linking zircon age to metamorphic stage using u-pb/ree

1
EGU2017- 1568 Sophie Briggs 1 , John Cottle 1 , Matthijs Smit 2 , Nicole Arnush 1 2 Pacific Center for Isotope and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. [email protected] 3 St Olaf College, Northfield, MN. [email protected] Linking zircon age to metamorphic stage using U-Pb/REE depth-profiling of zircon combined with Lu-Hf garnet geochronology Motivation 1 Department of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara [email protected] [email protected] 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 238 U/ 206 Pb Age (Ma) Th/U detrital zircon Zircon is capable of (re)crystallizing at any stage during metamorphism. Recrystallization events are often preserved in thin (<10 um) rims on inherited zircon grains in metamorphic rocks. Laser ablation split-stream (LASS) depth-profiling of unpolished zircon surfaces has enabled U-Pb isotope and trace element analysis of these thin zircon domains. The potential value of this high spatial resolution method as a petrochronologic tool hinges on the question: Can zircon depth-profile data be linked to specific metamorphic conditions and tectonothermal events? 50 μm pit spot 10 pit spot 10 - BSE 50 μm laser beam CL 20 μm Continental arc Accretionary wedge complex (Alpine Schist) Locus of rifting 83 - 52 Ma Hikurangi Plateau (LIP) 105 - 90 Ma 4 0.280 0.290 0.310 0.300 12 16 8 MSWD = 1.08 176 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.28343 ± 44 176 Lu/ 177 Hf 176 Hf/ 177 Hf 79.9 ± 2.3 Ma Results Geologic setting 78.0 ± 1.7 Ma 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 50 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -0.05 0 0.05 Th/U WC14-31-14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -10 0 10 20 Th (ppm) ) 0 20 40 60 80 Yb (ppm) ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Ce (ppm) 0 5 10 Lu/Ho 238 U/ 206 Pb Age (Ma) pulse laser pulse 45.1 ± 2.6 Ma 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 200 400 600 800 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Th/U 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -50 0 50 100 Th (ppm) ) 0 500 1000 Yb (ppm) ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -2 0 2 4 6 Ce (ppm) 0 100 200 300 Lu/Ho 238 U/ 206 Pb Age (Ma) WC14-31-10 laser pulse LASS zircon depth-profiles: Lu-Hf garnet geochronology: 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 zircon/chondrite Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu inherited cores REE zircon rim 45.1 ± 2.6 Ma 78.0 ± 1.7 Ma 72.2 ± 1.7 Ma 50 μm BSE laser beam 50 μm CL laser beam 50 μm BSE laser beam 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 D REE (zircon/garnet) Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu published D REE (zircon/garnet) <900° C 45.1 ± 2.6 Ma 78.0 ± 1.7 Ma 72.2 ± 1.7 Ma garnet unstable garnet stable La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu 0.001 0.01 0. 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 REE garnet rim garnet/chondrite rim towards core 0 20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Volume % of crystal (core to rim) Cumulative % Lu 75 Ma 78 Ma 97 Ma 80 Ma 85 Ma 92 Ma D REE Summary: Garnet chemistry: D REE (zircon/garnet): An amphibolite facies schist (WC14-31 ) yields 3 distinct zircon rim ages, two of which are close in age to garnet from the same sample. Calculated zircon/garnet REE partition coefficients overlap with published values for zircon that formed during garnet-stable conditions. Depth profile samples thick, chemically homogeneous rim. Convolute zoning and inclusions/porosity at core-rim interface indicate earlier modification by a dissolution-reprecipitation process. Depth profile samples thin convolute rim followed by an older, dark un-zoned domain. Porous texture of convolute rim indicates modification by dissolution-reprecipitation. EPMA garnet compositional maps. Lu-Hf isochron comprising four multi- grain garnet aliquots provides the ‘mean age’ of garnet growth. Lu distribution of WC14-31 garnet (bold) indicates age may be biased toward core. Garnet rim REE abundance (LA-ICP-MS). Profiles colored by distance of the analysis from the garnet rim. REE partition coefficients (REEppm zircon/REEppm garnet) using zircon rim average coupled with 8 garnet rim analyses. Method Alpine Schist garnet and zircon (re)crystallization is contemporaneous with the rifting of Zealandia from Gondwana during 83 – 52 Ma. The newly proposed geologic continent Zealandia is 94% submerged below sea level. Uplift along the active Pacific-Australia