macrophages prevent human red blood cell reconstitution in
TRANSCRIPT
1
Macrophages prevent human red blood cell reconstitution in immunodeficient mice
Zheng Hu1,2,3, Nico Van Rooijen4, Yong-Guang Yang2,3
1 Institute of Immunology, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and
School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
2 Transplantation Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA
3 Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University College of Physicians
and Surgeons, New York, NY
4 Department of Cell Biology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Short title: Human red blood cell reconstitution in mice
Corresponding Author: Yong-Guang Yang, MD, PhD
Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University College of Physicians and
Surgeons, 650 West 168th St, BB1501, New York, NY 10032
Tel (212) 304-5586; Fax (646) 426-0036; Email [email protected]
Blood First Edition Paper, prepublished online September 16, 2011; DOI 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321414
Copyright © 2011 American Society of Hematology
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
2
Abstract
An animal model supporting human erythropoiesis will be highly valuable for assessing the
biological function of human RBCs under physiological and disease settings, and for evaluating
protocols of in vitro RBC differentiation. Herein, we analyzed human RBC reconstitution in
NOD/SCID or NOD/SCID/γc-/- mice that were transplanted with human CD34+ fetal liver cells
and fetal thymic tissue. Although a large number of human CD45-CD71+ nucleated immature
erythroid cells were detected in the bone marrow, human RBCs were undetectable in the blood
of these mice. Human RBCs became detectable in blood following macrophage depletion, but
disappeared again after withdrawal of treatment. Furthermore, treatment with human
erythropoietin and IL-3 significantly increased human RBC reconstitution in macrophage-
depleted, but not control, humanized mice. Significantly more rapid rejection of human RBCs
than CD47-deficient mouse RBCs indicates that mechanisms other than insufficient CD47-
SIRPα signaling are involved in human RBC xenorejection in mice. All considered, our data
demonstrate that human RBCs are highly susceptible to rejection by macrophages in
immunodeficient mice. Thus, strategies for preventing human RBC rejection by macrophages
are required for using immunodeficient mice as an in vivo model to study human erythropoiesis
and RBC function.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
3
Introduction
Red blood cells are part of non-immune blood-lineage cells derived from hematopoietic stem
cells. Anemia continues to exert tremendous burdens to human health.1-4 Thus, a considerable
effort has been made to develop new therapies for the treatment of anemia. Although the focus in
the treatment of anemia has been on growth factors (e.g., erythropoietin, EPO), derivation of
hematopoietic cells from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem
cells (iPSCs) are considered a worthwhile endeavor in the areas of transfusion therapies.5 It has
been reported that enucleated RBCs can be differentiated from hESCs with functional oxygen-
carrying ability on large scale.6 However, these studies have been limited to in vitro assays due
to the lack of a suitable animal model.
Immunodeficient mice provide a very useful in vivo model for the study of human
lymphohematopoietic cell function. Human hematopoietic stem cell engraftment and
differentiation can now be reproducibly established in NOD/SCID mice or their derivatives.7
However, it remains unclear if immunodeficient mice are suitable for the study of human RBC
differentiation and function. Although a previous report showed detectable human RBCs in
NOD/SCID/IL2rnull (NSG) mice receiving human cord blood CD34+ cell transplantation via the
facial vein at the newborn stage,8 the ability of immunodeficient mice to support human
erythropoiesis and/or survival of human RBCs has not been confirmed by other studies.9
Recently, hydrodynamic injection of pcDNA-encoding EPO and IL-3 was found to improve
human RBC reconstitution in NSG mice receiving CD34+ cells, but the levels of human RBCs in
these mice were extremely low compared to the levels of human PBMCs.10
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
4
We have previously developed a humanized mouse model, in which co-transplantation of human
fetal thymic tissue (under renal capsule) and CD34+ fetal liver cells (FLCs; i.v.) resulted in
sustained repopulation with multilineages of human lymphohematopoietic cells, including T, B
and dendritic cells, and the formation of secondary lymphoid organs in NOD/SCID mice.11-13 In
this study, we assessed human RBC reconstitution in these humanized mice. We observed that
human RBCs were undetectable in blood circulation, despite the fact that large numbers of
human normoblasts were detected in the bone marrow. Furthermore, the lack of human RBCs in
blood circulation was largely accounted for by the extremely high susceptibility of human RBCs
to rejection by recipient mouse macrophages.
Materials and Methods
Animals and human tissues and cells
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J (NOD/SCID), NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NOD/SCID/γc-/- or
NSG), and B6.129-Itgptm1Fpl (CD47 KO B6) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory
(Bar Harbor, ME), and were housed in a specific pathogen-free micro-isolator environment and
used in experiments at 6 to 10 weeks of age. GFP-transgenic CD47 KO mice were generated by
crossing CD47 KO mice with C57BL/6-transgenic (UBC-GFP)30Scha/J (The Jackson
Laboratory) mice. Human fetal thymus and liver tissues of gestational age of 17 to 20 weeks
were obtained from Advanced Bioscience Resource (Alameda, CA). Protocols involving the use
of human tissues and animals were approved by the Human Research Committee and
Subcommittee on Research Animal Care of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA)
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
5
and Columbia University Medical Center (New York, NY), and all of the experiments were
performed in accordance with the protocols.
Humanized mouse preparation
NOD/SCID or NSG mice were conditioned with sublethal (2.25 Gy) total body irradiation, and
received human CD34+ FLCs (1-5×105/mouse, i.v.) alone, or along with a human fetal thymic
tissue fragment measuring about 1 mm3 (under the recipient kidney capsule) from the same fetal
donor, as previously described 12; 13. CD34+ FLCs were isolated by a magnetic-activated cell
sorter (MACS) separation system using anti-CD34 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech, Aubum, CA).
Levels of human hematopoietic cells in humanized mice were determined by flow cytometric
(FCM) analysis using various combinations of the following mAbs: anti-human CD45, CD19,
CD3, CD4, CD8, CD71, CD235a; anti-mouse CD45 and Ter119; and isotype control mAbs (all
purchased from BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). RBCs were collected by tail vein bleeding
and heparin was used for anticoagulation. Mononuclear cells were purified by density gradient
centrifugation with Histopaque 1077 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Analysis was performed
on a FACSCalibur or FACSCanto (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Dead cells were
excluded from the analysis by gating out lower forward scatter and high propidium iodide-
retaining cells.
