julia banks shared
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright 2014© Food Integrity Consulting Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of the material may be transmitted or reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storage in any medium by electronic means) without the written permission of the copyright owner. Application for permission shall be addressed to
Food Integrity Consulting Ltd, Shenna House, Cockley Road, Farthinghoe, NN13 5PD
2
Julia Banks Food Integrity Consulting ltd
www.foodintegrity-consulting.com
QUALITY SUPPORT FOR SUCCESS
HOW TO RISK ASSESS YOUR SITE AND
IMPLEMENT SEGREGATION
3
1. HOW to go about allergen risk assessment?
2. WHAT controls should be implemented?
3. HOW to incorporate controls into food safety management systems?
There can be a lack of reliable guidance on both of these aspects.
It can be a challenge to identify BEST PRACTICE
CHALLENGES FOR FOOD PRODUCERS:
5
www.foodintegrity-consulting.com
QUALITY SUPPORT FOR SUCCESS
RETAILER and FOOD PRODUCER REQUIREMENTS
• Removal of unnecessary allergens • Clear and legal labelling of the presence of
allergens• ‘May contain’ statements used judiciously• The correct identification and labelling of 'free
from’ products
6
www.foodintegrity-consulting.com
QUALITY SUPPORT FOR SUCCESS
CARRYING OUT ALLERGEN RISK ASSESSMENT
7
RISK ASSESSMENT CHALLENGES• Allergen risk assessment
can appear over complex
• It is easy to overlook important detail
• It must be systematic - every allergen assessed at every process stage
• Role of HACCP ?
8
RISK ASSESSMENTCHALLENGES
This session:
•Will present a practical approach to risk assessment
•Will discuss how to translate this into action
9
WHAT DOES THIS THIS METHOD AVCHIEVE?
• Systematic - every allergen is assessed at every process stage
• See the bigger picture and prioritise
• Look at the whole and not just the parts
10
RISK ASSESSMENTCHALLENGES
It must be a live system
To enable it to be kept up to date and to challenge / check NPD
NPD TECHNICAL / COMMUNICATION CHANNELS?
11
WHO SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR RISK
ASSESSMENT?
Someone who
understands food allergy
SOMEONE WHO HAS EXCELLENT PRODUCT AND FACTORY FLOOR
KNOWLEDGE
12
Raw material and recipe analysis:
•What allergens are being intentionally used on site.•What are the potential raw material cross contamination risks
THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
KEY STAGE1
13
RAW MATERIAL AND RECIPE ANALYSIS
• The risk assessment must provide information on:– Which products are at risk from
allergens intentionally present on site– Precisely what form those allergens
take
– Not just ‘egg’ for example but egg in the form of Lemon curd or meringue.
15
ATTENTION TO DETAIL IS KEY
You need to know the names of the ingredients to help with later risk assessment stages
UPC Product
102666Skinny Lemon
Mousse Skimmed milk powder
103666
Skinny Raspberry
Mousse Skimmed milk powder
104666Lemon Swirl
CheesecakeButter (Lemon Curd), Full
Fat Soft Cheese, CreamLemon Curd
Wheatflour (Ginger
Biscuit crumb)
Wheatflour (Biscuit
crumb)
105666Raspberry
PannacottapacCream
106666Chocolate
Mousse
Milk Fat, Whole Milk
Powder , Skimmed milk
powder
SOY LECITHIN
(CHOCOLATE )
107666
Raspberry
Meringue
Milk Protein, Dried
Skimmed Milk,Dried
Whole Milk
(Meringue(White
Chocolate Coating)),
Cream, Skimmed Milk
Meringue (large)
Soya Lecithin
(Meringue
(large)(White
Chocolate Coating))
108666Small Trifle
DessertButter (sponge), Cream Sponge (63 mm disc)
Soya Lecithin (Sponge
63mm)
Wheatflour (Sponge
63mm)Wheatflour (Sponge)
109666
Mandarin
Dessert
Skimmed milk powder
(sponge), Milk Protein ,
Cream, Skimmed Milk
Sponge (apricot
sponge)
Soya Lecithin (Sponge
apricot)Wheatflour (Sponge) Wheatflour (Sponge)
110666
Chocolate
Mousse
Milk Fat, Whole Milk
Powder , Skimmed milk
powder
Soya Lecithin
111666
Strawberry Trifle Milk Protein , Lactose
(MR05), Butter (Sponge),
Cream, Skimmed Milk
Powder
Sponge (drop sponge) Wheatflour (Sponge) Wheatflour (Sponge)
112666
Choc Muffin
DessertSkimmed Milk powder
(sponge), Milk Fat, Whole
Milk Powder, Skimmed
Milk Powder
Mini muffin
Soya Lecithin)
(Chocolate Curls)
(Cocolate Callets )
Wheatflour (Sponge) Wheatflour (Sponge)
113666Raspberry
PannacottaCream
114666Full Fat Lemon
Mousse
Cream, Milk Protein ,
Skimmed Milk
115666
Full Fat Belgian
Chocolate
Mousse
Cream, Milk Protein
(UNIQFFM1), Dried Whole
Milk (823NVGB), Dried
Skimmed Milk.
