managing new product development

4
Managing New Product Development BY ROBERT J. POTTER My assignment is to communicate some of my thoughts on the suc- cessful development and introduction of new products. I will concentrate on general principles because they apply equally well to software, hardware, services, or some com- bination of these elements. This discussion applies to tech- nically rich products and excludes consumer products, fads, and other products that might be distinguished only by the way they are marketed. Since the point of view I'm offering you is rooted in my experience, let me describe that briefly. I have worked for several large companies, starting as a technology developer, then moving into management. For most of my career, I have looked more like a technically strong businessman than a scientist. Some people have called me a salesman in engineer's clothing, or vice versa. From one perspective or another, I have been focusing on new product development in big company environments for 30 years. REVOLUTIONARY PRODUCTS Some of you might be developing revolutionary products based on entirely new technologies. Those of you who suc- ceed will become wealthy and may create new industries. Unfortunately, most people who try to develop revolution- ary products do not succeed. The success stories are very few. Those successes, such as xerography, transistors, and lasers, also teach us that the product development cycle from invention and discovery to the business phase takes decades. Reflect on the invention of xerography in 1938, and remember the copier really did not impact the business world until the early 1960s. The laser was invented in 1960, but hardly anybody made any money with it until the late 1970s. The transistor was invented in 1947, and the integrat- ed circuit came into widespread use in the 1960s. Mine was the first doctoral thesis on fiber optics in the U.S. It was a decade later before fiber optics became commonly available and two decades before the quality was adequate for large scale telecommunications applications. While I was preparing this paper, IBM announced a new optical disk technology to extend more than tenfold the storage capacity of digital disks used to play back music, video, or computer data. The IBM technology sandwiches up to 10 layers in the same format used by a conventional music CD or computer CD-ROM (see OPN, August 1994, page 39). The 10-layer disk would hold about 6.5 billion bytes of data, equivalent to more than a million pages of printed text. This appears to be a very important and timely announcement. But in the late 1950s, the same IBM research center announced an optical disk, a read-only memory that held a Russian-English dictionary in a half-inch band about six inches in diameter on a glass disk moving at high speed and read by a cathode ray tube scanner. Although the New York Times published the 1994 article on the first page of its business section with a picture, a schematic drawing, and at least 20 inches of text, it caused me to ask, "What is a new technology? What is a new product? Is this optical disk new, or is it the current version of the 1950s disk, which was not referenced?" A successful new product requires a delicate confluence of its technology, market, timing, and cost inter- secting with customer needs and their ability to use it. The CD-ROM accomplished this. Many other optical memory products and techniques did not. When I was in the corporate world, we provided the backing and the organization for people to develop revolu- tionary products. But the chances of succeeding are so small and the pressures of business so great that most people con- centrated resources on developing evolutionary, here-and- now products. EVOLUTIONARY PRODUCTS Most successful new products are evolutionary; that is, they are not based on entirely new technology. For example, I am writing this article on a computer that contains a 486 micro- processor operating at a 66 M H z clock rate. It contains 8 MB of R A M and a 450 MB hard disk, and is connected to a laser printer. Its microprocessor and memory came from many earlier generations of PCs. If a product like this can be priced for less than $3,000, it can be successful in 1994. Many large and small companies prosper and offer rewarding career paths for their employees by developing successful evolutionary products. On my desk, I have a tele- phone, an answering machine, an intercom, an electronic calendar, a steel tape measure, and four photographs—all evolutionary products of which millions were sold. Sometimes new products that contain absolutely no technological innovation succeed because of innovative marketing. EDS found a different way to deliver computer services. Dell Computer became a multibillion-dollar com- pany because it found a new way to sell PCs by enabling customers to order them by telephone. On the other hand, Dell recently withdrew a product it had announced but not introduced because the product could not be sold for the right price. Successful products require a prudent and sometimes unique juxtaposition of the right technology, the right engineering, the right price, the right distribution channels, the right market timing, and the right customer environment. CREATE A CLEAR STRATEGIC STATEMENT A clear strategic statement separates winners from everyone else. When you are developing a new product, whether rev- olutionary or evolutionary, you should have a strategy that you can express in one sentence. Let me give you a few examples, some of which may be apocryphal. Edwin Land, founder of Polaroid, said, "I want to see the picture in a minute." Joe Wilson, CEO of Xerox during its critical time, said, "Let's charge by the copy instead of the month." In the 1960s, people rented computers and office equipment on a 38 OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS/NOVEMBER 1994

Upload: robert-j

Post on 03-Oct-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Managing New Product Development

B Y R O B E R T J . P O T T E R

M y a s s i g n m e n t is to c o m m u n i c a t e s o m e of m y t h o u g h t s o n the s u c ­

c e s s f u l d e v e l o p m e n t a n d i n t r o d u c t i o n o f n e w p r o d u c t s . I w i l l concen t ra te o n g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e s because t hey a p p l y e q u a l l y w e l l to so f tware , h a r d w a r e , se rv i ces , o r s o m e c o m ­b i n a t i o n of these e lements . T h i s d i s c u s s i o n a p p l i e s to tech­n i ca l l y r i ch p r o d u c t s a n d e x c l u d e s c o n s u m e r p r o d u c t s , fads , a n d other p r o d u c t s that m i g h t be d i s t i n g u i s h e d o n l y b y the w a y they are m a r k e t e d .

