major hemorrhagic events (acute phase) no significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

38
ESSENCE Study D esign Study D esign Enoxaparin 1 m g/kg every 12 h subcutaneous + ASA UFH IV dose adjusted + A S A U nstable angina U nstable angina Non Non-Q - w ave M I w ave M I Treatm entphase m inim um 48 h m axim um 8 days Follow -up phase M I,m yocardial infarction ASA,acetylsalicylic acid U FH ,unfractionated heparin IV,intravenous C ohen M ,etal.N E ngl J Med 1997;337:447-52 ‡G oodm an SG , etal. J A m C oll C ardiol 2000 (in press) Follow Follow - up up call call 1 Year 1 Year Follow Follow - up up call call D ay 30 D ay 30 Follow Follow - up up visit visit D ay 14 D ay 14 Follow Follow - up up call call D ay 30 D ay 30 Follow Follow - up up visit visit D ay 14 D ay 14 Follow Follow - up up call call 1 Year 1 Year

Upload: katen

Post on 23-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase) No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage. 60. Number of patients. NS. UFH. Enoxaparin. 40. NS. NS. 20. 0. ESSENCE n = 3171. TIMI 11B n = 3910. TESSMA n = 7081. UFH, unfractionated heparin; NS, not significant. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

ESSENCE

Study DesignStudy Design

Enoxaparin1 mg/kg every

12 h subcutaneous

+ ASA

UFHIV dose

adjusted + ASA

Unstable anginaUnstable anginaNonNon--QQ--wave MIwave MI

Treatment phaseminimum 48 h

maximum 8 days

Follow-up phaseMI, myocardial infarctionASA, acetylsalicylic acid UFH, unfractionated heparinIV, intravenous

Cohen M, et al. N Engl J Med 1997;337:447-52

‡Goodman SG, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 (in press)

FollowFollow--up up callcall

1 Year1 Year‡‡

FollowFollow--up up callcall

Day 30Day 30

FollowFollow--up up visitvisit

Day 14Day 14

FollowFollow--up up callcall

Day 30Day 30

FollowFollow--up up visitvisit

Day 14Day 14

FollowFollow--up up callcall

1 Year1 Year‡‡

Page 2: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

2525

2020

1515

1010

55

00

22 44 66 88 1010 1212 1414 1616 1818 2020 2222 2424 2626 2828 3030

UFHEnoxaparin

Days from randomizationDays from randomization

% o

f pat

ient

s w

ith e

vent

s%

of p

atie

nts

with

eve

nts

P=0.019

P=0.017

Cohen M, et al. N Engl J Med 1997;337:447-52

MI, myocardial infarctionRA, recurrent anginaUFH, unfractionated heparin

Time to First Event over 30 Days: Death, MI, Recurrent AnginaTime to First Event over 30 Days: Death, MI, Recurrent AnginaSuperiority ofSuperiority of enoxaparinenoxaparin was maintained to 30 dayswas maintained to 30 days

15 % Risk Reduction

LMWH in ACS LMWH in ACS -- ESSENCE trail ESSENCE trail

Page 3: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

ESSENCE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14MonthsMonths

Cum

ulat

ive

even

t rat

e (%

)C

umul

ativ

e ev

ent r

ate

(%)

1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

MI, myocardial infarctionRA, recurrent anginaUFH, unfractionated heparin

Time to Event at 1 Year: Death, MI, Recurrent AnginaTime to Event at 1 Year: Death, MI, Recurrent AnginaSuperior efficacy ofSuperior efficacy of enoxaparinenoxaparin was maintained to 1 yearwas maintained to 1 year

EnoxaparinUFH

Fox KAA. Heart 1998;82: I12-I14

P = 0.02

P = 0.02

Page 4: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

ESSENCESafetySafety

Risk of majorRisk of major haemorrhagichaemorrhagic events was similar in both groupsevents was similar in both groups

HaemorrhageHaemorrhageMajorMajor 107 (7.0%)107 (7.0%) 102 (6.5%)102 (6.5%) 0.570.57MinorMinor 110 (7.2%)110 (7.2%) 188 (11.9%)188 (11.9%) < 0.001< 0.001

