john monaco foreman placer county 2010 – 2011 grand jury

21
John Monaco Foreman Placer County 2010 – 2011 Grand Jury

Upload: cleopatra-watson

Post on 11-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

John MonacoForemanPlacer County 2010 – 2011 Grand Jury

England, 12th CenturyBring charges against anyone who committed crimes

United States, 1635Massachusetts Bay Colony – 1st Grand Jury, to consider cases of murder, robbery, wife-beatingU.S. Constitution, Article Five of the Bill of Rights, 1791

California, 1850, CA Constitution, Article 1, § 23Arm of the court system; component of judicial branchCriminal hearings (as requested) - decreasing Civil oversight - increasing

2Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Help local government be more responsive and efficient.Monitor performance of county, city, and other public county entities within the county.Conduct research; interview public officials, experts, citizenry; visit facilities.Publish reports with recommendations to increase efficiency and effectiveness of government services.

3Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

ConfidentialityOath – Sworn to secrecy for life

Collegial BodyMeeting of equals; decisions as a body

Independent BodyMost independent of all government institutions

Continuity

4Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Via publically published response to Grand Jury reportsFindings:

Agree, or Disagree wholly or partially.

Recommendation implementation:Has been, Will be, orWill not be.

5Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Shall Investigate:Conditions & management of public prisons in the county;Inquire into willful/corrupt misconduct of public officials.

May Investigate:Cities

Special DistrictsAuthorities & Agencies

Counties

School Districts

6Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Not within Grand Jury jurisdiction:

State Agencies (excluding prisons)

School district personnel records, curriculum, policy

Federal Agencies

Superior Court System

7Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Responses to previous Grand Jury report:Reporting requirementsPotential further investigation

Required inspections (public prisons)Carry-over recommendations from prior Grand JuriesCitizen complaintsAgency investigation history – past 3 to 5 yearsCriminal hearings upon district attorney request

8Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Grand Jury can be selective in what it investigates and reportsBased on proposed investigation’s:

Scope – complexityImportance / impact on county citizensSignificance – itself compared to other potential investigationsExisting legal activity

Grand Jury’s:Resource availability and timelineExpertise

9Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Methods:ObservationResearch Interviewing

Factual information:ObtainVerify (triangulate)Utilize leads

10Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

11Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

76 Published Reports

12Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

13Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Annual average from 2005 through 2010:

TYPE RECEIVED RESULTING IN A FINAL REPORT

COMPLAINTS 20 20%

CARRY-OVER + NEW GJ-INITIATED INVESTIGATIONS

10 50%

REQUIRED 8 100%

14Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Financial ManagementQuimby Act in AuburnCity Manager’s CompensationRevenue Sharing FundsLibraries – Service vs. BusinessVolunteerismBlue Bag RecyclingThunder Valley Casino Costs to CommunityRefinancing School District BondsSpecial District – Special Benefit AssessmentSewer Service Rates in AuburnCity Council Members’ CompensationAuburn Recreation District

15Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Health and WelfareAnimal ShelterChild Abuse ProceduresEmergency Call Center ConsolidationWaste Water Treatment in ColfaxChild Abuse Reporting Process in SchoolsSewer Lift StationPublic Guardian’s OfficeAdult Residential Facilities

16Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Operational Efficiency and EffectivenessCemetery DistrictsSchool - Districts, Auburn, CharterMaterials Recovery FacilityRoseville TransitAuditor-ControllerCommunity Development Resource Agency SoftwarePolice Department Complaint ProcessNewcastle Fire Protection DistrictResource Conservation DistrictBuilding Department

17Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Required Holding Facility InspectionsCities – Auburn, Lincoln, Rocklin, RosevilleCounty – Auburn Courthouse, Santucci Justice Center, Main Jail, Burton Creek SubstationCounty - Juvenile Detention Facility

18Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

Law Enforcement– Held and Seized Property

• Misconduct– Sierra College President

19Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

• An audit or part of an audit can be the starting point of an investigation

– Audit reports and financial information as tools for more effective and efficient investigations

• The Auditor-Controller’s office can be used to verify that a recommendation has been addressed

• Recommendation to audit an organization or function• Other – Potential subject of an investigation by the Grand Jury

20Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011

• Placer County 2009-2010 Grand Jury Report– Issue:

• Myriad of different audits and external reviews conducted by municipalities and districts

– Findings:• No single repository• Different agencies report through different channels• Three different reporting cycles

– Recommendation:• Auditor-Controller create webpage as central repository• Implemented partially - within authority and where practical

21Placer County 2010-2011 Grand Jury27 January 2011