Morphological analyses of human erythroid cells from humanized mice
Erythroid cells were purified from blood and bone marrow by cell sorting, suspended in PBS and
centrifuged (800rpm for 5 min) onto glass slides using a Cytospin centrifuge (Shandon; Cheshire,
UK). The slides were stained with the DipQuick Stain Kit (modified Wright Giemsa staining)
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
6
from Jorgensen Laboratories (Loveland, CO). Stained slides were examined under a Zeiss
microscope and photographed using a Nikon Coolpix 5000 digital color camera.
Macrophage depletion in mice
Macrophage depletion in vivo was performed by intravenous injection of liposome-encapsulated
CL2MDP (dichloromethylene diphosphonate or clodronate). Clodronate was a kind gift of Roche
Diagnostic (Mannheim, Germany) and liposome-encapsulated clodronate (clodronate-liposomes)
was prepared as described.14 Clodronate-liposomes were given at 100 μl per mouse for the 1st
injection, and 50 μl or 100 μl per mouse thereafter, with an interval of 2-7 days as indicated.
Control mice were treated at the same times with liposome-encapsulated PBS (PBS-liposomes).
The efficacy of macrophage depletion was confirmed by measuring the clearance of infused
CD47-/- and CD47+/+ mouse RBCs in randomly selected mice as previously described, 15; 16 and
efficient macrophage depletion is confirmed by the lack of rejection of CD47-/- RBCs. In some
experiments, macrophage depletion was also confirmed by immunohistochemistry using anti-
mouse F4/80 mAb (Figure S1).
Human cytokine treatment
In order to determine whether human erythroid progenitors in humanized mice can respond to
human hematopoietic cytokines, we injected (i.p.) some humanized mice with human EPO (30
U/mouse) and rhIL-3 (100 ng/mouse) once every 3 days throughout the observation period.
Controls were injected i.p. with PBS on the same schedule.
Human RBC clearance assay
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
7
The human RBC clearance assay was performed as previously described.15 Briefly, fresh human
RBCs were labeled with CFSE and injected intravenously into NOD/SCID mice (1.5×108 RBCs
per mouse) that were treated with PBS-liposomes or clodronate-liposomes (100 μl at day -3, and
50 μl at day -1, with respect to RBC transfusion). To determine the kinetics of human RBC
clearance, 5-μl blood samples were collected at various time points and the levels of surviving
CFSE+ human RBCs were measured by FCM analysis.
Phagocytic assay
For in vitro phagocytic assay, 2x105 peritoneal cells were cultured at 37°C for 2 hours to allow
peritoneal macrophages attach to the plate, nonadherent cells were washed off. Attached
macrophages were then cultured with 1x107 CFSE-labeled RBCs in media containing 4%
NOD/SCID sera for 4 hours at 37°C. After lysis of free RBCs by ACK, the cells were stained with
anti-mouse F4/80-PE and analyzed for phagocytosis by FACS. Because peritoneal macrophages in
naïve mice are poorly phagocytic, NOD/SCID mice were injected i.p. with 2% Bio-Gel
polyacrylamide P 100 (1 mL per mouse; Bio-RAD Laboratories Hercules, CA) to activate
macrophages 4 days prior to peritoneal cell harvest. In vivo phagocytic assay was performed by
injecting CFSE-labeled RBCs (1x108 RBCs/ mouse) into peritoneal cavity of NOD/SCID mice 4
days after treatment with 2% Bio-Gel polyacrylamide P 100. Peritoneal cells were collected 4
hours later, lysed of free RBCs, and stained with anti-mouse F4/80-PE. In both in vitro and in vivo
assays, F4/80 and CFSE double positive (i.e., F4/80+CFSE+) cells are considered macrophages that
have engulfed CFSE-labeled RBCs, and the results are presented as percentages of F4/80+CFSE+
cells in F4/80+ cells.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
8
Statistical analysis
The level of significant differences in group means was determined by the student’s t test for
parametric data sets. All statistical analysis was performed using Prism 4 (GraphPad Software,
San Diego, CA). A P value of ≤ .05 was considered significant in all analyses herein.
Results
Humanized mice do not have human RBCs in peripheral blood
Humanized mice were prepared by injection (i.v.) of human CD34+ cells alone or along with
implantation of human fetal thymus under the renal capsule in sublethally-irradiated NOD/SCID
or NSG mice. Blood cells were collected between 9 and 38 weeks after transplantation for
measuring human cell chimerism. Consistent with our previous results,12 all humanized mice
showed high levels (>50% on average) of human cell reconstitution in PBMCs, including human
B cells and T cells (T cells were only detected in humanized mice receiving a fetal thymic graft).
Surprisingly, none of these humanized mice showed detectable human CD235a+ RBCs in the
blood at any time point after transplantation, even in those with >80% of human CD45+ cells in
PBMCs (Figure 1A, B). All RBCs in the blood of these mice stained positive for mouse Ter119.