StrokeStroke 7 (0.5%)7 (0.5%) 7 (0.4%)7 (0.4%) NSNSHaemorrhagicHaemorrhagic 1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%) 00 NSNSNonNon--haemorrhagichaemorrhagic 6 (0.4%)6 (0.4%) 7 (0.4%)7 (0.4%) NSNS

TransientTransient ischaemicischaemic attackattack 8 (0.5%)8 (0.5%) 1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%) NSNS

Drop in platelet countDrop in platelet count 56 (3.7%)56 (3.7%) 39 (2.5%)39 (2.5%) 0.080.08(> 50% from baseline)(> 50% from baseline)

UFHUFH EnoxaparinEnoxaparin P P valuevalue((nn=1529)=1529) ((nn=1578)=1578)

Cohen M, et al. N Engl J Med 1997;337:447-52UFH, unfractionated heparinNS, non-significant

Page 5: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

TIMI 11BTime to First Event (Triple Endpoint): Acute PhaseTime to First Event (Triple Endpoint): Acute Phase

Event rate significantly reduced at 48 h in enoxaparin groupEvent rate significantly reduced at 48 h in enoxaparin group10 10 –

8 8 –

6 6 –

4 4 –

2 2 –

0088 1616 3232 4040 4848 5656 7272

UFHEnoxaparin

Hours from randomizationHours from randomization

% o

f pat

ient

s w

ith e

vent

s%

of p

atie

nts

with

eve

nts 7.3%

5.5%

Relative risk reduction 23.8%

P=0.029

Triple endpoint, death/myocardial infarction/urgent revascularization UFH, unfractionated heparin

Antman EM, et al. Circulation

1999;100:1593-1601

Page 6: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

TIMI 11BTime to First Event (Triple Endpoint): Chronic PhaseTime to First Event (Triple Endpoint): Chronic PhaseEarly treatment benefit of enoxaparin sustained over 14 daysEarly treatment benefit of enoxaparin sustained over 14 days

UFHEnoxaparin

Days from randomizationDays from randomization

% o

f pat

ient

s w

ith e

vent

s%

of p

atie

nts

with

eve

nts 14.5%

12.4%

Relative risk reduction 15%P=0.048

16.7%

14.2%

44

88

1212

1616

2020

00 22 44 66 88 1010 1212 1414Antman EM, et al.

Circulation 1999;100:1593-1601

Triple endpoint, death/myocardial infarction/urgent revascularization UFH, unfractionated heparin

Page 7: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

TIMI 11BTime to First Event (Triple Endpoint): Chronic PhaseTime to First Event (Triple Endpoint): Chronic Phase

Superior efficacy of enoxaparin maintained to 43 daysSuperior efficacy of enoxaparin maintained to 43 days

UFHEnoxaparin

Days from randomizationDays from randomization

% o

f pat

ient

s w

ith e

vent

s%

of p

atie

nts

with

eve

nts

Relative risk reduction 12%P=0.048

19.7%

17.3%

44

88

1212

1616

2020

00 88 1616 2424 3232 4040 4343

Antman EM, et al.

Circulation 1999;100:1593-1601

Triple endpoint, death/myocardial infarction/urgent revascularization UFH, unfractionated heparin

Page 8: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase) No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

0

20

40

60

ESSENCEn = 3171

TIMI 11Bn = 3910

TESSMAn = 7081

UFHEnoxaparin

Antman EM et al. Circulation 1999;100:1602-8UFH, unfractionated heparin; NS, not significant

NS

NS

NS

Num

ber o

f pati

ents

Page 9: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

GUSTO VBenefit vs. risk

Death or re-MISevere / moderatehemorrhage

Reteplase

Abciximab+ reteplase

8.8%

7.4%

2.3%

4.6%

D = 2.3%P < 0.001

D = 1.4%P = 0.001

0 2 4 6 8 10246Percentage of patients

GUSTO V Investigators. Lancet. 2001;357:1905.

