loess in europe - egqsj · soils; similar observations were made for the early weichse-lian record...
TRANSCRIPT
3E&G / Vol. 60 / No. 1 / 2011 / 3–5 / DOI 10.3285/eg.60.1.00 / © Authors / Creative Commons Attribution License
E&G Quaternary Science Journal Volume 60 / Number 1 / 2011 / 3–5 / DOI 10.3285/eg.60.1.00
www.quaternary-science.net
GEOZON SCIENCE MEDIA
ISSN 0424-7116
Loess in EuropeGuest Editorial
Manfred Frechen
Address of author: M. Frechen,LeibnizInstituteforAppliedGeophysics(LIAG),Geochronology&IsotopeHydrology,Stilleweg2,30655Hannover,Germany.E-Mail:[email protected]
ThepapersofthisSpecialIssuegiveremarkablenewresultsandconclusionsonloessfromEuropeunderliningtheexcel-lenceofloessarchivesforpastclimateandenvironmentre-constructionsfromalocalandregionalperspectiveandtheirrelationshiptoamoreglobalinterpretation(Frechen2011a, b). Loess is a clastic predominantly silt-sized sediment,whichis formedbytheaccumulationofwind-blowndust.AccordingtoPye(1995)fourfundamentalrequirementsarenecessaryforitformation:adustsource,adequatewinden-ergytotransportthedust,asuitableaccumulationarea,anda sufficient amount of time. During the Quaternary, loessandloess-likesedimentswereformedinperiglacialenviron-mentsonmid-continentalshieldareasinEuropeandSiberia,on themarginsofhighmountain ranges like inTajikistanandon semi-aridmarginsof some lowlanddeserts like inChina.
Theterm“Löß”wasfirstdescribedinCentralEuropebyKarlCäsar von Leonhard (1823/24) who reported yel-lowish brown, silty deposits along the Rhine valley nearHeidelberg.CharlesLyell (1834)brought this term intowidespreadusagebyobservingsimilaritiesbetween loessand loess derivatives along the loess bluffs in the RhineandMississippi.Atthattimeitwasthoughtthattheyel-lowishbrownsilt-richsedimentwasoffluvialoriginbeingdepositedby the large rivers. It tookuntil theendof the19thcenturyuntiltheaeolianoriginofloesswasrecognized(VirletD'Aoust1857),especiallytheconvincingobserva-tionsof loess inChinabyFerdinandvonRichthofen's(1878). A tremendous number of papers have been pub-lished since then, focusingon the formationof loessandonloess/palaeosolsequencesasarchivesofclimateanden-vironment change (e.g. Pye 1995; Smalley 1995; Pécsi &Richter1996).
Mucheffortwasput intothesettingupofregionalandlocalloessstratigraphiesandtheircorrelation(Kukla1970,1975, 1977).But even thechronostratigraphical positionofthe last interglacial soil correlating tomarine isotope sub-stage5ehasbeenamatterofdebate,owingto the lackofrobust and reliable numerical dating, as summarized forexampleinZölleretal. (1994)andFrechen,Horváth&Gábris(1997)fortheAustrianandHungarianloessstratig-raphy,respectively.
Sincethe1980s,thermoluminescence(TL),opticallystim-ulatedluminescence(OSL)andinfraredstimulatedlumines-
cence (IRSL) dating are available providing the possibilityfordating the timeof loess (dust)deposition, i.e. the timeelapsedsincethelastexposureofthemineralgrainstoday-light.Duringthepastdecadeluminescencedatinghassig-nificantlyimprovedbynewmethodologicalimprovements,especially the development of single aliquot regenerative(SAR)protocols(Murray&Wintle2000)resultinginreli-ableages(orageestimates)withanaccuracyofupto5and10%forthelastglacialrecord.Morerecentlyluminescencedatinghasalsobecomearobustdatingtechniqueforpenul-timateandantepenultimateglacialloess(e.g.Thieletal.thisissue;Schmidtetal.thisissue)allowingforareliablecor-relationofloess/palaeosolsequencesforatleastthelasttwointerglacial/glacialcyclesthroughoutEuropeandtheNorth-ernHemisphere(Frechen2011a).Furthermore,thenumeri-caldatingprovidesthebasisforquantitativeloessresearchapplyingmoresophisticatedmethodstodetermineandun-derstandhigh-resolutionproxydata,suchasthepalaeodustcontentoftheatmosphere,variationsoftheatmosphericcir-culationpatternsandwindsystems,palaeoprecipitationandpalaeotemperature.
ThepapersofthisSpecialIssueonLoessinEuropegivethe basis for substantial further challenging developmentsin loess researchandare summarisedgeographically fromnorthtosouth.