We have also checked human RBC repopulation in various tissues of humanized mice. Except
the liver in which very few (<0.4%) human RBCs were detected, human RBCs were almost
undetectable in other tissues including lung, kidney and spleen (Supplemental Figure S2). These
results demonstrate that human hematopoietic stem cells are incapable of differentiating into
RBCs and/or human RBCs cannot survive in NOD/SCID or NSG mice.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
9
Human erythroid cells with an immature phenotype exist in the bone marrow of
humanized mice
Red blood cells are derived from hematopoietic stem cells in bone marrow and subsequently
migrate out into blood after nuclear extrusion.17 To determine whether a potential defect in
human erythroid lineage differentiation is responsible for the lack of human RBCs in blood, we
analyzed human erythropoiesis in the bone marrow from humanized mice. Unlike that observed
in peripheral blood, a large number of human CD235a+CD45- erythroid cells at a stage of
differentiation beyond erythroblasts (i.e., normoblasts or later),18 were detected in the bone
marrow of all humanized mice examined (Figure 2A). As indicated in Figure 2A, bone marrow
cells can be separated into 3 regions, in which erythroid cells are mainly distributed in R2 and R3,
and R4 contains predominantly granulocytes.18 To determine whether these CD235a+CD45- cells
are immature precursors or mature RBCs, we analyzed the distribution of these cells in the
mature erythrocyte- and immature erythroid precursor-enriched regions, which are presented as
R2 and R3, respectively in Figure 2A.18 Human CD235a+ cells were found mostly in R3, with
only a few cells in R2 (Figure 2A). In contrast, mouse Ter119+ erythroid cells were detected in
both R2 and R3 regions. Consistent with this result, intracellular staining with propidium iodide
revealed the presence of large numbers of nucleated erythroid cells in the bone marrow of these
humanized mice (Supplemental Figure S3). Moreover, the levels of human erythroid chimerism
[huCD235a+/(huCD235a+ plus muTer119+)] in region R3 were comparable to those observed for
human CD45+ cell chimerism [i.e., huCD45+/(huCD45+ plus muCD45+) in the bone marrow
(Figure 2B). These results indicate that human erythroid cell differentiation, at least to the
CD235a+CD45- normoblast stage occurred in the bone marrow of these humanized mice. To
further determine human erythroid cell differentiation in the humanized mice, human CD235a+
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
10
cells were purified from R2 by cell sorting and analyzed by modified Wright Giemsa staining
after cytospin. As shown in Figure 2C, most human CD235a+ cells in R2 were nucleated cells. In
contrast, most mouse Ter119+ cells in R2 were enucleated cells (Figure 2D). However, the level
of CD71 expression on human CD235a+ cells in R2 were lower than those in R3 (Figure 2E),
suggesting that human CD235a+ cells in R2 are relatively more mature than those in R3. It has
been reported that the level of CD71 (transferring receptor) expression decreases during
erythroid cell differentiation.19-21 Thus, the poor reconstitution with human enucleated mature
RBCs in bone marrow and the lack of human RBCs in blood could be due to the inability of
human erythroid precursors to fully mature, or to poor survival or rejection of mature human
RBCs in humanized mice.
Macrophages mediate rapid rejection of human RBCs in NOD/SCID mice
We next determined whether the lack of human RBCs in peripheral blood of humanized mice
was due to the failure of mature RBCs to survive or to rejection. Because NSG mice do not have
functional T, B or NK cells,22 macrophages are the likely potential effectors to reject human
RBCs. Therefore, we first assessed the ability of recipient macrophages to reject human RBCs by
comparing the survival of normal human RBCs in NOD/SCID mice with or without macrophage
depletion. Macrophage depletion was performed by intravenous injection of clodronate-
liposomes, where mice treated with PBS-liposomes were used as controls. CFSE-labeled human
RBCs were rapidly cleared and became almost undetectable by 2 hours after injection into the
control NOD/SCID mice treated with PBS-liposomes (Figure 3A, B, C). In contrast, human RBC
clearance was prevented by depleting macrophages. These results indicate that macrophages
mediate rapid rejection of human RBCs in NOD/SCID mice.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
11
We also measured the phagocytosis of human RBCs by NOD/SCID mouse macrophages. CFSE
labeled human or mouse RBCs were injected into peritoneal cavity of NOD/SCID mice, and
phagocytosis of CFSE-labeled RBCs by macrophages were assessed 4 hours later. As shown in
Figure 3D, recipient mouse F4/80+ macrophages were significantly more efficient in engulfing
human than mouse RBCs. Similar results were obtained from in vitro phagocytic assays, in
which NOD/SCID mouse macrophages were capable of engulfing human, but not mouse RBCs
(Figure 3E). Interestingly, phagocytosis of human RBCs was significantly greater in the cultures
added with untreated NOD/SCID mouse sera than in those containing heat-inactivated
NOD/SCID mouse sera, indicating that mouse complement may facilitate phagocytosis of human
RBCs in NOD/SCID mice. These results provide direct evidence for phagocytosis of human
RBCs by NOD/SCID mouse macrophages.
Human RBC reconstitution in peripheral blood of humanized mice after macrophage
depletion
To further determine whether macrophages are responsible for the lack of human RBCs in
humanized mice, we treated humanized mice with clodronate-liposomes 13 weeks after human
CD34+ cell injection and followed human RBC chimerism in these mice. Consistent with the
experiments described above, all of these mice had high levels of human cell reconstitution
(>40%) in PBMC, but none had detectable human RBC chimerism 12 weeks after CD34+ cell
transplantation (1 week prior to macrophage depletion). Because NOD/SCID mice are highly
sensitive to the toxicity associated with repeated injections of clodronate-liposomes, which is
required for preventing macrophage recovery,23 we stopped the treatment after 3 mice died in the
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
12
clodronate-liposome-treated group (the last injection was given at day 22). Macrophage
depletion resulted in a marked increase in human RBC chimerism in NOD/SCID mice (Figure 4).
The levels of human RBC chimerism in these mice increased over time to approximately 4% on
average by 3 weeks, but declined again after withdrawal of clodronate-liposome injection. In
contrast, human RBCs remained undetectable in the PBS-liposome control group. Flow
cytometric analysis revealed that most human RBCs detected in blood of macrophage-depleted
humanized mice were CD71- (Figure 4C). Since CD71 expression remains detectable in
immature erythroid cells, including early stage of enucleated reticulocytes, 19-21 the data indicate
that human CD235a+ cells detected in the blood of macrophage-depleted humanized mice are
fully matured RBCs. We also compared the ratios of CD71+ cells in human CD235a+ cells in the
“mature erythrocyte-enriched” R2 region (as defined in Figure 2A) in macrophage-depleted and
control humanized mice. Consistent with the data shown in Figure 2E, in PBS-treated mice, all
most all human CD235a+ cells in R2 were CD71+ immature erythroid cells (Figure 4D).
However, in macrophage-depleted mice, approximately half of the human CD235a+ cells were
mature RBCs, as shown by the loss of CD71 expression (Figure 4D). These results demonstrate
that macrophages pose an important barrier to human RBC reconstitution in humanized mice.
Cytokine treatment promotes the reconstitution of human RBCs in macrophage-depleted
humanized mice
The detection of human RBCs in humanized mice after macrophage depletion indicates that
human hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into mature RBCs in the NOD/SCID mouse
microenvironment. We next determined whether human erythroid progenitors can respond to
human hematopoietic cytokines in macrophage-depleted humanized mice. Humanized mice with
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
13
no detectable human RBCs were intraperitoneally injected with PBS (controls) or human
cytokines (EPO and rhIL-3), together with intravenous injection of clodronate-liposomes
(starting on the same day as the cytokine treatment). EPO (30 U/mouse) and rhIL-3 (100
ng/mouse) were injected once every 3 days throughout the observation period. Clodronate-
liposome treatment was discontinued after the last injection at day 25 due to the severe toxicity.
