may 2018 metropolitan region scheme amendment 1308/41 · east wanneroo structure plan area...

East WannerooStructure Plan Area

Submissions 366 - 408Volume 7 of 8

City of Wanneroo

May 2018

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41

East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area

Submissions 366 - 408

City of Wanneroo

May 2018

Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission Gordon Stephenson House 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA 6001 MRS Amendment 1308/41 Submissions 366 - 408 File 809-2-30-20 Pt 2 Published May 2018 Internet: www.dplh.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 655 18002 Fax: (08) 655 19001 This document is available in alternative formats on application to Communications Services.

Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) under review and initiating changes where they are seen as necessary. The MRS sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs. A proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes its recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise the amendment before it can take legal effect. In the process of making a substantial amendment to the MRS, information is published as a public record under the following titles: Amendment report This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed amendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through the submission process. Environmental review report The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment, an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the same time as the amendment report. Report on submissions The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the recommendations of the WAPC for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report. Submissions This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on the proposed amendment. Transcript of hearings A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in this volume.

Alphabetical Listing of Submissions

MRS Amendment 1308/41


Submission Number

Name

34 Aboriginal Affairs, Department of 300 Adma Weda, Emma and Agus 174 Allart, Barbara 175 Allart, Robert 176 Amonini, Kevin 241 Anderson, Christopher 301 Angell, Una and Ken

3 ATCO Gas Australia 328 Balic, Danica 362 Balinski, Angela 363 Balinski, Craig 242 Banks, Chantelle 109 Banks, Janne 110 Banks, Kevin 177 Banks, Sarah 364 Barnao, Kadambii 365 Barnao, Midhara 366 Barnao, Vasudeva 129 Barrow, Margaret 367 Bell, Murray and Ruth 161 Bennett, Carrie 302 Biancotti, Sandro 111 Black, Glenn 243 Borgogno, Jeffrey 244 Borgogno, Judy 178 Borgogno, Mary 245 Borgogno, Saraya 112 Bowman and Partners Environmental on behalf of Jazna Pty Ltd 91 Brindle, Tracey

130 Broadbent, Adrian 45 Broadbent, Catherine

103 Broadbent, David 104 Broadbent, Ruth 57 Brookes, Dennis and Gwen

246 Brown, Danella 247 Brown, Jenna 248 Brown, John 368 Brown, Michelle 369 Brown, Russell 329 Burden, Richard and Joanne 330 Burgess Design Group on behalf of Home Group WA 160 Burnett, Lorraine 131 Burnett, Pauline 92 Butler, Michael

289 Caccamo, Ralph

Submission Number

Name

442 Casal, Nathalie 179 Charlton, Brett 180 Charlton, Corey 181 Charlton, Michael 182 Charlton, Paula 11 Christou, Angelos 13 Christou, Anna 6 Christou, Christalla 7 Christou, Christos

14 Christou, Michael 15 Christou, Nicholas

331 Circosta, Larry 183 Clark, Phil 46 Cochrane, Debbie 8 Cohen, Frederick

132 Cohen, Margaret 370 Cohen, Mirella 133 Cohen, Peter 371 Colbung, Cetana 332 Cooper, Alison and Kay, Ken 372 Corrigan, Paul and Nicole 93 Corry, Mark and Jodie 94 Corry, Mark and Kestel, Fiona 47 Cottrill, Deborah

134 Coves, Brian and Dorothy 373 Cowper, Sundarii 374 Creative Design + Planning and Emerge Associates on behalf of Urban

Capital Carramar Pty Ltd and Pinjar Properties Pty Ltd 333 Cuttone Santoro, Donique 290 Cuttone Santoro, Filippo 334 Cuttone Santoro, Natasha 291 Cuttone Santoro, Vicki 428 Da Camara, Caroline 429 Da Camara, Maria 430 Da Camara, Vasco 58 Daly, Rachel

292 Davies, Annette 293 Davies, James 21 Davis, Beryl

375 Davis, Sandra 31 Davis, Steven and Meredith

335 de Cinque, Jarrad 336 de Cinque, Jason 337 de Cinque, Kaila 135 Desmond, Calen 136 Desmond, Kiel 137 Desmond, Natalie 138 Desmond, Steve 139 Desmond, Tegan 249 Dickson, James 79 Dineley, Frederick and Denise

250 Diodata, Clara 251 Diodata, Demi

Submission Number

Name

252 Diodata, Luigi and Clara 253 Diodata, Robert 376 Dique, Dickie and Lynn 95 Dixon, Eric 96 Dixon, Georgina 25 Do, Khang Duy and Pham, Tu Anh Thi

113 Doan, Thanh Tung 114 Doan, Van Mon 140 Doherty, Teresa 254 Doris, William 377 Drummond, Bruce 166 Dunbar, Alan 167 Dunbar, Heather 168 Dunbar, Laura 184 Dunbar, Mhairi 185 Dunbar, Steven 338 Dynamic Planning and Developments Pty Ltd on behalf of Balanced

Securities Ltd 26 Education, Department of

378 Ellison, Lisa 339 Emanuel, Nicola 51 Environment Regulation, Department of

255 Evans, Haylee 256 Evans, Jeremy 141 Everitt, Beryl 12 Falas, Litsa

340 Famlonga, Lynn 186 Farrall, Dan 187 Farrall, Najah 188 Fazio, Carmelo 189 Fazio, Giuseppe 190 Fazio, Melanie 191 Fazio, Michael 192 Fazio, Patricia 193 Fazio, Stephanie 142 Ferguson, J and P 341 Ferritto, Michael 303 Figliomeni, Angelina 304 Figliomeni, Maurizio 59 Fildes, Jennifer 60 Fildes, Lester 61 Fildes, Nathan

105 Fire and Emergency Services, Department of 194 Fitzgerald, William 305 Fitzsimmons, Maureen 306 Fitzsimmons, Syd 431 Fogliani, Riccardo 257 Foster, Debra 258 Foster, Kenneth 259 Foster, Tammy 307 Fowler, Catherine and Christopher 86 Franconi, Mauro

308 Frisina, Antonio

Submission Number

Name

30 Gagliano, Anne and Vince 309 Gagliano, Jesse 310 Gagliano, Vince 379 Genders, Warren 195 Gintzburger, Gustave 342 Giovenco, Francesco 16 Glavovic, Sladan and Belinda

432 Gnangara Action Group for Urban Deferred 38 Goodge, Ian and Barbara

196 Gordon, Jeanette 56 Grabovac, Vlade and Lesley

433 Green, Kate 260 Green, Robert 261 Green, Rosaleen 171 Green, Steven 262 Green, William 143 Haley, Margaret 22 Hanks, Trevor

311 Harding, Kelly 380 Harris, Timothy and Karen 144 Harvey, Keith and Rosemarie 312 Hatchett, Cheryl and Rodney 313 Hatchett, Richelle 381 Hayes, Emma 145 Hayman, Margaret 441 Health, Department of 44 Heintz, Darin

162 Hesling, Andrea 163 Hesling, Robert 314 Hibbert, Margaret 146 Hill, Beverley 97 Ho, Son Van

382 Holland, Suzanne and Martyn 315 Holmes, Leanne 87 Hong, Van Nhieu 62 Hoult, Garry

383 Housing Authority 147 Humble, H 294 Hunt, Caroline 197 Hunt, Erica 198 Hunt, Peter 199 Hunt, Philip 361 Intaract Pty Ltd 63 James, Michael and Kathy 72 Jarnicki, Wanda

148 Johnson, Anne 64 Johnson, Hayley

121 Johnson, Helen 68 Johnson, James

316 Johnson, Jodie 122 Johnson, Kaitlin 69 Johnson, Pamela

384 Joondalup, City of

Submission Number

Name

385 Keys, Kenneth 386 Keys, Kenneth and O’Brien, Constance

9 Klarich, Graeme 76 Klemm, Daniel

264 Kodnik, Amanda 265 Kodnik, Edwina 266 Kodnik, Joel 267 Kodnik, Liam 268 Kodnik, Robert 387 Kokir, Shubhra 388 Labang, Ambrose and Ratha & Nguon, Dana 200 Langdon, Rachael 73 Langdon, Ronald 74 Langdon, Sheila

123 Lau, Andrew 124 Lau, Dave 17 Lau, Que Hung and Jane

164 Lau, Suk Mei 201 Laverty, Karen 202 Laverty, Terrence 125 Layton, Kaycee 203 Lemmon, Bradley 204 Lemmon, Naomi 205 Lemmon, Rebecca 206 Lemmon, Sean 269 Leske, Richard

2 Lindeboom, Jack and Leslie 115 Lippi, Jason and Hannah 35 Lockwood, John

343 Loffman, Steven 149 Loomes, Graham 150 Loomes, JA 116 Lopreiato, Kerry and Joe 317 Lowe, Alexander and Robin 80 Lunn, Annabelle 98 Lupis, Giovanni 99 Ma, Phuong Thuc 32 MacAdams, Isabelle and Michael

172 MacAdams, Katie 151 Macente, Rick 318 Maher, Helen 319 Maher, Lisa 320 Maher, Vince 321 Main Roads Western Australia 344 Maine, Christopher 345 Maine, Jeni 346 Maine, Jessie 347 Maine, Kristie 173 Mantle, Andrew and Karen 165 Markoff, Carol 434 Marks, Jessica 348 Marotta, Vicki 82 Marriott, Cheryl

Submission Number

Name

106 Martin, Ilda 107 Martin, Paul 270 Martin-Brown, Lynn 389 Massari, Michele 390 Massari, Rita 24 McDermott, John 23 McDermott, Susan 70 MH Brothers Pty Ltd and Tran, Duc Dai 4 Mines and Petroleum, Department of

81 Mitchell, Robert and Ruth 117 Moodie, Clare 118 Moodie, Fraser 119 Moodie, Judith 120 Moodie, Warren 271 Moore, Jean 391 Moorehouse, Christine 349 Mori, Luciano and Diana 392 Moroz, Paul and Franklin, Claire 207 Moyle, Alesha 208 Moyle, Brett 209 Mullins, Craig 210 Mullins, David 211 Mullins, Diana and Ronald 212 Mullins, Glenys 213 Mullins, Tegan 36 Mundy, Jeremy 33 Murgatroyd, Merna

100 Murphy, Michelle 101 Murphy, Tenae 37 Neville, Stephen 20 Nguyen, Gong Van and Thi Kim Ngoc

126 Nguyen, Huu Hieu and Pham, Thi Mai 272 Nguyen, Minh Tan 65 Nguyen, Van Khai

393 Novak, Nick and John 263 Nuynh, Nho 394 O’Brien, Constance 322 Oates, Ken 273 Okely, Jessica 274 Okulicz, Danae 276 Okulicz, Deirdre 275 Okulicz, George 214 Ormsby, Brett 215 Ormsby, Chris 216 Ormsby, Jennifer 217 Ormsby, Melissa 48 Owens, Kate

435 Panzich, Debra 436 Panzich, John 350 Parody, Camille 351 Parody, Debra 395 Pater, Duan 396 Pater, Rogan

Submission Number

Name

397 Pater, Vonda 18 Pattison, Darren 10 Peacock, Irene

323 Pearce, Jenny and Robert 398 Pearn, Lesley 399 Perkins, Vivienne 83 Petrovski, Dimce 88 Petrovski, Karen

152 Phillips, Hazel 295 Piercy, Robert and Lorraine 277 Pine, Jess 400 Pinnacle Planning on behalf of the owners of Lot 21 (60) Damian Road,

Jandabup 401 Pirozzi, Domenico 402 Pirozzi, Francesco 403 Pirozzi, Giulia 404 Pirozzi, Katia 49 Planning Context on behalf of Bridgeleigh Investment Pty Ltd

405 Pondevie, Jean-Claude 169 Porter, Amelia 406 Prendergast, Susan 407 Radalj, Ivy 77 Ramsay, Elizabeth 78 Ramsay, Maurice 40 Ravi Lagopi Pty Ltd

278 Raymond, Ailsa 279 Raymond, Edward 352 Rego, Conrad 66 Reimers, Sharon 52 Rhodes, Brian 53 Rhodes, Carol 89 Rhodes, Kate 84 Richardson, Steven

108 Rigali, Elia 353 Rigney, Liam and Bobby & Maher, Gerry and Cathy 54 Rijks, JJF and Van De Klashorst-Rijks, EM

408 Rivas-Barnao, Nikiel 443 Roberts, Gary and Shirley 218 Roddy-Clarke, Christine 219 Roddy-Dixon, Katelyn 39 Rokbuild Pty Ltd; Rokich, S; Audas, K and J; Manera, P & Agostino, F, P

and G 154 Rolfing, Elsbeth 71 Rollini, Mario

220 Rose, Andrea 85 Roumier, Sylvie and Michot, Thierry

221 Rowbotham, Margaret 5 Rowe Group on behalf of landowners

153 Roy, Sue 409 RPS Group on behalf of Jazna Pty Ltd 410 RPS Group on behalf of North Mariginiup landowners 296 Russell, Brett 222 Sabatino, Jean

Submission Number

Name

354 Sabatino, Nigel and Caitlin 411 Saffioti, Rita 355 Saligari, Marcel and Patricia 324 Sandler, David 19 Saunders, Michael

412 Schad, Thomas and Marion 413 Seke, Annette and Gabor 414 Simmons, Dennis 102 Smith, Darren 155 Smith, Marjorie 50 Smyth, Erica

223 Solarz, Stanislaw 280 Somers, Dean 156 Sonter, Arthur, David, Joanne and Valmai 325 Southview Nominees Pty Ltd 224 Spiers, Lorraine 225 Spiers, Stephen 226 Spratt, Benjamin 227 Spratt, Jordan 228 Spratt, Melanie 229 Spratt, Nicholas 415 Stabler, Roberta 230 Stampalia, Debra 356 Stampalia, Gregory 281 Stampalia, Jeffrey 282 Stampalia, Marisa 90 State Development, Department of

231 Stephen, Ben 232 Stephen, Justine 297 Stevens, Clive 157 Stitt, PM 357 Strugnell, Stephen and Ruth 158 Taylor, Joanne 326 Taylor, Len 298 Terranovis Pty Ltd on behalf of affected landowners 416 Testi, Emilia 417 Tipper, Dianne 233 Torre, Michael 283 Townsend, David 437 Townsend, Heather 284 Townsend, Michael 285 Townsend, Robert 438 Townsend, Stanley 28 Tran, Phong 41 Treloar, Debra and Boyd

418 Treloar, Debra on behalf of Peard Real Estate 43 Treloar, Debra, Boyd, Luke and Josh 29 Truong, Huang Tho

419 Unknown 358 Unknown (petition) 420 Uyen, Elisa 234 Vakis, Mr and Mrs 421 Van Den Bussche, Angelina and Andrew

Submission Number

Name

422 Van Loenhout, Jamie 423 Van Loenhout, Jon-Paul 439 Verdanck, John 440 Verdanck, Kylee 235 Vickery, Alan and Stephanie 127 Vinciguerra, David 128 Vinciguerra, Sandra 236 Voight, Alex and Catherine 424 Vulinovich, Anthony 425 Vulinovich-Zlatan, Ven 359 Walker, Michael 170 Wanneroo, City of 67 Water, Department of 42 Webb, Chris

360 Webb, Elizabeth 327 Welch, Julia

1 Wells, Grazyna and Grant 426 Western Power 299 Wingfield, Christine 27 Wong, Raymond and Quach, Sien Ly 55 Wood, Terrence and Woodroffe, Susan

237 Wright, Rodney 238 Wright, Susanne 427 Wright, Suzanne 159 Wyatt, Gail 239 Wyche, Adam 240 Wyche, Amanda 75 Yakinthou, Robin and Effie

286 Zuvela, Angela 287 Zuvela, Lara 288 Zuvela, Lina

Late

Submissions Name

445 Franceschi, Maryke 447 Lau, Shirley 446 Parker, Scott and Vicki 444 Water Corporation

Submissions

Planning and Development Ad 2005Steffen 1 Amendment (Substantial

Form 41

SuiMiifesfemffeto ellten §t@gi®n Sctem® m®n m@nt 1180S/41

East Wa nsero© itrucfesr® Pten Ar i

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

08 JUL 2016

FILE Iv i b

To: Secretaryeste Australian Planning Comnrission

Locked Bag 2506Perth W 6001

sepee use only

i

Submission 366

Nam© ,.../ A . .(0rrT.:YT :Pi£ sepR»»tci,eJsfli.Y:' .

Address. .../. C. ?. .... Postcod® . .6... '?. ? .

Contact hone number . . M . !?.3Ema l address. . h. /£

u sfitesisn (Plea e attac additional ages if require It is preferre that any additional information be loose rather t an bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Envi onmental Assess ent(SEA), I submit that the area defin d as Deferre Urban south of Coogee Road bet een Momington and Adams Rd. is incon radiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversit of the area will be severel compromised by a narrowurba strip. Such n abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the t in wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiu andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural ovement of flora and fauna is completely restricted nd the unique ch nceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be asted. This opportun ty for aecological brid e is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these etlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed n rrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing trausitioits between Parks (Lake dams),

Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake dams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Sp cial Rural Estate, designed, plann and sold as an ques rian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Addition lly two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both etlands. Lake damsand the Mariginiu lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles an accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition betwee these two

etlan s is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and La e Ad ms as Special-MuraS with

Special Provisions as in r gard of efined building envelopes an protection of exis ing flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of most interested parties and:

a. ...avoid a clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned ar as.

b. ...maintain an enviroram utel bridge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo rea, betweenwetlands a d open space.

c. ... reserve the many m ture trees in the area, which are essential home an food sources for maffi birds including theCarnaby Cockatoos.

d. ...find the su port of most laa owmers conce ed.

e. ...mot require taxpa er money to establish an ecological bridge of par land and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration ill be given to the above submission, which I beli ve best serves gui elines by gove ment and altparties. - t rn over to complete your submission -

tearing ©f submission

An one who has made a written submission on the amend ent has the o po tunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a su -committee of the WAPC. You o not haw f® attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by ou in this ritten submission ill be considered in deter ining the recommendationfor t e proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to t e amendment report and inparticular ap endix D.

Ptease €h©@s@ ©n© ©f the following:

Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

n Yes, 1 ash to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the follo ing details)

f will be epresented by:[ M self - M tele hone number (business hours):

or

C A s okesperson

Name of s o esperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to b© conducted in:

[I] Public (me bers from the general public ma attend your resentation)

ORPrivate (only the peo le nominated by ou or the hearings committee will be

per itted to attend)

You should be aware that:

© T e WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, su missions made to the WAPC may esubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing su missions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, ma be disclosed to third parties.

> All hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in ariiament and published as pu lic recor s should the Gove or approve the propose amendment TheWAPC reco mendations are similarly pu lishe in a report on submissions and tabled in Pariiament.

To be si ned bv personfsj making the submission

Signature

Note: Sufemlsslora tiUST © re©©li e-d fey to© advertised elosing ate, befisig close offbusiness pml ®m ® JULY geiS. Late swfemfesfoM ra l ra@T be

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 0551 8000; Fa -(08) 6551 0001; Email - [email protected]; Website-http:flww .planning.wa.gov.au

lien' i m Y lki' uHii ili' chiiiiifi.' ( MH tmi ndmc I >08 -II

>»0 OHMr SIMGROVE PINJAR

C '* 4S0awse

C A274S

C/,90T18

ssProposal 1CA

4807? CA5M7:

c' SINAGRA4§39i

C -nwo 7965

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commiss onLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

Submission 367

Name /tfkt.&Mt i. Be.uw (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Postcode .. 4? . ?. P.

Contact phone number 2>0 4? P,. Email address &. X P>.@. P.' Xs.

Submission (Please attach additional pages if require . It is preterred that an additional information be loose rather than bound)

(L Ase ,,.. ... © C. fir . .X V.>. % t ° p... P . X-.... PyX.. £ <?.

DEPARTMENT OF PLA NING

- Jl)L

FILE

turn over to complete your submission

04.07.16 Murray & Ruth Bell

SUBMISSION Regarding MRS Amendment 1308/41

Our property is situated at 14 Albert Court, Wanneroo in the Special Rural zone east of Lenore

Road, which we understand is just outside the proposed framework area.

Sustainable Housing - We bought our property because we wanted this lifestyle and way of

liv ng, with space to bring up our family in a more rural setting. It was a property with enough

space to enable proper orientation of our house towards the sun, for effective passive solar

house design.

We are leased our zone has remained as rural living. However we must relay our very strong

opposition to the designated Urban Deferred zoning of the lots in our estate, which have

frontage to Lenore Road. For the minimal number of housing lots this strip will pro ide, it will

have great impact on the remaining Special Rural owners, who will ha e potentially 10 to 20

different neighbours along their adjoining fence line. This will undoubtedly cause friction and

unrest between the two very different lifestyles, in such close proximity. We believe people who

live on small urban blocks, generally may not respect bush properties as much as rural livin

owners do. We predominantly built here looking for a more peaceful e istence, with space for

horses or other rural pursuits. This MRS Amendment 1308/41 already shows urban housing

along 3 sides of our estate. Rezoning some of our rural lots as urban deferred is simply

unacceptable and we believe the thin end of a wedge to lever us out of our properties.

We strongly recommend the Urban Deferred Zone proposed for the 12 Special

Rural lots in our estate along the eastern side of Lenore Road be removed

entirely, to maintain the amenity of our Special Rural estate.

A Diverse Community - We believe it is of great benefit for a community to contain a mixture of

dwelling and lifestyle choices within its municipality. A diversity of living experience enriches a

community and gives people choices, as to how they wish to live their lives. Nearly all of the

developments we see springing up around us all look the same, so there is no diversity.

Predominately the houses people build are similar, all on small lots; I fear there will be little

choice in lifestyles of the future.

Natural vegetation - our block, and others in our estate have been identified by DEC as being

quality natural vegetation. We agree with the statement on page 3 of the East Wanneroo

Structure Plan document that re nant native vegetation is worthy of retention and that

priority local natural areas provide an important ecological function in the landscape .

;? of /f-

Our block has vast numbers of native trees including banksias, grass trees & jarrah, as well as a

ultitude of wild flowers. These naturally attract a range of wildlife such as lizards, frogs, a

variety of birds, including the endangered Carnaby s Black Cockatoos and also bees. Bees have

been suffering a decline in numbers statewide recently.

We agree holeheartedly with the State Planning Policy 2.8 - Bushland Policy for the Perth

Metropolitan Area that seeks to proactively safeguard an enhance Bushland Forever areas

and other significant quality bushland areas such as ours. East Wanneroo is being infiltrated by

developers who want to bulldoze every livin thing to maximize their profit.

Please safeguard our Badgerup Lakes estate from any plans for urbanization and keep all

properties to the east of Lenore Road Special Rural.

Yours sincerely,

Murray and Ruth Bell

o F

Hearing of submissions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D. i

Please choose one of the following:

m No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented by:

C] Myself-My telephone number (business hours):

or

CU A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

dl Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORd Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to attend)


• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date .. . r./.... sd.dl 9. I 9

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Conlacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// wrw.pIanning.wa.gov.au

1+. oP Lj-


Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308 41

' U J Li a

Ipa tmen ofpi n

08 JUL 2016

io B FILE


CFFCE fiEC:.LV

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth VV 6001

i

Submission 368

ft' jS/CpcP. TNameI f i PLE SE FFlVrCLEA=L

Postcode..

Contact phone number l l{t 2B OS S 'l Email address (

Submission (Please attach additional pages if req ired It is preferre that any additional information oe loose rather than boun )

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A endment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban outh of Coogee Road between Mornington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco dama e and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurba strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lalce Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andL ke Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the u ique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This op ortunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currentl proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a ore harmonious transition between these twowetlan s is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land beriveen both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined buildi g envelopes an protection of existing flora {map attached, targeted rea shadedin yellow).


a. ...avoid a clash of lifestyles by creating buf er zones for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environ ental bridge for the movement of flora and auna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds incl ding theCarnaby Cockatoo ,

d. ...find the upport of ost la downers conce ed.

e. ...not require t xpayer money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe e t serves guidelines by gove ment and allp rties. - turn over to complete your sub ission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasts of their submission to a su -committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D.


M No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


1 will be represented by:

C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:

I would prefer my hearing to e con ucted in:

E Public (mem ers from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on su missions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by erson(s) making the submission

Signature

Note: Subimissions MUST be received by the a vertised ciosing date, being close ofb siness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2018. Late su mis ions will NOT be considere .

Contacts: Telep one - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.plannin .wa.gov.au

Map showi g in Yellow submitted changes to MRS a endme t 1 308/41

038 tsfu si-H PINJARGROVE


Form 41

Submission

J ZoioeDE ARTMENT

08 JU

OF PLANNING

L 2016

OG (2?Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


OFFICE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 369

Name .... P.SX£ . . / P.b A . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address Irfr.... .t.,. .. v... Postcode .., .7. ?

Contact phone number (9, 2.7.20. Email address pi



For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D,


• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.



To be signed by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

e ,dl- O ., '.. L c-Jl O JL

,~io cJj g ji UL JL.f Jlwt x

co- - -

( -Xs- c j-- - ->- ,

U (£>- ~ - , O JL

-X> I Jl. , fe.t«X. r J

X c-'.-. - »: \ y . ¦ ,. j -S _ ¦?_ O ~(/)~' Jiy yy y- l - -

X 4 V-. - _ iv's X - O u ,, T..( . .X d-tj-fy ¦ '._ - ¦•

X Xo/Si ,

iXe As Jtaoi i 6. y <sr* z

kcJls jsi S'- ' w-'r- x} '

f - AJy - < ~ \A-~v v y'- i ,v-ir A. ? C O

f3jis 9 C£ p/Xg'-\S L-« il .

L l K o ? s cjX ~ L cA- o L

Jl f xJi Jl cb..A?

lanning ana ueveio mwia

Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41



oe e se only

To SecretaryWeste Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Pert WA 6001

Submission 370

Name

Address

tFLEASEPRINT CLEARL -

i3 (J A f ostcod e V-?.

Contact phone number >. Email address mlatt u .-. (&v¥>.

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferred that any additional information be loos rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amend ent 1 08/41and with due consideration follo in a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Momington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the bio iversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narro urban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Ada s and the t in wetlands of Lake Little-M riginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural move ent of flora and fauna is completely restricte and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encourage by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most lo ical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban stri South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transi ions between Parks (Lake Ada s),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Ada s) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Further ore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an e uestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land bet en both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural ith

Special Provisions as in regard of defined buildin envelopes and protection f existing flora (map attached, t rgeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of most interested parties and :

a. ...avoid a clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain a environmental bri ge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCarnaby Cockatoos.

d. ..find the support of ost landowners concerned.

e. ...not require taxpa er mone to establish an ecological bridge of parkland a d lifest le transitions.

I trust that due consi eration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allarties, - turn over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in deter ining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.



No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the for and sign)

OR

Yes, I wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please complete the following details)


Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson



C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORC Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act. _ _


• All hearings are recorded an transcribe . The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records shoul the Gove or approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly publishe in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv personfs) makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofusiness (Spm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late su missions will OT e considered.

Contacts; Tele hone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htt ://www.planning.wa.gov.au

shou I Mi, m V !?.,u submiiti'd han es Co MKS amen mem 1 08 !

86 o« »\ai«A GROVE PINJAR

lanning ana ueveio mem


SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Am ndment 1308/41


OFPCE USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWeste Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth W 6001

Submission 371

N3niG .. ... :PUEASE PRfriT CLEAEIY!'

Address .. . U& . Postcode . .P. .L

Contact phone number < M rQ 16£M . Email a dr ss

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferr d that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/ 1and with due consideration following a tudy of the Federal and State Government i itiative of Strategic Environ ental Assess ent(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Ro d between Momington and Adams R . is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be s verely compromised by a narrowurban s rip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Ada s and the t in wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural ovement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecolo ical lin age as outlined in the EWSP and encoura ed by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing tran itions between Parks (Lake Adams),


History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural E tate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths hichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area borderin the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for deca es provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural withSpecial Provisions as in regard of defined buildin envelopes and protection of existing flora (map attached, t rgeted area shadedin yellow).

esult: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of most interested parties and:

a. ...avoid a dash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environmental b idge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands a d open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds including theCarnaby Cock toos.

d. ...find the support of m st landowners concerned.

e. ... ot require taxpayer money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration w ll be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves gui elines by gover ment and allarties. - t rn over to complete your submission



For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appen ix D.

Please choose on of the following:

no, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the for and sign)

*

OR

Yes, wish to spea at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I wilt be represented by:


or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number ( usiness hours): Postal address:


Pu lic (members from the general public ay attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be


You shoul be aware that:

• T e WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 an as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may e disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all ritten submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should t e Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ne bv person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertised closing at , eing close ofusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late sub issions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website -http:ffwww. lanning wa.gov.au

sho njg lit \ tfliuH uh»it ted chan 4 to M amendment I 08 l

¦>S6 »Mr if\siM, GRO E PS JARiP-

Planning anci Development Act 2005

( $020 % biiPAiWiiiNT p InniNv

Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41 OB JUL 2016

Submiss onFILEMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


J=PCE USECI.LY

To: Secretar Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth VVA 6001

Submission 372

ame

Address.