Little is known about the timing of loess accumulationandsoil formationaswellas thesettlementhistory in the“Altmoränengebiet”innorthernGermany.Urban,Kunz&Gehrt(thisissue)providesomeevidenceforthehumanim-pactonsoildevelopmentsincethelateNeolithicbymeansofsedimentology,pedologyandpalynologyaswellasOSLandradiocarbondating.
Wagner (this issue) carried out a spatial compilationandvisualisationofloessparametersforloessandloess-likesedimentsintheWeser-Allercatchment,includingpartsofsouthern Lower Saxony and northern Hesse in NorthwestGermany. In this study, very detailed maps of loess prop-erty patterns including loess thickness, granulometry andstratigraphywerecollectedfrompublicationsandhistorical-lymapspublishedbetween1876and2007resultinginmorethan600loesslocationsprovidingthebaseinformationfortheareaunderstudy.
The loess/palaeosol sequences from Saxony were re-in-vestigated by Meszner, Fuchs & Faust (this issue), who
4
presentanewcompositeprofileincludingnewstratigraph-ic marker horizons and palaeosols. They identified threepalaeosols for the so far poorly differentiatedWeichselianPleniglacialrecordinSaxony.
In theLowerRhineEmbayment, detailed loess/palale-osolsequenceshavebeendescribedfromthekm-wideex-posuresofthebrowncoalopen-castminesandfrommanybrickyards, e.g. Grafenberg, Rheindahlen and Erkelenz.MostofthestudiedsectionsgiveevidenceforrichPalaeo-lithic(andyoungerperiods)artefactsandsettlementstruc-tures.Pawlik&Thissen(thisissue)presentresultsfromaMiddle Palaeolithic archaeological layer in the open castbrowncoalmineInden,whichtheycorrelatetotheEemianinterglacial. The studied artefacts give evidence for birchpitch fixed tools, either as hafted impliments fixed withbirch pitch onto shafts or being used for successive haft-ing-and-retrolingactivities.Pawlik&Thissen(thisissue)pointoutthatbirchpitchresiduesevidencehumanuseofadhesiveandmulticomponenttoolmakingalreadyintheMiddlePalaeolithic.
At theSchwalbenberg section, averydetailedWeichse-lian Middle Pleniglacial loess record is exposed (Frechen&Schirmer this issue).Eightweak interstadialpalaeosolsincludingAhandBcv(calciccambisol)horizonsare inter-calatedinloessandreworkedloess.Thechronostratigraphi-calunitsshowlittleornoageincreasewithdepthindicat-ingfastaccumulationofsedimentandfastformationofthesoils;similarobservationsweremadefortheEarlyWeichse-lianrecordattheTönchesbergsection(Boenigk&Frechen2001).
MaarlakesanddrymaarsoftheWestEifelVolcanicFieldareexcellent sediment trapsandprovide sediment recordswith the possibility to archive event-laminated sediments.Dietrich&Sirocko(thisissue)describethepotentialofmi-croX-rayfluorescence(µXRF)scanningtostudybulksedi-mentchemicaldata formajor and trace elements inmaarlake sediments to determine the elemental stratificationwithinsedimentcores.ThecoresunderstudyfromtheDeh-nerdrymaarandtheSchalkenmehrenmaarshowbothfullyglacialaswellaswarmandwetclimateconditionsandgiveevidenceforthemajordustdepositionevents.Dietrich&Sirocko(thisissue)showevidencethatacombinationoftheCacontentandthegrayscalevaluescorrelatesbestwiththesignalofaeoliansedimentinput.
Reliable dating of maar sediments is a real challenge.Schmidt et al. (this issue) studied sediments from theJungfernweiherlocatedintheWestEifelVolcanicFieldusingluminescencedating.TheIRSLdatingstudyindicatesthatthesedimentsfrom16mbelowsurfacehaveluminescenceageof250kaandincreaseupto400kafortheoldestsampledsedi-mentsabout94mbelowmodernsurface.However,oneoftheco-authors (F.Sirocko,seeappendixofSchmidtetal. thisissuea)hasadifferent interpretationbasedon radiocarbondatingandfurtherrelativedatingmethods,suchassedimentmagnetisation,tuningofgreyscalevariationswithGreenlandicecoreandintercalatedtephrahorizonsindicatingalastgla-cialrecord.Thedifferentopinionsshowthatchronologicalap-proachesareverychallenging.
At thegravelquarryGaul locatednearWeilbachin the
southernforelandoftheTaunusMountains,aMiddletoUp-perPleistocene loess/palaleosol sequence isexposedcorre-latingwiththelastthreeglacialcycles.Theoldestloessgavepost-IRIRSLat225°Cageestimatesofatleast350ka(MIS10)ago(Schmidt,Semmel&Frechenthisissue).Ahumic-richhorizon(“WeilbacherHumuszone”)correlatestothelatephaseofthepenultimateinterglacial(MIS7).TheuppermostloesscorrelatestotheUpperWürmian.
