management of deep overbite

35
Management of Deep Overbite Presented by Dr.Md. Sher Ali BDS(Dhaka) BCS(Health) FCPS Part II Trainee Dept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, DDCH.

Upload: ishfaq-ahmad

Post on 12-Feb-2017

42 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


10 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Management of deep overbite

Management of Deep Overbite

Presented byDr.Md. Sher AliBDS(Dhaka)BCS(Health) FCPS Part II TraineeDept. of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, DDCH.

Page 2: Management of deep overbite
Page 3: Management of deep overbite
Page 4: Management of deep overbite

Types of deep bite• Congenital deep bite (skeletal and

dentoalveolar).• Acquired deep bite.

Page 5: Management of deep overbite

1. Skeletal deep bite, characterized by a horizontal

growth factor. The anterior facial height is reduced;especially the

lower third of the face, meanwhile the posterior facial height is excessive.

When the anterior facial height is lesser than the posterior facial height the maxillary bases converge and the result is a deep bite of skeletal origin.

Skeletal deep bite

Page 6: Management of deep overbite
Page 7: Management of deep overbite

2. Dentoalveolar deep bite is characterized by molar infraclusion and/or incisor overeruption.

Deep bite produced by molar infraclusion presents the following characteristics:

a) The molars have erupted partially. b) The inter occlusal space is simple. c) The tongue occupies a lateral position. d) The distances between the basal planes of both maxillas and the

occlusal plane are short The deep bite produced by the over eruption of the incisors presents

the following characteristics: a) The incisor edges of the incisors exceed the occlusal plane. b) The molars have erupted completely. c) The Spee curve is excessive. d) The inter occlusal space is reduced.

Dentoalveolar deep bite

Page 8: Management of deep overbite

Acquired deep bite can be caused by the following factors:

1. The lateral posture of the tongue. 2. The premature loss of deciduous molars

or permanent posterior molars. 3. Wear of the occlusal surface or dental

abrasion.

Acquired deep bite

Page 9: Management of deep overbite

The three fundamental orthodontic treatment strategiesfor deep bite correction (not including the surgical option)

are: 1. extrusion of posterior teeth;2. flaring of anterior teeth;3. and intrusion of upper and/or lower incisors.

These effects are most often achieved biomechanically via bite plates,

reverse curve archwires, step bends in archwires, and intrusion arches .

Treatment Strategies forCorrection of Deep Bite

Page 10: Management of deep overbite

Extrusion of posterior teeth is one of the most common methods to correct deep overbite . This can be an efficacious method of bite opening.

One millimeter of upper or lower molar extrusion effectively reduces the incisor overlap by 1.5–2.5 mm. A very common method to extrude posterior teeth in patients with a deep curve of Spee is to level the arches with the sequential use of straight continuous archwires.

A close variation of this technique is to use mandibular reverse curve of Spee and/or maxillary exaggerated curve of Spee wires. Progressively increasing step bends in an archwire or

Extrusion of Posterior Teeth

Page 11: Management of deep overbite

purposely altering bracket placement heights also reduces overbite. Other common treatment options include the use of a bite plate,

which allows the posterior teeth to erupt, thereby reducing the overbite.

Extrusion of posterior teeth is indicated in patients with a short lower facial height, excessive curve of Spee, and moderate-to-minimal incisor display.

The stability of posterior extrusion may be questionable in nongrowing patients.

For patients with long lower facial heights, excessive incisor display, or overeruption of upper incisors, true incisor intrusion is indicated.

The major disadvantages of correcting deep overbite by extrusion are an excessive incisor display, an increase in the interlabial gap, and worsening of a gingival smile

Page 12: Management of deep overbite
Page 13: Management of deep overbite
Page 14: Management of deep overbite
Page 15: Management of deep overbite
Page 16: Management of deep overbite

Bite plates and reverse curve of Spee wires both are frequently used to correct deep overbite.

Bite plates and devices bonded to the lingual of the upper

incisors to disclude posterior teeth almost invariably extrude posterior teeth.

Reverse curve of Spee wires correct deep bite primarilyby extrusion of posterior teeth , along with flaring of incisors. Both extrusion and flaring may be unstable movements in many patients due to their effect on the facial neuromuscular balance.

Reverse curve of Spee wires also alter the axial inclinations of posterior teeth, which may also contribute to relapse

Page 17: Management of deep overbite

An increase in proclination of upper and lower incisors can effectively decrease deep overbite.

Flaring incisors tends to decrease overbite secondary to the rotational movement of the incisor crowns .

For mild-to-moderate corrections, this approach may be very effective.

This option may be best indicated in patients with lingually tipped incisors, such as in Class II, Division 2 patients, or Class III malocclusions that can withstand flaring of the upper and lower incisors.

The risk of flaring teeth include stability of proclined incisors because of the possible disturbance of the perioral neuromuscular balance

Flaring of Anterior Teeth

Page 18: Management of deep overbite
Page 19: Management of deep overbite

Intrusion of upper and/or lower incisors is a desirable method to correct deep bite in many adolescent and adult patients .