Page 10: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

FRAXIS2 (nadroparin)n=3468

FRIC3 (dalteparin)n=1482

TIMI 11B4 (enoxaparin)n=3910

ESSENCE5 (enoxaparin)n=3171

RRR-20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

3.9%

0%

-14.9%

-16.2%

1. Cohen M. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999;25(suppl 3):113-212. The FRAXIS study group. Eur Heart J 1999;20:1553-62 3. Klein W, et al. Circulation 1997;96:61-8 4. Antman EM, et al. Circulation 1999;100:1593-601 5. Cohen M, et al N Engl J Med 1997;337:447-52

LMWH superior UFH superior

Non ST Elevation MI/ Unstable Angina Non ST Elevation MI/ Unstable Angina Myocardial Infarction: Composite Endpoints Myocardial Infarction: Composite Endpoints

at 14 Daysat 14 Days11

Relative RiskRatio (RRR) Significance

NS

P=0.03

P=0.02

NS

Page 11: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

LowLow--MolecularMolecular--Weight HeparinsWeight HeparinsAnti-Facotr Xa : Anti - Factor IIa Ratios

Agent Trade Xa:IIa Mol Wt (d)

Enoxaparin Lovenox 3.8 : 1 4,200Dalteparin Fragmin 2.7 : 1 6,000Ardeparin Normiflo 1.9 : 1 6,000Nadroparin 3.6 : 1 4,500Reviparin 3.5 : 1 4,000Tinzaparin 1.9 : 1 4,500

Page 12: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

MontalescotG, et al. JAmColl Cardiol2000;36:110-4

vWF(%)

100

80

60

40

20

0

P=0.0006

Dalteparin120 IU anti-Xa/kg bid

Enoxaparin1 mg/kg (100 IU anti-Xa/kg) bid

UFH 5000 IU anti-Xai.v. bolus thenaPTT-adjusted continuous infusion

NS

Release of vonRelease of vonWillebrandWillebrandFactor (Factor (vWFvWF))

Enoxaparinreleases lessvWF, resulting in reducedplatelet aggregation

compared with UFH ordalteparinat approved treatment doses for unstable angina/

non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

UFH,unfractionatedheparin LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparinaPTT, activated partialthromboplastintime

Page 13: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

Indirect thrombin inhibitorLess reversibleDifficult to monitor

(no aPTT or ACT)Renally clearedLong half-lifeRisk of HIT

DisadvantagesIncreased anti-Xa to anti-IIa

activity inhibits thrombin generation more effectively

Induces ↑ release of TFPI vs UFH

Not neutralized by platelet factor 4

Less binding to plasma proteins (eg, acute-phase reactant proteins) more

consistent anticoagulationLower rate of HIT vs UFH Lower fibrinogen levels Easy to administer (SC

administration)Long history of clinical

studies and experience, FDA-approved indications

Monitoring typically unnecessary

Advantages

Hirsh J, et al. Circulation. 2001;103:2994-3018. TFPI = tissue factor pathway inhibitor; UFH = unfractionated heparin; SC = subcutaneous; aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time ;

ACT = activated coagulation time.

Page 14: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

ATIIa

Hep

UFH

IIaS

C

Direct antithrombin

LMWH

AT Xa

Page 15: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Clot Burden in ACS patient

Page 16: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Heparin fails to effectively inhibit Clot-bound Thrombin

Page 17: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Bivalirudin inhibitsClot-Bound and Circulating Thrombin

Page 18: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Bivalirudin Does not activate Platelets

Page 19: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Bivalirudin: Unique mechanism of action overcomes the limitation of Heparin

Page 20: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage
Page 21: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage
Page 22: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage
Page 23: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage
Page 24: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage
Page 25: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Compared to Heparin/Enoxaparin with GP IIb/IIa inhibitors,Bivalirudin monotherapy significantly reduces major bleeding while providing similar ischemic protection, and improves net clinical

outcome.

Bivalirudin Advantage

Page 26: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

ATIIa

Hep

UFH

IIaS

C

Direct antithrombin

LMWH

AT Xa AT Xa

Pentasaccharide

Page 27: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

IIa II

Fibrinogen Fibrin clot

Extrinsic pathway

Intrinsicpathway

AT XaAT AT

Fondaparinux

Xa

Antithrombin

Fondaparinux: A Synthetic Factor Xa Inhibitor

Adapted with permission from Turpie AGG et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:619.

