matc fall lecture series: paul hanley

55
Current & Future Alternative Funding for Surface Transportation Paul F Hanley Mid-America Transportation Center Fall 2012 Lecture Series Sponsored in part by Union Pacific September 7, 2012 Associate Professor, Civil & Environmental Engineering Director of Transportation Policy Research

Upload: mid-america-transportation-center

Post on 11-Nov-2014

272 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

MATC 2012 Fall Lecture Series

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Current & Future Alternative Funding for Surface Transportation

Paul F Hanley

Mid-America Transportation Center Fall 2012 Lecture SeriesSponsored in part by Union Pacific

September 7, 2012

Associate Professor, Civil & Environmental EngineeringDirector of Transportation Policy Research

Page 2: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

How do we pay for roads and mass transit in our nation?

Page 3: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Video Clipped from Winning MATC sponsored Student Video Competition: Allie Reiter, “Road Scholars”

Page 4: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Taxes

Excise

Fuel Tires

Sales Tolls Property

Registration Title/License Real Estate

Page 5: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Funding

Revenue Finance

Page 6: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Taxes

Excise

Fuel Tires

Sales Tolls Property

Registration Title/License Real Estate

Page 7: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Property

Registration

Title/License

Real Estate

Federal Excise

Fuel

Tires

State

LocalProperty

Sales

General Funds

Tolls

Page 8: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Property

Registration

Title/License

Real Estate

Federal Excise

Fuel

Tires

State

LocalProperty

Sales

General Funds

Tolls

Strong tie to system usage

Weak tie to system usage

Page 9: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

IowaRevenue

Page 10: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Video Clipped from Winning MATC sponsored Student Video Competition: Allie Reiter, “Road Scholars”

Page 11: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Would you be in favor of raising the fuel tax?

• Audience question 1

Page 12: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Video Clipped from Winning MATC sponsored Student Video Competition: Allie Reiter, “Road Scholars”

Page 13: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

What if you knew you paid $250 per year ($25 per month)?

• Audience question 2

Page 14: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

What if the money by law could only be spent on roads?

• Audience question 3

Page 15: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

What if some money was spent on transit?

• Audience question 4

Page 16: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Fuel TaxYes29%

No60%Increase Fuel Tax? Yes

29%

Yes15%

No72%

What if you knew you paid $250 per year ($25 per month)?

Yes38%

Yes47%

No41%

What if the money by law could only be spent on roads?

Yes49%

Yes10%

No73%

What if some money was spent on transit?

Yes51%

Total % in favor

n= 1,659

Page 17: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Changing Emphasis on existing taxes

Page 18: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Taxes

Excise

Fuel Tires

Sales Tolls Property

Registration Title/License Real Estate

Alternatives

Page 19: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

States with Local Option Sales Taxes

Page 20: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Increase Sales Tax?

• Audience question 5

Page 21: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

California’s Experience25 year history

Voters in 20 counties approved Generate $2.5 billion per year

Four featuresSpecify the improvements to be financed

Require direct voter approval

Spent within the counties that enact them

Automatically expire

Page 22: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Sales Tax

Yes18%

No78%

Increase Sales Tax? Yes18%

Yes20%

No72%

Yes34%

Total % in favor

n= 1,614

What if the money by law could only be spent on roads?

Page 23: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Create New Tolls?

• Audience question 6

Page 24: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Increase existing tolls where they exist?

• Audience question 7

Page 25: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Interstate Bridge/Tunnel Tolls

Page 26: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Non-Interstate Bridge & Tunnel Tolls

Page 27: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Interstate Road Tolls

Page 28: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Non-Interstate Road Tolls

Page 29: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Proposed/Financed/Constructing Tolls

Page 30: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Tolling Interstates

• Yesterday...• Long standing prohibition on new tolls for existing Interstate Highways

• Today....• MAP-21 opens the door for tolling both Interstate and Non-Interstate

Highways

• Section 129 general toll program• Section 166 high occupancy toll program

Page 31: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Tolling Interstates & Non-Interstate Highways