plate boundary exposes the Alpine Schist accretionary wedge complex in the South Island. Zircon was mounted on flat crystal faces in epoxy. Unpolished surfaces were analysed by LASS-ICP-MS using 35 μm spots for 40 seconds at 2 Hz = 80 shots. Data selection criteria: 500 300 100 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Th/U 0 0.9 206 Pb/ 207 Pb 238 U/ 206 Pb 63 Ma rim 190 Ma core mixing Anatectic pegmatites: Zircon rims summary: Mn Ca 1 mm 1) ≥10 data point ‘plateau’ age 2) no mixing or incomplete re-equilibration 3) Th/U correlates with age 4) REE is reset, not inherited from core Implications References monazite 208 Pb/ 232 Th age (Ma) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 relative probability 0 5 10 15 20 25 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Lu/Ho 238 U/ 206 Pb Age (Ma) Alpine Schist intruded by pegmatites garnet-stable 0 0.004 0.008 0.012 0.016 0.02 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Th/U 238 U/ 206 Pb Age (Ma) WC14-09 WC14-31 MR13-28 WC14-27 MR13-09 S O U T H E R N A L P S 43°0'0"S 44°0'0"S 169°0'0"E 171°0'0"E 172°0'0"E 170°0'0"E 44°0'0"S 2 3 4 0 50 25 K ilometers 97.3 ± 0.3 Ma 91.8 ± 0.3 Ma 78.4 ± 0.5 Ma 79.9 ± 2.3 Ma 85.1 ± 0.8 Ma 75.4 ± 1.3 Ma anatectic pegmatite intrusion: 80 - 51 Ma 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Age (Ma) Age (Ma) NE SW Legend K-feldspar amphibolite Oligoclase amphibolite Garnet amphibolite Garnet gs - amph Garnet greenschist Biotite greenschist Chlorite greenschist Pumpellyite-actinolite Prehnite-pumpellyite Metamorphic Zones Garnet Lu-Hf age (this study) seafloor spreading pegmatite intrusion lithospheric thinning Alpine Schist intruded by anatectic pegmatites yields zircon rims with higher sumREE and enriched HREE (high Lu/Ho ratio). These zircon rims likely formed either during fluid/melt influx associated with pegmatite intrusion, or during garnet-unstable conditions. Zealandia Zealandia was assembled at the paleo Pacific-Gondwana margin during Mesozoic subduction. The Alpine Schist represents the metamorphosed sediments of the accretionary wedge complex, long thought to have been metamorphosed during Jurassic – Cretaceous subduction. New metamorphic dates show that the Alpine Schist records metamorphism occurring concurrently with rifting and the final stages of break-up of Gondwana. We address this question by applying the depth-profiling method to zircon from amphibolite facies Alpine Schist (New Zealand) dated previously by Lu-Hf garnet geochronology and assessing: 1) rare earth element (REE) partitioning between zircon and garnet 2) independent constraints on the timing of garnet growth, and generation of anatectic pegmatites. Cottle et al. 2009 Depth-profiling is capable of resolving multiple zircon growth/modification events spanning a significant portion of a rock’s metamorphic history. Zircon rims formed during garnet-stable conditions are distinctly depleted in HREE, and yield D(REE) zircon/garnet values consistent with published values. Zircon rims formed during fluid/melt influx are characterized by enriched HREE and convoluted internal zoning. Limitations: the presence/absence, thickness and continuity of zircon rim domains is not predictable and may be governed by location of zircon in the rock and/or access to fluids/melts. Regional implications: Both garnet and zircon (re)crystallization in the Alpine Schist are contemporaneous with the rifting of the Zealandia microcontinent from East Gondwana during 83 – 52 Ma, suggesting that compressional and extensional tectonic regimes existed in close proximity during the formation of the Zealandia microcontinent. Rubatto, D., & Hermann, J. (2007). Experimental zircon/melt and zircon/garnet trace element partitioning and implications for the geochronology of crustal rocks. Chemical Geology, 241(1), 38-61. Hermann, J., & Rubatto, D. (2003). Relating zircon and monazite domains to garnet growth zones: age and duration of granulite facies metamorphism in the Val Malenco lower crust. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 21(9), 833-852. [14] Rubatto, D., Hermann, J., & Buick, I. S. (2006). Temperature and bulk composition control on the growth of 1973-1996. Rubatto, D. (2002). Zircon trace element geochemistry: partitioning with garnet and the link between U–Pb ages and metamorphism. Chemical Geology, 184(1), 123-138. Metamorphic zircon overgrowths are easily distinguished from igneous cores based on Th/U (<<1) Concordia plots show mixing between modified zircon rims and unmodified, inherited igneous cores

