john f rancis walsh environmen tal site asse ssment …
TRANSCRIPT
11
ENVIR
0-112 AD
JOHN F
RONMEN
DDISON R
Environm
Repor
FRANCI
NTAL SIT
ROAD, M
mental In
rt No. E2
2nd May 20
S WALSH
TE ASSE
MARRICK
nvestigatio
2157 AA
014
H
SSMENT
KVILLE
ons
T
NSW
Repor
ENVIRO
110-112EI ReporDate: Copies 1 Soft C2 Hard C
1 Origin
Author:
EMMANEnvironm © 2014 EnvThis reportdistributed
rt Distrib
NMENTAL S2 Addison Rort No.
Copy (PDF –Copies (sen
nal (Saved to
:
NUEL WOEmental Scie
vironmental Invt is protected byin full and with
bution
SITE ASSES
oad, MarricE22157 2nd May
– Secured, nt by Expres
o Digital Ar
ELDERS entist
vestigations Auy copyright lawh prior written p
SMENT ckville AA 2014
issued by emss Courier)
rchives)
ustralia Pty Ltd and may only b
permission by E
Recmail) Mr
5/2CO
EnvSuiPY
Tec
ERSen
T/A Environmbe reproduced, EI.
cipient John F. Wa47 Oberon
OOGEE NSW
vironmentalite 6.01, 55
YRMONT N
chnical Rev
IC GERGEnior Project
mental Investigatin electronic or
alsh Street, W 2034
l InvestigatiMiller Stree
NSW 2009
viewer:
ER Engineer
tions (EI) r hard copy form
ions et,
mat, if it is cop
ied and
Environm110-112 AReport No
1.0 I2.0 O
2.1 2.2
3.0 S3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4
4.0 S4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6
5.0 P5.1
6.0 S6.1 6.2
6.26.2
7.0 A7.1 7.2
8.0 D8.1
8.2 8.3 8.38.38.38.38.38.3
9.0 R9.1
9.19.19.1
9.2 9.29.29.29.29.2
ental Site AssAddison Road,o.E22157 AA
INTRODUCOBJECTIV
OBJECTIV
SCOPE OF
SITE DESCPROPERTY
LOCAL LA
REGIONAL
GROUNDW
SITE CONSITE LAND
SURROUN
COUNCIL
WORKCO
HAZARDO
SITE WAL
PRELIMINDATA GA
SAMPLINGDATA QU
ADOPTED
.1 Soil Cr
.2 GroundASSESSME
SOIL INVE
GROUNDW
DATA QUAQUALITY
Field QLABOR
.1 Sample
.2 Test M
.3 Method
.4 Labora
.5 Labora
.6 Matrix RESULTS
SOIL RESU
.1 Sub-Su
.2 Soil La
.3 DiscusGROUNDW
.1 Ground
.2 Ground
.3 Ground
.4 Ground
.4 Discus
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
CTION VES AND SVES
WORKS CRIPTIONY IDENTIFIC
AND USE L SETTINGS WATER BOR
TAMINATD TITLES IN
NDING LAND
INFORMATI
OVER NSW AOUS CHEMIC
LKOVER INS
NARY CONAPS G, ANALY
UALITY INDIC
D ASSESSMEN
riteria dwater CriteENT METHESTIGATION
WATER INVE
ALITY ASCONTROL P
QA/QC DataRATORY QA/e Holding T
Methods and d Blanks atory Duplicatory Contro
Spikes AND DISCULTS
urface Condaboratory Rsion of SoilWATER RESU
dwater Mondwater Fielddwater Flowdwater Analsion of Gro
NSW 4
TABL
SCOPE OF
N CATION, LOC
RE RECORDS
TION APPRNFORMATION
DS HISTORIC
ION AUTHORITY
CALS AND RE
PECTION
NCEPTUA
YTICAL ANCATORS
NT CRITERIA
eria HODOLOG
ESTIGATION
SESSMENPROGRAM
a Evaluation/QC
Times Practical Q
cate Sampleol Samples
CUSSION
ditions esults l ResultsULTS nitoring Wed Observatiw Directionlytical Resuundwater R
i
LE OF CO
F WORK
CATION AND
S AND LOCA
RAISALN / HISTORIC
CAL AERIAL
Y SEARCH
REGULATORY
AL SITE M
ND QUALI
A
GY
N
NT
n
Quantitation
es
ll Constructons
ultsResults
iii
NTENTS
D PHYSICAL
L GROUNDW
C AERIAL RPHOTOGRA
Y COMPLIAN
MODEL
ITY PLAN
Limits (PQ
tion
SETTING
WATER USE