Contact phone number IjQQ.

h) 7£Email address

*

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred that an additlonal information oe lo se rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for sub issions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I s bmit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of C ogee Road between Mornington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that, the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a nar owurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lalce Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as hese wetlands are closer together than a y other in this area.

currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian est te, has bridle paths hichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere D ive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare bet een both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these two

wetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the l nd between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-R ral with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of existi flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of most interested parties an :

a. ... void a clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zo es for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an envir nment l bridge for the movement of flora and f una, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the man mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCar ab Cock toos.

d. ...find the su port of most landowners concerned.

e. ...not require taxpayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and life tyle transitions.

I trust that, due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government a d llarties. - turn over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to atten a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.


sf-Please choose one of tlhe following:

No, I do not wish to spea at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

O

Yes, I ish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)



or

E] A spokesperson


I would refer my hearing to be con ucted in:

E Public (mem ers from the general public may attend your presentat on)

ORE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access un er the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly publis ed in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by person(s) makin the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (Spm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late su missions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Yellow submitted changes to MRS amend ent 1308/4!

33/RANCH L , P. y.D

BYV48464

; CASJARim

C 5117;

09B GROVE

¦ . '' ¦ \

PIN JAR

PA C 472-32 ™ Lj27 g48frH . k ¦

CA50718§MAf

3

C 1987>.040

3361;_jj':NSEND | ROAD 1

Proposal 11JAh

CA7349C SINAGRA

49394

A 47690 47965

Planning ana uevoio mwiiiAwi

Section 41 Amendment (Substantial) A fOiASqeForm 41 departm nt of planning

Submissio 08 JUL 2016Metropolitan Region Schem A ndm nt 1308(41

Eas W nneroo Str cture Plan Are FILE v ( O 6(3

To: SecretaryWestern Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

OSPCB USE ONLY

Submission 373 •

Name... . Q..SE PRINT

PostcodeAd ress • &

Contact phone mxrtbet Email address .: '.fY:lfc0.i...CLY /f O.cj/.vrKc'.l .co. rY .

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferred that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metro olit n Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consi eration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban sou h of Coogee Ro d between omington and Adams Rd. is incontr diction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurb n strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Ada s and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural ovement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecolo ical linkage as outline in theEWSP and encoura ed by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This op ortunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one i the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narro urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing tran ition between Parks (Lake Adams),

Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, lanned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area borderin the north side of Coogee Road, fro Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally t o road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes, To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetl nds is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land bet een both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Sural with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map att ched, t rgeted are shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of ost interested parties and:

a. ...avoid a clash of lifestyles by creating uffer zones for positive transitions t een the zoned areas.

b. ...m intain an environmental b idge for the movement of flor and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential hom and food sources for man birds including theCarnaby Cockatoos.

d. ...find the support of most landowner concerned,

e. ...not require taxpayer money to establish an ecological bridge of parklan an lifest le transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by govern ent and allparties. - (urn over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the reco mendationfor the proposed amendment.



No, i do not wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, l ish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the follo ing details)



or

A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number ( usiness hours): Postal a dress:


Pu lic (members from the general p blic ay attend your presentation)





• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yo rsubm ssion or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all ritten submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament,

To be si ned b person(s) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received y the advertised closing date, being close ofusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions wifi NOT e considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning. 8.gov.au

tunvin.- 4 »il suhmiitcd ch. ingts lo MUS aincndment I 0S 41

j95> omncvsim. GROVE Pi JAR


Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amend ent 1308/41



OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 374

lsjalr)e0 (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ?*.P?2™ ....... £asZ. . * .... Postcode

Contact phone number Email address : 0.N/.a.u

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

o jo WAPc S ff Afio jllsj Ut m ..... tftwt '(j MjtAt jp

... P..CA/} l . fa1 &}wtt is uidudeJ utA./ ..P oaM:.iSOs l

/vul Jaivff iti 0/ Len Ajr Q&,


- JUL 2016

FLE

turn over to com lete your submission



For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and in ,particular appendix D.


No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

0 Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)



or

A spokesperson

. , . A A l6fo - Cdfp.Na e of spokesperson:......... ...v.

Contact telephone number (business hours): /. . ..P.?r9.?..... Postal address: .2?. St. &lSt.Mj!1.. .... t..


Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)







To be si ned by person(s) making the submission

Signature Date <? 7 6X)(L

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions ill NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

7 July 2016

Western Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

ATTENTION: SECRETARY

Dear Kerrine,

RE: SUBMISSION - MRS AMENDME T 1308/41 EAST WANNEROO STRUCTURE PLAN AREALOTS 4 AND 5 MORNINGTON DRIVE, MARIGINIUP

Submission objective:

• To bring the WAPC s attention the historic planning and environmental approvals contextfor Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup-

• To ensure that Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup is included in the Urban Deferred zoningboundary under MRS Amendment 1308/41.

This submission on MRS Amendment 1308/41 has been compiled by Creative Design + Planning andEmerge Associates on behalf of Urban Capital Carramar Pty Ltd and Pinjar Properties Pty Ltd in relation toLots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup (subject land). The proposed MRS Amendment with the subjectland highlighted is shown at Figure 1.

MRS Amendment 1308/41 includes Lot 4 in the'Urban Deferred zone however excludes Lot 5;this lot proposed to be retained in the Rural zone. The submission requests, based ondetailed justification, inclusion of Lot 5 in theUrban Deferred’ zone as part of MetropolitanRegion Scheme (MRS) Amendment 1308/41.

Despite Lot 5 having historic federal approvalsand significant historical liaison with the State,including an agreed offset strategy with theDepartment of Environment and Conservation(DEC), it is understood that Lot 5 has beenexcluded from the ‘Urban Deferred’ zone on thegrounds of:

• unresolved ‘state environmentalconsiderations’

• consideration of State relevantenvironmental factors; and

• that Lot 5 supported significantenvironmental values and would ultimatelybe reserved for Parks and Recreation underthe MRS to retain and conserve the site’senvironmental values.

SUBJECT IAND

IJ

t

\

v

Figure 1: MRS Amendment 1308/41

WACD+P 2016\UrbAq\1. East Wanneroo\MRS\4. MRS SubmissionM 60707 L_WAPC MRS Amdl 1308_41 Submission.docx

28 BROWN STREET T +61 8 9325 0200EAST PERTH WA 6004 F +61 8 9325 4818PO BOX 7655 E [email protected] SQUARE WA 6850

ACN 600 658 722ABN 47 600 658 722CD 8 P PTY LTD T/AS CREATIVE DESIGN + PLA NING

Creative Design + Planning

This submission strongly disputes the above assertions countering with compelling rational as to why thesubject land should be identified as Urban Deferred in accordance with the WAPC s Directions 2031 andBeyond and Perth and Peel @ 3.5 million policy instruments.

1. The Subject Land

The subject land, being Lots 4 and 5 MorningtonDrive, Mariginiup comprises 16.58 ha in themunicipality of the City of Wanneroo. It is bound byCoogee Road to the north and Mornington Drive tothe west. Lot 5 is on the predominant corner of thisproposed new residential cell, at the corner ofCoogee Road and Mornington Drive.

Lot 4 has been historically cleared and used formarket gardening, whereas Lot 5 is encompassed bynative vegetation across this ~8ha site. However,Lot 5 is not contiguous with other Bush Forever orParks and Recreation Reserve land parcels underthe MRS as shown on Figure 2. It is surrounded byurban land to the west, future urban land to the eastand south (as per the Draft North West Sub-RegionalFramework) and a significant road reserve and thenrural land to the north.

The subject land is currently zoned Rural under theMetropolitan Region Scheme and ‘Rural Resource under the City of Wanneroo District PlanningScheme No.2. Lot 4 is proposed to be rezoned toUrban Deferred by MRS Amendment 1308/41,however Lot 5 is proposed to remain as Rural.

2. Environmental and Planning ApprovalBackground

The subject land has a long planning and environmental approvals history and context. Substantial timeand cost has been invested by Pinjar Properties since acquiring the site in 2007. This including securingthe necessary planning approvals required to progress a proposed Lifestyle Village; which necessitatesconsultation with, and/or assessment by, both the City of Wanneroo and Department of Planning.

The critically important historical process is conveyed as follows:

En ironmental Approvals

• Pinjar Properties secured approval to construct a lifestyle village pursuant to the EnvironmentProtection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) on 16 December 2011. Theassociated controlling provisions comprised listed threatened species and communities (section 18& 18A), and specifically related to two species of black cockatoo. Key conditional requirementsassociated with this approval were that 2.81 ha of native vegetation be retained and placed undera conservation covenant, and the securing of an offsite offset site (Attachment 1 refers).

® Pinjar Properties also lodged an application to clear native vegetation under Western Australia’sEnvironmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), which involved the remaining nati e vegetation(5.17ha) within Lot 5. A preliminary assessment report for CPS 4145 was issued by the Departmentof Environment and Conservation (DEC) in May 2011. DEC advised that it had specificallyconsidered the presence of a State listed threatened ecological community (FCT 20a) and wasprepared to accept the applicant’s environmental offset strategy accordingly. Importantly, as partof the environmental offset strategy, the WAPC was approached and agreed to a suite ofenvironmental restoration works being undertaken on land it owned at Little Lake Mariginiup(Attachment 2 refers).

Page I 2


• Despite the above, but in accordance with s51094 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986, theDEC deferred making a decision on the clearing permit application on the basis that the appropriatezoning was not in place to allow the development of a park home Lifestyle Village. The written DECadvice in this regard (dated 11 May 2011) has been included as Attachment 3. Pinjar Propertiescontinued efforts to resolve the planning requirements, and the clearing permit application >remained active but in abeyance, as can be seen in the correspondence from DEC dated 15 March2012 (Attachment 4 refers).

® In essense, Pinjar Properties had all but resolved the necessary environmental approvals tofacilitate the proposed Lifestyle Village, and the progression of this was only prevented by the needfor the subject land to be rezoned in accordance with the East Wanneroo Structure Plan.

• As part of historic environmental assessment and approval processes, the following investigationshave been undertaken;

o Lot 5 Pinjar Road Mariginiup Flora and vegetation Survey (ENV Australia 2006).

o Lot 5 Mornington Drive Mariginiup Fauna Assessment (ENV Australia 2008).

o Lot 5 Pinjar Road Mariginiup - Gaceful Sun Moth and Carnaby s Black Cockatoo Survey(Ecoscape Australia 2010).

o Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey - Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup (Monocot-DicotResearch, 2010).

The above investigations identified the key environmental consideration and values as follows:

o The site contains 5ha of native vegetation that was assessed as being in Very good toexcellent’ condition.

o The site supports habitat (foraging) for Carnaby’s black cockatoo.

o The native vegetation within the site is representative of a State listed threatened ecologicalcommunity, referred to as Floristic Community Type (FCT) 20a.

The investigations outlined above were undertaken to initiate and then progress environmentalapprovals pursuant to both the EPBC Act and the EP Act. Potential impacts on Carnaby’s blackcockatoo was the primary focus of the EPBC Act approval process, and vegetationrepresentativeness, Carnaby’s black cockatoo and the State listed threatened ecologicalcommunity were the primary focus of the relevant EP Act approval process (via the clearing permitapplication and assessment process).

Lifestyle Village and Local Planning Scheme Rezoning

• Both State and Local Government Agencies confirmed that the proposed Lifestyle Villagedevelopment was inappropriate; this by virtue of the land s existing ‘Rural’ zoning.

• Local Planning Scheme amendments were required to progress this. Flowever, the rezoning of theland was then not supported on the basis of being too premature under the guise of orderly andproper planning; namely the ad ancement of the WAPC’s endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan.

• Notwithstanding the above, the Department of Planning acknowledged that Pinjar Properties wereintending to progress with resolving federal and state environmental constraints’ (Attachment 5refers).

® This rezoning process had not substantially progressed until recently with the endorsement of theEast Wanneroo Structure Plan in 2011 and the recent initiation of MRS Amendment 1308/41 nowbeing considered.

Page|3

Creative Design + Pla ning

3. Statutor Planning Context

The following strategic Planning documents should be duly considered to guide inclusion of Lot 5Mornington Drive in the proposed Urban Deferred zone boundary under MRS Amendment 1308/41:

WAPC Draft Perth and [email protected] and draftNorth-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework

The Draft Perth and [email protected] and draft North-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework depicts theentire subject land (Lots 4 and 5) as UrbanExpansion (refer Figure 3).

WAPC East Wanneroo Structure Plan

The entire subject land (Lots 4 and 5) is identified asbeing suitable for urban development under therecently endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan(refer Figure 4) with no indication of Lot 5 beingexcluded from the Urban zone.

City of Wanneroo Local Planning Policy 5.3 - EastWanneroo

The City of Wanneroo’s Local Planning Policy 5.3 -East Wanneroo outlines the first step in the processof the development of the East Wanneroo area,including the subject land, is an amendment to theMRS to rezone the land to Urban based on the EastWanneroo Structure Plan. As outlined above, thesubject land is shown as ‘Urban on the endorsedEast Wanneroo Structure Plan.

WAPC State Planning Policy 2.8 - Bushland fo the Perth Metropolitan Region

The subject land is not included in a Bush Foreverarea as mapped in State Planning Policy 2.8.

The amendment report indicates that the WAPChas assessed this amendment against the policyobjectives of SPP 2.8. Subsequently, the WAPCadvises that areas have been identified which aresuitable as future Parks and Recreation reserves,and were identified as Potential Urban in theEWSP. These sites are relatively large and/or arecontiguous with existing Bush Forever and Parks &Recreation reserves and have been rationalised,consistent with lot boundaries where possible.These areas are to remain in the Rural zone, to bereserved as Parks and Recreation in a future RSamendment process.

It can be deduced that Lot 5 has been proposed toremain in the Rural zone as a result of this process.However, this has been undertaken without takinginto consideration the existing environmentalapprovals in place over the subject land.

Figure 3: Draft North West Sub-regionalPlanning Framework

a «•****«• * tf*!* « * * v® P »* « r • ••V.

to /urtftGfjji'a.mvrg, t

t * ft *

RANCH; R AD

Wannerooground atirea mentplant

. C POW .STREET

Wanneroo

SUBJECT

Figure 4: East Wanneroo Structure Plan

Page | 4


WAPC Draft Perth and Pee! for 3.5 Million Green Growth Plan

The Draft Green Growth Plan shows the following in relation to the subject land:

• Both Lots 4 and 5 are included within the Urban Class of Action ;

® Both Lots 4 and 5 are shown as having existing approvals in place; and

« The entirety of Lot 5 is shown as supporting a Specific Commitment . While the basis for this isnot clearly articulated within the draft Green Growth Plan, it is assumed that this relates to theremnant vegetation being representative of a State listed threatened ecological community.

On behalf of Pinjar Properties Pty Ltd and Urban Capital Carramar Pty Ltd, Emerge Associateslodged a submission on the WAPC s Green Growth Plan requesting that this documentation andassociated spatial mapping be modified to provide clarity regarding the Specific Commitment designation.

The submission drew the following conclusions and key recommendations:

o The key consideration for Lot 4 and 5 arising from the draft Green Growth Plan is the SpecificCommitment designation, which appears to exist despite the environmental approvalsbackground. Without specific clarity being provided or available in this regard, it wouldappear that the full environmental approval history has not seemed to have been recentlyconsidered by DoPAVAPC, to the extent that it has been thought that the State environmentalfactors have not been historically considered, and therefore there has been grounds to seekalternate outcomes to the historic approvals via the current MRS amendment process.

o The Green Growth Plan and associated EPBC Act strategic assessment has been primarilyprogressed to provide more certainty and addressing EPBC Act uncertainties and difficultiesthat arise at a project-by-project level. However, in this case it would strangely appear thatdespite an EPBC Act approval, it is State environmental considerations and processes thatare causing considerable uncertainty and also potentially substantial financial impacts interms of further delays and potentially the entire loss of any development potential within Lot5, which is entirely contrary to the environmental approvals history.

o It is therefore respectfully requested that the draft Green Growth Plan documentation andassociated spatial mapping be modified to provide clarity in this regard, and liaison occurbetween DPC and WAPC to ensure that the recently initiated MRS amendment be amendedto include Lot 5 in its entirety within the Urban Deferred zone. This will enable the suitableresolution of the environmental values within the site in line with the previously agreedenvironmental outcomes, which would involve the retention of 2.81 ha of native vegetation.

Within this submission Emerge Associates requested liaison occur between Department ofPremier and Cabinet (DPC) and WAPC to ensure that MRS amendment 1308/41 be amendedto include Lot 5 in its entirety within the Urban Deferred zone. This will enable the suitableresolution of the environmental values within the site in line with the previously agreedenvironmental outcomes, which would involve the retention of 2.81 ha of native vegetation withinLot 5. A full copy of the submission lodged on the Draft Green Growth Plan is included atAttachment 6.

Page I 5


4. Key Grounds for Consideration as Urban Deferred

Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup, should be included in the 'Urban Deferred Zone boundary under MRSAmendment 1308/41 on the following grounds:

• Development of the subject land (being Lots 4 and 5) has an EPBA Act approval and is the subjectof an agreed environmental offset package;

• A clearing permit (under the EP Act) has been significantly progressed and is only held in abeyancepending the rezoning of the subject land, this now to be specifically considered under MRSAmendment 1308/41;

• The subject land is included within and identified for Urban development in the Draft North-WestSub-Regional Planning Framework and the endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan;

• The subject land is identified in the ‘Urban Class of Action within the draft Green Growth Plan;

• The reasons stated by the WAPC for Lot 5 remaining in the Rural zone relate to environmentalconsiderations and factors. However, an environmental approval for the urban development of Lot5 has been issued under the EPBC Act and a clearing permit under the EP Act has significantlyprogressed and is only awaiting finalisation of the MRA rezoning process now being considered.These approvals involved careful consideration by the environmental agencies on all relevantenvironmental factors applicable to Lot 5;

• Lots 4 and 5 are in the final stages of a land sale transaction between Pinjar Properties Pty Ltd toUrban Capital Group. This sale was based on the expectation that the site could be developed inline with the existing environmental approvals. Importantly, it must also be noted that there is anopportunity to rationalise the currently required native vegetation retention area to provide betterconservation management outcomes (i.e. to achieve a more regular geometric shape with a lowerperimeter to area ratio);

Figure 5: Agreed Local Structure Plan (21 A) - Banksia Grove

Page|6

iitpH® IeiB s33$j£H®%s&F >iMfefel?£iW&®t

mmm®.llillMli

immmmmm

P

ws^/Z•*rrVL...

ImM

f&8VSSfeHSfil©L'KirM

BHp|w^SssaSKaBSTOfeSs^PIMlfi

ORTHOPHOTO

i»U|

•ae’cyi

Figure 6

LEGEND

K---------- 1 SUBJECT LAND

t


® The subject land situated on the corner of Mornington Drive and Coogee Road is immediately eastof the Banksia Grove urban front (refer Figure 5 and 6). Subsequently, the subject land is identifiedas a natural extension of this Structure Plan area and will positively contribute to the function,amenity and orderly and proper planning of the broader Banksia Grove neighbourhood by virtueof;

o contributing to the density and infill targets of the imminent Banksia Grove District TownCentre, recognising the subject land is within the 800m walkable catchment of this centreand its planned Main Street;

o contributing to the catchment of the Neerabup Primary School and associated communityfacilities, being within a 150m walkable catchment of this community node; and

o being within a 1500m catchment of the planned education and open space multi use facility(district facilit ) north-west of the Banksia Grove District Town Centre

® The subject land has direct access to Neighbourhood, District and Regional road infrastructure inJoondalup Drive, Pinjar Road and Wanneroo Road;

• The subject land has immediate access to all urban service infrastructure, being directly to the eastof the Banksia Grove urban front;

» Once the broader East Wanneroo District Structure Plan area is developed, the subject land willessentially have greater geographical and locational association to Banksia Grove than the EastWanneroo area; and

• The inclusion of Lot 5 in the Urban Deferred zoning provides Urban Capital a greater level ofcertainty to develop the site, and enables both Lots 4 and 5 to be designed holistically in terms ofplanning for open space distribution, and residential and road interface to the remnant bushlandareas with associated bushfire controls.

5. Summary

In light of the information presented above, we request that the subject land be included as part of theUrban Deferred area under MRS Amendment 1308/41. We understand there to be no valid legal reasonas to why Lot 5 could not be included in the amendment area. We acknowledge that the Department maynot have had all the necessary historical environmental context of these properties prior to the advertisingon MRS Amendment 1308/41.

We appreciate the opportunity to make a submission on MRS Amendment 1308/41 and look forward toreviewing the final document. We also take this opportunity to make formal request to m ke an oralpresentation to any special committee appointed to consider and report on submissions. We are also in aposition to facilitate formal meeting(s) that appear to be clearly warranted between the Department ofPlanning and the Department of Premier and Cabinet on this important matter.

Should you require any further information regarding this submission, please do not hesitate to contactJustin Hansen or the undersigned on 9325 0200.

Yours faithfullyCREATIVE DESIGN + PLANNING

FRANK ARA GIODIRECTOR

Page I 8

ATTACHMENT 1 - EPBC ACT APPROVAL, DECEMBER 2011

Australian GoYernme t

Department of Sustainability, Environnient, Water, Population and Communities

Approval

Residential Development, National Lifestyle Village, Lots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive,Mariginiup, WA (EPBC 2011/6020)

This decision is made under sections 130(1) and 133 of the Environment Protection andBiodiversity Cons rvation Act 1999.

Pro osed action

person to whom the Pinjar Propertiesapproval is granted

proponent s ACN (if ACN: 124 420 355applicable)

proposed ction To construct a lifestyle village at Lots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive atMariginiup, WA, [see EPBC Act referral 2011/6020].

Approval decision

Controlling Provision Decision

Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 & 18A) Approved

con itions of approval

T is approval is subject to the conditions specified below.

expiry date of approval

This approval has effect until 31 December 2024

Decision-maker

name and position Barbara JonesAssistant SecretaryEn ironment Assessment Branch

Conditions at ached to the approval

1. Prior to commencement of construction, the person taking the action must provide theDepartment with written evidence that 2.81 ha of onsite native vegetation (as shown atAttachment A) has been placed under a conservation covenant in accordance with theSoil and Land Conservation Act 1945. The title must state that the covenant isirrevocable and in perpetuity.

2. To mitigate potential impacts to Black Cockatoos, the person taking the action mustde elop a Black Cockatoo Management Plan (BCMP). The BCMP must includ but notbe limited to:

o Details of onsite habitat retention inclu ing maps and diagrams;o Clearing protocols;o Methodology for the protection of habitat trees that occur within the

development zone, including contingency meas res in the event of damageoccurring to these trees which causes the loss of an individual tree or thesignificant decline in health such that the long term viability of the tree iscompromised;

° Measures to be implemented to protect and conserve the retaine 2.81 ha ofnative egetation onsite;

o Onsite fencing around the retained vegetation;o Onsite path network;o Signage to be use to e cate and discourage the public from entering retained

vegetation;« Details of the resident education program;o Weed and plant disease controls;o Conservation covenant details (Soil and Land Conservation Act 1945)]o Roles and responsibilities of contractors, staff and the person ta ing the action

pre and post construction;o Program for reporting and monitoring, an o Timeframes for the implementation and management of the abo e measures.

The BCMP must be submitted to the Department and be approved by the Minister priorto commencement of construction. The BCMP must be implemented.

3. Prior to commencement of construction the person ta ing the action must providethe De artment with written evi ence:

i. of the provision of funds in full to the Western Australian Department forEnvironment and Conservation (WA DEC) for the acquisition of 50 ha of landwithin 70 km of the project area;

ii. that this land will contain foraging and potential breeding habitat forBlack Cockatoos of quality that is acceptable to WA DEC and;

iii. the 50 ha of land to be acquired will be added to the State reserve system forprotection in perpetuity under management control by A DEC.

4. Within two (2) years of the date of this approval, the person taking the action m stprovide to the De artment a description and map clearly efining the location andboundaries of the Offset Area, which must be accompanied with the offset attributesand a sha efile.

5. Unless otherwise agreed to in writin by the Minister, the person ta ing the action mustpublish all anagement plans referred to in these conditions of approval on theirwebsite. Each Management Plan must be published on the website for the length of theapproval within 1 month of the Management Plan being approved.

6. Within 30 days after the commencement of the action, the person taking the action mustadvise the Department in writing of the actual date of commencement.

7. T e person taking the action must maintain accurate records substantiating all activitiesassociated with or relevant to the conditions of approval, including measures taken toimplement the plan(s) required by this approval, and make them available upon requestto the Department. Such records may be subject to audit by the Department or anindependent auditor in accordance with section 458 of the EPBC Act, or use to verifycompliance with the conditions of approval. Summaries of audits will be posted on theDepartment s website. The results of audits may also be publicised through the generalmedia.

8. Within three months of every 12 month anniversary of the commencement of th action,the person taking the action must publish a report on their website addressingcompliance with each of the con itions of this approval, including implementation of anyplan(s) as specified in the conditions. Documentary evidence providing proof of the dateof publication and non-compliance with any of the conditions of this approval must beprovided to the Department at the same time as the compliance report is publishe .

9. If the person taking the action wishes to carry out any activity otherwise than inaccordance with the plan(s) as specified in the Conditions, the person taking the actionmust submit to the Department for the Minister s written approval a revised version ofthat plan(s). The varied activity shall not commence until the Minister has approved thevaried plan(s) in writing. The Minister will not approve a varied plan(s) unless the revisedplan would result in an equivalent or impro ed environmental outcome over ti e. If theMinister approves the revised plan(s), that plan(s) must be implemented in place of theplan(s) originally approved.

10. If the Minister believes that it is necessary or convenient for the better protection oflisted threatened species and communities to do so, the Minister may request that theperson taking the action make specified revisions to the plan(s) specified in theConditions and submit the revised plan(s) for the Minister’s written approval. The persontaking the action must comply with any such request. The revised approved plan(s) mustbe implemented. Unless the inister has approved the revised plan(s), then the persontaking the action must continue to implement the plan(s) originally approved, as specifiedin the conditions.

11. If, at any time after five years from the date of this approval, the person taking the actionhas not substantially commenced the action, then the person taking the action must notsubstantially commence the action without the written agreement of the Minister.

Definitions:

Black Cockatoos includes Carnaby s Blac -Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus latirostris) an theForest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo (Caly torhynchus banksii nasd).

Construction includes any preparatory works required to be undertaken includin clearingvegetation, the erection of any fences, signage or on-site temporary structures and the use ofconstruction or excavation equipment on site for the purpose of breaking the ground forbuildings or infrastructure.

The development zone is the area at Lots 4 and 5 Momington Drive, Mariginiup, WesternAustralia, excluding the area identified as conserve vegetation at Attachment A.

EPBC Act is the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Minister is the Minister administering the Environment Protection and BiodiversityConservation Act 1999 and includes a delegate of the Minister.

The Offset Area is the 50 ha area of land to be purchased and conserved in perpetuity by theWestern Australian Department of En ironment and Conservation on behalf of the personproposing to take the action. The Offset Area must be within 70 km of Lots 4 and 5Mornington Drive, Mariginiup, Western Australia.

Offset attributes means an '.xls' file capturing rele ant attributes of the Offset Area, includingthe EPBC reference ID number, the physical address of the offset site, coordinates of theboundary points in decimal degrees, the EPBC protecte matters that the offset compensates

for, any additional EPBC protected matters that are benefiting from the offset, and the size ofthe offset in hectares.

Project area is Lots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup, Western Australia,

Shapefile means an ESRI Shapefile containing '.shp', .shx and '.dbf files and other filescapturing attributes of the Offset Area, including the shape, EPBC reference ID number andEPBC protected matters present at the relevant site. Attributes should also be capture in.xls format.

The Department is the Australian Government Department administering the Environment Protectionand Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

Attachment A

ATTACHMENT 2 - WAPC AGREE ENT TO OFFSET WORKS, AY 2011

m; Planning,mnniccii

WesternAustralian

CommissionOur ref: 805/2/30/14PV1Enquiries: Ross ParkerTel: 9264 7843e-mail: [email protected]

9 May 2011

Ms Belinda WalkerA/Section Manager, Assessment CoordinationNative Vegetation Conservation BranchDepartment of Environment and ConservationLocked Bag 104BENTLEY DELIVERY CENTRE WA 6983

Dear Ms Walker

LITTLE LAKE MARIGINIUP - PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL OFFSETS -RPS ON BEHALF OF NATIONAL LIFESTYLE VILLAGES PTY LTD

Please accept t is letter as confirmation that the Western Australian PlanningCommission agrees to the ehabilitation works proposed above on land that itowns at Little La e Mariginiup.

Please contact me as indicated above if you require any further information.