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Linking zircon age to metamorphic stage using U-Pb/REE

EGU2017-1568

Sophie Briggs1, John Cottle1, Matthijs Smit2, Nicole Arnush 12Pacific Center for Isotope and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences,

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. [email protected] Olaf College, Northfield, MN. [email protected]

Linking zircon age to metamorphic stage using U-Pb/REE depth-profiling of zircon combined with Lu-Hf garnet geochronology

Motivation

1Department of Earth Science, University of California Santa Barbara

[email protected]@geol.ucsb.edu

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600238U/206Pb Age (Ma)

Th/U

detr

ital z

ircon

Zircon is capable of (re)crystallizing at any stage during metamorphism. Recrystallization events are often preserved in thin (<10 um) rims on inherited zircon grains in metamorphic rocks. Laser ablation split-stream (LASS) depth-pro�ling of unpolished zircon surfaces has enabled U-Pb isotope and trace element analysis of these thin zircon domains.

The potential value of this high spatial resolution method as a petrochronologic tool hinges on the question:

Can zircon depth-pro�le data be linked to speci�c metamorphic conditions and tectonothermal events?

50 μm

pitspot 10

50 μm

pitspot 10 - BSE

50 μm

laserbeam

CL

20 μm

Continental arc

Accretionary wedge complex(Alpine Schist)

Locus of rifting 83 - 52 Ma

Hikurangi Plateau (LIP)

105 - 90 Ma

4 0.280

0.290

0.310

0.300

12 168

MSWD = 1.08176Hf/177Hf = 0.28343 ± 44

176Lu/177Hf17

6 Hf/

177 H

f

79.9 ± 2.3 Ma

Results

Geologic setting

78.0 ± 1.7 Ma

010

2030

4050

6070

0 50

100

010

2030

4050

6070

-0.05 0

0.05

Th/U

WC14-31-14

010

2030

4050

6070

-10 0 10 20

Th (ppm))

0 20 40 60 80

Yb (ppm))

010

2030

4050

6070

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4

Ce (ppm)

0 5 10

Lu/Ho

238U/206Pb Age (Ma)

pulse

lase

r pul

se

45.1 ± 2.6 Ma

010

2030

4050

6070

0

200

400

600

800

010

2030

4050

6070

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4

Th/U

010

2030

4050

6070

-50 0 50

100

Th (ppm))

0 500

1000

Yb (ppm))

010

2030

4050

6070

-2 0 2 4 6

Ce (ppm)

0 100

200

300

Lu/Ho

238U/206Pb Age (Ma)

WC14-31-10

lase

r pul

se

LASS zircon depth-pro�les:

Lu-Hf garnet geochronology:

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

zirc

on/c

hond

rite

La Ce Pr Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

zirc

on/c

hond

rite

inherited cores

REE zircon rim

45.1 ± 2.6 Ma

78.0 ± 1.7 Ma

72.2 ± 1.7 Ma

50 μm

BSE laserbeam

50 μm

CL laser beam

50 μm

BSE laserbeam

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

DRE

E (zirc

on/g

arne

t)

