masakiyo kitazawa (osaka univ.) hq2008, aug. 19, 2008 hot quarks in lattice qcd
TRANSCRIPT
Masakiyo Kitazawa(Osaka Univ.)
HQ2008, Aug. 19, 2008
Hot Quarks in Lattice QCD
Masakiyo Kitazawa(Osaka Univ.)
HQ2008, Aug. 19, 2008
Lattice QCD and Hot Quarks
1. Introduction to Lattice QCD 2. Hot quarks
in lattice QCD
3. Discussions
WHY we study Lattice QCD? WHY we study Lattice QCD? WHY we study Lattice QCD? WHY we study Lattice QCD?
Lattice QCD provides a “first principle” calculation of QCD.
•Lattice results justify QCD as well as lattice itself.•inputs for the physics beyond the standard model.
•hadron mass spectrum PACS-CS collab. 2007
•reproduces experiments quite well!
Will lattice QCD take over heavy-ion experiments?
Path Integral – Quantum Mechanics Path Integral – Quantum Mechanics Path Integral – Quantum Mechanics Path Integral – Quantum Mechanics
(
0
)1
0
, ,
e ( , )xp exp ( , )
F I
F
I
iH t tF F I
iH tn
i i ii
n
i ii
I F I
t
n tii
q t q t q e q
i t Dq i L q q dt
dq q
q
e
d L
q
q q
transition amplitude in Feynman’s path-integral
n-dimensional integral;With fixed n, this amplitude is numerically calculated in principle.
t
tI
t1
t2
t3
tn
tF
Path Integral – Field Theory Path Integral – Field Theory Path Integral – Field Theory Path Integral – Field Theory
4( ), ( ), exp ( , )F
I
t
F F I I tt t D i d xL x x
( ), t xinfinite degrees of freedom for each t :
•discretize space-time and sum up all field configurations
•Lattice QCD is formulated in the path integral formalism.Note:
t
xy
t
Systematic Errors Systematic Errors
Lattice action : discrete QCD action
•approaches QCD action in a0 limit•various choices
1( )
4b
bL iD m F F
different results for different actions
•quarks actions:
•Wilson•staggard (KS)
•Domain wall•Ginsparg-Wilson
in numerical simulations,
•a : lattice spacing•V : lattice volume•m : quark mass
a0 (continuum limit)Vinfinite mmphys (chiral extrapolation)in the real world
heavy numeciral cost Lattice2007, Karsch
critical temp.
Dynamical Quarks Dynamical Quarks
Example : Meson propagator
•neglect quark-antiquark loops•~103 times faster than full calc.
full QCD quenched QCD
•quenched (Nf=0)•Nf=2 (two light quarks)•Nf=2+1 (two-light + strange)
Simulation settings
heav
ier
calc
ulat
ion
M(x) M(y) M(y)M(x)
Lattice QCD at Lattice QCD at TT>0 >0 Lattice QCD at Lattice QCD at TT>0 >0
Tre H Hn n
n
eZ : Partition function
1Tr e H
ZO O : Expectation value of O
1
T
•Lattice is not the real-time simulation.•Lattice can deal with only the equilibrium system.
Statistical mechanics in equilibrium
Note:
•imaginary-time action0exp EDU d LZ
( )E ML L t i •periodicity at ==1/T
Hn n
n
Z e ( )F Ii t t HF Ie
( )F Ii t t exp ( , )
F
I
t
tD i dtL
Bulk Thermodynamics Bulk Thermodynamics Bulk Thermodynamics Bulk Thermodynamics
ZPartition function:
•thermodynamic quantities:2 ln
,T
V
Z
T
ln
,p TV
Z
actually, we calculate
ln /E ZS
s, susceptibilities, etc…
•energy density •pressure p
sudden increase of at T~190MeV
Cheng, et al., 2007
Correlation Function (Propagator) Correlation Function (Propagator) Correlation Function (Propagator) Correlation Function (Propagator)
1 2( )( ) (0)O OD
Imaginary-time propagator(Correlation function)
ni
observables on the lattice
Spectral function( , ) Im ( , )Rp D p
1Tr e H
ZO O Expectation values:
( , )nD i pF.T.
1 2( ) [ ( ), (0)] ( )RD t O t O t
Real-time propagator
dynamical propagation( , )RD pF.T.
discrete and noisy
continuous function
analytic continuation
Ill-posed problem
Note: •Only the Euclidean propagator is calculated on the Lattice.
Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) Maximum Entropy Method (MEM)
method to infer the most probable image with the lattice data and a set of prior information
Asakawa,Hatsuda,Nakahara, 2001
Charmonium spectral function above Tc
•charmonium survives even above Tc up to 1.5~2Tc.
