· main investor project company . pwc trend – central europe/russia/middle east financing...
TRANSCRIPT
Financing alternatives Which have been most effective and why?
www.pwc.com
IFENC
May 2016
PwC
Government’s role
03
Agenda
Financing alternatives
2
May 2016
Other Factors
02
Financing alternatives
01
PwC
Government’s role
03
Financing alternatives
3
May 2016
Other Factors
02
Financing alternatives
01
PwC
Financing options
Financing alternatives
4
May 2016
Government funded
Corporate/ on balance
sheet
Build-own-operate (‘BOO’)
Mankala
Exceltium
Vendor financing
Government Guaranteed
7 nuclear financing
models globally
PwC
(Traditional) Nationalised Industry
Financing alternatives
5
May 2016
Government
Project company
Shareholding/ Finance
Profits
PwC
Balance Sheet/Corporate Debt
Financing alternatives
6
May 2016
Nuclear New Build Holding Company Board
Corporate debt Corporate
debt Corporate
debt
NNB Site Licensee Company
PwC
BOO(D)
Financing alternatives
7
May 2016
Host Government
Technology Government
(ECA)
Project Company Initially 100%
No less than 51%
PPA PPA
Localisation requirements Technology, fuel, other
goods and services
Financing
Site?
PwC
French Exceltium
Financing alternatives
8
May 2016
Financing Upfront payment to secure electricity
Monthly payments on contracted volumes (risk sharing)
Nuclear project
Electricity – EDF portfolio
(Government) Developer
companye.g. EDF Exceltium
Consortium of banks – non recourse senior debt plus junior debt
24 year supply agreement 148Twh baseload Price - fixed and
variable elements
Guarantors
25+ Eligible Investors –Diverse industrial sectors
Power – Own use or sell into open market
Equity
PwC
Finnish Mankala
Financing alternatives
9
May 2016
Financing mix of corporate debt, vendor loans, ECA financing, bilateral loans
Power company
Finnish industrial retail and service enterprises
Electricity
Regional and local energy companies
Main investor
Project company
PwC
Trend – Central Europe/Russia/Middle East
Financing alternatives
10
May 2016
Government
(Government) developer
ECA Debt
Owner Co Op Co
Power purchaser
EPC/FSA/LTMA
Shareholder Agreement
Shareholder Agreement
Potential (incorporated) JV Partner (s)
(Technology Provider)
Power Purchase Arrangements
PwC
Sharing risks Balancing regulatory and financing requirements
Financing alternatives
11
May 2016
Commercial ECA Parents/
Corporate lending
Debt Equity Equity
Owner Co
Offtaker Operator Co
EPC, FSA, LTSA etc.
PwC
Government’s role
03
Financing alternatives
12
May 2016
Other Factors
02
Financing alternatives
01
PwC
Risks
Long term investment and financing:
• 5 – 7 construction period
• 40 years operation
• 15 – 18 year pay back period for debt (OECD arrangement for ECA)
• Refinancing
• Risk register needs be compiled for stakeholders inc. financiers e.g.:
• Interface risks
• Technology risks/ transfer
• Delays
• Cost overruns/ variations
• Regulatory
• Decommissioning and waste policies
• Off-take
Financing alternatives
13
May 2016
PwC
Structuring (Owner/Operator) Model is evolving
Benefits in splitting
• Export credit agencies ('ECAs') and other lenders may be more comfortable lending to a company that is not a nuclear licensed company
• Third party liability strict liability of the Operator
• Allows different ownership options for different entities
Challenges in splitting
• Regulatory approval process
• Needs contract for site management and operating including funding between Owner and Operator
Financing alternatives
Traditionally, Owner and Operator roles are combined in one legal entity, the Site Licensee Company ('SLC'); however internationally, the market is moving to having 2 or more legal entities, 1) as Owner and 2) as Operator (the Operator being the SLC). All stakeholders will want to agree the structure.
