k ° ° w t p kk - phd in industrial...
TRANSCRIPT
2
2
( , ; )
( , ; )
D S pt
D S pt
ECD: Spelch (topics specifically addressed in talk)
1) PREMISE: WHY IN SITU SPECTROELECTROCHEMISTRY
FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL MATERIALS-SCIENCE PROBLEMS?
CN¯-related electrochemical instabilities in Au-alloy electrodeposition
2) THE SURPRISING INTERFACIAL STORY OF CN¯ RELEASED FROM
CYANOCOMPLEXES DURING ELECTRODEPOSITION OF Au AND Au-ALLOYS
(2.1) Speciation; (2.2) Dynamics; (2.3) Coadsorption; (2.4) Reactivity
3) BEYOND CN¯: CN¯-FREE Au ECD BATHS
4) Cu-INTERCONNECTS (VIA FILLING)
(4.1) Suppressor (PEG); (4.2) Accelerator (SPS); 4.3) Levellers; 4.4) The full package
5) ECD FROM RTIL
6) MONITORING ECD OF METAL/OXIDE COMPOSITES
7) ACTIVITY OF ELECTRODEPOSITED ELECTROCATALYSTS
ECD: contents
1) Spelch: Section E of present seminar
2) Materials for supercapacitors: Section D of present seminar
3) ECD from RTIL: see Section E5
4) ECD from non-aqueous electrolytes (different from RTIL)
5) Cu-damascene: Section E4
5) DIB (strictly related) [415, 388, 284], WASCOM ’12 [368, 372], Ripple [357, 370]
6) Non-metals, non-PPy:
(i) NiO/YSZ [308]; (ii) Y2O3/CoO, Y2O3/Au [323]; (iii) PANI/CNT [343];
(iv) montmorillonite+epoxy (electrophoresis) [320]; (v) DLC [394];
(vi) hydroxyapatite+heparine@Ti [395]
7) Archaeometallurgy:
(i) recostruction of Ag coins [409]; (ii) treatment of bronze disease [315,392];
(iii) ancient forgeries (Parabita) [248, 382]
8) Metal-based composites:
(i) Au/Dy2O3 from RTIL [386]; (ii) Au/Y2O3; (iii) Ni/ceria [376];
(iv) filling of porous ceramic [153]; (v) Au/B4C [124, 146]
9) Magnetic field effects (on 2D and 3D mass transport) [266, 282, 298, 329]
10)Semiconductors: (i) GaAs [219]; (ii) InAs [188]; (iii) ZnTe [140, 141]
11)Au alloys: more recent work Section E
12)Alloys: older work (NiP, NiP/Sn, CoPt, CoPd, ZnMn, CuSb)
13)ACD: older work on NiP, NiP-based composites, CoP
[1, 5, 69, 72, 75, 83, 85, 102, 108, 119, 125, 126, 128, 144, 155, 163, 164]
ECD: Spelch (topics not covered in talk)
OTHER ECD-SPELCH TOPICS THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THIS TALK
1) ex-situ SPEM for morphochemical studies related to DIB-modelling
2) mCT for the electrochemical restoration of corroded ancient Ag coins
3) Studies of Ag ECD from non-aqueous (ACN) and mixed (ACN+H2O) solutions
(SERS, SHG))
4) Study of ECD intermediates (Ni(OH)2,ads, role of H3BO3 in Co ECD) (Raman)
5) TR studies of UPD
6) Cu ECD in the presence of self-assembling systems (SERS and SFG)
7) Raman-based studies of incorporation of organics into ECD layers.
