Cx26 mutants activelyexit the Golgi in the form of dynamic tubular extensionsand vesicles. HBL-100 cells stably expressing D66K-GFP(A,C, green) or D66H-GFP (D,F, green) were labeled forthe cis-Golgi resident protein, GPP130 (B,E,C,F; red).Both D66H-GFP and D66K-GFP exhibit a high degree ofco-localization with the Golgi apparatus (C,F, note yellowcolor). Cells were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 todenote the nuclei (C,F, blue). HBL-100 cells expressingD66H-GFP were time-lapse imaged followingphotobleaching of the Golgi population (series G, boxindicates photobleached region). A new population ofD66H-GFP migrated to the photobleached Golgiapparatus with a 40% recovery of fluorescence in 1 hour(based on the pre-bleached area being 100%). Tubularextensions were observed exiting the Golgi apparatus ofHBL-100 cells expressing D66H-GFP (series H, arrows).In series I, the area surrounding the Golgi pool of D66K-GFP mutant was photobleached and time-lapse imaged.Highly dynamic vesicles were observed to emanate fromthe Golgi apparatus within 15 minutes (series I, arrowsand supplementary material Movie 6). Bars, 10 �m.

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence


Cx26 is transported through the Golgi apparatus in NRKand BICR-M1Rk cellsCx26 and Cx43 have been reported to exhibit uniquecharacteristics that include different intracellular sites ofoligomerization. Whereas Cx26 is thought to oligomerize inthe endoplasmic reticulum (Falk et al., 1994), substantialevidence suggests that Cx43 assembles into connexons whilein the trans-Golgi network (Musil and Goodenough, 1993).Other notable studies using aequorin-tagged Cx26 andconnexin-domain substitutions suggest that Cx26 transport tothe cell surface is not efficiently blocked by the inhibitor BFA(George et al., 1999; George et al., 1998b) and may not takeplace through the classical secretory pathway during gapjunction biogenesis. This notion was further supported bysubcellular fractionation of guinea pig liver tissue, where littleCx26 was found in the Golgi apparatus (Diez et al., 1999).Together with the fact that Cx26 can post-translationally insertinto ER membranes in cell-free assays (Ahmad et al., 1999;Zhang et al., 1996) and possibly plasma membranes (Ahmadand Evans, 2002), these results suggest that Cx26 bypasses theGolgi apparatus en route to the cell surface. In the presentstudy, our results using both untagged and fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx26, as well as a disease-linked Cx26 mutant, revealedthat a substantial population of Cx26 does indeed pass throughthe Golgi apparatus. We found in BICR-M1Rk cells thatuntagged Cx26 and Cx26-YFP were prevented from beingtransported to the cell surface in the presence of BFA and therewas a concomitant loss of gap junction plaques at the cellsurface. In addition, expression of wild-type Cx26 in BICR-M1Rk cells resulted in an intracellular population that clearlyco-localized with Cx43 in paranuclear regions (reminiscent ofthe Golgi apparatus) of untreated cells and cells recoveringfrom BFA-treatment. Further confirmation of the essential roleof ER-to-Golgi transport of Cx26 was provided by the fact thatSar1-dependent, COPII-mediated ER-to-Golgi transport wasrequired for both Cx26 and Cx43 transport to the plasmamembrane. Likewise, FRAP analysis performed in thepresence of BFA further demonstrated the necessity of nascentCx26 delivery to the cell surface from a BFA-sensitivecompartment in order to regenerate photobleached Cx26-GFP-containing gap junction plaques. Finally, the retention andretrieval of disease-linked Cx26 mutants to the Golgi apparatusis further evidence that the Golgi apparatus plays a central rolein Cx26 secretion. The difference between the present reportand former studies may be attributed to cell types examined,or Cx26 may have an alternative route to the plasma membranewhen overexpressed. Given the possibility that Cx26 has the

capacity to post-translationally import into ER membranes invitro (Ahmad et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 1996) and possiblydirectly into plasma membranes (Ahmad and Evans, 2002), itremains possible that a sub-population of Cx26 exhibits diverserouting in the biogenesis of gap junctions. Additionally, thereis a growing number of proteins that appear to reach theirsubcellular destination or the cell surface by a Golgi-independent mechanism, including calsequestrin (Nori et al.,2004), flotillin (Morrow et al., 2002), FGF1 and IL-1�(Prudovsky et al., 2003). Nevertheless our results stronglysupport the position that, during gap junction biogenesis, amajor population of Cx26 proceeds through classicalintracellular compartments, including the Golgi apparatus, in aprocess similar to that previously characterized for Cx43(Evans et al., 1999; George et al., 1998a; Laird et al., 1995;Musil and Goodenough, 1993; Paulson et al., 2000).