- Ross ParkerPolicy and Projects OfficerWAPC Property Management Services

ATTACHMENT 3 - DEC ADVICE O CLEARING APPLICATIO , MAY 2011

Go ernment of Western AustraliaDepartment of Environment and Conser ation

Yo r ref'

Our -ef:

Enquiries CPS 4145/1

Phone. Chios Sykes

Fax: 9219 8744

Email: 9219 8701

[email protected]

Mr Mike HolletChief Executive OfficerNational Lifestyle VillagesPO Box 6423EAST PERTH WA 6892

Dear Mr'Hollet

APPLICATION TO CLEAR NATIVE VEGETATION UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION ACT 1986

I refer to your application to clear 5.17 hectares of native egetation on Lot 5 on Plan 13980,Mariginiup for the urpose of a lifestyle village de elopment (reference CPS 4145/1) and theDepartment of En ironment and Conservation s (DEC) letter of 30 March 2011.

Subsequent to DEC S letter, Shaun Atkins of our office, John Halleen of RPS, and BelindaWalker and Craig Olejnik of DEC met to discuss options for itigating and offsetting theenvironmental impacts identified in DEC S assessment of the proposed clearing. A copy ofDEC’S preliminary assessment report is attached for our con enience.

Whilst potential sites identified and discussed, it is acknowledged there are limited opportunitiesto find a suitable site w thin the northern range of the mpacted FCT20a threatened ecologicalcommunity available to be sed as an offset for this clearing.

As such, I ha e reviewed your original offset strategy and subsequent updates EnvironmentalOffset Strategy, Lot 5 ornington Drive, Mariginiup, Rev 1, May 2011 , inclusi e of the LittleLake ariginiup and Ecological Corridor Rehabilitation Plan, P471/02-Rev3, May 2011 , andadvise that the Environmental Offset Strategy for Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup has nowbeen accepted.

Whilst the assessment of your application has been completed and I have approved our offsetproposal, I advise that, under s510(4) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986, I am alsorequired to ha e regard to any planning instrument or other matters considered relevant. Iunderstand that the City of Wanneroo is currently considering our application to amend thezoning of the property to allow for the development of a park home lifestyle village.

In view of this, I advise that I will continue to defer my decision on this application until you areable to provide evidence that the property is zoned a propriately to support the development ofa park home lifestyle village.

Native Vegetation Conservation Branch

hone: 'O I 921 3700 or rTJ8) S2 !9 3744 -ax: (08) 92'9 3701 Email: [email protected] ov a

Postal Address: Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre. BENTL Y WA 8983www.dec.wa .gov au/ nvc

wa.gov au

2

Please provide confirmation of rezoning to support the development of a park home lifestylevillage or an update on the status of the rezon ng by 10 August 2011, so that your applicationcan be considered for finalisation.

If you have any queries regarding the progress of your application, please contact BelindaWalker at the Department s Native Vegetation Conservation Branch on 9219 8744.

Yours sincerely

Kelly FaulknerMANAGERNATI E VEGETATION CONSERVATION BRANCH

Officer delegated under Sectio 20of the Environmental Protection Act 1996

11 May 2011

Att: CPS 4145/1 Preliminary Assessment ReportEnvironmental Offset Strateg , Lot 5 Momington Drive, Mariginiup, Rev 1, May 2011

Cc. Mr John Halleen, Environment - Land & Infrastructure, RPS, PO Box 465, SUBI CO,WA 6904

ATTACHMENT 4 - DEC CORRESPO DENCE ON CLEARING APPLICATION, MARCH 2012

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Environment and Conservation

You ref:

Our ref: CPS 4145/1Enquiries' Chloe Sy esPhone: (08) 9219 8743Fax: (08) 9219 8701E ail: nvp@deo,wa.gov.au

Mr Mike HolletChief Executi e OfficerNational Lifestyle VillagesPO Box 6423EAST PERTH WA6892

Dear Mr Hollet

Thank you for the letter dated 28 February 2012 providing an update on the status of the re-zoning of Lot 5 on Plan 13980, Mariginiup (CPS 4145/1).

As discussed between John Halleen of RPS Environment an Planning Pty Ltd and ChloeSykes of this office, I note that it is anticipated appropriate zoning to support the proposeddevelopment of a park ho e lifestyle illage will be obtained in late 2012.

Please provide an update on the progress of the rezoning by 28 May 2012.

Should you have any queries regarding this matter, please contact DEC s Chloe Sykes of theNative Vegetation Conser ation Branch on (08) 9219 8744.

Yours sincerely

Belinda WalkerPrincipal Environmental Officer, Assessment CoordinationNATIVE VEGETATION CONSERVATION BRANCH

Officer delegated under Section 20of the Environmental Protection Act 1986

15 arch 2012


Phone: (08) 9219 8700 or (08) 9219 8744 Fax: (08) 9219 8701 Email: nvp@deo,wa.gov.auPostal Address: Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, BENTLEY WA 6983

w w.decwa.gov.au/nvc

wa.go .au

ATTACHMENT 5 - DEPARTMENT OF PLA NING DVICE O REZONING

Government of Western Australia Department of Planning

Our ref: 853-2-30-19P65Enquiries: Kym Peiani (9264 7900)

Mr Mike HollettChief Executive OfficerNational Lifestyle VillagesPO Box 6423East Perth WA 6892

Dear Mike

CITY OF WANNEROO DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME NO. 2 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 111 - LOTS 4 AND 5 MORNINGTON DRIVE, MARIGINIUP

Thank you for your letter dated 31st May 2010 regarding a proposed amendment to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme to facilitate the development of a national lifestyle village on the abovementioned site.

As you are aware, the Town Planning Regulations 1967 outline the legislative process for initiating a local scheme amendment. Under current legislation, only a local government can initiate an amendment to the local planning scheme.

I am sure you will appreciate, it is not appropriate that officers from the Department preempt the recommendations of the Western Austraiian Planning Commission or the decision of the Minister for Planning, and the comments provided to date, have been without prejudice officer level advice only.

Notwithstanding, i can advise that at its 25 August 2009 meeting, the Statutory Planning Committee of the Western Australian Planning Commission resolved, inter alia, to>

■> Support the use of 'Urban' land for the purpose of park home sites due to their density, infrastructure/servicing requirements and necessity for accessibility to community and medical services and support the zoning of these sites as 'Special Use' to provide greater certainty, simplicity and consistency to the land zoning for park home sites, ensuring that the site is only used for a park home site unless a rezoning is initiated.

o Request that the Department of Planning investigates the implications of using "Special Use" zones within rural areas to accommodate Caravan Parks which may combine limited park home development, particularly in regard to site suitability, compliance with State Planning Policy 2.5 - Agriculture and Rural Land use planning, Metro Rural Strategy, WAPC Visual Landscapes Planning Guidelines and impact on adjoining land uses, rural issues or zoning.

Albert Facey House, 469 Wellington Street, Perth, Western Australia 6QQ0 Tel: (08) 9264 7777 Fax: (08) 9264 7566 wvvw.planning.wa.gov.au

ABN 79 051 750 600

• Request the Department of Planning investigate the land use definitions of'park home park' and 'caravan ark' w/ithin the Model Scheme Text, with a viewto providing furt er clarification in terms of these two types of land uses.

• Request t e Department of Planning in estigate the possibility of identifyingland suitable and capable of being developed for park home parks, retirementvillages, hostels, long er leases and nursing homes as part of structureplanning processes.

While t ese investigations are ongoing an yet to be concluded, it ould ap ear toindicate a willingness by the Western Australian Planning Commissio to possiblyconsi er proposals for Caravan Parks incorporating par home de elopment on ruralland where it can be demonstrated that there will be no adverse impacts on the proposedor existing communities.

The suitability of particular sites will vary dependent on local characteristics and specificon site constraints, accessibility to services, bush fire risk etc. In this respect, it is notedthat you are pro ressing resolutio of federal and state environmental constraints.

I trust t e above information clarifies the matter for you.

You s sincerely

Eric Lumsder PSIVIDirector General

///2010

2

ATTACHMENT 6 - SUBMISSION ON DRAFT PERTH AND PEEL GREEN GROWTH PLAN FOR 3.5MILLION, AY 2016

Document Reference: EP16-024-001 JDH

Emerge contact: Jason Hick 0488 223 306

13 May 2016

Attention: Simon TaylorDraft Perth and Peel Green Growth Plan for 3.5 million

Department of the Premier and CabinetLocked Bag 3001WEST PERTH WA 6872

Delivered by email to: [email protected]

emerIntegrated Science & Design

PERTHSuite 4, 26 Railway RoadSubiaco. PerthWestern Australia 6008

p +61 8 9380 4988F +61 8 9380 9636www.emergeassociates.com.au

Bl e Tang (WA} Ply Ltd as trustee for TheReef Unit Trust ABN 44656153170 andEmerg Envi onmental Ser ices Ply LtdASM 57144772510 tradng as Emerge . ssociates

Dear Simon,

SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT PERTH AND PEEL GREEN GROWTH PLAN FOR 3.5MILLION - LOTS 4 AND 5 MORNINGTON DRIVE, MARIGINIUP

Executive summary

The primary purpose of this submission is to:

• Bring to the Department of Premier and Cabinet s (DPC) attention the historic planning andenvironmental approvals context for Lot 4 and 5 ornington Drive (the site), and thecontradiction that has recently arisen from Lot 5 being excluded from being rezoned to theUrban zone within the recently initiated Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment1308/41.

• Ensure that the finalised Green Growth Plan and other associated or resultant planning

processes support the full development of the site (both Lot 4 and 5) in accordance with thehistoric approvals and reflecting the substantial time and cost that has been invested into

these processes to date.

Background

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the recently released Draft Perth and PeelGreen Growth Plan for 3.5 Million Green Growth Plan (herein referred to as the Green Growth Plan )and associated supporting documentation, including the spatial mapping released in April 2016.

This submission has been prepared by Emerge Associates in collaboration with Creative Design +Planning on behalf of Urban Capital Carramar Pty Ltd (Urban Capital) and Pinjar Properties Pty Ltd,the latter a subsidiary company of National Lifestyle Villages. It raises our concerns regarding Lots 4and 5 Mornington Drive Mariginiup, and the recent complexities that have arisen in the planningprocess on the grounds of unresolved 'state environmental considerations’. We believe that the

Green Growth Plan is one of the key mechanism to resolve these environmental complexities andtherefore are lodging this submission to the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC) to rectify this

situation accordingly.

Emerge Environmental Services Pty Ltd ACN 144 772 510 trading as E erge Associates

2

Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive has been owned by Pinjar Properties since 2007, who were interested in

progressing a lifestyle village on the site.

Pinjar Properties expended considerable time and effort towards securing the necessary planningapprovals to progress their proposed lifestyle village. This involved interaction with both the City ofWanneroo and the Department of Planning. Both confirmed that the proposed development was notappropriate for the land s existing zoning and that planning scheme amendments would be required toenable this. This was not supported on the basis that it did represent orderly and proper planning,given the regional planning necessary to implement the Western Australian Planning Commission(WAPC) endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan (primarily that the rezoning was consideredpremature). Notwithstanding this, the Department of Planning acknowledged that Pinjar Propertieswere intending to progress with resolving federal and state environmental constraints', as indicated in

the written correspondence included as Attachment A.

Pinjar Properties secured approval to construct the lifestyle village pursuant to the EnvironmentProtection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) on 16 December 2011, with thecontrolling provisions being listed threatened species and communities (section 18 & 18A), andspecifically related to two species of black cockatoo. Key conditional requirements associated withthis approval were that 2.81 hectares (ha) of native vegetation be retained and placed under aconservation covenant, and the securing of an offsite offset site. A copy of this approval has beenincluded as Attachment B.

In parallel to this, Pinjar Properties also lodged an application to clear native vegetation under WesternAustralia s Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), which involved the remaining native

vegetation (5.17 ha) within Lot 5. A preliminary assessment report for CPS 4145 was issued by theDepartment of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in May 2011. DEC advised that they hadspecifically considered the presence of a State listed threatened ecological community (FCT 20a) andthat they were prepared to accept the applicant's environmental offset strategy accordingly. It is alsoimportant to note that as part of the environmental offset strategy, the WAPC was approached andagreed to a suite of environmental restoration orks being undertaken on land it owned at Little LakeMariginiup, and this correspondence has been included as Attachment C.

Despite this, but in accordance with s51094) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986, the DECdeferred making a decision on the clearing permit application on the basis that the appropriate zoningwas in place to allow the development of a park home lifestyle village. The written DEC advice in thisregard (dated 11 May 2011) has been included as Attachment D. Pinjar Properties continued efforts

to resolve the planning requirements, and the clearing permit application remained active but inabeyance, as can be seen in the correspondence from DEC dated 15 March 2012 as contained withinAttachment E

Therefore in summary of the background, as at 15 March 2012, Pinjar Properties had secured EPBCAct approval, and all but resolved the necessary environmental approvals (a clearing permit to

address the key State environmental factors) to facilitate their proposed lifestyle village, and theprogression of this was only prevented through the broader planning associated with the EastWanneroo Structure Plan area, which had not substantially progressed until recently with the initiationof MRS Amendment 1308/41. The entire site was indicated as being suitable for urban developmentunder the recently endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan with no indication of beign excluded fromthe urban zone, as shown below in Plate 1.

EP16-024-001 JDH Emerge Associates

3

putlc lOea

(Z F«jLlcii?ly

state

FC-.1 (uti: psH l nI ecdtxjial Iriiege

r „ roiustnai.»«»«.

• n'=-

I

I uffiiL nI -rd rx ,t.'tcxrrj A w {*l4 Co im Ck irtf/ Jlj ri-fcWAOr. * Jl i/V*rw *vr1 P#-?*-Cow »r* C/ s" n • C li»are* ?JM r' uvj JW5 «£i .ZV. i tMKK Su i tEii.ViJ uosR pr.viHO

f 1* A . rajfc«M rlyr-j rx> t '.Sfilj £• .JiVC J i • U d »\i - fcf i.< . J e;.L'iJCKH/.

tog<rd

pcts ifcil

rj-al

Plate 1: The endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan, with the site s approximate location shown bythe red circle.

It was much to Pinjar Properties and the intended purchaser of Lots 4 and 5 (Urban Capital) surpriseand disappointment that MRS Amendment 1308/41 proposes to rezone Lot 4 from the Rural zone tothe Urban Deferred zone, but for Lot 5 to remain in the Rural zone. Upon further investigation withDoP Officers (meeting held on Tuesday 12 May, 2016), it was indicated that the primary basis for thisproposition was the consideration of State relevant environmental factors, and that Lot 5 had beenexcluded from the amendment on the basis that it supported significant environmental values andwould ultimately be reserved for Parks and Recreation under the MRS to retain and conserve thesite s environmental values. The extent of the initiated RS amendment in relation to Lots 4 and 5 isshown below in Plate 2.


4

Plate 2: The recently imitated MRS amendment, with the location of the site highlighted by the red

circle.

Lots 4 and 5 are in the final stages of a land transaction that would see it sold by Pinjar Properties toUrban Capital. The basis of this was an assumption that the site could be developed in line with the

previously negotiated and agreed environmental approval outcomes, given the likely immanentprogression of the East Wanneroo Structure Plan MRS amendments. At this point in time this could

involve the progression of the lifestyle village proposal, or a more conventional residential subdivisionand development proposal. In either case, there is also an opportunity to rationalise the currentlyrequired native vegetation retention area to provide better conser ation management outcomes (i.e. to

achieve a more regular geometric shape with a lower perimeter to area ratio).

The proposed MRS amendment and preliminary feedback from DoP puts this proposition intoconsiderable disarray, and Urban Capital and Pinjar Properties require the appropriate level ofcertainty to be able to continue on the pathway that had been substantially established but only

delayed through the planning process.

Site conditions, historic technical investigations and environmental values

Lot 4 has been historically cleared and used for market gardening, whereas Lot 5 supports nativevegetation across its extent of approximately 8 ha.

As part of historic environmental assessment and approval processes, the following investigations

have been undertaken: •

• Lot 5 Pinjar Road Mariginiup Flora and vegetation Survey (ENV Australia 2006).


5

« Lot 5 Mornington Drive Mariginiup Fauna Assessment (ENV Australia 2008).

® Lot 5 Pinjar Road Mariginiup - Gaceful Sun Moth and Carnaby s Black Cockatoo Survey

(Ecoscape Australia 2010).

® Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey - Lot 5 ornington Drive, Mariginiup (Monocot-Dicot

Research, 2010).

Based on the above, they key environmental consideration and values were identified to include thefollowing:

• The site contains 5 ha of native vegetation that was assessed as being in 'very good to

excellent condition.

• The site supports habitat (foraging) for Carnaby s black cockatoo.

• The native vegetation within the site is representative of a State listed threatened ecological

community, referred to as Floristic Community Type (FGT) 20a.

The investigations outlined above were undertaken to initiate and then progress environmentalapprovals pursuant to both the EPBC Act and the EP Act. Potential impacts on Carnaby’s black

cockatoo was the primary focus of the EPBC Act approval process, and vegetationrepresentativeness, Carnaby’s black cockatoo and the State listed threatened ecological community

were the primary focus of the relevant EP Act approval process (via the clearing permit applicationand assessment process).

Any of the abo e investigation documents or additional background information regarding either

approval process can be provided on request should this be required.

Draft Green Growth Plan context for Lots 4 and 5

The key context from the draft Green Growth Plan in relation to Lots 4 and 5 are as follows:

• Both Lots 4 and 5 are included within the Urban Class of Action.

® Both Lots 4 and 5 are shown as having existing approvals in place. This is understood to bereflective/cognisant of the EPBC Act approval only, and not the progressed clearing permitapplication.

• The entirety of Lot 5 is shown as supporting a Specific Commitment’’. While the basis for thisis not clearly articulated within the draft Green Growth Plan, it is assumed that this relates tothe remnant vegetation being representative of a State listed threatened ecologicalcommunity.

The spatial mapping associated with the Green Growth Plan in relation to Lots 4 and 5, and other sitespecific information has been contained within Attachment F.

Draft Green Growth Plan considerations, key concerns and recommended responses

The key consideration for Lot 4 and 5 arising from the draft Green Growth Plan is the SpecificCommitment designation, which appears to exist despite the environmental approvals background.Without specific clarity being provided or available in this regard, it would appear that the full


6

environmental approval history has not seemed to have been recently considered by DoP/WAPC, tothe extent that it has been thought that the State environmental factors have not been historicallyconsidered, and therefore there has been grounds to seek alternate outcomes to the historic

approvals via the current MRS amendment process.

The Green Growth Plan and associated EPBC Act strategic assessment has been primarilyprogressed to provide more certainty and addressing EPBC Act uncertainties and difficulties that ariseat a project-by-project level. However in this case it would strangely appear that despite an EPBC Actapproval, it is State environmental considerations and processes that are causing considerable

uncertainty and also potentially substantial financial impacts in terms of further delays and potentiallythe entire loss of any development potential within Lot 5, which is entirely contrary to theenvironmental approvals history.

We therefore respectfully request that the draft Green Growth Plan documentation and associatedspatial mapping be modified to provide clarity in this regard, and liaison occur between DPC andWAPC to ensure that the recently initiated MRS amendment be amended to include Lot 5 in itsentirety within the Urban Deferred zone. This will enable the suitable resolution of the environmentalvalues within the site in line with the previously agreed environmental outcomes, which would involve

the retention of 2.81 ha of native vegetation.

Summary and closing

Thank you for this opportunity to provide comment on the draft Green Growth Plan. We trust that thisinformation, the relevant concerns and associated requests can be appropriately taken into account

when DPC is reviewing and responding to this submission during the finalisation of the draft Green

Growth Plan documentation.

Should you require clarification regarding any of our comments above or would like to discuss furtherhow we could contribute to the finalisation of the draft documentation or its implementation in regardsto Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, please do not hesitate to contact me on 0488 223 306.

Yours sincerelyEmerge Associates

Jason HickDIRECTOR, PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT

cc: Tom Kroyer - Urban Capital GroupMichael Taylor - Urban Capital GroupJohn Wood _ National Lifestyle V llagesDebra Goostrey - National Lifestyle VillagesEric Lumsden - Western Australian Planning CommissionAnthony Muscara - Department of Planning

Enel: Attachment A - Correspondence from DoP regarding planning processAttachment B - En ironment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act approval


7

Attachment C - Correspondence from DEC regarding preliminary clearing permit assessmentAttachment D - Correspondence from WAPC regarding offset siteAttachment E - Correspondence from DEC reg rding delayed clearing permit processAttachment F - Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup draft Green Growth Plan spatial mapping


( sN

/

Attac ment

CORRESPONDENCE FROM DOR REGARDING PLANNING PROCESS

Y-1 < n

Government of Weste AustraliaDepartment of Planning

Our ref: 853-2-30-19P65Enquiries: Kym Petani (9264 7900)

Mr Mike HollettChief Execut ve OfficerNational Lifestyle VillagesPO Box 6423E st Perth WA 6892

Dear Mi e

CITY OF WANNEROO DISTRICT PL NNING SCHEME NO. 2 PROPOSEDAMENDMENT O. 111 - LOTS 4 AND 5 WIORNINGTON DRIVE, MARIGINJUP

Thank you for your letter dated 31st May 2010 regar ing a proposed amendment to t eCity of Wanneroo D strict Planning Scheme to facilitate the development of a nationallifestyle village on the abovementioned site.

As you are aware, the Town Planning Regulations 1967 outline the legislati e process forinitiating a local scheme amend ent. Under current legislation, only a local governmentcan initiate an amendment to the local planning scheme.

I a sure you will appreciate, it is no appropriate that officers from the Department pre empt the reco mendations of t e Western Aust alian Planning Commission or t edecision of the Minister for Planning, and the comments provided to ate, have beenwithout prejudice officer level advice only.

Notwithstanding, I can advise that at its 25 August 2009 meeting, the Statutory PlanningCommit ee of the Western Australian Planning Commission resolved, inter alia, to:-

o Support t e use of 'Urban' land for the purpose of park home sites due to theirdensity, infrastmcture/ssi icing requirements an necessity fo accessibility tocommunity and medical ser ices and support the zoning of these sites asSpecial Use' o provide greater certainty, si plicity and consistency to the landzoning for park home sites, ensuring that the site is only used for a par homesite unless a rezoning is initiated.

o Requ st that the Department of Planning investigates the i plications of usingSpecial Use" zones within rural areas to accommodate Cara an Parks which

may combine limited park home de elopment, particularly in regard to sitesuitability, compliance with State Planning Policy 2.5 - Agriculture and RuralLand use planning, etro Rural Strategy, WAPC Visual Landscapes lanningGuidelines and imp ct on adjoining land uses, rural issues or zoning.

Albert Facey House, 469 ellin ton S ree , Perth, Western Aus ralia 000Tel: (08) 9264 7777 Fax: (08) 9264 7566 www.planning.wa.gov.a

ABN 79 051 750 680

• Request the Department of Planning investigate the land use definitions of'park home park an caravan park’ ithin the Model Scheme Text, with a viewto providing further clarification in terms of these two types of land uses.

® Request the Department of Planning in estigate t e possibility of identifyingland suitable and capable of being developed for park home parks, retirementvilla es, hostels, long erm leases and nursing homes as part of structureplanning processes.

While these in estigations are ongoing and yet to be concluded, it would appear toindicate a willingness by the Weste n Australian Planning Commissio to ossiblyconsider p oposals for Caravan Pa s incorporating park home development on ruralland where it can be demonstrated that there will be no ad erse im acts on the proposedor existing communities.

The suitability of particular sites will vary dependent on local characteristics and specificon site const aints, accessibilit to services, bush fire risk etc. In this respect, it is notedthat you are progressing esolution of fede al and state environmental constraints.

i trust the above information clarifies the matter for ou.

Yours sincerely

Director General

2

w

•

\\\ \ \\ \••,

' \

b /• V'

emerASSOCIATES

InlegidlcU Science £ Design

9

\ / \ \\\

\\ // f\

X /

f/ r

\ ¦x

Attachment B/

/ /

/ / /

\, ,x /'X

¦ / \ /

¦" \

\ /; v'/ /\

, \\\

A . ¦" \

\.

' \ X \\ \ \ \\

ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT APPROVAL

\\ . \ \

\ XK\¦ \ A \M v\ \ H \ A \ \ \\ \ \\ i W v

¦\ \\\ \\\ \\i \\ l\ j\ 1/1/ ,4/ a/If / /t /' y v •. ' ¦¦ k ti I r /////I/K « ¦ '¦

Austr lian Governme t

Department of Sustainabilit , Environment, Water, Population and Communities

Approval

Residential Development, National Lifestyle Village, Lots 4 an 5 Mornington Drive,Mariginiup, WA (EPBC 2011/6020)

This decision is made under sections 130(1) and 133 of the Environment Protection andBiodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Propo action

person to whom the Pinjar Propertiesapproval is granted

proponent s ACN (if CN: 124 420 355applicable)

proposed action To construct a lifestyle village at Lots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive atMariginiup, WA, [see EPBC Act referral 2011/6020],

Approval decision

Controlling Provision Decision

Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 & 18A) Approved

conditions of approval

This approval is subject to the conditions specified below.

expiry date of approval

This approval has effect until 31 December 2024

Decision-maker

name and position Barbara JonesAssistant SecretaryEnvironment Assessment Branch

Conditions attached to the ap roval

1. Prior to commencement of construction, the person taking the action must provide theDepartment with written e idence that 2.81 ha of onsite native vegetation (as shown atAttachment A) has been placed under a conservation covenant in accordance with theSoil and Land Conservation Act 1945. The title must state that the covenant isirrevocable and in perpetuity.

2. To itigate potential impacts to Black Cockatoos, the person ta ing the action mustdevelop a Black Cockatoo Management Plan (BCMP). The BC P must include but notbe limited to:

o Details of onsite habitat retention inclu ing maps and diagrams;o Clearing protocols;o Methodology for the protection of habitat trees that occur within the

development zone, including contingency measures in the event of damageoccurring to these trees which causes the loss of an individual tree or thesignificant decline in health such that the long term viability of the tree iscompromised;

o Measures to be implemented to protect and conserve the retained 2.81 ha ofnative vegetation onsite;

o Onsite fencing around the retained vegetation;• Onsite path network;e Signage to be used to educate and discourage the public from entering retained

vegetation;o Details of the resident education program;c Wee and plant disease controls;• Conservation covenant details (Soil and Land Conse vation Act 19 5);« Roles and responsibilities of contractors, staff and the person taking the action

pre and post construction;° Program for reporting and monitoring, and® Timeframes for the implementation and management of the above measures.

The BCMP must be submitted to the Department and be approved by the Minister priorto commencement of construction. The BCMP must be implemented.

3. Prior to commencement of construction the person ta ing the action must providethe Department with written evidence:

i. of the provision of funds in full to the Western Australian Department forEnvironment and Conservation (WA DEC) for the acquisition of 50 ha of landwithin 70 m of the project area;

ii. that this land will contain foraging and potential breeding habitat forBlack Cockatoos of quality that is acceptable to WA DEC and;

iii. the 50 ha of land to be acquired will be added to the State reserve system forprotection in perpetuity under management control by WA DEC.

4. Within two (2) years of the date of this approval, the person taking the action mustprovide to the Department a description and map clearly defining the location andboundaries of the Offset Area, which ust be accompanied with the offset attributesand a shapefile.

5. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Minister, the person taking the action mustpublish all management plans referred to in these conditions of approval on theirwebsite. Each anagement Plan must be published on the ebsite for the length of theapproval within 1 month of the Management Plan being approved.

6. Within 30 days after the commencement of the action, the person taking the action mustadvise the Department in writing of the actual date of commencement.

7. The person taking the action must maintain accurate records substantiating all activitiesassociated with or relevant to the conditions of approval, including measures taken toimplement the plan(s) required by this approval, and ma e them available upon requestto the Department. Such records may be subject to audit by the Department or anindependent auditor in accordance with section 458 of the EPBC Act, or used to verifycompliance with the conditions of approval. Summaries of audits will be osted on theDepartment s website. The results of audits may also be publicised through the generalmedia.

8. Within three months of every 12 month anniversary of the commencement of the action,the person taking the action ust publish a report on their website addressingcompliance with each of the conditions of this approval, inclu ing implementation of anyplan(s) as specified in the conditions. Documentary evidence providing proof of the dateof publication and non-compliance with any of the conditions of this appro al must beprovided to the Department at the same time as the compliance report is published.

9. If the person taking the action ishes to carry out any activity otherwise than inaccordance with the plan(s) as specified in the Conditions, the person ta ing the actionmust submit to the Department for the Minister s written approval a revised version ofthat plan(s). The varied activity shall not commence until the Minister has approved thevaried plan(s) in writing. The inister will not approve a varie plan(s) unless the revise plan would result in an equivalent or im roved environmental outcome overtime. If theMinister appro es the revise plan(s), that plan(s) must be implemented in place of theplan(s) originally approved.

10. If the Minister believes that it is necessary or convenient for the better protection oflisted threatened species and communities to do so, the Minister may request that theperson taking the action make specified revisions to the plan(s) specified in theConditions and submit the revised plan(s) for the inister’s written approval. The persontaking the action must comply ith any such request. The revised approved plan(s) mustbe implemented. Unless the Minister has approved the revised plan(s), then the persontaking the action must continue to implement the plan(s) originally approved, as specifiedin the conditions.

11. If, at any time after fi e years from the date of this approval, the person taking the actionhas not substantially commenced the action, then the person taking the action must notsubstantially commence the action without the written agreement of the Minister.

Definitions:

Black Cockatoos includes Carnaby s Black-Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus latirostris) and theForest Red-tailed Blac -Cockatoo {Calyptorhynchus banksii naso).