ECD: methods spelch
1) Metastable structures in ECD alloys:
(i) supersaturated solid solutions; (ii) intermetrallics TD-ly stable at high T;
(iii) metallic glasses
2) Mass-transport and fluid-dynamics (alloys and composites)
3) Morphology of electrodeposited metals and alloys
4) ECD for functional films: (i) magnetic, (ii) corrosion resistance; (iii) wear resistance
Non-ECD studies in materials electrochemistry
1) Hardmetals (WC-Co type): corrosion and recovery of raw materials
(i) corrosion of hardmetals and binders [181, 199, 200, 213, 225]
(electrochemistry and structure); (ii) Spelch during corrosion of HM
(FTIR [208], SFG [427, 302, 259], ERS [259]); (iii) SPEM [302])
2) Corrosion:
(i) Petrochemical [426], (ii) High-T aqueous and molten salts [364, 367];
(iii) Cu/S [358]; (iv) dental implants [268,337]; (v) Rebar by Spelch
(Raman [244], FTIR [255], SHG [277]); (vi) steel/C-fibres [169];
(vii) Ag [224, 228]; (viii) tribocorrosion [167, 193, 194, 197, 206]
3) Archaeometallurgy
(i) ancient forgeries in coins [258]; (ii) incluse coins [220]
4) Adsorption at metal surfaces (by Spelch)
aqueous solutions - (i) FTIR+Raman coadsorption CN¯+org @Ag(111) [218]:
(ii) SFG/DFG adsorption and coadsorption:
CN¯ @Au(xyz) [230], @Au-alloys [231], coads. CN¯+org @Au(xyz) [212, 232]
(iii) 2D-SFG org. @Cu(poly) [269]
(iv) TR: Cl¯ @Au(111) [306]
(v) Raman org. @Au(poly) [190]
RTIL - [BMP][TFSA] [318]
5) Microfabrication (related to Cu-damascene):
etching of CoSi [287], corrosion of Cu ECD by volatile organics [285]
1) PREMISE: WHY IN SITU SPECTROELECTROCHEMISTRY
FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL MATERIALS-SCIENCE PROBLEMS?
CN¯-related electrochemical instabilities in Au-alloy electrodeposition
[115] (1999)
hi-Aulo-Au
FREE-CN¯ Au-Cu BATH instabilities
[115] (1999)
Au-Cu alloy
Au-Cu/B4C
composite
Morphochemical impact of instabilities in Au-Cu ECD
Cd2+ 1.0 g/L
Cd2+ 0.3 g/L
[148] (2001)
2 mA cm-2
FREE-CN¯ Au-Cu-Cd BATH instabilities mitigated
20 mA cm-2
10 mA cm-2
with B4C
[135] (2000), [137] (2000)
See Section E2.3: “UPD-DRIVEN” 18 kt Au-Cu
CYANOCOMPLEX Au-Cu BATH instabilities suppressed
Au(CN)2¯
CuCN, Cu(CN)2¯, Cu(CN)32-
equil
ECD
ECD from
majority species
ECD from
minority species:
cathode passivation
Au(CN)2¯
Cd(CN)42-
CuCN, Cu(CN)2¯, Cu(CN)32-
electrochemical
nobility
“Electroactivity gap” filled.
Cd2+ 1.0 g/L
Cd2+ 0.3 g/L
Au-Cu+KCN
+ UPD role of Cd
Au(CN)2¯
Cu(II)-EDTA
Kstab[Cu(II)-EDTA]>>Kstab[Cu(II)-CN¯] no impact of CN¯ release
Au(I), Cu(I), KCN
Au(I), Cu(II), EDTA
Hysteretic behaviour suppressed
2) THE SURPRISING INTERFACIAL STORY OF CN¯ RELEASED FROM
CYANOCOMPLEXES DURING ELECTRODEPOSITION OF Au AND Au-ALLOYS
2.1) Speciation
2.2) Dynamics
2.3) Coadsorption
2.4) Reactivity
2.1) Speciation
SETTING THE SCENE: vibrational spectroscopies of adsorbed CN¯ during ECD()
[176] (2002) Raman: strong enhancement from growth features (SERS)
ECD from Au(CN)2¯
Au-NC¯Au-HAu-CN¯Au-CNO¯
Au(CN)2¯
Intramolecular bands
A range of different types of surface CN¯
n(Au-C)
d(Au-CN)
n(Au-N)
Extramolecular bands
FTIR: more representative of average cathode conditions & film formation (2-state probe)
ECD from Au(CN)2¯[214] (2004)
free CN¯
CN¯ads
Au(CN)2¯
AuCN
vs. SERS hot-spots
Formation of (intermediate) AuCN films during electroreduction
Sum Frequency Generation (SFG) Spectroscopy
2nd-order non-linear optical process:
2 laser beams ωVIS e ωIR interact, yielding:
This process is forbidden
in centro-symmetric media
Extreme interface sensitivity
(symmetry breaking at the interface)
ωSFG = ωVIS + ωIR
ωDFG = ωVIS ω2IR
SFG spectroscopy - optics
SFG: more representative of average cathode conditions (1-state probe)
(2) (2) (2)
,tot zzz res NR
SFG/DFG intensity:
Components of tot
SFG/DFG spectroscopy
Models and quantitative analysis2
2 2(2) (2) (2)
, , ,xyz tot xyz zzz tot zzz tot zzz
xyz
I P P const
Resonant part res: vibrational state
and orientation of adsorbate
(2)
/
( )
[ ( )]res
o SFG DFG
A V
V i
n n
Non-resonant part NR: electronic
structure of the metallic substrate (2) ( )NR IRa V i n
Optical set-up optimisation routines set a limit on physical
meaning of parameters (absolute values of I):
(i) Purely vibrational parameters: no, , A(V)/Amax;
(ii) Purely electronic parameter: Df=fSFG-fDFG;
(iii) Interference parameter: c=2·|r|·|NR|/[|r|2·|NR|2].
