lara lafontain | portfolio
DESCRIPTION
I am seeking a position with a firm where I can contribute my skills in research, design, and multidisciplinary collaboration as an intern architect. Experience in interior design, exhibit design, and research enhances my highly creative yet pragmatic approach to architecture. For a printed portfolio or other inquiries, please email me at [email protected].TRANSCRIPT
Lara LaFontain
02
03
Hope lies in dreams, in imagination, and in the courage of those who dare to make dreams into reality.
- Jonas Salk
Living Building
Sandy 28
CRYSTALLIZE.
Urban Intervention
Perspective looking southwest toward fiction collection
21st Century LibraryCapstone Thesis - Spring, Fifth Year
Conceptually, this project evolved from the intersection of three sets of contrasting themes: physical / virtual, local / global, and old/ new. These themes highlight three main areas in which libraries as a project type can evolve. The function of a library has shifted from a community’s collective place to store printed material toward a point of access to an interconnected web of global content across varied types of media. A 21st century library must embrace the inherent simultaneity between the physical and virtual worlds of the digital age in order to create a physical space that remains relevant.
Collaborative Legacy
Exhibit DesignIndependent Research; Design Studio- Spring, Fourth Year
A grant-funded investigation into the collaborations of choreographer Merce Cunningham inspired an exhibit design selected by peers and instructors to publicly showcase the research. I translated conceptual ideas into a system of built forms, responding to input from my team and delegating tasks to finish the project on time and within the budget. The exhibit was open to the public for six weeks in the main gallery of the College of Architecture at the University of Arizona, and formed the environment for several related special events.
A grid of thin rope and sliding connectors molds the space underneath it, creating a virtual ceiling above exhibit panels and seating areas.
21st Century Library
pages 06-23
pages 24-35
pages 36-41
pages 54-61
pages 42-53
featured work
06
07
LivingBuilding
Ankrom Moisan ArchitectsLead Designer & Job CaptainSD, DD, and Design ReviewEstimated Completion: Fall ‘19
Sustainable Senior Living
This 77 unit, 6 story assisted living and memory care community is designed to reflect the context and history of its location in the Eastlake neighborhood of Seattle. Overlooking Lake Union, the project is inspired by the history of the 1936 gold medal-winning UW rowing team, nicknamed “The Boys in the Boat”.
This project will be the first of its kind as a high-density, urban, senior living community pursuing Living Building Challenge Petal Certification along with the energy and water reduction requirements of the City of Seattle. The project will be an example of craftsmanship, lightness, and community, merging the philosophy of the client and the imperatives of the Living Building Challenge with design inspiration from rowing and shell houses.
08
EASTLAKE NEIGHBORHOOD
The Eastlake neighborhood is one of the oldest in Seattle described by the Eastlake Community Council as a ‘pleasant jumble of houseboats, singles family homes, apartments, condos, and large and small businesses.’ Eastlake is home to about 4,000 residents and 4,000 people who work in the neighborhood. The neighborhood extends from the intersection of Eastlake Avenue E and Fairview Avenue at its southern end northward to University Bridge with Lake Union forming the western edge and I-5 forming the eastern edge. In 1962 the I-5 corridor cut through the neighborhood , creating a physical separation.
The shoreline has traditionally been the site of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. Several of Seattle’s houseboat communities are located along the Eastlake/Lake Union shoreline, primarily in the Portage Bay/Roanoke sub-neighborhood. Eastlake Avenue E is a major north-south traffic arterial and was one of Seattle’s primary trolley car routes.
Site Constraints
Future High Capacity Transit
Steep Topography
Exceptional Tree
Views
Adjacent LR Zone
Adjacent Residential BuildingsI-5
SITE
LAKE UNION
DOWNTOWN
views to lake union
vie
ws
to l
ake
un
ion
UNIVERSITY OF
WASHINGTON
20% slope
LR2 zone
09
V I C I N I T Y M A P
EASTLAKE URBAN VILLAGE
PROJECT site
PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY
E A S T L A K E
E A S T L A K E N E I G H B O R H O O D P L A NG U I D E L I N E S A D O P T E D 1 9 9 9
eas t l a ke a v e e
e b l a i n e s t
e h o w e s t
e n e w t o n s t
y a l e p l e
fra
nk
lin av
e e
boy
lston
ave e
eastla
ke av
e e
yale av
e e
f a i r v i e w a v e e
I 5
I 5
I 5 C O L O N N A D E P A R K
A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g E A R L Y D E S I G N G U I D A N C E - S D C I # 3 0 2 3 8 4 5 - 0 2 / 0 8 / 1 7
9
V I C I N I T Y M A P
EASTLAKE URBAN VILLAGE
PROJECT site
PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY
E A S T L A K E
E A S T L A K E N E I G H B O R H O O D P L A NG U I D E L I N E S A D O P T E D 1 9 9 9
eas t l a ke a v e e
e b l a i n e s t
e h o w e s t
e n e w t o n s t
y a l e p l e
fra
nk
lin av
e e
boy
lston
ave e
eastla
ke av
e e
yale av
e e
f a i r v i e w a v e e
I 5
I 5
I 5 C O L O N N A D E P A R K
A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g E A R L Y D E S I G N G U I D A N C E - S D C I # 3 0 2 3 8 4 5 - 0 2 / 0 8 / 1 7
9
Planning Area Boundary
Eastlake Urban Village
Project Site
Vicinity Map
potential future development
PROJECT sitefuture development potentialwith current base zoning
contextfuture development potentialwith current base zoning
contexthala development potentialwith adoption of zoning changes
PROJECT siteliving building challenge10' additional height
contextcurrent development
e a s t l a k e a v e e
e a s t l a k e a v e e
e ne w t o n s t
e n e w t o n s t
y a l e p l e
f r a n k l i n a v e e
f r a n k l i n a v e e
f r a n k l i n p l e
NEW CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT SITE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEVILLA APARTMENTS KIRO (BONNEVILLE) BUILDINGVILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS
CORTINA
Z O N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T P O T E N T I A L
A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g E A R L Y D E S I G N G U I D A N C E - S D C I # 3 0 2 3 8 4 5 - 0 2 / 0 8 / 1 7
1 1
Development Potential
010
Site Plan
E Howe St.
Yale Pl. E
E Newton St.
Eastlake A
ve. E
Surface Parking (E)
3 Story Duplex
4 Story Apartments
2 Story Apartments
Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family
Residential
2 Story Apartments
2 Story Apartments
4 Story Apartments
4 Story Apartments
4 Story Mixed Use
67'-6"
76'-5" 102'-3"
72'-4"
70
70
A
B
0 32168
FG=67.50
FG=69.04
FG=68.02
PLANTERWIDTH VARIES
STA: 0+58
.09 23.999
LT
BF 73.23
TF 73.73
STA: 0+83
.08 22.984
LT
BF 72.32
TF 72.82
STA: 1+08
.09 22.711
LT
BF 70.83
TF 71.33
STA: 1+33
.09 23.008
LT
BF 69.40
TF 69.90
STA: 1+58
.08 23.285
LT
FG=68.07
STA: 1+83
.09 23.462
LT
BF 66.85
TF 67.35
FG=67.62
STA: 0+42.38 14.08 RT
STA: 0+67.38 13.92 RT
STA: 0+92.38 14.73 RT
STA: 1+17.38 15.55 RT
STA: 1+42.38 15.91 RT
STA: 1+68.57 15.88 RT
FG=75.42FG=75.43
FG=78.60
FG=75.50
FG=75.17
FG=75.35
EG=75.42
EG 68.76
BF 87.52TF 88.02
BF 93.07TF 93.57
EG 101.46
W
REF.
WD
1
A A
765432
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
EAST NEWTON STREET
EASTLAKE AVENU
E EAST
PROPERTY LINE
PLANTING STRIP 6'-0" WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
CONCRETE CURB
REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK MARKER
PLANTING STRIP
6'-0" WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MIN.)
CONCRETE CURB
MAIN BUILDING ENTRY CANOPY ABOVE
GARAGE LEVEL ENTRY BELOW CANOPY
GARAGE DRIVEWAY APRON
(E) POWER POLE
(E) POWER POLE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
R
S
T
V
76'-1 1/4"
67'-6 1/8"
102'-0"
100'-0"
95'-0"
91'-6"
87'-6"
87'-6"
85'-0 7/8"
102'-2 5/8"
99'-0 1/8"85'-0 7/8"
83'-0"85'-0 7/8"
82'-0"85'-0 7/8"
72'-4 1/8"85'-0 7/8"
ADJACENT BUILDING(EXISTING)
ADJACENT BUILDING(EXISTING)
6"
5 7/8"
8 3/
8"
(E) POWER POLE
MAIN BUILDING ENTRY PLAZA
STORM WATER PLANTERS AND BENCHES AT SIDEWALK LEVEL
141'
- 9
3/4"
121' - 8 3/8"
SEE CIVIL WORK FOR NEW WORK
(E) CURB CUT
LINE OF SOLAR ARRAY ABOVE
PROPOSED 6-STORY ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY
S 890 57'45" W 89.05'
S 890 55'25" W 122.90'
S 00
007
'01"
E
143.