Constructio includes any preparatory works required to be underta en including clearingvegetation, the erection of any fences, signage or on-site temporary structures and the use ofconstruction or excavation equipment on site for the purpose of breaking the ground forbuildings or infrastructure.

The development zone is the area at Lots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup, WesternAustralia, excluding the area identified as conserved vegetation at Attachment A.

EPBC Act is the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Minister is the Minister administering the Environment Protection and BiodiversityConservation Act 1999 and includes a delegate of the Minister,

The Offset Area is the 50 ha area of land to be purchased and conserved in per etuity by theWestern Australian Department of Environment and Conser ation on behalf of the personproposing to take the action. The Offset Area must be within 70 km of Lots 4 and 5Mornington Drive, Mariginiup, Western Australia.

Offset attributes means an '.xls' file capturing relevant attributes of the Offset Area, includingthe EPBC reference ID number, the physical address of the offset site, coordinates of theboundary points in decimal degrees, the EPBC protected matters that the offset compensates

for, any additional EPBC protecte matters that are benefiting fro the offset, and the size ofthe offset in hectares.

Project area is Lots 4 and 5 Momington Drive, Mariginiup, Western Australia.

Shapefile means an ESRI Shapefile containing '.shp , '.shx' and .dbf files and other filescapturing attributes of the Offset Area, including the shape, EPBC reference ID nu ber andEPBC protected matters present at the relevant site. Attributes should also be captured in.xls format.

The Department is the Australian Government Department administering the Environment Protectionand Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

Attachment A

emerASSOCIATES

Inlegfalcd Science f. Oe<ign

3

\ \

/> , \

.

Attachment C/ y -' /¦

/A/ \/7V

•\ ' \X

\\ '\\

\ \

'A \ \ \- \\ ' \- \ \\ x \ \ \

\ \ \ \ \. - ¦, \\ s \\

CORRESPONDENCE FROM DEC REGARDING PRELIMI ARY CLEARINGPERMIT ASSESSMENT

/ / / n /.y "f. / ¦ /" / / t

l\ i r I// // //1/////yy? / 7 - ¦ ¦ /

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Envi onment and Conservation

Your re

Our ref:

Enquiries CPS 4145/1

Phone: Chloe Sykes

Fax: 9219 8744

Email: 9219 8701

nvp@dec. a.gov.au

Mr Mike HolletChief Executive OfficerNational Lifestyle VillagesPO Box 6423EAST PERTH WA 6892

Dear r'Hollet

APPLICATION TO CLEAR NATIVE VEGET TION UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION ACT 1986

I refer to your application to dear 5.17 hectares of native egetation on Lot 5 on Plan 13980,Mariginiup for the purpose of a lifestyle village de elopment (reference CPS 4145/1) and t eDepartment of Environment an Conservation s (DEC) letter of 30 March 2011.

Subsequent to DEC S letter, Shaun Atkins of our office, John Halleen of RPS, and BelindaWalker and Craig Olejnik of DEC met to discuss options for mitigating and o fsetting theen ironmental impacts identified in DEC S assessment of the proposed clearing. A copy ofDEC'S preliminary assessment report is attached for our con enience.

W ilst potential sites identified and discussed, t is ac nowledged there are limited opportunitiesto find a suitable site w thin the northern range of the impacted FCT20a threatened ecologicalcommunity available to be used as an offset for this clearing.

As such, I ha e reviewed your original offset strategy and subsequent updates En ironmentalOffset Strategy, Lot 5 Mornington Dri e, Mariginiup, Rev 1, ay 2011 ’, inclusi e of the LittleLake ariginiup and Ecological Corridor Rehabilitation Plan, P471/02-Rev3, May 2011 , andadvise that the Environmental Offset Strategy for Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup has nowbeen accepted.

Whilst the assessment of your application has been completed and I have approved our offsetproposal, I advise that, under s51C(4) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986, I am alsorequired to have regard to any planning instrument or other matters considered rele ant. Iunderstan that the City of Wanneroo is currently considering your application to amend thezoning of the property to allow for the develop ent of a park home lifestyle village.

In view of this, I advise that I will continue to defer my decision on this application until you areable to pro ide evidence tha the property is zoned appropriately to support the development ofa park home lifestyle village.

Nativ Vscjetation Conservation Branch

?bone: 'OBI 321 v 3700 or (08) 9219 3744 -ax (05) 92 >9 8701 Email: [email protected] gov a '-ostal Address: Locired Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre. BENTLEY WA 6983

••(vww.dec.vva.gov aumvc

a.gov au

2

Please provide confirmation of rezoning to support the development of a park home lifestylevillage or an update on the status of the rezoning by 10 August 2011, so that your applicationcan be considered for finalisation.

if you have any queries regarding the progress of your application, lease contact Bel ndaalker at the Department s Nati e Vegetation Consen/ation Branch on 9219 8744.

Yours sincerely

Kelly FaulknerMANAGERNATIVE VEGETATION CONSERVATIO BRANCH


11 May 2011

Att: CPS 4145/1 Preliminary Assessment ReportEnvironmental Offset Strategy, Lot 5 Momington Drive, Mariginiup, Re 1, May 2011

Cc. Mr John Halleen, Environment - Land & Infrastructure, RPS, PO Box 465, SUBiACO,A 6904

emerSSOCIATES

Inlegfalcd Science & Design

9

'' /

./ \

\

\

// / \

// / \ // / '/

w\ \

'\

\

/

Attachment D -

V

/ / / \ // / /: \ - ' \ \

CORRESPONDENCE FROM WAPC REGARDING OFFSET SITE

\ \\ .. V \\ \ \ \r \ \ \ \ \

.' ¦ \x A . \ \..\ \ '

/ / / f f / f fm ,i mmm v. / !i ./

; Planning,

WesternAustralian

CommissionOur ref: 805/2/30/14PV1Enquiries: Ross ParkerTel: 9264 7843e-mail: Ross,Par [email protected]

9 May 2011

Ms Belinda WalkerA/Section Manager, Assessment CoordinationNative Vegetation Conservation BranchDepartment of Environment and ConservationLoc ed Bag 104BENTLEY DELIVERY CENTRE WA 6983

Dear Ms Walker

LITTLE LAKE MARIGINIUP - P OPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL OFFSETS ¦RPS ON BEHA F OF NATIONAL LIFESTYLE VILLAGES PTY LTD

Please accept this letter as confirmation that the Western Australian PlanningCommission agrees to the rehabilitation works proposed above on land that itowns at Little Lake Mariginiup.

Please contact me as indicated above if you require any further information.

Ross ParkerPolicy and Projects OfficerWAPC Property Management Services

wa.gov.au

CORRESPONDENCE FROM DEC REGARDI G DELAYED CLEARING PERMIT PROCESS

Government of Western AustraliaDepartment of Environment and Conservation

Your raf:

Our ref: CPS 4145/1Enquiries Chloe SykesPhone; (08) 9219 87 3Fax: (08) 9219 8701Email: [email protected]

Mr Mike HolletChief Executi e OfficerNational Lifestyle VillagesPO Box 6423EAST PERTH WA6892

Dear Mr Hollet

Thank you for the letter dated 28 February 2012 provi ing an update on the status of the re¬zoning of Lot 5 on Plan 13980, Mariginiup (CPS 4145/1).

As discusse between John Halleen of RPS Environment and Planning Pt Ltd and ChloeSy es of this office, I note that it is anticipated appropriate zoning to support the proposeddevelopment of a park home lifestyle village will be obtained in late 2012.

Please provide an update on the progress of the rezoning by 28 May 2012.

Should you have any queries regarding this matter, please contact DEC S Chloe Sykes of theNative Vegetation Conservation Branch on (08) 9219 8744.

Yours sincerely

Belinda WalkerPrincipal Environmental Officer, Assess ent CoordinationNATIVE VEGETATION CONSERVATION BRANCH


15 arch 2012


Phone: (08) 9219 8700 or (0B) 9219 8744 Fax: (08) 9219 8701 Email: n [email protected] Address: Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, BENTLEY WA 6983

www.dec wa.go .au/n c

wa.gov.au

/- /j///i /,f ///// i 1/ \ k\ \\K\ - V\nv>n '\

i 1 \

ttAl \ \ \ \ \\ \ - \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \

ONIddVIAI IVIlVdSNVHd HlMOdO N33dO Id UCJ dniNIOiaVWI 3Aiaa NOlONINdOI l S QNV 101

V \

\\ \\

\

\\ \\ V / /\ /\ /

\ \ \ • :•

y y \ ¦

\ \, \\ \

j lueiui|OBii.y\\

v< \/ \

\w\//

'

\.\

/ ////

/ \

\ ,'!\

\ \ A\ /

\

it0!5?o 9 diuoias p:'lPJf 3| |

S31VI00SSV

Djaiua

Attachment F

ASSOC Ilrj-J-i.! Sc

ATTACHMENT F - LOT 4 AND S SIO NSNGTON DRIVE, M RSGSNSUP

Urban Capital Carramar Pty Ltd are seeking to progress residential development with Lot 4 and Lot 5Mornington Drive, located within the locality of Mariginiup in the East Wanneroo region. The site iscurrently zoned Rural under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS), however forms part of the EastWanneroo Cell which is identified for future urban development. An existing EPBC Act approvalapplies across the site, which allows for the clearing of native vegetation subject to the 2.81 ha ofretention and the implementation of an agreed environmental offset package. It is anticipated thatstructure planning for the project will commence following the rezoning of the East Wanneroo Cell to‘Urban . The key considerations of this project as it relates to the Green Growth Plan and the draftGreen Growth Plan mapping are shown in Figure F1 and include:

• Clarification regarding specific commitments.

Table F1 below summarises the details of the project and outlines the proposed clarifications to thedraft Green Growth Plan mapping, as shown in Figure F1.

Table FT. Summary of project details and their relation to the Green Growth Plan

SUMMARY OF PROJECT DET ILS

Project name Lot 5 Marginiup

Location Lot 5 (11) Mornington Drive, Marginiup

Local Government Area City of Wanneroo

Project area 8 ha

Existing appro als EPBC Act-Approved with conditions (reference no. 2011/6020)Clearing permit application progressed by DEC but not issued due to planningconsiderations

Class(es) of Action wit inproject area

Urban

Was a submission on Pertha d Peel @3.5 Million made?

No

ENVIRON ENTAL VALUES WITHIN THE SITE

Site specific surveys A range of site-specific surveys and investigations have been undertaken to date, includingthose related to flora and vegetation and fauna. For further information please contactEmerge Associates.

Mapped vegetation complexes Complex Remnant egetation present within site

Karrakatta - central and south Yes

Relevant Matters of NationalEnvironmental Significance

Carnaby s black coc atoo.

State environmental factors Threatened Ecological Communities - SCP20a Banksia attenuate woodland over speciesrich dense shrublands

Existing conservation areas None.

CLARIFICATIONS FOR DRAFT GREEN GROWTH PLAN APPING

Class of Action No clarifications.

Existing Approvals None identified. No clarifications.

1

Attachment F

emerASSOCIATES

A D?:g

Specific Commitments Portions of the project identified with specific commitments. Generally align with the extentof native egetation, which is identified as TEC SCP20a and as potential Carnaby s blac cockatoo foraging habitat within DRAW mapping. 2.81 ha of this vegetation will be retainedin accordance with existing approvals granted pursuant to Part 9 of the EPBC Act. TheGreen Growth Plan mapping should be amended to align with the outcomes and conditionsof the existing approvals over the site. These areas have been shown within Figure F1,

Broad Commitments None identified. No clarifications.

Conser ation Reser es None identified. No clarifications.

2

Draft Green Growth Plan Commitment Mapping

Legend

Project boundary

Cadastre

Classes of action

Urban class of action

Rural residential class of action

Industrial class of action

Area not within the Urban, Industrial orRural Residential classes of action

Commitment mapping

I Specific commitments

Broad commitments and values

Known existing approvals

Conservation program

Existing conservation reserves

Phase 1 - Initial package of additionalconservation reserves (80,000 ha)

Phase 2 - Area for selection of further90,000 ha of conservationreserves/areas

Priority areas for acquisition in Phase 2

Clarifications for Green Growth Plan Mapping

Legend

Project boundary

Extent of vegetation to be refine through structure planning in accordancewith existing EPBC Act approval

Figure F1: Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Margining

Project: Commitment Mapping Re iewGreen Growth Plan Submission

Client: Urban Capital Group

Plan Number: EP16-024(01)-F04Drawn: ADBApproved: JDH

Date: 09/05/2016Date: 13/05/2016

Checked: ADB Scale: 1:10,000@A4emera j

ASSOCIATESIntegrate', Selene*? I Design

TABLED AT HEARINGS 26/5/17 - SUBMISSION NO. 374

26 May 2017


ATTENTION: WAPC Sub-Committee

RE: HEARING DEPUTATION - MRS AMDT 1308/41 EAST WANNEROO STRUCTURE PLAN AREALOTS 4 AND 5 MORNINGTON DRIVE, MARIGINIUP

Deputation objective:

Creative Design + Planning and Emerge Associates on behalf of Urban Capital Carramar Pty Ltdand Pinjar Properties Pty Ltd request:

• To bring the WAPC s attention the historic planning and environmental a rovals contextfor Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup

That Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup is included in the Urban Deferred zoning boundaryunder MRS Amendment 1308/41.

General Overview (CD+P)

• MRS Amendment 1308/41 includes Lot 4 (~8.5ha) in the Urban Deferred zone - this site historicallycleared and used for market gardening.

• Lot 5 (~8ha) is excluded from the amendment and proposed to be retained in the Rural zone.• Despite Lot 5 having historic federal approvals and significant historical liaison with the State, including

an agreed offset strategy with the (former) Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC), it isunderstood that Lot 5 has been excluded from the ‘Urban Deferred’ zone on the grounds of:

o unresolved ‘state environmental considerations o consideration of State relevant environmental factors; ando that Lot 5 supported significant environmental values and would ultimately be reserved for Parks and

Recreation under the MRS to retain and conser e the site’s environmental values.

We strongly dispute the above assertions and request that the subject land be included in A dt 1308/41;thus offering an Urban Deferred’ zoning in accordance with the WAPC’s Directions 2031 and Beyond andPerth and Peel @ 3.5 million policy instruments.

Our rationale being:

• The subject site s exclusion on environmental grounds differs from the various other site’s alsoexcluded from the A dt; with the vast majority of the other sites identified in Bush Forever mapping.

• Of those other sites excluded, we are not aware of any other site having the same extent ofenvironmental approvals applying to the land as Lot 5.

• The reasons stated by the WAPC for Lot 5 remaining in the Rural zone relate to environmentalconsiderations and factors. However, an environmental approval for the urban development of Lot 5has been issued under the EPBC Act and a clearing permit under the EP Act had significantlyprogressed and is only awaiting finalisation of the MRS rezoning process now being considered. Theseapprovals involved careful consideration by the environmental agencies on all relevant environmentalfactors applicable to Lot 5.

• Development of the subject land has an EPBC Act approval and is the subject of an agreedenvironmental offset package; •

• A clearing permit (under the EP Act) had been significantly progressed and was only held in abeyancepending the rezoning of the subject land, this now can be specifically considered under MRSAmendment 1308/41;

S:\Word\CD fP 2017\UrbEvv\MRS\4 MRS 1308-41 Submisslon\170522 WAPC De ulationM70524 L.WAPC MRS Amdl 1308_41 (v2).docx

28 BROWN STREET T +61 8 9325 0200EAST PERTH WA 6004 F+61 8 9325 818PO BOX 7655 E [email protected] SQUARE WA 6850

ACN 600 658 722ABN 47 600 658 722CD &P PTY LTD T/AS CREATIVE DESIGN + PLANNING


• The subject land is identified in the Urban Class of Action within the draft Green Growth Plan;

• The subject land is included within and identified for Urban development in the Draft North-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework and the endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan;

• The subject land situated on the corner of Mornington Dri e and Coogee Road is immediately east ofthe Banksia Grove urban front. Subsequently, the subject land is identified as a natural extension ofthis Structure Plan area and will positively contribute to the function, amenity and orderly and properplanning of the broader Banksia Grove neighbourhood by virtue of:

o contributing to the density and infill targets of the imminent Banksia Grove District Town Centre,recognising the subject land is within the 800m walkable catchment of this centre and its plannedMain Street;

o contributing to the catchment of the Neerabup Primary School and associated community facilities,being within a 150m walkable catchment of this community node; and

o being within a 1500m catchment of the planned education and open space multi use facility (districtfacility) north-west of the Banksia Grove District Town Centre

• The subject land has direct access to Neighbourhood, District and Regional road infrastructure inJoondalup Drive, Pinjar Road and Wanneroo Road;

• The subject land has immediate access to all urban service infrastructure, being directly to the east ofthe Banksia Grove urban front;

• Once the broader East Wanneroo District Structure Plan area is developed, the subject land willessentially have greater geographical and locational association to Banksia Grove than the EastWanneroo area; and

• The inclusion of Lot 5 in the Urban Deferred zoning provides Urban Capital a greater level of certaintyto develop the site, and enables both Lots 4 and 5 to be designed holistically in terms of planning foropen space distribution, and residential and road interface to the remnant bushland areas withassociated bushfire controls.

Environmental and Planning Approval Background (Emerge)



• Pinjar Properties secured approval to construct a Lifestyle Village pursuant to the EnvironmentProtection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) in December 2011. The associatedcontrolling provisions comprised listed threatened species and communities specifically related to twospecies of black cockatoo. Key conditional requirements associated with this approval were that 2.81 haof native vegetation be retained and placed under a conservation covenant, and the securing of anoffsite offset site.

• Pinjar Properties also lodged an application to clear native vegetation under Western Australia’sEnvironmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), which involved the remaining native vegetation (5.17ha)within Lot 5. A preliminary assessment report was issued DEC in May 2011. DEC advised that it hadspecifically considered the presence of a State listed threatened ecological community (FCT 20a) andwas prepared to accept the applicant’s environmental offset strategy accordingly. Importantly, as partof the environmental offset strategy, the WAPC was approached and agreed to a suite of environmentalrestoration works being undertaken on land it owned at Little Lake Mariginiup.

• Despite the above, but in accordance with s510(4) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986, the DECdeferred making a decision on the clearing permit application on the basis that the appropriate zoningwas not in place to allow the development of a park home Lifestyle Village. Pinjar Properties continuedefforts to resolve the planning requirements, and the clearing permit application remained active but inabeyance until 2013, when it was withdrawn by Pinjar Properties pending resolution of the planning forthe site.

• In essense, Pinjar Properties had all but resolved the necessary environmental approvals to facilitatethe proposed Lifestyle Village, and the progression of this was only prevented by the need for the subjectland to be rezoned in accordance with the East Wanneroo Structure Plan.


• As part of historic environmental assessment and approval processes, the following investigations havebeen undertaken:

o Flora and vegetation Survey (ENV Australia 2006).

o Fauna Assessment (ENV Australia 2008).

o Gaceful Sun Moth and Carnaby s Black Cockatoo Survey (Ecoscape Australia 2010).

o Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey (Monocot-Dicot Research, 2010).

o Environmental Offset Strategy (RPS 2011).

o Little Lake Mariginiup and Ecological Corridor Rehabilitation Plan (Tranen Revegetation Systems,2011).


o The site contains 5ha of native vegetation that was assessed as being in very good to excellent’condition.



• The investigations outlined above were undertaken to initiate and then progress environmentalapprovals pursuant to both the EPBC Act and the EP Act. Potential impacts on Carnaby’s blackcockatoo was the primary focus of the EPBC Act approval process, and vegetation representativeness,Carnaby’s black cockatoo and the State listed threatened ecological community were the primary focusof the relevant EP Act approval process (via the clearing permit application and assessment process).

• Recent conversations with state agencies have confirmed the following:

o the WAPC are supportive of the offset revegetation proposed at Little Lake Marginiup.

o The Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) will require a new clearing permit to beprepared, which addresses the requirements of the State Offset Policy. We believe the historicproposed offset (and the EPBC offset requirements) will provide an offset that is more thanadequate to offset for the proposed impacts associated with development of the site.

o Pinjar Properties (and Urban Capital Group) have also recently been in contact with theFederal Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE) to update the existing EPBC Actconditions and seek a transfer of approval holder to Urban Capital Group. The EPBC Actapproval is therefore valid and the approval conditions can be met by the proponent.

SUMMARY (CD+P)

We acknowledge that the Department may not have had all the necessary historical environmental contextof these properties prior to the advertising on MRS Amendment 1308/41. Flowever, if given the chanceprior to advertising, this matter before you today may have easily been resolved.

In light of the information presented above, we request that the subject land be included as part of the‘Urban Deferred’ boundary under MRS Amendment 1308/41. We understand there to be no valid legalreason as to why Lot 5 could not be included in the amendment area, however recognise that adjustmentof the A dt boundary may be considered a major variation and require further referral to the ERA andreadvertising of the A dt. In light of the multitude of submissions on this A dt, and potential for it to bereadvertised, we respectfully request the inclusion of Lot 5 in any refined boundary given the project team’sextensive consultation with Commonwealth and State environmental agencies prior and concurrent toadvertising of the A dt.

Thank you for the opportunity to make this Deputation.


FRANK ARANGIODIRECTOR

Page I 3

TABLED AT HEARINGS 26/5/17 - SUBMISSION NO. 374 1.7414

NORTH-WEST SUB-REGION

Two Rocks North

Yanchep

Butler

FLYNN

WEAVES

iCurrambine

Wanneroo i'

OCEAN

Edgewater

JWhitfordsGNANGARA

Whitfords

Warwick

Warwick

Urban Deferred

Urban Expansion

Urban Investigation

City Centre

Industrial

Industrial Expansion

Industrial Investigation

Rural Residential

Rural

State Forest

Open Space

Waterway

Public Purposes

Public Purposes -Proposed

Regional Roads (MRS)1 Existing

= = Proposed

Passenger Rail/Station -' * Existing

Passenger Rail/Station -Proposed

=: Passenger Rail - Potential(Subject to further investigation)

Activity Centres

Strategic Metropolitan

Secondary

9 District

Produced by:GeoSpatial Planning SupportDepartment of Planning. W On behalf of;

estern Australian Plannin CommissionCop right ©April 2015

ttNls- e/ nagsprojedstStale_MulliRegion\StmcturePlans_SubRegional_NW_NE_SMP\ orWng reas\North estSubRegionalSlnjcturePlan JWSRSPtNWSRSP_Plan1_ThePlannlngFramev.ort(_A3jnxd

Base info mation sup lied by:Weste Australian Land Infonnab'on AuthorityUM6-2014-3

Legend

Su -region Boundary

Framework Land Uses

Rail ay

Urban

NO A

NOTE; This is a conceptual representaBon oflanduse within the sutKegion. Furt er planningprocesses w ll need to be un ertaken, includingamendments to statutory mechanisms anddetaile planni g.

THE PLANNING FRAMEWORK PLAN 1

Figure 11: East Wanneroo Structure Plan

LEGEND

LEGEND

h —'—j SUBJECT LAND

■fe JF ’.H.

ORTHOPHOTO100 200 300m

Scale: 1:10 000@A4 Date: 24/05/2017 Plan: URBEW-5-006Amr

I'r- !

',l ll

I. -.

.' It

I

Bus

hlan

d H

illto

p P

rote

ctio

nP

riorit

y in

Nor

ther

n S

ecto

r of P

OS

Bus

h Fo

reve

r Site

295

(-41

.96h

a). A

rea

may

be

ratio

nalis

ed to

ref

lect

topo

grap

hy a

nd v

eget

atio

n

Hill

top

Priv

ate

Prim

ary

Ope

nS

pace

Edu

catio

n &

Ope

nS

pace

Pre

cinc

lM

ulti

Use

.

Dis

trict

Cen

treH

.97h

a

«V>

0/ f

sJK

SiA

GR

OV

E98

1-25

9G-0

1 (2

0.09

.201

1). N

ot to

Sca

le_y .

AGRE

ED L

OCA

L ST

RUCT

URE

PLAN

(21

A)B

anks

ia G

rove

- M

AP

1

Loca

l Ope

n S

pace

Cor

ridor

for

Pas

sive

Rec

reat

ion

& C

onse

rvat

ion

Loca

l Cen

tre E

nviro

ns•

Resi

dentia

l•

Mix

ed u

se

Loca

l Cen

tre

Spe

cial

Res

iden

tial

Fina

l con

figur

atio

n of

use

s su

bjec

tto

site

pla

nnin

g. M

a im

um A

rea

1 .5ha

Tow

n C

entre

En

irons

• R

esi

de

ntia

l•

Mix

ed u

se

Tow

n C

entre

Env

irons

• M

ain

Str

ee L

ayo

ut

• R

etai

l Bus

ines

s &

Res

iden

tial

Land

mar

k C

or e

r

Tow

n C

entre

Cor

e•

Ma

in S

tre

e L

ayo

ut

• R

etai

l Bus

ines

s &

Res

iden

tial

Larg

er L

ots

at 1

000m

Pass

ive R

ecr

eatio

n P

riority

inS

outh

ern

Por

tion

of P

OS

•j Lo

cal C

entr

e |

Act

ive

PO

S (1

.2ha

)

LEG

END

i / i

Res

iden

tial

i ]

Pub

lic o

pen

Spa

ce

i i

Spe

cial

Res

iden

tial

V / 7

\R

esid

entia

l / M

i ed

Use

nr.

zi

Com

mer

cial

Dis

trict

Dis

tribu

tor

Nei

ghbo

urho

od C

onne

ctor

« 2

Nei

ghbo

urho

od P

reci

ncts

oC

ontr

olle

d In

ters

ectio

n

oLe

ft IN

/OU

T

oT-

Junc

tion

*W

ater

Tan

Site

[Indi

cativ

e o

colio

n)

©S

ewer

Pum

p S

tatio

n[In

dicali

ve L

ocoli

on)

Bus

hlan

d P

rote

ctio

n P

riorit

y in

this

Nor

the

PO

S P

reci

nct

Loca

l Ope

n S

pace

Cor

ridor

for

Pas

sive

Rec

reat

ion

&C

onse

rvat

ion

& D

rain

age

SUBJ

ECT

Pos

sibl

e sl

ip r

oad

and

par

ing fro

m P

inja

rR

oad

Tow

n C

entre

Env

irons

• R

esid

entia

l, C

omm

erci

al a

ndBu

sine

ss

Prim

ary

Sch

ool (

3.5h

a)

CONC

EPT

LAYO

UT P

LAN

Lots

4 &

5 M

orni

ngto

n D

rive,

MAR

IGIN

IUP

Attachment A

. »

Legend

Project boundary

[ Cadastre

Classes of action



Industrial class of action


Commitment mapping

Specific commitments

Broad commitments and values

Known existing approvals



| Phase 1 - Initial package of additionalI conservation reserves (80,000 ha)


• Priority areas for acquisition in Phase 2

Clarifications for Green Growth Plan Mapping

Client:While Emerge Associates makes every attempt to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data, Emerge accepts no responsibility for externally sourced data used

COOG

EE

LEGE

ND

CONS

ERVA

TION

VEG

ETAT

ION

3.03

2ha

1 1

PU

BLI

C O

PE

SP

AC

E1.

329h

a

I | R

ES

IDE

TIA

L8.

095h

a

1 ROA

D RE

SERV

E4.

119h

a

CONC

EPT

LAYO

UT P

LAN

Lots

4 &

5 M

orni

ngto

n D

rive,

MAR

IGIN

IUP

DRAF

T0

20

40

60

mS a

le: 1:

2000

@A3

Date:

01/09

/2015

Plan:U

RBAQ

-l-O02

A 2

8 B

row

n S

t, E

ast P

erth

WA

G0Q

4

P (0

8) 9

325

0200

E ir

iro@

crea

tiver

tp.c

oin.

au

W c

reat

i e p

.com

.a

' u ,1

1 ii i

. jir..

Cr.rj'

1 ri|.

ln i lj.

,[

PUBL

IC O

PEN

SPAC

E&

DRAI

NAG

EI.O

OBSh

aPU

BLIC

OPE

N SP

ACE

& DR

AINA

GE

4975

sqm

LEGE

ND

h 1

SUBJ

ECT S

ITE

r *

iCO

NSER

VATI

ON V

EGET

ATIO

N3.