Delivery of connexins to the plasma membraneIn the present study we used a BFA-treatment and wash-outapproach to distinguish between transport intermediatescontaining connexins that were derived from the Golgiapparatus and delivered to the cell surface from carriersinvolved in gap junction internalization. We observed theformation of both numerous heterogeneous vesicles and long,labile, tubular extensions derived from the newly reorganized

Fig. 7. Differential mobility of fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx26 andCx43 within assembled gap junctions. Central regions of gapjunction plaques in BICR-M1Rk cells, composed of Cx26-YFP (A-D) or Cx43-GFP (E-H), were photobleached and the fluorescentrecovery in the photobleached area was monitored. Note the rapidrecovery of Cx26-YFP within 200-400 seconds but little recoverywas observed in Cx43-GFP photobleached regions of gap junctionplaques. Further FRAP analysis revealed that gap junctionscomposed of Cx26-YFP had a substantially larger mobile fractionpopulation than Cx43-GFP gap junctions (I). Bar, 5 �m.

Table 1. Microtubule disruption decreases thedisplacement of intracellular transport vesicles containing

Cx26 or Cx43Control 10 �M Nocodazole % Decrease

Cx26 2.18±0.21 �m 0.46±0.05 �m* 78.8Cx43 2.35±0.39 �m 0.44±0.08 �m* 81.3

NRK cells stably expressing fluorescent-protein-tagged Cx26 or Cx43 weretime-lapse imaged before and after nocodazole treatment. Time-lapse movieswere used to determine the average connexin-containing vesicle displacementover a period of 1 minute. Movie 7 (see supplementary material) shows theanimated time-lapse series corresponding to Cx26-YFP-expressing cellsbefore and after microtubule disruption. *P

4460

Golgi apparatus that contained Cx43-GFP orCx26-YFP. In other studies, tubular PGCshave been shown in other systems to emanate,bifurcate and translocate from the trans-Golginetwork as they deliver VSVG-GFP to theplasma membrane (Hirschberg et al., 1998).In this same study it was shown that largepleiomorphic tubular PGCs delivered VSVG-GFP to the cell surface rather than smallvesicles. Since we could not identify anydirect delivery of connexins via tubularextensions to the plasma membrane,connexin transport within heterogeneousvesicular PGCs may represent the primarytransport mechanism for nascent delivery ofconnexins.

The fusion of PGCs at the cell surfaceappears to occur randomly at the cell surfaceof non-polar BICR-M1Rk cells, and somePGCs appear to fuse in close proximity topre-existing gap junctions and others at freesurface where there are no contacting cells.Newly delivered cell surface connexins


Fig. 8. Steady-state regeneration of Cx26-GFPgap junctions is sensitive to BFA but notnocodazole. NRK cells stably expressing Cx26-GFP were time-lapse imaged followingphotobleaching of a series of gap junctions(A,D,G, box indicates photobleached area).Cx26-GFP fluorescence steadily recovered withinthe photobleached area (G, box). ER-to-Golgitransport was disrupted by a 45 minute pre-incubation with BFA followed by FRAP in thepresence of BFA (B,E,H, box indicatesphotobleached area). After 1 hour, there was nodetectable Cx26-GFP within the photobleachedregion of interest (H, box). To disruptmicrotubules, nocodazole was added to the cellculture 45 minutes prior to photobleaching of gapjunctions in the continued presence of nocodazole(C,F,I). There was significant recovery of Cx26-GFP to the region of interest after 1 hour (I, box),comparable with that occurring under controlconditions. Panel inserts represent highermagnifications of the photobleached regions ofinterest. Experimental sets were repeated seventimes with similar results. Bar, 10 �m.

Fig. 9. Steady-state regeneration of Cx43-GFPgap junctions is sensitive to BFA and nocodazole.NRK cells stably expressing Cx43-GFP weretime-lapse imaged following photobleaching of aseries of gap junctions in the presence of BFA ornocodazole. Control cells revealed substantialrecruitment of Cx43-GFP to the photobleachedgap junctions after 1 hour (A,D,G) but this levelof recovery was not observed in cells treated withBFA (B,E,H) or nocodazole (C,F,I). Panel insertsrepresent higher magnifications of thephotobleached regions of interest. Experimentalsets were repeated six times with similar results.Bar, 10 �m.

