manova - equations lecture 11 psy524 andrew ainsworth
TRANSCRIPT
Data design for MANOVAIV1 IV2 DV1 DV2 DVM
S01(11) S01(11) S01(11)
S02(11) S02(11) S02(11) 1
S03(11) S03(11) S03(11)
S04(12) S04(12) S04(12)
S05(12) S05(12) S05(12)
1
2
S06(12) S06(12) S06(12)
S07(21) S07(21) S07(21)
S08(21) S08(21) S08(21) 1
S09(21) S09(21) S09(21)
S10(22) S10(22) S10(22)
S11(22) S11(22) S11(22)
2
2
S12(22) S12(22) S12(22)
Steps to MANOVA
MANOVA is a multivariate generalization of ANOVA, so there are analogous parts to the simpler ANOVA equations
Steps to MANOVA
ANOVA –
22 2( ) ( )( ) ( )ij y j y ij j
i j j i j
Y GM n Y GM Y Y
( ) ( ) ( )Total y bg y wg ySS SS SS
Steps to MANOVA
When you have more than one IV the interaction looks something like this:
2 22( ) ( ) ( )
2 2 2
( ) ( ) ( )
( )km km DT k k D m m Tk m k m
km km DT k k D m m Tk m k m
n DT GM n D GM n T GM
n DT GM n D GM n T GM
bg D T DTSS SS SS SS
Steps to MANOVA
The full factorial design is:
2 22( ) ( ) ( )
2 2 2
( ) ( ) ( )
2
( )
( )
ikm ikm k k D m m Ti k m k m
km km DT k k D m m Tk m k m
ikm kmi k m
Y GM n D GM n T GM
n DT GM n D GM n T GM
Y DT
Steps to MANOVA
MANOVA - You need to think in terms of matrices
Each subject now has multiple scores, there is a matrix of responses in each cell
Matrices of difference scores are calculated and the matrix squared
When the squared differences are summed you get a sum-of-squares-and-cross-products-matrix (S) which is the matrix counterpart to the sums of squares.
The determinants of the various S matrices are found and ratios between them are used to test hypotheses about the effects of the IVs on linear combination(s) of the DVs
In MANCOVA the S matrices are adjusted for by one or more covariates
Matrix Equations
If you take the three subjects in the treatment/mild disability cell:
11
115 98 107
108 105 98iY
Matrix Equations You can get the means for disability by
averaging over subjects and treatments
1 2 3
95.83 88.83 82.67
96.50 88.00 77.17D D D
Matrix Equations
Means for treatment by averaging over subjects and disabilities
1 2
99.89 78.33
96.33 78.11T T
Matrix Equations The grand mean is found by averaging
over subjects, disabilities and treatments.
89.11
87.22GM
Matrix Equations Differences are found by subtracting
the matrices, for the first child in the mild/treatment group:
111
115 89.11 25.89( )
108 87.22 20.75Y GM
Matrix Equations Instead of squaring the matrices you
simply multiply the matrix by its transpose, for the first child in the mild/treatment group:
111 111
25.89 670.29 537.99( )( ) ' 25.89 20.75
20.75 537.99 431.81Y GM Y GM
Matrix Equations This is done on the whole data set at the
same time, reorganaizing the data to get the appropriate S matrices. The full break of sums of squares is:
( )( ) ' ( )( ) '
( )( ) ' [ ( )( ) '
( )( ) ' ( )( ) ']
( )( ) '
ikm ikm k k ki k m k
m m m km km kmm km
k k k m m mk m
ikm km ikm kmi k m
Y GM Y GM n D GM D GM
n T GM T GM n DT GM DT GM
n D GM D GM n T GM T GM
Y DT Y DT
Matrix Equations
If you go through this for every combination in the data you will get four S matrices (not including the S total matrix):
/
570.29 761.72 2090.89 1767.56
761.72 1126.78 1767.56 1494.22
2.11 5.28 544.00 31.00
5.28 52.78 31.00 539.33
D T
DT s DT
S S
S S
Test Statistic – Wilk’s Lambda Once the S matrices are found the
diagonals represent the sums of squares and the off diagonals are the cross products
The determinant of each matrix represents the generalized variance for that matrix
Using the determinants we can test for significance, there are many ways to this and one of the most is Wilk’s Lambda
Test Statistic – Wilk’s Lambda
this can be seen as the percent of non-overlap between the effect and the DVs.
error
effect error
S
S S
Test Statistic – Wilk’s Lambda
For the interaction this would be:
/
/
/
292436.52
2.11 5.28 544.00 31.00 546.11 36.28
5.28 52.78 31.00 539.33 36.28 529.11
322040.95
292436.52.908068
322040.95
s DT
DT s DT
DT s DT
S
S S
S S
Test Statistic – Wilk’s Lambda Approximate Multivariate F for Wilk’s
Lambda is
21 2
1
2 21/
2 2
1
2
1( , )
( ) 4 , ,
( ) 5
, ( )
1 ( ) 2( )
2 2
effects
effect
effect
effect effecterror
dfyF df df
y df
p dfwhere y s
p df
p number of DVs df p df
p df p dfdf s df
Test Statistic – Wilk’s Lambda So in the example for the interaction:
2 2
2 2
1/ 2
1
2
(2) (2) 42
(2) (2) 5
.908068 .952926
2(2) 4
( 1) 3(2)(3 1) 12
2 2 1 2(2) 22 12 22
2 2
.047074 22 F(4,22)= 0.2717
.952926 4
error
s
y
df
df dt n
df
Approximate