library material labels and rating systems mary minow, j.d., a.m.l.s. librarylaw.com...

41
Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com [email protected] Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00 noon to 1:00 p.m

Upload: rudolf-rich

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Library Material Labels and Rating Systems

Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S.

LibraryLaw.com

[email protected]

Infopeople Webcast

Thursday Dec. 7, 2006

12:00 noon to 1:00 p.m

Page 2: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

• Today’s webcast:– presentation: 50 minutes– Q&A: final 10 minutes

• Submit your questions via ‘Chat’ during webcast so presenter gets them in time

• Fill out evaluation during Q&A

Don’t wait for Q&A to submit questions

Webcast Archives: infopeople.org/training/webcasts/archived.php

Technical Housekeeping

Page 3: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

• Get help with technical difficulties - send message to “HorizonHelp”

• Ask presenter questions- send message to “ALL”

• Chat with other participants- “select name from dropdown list”

Using Chat

Chat Area ThereList of Participants There

Page 4: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Legal Disclaimer

• Legal information

•Not legal advice!

Page 5: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Agenda

Labels: Viewpoint Neutral or PrejudicialReading lists, genres, ethnic/language

Notes and Ratings in Bibliographic Records Written by libraries / vendors

Restricting Materials Based on RatingsFirst Amendment problemWal-Mart problem

Five Key Questions

Page 6: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

1. Labels: Viewpoint Neutral or Prejudicial?

Page 7: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

wikis.ala.org/lawforlibrarians/

esp. Candace Morgan,

Labeling

Page 8: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Background: American Library Association (ALA) on Labeling

1950 Sons of the American Revolution pressured libraries to label “communistic or subversive”

Led to ALA stance against labeling

p. 173-181 history of ALA on labeling

Page 9: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Faith Fiction titles up 500% since 1990 >2500

Subgenres: contemporaryend of dayshistorical romancesuspense

western allegory young adult thrillers Christian chick lit

Page 10: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Current Interpretation Rev. 2005 Q & A added April 6, 2006

www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/statementspolicies.htm#labeling

Page 11: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Current Interpretation Rev. 2005 Q & A added April 6, 2006

www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/statementspolicies.htm#labeling

Warning: This presentation is based largely on ALA documents, but

paraphrasing is mine, not ALA’s.- Mary Minow

Page 12: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

LabelsALA opposes labeling as means of predisposing

attitudes

When labeling attempts to prejudice attitudes, it is censor's tool

Labels can be used to restrict materials

Viewpoint-neutral directional labels make it easier to locate material

But if used to forbid access or suggest doctrinal endorsement, effect is same as prejudicial labeling

paraphrased

Page 13: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Is Label Viewpoint Neutral Directional or Prejudicial?

Not always obvious answer.

Depends on implementation.

Examine in light of intellectual freedom principles.

paraphrasedQuestions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems

Page 14: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Reading List Shelf Viewpoint Neutral?

May library label/shelve school summer reading list books?

Yes. Assembling high demand materials for limited times helps users.

But make accessible to everyone, not just target audience.

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems paraphrased

Page 15: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems

Romance, mystery, and science fiction Different opinions about titles’ fit, viewpoint neutral

Not moral or doctrinal endorsement.

Christian fiction labels e.g. cross

communicates a message of preference for Christianity especially when other religious fiction is not designated

Violation of First Amendment’s separation of church and state and of Library Bill of Rights.

Genre Labels Viewpoint Neutral?

paraphrased

Page 16: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Lawsuit Threat

ACLU threatened legal action library used cross stickers

"suitable for Christians"

claimed First Amendment violation separation of church and state

www.catholicleague.org/2000report/activists2000.html

Olathe, KS

Page 17: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Different Views

Library Director: Christian labels on light fiction. No sex or violence. Not doctrinal.

Board President: Never meant to offend or promote a religion with stickers. Just service to patrons.

ACLU: Effect of stickers, intended or not, gives message Christian books preferable to non-Christian books.