Thieletal.(thisissue)investigatedthreeimportantPleis-tocenekeyloesssectionsinLowerAustria,theseareJoching,PaudorfandGöttweig.Thepost-IRIRSLageestimatesallowfora correlationof thepedocomplex“PaudorferBodenbil-dung”withthelast interglacial(MIS5),whichisinagree-mentwithpreviousTLageestimatesofZölleretal.(1994).However, thepedocomplex“GöttweigerVerlehmungszone”is signifiacantly older (≥350 ka) than the last interglacialsoil.Thieletal.(thisissue)foundoutthatdiscontinuitiesinloess/palaeosol recordsobserved inLowerAustriaare sig-nificant making a simple counting from the top approachunreliable.Thus, theLowerAustrian loessstratigraphy in-cludingthetimingoftheintercalatedpalaeosolsremainsun-derdiscussionandrequiresfurtherluminescencebasedagedetermination.
LoessdepositsfromtheHagenbachKlammlocatedinthenorthernViennaForestweredatedusingluminescencedat-ingbyFranketal.(thisissue).Themolluscassemblagesin-dicateveryhumidandcoolclimaticconditionsfortheUp-perPleniglacial (UpperWürmian).Franketal. (this issue)observedgoodagreementbetweenmalcalogicalresultsandthoseofnumericaldatingincluding14CandIRSLages.Thedating resultsmakea loessaccumulationprior to theLastGlacialMaximummostlikely.
Zech et al. (this issue) give an overview on the mostrecent proxy developments concerning biomarkers andcompound-specific stable isotopes. The aim of these novelmethodological approaches is todeterminemorequantita-tivepalaeoclimateproxies for reconstructionofvegetationhistory,palaeotemperatureandpalaeoclimate/aridity.
Wacha et al. (this issue) investigated a very detailedloess/palaeosol sequence on Susak. Radiocarbon ages andluminescence age estimates indicate an Upper PleistocenerecordincludingaverydetailedandthickMiddlePlenigla-cialrecord(MIS3)includingnumerousintercalatedpalale-osolsandat leastthreetephralayers,most likelyfromtheItalianVolcanicprovinces.TheislandofSusakisuniqueintheNorthAdriatic Seabecause the geomorphologyof theislandhasallcharacteristicsofaloessplateaudissectedbynumerousgorges,steepbluffsandgullies(Wachaetal.thisissue).
The Late Pleistocene/Holocene morphological and geo-logicalhistoryoftheParaguayanChacoandtheArgentinePampaPlain(Chaco-PampaPlain)wasstudiedbyKrucketal.(thisissue).Satelliteimageswereusedtosynthesisepre-viousandnewmultidisciplinaryresultsofthisvast-extend-edarea.Krucketal.(thisissue)localisedsourceregionsofloess,loess-likesedimentsandsandydepositsinthesouth-westernPampaandtheneighbouringAndeanslopesandtheAltiplano,thusindicatingasedimenttransporttowardseastandlaternortheast.
E&G / Vol. 60 / No. 1 / 2011 / 3–5 / DOI 10.3285/eg.60.1.00 / © Authors / Creative Commons Attribution License
5E&G / Vol. 60 / No. 1 / 2011 / 3–5 / DOI 10.3285/eg.60.1.00 / © Authors / Creative Commons Attribution License
References
Boenigk,W.&Frechen,M.(2001):TheloessrecordinsectionsatKoblenz-MetternichandTönchesbergintheMiddleRhineArea.–QuaternaryInternational,76/77:201–209.
Dietrich,S.&Sirocko,F.(thisissue):Thepotentialofdustdetectionbymeansof !XRFscanning inEifelmaar lakesediments.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Frank,C.,Terhorst,B.,Damm,B.,Thiel,C.,Frechen,M.&Peticzka,R.(thisissue):PleistoceneloessdepositsandmolluscassemblagesintheEasternPre-Alps.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Frechen,M.(2011a):Loess inEurasia.–QuaternaryInternational,xyxy,1–3.
Frechen, M. (2011b): Timing and Vegetation History of Interglacials innorthernEurasia.–QuaternaryInternational,141:1–2.
Frechen, M., Horváth, E. & Gábris, G. (1997): Geochronology of Mid-dleandUpperPleistoceneloesssectionsinHungary.–QuaternaryRe-search,48:291–312.