S ince the p o i n t of v i e w I 'm o f fe r i ng y o u is r oo ted i n m y expe r i ence , let m e desc r i be that b r ie f l y . I h a v e w o r k e d fo r severa l la rge c o m p a n i e s , s ta r t ing as a t e c h n o l o g y d e v e l o p e r , t h e n m o v i n g i n t o m a n a g e m e n t . F o r m o s t of m y career , I h a v e l o o k e d m o r e l i k e a t e c h n i c a l l y s t r o n g b u s i n e s s m a n than a scient is t . S o m e p e o p l e h a v e ca l l ed m e a s a l e s m a n i n eng inee r ' s c l o t h i n g , o r v i ce v e r s a . F r o m one pe rspec t i ve o r another , I h a v e b e e n f o c u s i n g o n n e w p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t i n b i g c o m p a n y e n v i r o n m e n t s fo r 30 years .

REVOLUTIONARY PRODUCTS

S o m e of y o u m i g h t be d e v e l o p i n g r e v o l u t i o n a r y p r o d u c t s based o n en t i re ly n e w techno log ies . T h o s e of y o u w h o suc ­ceed w i l l b e c o m e w e a l t h y a n d m a y create n e w i n d u s t r i e s . Un fo r t una te l y , m o s t p e o p l e w h o t ry to d e v e l o p r e v o l u t i o n ­a ry p r o d u c t s d o no t s u c c e e d . T h e success s to r ies are v e r y few.

T h o s e successes , s u c h as x e r o g r a p h y , t r ans i s t o r s , a n d l ase rs , a l s o teach u s tha t the p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t c y c l e f r o m i n v e n t i o n a n d d i s c o v e r y to the b u s i n e s s p h a s e takes decades . Ref lec t o n the i n v e n t i o n of x e r o g r a p h y i n 1938, a n d r e m e m b e r the c o p i e r r e a l l y d i d n o t i m p a c t the b u s i n e s s w o r l d u n t i l the ea r l y 1960s. T h e laser w a s i n v e n t e d i n 1960, b u t h a r d l y a n y b o d y m a d e a n y m o n e y w i t h i t u n t i l the late 1970s. T h e t rans is to r w a s i n v e n t e d in 1947, a n d the in tegra t ­e d c i r cu i t c a m e in to w i d e s p r e a d use i n the 1960s. M i n e w a s the f irst d o c t o r a l thes is o n f iber op t i cs i n the U . S . It w a s a decade later before f iber op t ics b e c a m e c o m m o n l y ava i l ab le a n d t w o decades before the q u a l i t y w a s adequa te for la rge scale t e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s app l i ca t i ons .

W h i l e I w a s p r e p a r i n g th i s p a p e r , I B M a n n o u n c e d a n e w op t i ca l d i s k t e c h n o l o g y to ex tend m o r e t h a n ten fo ld the s to rage capac i t y of d i g i t a l d i s k s u s e d to p l a y b a c k m u s i c , v i d e o , or c o m p u t e r da ta . T h e I B M t e c h n o l o g y s a n d w i c h e s u p to 10 layers i n the same f o r m a t u s e d b y a c o n v e n t i o n a l m u s i c C D or c o m p u t e r C D - R O M (see OPN, A u g u s t 1994, p a g e 39). T h e 10 - l aye r d i s k w o u l d h o l d a b o u t 6.5 b i l l i o n by tes of d a t a , e q u i v a l e n t to m o r e t h a n a m i l l i o n p a g e s of p r i n t e d text. T h i s appea rs to be a v e r y i m p o r t a n t a n d t i m e l y a n n o u n c e m e n t . Bu t i n the late 1950s, the s a m e I B M research center a n n o u n c e d a n op t i ca l d i sk , a r e a d - o n l y m e m o r y that h e l d a R u s s i a n - E n g l i s h d i c t i o n a r y i n a h a l f - i n c h b a n d abou t s ix inches i n d i a m e t e r o n a g lass d i s k m o v i n g at h i g h s p e e d a n d read b y a ca thode ray tube scanner . A l t h o u g h the New York Times p u b l i s h e d the 1994 ar t ic le o n the f i rst p a g e of i ts bus i ness sec t ion w i t h a p i c tu re , a schemat i c d r a w i n g , a n d at

least 20 i nches of text, i t c a u s e d m e to ask , " W h a t is a n e w t e c h n o l o g y ? W h a t is a n e w p r o d u c t ? Is th is op t i ca l d i s k new , or is i t the cu r ren t v e r s i o n of the 1950s d i s k , w h i c h w a s no t r e f e r e n c e d ? " A s u c c e s s f u l n e w p r o d u c t requ i res a de l i ca te con f l uence of i ts t echno logy , m a r k e t , t i m i n g , a n d cost in ter ­sec t ing w i t h c u s t o m e r needs a n d the i r ab i l i t y to use it. T h e C D - R O M a c c o m p l i s h e d th is . M a n y o the r o p t i c a l m e m o r y p r o d u c t s a n d techn iques d i d not.

W h e n I w a s i n the c o r p o r a t e w o r l d , w e p r o v i d e d the b a c k i n g a n d the o r g a n i z a t i o n fo r p e o p l e to d e v e l o p r e v o l u ­t i o n a r y p r o d u c t s . B u t the chances of s u c c e e d i n g are so s m a l l a n d the p ressu res of b u s i n e s s so great that m o s t p e o p l e c o n ­cen t ra ted resources o n d e v e l o p i n g e v o l u t i o n a r y , h e r e - a n d -n o w p r o d u c t s .

