EditorsDima Mohammed

Marcin Lewinski

63Studiesin Logic

Argumentation and Reasoned Action Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015

Volume II

This is Volume II of the proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation: Argumentation and Reasoned Action, held at the Argumentation Lab in Lisbon, Portugal, in June 2015. The European Conference on Argumentation (ECA) is a new pan-European initiative aiming to consolidate and advance various streaks of research into argumentation and reasoning: philosophy, communication, linguistics, discourse analysis, computer science, psychology, cognitive studies, legal theory, etc. The proceedings comprise what we think is the most complete statement of the state of the art of argumentation studies today across these disciplines. From ancient rhetoric to Artifi cial Intelligence, and from analytic philosophy to detailed empirical research, the contributors examine argumentation theory and practice with a special focus on argumentation aimed at reasoned action. It’s gratifying to have all this research collected in one source and realise the breadth and depth of the lively debates in argumentation studies.

Arg

um

enta

tion a

nd R

easoned A

ctio

n

Pro

ceedin

gs o

f the 1

st E

uro

pean

Confe

rence o

n A

rgum

enta

tion, L

isbon 2

015

Volu

me II

Edito

rsD

ima M

oham

med

Marc

in L

ew

inski

63S

tudie

sin

Logic

Logic and Argumentation

Studies in Logic

Volume 63

Argumentation and Reasoned Action Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation,

Lisbon 2015

Volume II

Volume 52 Inconsistency Robustness Carl Hewitt and John Woods, eds.

Volume 53 Aristotle’s Earlier Logic John Woods

Volume 54 Proof Theory of N4-related Paraconsistent Logics Norihiro Kamide and Heinrich Wansing

Volume 55 All about Proofs, Proofs for All Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo and David Delahaye, eds

Volume 56 Dualities for Structures of Applied Logics Ewa Orłowska, Anna Maria Radzikowska and Ingrid Rewitzky

Volume 57 Proof-theoretic Semantics Nissim Francez

Volume 58 Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic, Volume 3 Petr Cintula, Petr Hajek and Carles Noguera, eds.

Volume 59 The Psychology of Argument. Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion Fabio Paglieri, Laura Bonelli and Silvia Felletti, eds

Volume 60 Absract Algebraic Logic. An Introductory Textbook Josep Maria Font

Volume 61 Philosophical Applications of Modal Logic Lloyd Humberstone

Volume 62 Argumentation and Reasoned Action. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Volume I Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński, eds

Volume 63 Argumentation and Reasoned Action. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Volume II Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński, eds

Studies in Logic Series Editor Dov Gabbay dov.gabbay@kcl.ac.uk

Argumentation and Reasoned Action

Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation,

Lisbon 2015

Volume II

Edited by

Dima Mohammed and

Marcin Lewiński

© Individual author and College Publications 2016 All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-84890-212-1 College Publications Scientific Director: Dov Gabbay Managing Director: Jane Spurr http://www.collegepublications.co.uk Original cover design by Orchid Creative www.orchidcreative.co.uk Printed by Lightning Source, Milton Keynes, UK All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior permission, in writing, from the publisher.

v

Tableofcontents ThematicPanels:

PanelI:ArgumentationinInstitutionalizedContexts

1

I.1.Prototypicalargumentativepatternsinthejustificationofjudicialdecisions:Apragma-dialecticalperspective

3

ByEvelineT.Feteris

I.2.Strategicmaneuveringinadministrativejudicialdecisions:Groundworkforargumentativepatterns

15

ByH.JoséPlug

I.3.Anticipatingcriticalquestionstopragmaticargumentationinover-the-countermedicineadvertisements

29

ByFranciscaSnoeckHenkemans

I.4.Criteriafordecidingwhatisthe‘best’scientificexplanation

43

ByJeanH.M.Wagemans

PanelII:Visualargumentsandbeyond

55

II.1.Kindsofvisualargument 57ByIanJ.Dove

II.2.Visualargument:Content,commensurability,andcogency 69ByDavidGodden

II.3.Thesemanticsofmultimodalarguingandthefallacyofindependentmeaning

83

ByLeoGroarke

PanelIII:Argumentation,politicsandcontroversyinMexico

97

III.1.Whatpersonalitytraitsshouldagovernorhave? 99ByJoseMariaInfanteBonfiglioandMariaEugeniaFloresTreviño

vi

III.2.Refusalargumentativestrategiesinatelephoneinterview:ThemayorinMonterrey,Mexico,handsoverthekeysofthecitytoChrist

117

ByMariaEugeniaFloresTreviñoandArmandoGonzálezSalinas

III.3.EristicargumentationinCEU-rectorydebate 137ByJulietaHaidar

RegularPapers:

1.Understandingthecompetenceinvolvedinconstructingargumentativecontexts

153

ByMarkAakhus

2.Usingabstractdialecticalframeworkstoargueaboutlegalcases

163

ByLatifaAl-Abdulkarim,KatieAtkinsonandTrevorBench-Capon

3.Non-verbalargumentsinWarRequiem 181ByJ.JesúsAlcolea-Banegas

4.Boundedagentsandepistemicvigilance 195ByJ.FranciscoÁlvarez

5.Impassioningreason:Ontheroleofhabitinargumentation 205ByMichaelJ.Ardoline

6.Computationalmodellingofpracticalreasoningusingtransitiondiagrams

215

ByKatieAtkinson,TrevorBench-CaponandLatifaAl-Abdulkarim

7.Uncertaintyandfuzzinessfromnaturallanguagetoargumentationmodels

227

ByPietroBaroni,MassimilianoGiacominandBeishuiLiao

8.Frombeliefstotruthviaargumentation:Intentionality,multi-agentsystemsandcommunityagreement

241

ByAndréBazzoni

vii

9.Criteriaforthereconstructionandanalysisofdoctors’argumentationinthecontextofchroniccare

251

BySarahBigiandNanonLabrie

10.Argumentandcontext 267ByJohnBiroandHarveySiegel

11.Argumentfromanalogyanditsinterpretation:Aproblemofevaluation

281

ByAngelinaBobrova

12.Analyticalsociology,argumentationandrhetoric:Largescalesocialphenomenasignificantlyinfluencedbyapparentlyinnocuousrhetoricaldevices

291

ByAlbanBouvier

13.Enquiringresponsiblyincontext:Rolerelativityandtheintellectualvirtues

301

ByTracyBowellandJustineKingsbury

14.Automaticallyidentifyingtransitionsbetweenlocutionsindialogue

311

ByKatarzynaBudzynskaetal.

15.Limitationsofthesympathy-basedmodelofethicaldeliberation:ThecaseofAdamSmithandRichardMervynHare

329

ByAdamCebula

16.Shallowtechniquesforargumentmining 341ByJérémieClos,NirmalieWiratunga,StewartMassieandGuillaumeCabanac

17.Reasonableagentsandreasonablearguers:Rationalization,justification,andargumentation

357

ByDanielH.Cohen

18.Argumentsanddecisionsincontextsofuncertainty 367ByVascoCorreia

viii

19.Instrumentalrationalityasacomponentofepistemicvigilanceinapersuasiondialogue

379

ByKamilaDebowska-Kozlowska

20.Strategicmaneuveringtodiminishpoliticalresponsibilityinapressconference

393

ByYelizDemirandKeremYazici

21.Fallacyasviceand/orincontinenceindecision-making 407ByIovanDrehe

22.Argumentsforaninformationallayerintheoriesofargumentation

417

BySjurKristofferDyrkolbotn

23.Familiars:Culture,Griceandsuper-dupermaxims 431ByMichaelA.Gilbert

24.What(thehell)isvirtueargumentation? 439ByG.C.Goddu

25.Thepragmaticforceofmakingreasonsapparent 449ByJeanGoodwinandBethInnocenti

26.Gettinginvolvedinanargumentationinclassasapragmaticmove:Socialconditionsandaffordances

463

BySaraGreco,TeutaMehmetiandAnne-NellyPerret-Clermont

27.Analysingargumentsindecisionmakingdiscourse 479ByKiraGudkova

28.Automaticexplorationofargumentandideologyinpoliticaltexts

493

ByGraemeHirstandVanessaWeiFeng

29.Persuasion,authority,andthe(commonlaw)foundationsoftransnationallegaldecision-making

505

ByGrahamHudson

30.Pragmaticargumentationinthelaw-makingprocess 519ByConstanzaIhnenJory

ix

31.Acomputationalstudyofthevaccinationcontroversy 539BySallyJacksonandNatalieLambert

32.Verbalswindles,frauds,andotherformsofdeceptivemanipulationinthebushadministrationcaseforinvadingIraq:Howtoexploitpragmaticprinciplesofcommunicationsoasnottolie

553

ByScottJacobs

33.Applyinginferenceanchoringtheoryforargumentativestructurerecognitioninthecontextofdebate

569

ByMathildeJanierandOlenaYaskorska

34.Strategicmaneuveringwiththatsaysitallandthatsayseverything

587

ByHenrikeJansen

35.Overcomingobstaclestotheuseofpeergradingintheassessmentofwrittenarguments

601

ByDavidKary

36.Typesofreasoninginargumentation 617ByIrynaKhomenko

37.Prosodicfeaturesintheanalysisofmultimodalargumentation

629

ByGabrijelaKišiček

38.Adjudicationandjustification:Towhatextentshouldtheexcludedbeincludedinthejudge’sdecision?