033h

a

i _j i

PUBL

IC O

PEN

SPAC

E &

DRAI

NAGE

1.50

6ha

RESI

DENT

IAL

8.42

2ha

l i

ROAD

RES

ERVE

3.61

4ha

TOTA

L16

.575

ha

AREA

S AN

D DI

MENS

IONS

SHO

WN

ON P

LAN

ARE

SUBJ

ECTT

O FI

NAL S

URVE

Y |

CONC

EPT

LAYO

UT P

LAN

Lots

4 &

5 M

orni

ngto

n D

rive,

MA

RIG

INIU

PDR

AFT

0 2

5 S

O 7

5m

Scale

: 1:25

00@

A3Da

te: 24

/01/20

17Pla

n:URB

AQ-1-

017

'-unM

j '.i.M

U-fC

i K.rb

aii.jI

lipjm

a'iU

nm

. Lrrt

Jik.i

fij-vlw

irv.iii

ija k,

iw K

n.r i-i

lCJ A

lv.wl

j.Uv

«ni

-'<• l

lm.4

one C

.vtuj

vov n

'-S in

li)' olw

ji itu

jwMn n

r mil,

TABLED AT E RINGS 26/5/17 - SUBMISSION NO. 374

26 May 2017


ATTEIMTiON: WAPC Su -Committee

RE: HEARING DEPUTATION - MRS AMDT 1308/41 EAST W NNEROQ STRUCTURE PL N RE LOTS 4 ND 5 MORNINGTON DRI E, RIGINIUP

Deputation objective:

Creative Design + Planning and Emerge ssociates on behalf of Urban Capital Carramar Pty Ltdand Pinjar Propert es Pty Ltd request:

® To bring th& WAPC s attention the historic planning and envi onmental app ovals contextfor Lot 4 and 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup;

o That Lot 5 Mornington Drive, Mariginiup is inclu e in the Urban Deferred zoning boundaryunde MRS Amendment 1308/41.

General Overview (CD+P)

® MRS Amendment 1308/41 includes Lot 4 (~8.5ha) in the Urban Deferred zone - this site historicallycleared and used for market gardening.

® Lot 5 (~8ha) is excluded from the amendment and proposed to be retained in the Rural zone.® Despite Lot 5 having historic federal approvals and significant historical liaison with the State, including

an ag eed offset strategy with the (former) Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC), it isunderstood that Lot 5 has been excluded from the 'Urban Deferred’ zone on the grounds of:

o unresolved ‘state environmental considerations’o consideration of State relevant environmental factors; ando that Lot 5 supported significant environmental values and would ultimately be reserved for Parks and

Recreation under the MRS to retain and conser e the site’s environmental values.

We strongly dispute the above assertions and request that the subject land be included in A dt 1308/41;thus offering an ‘Urban Deferred’ zoning in accordance with the WAPC’s Directions 2031 and Beyond andPerth and Peel @ 3.5 million policy instruments.

Our rationale being:

® The subject site’s exclusion on environmental grounds differs from the various other site’s alsoexcluded from the A dt; with the vast majority of the other sites identified in Bush Forever mapping.

® Of those other sites excluded, we are not aware of any other site having the same extent ofenvironmental approvals applying to the land as Lot 5.

© The reasons stated by the WAPC for Lot 5 remaining in the Rural zone relate to environmentalconsiderations and factors. However, an environmental approval for the urban development of Lot 5has been issued under the EPBC Act and a clearing permit under the EP Act had significantlyprogressed and is only awaiting finalisation of the MRS rezoning process now being considered. Theseapprovals involved careful consideration by the environmental agencies on all relevant environmentalfactors applicable to Lot 5.

® Development of the subject land has an EPBC Act approval and is the subject of an agreedenvironmental offset package;

© A clearing permit (under the EP Act) had been significantly progressed and was only held in abeyancepending the rezoning of the subject land, this now can be specifically considered under MRSAmendment 1308/41;

S:\WordlCD+P 2017\UrbEw\MRS\4. MRS 1308-41 Submission 70522 WAPC DepulatlonM 70524 L_WAPC MRS mdl 1308_41 (v2).docx

28 BROWN STREET T t61 8 9325 0200EAST PERTH WA 6004 F +61 8 9325 4818PO BOX 7655 E [email protected] SQUARE WA 6850

AON 600 658 722ABN 47 600 658 722CD & P PTY LTD T/AS CREATIVE DESIGN 4 PLANNING


• The subject land is identified in the Urban Class of Action within the draft Green Growth Plan;

• The subject land is included within and identified for ‘Urban development in the Draft North-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework and the endorsed East Wanneroo Structure Plan;

• The subject land situated on the corner of Mornington Dri e and Coogee Road is immediately east ofthe Banksia Grove urban front. Subsequently, the subject land is identified as a natural extension ofthis Structure Plan area and will positively contribute to the function, amenity and orderly and properplanning of the broader Banksia Grove neighbourhood by virtue of:

o contributing to the density and infill targets of the imminent Banksia Grove District Town Centre,recognising the subject land is within the 800m walkable catchment of this centre and its plannedMain Street;

o contributing to the catchment of the Neerabup Primary School and associated community facilities,being within a 150m walkable catchment of this community node; and

o being within a 1500 catchment of the planned education and open space multi use facility (districtfacility) north-west of the Banksia Grove District Town Centre

The subject land has direct access to Neighbourhood, District and Regional road infrastructure inJoondalup Drive, Pinjar Road and Wanneroo Road;

« The subject land has immediate access to all urban service infrastructure, being directly to the east ofthe Banksia Grove urban front;

« Once the broader East Wanneroo District Structure Plan area is developed, the subject land willessentially have greater geographical and locational association to Banksia Grove than the EastWanneroo area; and

« The inclusion of Lot 5 in the Urban Deferred zoning provides Urban Capital a greater level of certaintyto develop the site, and enables both Lots 4 and 5 to be designed holistically in terms of planning foropen space distribution, and residential and road interface to the remnant bushland areas withassociated bushfire controls.

En ironmental and Planning App oval Background (Emerge)



® Pinjar Properties secured approval to construct a Lifestyle Village pursuant to the EnvironmentProtection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) in December 2011. The associatedcontrolling provisions comprised listed threatened species and communities specifically related to twospecies of black cockatoo. Key conditional requirements associated with this approval were that 2.81 haof native vegetation be retained and placed under a conservation covenant, and the securing of anoffsite offset site.

e Pinjar Properties also lodged an application to clear native vegetation under Western Australia’sEnvironmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), which involved the remaining native vegetation (5.17ha)within Lot 5. A preliminary assessment report was issued DEC in ay 2011. DEC advised that it hadspecifically considered the presence of a State listed threatened ecological community (FCT 20a) andwas prepared to accept the applicant’s environmental offset strategy accordingly. Importantly, as partof the environmental offset strategy, the WAPC was approached and agreed to a suite of environmentalrestoration works being undertaken on land it owned at Little Lake Mariginiup.

«. Despite the above, but in accordance with s510(4) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986, the DECdeferred making a decision on the clearing permit application on the basis that the appropriate zoningwas not in place to allow the development of a park home Lifestyle Village. Pinjar Properties continuedefforts to resolve the planning requirements, and the clearing permit application remained active but inabeyance until 2013, when it was withdrawn by Pinjar Properties pending resolution of the planning forthe site.

• In essense, Pinjar Properties had all but resolved the necessary environmental approvals to facilitatethe proposed Lifestyle Village, and the progression of this was only prevented by the need for the subjectland to be rezoned in accordance with the East Wanneroo Structure Plan.


® As part of historic environmental assessment and approval processes, the following investigations havebeen undertaken:

o Flora and vegetation Survey (ENV Australia 2006).

o Fauna Assessment (ENV Australia 2008).

o Gaceful Sun Moth and Carnaby s Black Cockatoo Survey (Ecoscape Australia 2010).

o Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey (Monocot-Dicot Research, 2010).

o Environmental Offset Strategy (RPS 2011).

o Little Lake Mariginiup and Ecological Corridor Rehabilitation Plan (Tranen Revegetation Systems,2011).


o The site contains 5ha of native vegetation that was assessed as being in very good to ‘excellent’condition.



© The investigations outlined above were undertaken to initiate and then progress environmentalapprovals pursuant to both the EPBC Act and the EP Act. Potential impacts on Carnaby’s blackcockatoo was the primary focus of the EPBC Act approval process, and vegetation representativeness,Carnaby’s black cockatoo and the State listed threatened ecological community were the primary focusof the relevant EP Act approval process (via the clearing permit application and assessment process).

© Recent conversations with state agencies have confirmed the following:

o the WAPC are supporti e of the offset re egetation pro osed at Little Lake Marginiup.

o The Department of En i onmental Regulation (DER) will requi e a new clearing mit to berepared, which add esses the requirements of the State Offset Polic . We belie e the historic

proposed offset (and the EPBC offset requirements) will provide an offset that is ore thanadequate to offset for the ro osed impacts associated with d velo ment of the site.

o Pinjar Properties (and Urban Capital Group) have also recently been in contact with theFederal Department of Energy and En ironment (DOEE) to update the existing EPBC Actconditions and seek a transfer of a proval holder to Urba Capital G oup. The EPBC ctappro al is t erefore alid an the ap roval conditions can be m t b the p oponent.

SUMMARY (CD+P)We acknowledge that the Department may not have had all the necessary historical environmental contextof these properties prio to the advertising on MRS Amendment 1308/41. However, if given the chanceprior to advertising, this matter before you today may have easily been resolved.

In light of the information presented above, we request that the subject land be included as part of the‘Urban Deferred’ boundary under MRS Amendment 1308/41. We understand there to be no valid legalreason as to why Lot 5 could not be included in the amendment area, however recognise that adjustmentof the A dt boundary may be considered a major variation and require further referral to the ERA andreadvertising of the A dt. In light of the multitude of submissions on this A dt, and potential for it to bereadvertised, we respectfully request the inclusion of Lot 5 in any refined boundary given the project team’sextensive consultation with Commonwealth and State environmental agencies prior and concurrent toadvertising of the A dt.

Thank you for the opportunity to make this Deputation.


FR K ARA GIODIRECTOR

Page|3

17414

£\»* *v;

r

1' '

!

*t.w«

/ . .

I

J

gmr. jw Coxinv .:

I jvri ,. 'fPlknring

AMENDMENT PL NMeiropoliian Region Scheree

East Wawercc Swuclure Plan

Ame dment No t 'OS <4 \

17 14

1

1

{

I

NORTH-WEST SUB-REGICM

j i

K

Prn.ZKlttPir->5S4rpM

Osaxrfc C ''a'; VASJbt c e#'A t TKii ir. Pjrt-rq Cc isi>Caitg iC aiS

V « » sfTi»5iSat 'A. ' ' -rvG-i''i '- *}N.V £_SW f * • j «tf

iViJliP Ptil ThrPU f. < v.*crt. Alr- £

asyt j4tT .< r, &ii'.r5 rA 36s sit nsWW y 'Ver jW-23!i-l

legen

' S tiffig .o Boundar -

Lana ses

Rfriiay

Urtwi

Urfcsn Dc ssiea

Utb n Expana sn

Urban Invtscgalon

| (fyCtnir*

, Indjslri!

industrial E ansion

lnd.i5tr.al hves pten

Rur l Re icltnria

Rural

i Stfe forest

p n $? c

Waterway

P >tc Pu peses

Pubic Pu posesProposed

Regonal Roa3«{MR5l1 EKislnfl= «=¦ proposed

RaPcSiprger Rail Siaton -Bta a

a Pstser er RaiLSlafo ¦PrOKiSfidPasse r«gsf Rs'l ¦ PotenlJa

A<cpw:

Ac ly Centres

( ' ; Str tegic >* :rc&tf !a

( : gewnU r,

DtsV'.CI

e«Mi

oc&vi

•iVct r» tt a -. 'i .t cri*3f,vw»- a £ FiTVt.irs. 3Ctttte. bcV&iS*? ctritj«Mllfc«9itlMUalS >nKAjna T- * >.*•ar'rrfsirna

FLYNN

fsubject to farther planning

[ [Subject t .['furth r planting

C PQRN STH E.'

WannerOores r\'oi(

SUBJECTLAND

ktfometresPx Mj-} fc

apfinfj 6 GtoSpai-al O a 3:c .tf Ofr ckrtm e o WAOn of.

t ait'ft uss-a anfna-ft wC&n.-.--ss:opCopvrtghT f Oece it»«

to SasIWa . st a Sl dyAfcbE a T 11 -te toSP r\*o IJt *¦ MXft Rgu.- ar.dUse _Fig1f FlLiAL n <rf

Sase ir4uin)3tion suppHtd by.Wester Ausi a' a" Lan j Worm *, n. A P, r?yU 430 2039-4

Legen

potential urban

rural

parks andrecreation

public uses

public utility

state forests

post pine plantationecological linkage

__ . . industrial| J J J1 (subjeci to futrie planivng)1 : (refer to ILS)

v.w employmenl purposes(subject to further plan ing)proposed higli sclwo!

vc? (ap rotumaia locat o )

primar regional roads(MRS outside study area)

other regional roads(MRS outside stud a ea)

* study boundary

bush foreve

primar regional roads(subject to final planning}

other road

feCtolKK- Zi'tuDiWG rtVvl ll ft 11 fl 'l fl

Jtett i NJ iS tA .U 'JSDt»C'- |ft J.H- lUtW ) flfi IXiP U. KJ : indsftlll-t-iK-rtf'C- . PW- f nrt>ylr< v W t.t rtimt-rts.

f t>« '

f •**«««¦ i* ¦ *. f* * • i JyfcJ -,*® » * • * * 9 * li

/ •». fS » i' ¦ v «F. 4 f» iMSfr • * • 6 < i> *14 i » a *§««-«(«-)9 *»©' e ¦: «»«««r * © « t c c. <., © .«• agfe. t»tji - N '7». c- -; * e ST . » !.

- • f-* Sudjscf Id furiner planning l • -

DRI E

« » « rJVtAY-S ROAD 9 * 5 G - - _

vvanoBroogroundwaterfreatmenlplant

Wanneroo itown centre

SC XU

Public utility: power substation

,'AD

GNAKGA l ROADI

Figure 11 East Wanneroo Stru ture Plan

LEGEND

ORTHOPHOTO

, . !00 2oa 300m

mmeM D nw Pfe. UfflEWS A

AI

Tow

n C

entre

En

irons

o R

csi e

niio

l, C

on'.m

erci

of'C

rn J

B s

'nes

s

GR

OV

E- - .... .. . /

98J-

259G

-01

(23,

09.2

011)

. Not

1o

Sca

le

AGRE

ED L

OCA

L ST

RUCT

U E

PLAN

(2 !

A)B

an s

ia G

rove

- M

AP

1

rB'a

E p

afflr

fcy.

-i>

&O

RA

Tl W

' .7

<49755 *

-

Mift

o&fir

iift'l

l'i™

fit

28 r

o n

St.

Ha:

(08)

532

5 02

00

CONC

EPT

LAYO

UT P

L N

Drive

, MAR

IG1N

IUP

ived

p.co

m.a

;Sc

ale 12

0006

>A3

Daw:

2070

1/201

7Pla

n: UR

BAO-

1-002

Dliv

edD

.com

.Lo

ts 4

& 5

Mor

ning

ton

Attachment A

Ccmwrgd V g t»ti w

K i-A\

Draft Green Growth Plan Commitment Mapping7Ei i 'ii

)S ii£,: kk 7'¦/ /fvi< uw>' y J&itSja

,

Legend

Project boundary

| | Cadastre

Classes of action



m Industrial class of action


Commitment mapping

Specific commitments

i. -i - ! Broad commitments and valuesl- cix Known e isting approvals



¦ Phase 1 - Initial package of additionalconservation reserves (80,000 ha)


* J Priority areas for acquisition in Phase 2

Clarifications for Green Growt Plan Mapping

Legend

Project boundary

i 1

Extent of vegetation to be refinedthrough structure planning in accordancewith existing EPBC Act approval

FigureAt: Lot 5 Marginiup

Project: Commitment Mapping ReviewGreen Growt Plan Submission

Client: Urban Capital Group

Plan Number: EP16-024(01)-F04Drawn: ADB Date: 09/05/2016Approved: JDH Date: 12/05/2016Checked: ADB Scale: 1:10,000@A4

emerg

pacn tticp paanios A eiua w ioi Aiiflqisuodsaj ou s}d»33» aftia g o ssauaiaytujoa pua A3at

LEG

END

CONC

EPT

LAYO

UT P

LAN

Lots

4 &

5 M

orni

ngto

n D

rive,

MA

RIG

INIU

P

r iin

t-V

i ¦n

fT. S

'K (

m

LEG

END

3 SU

BJEC

T SI

TE

Roa

d

PUBU

C OP

EN S

PACE

& DR

AINA

GE

1.00

85ha

PUBL

IC O

PEN

SPAC

E&

DRAI

NAG

E49

75sq

m

CONC

EPT

LAYO

UT P

LAN

Lots

4 &

5 M

orni

ngto

n D

rive,

MAR

IGIN

IUP

A 2

C B

row

n S

t. E

ast P

erth

WA

800

°

(08)

932

5 02

00

E ln

fp@

crea

llved

p.co

m.a

u .

Scat

eli50

0pA3

Date

24/01

/2017

fc r

TPt .

Sr u

Ife

ft.


Form 41

Submission

DEPARTMENT OF PLA I G

08 JUL 2016

FILE jo ( I 2? IMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


OFFICE USE ONLY

)


Submission 375

Name . K ia/u/fa.. i'/ >

Address < 0. €/?,... Z.r. L s'S.de ....&06S..

cowSub ission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

Contact phone number Email address

/...

4 ... . ..... .cyy . .,.. &cf/cn.,. /?, ...rf.... t/i

. ./ml. ./. t2y?. .& /... .a&... Sao./ .... LhS.






Ef No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR



E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson



E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OREH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be




a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.


Signature


Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertise closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


METROPOLITAN REGION SCHEME AMENDMENT 1308/41

EAST WAN EROO STRUCTURE PLAN AREA - SUBMISSION

SANDRA DAVIS 20 GREVILLEA COURT, WANNEROO

I support the proposed structure plan and urge it's approval as soon as

possible.

I live on a 4 acre lot, at the above address, I have only bore water to rely

on and it is becoming so dirty no amount of filtering makes it suitable to

drink.

I find it expensive to maintain this property due to high and unfair rates

given that there is an appauling lack of infrastructure - internet and

phone services are outmoded and extremely unreliable, no gas, no

scheme water.

I have maintained and survived on this property hoping I can one day

subdivide -1 have put up with noisy development right up to my back

fence, 2 years of noisy machines and dust, then 2 years of building. I am

70 yrs old and would like to subdivide in my life time rather than sell off

and someone else benefit from what I have had to tollerate.

I would like to see this amendment proceed in an orderly and logical

manner and believe properties zoned special rural should be given

priority to subdivide to urban lots. Land zoned for agriculture, food

basket land should remain as such because we have so little very fertile

land left. I believe the rates should be lower for these people so they

can produce our food at reasonable costs.

I would like to see land containing banksia and habitat for the

endangered cockatoos preserved. I have noticed land owners around

me bulldozing these trees and burning them so that their land can be

subdivided. We need stricter arial mapping and policing of these

ii#» 'tii;

'•J mi

1 ..'ti ifli

culprits.

I am disappointed at the wholesale bulldozing of blocks similar to mine

to create tiny residential lots with no off street parking and no room to

leave any substantial existing trees. This policy is causing future

subdividers to get rid of trees now. Surely we can incorporate big old

natives into the future plan by giving developers credits for leaving

worthy trees within their plan.

The overdevelopment with no room for off-street parking is making

negotiating some roads dangerous due to cars parking on both sides of

the street leaving only one lane clear for cars.

Thankyou for hearing my submission.

Sandra u/ctvii

/ oPlanning a d Development Act 2005


Su missionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amen ment 1308/4'

1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

08 JUL 2016

RLE O £



Submission 376

Name ...QJ.CJp& 'l') T....stv. 0 ; PLE SE FRKT CbEARLYi _

Address P....l- rT.......Q r . . Postcode

Contact phone number, .Q id .CL . . Email address ... .

Submission (Please attach a ditional ages if req ired It is preferred that any a itional informat on be loose rat er t an bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A endment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SE ), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between M rnington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage a d lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be severel compromised by a narrowurb n trip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiu prevents any connectivity. The n tural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. Tins opportunity for aecological bri ge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake dams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthennore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road a d an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided n equestrian thoroughfare between both etlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition betwee these twowetlands is a necessity .

Su gestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Spe ial-Rural with

Special Provisions as in reg rd of defined building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).


a. ...avoid a clash of lifestyles by creating buf er zones for positive transitions be ween the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environmental bri ge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenetlands and o en space.

c. ...p eserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCarnab Cockatoos.

d. ...find the sup ort of most lan owners concerned.

e. ...not require taxpayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of pa kland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best selves guidelines by government and allparties. - tu over to complete your submission -

CkJ.


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC, You o not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amen ment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report an inparticular appendix D.

Please choose on® of the following:

a Wo,i do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, 1 wish to speak at t e hearings, (Please complete the following details)

1 will be re resented b :


or

A spokesperson


1 would prefer my hearing to e conducted in:



permitte to attend)




• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of ail hearings, along with ali written submissions, aretabled n Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfs) makin the submission

Signature . Date

Note: Su missions MUST be received y the a verti ed closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.plannin .wa.gov.au

Yellow submitted changes to MRS amendment 1308/41


Form 1

Submiss onMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41

East Wanneroo Struct)re Plan Area

To: Secretaryestern Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 377

Name UK. I'ArA&HtF LEASE FP IK T CLEARLY)

Address .Q D.... \ Sf?-.\Cr 1 .f1 Postcode .... .Q.l

Contact phone number ., .9. .?., . .5 E ail address .. .

Sub ission (Pl ase attach additional pages if required It is preferred that any additional information ce loose rath r than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A endment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined s Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Momington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with t e objectives of the SEA.

Eco dam ge and lifestyle clashes: I further submit t at the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and e couraged by the Green Growth Plan woul be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as n equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dress ge area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a ecessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural with

Special Provi ions as in regard of defined buildin envelope and protection of existing flora (map att ched, targeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the pproval of most interested parties and:


b. , ..maintain an environmental bridge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetla ds and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds includin theCarnab Coc atoos.

d. ...find the sup ort of most landowner concerned.

e. ...not require ta payer mone to est blish an ecological bridge of arkland and lifest le transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe be t serves guidelines by government and allparties. - turn over to complete your submissio -


Anyone w o has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to atten a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.


Please choose one of the follo ing:

M No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR



Myself - y telephone number (business hours):

or

[ A spokesperson







® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


© All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed b person(s) making the submission

Signature Date 2> ~ .

Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the advertise closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late sub issions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au

Map showi g in Yellow submitted changes to MRS amendment 1308/41


Form 41


East Wanneroo Struct re Plan Area

-

epartment of planni g

08 JUL 2016

hi £m1q i2>

PCe USB ONLY

To; SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 378

Name :fi£asepp clearly;.

Address . ?... .C. . Sl -Postcode. „.. .(a. a.l

Contact phone number. Email address c o/

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferr that anyadditional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissi ns on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41

and wit due consideration following a stud of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area efined as Deferred Urban outh of Coogee Road between Momington and Ada s Rd. is incon ra iction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromise by a narrowur an strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the t in etlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup and

ake Mari iniup prevents any connectivity. The natural ovement of flora and faun is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecolo ical bridge s the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these etlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narro urban strip South of Coo ee Road creates three clashing transition between Parks (Lake Ada s),


History; Furthermore Lake Ada s Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths hichaccess Coogee Road and an e uestri n dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee oad, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally t o road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I sug est, a more harmonious transition bet een these two

etlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land bet een both wetl nds of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural with

pecial Provi ions as in regard of defined building envelo e and protection of exi ting flor (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).


a. ...avoi a clash of lifestyles by cre ting buffer zones for ositive tr nsitions between the zoned areas.

b. ... aintain an environmental brid e for the movement of flora nd fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo are , betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for m n birds including theC rn b Cockatoos.

d. ...find the support of most landowners concerned.

e. ... t require taxpa er mone to establish an ecological bridge of arkland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consi eration ill be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines b gove ent and allparties. - (urn over to complete yo r submission -

Hearing of su missions

Anyone who has made a written submission on the a endment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC, You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission ill be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D,


No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the for and sign)

OR

0 Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be re resented by:Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


I would prefer my hearing to be conducte in:





• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act. __ _


• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Gove or a prove the proposed amendment. TheWAPC reco mendations are similarly publishe in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date ; O I ;

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing date, being close ofbusiness (6pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Co tacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www. lanning.wa.gov.au

sho ing in \ ll w submitted changes to MRS amen ment 1 08 4 i

098 o Nnaiw, G OVE PINJAR

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantia!)

Form 41



ft fmo -y (DEP RTMENTOF PLANNING

08 JUL 2016

j Q (o (3

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 379

Name ,.(PLEASE PRMT CLEARLY)

Address .33 .... 3/.... /y 3.3'3. Postcode .. . Z..

Contact phone number.,333.3.. .333 Email address .

Submission (Please attach add tional pages if required. It is preferred that any ad itional information be loose rather than bound)

... '~ y j

iyj.... /(j Cn <2 's.

3




For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment repon and inparticular appendix D.



OR



I I Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

I I A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact tele hone number (business hours): . ...Postal address:


I I Public ( embers from the.general public may attend your presentation)

ORI I Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be

subject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties,

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parlia ent and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


Signature Date


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

ft io o x\ vPlanning and Development Act 2005 DEPARTMENT of planning

Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41 08 JUL 2016

SubmissionF|LE Olo k Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


To: SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

Submission 380

Name T7 r1. &. 0;i ,'ri. ± i \ S. FLEAS E FPIM CLEARLY)

r I ~

A dress ... . ... ,-S .v? .vrS-. I .vf .!?l . A Postco e !<>. ?. ..C.

Contact phone numberEmail address .. , C.C.). • C ro

Submission (Please attac additional ages if required It is referr d t at any additional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the rea defined as Deferred Urban outh of Coogee Road bet een Mornington and Adams Rd. is inco tradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further sub it that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurb n strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological lin age as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing ransitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to Ad msRoad. Additionally two ro d reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition bet een these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural withSpecial Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of exi ting flor (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).



b. ...maintain an environmental bridge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetla ds and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCarnaby Cockatoos.

d. ...fmd the upport of most landowners concerned.

e. ...not require ta payer money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allparties. - turn over to complete your submission -





H Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I ill be represented by:


or

L A spo esperson


I would prefer my hearing to be conduct in:





© The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

*> In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all ritten subm ssions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (Sp n) on 8 JULY 201S. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.pIanning.wa.gov.au

MRS amendment 1308 41Map showing in Yellow submitted changes to

»MNi\sitt PiNJARGROVE

lanning a no ueveio mw i u

Sectloii 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Am ndment 1308/41

East Wanner©® Structure Plan rea

DEPARTM JT QF gLAf JING

08 JUL 2010

FILE £tS I 0 & 13?

To: SecretaryWeste Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

off ce use only

Submission 381 *

Name ... Em r H :PLEASE PRINT CLEA LY;-

Address . ..... io. p Postcode

Contact phone number Z >-7. Email address i .


Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A end ent 1308/41an with due consideration followi a study of the Federal and State Govern ent initiative of Strategic Environ ental Assess ent(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferre Urban south of Coogee Road between Momington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversit of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurb n strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the t in wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological lin age as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Gro th Plan would b asted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these etland are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions bet ee Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake dams) and Rural zoning (North of La e Little Mariginiup).

History: F rthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area borderi g the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an e u strian thorou hfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land bet een both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of exis ing flora (map attached, targeted area shad din yellow).



b. ...maintain an environ ental brid e for the movement of flora an fauna, endemic to the Wann roo area, betweenetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many ature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds inclu ing theCarnab Cockatoos.

d. ...find the suppor of ost landowners concerned.

e. ...not require tax ayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of parldamd and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consi eration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allparties. turn over to complete your submissio -


An one who has made a written submission on the amendment has the o portunity to personall present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. T ecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment,


Please choose on of the following:

E No, 1 do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

O Y©S, i ish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete t e following details)

1 wilt be represented by:


©r

A spokesperson


1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:


ORPri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be


You should be aware t at:

• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applicat ons for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursu mission or the substance of that submission, ma be disclosed to third parties.

« All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv person(s) making the submission

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertise closing date, eing close ofbusines (5 m) on 8 JULY 2016. Late su issions will NOT e consider d.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; ebsite - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

siunvitn* m ' ow submittfu dian j. 1 N fRs amciuimenc 1 8 11

98 e*MWf\aiMGROVE PtNJAR

DEP RTMENT OF PL ING

08 JUL 2016


Form 1

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 13Q8/411


To: SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 382

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferre t at any additional inforn-ation oe loose rat r than boun )

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental ssessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Mornington and Adams Rd. is incontradictio with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversit of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurban stri . Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twi wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological lin age as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aec logical bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narro urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing tran itions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles nd accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these two


Suggestion: I submit to zone the la d between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural withS eci l Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map att ched, targeted are shadediti yellow).


a. ...avoid a clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive tr nsitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environmental brid e for the movement of flora a d fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetla ds and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds including theCarnab Cockatoos,


e. ...not require taxpayer money to establish an ecological bridge of rkland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and llarties. - turn over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to atten a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.



0 No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


1 will be represente by:

[ Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson




ORC] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



® The WAPC s subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, cop es of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are sim larly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by peirson(s) making the submission

Signature . Date jT.lTTC

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late su missions will NOT be conside ed.


J

Map showing in Yellow submitted changes to MRS amend ent 1308/41

Submission 383

Government of Western AustraliaHousing Authority

OPENING DOORSTo Affordable Housing

Ref: 809-2-30-20SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Attn: Anthony Muscara

Dear Ms. Blenkinsop,

METROPOLITAN REGION SCHEME AMENDMENT 1308/41 - EAST WANNEROOSTRUCTURE PLAN AREA

Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comment on the MetropolitanRegion Scheme Major Amendment 1308/41 for the East Wanneroo Structure PlanArea.