EVOLUTIONARY PRODUCTS

M o s t success fu l n e w p r o d u c t s are e v o l u t i o n a r y ; that is , they are no t b a s e d o n en t i re l y n e w techno logy . F o r e x a m p l e , I a m w r i t i n g th is ar t ic le o n a c o m p u t e r that con ta ins a 486 m i c r o ­p rocesso r o p e r a t i n g at a 66 M H z c lock rate. It con ta ins 8 M B of R A M a n d a 450 M B h a r d d i s k , a n d is connec ted to a laser p r in te r . Its m i c r o p r o c e s s o r a n d m e m o r y c a m e f r o m m a n y e a r l i e r g e n e r a t i o n s o f P C s . If a p r o d u c t l i k e t h i s c a n b e p r i c e d for less than $3,000, i t c a n be success fu l i n 1994.

M a n y l a r g e a n d s m a l l c o m p a n i e s p r o s p e r a n d o f fe r r e w a r d i n g career pa ths fo r the i r e m p l o y e e s b y d e v e l o p i n g success fu l e v o l u t i o n a r y p r o d u c t s . O n m y desk , I h a v e a tele­p h o n e , a n a n s w e r i n g m a c h i n e , a n i n t e r c o m , a n e l ec t ron i c ca lenda r , a steel tape m e a s u r e , a n d f o u r p h o t o g r a p h s — a l l e v o l u t i o n a r y p r o d u c t s of w h i c h m i l l i o n s w e r e s o l d .

S o m e t i m e s n e w p r o d u c t s tha t c o n t a i n a b s o l u t e l y n o t e c h n o l o g i c a l i n n o v a t i o n s u c c e e d b e c a u s e o f i n n o v a t i v e m a r k e t i n g . E D S f o u n d a d i f ferent w a y to d e l i v e r c o m p u t e r se rv i ces . D e l l C o m p u t e r b e c a m e a m u l t i b i l l i o n - d o l l a r c o m ­p a n y because i t f o u n d a n e w w a y to se l l P C s b y e n a b l i n g c u s t o m e r s to o rde r t h e m b y te lephone .

O n the o ther h a n d , D e l l recent ly w i t h d r e w a p r o d u c t it h a d a n n o u n c e d b u t n o t i n t r o d u c e d b e c a u s e the p r o d u c t c o u l d n o t be s o l d fo r the r i g h t p r i c e . S u c c e s s f u l p r o d u c t s r e q u i r e a p r u d e n t a n d s o m e t i m e s u n i q u e j u x t a p o s i t i o n of the r i gh t t echno logy , the r i gh t e n g i n e e r i n g , the r igh t p r i c e , the r i gh t d i s t r i b u t i o n c h a n n e l s , the r i gh t m a r k e t t i m i n g , a n d the r i gh t c u s t o m e r e n v i r o n m e n t .

C R E A T E A C L E A R S T R A T E G I C S T A T E M E N T

A c lear s t ra teg ic s ta tement separa tes w i n n e r s f r o m e v e r y o n e else. W h e n y o u are d e v e l o p i n g a n e w p r o d u c t , w h e t h e r rev ­o l u t i o n a r y o r e v o l u t i o n a r y , y o u s h o u l d h a v e a st rategy that y o u c a n e x p r e s s i n o n e s e n t e n c e . L e t m e g i v e y o u a f e w e x a m p l e s , s o m e of w h i c h m a y be a p o c r y p h a l .

E d w i n L a n d , f o u n d e r of P o l a r o i d , s a i d , "I w a n t to see the p i c t u re i n a m i n u t e . "

Joe W i l s o n , C E O of X e r o x d u r i n g its c r i t i ca l t ime , s a i d , " L e t ' s c h a r g e b y the c o p y i n s t e a d o f the m o n t h . " In the 1960s, p e o p l e r e n t e d c o m p u t e r s a n d off ice e q u i p m e n t o n a

38 OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS/NOVEMBER 1994

m o n t h l y bas is . Joe W i l s o n p u t i n a mete r a n d c h a r g e d b y the copy, a n d that i n n o v a t i o n con t r i bu ted s ign i f i can t l y to X e r o x ' success.

S o m e o n e at E a s t m a n K o d a k u n d o u b t e d l y s a i d , " M a k e per fect f i l m . "

I d o no t k n o w w h o i n the au to i n d u s t r y to c red i t w i t h th is one: " D r i v e the car w i t h the f ront w h e e l s . " F r o n t - w h e e l d r i v e cars are safer a n d m o r e m a n e u v e r a b l e .

O n e - l i n e s ta tements s u c h as these c a n l e a d to v e r y suc ­cess fu l p r o d u c t s a n d b u s i n e s s e s . If y o u r s t r a tegy is c lear , y o u c a n c o m m u n i c a t e i t e a s i l y to p e o p l e w i t h a s take i n y o u r bus i ness : e m p l o y e e s , c u s t o m e r s , v e n d o r s , s h a r e h o l d ­e rs , a n d p o t e n t i a l i n v e s t o r s . If y o u c a n n o t e x p r e s s y o u r st rategy c lear ly , y o u r v i s i o n is too b l u r r y to go f o r w a r d ; y o u w i l l was te t ime a n d m o n e y .