Human RBCs became detectable in blood by 1 week after injection of clodronate-liposomes in
all groups of humanized mice, and there was no significant difference in the levels of human
RBC chimerism between the cytokine-treated and control groups by week 3 (Figure 5). In the 4th
week, the levels of human RBC chimerism increased significantly, but more rapidly in mice
treated with EPO plus IL-3 than that observed for the control group (Figure 5). However, human
RBCs remained undetectable in humanized mice that were treated with human cytokines alone
(Figure 5). These data indicate that human erythroid progenitors developing in humanized mice
are capable of responding to human cytokines. This is consistent with a recent study showing
that bone marrow recovered from humanized mice could differentiate into human erythroid cells
ex vivo 24. The failure of human cytokine treatment to improve human RBC reconstitution in
humanized mice without macrophage depletion further supports the argument that macrophages
pose a critical obstacle to human RBC reconstitution in humanized mice.
Robust rejection of human RBCs in mice can be induced by mechanisms independent of
CD47-SIRPα signaling
The CD47-SIRPα pathway induces inhibitory signals in macrophages and prevents abnormal
phagocytosis of autologous hematopoietic cells.15; 25-27 It has been shown that NOD SIRPα is
capable of cross-reacting with human CD47,28 suggesting that the rejection of human RBCs in
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
14
humanized mice is unlikely to be predominantly induced by the inability of human CD47 to
interact with the recipient SIRPα. However, our previous studies showed that macrophages in
mixed hematopoietic chimeras, where non-hematopoietic cells do not express CD47, are
tolerized to CD47 KO WBCs, but remain phagocytic against CD47 KO RBCs.16 To determine
the role of the CD47-SIRPα pathway in the rejection of human RBCs in humanized mice, we
compared the rejection rates of human RBCs vs. CD47 KO mouse RBCs in NOD/SCID mice.
Human RBCs were significantly more rapidly cleared than CD47 KO mouse RBCs (Figure 6),
indicating that the rejection of human RBCs in NOD/SCID mice was mainly induced by
mechanisms other than the lack of CD47-SIRPα signaling. In support of this scenario, human
RBCs were also swiftly cleared in T and NK cell-depleted CD47 KO B6 mice, where the lack of
CD47-SIRPα signaling does not trigger phagocytosis (Figure 7). These data suggest that
improving CD47-SIRPα interaction alone is insufficient to prevent human RBC rejection by
mouse macrophages.
Discussion
Since the first humanized SCID (SCID-Hu) mouse model was established over two decades
ago,29 humanized mice have been widely used to study the function of human hematopoietic and
lymphoid cells under normal or disease conditions.7 However, the currently available humanized
mouse models have not been demonstrated to be very useful in assessing human RBC function.
In the study herein, we show that, despite the high levels of human PBMC chimerism, human
mature RBCs were undetectable in NOD/SCID or NSG mice that received transplantation of
CD34+ FLCs or CD34+ FLCs plus human fetal thymic tissues (Figure 1). However, human late-
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
15
stage immature erythroid cells, i.e., CD235a+CD45- nucleated normoblasts were readily detected
in bone marrow at levels similar to those of human CD45+ cells (Figure 2). Furthermore,
recipient macrophages were found to mediate vigorous rejection of human RBCs (Figure 3), and
macrophage depletion led to detection of human RBCs in the blood circulation of these mice
(Figure 4). Our data demonstrate that overcoming macrophage-mediated rejection is required for
achieving human RBC reconstitution in mice and that other pathway(s) than CD47-SIRPα are
involved in human RBC xenorejection.
A previous report showed that human RBCs remained detectable 3 days after injection of a very
large number (4-5x109/mouse) of cultured human RBCs (cRBCs) into sublethally-irradiated
NOD/SCID mice 21. In this study, the recipient NOD/SCID mice were injected with 4-5x109
“decoy cells” (i.e., human type-O RBCs) 24 hours before cRBC injection. Thus, it is likely that
the short survival of human cRBCs detected in this model was due to saturation of the
phagocytic system by pre-injected “decoy” human type-O RBCs. In support of this possibility,
our data showed that human RBCs remained undetectable in humanized mice after sublethal
irradiation (Supplementary Figure S4).
It remains unclear why only human RBCs but not other hematopoietic cells were rejected by
macrophages in humanized mice. Macrophage activation is regulated by the balance between
activating and inhibitory receptor signals. Previous studies have shown that the CD47-SIRPα
interaction provides inhibitory signal to macrophages and prevents phagocytosis of normal
cells.15; 25-27 Furthermore, the lack of cross-species reactivity between CD47 and SIRPα has
been shown to induce phagocytosis of xenogeneic cells by macrophages.30; 31 Although human
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
16
CD47 has been shown to cross-react with NOD SIRPα,28 it remains unclear whether human
CD47 is as efficient as mouse CD47 in inducing SIRPα signaling in NOD mouse macrophages,
and if the cross-reaction between human CD47 and NOD SIRPα is sufficient in preventing
human RBCs from phagocytosis by NOD mouse macrophages. Because enucleated RBCs are
more sensitive to phagocytosis than nucleated cells,32; 33 a possible explanation for the rejection
of human RBCs but not nucleated human blood cells could be that the cross-reactivity of human
CD47 with NOD SIRPα is not optimal, which is sufficient for human nucleated hematopoietic
cells, but not RBCs, to prevent rejection by macrophages.