La Ce Pr Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

zirc

on/c

hond

rite published

DREE (zircon/garnet) <900° C

45.1 ± 2.6 Ma

78.0 ± 1.7 Ma

72.2 ± 1.7 Ma

garnet unstable

garnet stable

La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu0.001

0.01

0. 1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000 REE garnet rim

garn

et/c

hond

rite

rim

towardscore

Volume % of Crystal (Core to Rim)

0

20

40

60

80

100

20 40 60 80 100Volume % of crystal (core to rim)

Cum

ulat

ive

% L

u

75 Ma

78 M

a

97 M

a

80 M

a

85 Ma

92 Ma

DREE Summary:

Garnet chemistry: DREE (zircon/garnet):

An amphibolite facies schist (WC14-31 ) yields 3 distinct zircon rim ages, two of which are close in age to garnet from the same sample. Calculated zircon/garnet REE partition coe�cients overlap with published values for zircon that formed during garnet-stable conditions.

Depth pro�le samples thick, chemically homogeneous rim. Convolute zoning and inclusions/porosity at core-rim interface indicate earlier modi�cation by a dissolution-reprecipitation process.

Depth pro�le samples thin convolute rim followed by an older, dark un-zoned domain. Porous texture of convolute rim indicates modi�cation by dissolution-reprecipitation.

EPMA garnet compositional maps.

Lu-Hf isochron comprising four multi-grain garnet aliquots provides the ‘mean age’ of garnet growth.

Lu distribution of WC14-31 garnet (bold) indicates age may be biased toward core.

Garnet rim REE abundance (LA-ICP-MS). Pro�les colored by distance of the analysis from the garnet rim.

REE partition coe�cients (REEppm zircon/REEppm garnet) using zircon rim average coupled with 8 garnet rim analyses.

Method

Alpine Schist garnet and zircon (re)crystallization is contemporaneous with the rifting of Zealandia from Gondwana during 83 – 52 Ma.

The newly proposed geologic continent Zealandia is 94% submerged below sea level. Uplift along the active Paci�c-Australia plate boundary exposes the Alpine Schist accretionary wedge complex in the South Island.

Zircon was mounted on �at crystal faces in epoxy. Unpolished surfaces were analysed by LASS-ICP-MS using 35 μm spots for 40 seconds at 2 Hz = 80 shots.

Data selection criteria:

500

300

100

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Th/U

0

0.9

206 P

b/20

7 Pb

238U/206Pb

63 Marim

190 Macore

mixing

Anatectic pegmatites:

Zircon rims summary:

Mn Ca

1 mm

1) ≥10 data point ‘plateau’ age2) no mixing or incomplete re-equilibration3) Th/U correlates with age4) REE is reset, not inherited from core

Implications

References

monazite 208Pb/232Th age (Ma)40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0

14

28

42

57

(n=453)

rela

tive

prob

abili

ty

0

5

10

15

20

25

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Lu/H

o

238U/206Pb Age (Ma)

Alpine Schist intruded by pegmatites

garnet-stable0

0.004

0.008

0.012

0.016

0.02

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Th/U

238U/206Pb Age (Ma)

WC14-09WC14-31

MR13-28

WC14-27

MR13-09

173°0'0"E

172°0'0"E

171°0'0"E

170°0'0"E

170°0'0"E

169°0'0"E

169°0'0"E

43°0

'0"S

43°0

'0"S

44°0

'0"S

0

90

45

Kilometers

±

S O U T H E R N A L P S

43°0'0"S

44°0

'0"S

169°

0'0"

E

171°0'0"E 172°0'0"E170°0'0"E 44°0'0"S

0 5025K ilometers

0 5025K ilometers

2 3

4

0 5025K ilometers

97.3 ± 0.3 Ma

91.8 ± 0.3 Ma78.4 ± 0.5 Ma 79.9 ± 2.3 Ma 85.1 ± 0.8 Ma

75.4 ± 1.3 Ma

anatectic pegmatite intrusion: 80 - 51 Ma

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Age (M

a)Age

(M

a)