H e r e are the m o s t i m p o r t a n t r equ i r emen ts for success­f u l p roduc t s :

1. The product must make money for its customer. U n i t e d A i r l i n e s b u y s 777s f r o m B o e i n g b e c a u s e the n e w p l a n e a l l o w s t h e m to d e l i v e r m o r e p a s s e n g e r m i l e s at a l o w e r cost . C o m p a n y X Y Z b u y s a c o m p u t e r o r p r i n t e r o r c o p i e r b e c a u s e i t e n a b l e s t he i r a c c o u n t i n g o r p u r c h a s i n g d e p a r t m e n t to get m o r e w o r k d o n e at a l o w e r cost. A n i n d i ­v i d u a l p rac t i t i one r s u c h as a doc to r , p h o t o g r a p h e r , o r car ­penter w i l l b u y p r o d u c t s that m a k e h i m or he r a m o r e pro f ­i tab le b u s i n e s s ent i ty. If p r o d u c t s d o n o t m a k e m o n e y for b u y e r s , they w i l l r e m a i n o n the shelf .

M a n y en t rep reneurs get so c a u g h t u p i n m a k i n g m o n e y for t h e m s e l v e s , they fo rget a b o u t m a k i n g m o n e y for the i r c u s t o m e r s . T e c h n o l o g i s t s h a v e to u n d e r s t a n d that e l egan t t echno logy is no t the object ive. M a k i n g m o n e y is the objec­t ive. T h e e legant t e c h n o l o g y w i l l d i s a p p e a r un less i t m a k e s m o n e y for its user.

2. The technology must be appropriate for the application. L a s e r or x e r o g r a p h i c p r i n t i n g t echno logy is a p p r o p r i a t e fo r a d e s k t o p o r c o m p u t e r p r in te r , no t fo r a n e w s p a p e r p ress . T h e t echno logy m u s t be a p p r o p r i a t e fo r the a p p l i c a t i o n a n d the e n v i r o n m e n t . It s o u n d s s i m p l e , b u t I h a v e seen c o u n t ­less p r o d u c t s that n e v e r m a d e i t to the m a r k e t p l a c e because s o m e b o d y i g n o r e d th i s p o i n t . It is h a r d to g i v e f a m i l i a r e x a m p l e s , because these concep ts n e v e r s a w the l i gh t of the bus iness day.

3. The product must work perfectly. Japanese car m a n u f a c t u r e r s taugh t th is p r i n c i p l e to A m e r i ­c a n car manu fac tu re r s . In the 1960s, A m e r i c a n a u t o m o b i l e manu fac tu re r s d i d no t a b i d e b y that p r i n c i p l e . A s a resu l t , they a l l o w e d fo re ign m a n u f a c t u r e r s to take b i l l i o n s of d o l ­la rs ou t of the A m e r i c a n e c o n o m y .

4. The product must be easy to use. M o s t s u c c e s s f u l p r o d u c t s are u s e a b l e w i t h o u t i n s t r u c t i o n b o o k s o r w i t h m i n i m a l d i r ec t i ons . T h e c o m p u t e r i n d u s t r y

t r a d i t i o n a l l y w a n t e d p e o p l e to b e c o m e c o m p u t e r l i te ra te . Sales are i n c r e a s i n g n o w that c o m p u t e r s are b e c o m i n g p e o ­p l e l i te ra te . T h e t e l e p h o n e w a s a l w a y s u s e r f r i e n d l y . F a x f l o u n d e r e d u n t i l i n d u s t r y s t a n d a r d s w e r e e s t a b l i s h e d , a n d the m a c h i n e s b e c a m e easy to use .

K E Y STEPS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND INTRO­

DUCTION

T h e p rocess of d e v e l o p i n g a n d i n t r o d u c i n g a n e w p r o d u c t i n v o l v e s m a n y b u s i n e s s a n d techn i ca l s teps. T h e k e y po in t s are o f fe red b e l o w . T h e f i rst t w o are c l ose l y re la ted , so I w i l l ci te t h e m b o t h a n d t hen e x p l a i n t h e m together.

1. The product concept must be proved with a prototype. A p r o t o t y p e is an ea r l y c o n f i g u r a t i o n that m a y or m a y no t be i n the f o r m , shape , a n d s i ze of the u l t ima te p r o d u c t , b u t the p r o t o t y p e m u s t d o e v e r y t h i n g the p r o d u c t s h o u l d do .

2. The engineering model must be in the right configuration, and it must be shown to work in every way, in every application. A n e n g i n e e r i n g m o d e l m i g h t b e h a n d - m a d e r a t h e r t h a n m a n u f a c t u r e d , b u t i t has the same s i ze , shape , a n d c o m p o ­nents as the f i n i s h e d p r o d u c t , i n a d d i t i o n to d o i n g e v e r y ­t h i n g it s h o u l d d o .

W i t h respect to b o t h the p r o t o t y p e a n d the e n g i n e e r i n g m o d e l , too o f ten the e n g i n e e r says , "It does a l m o s t e v e r y ­t h i n g i t n e e d s to d o . W e w i l l f i x i t i n the nex t r o u n d . " It a l m o s t n e v e r gets f i x e d , fo r t w o reasons .