The Housing Authority acknowledges the above amendment to the MetropolitanRegion Scheme (MRS), seeking to transfer 2,099.ha of land in Wanneroo from theRural zone to the 'Urban Deferred Zone is to increase the supply of land for housingand employment. The amendment is consistent with the designation of the area asUrban Expansion’ under the Draft North-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework (NWSub-Regional Framework) as contained in the Perth and Peel @ 3.5 Million land useplanning suite of documents.

This identified urban expansion area is part of critical land supply identified for urbanconsolidation which will help meet population demands and increase opportunities foraffordable land, housing and living. Consolidation of the urban form will encourage thegrowth of the transport network, industry and residential development withinlOkm of theJoondalup Strategic Metropolitan Centre. The area is also located to the north of theGnangara industrial area, a significant employment area for the current Gnangara-Jandabup-Mariginiup population. Australian Bureau of Statistic Census data from 2011identified over 30% of this population was employed in construction, manufacturing orother industrial related industries. The development of the Neerabup industrial area hasbeen identified as an Industrial Centre capable of providing jobs for the north-westmetropolitan region within the NW Sub-Regional Framework also notable is theindustrial expansion in South Pinjar to the north-east of the East Wanneroo StructurePlan area {EWSP).

The amendment will facilitate future residential development boasting in excess of26,000 dwellings in the EWSP. With the requirement for an additional 229,089 jobs and283,713 dwellings by 2050 to accommodate the anticipated population growth in theNorth-west sub-region, this urban expansion is considered appropriate and necessary.Subsequent planning within the EWSP area must ensure appropriate densities of

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNI G

- 8 JUL 2016

FILE

99 Plain Street, East Perth Western Australia 6004Telephone (08) 9222 4791 [email protected]

ww .housing.wa.gov.au

development to minimise the requirement for further Greenfield expansion that may beunsustainable and detrimental to the environment. Infrastructure planning andcoordination, conservation and sustainable communities are among key strategic goalsof the State Planning Strategy 2050 for managing change. Perth and Peel @3.5 Millionhighlights the need to maintain livability with the urban growth urban growth we areexperiencing. Success of this urban expansion area will rely on access to affordableand diverse housing, employment, education, efficient public transport and othernecessary services.

The Authority has no objection to the MRS Amendment 1308/41.

Yours sincerely

Hannelie EvansSenior PlannerUrban Planning, Design & Approvals

8 July 2016

Submission 384

8 July 2016

Jo Kempton9400 4455

809-2-30-20 Pt 1 (RLS/0603/1)

08570

INW16/7365

130101121211211110112The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

Dear Ms Blenkinsop

METROPOLITAN REGIO SCHEME MAJOR AMEND ENT 1308/41EAST WANNEROO STRUCTURE PLAN AREA

I write in response to the request for comments regarding the above proposal toamend the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS).

Please note that the following are interim comments only as this submission is yet tobe formally endorsed by the Director Planning and Community Development. Thesubmission will be considered by the Director early next week and a final submissionwill follow.

Although the detail is not included in the MRS amendment, the zoning will facilitatethe implementation of the structure plan. Having regard for the consequence of thedensity and development to be achieved through the implementation of the EastWanneroo Structure Plan the City anticipates there will be a significant impact on theoperation of some critical major roads and intersections within the City ofJoondalup s road network.

It is therefore requested that detailed transport odelling and traffic impactassessment is undertaken to address the following:

• Road network and connections determined with special consideration given tonorth south spine routes/ connections

© Land use and staging of the proposed development to be determined and used toderive accurate traffic generation and distribution assumptions

® Demonstration of trip demand/ distribution for each stage of the development andimplementation of appropriate growth rates for transport model of future scenarios

® Transport model to be developed in line with Main Roads WA ROM24 model© Provide traffic/ transport related recommendations, for short, medium and long

term scenarios. Recommendations to include intersection and midblock upgradeswhen and if necessary.

Should you require further information in relation to this matter, please contact theabovementioned officer.


- 8 JUL 2016

FILE

Yours sincerely

JOHN CORBELLINIManager, Planning Services

)

Date: 5 July 2016 Your Ref: 809-2-30-20 Ft 1 (RLS/0603/1)

Citr ofvfi loondalun

Addition toAF

Enquiries: Jo Kempton9400 4455

Our Ref: 08570

INW16/7365Submission 384

l,lllllllllllllllllllllll-lllll",l1'The SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506PERTH WA 6001

DEPARTMENT OF PLAN ING

11JUL 2016

FILE /Z3

Dear Ms Blenkinsop

METROPOLITAN REGIO SCHEME AJOR AME DMENT 1308/41EAST WANNEROO STRUCTURE PLAN AREA

I write in response to the request for comments regarding the proposal to amend theMetropolitan Region Scheme (MRS).

Although the detail is not included in the MRS amendment, the zoning will facilitatethe implementation of the structure plan. Having regard for the consequence of thedensity and development to be achieved through the implementation of the EastWanneroo Structure Plan the City anticipates there will be a significant impact on theoperation of some critical major roads and intersections within the City ofJoondalup s road network.

It is therefore requested that detailed transport modelling and traffic impactassessment is undertaken to address the following;

® Road network and connections determined with special consideration given tonorth south spine routes/ connections

® Land use and staging of the proposed development to be determined and used toderive accurate traffic generation and distribution assumptions

• Demonstration of trip demand/ distribution for each stage of the development andimplementation of appropriate growth rates for transport model of future scenarios

® Transport model to be developed in line with Main Roads WA ROM24 model• Provide traffic/ transport related recommendations, for short, medium and long

term scenarios. Recommendations to include intersection and midblock upgradeswhen and if necessary.

Should you require further information in relation to this matter, please contact theabovementioned officer.

Yours sincerely

JOH CORBELLINIManager, Planning Services

City of Joondalup | Boas Avenue Joondalup WA 6027 | PO Box 21 Joondalup WA 6919 | T: 9400 4000 | F: 9300 1383National Relay Service | TTY/voice calls: 13 36 77 | Speak and Listen: 1300 555 727 | Translating and Interpreting Service: 13 14 50joondalup.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act. 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)

Form 41


l DHPARTfifilT OP PUNNING

East Wanneroo Struc re Plan Area

To: SecretaryWeste Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 385

ame &.fAN&'X. , 3.9. •FLEA = t== .7 CLE-FL Y •

Address S T.E;e,f? fe.... . .(M .£.,. MfifU&Mup..... Postcode .. .6.0.7.

Contact phone number... .5.Q. . Email address.... (S . j'cc/Aruct.. oM

Submission (Please attach additional ages if require . It is preferre that any additional information o loos rat er t an bo nd)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the are defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road bet een Mornington and A ams Rd. is incon radiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further s bmit that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a n rrowurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in theEWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing tra sitions bet een Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as n equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare bet een both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I s bmit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of existin flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).



b. ...maintain an nvironmental bri ge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo are , betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the m ny mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds including theC naby Cockatoos.

d. ...find the su port of most landowners concerned.

e. ...not require t xpayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of arkla d nd lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consider tion will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allparties. - turn over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You o not have to attend a hearing. Thecom ents presented by you in this written submission will be considered in etermining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.


Please choose one of fhe following:

Ef No, I do not wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


1 will be represente by:

C Myself - y telephone number (business hours):

or

Q A spokesperson


I oul prefer my earing to be conducted in:

l Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORQ Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be

permitted to atten )



° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these su missions, copies of yoursu mission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are simiiariy published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signeol by personfs makin the submission

Signature Date / 7 - / .

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing date, bei g close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2018. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Yellow submitted changes to MRS amendment I30X/4I


Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/

f\ 30<2 )15 OF PLANNING

08 JUL 2016

G &&East Wanneroo Structure Plan Ar a

To Secretary/estern Australian Planning Commissionockecl Bag 2506

Perth WA 6001

Submission 386

Name . . f WC.r. t...TOijAj 6t»Nym/ us TSM i3ei_ O' IS'Bj Vt' J ft /T / ) FL=«EFPr TCLEi=t

Address .63 Caa Ro.fr.Q.. .ft .ft ft A Postcode . .0. . 0 -5 g Ujl S c,ss€ ) Cfoucl. Co

Contact phone number ..l &.6. LlQci& Email address .Aqsob ecS5 jCn C.- arrt •

Submission iPfease attach additional pages if required It is preferred t at any a ditional information be loose rather than bound I

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions o the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amend ent 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government i itiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I siabmit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road bet een Mornington and dams Rd. is inco tradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the are will be severely compromised by a narrowurban stri . Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Ada s and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup preve ts any connectivity. Tire natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the nique chanceoi ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be asted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake dams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History . Furthermore Lake d ms Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, f om Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road dditionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, La e A ams

and the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, 1 suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of e isting flora (map attached, t rgeted rea shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would h ve the approval of most interested parties and:


b. ...maintain an e vironmental bri ge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds including theCarnaby Cockatoos.


e. ...not require taxpayer money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifest le transitions.

1 trust that due consideration will be given to the above sub ission, which 1 believe best serves guidelines by gove ment and allparties. - turn over to complete your s bmission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally resent thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the pro osed amendment.




OR

O Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

I will be represented b :

L Myself - My telephone num er (business hou s):

or

A spokesperson


i would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

[ Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORPrivate (onl the people nominated b you or the earings committee will be


You should be a are that:

# The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, subm ssions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all written submissions, arefabled n Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions an tabled in Parliament.


Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing d te, being close ofbusiness (Sp n) on 8 JULY 2916. Late submissions will NOT be co sidered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08)6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://vAVW.planning.wa.gov.au

Yellow su mitted changes to MRS amen ment I30S/4I

/O- 802 j iPlanning and Development Act 2005

Section 41 Ame dme t (Substantial) epartment of pla ingForm 41

08 JUL 2016Submission

Metro olitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41 RLE 0 3


To: SecretaryWestern Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Pertii WA 6001

osfceusgomly

Submission 387

Name . ... S. o c N.... .V ?)fr- ;PLEASE PR ff'iT CLEARLY*

Ad ress , .... ck C:...Cg .dr... Postcode .„.,. .6.03.1

Contact phone numberO . S.. .3 H3...1.S. .... Email ad ress . r6>?. =&. .6 . t iS ..-. CjOL t\.


Problem to be addressed: In response to the call fo su missions on the pro osed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Fe eral and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SE ), I sub it that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Momington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco da age nd lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area ill be severely compromised by a narrowurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the t in wetlands of La e Little-M riginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natur l ovement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linka e as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by he Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the ost logical one in the whole EWSP rea, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narro urban strip South of CoO ee Road creates three clashi transitions bet een Parks (Lake Ada s),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Ad ms Special Rural Estate, designe , planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage are bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to A a sRoad. Additionally two road r serves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfar betwee both etlands, Lake Ada s

¦ and the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmon ous transition b tween these two


Suggestion: I submit to zone the land bet een oth wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural withSpecial Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes an protection of existing flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).


a. ...avoid clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environmental bridge for the ovement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, b weenetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, hich are essential home and food sources for many bir s including theCarnaby Cockatoos.


e. ...not require tax ayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of arkla d a d lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allparties. - turn over to complete your submission -

Heari g of submission

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personall present thebasis of their su mission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You d© not have to atten a hearing. T ecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in deter ining the reco endationfor the proposed amend ent.

For infor ation about the sub ission an hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D.

Please choose ne of the fol o i g:

H , do not wis to speak at t e hearings. ( lease go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR



Myself - M telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


S wouSd prefer my hearing to be conducted in:


ORPrivate (oni t e people no inated by you or t e hearings committee will be


You should be aware t at:


• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, cop es of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclose to third parties.

0 All. hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of al! hearin s, along with all written submissions, aretable in Parliament and published as public recor s should the Governor approve the proposed amen ment TheWAPC recommendations are similarly pu lished in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


Signature

S ote: Submissions MUST be received b tbs advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (Spm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions wilS NOT foe considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.ptenning.wa.gov.au

31 Id9ioz inr s-

9NINNV"ld JO INdlAliaVddQuojssi. qns jno aiaidiuoo oj jaAo uunj

'. c wddj '' f o\' wi§' ' 'W ?'' pq rj" " ' ''

p J )I V " t?'" " j i p> j p i'' '••• ""'"4' psv|''''• pw'¦ •••&•• ' i»'¦ --dvr "

po'js' pr '< d' v jj ' ' ' '' c? ’' 'jy'&H' " " c ? ''' o ' '' ' &rf

pdcf' A ' i(' ' ' j

p ,2rw' "to" j' '' v 1' '¦ p' r)1 " " p Cv'A ' jd'' £)'J ' y.Qo Q -' ' irt p ' "2<j "' p Q j r pc ''' <•'

d SCi "" ¦" " ’ ’" )'' ’ " " ¦ ¦ B a. K) ¦ ¦ '''3s"" f d d o'¦ ) -3 "¦ ¦

cj Ct ip'" p ' wotsO)- ' ’ p d(K ''' " " 'CJrS 'i rA'O''' ''

io "db Q'"Yji s "v""'fy i '' 3 )- q i'• p;• ' io. '’

p i£J2; £ ¦ c[-' ¦ cf 6- " " o " ¦'' P ¦' ' - p f ' J' C S xS Ki i o co arnaq p ) Sri /9t nVj. '

C p pa/© ' ' " <i | '•' 'pXA/' sxyo"' p 'cl'oxl ' a p ' 'x>

(punoq UB4) jeqjBj esoo| sq uo bujjojui iBuompps Aub jsqj pejjSiSjd s| t| pajinbai seBBd isuomppB qoB«B esE8|d) uoiSSILUqns

J<rJ |f© i©' ¦ SS8JPP£ l!BLU3 '' - qwnu suoqd bjuoq

S J ? spooisod ''' '.Aycj ip hfy-z i ' SS0JPPV( 1BV310 iNIHd 3SV31d) ' ''V lp' " " p i ' Viip' - ' 8LUBN

88C uojssituqns1 009 VM W9d9092 Bsa pa>|Ooq

UOISSjUJLUOO BujUUEId UB||BJlsnV UJ8 S8/\AAJB}9JO0S -'01

A1NO asn SOIddO

eajv UB|d ajn ruis oojauue/\/\ jseg

IP/80EL juaiupuaiuv atua os uoiBay UBt odoj i/y

uojssiujqns

Ip LLUOJ(|B!luejsqns) iuaiupuauj IP uopoas

S00S V juemdo|9Aea pub GupuBy


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amend ent has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular'appendix D.



OR




o

A spokesperson



D Public (members from the general public may atten your presentation)

OR

d] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)


Q The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

[/in the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

/Ml hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The

WAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


Signature Date ).T|!k


Contacts: Telep one - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htlp://www.planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment fSubstantiai)

For 41

Submission

1RTMENT 0F.ELANNING

08 JUL 2016

FILE I&3 0 6 OMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41

East Wanneroo Structure Plan rea

opece use only

To. SecretaryWeste Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 389

Name

A dress

.An.:.tJ-!. '. . i'LlflSSfluc.i , :Fl£ASEPRINT CLEARLY'

. .Z ... .hs&GLy.Qi& . . p . Z.'-k.feik. . Postco e .6(3.3./.

Contact phone number..Q __£ Z.5.7.5 L Email address .tYtwJr&J!0. jC.55e 'c;<?.5.:

Sub ission (Please attach additio al pages if required It is preferred that anyadditional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amend ent 1308/41

and with due consideration follo ing study of t e Fe eral and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urba south of Coogee Road between Momington and Adams Rd. is in

co tradiction ith the obj ectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area ill be severely compromise by a narrowurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup and

Lake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricte and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be waste . This opportunity for a

ecological brid e is the most logical one i the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban stri South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake dams),


History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an e uestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Roa and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provide an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these two wetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zo e the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lak Adams as Special-Rural withSpecial Provisions as in regard of defined building envelope and protection of exi ting flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zonin , woul have the approval of most interested parties and:


b. ...m intain an environmental bri e for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, b tweenetlands and open s ace.

c. ...preserve the many ature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCarnab Cockatoos.

d. ...find the support of most landowner concerned.

e. ... ot require taxpa er money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifest le tra sitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and all

parties. - lum over to complete your submission -


Anyone w o has made a written submission on the amend ent has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a su -committee of the W PC. You do not have to atten a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission ill e considered in determining the recommendationfor t e proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appen ix D.

Please choose one of th following:

0 No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I will be represented b :

M self - M telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson


1 woul refer m earing to be conducted in:


ORPrivate (onl the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions ma e to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

9 in t e course of t e WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursu mission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

« All earings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all earings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should t e Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) making the submission

Signature

Note: S bmissions MUST be receive y the advertised closing date, being close offbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 201®. Late submissions wil! NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website ¦¦ htip://www p!anning.wagov.au

s owing Y w utv Mte i chang - to MKS amendment 110X *11

#g omisissim

, GROVE PINJAR

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amen ment (Substantial)

Form 41

SubmissionMetropoli an Region Scheme Am ndment 1308/41

East Wanneroo Structure Flan re®

> lo i%bDEPARTMENT OF PL NNING

08 JUL 2016

FILE : (j( I 0

OFFC6 USE ONLY

To: SecretaryWeste AustraSan Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 390

Name.,. iFUEASEPRINT CLEARLY- .

Address .Z?f...S.c .... Q/o.,./. .fe. Postcode ...6o.

Contact phone nurnbex" kL Y r??r. r!?. Email address .......

ub ission (Please attach additional pages if required it is preferred t at anyadditional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A endment 1308/41

and ith due consideration follo ing a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment

(SEA), I submi that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Mornington and Adams Rd. is inco tradiction ith the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area ill be severely compromised by a narrowurban st ip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the t in wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup and

Lake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural ovement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linka e as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Pl n would be wasted. This opportunity for a

ecological bridge is the most logical one in the hole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than a y other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing tran itions bet een Parks (Lake Adams),

Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Ada s) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams S ecial Rural Estate, designed, planned an sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths which

access Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coo ee Road, fro Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestri n thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more har onious transition between these t o

etlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I sub it to zone the land bet een both etl nds of Lake Little Mari iniup and Lake Ada s as Special-Rural withSpecial Provisions as in regard of define building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map attached, targeted a ea shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have he approval of most interested parties and:


b. ...maintain an en ir nmental bri ge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the any mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCarnab Cockatoos.


e. ...not require taxpa er money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifestyle transitions.

*

I trust that due consideration will be iven to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and all

parties. - turn over to complete your submission -

Hearing of su m ss ons

Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC. You do not Slave to atten a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in deter ining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.


Please choose one of t e following:

s\i©, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, i wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete t e following details)

1 will be represented b :

dl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal ad ress:


dl Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORCl Private (only the people no inate by you or the hearings co mittee will be

permitted to atten )


® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions ma e to t e WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• in the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, areta led in Parliament and published as public records should t e Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly publis ed in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfs) makin the submission

ote: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close offbusiness (5 m) on 8 JULY 2016. Late su missions will NOT be consi ered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08)6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; ebsite - http:// ww.pianning. a.gov.au

.howmg in Yellow submitted changes to MRS amendment 1308 41

Proposal 1a

7349

JAN

4893!CA

4?072

5117 CA

JS334

CA470*0

CASLWBMi >Q 1

47965

39* wrmjiM

GROVE

Ct'*4<50

Ck a

*5941

C/ 50718

PINJAR

-MAf

33* r,> r cc z

Cfc36496

C<47745

CA(9»7

Planning ana ueveiu niw mia

ieetsosi 41 Amendment fSybstantial)Form 41

SubmissionWtetropolitan Region Scheme Ar ndment 1308/41

East anneroo Structure Flan Area

oF cs secm-Y

To: SecretaryWeste Australan Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 391

Mime C sr t £ 5A.. :FL£ASE PR IfsT CLEARLY;-

Address .7. (£ Postcode - ----- - 13 A AJ 4 S 7 L r 3 -

Contact phon© number.. r.t<.Q.tf.Si.9i..C*. 7. Em il address

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferred that any ad itional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A endment 1308/41and ith due consideration following a stud of the Fe eral and State Government initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area define as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Momin ton and Ada s Rd. is incont adiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further ubmit that the biodiversity of the area ill be severely compromised by a rrowurb n strip. Such an abrupt separation of the etlands between Lake Adams and the t in wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encoura ed by th Green Growth Plan would be asted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these etlands are clos r together than any other in this rea.

A currently pro osed narrow urban strip South of Coo ee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake da s) and Rural zoning (North of L ke Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Ro d and an equestrian dressage area borderin the north side of Coogee Road, fro Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Ad itionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To void a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .


Speci l P ovisions as in regar of defined building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of ost interested parties and


b. . .. aintain an enviro mental bridg or the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the W nneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preseive the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds inclu ing theCarnaby Cockatoos.


e. ...not require taxpayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of a kland and lifest le tra sitions.

I trust that due consideration ill be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by gove ment and allparties. - turn over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written sub ission ill e considered in deter ining the recommendationfor t e propose amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the a en ment report and inparticular appendix 0.


No, 1 do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bo to of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, wis to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


Myself - y telephone number (business hours):

©r

A spokesperson


1 wo l p efer my hearing to be conducted in:


ORPri ate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



• T e WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions ma e to the WAPC may besubject o applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursu mission or the substance of that submission, may be disclose to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Gove or approve t e proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv personfs) making the submission

Note: Submissions (MUST be received y the ad ertised closing ate, eing close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. L e su missions ill NOT consi ere .

Contacts: Telephone-(08)6551 9000; Fax-(08)6551 9001; [email protected]; Website-http://www.planning.wa.go .au


Form 41

Submission

ft fojM jdepartment of pla ing

08 JUL 2016

FILE I 0 biOMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 392

Name..

Address

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

2,0.....Ci.O F.Uk ..0. t.<L.£ Postcode ...foO.T??:

Contact phone number Email address .

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required, it is preferred that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

.... .Go. .-fch. .. .u.do av s Vf ».a >.>.VV. . c ur inthe.. a y .fi5Q

\ . ,0?x\vVt .. .. .S . ,\ ..thG.. .ffea . ,<?S. ..S. A/A Auo. . . lAT. .S.W.h €Cj.vftp \

rp .CQfT>.e. As ru... 0} o..,AJ<2 . Q.Y G-.a .+o. t .Q.. . ,t . A l >015.10

s . . . .s.. c. ,ae.oVJp.o.r.r.'i.... .P. <5 c.. £q iQ r ,te> . .< . .> .

S b.WLSsiQa.. )s<2\?. . A f es... .rdo AS., ..O.b c .io .. Q.

.Co.r rr oo.deYto .. . 0/... . a. o. ..... . .PQS. j-

i .iA .t! p(..<o .i

TF ,ss C lX n 0,0(1,VLoq ,







OR

M Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)



or

dl A spokesperson










To be si ned by erson(s) makin the submission



SUBMISSIO IN OBJECTION TO M S AMENDMENT 1308/4! IN ITS CURRE T FO M

Summary of Grounds Of Objection:

Inconsiste t with properly consi ered an advertise State Gove ment strategic planning

ocuments which identifies our property and its exten e locality, Golfview PI fSouthj p ecinct fo

urban development in the immediate sho t te m 5 0 yea s.

he proposed M S zoning boundary a bit arily follows the East Wanneroo Structure Plan (2011)

study boundary without conside ation of to ogra hy, infrastructure servicing catchments,

i plementation constraints and landowner developme t intentions. istrict structure lan

would provi e g eate guidance in espect of these ssues and should be progres ed as a atte of

prio ity, prior to the finalisation of the MRS amendment boundary.

Our dual frontage 2.5 ac e lan holding is u constrained as it has no remnant evegetation,

connected to eticulated ater an mains power, not subject to inundation/wetlan buffers..

P e-existing special u al local scheme provisions for t e subject land are typical. Due to the

unco st aine ature of the land they relate to the esignation of a buil ing envelo e, limitations

in relation to keepi g of li estock an horses and estricte evelopment due to being unsewered.

These existing local scheme co t ols ould be rendered superfluous once Urban Development

occurs in the locality.

The MRS Amendme t pro osal in its current fo m could significantly i act upon our residential

amenity an is not in keeping with the existing special rural lifestyle enjoyed in the locality. In

being excluded from the MRS Amendme t, e will not be afforded the opportunity to artici ate

as affecte la d owners in the ist ict planning rocess to ensure the best outcome fo ou

lan holding an locality.

ecommendation

That in respect of Lot 503 (SN 20) that it should be included in the M S Amen ment as Urban

Defe red

If this p oposal is conside ed a too substant al modification then Minor MRS men ment s ould

be initiate by the WAPC ior to the gazettal of the MRS A en ment to fully consi er the

suitability a lan o ne de elopment inte tion for inclusion of Golfview View (South) precinct

into Urban Deferre .

Submission on East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area MRS Amendment 1308/41 MOROZ1

Grounds of Objection

Inconsistent with properly considered and ecently advertised State Gove nment strategic

planning documents w ich identifies our property an its ejrtended locality, Golfview PI (South

precinct for u ban expansio in the immediate short te m 5-10 yea s.

The public advertising of the draft Strategic Conservation Plan and the draft Impact Assessment

Report, the 'Perth and Peel Green Growth Plan for 3.5 million', coincided with the Commission s

initiation of this MRS amendment (advertising of the Green Growth Plan closing 8 April 2016) and

shows the subject land and land in the vicinity as future urban. The Green Growth Plan as a hole of

government high level initiative has been developed in collaboration with the Western Australian

Planning Commission's ( the Commission ) draft Perth & Peel @3.5million sub-regional planning

frameworks. The Commission's draft Perth & Peel (g)3.5million sub-regional planning fr mework for

the North West Corridor, advertised 2015, clearly shows the subject land and land in the vicinity

for future Urban Development in the s ort term. The Framework states that identified Urban

Expansion areas take advantage of the proximity to existing development and infrastructure in the

Wanneroo locality and form a logical consolidation of the existing urban areas. Whilst these High

Order documents are cursorily mentioned in the MRS Amendment report there is no mention of

how the proposed MRS amendment is implementing the mandate set out in these documents or

why significant areas, identified for Urban Expansion (development), have been left out of this

major MRS Amendment. Justification of the MRS Amendment resides instead on a lower order

planning policy, the East Wanneroo Structure Plan EWSP (2011) prepared by the Commission 5-8

years prior. It is also noted, that at the time of t e EWSP (2011) adoption, the City didn't fully

support the study and raised concerns regarding the need for a range of supporting studies before

the scale of urbanisation could be contemplated. To date it's unclear whether more rigorous

investigations have been undertaken to support the current MRS Amen ment with the exception of

the broader Perth & Peel @3.5million sub-regional planning framework for the North West Corridor

which has in turn been disregarded.

On this basis, the finalisation of the M S Amendment i its current form is premature until t e

bounda y of future u ban expansion set out in draft Perth & Peel @3.5million sub-regional planning

W framework has been properly investigated through district structure and infrastructure

2Submission on East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area MRS Amendment 1308/41 MOROZ

planning. Furthermore, the recommendations of the Green Growth Plan need to be fully reconciled

within the proposal.

T e proposed MRS zoning boundary arbitrarily follows the East Wanneroo St uctu e Plan (2011)

study boundary without consideration of topog a hy, infrastructure servicing catchments,

im lementation co st aints an landowne de elo ment inte tions. A district st ucture lan

oul provi e greater guidance in res ect of t es issues and s ould be p ogressed as a matte of

p io ity, prior to the fin lisation of the MRS amendment boundary.

The proposed MRS zoning follows the cadastre and road alignment of the East Wanneroo Structure

Plan (2011) study area as the basis of the Urban Deferred zoning designation which effectively

rezones 2000 hectares of land to the immediate Nort /East of our property frontage. It is envisagedthat ultimately all this land will go to Urban and Golfview PI will function as a subdivisional service

road for this Urban expansion area. As a Special Rural lot excluded from the Urban Deferred MRS

zone we will not be considered affected landowners within a district structure plan and able to fully

participate and benefit from resultant proposals. But instead be im acted upon by changed traffic

conditions, bulk earthworks, infrastructure upgrades and an impacted residential amenity not in

keeping with our existing special rural lifestyle. Serious conside ation needs to be given to mid

block rather than road carriageway MRS boundary designation, so that district structure planning

can adequately address transitions of suitable land uses and a less intensive buffer to existing

development in this locality. On this basis, the subject land should be included as Urban Deferred in

the MRS Amendment to allow district structure planning to examine suitable transition of land uses

as a buffer and fully evaluate servicing catchments. Furthermore, the district structure planning

process can fully assess development intentions within the Gnangara precinct to best manage

orderly and roper planning of the area and staged development minimising impacts on existing

landholders.

Our dual f ontage 2.5 acre landholding is unconstrained as it has no remnant revegetation,

connected to reticulated ater and mains power, not subject to inumdation/wetland buffers.

Lot 503 (SN 20) is located within Special Rural Precinct 15 of t e local scheme area and was created

as part of a special rural subdivision in the late 1990s. Comprising one hectare (2.5 acres) it is located

at the intersection of two fully constructed sealed, drained service roads, Golfview PI and the Links.

