literary analysis
DESCRIPTION
My analysis on “Flight Patterns” by Sherman AlexieTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Literary Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080220/55cf9a94550346d033a27025/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Robles 1
Sandra Robles
Mr. Newman
English 101: Rhetoric
5 November 2013
Stop the Prejudice
“Flight Patterns” by Sherman Alexie focuses on the main character, William, a healthy,
ritualistic Spokane Indian living in Seattle, Washington, who knows a wide variety of American
trivia. Alexie places an emphasis on William’s interest in American culture to show his want to
feel as though he is a true American. He is a businessman that loves his job, but hates to leave his
family, travels often but has a fear of flying, and is always a victim of prejudice, yet is guilty of
doing so to others. Throughout “Flight Patterns,” readers learn that people as a society are quick
to stereotype others and, if given the chance, the ones who are stereotyped could add growth to
and better your character.
Every day, people unnoticeably profile others, whether it is someone off the street or
someone they see every day. When William first got into the taxi cab, he disregarded the cab
driver, Fekadu, but then when William actually studied his features, William thought of him as
being "a black man with a violent history” because of the scar of the back of his neck (55). Even
though William knew nothing about this man or the truth behind the scar on his neck, William
stereotyped him like another person would: an African American who lives a malicious life.
William is no stranger to prejudice, especially since September 11th
, but even then he is still
human and does the same mistake himself. Alexie states, “William didn’t want to insult
anybody; he wanted the world to be a fair and decent place,” which goes to prove that from what
![Page 2: Literary Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080220/55cf9a94550346d033a27025/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Robles 2
William has experienced, he does not want to be offensive towards others by doing the exact
same thing that is done to him and that he wishes for people to do the same (53).
When people are profiled, the normalities that other people expect them to be a part of
are—more likely than not—much further from the truth. As Fekadu is telling William that in
England he studied physics at Oxford, William suspects whether Fekadu is lying or not because
no one could ever think of an Oxford man turning out to be a taxi cab driver (56). When Fekadu
realizes this, he states, “Aha, you do think I’m lying. You ask yourself questions about me. How
could a physicist drive a taxi? Well, in the United Sates, I am a cabdriver, but in Ethiopia, I was a
jet-fighter pilot,” which demonstrates that there is always more than meets the eye with people
(56). Another example of ignorant profiling would be when William was walking out of his gym
and a big phallic pickup came up to him and the person inside told William, “’Go back to your
own country!’”, thinking that William was a terrorist involved with September 11th
because of
his physical features alone (57). If that person would not have been profiling William on his
features, then that person would have discovered that William is in fact a Spokane Indian who
has nothing to do with what happened on September 11th
.
As the story concludes, William is able to learn that people should not be so quick to
judge others because there is so much that they do not know about them that would change their
whole outlook on that person. Alexie writes, “William was surprised to discover that he didn’t
want this journey to end so soon. He wondered if he should invite Fekadu for coffee and a
sandwich, for a slice of pie, for brotherhood. William wanted to hear more of this man’s stories
and learn from them, whether they were true or not,” (59, 60). By being told about Fekadu’s past
life in Ethiopia, William is able to change his perspective from thinking that Fekadu is “a black
man with a violent history” to Fekadu is a father who has made life altering decisions for himself
![Page 3: Literary Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080220/55cf9a94550346d033a27025/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Robles 3
and his family. Just before William leaves the taxi cab, he tells Fekadu, “Your stories…I want to
believe you,” to which Fekadu replies, “Then believe me,” (61). This goes to show that by the
end of the story, William has become more receptive when it comes to learning about a person’s
life and not be so focused on their stereotypes.
Throughout “Flight Patterns,” readers learn that people as a society are quick to
stereotype others and, if given the chance, the ones who are stereotyped could add growth to and
better your character. William was able to steer away from the status quo of what African
American taxi cab drivers are supposed to be like and begin to be impartial of how their lives
could truly be. If society was to become unprejudiced and there were no stereotypes, then the
world would be a better place for everyone because no one would be profiled for who they aren’t
and everyone could learn from one another of what they have overcome.
![Page 4: Literary Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080220/55cf9a94550346d033a27025/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Robles 4
Work Cited
Alexie, Sherman. "Flight Patterns." 2003. The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Alison
Booth, J. Paul Hunter, and Kelly J. Mays. 9th ed. New York: W. W. Norton and
Company, 2005. 49-61. Print.