F i r s t o f a l l , p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t i s a n i n e l a s t i c p r o c e s s — i n m o s t cases, the o n l y w a y to a d d a n e w feature is to c o m p r o m i s e a n ex i s t i ng one. S u p p o s e y o u w a n t to d e v e l ­o p a fast, c o m p a c t , i n e x p e n s i v e cop ier . T h e eng inee r s h o w s y o u a d e s i g n that is c o m p a c t a n d i n e x p e n s i v e , b u t no t fast e n o u g h . H e says , " N o p r o b l e m , w e c a n m a k e it go faster." Bu t i f the p a p e r r u n s t h r o u g h the fuser too fast, y o u get b a d c o p y qua l i t y . Y o u c a n i m p r o v e the c o p i e s b y p u t t i n g i n a b i g g e r fuser , b u t then the c o p i e r is n o l o n g e r s m a l l a n d inex­p e n s i v e . O n l y s i m u l t a n e o u s p e r f o r m a n c e of a l l the features m a k e s a p r o d u c t r i gh t . In m o s t cases , the p r o t o t y p e s a n d e n g i n e e r i n g m o d e l s that are r i gh t are r i gh t i n the b e g i n n i n g . O t h e r w i s e , the p r o d u c t concep t is u s u a l l y no t s o u n d .

T h e s e c o n d r e a s o n w h y p r o t o t y p e s a n d e n g i n e e r i n g m o d e l s n e v e r get f i x e d is tha t the p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t p rocess c o m p r o m i s e s t h e m . T h e m a n u f a c t u r i n g p e r s o n says i t 's too cos t l y to m a n u f a c t u r e . T h e se rv ice m a n a g e r says y o u h a v e to m o v e the d o o r so a r e p a i r m a n c a n reach the gear. T h e m a r k e t i n g p e r s o n says i t 's too b i g or too heavy . W i t h o u t a s t r ong start, m o s t p r o d u c t s n e v e r m a k e i t to the f i n i s h l ine . A n d if they d o , they h a v e b e e n c o m p r o m i s e d so m u c h that t h e y ' v e b e c o m e a k l u g e a n d are n o l o n g e r cost ef fect ive i n the c u s t o m e r ' s e n v i r o n m e n t .

I a m no t s a y i n g that i n c o m p l e t e p r o t o t y p e s a n d e n g i ­n e e r i n g m o d e l s n e v e r succeed . B u t it is a n u p h i l l bat t le. In gene ra l , I t h i n k e n g i n e e r i n g m a n a g e r s n e e d to l e a r n to w e e d o u t w e a k p r o d u c t c o n c e p t s . O n e o f the m o s t i m p o r t a n t

OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS/NOVEMBER 1994 39

The Business of Optics

goa ls i n a p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t l abo ra to r y is to a v o i d g o i n g d o w n too m a n y d e a d e n d s . In m o s t o r g a n i z a t i o n s , o n l y a s m a l l p e r c e n t a g e of p r o d u c t s m a k e i t to the m a r k e t p l a c e . T h e p r o d u c t s that succeed have to absorb the d e v e l o p m e n t costs of those that d o not .

Some t imes genera l m a n a g e r s start s p e n d i n g m o n e y o n the p r o d u c t before it has been p r o v e n . W h e n a la rge c o m p a ­n y in t roduces a p r o d u c t , it has to start se l l i ng t h o u s a n d s of them at m a n y d i f fe rent l oca t i ons a l l o v e r the coun t r y , pe r ­haps a l l over the w o r l d , at the same t ime. I h a v e seen m a n ­agers start b u i l d i n g m a n u f a c t u r i n g fac i l i t ies , m a k i n g t o o l i n g , educa t i ng the sales force, p r i n t i n g b rochu res , t r a i n i n g serv ice techn ic ians, a n d so o n , fo r p r o d u c t s that n e v e r m a d e it to the marke tp lace because , l i ke the p r o t o t y p e o r the e n g i n e e r i n g m o d e l , they never ac tua l l y w o r k e d r ight . D o not let projects that fa i l to sat is fy s o m e of the d e s i g n cr i te r ia start g r o w i n g , s p e n d i n g money , a n d s p i n n i n g ou t of con t ro l . D o no t accept 50%, or e v e n 90%. M a k e sure e v e r y t h i n g is 100% r ight .

3. Early production models must meet cost objectives and stan­dards for manufacturing. In genera l , large A m e r i c a n c o m p a n i e s f o l l o w this p r i n c i p l e w e l l . In sma l l e r c o m p a n i e s , i t 's m o r e d i f f i cu l t ; en t rep reneu rs d o n ' t k n o w w h a t the m a n u f a c t u r i n g cos t i s g o i n g to b e because they are t r y i n g to b u i l d s o m e t h i n g that has n e v e r been bu i l t be fore w i t h a n o r g a n i z a t i o n that m i g h t h a v e l i t t le m a n u f a c t u r i n g exper ience .

4. Field test units must meet the requirements of the customer environment. G o to a rea l c u s t o m e r w i t h a rea l p r o d u c t a n d ask , " W h a t d o y o u t h i nk of i t ? " In the c o m p u t e r i ndus t r y , th is p rocess is ca l l ed beta tes t ing. O v e r the last decade or t w o , th is step has become m o r e ma tu re a n d m o r e v a l u a b l e .