We have previously shown that the lack of CD47 expression on non-hematopoietic cells can
induce split macrophage tolerance in mixed bone marrow chimeras, where macrophages remain
phagocytic against CD47 KO RBCs, but not against nucleated hematopoietic cells, including T,
B and myeloid cells.16 These results indicate that phagocytosis of CD47 KO nucleated
hematopoietic cells, but not RBCs can be prevented by mechanisms independent of the CD47-
SIRPα interaction. Further studies are needed to determine whether such CD47-SIRPα
interaction-independent mechanisms are also involved in the selective protection against
phagocytosis of human nucleated hematopoietic cells in humanized mice. Nonetheless, the
significantly more rapid rejection of human RBCs than CD47 KO mouse RBCs in NOD/SCID
(Figure 6) and CD47 KO (Figure 7) mice indicates that the lack of or insufficient CD47-SIRPα
signaling is unlikely to be the major mechanism triggering macrophage-mediated rejection of
human RBCs in the humanized mice. It is likely that the vigorous rejection of human RBCs by
macrophages is accounted for predominantly by the xenoantigens on human RBCs that can
activate macrophages.34; 35
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
17
Previous studies have shown the presence of human macrophages and dendritic cells in the
humanized mice.12; 13; 36 However, we do not fully understand why human macrophages did not
reject mouse RBCs in these mice. The fact that non-hematopoietic cells play an important role in
regulating macrophage phagocytic activity and can induce macrophage tolerance 16 raises a
possibility that human macrophages developing in the humanized mice are tolerant of mouse
cells. Further studies are clearly needed to answer these questions.
Although human RBCs became detectable in humanized mice after macrophage depletion, the
levels of human RBC chimerism were still significantly lower than human PBMC chimerism.
Because repeated injections of clodronate-liposomes were highly toxic to NOD/SCID and NSG
mice, we could only treat humanized mice for a short period (approximately 3-4 weeks).
Considering the long lifespan of RBCs (approximately 120 days), it is possible that the limited
recovery in the levels of human RBC chimerism in humanized mice after macrophage depletion
was due to the short period of observation. Even though macrophage-depleted humanized mice
treated with human EPO and IL-3 showed marked increase in the levels of human RBCs in blood
(to 25% on average) at week 4, there was no significant difference in human RBC levels between
these mice and those without cytokine treatment by week 3 (Figure 5). This also suggests that a
longer period of macrophage-depletion will likely permit additional increase in human RBC
chimerism in humanized mice. On the other hand, these data also suggest that the limited human
RBC recovery might be accounted for partially by the relatively poor human erythropoiesis due
to the lack of human hematopoietic growth factors. Furthermore, our data provide evidence that
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
18
human erythroid progenitors in humanized mice are capable of responding to human EPO and/or
IL-3.
Hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into different lineages of blood cells depending on specific
cytokines, and EPO and IL-3 are essential to erythroid lineage differentiation.21 IL-3 is a
hematopoietic growth factor that plays an important role in hematopoietic stem cell renewal and
differentiation into myeloid, erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages.37-41 IL-3 can be produced by
multiple types of cells, including activated T cells, NK cells, mast cells, and eosinophils.42-44
Mouse cells have been shown to react to human EPO,45 but there is no information indicating
that human cells may also react to mouse EPO in a similar manner. Although human cells do not
react to mouse IL-3,37; 46 it remains unclear if the level of human IL-3 produced by human cells
in humanized mice is sufficient to support human erythropoiesis. Our data indicate that human
IL-3 plus EPO, but not EPO alone (data not shown) could significantly improve human RBC
development in humanized mice (in a period of 4 weeks), suggesting that insufficient human IL-
3 production may contribute to the potentially poor erythropoiesis in humanized mice. However,
the observed large numbers of immature normoblasts in the bone marrow suggest that
humanized mice could support some level of human erythropoiesis. We recently observed that
human megakaryocyte and platelet differentiation are normal in the humanized mice (Hu Z and
Yang YG, unpublished data). Because IL-3 also plays an important role in megakaryocyte and
platelet differentiation,41; 47; 48 these results suggest that the level of human IL-3 in humanized
mice is capable of supporting human hematopoiesis. Thus, although the suboptimal
hematopoietic environment may possibly result in a reduced level of human erythropoiesis in
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
19
humanized mice, the rejection of mature enucleated RBCs is considered a predominant factor
causing the absence of human RBCs in these mice.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Drs. Hannes Kalscheuer Hannes and Ben Sprangers for critical review of this
manuscript, and Mr. Orlando Moreno for outstanding animal husbandry. This work was
supported by grants from NIH (RC1 HL100117, PO1 CA111519 and R01 AI064569).
Authorship
Z.H. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; N.VR provided
key reagents; Y-G.Y. conceived the research project, designed experiments, analyzed data, and
wrote the paper.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interest.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
20
Reference
1. Wellems TE, Hayton K, Fairhurst RM. The impact of malaria parasitism: from corpuscles
to communities. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(9):2496-2505.
2. Flygare J, Karlsson S. Diamond-Blackfan anemia: erythropoiesis lost in translation. Blood.
2007;109(8):3152-3154.
3. Young NS, Calado RT, Scheinberg P. Current concepts in the pathophysiology and
treatment of aplastic anemia. Blood. 2006;108(8):2509-2519.
4. Taniguchi T, D'Andrea AD. Molecular pathogenesis of Fanconi anemia: recent progress.
Blood. 2006;107(11):4223-4233.
5. Kaufman DS. Toward clinical therapies using hematopoietic cells derived from human
pluripotent stem cells. Blood. 2009;114(17):3513-3523.
6. Lu SJ, Feng Q, Park JS, et al. Biologic properties and enucleation of red blood cells from
human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2008;112(12):4475-4484.
7. Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL. Humanized mice in translational biomedical research.
Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(2):118-130.
8. Ishikawa F, Yasukawa M, Lyons B, et al. Development of functional human blood and
immune systems in NOD/SCID/IL2 receptor {gamma} chain(null) mice. Blood.
2005;106(5):1565-1573.
9. Manz MG, Di Santo JP. Renaissance for mouse models of human hematopoiesis and
immunobiology. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(10):1039-1042.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
21
10. Chen Q, Khoury M, Chen J. Expression of human cytokines dramatically improves
reconstitution of specific human-blood lineage cells in humanized mice. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 2009;106(51):21783-21788.
11. Lan P, Wang L, Diouf B, et al. Induction of human T-cell tolerance to porcine
xenoantigens through mixed hematopoietic chimerism. Blood. 2004;103(10):3964-3969.
12. Lan P, Tonomura N, Shimizu A, Wang S, Yang YG. Reconstitution of a functional human
immune system in immunodeficient mice through combined human fetal thymus/liver and
CD34+ cell transplantation. Blood. 2006;108(2):487-492.