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence


appear to cluster laterally within the plane of the membranewith the first stable clustering events occurring preferentiallyat cell-cell contacts. These findings are consistent with apreviously proposed ‘selftrap’ model (Abney et al., 1987) andthe concept of progressive gap junction formation (Johnson etal., 2002; Paulson et al., 2000). Gap junctions grow in size inthese ‘primed’ areas of cell-cell contacts and evidence suggeststhat gap junction channels are required to be in a clustered stateof minimal size in order to function (Bukauskas et al., 2000).

Differential mobility of Cx43-GFP and Cx26-YFP gapjunction plaquesCx43-GFP gap junction plaques in MDCK (Jordan et al., 1999)and RL-CL9 cells (Ingvar Holm, 1999) have been shown toremodel and coalesce in the membrane. Interestingly, in BICR-M1Rk cells we observed that Cx26-YFP gap junctions have alarger mobile fraction in comparison with Cx43-GFP gapjunctions. This difference may reflect the possibility that Cx43-GFP intermixing with wild-type Cx43 within the same gapjunction plaques would allow for interactions with thescaffolding protein ZO-1 or the microtubule protein �-tubulin,which are known to interact with Cx43 but not Cx26(Giepmans, 2004; Giepmans and Moolenaar, 1998; Laing etal., 2001). Cx43 gap junction interactions with ZO-1 or �-tubulin may allow for scaffolding with other cytoplasmicproteins, including likely interactions with microfilaments andmicrotubules. It has been suggested from data obtained fromfreeze-fracture electron microscopy that cytoskeletal elementswere important for the positioning of gap junctions in themembrane (Green and Severs, 1984) and, more recently, Cx43gap junction channel clustering was shown to be dependentupon intact microfilaments following inhibition ofglycosylation (Wang and Rose, 1995). Since Cx26 does notappear to interact with ZO-1 (Kojima et al., 2001), Cx26-YFPgap junctions may exhibit distinctly different anchoringproperties and be more subject to lateral flow within the plasmamembrane.

Rapid renewal of gap junction plaquesMetabolic labeling and pulse-chase studies have clearlydemonstrated that connexins have half-lives of 1.5-3.5 hours(Beardslee et al., 1998; Laing et al., 1997; Laird et al., 1995;Laird et al., 1991) and most studies are consistent with bothunassembled connexins and connexins assembled into gapjunctions having the same turnover kinetics. Recent studies byMusil and colleagues have shown that a sub-population ofconnexins is also subject to proteasomal-based turnover in theabsence of assembly into gap junctions (VanSlyke et al., 2000;VanSlyke and Musil, 2002). Our earlier studies showing thatgap junctions were lost from the cell surface of BICR-M1Rkcells when protein transport was blocked by BFA wereconsistent with Cx43 gap junctions having the same half-lifeas monomeric Cx43 (Laird et al., 1995; Laird et al., 1991). Inthe present study we extended this finding by using FRAPanalysis to show that new molecules of Cx43-GFP are recruitedinto gap junctions with kinetics similar to those suggested byCx43 pulse-chase studies. More importantly, BFA-treatmentstudies and FRAP analysis suggest that Cx26-YFP gapjunctions have similar turnover kinetics to Cx43-GFP gap

junctions. These rapid turnover characteristics provide amechanism by which gap junctional intercellularcommunication can be exquisitely regulated in response tophysiological stimulus.

We thank Debra Telford for doing the microinjection studies andfor assistance in generating the Sar1-DsRed2 vector. This work wassupported by Canadian Institute of Health Research grants to D.W.L.and NSERC funding to T.T.

ReferencesAbney, J. R., Braun, J. and Owicki, J. C. (1987). Lateral interactions among

membrane proteins. Implications for the organization of gap junctions.Biophys. J. 52, 441-454.

Ahmad, S. and Evans, W. H. (2002). Post-translational integration andoligomerization of connexin 26 in plasma membranes and evidence offormation of membrane pores: implications for the assembly of gapjunctions. Biochem. J. 365, 693-699.

Ahmad, S., Diez, J. A., George, C. H. and Evans, W. H. (1999). Synthesisand assembly of connexins in vitro into homomeric and heteromericfunctional gap junction hemichannels. Biochem. J. 339, 247-253.

Aridor, M., Bannykh, S. I., Rowe, T. and Balch, W. E. (1995). Sequentialcoupling between COPII and COPI vesicle coats in endoplasmic reticulumto Golgi transport. J. Cell Biol. 131, 875-893.

