m a n a g e m e n t m a n a g e m e n t 1 st e d i t i o n 1 st e d i t i o n gulati | mayo | nohria...
TRANSCRIPT
M A N A G E M E N T 1st E D I T I O N
Gulati | Mayo | Nohria
Chapter 6
CORPORATE-LEVEL STRATEGY
©South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
STRATEGICPERSPECTIVE
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Learning Objectives
• Understand that corporate-level strategies include decisions regarding diversification, international expansion, and vertical integration
• Describe the difference between related and unrelated diversification and outline the advantages and disadvantages of each approach
• Explain the reasons why firms decide to diversify through international expansion
• Describe the process of vertical integration and the reasons why a firm would choose to pursue this path
6–2
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Developing a Corporate-Level Strategy
6–3
The way a company seeks to create value through the configuration and coordination of multimarketactivities
Corporate-level strategy
Occurs when a firm maximizes its resources to build a competitive advantage across its business units
Corporate advantage
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Corporate-Level Strategy Decisions
6–4
Whether the firm should vertically integrate
Motivation to pursue diversification strategies
Diversification into international markets“Big Bets”
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
History of Diversification
6–5
1900s
Single-Core Business Focus
Related (Horizontal) DiversificationAcquisition of competitors
1950
Vertical DiversificationAcquisition of suppliers
Celler- Kefauver
Act of 1950
Unrelated DiversificationOpportunistic expansion
1960-1970
Reagan Era Deregulation
Reversal of DiversificationCorporate raidersInstitutional investor activism
1980s 2000s
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Diversification Strategy
6–6
A strategy in which a firm engages in several different businesses that may or may not be related in an attempt to create more value than if the businesses existed as stand-alone entities
A firm focuses on one specific product, typically in one marketSingle-product
strategy
A firm pursues businesses that share a similar set of tangible and intangible resources
Horizontal (related)
diversification
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Diversification Strategy
6–7
A firm that manages several businesses with no connectionUnrelated
diversification
Exists when the costs of operating two or more businesses or producing two or more products with the same corporate structure is less than the costs of operating the businesses independently or producing each product separately
Economies of scope
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
General Reasons for Diversification Strategies
6–8
The opportunity to leverage core assets or skills between different businesses
The opportunity for growth
The potential to manage or minimize risk
The potential for personal gain
Why diversify?
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning 6–9
General Reasons for Diversification Strategies
Synergy: Created when a firm generates sustainable cost savings by combining duplicate activities or deploying underutilized assets across multiple businesses
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Related Diversification
6–10
Leveraging a firm’s strong brand name and reputation across multiple product lines
Exploiting closely related technologies or research and development activities
Creating value through sharing and transferring of resources and skills
Sharing sales forces, advertising expenses, distribution channels for similar products
Transferring operational knowledge or processes
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Reasons for Pursuing Related Diversification
6–11
The skills transferred represent a significant source of competitive advantage for the receiving unit
The activities involved in the business are similar enough that sharing expertise is meaningful
The transfer of skills involves activities important to competitive advantage
Transferring skills leads to competitive advantage
when:
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Reasons for Pursuing Related Diversification
6–12
Sharing of intangible resources results in the transfer of internal value for business units
Sharing of resources allows the firm to spread fixed costs across its business units
Sharing of internal functions among units creates economies of scope
Sharing of resources leads to competitive
advantage when:
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Unrelated Diversification
6–13
Cost savings that a firm achieves through the distribution of capital among business units
Financial economiesBy efficiently allocating capital among units
By purchasing a business and restructuring its assets with the goal of selling it back into the marketplace at a higher price
A firm that manages several businesses with no reasonable connection
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Reasons for Pursuing Unrelated Diversification
• To reduce the overall risk of the business through the efficient distribution of capital between business units
• To allow for the use of capital from a profitable division to sustain a failing firm for a period of time
• To acquire undervalued assets and attempt to raise their value through specific restructuring activities
6–14
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
International Diversification
• International strategy– A strategy a firm uses to conduct operations outside
its home market by selling products and services or conducting activities through the use of international resources to create a value chain
• Motives for international diversification– Finding new markets– Achieving economies of scale– Taking advantage of certain local factors
6–15
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning 6–16
• The test a manager can use to determine the viability of international diversification– Similar to the tests used to determine the viability of
diversification
• Components– Better-off test– Ownership test
• Factor cost differences: Cost savings achieved by access to raw materials or other factors such as low cost labor
International Scope Test
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Vertical Integration
6–17
Occurs when one corporation owns business units that make inputs for other business units in the same corporation
Occurs when a firm owns or controls the customers or distribution channels for its main products
Forward integration
Occurs when a firm owns or controls the inputs it usesBackward integration
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Costs Associated with Vertical Integration
6–18
The costs of coordinating activities between business units
Administrative costs
Costs to obtain products or services from a contractor or supplier as well as the costs associated with writing and administering the contracts for these products and services
Transaction costs
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Alternatives to Vertical Integration
6–19
Allow a buyer to purchase a commodity at a specific priceSpot contracts
Contracting with a firm outside the corporation to perform certain tasks or functions that the corporation used to do on its own
Outsourcing
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Outsourcing
• Advantages
– Reduces the costs of the firm’s noncore value chain activities
– Allows a firm to focus more on core functions in its value chain
• Disadvantages
– Outsourcing of too many activities may damage the firm’s internal core competencies and capabilities
– Outsourcing may isolate a firm from its external market
6–20
© South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
KEY TERMS
6–21
Administrative costs
Backward integration
Corporate advantage
Diversification
Economies of scope
Factor cost differences
Financial economies
Forward integration
Horizontal diversification
Market power
Outsourcing
Related diversification
Single-product strategy
Spot contracts
Synergy
Transaction costs
Unrelated diversification
Vertical integration