lct december 2006 petersfield

1
12 LCT December 2006 Technology How to process 85,000 pieces a week and save 10 million gallons of water in 30 months T o this question the answer is easy! First you own a fifth generation family laundry with a broadly based mix of work, then you come up against the impossibility of increasing the water input for a variety of practical as well as bureaucratic reasons. Finally you realise that the ‘future’ is actually now in energy cost terms and that your very survival in business demands that you take the correct long- term decision to invest in new technology - and, hopefully, solve all your problems in one fell swoop. It also helps if the quotation for the supply of a brand new water recycling system has a promised payback period of three and a half years, which means that the finance case is soundly justified. Other savings and benefits were promised and there were a range of knock-on efficiencies which at the time were hoped for - but not given as assurances which were certain to happen after the event. All in all, this was the general situation in which Robert James found himself in the summer of 2003 at the Petersfield and Reliance Laundry in Hampshire. Business pressures were mounting, competition was strong, the water companies involved were unhelpful on the supply issue and the cost increases in energy, effluent and fuel were already rising at a hitherto undreamt of rate. “We had to do ‘something,” says Robert, “as the status quo was not an option. We have a very constricted site in an industrial area. We have a mixed throughput of a lot of significantly different types and classifications of work, and we had enormous pressure on production performance in the summer months from our large hotel and guest house trade. “It was not deemed possible for us to install a CBW for space, production efficiency and wash quality reasons. We could not enlarge the footprint of the plant and it was not an option for us to move a substantial distance away from our workforce of 65 people. Together with my management team, we spent a long time assessing the options and decided to invest in a Kemco system supplied from the United States by Dunlop Design Engineering in Ulster. This seemed to us to combine the necessary qualities of robust design with leading edge technology, together with good field installation reports from the USA and, of course, a very supportive back-up commiss- ioning team in the UK. “Commissioning and installation were accomplished over a six month period and we were all on a very steep learning curve. Our long serving plant engineer, Phil Stammers, spent a great deal of time with the commissioning engineers and technical support staff from Dunlop and I too was closely involved as the whole philosophy of how the laundry operated was taken through a total change of approach. We also had a very productive and beneficial relationship with Christeyns, our soap supplier as the water recycling necessitated the complete reformulation of our chemical input and dosing. “Prior to installing the Kemco system we were using up to 700 cubic metres of water per week and now, nearly 31 months later, this consumption is down to about 350 cubic metres of water per week - a fifty percent reduction on average. At the same time our effluent discharge has dropped from 600 cubic metres per week to less than 300 cubic metres; a drop of more than 50 per cent. “These are truly amazing figures as they represent significant water and effluent cost savings and the nearby community, which shares our supply system, has had an additional 10,000,000 gallons available for its use. Naturally the effluent treatment people are very happy with the performance of the system; equally naturally the water supply company is not so happy as they based our tariff on our former usage and now there is a ten million gallon shortfall in volume and value invoiced!” Robert James is a very happy laundryman and he takes a great deal of pride in the Kemco system and its delivered performance. “We process over 75,000 pieces per week throughout the year and summertime was becoming a serious difficulty. With the full effects of the system only now becoming measurable, we have kept our costs at a figure which in effect has stayed level at the two year old mark. Nationally, as you have seen in the recent TSA Cost Indices Tables, costs have risen dramatically in the time since installation and had we not made the decision to proceed when we did, the effects on the business would have been serious.” There have been significant added benefits from the system since commissioning was completed, apart from the reduction in water input and effluent discharge volumes. As water is recycled back for reuse at 50°C this reduces live steam demand from the washer- extractors which has the effect of increasing boiler efficiency as well as increased steam pressure across the laundry. “Recycling is so efficient that we are able to use recycled process water in the final rinse, and when and where could you have done that before installing such a system as ours?”, asks Phil Stammers. “Previously we had a plate heat exchanger, but this achieved minimal savings which didn’t equate to the energy cost increases imposed from outside. The heat recovery assumes great importance in reducing the cycle times of the washers which has had a marked increase on the number of loads being processed.” Thus the heat recovery brought about by the Kemco system has been a further direct cost saving to the laundry. “In fact,” says Stammers, “we have had a lot more delivered than we were promised and in this day and age that is a fairly unusual event.” So the Petersfield and Reliance has successfully managed the transition from what might fairly be described as a ‘traditional steam laundry set up’ to being in the position of market leader in energy and water and effluent saving. Stable costs, and 20 per cent increased turnover – from £1.5M pre Kemco to £1.8M after system commissioning – are a huge achievement for the small and totally dedicated team at P & R. The drive and leadership of Robert James has brought new technology and with it, hugely beneficial investment returns to the business. This may be the fifth generation now running the business, but on our recent visit to investigate ‘how to save 10 million gallons of water’ we didn’t see any signs of the commonly found arthritic symptoms of old age in this busy business. Perhaps it stems from Robert James’ early career in the advertising profession. Or perhaps it is the training which Robert’s parents insisted he took at other laundries of a variety of different types, where the intricacies and quirks of different process requirements were learnt ‘off-site’ away from home, and where the facts of laundry life were instilled. Robert speaks with genuine pleasure of the months he spent with Blossom and Browne in domestic laundry, and at three different Sunlight plants in South Park, Croydon and Eastbourne, where, as he says, “a full grounding in all management issues and the need for good training in all aspects of laundry were impressed upon me before I started in the family business”. We also think that the best instincts and attitudes of a long- established family business were inherited by Robert and that the happy decision to install advanced technology and become the very first installation of the ground- breaking Kemco system in Britain, was not just a chance in the lottery of laundry life. Petersfield and Reliance should be held up as a genuine example of how tradition meets technology and the sum of the parts, as expressed in the success of this process water recycling plant is far, far greater than the benefits originally quoted. Many, many laundries could take real advantage for their own future in a highly competitive and costly business world by following Robert James’ example. Climate change and the associated costs already imposed and the taxes about to be imposed, are possibly the driving forces in the laundry business today; by investing in his plant Robert James has in effect stopped the clock and to a very large extent, frozen his costs. As for the supplier/distributor, having delivered a totally ‘steam-free’ laundry in the far west of Ireland and now a virtually ‘water-free’ laundry process in Petersfield, we wonder just what Dunlop Design will come up with next? Irving Scott reports TOP: Phil Stammers, plant engineer shows how simple the control panel is. Robert James is on the right ABOVE: The complete end-on view of the Kemco in its own separate steel shed BIG SAVINGS ON TAP RIGHT: Portrait of a very happy laundryman - Robert James in his office LCT December 06 pages 26/11/06 3:39 pm Page 12