Bakirtzis, G., Jamieson, S., Aasen, T., Bryson, S., Forrow, S., Tetley, L.,Finbow, M., Greenhalgh, D. and Hodgins, M. (2003). The effects of amutant connexin 26 on epidermal differentiation. Cell Commun. Adhes. 10,359-364.

Beardslee, M. A., Laing, J. G., Beyer, E. C. and Saffitz, J. E. (1998). Rapidturnover of connexin43 in the adult rat heart. Circul. Res. 83, 629-635.

Bukauskas, F. F., Jordan, K., Bukauskiene, A., Bennett, M. V., Lampe, P.D., Laird, D. W. and Verselis, V. K. (2000). Clustering of connexin 43-enhanced green fluorescent protein gap junction channels and functionalcoupling in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2556-2561.

Dascher, C. and Balch, W. E. (1994). Dominant inhibitory mutants of ARF1block endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport and trigger disassembly ofthe Golgi apparatus. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1437-1448.

Diez, J. A., Ahmad, S. and Evans, W. H. (1999). Assembly of heteromericconnexons in guinea-pig liver en route to the Golgi apparatus, plasmamembrane and gap junctions. Eur. J. Biochem. 262, 142-148.

Evans, W. H., Ahmad, S., Diez, J., George, C. H., Kendall, J. M. andMartin, P. E. (1999). Trafficking pathways leading to the formation of gapjunctions. Novartis Foun. Symp. 219, 44-54.

Falk, M. M. (2000). Connexin-specific distribution within gap junctionsrevealed in living cells. J. Cell Sci. 113, 4109-4120.

Falk, M. M. and Gilula, N. B. (1998). Connexin membrane proteinbiosynthesis is influenced by polypeptide positioning within the transloconand signal peptidase access. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7856-7864.

Falk, M. M., Kumar, N. M. and Gilula, N. B. (1994). Membrane insertionof gap junction connexins: polytopic channel forming membrane proteins.J. Cell Biol. 127, 343-355.

Falk, M. M., Buehler, L. K., Kumar, N. M. and Gilula, N. B. (1997). Cell-free synthesis and assembly of connexins into functional gap junctionmembrane channels. EMBO J. 16, 2703-2716.

Forge, A., Marziano, N. K., Casalotti, S. O., Becker, D. L. and Jagger, D.(2003). The inner ear contains heteromeric channels composed of cx26 andcx30 and deafness-related mutations in cx26 have a dominant negative effecton cx30. Cell. Commun. Adhes. 10, 341-346.

Galipeau, J., Li, H., Paquin, A., Sicilia, F., Karpati, G. and Nalbantoglu,J. (1999). Vesicular Stomatis Virus G pseudotyped retrovector mediateseffective in vivo suicide gene delivery in experimental brain cancer. CancerRes. 59, 2384-2394.

Gemel, J., Valiunas, V., Brink, P. R. and Beyer, E. C. (2004). Connexin43and connexin26 form gap junctions, but not heteromeric channels in co-expressing cells. J. Cell Sci. 117, 2469-2480.

George, C. H., Kendall, J. M., Campbell, A. K. and Evans, W. H. (1998a).Connexin-aequorin chimerae report cytoplasmic calcium environmentsalong trafficking pathways leading to gap junction biogenesis in living COS-7 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29822-29829.

George, C. H., Martin, P. E. and Evans, W. H. (1998b). Rapid determinationof gap junction formation using HeLa cells microinjected with cDNAs

Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence

4462

encoding wild-type and chimeric connexins. Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun. 247, 785-789.

George, C. H., Kendall, J. M. and Evans, W. H. (1999). Intracellulartrafficking pathways in the assembly of connexins into gap junctions. J. Biol.Chem. 274, 8678-8685.

Giepmans, B. N. (2004). Gap junctions and connexin-interacting proteins.Cardiovasc. Res. 62, 233-245.

Giepmans, B. N. and Moolenaar, W. H. (1998). The gap junction proteinconnexin43 interacts with the second PDZ domain of the zona occludens-1protein. Curr. Biol. 8, 931-934.

Gonatas, J. O., Mezitis, S. G. E., Stieber, A., Fleischer, B. and Gonatas, N.K. (1989). MG-160: A novel sialoglycoprotein of the medial cisternae ofthe Golgi apparatus. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 646-653.

Green, C. R. and Severs, N. J. (1984). Connexon rearrangement in cardiacgap junctions: evidence for cytoskeletal control? Cell Tissue Res. 237, 185-186.