14
May 2016
PwC
Capability requirements – in-house or supply chain
Financing alternatives
15
May 2016
Controlling mind and
intelligent / knowledgeable
customer
Contracting/ out-sourced capabilities
In-house core capabilities
PwC
EPCM
Financing alternatives
16
May 2016
Equity
Developer
EPCM
1
Equity ECA Other
Technical support
2 3 4 5 6 7
PwC
EPC
Financing alternatives
17
May 2016
Vendor Equity
Developer
EPC
Equity ECAs Others
PwC
Government’s role
03
Financing alternatives
18
May 2016
Other Factors
02
Financing alternatives
01
PwC
Role of Government
Financing alternatives
19
May 2016
• Policy supporting the development of nuclear power plant – cross party
• Providing a strong rule of law
• Stable environment for the development of new nuclear by the private sector
• Partial owner/developer
• Insurer of last resort including nuclear liability
• Guarantor of debt
• Guarantor of off-take agreement/offtaker
• Decommissioning and waste management solution
PwC
Government’s role
03
Financing alternatives
20
May 2016
Other Factors
02
Financing alternatives
01
Conclusion
PwC
Summary
• Bespoke solutions
• Be clear what your objectives are
• Government has a key role to play in every country
• Define structure/ procurement strategy/ framework early with stakeholders
• Drive alignment/integration of procurement and funding activities
• Early but balanced engagement with market, financiers, equity and government
• Don’t take the project too far in developing the project before engaging the market
• Create a manageable and realistic roadmap to completing the financing jigsaw!
Financing alternatives
21
May 2016
PwC
For over 20 years Fiona has been involved with projects in the nuclear industry. She remains a highly regarded specialist, particularly by industry, in the nuclear market. She is familiar with and has worked on all aspects of the nuclear cycle from new build and licensing to decommissioning, fuel storage and waste management.
She has a detailed understanding of the international regulatory framework within which the nuclear industry works and frequently advises on liability regimes and nuclear insurance, regulatory and reporting requirements, the development of regulatory regimes, feasibility studies and structuring as well as the financing, development, construction, operation and maintenance of nuclear stations and the fabrication, reprocessing and storage of nuclear fuel and waste.
She has a detailed understanding of the international regulatory framework within which the nuclear industry works and frequently advises on liability regimes and nuclear insurance, regulatory and reporting requirements, the development of regulatory regimes, feasibility studies and structuring as well as the financing, development, construction, operation and maintenance of nuclear stations and the fabrication, reprocessing and storage of nuclear fuel and waste.
She is recognised as an expert in the development and financing of nuclear projects by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and has served as a designated expert on the financing, development and structuring of nuclear projects and on decommissioning and waste funding at special meetings of the IAEA.
She is co-author of the chapter on the resolution of disputes in the nuclear industry in “Dispute Resolution in the Energy Sector: A Practitioner’s Handbook.”
Fiona has worked on nuclear new build projects in the UK, Central Europe, Russia and the Middle East and has worked on life extension, decommissioning and fuel management project.
Fiona Reilly PwC | Capital Projects and Infrastructure – Global nuclear lead
22
PwC
Understanding of the nuclear market
Financing alternatives
23
May 2016
We advise on nuclear new-build, operational nuclear issues and on decommissioning and waste management
We understand policy, regulatory and financing issues associated with the nuclear sector and why certain solutions are not universally applicable.
We know participants and stakeholders across the globe
We understand the risks faced by participants in different countries and different parts of the value chain
Mining
Conversion
Enrichment
Fabrication
Reactor construction
Power generation
Decommissioning
Storage
Reprocessing
Vitrification
Disposal
PwC
Experienced in the global nuclear market
Financing alternatives
24
May 2016
The financing of new build projects (including the use of export credit agency and multilateral borrowing sources)
Structuring projects to achieve an optimal finance solution
PPA and CfDs, and other regulatory and revenue models
Government support mechanisms, including guarantees
Regulatory compliance advice
Decommissioning funding assessments and review
Contracting and procurement support
Organisation development
Project construction and operational support
Governance and operating model design
Risk analysis and management
Joint venture and alliance design and stand-up
Thank you
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional
advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No
representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this
publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents do not
accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to
act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
© 2016 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. In this document, "PwC" refers to the UK member firm, and may
sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for
further details.
160505-160345-FR-UK