lara lafontain | portfolio

64
L ara L aFontain

Upload: lara-lafontain

Post on 28-Mar-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

I am seeking a position with a firm where I can contribute my skills in research, design, and multidisciplinary collaboration as an intern architect. Experience in interior design, exhibit design, and research enhances my highly creative yet pragmatic approach to architecture. For a printed portfolio or other inquiries, please email me at [email protected].

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

Lara LaFontain

Page 2: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

02

Page 3: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

03

Hope lies in dreams, in imagination, and in the courage of those who dare to make dreams into reality.

- Jonas Salk

Page 4: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio
Page 5: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

Living Building

Sandy 28

CRYSTALLIZE.

Urban Intervention

Perspective looking southwest toward fiction collection

21st Century LibraryCapstone Thesis - Spring, Fifth Year

Conceptually, this project evolved from the intersection of three sets of contrasting themes: physical / virtual, local / global, and old/ new. These themes highlight three main areas in which libraries as a project type can evolve. The function of a library has shifted from a community’s collective place to store printed material toward a point of access to an interconnected web of global content across varied types of media. A 21st century library must embrace the inherent simultaneity between the physical and virtual worlds of the digital age in order to create a physical space that remains relevant.

Collaborative Legacy

Exhibit DesignIndependent Research; Design Studio- Spring, Fourth Year

A grant-funded investigation into the collaborations of choreographer Merce Cunningham inspired an exhibit design selected by peers and instructors to publicly showcase the research. I translated conceptual ideas into a system of built forms, responding to input from my team and delegating tasks to finish the project on time and within the budget. The exhibit was open to the public for six weeks in the main gallery of the College of Architecture at the University of Arizona, and formed the environment for several related special events.

A grid of thin rope and sliding connectors molds the space underneath it, creating a virtual ceiling above exhibit panels and seating areas.

21st Century Library

pages 06-23

pages 24-35

pages 36-41

pages 54-61

pages 42-53

featured work

Page 6: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

06

Page 7: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

07

LivingBuilding

Ankrom Moisan ArchitectsLead Designer & Job CaptainSD, DD, and Design ReviewEstimated Completion: Fall ‘19

Sustainable Senior Living

This 77 unit, 6 story assisted living and memory care community is designed to reflect the context and history of its location in the Eastlake neighborhood of Seattle. Overlooking Lake Union, the project is inspired by the history of the 1936 gold medal-winning UW rowing team, nicknamed “The Boys in the Boat”.

This project will be the first of its kind as a high-density, urban, senior living community pursuing Living Building Challenge Petal Certification along with the energy and water reduction requirements of the City of Seattle. The project will be an example of craftsmanship, lightness, and community, merging the philosophy of the client and the imperatives of the Living Building Challenge with design inspiration from rowing and shell houses.

Page 8: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

08

EASTLAKE NEIGHBORHOOD

The Eastlake neighborhood is one of the oldest in Seattle described by the Eastlake Community Council as a ‘pleasant jumble of houseboats, singles family homes, apartments, condos, and large and small businesses.’ Eastlake is home to about 4,000 residents and 4,000 people who work in the neighborhood. The neighborhood extends from the intersection of Eastlake Avenue E and Fairview Avenue at its southern end northward to University Bridge with Lake Union forming the western edge and I-5 forming the eastern edge. In 1962 the I-5 corridor cut through the neighborhood , creating a physical separation.

The shoreline has traditionally been the site of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. Several of Seattle’s houseboat communities are located along the Eastlake/Lake Union shoreline, primarily in the Portage Bay/Roanoke sub-neighborhood. Eastlake Avenue E is a major north-south traffic arterial and was one of Seattle’s primary trolley car routes.

Site Constraints

Future High Capacity Transit

Steep Topography

Exceptional Tree

Views

Adjacent LR Zone

Adjacent Residential BuildingsI-5

SITE

LAKE UNION

DOWNTOWN

views to lake union

vie

ws

to l

ake

un

ion

UNIVERSITY OF

WASHINGTON

20% slope

LR2 zone

Page 9: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

09

V I C I N I T Y M A P

EASTLAKE URBAN VILLAGE

PROJECT site

PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY

E A S T L A K E

E A S T L A K E N E I G H B O R H O O D P L A NG U I D E L I N E S A D O P T E D 1 9 9 9

eas t l a ke a v e e

e b l a i n e s t

e h o w e s t

e n e w t o n s t

y a l e p l e

fra

nk

lin av

e e

boy

lston

ave e

eastla

ke av

e e

yale av

e e

f a i r v i e w a v e e

I 5

I 5

I 5 C O L O N N A D E P A R K

A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g E A R L Y D E S I G N G U I D A N C E - S D C I # 3 0 2 3 8 4 5 - 0 2 / 0 8 / 1 7

9

V I C I N I T Y M A P

EASTLAKE URBAN VILLAGE

PROJECT site

PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY

E A S T L A K E

E A S T L A K E N E I G H B O R H O O D P L A NG U I D E L I N E S A D O P T E D 1 9 9 9

eas t l a ke a v e e

e b l a i n e s t

e h o w e s t

e n e w t o n s t

y a l e p l e

fra

nk

lin av

e e

boy

lston

ave e

eastla

ke av

e e

yale av

e e

f a i r v i e w a v e e

I 5

I 5

I 5 C O L O N N A D E P A R K

A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g E A R L Y D E S I G N G U I D A N C E - S D C I # 3 0 2 3 8 4 5 - 0 2 / 0 8 / 1 7

9

Planning Area Boundary

Eastlake Urban Village

Project Site

Vicinity Map

potential future development

PROJECT sitefuture development potentialwith current base zoning

contextfuture development potentialwith current base zoning

contexthala development potentialwith adoption of zoning changes

PROJECT siteliving building challenge10' additional height

contextcurrent development

e a s t l a k e a v e e

e a s t l a k e a v e e

e ne w t o n s t

e n e w t o n s t

y a l e p l e

f r a n k l i n a v e e

f r a n k l i n a v e e

f r a n k l i n p l e

NEW CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT SITE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEVILLA APARTMENTS KIRO (BONNEVILLE) BUILDINGVILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS

CORTINA

Z O N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T P O T E N T I A L

A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g E A R L Y D E S I G N G U I D A N C E - S D C I # 3 0 2 3 8 4 5 - 0 2 / 0 8 / 1 7

1 1

Development Potential

Page 10: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

010

Site Plan

E Howe St.

Yale Pl. E

E Newton St.

Eastlake A

ve. E

Surface Parking (E)

3 Story Duplex

4 Story Apartments

2 Story Apartments

Single Family

Residential

Single Family Residential

Single Family

Residential

2 Story Apartments

2 Story Apartments

4 Story Apartments

4 Story Apartments

4 Story Mixed Use

67'-6"

76'-5" 102'-3"

72'-4"

70

70

A

B

0 32168

FG=67.50

FG=69.04

FG=68.02

PLANTERWIDTH VARIES

STA: 0+58

.09 23.999

LT

BF 73.23

TF 73.73

STA: 0+83

.08 22.984

LT

BF 72.32

TF 72.82

STA: 1+08

.09 22.711

LT

BF 70.83

TF 71.33

STA: 1+33

.09 23.008

LT

BF 69.40

TF 69.90

STA: 1+58

.08 23.285

LT

FG=68.07

STA: 1+83

.09 23.462

LT

BF 66.85

TF 67.35

FG=67.62

STA: 0+42.38 14.08 RT

STA: 0+67.38 13.92 RT

STA: 0+92.38 14.73 RT

STA: 1+17.38 15.55 RT

STA: 1+42.38 15.91 RT

STA: 1+68.57 15.88 RT

FG=75.42FG=75.43

FG=78.60

FG=75.50

FG=75.17

FG=75.35

EG=75.42

EG 68.76

BF 87.52TF 88.02

BF 93.07TF 93.57

EG 101.46

W

REF.

WD

1

A A

765432

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

EAST NEWTON STREET

EASTLAKE AVENU

E EAST

PROPERTY LINE

PLANTING STRIP 6'-0" WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK

CONCRETE CURB

REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK MARKER

PLANTING STRIP

6'-0" WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MIN.)

CONCRETE CURB

MAIN BUILDING ENTRY CANOPY ABOVE

GARAGE LEVEL ENTRY BELOW CANOPY

GARAGE DRIVEWAY APRON

(E) POWER POLE

(E) POWER POLE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

R

S

T

V

76'-1 1/4"

67'-6 1/8"

102'-0"

100'-0"

95'-0"

91'-6"

87'-6"

87'-6"

85'-0 7/8"

102'-2 5/8"

99'-0 1/8"85'-0 7/8"

83'-0"85'-0 7/8"

82'-0"85'-0 7/8"

72'-4 1/8"85'-0 7/8"

ADJACENT BUILDING(EXISTING)

ADJACENT BUILDING(EXISTING)

6"

5 7/8"

8 3/

8"

(E) POWER POLE

MAIN BUILDING ENTRY PLAZA

STORM WATER PLANTERS AND BENCHES AT SIDEWALK LEVEL

141'

- 9

3/4"

121' - 8 3/8"

SEE CIVIL WORK FOR NEW WORK

(E) CURB CUT

LINE OF SOLAR ARRAY ABOVE

PROPOSED 6-STORY ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY

S 890 57'45" W 89.05'

S 890 55'25" W 122.90'

S 00

007

'01"

E

143.