Intrusion of incisors is most reliably accomplished if a pure intrusive force is applied to the incisors. Intrusion is particularly indicated in deep bite patients with a large vertical dimension, excessive incision–stomion distance, and a large interlabial gap.

Intrusion of Incisors

Page 20: Management of deep overbite
Page 21: Management of deep overbite

Soft Tissue Considerations A careful clinical examination of a patient’s soft tissue facial

features can help in strategy selection between extrusion of molars and intrusion of upper and/or lower incisors.

The face is evaluated in frontal and profile views , both with relaxed lips and lips closed.

Facial evaluation should include an assessment of the interlabial gap, incision–stomion distance

(incisor display), and lip support with the upper and lower lips in their relaxed position.

Observation of the patient during an unforced smile is also important to determine the relationship of the upper lip to the gingival line, as well as the smile line

Treatment Plan Considerations

Page 22: Management of deep overbite

In a relaxed lip position, an interlabial gap of 3–4 mm is considered esthetically acceptable.

The interlabial gap is increased in children with a long vertical dimension and/or respiratory obstruction.

Maintaining an acceptable interlabial gap should be considered when selecting a strategy for deep overbite correction. If a patient exhibits an excessive interlabial gap, the objective should be to help reduce the discrepancy, if possible, or at least to avoid worsening the problem.

Class II, Division 1 patients with deep overbite, normal-to-long lower facial heights, and increased anterior vertical dimension, frequently present with these associated concerns.

Extrusion of the posterior teeth increases the lower vertical dimension by rotating the mandible downward and backward thereby worsening an already excessive interlabial gap.

Interlabial Gap

Page 23: Management of deep overbite
Page 24: Management of deep overbite

In a clinical situation where a patient’s incisor display at rest (the distance of the upper incisal edge to the lower lip, or the incision–stomion distance) measures 3–4 mm, with a deep overbite and a normal-to-long vertical dimension, the treatment of choice may be intrusion of the lower incisors.

In adult patients, intrusion of the upper incisors should only be planned if the incision–stomion distance is >3 mm. A vast number of these patients with deep overbite often benefit from lower incisor intrusion, as its display increases with age.

Upper Incisor Display

Page 25: Management of deep overbite

Evaluating a natural smile provides valuable information for planning deep overbite correction.

The upper lip, upper incisors, gingival levels, and lower lip contour interrelate in an esthetic smile .

The arc of the upper teeth should follow the curvature of the lower lip and the upper lip should be at or slightly above the upper gingival line.

Females frequently show more gingiva on smiling than males. Planning deep overbite correction with these important esthetic considerations aids in determining appropriate individualized treatment goals.

Smile Line

Page 26: Management of deep overbite
Page 27: Management of deep overbite

Upper lip length can also contribute to the overall dental esthetics of the patient at rest or smiling.

A short upper lip may play a role in an excessive interlabial gap, the appearance of excessively long maxillary anterior crown lengths, or a gummy smile.

Upper incisor intrusion is a valuable alternative for patients with deep overbite and a short upper lip.

Lip Length

Page 28: Management of deep overbite
Page 29: Management of deep overbite

The most favorable crown–gingival relationship is for the central incisors and canine gingival margins to be higher than the lateral incisor margins.

The canine and central incisors should be at similar levels. This idealized “high– low–high” appearance of the gingival line of the

maxillary incisors improves the harmony of a smile. Class II, Division 2 malocclusions commonly show severe discrepancies

in this relationship. the central incisor gingival margins are far more occlusal than the canine margins.

This relationship can be corrected efficiently by anterior intrusion of the four incisors.

In patients with a larger discrepancy, the central incisors can be intruded first to the level of the lateral incisors.

Further deep overbite correction with intrusion of all four incisors may follow to obtain the proper gingival relationship with the canine.

In select cases, gingivectomy may further enhance this appearance.

Crown–Gingival Relationships

Page 30: Management of deep overbite
Page 31: Management of deep overbite

Three skeletal considerations can significantly affect the outcome of overbite correction in patients:

1. Vertical dimension; 2. anteroposterior relationship of the maxilla to the mandible; 3. and in younger patients,the amount of growth remaining

and its direction. Extrusion is contraindicated in patients with excessive lower

facial heights. In brachyfacial (short face) patients with deep overbite

malocclusions, increasing the vertical dimension through posterior extrusion may be advised.

It is important to consider function in these patients as a strong musculature increases the risk of post-treatment relapse.

Skeletal Considerations

Page 32: Management of deep overbite
Page 33: Management of deep overbite

Intrusion of Incisors and Apical Root Resorption A major risk factor associated with orthodontic

treatment is external apical root resorption. While the prevalence of root resorption

secondary to tooth movement appears to be high, reports average 1–2 mm for upper incisors with 2–3% of patients showing a loss of up to 4 mm.

An average intrusion of 2–3 mm and apical root resorption of 1.0 mm was found.

Clinical Concerns with Intrusion

Page 34: Management of deep overbite

The stability of deep overbite correction may be dependent on the specific nature of its correction (intrusion, extrusion, or flaring).

Additionally, various factors, such as growth and neuromuscular adaptation, may play a

role in relapse.

Stability and Relapse of DeepOverbite Correction

Page 35: Management of deep overbite

Thank You