VIS: doubled YAG, 532 nm
IR:
OPO-SFG Benchtop Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO), 2.5÷10 μm
CLIO-FEL-SFG FEL-IR: 3.5÷50 μm
SFG/DFG spectroscopy - Facilities
Electrodeposition Au(CN)2¯ and Au(CN)4¯
0.1M NaClO4, 25mM
KAu(CN)2
0.1M NaClO4, 25mM KAu(CN)4
SFG: more representative of average cathode conditions (1-state probe)
[260] (2004)
Impact of type of cyanocomplex metal precursor
Electrodeposition: Au(CN)2¯ and Au(CN)4¯ quantitative analysis – no,
Differences in Stark shift and between Au(I) and
Au(III) suggest different adsorption sites for CN¯
values measured during ECD are larger by a factor
of 2÷3 than for static electrodes
Stark shift
Au(CN)2¯: 35.89±1.32 V-1 cm-1
Au(CN)4¯: 32.29±1.59 V-1 cm-1
Peak half-width
Not affected by potential
Au(CN)2¯: 16.15±2.6 cm-1
Au(CN)4¯: 25.33±3.1 cm-1
Electrodeposition: Au(CN)2¯ and Au(CN)4¯quantitative analysis – A, fNR
Discontinuity with potential visible in A and fNR
change of electrodeposition mechanism: case of Au(I):
low cat: Au(CN)2¯ AuCNads + CN¯, AuCNads + e¯ Au + CN¯
high cat: Au(CN)2¯ + e¯ Au + CN¯
Au(I) vs. Au(III): similar values of A, different of fNR for V<-1 V
[215] (2004) Au-Ag
Single-phase alloy, but 2 different adsorption sites
AuAu-Ag
Au-ALLOYS Single-phase deposits of composition
ranging from 13% to 75% Au
-700 mV
-1100 mV
-1300 mV
Different adsorption sites
in alloy ECD
[184] (2003) Au-Sn
2.2) Dynamics
2.2.1) Analysis of SERS time series
2.2.2) SERS during pulse plating
2.2.3) Transient reflectivity
Time-dependent SERS measurements
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
inte
nsità
se
gn
ale
no
rm.