Upload: paul-knight

Post on 20-Mar-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Irving Scott reports RIGHT: Portrait of a very happy laundryman - Robert James in his office ABOVE: The complete end-on view of the Kemco in its own separate steel shed TOP: Phil Stammers, plant engineer shows how simple the control panel is. Robert James is on the right 12LCT December 2006 LCT December 06 pages 26/11/06 3:39 pm Page 12

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LCT December 2006 PETERSFIELD

12 LCT December 2006

Technology

How to process 85,000 pieces a week and save 10 million gallons of water in 30 months

To this question theanswer is easy! Firstyou own a fifth

generation family laundrywith a broadly based mix ofwork, then you come upagainst the impossibility ofincreasing the water inputfor a variety of practical aswell as bureaucraticreasons. Finally you realisethat the ‘future’ is actuallynow in energy cost termsand that your very survivalin business demands thatyou take the correct long-term decision to invest innew technology - and,hopefully, solve all yourproblems in one fell swoop.

It also helps if the quotationfor the supply of a brand newwater recycling system has apromised payback period ofthree and a half years, whichmeans that the finance case issoundly justified. Other savingsand benefits were promised andthere were a range of knock-onefficiencies which at the timewere hoped for - but not givenas assurances which werecertain to happen after theevent. All in all, this was thegeneral situation in whichRobert James found himself inthe summer of 2003 at thePetersfield and RelianceLaundry in Hampshire.Business pressures weremounting, competition wasstrong, the water companiesinvolved were unhelpful on thesupply issue and the costincreases in energy, effluent andfuel were already rising at ahitherto undreamt of rate.

“We had to do ‘something,”says Robert, “as the status quowas not an option. We have avery constricted site in anindustrial area. We have amixed throughput of a lot ofsignificantly different types andclassifications of work, and wehad enormous pressure onproduction performance in thesummer months from our largehotel and guest house trade.

“It was not deemed possiblefor us to install a CBW forspace, production efficiency andwash quality reasons. We couldnot enlarge the footprint of theplant and it was not an optionfor us to move a substantialdistance away from our

workforce of 65 people.Together with my managementteam, we spent a long timeassessing the options anddecided to invest in a Kemcosystem supplied from theUnited States by Dunlop DesignEngineering in Ulster. Thisseemed to us to combine thenecessary qualities of robustdesign with leading edgetechnology, together with goodfield installation reports fromthe USA and, of course, a verysupportive back-up commiss-ioning team in the UK.

“Commissioning andinstallation were accomplishedover a six month period and wewere all on a very steep learningcurve. Our long serving plantengineer, Phil Stammers, spenta great deal of time with thecommissioning engineers andtechnical support staff fromDunlop and I too was closelyinvolved as the wholephilosophy of how the laundryoperated was taken through atotal change of approach. Wealso had a very productive andbeneficial relationship withChristeyns, our soap supplier asthe water recycling necessitatedthe complete reformulation ofour chemical input and dosing.