18'S 13
025'19" E 147.09'
3' -
0"
FDC IN BRICK COLUMN
CONSTRUCTION START POINT: GRIDS "1" AND "A"GRID "A" AND NORTH PROPERTY LINE ARE PARALLEL
QUEEN BEE ENTRY
EXIT DOOR & TRASH STAGING FOR PICK UP
GENERAL NOTES - SITE PLAN1. SEE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, NOTES, AND DETAILS.2. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSIONS.3. ENCROACHMENTS OF BUILDING OVER SIDEWALKS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF
TRANSPORTATION THAT A STREET-USE PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED FOR THE CANOPIES THAT EXTEND INTO THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
4. REFER TO SDOT STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN C5.2 FOR THE WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
SITE INFORMATION - LEGAL DESCRIPTION1916 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SEATTLE WA. 98102
PARCEL NUMBERS:• 202504-9131
SITE AREA:• 15,261 SF
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:• PLAT NAME: GOVERNMENT• BLOCK: S 20, T25N, R4E• LOT: 5• That portion of Government Lot 5, Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian
(WM) in King County Washington, lying easterly of the east line of Eastlake Avenue and South of the South Line of East Newton Street, as said street is now established. Except portion platted as Lake Union Heights Addition to the City of Seattle, According to the Plat recorded in Volume 13, of Plats, Page 70, Records of King County, Washington
ZONING:• C1-40' (COMMERCIAL 1)• URBAN VILLAGE: EASTLAKE RESIDENTIAL URBAN VILLAGE• OVERLAY DISTRICT: NONE• STREET CLASSIFICATION: PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGNATION• APPROX. MAX. SLOPE ACROSS SITE: 34'-0"+/-• NO LANDMARK STRUCTURES ON SITE
DPD PROJECT NUMBER:1916 EASTLAKE AVENUE E. DPD# 3023368
PROJECT NUMBER
© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.
38 NORTHWEST DAVIS, SUITE 300PORTLAND, OR 97209T 503.245.7100
1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600
1014 HOWARD STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103T 415.252.7063
DATE
DPD APPROVAL STAMP
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NUMBER
C:\_
Rev i
t Pro
ject
s\15
249 2
- 17
- Ae
gis
o f L
ake
Uni
on\1
5 249
2 - 1
7 - A
egis
of L
ake
Uni
on_ a
man
dai.r
vt8/
14/2
017
2:52
:15
PM
152492
MUP RESPONSECYCLE 1
AEG
IS O
F LA
KE U
NIO
N
AEG
IS L
IVIN
G
1916
EAS
TLAK
E AV
ENU
E E
SEAT
TLE,
WA
9810
2
2017-08-08
SITE PLAN
A1.01A1.01
1/8" = 1'-0"2 SITE PLAN
REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE
0 321684 64
Retail Entry
Parking
Main Entry
Bus StopCirc.
Parking
Service
Amenity
Units
Retail
011
RESPONSE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS
The site is steeply sloped with an elevation change of 35 feet from the lowest point at the site at the southwest corner to the highest point at the northeast corner. Along Eastlake Avenue E the elevation increases 9 feet. Along E Newton Street the elevation increases 26 feet with a 20% grade.
The proposal locates the active amenity spaces along the Eastlake Avenue E street frontage. Residential entry and retail coffee shop are concentrated to create a shared amenity court near the center of the site. Vehicle and service access is located at the southern most part of the site on Eastlake Avenue E to push the curb cut as far as possible from Eastlake and Newton intersection and utilize the slope of the site to seamlessly integrate the vehicular entry into the facade.
Site Sections
15TH AVE N
E
AURORA AVE N
35TH AVE N
E
8TH AVE N
W
1ST AVE S
4TH AVE S
NE 75TH ST
1ST AVE
4TH AVE
5TH AVE3RD AVE
ROOSEVELT WAY N
E
2ND AVE
5TH AVE N
E
6TH AVE
6TH AVE S
ALASKAN W
Y VI NB
RAINIER AVE S
25TH AVE N
E
40TH AVE N
E
EASTLAKE AVE E
N 80TH ST
DEXTER AVE N
12TH AVE
N 85TH ST
23RD AVE
BOREN AVE
N 50TH ST
15TH AVE E
8TH AVE
WESTLAKE AVE N
NE 55TH ST
LAKE CITY WAY N
E
10TH AVE E
MERCER ST
DENNY WAY
WESTERN AVE
AIRPORT WAY S
BROAD ST
BROADWAY
E CHERRY ST14TH AVE
BOYER AVE E
7TH AVE
PINE ST
NE 40TH ST
24TH AVE E
ALASKAN WAY
NE 80TH ST
PIKE ST
PHIN
NEY AVE N
19TH AVE E
N 45TH ST
STONE W
AY N
20TH AVE N
E
QUEEN AN
NE AVE N
E PINE ST
11TH AVE N
E
N 34TH ST
SENECA ST
34TH AVE
17TH AVE S
JAMES ST
FREMON
T AVE N
NW MARKET ST
E ALOHA ST
M L KIN
G JR WAY
9TH AVE
LAKESIDE AVE S
E PIKE ST
14TH AVE S
STEWART S
T
ELLIOTT AVE
ROY ST
BROOKLYN AVE N
E
FAIRVIEW AVE N
N 35TH ST
WALL ST
15TH AVE N
EUN
IVERSITY WAY N
E
OLIVE WAY
LEARY WAY NW
YESLER WAY
VIRGIN
IA ST
9TH AVE N
SPRING ST
NE 41ST ST
7TH AVE N
E
NE PACIFIC ST
EAST MARGIN
AL WAY S
5TH AVE N
TAYLOR AVE N
N 46TH ST
MON
TLAK
E BL
VD N
E
12TH AVE E
FAIR
VIEW AV
E N
6TH AVE W
1ST AVE N
N 39TH ST
N 65TH ST
1ST AVE W
NE RAVENNA BLVD
LENORA ST
NE 65TH ST
W MCGRAW ST
19TH AVE
S COLLEGE ST
BANNER WAY NE
5TH AVE S
NW 46TH ST
N NO
RTHL
AKE
WAY
EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N
47TH AVE N
E
REPUBLICAN ST
43RD AVE E
32ND AVE E
8TH AVE N
E
N PACI
FIC
ST
BELLEVUE AVE E
S HOLGATE ST
MADRONA DR
GREEN LAKE WAY N
HARVARD AVE E
42ND AVE E
CHERRY ST
COLUMBIA ST
E OL
IVE W
AY
N 36TH ST
15TH AVE
HOWELL ST
NE 45TH ST
E LYNN ST
WINONA AVE N
N 38TH ST
THACKERAY PL N
E
FLORENTIA ST
S MASSACHUSETTS ST
NE 70TH ST
BATTE
RY ST
S ROYAL BROUGHAM WAY
6TH AVE N
FUHRMAN AVE E
7TH AVE W
NE 43RD ST
E THOMAS ST
N 56TH ST
NE 47TH ST
E JOHN ST
NE 85TH STGREEN LAKE DR N
WEST GREEN LAKE WAY N
12TH AVE N
E
E GALER ST
BELLEVUE AVE
55TH AVE N
E
N 43RD ST
E DENNY WAY
35TH AVE S
E ROY ST
BOREN AVE S
VALLEY ST
WEST GREEN LAKE DR N
WOODLAWN AVE N
E ALDER ST
MCG
ILVR
A BL
VD E
QUEEN ANNE DR
WOODLAN
D PL N
W RAYE ST
S WALKER ST
BELMONT AVE E
M L KIN
G JR WAY E
48TH AVE N
E
SW FLORIDA ST
AURORA BR
FREMONT W
AY N
KIRKWOOD PL N
S HOLGATE BR
NE 54TH ST
S KING ST
S JUDKINS ST
5TH AVE W
NE 56TH ST
E BLAINE ST
S ATLANTIC ST
N MARKET ST36TH
AVE S
LAKESIDE AVE
MELROSE AVE
FREMONT PL N
EAST MONTLAKE PL E
SMITH ST
E ROANOKE ST
4TH AVE N
COWEN PL NE
NW 36TH ST
11TH AVE
32ND AVE S
N 66TH ST
E MCGILVRA ST
7TH AVE
I90 WB
VALLEY ST
N 65TH ST
NE 45TH ST
NE 70TH ST
6TH AVE S
I90 EB
E JOHN ST
LATONA AVE N
E
3RD AVE W
MERIDIAN
AVE N
NE 65TH ST
S MASSACHUSETTS ST
30TH AVE N
E
12TH AVE S
31ST AVE S
5TH AVE N
WALLIN
GFORD AVE N
LATONA AVE N
E
51ST AVE S
MADISON ST
UNIV
ERSI
TYBR
IDGE
UNION ST
E HARRISON ST
E HAMLIN ST
I-5
I-5
I-5
I-90
520
520
Universityof Washington
Capitol Hill
U District (2021)
Westlake
UniversityStreet
PioneerSquare
InternationalDistrict/
Chinatown
StadiumJudkins Park
(2023)
Roosevelt(2021)
To Northgate TC
Elliot Bay
LakeUnion
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
11th Ave NE between NE 65th St and NE 40th St facing north
TYPICAL SECTION
40’Curb to curb
Right-of-way60’
Drivelane
10’ 11’Drivelane
8’Parking
lane
7’Bikelane
3’
Buffe
r
P
Eastlake Ave E between Fuhrman Ave E and Fairview Ave N facing north
TYPICAL SECTION
49’Curb to curb
Right-of-way75’
11’Drivelane
11’Center
turn lane
11’Drivelane
6’Bikelane
6’Bikelane
2’
Buffe
r
2’
Buffe
r
Fairview Ave N between Eastlake Ave E and Yale Ave N facing northeast
TYPICAL SECTION
7.5’49’
Curb to curb
Right-of-way64.5’
12’Drivelane
Drivelane
12’11’Drivelane
6’Bikelane
2’
Buffe
r
6’Bikelane
SOUTHBOUND
NORTHBOUND
TYPICAL SECTION
44’Curb to curb
Right-of-way66’
Drivelane
9’ 10’Drivelane
14’Buslane
11’Drivelane
Virginia St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north
Stewart St between 3rd Ave and Boren Ave facing north
B
C
A
BOREN AVE
YALE AVE N
NE 40TH ST
FUHRMAN AVE E
N 65TH ST
FAIRVIEW AVE N
D
VALLEY ST
Fairview Ave N between Valley St and Denny Way facing north
TYPICAL SECTION
56’Curb to curb
Right-of-way84’
10’Drivelane
12’Center
turn lane
10’Drivelane
12’Shared bus/bike
lane
12’Shared bus/bike
lane
E
3RD AVE
F
FASTER20%
FASTER20%
TYPICAL SECTION
48’Curb to curb
Right-of-way80’
11’Drivelane
12’Drivelane
14’Shared bus/bike
lane
11’Drivelane
Stewart St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north
Fairview Ave N between Yale Ave N and Valley St facing northeast
TYPICAL SECTION
70’Curb to curb
Right-of-way98’
14’Streetcar
/buslane
14’Streetcar
/buslane
10’Drivelane
11’Drivelane
10’Center
turn lane
11’Drivelane
0 11/21/4 MileExisting RapidRide corridor
Proposed RapidRide corridor
Existing Link
Planned Link
Existing Seattle Streetcar
Planned Seattle Streetcar
Other Transit FacilitiesCorridor Treatment
Potential future Northgate service extension
Bike ImprovementsBAT Lane Transit Only
LaneGP LaneProposed alignment
Existing Stop
New / Upgraded
RR Station
Protected Bike Lane proposed as part of Project
Existing Protected Bike Lane
Corridor improvements include stop consolidation, transit signal priority and transit queue jumps.