Soya Lecithin
(Chocolate 823NVGB)
117666
Full Fat Toffee
Mousse
Cream, Milk Protein
(UNIQFFM1), Dried
Skimmed Milk,
Sweetened Condensed
Skimmed Milk, Unsalted
Butter
Soya Lecithin
(Butterscotch Pieces)
118666
Toffee Muffin
Dessert
Dried Skimmed Milk,
Sweetened Condensed
Skimmed Milk
(Butterscotch
Pieces)(Toffee Sauce),
Unsalted Butter
(Butterscotch Pieces),
Dried Skimmed Milk
(Sponge), Milk Fat
(Sponge), Whole Milk
(Sponge), Dried Whole
Milk (Chocolate Curls).
Toffee Muffin
Soya Lecithin (White
Chocolate Curls)
(Butterscotch Pieces).
Wheatflour, Wheat
Starch (Sponge)Wheatflour (Sponge)
119666Twin-Pack Rice
PuddingClotted Cream, Milk
120666
COU Chocolate
Mousse Single
FTG
Milk Fat, Whole Milk
Powder (LE321), Skimmed
milk powder
Soya Lecithin (LE321)
121666
Family Mandarin
Dessert
Butter (sponge), Milk
Protein (WFC13), Cream,
Skimmed Milk
Sponge (large)Soya Lecithin (Sponge
large)Wheatflour (Sponge) Wheatflour (Sponge)
MIL
K
WH
EAT
GLU
TEN
EGG
S
SOYA
16
POTENTIAL RAW MATERIAL RISKS - CANS OF WORMS MAY BE OPENED…
• Time consuming investigation work required.
• What ingredients is the supplier using? How will you know?
• Are the ingredients used compatible with what you are manufacturing?
17
POTENTIAL RAW MATERIAL RISKS
• If allergens are on site - what can be gathered about the controls in place
• What further questions need to be asked?
• Is there a need to audit?
18
•Accurately map where allergens and non allergens some into contact
•Clearly show where products and ingredients which do not contain the allergens are at risk
•Problem with some risk assessments – they focus on the allergen rather than the products at risk
THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
KEY STAGE 2
19
Can be hard to use HACCP flow charts for this stage of risk assessment:
•Too complicated•End up with too many charts that focus on one group of products alone•Hard to see all the risks at once
Spread sheet based maps preferable, with all areas and risks on one page
THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
KEY STAGE 2
20
• Where both allergens and products / ingredients at risk are present assess risks
• Clear criteria must be in place as the basis for risk assessment.
• Allergens don’t jump!• Allergens are not
radioactive!
THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS KEY STAGE 2
22
• Summary taken from the Food Standards Agency Voluntary Guidance on Allergen Management and Consumer Information (July 2006) and gives
guidance on the aspects to be considered when carrying out this risk assessment.
As part of this process, identified risks should be classified as either ‘probable’ or ‘remote’ using the criteria described in Table 2 below, as well as any other criteria relevant to the factory.
23
THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS KEY STAGE 2 The desk top risk assessment must be verified on the shop floor to :
•Understand what action is required•Seek views from factory floor teams•Understand ‘what good looks like’•Find hidden areas of weakness
24
THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
KEY STAGE 3 2 criteria are used to carry out this stage of risk assessment:•the likelihood of the issue occurring, •and the quantity of the allergenic material involved.
30
THE ROLE OF GMP• Many allergen controls relate to basic GMP
disciplines• Therefore it is easy to integrate them
within PRP plans• The majority of allergen controls fall within
PRP plans• Some may be OPRP’s
31
THE ROLE OF CLEANING
• Is cleaning required for GMP to support allergen management
• Or• Will it play a critical and
fundamental part in achieving safety (if production lines and equipment are not dedicated)?
32
CLEANING CHALLENGES
• If the manufacturing process is ‘dry’, and wet cleaning is impractical
• Removing the allergen might be difficult
• Particularly if production equipment is complex, large scale
• Solutions?
34
CAN YOU RELY ON CLEANING
Consider - how much supervision will be required to get cleaning right?How much verification will be required?How much are cleaners trusted?
CLEAN LIKE THIS
35
CHANGEOVER CLEANING• Risky activity: Time
pressure• Resource issues – how
much supervision will be required?
• Errors could be disastrous.
36
RAW MATERIAL STORAGE
• Separate storage bays, dedicated?
• Not a necessity - avoiding miss picks is key- labelling and organisation
37
USING ALLERGENIC MATERIALS IN MANUFACTURING
• Controls required unique to each factory
• One size does not fit all
• Use risk assessment to judge
• Validation and verification critical
38
USING ALLERGENIC MATERIALS IN MANUFACTURING
• Common practice to use the same production line.
• Is sufficient cleaning resource and time available end of run?
• Production schedules– ALLERGENS LAST – if practical?
• Cleaners trained? Change parts included?• Effective validation and verification
carried out?
39
USING ALLERGENIC MATERIALS IN MANUFACTURING
• Allergens last might not be practical.
• And other lines could well be running at risk product.
• Additional controls can be essential.
• Can these be implemented in practical terms?
40
THE NPD CHALLENGETechnical department involved at an early stageClear procedures and decision making in place
41
PLANNING OF PRODUCTION PROGRAMMES TO MINIMISE
RISK• Planners trained and
understand factory controls• Clear procedures to follow to
make sure production sequences are adhered to?
• What if sequences have to be changed?
• Arguably too much reliance on planning instead of risk assessment and cleaning
Copyright 2014© Food Integrity Consulting Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of the material may be transmitted or reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storage in any medium by electronic means) without the written permission of the copyright owner. Application for permission shall be addressed to
Food Integrity Consulting Ltd, Shenna House, Cockley Road, Farthinghoe, NN13 5PD