EVIEW
APHY REVIEW
NCE
N (SAQP)
QLs)
W
1 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 8 8
10 12 12 12 12 14 14 16 17 19 19 21 23 23 24 27 27 28 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 33 33 33 34 36 37 37 37 38 38 39
Environm110-112 AReport No
10.0 C11.0 S
REFER
ABBRE TABLE
TABLE 3TABLE 3TABLE 3TABLE 3TABLE 4
MATABLE 4TABLE 5TABLE 6TABLE 6TABLE 6TABLE 6
TABLE 6TABLE 7TABLE 7TABLE 8TABLE 8
SOIPER
TABLE 9TABLE 9TABLE 9TABLE 9TABLE 9
MET FIGURE
1. S2. S APPEN
A NB LC ND QE BF SG L
ental Site AssAddison Road,o.E22157 AA
CONCLUSSTATEME
RENCES
EVIATION
E 3-1: SITE 3-2: LOCA3-3: TOPO3-4: SUM4-1-1: SU
ARRICKVILL4-2: SUM5-1: PREL6-1: DATA6-2: DATA6-3: DATA6-4: SUM
20 6-5: SUM7-1: SOIL7-2: GROU8-1: SAM8-2: SUMIL AND GRORCENTAGE D9-1: SUM9-2: SOIL9-3: GROU9-4: FIEL9-5: SUMTALS, PAHS
ES
Site LocatioSite Samplin
NDICES
NR Atlas GrLand Titles NSW WorkQuality AssuBorehole LoSample RecLaboratory A
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
SIONS ANDENT OF LI
NS
IDENTIFICAAL LAND USOGRAPHICA
MMARY OF RUMMARY OFLE
MMARY OF SLIMINARY CA QUALITY A QUALITY A QUALITY
MMARY OF S
MMARY OF SL SAMPLINGUNDWATER
MPLING DATAMMARY OF LOUNDWATERDIFFERENCE
MMARY OF SL LABORATOUNDWATERD-BASED GR
MMARY OF GS, BTEX, TPH
on Plan ng Plan
roundwaterSearch Cover Searurance / Quogs ceipt AdviceAnalytical R
NSW 4
D RECOMMITATIO
ATION, LOCASE
AL, GEOLOGREGISTEREDF OWNERS –
URROUNDINCONCEPTUA
OBJECTIVEASSURANCINDICATORITE ASSESSM
ITE ASSESSMG METHODOLR SAMPLINGA QUALITY
LABORATORR, FIELD QC ES (% RPD)UB-SURFAC
ORY RESULTR MONITORIROUNDWAT
GROUNDWAHS
r Bore Searc
ch uality Contr
e & Chain-oReports
i
MMENDATONS
ATION AND
GICAL AND HD GROUNDW– LOTS 1 IN D
NG LAND AAL SITE MODESCE PROCEDURS (NSW DECMENT CRIT
MENT CRITLOGY
G METHODOINDICATOR
RY RESULTSC DUPLICATE
CE CONDITIOTSING WELL CTER MEASU
ATER LABOR
ch
rol
of-Custody
iv
TIONS
D ZONING
HYDROGEOLWATER BORE
D.P. 527129 –
ERIAL PHOTDEL
URESC, 2005)ERIA FOR SO
ERIA FOR G
OLOGYRSS FOR BFD SAES, WITH CA
ONS
CONSTRUCTUREMENTSRATORY ANA
Certificates
LOGICAL INES WITHIN 1– 110-112 AD
TOGRAPH R
OIL INVEST
GILS
AMPLES ANALCULATED
TION DETAIL
ALYSIS RES
s
NFORMATIO1 KM OF THE
DDISON ROA
REVIEW
TIGATION LE
ND ILD SAMPD RELATIVE
LS
SULTS – HEA
42 43
4 5
ON 5 E SITE. 7
AD, 9
11 15 16 17 18
EVELS (SILS
22 23 25 27
PLES FOR E
32 34 35 37 38
AVY 41
7
S)
Environm110-112 AReport No
1.0 I
Environm
Environm
site’), as
P12508
The site
Area of
total area
Propose
The purp
Develop
mixed co
Regulato
The follo
report:
NE
Na
Am
NE
Pro
En
(A
Co
Co
(N
NS
AN
Ma
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
INTRODUC
mental Inv
mental Site
s shown in
dated 21st M
is further
Marrickville
a of a 1,493
ed Developm
pose of this
pment Appli
ommercial a
ory Framew
owing regu
EPC (2013)
ational Env
mendment 2
EPC (2013
otection (A
nvironment
ANZECC an
ontaminated
onservation
NHMRC);
SW DEC, 2
NZECC &
Marine Water
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
CTION
vestigations
e Assessmen
Figure 1.