Frechen,M.&Schirmer,W.(thisissue):LuminescenceChronologyoftheSchwalbenbergIILoessintheMiddleRhineValley.–QuaternarySci-enceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Kruck, W., Helms, F., Geyh, M.A., Suriano, J.M., Marengo, H.G. &Pereyra,F.(thisissue):LatePleistocene-HoloceneHistoryofChaco-PampaSediments inArgentinaandParaguay.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Kukla,G. (1970):Correlationbetween loessesanddeep-seasediments.–GeologiskeForeningenFoerhandlingar,92:148–180;Stockholm.
Kukla,G.J.(1975):LoessstratigraphyofCentralEurope.–InK.W.ButzerandG.L. Isaac,Eds.,AftertheAustralopithecus,pp.99–188;Mouton,TheHague.
Kukla,G.J.(1977):PleistoceneLand-SeaCorrelationsI.Europe.EarthSci-enceReviews,13:307–374.
Leonhard, K.C. von (1823/24):Charakteristik der Felsarten. – 3Vols., J.EngelmannVerlagHeidelberg,pp.772.
Lyell,C.(1834):Observationsontheloamydepositscalled”loess”oftheba-sinoftheRhine.–EdinburghNewPhilosophicalJournal,17:110–113,118–120.
Meszner,S.,Fuchs,M.&Faust,D.(thisissue):Loess-Palaeosol-SequencesfromtheloessareaofSaxony(Germany).–QuaternaryScienceJour-nal(EuG),60(1).
Murray,A.S.&Wintle,A.G.(2000):Luminescencedatingofquartzus-ingan improved singlealiquot regenerative-doseprotocol.RadiationMeasurements32:57–73.
Novothny,A.,Horvath,E.&Frechen,M.(2002):TheloessprofileatAl-bertirsa,Hungary– improvements in loess stratigraphyby lumines-cencedating.–QuaternaryInternational,95–96:155–163.
Pawlik,A.F.&Thissen,J.(thisissue):The‘PalaeolithicProspectionintheIndeValley’Project.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Pécsi,M.(1990):Loessisnotjusttheaccumulationofdust.–QuaternaryInternational,7/8:1–21.
Pécsi,M.&Richter,G.(1996):Löss:Herkunft–Gliederung–Landschaf-ten.–ZeitschriftfürGeomorphologie,NeuFolgeSupplementband98,Berlin.
Pye,K.(1995):Thenature,originandaccumulationofloess.-QuaternaryScienceReviews,14:653–667.
Richthofen,F.von(1878):BemerkungenzurLößbildung.–VerhGeolRe-ichsanst,Berlin,pp1–13.
Schmidt,E.D.,Semmel,A.&Frechen,M.(thisissue):Luminescencedat-ingoftheloess/palaeosolsequenceatthegravelquarryGaul/Weilbach,SouthernHesse(Germany).–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Schmidt,E.D.,Murray,A.S.,Sirocko,F.,Tsukamoto,S.&Frechen,M.(thisissue):IRSLSignalsfromMaarLakeSedimentsStimulatedatVari-ousTemperatures.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Smalley,I.(1995):Makingthematerial:theformationofsilt-sizedpromarymineralpariclesforloessdeposits.–QuaternaryScienceReviews,14:645–651.
Thiel, C., Buylaert, J.P., Murray, A.S., Terhorst, B., Tsukamoto, S.,Frechen,M.&Sprafke,T.(thisissue):Investigatingthechronostratig-raphy of prominent palaeosols in Lower Austria using post-IR IRSLdating.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Urban,B.,Kunz,A.,Gehrt,E.(thisissue):GenesisanddatingofLatePleis-tocene-Holocene soil sediment sequences from the Lüneburg Heath,NorthernGermany.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Virlet D'Aoust, P.T. (1857): Observations sur un terrain d`originemétéorique ou de transport aerien qui existe au Mexique et sur lephénomènedestrombesdepoussièreauquelildoitprincipalementsonorigine.–Geol.Soc.France,Full.,2d,Ser.2,129–139.
Wacha,L.,MikulcicPavlakovic,S.,Frechen,M.,Crnjakovic,M.(thisissue):TheLoessChronologyoftheIslandofSusak,Croatia.–Quater-naryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Wagner,B. (this issue):Spatialanalysisof loessand loess-likesedimentsintheWeser-Allercatchment(LowerSaxonyandNorthernHesse,NWGermany).–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Zech,M.,Zech,R.,Buggle,B.,Zöller,L.(thisissue):Novelmethodologi-calapproachesinloessresearch–interrogatingbiomarkersandcom-pound-specificstableisotopes.–QuaternaryScienceJournal(EuG),60(1).
Zöller,L.,Oches,E.A..&McCoy,W.D.(1994):Towardsarevisedchronos-tratigraphyofloessinAustriawithrespecttokeysectionsintheCzechRepublicand inHungary.–QuaternaryGeochronology(QuaternaryScienceReviews),13:465–472.