ROOSEVELT RAPIDRIDE CORRIDORDOWNTOWN TO ROOSEVELT VIA EASTLAKE
DRAFT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
Service will operate in existing BAT Lanes on Stewart
11'
17'
16'
ASECTIONPr
oper
ty L
ine
Prop
erty
Lin
e
15' S
etba
ck
Kitchen DiningTheater
Parking
Sky Lounge
15' Rooftop Bonus (143'-6")
4' Rooftop Bonus (132'-6)LBPP Height Limit (128'-6")
Zoning Height Limit (118'-6")Existing Duplex
EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST
Average Grade (74'-6")
15' Rooftop Bonus (152'-6")
4' Rooftop Bonus (141'-6)LBPP Height Limit (137'-6")
Zoning Height Limit (127'-6")
Average Grade (83'-6")_
Site Section B Site Section A
39'
70'32
'-6"
13'-1
0"23
'-8"
13'
11'
10'-6
"10
'-6"
10'-6
"11
'-2"
1315
'-3"
driveway
15TH AVE N
E
AURORA AVE N
35TH AVE N
E
8TH AVE N
W
1ST AVE S
4TH AVE S
NE 75TH ST
1ST AVE
4TH AVE
5TH AVE3RD AVE
ROOSEVELT WAY N
E
2ND AVE
5TH AVE N
E
6TH AVE
6TH AVE S
ALASKAN W
Y VI NB
RAINIER AVE S
25TH AVE N
E
40TH AVE N
E
EASTLAKE AVE E
N 80TH ST
DEXTER AVE N
12TH AVE
N 85TH ST
23RD AVE
BOREN AVE
N 50TH ST15TH
AVE E
8TH AVE
WESTLAKE AVE N
NE 55TH ST
LAKE CITY WAY N
E
10TH AVE E
MERCER ST
DENNY WAY
WESTERN AVE
AIRPORT WAY S
BROAD ST
BROADWAY
E CHERRY ST14TH AVE
BOYER AVE E
7TH AVE
PINE ST
NE 40TH ST
24TH AVE E
ALASKAN WAY
NE 80TH ST
PIKE ST
PHIN
NEY AVE N
19TH AVE E
N 45TH ST
STONE W
AY N
20TH AVE N
E
QUEEN AN
NE AVE N
E PINE ST
11TH AVE N
E
N 34TH ST
SENECA ST
34TH AVE
17TH AVE S
JAMES ST
FREMON
T AVE N
NW MARKET ST
E ALOHA ST
M L KIN
G JR WAY
9TH AVE
LAKESIDE AVE S
E PIKE ST
14TH AVE S
STEWART S
T
ELLIOTT AVE
ROY ST
BROOKLYN AVE N
E
FAIRVIEW AVE N
N 35TH ST
WALL ST
15TH AVE N
EUN
IVERSITY WAY N
E
OLIVE WAY
LEARY WAY NW
YESLER WAY
VIRGIN
IA ST
9TH AVE N
SPRING ST
NE 41ST ST
7TH AVE N
E
NE PACIFIC ST
EAST MARGIN
AL WAY S
5TH AVE N
TAYLOR AVE N
N 46TH ST
MON
TLAK
E BL
VD N
E
12TH AVE E
FAIR
VIEW AV
E N
6TH AVE W
1ST AVE N
N 39TH ST
N 65TH ST
1ST AVE W
NE RAVENNA BLVD
LENORA ST
NE 65TH ST
W MCGRAW ST
19TH AVE
S COLLEGE ST
BANNER WAY NE
5TH AVE S
NW 46TH ST
N NO
RTHL
AKE
WAY
EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N
47TH AVE N
E
REPUBLICAN ST
43RD AVE E
32ND AVE E
8TH AVE N
E
N PACI
FIC
ST
BELLEVUE AVE E
S HOLGATE ST
MADRONA DR
GREEN LAKE WAY N
HARVARD AVE E
42ND AVE E
CHERRY ST
COLUMBIA ST
E OL
IVE W
AY
N 36TH ST
15TH AVE
HOWELL ST
NE 45TH ST
E LYNN ST
WINONA AVE N
N 38TH ST
THACKERAY PL N
E
FLORENTIA ST
S MASSACHUSETTS ST
NE 70TH ST
BATTE
RY ST
S ROYAL BROUGHAM WAY
6TH AVE N
FUHRMAN AVE E
7TH AVE W
NE 43RD ST
E THOMAS ST
N 56TH ST
NE 47TH ST
E JOHN ST
NE 85TH STGREEN LAKE DR N
WEST GREEN LAKE WAY N
12TH AVE N
E
E GALER ST
BELLEVUE AVE
55TH AVE N
E
N 43RD ST
E DENNY WAY
35TH AVE S
E ROY ST
BOREN AVE S
VALLEY ST
WEST GREEN LAKE DR N
WOODLAWN AVE N
E ALDER ST
MCG
ILVR
A BL
VD E
QUEEN ANNE DR
WOODLAN
D PL N
W RAYE ST
S WALKER ST
BELMONT AVE E
M L KIN
G JR WAY E
48TH AVE N
E
SW FLORIDA ST
AURORA BR
FREMONT W
AY N
KIRKWOOD PL N
S HOLGATE BR
NE 54TH ST
S KING ST
S JUDKINS ST
5TH AVE W
NE 56TH ST
E BLAINE ST
S ATLANTIC ST
N MARKET ST
36TH AVE S
LAKESIDE AVE
MELROSE AVE
FREMONT PL N
EAST MONTLAKE PL E
SMITH ST
E ROANOKE ST
4TH AVE N
COWEN PL NE
NW 36TH ST
11TH AVE
32ND AVE S
N 66TH ST
E MCGILVRA ST
7TH AVE
I90 WB
VALLEY ST
N 65TH ST
NE 45TH ST
NE 70TH ST
6TH AVE S
I90 EB
E JOHN ST
LATONA AVE N
E
3RD AVE W
MERIDIAN
AVE N
NE 65TH ST
S MASSACHUSETTS ST
30TH AVE N
E
12TH AVE S
31ST AVE S
5TH AVE N
WALLIN
GFORD AVE N
LATONA AVE N
E
51ST AVE S
MADISON ST
UNIV
ERSI
TYBR
IDGE
UNION ST
E HARRISON ST
E HAMLIN ST
I-5
I-5
I-5
I-90
520
520
Universityof Washington
Capitol Hill
U District (2021)
Westlake
UniversityStreet
PioneerSquare
InternationalDistrict/
Chinatown
StadiumJudkins Park
(2023)
Roosevelt(2021)
To Northgate TC
Elliot Bay
LakeUnion
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
11th Ave NE between NE 65th St and NE 40th St facing north
TYPICAL SECTION
40’Curb to curb
Right-of-way60’
Drivelane
10’ 11’Drivelane
8’Parking
lane
7’Bikelane
3’
Buffe
r
P
Eastlake Ave E between Fuhrman Ave E and Fairview Ave N facing north
TYPICAL SECTION
49’Curb to curb
Right-of-way75’
11’Drivelane
11’Center
turn lane
11’Drivelane
6’Bikelane
6’Bikelane
2’
Buffe
r
2’
Buffe
r
Fairview Ave N between Eastlake Ave E and Yale Ave N facing northeast
TYPICAL SECTION
7.5’49’
Curb to curb
Right-of-way64.5’
12’Drivelane
Drivelane
12’11’Drivelane
6’Bikelane
2’
Buffe
r
6’Bikelane
SOUTHBOUND
NORTHBOUND
TYPICAL SECTION
44’Curb to curb
Right-of-way66’
Drivelane
9’ 10’Drivelane
14’Buslane
11’Drivelane
Virginia St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north
Stewart St between 3rd Ave and Boren Ave facing north
B
C
A
BOREN AVE
YALE AVE N
NE 40TH ST
FUHRMAN AVE E
N 65TH ST
FAIRVIEW AVE N
D
VALLEY ST
Fairview Ave N between Valley St and Denny Way facing north
TYPICAL SECTION
56’Curb to curb
Right-of-way84’
10’Drivelane
12’Center
turn lane
10’Drivelane
12’Shared bus/bike
lane
12’Shared bus/bike
lane
E
3RD AVE
F
FASTER20%
FASTER20%
TYPICAL SECTION
48’Curb to curb
Right-of-way80’
11’Drivelane
12’Drivelane
14’Shared bus/bike
lane
11’Drivelane
Stewart St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north
Fairview Ave N between Yale Ave N and Valley St facing northeast
TYPICAL SECTION
70’Curb to curb
Right-of-way98’
14’Streetcar
/buslane
14’Streetcar
/buslane
10’Drivelane
11’Drivelane
10’Center
turn lane
11’Drivelane
0 11/21/4 MileExisting RapidRide corridor
Proposed RapidRide corridor
Existing Link
Planned Link
Existing Seattle Streetcar
Planned Seattle Streetcar
Other Transit FacilitiesCorridor Treatment
Potential future Northgate service extension
Bike ImprovementsBAT Lane Transit Only
LaneGP LaneProposed alignment
Existing Stop
New / Upgraded
RR Station
Protected Bike Lane proposed as part of Project
Existing Protected Bike Lane
Corridor improvements include stop consolidation, transit signal priority and transit queue jumps.