March 2014
identified a
e Municipal
3.3m2.
ment
s ESA is to
ication to M
and residen
work
latory fram
) Schedule
vironment P
2013, Natio
) Schedule
Assessment o
Protection C
nd NHMRC
d Sites, pu
Council (A
2006 Guidel
ARMCAN
r Quality; an
NSW
(EI) was
nt (ESA) a
This ESA
.
as Lot 1 in
Council, Pa
evaluate the
Marrickville
ntial land use
ework and
B(1) Guide
Protection
nal Environ
B(2) Guid
of Site Con
Council, M
C January, 1
ublished by
ANZECC) a
lines for the
NZ (2000) A
nd the NSW
1
engaged b
at 110-112
was carrie
DP527129
arish of Pete
e potential f
e Municipali
es.
guidelines w
eline on Inv
(Assessmen
nment Prote
deline on S
ntamination)
May 2013;
1992) Guide
y the Austr
and the Na
e NSW Site A
Australian
W EPA (199
by Mr Joh
Addison Ro
ed out in ac
being situa
ersham and C
for contami
ity Council
were consid
vestigation
nt of Site
ection Coun
Site Charac
) Measure 1
elines for th
ralian and
ational Heal
Auditor Sch
and New Z
95) Samplin
hn Francis
oad, Marric
ccordance w
ated within
County of C
ination on s
to include
dered during
Levels for
Contamina
ncil, May 20
cterisation,
1999 – Ame
he Assessme
New Zeal
lth and Med
heme;
Zealand Gu
g Design G
Walsh to
ckville (hen
with EI pro
the Local
Cumberland
site as part o
site redevel
g the prepar
Soil and G
ation) Meas
013;
National E
endment 20
ent and Ma
land Envir
dical Resea
uidelines fo
Guidelines.
conduct a
nceforth ‘th
oposal – re
Governmen
d, covering
of any futur
lopment int
ration of thi
Groundwater
sure 1999
Environmen
013, Nationa
anagement o
onment an
arch Counc
r Fresh an
an
he
f.
nt
a
re
to
is
r,
–
nt
al
of
nd
il
nd
Environm110-112 AReport No
2.0 O
2.1 O
The prin
E
u
I
s
The inv
Environm
National
Guidelin
2.2 S
In order
the min
contamin
Desktop
A re
the p
Sear
order
neigh
A la
infor
Site
relat
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
OBJECTIV
OBJECTIVE
ncipal objec
Evaluate th
uses and an
Investigate
sampling an
vestigation
ment Protec
l Environm
nes for the A
SCOPE OF W
r to achieve
nimum req
nated sites,
p Study
eview of rel
project area;
ch of histo
r to review
hbouring ar
and titles s
rmation rela
history surv
ing to opera
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
VES AND S
S
tives of this
he potential
necdotal and
the degree
nd laborator
follows st
ction (Asse
ment Protec
Assessment
WORKS
e the above
quirements
the scope o
levant topog
;
rical aerial
w previous
rea;
search, also
ating to site
vey involvin
ational site h
NSW
SCOPE OF
s ESA were
for contam
d documenta
e of any p
ry analysis,
andard env
ssment of S
ction Counc
of Contami
objective,
of the E
of works wa
graphical, g
photograph
site use an
o conducte
ownership;
ng a detaile
history and/
2
F WORK
e to:
mination to b
ary evidenc
potential co
for relevan
vironmental
Site Contam
cil, May 2
inated Sites
and in keep
EPA/DECC
as as follow
geological,
hs archived
nd the histo
ed through
;
ed search of
/or relevant
be present o
ce of possibl
ontamination
nt contamina
l procedure
mination) M
2013 and th
s (ANZECC
ping the pro
guideline
s:
hydrogeolo
d at NSW L
orical sequ
NSW Lan
f Marrickvil
t environme
on site base
le pollutant
n by mean
ants of conc
es as descr
Measure 199
he Australi
C/NHMRC 2
oject cost-e
s for con
gical and s
Land and P
ence of lan
nd and Pro
le Council r
ental inciden
ed on the hi
sources; an
ns of limite
cern.