T h e success fu l i n t r o d u c t i o n of a techn i ca l l y r i c h p r o d ­uc t requ i res r i g o r o u s t e c h n i c a l t es t i ng f o l l o w e d b y s o u n d m a r k e t i n g a n d se l l i ng t h r o u g h the a p p r o p r i a t e d i s t r i b u t i o n channe l s at the r i gh t cost . T h e m a r k e t i n g p r i n c i p l e is that everybody must make money. T h e p r o d u c t m u s t be p ro f i t ab le t h r o u g h a n d t h rough . T h e d i s t r i bu to r o r rese l ler m u s t m a k e a g o o d p ro f i t m a r g i n , the m a n u f a c t u r e r m u s t m a k e a sens i ­b l e pro f i t , a n d , m o s t i m p o r t a n t , the e n d use r m u s t bene f i t f i nanc ia l l y f r o m b u y i n g the p r o d u c t .

C R E A T I N G A FERTILE ENVIRONMENT FOR PRODUCT

D E V E L O P M E N T

A fert i le e n v i r o n m e n t is essent ia l . If the r i gh t p e o p l e are i n the r i g h t e n v i r o n m e n t , t h e y w i l l d o m o r e t h a n y o u e v e r t hough t poss ib le . In the bus iness w o r l d , the e n v i r o n m e n t is a l l i m p o r t a n t , r ega rd less of the s i ze of the en te rp r i se . T h e e n v i r o n m e n t d e p e n d s s t rong l y o n the p e r s o n a l i t y a n d s ty le of the m a n a g e m e n t , o f ten the C E O a l o n e , o r the f o u n d e r , w h o c a n f o r m a n d shape the pe rsona l i t y of the c o m p a n y b y c rea t ing an e n v i r o n m e n t w h e r e p e o p l e c a n succeed .

W h e n I l e a d p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t o r g a n i z a t i o n s w i t h i n

l a rge c o m p a n i e s , I t ry to fos ter the e n t r e p r e n e u r s h i p , c re­at iv i ty , a n d flexibility assoc ia ted w i t h s m a l l c o m p a n i e s . T h e k e y is to h e l p p e o p l e feel l i ke they are ves ted i n the en t i t y i n w h i c h they are w o r k i n g w i t h o u t c o m p r o m i s i n g the pa ren t o r g a n i z a t i o n . H e r e are s o m e techn iques I use :

1. Hold frequent informal meetings with small groups of people from all parts of the organization. I h o l d i n f o r m a l m e e t i n g s , s o m e t i m e s o v e r l u n c h , w i t h g r o u p s of 10 o r 15 p e o p l e a p p a r e n t l y p i c k e d at r a n d o m — p e o p l e w h o s e last n a m e s start w i t h J , o r w h o have a b i r t h ­d a y th is m o n t h , o r w h o got p r o m o t e d recent ly. T h e job t i t les of these p e o p l e t y p i c a l l y range f r o m techn i c i an to v i ce p r e s i ­den t . These m e e t i n g s h a v e t w o g r o u n d ru les . F i r s t , a n y o n e c a n ask a n y ques t i on . A j u n i o r t echn i c i an can l o o k m e in the eye , ask a q u e s t i o n , a n d get a n answer . These mee t i ngs c a n c o m p e n s a t e for weaknesses i n a n o r g a n i z a t i o n ; i n te rmed ia te m a n a g e r s m a y be y o u n g a n d i n e x p e r i e n c e d a n d no t k n o w h o w to g i ve c lear a n s w e r s a n d c lear d i rec t ions .

T h e s e c o n d g r o u n d r u l e i s t h a t a l l s t a t e m e n t s a r e quo tab le . T h i s ru l e b l o w s a w a y a n y m y s t i q u e of c o n f i d e n ­t ia l i ty or secrecy. I w a n t e v e r y o n e to go ou t a n d tel l thei r co l ­leagues w h a t they hear. I c a n state m y one-sentence p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t st rategy a n d expect they w i l l r e m e m b e r it a n d repeat i t for the p e o p l e w o r k i n g next to them. T h e y w i l l go ou t o n the floor a n d say, " H e y , I w a s i n a m e e t i n g w i t h Po t ­ter, a n d he sa id the target fo r the p r i n te r is 30 characters pe r s e c o n d . D i d y o u k n o w that? I t hough t it w a s 20 . "

These m e e t i n g s g i ve m e a qu ie t a n d gent le w a y of m a k ­i n g sure e v e r y b o d y gets the w o r d . M e s s a g e s t end to get d i s ­to r ted w h e n they pass t h r o u g h the m a n a g e m e n t c h a i n a n d i n to a n o r g a n i z a t i o n of h u n d r e d s o r t h o u s a n d s of p e o p l e . G o o d c o m m u n i c a t i o n c rea tes e c o n o m y o f e f fo r t . P e o p l e w h o u n d e r s t a n d the s t ra tegy d o n o t d o w r o n g t h i n g s o r was te t ime o n i r re levan t tasks , a n d that b e h a v i o r i m p r o v e s the b o t t o m l ine . It 's pa r t of s a v i n g m o n e y .