18'S 13

025'19" E 147.09'

3' -

0"

FDC IN BRICK COLUMN

CONSTRUCTION START POINT: GRIDS "1" AND "A"GRID "A" AND NORTH PROPERTY LINE ARE PARALLEL

QUEEN BEE ENTRY

EXIT DOOR & TRASH STAGING FOR PICK UP

GENERAL NOTES - SITE PLAN1. SEE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, NOTES, AND DETAILS.2. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSIONS.3. ENCROACHMENTS OF BUILDING OVER SIDEWALKS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF

TRANSPORTATION THAT A STREET-USE PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED FOR THE CANOPIES THAT EXTEND INTO THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.

4. REFER TO SDOT STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN C5.2 FOR THE WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

SITE INFORMATION - LEGAL DESCRIPTION1916 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SEATTLE WA. 98102

PARCEL NUMBERS:• 202504-9131

SITE AREA:• 15,261 SF

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:• PLAT NAME: GOVERNMENT• BLOCK: S 20, T25N, R4E• LOT: 5• That portion of Government Lot 5, Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian

(WM) in King County Washington, lying easterly of the east line of Eastlake Avenue and South of the South Line of East Newton Street, as said street is now established. Except portion platted as Lake Union Heights Addition to the City of Seattle, According to the Plat recorded in Volume 13, of Plats, Page 70, Records of King County, Washington

ZONING:• C1-40' (COMMERCIAL 1)• URBAN VILLAGE: EASTLAKE RESIDENTIAL URBAN VILLAGE• OVERLAY DISTRICT: NONE• STREET CLASSIFICATION: PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGNATION• APPROX. MAX. SLOPE ACROSS SITE: 34'-0"+/-• NO LANDMARK STRUCTURES ON SITE

DPD PROJECT NUMBER:1916 EASTLAKE AVENUE E. DPD# 3023368

PROJECT NUMBER

© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.

38 NORTHWEST DAVIS, SUITE 300PORTLAND, OR 97209T 503.245.7100

1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600

1014 HOWARD STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103T 415.252.7063

DATE

DPD APPROVAL STAMP

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

SHEET NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

C:\_

Rev i

t Pro

ject

s\15

249 2

- 17

- Ae

gis

o f L

ake

Uni

on\1

5 249

2 - 1

7 - A

egis

of L

ake

Uni

on_ a

man

dai.r

vt8/

14/2

017

2:52

:15

PM

152492

MUP RESPONSECYCLE 1

AEG

IS O

F LA

KE U

NIO

N

AEG

IS L

IVIN

G

1916

EAS

TLAK

E AV

ENU

E E

SEAT

TLE,

WA

9810

2

2017-08-08

SITE PLAN

A1.01A1.01

1/8" = 1'-0"2 SITE PLAN

REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE

0 321684 64

Retail Entry

Parking

Main Entry

Bus StopCirc.

Parking

Service

Amenity

Units

Retail

Page 11: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

011

RESPONSE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS

The site is steeply sloped with an elevation change of 35 feet from the lowest point at the site at the southwest corner to the highest point at the northeast corner. Along Eastlake Avenue E the elevation increases 9 feet. Along E Newton Street the elevation increases 26 feet with a 20% grade.

The proposal locates the active amenity spaces along the Eastlake Avenue E street frontage. Residential entry and retail coffee shop are concentrated to create a shared amenity court near the center of the site. Vehicle and service access is located at the southern most part of the site on Eastlake Avenue E to push the curb cut as far as possible from Eastlake and Newton intersection and utilize the slope of the site to seamlessly integrate the vehicular entry into the facade.

Site Sections

15TH AVE N

E

AURORA AVE N

35TH AVE N

E

8TH AVE N

W

1ST AVE S

4TH AVE S

NE 75TH ST

1ST AVE

4TH AVE

5TH AVE3RD AVE

ROOSEVELT WAY N

E

2ND AVE

5TH AVE N

E

6TH AVE

6TH AVE S

ALASKAN W

Y VI NB

RAINIER AVE S

25TH AVE N

E

40TH AVE N

E

EASTLAKE AVE E

N 80TH ST

DEXTER AVE N

12TH AVE

N 85TH ST

23RD AVE

BOREN AVE

N 50TH ST

15TH AVE E

8TH AVE

WESTLAKE AVE N

NE 55TH ST

LAKE CITY WAY N

E

10TH AVE E

MERCER ST

DENNY WAY

WESTERN AVE

AIRPORT WAY S

BROAD ST

BROADWAY

E CHERRY ST14TH AVE

BOYER AVE E

7TH AVE

PINE ST

NE 40TH ST

24TH AVE E

ALASKAN WAY

NE 80TH ST

PIKE ST

PHIN

NEY AVE N

19TH AVE E

N 45TH ST

STONE W

AY N

20TH AVE N

E

QUEEN AN

NE AVE N

E PINE ST

11TH AVE N

E

N 34TH ST

SENECA ST

34TH AVE

17TH AVE S

JAMES ST

FREMON

T AVE N

NW MARKET ST

E ALOHA ST

M L KIN

G JR WAY

9TH AVE

LAKESIDE AVE S

E PIKE ST

14TH AVE S

STEWART S

T

ELLIOTT AVE

ROY ST

BROOKLYN AVE N

E

FAIRVIEW AVE N

N 35TH ST

WALL ST

15TH AVE N

EUN

IVERSITY WAY N

E

OLIVE WAY

LEARY WAY NW

YESLER WAY

VIRGIN

IA ST

9TH AVE N

SPRING ST

NE 41ST ST

7TH AVE N

E

NE PACIFIC ST

EAST MARGIN

AL WAY S

5TH AVE N

TAYLOR AVE N

N 46TH ST

MON

TLAK

E BL

VD N

E

12TH AVE E

FAIR

VIEW AV

E N

6TH AVE W

1ST AVE N

N 39TH ST

N 65TH ST

1ST AVE W

NE RAVENNA BLVD

LENORA ST

NE 65TH ST

W MCGRAW ST

19TH AVE

S COLLEGE ST

BANNER WAY NE

5TH AVE S

NW 46TH ST

N NO

RTHL

AKE

WAY

EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N

47TH AVE N

E

REPUBLICAN ST

43RD AVE E

32ND AVE E

8TH AVE N

E

N PACI

FIC

ST

BELLEVUE AVE E

S HOLGATE ST

MADRONA DR

GREEN LAKE WAY N

HARVARD AVE E

42ND AVE E

CHERRY ST

COLUMBIA ST

E OL

IVE W

AY

N 36TH ST

15TH AVE

HOWELL ST

NE 45TH ST

E LYNN ST

WINONA AVE N

N 38TH ST

THACKERAY PL N

E

FLORENTIA ST

S MASSACHUSETTS ST

NE 70TH ST

BATTE

RY ST

S ROYAL BROUGHAM WAY

6TH AVE N

FUHRMAN AVE E

7TH AVE W

NE 43RD ST

E THOMAS ST

N 56TH ST

NE 47TH ST

E JOHN ST

NE 85TH STGREEN LAKE DR N

WEST GREEN LAKE WAY N

12TH AVE N

E

E GALER ST

BELLEVUE AVE

55TH AVE N

E

N 43RD ST

E DENNY WAY

35TH AVE S

E ROY ST

BOREN AVE S

VALLEY ST

WEST GREEN LAKE DR N

WOODLAWN AVE N

E ALDER ST

MCG

ILVR

A BL

VD E

QUEEN ANNE DR

WOODLAN

D PL N

W RAYE ST

S WALKER ST

BELMONT AVE E

M L KIN

G JR WAY E

48TH AVE N

E

SW FLORIDA ST

AURORA BR

FREMONT W

AY N

KIRKWOOD PL N

S HOLGATE BR

NE 54TH ST

S KING ST

S JUDKINS ST

5TH AVE W

NE 56TH ST

E BLAINE ST

S ATLANTIC ST

N MARKET ST36TH

AVE S

LAKESIDE AVE

MELROSE AVE

FREMONT PL N

EAST MONTLAKE PL E

SMITH ST

E ROANOKE ST

4TH AVE N

COWEN PL NE

NW 36TH ST

11TH AVE

32ND AVE S

N 66TH ST

E MCGILVRA ST

7TH AVE

I90 WB

VALLEY ST

N 65TH ST

NE 45TH ST

NE 70TH ST

6TH AVE S

I90 EB

E JOHN ST

LATONA AVE N

E

3RD AVE W

MERIDIAN

AVE N

NE 65TH ST

S MASSACHUSETTS ST

30TH AVE N

E

12TH AVE S

31ST AVE S

5TH AVE N

WALLIN

GFORD AVE N

LATONA AVE N

E

51ST AVE S

MADISON ST

UNIV

ERSI

TYBR

IDGE

UNION ST

E HARRISON ST

E HAMLIN ST

I-5

I-5

I-5

I-90

520

520

Universityof Washington

Capitol Hill

U District (2021)

Westlake

UniversityStreet

PioneerSquare

InternationalDistrict/

Chinatown

StadiumJudkins Park

(2023)

Roosevelt(2021)

To Northgate TC

Elliot Bay

LakeUnion

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

11th Ave NE between NE 65th St and NE 40th St facing north

TYPICAL SECTION

40’Curb to curb

Right-of-way60’

Drivelane

10’ 11’Drivelane

8’Parking

lane

7’Bikelane

3’

Buffe

r

P

Eastlake Ave E between Fuhrman Ave E and Fairview Ave N facing north

TYPICAL SECTION

49’Curb to curb

Right-of-way75’