NESW

Metamorphic Zones of the

171°0'0"E170°0'0"E

43°0

'0"S

43°0

'0"S

44°0

'0"S

44°0

'0"S

0 5025K ilometers

Datum: NZG D_2000P rojection: New Zealand Trans vers e Merc ator

± A lpine S c his t,Wes tland, New Zealand

Legend

K-feldspar amphibolite

Oligoclase amphibolite

Garnet amphibolite

Garnet gs - amph

Garnet greenschist

Biotite greenschist

Chlorite greenschist

Pumpellyite-actinolite

Prehnite-pumpellyite

S O

U

T

H

E R

N

A

L P

S

Garnet Lu-Hf sample location

Alpine Fault

Published dates: Metamorphic Zones

100 ± 12 (Mortimer and Cooper, 2004)

98 ± 8 (core)

71 - 64 (Cooper and Ireland, 2013a)

86 ± 0.2 (rim) (Vry et al., 2004)

Western Province

Eastern Province

Otago Schist

Alpine Schist

C a p l e s

R a k a i a

ALPINE FAULT

WesternProvince

EasternProvince

72 ± 2(Cooper and

Ireland, 2013b)

71 ± 2 (Mortimer and Cooper, 2004)

Garnet Sm-Nd

Garnet Lu-Hf

Monazite

Zircon rim

97 ± 0.392 ± 0.3

107 ± 0.2

80 ± 2

26?re-xl

85 ± 0.8

75 ± 1

78 ± 0.5

Garnet Lu-Hf age(this study)

sea�oor spreading

pegmatite intrusion

lithospheric thinning

Alpine Schist intruded by anatectic pegmatites yields zircon rims with higher sumREE and enriched HREE (high Lu/Ho ratio).

These zircon rims likely formed either during �uid/melt in�ux associated with pegmatite intrusion, or during garnet-unstable conditions.

ZealandiaZealandia was assembled at the paleo Paci�c-Gondwana margin during Mesozoic subduction. The Alpine Schist represents the metamorphosed sediments of the accretionary wedge complex, long thought to have been metamorphosed during Jurassic – Cretaceous subduction. New metamorphic dates show that the Alpine Schist records metamorphism occurring concurrently with rifting and the �nal stages of break-up of Gondwana.

We address this question by applying the depth-pro�ling method to zircon from amphibolite facies Alpine Schist (New Zealand) dated previously by Lu-Hf garnet geochronology and assessing:1) rare earth element (REE) partitioning between zircon and garnet2) independent constraints on the timing of garnet growth, and generation of anatectic pegmatites.

Cottle et al. 2009

Depth-pro�ling is capable of resolving multiple zircon growth/modi�cation events spanning a signi�cant portion of a rock’s metamorphic history.

Zircon rims formed during garnet-stable conditions are distinctly depleted

in HREE, and yield D(REE) zircon/garnet values consistent with published values.

Zircon rims formed during �uid/melt in�ux are characterized by enriched

HREE and convoluted internal zoning.

Limitations: the presence/absence, thickness and continuity of zircon rim domains is not predictable and may be governed by location of zircon in the rock and/or access to �uids/melts.

Regional implications: Both garnet and zircon (re)crystallization in the Alpine Schist are contemporaneous with the rifting of the Zealandia microcontinent from East Gondwana during 83 – 52 Ma, suggesting that compressional and extensional tectonic regimes existed in close proximity during the formation of the Zealandia microcontinent.

Rubatto, D., & Hermann, J. (2007). Experimental zircon/melt and zircon/garnet trace element partitioning and implications for the geochronology of crustal rocks. Chemical Geology, 241(1), 38-61.Hermann, J., & Rubatto, D. (2003). Relating zircon and monazite domains to garnet growth zones: age and duration of granulite facies metamorphism in the Val Malenco lower crust. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 21(9), 833-852.[14] Rubatto, D., Hermann, J., & Buick, I. S. (2006). Temperature and bulk composition control on the growth of

1973-1996.Rubatto, D. (2002). Zircon trace element geochemistry: partitioning with garnet and the link between U–Pb ages and metamorphism. Chemical Geology, 184(1), 123-138.

Metamorphic zircon overgrowths are easily distinguished from igneous cores based on Th/U (<<1)

Concordia plots show mixing between modi�ed zircon rims and unmodi�ed, inherited igneous cores