ROOSEVELT RAPIDRIDE CORRIDORDOWNTOWN TO ROOSEVELT VIA EASTLAKE
DRAFT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
Service will operate in existing BAT Lanes on Stewart
23'
17'27'
BSECTION
15' Rooftop Bonus (143'-6")
4' Rooftop Bonus (132'-6)LBPP Height Limit (128'-6")
Zoning Height Limit (118'-6")
Prop
erty
Lin
e
Prop
erty
Lin
e
15' S
etba
ck
Lobby Entry Court
Parking
ExistingApartments
EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST
Average Grade (74'-6")
15' Rooftop Bonus (152'-6")
4' Rooftop Bonus (141'-6)LBPP Height Limit (137'-6")
Zoning Height Limit (127'-6")
Average Grade (83'-6")
Site Section B Site Section A
25'-9
"73
'
57'-6
"
11'
10'-6
"10
'-6"
10'-6
"24
'-2"
15'-3
"
012
SUSTAINABILITY, LIGHTNESS & SENIOR LIVING
Through the Living Building Pilot Program, this project seeks to meet the Place, Materials, and Beauty petals of the Living Building Challenge. It also seeks to use 75 percent or less of the energy use targets established in the 2012 Seattle Energy Code’s Target Performance Path (25 percent reduction). In addition, the project will use no potable water for non-potable uses, as approved by Public Health, Seattle and King County .
More and more seniors report being concerned with environmental issues, but sustainability doesn’t start and stop with environmental impact. It also includes economic and social tenets such as enhancing sense of community, and creating comfortable and healthy indoor environments.
013
treatstore
ENERGY STORY
To meet the stringent Living Building Pilot Program energy reduction goals as well as targets established with the City of Seattle, the project has incorporated intensive energy conservation measures throughout. A high performance envelope, high efficiency systems and fixtures, and a focus on operational energy reduction combine to reduce energy demand. An 11,000 square foot 111 kW high efficiency array provides the additional energy needed to meet LBPP target energy reduction.
WATER STORY
The Living Building Pilot Program requires that projects use no potable water for non-potable uses as approved by DOH and King County Public Health officials. With the exception of the memory care floor, all non-potable water needs in this community are supplied by on-site recycled greywater. These uses include all irrigation and toilet flushing. Rainwater is captured and stored in a cistern below grade (in addition to the greywater cistern) as backup water supply.
111 kW high efficiency array
Traction; regenerative drive; LED cab lights with auto shut-off
Variable frequency; garage fans turn down with CO & NO2 sensors
Demand control ventilation senses cooking activity to vary exhaust rates
Passive house envelope strategies
Energy and water efficient appliances; optimized kitchen operations to reduce energy consumption
Variable refrigerant flow heating and cooling
Heat pump water heaters; Piranha wastewater heat recovery
LED lighting; daylighting controls; exterior light photosensors
Commercial heat pump dryers; residential Energy Star washer and heat pump dryers
Direct digital control building system metering
Energy and water efficient appliances and fixtures
014
+
craftsmanship intention
SLOPE
• Solar panels 'float' above building form• Curtain wall glazing allows maximum light and views for west-facing facade• Echoes shell house typology, where top floor windows provide ample view of water
• Natural material with regional sourcing• Provides a warm, residential aesthetic• Material precedent and tectonic details draw from the shell house and rowing shell• Wood continues to street level at entry and Queen Bee to warm entry court
• Familiar and welcoming texture at pedestrian levels with thoughtful details• Storefront glazing allows visual connection to sidewalk and street• Vernacular material of the earth with attention to detail and reflective of concept
glass
brick
woodLIGHTNESS
REPETITION
CO
MM
UN
ITY
Material Strategy: Base, Middle, Top
015
CRAFTSMANSHIP, MATERIALITY & INTENTION
“When I build a shell I leave a piece of my heart in that shell, that’s how I want you to leave a race.”
- George Yeoman Pocock
The racing shell is a carefully crafted vessel, constructed using the highest quality materials with scrupulous attention to detail. Every part of the shell is critical, serving a function - nothing is extraneous.
To meet the requirements of the Living Building Challenge Materials Petal, natural materials will be selected whenever possible. The integrated project team will thoroughly vet materials and products to specify those which are red list free, emphasize regional sourcing and responsible manufacturing, and reduce the carbon footprint of the building.
016
LIGHTNESS
REPETITION CO
MM
UN
ITY
Rhythm and Structure
LIGHTNESS
LIGHTNESS
REPETITION
REPETITION
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
MM
UN
ITY
017
ROWING & THE SHELL HOUSE
“Where is the spiritual value of rowing? ... The losing of self entirely to the cooperative efforts of the crew as a whole.”
- George Yeoman Pocock
Rhythm and community are critical principles of rowing that also inform the design of the shell house. Rhythm is apparent in the lower floor of the shell house, the bays for shell storage. These bays provided for each crew also reflect community. Community and teamwork are emphasized further in the upper level of the shell house where dining, workout, and viewing spaces are placed.
This project is influenced by the traditional parti of shellhouse architecture in the repetition of bays, rhythm of facade articulation, and elements of lightness and community at the top level.
A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g b u i l d i n g e x t e r i o r p r e s e n t a t i o n - 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 7
9
r o w i n g : r e p e t i t i o n o f t e a m & m o v e m e n t
s h e l l h o u s e : r e p e t i t i o n o f b ay s
r h y t h m o f s t r u c t u r e
018 A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g b u i l d i n g e x t e r i o r p r e s e n t a t i o n - 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 7
9
r o w i n g : r e p e t i t i o n o f t e a m & m o v e m e n t
s h e l l h o u s e : r e p e t i t i o n o f b ay s
r h y t h m o f s t r u c t u r e
Details: Repetition and Compatibility
INSPIRATION FROM ROWING
Several major design elements of the building take their inspiration from the geometry, repetition, and compatibility of materials found in rowing. Alternating angles of a herringbone brick pattern repeat along the main street-facing facade, echoing the alternating strokes of oars. This same pattern is echoed in the main entry canopy, this time constructed in the contrasting materials of steel and glass.
Main Canopy Plan
Canopy Signage
Painted Perimeter Frame
6'
Clear Tempered Glazing
Painted Steel
16'-8
"
Valley
Gutter
Knife Plate Attachment, typ.
019
A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g b u i l d i n g e x t e r i o r p r e s e n t a t i o n - 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 7
1 1
a p p r o a c h
cafe seating vestibule water courtlobby living
e n j o y e n t e r d e l i g h t i n t e r a c t c o n n e c t i n s p i r e
20
Activating the street edge with indoor/ outdoor connection
Short-term bike parking
Walk/bike-up coffee window
Oversized awning windows
Indoor/outdoor bench seating
Indoor/outdoor bench/counter
Cafe tables in entry court
Stormwater planter benches
Wide sidewalk
Vestibule Lobby
Dining
Cafe
Ground Level Uses
8
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
56
6
7
7
8
Circ.