Haucke, V. (2003). Vesicle budding: a coat for the COPs. Trends Cell Biol.13, 59-60.

Hirschberg, K., Miller, C. M., Ellenberg, J., Presley, J. F., Siggia, E. D.,Phair, R. D. and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1998). Kinetic analysis ofsecretory protein traffic and characterization of Golgi to plasma membranetransport intermediates in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1485-1503.

Holm, I., Mikhailov, A., Jillson, T. and Rose, B. (1999). Dynamics of gapjunctions observed in living cells with connexin43-GFP chimeric protein.Eur. J. Cell Biol. 78, 856-866.

Johnson, R. G., Meyer, R. A., Li, X. R., Preus, D. M., Tan, L., Grunenwald,H., Paulson, A. F., Laird, D. W. and Sheridan, J. D. (2002). Gap junctionsassemble in the presence of cytoskeletal inhibitors, but enhanced assemblyrequires microtubules. Exp. Cell Res. 275, 67-80.

Jordan, K., Solan, J. L., Dominguez, M., Sia, M., Hand, A., Lampe, P. D.and Laird, D. W. (1999). Trafficking, assembly, and function of aconnexin43-green fluorescent protein chimera in live mammalian cells. Mol.Biol. Cell 10, 2033-2050.

Kelsell, D. P., Di, W. L. and Houseman, M. J. (2001). Connexin mutationsin skin disease and hearing loss. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 559-568.

Kojima, T., Kokai, Y., Chiba, H., Yamamoto, M., Mochizuki, Y. andSawada, N. (2001). Cx32 but not Cx26 is associated with tight junctions inprimary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 263, 193-201.

Koval, M., Harley, J. E., Hick, E. and Steinberg, T. H. (1997). Connexin46is retained as monomers in a trans-Golgi compartment of osteoblastic cells.J. Cell Biol. 137, 847-857.

Laing, J. G., Tadros, P. N., Westphale, E. M. and Beyer, E. C. (1997).Degradation of connexin43 gap junctions involves both the proteasome andthe lysosome. Exp. Cell Res. 236, 482-492.

Laing, J. G., Manley-Markowski, R. N., Koval, M., Civitelli, R. andSteinberg, T. H. (2001). Connexin45 interacts with zonula occludens-1 andconnexin43 in osteoblastic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23051-23055.

Laird, D. W., Puranam, K. L. and Revel, J. P. (1991). Turnover andphosphorylation dynamics of connexin43 gap junction protein in culturedcardiac myocytes. Biochem. J. 273, 67-72.

Laird, D. W., Castillo, M. and Kasprzak, L. (1995). Gap junction turnover,intracellular trafficking, and phosphorylation of connexin43 in brefeldin A-treated rat mammary tumor cells. J. Cell Biol. 131, 1193-1203.

Laird, D. W., Jordan, K. and Shao, Q. (2001). Expression and imaging ofconnexin-GFP chimeras in live mammalian cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 154,135-142.

Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Snapp, E. and Kenworthy, A. (2001). Studyingprotein dynamics in living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 444-455.

Mao, A. J., Bechberger, J., Lidington, D., Galipeau, J., Laird, D. W. andNaus, C. C. (2000). Neuronal differentiation and growth control of neuro-2a cells after retroviral gene delivery of connexin43. J. Biol. Chem. 275,34407-34414.

Martin, P. E., Errington, R. J. and Evans, W. H. (2001). Gap junctionassembly: multiple connexin fluorophores identify complex traffickingpathways. Cell Commun. Adhes. 8, 243-248.

Marziano, N. K., Casalotti, S. O., Portelli, A. E., Becker, D. L. and Forge,A. (2003). Mutations in the gene for connexin 26 (GJB2) that cause hearingloss have a dominant negative effect on connexin 30. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12,805-812.

Morrow, I. C., Rea, S., Martin, S., Prior, I. A., Prohaska, R., Hancock, J.F., James, D. E. and Parton, R. G. (2002). Flotillin-1/reggie-2 traffics tosurface raft domains via a novel Golgi-independent pathway. Identificationof a novel membrane targeting domain and a role for palmitoylation. J. Biol.Chem. 277, 48834-48841.

Musil, L. S. and Goodenough, D. A. (1993). Multisubunit assembly of anintegral plasma membrane channel protein, gap junction connexin43, occursafter exit from the ER. Cell 74, 1065-1077.

Nori, A., Bortoloso, E., Frasson, F., Valle, G. and Volpe, P. (2004). Vesiclebudding from endoplasmic reticulum is involved in calsequestrin routing tosarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscles. Biochem. J. 379, 505-512.