• Section 129 general toll program• Allows toll on all new capacity added to the National Highway System

• Revenue used for • Debt service, • Private invest return, • Operations and maintenance, • P3 payments, • Other 23 programs

• Needs annual audits

• No toll agreements between USDOT and State & Local Gov

Page 32: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Tolling Interstates & Non-Interstate Highways

• Section 166 high occupancy toll program• Allows toll on all new capacity added to the National Highway System

• Revenue used for • Same as Section 129

• Must include• Enforcement, • automatic tolling, • tolls vary by congestion, • Interoperable between systems

• Needs annual audits

• No toll agreements between USDOT and State & Local Gov

Page 33: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

I-394 in Minneapolis, Minnesota (HOT lanes)

Page 34: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Tolls

Yes31%

No63%

Increase Existing Tolls?

Yes31%

Yes30%

No62%

Yes50%

Total % in favor

n= 965

What if the money by law could only be spent on roads?

Yes32%

No61%

Create New Tolls? Yes32%

Total % in favor

n= 638

Page 35: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Property Taxes

Page 36: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Increase Registration Fees?

• Audience question 8

Page 37: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Registration Fees

Yes31%

No63%

Increase Fees? Yes31%

Yes34%

No57%

Yes53%

Total % in favor

n= 1,623

What if the money by law could only be spent on roads?

Page 38: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Introduce New Taxes

Page 39: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

New Taxes/Fees

Page 40: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Mileage Based Charging

Page 41: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Adopt a mileage based user charge?

• Audience question 9

Page 42: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Vehicle w/ OBU

Cellular Data Network

Billing & Dispersal Center

$$

Participants

Page 43: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley
Page 44: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

ParticipantsOver 81,000 eligible candidates volunteered

Enrolled 2,653Completed 2,511Dropped out 5.4%

Matched National DemographicsGender, Age, Education, Income, Commute

Travel Time, Self-identified Political Affiliation

Page 45: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Vehicle Miles Traveled

• Total 22,000,000 miles (8,400 mi/veh)

Page 46: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

GPS Accuracy

Total VMTGPS Outage

MilesPercent of

Total

21,566,000 1,626,000 7.54%

Page 47: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Findings: Technology

Page 48: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Technically feasible using currently mature technologies.

•Reliably assigned VMT to federal, state, and local jurisdictions

–99.4% accountability

–No detectable urban or natural canyon effects

–No significant data loss using commercial cellular data

–Mature Technology used o designed and manufactured in the 2005-06 timeframe

Page 49: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Installation equipment into existing vehicles posed a daunting challenge.

• Complex process

Trained, professional installers, required an average of 90 minutes to complete

25% required a follow-up visit8% directly related to installation

1.3% had vehicle incompatibility issues

*OBU connected into electrical system and on-board diagnostic bus

Page 50: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Findings: Participant Acceptance

Page 51: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Perception was positively impacted by experience and exposure

• Initial perception – 42% favorable– 17% negative

• Final perception (10 month exposure)– 70% favorable– 19% negative

Page 52: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

Privacy was a significant issue but is not an insurmountable barrier•60% believe – Government will track their travel

•34% want – Minimal travel detail collected

•Still, > 70% stated– The system was reliable, accurate, and fair– Viable replacement of the fuel tax

Page 53: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

The ability to audit the accuracy of charges outweighed privacy concerns.

•66% favored– Summary of VMT by jurisdiction, and– Indifferent to oDaily summary, oroMonthly summary

•Strong desire to audit the system for accuracy

Page 54: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

VMT Fee

Yes32%

No68%

In favor of a VMT fee?

Yes19%

No81%

What if the vmt fee was tied to your mpg?

n= 1,589

Yes57%

No43%

Would you still be in favor if GPS was used ?

n= 715

Yes45%

Yes45%

Total % in favor

Yes26%

Total % in favor

Page 55: MATC Fall Lecture Series: Paul Hanley

• Thank you for your attention!