tempo [s]
CN norm
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
inte
nsità
se
gn
ale
n [cm-1]
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
inte
nsità s
egnale
tempo [s]
B
CN BCNnorm
B
Objectives:-500 mV → 50x
-1000 mV → 10x e 50x
-1600 mV → 10x
2.2.1) Analysis of SERS time series
Typical spectral patterns
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
inte
nsità
se
gn
ale
n [cm-1]
Extramolecularn(Au-C) ~300 cm-1
n(CN¯ads)
~ 2108 cm-1
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0
200
400
600
800
1000
inte
nsità
se
gn
ale
n [cm-1]
n(CN¯ads)
~ 2075 cm-1
Hydrogenation product of CN¯
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
inte
nsità
se
gn
ale
n[cm-1]
Fluorescence
n(CN¯ads)
~ 2115 cm-1
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
50
100
150
200
250
300
inte
nsità
se
gn
ale
n [cm-1]
1381 s
1929 s
2600 s
3046 s
7003 s
Time-dependent trend of fluorescence
-500 mV
-1000 mV
-1600 mV
Micrographic investigation (SEM)
Measurement and modelling of ACF
for I[n(CN¯)] and Ibackgroung
1 2
1 2
( ) exp exp sint t t
ACF t A AT
D D D D
1. 1 relaxation time of auto-correlation
2. T period of the oscillating component
3. 2 oscillation damping time constant
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
-200000
-100000
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000Data: Data4_B
Model: nuova
Chi^2 = 781380517.1537
R^2 = 0.83731
P1 487.19904 ±41.70268
P2 13.66599 ±0.03269
P3 1.28551 ±0.04195
P4 114634.63709 ±4935.22437
P5 384833.76325 ±28542.81485
P6 5.89736 ±0.61817
au
toco
rre
lazio
ne
ritardi [s]
acf B 4°
fit acf
Modellisation of coupled dynamics of
morphology and surface composition
2
2
( , ; )
( , ; )
D S pt
D S pt
,
, ,x y
I t x y t dxdy
,
, ,x y
I t x y t dxdy
t ε [0,T]
Dfixed p ; different values of
D
(t)
M*(t)
(t)
2.2.2) SERS during pulse plating [241] (2006)
Femtosecond in situ transient reflectivity measurements.
Ultrafast electronic response controlled by electrochemical processes: corrosion, deposition of metal layers, chemisorption.
Concept of the experimenti) fs monochromatic pump pulseii) delayed (fs-ps range) broadband fs probe pulseiii) detection of reflected probe
2.2.3) Transient reflectivity
Experimental - electrochemistry
WE: Au(111)
Electrolytes:(i) 0.1M NaClO4
(ii) 0.1M NaClO4 + 0.025M KCN
(iii) 0.01M CuSO4 + 0.5M H2SO4
Reflection cell
Thick electrolyte layer (visible pump & probe)
Flexible sample-holder
Experimental - optical set-up
Ti:sapphire FF 780 nm, 500-µJ, 150 fs, 1 kHz repet. rate BS:
0.1÷2 mJ to pump line (possibly through wl-tuning device) incl. delay0.1÷2 mJ to probe line through white-light generation in sapphire plate
Reflected probe analysed by spectrograph
Chopped pump beam allows to measure:
tR
tRtRt
R
R
off
offon
D
DDD
D
,
,,,
Chief highlights of this set-up:- Spectral capability (450÷650 nm) with fixed pump frequency- Tunability of the pump frequency
Transient Reflectivity
In our experiments pump energy at 780 nm: hn1<hnIB
Pump beam excites the e¯ population, collisions thermalise the distribution.
Energy relaxation channels for e¯
Specific relaxation channels can be active at electrochemical interfaces:
"electron-surface" interactions:
surface states, adsorbed molecules, grain boundaries
metal nanoparticles at the interface (nuclei, clusters, crystallites)
subsurface alterations of the metal
lattice
surface
electronliquid
e-s
e-ph
e-e
hn
fit parameters
2D spectra
transients and fits
Typical data structure e.g. Au(111)/NaClO4
Dynamic Model
Pump pulse at win affects electron distribution r(E,t;win)
Broadband probe pulse monitors reflectivity R(t,w), But R=R(e) and e=e(r;D)
Thus:
The evolution of r can be described by the Boltzmann equation:
s"" and ph"" of dynamics
anL
sephe
s
ee ttq
tt
rrrr
qs is the screening length
e-ph denotes the phonon coupling term
e-s accounts for surface contributions
L is the source due to absorption of laser energy
an is the source due to anodic hot electron injection
inin
inDt
R
RDt
ED
twwwwe
wwr,;,,;,
;, DD
D
Integration of Boltzmann eq. and convolution with the DOS yield the transient reflectivity model.