Datta, et al. 2004
Summary for the First Part Summary for the First Part
•Lattice QCD at finite T is formulated based on the quantum statistical mechanics, with path integral in the Euclidean space.•It treats the equilibrium physics.
1Tr e H
ZO O
•The propagator calculated on the lattice is the imaginary-time function.•Analytic continuation is needed to extract dynamical information.
1 2( )( ) (0)O OD ( , )p
•We need ideas to measure observables on the lattice.
•topics not mentioned here: finite density / viscosities / Polyakov loop / etc.
Hot Quarks in Lattice QCD
Karsch, Kitazawa, PLB658,45 (2007); in preparation.
Hot Quarks in sQGP Hot Quarks in sQGP Hot Quarks in sQGP Hot Quarks in sQGP
Success of recombination model suggests theexistence of quark quasi-particles in sQGP.
Lattice simulations do not tell us physics under observables.
Quarks at Extremely High Quarks at Extremely High TT Quarks at Extremely High Quarks at Extremely High TT
•Hard Thermal Loop approx. ( p, , mq<<T )•1-loop (g<<1)
Klimov ’82, Weldon ’83Braaten, Pisarski ’89
( , ) p
“plasmino”
p / mT
/
mT
6T
gTm
0
1( , )
( , )S
p
p γ p
•Gauge invariant spectrum
•2 collective excitations having a “thermal mass” ~ gT
•The plasmino mode has a minimum at finite p.
• width ~g2T
p / m
/
m
Decomposition of Quark Propagator Decomposition of Quark Propagator Decomposition of Quark Propagator Decomposition of Quark Propagator
0
free
0
( ,)
)( ) (
SE E
p p
pp
p
0 ((
))
2
E m
E
p
p
pp
0
0
( )( , ) ( , )
(( ) ),
S S
S
p p
p
p
p
Free quark with mass mHTL ( high T limit )0
HTL
0
( , )( ) ( )
Sp p
p pp
p / mT
/
mT
2 2E m p p
0
0
( )
( , )
(
( )
, )
( , )
p
p
p
p
p
Quark Spectrum as a function of Quark Spectrum as a function of mm00 Quark Spectrum as a function of Quark Spectrum as a function of mm00
Quark propagator in hot medium at T >>Tc
- as a function of bare scalar mass m0
•How is the interpolating behavior?•How does the plasmino excitation emerge as m00 ?
m0 << gT
m0 >> gT
We know two gauge-independent limits:
m0mT-mT
+(,p=0) +(,p=0)
Fermion Spectrum in QED & Yukawa Model Fermion Spectrum in QED & Yukawa Model Fermion Spectrum in QED & Yukawa Model Fermion Spectrum in QED & Yukawa Model Baym, Blaizot, Svetisky, ‘92
0
1( )
2L i i m g
Yukawa model:
1-loop approx.:
m/T=0.01
0.80.450.3
0.1
+(
,p=
0)
Spectral Function for g =1 , T =1
0 / 1m T thermal mass mT=gT/4
0 / 1m T single peak at m0
Plasmino peak disappearsas m0 /T becomes larger.
cf.) massless fermion + massive bosonM.K., Kunihiro, Nemoto,’06
Simulation Setup Simulation Setup Simulation Setup Simulation Setup
•quenched approximation•clover improved Wilson•Landau gauge fixing
T size # of conf.
3Tc 7.45 643x16 51 (0)
483x16 51 (0)
7.19 483x12 51 (0)
1.5Tc 6.87 643x16 51 (7)
483x16 51 (0)
6.64 483x12 51 (0)
1.25Tc 6.72 643x16 71 (31)configurations generated
by Bielefeld collaboration
•vary bare quark mass m0
Correlator and Spectral Function Correlator and Spectral Function Correlator and Spectral Function Correlator and Spectral Function
( / 2 )
/ 2 / 2( ) ( )
eC d
e e
E1E2
Z1Z2
observablein lattice
dynamicalinformation
2-pole structure may be a goodassumption for +().
1 21 2( ) ( ) ( )E EZ Z
4-parameter fit E1, E2, Z1, Z2
Correlation Function Correlation Function Correlation Function Correlation Function 0
0
( , ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )S
C C C
C C
0
( )C
•We neglect 4 points near the source from the fit.•2-pole ansatz works quite well!! ( 2/dof.~2 in correlated fit)
643x16, = 7.459, = 0.1337, 51confs.