Golfview PI connects to Badgerup Road, a major North-South connector (identified as a future

integrator arterial) within the Gnangara locality and is a service road cul de sac to approximately 20

rural (some substantial landholdings) and 11 special rural lots. The landholdings within the rural

residential subdivision have been highly modified and cleared for special rural pursuits with

substantial residences constructed within designated building envelopes. The landholdings within

Golfview PI (South) precinct have reticulated water and mains power. Located on a North-South

ridge line, the land is elevated and not subject to inundation or wetland buffer setbacks and. As with

the land to be zoned North of Golfview PI it is subject to SPP 3.7 bushfire provisions. Majority of the

land on the Northern side of Golfview PI are larger landholdings and used for market gardening

pur oses, horse agistment and rural living pursuits. In fact the boundary bisects a prominent North

South ridge line and topographical feature in the locality. With the exception of the historical pattern

of subdivision and current local scheme provisions there is nothing inherently different between the

land north and south of Golfview PI. On the basis of the lack of constraints on the land and the


current level of servicing, the subject land should be included as Urban Deferred in the MRS

Amendment.

Pre-existing s ecial rural local scheme provisions for the subject lan a e typical an related to

relate to a sub ivision g ide plan. Due to the unconstraine natu e of t e land these rovisions

relate to the designation of a building en elo e, limitations in relation to keeping of livestoc and

horses and restriction o esi ential develo ment ue to the land being unsewered. These

existing local scheme controls would be endered superfluous once Urban De elo nt occurs in

the locality

The pattern of development and subdivision layout does not preclude further residential

development occurring being adequately serviced by two fully constructed sealed, drained service

roads, Furthermore, increasingly limitations are being set on how Special Rural landowners can use

their land and access the locality which includes the limitation/licensing of bore use and the

restriction of equine activities and access to the Badgerup Reserve. This is indicative of the increased

pressures on the locality and that the extensive special rural land use is not a tenable one over the

long term. The Commission s draft Perth & Peel @3.5million sub-regional planning framework states

that no further Special Rural subdivision will be supported . As its stands, it is quite likely that when

urban development does proceed North of Golfview PI that costly servicing upgrades of reticulated

sewer, mains gas and telecommunications will be aligned within the southern side of road reserve

(as is the case currently) but won t necessary service their southern ideal catchment. The proposal in

its current form will mean that our neighbours across the street will be affected landowners when

structure plans are prepared and implemented and will be able to fully participate in this process

whereas we will be token adjoining owners with no third party rights to local scheme and local

structure planning proposals.

Furthermore, the Golfview PI (South) precinct landholdings are bounded to the South by a

substantial rural landholding fronting Badgerup oad which is zoned Rural in both the MRS and local

scheme and has not been included in the MRS Amendment . Potentially, 12 existing special

residential landholdings (the Golfview PI Southern precinct) and the remnant rural land holding

comprising over 20 hectares of land could be excluded from servicing catchment and this could be

significant when funding of infrastr cture is increasingly marginal. Subject to landowners'


development intentions, this southern landholding may provide a more suitable rounding off of the

proposed urban deferred MRS zoning an resultant istrict structure plan area.

IProposed Urban Deferred

Proposed Urban Deferred

Prop sed Urban Deferred

Lot503 6i r i leBrbposed Urban Deferred

Proposed MRS zoning pro osals rel ting to Lot 503 Golfview PI within the Golfview South Precinct

In conclusion, the MRS Amendment proposal in its cu rent form could significantly im ct upon o

residential menity and is not in keeping with the existing speci l ru al lifestyle currently enjoyed

i the locality. In being excluded from the MRS Amendment, we will not be affo ded the

oppo tunity to a tici ate as affected land owners in the district lanning p ocess to ensure the

best outcome fo landholding and our loc lity. I stead we will be on the sidelines literally,

significantly impacted u on by the p ocesses of urbanis tio in the sho t to medium term with the

special r ral design tio (and evelo ment cont ol ove ou landhol ing) w ich will be s eci l

ural in name only. We will be left in li bo, where we will no longer enjoy a special ural lifestyle

but will not be affo ded the benefits of Urban developme t otenti l to offset these signific nt

impacts.

Submission on East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area MRS Amendment 1308/41 MOROZ5

y .y ty.y,y.y,:tmi&mmy

'i-' .y .,

WiW&w•II' -X-X- 'XvX-I- -

mSWmI : ?:\:::::::::A ::;v:::::::-::

1 11 1 ¥: $S;x:::Xw vXft WxW SW:::

TABLED AT HEARINGS 26/5/17 - SUBMISSION NO. 392

i liillilllll:-:- : :v - - -: < - -

i

wmw mm m&WMmi

•x'?v:w: :wx :S&A: $ W: :'xii$SSi:i:Si%H.":®$:S

' • - •

Loca

l Sch

eme

Zon

ing

Wa

nn

ero

o D

PS

2

iWA

NN

ER

OO

S/R

.Q7

S/R

09

GN

ANG

ARA

sI'R

t2 S

/R 1

6

- t i s'fR

17 s-''R

05 „ i

10

- L-

5» 4

\ ¦

S/R

15

> !

Pla

nnin

g an

d D

evel

opm

ent A

ct 2

005

Sec

tion

41 A

men

dmen

t (S

ubst

antia

l)F

orm

41

-mO m

i

0r m

13> m

t_

zc= r~

CD -n5

OCT

i |1

Subm

issi

on

Met

ropo

litan

Reg

ion

Sch

eme

Am

endm

ent 1

308/

41

East

Wa n

ero

o S

truct

ure

Pla

n A

rea

OFF

ICE

USE

ON

LY

To: S

ecre

tary

Wes

tern

Aus

tral

ian

Pla

nnin

g C

omm

issi

onLo

cked

Bag

250

6P

ert

h W

A 6

001

SUBM

ISSI

ON

NU

MBE

R

RLS

/061

3 1

Na

me

...... I O

R... .N

D

.V

k J.Q

tl ..

(PLE

ASE

PRIN

T C

LEAR

LY)

Address ,.. 2 Q

... P

ostcode .0...

Co

nta

ct

ph

on

e n

um

be

r...

.0.

hZ

}D

. I.

Qfk

l.Q

....

....

Em

ail a

dd

ress .

f 0

y

Sub

mis

sion

(P

leas

e at

tach

add

ition

al p

ages

if r

equi

red.

It is

pre

ferr

ed th

at a

n a

diti

onal

Info

rmat

ion

be lo

os r

athe

r th

an b

ou

5 &

£ A

:

CD

*¦

c 5 -

w o GO

C ¦

GO


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment as the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.


Please choose o e of the foilowing:

H No, I o not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

n Y@S, 1 wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

1 will be re resented by:


or

A spokesperson





per itted to atten )



« In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorde and transcribe . The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned bv personfs) making the submission

Signature Date ... .8. ./ol j. 2df?.,

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing ates being close ofbusine s (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submis ions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9I3.()0; Fax-(08)6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

SUBMISSION

Metropolitan Region Scheme Major Amendment 1308/41

East Wanneroo Structure Plan rea

We Nick and John Novak of 260 Dundebar Road Wanneroo wish to make the following comments in

regards to the proposed major amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) 1308/41 of the

East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area.

We give our full support for the above proposal to include our land within the urban deferred zone

without any objections however;

we are very concerned with the proposed Draft Perth and Peel Green Growth Plan (PPGGP) in regards to

what impact the PPGGP will have for the future urban zoning of East Wanneroo.

We understand that the PPGGP is proposing to cut red tape by securing upfront commonwealth

environmental approvals for urban development required to support rowth to 3.5 million people and

at the same time protecting the environmental values.

The PPGGP provides a comprehensive integration between land development and environmental

conservation and will streamline or supposedly consolidate the previous environmental assessments

and conservation process required for urban development.

The PPGGP is proposing to create and protect areas that contain significant en ironmental values which

includes privately owned land that will be acquired by an acquisition process over a period of time

however, what the 2600 page PPGGP document does not explain in any detail is how privately owned

land will be acquired and funded to compensate these land owners, which is very concerning

considering how much detail and tax payers money has gone into planning and preparing the document

which is only predominantly focused with protection of environmental values and related issues.

To suggest that the funds will come from a developer contribution cost fund or levy is clearly inequitable

and is simply designed to fail.

The current contribution cost for urban development in East Wanneroo is already approximately

$30,000 for every new parcel of land created to fund the Infrastructures in East Wanneroo and this does

not take into consideration the requirement to fund the recommendation of the PPGGP. Any further

additions to the developer contribution cost would be a blowout and this will not make it viable to

develop any parcel of land in East Wanneroo.

We are also concerned that additional substantial costs incurred to develop new parcel of land in East

Wanneroo will increase land prices making this unaffordable and a out of reach for first home buyers

and many other potential home buyers in East Wanneroo.

Small Fragmented Areas of native vegetation and other environmental values to be protected will have

majo implications to urban development in this area in particular; constraints to the construction of

infrastructure in regards to the positioning of these services to avoid these protected fragmented areas.

These fragmented areas will also be of some concern as to how these areas will be properly maintained

and not neglected in the future. Currently land owners have always maintained theses pockets of native

vegetation on their properties and if acquired by acquisition how will these small areas be maintained so

they don t become a bush fire risk liability especially so close to the Wanneroo town site

A District Structure Plan (DSP) is a requirement by the Western Australian Planning Commission

(WAPC) to be prepared for the whole of East Wanneroo before Urban Deferred zoning can be lifted to

an urban zoning funded by private land owners or developers, however because of the substantial cost

involved to prepare a DSP and now with the uncertainty of the PPGGP funding liability factor, no land

owner or developer in their right frame of mind would consider to initiate the DSP until there is some

clarity and certainty in regards to what the final costing implications are and the overall impact that the

PPGGP will have for the future urban zoning of the whole East Wanneroo area.

We believe that the DSP should be initiated by the WAPC in consultation with City of Wanneroo (COW)

because this is a large area of fragmented privately owned land (approximately 2100ha) to be rezoned

in East Wanneroo and due to the fragmentation and multiplicity of land owners and the concerns with

the costing implication for the PPGGP and the complex strategic planning process required for the whole

of East Wanneroo, we believe that this is outside of most landowners expertise and financial means.

Without the WAPC and the COW driving the process, this whole area of East Wanneroo may not achieve

its full potential for urban residential development for many more years.

Without the certainty that a residential zoning is guaranteed it is very unlikely that other developers will

initiate the DSP because of this high risk factor.

We are also very concerned with the lack of waste water capacity of the existing Beenyup Waste Water

Treatment Plant (WWTP) to serve any additional urban residential development in the East Wanneroo

area.

Therefore this requires new pumping and wastewater infrastructure to transfer wastewater to the new

Alkimos WWTP which will require major new infrastructure which is currently not available or even

within the Water Corporations five year capital plan and this could than delay any urban residential

development in East Wanneroo for many more years or even decades.

We would also like to make a comment in regards to the 500 metre separation buffer for sand resources

and request that only those properties within 500 meters of the sand resource be excluded until such

time as the sand extraction is completed so that the remaining properties can be included within the

urban zone as soon as structure planning has been completed.

In conclusion we believe that the current planning process requirements to achieve urbanization for the

whole of East Wanneroo is designed to fail and that the PPGGP will have a major negative impact on the

future urban zoning of East Wanneroo .

Without the involvement and assistance required from the WAPC and the COW to initiate the DSP, it

would be very highly unlikely that East Wanneroo will achieve its full potential of urban residential

development for many more years or even possibly decades to come.

Kind regards,

Nick ovak

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 mendment (Substant a!)

Form 41



(103S qs EPARTMENT OF PLANNING

08 JUL 2016

file O (

To SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2508Perth WA 8001

Submission 394

Name .Q. fs). .5. i. AD nJ.C.i ..., .ZC.S. . .B.C.. . .LfD.fs) FLEASE PT-iT :lEA.= _v

Address ....6*r.... Postcode

Contact phone number .... Email address ..£$?.! . >.Qc CS .ty.L?y ¦ dotT • vT

Submission (Please attach additional cages if required It is oreferred that any ad itional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A end ent 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Govern ent initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area def ned as Deferred U ban south of Coogee Road between ornington and Adams Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further s bmit that the bio iversit of the area will be severely compromised by a narrow

urban st ip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural move ent of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique ch nceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan ould be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bri e is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands a e closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing tra sitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rnral zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup)

History : Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned an sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths hichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area bordering the north side of Coogee Road, fro Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonio s transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Ada s as Special-Rural with

S ecial Provisions as in regard ol defined b ilding envelopes and protection of existing fl ra (map attached, targeted area shadedi yellow).

Resul : Such re-zoning, would have the approval of ost interested parties and:


b. ...maintain an environmental bridge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources or man birds including theCarnaby Cockatoos.

d. ...find the sup ort of most landowners concerned.

e. ...mot require taxpayer money to establish an ecological bridge of parkla d and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be give to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allpar ies. - t rn over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has ma e a written submission on the amendment has t e opportunity to personally present t ebas s of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommen ationfor the proposed amendment.



0 No, I do ot wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

O


! wi!i be re resente by:


or

EH A spokesperson


! would refer m hearing to be conducted in:

EH Public (members from the general public may attend our presentation)

O EH Private (only the people nominate by you or the hearings committee will be



® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as suc , submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

» In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

s All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submiss ons, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) makin the submission

Signature Date... .*...7. . ao i (co

Mote: Submissions MUST e received by the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (S m) on 8 JULY 291S. Late submissions will MOT be considered.

Contacts: Tele hone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://vvWVV.pianning.vva.gov.au

Map showing in Yellow submitted changes to MRS a endment 1308/41


Form 41


odepartment of pl ning

08 JUL 2016

Io(ol East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 395

Name I t . PKn L (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) „

Address .. Postcode . ?

Contact phone number ¦ ,.. E ail address . tA


! .. . ,... fUA:.... .. .ter... ,lQte...

.., . .Cr vA ..

...I;.. . . .. . fcb. O , o j A

.. . I a. .

tete.. 'bVrv.. .. . ... . ri O ..

G> ?... QmA. .. .. . xb .. ni... . P tev. . te .. QrAi ,

.. .( nil... te -..

.... .}. .QAte... .W ... A> .... te y.... .. AtJov .

.kt .o te. .te .i. A .flt ). te AAA>6(

.. ,' 0 .. .te ..tetes tek.:. te.' .. .kfiV 3... .. W.4 TT .|.

...Ap tePAON... ... aO ......< .. d c p. tete. .'teA

L tek • .ter..... .tesAD....! ?.....<;ktetete



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WARC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.




OR

Y6S, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


IZ] Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

E A spokesperson

Na e of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:


Public (members from the.general public may attend your presentation)

OR

EH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)


«> The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5p ) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http://w w.planning.wa.gov.au

A %020>?09Planning and Development Act 2005 rnctM ~ -

Section 41 Amendment (Substantia!) rJtm™ENT OF PLANNINGForm 41 j

08 JUL 2016Submission I f I

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 130SHaE.._. j & ' Js

East Wanneroo Structure Plan A ea

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 396

Name f OGA/ / A 9fZ(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

G07Address . Y- .. }. A. A /AA/ AA Postcode

Contact phone number. ! 7. (? Email address

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred that any additional information be loose rather t an bound)

7. ® \m7.

. J. r... . .77A c...

,.. wJAjft 1. ... V.... ... (22. 2

O rt i,

.. Mrtr /A ... c f Q I' r t .... dth .

.VA...i) Q o r y

[ ivy\ j)t.... y r .....Ia I. hi/AM-. ,t «

I! r t C&Uf ... uroi/. ). .hr y dd 1. .. .,/Yp.o SiI... .. .U/

. '{ trpi&d a brid... . ,T... .(/2!2 2.Gfe).' y ' 1

j





/Please choose one of the following:

, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR



C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

d] A spokesperson

Name of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): ' Postal address:


Public (members from the.general public may attend your presentation)

OR

d] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)


» The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yo.ursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public record should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed b person(s) making the submission

Signature .- Date


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://ww .planning.wa.gov.au

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantia!)

Form 41



0 %o<lo 7 £ARTMENTOFI


Submission 397

Name (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address ..0?2... 4 , . y.. Postcode ... &d7.7..

Contact phone number.. Email address


. /)4 .. Qrf#?.€.. .zq. .. .t&z ./z/zz.. Gk .g ... . dzz.. . .Bj &r... z/ xc ...

.I04u.er.;.. 15o7/z.. .Wag:. . zzBe.i/rjzd.. .c B/ eo. .&/. b. z&mjfo '

./?. a£< .. Z /gBcg ?. . .dta.. JdCtfL.. . J&?<5.

Q/.dtZd... d. Zj.. ZVZ .:d7 OZ?zd.... ZWi. .Qg ZZZCf.... ZJZBjWBlizB..

7?7.../?.. .SB/d vB.. . ABzDz Zgt.. /B.. . 777.. /7ZBz.B/zz?.,2 zz

JZ.. Tg gdg... .(Ajg.. S'Z/O IB.. ... ZJ.BM . 2)&7y<7&Q. Z /l

. 7Q??7.g... <$d:. 77z.. Z7UzzJ.zd. Z.

./ /'B... )g W... fist/7... 70.. y&fz E'.. ZZ>MO.. Zdi /o. T .. QBz/<Sm£.. .Z7M?.

c s Z/zzof.. ... z>.. zz/ O... i&yj/mz:.?.. s S:. -.

u .. BZB... .dt&s sxJ... y.d Ba. ../Jr .... y.d/ZBhl. .CaBQ/j/oBJ .. M7Z/.

/WMZ .. Ms me.. ZZazv... ./z.m. jJ/z/odbfo&D. .MJ... /f/.ZJZ.

... c ZB S zzsa.. Agbo S1.

g..... . .ar.. . /9ofoSs.jzzg. B?70.. .zr..BiL./zzzg.. M

//ZGZ fBQg'.g... ./ /.Og . /Z .BBB Z.Bj/ .. d UUQ. /Z ZsO .ZZzMzZ. ....

o& ... . 7/Z7.. ../Cr..... ZAOZMZzZZ.ZO?.. .' ZZZ... z/BBB/ /O/zB?. r.

y. .. ZW/ZZZZZ...//... T /g.. .Z jG/.C. . zr. / Z/zzzB ZI... oJ... QKBZzzZ /.O.

o /z/:... (zky./gy /i 47.7z3.do/ ... ./MQ.. . /ze.. .//sbc cz b

..../ .E/dBdmB..7/7...E B..C/ ... ..' 47/7Ei. 0zE ..:?.

ZZ/.d. .../W/E/k E...$S...ZZUEct/j/B//k.. / Es EM..E. /zmJZ zX 9a//turn over to complete your submission





OR




or

E A spokesperson


1 ould prefer my hearing to be conducted in:

EH Public (members from the.general public may attend your presentation)

OR

EE Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings co mittee will bepermitted to attend)


° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheW PC recommendations are similarly published in a report on su missions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature


Date ..


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa,gov.au

Planning a no ueveio niwui w

Sectio 41 men ment fSub tantiai)Form 41



fj $020 (ol( DEPARTMENT OF PLA NING

08 JUL 2016

| O to l

ofpce use on y

To SecretaryWeste Austraian Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth A 6001

Submission 398 '

Name . Pg M. :Pl£AS£FRtt'iT CLEAPL '

Address ....O P.&&J&PL.Postco

Contact phone number. Z. OrO. .,, Email address . .Ill

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferr d that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41an with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environ ental Assessment(SEA), I submi that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coo ce Road between Momington and Ada s Rd. is incontr diction with the objectives of the SEA,

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and fauna is completely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in theEWSP and encouraged by the Green Gro th Plan would be waste . This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most logical one i the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions betwee Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, plan e and sold as an e uestrian estate, as bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area borderin the north side of Coogee Road, fro Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for deca es provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, 1 suggest, a more harmo ious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity .


Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map attached, targeted area shaded

in yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of ost interested parties and:


b. ...maintain an environ ental bridge for the ovement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlan s a d open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds including theCarnab Cockatoos.

d. ...find the sup ort of most landow ers conce ed.

e. ... ot require taxpa er money to establish an ecological bridge of p rkland and lifes yle transitions.

I trust that due consideration ill be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allpa ties. - turn over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-com ittee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will e considered in determining the recommendationfor the propose amendment.


Please choose one ©f t e following:

m No, I do not ish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR

Yes, I ish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the fallowing details)

I will be represented y:


or

Q A spokesperson


I would prefer my hearing to be conducte in:

CD Public (me bers from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORE Private (only the people no inated by you or the hearings com ittee will be



• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, subm ssions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access un er the act. _ _ _


• All hearings are recorded an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and pu lished as public records should the Gove or approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature

To e signed bv person(s) makin the submission

Note: Submis ions S ST b® received by tbe advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (§pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late su missions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htt ://www. lanning.wa.gov.au

!to\ 'vig m '» :.*!!• i' 'iijh iitU.' I'ls ngt' ic MR . aiH ndmeiU 1 08 i

jgg ««r«r\ssHGROVE FIG,JAR

5941

C 5GH8

CA»J.»,PJN

Proposal 1C(\807?

SINAGRA

CJ\ CA. 47090 47885 c .


Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 399

Name ... . .\1 x fk-t*, ?. (PLEASE PRINT CLE RLY)

Address .. Vt 1. . Postcode .

Contact phone number Email address . !>.'


.sty*. yA'fvJfr. . >HY*r >.SA.' -S-...

5« '3ir =?>. . vrS. .=??.. ?.SS- VrS fe A ." ..

. lesvry. . ryft A q. 'S rt. S P??.. £?A?rV.\V. ev . P f:. rf . . S- fvr . . r??.,:A<y*N .'?fi:'.

. . ?. . . .. .9y*?.t? y. r. SAdSVy .. .' A SFr . Sfy?P?S?i . y). . rS Cy-

.rS'Af . . T«*y> T. .Si. . fSV?> « P«?>\ . . .VsfN'J. r. .

. . PN tt vvvhfc.. .<?*..f .• •c,. >fc, Sr .f .T vsfe*. .<?»V -. .9yt-. . . P'rt . ySA.'. . . P .VAr A??.-.

..r .Oi . . V#Cwy 5».iSSyR- . vPTT. . S-rtfe. A-. .V. ft-.T* .mr-r?. . p!4 7svrt= . . f=T!P>.'A.r . .\Cr9iCxyS -..

.. . c*f?V dS A¥yS , .t APT . . %VAs .sV *A VA4. .\*rA<5-A ='?AS>'>hAi '. .Vr . ..

. ..Qfr. .femr' vh\< Tm:yP5w

... W.VS'iNW. ;. . .F ypirA .Tf«. NT STyVTA .SPy?fS= .TT.SS -. .9.?.

,tFv ..ysP\<2?>rc fy. 5: v _ 'S0;c?i -? r?> F!,TA. . yP.T A-r. .'s-fPrrV T TA PI a. .T fP.

. . ?rfH y?i!HCT9.'l? rAPrrS . :

, .C=p9> . .W?. >3y>*A<fl. >thftje?py .. As< . S-p -s.. rAv. . - v .0S7. S atp;. r t? . j rris .vas .V .

.TT.<Afe -. A.. s. sSt v. >9 sS.<?[r.. >A a9ft-. .TPP. rPyAfc. .\ isftsy4'fc-., .T . ,vP«-? rW> . r\y<ift-r .P.

,?S. .G?. frfeA. v?v. .ep . .V fSt .. A-fefrr..fi fe-TCvPfeferA. .As .t f. . .Vsfe .\r SVi-S?y

.Ty- 'fA-PPTyrA ft. .T T JWry. .YrrtryN?.'fe . . ??r5>f2>- fe~?9.. .9.5?.-. .7 rS .» S?- fe<?y. . .9 .

P?9t .TT. 'r-P.T y.' -r-rs.. . rrlcSf .*=: . .'fe . r.. Vy. s .rA.S-S. v.. ? A>.-e\tA .k> . 'fSVSyfe'A . T.VyftcA .Ps9 r.

Ts'??fe 4r ." ?. . ?S (f:7<??7\<!:i(?L t •Syi'S'AV ??.'S rSS FS tyA.

.kk'.VA=y>rA.'S. t >.<?>. . .'+Ah . PS R. yJHV JbJ. .T??. .?*. 9. >.y-P'ft. . P1A. TT. fc. -. •¦ . (A>5vrA. %?¥»

.. C T. ?rA.<rr? . -ft.. VieytyA r ?. . ?.- .-,,,,',,



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.

For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and in particular appendix D.


E No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and s gn)

OR




or

A spokesperson



I I Public (members from the general pu lic may attend your presentation)




• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions ade to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all ritten submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor appro e the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfs) making the submission

Signature .... . Date


Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected] .au; Website - http://ww .planning. a.go .au


Form 41

Su missionMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 130S/41

r-i-J2L j2ihI department of planning

08 JUL 2016

FILE q6i3

East Wanner©© Structure Plan Area

OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 400

Name

Address

/ > / D- k /(RkEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

c/- „ /I ,q-37' ' J E5+' Postcode

Contact phone number . .67- Email address


urn over to complete your submission


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You o not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.




OR


[zf8 will be represented by:


or

A spokesperson

Name of spokespersonContact teleph(Postal address

. Ge : ¦ ¦ ¦ v.' ¦ v j • ¦ 7>'zyy tY •

Contact telephone number (business.hoursl; . . 77. . ........ddress:. ZS'.l. fe . Sted... .. f.?dd.o

i would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:





» The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.

° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfst makin the submissiomi

Signature

Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusi ess (5pm) on § JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.


CLEplanning

TOWN PLANNI G I APPEALS I ADVOC CY

1 July 2016

SecretaryWestern Australian Planning Commission

Locked Bag 2506

Perth WA 6001

Dear Sir/Madam

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSIONMetropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41: East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area

Lot 21 (No. 60) Damian Road, Jandabup

INTRODUCTORY PREAMBLE

Pinnacle Planning act on behalf of the owners of Lot 21 (No. 60) Damian Road, Jandabup (subject

site).

We have been instructed to prepare and lodge a submission on the currently ad ertised

Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41: East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area by the

owners of the subject site, who directly abut the north-eastern boundary of the proposed MRS

Amendment Area.

This submission relates to a request for the subject land, and land located north of our Client s land,

to the northern termination of Damian Road, Jandabup to be included within the MRS Amendment

area. The MRS Amendment proposes rezoning of approximately 2,099.80 ha from the Rural zone to

the Urban Deferred zone in the MRS, in order to facilitate future urban development in East

Wanneroo.

In the first instance, we wish to confirm our support for the intent of the proposed MRS Amendment

on behalf of our Client. The proposal to re-zone parts of East Wanneroo to allow for urban

development in existing rural areas, is of high regard to our Client. This is particularly the case given

that the MRS Amendment seeks to increase the area made available for urban development extra

over the current extents for this form of land contained within the current City of Wanneroo

planning framework. However, there are illogical boundaries to the current extent of the future

urban land comprised within the MRS Amendment. Essentially we wish to ensure that our Client is

afforded the opportunity to be a part of the ongoing MRS Amendment process.

Pinnacle Planning Services Pty Ltd | Post 937 Wellington Street West Perth WA 6005

Email [email protected] | Ph 0861433671 | ABN 37 159 462218

2

TOWN PLA NING FRAMEWORK

Current Planning Framework Applicable to the Subject Site

The subject site is presently zoned Rural under the provisions of the MRS, and General Rural

pursuant to the City of Wanneroo (City) District Planning Scheme No. 2. The subject site is also

assigned the designation of Priority Local Natural Area under the City s East Wanneroo Structure

Plan (EWSP).

Implications of the MRS Amendment and Departures from Current Planning Framework

We note that the proposed MRS Amendment boundaries have loosely been guided by the

boundaries of the EWSP, though the MRS boundaries extend further than those set under EWSP,

providing a larger urban development area. We wish to confirm our support for the increased

boundary proposal however, in our opinion, they do not go far enough.

The EWSP identifies rural land considered suitable for urban development, and rural land to be

retained because it is not considered suitable for urban development within the time frames of the

study . This suggests that some of the proposed boundaries of the EWSP Area, were determined as

a result of time constraints, and not detailed investigations.

Following a review of the MRS Amendment, we have found that the subject site is not included in

the proposed MRS Amendment Area. This is an issue for our Client because the proposed

boundaries appear to be neither logical or consistent.

It is considered that the land extents for urban development established within the EWSP are now

superseded. Therefore, the implications of the MRS Amendment is that further detailed local

planning processes (structure planning, strategic planning, TPS Amendments and investigative tasks)

will now need to be undertaken which calls into question previous extents to urban development

boundaries, but importantly, makes the boundaries set within the proposed MRS Amendment

subject to discussion and change, hence this submission.

Whilst the current planning framework applicable to the subject site means that the land is currently

proposed to remain rural, the changes to the MRS means that our Client is rightfully able to be

included in that change process; as opposed to being precluded at this early stage.

TOWN PLANNING PROCESSES / PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS

The application of proper town planning processes and procedural fairness is a key concern for our

Client. With a large scale rezoning project such as this, there are normally no lower order, detailed

decisions, assumptions or deliberations made.

As established above, the MRS Amendment means that the current EWSP will at the very least

require significant amendments, and at worst, require a new structure planning document to be

prepared. Irrespective of which outcome is required, the Local Planning framework will require

significant amendments and development of specific details, at a micro level for both precincts and

individual sites.