11’Drivelane

11’Center

turn lane

11’Drivelane

6’Bikelane

6’Bikelane

2’

Buffe

r

2’

Buffe

r

Fairview Ave N between Eastlake Ave E and Yale Ave N facing northeast

TYPICAL SECTION

7.5’49’

Curb to curb

Right-of-way64.5’

12’Drivelane

Drivelane

12’11’Drivelane

6’Bikelane

2’

Buffe

r

6’Bikelane

SOUTHBOUND

NORTHBOUND

TYPICAL SECTION

44’Curb to curb

Right-of-way66’

Drivelane

9’ 10’Drivelane

14’Buslane

11’Drivelane

Virginia St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north

Stewart St between 3rd Ave and Boren Ave facing north

B

C

A

BOREN AVE

YALE AVE N

NE 40TH ST

FUHRMAN AVE E

N 65TH ST

FAIRVIEW AVE N

D

VALLEY ST

Fairview Ave N between Valley St and Denny Way facing north

TYPICAL SECTION

56’Curb to curb

Right-of-way84’

10’Drivelane

12’Center

turn lane

10’Drivelane

12’Shared bus/bike

lane

12’Shared bus/bike

lane

E

3RD AVE

F

FASTER20%

FASTER20%

TYPICAL SECTION

48’Curb to curb

Right-of-way80’

11’Drivelane

12’Drivelane

14’Shared bus/bike

lane

11’Drivelane

Stewart St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north

Fairview Ave N between Yale Ave N and Valley St facing northeast

TYPICAL SECTION

70’Curb to curb

Right-of-way98’

14’Streetcar

/buslane

14’Streetcar

/buslane

10’Drivelane

11’Drivelane

10’Center

turn lane

11’Drivelane

0 11/21/4 MileExisting RapidRide corridor

Proposed RapidRide corridor

Existing Link

Planned Link

Existing Seattle Streetcar

Planned Seattle Streetcar

Other Transit FacilitiesCorridor Treatment

Potential future Northgate service extension

Bike ImprovementsBAT Lane Transit Only

LaneGP LaneProposed alignment

Existing Stop

New / Upgraded

RR Station

Protected Bike Lane proposed as part of Project

Existing Protected Bike Lane

Corridor improvements include stop consolidation, transit signal priority and transit queue jumps.

ROOSEVELT RAPIDRIDE CORRIDORDOWNTOWN TO ROOSEVELT VIA EASTLAKE

DRAFT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Service will operate in existing BAT Lanes on Stewart

11'

17'

16'

ASECTIONPr

oper

ty L

ine

Prop

erty

Lin

e

15' S

etba

ck

Kitchen DiningTheater

Parking

Sky Lounge

15' Rooftop Bonus (143'-6")

4' Rooftop Bonus (132'-6)LBPP Height Limit (128'-6")

Zoning Height Limit (118'-6")Existing Duplex

EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST

Average Grade (74'-6")

15' Rooftop Bonus (152'-6")

4' Rooftop Bonus (141'-6)LBPP Height Limit (137'-6")

Zoning Height Limit (127'-6")

Average Grade (83'-6")_

Site Section B Site Section A

39'

70'32

'-6"

13'-1

0"23

'-8"

13'

11'

10'-6

"10

'-6"

10'-6

"11

'-2"

1315

'-3"

driveway

15TH AVE N

E

AURORA AVE N

35TH AVE N

E

8TH AVE N

W

1ST AVE S

4TH AVE S

NE 75TH ST

1ST AVE

4TH AVE

5TH AVE3RD AVE

ROOSEVELT WAY N

E

2ND AVE

5TH AVE N

E

6TH AVE

6TH AVE S

ALASKAN W

Y VI NB

RAINIER AVE S

25TH AVE N

E

40TH AVE N

E

EASTLAKE AVE E

N 80TH ST

DEXTER AVE N

12TH AVE

N 85TH ST

23RD AVE

BOREN AVE

N 50TH ST15TH

AVE E

8TH AVE

WESTLAKE AVE N

NE 55TH ST

LAKE CITY WAY N

E

10TH AVE E

MERCER ST

DENNY WAY

WESTERN AVE

AIRPORT WAY S

BROAD ST

BROADWAY

E CHERRY ST14TH AVE

BOYER AVE E

7TH AVE

PINE ST

NE 40TH ST

24TH AVE E

ALASKAN WAY

NE 80TH ST

PIKE ST

PHIN

NEY AVE N

19TH AVE E

N 45TH ST

STONE W

AY N

20TH AVE N

E

QUEEN AN

NE AVE N

E PINE ST

11TH AVE N

E

N 34TH ST

SENECA ST

34TH AVE

17TH AVE S

JAMES ST

FREMON

T AVE N

NW MARKET ST

E ALOHA ST

M L KIN

G JR WAY

9TH AVE

LAKESIDE AVE S

E PIKE ST

14TH AVE S

STEWART S

T

ELLIOTT AVE

ROY ST

BROOKLYN AVE N

E

FAIRVIEW AVE N

N 35TH ST

WALL ST

15TH AVE N

EUN

IVERSITY WAY N

E

OLIVE WAY

LEARY WAY NW

YESLER WAY

VIRGIN

IA ST

9TH AVE N

SPRING ST

NE 41ST ST

7TH AVE N

E

NE PACIFIC ST

EAST MARGIN

AL WAY S

5TH AVE N

TAYLOR AVE N

N 46TH ST

MON

TLAK

E BL

VD N

E

12TH AVE E

FAIR

VIEW AV

E N

6TH AVE W

1ST AVE N

N 39TH ST

N 65TH ST

1ST AVE W

NE RAVENNA BLVD

LENORA ST

NE 65TH ST

W MCGRAW ST

19TH AVE

S COLLEGE ST

BANNER WAY NE

5TH AVE S

NW 46TH ST

N NO

RTHL

AKE

WAY

EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N

47TH AVE N

E

REPUBLICAN ST

43RD AVE E

32ND AVE E

8TH AVE N

E

N PACI

FIC

ST

BELLEVUE AVE E

S HOLGATE ST

MADRONA DR

GREEN LAKE WAY N

HARVARD AVE E

42ND AVE E

CHERRY ST

COLUMBIA ST

E OL

IVE W

AY

N 36TH ST

15TH AVE

HOWELL ST

NE 45TH ST

E LYNN ST

WINONA AVE N

N 38TH ST

THACKERAY PL N

E

FLORENTIA ST

S MASSACHUSETTS ST

NE 70TH ST

BATTE

RY ST

S ROYAL BROUGHAM WAY

6TH AVE N

FUHRMAN AVE E

7TH AVE W

NE 43RD ST

E THOMAS ST

N 56TH ST

NE 47TH ST

E JOHN ST

NE 85TH STGREEN LAKE DR N

WEST GREEN LAKE WAY N

12TH AVE N

E

E GALER ST

BELLEVUE AVE

55TH AVE N

E

N 43RD ST

E DENNY WAY

35TH AVE S

E ROY ST

BOREN AVE S

VALLEY ST

WEST GREEN LAKE DR N

WOODLAWN AVE N

E ALDER ST

MCG

ILVR

A BL

VD E

QUEEN ANNE DR

WOODLAN

D PL N

W RAYE ST

S WALKER ST

BELMONT AVE E

M L KIN

G JR WAY E

48TH AVE N

E

SW FLORIDA ST

AURORA BR

FREMONT W

AY N

KIRKWOOD PL N

S HOLGATE BR

NE 54TH ST

S KING ST

S JUDKINS ST

5TH AVE W

NE 56TH ST

E BLAINE ST

S ATLANTIC ST

N MARKET ST

36TH AVE S

LAKESIDE AVE

MELROSE AVE

FREMONT PL N

EAST MONTLAKE PL E

SMITH ST

E ROANOKE ST

4TH AVE N

COWEN PL NE

NW 36TH ST

11TH AVE

32ND AVE S

N 66TH ST

E MCGILVRA ST

7TH AVE

I90 WB

VALLEY ST

N 65TH ST

NE 45TH ST

NE 70TH ST

6TH AVE S

I90 EB

E JOHN ST

LATONA AVE N

E

3RD AVE W

MERIDIAN

AVE N

NE 65TH ST

S MASSACHUSETTS ST

30TH AVE N

E

12TH AVE S

31ST AVE S

5TH AVE N

WALLIN

GFORD AVE N

LATONA AVE N

E

51ST AVE S

MADISON ST

UNIV

ERSI

TYBR

IDGE

UNION ST

E HARRISON ST

E HAMLIN ST

I-5

I-5

I-5

I-90

520

520

Universityof Washington

Capitol Hill

U District (2021)

Westlake

UniversityStreet

PioneerSquare

InternationalDistrict/

Chinatown

StadiumJudkins Park

(2023)

Roosevelt(2021)

To Northgate TC

Elliot Bay

LakeUnion

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

11th Ave NE between NE 65th St and NE 40th St facing north

TYPICAL SECTION

40’Curb to curb

Right-of-way60’

Drivelane

10’ 11’Drivelane

8’Parking

lane

7’Bikelane

3’

Buffe

r

P

Eastlake Ave E between Fuhrman Ave E and Fairview Ave N facing north

TYPICAL SECTION

49’Curb to curb

Right-of-way75’

11’Drivelane

11’Center

turn lane

11’Drivelane

6’Bikelane

6’Bikelane

2’

Buffe

r

2’

Buffe

r

Fairview Ave N between Eastlake Ave E and Yale Ave N facing northeast

TYPICAL SECTION

7.5’49’