Interaction
Amenity
Retail
Memory Care Terrace
Cafe
sidewalk planter
9' 5'
Pro
pe
rty
Lin
e
Eastlake Ave E
12'-
10"
entry
5'
5'-6"
Opaque GlazingLiving
Unit
21
INDOOR/ OUTDOOR CONNECTION
To create a strong, interactive connection to the street for the public, as well as residents, special attention was paid to the treatment of the facade at the coffee shop. A series of pedestrian amenities were integrated into the public realm and street edge including bicycle parking, oversized operable glazing, benches, entry court, a large sidewalk, and overhead weather protection along the entire Eastlake street frontage.
22
rhythm
refinement
l ightness
Fenestration and Facade Patterning
RHYTHM, REFINEMENT, LIGHTNESS
The inspiration of the 1936 Olympics gold medal rowing team and traditional shellhouse architecture is reflected throughout the building design on all sides. The concepts of rhythm and repetition of bays are seen in how the massing of the east facade is broken up with metal reveals. The base, middle, top parti is followed around to the north and east, wrapping brick around at the same level and using a fenestration pattern that reflects each component of the parti. Finally, the idea of lightness is emphasized at the top level of the building by using a lighter siding material and a different pattern of fenestration, with more glazing.
23
East Facade at Eco Roof
East Facade at Reflect ing Pool Detai l of North Facade
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3
FILL GAP AROUND PENETRATION W/ SPRAY IN PLACE INSULATION
SHEATHING
PIPE / CONDUIT
FLUID-APPLIED JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR
2-3"
BEY
OND
PENE
TRAT
ION
EXTE
ND AP
PROX
.
LAP W
RB M
IN. 2
"
TROWELAPPLIED FLASHING
FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB
METAL FLASHING W/ HEMMED DRIP EDGE
FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB
FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB
3" M
IN.
3" M
IN.
WET SET FLASHING LEG IN JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR
TROWEL APPLIED WRB FLASHING
FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB
3"
3"
FLUID-APPLIED JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR
OUTSIDE CORNER
INSIDE CORNER
FLUID-APPLIED JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR; PRIME RAW EDGE OF GYP SHEATHING AS NEEDED
KNIFE PLATE OR TUBE STEEL
TROWEL APPLIED FLASHING
FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB O/TROWEL FLASHING
2" MIN. OVERLAP
CLEAR-FINISHED LAPPED TEAK WOOD 1”x10” FLAT PLANK BOARDS WITH 1” MIN. OVERLAP.TRIM BOTTOM OF CLAD AT ANGLES DEPICTED BELOW.
WO
OD
WAV
E RE
PEAT
PAT
TERN
2'-9
1/2
"
GLB COLUMN
12"w x 6"d VERTICAL WOOD TRIM
RATED UNIT DEMISING WALL
12” WIDE METAL HEADER PANELS
2 3/
4"
PROJECT NUMBER
© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.
38 NORTHWEST DAVIS, SUITE 300PORTLAND, OR 97209T 503.245.7100
1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600
1014 HOWARD STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103T 415.252.7063
DATE
DPD APPROVAL STAMP
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NUMBER
C:\_
Rev i
t Pro
ject
s\15
249 2
- 17
- Ae
gis
o f L
ake
Uni
on\1
5 249
2 - 1
7 - A
egis
of L
ake
Uni
on_ a
man
dai.r
vt10
/28/
2017
4:1
6:51
PM
152492
MUP RESPONSECYCLE 1
AEG
IS O
F LA
KE U
NIO
N
AEG
IS L
IVIN
G
1916
EAS
TLAK
E AV
ENU
E E
SEAT
TLE,
WA
9810
2
2017-08-08
DETAILS - EXTERIOR
A7.08A7.08
REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE
1 1/2" = 1'-0"1 TYPICAL PENETRATION THROUGH WRB 6" = 1'-0"2 TYP WRB/MTL FLASHING TRANSITION
3" = 1'-0"3 TYP INSIDE/OUTSIDE CORNER 3" = 1'-0"4 KNIFE PLATE/TUBE STEEL FLASHING
1" = 1'-0"5 WOOD WAVE WALL
3" = 1'-0"6 METAL PANEL AT WOOD COLUMN
24
25
Ankrom Moisan ArchitectsJunior Designer & Job CaptainSD through CD PhasesEstimated Completion: Fall 2018
Urban Multifamily Residential + Retail
This apartment community provides a mix of studio, 1- and 2- bedroom apartments on an unusually shaped urban infill site near the corner of NE 28th Avenue and NE Sandy Boulevard in Portland’s Kerns Neighborhood. The project comprises 206 units total across six floors, along with parking below grade, two courtyards, and retail at the ground floor. The project is also highly visible from Interstate 84.
Sandy28
26
Concept Studies
STUDY MODELS
Study models exploring material and massing concepts were inspired by the location and history of the site, next to the historic Sullivan’s Gulch and I-84. These natural and man-made landforms generated ideas for four typologies to inform the project: Strata, Canyon, Aggregate, and Cavern (clockwise from top left).
27
cavern
aggregate
aggregate
strata
stratacanyon
canyon
TYPOLOGY CONCEPT SKETCH
Ideas of how to incorporate the four typologies derived from the concept models were applied to the massing study. Courtyards and notches were carved into the building, revealing slices of color and light. Materials and massing make subtle shifts from level to level, reflecting ideas of aggregation and strata.
28
Process: Site Massing
29
A
B
CONGRUENCE
The facade articulation reflects differences in character and context through the concept of congruence: uniting dissimilar pieces in harmony. Along the sides of the building in view of Interstate 84, the material articulation evokes the rhythm and movement of cars shifting positions. Pops of color are like headlights and tail lights.
The elevation along Sandy Boulevard has a much more neighborhood-like scale. Varied materials weave and contrast, and wood siding along the ground floor lends warmth and familiar texture. Upon entering the building along the main street frontage of active ground floor retail, one can catch a glimpse all the way through the building lobby to the apex of the building’s central courtyard, uniting the two wings.
Facade Articulation Strategy
SANDY BLVD.
SULLIVAN ST.
ROOF - 201’-0”T.O. PARAPET - 205’-0”
LEVEL 6 - 191’-0”
LEVEL 5 - 181’-0”
LEVEL 4 - 171’-0”
LEVEL 3 - 161’-0”
LEVEL 2 - 151’-0”
GROUND FLOOR - 138’-0”
PARKING LEVEL- 126’-0”
I - 84
Site Section
30
Sample of Construction Documents
Design Throughout Process
THEME AND VARIATION
As junior designer and job captain on the project through construction documents, I was able to track early concepts throughout the process to make sure they were clearly communicated and developed for constructibility. I ensured that the varied textures and colors of metal panel the client desired were articulated in a logical and pleasing manner, and selected materials to appropriately reflect design intent within budget.
31
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
T.O
. PAR
APET
3' -
0"
BOTT
OM
OF T
RUSS
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
12' -
6"
T.O
. PT
SLAB
STE
P (V
ARIE
S)
12' -
6"
J
REM
OVE
SHO
RING
5' -
0"
VESTIBULE148
UNIT229
A7.0
UNIT329
A7.0
UNIT429
A7.0
UNIT529
A7.0
UNIT626
A7.0
A7.124
TYP
A7.1219
TYP
9
A7.12
TYP
A7.2120
TYP
A7.2115
TYP
A7.1120
TYP
1C3 7
1J1 12
2E7
1A3 5
1Q6.1
12
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
13
10' -
0"
STAIR 4S41
UNIT224
S6.0
BIKE STORAGE125
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
13
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
50' -
0"
12' -
6"
3' -
0"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"
A7.511
BIKE STORAGE125
UNIT223
S5.1
UNIT323
S5.1
UNIT423
S5.1
UNIT523
S5.1
UNIT620
S5.1
REM
OVE
SHO
RING
5' -
0"
A7.2120
TYP
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
1A3 5
2E7
1C3 7
1J1 12
1Q6.1
12
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
13
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
2C3 7
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
1
A4.02
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
UNITUNIT
3' -
0"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"12
' - 6
"6"
12' -
0"
FUTURE RETAIL 1142
ROOF DRAIN WITHIN FURRED OUT WALL, WHERE OCCURS
CORRIDOR
A0.165
1A3 5
2E7
1C3 7
1J1 12
1Q6.1
12
PROJECT NUMBER
© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.
SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
REVISION
6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100
1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600
DATE
C:\_
Revi
t Pro
ject
s\15
2680
-15_
Sand
y-an
d-2 8
th-A
pts_
Cent
ral \1
5268
0-15
_San
d y-a
nd-2
8th-
Apts
_sco
tts.
rvt
12/6
/201
6 5:
48:4
7 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"
152680A3.52
PERMIT SET
SAN
DY
BLVD
APA
RTM
ENTS
FAIR
FIEL
D R
ESID
ENTI
AL C
OM
PAN
Y LL
C
2869
NE
SAN
DY
BLVD
, PO
RTLA
ND
, OR
9723
2
12.07.2016
WALL SECTIONS(SOUTH & EAST)
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH WALL SECTION EA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EAST WALL SECTION G
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST WALL SECTION HA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"5 EAST WALL SECTION G
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - CORRIDOR
REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
13 12
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
CI
C
CI
IC
IC
CI
BASE POINT 2
139' - 0"
65' -
0"
C
S
S
S
S
S S
S
S
S
S
S SSS
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
C
C
C
C
C
BASE POINT 2
139' - 0"
65' -
0"
S
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
L K
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
3
A3.53
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
BC
C
C
C
C
2
A3.53
BASE POINT 2
139' - 0"
65' -
0"
S
S SS
S S
S SS
S S
S SS
S S
S SS
S S
S SS
S S
S
LEGEND - ELEVATIONS
CIP CONCRETE 1 :VERTICAL BOARDFORMTEXTURE
CIP CONCRETE 2:HORIZONTAL BOARDFORMTEXTURE
GLASS - COLOR 1
INSULATED METAL PANEL
GLASS - TYPICAL
DISPLAY WINDOW
INSULATED METAL PANEL:PERFORATED
INSULATED METAL PANEL:COLOR
INSULATED METAL PANEL:COLOR - LIGHT GRAY
INSULATED METAL PANEL:LIGHT GRAY PTAC PERF
INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK
INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK 2
INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK 2 PTAC PERF
INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK PTAC PERF
METAL PANEL - 2:PTAC PERF
METAL PANEL - 2:VERTICAL
METAL PANEL - 2:HORIZONTAL
METAL PANEL - 3:HORIZONTAL
METAL PANEL - 3:PTAC PERF
METAL PANEL - 3:VERTICAL
METAL PANEL - 4
METAL PANEL - 4:PTAC PERF
VERTICAL WOOD SLATS
UNIT TYPES1
S SAFETY GLAZING GLASS
PERFORATED METAL -BALCONIES & SCREENS
PROJECT NUMBER
© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.
SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
REVISION
6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100
1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600
DATE
C:\_
Revi
t Pro
ject
s\15
2680
-15_
Sand
y-an
d-2 8
th-A
pts_
Cent
ral \1
5268
0-15
_San
d y-a
nd-2
8th-
Apts
_sco
tts.
rvt
12/6
/201
6 6:
51:0
7 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"
152680A3.15b
PERMIT SET
SAN
DY
BLVD
APA
RTM
ENTS
FAIR
FIEL
D R
ESID
ENTI
AL C
OM
PAN
Y LL
C
2869
NE
SAN
DY
BLVD
, PO
RTLA
ND
, OR
9723
2
12.07.2016
ENLARGEDELEVATIONS - EAST
A3.15b | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION - EAST COURTYARD - AA3.15b | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION - EAST COURTYARD - B
A3.15b | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 ELEVATION - EAST COURTYARD - C
REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
T.O
. PAR
APET
3' -
0"
BOTT
OM
OF T
RUSS
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
12' -
6"
T.O
. PT
SLAB
STE
P (V
ARIE
S)
12' -
6"
J
REM
OVE
SHO
RING
5' -
0"
VESTIBULE148
UNIT229
A7.0
UNIT329
A7.0
UNIT429
A7.0
UNIT529
A7.0
UNIT626
A7.0
A7.124
TYP
A7.1219
TYP
9
A7.12
TYP
A7.2120
TYP
A7.2115
TYP
A7.1120
TYP
1C3 7
1J1 12
2E7
1A3 5
1Q6.1
12
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
13
10' -
0"
STAIR 4S41
UNIT224
S6.0
BIKE STORAGE125
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
13
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
50' -
0"
12' -
6"
3' -
0"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"
A7.511
BIKE STORAGE125
UNIT223
S5.1
UNIT323
S5.1
UNIT423
S5.1
UNIT523
S5.1
UNIT620
S5.1
REM
OVE
SHO
RING
5' -
0"
A7.2120
TYP
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
1A3 5
2E7
1C3 7
1J1 12
1Q6.1
12
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
13
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
2C3 7
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
1
A4.02
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
UNITUNIT
3' -
0"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"12
' - 6
"6"
12' -
0"
FUTURE RETAIL 1142
ROOF DRAIN WITHIN FURRED OUT WALL, WHERE OCCURS
CORRIDOR
A0.165
1A3 5
2E7
1C3 7
1J1 12
1Q6.1
12
PROJECT NUMBER
© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.
SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
REVISION
6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100
1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600
DATE
C:\_
Revi
t Pro
ject
s\15
2680
-15_
Sand
y-an
d-2 8
th-A
pts_
Cent
ral \1
5268
0-15
_San
d y-a
nd-2
8th-
Apts
_sco
tts.
rvt
12/6
/201
6 5:
48:4
7 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"
152680A3.52
PERMIT SET
SAN
DY
BLVD
APA
RTM
ENTS
FAIR
FIEL
D R
ESID
ENTI
AL C
OM
PAN
Y LL
C
2869
NE
SAN
DY
BLVD
, PO
RTLA
ND
, OR
9723
2
12.07.2016
WALL SECTIONS(SOUTH & EAST)
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH WALL SECTION EA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EAST WALL SECTION G
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST WALL SECTION HA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"5 EAST WALL SECTION G
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - CORRIDOR
REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
By coupling advanced skills in Revit and documentation with design sensibility, I was able to ensure that early concepts come to life in the built project. Design is just as much in the details as in the big ideas.
1 2PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
T.O
. PAR
APET
3' -
0"
BOTT
OM
OF T
RUSS
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
10' -
0"
12' -
6"
T.O
. PT
SLAB
STE
P (V
ARIE
S)
12' -
6"
J
REM
OVE
SHO
RING
5' -
0"
VESTIBULE148
UNIT229
A7.0
UNIT329
A7.0
UNIT429
A7.0
UNIT529
A7.0
UNIT626
A7.0
A7.124
TYP
A7.1219
TYP
9
A7.12
TYP
A7.2120
TYP
A7.2115
TYP
A7.1120
TYP
1C3 7
1J1 12
2E7
1A3 5
1Q6.1
12
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
13
10' -
0"
STAIR 4S41
UNIT224
S6.0
BIKE STORAGE125
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
13
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
50' -
0"
12' -
6"
3' -
0"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"
A7.511
BIKE STORAGE125
UNIT223
S5.1
UNIT323
S5.1
UNIT423
S5.1
UNIT523
S5.1
UNIT620
S5.1
REM
OVE
SHO
RING
5' -
0"
A7.2120
TYP
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
1A3 5
2E7
1C3 7
1J1 12
1Q6.1
12
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
13
ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN
2C3 7
PARKING126' - 0"
LEVEL 1138' - 6"
LEVEL 2151' - 0"
LEVEL 3161' - 0"
LEVEL 4171' - 0"
LEVEL 5181' - 0"
LEVEL 6191' - 0"
ROOF201' - 0"
1
A4.02
MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"
LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"
LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"
UNITUNIT
3' -
0"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"10
' - 0
"12
' - 6
"6"
12' -
0"
FUTURE RETAIL 1142
ROOF DRAIN WITHIN FURRED OUT WALL, WHERE OCCURS
CORRIDOR
A0.165
1A3 5
2E7
1C3 7
1J1 12
1Q6.1
12
PROJECT NUMBER
© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.
SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
REVISION
6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100
1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600
DATE
C:\_
Revi
t Pro
ject
s\15
2680
-15_
Sand
y-an
d-2 8
th-A
pts_
Cent
ral \1
5268
0-15
_San
d y-a
nd-2
8th-
Apts
_sco
tts.
rvt
12/6
/201
6 5:
48:4
7 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"
152680A3.52
PERMIT SET
SAN
DY
BLVD
APA
RTM
ENTS
FAIR
FIEL
D R
ESID
ENTI
AL C
OM
PAN
Y LL
C
2869
NE
SAN
DY
BLVD
, PO
RTLA
ND
, OR
9723
2
12.07.2016
WALL SECTIONS(SOUTH & EAST)
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH WALL SECTION EA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EAST WALL SECTION G
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST WALL SECTION HA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"5 EAST WALL SECTION G
A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - CORRIDOR
REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE
1 2
32
Color Studies
S C H E M E : J A P A N E S E M A P L E A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & f a i r f i e l d r e s i d e n t i a l
s a n d y b l v d A N D N E 2 8 t h a v e n u e , i - 8 4 - a c c e n t c o l o r o p t i o n s - 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 6
v i b r a n t & s at u r at e d
VIEW LOOKING WEST ALONG SANDY BOULEVARD
ACCENT METAL PANEL BALCONY
2 3 4 5 61
1
4
2
3
6
5
METAL PANEL COLORS
MAIN ENTRY
Scheme: Japanese Maple
CLIENT COMMUNICATION
The client wanted to get ideas of different options for the overall color scheme for the exterior facade materials. I was able to quickly generate several different schemes for them to review, and develop a clear tool and process that I can employ on future projects.