It seems somewhat irregular therefore that sites on an individual basis are precluded from such a

large Amendment area.

Pinnacle Planning Services Piy Ltd | Post 937 Wellington Street West Perth WA 6005

Email [email protected] | Pb 08 6143 3671 | ABN 37 159 462 218

Whilst the subject site may currently be designated as a Priority Local Natural Area, much of the

surrounding sites are either completely cleared, have remnant vegetation, are used for Market

Gardens or Agistment type uses.

3

Therefore, there is no congruity to the immediate locality being of significant environmental

significance that would warrant removal from the MRS Amendment area, hence the request to

round out the Amendment area to the northern termination of Damian Road.

The current approach being taken appears to be on the basis of remnant vegetation and its

appearance on aerial photography, supported by the notion that environmental reporting would not

have been conducted for each site within the Amendment area (or more importantly outside of it).

It is important to note that the proposed MRS Amendment in its current extent has a significant

impact on our Client whereby their land has been excluded from the subject Amendment, therefore,

at this stage, they have been denied the opportunity to be involved in the planning process and

realise the potential of their land as being suitable for urban development.

Notwithstanding, the subject land may be of environmental significance, all that is sought is the

afforded opportunity, commensurate with regular planning processes, that their land is included,

with the ability for further detailed investigations occurring in the future.

The current approach being taken is akin to taking a prejudiced view of any development or

subdivision proposal on a site, prior to any Applications being submitted, yet without any precursory

detailed investigations being conducted.

We are of the view that the land, and locality will clearly form part of the future urban expansion in

the East Wanneroo area, and, would either be ripe for subdivision, or be suitable for public open

space, if the land is deemed to be of environmental significance.

If the land is desired to be utilised for open space through the preparation of future detailed

Structure Plans, the land ought to be included in either cost sharing arrangements (development

contribution plans), or be acquired at the time by the WAPC. Conversely, if the land is not required

for such purposes, it can proceed to be developed commensurate with the surrounding

landholdings.

We do not consider that our Client ought to be pre-disposed to processes such as spot rezoning's,

and further planning framework amendments on the basis that the site is not developed currently.

That is to say, abutting and surrounding landholdings that have historically been cleared have been

included within the Amendment area, therefore we question the motivations for selective

preclusion of sites at the time.

We consider that this is a planning process, and the other factors such as monetary or economic

considerations ought not to be appropriate as determining factors in precluding our Client's land.

That is to say, whilst the land may present environmental value, and be utilised as open space in the

future, the compensation value would be lower if left Rural, and not progressed to Urban Deferred.

However, we note that the converse applies, if it is not desired to be acquired, our Client will have to

undertake a costly and time exhaustive process simply to develop their land, solely on the basis that

Pinnacle Planning Services Ply Ltd | Post 937 Wellington Street West Perth WA 6005

Email [email protected] | Ph 08 61433671 | ABN 37 159 462218

their land was noted historically as a potential higher value compensation risk asset, which was

attempted to be reduced.

4

We are of the view that the intent and spirit of the Planning process ought not to be misused in the

way that is perhaps occurring in this instance, and urge the WAPC to amend the MRS Amendment

boundary in the manner requested in this submission. It is important to note that the converse of

this process would not apply, meaning that if private landowners believe, or have evidence to

support that their land is free from constraint, that they as landowners would still be required to

undertake themselves, or wait until Government Departments undertake the full gamut of planning

processes, and could not shortcut or circumvent the established process. We question why then it

would be appropriate to preclude a site without going through the full and proper process.

With regard to the proposed MRS Amendment boundaries, we see no reason that the north-eastern

boundaries could not be extended to the end of the street (i.e. Wirrega Road to the north). We

suggest that his would provide a more logical boundary to the MRS Amendment Area with natural

boundaries provided to the west by Lake Jandabup and to the east by Parks and Recreation Reserve.

We note that the subject MRS Amendment is the first step in a town planning pprocess that aims

to facilitate future urban development on land currently zoned for rural purposes in East Wanneroo.

At this early stage of the MRS Amendment town planning process, we confirm that our Client would

like to have the opportunity to:

Investigate the capacity of the subject site for urban development;

Be part of future detailed investigations relating to possible changes to the proposed MRS

Amendment boundaries; and

Be part of the ongoing MRS Amendment town planning process.

In this way, our Client has a reasonable expectation to be part of an orderly and proper, and

procedurally fair, town planning process.

Taking the above matters into account, we confirm our Client s support for the proposal to rezone

parts of East Wanneroo from Rural to Urban Deferred, and a request to be granted the opportunity

to part of future MRS Amendment town planning processes. We also confirm that our Client would

like to see the size of the MRS Amendment Area further increased to the end of the street; not only

include the subject site, but also to provide a more logical boundary to the north-eastern portion of

the proposed MRS Amendment Area. In this regard, we suggest a rounding out of the boundary

line that will ensure that a more logical boundary is provided.

Should you wish to discuss the above matters in further detail, please do not hesitate to contact the

undersigned.

Yours faithfully

PINNACLE PLA I G

BEN CARTER

Pinnacle Planning Services Pty Ltd | Post 937 Wellington Street West Perth WA 6005

Email [email protected] | Ph 08 61433671 | ABN 37 159 462218

A d -Tojodepartment of plan i g


Form 4108 JUL 2016

Submission FILE lv £ i ~)Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41


OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 401

Name ... tt.OMfeWS.SO..MftCO....ft&Q2Z\ (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address T. PostcodePasVai -• pO 6ov U2.LL- r va d-e Vxt cOb "

Contact phone number..Q9r) Email address .

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred that any additional information be loose rat er than bound)

s. .. rrrr.A. .eD.




For information about the submission and Hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D.

Please choose one of the follpwing:


OR

n Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


Cl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

[Z] A spokesperson



[Z Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

ORC Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be



® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Info mation Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the roposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

Signature

business (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late ubmissions will NOT be considered.

To be si ned by person(s) makin the submission

Date ..shbk

te: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close of


SUBMISSION

Metropolitan Regional Scheme Amendment 1308/41 - East Wanneroo Structural Plan Area

In Our opinion. We believe that the Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41 dated April

2016 for the East Wanneroo Structure Plan should be modified and our land and surrounding

properties on Pine Crest Way should be rezoned to urban deferred or special rural for the reasons

set out below:

Our property is located in Bush Forever Site 326: Bush Forever Site 326 will be divided by the

proposed extension of Elliot Road as per the draft North-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework

and in this amendment.

This area has previously been cleared of flora and fauna and contains an abundance of introduced

plant species including invasive Pampas Grass and Pig Weed, as well as Woolly Bush and Pine Trees

which are a fire hazard. The Pine Trees also draw an abundant amount of water from the Gnangara

water mound. We believe that any bush/conservation value of our land and surrounding land

included in the relatively small pocket of land of the Bush Forever Site 326 will further be diminished

by the proposed extension of Elliot Road.

The Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41 dated April 2016, for the East Wanneroo

Structure Plan, proposed that site 326 remain a bush forever site, while the land on the western side

of Sydney Road, be zoned as Urban Deferred. In actual fact, the land in Gnangara on the western

side, being that it is primarily covered in Pine trees, invasive Pampas Grass, and Pig Weed is in fact a

greater burden on Gnangara water mound than the western side of Sydney Road with all the Pine

trees sucking up the water from the Gnangara Aquifer.

The land to the East is crown land and is being cleared of Pine trees. Allowing for our property and

surrounding properties to being a conduit to Ellenbrook/The Vines and to Alexander Drive and

Beechboro Road.

We believe that our land and the surrounding properties on Pine Crest Way should be rezoned as

per the land zoning to the west or south being urban deferred or special rural, respectively.

The property located at 440 Sydney Road which adjoins our properties is already 2.2 hectares and

excluded from Bush Forever.

The proposed extension of Elliot Road will provide a major road artery and transport corridor which

will promote and suit urban deferred or urban expansion. The proposed new regional road, East

Wanneroo Bypass and potential passenger rail alongside the East Wanneroo Bypass would make our

property and surrounding properties well positioned for urbanisation or rezoning to allow a greater

density of housing. This rezoning will assist in meeting the long term housing requirement for Perth

in the future.

The land nearby the proposed intersection of Elliot Road and Wanneroo Bypass is ideally located to

become a future activity centre and major transport hub in the North East metropolitan area. This

area could include a future passenger rail station which would facilitate key community/social

infrastructure facilities and be a hub between Joondalup, Wanneroo, Ellenbrook and the Swan

Valley.

Gnangara has easy access to the city without the excessi e commutes that the further northern

urban sprawl suburbs have to face, either by train station at either Edgewater or Joondalup, bus

services via the freeway, Alexander Drive, Sydney Road/Mirrabooka Avenue or Wanneroo Road.

Gnangara s peaceful rural lifestyle has long gone, with our near proximity to the huge and ever

expanding commercial/industrial area of Wangara and the increase in traffic this brings and also the

fact that the roads of Gnangara are already seeing a huge increase in traffic, with road users using

Sydney Road, Ross Street and Badgerup Road as short cuts to avoid the traffic on Ocean Reef Road

and North on Wanneroo Road.

In summary the Bush Forever Site 326 holds very little value to the protection of native flora or

fauna but is very valuable if it rezoned to urban deferred, because of its proximity to existing

infrastructure, existing facilities, proximity to the city and the large commercial/industrial area of

Wangara. Rezoning this Bush Forever Site 326 will help prevent urban sprawl by allowing many

more families to live closer to their place of work and is in keeping with the current policy of

increase in housing density that is being promoted by Perth Councils and is a key planning policy and

principal of the draft North-West Sub-Regional Planning framework


Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 402

Name ., NCB CO , _, (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .. las. . . . . • Postcode .... 4 .77. fS , I pa BtiT M2 US Wl-evct c V iQk4s MctbM n

Contact phone nu ber. .0. .QZ..i05.,S9. r Email address .. .p.tTP. .V .Z F.0.


S.ert . .eyr iO g



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You .do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written sub ission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.


if/ Please choose one of the following:


OR

n Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


dl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

C A spokesperson


I would p efer my hearing to be conducted in:

LZI Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR

C Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)


® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybesubject to applications for access under the act.

« In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along ith all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly ublished in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


fote: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submission will NOT be considered.


SUBMISSION





set out below:







water mound. We believe that any bush/conser ation value of our land and surrounding land











Beechboro Road.










in the future.





Valley.

Gnangara has easy access to the city without the excessive commutes that the further northern










infrastructure, existing facilities, proximity to the city and the large commerciai/industrial area of






Form 41




OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 403

Name y Q Zi (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address . A \..Ufe& . V i H .. Postcode Pc )- \ ' P O 6>OK M-2-U- TiLiVLitfcj< i-l€ (oO cU-

Contact phone number .Q 7r2 . Email address \! .9.

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred t at any additional information be loose rat er than bound)

S



Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a.sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.



eT No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)

OR


I ill be represented by:


or

[Z1 A spokesperson


I would prefe my hearing to be conducted in:


OR

Private (only the people nominate by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)




® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed a endment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.


Signature Date

Mote: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; ebsite - htt ://www.planning.wa.gov.au

SUBMISSION


In Our opinion, We believe that the Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41 dated April



set out below:






hich are a fire hazard. The Pine Trees also draw an abundant amount of water from the Gnangara

water mound. We believe that any bush/conser ation value of our land and surrounding land











Beechboro Road.





The proposed extension of Elliot Road will pro ide a major road artery and transport corridor which



property and surrounding properties well positioned for urbanisation or rezonin to allow a greater


in the future.



area could include a future passen er rail station which would facilitate key community/social


Valley.




Gnangara s peaceful rural lifestyle has lon gone, with our near proximity to the huge and ever













Form 41

SubmissionMetropoiitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41

DEPARTMENT OF P ANNING

08 JUL 2016

file


OFFI E USE ONLY


Submission 404

Name ... ,. r ,.. . Q'<N2 I (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

Address .. \OV . * Postcode ... 0 7.1 Pota \ ' PO feOK iU-S Av v d©/ to O < -

Contact phone number .QU fi. d tl.SO.t Email address . pA.ro ls. .© .1. .'. .dib -

Su mission (Please attach a ditional pages if required. It is preferred that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

i T ACM g Q







OR

D Yes, 1 wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


m Myself - My telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson



C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR

C Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)




® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by person(s) makin the submission

Signature Date S l Jo



SUBMISSION





set out below:







water mound. We believe that any bush/conservation value of our land and surrounding land


by the proposed e tension of Elliot Road.



of Sydney Road, be zoned as Urban Deferred. In actual fact, the land in Gnan ara on the western






Beechboro Road.










in the future.





Valley.



services via the freeway, Alexander Drive, Sydney Roa /Mirrabooka Avenue or Wanneroo Road.














Form 41



OFFICE USE ONLY


Submission 405

Name - C L t <*

y .y e ufe zr* T niS's . Address . ..Postcode

Contact phone number.Q E ail a dress . .9. M.Sl. h vi

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if require - It is preferred that any ad itional information be loose rather than boun )

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 130/41

and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Gove ment initiative of Strategic Environmental Assessment

(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Road between Mo ington Drive and Ada s Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of this area will be severely compromised by a narrow

urb n strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlands between Lake Adams and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup and

La e ariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural movement of flora and faun is completely restricted and the unique chance

of ecological linka e as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for anecological bri ge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other wetlands inthis area.

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake Adams),Special-Rural lifestyle (Lake Adams) and Rural zonin (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake A ams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths which

access Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area borderin the north side of Coo ee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

Road. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both wetlands. Lake Adams and

the Mariginiup la es. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity.

Suggestion: 1 submit to zone the land between both etlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Adams as Special-Rural withSpecial Provisions in regard to defined building envelopes and protection of existing flora (map attac ed, targeted area shaded inyellow).


a. ...avoi a clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environmental bridge for the movement of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area,between wetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for man birds includingthe Car aby Cockatoos.

d. ...fi d the support of most landowners concerned.

e. ...not require ta payer money to establish an ecological bridge of parkland an lifest le transitions.

I trust that due consideration will be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and allp rties. - Uirn over to complete yo r submissions

Hear ng of submissions

Anyone who has made a written sub ission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.




OR




or

A spokesperson

Na e of spokesperson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address:


EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)

OR

Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will bepermitted to attend)


The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Art iqqo u , , .subject to applications for access under the act SUC submissi0ns macle to the WAPC may be

submission or the substanceo)Ta s m Sotm y °b disclosed tXd partTeT SUbm ions °< >™r

rin9S' al°n9 Wi*h a" ~ns, re

WAPC recommendations are similarlj published'in report n rbmlssions arn atbtedrin Parliament1dment The

Io.be signed by eersonjs) makin the submission

Signature

Note: Submissions MUST bo received by the advertised closing ate, bein, close ofbusiness (5pm| on 8JULY 2016. Late submissions mil] NOT be consirfered.

Contacls: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fa - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website-http://vsAAA .planning.wa.gov.au

Map showing in Yellow submitted changes to MRS amendment 1308/41

098 PINJAR

'3 0 UJ / -1Planning a no ueveio i #iu w

Sactioti 41 Amendment (Substantial)Form 41

SubmissionMetropolitan egion Scheme Am ndmen 1308141


D PARTMENT OF PLANNING j

08 JUL 2016

FILE ) 0 3

OFPCE use ONLY

To SecretaryWeste Australan Planning CommissionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 406

Name .,.SW .$>. ...'Sic. ££?. 3 ?. /:fe$. 1•.PLEASE PRffsT CLEAffLYl-

Address..: m.J.fjMSfAltfc ostcode

Contact phone numberQl(£(00.U.Ik .\ Email address.

Submission (Please atta h additional pages if required It is preferred that any additional information be loose ra her than bound)

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme A end ent 1308/41and with due consideration followi g a study of the Fed ral and State Government initiative of Strategic Environ ental Assess ent(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogee Ro d between Mornington and Ada s Rd. is incon radiction ith the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the bio iversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrowurban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the wetlan s between Lake Adams and the twin wetla ds of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural ovement of flora and fauna is completely restricte and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outline in theEWSP and encoura ed by the Green Growth Plan would be wasted. This opportunity for aecological bridge is the most lo ical one in the whole EWSP area, as these wetlands are closer together than any other in this area.

A currently propose narrow urban strip South of Coogee oad creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake dams),Special- ural lifestyle (Lake da s) and Rural zoning (North of Lake Little Mariginiup).

History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned and sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coogee Road and an equestrian dressage area borderin the north side of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to AdamsRoad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an e uestrian thoroughfare between both etlands, Lake Adamsand the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, 1 suggest, a more harmonious transition between these twowetlands is a necessity ,

Suggestion: I submit to zone the lan bet en both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and L ke Adams as Special-Rural with

Special Provisions as in regard of defined building envelope and protection of existing flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).

Result: Such re-zoning, would have the approval of most interested parties nd:

a. ...avoid a dash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned ar as.

b. ...maintain an environment l bridge for the movement of flor and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo rea, betweenwetlan s and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home and food sources for many birds including theCar ab Cockatoos.


e. ...not require taxpayer mone to establish an ecological bridge of parkland and lifest le transitions.

I trust that due consi eration ill be given to the above submission, which I believe best seives guidelines by government and allparties. - turn over to complete you submission -


Anyone who has made a written sub ission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Theco ments presented by you in this written submission ill be considered in deter ining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment,




OR

Yes, ish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

| will be represented by:Myself - y telephone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson




ORPrivate (only the people nominated by you or the hearings com ittee ill be



• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under he act.

• In the course of the WAPC assessing sub issions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of oursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all ritten submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed bv person(s) making the submission

Signature --r .' !.... Lj. Date

Note; Submissions MUST be received by the adver ised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts; Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Emall [email protected]; Website - http://www.plannin .wa.gov.au

shtwi y m 'i lion sah tvu ctiang s to MRS amendment I 0N II

098 owwasim, GROVE Fi JAR


Form 41



To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLoc ed Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

OFFICE USE ONLY

Submission 407

LEASE PRINT CLEARLY)Name L.. 1, v , .. -\ ¦

Address t,W..Q Postcode !? ?.,

Contact phone number t , Email address JL. <-c.Cv;

Sub ission (Please attach additional pages if required. It is preferred that any additional information be loose rather than bound)

./i c <? r.... t s :< \

turn over to co plete your submission

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNI G

- e JUL 2016


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has t e opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.

For infor ation about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D.



OR

YesT 1 wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)


Cl Myself - My telephone number (business hours);. .9. feP,

or

C A spokesperson



Public (me bers from the general public may attend your presentation)




• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access un er the act.

• In the course of t e WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, ay be disclosed to third parties.

• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written sub issions, aretable in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The

APC reco mendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be si ned by personfsf makin the submission

Signature Date \o\ i\ *<3

Note: Submissions MUST e received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on S JULY 2016. Late sub issions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 9000; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au

SUBMISSION:

PLANNING AND DEVEPMENT ACT 2005

. METROPOLITAN REGIO SCHEME AMENDMENT 1308/41

EAST WANNEROO STRUCTURE PLAN AREA

TO THE SECR TARYWESTERN AUSTRALIA PLA NI G COMMISSIONLOCKED BAG 2506PERTH WA 6001

Dear Sir

Re: Submission to East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area.

Our family own the property at 149 Badgerup Road, Wanneroo. Being Lot 3 On Diagram 60693

Certificate of Title Volume 1591 Folio 328,

Our family have been market gardeners for over fifty (50) years. Our first market gardens were in

Kingsway Wanneroo. Our family ran a very successful market garden until urban development

forced us out. We have been in our current location now since 2006.

With the planned infill to the area it appears very strange that our garden has been left out of the

proposed redevelopment plan. In doing so we would be the only market garden/farming lot

surrounded by residential and industrial lots.

Our past experience is that residential and industrial lots suffer from being so close to farming lots.

As arket gardeners we are required to use lots of Water, Fertiliser, and Manures to produce a

product that is acceptable to the local market.

The fact that our lot would be left off the proposed rezoning would greatly devalue the value of our

land and leave us exposed to future angry households livin next to o r land.

If we could be included in the re-zoning it would allow us to receive a reasonable price for our land

so we could relocate to a more isolated area from any housing area that would welcome a fully

working market garden that would allow our family to receive an income from the produce from our

land,

Residential lots do not want to be close to farming lots due to perceived health issues that farming

pose, due to fertiliser, manures and water use by farmers market gardens.

Our market garden is our livelihood, however due to the proposed major amendment for urban

growth e believe it is detrimental to all whom live in the area to keep the land as its present

zoning.

We understand that If our land is not included in the proposed sche e the whole new area rezoned

would be affected by our one parcel of market garden land in respect of public health and more,

particularly in respect of Environmental Factors e.g. Environment Protection and Biodi ersity

Conversation Act.

Yours sincerely

IVY RADAU

CA C.t.51C!)5 UANKSIA: ; GROVE

CA RAMAR '

PINJAR

- c iiWijso c ..1. .. ™ -36 9S

s t fi. l cAsaso? l- ,1 „ - ' ¦_ ¦ . - - r-i - ,, Asm -.g ¦ _ s:i cA C 4?J32 C

d & 45 " C IB

cfrMm- c,t>' - - 47233

C , _ .oSJfl T • Jj.

;nberasijp ,.- 7B53

TAPPING- - ¦ CA t

cA Boes. . 9 as?.

SDS-6: .. s-w - a T.

C$ AS4lSf '-£ B CA SHBY2)176

AA43290

0121-

Afi21706

itrALOp« z1.45624 A

' ' 3(048

: ;CA'46303

cA[_46211r; %I ;

i !I

% C 35577

t EDGEWAT r

Austi C 6035; HFATIIRinGjE ' ;

! C.fu45701 tr -CA!- %BELDON

! c*30809 ,= cA

GR ilGlE 43971

rtAaass c

48'072 Li m

-r, 40394 SflJAGR

,A „ ... .... T .';JCA-'' e '

51 9 W9n -_47D6S C ,49323 » ¦ ™~25409

jSJi "

%

332-33 i ~ CA6l(q36

iyit-Sot ScA

46173 rv-.-44506 r. < U '

HOCKING- - Wjeifflfe awgE a •»'902

. CA_

2:'

-¦ ' lifAd-' .SIKE-.HI

i . c f WOODV LE -¦ •••», '• 'IT _J3021..

A 1 *5:T I«»P cA20971 r 1 * _x-

_ 1 C4 _CA320S8 '40313

15 December 2015

= T , l 40533 I..- - •' JJ - --7\¦- " CA'11009

c c ,27279 8399 /

CA45677;

52092 - afw. -- . ~ ' lO G ®2 ?

ro CA3901 ROAD

Iiiiii'iiilmimi

East Wanneroo Structure plan Areaproposed major amenc

as advertisedment

Proposal 1

Proposed Amendment:

Urban deferred zone >ac\op\ J OCLct,

C YA V\ Si O O

Oracle reference no: 2848File number 809/02/30/0020PVersion number: 1

Department ofI, * 1 Planning"4 '

estern,. Australian

Planmna,* Commission

N:

D«A: S-'IMOISProduced by GeoSpaUat PJannl.ng Support, Department of Pfannlng, Pertrt VyABase Information suppHe by Western Aus elan Land JnformaUon Authority LI7B2-2015-1

T BLED AT HEARINGS 29/5/17 - SUBMISSION NO. 407

MEMO (Internal Use Only)

To: Department of Planning

Cc: Donna Radalj

From: Kris Nolan

Email: [email protected]

Date: 29 May 2017

Subject: MRS Amendment 1308/41 - East Wanneroo Structure Plan Area

To Whom It May Concern

On behalf of our client the Radalj Family, we provide the following justification points for the inclusion of Lot 3(No.149) Badgerup Road within the Urban Deferred Zoning as part of the East Wanneroo Structure Plan area.

The lot and immediate surrounds provide a natural rounding off of the East Wanneroo urban cell beingat the juncture of two Other Region Roads being Ocean Reef Road and Badgerup Road (future).

The land is not environmentally constrained like some of its immediate surrounds.

The site is currently utilised for market garden purposes - not an appropriate use in an ultimateurbanisation scenario.

Whilst residential development could be contemplated, we believe the site would be appropriate forservice/highway commercial type uses (fast food, convenience store, service station etc).

Being at the juncture of two Other Regional Roads (Ocean Reef Road being projected at 40,000vpdand Badgerup Road at 10-15,000 vpd) and being physically separated from future residential areas byenvironmental constraints, the site lends itself to predominantly car-based business, which has not beencontemplated by the East Wanneroo Structure Plan.

The existing rural residential area and industrial cell to the south of Ocean Reef Road is generallydevoid of such uses (Ashby local Centre 3km and Landsdale Local Centre 4km).

Considered traffic and access to the site could be managed away from the future upgrade of theBadgerup/Ocean Reef Road intersection.

Overall we do not believe isolation via mapped environmental values to be an adequate reason for exclusionfrom the future urban cell. The site at 3.7ha (plus additional unconstrained land to the north) is of sufficient sizeto facilitate, quality meaningful development that would again provide a logical rounding off of the EastWanneroo urban cell.

Kind Regards

Director

Document

LOT 3

- (NO

. 1 9)

BAO

GERU

P RO

AD, W

ANNE

ROO

CIT

Y O

F W

AN

NE

RO

O

Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Su stantial)

Form 1

SubmissionMetropolitan Region Scheme A en ment 1308/41


DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING I

08 JUL 2016

FILE vl | Q j J

OSPCE USEOHLY

To; SecretaryWeste Australan Planning Co missionLocked Bag 2506Perth WA 6001

Submission 408

Name .. .Ah.hlA./.. fi&i)a p-Kir-ll Lt>V4 T; »

Address .cl(. ,..Cr<\( A.!i . Postcod ...

Contact phone number.Qf rQ, Email a ress Ai y . AP.C?..f\...CjZ

Submission (Please attach additional pages if required It is preferre that any additional inform tion be loose rather than boun )

Problem to be addressed: In response to the call for submissions on the proposed Metropolita Region Scheme Amend ent 1308/41and with due consideration following a study of the Federal and State Government initiative of Strategic Environ ental Assessment(SEA), I submit that the area defined as Deferred Urban south of Coogce Road between Momington and Ada s Rd. is incontradiction with the objectives of the SEA.

Eco damage and lifestyle clashes: I further submit that the biodiversity of the area will be severely compromised by a narrow

urban strip. Such an abrupt separation of the etlands between Lake Ada s and the twin wetlands of Lake Little-Mariginiup andLake Mariginiup prevents any connectivity. The natural move ent of flora and fauna is co pletely restricted and the unique chanceof ecological linkage as outlined in the EWSP and encouraged by the Green Growth Plan woul be waste . This opportunit fo aecological bridge is the most logical one in the whole EWSP area, as these etlands are closer to ether than any other in this are .

A currently proposed narrow urban strip South of Coogee Road creates three clashing transitions between Parks (Lake Adams),


History: Furthermore Lake Adams Special Rural Estate, designed, planned nd sold as an equestrian estate, has bridle paths whichaccess Coo ee Roa and an e uestri n dressage area bordering the north si e of Coogee Road, from Lee-Steere Drive to Adams

oad. Additionally two road reserves have for decades provided an equestrian thoroughfare between both etlands, Lake Adamsan the Mariginiup lakes. To avoid a clash of lifestyles and accidents, I suggest, a more harmonious transition between these two

etlands is a necessity ,

Suggestion: I submit to zone the land between both wetlands of Lake Little Mariginiup and Lake Ada s as Special-Rural with

S ecial Provisions as in regard of defined building envelope and protection of e isting flora (map attached, targeted area shadedin yellow).


a. ...avoid clash of lifestyles by creating buffer zones for positive transitions between the zoned areas.

b. ...maintain an environmen al bridge for the move ent of flora and fauna, endemic to the Wanneroo area, betweenwetlands and open space.

c. ...preserve the many mature trees in the area, which are essential home nd food sources for many birds including theCarna y Cockatoos.

. ...find the support of most landowner concerned.

e. ...not require taxpayer one to establish an ecological brid e of parkland and lifestyle transitions.

I trust that ue consi eration ill be given to the above submission, which I believe best serves guidelines by government and all

parties. - tum over to complete your submission -


Anyone who has made a written submission on the amend ent has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You do not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by ou in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the roposed amendment.



No, 1 do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the for and sign)

OR

Yes, 1 wish to s eak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)

1 will be represented by:Myself - My tele hone number (business hours):

or

A spokesperson

Na e of spokes erson: Contact telephone number (business hours): Postal address;






• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions ma e to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the act.


• All hearings are recorded and transcribe . The transcripts of all hearings, along with all ritten submissions, aretabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Gove or approve the proposed amendment, TheWAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.

To be signed by personfs) makin the submission

Signature Date

Note: Submissions MUST be received y the advertised closing ate, being close ofbusiness (Spm) on 8 JULY 2016. Late submissions will NOT be considered.

Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 9000; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website-http:ffwww.planning.wa.gov.au

sho iriL! m M liou u mitie chitn es to Ml?S anicndmem I30S -11

8*8GROVE PINJAR

may 2018 metropolitan region scheme amendment 1308/41 · east wanneroo structure plan area...

Documents