Curb to curb

Right-of-way64.5’

12’Drivelane

Drivelane

12’11’Drivelane

6’Bikelane

2’

Buffe

r

6’Bikelane

SOUTHBOUND

NORTHBOUND

TYPICAL SECTION

44’Curb to curb

Right-of-way66’

Drivelane

9’ 10’Drivelane

14’Buslane

11’Drivelane

Virginia St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north

Stewart St between 3rd Ave and Boren Ave facing north

B

C

A

BOREN AVE

YALE AVE N

NE 40TH ST

FUHRMAN AVE E

N 65TH ST

FAIRVIEW AVE N

D

VALLEY ST

Fairview Ave N between Valley St and Denny Way facing north

TYPICAL SECTION

56’Curb to curb

Right-of-way84’

10’Drivelane

12’Center

turn lane

10’Drivelane

12’Shared bus/bike

lane

12’Shared bus/bike

lane

E

3RD AVE

F

FASTER20%

FASTER20%

TYPICAL SECTION

48’Curb to curb

Right-of-way80’

11’Drivelane

12’Drivelane

14’Shared bus/bike

lane

11’Drivelane

Stewart St between Boren Ave and 3rd Ave facing north

Fairview Ave N between Yale Ave N and Valley St facing northeast

TYPICAL SECTION

70’Curb to curb

Right-of-way98’

14’Streetcar

/buslane

14’Streetcar

/buslane

10’Drivelane

11’Drivelane

10’Center

turn lane

11’Drivelane

0 11/21/4 MileExisting RapidRide corridor

Proposed RapidRide corridor

Existing Link

Planned Link

Existing Seattle Streetcar

Planned Seattle Streetcar

Other Transit FacilitiesCorridor Treatment

Potential future Northgate service extension

Bike ImprovementsBAT Lane Transit Only

LaneGP LaneProposed alignment

Existing Stop

New / Upgraded

RR Station

Protected Bike Lane proposed as part of Project

Existing Protected Bike Lane

Corridor improvements include stop consolidation, transit signal priority and transit queue jumps.

ROOSEVELT RAPIDRIDE CORRIDORDOWNTOWN TO ROOSEVELT VIA EASTLAKE

DRAFT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Service will operate in existing BAT Lanes on Stewart

23'

17'27'

BSECTION

15' Rooftop Bonus (143'-6")

4' Rooftop Bonus (132'-6)LBPP Height Limit (128'-6")

Zoning Height Limit (118'-6")

Prop

erty

Lin

e

Prop

erty

Lin

e

15' S

etba

ck

Lobby Entry Court

Parking

ExistingApartments

EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST

Average Grade (74'-6")

15' Rooftop Bonus (152'-6")

4' Rooftop Bonus (141'-6)LBPP Height Limit (137'-6")

Zoning Height Limit (127'-6")

Average Grade (83'-6")

Site Section B Site Section A

25'-9

"73

'

57'-6

"

11'

10'-6

"10

'-6"

10'-6

"24

'-2"

15'-3

"

Page 12: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

012

SUSTAINABILITY, LIGHTNESS & SENIOR LIVING

Through the Living Building Pilot Program, this project seeks to meet the Place, Materials, and Beauty petals of the Living Building Challenge. It also seeks to use 75 percent or less of the energy use targets established in the 2012 Seattle Energy Code’s Target Performance Path (25 percent reduction). In addition, the project will use no potable water for non-potable uses, as approved by Public Health, Seattle and King County .

More and more seniors report being concerned with environmental issues, but sustainability doesn’t start and stop with environmental impact. It also includes economic and social tenets such as enhancing sense of community, and creating comfortable and healthy indoor environments.

Page 13: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

013

treatstore

ENERGY STORY

To meet the stringent Living Building Pilot Program energy reduction goals as well as targets established with the City of Seattle, the project has incorporated intensive energy conservation measures throughout. A high performance envelope, high efficiency systems and fixtures, and a focus on operational energy reduction combine to reduce energy demand. An 11,000 square foot 111 kW high efficiency array provides the additional energy needed to meet LBPP target energy reduction.

WATER STORY

The Living Building Pilot Program requires that projects use no potable water for non-potable uses as approved by DOH and King County Public Health officials. With the exception of the memory care floor, all non-potable water needs in this community are supplied by on-site recycled greywater. These uses include all irrigation and toilet flushing. Rainwater is captured and stored in a cistern below grade (in addition to the greywater cistern) as backup water supply.

111 kW high efficiency array

Traction; regenerative drive; LED cab lights with auto shut-off

Variable frequency; garage fans turn down with CO & NO2 sensors

Demand control ventilation senses cooking activity to vary exhaust rates

Passive house envelope strategies

Energy and water efficient appliances; optimized kitchen operations to reduce energy consumption

Variable refrigerant flow heating and cooling

Heat pump water heaters; Piranha wastewater heat recovery

LED lighting; daylighting controls; exterior light photosensors

Commercial heat pump dryers; residential Energy Star washer and heat pump dryers

Direct digital control building system metering

Energy and water efficient appliances and fixtures

Page 14: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

014

+

craftsmanship intention

SLOPE

• Solar panels 'float' above building form• Curtain wall glazing allows maximum light and views for west-facing facade• Echoes shell house typology, where top floor windows provide ample view of water

• Natural material with regional sourcing• Provides a warm, residential aesthetic• Material precedent and tectonic details draw from the shell house and rowing shell• Wood continues to street level at entry and Queen Bee to warm entry court

• Familiar and welcoming texture at pedestrian levels with thoughtful details• Storefront glazing allows visual connection to sidewalk and street• Vernacular material of the earth with attention to detail and reflective of concept

glass

brick

woodLIGHTNESS

REPETITION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

Material Strategy: Base, Middle, Top

Page 15: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

015

CRAFTSMANSHIP, MATERIALITY & INTENTION

“When I build a shell I leave a piece of my heart in that shell, that’s how I want you to leave a race.”

- George Yeoman Pocock

The racing shell is a carefully crafted vessel, constructed using the highest quality materials with scrupulous attention to detail. Every part of the shell is critical, serving a function - nothing is extraneous.

To meet the requirements of the Living Building Challenge Materials Petal, natural materials will be selected whenever possible. The integrated project team will thoroughly vet materials and products to specify those which are red list free, emphasize regional sourcing and responsible manufacturing, and reduce the carbon footprint of the building.

Page 16: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

016

LIGHTNESS

REPETITION CO

MM

UN

ITY

Rhythm and Structure

LIGHTNESS

LIGHTNESS

REPETITION

REPETITION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

Page 17: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

017

ROWING & THE SHELL HOUSE

“Where is the spiritual value of rowing? ... The losing of self entirely to the cooperative efforts of the crew as a whole.”

- George Yeoman Pocock

Rhythm and community are critical principles of rowing that also inform the design of the shell house. Rhythm is apparent in the lower floor of the shell house, the bays for shell storage. These bays provided for each crew also reflect community. Community and teamwork are emphasized further in the upper level of the shell house where dining, workout, and viewing spaces are placed.

This project is influenced by the traditional parti of shellhouse architecture in the repetition of bays, rhythm of facade articulation, and elements of lightness and community at the top level.

A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g b u i l d i n g e x t e r i o r p r e s e n t a t i o n - 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 7

9

r o w i n g : r e p e t i t i o n o f t e a m & m o v e m e n t

s h e l l h o u s e : r e p e t i t i o n o f b ay s

r h y t h m o f s t r u c t u r e

Page 18: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

018 A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g b u i l d i n g e x t e r i o r p r e s e n t a t i o n - 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 7

9

r o w i n g : r e p e t i t i o n o f t e a m & m o v e m e n t

s h e l l h o u s e : r e p e t i t i o n o f b ay s

r h y t h m o f s t r u c t u r e

Details: Repetition and Compatibility

INSPIRATION FROM ROWING

Several major design elements of the building take their inspiration from the geometry, repetition, and compatibility of materials found in rowing. Alternating angles of a herringbone brick pattern repeat along the main street-facing facade, echoing the alternating strokes of oars. This same pattern is echoed in the main entry canopy, this time constructed in the contrasting materials of steel and glass.

Main Canopy Plan

Canopy Signage

Painted Perimeter Frame

6'

Clear Tempered Glazing

Painted Steel

16'-8

"

Valley

Gutter

Knife Plate Attachment, typ.

Page 19: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

019

A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & a e g i s l i v i n g b u i l d i n g e x t e r i o r p r e s e n t a t i o n - 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 7

1 1

a p p r o a c h

cafe seating vestibule water courtlobby living

e n j o y e n t e r d e l i g h t i n t e r a c t c o n n e c t i n s p i r e

Page 20: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

20

Activating the street edge with indoor/ outdoor connection

Short-term bike parking

Walk/bike-up coffee window

Oversized awning windows

Indoor/outdoor bench seating

Indoor/outdoor bench/counter

Cafe tables in entry court

Stormwater planter benches

Wide sidewalk

Vestibule Lobby

Dining

Cafe

Ground Level Uses

8

1

1

2

2

3

3

3

4

4

5

56

6

7

7

8

Circ.

Interaction

Amenity

Retail

Memory Care Terrace

Cafe

sidewalk planter

9' 5'

Pro

pe

rty

Lin

e

Eastlake Ave E

12'-

10"

entry

5'

5'-6"

Opaque GlazingLiving

Unit

Page 21: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

21

INDOOR/ OUTDOOR CONNECTION

To create a strong, interactive connection to the street for the public, as well as residents, special attention was paid to the treatment of the facade at the coffee shop. A series of pedestrian amenities were integrated into the public realm and street edge including bicycle parking, oversized operable glazing, benches, entry court, a large sidewalk, and overhead weather protection along the entire Eastlake street frontage.