33
S C H E M E c : r i v e r r o c k s o f t & s u bt l e A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & f a i r f i e l d r e s i d e n t i a l
s a n d y b l v d A N D N E 2 8 t h a v e n u e , i - 8 4 - a c c e n t c o l o r o p t i o n s - 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 6
VIEW LOOKING WEST ALONG SANDY BOULEVARD
ACCENT METAL PANEL BALCONY
2 3 4 5 61
4
2
3
6
5
METAL PANEL COLORS
MAIN ENTRY
1
Scheme: River Rock
34
35
36
CRYSTALLIZE.
37
CRYSTALLIZE.
Crystallize
24 Hour ChallengeIndependent ProjectDesigner
I enjoy doing small projects on my own to keep my design skills sharp and try new techniques. This keeps me inspired and engaged. For this project, I gave myself 24 hours to find a difficult site somewhere near my neighborhood, identify what makes it challenging, and start developing an idea for a response. I found a cavernous space underneath a large highway interchange beneath the Fremont Bridge in Northeast Portland, and started brainstorming ideas. What if we saw the potential in underutilized spaces such as these, and turned them into hidden gems? They could be transformed by a grassroots movement into pop-up cocktail bars, homes for the house-less, flower markets, maker spaces... the possibilities are plentiful.
Urban Intervention
38
WHAT HAPPENS HERE?
WE CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS.
39
Crystallize
LET’S MINE THESE UNDER- UTILIZED SPACES TO CREATE HIDDEN GEMS
photo credit: Edward Burtynsky
UTILIZE EXISTING NETWORK TO CRYSTALLIZE A NEW ONE.
40
41
42
21st Century LibraryCapstone Thesis - Spring, Fifth Year
Conceptually, this project evolved from the intersection of three sets of contrasting themes: physical / virtual, local / global, and old/ new. These themes highlight three main areas in which libraries as a project type can evolve. The function of a library has shifted from a community’s collective place to store printed material toward a point of access to an interconnected web of global content across varied types of media. A 21st century library must embrace the inherent simultaneity between the physical and virtual worlds of the digital age in order to create a physical space that remains relevant.
INSIDE - OUTSIDE
Perspective looking toward fiction collection.
43
Perspective looking southwest toward fiction collection
The University of ArizonaB. Arch Senior Thesis Project
Library for Sunnyslope, AZ
Conceptually, this project evolved from the intersection of three sets of contrasting themes: physical/virtual, local/global, and old/new. These themes highlight three main areas in which libraries as a project type can evolve. The function of a library has shifted from a community’s collective place to store printed material, toward a point of access to an interconnected web of global content across varied types of media. A 21st century library must embrace the inherent simultaneity between the physical and virtual worlds of the digital age in order to create a physical space that remains relevant.
21st CenturyLibrary
44
Critical Position & Concept DevelopmentThe contrasts between physical and virtual worlds, local and global cultures, and old and new technologies are becoming ever more apparent. Through the design of physical environments, architecture has the capacity to bridge these gaps.
A vast amount of information can now be accessed by anybody with an internet connection, and taken anywhere in the world via mobile devices. Such devices act as the portals to virtual realms separate from the physical world and the sense of place inherent within it. As more people in more places have access to the same information, cultural globalization approaches homogeneity-- and this is reflected in the built environment.
When precedence is given to global culture, local ideas not represented in a virtual way begin to lose relevance. As such, one must adapt to new technologies not only to maintain literacy but also representation within them. Those who do not are left ever further behind as new technologies evolve. The deterioration of local culture in response to cultural globalization underscores the importance of an architect’s role in creating a physical place that plugs a local community in to worldwide virtual realms while protecting cultural identity.
45
Physical | Virtual
Old
| N
ew
Local | Global
(Technology)(Com
munity)
(Literacy)
New & Interactive Library Cycle
physicalvirtual&
localglobal&
oldnew&
Traditional Library Cycle
sources &
eventspublishing library
systemusers
sources &
eventspublishing
librarysystem
users
“Imagine: a single library can now store the digital content of all the world’s libraries. It is di�cult to fathom the possibilities, let alone exploit them, without conceiving a new method of retrieval...the library’s civic duty is predicated on its ability to become its own database. All content remains �exible, updateable, and alive.”- Bruce Mau, Life Style, 2011
The three themes of the architectural position point toward three goals of a library: community, technology, and literacy-- distinct, yet interconnected.
Physical | Virtual
Old
| N
ew
Local | Global
(Technology)(Com
munity)
(Literacy)
New & Interactive Library Cycle
physicalvirtual&
localglobal&
oldnew&
Traditional Library Cycle
sources &
eventspublishing library
systemusers
sources &
eventspublishing
librarysystem
users
“Imagine: a single library can now store the digital content of all the world’s libraries. It is di�cult to fathom the possibilities, let alone exploit them, without conceiving a new method of retrieval...the library’s civic duty is predicated on its ability to become its own database. All content remains �exible, updateable, and alive.”- Bruce Mau, Life Style, 2011
The three themes of the architectural position point toward three goals of a library: community, technology, and literacy-- distinct, yet interconnected.
CRITICAL POSITION & CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT
The contrasts between physical and virtual worlds, local and global cultures, and old and new technologies are becoming ever more apparent. Through the design of physical environments, architecture has the capacity to bridge these gaps.
A vast amount of information can now be accessed by anybody with an internet connection, and taken anywhere in the world via mobile devices. Such devices act as the portals to virtual realms separate from the physical world and the sense of place inherent within it. As more people in more places have access to the same information, cultural globalization approaches homogeneity-- and this is reflected in the built environment.
When precedence is given to global culture, local ideas not represented in a virtual way begin to lose relevance. As such, one must adapt to new technologies not only to maintain literacy but also representation within them. Those who do not are left ever further behind as new technologies evolve. The deterioration of local culture in response to cultural globalization underscores the importance of an architect’s role in creating a physical place that plugs a local community into worldwide virtual realms while protecting cultural identity.
46
Diagram illustrating network structure of Phoenix library system
Site location in Sunnyslope, Arizona, just north of downtown Phoenix where North Central Avenue, a major traffic artery, intersects the Arizona Canal.
Site Strategies and AnalysisThe concept of libraries of information existing as networked structures informed site analysis strategies. A main goal going forward with site planning was to acknowledge the strong existing vectors adjacent to the site-- the canal and major roadway. In addition, the design would take advantage of mountain views to the north while creating a lively public outdoor space with access to the Arizona Canal.
2.
1.
4.
6.
5.
7.
3.
Site Adjacencies: Physical and Virtual1. North Central Avenue2. “S” Mountain3. Arizona Canal4. half mile radius from site5. Sunnyslope High School6. quarter mile radius7. Arizona Canal Trail
47
48
physical collections
digital experiences
mixing
collaboration
support &patron services
mixing supportcollections
+collaboration
building services
build
ing services
Program ProposalRooted in the Local Community, Providing Access to Global CultureThe design of a new branch library for the Sunnyslope, Arizona community will embrace new global technologies without losing sight of local culture. It will promote technological literacy and integrate physical and virtual experiences through multimedia learning and digital media browsing. It will create a sense of place through art installations, a strong connection to the outdoors, and a community archives collection. It will provide an environment for individual inspiration as well as a collaborative exchange of ideas.
By tailoring collections to the needs of the community and embracing digital technologies, new opportunities for spatial overlaps and flexible uses emerge.
Physical & virtual programmatic connections
49
children’s digital zone850 sf
homework help center 800 sf
children’s info hub 250 sf
children’s print collection 1000 sf
teens’ print collection850 sf
teens’ digital zone1000 sf
teens’ info hub350 sf
periodicals750 sf
general collections1500 sf
reference600 sf
adult continuing education & services900 sf
community multimedia archive850
activity rooms3000 sf
lecture and screening hall1800 sf
lobby350 sf
checkout200 sf
informationdesk & returns500 sf
search and find center500 sf
hold shelves300 sf
-
multimedia collection1750 sf
laptop and tabletbrowsing and seating1750 sf
device checkout400
-
tech support400 sf
print center300 sf
digital literacy learning lab900 sf
audio and visual seating1500 sf
digital creation labs
digital accesscenter500 sf
retail
staff
digital
circulation services
event
children
teens
adults
children’s reading area1000 sf
flex study spaces 1200 sf
teens’ reading area1000 sf
small meeting flex spaces1250 sf
exhibition gallery750 sf
media store1050 sf
convenience market1050 sf
cafe and coffee/ aguas frescas bar2000 sf
shared back of house400 sf
restrooms400 sf
materialsprocessing1250 sf
staff offices500 sf
storage500 sf
24 hrdrop200 sf
staff lounge450 sf
staff computing hub500 sf
media storage400 sf
staff restroom
physical collections
digital experiences
mixing
collaboration
support &patron services
mixing supportcollections
+collaboration
building services
build
ing services
Programming diagram illustrating various zone types and functions throughout the project. The Sunnyslope Branch Library has an expanded focus on providing experiences, not just physical materials, to its patrons. This manifests in various ways: browsing digital collections on library-use tablets and laptops, audio-visual browsing, a community gallery and cafe, and more.
50
media store
market
cafe
multimedia collection
staff
public circulation services
laptop & tablet browsing
digital creation labs
audio & video browsing
gallery
multimedia archive
general collections
meeting flex space
children’s collectionteens’ collection
activity rooms
lecture hall
courtyard
folding enve
lope - st
reet p
resen
ce - s
equen
ce of v
iews
parking
2.