ribed in th
99 – Amend
ian and Ne
2000).
effective wh
nsultants re
soil landscap
Property Inf
nd developm
operty Info
records for
nts;
istorical site
nd
ed intrusive
he Nationa
dment 2013
ew Zealand
hile meeting
eporting on
pe maps fo
formation in
ment in the
rmation fo
information
e
e
al
3,
d
g
n
or
n
e
or
n
Environm110-112 AReport No
A se
statu
Cont
A se
Work
A rev
Field W
A de
Cons
trian
Insta
asses
the p
Mult
from
Labo
from
Data
repor
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
arch throug
utory notice
taminated L
arch of the
kCover NSW
view of exi
Work
etailed site w
struction of
ngular grid p
allation and
ssment wor
potential for
tiple level s
m the newly
oratory anal
m the site his
a interpreta
rting.
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
gh the NSW
es current o
Land Manag
Stored Che
W relating t
sting underg
walkover in
f test boreh
pattern acro
d developm
rks and insta
r groundwat
soil samplin
constructed
lysis of sele
story survey
ation in rel
NSW
W EPA / OEH
on the site
gement Act
emical Infor
to possible
ground serv
nspection;
holes at sev
ss accessibl
ment of thre
alled to stan
ter contamin
ng down to
d groundwat
ected soil sa
y and field o
lation to ad
3
H Land Inf
under the
(1997);
rmation Dat
undergroun
vices on site
ven prelimin
le areas of t
ee (3) groun
ndard enviro
nation and o
o natural so
ter monitor
amples for
observation
dopted soil
formation re
Unhealthy
tabase (SCI
nd tank appr
e.
nary locatio
the site;
ndwater mo
onmental re
off-site mig
oils and one
ing wells;
relevant an
s during the
l and grou
ecords to co
Building L
D) and mic
rovals and l
ons (BH1 –
onitoring w
equirements
gration of co
e round of
nalytical par
e investigati
undwater as
onfirm that
Land Act (1
crofiche reco
locations; an
– BH7) dist
wells drilled
s, in order to
ontaminants
groundwat
rameters as
ion program
ssessment
there are no
990) or the
ords held by
nd
tributed in a
d during th
o investigat
s;
ter sampling
determined
m; and
criteria and
o
e
y
a
he
te
g
d
d
Environm110-112 AReport No
3.0 S
3.1 P
The site
locality i
Table 3-
Street A
Location
Site Are
Site Own
Lot and
State Su
Local G
Parish
County
Current
The site
vacated
building
plan illu
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
SITE DESC
PROPERTY I
identificati
is shown in
-1: Site
Attribute
Address
n Description
ea/GDA
ner
Deposited Pl
urvey Marks
Government A
t Zoning
e is a sligh
car washin
g previously
ustrating the
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
CRIPTION
IDENTIFICA
ion details a
n Figure 1.
