mastitis epidemiology epidemiology and pathogenesis: paradigm … · 2013. 5. 27. · 1 nkvet, 2013...

7
1 NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks Epidemiology and Pathogenesis: Paradigm Shifts in the Molecular Era Ruth Zadoks Moredun Research Institute University of Glasgow NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks Mastitis Epidemiology Contagious mastitis: 5-Point Plan Environmental mastitis: Pressure vs. Resistance NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks Mastitis Pathobiology Host adapted “Knows how to behave” Opportunistic “Does not know how to behave” Reduce incidence: prevention Reduce duration: treatment, culling NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks Pathobiology ↔ Epidemiology Host level affects population level Host or niche adaptation or ecotype Zadoks, CAB Reviews 2007;2:030e Species and Strains Zadoks and Schukken, Vet Clin North Am 2006;22:229 NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks Comparative Typing Based on comparison of fragment length polymorphisms or “banding patterns” Standardization problematic scope of studies limited “Quick and dirty” vs. “cheap and cheerful” Only strain typing method used for diagnostics (RAPD) PFGE RAPD

Upload: others

Post on 05-Feb-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Epidemiology and

    Pathogenesis: Paradigm

    Shifts in the Molecular Era

    Ruth Zadoks

    Moredun Research Institute

    University of Glasgow

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Mastitis Epidemiology

    Contagious mastitis:

    5-Point Plan

    Environmental mastitis:

    Pressure vs. Resistance

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Mastitis Pathobiology

    Host adapted

    “Knows how to behave”

    Opportunistic

    “Does not know how to behave”

    Reduce incidence:

    prevention

    Reduce duration:

    treatment, culling

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Pathobiology ↔ Epidemiology

    • Host level affects population level

    • Host or niche adaptation or ecotype

    Zadoks, CAB Reviews 2007;2:030e

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Species and Strains

    Zadoks and Schukken, Vet Clin North Am 2006;22:229 NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Comparative Typing

    • Based on comparison of fragment length polymorphisms

    or “banding patterns”

    • Standardization problematic – scope of studies limited

    • “Quick and dirty” vs. “cheap and cheerful”

    • Only strain typing method used for diagnostics (RAPD)

    PF

    GE

    RA

    PD

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:New_Glasgow_Crest.png

  • 2

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Definitive Typing

    • Based on DNA sequence data – A, C, G and T

    • Standardization easy – web based infrastructure

    • World wide comparison across studies

    • “Slow and expensive” vs. “value for money”

    • In diagnostic use in human medicine

    Gen

    om

    es

    ML

    ST

    Richards et al., Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:1263

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Strain Heterogeneity

    Klebsiella from soil Strep. uberis from soil

    L 80 81 82 89 88 64 65 67 68 79 69 70 71 72 52 53 54 62 L

    KPKVRPKO

    L 80 81 82 89 88 64 65 67 68 79 69 70 71 72 52 53 54 62 L

    KPKVRPKO

    L 80 81 82 89 88 64 65 67 68 79 69 70 71 72 52 53 54 62 L

    KPKVRPKO

    Many different strains in the environment

    Many different strains present in environmental mastitis cases

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Strain Homogeneity

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Molecular Clockspeed and

    Spatio-temporal Scale

    Struelens et al., Inf Control Hospital Epidemiol. 998;19:565

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Applications and Insights

    • Pathobiology in animals

    – Transient and persistent infections (RAPD, PFGE)

    – Host adaptation and response to treatment (MLST)

    • Introduction of pathogens into herds

    – Animals (PFGE)

    – Other sources (MLST)

    • Transmission in herds

    – Contagious (RAPD)

    – Environmental (RAPD)

    – Point source (RAPD)

    – Host-to-host (whole genome sequencing)

    http://www.chicagostamps.com/rrtroot/articles/cattlearticle.htmlhttp://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/299839/299839,1274098507,8/stock-photo-vietnam-circa-a-stamp-printed-in-vietnam-shows-a-young-goat-series-devoted-to-pet-circa-53257390.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-53257390/stock-photo-vietnam-circa-a-stamp-printed-in-vietnam-shows-a-young-goat-series-devoted-to-pet-circa.html&usg=__nYCKolOqIS3ZOmfHTXegg5GuBYk=&h=470&w=362&sz=91&hl=en&start=5&zoom=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=VEJmH111vIbSrM:&tbnh=129&tbnw=99&prev=/images?q=stamp+collection+goat&um=1&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7GGLH&tbs=isch:1

  • 3

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Transient E. coli Infections

    • Each cow has her own strain of E. coli

    • Many different strains are present on a single farm

    • Multiple infections due to a single strain are unlikely

    Schukken et al., J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:6203

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Repeated Clinical Mastitis

    • Scenario 1 – Cow becomes infected, CM

    – Cow clears infection

    – Cows become infected, CM

    – Cow clears infection

    – Etc.

    • Failure of prevention

    • Multiple infections,

    multiple strains

    • Scenario 2 – Cow becomes infected, CM

    – Clinical signs disappear

    – Clinical signs recur, CM

    – Clinical signs disappear

    – Etc.