American Libraries, Oct. 30, 2000 tinyurl.com/p7tgl

Page 18: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Result?

American Libraries, Oct. 30, 2000 tinyurl.com/p7tgl

Board voted to remove labels

Page 19: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Ethnic/Language Sections?

Okay to meet demand

Make it simple for users to locate items

Design sections to help users find resources relevant to their experience, not restrict them to a certain section

Represent diverse viewpoints

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems paraphrased

Page 20: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

2. Notes and Ratings in Bibliographic Records

Can we add "contains mild violence" on bibliographic records e.g. graphic novels?

No. This voluntary labeling violates Library Bill of Rights.

Range of attitudes on “offensive” and “moral values”values. Sex, violence, language…

“Objectionable content” in bibliographic record assumes all members of community hold same values

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems

paraphrased

Written by libraries

Page 21: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Vendor Enhanced Catalogs?

Page 22: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Enhanced Catalogs

Book reviews, jackets, evaluative materials?

Libraries shouldn’t preclude information useful to users as long as the criteria for inclusion is viewpoint neutral

Seek broadest spectrum of informational and evaluative materials possible. Ask vendors to include diverse viewpoints in their products

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems paraphrased

Page 23: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Hitchcock CritiquesALA “Value Judgment” Test

Informative or Prejudicial?

Jean Genet, The Thief’s JournalNotes: author petty thief, homosexual prostitute, army deserter

Diary and Correspondence of Samuel PepysNotes: edition deletes erotic and scatalogical content

Michael Bellesiles’s Arming America Catalog record: shows positive reviews [book now discredited]

“causes more problems than it solves”Leonard A. Hitchcock, “A Critique of the New Statement on Labeling,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32:3 (May 2006) p. 296-302

Page 24: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Ratings in Catalog Records?

Page 25: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Ratings in Catalog Records

Page 26: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Movie, Music, Game Ratings in Bibliographic Records, Finding

Aids?

No.

Libraries must not endorse private rating systems subjective, changing criteria

Ratings in library records, library-created finding aids can predispose users

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems

paraphrased

Library Pathfinder

Page 27: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

paraphrased

Rating Systems

• Ratings in packaging? Library should not endorse practice, but removal could constitute expurgation [denying access to a complete work]

• If legislation enforces private rating systems, seek legal advice

Page 28: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Can library restrict R-Rated movies?

Libraries can make rating systems information available

BUT Government, including public libraries, cannot mandate or enforce private organizations’ ratings

First Amendment problem

Questions and Answers on Labels and Rating Systems

paraphrased

3. Restricting Materials Based on Ratings

Page 29: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Who Determines R-Ratings, Parental Advisory Notices?

Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) www.mpaa.org/FilmRatings.asp

Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) www.riaa.com/issues/parents/

Rating systems for

parents: films, recordings …

Parental Advisory may contain strong language or depictions of violence, sex or substance abuse

Page 30: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Illinois Library Association Reporter 22:2 (2004) p. 10-13

www.ila.org/pub/reporter/vol22no2.pdf

“The public library’s restriction on films represents a presumptively unconstitutional prior restraint on speech.”

-Deborah Caldwell-Stone

Page 31: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT

Page 32: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Courts Strike Down Government Enforcement of Ratings

• City ordinance used MPAA ratings to restrict minors

- Struck down

• State penal code made it crime to show movies to minors based on MPAA ratings

- Struck down

Enghahl v. Kenosha, 317 F. Supp. 1133 (E.D. Wis. 1970); Motion Picture Association of America v. Arlen Specter, 315 F. Supp. 824 (E.D. Pa.1970.) Other cases invalidating government use of MPAA ratings: Swope v. Lubbers, 560 F.Supp. 1328 (W.D. Mich. 1983), Rosen v. Budco, 10 Phila. 112 (1983). Cited in Deborah Caldwell-Stone, "Movie Ratings are Private, Not Public Policy,“ Illinois Library Association Reporter 22:2 (2004) p. 10-13 at www.ila.org/pub/reporter/vol22no2.pdf

Page 33: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Government Requirement to Label and Restrict Violent Video Games

California law scheduled Jan. 1, 2006:

Label and restrict violent video games with white “18” outlined in black at least two inches square.