/T
1 2 ( )1 2( ) e eE EC z z
Fitting result
0
1 1 1
2 c
m
Spectral Function Spectral Function Spectral Function Spectral Function
E1E2
Z1
Z2
E1E2
Z1Z2
T = 3Tc 643x16 (= 7.459)
E2
E1
2
1 2
Z
Z Z
= m0 pole of free quark
m0 / T
E /
TZ
2 / (
Z1+
Z 2)
T=3Tc
1
2
1
2
( ) ( )
( )
E
E
Z
Z
0
1 1 1
2 c
m
Spectral Function Spectral Function Spectral Function Spectral Function T = 3Tc 643x16 (= 7.459)
E2
E1
2
1 2
Z
Z Z
= m0 pole of free quark
m0 / T
E /
TZ
2 / (
Z1+
Z 2)
1
2
1
2
( ) ( )
( )
E
E
Z
Z
•Limiting behaviors for are as expected.•Quark propagator approaches the chiral symmetric one near m0=0.•E2>E1 : qualitatively different from the 1-loop result.
0 00,m m
T=3Tc
Temperature Dependence Temperature Dependence Temperature Dependence Temperature Dependence
•mT /T is insensitive to T.•The slope of E2 and minimum of E1 is much clearer at lower T.
T = 3Tc
T = 1.5Tc
minimum of E1
E2
E1
2
1 2
Z
Z Z
m0 / T
E /
TZ
2 / (
Z1+
Z 2)
1-loop result might be realized for high T.
643x16
T = 1.25Tc
Lattice Spacing Dependence Lattice Spacing Dependence Lattice Spacing Dependence Lattice Spacing Dependence
643x16 (= 7.459)
483x12 (= 7.192)
E /
T
E2
E1
m0 / T
same physical volumewith different a.
•No lattice spacing dependence within statistical error.
T=3Tc
Spatial Volume Dependence Spatial Volume Dependence Spatial Volume Dependence Spatial Volume Dependence
E2
E1
m0 / T
E /
T
T=3Tc
643x16 (= 7.459)
483x16(= 7.459)
same lattice spacingwith different aspect ratio.
•Excitation spectra have clear volume dependence even for N/N=4.
Extrapolation of Thermal Mass Extrapolation of Thermal Mass Extrapolation of Thermal Mass Extrapolation of Thermal Mass
Extrapolation of thermal mass to infinite spatial volume limit:
•Small T dependence of mT/T, •while it decreases slightly with increasing T.•Simulation with much larger volume is desirable.
mT /T
3 3/ ~ 1/N N V
T=1.5Tc
T=3Tc
mT /T = 0.800(15) mT = 322(6)MeV
mT /T = 0.771(18)mT = 625(15)MeV
483x16
643x16
T=1.25Tc
mT /T = 0.816(20) mT = 274(8)MeV
Pole Structure for p>0 Pole Structure for p>0
•E2<E1; consistent with the HTL result.•E1 approaches the light cone for large momentum.
HTL(1-loop)
•2-pole approx. works well again.
Discussions?
Charm Quark Charm Quark from Datta et al. PRD69,094507(2004).
•Charm quark is free-quark like, rather than HTL.•The J/ peak in MEM seems to exist above 2mc.
mcpreliminary
threshold 2mc
T=1.5Tc
Role of Thermal Mass Role of Thermal Mass
•Does chiral symmetry breaking take place even with mT?•Does thermal mass contribute to the stability of mesons?
2 25[( ) ( ) ]HTL SL D G i
+ +
1( , )HTL T HTLD p m
p
( , )HTL p
Interaction:
Hidaka, MK, PRD75, 011901(R) (2007)
YES
NO. Mesons are unstable even for <2mT.
Away Side Particle Distribution Away Side Particle Distribution
Quark mass ~TPartons have position dependent mass.
orbit of light in medium
slow
fast
orbit of quarks in sQGP
light
heavy
in very progress…
high
low T
Summary Summary Summary Summary
•Quarks seem to behave as a good quasi-particles.•Thermal gluon field gives rise to the thermal mass in the light quark spectra.•The plasmino mode disappears for heavy quarks. •The ratio mT/T is insensitive to T near Tc.
Lattice simulations provide us many information about the sructure of quark propagator successfully.
Information about the quark propagator will usedfor phenomenological studies of the QGP.
Future Work Future Work Future Work Future Work
full QCD / gauge dependence / volume dependence / …
Effect of Dynamical Quarks Effect of Dynamical Quarks Effect of Dynamical Quarks Effect of Dynamical Quarks
Quark propagatorin quench approximation:
screen gluon field suppress mT?
meson loop will have strong effect if mesonic excitations exist
In full QCD,
massless fermion + massive boson 3 peaks in quark spectrum! M.K., Kunihiro, Nemoto, ‘06