managing the molecule

7
Managing the molecule: an update on 2005 A few years ago, this author wrote a paper, Managing the Molecule, which reviewed likely future product specifications and how the refiner was likely to fare in the future. A scenario was presented whereby the refiner is faced with the realisation that existing technol- ogy is likely to struggle some time hence and that a more radical solution might be required. The paper then reviewed Fischer-Tropsch tech- nology from the standpoint of product quality, and postulated a scenario where this might solve the refiner’s problems. Now, more than three years later, Europe is facing some of the most stringent specifications for transport fuels the world has seen in a large market (ignoring local specialised requirements for city fuels). There has already been one round of specification tightening – in 2000 – which the refiners have spoken about with doom and gloom as the industry faces further tightening in 2005. But where are the refinery-based Fischer- Tropsch projects promoted in that paper? The industry is still waiting for the first of the large- scale Fischer-Tropsch gas-to-liquids (GTL) projects to get off the ground. Here at present is the exact scenario postulated in the paper to act as a launch pad for refinery-based Fisher- Tropsch projects, but nothing has happened. Why? Within the EU there has been a fairly trackable series of tightening specifications over time, which is precisely the model needed for some form of analysis. That is why this article focuses on EU specifications. It will be useful to review the trends in EU specifications for 2000 and 2005, as currently debated (Table 1). Simon C Clarke Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd Looking back to 1997, when the EU refining industry was facing the 2000 specifications with the knowledge that the 2005 specs would follow, wild claims were made about the impact on the European refining industry: mass closures, unemployment, not enough time to implement, large scale hydrogen plant requirements and a bill equivalent to around US$33 billion. With the first round of specifications enforced, and refiners planning for 2005, no refiner has decided that Fischer-Tropsch products are the solution to the problem – not even imported from a GTL plant located somewhere distant, let alone a refinery-based Fischer-Tropsch project. Smart refining So how has the refiner managed to meet these clean fuels specifications when faced with such www.digitalrefining.com/article/1000258 PTQ Q3 2002 1 An overall look at the opportunities for gas-to-liquids projects in Europe as tighter gasoline and diesel specifications loom Gasoline 2000 2005 Sulphur (ppm wt) 150 50 Benzene (vol%) 1.0 1.0 Aromatics (vol%) 42 35 Olefins (vol%) 18 18 E100 (°C) 46 46 E150 (°C) 75 75 RONC 97 97 Diesel 2000 2005 Sulphur (ppm wt) 350 50 Density (kg/m3) 820-845 820-845 Cetane Number 51 51 PNA (wt%) 11 <11? T95 (°C) 360 340 EU specification trends Table 1

Upload: saleh-daryabari

Post on 16-Aug-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Managing the Molecule

TRANSCRIPT

Managing the molecule: an update on 2005A fewyearsago,thisauthorwroteapaper, ManagingtheMolecule,whichreviewed likelyfutureproductspecifcationsand how the refner was likely to fare in the future. A scenariowaspresentedwherebytherefneris facedwiththerealisationthatexistingtechnol-ogyislikelytostrugglesometimehenceand thatamoreradicalsolutionmightberequired. ThepaperthenreviewedFischer-Tropschtech-nologyfromthestandpointofproductquality, and postulateda scenario where this might solve the refners problems.Now,morethanthreeyearslater,Europeis facingsomeofthemoststringentspecifcations fortransportfuelstheworldhasseeninalarge market(ignoringlocalspecialisedrequirements forcityfuels).Therehasalreadybeenoneround of specifcation tightening in 2000 which the refners have spoken about with doom and gloom as the industry faces further tightening in 2005.Butwherearetherefnery-basedFischer-Tropschprojectspromotedinthatpaper?The industryisstillwaitingforthefrstofthelarge-scaleFischer-Tropschgas-to-liquids(GTL) projectstogetofftheground.Hereatpresentis theexactscenariopostulatedinthepapertoact asalaunchpadforrefnery-basedFisher-Tropschprojects,butnothinghashappened. Why?Within the EU there has been a fairly trackable seriesoftighteningspecifcationsovertime, whichispreciselythemodelneededforsome formofanalysis.Thatiswhythisarticlefocuses on EU specifcations.ItwillbeusefultoreviewthetrendsinEU specifcationsfor2000and2005,ascurrently debated (Table 1).Simon C Clarke Foster Wheeler Energy LtdLookingbackto1997,whentheEUrefning industrywasfacingthe2000specifcationswith theknowledgethatthe2005 specswouldfollow, wildclaimsweremadeabouttheimpactonthe Europeanrefningindustry:massclosures, unemployment,notenoughtimetoimplement, largescalehydrogenplantrequirementsanda bill equivalent to around US$33 billion.Withthefrstroundofspecifcationsenforced, andrefnersplanningfor2005,norefnerhas decidedthatFischer-Tropschproductsarethe solutiontotheproblemnotevenimported fromaGTLplantlocatedsomewheredistant,let alone a refnery-based Fischer-Tropsch project.Smart reningSohowhastherefnermanagedtomeetthese cleanfuelsspecifcationswhenfacedwithsuch www.digitalrening.com/article/1000258PTQ Q3 20021An overall look at the opportunities for gas-to-liquids projects in Europe as tighter gasoline and diesel specications loomGasoline20002005Sulphur (ppm wt)15050Benzene (vol%)1.01.0Aromatics (vol%)4235Olens (vol%)1818E100 (C)4646E150 (C)7575RONC9797Diesel20002005Sulphur (ppm wt)35050Density (kg/m3)820-845820-845Cetane Number5151PNA (wt%)11