Page 22: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

22

rhythm

refinement

l ightness

Fenestration and Facade Patterning

RHYTHM, REFINEMENT, LIGHTNESS

The inspiration of the 1936 Olympics gold medal rowing team and traditional shellhouse architecture is reflected throughout the building design on all sides. The concepts of rhythm and repetition of bays are seen in how the massing of the east facade is broken up with metal reveals. The base, middle, top parti is followed around to the north and east, wrapping brick around at the same level and using a fenestration pattern that reflects each component of the parti. Finally, the idea of lightness is emphasized at the top level of the building by using a lighter siding material and a different pattern of fenestration, with more glazing.

Page 23: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

23

East Facade at Eco Roof

East Facade at Reflect ing Pool Detai l of North Facade

STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3

FILL GAP AROUND PENETRATION W/ SPRAY IN PLACE INSULATION

SHEATHING

PIPE / CONDUIT

FLUID-APPLIED JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR

2-3"

BEY

OND

PENE

TRAT

ION

EXTE

ND AP

PROX

.

LAP W

RB M

IN. 2

"

TROWELAPPLIED FLASHING

FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB

METAL FLASHING W/ HEMMED DRIP EDGE

FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB

FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB

3" M

IN.

3" M

IN.

WET SET FLASHING LEG IN JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR

TROWEL APPLIED WRB FLASHING

FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB

3"

3"

FLUID-APPLIED JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR

OUTSIDE CORNER

INSIDE CORNER

FLUID-APPLIED JOINT/SEAM FLASHING PER MFR; PRIME RAW EDGE OF GYP SHEATHING AS NEEDED

KNIFE PLATE OR TUBE STEEL

TROWEL APPLIED FLASHING

FLUID-APPLIED WRB/AB O/TROWEL FLASHING

2" MIN. OVERLAP

CLEAR-FINISHED LAPPED TEAK WOOD 1”x10” FLAT PLANK BOARDS WITH 1” MIN. OVERLAP.TRIM BOTTOM OF CLAD AT ANGLES DEPICTED BELOW.

WO

OD

WAV

E RE

PEAT

PAT

TERN

2'-9

1/2

"

GLB COLUMN

12"w x 6"d VERTICAL WOOD TRIM

RATED UNIT DEMISING WALL

12” WIDE METAL HEADER PANELS

2 3/

4"

PROJECT NUMBER

© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.

38 NORTHWEST DAVIS, SUITE 300PORTLAND, OR 97209T 503.245.7100

1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600

1014 HOWARD STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103T 415.252.7063

DATE

DPD APPROVAL STAMP

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

SHEET NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

C:\_

Rev i

t Pro

ject

s\15

249 2

- 17

- Ae

gis

o f L

ake

Uni

on\1

5 249

2 - 1

7 - A

egis

of L

ake

Uni

on_ a

man

dai.r

vt10

/28/

2017

4:1

6:51

PM

152492

MUP RESPONSECYCLE 1

AEG

IS O

F LA

KE U

NIO

N

AEG

IS L

IVIN

G

1916

EAS

TLAK

E AV

ENU

E E

SEAT

TLE,

WA

9810

2

2017-08-08

DETAILS - EXTERIOR

A7.08A7.08

REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE

1 1/2" = 1'-0"1 TYPICAL PENETRATION THROUGH WRB 6" = 1'-0"2 TYP WRB/MTL FLASHING TRANSITION

3" = 1'-0"3 TYP INSIDE/OUTSIDE CORNER 3" = 1'-0"4 KNIFE PLATE/TUBE STEEL FLASHING

1" = 1'-0"5 WOOD WAVE WALL

3" = 1'-0"6 METAL PANEL AT WOOD COLUMN

Page 24: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

24

Page 25: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

25

Ankrom Moisan ArchitectsJunior Designer & Job CaptainSD through CD PhasesEstimated Completion: Fall 2018

Urban Multifamily Residential + Retail

This apartment community provides a mix of studio, 1- and 2- bedroom apartments on an unusually shaped urban infill site near the corner of NE 28th Avenue and NE Sandy Boulevard in Portland’s Kerns Neighborhood. The project comprises 206 units total across six floors, along with parking below grade, two courtyards, and retail at the ground floor. The project is also highly visible from Interstate 84.

Sandy28

Page 26: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

26

Concept Studies

STUDY MODELS

Study models exploring material and massing concepts were inspired by the location and history of the site, next to the historic Sullivan’s Gulch and I-84. These natural and man-made landforms generated ideas for four typologies to inform the project: Strata, Canyon, Aggregate, and Cavern (clockwise from top left).

Page 27: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

27

cavern

aggregate

aggregate

strata

stratacanyon

canyon

TYPOLOGY CONCEPT SKETCH

Ideas of how to incorporate the four typologies derived from the concept models were applied to the massing study. Courtyards and notches were carved into the building, revealing slices of color and light. Materials and massing make subtle shifts from level to level, reflecting ideas of aggregation and strata.

Page 28: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

28

Process: Site Massing

Page 29: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

29

A

B

CONGRUENCE

The facade articulation reflects differences in character and context through the concept of congruence: uniting dissimilar pieces in harmony. Along the sides of the building in view of Interstate 84, the material articulation evokes the rhythm and movement of cars shifting positions. Pops of color are like headlights and tail lights.

The elevation along Sandy Boulevard has a much more neighborhood-like scale. Varied materials weave and contrast, and wood siding along the ground floor lends warmth and familiar texture. Upon entering the building along the main street frontage of active ground floor retail, one can catch a glimpse all the way through the building lobby to the apex of the building’s central courtyard, uniting the two wings.

Facade Articulation Strategy

SANDY BLVD.

SULLIVAN ST.

ROOF - 201’-0”T.O. PARAPET - 205’-0”

LEVEL 6 - 191’-0”

LEVEL 5 - 181’-0”

LEVEL 4 - 171’-0”

LEVEL 3 - 161’-0”

LEVEL 2 - 151’-0”

GROUND FLOOR - 138’-0”

PARKING LEVEL- 126’-0”

I - 84

Site Section

Page 30: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

30

Sample of Construction Documents

Design Throughout Process

THEME AND VARIATION

As junior designer and job captain on the project through construction documents, I was able to track early concepts throughout the process to make sure they were clearly communicated and developed for constructibility. I ensured that the varied textures and colors of metal panel the client desired were articulated in a logical and pleasing manner, and selected materials to appropriately reflect design intent within budget.

Page 31: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

31

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

T.O

. PAR

APET

3' -

0"

BOTT

OM

OF T

RUSS

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

12' -

6"

T.O

. PT

SLAB

STE

P (V

ARIE

S)

12' -

6"

J

REM

OVE

SHO

RING

5' -

0"

VESTIBULE148

UNIT229

A7.0

UNIT329

A7.0

UNIT429

A7.0

UNIT529

A7.0

UNIT626

A7.0

A7.124

TYP

A7.1219

TYP

9

A7.12

TYP

A7.2120

TYP

A7.2115

TYP

A7.1120

TYP

1C3 7

1J1 12

2E7

1A3 5

1Q6.1

12

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

13

10' -

0"

STAIR 4S41

UNIT224

S6.0

BIKE STORAGE125

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

13

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

50' -

0"

12' -

6"

3' -

0"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

A7.511

BIKE STORAGE125

UNIT223

S5.1

UNIT323

S5.1

UNIT423

S5.1

UNIT523

S5.1

UNIT620

S5.1

REM

OVE

SHO

RING

5' -

0"

A7.2120

TYP

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

1A3 5

2E7

1C3 7

1J1 12

1Q6.1

12

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

13

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

2C3 7

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

1

A4.02

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

UNITUNIT

3' -

0"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"12

' - 6

"6"

12' -

0"

FUTURE RETAIL 1142

ROOF DRAIN WITHIN FURRED OUT WALL, WHERE OCCURS

CORRIDOR

A0.165

1A3 5

2E7

1C3 7

1J1 12

1Q6.1

12

PROJECT NUMBER

© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.