13. Tonomura N, Habiro K, Shimizu A, Sykes M, Yang YG. Antigen-specific human T-cell
responses and T cell-dependent production of human antibodies in a humanized mouse
model. Blood. 2008;111(8):4293-4296.
14. Van Rooijen N, Sanders A. Liposome mediated depletion of macrophages: mechanism of
action, preparation of liposomes and applications. J Immunol Methods. 1994;174(1-2):83-
93.
15. Oldenborg PA, Zheleznyak A, Fang YF, Lagenaur CF, Gresham HD, Lindberg FP. Role of
CD47 as a marker of self on red blood cells. Science. 2000;288(5473):2051-2054.
16. Wang H, Madariaga ML, Wang S, Van Rooijen N, Oldenborg PA, Yang YG. Lack of
CD47 on nonhematopoietic cells induces split macrophage tolerance to CD47null cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(34):13744-13749.
17. Qiu LB, Dickson H, Hajibagheri N, Crocker PR. Extruded erythroblast nuclei are bound
and phagocytosed by a novel macrophage receptor. Blood. 1995;85(6):1630-1639.
18. Loken MR, Shah VO, Dattilio KL, Civin CI. Flow cytometric analysis of human bone
marrow: I. Normal erythroid development. Blood. 1987;69(1):255-263.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
22
19. Lok CN, Ponka P. Identification of an erythroid active element in the transferrin receptor
gene. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(31):24185-24190.
20. Miharada K, Hiroyama T, Sudo K, Nagasawa T, Nakamura Y. Efficient enucleation of
erythroblasts differentiated in vitro from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat
Biotechnol. 2006;24(10):1255-1256.
21. Giarratana MC, Kobari L, Lapillonne H, et al. Ex vivo generation of fully mature human
red blood cells from hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):69-74.
22. Ito M, Hiramatsu H, Kobayashi K, et al. NOD/SCID/gamma(c)(null) mouse: an excellent
recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. Blood. 2002;100(9):3175-3182.
23. Fraser CC, Chen BP, Webb S, van RN, Kraal G. Circulation of human hematopoietic cells
in severe combined immunodeficient mice after Cl2MDP-liposome-mediated macrophage
depletion. Blood. 1995;86(1):183-192.
24. Hayakawa J, Hsieh MM, Anderson DE, et al. The assessment of human erythroid output in
NOD/SCID mice reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Transplant.
2010;19(11):1465-1473.
25. Jiang P, Lagenaur CF, Narayanan V. Integrin-associated protein is a ligand for the P84
neural adhesion molecule. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(2):559-562.
26. Vernon-Wilson EF, Kee WJ, Willis AC, Barclay AN, Simmons DL, Brown MH. CD47 is a
ligand for rat macrophage membrane signal regulatory protein SIRP (OX41) and human
SIRPalpha 1. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30(8):2130-2137.
27. Blazar BR, Lindberg FP, Ingulli E, et al. CD47 (integrin-associated protein) engagement of
dendritic cell and macrophage counterreceptors is required to prevent the clearance of
donor lymphohematopoietic cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194(4):541-549.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
23
28. Takenaka K, Prasolava TK, Wang JC, et al. Polymorphism in Sirpa modulates engraftment
of human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(12):1313-1323.
29. McCune JM, Namikawa R, Kaneshima H, Shultz LD, Lieberman M, Weissman IL. The
SCID-hu mouse: murine model for the analysis of human hematolymphoid differentiation
and function. Science. 1988;241(4873):1632-1639.
30. Wang H, VerHalen J, Madariaga ML, et al. Attenuation of phagocytosis of xenogeneic
cells by manipulating CD47. Blood. 2007;109(2):836-842.
31. Ide K, Wang H, Tahara H, et al. Role for CD47-SIRPalpha signaling in xenograft rejection
by macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(12):5062-5066.
32. Oldenborg PA, Gresham HD, Lindberg FP. CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha
(SIRPalpha) regulates Fcgamma and complement receptor-mediated phagocytosis. J Exp
Med. 2001;193(7):855-862.
33. Oldenborg PA, Gresham HD, Chen Y, Izui S, Lindberg FP. Lethal autoimmune hemolytic
anemia in CD47-deficient nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. Blood. 2002;99(10):3500-3504.
34. Burlak C, Twining LM, Rees MA. Terminal sialic acid residues on human glycophorin A
are recognized by porcine kupffer cells. Transplantation. 2005;80(3):344-352.
35. Jin R, Greenwald A, Peterson MD, Waddell TK. Human monocytes recognize porcine
endothelium via the interaction of galectin 3 and alpha-GAL. J Immunol.
2006;177(2):1289-1295.
36. Tonomura N, Shimizu A, Wang S, et al. Pig islet xenograft rejection in a mouse model
with an established human immune system. Xenotransplantation. 2008;15(2):129-135.
37. Clark SC, Kamen R. The human hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors. Science.
1987;236(4806):1229-1237.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
24
38. Leary AG, Yang YC, Clark SC, Gasson JC, Golde DW, Ogawa M. Recombinant gibbon
interleukin 3 supports formation of human multilineage colonies and blast cell colonies in
culture: comparison with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor. Blood. 1987;70(5):1343-1348.
39. Saeland S, Caux C, Favre C, et al. Effects of recombinant human interleukin-3 on CD34-
enriched normal hematopoietic progenitors and on myeloblastic leukemia cells. Blood.
1988;72(5):1580-1588.
40. Sonoda Y, Yang YC, Wong GG, Clark SC, Ogawa M. Analysis in serum-free culture of
the targets of recombinant human hemopoietic growth factors: interleukin 3 and
granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor are specific for early developmental
stages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(12):4360-4364.
41. Bruno E, Briddell R, Hoffman R. Effect of recombinant and purified hematopoietic growth
factors on human megakaryocyte colony formation. Exp Hematol. 1988;16(5):371-377.
42. Wodnar-Filipowicz A, Heusser CH, Moroni C. Production of the haemopoietic growth
factors GM-CSF and interleukin-3 by mast cells in response to IgE receptor-mediated
activation. Nature. 1989;339(6220):150-152.
43. Oster W, Lindemann A, Mertelsmann R, Herrmann F. Production of macrophage-,
granulocyte-, granulocyte-macrophage- and multi-colony-stimulating factor by peripheral
blood cells. Eur J Immunol. 1989;19(3):543-547.