These m e e t i n g s a lso keep the w h o l e m a n a g e m e n t t e a m g l u e d together. W h e n the i n t e r m e d i a t e m a n a g e r s k n o w that c o m m u n i c a t i o n s are g o i n g to be o p e n , they d o not p u t the i r o w n s p i n o n the ma jo r ob ject ives. F o r e x a m p l e , a n i n e x p e r i ­e n c e d m a n a g e r m i g h t say p r i va te l y , " T h e p r i n te r can ' t r ea l l y w o r k at 30 charac te rs a s e c o n d , so le t 's just t ry to b u i l d a m a c h i n e that w o r k s at 20 . " If the p r i n t e r can ' t w o r k at 30, I d o no t w a n t to s p e n d a d i m e t r y i n g for 20; a 20-charac ter p r i n t e r w o u l d be a d e a d e n d .

2. Run the organization as if it were a stand-alone company. I t ry to r u n m y g r o u p s o r d i v i s i o n s as i f they w e r e s t a n d ­a lone c o m p a n i e s . I t ry to s p e n d the c o m p a n y ' s m o n e y as i f it w e r e m y o w n . I u r g e the p e o p l e w o r k i n g for m e to s p e n d the c o m p a n y ' s m o n e y as i f i t w e r e the i r o w n .

A c o r p o r a t e d i v i s i o n o p e r a t i n g a g a i n s t a b u d g e t has m a n y th ings i n c o m m o n w i t h a s ta r tup f u n d e d b y v e n t u r e cap i ta l . Y o u h a v e a cer ta in a m o u n t of m o n e y to s p e n d , y o u r o w n " b a n k a c c o u n t . " Y o u c a n b u y e q u i p m e n t , p a y sa lar ies ,

40 OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS/NOVEMBER 1994

a n d g ive raises, bu t y o u cannot s p e n d m o r e than y o u h a v e i n the b a n k . S o m e p e o p l e w h o w o r k fo r l a r g e c o r p o r a t i o n s b e h a v e as if they h a v e u n l i m i t e d m o n e y b e h i n d t h e m a n d the i r sa la r ies are g u a r a n t e e d . T h e rea l i t y is that m o n e y is str ict ly l im i ted a n d that mos t peop le ' s salar ies are not gua r ­anteed at a l l . If w e d o not p r o d u c e , o u r d i v i s i o n w i l l fa i l . T h e bus iness e n v i r o n m e n t w i l l be more creat ive a n d m o r e ener­getic if y o u do not a l l o w y o u r peop le to ignore this fact of l i fe.

3. Shield people from the bureaucracy. E v e r y la rge c o r p o r a t i o n has i ts b u r e a u c r a c y , s y s t e m s , a n d p rocedu res that c a n s o m e t i m e s be a nu i sance . S o m e c o r p o ­rate headqua r te r s h a v e a n end less d e m a n d for repor ts , fore­cas ts , o u t l o o k s , p r e s e n t a t i o n s , r e v i e w s , a n d r e - r e v i e w s . W h e n s e r v i n g as a d i v i s i o n or g r o u p off icer, I h a n d l e i tems f r om headquar te rs m y s e l f o r w i t h s o m e d iscre te h e l p . I try to m i n i m i z e the o c c a s i o n s i n w h i c h b u r e a u c r a t i c r e q u i r e ­men ts a n d processes penet ra te the o r g a n i z a t i o n . S o m e t i m e s I ask m y s u b o r d i n a t e s fo r i n f o r m a t i o n , b u t I a l w a y s m a k e the reques t m y s e l f r a t he r t h a n p r e s e n t i n g it as a r e q u e s t f rom above , so they t h i nk of i t as pa r t of o u r bus i ness .

Y o u h a v e to d e c i d e w h a t to let t h r o u g h a n d w h a t not . In m o s t cases, the m a n a g e r s h o u l d be a bu f fe r . P e o p l e d o not n e e d to k n o w h o w m a n y t imes a co rpo ra te staff r e v i e w s a d i v i s i o n p res iden t . T h e y d o n e e d to k n o w that y o u h a v e a p l a n , that y o u h a v e a b u d g e t a p p r o v e d , a n d that y o u are ope ra t i ng aga ins t it.

4. Create an egalitarian atmosphere. P e o p l e w i l l fee l ves ted i n the o r g a n i z a t i o n i f e v e r y o n e p a r ­t ic ipates as equa l s o n s o m e f u n d a m e n t a l l e v e l . T h e y m u s t u n d e r s t a n d that the i r behav io r , the i r cost c o n t r o l , a n d the i r h a r d w o r k is c o n t r i b u t i n g d i rec t l y to the o r g a n i z a t i o n ' s suc ­cess. T h e y w i l l be m o r e w i l l i n g to b e h a v e c o n s t r u c t i v e l y , con t ro l costs, w o r k h a r d , a n d m a k e sacr i f ices if y o u d o the same. I never ask p e o p l e w h o w o r k for m e to d o a n y t h i n g I w o u l d not d o myse l f .

W h e n I gave p resen ta t ions to the b o a r d of d i rec to rs , I o f ten repea ted those p resen ta t i ons w i t h i n the c o m p a n y o r d i v i s i o n a n d s h o w e d m o s t of the same s l i des to m y s u b o r d i ­nates, so they w o u l d k n o w w h a t I w a s s a y i n g to m y bosses .