643

ByBartvanKlink

39."Doctor,Idisagree!”Developmentandinitialvalidationofascaletomeasurepatients’argumentativenessinmedicalconsultation

657

ByNanonLabrie,AnnegretHannawaandPeterSchulz

40.Temporalityinrhetoricalargumentation 671ByIlonLauer

41.Isreasoninguniversal?PerspectivesfromIndia 683ByKeithLloyd

x

42.TheargumentationofH.L.A.Hartonlegalopositivism:Thedescriptiviststanceanditscategories

695

ByAntónioMarques

43.Arguinginthehealthcare:Onthediscourseofweb-basedcommunicationtopatients

705

ByDavideMazzi

44.Phronesisandfallacies 719ByTimothyMosteller

45.Anagentiveresponsetotheincompletenessproblemforthevirtueargumentationtheory

733

ByDouglasNiñoandDannyMarrero

46.Narrativity,narrativeargumentsandpracticalargumentation

743

ByPaulaOlmos

47.Maneuveringstrategicallybymeansofanallegoricalbeastfableinpoliticalcommunication

755

ByAhmedOmar

48.Algorithmsinargumentation:Implicationsforreasoneddecisionmaking

769

ByMarcusParoskeandRonvonBurg

49.Whosefunction?Whichnormativity? 781BySuneH.Pedersen

50.Anannotatedcorpusofargumentativemicrotexts 801ByAndreasPeldszusandManfredStede

51.ApproximatesyllogismasargumentativeexpressionforknowledgerepresentationandreasoningwithgeneralizedBayes'theorem

817

ByM.Pereira-FariñaandA.Bugarín

52.Comparingwordstodebateaboutdrinkingwater:Textometricsforargumentationstudies

831

ByClairePolo,ChristianPlantin,KristineLundandGeraldPeterNiccolai

xi

53.ThephilosophicalandliteraryargumentationmethodsintheancientEgyptianrhetoricalsystems

849

ByHanyRashwan

54.Evaluationofproandcontraargumentation 865ByMagneReitan

55.Anexplorationoftherelatednessproblembetweenarguments:Combiningthegenerativelexiconwithlexicalinference

879

ByPatrickSaint-Dizier

56.Argumentcompoundminingintechnicaltexts:Linguisticstructures,implementationandannotationschemas

895

ByPatrickSaint-DizierandJuyenKang

57.WhensubjectivityarisesinaSwisscriminalcourt:Howintensifierscanworkaspragmaticmarkersinargumentativediscourse

907

ByCamilliaSalasandThierryRaeber

58.Rusticscepticismasargumentation 921ByVitorHirschbruchSchvartz

59.MultimodalargumentationinaclimateprotectioninitiativeonAustriantelevision

933

ByAndreaSabineSedlaczek

60.Reasoningtypesanddiagrammingmethod 947ByMarcinSelinger

61.Ontheendsofargumentation 961ByPaulL.SimardSmith

62.Aformalmodeloferoteticreasoninginsolvingsomewhatill-definedproblems

973

ByMariuszUrbański,NataliaŻyluk,KatarzynaPaluszkiewiczandJoannaUrbańska

63.Dissociatingbetween‘is’and‘ought’:Recognizingandinterpretingpositionsinclimatechangecontroversies

985

ByMehmetAliUzelgunandPaulaCastro

xii

64.“Vaccinesdon’tmakeyourbabyautistic”:Arguinginfavourofvaccinesininstitutionalhealthcarecommunication

999

ByAlessandraVicentiniandKimGrego

65.Argumentationandmoraleducation 1021ByAnaMaríavicuñaNavarro

66.Markmywords:Vindicatingmoralandlegalarguments 1033BySheldonWein

67.Combinatorialdialoguegamesinstrategicargumentation 1045BySimonWells

68.Lostinargumentation?China’sargumentsininternationalhumanrightstreatybodies

1055

ByJingjingWu

69.Areinferencesconcerningactionformalormaterial?Aninferentialistperspective

1071

ByTomaszZarębski

70.Isdialoguethemostappropriatemodelforargumentation?

1081

ByDavidZarefsky

71.Meta-reasoninginmakingmoraldecisionsundernormativeuncertainty

1093

ByTomaszŻuradzki

EditorsDima Mohammed

Marcin Lewinski

63Studiesin Logic

Argumentation and Reasoned Action Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015

Volume II

This is Volume II of the proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation: Argumentation and Reasoned Action, held at the Argumentation Lab in Lisbon, Portugal, in June 2015. The European Conference on Argumentation (ECA) is a new pan-European initiative aiming to consolidate and advance various streaks of research into argumentation and reasoning: philosophy, communication, linguistics, discourse analysis, computer science, psychology, cognitive studies, legal theory, etc. The proceedings comprise what we think is the most complete statement of the state of the art of argumentation studies today across these disciplines. From ancient rhetoric to Artifi cial Intelligence, and from analytic philosophy to detailed empirical research, the contributors examine argumentation theory and practice with a special focus on argumentation aimed at reasoned action. It’s gratifying to have all this research collected in one source and realise the breadth and depth of the lively debates in argumentation studies.

Arg

um

enta

tion a

nd R

easoned A

ctio

n

Pro

ceedin

gs o

f the 1

st E

uro

pean

Confe

rence o

n A

rgum

enta

tion, L

isbon 2

015

Volu

me II

Edito

rsD

ima M

oham

med

Marc

in L

ew

inski

63S

tudie

sin

Logic

Logic and Argumentation