THROMBIN

Page 28: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Key Steps in Coagulation Pathway

Inhibition of one molecule of factor Xa can inhibit the

generation of 50 molecules of thrombin2

Intrinsic pathway Extrinsic pathway

1 .Rosenberg RD, Aird WC. N Engl J Med 1999;340(20):1555–64.2 .Wessler S, Yin ET. Thrombo Diath Haemorrh 1974;32(1):71–8.

Intrinsic pathway

1

50

Xa X

IIFibrinFibrinogen

Clot

Xa

Va

PLCa2+

IIa

VIIIa

Ca2+

PL

IXa

Page 29: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Herbert JM et al. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 1997;15:1 .van Boeckel CAA et al. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1993;32:1671 .

·Once daily administration ·Rapid onset (Cmax/2=25 min)·Half life: 15-18 h.·Effects reversible with administration

of activated Factor VII (Novoseven®)·No liver metabolism·Renal clearance·No protein binding (other than AT)·No reported cases of HIT·No dose adjustment necessary in

elderly

Fondaparinux: A Synthetic Inhibitor of Factor Xa

Page 30: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

12,000 Patients with STEMI < 12 h of symptom onsetInclusion: ST 2 mm prec leads or 1 mm limb leads

Exclusion: Contra-ind. for anticoagulant, INR>1.8, pregnancy, ICH<12 mo.

UFH not indicated

OASIS-6: Randomized, Double Blind

Lytics (SK, TPA, TNK, RPA), Primary PCI or no reperfusion (eg. late)

Stratification

UFH indicatedRandomization Randomization

Fondaparinux2.5 mg Placebo Fondaparinux

2.5 mg UFH JAMA 2006;295:1519-30

Page 31: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Primary Efficacy OutcomeDeath/MI at 30 Days

Days

Cum

ulati

ve H

azar

d0.0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

UFH/Placebo

Fondaparinux

HR 0.86 95% CI 0.77-0.96

P=0.008

The OASIS-6 Trial Group. JAMA 2006;295:1519-30

Page 32: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Death or MI 3 or 6 months

Days

Cum

ulati

ve H

azar

d

0.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.1

00.1

2

0 18 36 54 72 90 108 126 144 162 180

UFH/Placebo

Fondaparinux

HR 0.88 95% CI 0.79-0.99

P=0.029

The OASIS-6 Trial Group. JAMA 2006;295:1519-30

Page 33: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

•Primary: Efficacy: Death, MI, refractory ischemia 9 day

Safety: Major bleeds

Risk benefit: Death, MI, refractory ischemia, major bleeds•Secondary: Above & each component (especially deaths) at 30 & 180 d•Hypothesis: First test non-inferiority, then test superiority

Page 34: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Death at 6 Months

Days

Cum

ulati

ve H

azar

d0.0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

HR 0.8995% CI 0.79-0.99

p=0.037

Enoxaparin

Fondaparinux

Page 35: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Death or MI: 6 Months

Days

Cum

ulati

ve H

azar

d0.0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

HR 0.9195% CI 0.84-0.99

p=0.036

Enoxaparin

Fondaparinux

Page 36: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Major Bleeding: 6 Months

Days

Cum

ulati

ve H

azar

d

0.00.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

HR 0.7295% CI 0.63-0.82

p<<0.00001

Enoxaparin

Fondaparinux

Page 37: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Death, MI, RI or Major Bleeding at 6 Months

Days

Cum

ulati

ve H

azar

d0.0

0.05

0.10

0.15

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Enoxaparin

Fondaparinux

HR 0.8795% CI 0.81-0.93

p<<0.00001

Page 38: Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase)  No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage

Fondaparinux

•Difficult to monitor (no aPTT or ACT)

•Long half-life•Catheter thrombosis

during PCI

DisadvantagesAdvantages•SC administration

―Potential exists for outpatient

management•Once-daily

administration•Predictable

anticoagulant response•Fixed dose•No antigenicity•Potentially no need for

serologic parameters•Does not cross the

placenta•HIT antibodies do not

cross-react•Decreased bleeding

complications vs UFH or LMWH

Simoons ML, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2183-2190.Yusuf S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2066;354:1464-1476 .