In situ electrochemical experiments
Au(111)/KCN
chemisorption andactive corrosion
@ -0.25VAg/AgCl
Au(111)/KCN
-0.25 VAg/AgCl:
Au(0)-CN¯
0.20 VAg/AgCl:
Au(I)-CN¯
- Changes in dynamic and dispersionbehaviour
- Faster decay with CN¯ - decay rate correlates with applied potential
surface-state scattering effects
set
tk
,r
2.3) Coadsorption
[214] (2004)
Citrate adsorbs anodically from KAu(CN)2-Na3citrate baths
corrosion-driven desorption
(Au dissolves)electrostatically-
controlled
adsorption
O O
R
Supporting electrolyte
MULTILAYERES STRUCTURES RELATED TO CATHODIC PASSIVATION
[185] (2002)
Au
AuCN
Au
w/o Tl+: ECD stops
with Tl+ & low-c.d: ML structures are obtained
with Tl+ & high-c.d. conventional Au is obtained
AuCN
Au
XPS+XRD
Au
AuCN
Au
Inorganic additives
ROLE OF Tl+ at hi-c.d.: “CN¯ hopping” + UPD effects[183] (2002)
passivating form
active process
Au-NC¯
Au-CN¯
FTIR
Au
Tl+-d
Au
Tl+-d
Au
Tl+
Tl+-d
Au
Tl+
Tl+-dAu0
Au
Tl+[185] (2002)Depassivating role of UPD
(e.g. Tl+ & Cu2+ )
COADSORPION OF ADDITIVES (for morphology control)
[184] (2003) Au-Snno 4CP 100 ppm 4CP
20 mm 20 mm
60 mm 20 mm
20 mm 8 mm
Addition of 4CP: Different phases
with different textures,
more compact morphologies
-0.5V
-0.6V
-0.7V
AuSn
AuSn
AuSn2
AuSn4
AuSn
Au5Sn
AuSn
AuSn2
AuSn4
AuSn
Inorganic additives
Anodic: vertical through nitrile, then (CGS) tilts and switches to N-bonded,
finally (high cathodic) denitrilates
CN¯ads
nitrile
[204] (2004) Au-SnAu-N
(of 4CP)Au(CN)4¯
nitrile
Au-C
(of CN¯)
Surface complexes by coadsorption
SFG - Au(hkl)/CN¯+ CP+ - CV
Modification of CN¯ adsorption by CPC
peak shift &c.d. reduction
(111) CN¯
(210) CN¯
(111) CN¯ + CP+
(210) CN¯ + CP+
0.1M NaClO4, 25 mM KCN,2mM CPC
[212] (2004)
Au(hkl)/CN¯+ CP+ - SFG, Au(hkl)
(210) CN¯ (210) CN¯+CP+
(111) CN¯ (111) CN¯+CP+
Ionic couple between CN¯ and CP+, weakening CNads¯
surface
ionic
couple
(111): more compact CN¯ more loosely adsorbed ionic couple with CP+
[168] (2001)
BDMPAC
I111/I220~10 no BDMPAC
I111/I220~3 Au powder XRD
I111/I220~1 with BDMPAC
Multiple twinning pentagonal shape
Preferential ads. stabilising (210) vs (100) star shaped
Competition of coadsorbates
for crystal faces
[186] (2002)
BDMPAC
cathodic
adsorption
of QAS+
QAS also impacts HER opens to reactivity
no BDMPAC with BDMPAC
n(CN¯)
n(Au-H)
2.4) Reactivity
2)(CNAu
e Au
OH2
eH*
???