SCALE

SHEET NUMBER

REVISION

6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100

1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600

DATE

C:\_

Revi

t Pro

ject

s\15

2680

-15_

Sand

y-an

d-2 8

th-A

pts_

Cent

ral \1

5268

0-15

_San

d y-a

nd-2

8th-

Apts

_sco

tts.

rvt

12/6

/201

6 5:

48:4

7 PM

1/4" = 1'-0"

152680A3.52

PERMIT SET

SAN

DY

BLVD

APA

RTM

ENTS

FAIR

FIEL

D R

ESID

ENTI

AL C

OM

PAN

Y LL

C

2869

NE

SAN

DY

BLVD

, PO

RTLA

ND

, OR

9723

2

12.07.2016

WALL SECTIONS(SOUTH & EAST)

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH WALL SECTION EA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EAST WALL SECTION G

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST WALL SECTION HA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"5 EAST WALL SECTION G

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - CORRIDOR

REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

13 12

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

C

C

C

C

C C

C

C

CI

C

CI

IC

IC

CI

BASE POINT 2

139' - 0"

65' -

0"

C

S

S

S

S

S S

S

S

S

S

S SSS

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

C

C

C

C

C

BASE POINT 2

139' - 0"

65' -

0"

S

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

L K

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

3

A3.53

B

B

B

B

BB

B

B

B

BC

C

C

C

C

2

A3.53

BASE POINT 2

139' - 0"

65' -

0"

S

S SS

S S

S SS

S S

S SS

S S

S SS

S S

S SS

S S

S

LEGEND - ELEVATIONS

CIP CONCRETE 1 :VERTICAL BOARDFORMTEXTURE

CIP CONCRETE 2:HORIZONTAL BOARDFORMTEXTURE

GLASS - COLOR 1

INSULATED METAL PANEL

GLASS - TYPICAL

DISPLAY WINDOW

INSULATED METAL PANEL:PERFORATED

INSULATED METAL PANEL:COLOR

INSULATED METAL PANEL:COLOR - LIGHT GRAY

INSULATED METAL PANEL:LIGHT GRAY PTAC PERF

INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK

INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK 2

INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK 2 PTAC PERF

INSULATED METAL PANEL:DARK PTAC PERF

METAL PANEL - 2:PTAC PERF

METAL PANEL - 2:VERTICAL

METAL PANEL - 2:HORIZONTAL

METAL PANEL - 3:HORIZONTAL

METAL PANEL - 3:PTAC PERF

METAL PANEL - 3:VERTICAL

METAL PANEL - 4

METAL PANEL - 4:PTAC PERF

VERTICAL WOOD SLATS

UNIT TYPES1

S SAFETY GLAZING GLASS

PERFORATED METAL -BALCONIES & SCREENS

PROJECT NUMBER

© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.

SCALE

SHEET NUMBER

REVISION

6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100

1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600

DATE

C:\_

Revi

t Pro

ject

s\15

2680

-15_

Sand

y-an

d-2 8

th-A

pts_

Cent

ral \1

5268

0-15

_San

d y-a

nd-2

8th-

Apts

_sco

tts.

rvt

12/6

/201

6 6:

51:0

7 PM

1/4" = 1'-0"

152680A3.15b

PERMIT SET

SAN

DY

BLVD

APA

RTM

ENTS

FAIR

FIEL

D R

ESID

ENTI

AL C

OM

PAN

Y LL

C

2869

NE

SAN

DY

BLVD

, PO

RTLA

ND

, OR

9723

2

12.07.2016

ENLARGEDELEVATIONS - EAST

A3.15b | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION - EAST COURTYARD - AA3.15b | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION - EAST COURTYARD - B

A3.15b | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 ELEVATION - EAST COURTYARD - C

REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

T.O

. PAR

APET

3' -

0"

BOTT

OM

OF T

RUSS

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

12' -

6"

T.O

. PT

SLAB

STE

P (V

ARIE

S)

12' -

6"

J

REM

OVE

SHO

RING

5' -

0"

VESTIBULE148

UNIT229

A7.0

UNIT329

A7.0

UNIT429

A7.0

UNIT529

A7.0

UNIT626

A7.0

A7.124

TYP

A7.1219

TYP

9

A7.12

TYP

A7.2120

TYP

A7.2115

TYP

A7.1120

TYP

1C3 7

1J1 12

2E7

1A3 5

1Q6.1

12

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

13

10' -

0"

STAIR 4S41

UNIT224

S6.0

BIKE STORAGE125

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

13

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

50' -

0"

12' -

6"

3' -

0"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

A7.511

BIKE STORAGE125

UNIT223

S5.1

UNIT323

S5.1

UNIT423

S5.1

UNIT523

S5.1

UNIT620

S5.1

REM

OVE

SHO

RING

5' -

0"

A7.2120

TYP

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

1A3 5

2E7

1C3 7

1J1 12

1Q6.1

12

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

13

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

2C3 7

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

1

A4.02

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

UNITUNIT

3' -

0"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"12

' - 6

"6"

12' -

0"

FUTURE RETAIL 1142

ROOF DRAIN WITHIN FURRED OUT WALL, WHERE OCCURS

CORRIDOR

A0.165

1A3 5

2E7

1C3 7

1J1 12

1Q6.1

12

PROJECT NUMBER

© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.

SCALE

SHEET NUMBER

REVISION

6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100

1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600

DATE

C:\_

Revi

t Pro

ject

s\15

2680

-15_

Sand

y-an

d-2 8

th-A

pts_

Cent

ral \1

5268

0-15

_San

d y-a

nd-2

8th-

Apts

_sco

tts.

rvt

12/6

/201

6 5:

48:4

7 PM

1/4" = 1'-0"

152680A3.52

PERMIT SET

SAN

DY

BLVD

APA

RTM

ENTS

FAIR

FIEL

D R

ESID

ENTI

AL C

OM

PAN

Y LL

C

2869

NE

SAN

DY

BLVD

, PO

RTLA

ND

, OR

9723

2

12.07.2016

WALL SECTIONS(SOUTH & EAST)

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH WALL SECTION EA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EAST WALL SECTION G

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST WALL SECTION HA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"5 EAST WALL SECTION G

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - CORRIDOR

REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

By coupling advanced skills in Revit and documentation with design sensibility, I was able to ensure that early concepts come to life in the built project. Design is just as much in the details as in the big ideas.

1 2PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

T.O

. PAR

APET

3' -

0"

BOTT

OM

OF T

RUSS

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

10' -

0"

12' -

6"

T.O

. PT

SLAB

STE

P (V

ARIE

S)

12' -

6"

J

REM

OVE

SHO

RING

5' -

0"

VESTIBULE148

UNIT229

A7.0

UNIT329

A7.0

UNIT429

A7.0

UNIT529

A7.0

UNIT626

A7.0

A7.124

TYP

A7.1219

TYP

9

A7.12

TYP

A7.2120

TYP

A7.2115

TYP

A7.1120

TYP

1C3 7

1J1 12

2E7

1A3 5

1Q6.1

12

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

13

10' -

0"

STAIR 4S41

UNIT224

S6.0

BIKE STORAGE125

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

13

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

50' -

0"

12' -

6"

3' -

0"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"

A7.511

BIKE STORAGE125

UNIT223

S5.1

UNIT323

S5.1

UNIT423

S5.1

UNIT523

S5.1

UNIT620

S5.1

REM

OVE

SHO

RING

5' -

0"

A7.2120

TYP

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

1A3 5

2E7

1C3 7

1J1 12

1Q6.1

12

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

13

ADJACENTBUILDINGTO REMAIN

2C3 7

PARKING126' - 0"

LEVEL 1138' - 6"

LEVEL 2151' - 0"

LEVEL 3161' - 0"

LEVEL 4171' - 0"

LEVEL 5181' - 0"

LEVEL 6191' - 0"

ROOF201' - 0"

1

A4.02

MAX HEIGHT204' - 0"

LEVEL 1- RAISED AREA140' - 6"

LOWEST GRADE129' - 0"

UNITUNIT

3' -

0"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"12

' - 6

"6"

12' -

0"

FUTURE RETAIL 1142

ROOF DRAIN WITHIN FURRED OUT WALL, WHERE OCCURS

CORRIDOR

A0.165

1A3 5

2E7

1C3 7

1J1 12

1Q6.1

12

PROJECT NUMBER

© ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECTS, INC.

SCALE

SHEET NUMBER

REVISION

6720 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 100PORTLAND, OR 97219T 503.245.7100

1505 5TH AVE, SUITE 300SEATTLE, WA 98101T 206.576.1600

DATE

C:\_

Revi

t Pro

ject

s\15

2680

-15_

Sand

y-an

d-2 8

th-A

pts_

Cent

ral \1

5268

0-15

_San

d y-a

nd-2

8th-

Apts

_sco

tts.

rvt

12/6

/201

6 5:

48:4

7 PM

1/4" = 1'-0"

152680A3.52

PERMIT SET

SAN

DY

BLVD

APA

RTM

ENTS

FAIR

FIEL

D R

ESID

ENTI

AL C

OM

PAN

Y LL

C

2869

NE

SAN

DY

BLVD

, PO

RTLA

ND

, OR

9723

2

12.07.2016

WALL SECTIONS(SOUTH & EAST)

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH WALL SECTION EA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EAST WALL SECTION G

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EAST WALL SECTION HA3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"5 EAST WALL SECTION G

A3.52 | 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION - CORRIDOR

REVISION DATE REASON FOR ISSUE

1 2

Page 32: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

32

Color Studies

S C H E M E : J A P A N E S E M A P L E A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & f a i r f i e l d r e s i d e n t i a l

s a n d y b l v d A N D N E 2 8 t h a v e n u e , i - 8 4 - a c c e n t c o l o r o p t i o n s - 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 6

v i b r a n t & s at u r at e d

VIEW LOOKING WEST ALONG SANDY BOULEVARD

ACCENT METAL PANEL BALCONY

2 3 4 5 61

1

4

2

3

6

5

METAL PANEL COLORS

MAIN ENTRY

Scheme: Japanese Maple

CLIENT COMMUNICATION

The client wanted to get ideas of different options for the overall color scheme for the exterior facade materials. I was able to quickly generate several different schemes for them to review, and develop a clear tool and process that I can employ on future projects.

Page 33: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

33

S C H E M E c : r i v e r r o c k s o f t & s u bt l e A n k r o m M o i s a n A r c h i t e c t s & f a i r f i e l d r e s i d e n t i a l

s a n d y b l v d A N D N E 2 8 t h a v e n u e , i - 8 4 - a c c e n t c o l o r o p t i o n s - 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 6

VIEW LOOKING WEST ALONG SANDY BOULEVARD

ACCENT METAL PANEL BALCONY

2 3 4 5 61

4

2

3

6

5

METAL PANEL COLORS

MAIN ENTRY

1

Scheme: River Rock

Page 34: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

34

Page 35: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

35

Page 36: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

36

CRYSTALLIZE.