44. Kita H, Ohnishi T, Okubo Y, Weiler D, Abrams JS, Gleich GJ. Granulocyte/macrophage
colony-stimulating factor and interleukin 3 release from human peripheral blood
eosinophils and neutrophils. J Exp Med. 1991;174(3):745-748.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
25
45. Sathyanarayana P, Houde E, Marshall D, et al. CNTO 530 functions as a potent EPO
mimetic via unique sustained effects on bone marrow proerythroblast pools. Blood.
2009;113(20):4955-4962.
46. Metcalf D. Control of granulocytes and macrophages: molecular, cellular, and clinical
aspects. Science. 1991;254(5031):529-533.
47. Lu L, Briddell RA, Graham CD, Brandt JE, Bruno E, Hoffman R. Effect of recombinant
and purified human haematopoietic growth factors on in vitro colony formation by
enriched populations of human megakaryocyte progenitor cells. Br J Haematol.
1988;70(2):149-156.
48. Teramura M, Katahira J, Hoshino S, Motoji T, Oshimi K, Mizoguchi H. Clonal growth of
human megakaryocyte progenitors in serum-free cultures: effect of recombinant human
interleukin 3. Exp Hematol. 1988;16(10):843-848.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
26
Figure Legends
Figure 1. Human blood cell reconstitution in humanized mice. NOD/SCID or NSG mice
(n=50) were transplanted with human CD34+ cells alone (n=29) or along with human fetal
thymus tissue (n=21). (A) Levels of human CD45+ cells, CD3+ T cells and CD19+ B cells in
PBMCs, as well as human CD235a+ RBCs in whole blood were analyzed by flow cytometry
between 9 and 38 weeks after human cell/tissue transplantation. Each symbol represents an
individual mouse. (B) Flow cytometry profiles of humanized mouse PBMCs stained with anti-
human CD45 and anti-mouse CD45, and RBCs stained with anti-human CD235a and anti-mouse
Ter119.
Figure 2. Human erythroid cell reconstitution in bone marrow of humanized mice. Bone
marrow cells were harvested from femur and tibia of humanized mice 18 weeks after human
CD34+ FLC transplantation, and analyzed by flow cytometry and cytospin. (A-B) The levels of
huCD45+ and huCD235a+ cells in the indicated regions were determined by flow cytometry.
Shown are flow cytometric profiles (A) and levels (mean± SD; n=9) of human CD45+ cell
chimerism (i.e., % huCD45+ cells in huCD45+ plus muCD45+ cells) and CD235a+ cell chimerism
(i.e., % huCD235a+ cells in huCD235a+ plus Ter119+ cells) in the indicated regions (B). RBCs
were mainly detected in R2 and R3, but not R4 (granulocyte region). *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***
p<0.001; n.s., not significant. (C, D) Human CD235+ cells (C) and mouse Ter119+ cells (D) in
gated R2 region were purified from bone marrow by cell sorting and analyzed morphologically.
The purity (i.e., % of human CD235a or mouse Ter119 cells in the sorted cell population) and
Wright Giemsa staining of the sorted cells are shown in left and right panels, respectively. (E)
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
27
Representative flow cytometry profiles showing human CD71 expression on gated huCD235a+
cells in R2 and R3. MFI denotes median fluorescence intensity.
Figure 3. Rejection of human RBCs by recipient macrophages in NOD/SCID mice. (A-C)
CFSE-stained human RBCs (1.5×108) were intravenously injected into macrophage depleted
(n=3) or control (n=4) NOD/SCID mice. Blood were collected at the indicated time points and
the levels (%) of injected human RBCs were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative
flow cytometric profiles. (B) Percentages (mean±SDs) of CFSE+ human RBCs at the indicated
times. (C) Clearance rates of infused human RBCs, i.e., percentages of CFSE+ human RBCs
normalized with the levels at 20 minutes after injection as 100%. (D) CFSE-labeled human or
mouse RBCs (1x108) were injected into peritoneal cavity of NOD/SCID mice, and phagocytosis
of human RBCs (n=3) or mouse RBCs (n=3) by mouse macrophages were measured by staining
with anti-mouse F4/80-PE using flow cytometric analysis. Shown are mean (±SDs) of
phagocytic ratios and representative flow cytometric profiles showing % of CFSE+ cells in the
gated F4/80+ cell population. (E) Human and mouse RBCs were co-cultured with NOD/SCID
mouse macrophages in media containing 4% NOD/SCID mouse sera (untreated or 56oC-heated),
and phagocytosis was measured 4 hours later. Shown are mean (±SDs; n=5 per group) of
phagocytic ratios and flow cytometric profiles showing % of CFSE+ cells in the gated F4/80+ cell
population. Data combined from 2 independent experiments are shown.
Figure 4. Human RBCs reconstitute in humanized mice after macrophage depletion.
Humanized NOD/SCID mice were treated at 13 weeks after human CD34+ FLC transplantation
with clodronate-liposomes (n=6) or PBS-liposomes (n=3) (100 μL at days 0, 2, 7, 12, 17, and 22).
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
28
In clodronate-liposome treated group, 4 mice died after treatment and numbers of mice available
for analysis were: n=6 for pretreatment; n=4 for weeks 1 and 2; n=3 for weeks 3 and 4; and n=2
for weeks 5 and 6. Blood was collected 1 week prior to and weekly after clodronate-liposome
treatment, and the percentages of human RBCs were determined by flow cytometry. (A)
Representative flow cytometric profiles at week 3 post-treatment. (B) Percentages of human
CD235a+ RBCs in blood at the indicated time points after treatment. Arrow indicates the time we
stopped treatment. (C) Human CD235+ cells were purified by cell sorting from blood of
macrophage-depleted humanized mice, and analyzed by flow cytometry and cytospin. Shown are
flow cytometry profiles of human CD235a and CD71 expression and Wright Giemsa staining of
the purified cells. (D) Percentages (mean±SDs) and representative staining profiles of human
CD71 expression on gated human CD235a+ cells in the “mature erythrocyte-enriched” R2 region
of bone marrow cells (as defined in Figure 2A) from humanized mice treated with PBS-
liposomes (n=3) or clodronate-liposomes (n=3).