3.
4.5.
6.
1.
Key Moments1. Cantilevering over the Arizona Canal, patrons get a much more direct experience of the water than by simply observing from a distance.
2. The built form is designed in an architectural language of form evolving from the land.
3. The space between the retail spaces and the program on the opposite side of the underpass is transformed into an inviting public plaza, with cafe seating and landscape shaded by the built form.
4. The geometry of the library projects outward at the main entry point.
5. Interior courtyards are interwoven with the geometry of the library, with glimpses visible from the exterior.
6. The east facade holds the street edge.
51
1. Boundary formationResponse to existing conditionsMajor programmatic divisions
2. ConnectingFinding pathwaysRelating zones
3. SplittingMain interior divisionsFinding vertices
4. SubdividingSecondary zonesCreating variations
5. SelectingEvaluating resultsCreating form
Perspective looking southeast from courtyard toward fiction and non-fiction collections. Library patrons can see through multiple planes of glazing into the collections as a result of the geometry of the courtyard, reinforcing themes of simultaneity and interconnectedness.
Form Finding ProcessThrough a series of carefully orchestrated steps, the built volume is fractured and subdivided to meet the site planning strategy and programming goals.
Site Plan 1. Library 2. Community Archive 3. Cafe and Gallery
Site Plan
52
53
54
Exhibit DesignIndependent Research; Design Studio- Spring, Fourth Year
A grant-funded investigation into the collaborations of choreographer Merce Cunningham inspired an exhibit design selected by peers and instructors to publicly showcase the research. I translated conceptual ideas into a system of built forms, responding to input from my team and delegating tasks to finish the project on time and within the budget. The exhibit was open to the public for six weeks in the main gallery of the College of Architecture at the University of Arizona, and formed the environment for several related special events.
CHOREOGRAPHING SPACE
A grid of thin rope and sliding connectors shapes the space beneath it.
55
A grid of thin rope and sliding connectors molds the space underneath it, creating a virtual ceiling above exhibit panels and seating areas.
The University of ArizonaIndependent Research Grant; Design Studio
Research & Immersive Exhibit Design
A grant-funded investigation into the collaborations of modern dance choreographer Merce Cunningham inspired an exhibit design selected by peers and instructors to publicly showcase the research. I translated conceptual ideas into a system of built forms, and led a small team of fellow architecture students in prototyping and fabrication. The exhibit was open to the public for six weeks in the main gallery of the College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture at The University of Arizona, and formed the setting for several related special events.
CollaborativeLegacy
Design StrategyThe exhibit documented seven multi-disciplinary works by Merce Cunningham and his collaborators, as well as other selected collaborations between choreographers and architects. Existing light fixtures formed the structure for exhibit panels to hang, displaying reproductions of music and dance notations, drawings, photographs, and text. The main design objectives were to create a field condition that encouraged multiple pathways through the exhibit (an idea referencing Cunningham’s open-ended choreography), and to shape the space without blocking views of the display panels.
Below: Rendering illustrating open circulation-- visitors can see display panels in chronological order of the content, or according to personal interests. A grid of thin rope and sliding plastic connectors forms a virtual ceiling above the exhibit panels, reflective of the grid in the concrete floor below. Visitors can circulate around audio-visual seating areas and drops in the rope grid while maintaining sight lines.
56
Design StrategyThe exhibit documented seven multi-disciplinary works by Merce Cunningham and his collaborators, as well as other selected collaborations between choreographers and architects. Existing light fixtures formed the structure for exhibit panels to hang, displaying reproductions of music and dance notations, drawings, photographs, and text. The main design objectives were to create a field condition that encouraged multiple pathways through the exhibit (an idea referencing Cunningham’s open-ended choreography), and to shape the space without blocking views of the display panels.
Below: Rendering illustrating open circulation-- visitors can see display panels in chronological order of the content, or according to personal interests. A grid of thin rope and sliding plastic connectors forms a virtual ceiling above the exhibit panels, reflective of the grid in the concrete floor below. Visitors can circulate around audio-visual seating areas and drops in the rope grid while maintaining sight lines.
56
57
printed exhibit panel
a/v seating node
small drop in grid
large drop in grid0’ 4’ 8’ 16’
Rendered perspective illustrating open circulation through the exhibit.
Floor plan diagramming location of hanging panels, drops in the grid of rope, and seating areas in relation to the existing light fixtures and scored grid in the concrete floor of the gallery.
58
Rope sections were assembled in studio and installed in gallery.
Connectors were added between pre-assem-bled sections of rope.
Tension was adjusted to affect how much rope dropped down.
Exhibit ConstructionThe exhibit design went through many iterations of materials testing and full scale modeling to prepare for construction in the gallery. Each of the components, from seating areas to the connectors used to join rope together, went through a collaborative peer-review process until the materials and construction details were budgeted and finalized.
A section of the rope grid assembled in the design studio.
A view of the virtual vs. physical ceilings above the exhibit.
Right: View from seating area through rope grid toward gallery ceiling.
59
60
During the six weeks the exhibit was on display, the space was used tor several events including a poetry reading and workshop, a round table
discussion with special guests involved in the exhibited works, and a performance by students from the University of Arizona School of Dance.
Also, computer screens were built into the exhibit’s seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the works featured in the exhibit.
Collaborative Legacy
During the six weeks the exhibit was on display, the space was used tor several events including a poetry reading and workshop, a round table
discussion with special guests involved in the exhibited works, and a performance by students from the University of Arizona School of Dance.
Also, computer screens were built into the exhibit’s seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the works featured in the exhibit.
Collaborative Legacy
During the six weeks the exhibit was on display, the space was used for several events including a poetry reading and workshop, a round table discussion with special guests from the exhibited works, and a performance by students from the University of Arizona School of Dance.
Right: The exhibit design brought to life abstract ideas from Merce Cunningham’s choreography; visitors to the exhibit create their own choreography in the route they take through the exhibit.
Computer screens were built into the seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the featured works.
61
Computer screens were built into the seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the featured works.
SKILLS
HONORS + LEADERSHIP
Digital: Advanced skills in Revit, Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Rhino, SketchUp
Sustainability: Knowledgeable of sustainable design principles and certification programs, namely the Living Building Challenge
Communication: Skilled in writing, research, and presentations for clients and design review
Design: Leader of weekly charrettes for 50+ person team, passionate about design thinking, research, and collaboration
Board of Directors, AIA PortlandTerm beginning January 2018
Chris White Scholarship for Emerging ProfessionalsAIA Portland, 2017
Future Vision Symposium, Panel SpeakerAIA Portland + forWARD, Spring 2017
BOLD TYPE Talks, Founder & Organizer Quarterly event series with AIA Portland, February 2017 - present
Elevation Lab, Design Leader Year-long leadership group within Ankrom Moisan Architects for emerging designers, 2016
Top 10, Loop PDX Competition University of Oregon, Design Week PDX, 2015
Top 5 B. Arch. Thesis ProjectOf 50+ students, The University of Arizona, 2012
Honors College Research Grant“Collaborative Legacy of Merce Cunningham”, The University of Arizona, 2010
Thomas R. Brown Distinguished Scholarship College of Engineering, The University of Arizona, 2006-08
National Merit Scholarship The University of Arizona, 2006-2010
Young Scientist Program Full time summer project in Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, 2005
The University of Arizona Tucson, ArizonaBachelor of Architecture, 2012
The University of Oregon Portland, OregonVisiting Student, Urban Design Studio, Fall 2011
Architectural Licensure: I have completed all exams and the IDP process and my initial license through the State of Oregon is pending transmittal of NCARB paperwork and a trip to Salem to make it official.
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
10215 N Polk Avenue Portland, OR 97217lara . [email protected] . 422 . 2005
LaraLaFontain
Ankrom Moisan Architects - Portland, ORAssociate, Intern 3: December 2016 - presentIntern 2: December 2015- December 2016Intern 1: March - December 2015
As a designer and job captain on urban multifamily and senior living projects, I aid in concept development and exterior design, design development, code research, design of architectural details, and production of construction drawings along with a wide variety of other tasks. I also prepare presentation materials for Design Review, neighborhood meetings, and client communication. One of my current projects is a first-of-its-kind sustainable senior living community in Seattle pursuing Living Building Challenge petal certification, for which I am the lead designer.
CB | Two Architects - Salem, OR (commuted daily from Portland)Architectural Intern: January 2014 - March 2015
As an architectural intern I assisted with medical clinic and senior living projects in various phases of design. Responsibilities included feasibility studies, in-depth architectural programming services, client communication, and a wide variety of tasks through schematic design, design development, and construction documents.
RH Interior Design - St. Louis, MO and Portland, ORDesign Associate: September 2012 - December 2014Assisted interior designers in drafting, space planning, client communication, and presentations.
Exhibit Designer & Researcher - The University of ArizonaMay 2010 - March 2011Wrote a grant proposal to fund research into the multidisciplinary collaborations of modern dance choreographer Merce Cunningham. Won a competition for an exhibit design be further developed and built, and led a team of students in its prototyping and construction. The exhibit was open to the public for 6 weeks and created an immersive environment for several dance performances and other events.
View my portfolio: https://issuu.com/lara.lafontain
LaraLaFontain
503 . 422 . 2005lara . [email protected]