leicester district energy scheme - african studies · •final contract award was made in october...

15
LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME Nick Morris Head of Energy Services Leicester City Council District Energy Vanguards Event - 17th July

Upload: others

Post on 09-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

LEICESTER DISTRICT

ENERGY SCHEME

Nick Morris

Head of Energy Services

Leicester City Council

District Energy Vanguards Event - 17th

July

Page 2: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Overview

• Leicester – a city of 300,000 people (10th largest in the

UK)

• “Environment City” with Strong Climate Change Strategy

and Energy Planning Policy with District Energy at it Core

• Key Aim: “the provision of controllable and reliable warmth

to a group of buildings at an affordable price, minimising

CO2 emissions and using Combined Heat and Power via

a District Heating System”.

Page 3: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

How did we start ?

• False dawns including a significant community energy

program grant 2003

• Change in political leadership

• Strategic priority to reduce Leicester’s carbon footprint

• Re-energised process and in 2007 a detailed study was

undertaken which confirmed the potential of utilising

existing district heating schemes

Page 4: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Feasibility Study

• Study identified the technical feasibility

Buildings that could be connected

Potential energy centres and technologies

• Business case identified environmental, social

and economic benefits

• Political approval gained to proceed with

procurement in July 2008, based on the

extension of existing district schemes

Page 5: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

St Matthews to St Marks Link

Page 6: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Commencing the Procurement Process

• Soft Market Testing end 2008

• Competitive Dialogue procedure selected

• Procurement led by Housing due to high proportion of

residential district heating in the overall scheme

• LCC formed a team to take procurement forward:

• Project Director; Project Manager; Working Group to include Legal,

Financial, Technical, Environmental expertise

• Highways, Planning and other departments consulted

• OJEU issued in August 2009

• Following PQQ, dialogue commenced October 2009

• 12 month dialogue and evaluation process

Page 7: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

The Leicester Partnership

• LCC were keen to include as many public bodies as

possible in the process to ensure scheme size and

carbon/cost benefits could be maximised.

• The OJEU was issued by LCC as the “enabler” on behalf

of the Leicester Partnership which comprised:

• Leicester City Council

• University of Leicester

• HMP Leicester

• OJEU Notice also had a wide scope and covers

expansion or delivery of entirely new schemes across the

City where these involve public buildings.

Page 8: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Key Outputs Required

• There were a number of key outputs required from the procurement process:• Affordable and reliable warmth

• Secure and sustainable energy supply

• Significant reduction in CO2 emissions

• Expansion potential

• No investment by LCC or any of the members of the Leicester Partnership

• Future energy charges that deliver a whole life cost savings

• A mechanism to assess the cost/benefit of individual residential heat meters

• An acquisition fee for the existing plant in recognition of the long term contract (if possible)

• Confidence in a long-term partner to deliver the agreed solution – both in terms of experience and financial standing

• All of these have been achieved with the selected solution

Page 9: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

The Procurement Process

• Significant interest was generated in the market

• Three companies were ultimately taken forward

and Invited to Submit Final Bids (May 2010)

• Final contract award was made in October 2010

• Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy

(CDE) were signed on 14th January 2011

• CDE signed contracts with the University of

Leicester in April 2011.

Page 10: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

First Dig

Page 11: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

St Matthews

Page 12: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Key Lessons Learned• Political Support:

• Requires a political sponsor and champion

• Project Manager:• Important to have a dedicated and experienced project

manager who is capable of working across council departments

• Project complexity meant it proved essential to closing the Leicester scheme

• Quality of Data:• Competitive dialogue process moving into binding Final

Bids means that information supplied to bidders should be good quality and should be checked thoroughly – no assumptions

Page 13: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Key Lessons Learned• Standard form of contract

• Try to use a standard form of contract, this saves time and

avoids reinvention

• Also prevents ambiguity between different parts of the

contract

• Experienced Partner

• Conduct soft market testing early on to inform the process

• Select an experienced partner who can meet your

objectives and can demonstrate how they have done the

same in other schemes

• LCC selected CDE who had already delivered a number of

schemes including Southampton and Birmingham

Page 14: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

What did we procure ?

25 year energy services agreement with the potential for a 5 year extension to deliver:

• Citywide District Energy Schemes – 6 MWe of CHP and over 16 km of new network

• £15M of private sector investment into the City and adoption of existing assets (included £1M from CESP)

• Over 100 GWh of low carbon energy supplies for c.3000 homes, 35 administrative buildings and the University of Leicester

• Whole-life cost savings

• Expansion plans to connect to prison and many other public and private sector buildings in the city

Page 15: LEICESTER DISTRICT ENERGY SCHEME - African studies · •Final contract award was made in October 2010 •Contracts between LCC and Cofely District Energy (CDE) were signed on 14th

Benefits

• An experienced long term partner

• WLC cost savings

• Significant reduction in CO2 emissions

• Increased resilience

• Investment in the City

• No capital expenditure for LCC - a capital receipt

• Significant potential for future expansion with

associated profit share