Page 37: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

37

CRYSTALLIZE.

Crystallize

24 Hour ChallengeIndependent ProjectDesigner

I enjoy doing small projects on my own to keep my design skills sharp and try new techniques. This keeps me inspired and engaged. For this project, I gave myself 24 hours to find a difficult site somewhere near my neighborhood, identify what makes it challenging, and start developing an idea for a response. I found a cavernous space underneath a large highway interchange beneath the Fremont Bridge in Northeast Portland, and started brainstorming ideas. What if we saw the potential in underutilized spaces such as these, and turned them into hidden gems? They could be transformed by a grassroots movement into pop-up cocktail bars, homes for the house-less, flower markets, maker spaces... the possibilities are plentiful.

Urban Intervention

Page 38: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

38

WHAT HAPPENS HERE?

WE CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS.

Page 39: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

39

Crystallize

LET’S MINE THESE UNDER- UTILIZED SPACES TO CREATE HIDDEN GEMS

photo credit: Edward Burtynsky

UTILIZE EXISTING NETWORK TO CRYSTALLIZE A NEW ONE.

Page 40: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

40

Page 41: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

41

Page 42: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

42

21st Century LibraryCapstone Thesis - Spring, Fifth Year

Conceptually, this project evolved from the intersection of three sets of contrasting themes: physical / virtual, local / global, and old/ new. These themes highlight three main areas in which libraries as a project type can evolve. The function of a library has shifted from a community’s collective place to store printed material toward a point of access to an interconnected web of global content across varied types of media. A 21st century library must embrace the inherent simultaneity between the physical and virtual worlds of the digital age in order to create a physical space that remains relevant.

INSIDE - OUTSIDE

Perspective looking toward fiction collection.

Page 43: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

43

Perspective looking southwest toward fiction collection

The University of ArizonaB. Arch Senior Thesis Project

Library for Sunnyslope, AZ

Conceptually, this project evolved from the intersection of three sets of contrasting themes: physical/virtual, local/global, and old/new. These themes highlight three main areas in which libraries as a project type can evolve. The function of a library has shifted from a community’s collective place to store printed material, toward a point of access to an interconnected web of global content across varied types of media. A 21st century library must embrace the inherent simultaneity between the physical and virtual worlds of the digital age in order to create a physical space that remains relevant.

21st CenturyLibrary

Page 44: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

44

Critical Position & Concept DevelopmentThe contrasts between physical and virtual worlds, local and global cultures, and old and new technologies are becoming ever more apparent. Through the design of physical environments, architecture has the capacity to bridge these gaps.

A vast amount of information can now be accessed by anybody with an internet connection, and taken anywhere in the world via mobile devices. Such devices act as the portals to virtual realms separate from the physical world and the sense of place inherent within it. As more people in more places have access to the same information, cultural globalization approaches homogeneity-- and this is reflected in the built environment.

When precedence is given to global culture, local ideas not represented in a virtual way begin to lose relevance. As such, one must adapt to new technologies not only to maintain literacy but also representation within them. Those who do not are left ever further behind as new technologies evolve. The deterioration of local culture in response to cultural globalization underscores the importance of an architect’s role in creating a physical place that plugs a local community in to worldwide virtual realms while protecting cultural identity.

Page 45: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

45

Physical | Virtual

Old

| N

ew

Local | Global

(Technology)(Com

munity)

(Literacy)

New & Interactive Library Cycle

physicalvirtual&

localglobal&

oldnew&

Traditional Library Cycle

sources &

eventspublishing library

systemusers

sources &

eventspublishing

librarysystem

users

“Imagine: a single library can now store the digital content of all the world’s libraries. It is di�cult to fathom the possibilities, let alone exploit them, without conceiving a new method of retrieval...the library’s civic duty is predicated on its ability to become its own database. All content remains �exible, updateable, and alive.”- Bruce Mau, Life Style, 2011

The three themes of the architectural position point toward three goals of a library: community, technology, and literacy-- distinct, yet interconnected.

Physical | Virtual

Old

| N

ew

Local | Global

(Technology)(Com

munity)

(Literacy)

New & Interactive Library Cycle

physicalvirtual&

localglobal&

oldnew&

Traditional Library Cycle

sources &

eventspublishing library

systemusers

sources &

eventspublishing

librarysystem

users

“Imagine: a single library can now store the digital content of all the world’s libraries. It is di�cult to fathom the possibilities, let alone exploit them, without conceiving a new method of retrieval...the library’s civic duty is predicated on its ability to become its own database. All content remains �exible, updateable, and alive.”- Bruce Mau, Life Style, 2011

The three themes of the architectural position point toward three goals of a library: community, technology, and literacy-- distinct, yet interconnected.

CRITICAL POSITION & CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

The contrasts between physical and virtual worlds, local and global cultures, and old and new technologies are becoming ever more apparent. Through the design of physical environments, architecture has the capacity to bridge these gaps.

A vast amount of information can now be accessed by anybody with an internet connection, and taken anywhere in the world via mobile devices. Such devices act as the portals to virtual realms separate from the physical world and the sense of place inherent within it. As more people in more places have access to the same information, cultural globalization approaches homogeneity-- and this is reflected in the built environment.

When precedence is given to global culture, local ideas not represented in a virtual way begin to lose relevance. As such, one must adapt to new technologies not only to maintain literacy but also representation within them. Those who do not are left ever further behind as new technologies evolve. The deterioration of local culture in response to cultural globalization underscores the importance of an architect’s role in creating a physical place that plugs a local community into worldwide virtual realms while protecting cultural identity.

Page 46: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

46

Diagram illustrating network structure of Phoenix library system

Site location in Sunnyslope, Arizona, just north of downtown Phoenix where North Central Avenue, a major traffic artery, intersects the Arizona Canal.

Site Strategies and AnalysisThe concept of libraries of information existing as networked structures informed site analysis strategies. A main goal going forward with site planning was to acknowledge the strong existing vectors adjacent to the site-- the canal and major roadway. In addition, the design would take advantage of mountain views to the north while creating a lively public outdoor space with access to the Arizona Canal.

Page 47: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

2.

1.

4.

6.

5.

7.

3.

Site Adjacencies: Physical and Virtual1. North Central Avenue2. “S” Mountain3. Arizona Canal4. half mile radius from site5. Sunnyslope High School6. quarter mile radius7. Arizona Canal Trail

47

Page 48: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

48

physical collections

digital experiences

mixing

collaboration

support &patron services

mixing supportcollections

+collaboration

building services

build

ing services

Program ProposalRooted in the Local Community, Providing Access to Global CultureThe design of a new branch library for the Sunnyslope, Arizona community will embrace new global technologies without losing sight of local culture. It will promote technological literacy and integrate physical and virtual experiences through multimedia learning and digital media browsing. It will create a sense of place through art installations, a strong connection to the outdoors, and a community archives collection. It will provide an environment for individual inspiration as well as a collaborative exchange of ideas.

By tailoring collections to the needs of the community and embracing digital technologies, new opportunities for spatial overlaps and flexible uses emerge.

Physical & virtual programmatic connections

Page 49: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

49

children’s digital zone850 sf

homework help center 800 sf

children’s info hub 250 sf

children’s print collection 1000 sf

teens’ print collection850 sf

teens’ digital zone1000 sf

teens’ info hub350 sf

periodicals750 sf

general collections1500 sf

reference600 sf

adult continuing education & services900 sf

community multimedia archive850

activity rooms3000 sf

lecture and screening hall1800 sf

lobby350 sf

checkout200 sf

informationdesk & returns500 sf

search and find center500 sf

hold shelves300 sf

-

multimedia collection1750 sf

laptop and tabletbrowsing and seating1750 sf

device checkout400

-

tech support400 sf

print center300 sf

digital literacy learning lab900 sf

audio and visual seating1500 sf

digital creation labs

digital accesscenter500 sf

retail

staff

digital

circulation services

event

children

teens

adults

children’s reading area1000 sf

flex study spaces 1200 sf

teens’ reading area1000 sf

small meeting flex spaces1250 sf

exhibition gallery750 sf

media store1050 sf

convenience market1050 sf

cafe and coffee/ aguas frescas bar2000 sf

shared back of house400 sf

restrooms400 sf

materialsprocessing1250 sf

staff offices500 sf

storage500 sf

24 hrdrop200 sf

staff lounge450 sf

staff computing hub500 sf

media storage400 sf

staff restroom

physical collections

digital experiences

mixing

collaboration

support &patron services

mixing supportcollections

+collaboration

building services

build

ing services

Programming diagram illustrating various zone types and functions throughout the project. The Sunnyslope Branch Library has an expanded focus on providing experiences, not just physical materials, to its patrons. This manifests in various ways: browsing digital collections on library-use tablets and laptops, audio-visual browsing, a community gallery and cafe, and more.

Page 50: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

50

media store

market

cafe

multimedia collection

staff

public circulation services

laptop & tablet browsing

digital creation labs

audio & video browsing

gallery

multimedia archive

general collections

meeting flex space

children’s collectionteens’ collection

activity rooms

lecture hall

courtyard

folding enve

lope - st

reet p

resen

ce - s

equen

ce of v

iews

parking

2.

3.

4.5.

6.

1.