Nunn, R. S., Macke, T. J., Olson, A. J. and Yeager, M. (2001).Transmembrane alpha-helices in the gap junction membrane channel:systematic search of packing models based on the pair potential function.Microsc. Res. Tech. 52, 344-351.

Paulson, A. F., Lampe, P. D., Meyer, R. A., TenBroek, E., Atkinson, M. M.,Walseth, T. F. and Johnson, R. G. (2000). Cyclic AMP and LDL triggera rapid enhancement in gap junction assembly through a stimulation ofconnexin trafficking. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3037-3049.

Paznekas, W. A., Boyadjiev, S. A., Shapiro, R. E., Daniels, O., Wollnik, B.,Keegan, C. E., Innis, J. W., Dinulos, M. B., Christian, C., Hannibal, M.C. et al. (2003). Connexin 43 (GJA1) mutations cause the pleiotropicphenotype of oculodentodigital dysplasia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 408-418.

Prudovsky, I., Mandinova, A., Soldi, R., Bagala, C., Graziani, I.,Landriscina, M., Tarantini, F., Duarte, M., Bellum, S., Doherty, H. etal. (2003). The non-classical export routes: FGF1 and IL-1alpha point theway. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4871-4881.

Qin, H., Shao, Q., Belliveau, D. J. and Laird, D. W. (2001). AggregatedDsRed-tagged Cx43 and over-expressed Cx43 are targeted to lysosomes inhuman breast cancer cells. Cell Commun. Adhes. 8, 433-439.

Qin, H., Shao, Q., Curtis, H., Galipeau, J., Belliveau, D. J., Wang, T.,Alaoui-Jamali, M. A. and Laird, D. W. (2002). Retroviral delivery ofconnexin genes to human breast tumor cells inhibits in vivo tumor growthby a mechanism that is independent of significant gap junctionalintercellular communication. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29132-29138.

Richardson, R., Donnai, D., Meire, F. and Dixon, M. J. (2004). Expressionof Gja1 correlates with the phenotype observed in oculodentodigitalsyndrome/type III syndactyly. J. Med. Genet. 41, 60-67.

Rouan, F., White, T. W., Brown, N., Taylor, A. M., Lucke, T. W., Paul, D.L., Munro, C. S., Uitto, J., Hodgins, M. B. and Richard, G. (2001). trans-dominant inhibition of connexin-43 by mutant connexin-26: implications fordominant connexin disorders affecting epidermal differentiation. J. Cell Sci.114, 2105-2113.

Saez, J. C., Berthoud, V. M., Branes, M. C., Martinez, A. D. and Beyer, E.C. (2003). Plasma membrane channels formed by connexins: theirregulation and functions. Physiol. Rev. 83, 1359-1400.

Sosinsky, G. E. (1996). Molecular organization of gap junction membranechannels. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 28, 297-309.

Thomas, T., Jordan, K. and Laird, D. W. (2001). Role of cytoskeletalelements in the recruitment of Cx43-GFP and Cx26-YFP into gap junctions.Cell Commun. Adhes. 8, 231-236.

Thomas, T., Telford, D. and Laird, D. W. (2004). Functional domainmapping and selective trans-dominant effects exhibited by Cx26 disease-causing mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 19157-19168.

VanSlyke, J. K. and Musil, L. S. (2002). Dislocation and degradation fromthe ER are regulated by cytosolic stress. J. Cell Biol. 157, 381-394.

VanSlyke, J. K., Deschenes, S. M. and Musil, L. S. (2000). Intracellulartransport, assembly, and degradation of wild-type and disease-linked mutantgap junction proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1933-1946.

Wang, Y. and Rose, B. (1995). Clustering of Cx43 cell-to-cell channels intogap junction plaques: regulation by cAMP and microfilaments. J. Cell Sci.108, 3501-3508.

Willecke, K., Eiberger, J., Degen, J., Eckardt, D., Romualdi, A.,Guldenagel, M., Deutsch, U. and Sohl, G. (2002). Structural andfunctional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome.Biol. Chem. 383, 725-737.

Zhang, J. T., Chen, M., Foote, C. I. and Nicholson, B. J. (1996). Membraneintegration of in vitro-translated gap junctional proteins: co- and post-translational mechanisms. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 471-482.


Jour

nal o

f Cel

l Sci

ence

mechanisms of cx43 and cx26 transport to the plasma … · 2005. 9. 13. · cx26, cells were...

Documents