learning for disaster resilience presentation
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was given by Neil Dufty to the Australian and New Zealand Disaster and Emergency Management Conference held in Brisbane on 16-18 April 2012. The paper and presentation develop a learning framework to build community disaster resilience based on evidence. The presentation shows that education, communications and engagement (ECE) is required across three interrelated fields: disaster risk reduction, emergency management and community development. The presentation also outlines best practices in ECE including using a community participatory approach, forming social capital through learning and the promotion of social media use before, during and after hazard events.TRANSCRIPT
Neil DuftyMolino Stewart Pty Ltd
Learning for Disaster Resilience
I’ve had my share of disasters
…and there’s more (this one a near miss)
so I could be called a ‘walking disaster’
Evidence• Personal experience in disasters • Experience working in disaster-prone communities• Investigation into Australian disaster-related community
education across agencies• Design, implementation and evaluation of ECE programs• Numerous reports on aspects of hazard education,
communications and engagement• Monitoring of worldwide trends including through social
media• Major reviews of community warning systems e.g.
progress with Vic bushfire warnings, review of warnings for Vic Floods Review
Some terms
• Resilience: return to ‘normal’ functioning; ‘bounce back’ vs ‘bounce forward’
• Education: two-way process with defined learning outcomes e.g. school program, volunteer training
• Communications: one-way process from provider e.g. media release, community warning
• Engagement: interactive dialogue process e.g. community forum, world cafes
ECE and learning
• In many cases disaster-related education, communications and engagement (ECE) are integrated e.g. in a public event, social media
• ECE leads to individual and community learning
• There should be ‘shared responsibility’ for disaster ECE between agencies and communities
Disaster Risk ReductionGoal: Minimise residual risk
Learning from ECE:•Improve risk perception•Ways to minimise risk•Post-event learning
Emergency ManagementGoal: Public safety
Learning from ECE:•Precautions•How/when to respond•How to recover•Post-event learning e.g. how to better prepare
Is this enough to build community disaster
resilience?
Evidence shows a ‘community development’ element is also required
Evidence includes:•Extensive research into disaster-affected communities (e.g. 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Hurricane Katrina)•Psychological studies in a range of communities•Actions in Australia’s National Strategy for Disaster Resilience
Social capital
• Social capital is the ‘networks, norms, and social trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit’ (Putnam, 1995)
• Several researchers (e.g. Aldrich, Chamlee-Wright) have found that social capital is critical to the fast and efficient recovery of disaster-affected communities and thus it should be an important part of community development for disaster resilience
Community DevelopmentGoal: Coordination and cooperation for disasters
Learning from ECE:•How/where to develop networks, trust•How/where to develop human capital e.g. leadership•Post-event learning
Best practices in ECE
• Based on understanding of the learning community e.g. psychological profiles
• Should be participatory
• Integrated with other DRR, EM and CD activities
• Ongoing, not campaign
• Cross-hazard where possible
• Include evaluation of ECE programs e.g. use of logic models
• Use of a range of ECE techniques including social media
‘Learning for Disaster Resilience’ (LfDR)
we now have a framework but more research is required
LfDR will help those impacted by disasters to become more resilientYes that’s me with hair and a son who is now 26!
Thank you
Questions?