    • Failure of cure

    • Single infection,

    single strain

    In the milking parlour, the clinical appearance is the same

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Persistent E. coli Infections

    Döpfer et al., J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:80 Bradley et al., J Dairy Sci.2000;83:1957

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Pathobiology and Treatment

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    Study

    % b

    ac

    teri

    olo

    gic

    al c

    ure

    N

    N N

    N

    E

    E

    E

    S

    S S S

    S

    C

    C

    N No treatment

    S 2-3 day subclinical C 2-3 day clinical

    E Extended therapy Host-adapted

    Strep. uberis

    Opportunistic

    Strep. uberis

    Zadoks, CAB Reviews 2007;2:030e

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Pathobiology and Treatment

    • Dutch field trial on subclinical S. aureus mastitis – 166 isolates, 139 quarters, 119 cows, 31 herds

    – treatment and control groups

    • Hypothesis: host-adaptation predicts cure – niche-adapted (CC50, CC97, CC151, CC497): low cure

    – non-adapted (all others): high cure

    • Literature: penicillin-resistance predicts cure – resistant: low cure (even with other antibiotics)

    – non-resistant: high cure

    • Result: host adaptation does NOT predict cure

    Barkema et al., J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:1877 Van den Borne et al., J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:2550

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. aureus - Probability of Cure

    Theory

    • Bovine ↓

    • Non-bovine ↑

    • Resistant ↓

    • Non-resistant ↑

    Practice?

    • NB-NR: low SCC, excl.

    • B-R: high SCC, culled

    • NB-R, B-NR: present

    Resistant Non-

    resistant

    Bovine ↓↓ ↓↑

    Non-bovine ↑↓ ↑↑

  • 4

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Introduction – Cattle

    • One-year study with 4 samplings in 15 herds

    • More animals purchased, more strains introduced

    • May apply to expanding herds in Nordic countries

    Category Herds Total New

    Closed herds 6 3 1

    Contract reared replacement heifers 4 9 4

    Purchased lactating cows 2 7 5

    Purchased replacement heifers 3 15 10

    S. aureus strainsMiddleton et al., Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129:387

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Introduction – Niche adaptation

    Bisharat et al., J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2161 Delannoy et al., BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:41

    ST67

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Introduction - Humans

    S. agalactiae in Denmark:

    strains (MLST)

    S. agalactiae in Denmark:

    prevalence

    Katholm, Veterinärkongressen 2010 Zadoks et al., J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2011;16(4):357-72

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Transmission

    A

    A

    A

    C

    D

    B

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. aureus - Contagious

    Juhasz et al., Emerging Inf Dis. 2007;13:630 Zadoks and Schukken, Vet Clin North Am. 2006;22:229

    I - ST151

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. aureus - Environmental

    Schukken et al., submitted

  • 5

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. aureus - Environmental

    • Multiple strains in lactating cows

    • Different strains in pre-calving heifers – not milked yet

    • Transient, severe (heifer) or mild (cow) clinical mastitis

    • Not controlled by 5-point plan

    L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 + L

    Schukken et al., submitted

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. aureus - Environmental

    Gu

    rja

    r e

    t a

    l., V

    et C

    lin N

    ort

    h A

    m

    20

    12

    ;28:5

    65

    Sommerhauser et al., Vet Microbiol. 2003;96:91

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. uberis - Environmental

    • S. uberis is common in dry cows and heifers

    • The 5-point plan does not eliminate S. uberis mastitis

    Baseggio et al., Mol Cell Probes 1997;11:349 Wang et al., Epidemiol Infect.1999;123:317

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    S. uberis - Contagious

    • One strain affecting multiple lactating cows

    • Spread via liners of milking machine demonstrated

    • PMTD and treatment/segregation of infected animals

    • Ignore the 5-point plan at your peril!

    L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 L

    + + - W

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    A

    A

    A

    C

    D

    BA

    A

    A

    C

    D

    B

    Contagious or Point Source?

    ?

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Klebsiella mastitis

    • One strain in most cows

    • Contagious or point source

    • Isolated from liners

    Multiple strains

    • Isolated from bedding

    One dominant strain

    L Milk + - w L

    Munoz et al., J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3964

    Position Position

    time time

    LF RF LF RF

    LR RR LR RR

    LF RF 1100 LF RF 174 Kleb. events

    LR RR LR RR (Index) * LR 4/2

    LF RF LF RF 28m * RR 4/15

    LR RR LR RR

    37t 40t

    LF RF 1068 LF RF

    LR RR LR RR

    LF RF LF RF

    LR RR 23m LR RR

    LF RF 842 41t 44t LF RF 1028

    31t LR RR LR RR

    LF RF 21m 24m LF RF

    LR RR LR RR

    29t 32t 48t

    Cow

    9 right 7 right

    Cow

  • 6

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    "Contagious via the Environment"

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    MRSA transmission - PFGE

    • 1978 - MRSA mastitis in

    dairy cattle in Belgium -

    milkers thought to be the

    source (Devriese, 1978)

    • 2007 - MRSA mastitis in

    dairy cattle in Hungary -

    milker and cattle share

    same strain

    Mastitis outbreak

    isolates

    Human

    isolate

    Juhasz et al., Emerging Inf Dis. 2007;13:630

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    MRSA - MLST

    • Host-association of CCs

    • Major human CCs

    • Major bovine CCs

    – CC97

    – CC151

    – CC479

    • MRSA in cattle and milker: ST1

  • 7

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Lessons for Management

    Low High

    Low Environmental Environmental

    Hig

    h

    Environmental ContagiousDu

    rati

    on

    Transmission risk

    NKVet, 2013 - © RN Zadoks

    Conclusion and Outlook

    • Pathogens, knowledge and management evolves –

    paradigms (and veterinarians) also need to evolve

    • Gram positive and Gram negative species can cause

    chronic infections

    • Gram positive and Gram negative species can cause

    contagious mastitis

    • Contagious or environmental epidemiology is determined

    by pathogen species, strain and herd management

    • Whole genome sequencing, microbiomics and

    metagenomics will generate additional insights into

    mastitis pathobiology and epidemiology