Court:(1) Plausible, less restrictive alternative?

(2) State-compelled speech on commercial videos?

Video Software Dealers Ass'n v. Schwarzenegger, 401 F. Supp. 2d 1034, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39476 (N.D. Cal. 2005); similar rulings in other

states at www.theesa.com/facts/industry_self_reg.php

Page 34: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Government Requirement to Label and Restrict Violent Video Games

California law scheduled Jan. 1, 2006:

Label and restrict violent video games with white “18” outlined in black at least two inches square.

Court:(1) Plausible, less restrictive alternative?

(2) State-compelled speech on commercial videos?

Video Software Dealers Ass'n v. Schwarzenegger, 401 F. Supp. 2d 1034, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39476 (N.D. Cal. 2005); similar rulings in other

states at www.theesa.com/facts/industry_self_reg.php

Struck down before

law could take effe

ct

Page 35: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Law: R-Rated Movies in California

Libraries

Cal Ed Code § 18032 

Policy regarding access by minors to videotapes

(a) Every public library that receives state funds pursuant to this chapter and that provides public access to motion picture videotapes shall, by a majority vote of the governing board, adopt a policy regarding access by minors to motion picture videotapes by January 1, 2000.

(b) Every public library that is required to adopt a policy pursuant to subdivision (a) shall make that policy available to members of the public at every library branch.

www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/97-98/bill/asm/ab_1851-1900/ab_1886_bill_19980914_chaptered.pdf

Page 36: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Legislative Attempt To Restrict R-Rated Movies

SB 1412 (Haynes) Safe Libraries Act

“… prohibit a public library from providing a direct loan of any motion picture videotape or videodisc that has received an “R” (Restricted) or “NC-17” (No One 17 and Under Admitted) rating by the Motion Picture Association of America to any person under 17 years of age…” Feb. 1, 2000

Former Sen. Ray Haynes, Riverside

www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/sen/sb_1401-1450/sb_1412_bill_20000411_amended_sen.pdf

Page 37: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Library Legislation toRestrict R-rated Movies

Iowa Senate File 2108 (2006) http://tinyurl.com/y5f7df

Kansas HB 2581 (2006) http://www.kslegislature.org/bills/2006/2581.pdf

Wisconsin SB 258 (2005) www.wla.lib.wi.us/legis/SB258.htm

Page 38: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

MPAA Opposition to Library Legislation to Restrict R-Rated Movies

www.wla.lib.wi.us/ifrt/documents/OhioMPAALawMemo.pdf

Page 39: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Purchasing Decisions

CLA Conference Question: Can library choose to not buy R-

Rated / Parental Advisory stickers?

Answer: Although restrictions on materials trigger First Amendment, Courts don’t tell libraries how to spend their money.

Blanket policy not to buy may be shakier than item-by-item choices

Page 40: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

Wal-Mart Problem: Promised Clean Lyrics

Couple sued when CD had “explicit lyrics”

[no parental advisory sticker]

Did Wal-Mart violate own policy?

… settled (refunds)

Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom, March 2005 https://members.ala.org/nif/v54n2/is_it_legal.html

Page 41: Library Material Labels and Rating Systems Mary Minow, J.D., A.M.L.S. LibraryLaw.com consult@librarylaw.com Infopeople Webcast Thursday Dec. 7, 2006 12:00

4. Five Key Questions [Based on Candace Morgan’s Law for Librarians

Presentation]

Intended purpose? Inform? Warn? Discourage? Encourage? Promote?

Nature of symbol used? Viewpoint neutral? Prejudicial? Religious meaning or association?   Criteria for inclusion? Objective? Value based?  Publisher identified? Library judgment? Inclusive or exclusive?

How is label used? Interfiled?  Separate shelving? Restrict access?

Sum total of communication to average library user?