mapping separation power klaus götzen gsi darmstadt pid tag meeting 15. feb. 2007

20
Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

Upload: amanda-wade

Post on 04-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

Mappingseparation power

Klaus Götzen

GSI Darmstadt

PID TAG Meeting15. Feb. 2007

Page 2: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

2K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Central Problem

• Problem:– What is necessary PID quality for PANDA, i.e. what

minimal set of PID detectors is needed?... or to be more exact:

– How much separation power do we need in which phase space region to reach our physics goals?

• Answering implies:1. How good is separation over phase space?

2. Where is significant kinematic signal/background overlap?

Page 3: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

3K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

PID information

• Attempt to answer question No 1.• At the moment: almost no reco‘d PID info from Full Sim• Consider parametrized PID info in Fast Sim from det‘s

– Barrel DIRC (C) tcb

– Endcap DIRC (C) tcd

– Forward RICH (C) tcr

– Straw Tube Tracker (dE/dx) des– Micro Vertex Detector (dE/dx) dem– Barrel TOF (m2) mt

• Dataset: 200k isotropic (,p) single track events ofevery particle type (e, , , K, p)

0° < < 180° 0.15 GeV/c < p < 8 GeV/c

Page 4: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

4K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Quality check

barrelDIRC

endcapDIRC

forwardRICH

STTMVD TOF

p [GeV/c2] p [GeV/c2] p [GeV/c2]

p [GeV/c2] p [GeV/c2] p [GeV/c2]

C C C

dE/d

x

dE/d

x m2

Page 5: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

5K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Method

• Divide 2-D p, region into bins• for every bin & every 2 PID hypothesis (only ‚neighbours‘,

i.e.: e- / - / -K / K-p)– plot the 2 distributions

– determine mean values i and RMS r

i for both

hypothesis (e.g. and K)– separation power (number sigmas) is estimated as

– colorize a 2-D map according to n

Page 6: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

6K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Example 1

C C

K

K

K = 0.7955rK = 0.00288

= 0.8218r = 0.00239

(not really gauss‘sch)

K = 0.7071rK = 0.01436

= 0.8147r = 0.00238

Barrel DIRC Barrel DIRC|p-2.0|<0.1 [GeV]|-2|<0.2

|p-1.0|<0.1 [GeV]|-2|<0.2

Page 7: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

7K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Example 2

Barrel DIRC STT

C dE/dx

K

K

K = 0.817rK = 0.00243

= 0.823r = 0.00239

K = 12.94rK = 6.015

= 4.02r = 0.976

|p-4.0|<0.1 [GeV]|-2|<0.2

|p-0.3|<0.1 [GeV]|-2|<0.2

Page 8: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

8K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Separation e - mup

[GeV

]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

p [G

eV]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

0

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

Page 9: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

9K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Separation mu - pip

[GeV

]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

p [G

eV]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

Page 10: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

10K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Separation pi - Kp

[GeV

]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

p [G

eV]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

Page 11: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

11K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Separation K - pp

[GeV

]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

p [G

eV]

[deg] [deg] [deg]

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

0

3

6

1

2

4

5

Page 12: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

12K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Overall performance

Combined n

given by expression

Of course, there arestill some flaws, but

this is the preliminaryseparation power map!

Page 13: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

13K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Signal / Background overlap

• How does this now apply to our physics cases?• Compare the following:

• EvtGen: Kaon p- distributions of benchmark channel, e.g.

at different pbar momenta (1.432, 5.0, 10.0, 15.0 GeV/c)

• DPM Gen: Pion p- distribution at same energies

• Determine kinematic overlap regions and look how good separation power is there

Page 14: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

14K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

ppbar = 1.432 / 5.0 GeV/c

bkg K, signal productof histo‘s(overlap)

p =

1.4

32 G

eV/c

p =

5.0

GeV

/c bkg K, signal productof histo‘s(overlap)

Page 15: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

15K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

ppbar = 10.0 / 15.0 GeV/c

bkg K, signal productof histo‘s(overlap)

p =

10.

0 G

eV/c

p =

15.

0 G

eV/c bkg K, signal product

of histo‘s(overlap)

Page 16: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

16K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Combining information

Page 17: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

17K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Combining information

@ 1.432 GeV/c

Page 18: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

18K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Combining information

@ 15.0 GeV/c

Page 19: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

19K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Combining information

@ 15.0 GeV/c

problem here?

Page 20: Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb. 2007

20K. Götzen PID TAG Meeting – EVO – 15.02.08

Summary

• Task: Recommendation for minimum set of PID detectors

• Attempt to determine– Separation power p- dependent– Regions, where it‘s acctually needed

• Limitations– Information based on parametrizations only– No EMC informations so far– Dsitributions are not gaussian

does our definition of sep. power make sense here– Due to finite granularity (bin width) artifacts in the map

– Is the estimate for the total n,tot correct?