“Prior to installing theKemco system we were usingup to 700 cubic metres of waterper week and now, nearly 31months later, this consumptionis down to about 350 cubicmetres of water per week - afifty percent reduction onaverage. At the same time oureffluent discharge has droppedfrom 600 cubic metres per weekto less than 300 cubic metres; adrop of more than 50 per cent.

“These are truly amazingfigures as they representsignificant water and effluentcost savings and the nearbycommunity, which shares oursupply system, has had anadditional 10,000,000 gallonsavailable for its use. Naturallythe effluent treatment people arevery happy with theperformance of the system;equally naturally the watersupply company is not so happyas they based our tariff on ourformer usage and now there is aten million gallon shortfall involume and value invoiced!”

Robert James is a very

happy laundryman and he takesa great deal of pride in theKemco system and its deliveredperformance.

“We process over 75,000pieces per week throughout theyear and summertime wasbecoming a serious difficulty.With the full effects of thesystem only now becomingmeasurable, we have kept ourcosts at a figure which in effecthas stayed level at the two yearold mark. Nationally, as youhave seen in the recent TSACost Indices Tables, costs haverisen dramatically in the timesince installation and had wenot made the decision toproceed when we did, theeffects on the business wouldhave been serious.”

There have been significantadded benefits from the systemsince commissioning wascompleted, apart from thereduction in water input andeffluent discharge volumes. Aswater is recycled back for reuseat 50°C this reduces live steamdemand from the washer-extractors which has the effectof increasing boiler efficiencyas well as increased steampressure across the laundry.

“Recycling is so efficientthat we are able to use recycledprocess water in the final rinse,and when and where could youhave done that before installingsuch a system as ours?”, asksPhil Stammers.

“Previously we had a plateheat exchanger, but thisachieved minimal savingswhich didn’t equate to theenergy cost increases imposedfrom outside. The heatrecovery assumes greatimportance in reducing thecycle times of the washerswhich has had a markedincrease on the number of loadsbeing processed.”

Thus the heat recoverybrought about by the Kemcosystem has been a further directcost saving to the laundry.

“In fact,” says Stammers,“we have had a lot moredelivered than we were promisedand in this day and age that is afairly unusual event.”

So the Petersfield andReliance has successfullymanaged the transition fromwhat might fairly be described

as a ‘traditional steam laundryset up’ to being in the positionof market leader in energy andwater and effluent saving.Stable costs, and 20 per centincreased turnover – from£1.5M pre Kemco to £1.8Mafter system commissioning –are a huge achievement for thesmall and totally dedicated teamat P & R. The drive andleadership of Robert James hasbrought new technology andwith it, hugely beneficialinvestment returns to thebusiness. This may be the fifthgeneration now running thebusiness, but on our recent visitto investigate ‘how to save 10million gallons of water’ wedidn’t see any signs of thecommonly found arthriticsymptoms of old age in thisbusy business.

Perhaps it stems fromRobert James’ early career inthe advertising profession. Orperhaps it is the training whichRobert’s parents insisted hetook at other laundries of a

variety of different types, wherethe intricacies and quirks ofdifferent process requirementswere learnt ‘off-site’ away fromhome, and where the facts oflaundry life were instilled.Robert speaks with genuinepleasure of the months he spentwith Blossom and Browne indomestic laundry, and at threedifferent Sunlight plants inSouth Park, Croydon andEastbourne, where, as he says,“a full grounding in allmanagement issues and theneed for good training in allaspects of laundry wereimpressed upon me before Istarted in the family business”.

We also think that the bestinstincts and attitudes of a long-established family businesswere inherited by Robert andthat the happy decision to installadvanced technology andbecome the very firstinstallation of the ground-breaking Kemco system inBritain, was not just a chance inthe lottery of laundry life.

Petersfield and Reliance shouldbe held up as a genuineexample of how tradition meetstechnology and the sum of theparts, as expressed in thesuccess of this process waterrecycling plant is far, far greaterthan the benefits originallyquoted.

Many, many laundries couldtake real advantage for theirown future in a highlycompetitive and costly businessworld by following RobertJames’ example. Climatechange and the associated costsalready imposed and the taxesabout to be imposed, arepossibly the driving forces inthe laundry business today; byinvesting in his plant RobertJames has in effect stopped theclock and to a very large extent,frozen his costs. As for thesupplier/distributor, havingdelivered a totally ‘steam-free’laundry in the far west ofIreland and now a virtually‘water-free’ laundry process inPetersfield, we wonder justwhat Dunlop Design will comeup with next?

Irving Scott reports

TOP: Phil Stammers, plantengineer shows how simplethe control panel is. RobertJames is on the right

ABOVE: The complete end-onview of the Kemco in itsown separate steel shed

BIGSAVINGS ON TAP

RIGHT: Portrait of a very happylaundryman - Robert James in his office

LCT December 06 pages 26/11/06 3:39 pm Page 12