low-c.d. pathway
high-c.d. pathway
Hat formation
attack by Hat
CNads¯ REACTS AT Au …[273] (2008)
[273] (2008) … AS WELL AS AT Ag, though in a different way …
linear polycyanogencyclic polycyanogen
[408] (2015)
@Ag and even higher cathodic polarisations … compounds with H appear too
H2O D2O
d(NH2)/d(ND2)
n(NH)/n(ND)
ns(CH),nas(CH),ns(CD),nas(CD)
n(OH),n(OD)
d(C=C=H)
… BUT NOT @Cu.[273] (2008)
3) BEYOND CN¯: CN¯-FREE Au ECD BATHS
S-bonded
bidentate
O-bonded
n(S-S)
asymm: O-bonded
asymm: S-bonded sulphite
symm. SO32- stretch
Sulphites [189] (2002) Raman
lo-: cathodic passivation S film
due to sulphite reduction S film can be
oxidised or reduced (to HS¯) electrochemically
(empirical processes rely on additives, but
appropriate choice of allows to avoid this)
Thiourea [207] (2003)
C=SNH2 CN CN+CS
SO42- (supporting ellyte)
dSCNN)
Cathodic:
vertical with NH2 on surface
Au-N
flat
Au-C Au-NAu-S
Thiourea: potential-dependent reorientation
Au+
Thiourea @Au: from anodic adsorption to oxidative desorption
4) Cu-INTERCONNECTS (VIA FILLING)
4.1) Suppressor (PEG)
4.2) Accelerator (SPS)
4.3) Levellers
4.4) The full package
Background:
Additive packege in Cu ECP for semiconductor fabrication
Suppressors: inhibit growth outside features (act on flats)
Accelerators: enhance Cu growth in trenches (act in holes)
Levellers: inhibit overgrowth (act on humps)
Background:
Levellers in Cu ECP for semiconductor fabrication
5 mA cm-2
No additives
“Accelerator”
Full package, incl. levellerTarget finish
After CMP
4.1) Suppressor (PEG)
(I): lo-cd pathway
(II): hi-cd pathway
[245] (2006)SUPPRESSOR: PEG
SERS [217,221,245], ERS [226]
Adsorbs & reacts
crucial role of Cl¯
The suppressor alone does not improve much morphology,
but yields more compact layers
[221,226] (2006)
ERS shows notable incrase in
reflectivity with PEG
no PEG
with PEG
4.2) Accelerator (SPS)
ACCELERATOR: SPS bis-3-sulfopropyl-disulfide Na salt
SERS [233,234] (2006)
Stark tuning
of SPS bands
n(Cu-Cl)
no Cl¯ almost no signal
(apart from narrow cat range)
n(Cu-O)intensity drops with cathodic
polarisation reactivity (next)
with Cl¯: several spectral features
show up in whole ECD range.
n(S-S)
-0.5 mA cm-2
Cathodic reactivity of SPS
SPS: bis-3-
sulfopropyl-disulfide
MPS: mercapto-
propyl-sulfonate
4.3) Levellers
(among other investigated, I selected the following 2 examples)
4.3.1) CTDB
4.3.2) BPPEI
SERS
potential-dependent spectra
Reaction (low cat):
770 N-H wag ,
1425 N=N str ,
1515 R-NH3+ str
Reaction (high cat):
2110 CN¯ads str
“Reorientation”:
710 Ar-oopb ,
980 Ar-rs ,
1172 Ar-ipb ,
1218 ArCN st ,
1600 quad st ,
2233 CN st
CTDB [294] (2010)
SERS – potential-dependent spectra - 2
Reaction (low cat):
1425 N=N str , 1515 R-NH3+ str
Reaction (high cat):
2110 CN¯ads str
low cat
hi cat
SFG: IR Ar range, VIS variable , pH 7
• For 0.05E>-0.5 V: no signal, VIS
• For E-0.5 V: enhanced band
• Band assignment:
Ar-CN str. of 3-cyano-aniline
• Unreacted Q and ACET have
vibrations in this range, but no absorption owing to surface selection rules
•DFT of 3CA: IR and Raman double peak,•3CA bears no chromophore, DR due to VIS absorption by the chemisorption bond
[269] (2008)
SFG: IR CN range, VIS=532 nm, pH 7
• No discernible peaks for E>-0.5 V
• For E-0.5 V: positive band
• No SFG enhancement• VIS,INPUT=532 nm off VIS
absorption peak of unreacted Q
• Reaction products have no chromophores
• Adsorption orbital of 3CA to Cu absorbs at 442 nm.