W h e n m y d i v i s i o n i n Texas h a d v i s i t o r s , w e d i d n o t send l i m o u s i n e s — i n s t e a d , o u r p e o p l e me t t h e m at the a i r ­por t . W h e n w e w a n t e d to en ter ta in v i s i t o r s , w e s e r v e d t h e m a Texas-s ty le ba rbecue on p a p e r p la tes . E v e r y o n e k n e w that w e c o u l d h a v e taken t h e m to a f ancy c l u b i n D a l l a s w i t h a w a l n u t - p a n e l e d r o o m a n d s e r v e d e x p e n s i v e f o o d o n f i ne c h i n a . Bu t the e m p l o y e e s felt m o r e ves ted i n the en te rp r i se if w e treated v i s i t o rs modes t l y . T h e y we re w i l l i n g to be f r u ­g a l because m a n a g e m e n t w a s f r u g a l . T h e v i s i t o r s d i d n o t m i n d ; they k n e w that a n y m o n e y w e spen t o n t h e m w o u l d even tua l l y s h o w u p i n the p r i ces of o u r p r o d u c t s .

G O I N G I N T O B U S I N E S S

I th ink the k e y to success i n bus i ness is i n t u i t i on . I n tu i t i on is

the ab i l i t y to assemb le d i s c o n n e c t e d or i n c o m p l e t e p ieces of a s i t ua t i on i n y o u r m i n d , cor re la te the s i t ua t i on w i t h s o m e ­t h i n g i n y o u r exper ience or y o u r m e m o r y , a n d see a s o l u t i o n or a s t ra tegy that o thers m i g h t not see. In bus i nes s , as i n s c i ­ence, i n t u i t i o n g u i d e s y o u to take steps that m i g h t not m a k e sense to s o m e o n e e lse i n i t i a l l y , b u t s o o n e r or l a te r p r o v e success fu l . I t rust m y i n t u i t i o n abso lu te ly .

If y o u are a s c i e n t i s t , y o u p r o b a b l y h a v e n o t r o u b l e accep t i ng the s ta tement that the des i re to d o sc ience has to c o m e ou t of y o u r genes. It 's e q u a l l y t rue that the des i re to d o bus iness has to c o m e ou t of y o u r genes.

I h a v e w o r k e d as a d i v i s i o n p r e s i d e n t i n la rge c o m p a ­n ies a n d as p r e s i d e n t of a p u b l i c c o m p a n y . I h a v e neve r h a d A c c o u n t i n g 101, n e v e r taken a b u s i n e s s cou rse of any k i n d . I l e a r n e d f i n a n c i a l m a n a g e m e n t o n the job. W h e n I w a s an e n g i n e e r i n g m a n a g e r , I w a t c h e d s o m e of t he v e r y bes t f i n a n c i a l p e o p l e g i v e p r e s e n t a t i o n s a n d l e a r n e d h o w they w e r e a n a l y z i n g i n f o r m a t i o n . I m i g h t h a v e b e e n bet ter off ge t t ing a n M . B . A . , b u t I d o u b t it.

In m a n y w a y s , b u s i n e s s is m u c h s i m p l e r t han sc ience. F o r e x a m p l e , to t u r n a r o u n d a b u s i n e s s that is l o s i n g m o n e y , y o u h a v e to d o two t h i n g s , w h i c h y o u c a n express i n f i ve w o r d s : sell more and spend less. Tha t p r i n c i p l e is no t nea r l y as c o m p l e x as the t heo ry of coheren t l igh t .

D o n ' t unde res t ima te the d i f f i cu l t y of m a k i n g money . It is hard to make money. It is h a r d to create a n e w t echno logy a n d d e v e l o p it i n to a n e w p r o d u c t . It is e v e n ha r de r to cre­ate a c o m p a n y a n d m a r k e t a n e w p r o d u c t . A l l these tasks take lots of h a r d w o r k .

O n the o t h e r h a n d , i t i s p e r f e c t l y p o s s i b l e to m a k e m o n e y , a n d there are a lo t of w a y s to d o it, a l l of w h i c h d e p e n d o n the i n d i v i d u a l , t he o p p o r t u n i t y , the t i m i n g , t he b u s i n e s s e n v i r o n m e n t , a n d the s ta te o f t e c h n o l o g y . W e h a v e the o p p o r t u n i t i e s of a f ree e n t e r p r i s e s y s t e m i n the e n v i r o n m e n t o f c a p i t a l i s m , w h i c h a l l o w s i n d i v i d u a l s a c h a n c e to se lec t a n y rou te t hey c h o o s e — a s a n e n t r e p r e ­n e u r , as a s a l a r i e d sc ien t i s t i n a n i n d u s t r i a l l a b o r a t o r y , as a t e c h n i c a l l y c o m p e t e n t b u s i n e s s e x e c u t i v e , o r m a n y o the r w a y s . F u r t h e r m o r e , m a k i n g m o n e y m e a n s d i f f e ren t t h i n g s to d i f f e ren t p e o p l e . If y o u go i n t o b u s i n e s s , c h o o s e a r o u t e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h y o u r n e e d s , y o u r t a l e n t s , a n d y o u r a s p i r a t i o n s . M o s t i m p o r t a n t , c h o o s e a r o u t e that y o u en joy .

R O B E R T J . P O T T E R provides business consulting to a variety of large and small corporations as well as indi­viduals, mostly on new product and technolo­gy issues. Currently, his primary consulting assignment is as vice president for business development of the Communications and Elec­tronics Industries Practice of EDS Manage­ment Consulting Services. Potter was elected an OSA Fellow in 1966 and was the first chairman of the OSA Technical Council in 1968. He lives in Irving, Texas.

OPTICS & PHOTONICS NEWS/NOVEMBER 1994 41