Figure 5. Treatment with human EPO and IL-3 promotes human erythropoiesis in
macrophage-depleted humanized mice. Humanized mice were prepared by injection of human
CD34+ FLCs into NOD/SCID mice after sublethal irradiation. At week 13, the mice were treated
with clodronate-liposomes (100μl for the 1st injection and 50μl every 5 days thereafter) plus
human cytokines (EPO and IL-3; n=4) or PBS (n=6), or with human cytokines alone (EPO and
IL-3; n=4). EPO (30U) and rhIL-3 (100 ng) were given every 3 days starting one day after the 1st
injection of clodronate-liposomes. (A) Flow cytometric profiles at week 4 post-treatment. (B)
Percentages (mean±SEMs) of human CD235a+ RBCs in blood at the indicated time points after
treatment. *, p<0.05 for the indicated group compared to the other groups.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
29
Figure 6. Human RBCs are more rapidly cleared than CD47 KO mouse RBCs in
NOD/SCID mice. CFSE labeled human RBCs (higher fluorescence) were mixed with CD47
KO-GFP (lower fluorescence) RBCs at 1:1 ratio, and injected i.v. into NOD/SCID mice. Blood
was collected as the indicated times and the levels of surviving human and CD47 KO mouse
RBCs were assessed by flow cytometry. Data shown are representative flow cytometric profiles
(A), levels (%; mean±SEMs) of human and mouse RBCs in blood (B; p<0.0001 for all time
points), and clearance rates of human and mouse RBCs (C; p<0.001). Clearance rates are
presented as the percentages (mean±SEMs) of infused RBCs normalized with the levels at 10
minutes after injection as 100%.
Figure 7. Rapid rejection of human RBCs in CD47KO mice. CD47 KO B6 mice (n=4) were
depleted of T and NK cells by treatment with 1.75mg GK1.5 and 1.4mg 2.43 at day-2, and
150μg PK136 at days -6 and -1, with respect to RBC transfusion. Human and CD47 KO mouse
RBCs were labeled with CFSE at lower and higher concentrations, respectively, mixed at 1:1
ratio, and injected into CD47 KO mice. Blood was collected at the indicated time points for
assessing the levels of human (lower fluorescence) and CD47 KO mouse (higher fluorescence)
RBCs by flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow cytometric profiles at the indicated times. (B)
Level (mean±SDs) of human RBCs or CD47KO RBCs measured at 10 minutes after transfusion.
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
30
Figure 1
Figure 2
CD45+ CD3+ CD19+ CD235a+0
20
40
60
80
100
Hu
man
cel
ls (
%)
PBMC Blood
muCD45 Ter119
huCD45
huCD235a
A B
99.5%
0%88%
huCD45+
(R1)
huCD235a
+ (R
2)
huCD235a
+ (R3)
0
20
40
60
80
100 ***n.s.
***
Hu
man
cel
ls (%
)A B
FSC huCD45 huCD45
SSC
huCD235a
muCD45
huCD235a
huCD235a
SSC
mTer119 mTer119FSC
R1
R1
R2 R3
R4
R1
R2 R3
C D
R2 huCD235a+ cells
94%
huCD235a
R2 Ter119+ cells
98%
mTer119
EhuCD235a+ cells
R2 R3
huCD71
MFI=1964MFI=365
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
31
Figure 3
0 100 200 300 400 5000
20
40
60
80
100 PBSClodronate*
***
******
***
Time after transfusion (min)
Cle
aran
ce r
ate
(%)
0 100 200 300 400 5000.00
0.05
0.100.20.30.40.50.6 PBS
Clodronate
***
***
****** ***
***
Time after transfusion (min)
hu
RB
C in
blo
od
(%)
20 min
40 min
60 min
120 min
240 min
480 min
CFSE
PBS Clodronate
CFSE
A B
C
Human RBC
31.3±6.8
Mouse RBC
7.7±4.3
CFSE0
10
20
30
40
Human Mouse RBC RBC
**
Ph
ago
cytic
rat
io (
%)
0
10
20
30
40
***
*****
RBC Human Human MouseSerum + Heated +
Pha
goc
ytic
rat
io (
%)
D
E
Human RBCs
+ serum
Human RBCs
+ heated
Mouse RBCs
+ serum
CFSE
2.1±0.429.1±3.4 16.8±5.6
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
32
Figure 4
Figure 5
-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5PBSClodronate
Weeks after treatment
Hu
man
RB
Cs
(%)
A B
mTer119
huCD235a
PBS Clodronate
3.360
C
0
20
40
60
80
100 *
PBS Cladronate
% h
uCD
71+ c
ells
inh
uC
D23
5a+
cells
in R
2D
Purified human CD235a+ cells
96% 14%
huCD235a huCD71
PBS Clodronate
huCD71
1 2 3 40
10
20
30
40Clodronate
EPO+IL-3/Clodronate
*EPO+IL-3/PBS
Weeks after treatment
Hu
man
RB
Cs
(%)
B
Ter119
HuCD235a
ClodronateA
6.45
92.32
16.65
80.72
EPO+IL-3/Clodronate
0
99.60
EPO+IL-3/PBS
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
33
Figure 6
Figure 7
0 100 200 300 400 5000
20
40
60
80
100 Human RBCCD47KO RBC
Time after transfusion (min)
Cle
aran
ce r
ate
(%)
0 100 200 300 400 5000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 Human RBCCD47KO RBC
Time after transfusion (min)
Tra
nsf
usi
on
cel
ls (%
)
B C
A
Before 10 min 20 min 40 min 60 min 480 min 4 days
GFP(low) / CFSE(high)
A B
Before
10 min
20 min
40 min
CFSE CD47KO RBC
Human RBC
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
RB
C (
%)
***
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom
doi:10.1182/blood-2010-11-321414Prepublished online September 16, 2011;
Zheng Hu, Nico Van Rooijen and Yong-Guang Yang immunodeficient miceMacrophages prevent human red blood cell reconstitution in
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requestsInformation about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprintsInformation about ordering reprints may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtmlInformation about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at:
digital object identifier (DOIs) and date of initial publication. indexed by PubMed from initial publication. Citations to Advance online articles must include final publication). Advance online articles are citable and establish publication priority; they areappeared in the paper journal (edited, typeset versions may be posted when available prior to Advance online articles have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet
Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036.Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of
For personal use only.on April 10, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.orgFrom