• Non-DR: phase information can help discriminate between the
adsorption modes allowed by surface
selection rules:
positive band: N facing Cu
• Tentative band assignment:
3-cyano-aniline, adsorbed via CN
SFG: IR CN range, VIS=532 nm, pH 3
• No discernible peaks for E>-0.5 V
• For E-0.5 V: negative band
• No SFG enhancement• Bathochromic shift not enough to
bring VIS absorption in resonance with VIS input
• Band inversion nitrile inversion• Protonation and formation of NH3
+
• Preferred adsorpion through QA moiety
SFG: IR CN range, VIS=532 nm, pH 0.5
• Strong SFG enhancement: over 100
• DR-SFG• bathochromic shift brings VIS
absorption in resonance with VIS input
• Positive band: owing to DR, phase information is no longer diagnosticdiagnostic of -CN orientation
• For E-0.5 V change in the peak position and intensity increase
• Peaks correspond to unreacted Q• E>-0.5 V: straightforward
• E-0.5 V: no VIS absorption of reaction products expected
• Peak shifts due to change of chemical environment for adsorbed unreacted Q
• Intensity increase due to change in electronic structure of Cu-absorbate interface
[262] (2007)BPPEI
On the basis of experience with BDMPA+
We developed a polymeric leveller: benzyl-Phenyl modified Polyethyleneimine: BPPEI
(MW ca. 50,000)
JGB
BPPEI
[263] (2009)
In situ SERS during Cu electrodeposition
in the presence of BPPEIPrincipal bands:
991: ring breathing1338: Ph-N stretch. for QAS1381: Ph-N stretch. For DMA1481: rs-ipd combinat. band1590: ring stretch. for DMA1629: ring stretch. (for QAS)
Stark tuning
QAS DMA
In QAS: benzyl flat, phenyl vertical
DMA/QAS
In situ SERS in the presence of BPPEI
dynamic spectroscopy
-500mV -850mV
DMA/QAS
QAS DMA
In situ ERS at Cu electrodes
in the presence of 4CP, JGB and BPPEI
Interband transition shifts
Adsorbatestates
4.4) The full package
[263] (2009)
Lo-cd: suppressor (PEG) dominates
Intermediate-cd: accelerator (SPS) dominates
Hi.cd: leveller (BPPEI) dominates
Suppressors: always adsorbed
Accelerators: selective adsorption in cathodic regions (SPSMPSMPSads),
easy mass transporteffective in holes
(higher-q at the mouth than at the bottom)
Levellers: selective adsorption in reacting regions (QASDMA: higher density of adsorbable species),
sluggish mass transport (polymer)effective on humps
5) ECD FROM RTIL
ELECTRODEPOSITION FROM RTIL
1) [BMP][TFSA]: well established for electrodeposition processes
hydrophobic, good stability (to T and hydrolysis), wide elchemical window.
2) [EMIm][TFSA]: lower viscosity, higher conductivity.
~PZC
a few ionic layers
n.b.: in aqueous solutions: ~20 mF cm2
[318] 2010DL structure at Au in the presence of CN¯
SFG DFG
SFG DFGStark tuning: ~3 cm-1 V-1
aqueous: ~20 cm-1 V-1
CH3, CH2 wagging
oop+ip ns(S=O)
in SO2
of [TFSA]
n(C-F) of CF3
Both ions adsorbed over extended
potential range:
Mulliken charge distribution and
bond delocalization – in conjunction
with molecular reorientations –
accomodate changes in applied
electric field without expelling either
species from interface.
~8Å
Stark
~30Å
Field screening for CN¯ (see our data with SAM)
ECD SFG [344] 2011
n.b. KCN ~3 cm-1 V-1
non-reacting adsorbate
reacting adsorbate
ring
butyl
Au ECD anodic: equatorial
high q(CN¯ads) vertical
with Au(CN)2¯:
no TFSA¯ at interface
Changes in orientation
& conformation of BMP+
cathodic: axial
electrostatically
favoured adsorption through N atom
ring // plane low q(CN¯ads)
+ tail
@0 V
VIS resonance with adsorption bond
2D-SFG
6) MONITORING ECD OF METAL/OXIDE COMPOSITES
MONITORING NON-METALLIC COMPONENTS IN COMPOSITE ECD
Au-Y2O3 [350] Raman (2012)
ECD of Ni:
(i) nucleation
(ii) 3D growth + roughening
ECD Ni/CeOx:
(i) Ni nucleation,
(ii) formation of cerium oxide,
(iii) secondary nucleation,
(iv) 3D growth and roughening.
Ni-ceria [376] ERS-Raman (2012)
7) ACTIVITY OF ELECTRODEPOSITED ELECTROCATALYSTS
FOLLOWING PERFORMANCE OF ELECTRODEPOSITED ELECTROCAYALYSTS
Pt-NP/WC for EtOH oxidation: FTIR, SFG, SPEM [377] (2013)
FTIR SFG
Follow changes in electrooxidation mechanism with electrocatalyst ageing:
adsorption of reagent (EtOH), reaction product (acetate) and …
… catalyst poison (CO)
Attending changes in chemical state of Pt and WC support.