Key Moments1. Cantilevering over the Arizona Canal, patrons get a much more direct experience of the water than by simply observing from a distance.

2. The built form is designed in an architectural language of form evolving from the land.

3. The space between the retail spaces and the program on the opposite side of the underpass is transformed into an inviting public plaza, with cafe seating and landscape shaded by the built form.

4. The geometry of the library projects outward at the main entry point.

5. Interior courtyards are interwoven with the geometry of the library, with glimpses visible from the exterior.

6. The east facade holds the street edge.

Page 51: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

51

1. Boundary formationResponse to existing conditionsMajor programmatic divisions

2. ConnectingFinding pathwaysRelating zones

3. SplittingMain interior divisionsFinding vertices

4. SubdividingSecondary zonesCreating variations

5. SelectingEvaluating resultsCreating form

Perspective looking southeast from courtyard toward fiction and non-fiction collections. Library patrons can see through multiple planes of glazing into the collections as a result of the geometry of the courtyard, reinforcing themes of simultaneity and interconnectedness.

Form Finding ProcessThrough a series of carefully orchestrated steps, the built volume is fractured and subdivided to meet the site planning strategy and programming goals.

Site Plan 1. Library 2. Community Archive 3. Cafe and Gallery

Site Plan

Page 52: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

52

Page 53: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

53

Page 54: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

54

Exhibit DesignIndependent Research; Design Studio- Spring, Fourth Year

A grant-funded investigation into the collaborations of choreographer Merce Cunningham inspired an exhibit design selected by peers and instructors to publicly showcase the research. I translated conceptual ideas into a system of built forms, responding to input from my team and delegating tasks to finish the project on time and within the budget. The exhibit was open to the public for six weeks in the main gallery of the College of Architecture at the University of Arizona, and formed the environment for several related special events.

CHOREOGRAPHING SPACE

A grid of thin rope and sliding connectors shapes the space beneath it.

Page 55: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

55

A grid of thin rope and sliding connectors molds the space underneath it, creating a virtual ceiling above exhibit panels and seating areas.

The University of ArizonaIndependent Research Grant; Design Studio

Research & Immersive Exhibit Design

A grant-funded investigation into the collaborations of modern dance choreographer Merce Cunningham inspired an exhibit design selected by peers and instructors to publicly showcase the research. I translated conceptual ideas into a system of built forms, and led a small team of fellow architecture students in prototyping and fabrication. The exhibit was open to the public for six weeks in the main gallery of the College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture at The University of Arizona, and formed the setting for several related special events.

CollaborativeLegacy

Page 56: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

Design StrategyThe exhibit documented seven multi-disciplinary works by Merce Cunningham and his collaborators, as well as other selected collaborations between choreographers and architects. Existing light fixtures formed the structure for exhibit panels to hang, displaying reproductions of music and dance notations, drawings, photographs, and text. The main design objectives were to create a field condition that encouraged multiple pathways through the exhibit (an idea referencing Cunningham’s open-ended choreography), and to shape the space without blocking views of the display panels.

Below: Rendering illustrating open circulation-- visitors can see display panels in chronological order of the content, or according to personal interests. A grid of thin rope and sliding plastic connectors forms a virtual ceiling above the exhibit panels, reflective of the grid in the concrete floor below. Visitors can circulate around audio-visual seating areas and drops in the rope grid while maintaining sight lines.

56

Design StrategyThe exhibit documented seven multi-disciplinary works by Merce Cunningham and his collaborators, as well as other selected collaborations between choreographers and architects. Existing light fixtures formed the structure for exhibit panels to hang, displaying reproductions of music and dance notations, drawings, photographs, and text. The main design objectives were to create a field condition that encouraged multiple pathways through the exhibit (an idea referencing Cunningham’s open-ended choreography), and to shape the space without blocking views of the display panels.

Below: Rendering illustrating open circulation-- visitors can see display panels in chronological order of the content, or according to personal interests. A grid of thin rope and sliding plastic connectors forms a virtual ceiling above the exhibit panels, reflective of the grid in the concrete floor below. Visitors can circulate around audio-visual seating areas and drops in the rope grid while maintaining sight lines.

56

Page 57: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

57

printed exhibit panel

a/v seating node

small drop in grid

large drop in grid0’ 4’ 8’ 16’

Rendered perspective illustrating open circulation through the exhibit.

Floor plan diagramming location of hanging panels, drops in the grid of rope, and seating areas in relation to the existing light fixtures and scored grid in the concrete floor of the gallery.

Page 58: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

58

Rope sections were assembled in studio and installed in gallery.

Connectors were added between pre-assem-bled sections of rope.

Tension was adjusted to affect how much rope dropped down.

Exhibit ConstructionThe exhibit design went through many iterations of materials testing and full scale modeling to prepare for construction in the gallery. Each of the components, from seating areas to the connectors used to join rope together, went through a collaborative peer-review process until the materials and construction details were budgeted and finalized.

A section of the rope grid assembled in the design studio.

A view of the virtual vs. physical ceilings above the exhibit.

Right: View from seating area through rope grid toward gallery ceiling.

Page 59: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

59

Page 60: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

60

During the six weeks the exhibit was on display, the space was used tor several events including a poetry reading and workshop, a round table

discussion with special guests involved in the exhibited works, and a performance by students from the University of Arizona School of Dance.

Also, computer screens were built into the exhibit’s seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the works featured in the exhibit.

Collaborative Legacy

During the six weeks the exhibit was on display, the space was used tor several events including a poetry reading and workshop, a round table

discussion with special guests involved in the exhibited works, and a performance by students from the University of Arizona School of Dance.

Also, computer screens were built into the exhibit’s seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the works featured in the exhibit.

Collaborative Legacy

During the six weeks the exhibit was on display, the space was used for several events including a poetry reading and workshop, a round table discussion with special guests from the exhibited works, and a performance by students from the University of Arizona School of Dance.

Right: The exhibit design brought to life abstract ideas from Merce Cunningham’s choreography; visitors to the exhibit create their own choreography in the route they take through the exhibit.

Computer screens were built into the seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the featured works.

Page 61: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

61

Computer screens were built into the seating areas to present related audio clips and videos of the featured works.

Page 62: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio
Page 63: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

SKILLS

HONORS + LEADERSHIP

Digital: Advanced skills in Revit, Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Rhino, SketchUp

Sustainability: Knowledgeable of sustainable design principles and certification programs, namely the Living Building Challenge

Communication: Skilled in writing, research, and presentations for clients and design review

Design: Leader of weekly charrettes for 50+ person team, passionate about design thinking, research, and collaboration

Board of Directors, AIA PortlandTerm beginning January 2018

Chris White Scholarship for Emerging ProfessionalsAIA Portland, 2017

Future Vision Symposium, Panel SpeakerAIA Portland + forWARD, Spring 2017

BOLD TYPE Talks, Founder & Organizer Quarterly event series with AIA Portland, February 2017 - present

Elevation Lab, Design Leader Year-long leadership group within Ankrom Moisan Architects for emerging designers, 2016

Top 10, Loop PDX Competition University of Oregon, Design Week PDX, 2015

Top 5 B. Arch. Thesis ProjectOf 50+ students, The University of Arizona, 2012

Honors College Research Grant“Collaborative Legacy of Merce Cunningham”, The University of Arizona, 2010

Thomas R. Brown Distinguished Scholarship College of Engineering, The University of Arizona, 2006-08

National Merit Scholarship The University of Arizona, 2006-2010

Young Scientist Program Full time summer project in Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, 2005

The University of Arizona Tucson, ArizonaBachelor of Architecture, 2012

The University of Oregon Portland, OregonVisiting Student, Urban Design Studio, Fall 2011

Architectural Licensure: I have completed all exams and the IDP process and my initial license through the State of Oregon is pending transmittal of NCARB paperwork and a trip to Salem to make it official.

EDUCATION

EXPERIENCE

10215 N Polk Avenue Portland, OR 97217lara . [email protected] . 422 . 2005

LaraLaFontain

Ankrom Moisan Architects - Portland, ORAssociate, Intern 3: December 2016 - presentIntern 2: December 2015- December 2016Intern 1: March - December 2015

As a designer and job captain on urban multifamily and senior living projects, I aid in concept development and exterior design, design development, code research, design of architectural details, and production of construction drawings along with a wide variety of other tasks. I also prepare presentation materials for Design Review, neighborhood meetings, and client communication. One of my current projects is a first-of-its-kind sustainable senior living community in Seattle pursuing Living Building Challenge petal certification, for which I am the lead designer.

CB | Two Architects - Salem, OR (commuted daily from Portland)Architectural Intern: January 2014 - March 2015

As an architectural intern I assisted with medical clinic and senior living projects in various phases of design. Responsibilities included feasibility studies, in-depth architectural programming services, client communication, and a wide variety of tasks through schematic design, design development, and construction documents.

RH Interior Design - St. Louis, MO and Portland, ORDesign Associate: September 2012 - December 2014Assisted interior designers in drafting, space planning, client communication, and presentations.

Exhibit Designer & Researcher - The University of ArizonaMay 2010 - March 2011Wrote a grant proposal to fund research into the multidisciplinary collaborations of modern dance choreographer Merce Cunningham. Won a competition for an exhibit design be further developed and built, and led a team of students in its prototyping and construction. The exhibit was open to the public for 6 weeks and created an immersive environment for several dance performances and other events.

View my portfolio: https://issuu.com/lara.lafontain

Page 64: Lara LaFontain | Portfolio

LaraLaFontain

503 . 422 . 2005lara . [email protected]