Identificatio
e
n
lan (DP)
Authority
htly skewed
ng facility,
y used for am
assessment
NSW
N
ATION, LOC
and associat
on, Locatio
110-112 Ad
Located app(north-east)west), and I
0.14933 hecSouthern ea
Mr John Fra
Lot 1 in DP
Two State Sthe Corner of Addison
Marrickvill
Petersham
Cumberland
B4 –Mixed
d rectangula
with two
menities and
t areas are s
4
CATION AND
ated informa
on and Zonin
ddison Road, M
prox. 5km sou), commercialIllawarra Road
ctares (1493.3astern corner G
ancis Walsh
P 527129
Survey Marksof Addison RRoad and She
le Municipal C
d
Use (Marrick
ar shaped b
rectangula
d an enclose
shown in Fi
D PHYSICAL
ation are pre
ng
Descr
Marrickville N
uth west of Syl building (soud (north-west)
3m2, from httpGDA Lat:-33.
s (SSM) occuRoad and Illawepherd Street.
Council
kville Draft Lo
block which
ar shaped a
ed room for
igure 2.
L SETTING
esented in T
ription
NSW
ydney CBD anuth-east), low)
p://maps.six.ns902838575, L
ur around the warra Road, an (http://maps.
ocal Environm
h was foun
awnings an
r the electric
Table 3-1 w
nd bound by Aw density resid
sw.gov.au) Long: 151.163
sites, being Pnd SS49215 osix.nsw.gov.a
ment Plan, 201
nd to be oc
nd small sq
cal switch b
while the sit
Addison Roaddential (south
3584185
PM587850 onon the Cornerau)
1)
ccupied by
quare shape
board. A sit
te
d h
r
a
ed
te
Environm110-112 AReport No
3.2 L
The site
Table 3-
Table 3-
DirecRelative
North
South
North
South
3.3 R
The toposummari
Table 3-
At
Topogra
Site Dra
Regiona
Soil Lan
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
LOCAL LAN
is situated
-2.
-2: Loca
ction e to Site
h-East Ad
-West Lo
h-West Illa
-West Co
REGIONAL S
ographical, ised in Tab
-3: Topo
ttribute
aphy
ainage
al Geology
ndscapes
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
ND USE
d within a m
al Land Use
ddison Road, t
ow density res
awarra Road t
ommercial (ca
SETTINGS
geological,ble 3-3.
ographical,
The site s
The generAlexandridrainage t
The site iof black tSydney)
The Soil CChapman Blacktownundulatingoccasionaupper slopvalley flatThe domiextracted moderate
NSW
mixed land u
e
then commerc
idential
then mixed co
afé)
, soil landsc
Geological
lopes gently t
ral slope of thia Canal, withto various stor
s likely undero dark grey sh
Conservation and Murphy,
n (bt). Accordg rises with lo
ally up to 10%pes grading ints. Rock outcrnant land usesfrom localisedsheet and gul
5
uses area w
Land Use
cial (retail)
ommercial (gr
cape and hy
and Hydro
to the south, so
he site to the h all stormwatrmwater easem
rlain by Triashale and lami
Service of NS 1989), indica
rding to Chapmocal relief betw
%. Crests and rnto concave lorop is absent.s are urban red deeply weatlly erosion hav
with surroun
e Description
ocery store) a
ydrogeolog
geological I
Descriptio
outh east.
south, south ter present at ments and the
ssic Age Shaleinite. (Ref. 1:1
SW Soil Landated that the siman and Murpween 10-30m.ridges are broaower slopes an
sidential and lthered locationve occurred in
nding land u
n
and residential
ical inform
Information
n
east in the dirthe site flowinmunicipal sto
e of the Wian100 000 Geolo
scapes of the ite overlies a Rphy, this lands. Slopes are gad (200-600mnd broad drain
light industry.ns where subs
n the past in so
uses being
l
mation for th
n
rection of Cong towards thormwater syst
namatta Grouplogical Series
Sydney 1:100Residual Landscape type incgenerally <5%
m) and roundernage depressio
. Clay has oftsoils are graveome locations
described i
he locality i
ook River andhis feature viatem.
p, comprisingSheet 9130 –
0,000 Sheet dscape – cludes gently
% but r with convex ons and
ten been ely. Minor to .
in
is
d
–
Environm110-112 AReport No
At
Botany BSulfate SMap (1:Murphy,
MarrickEnvironAcid SulClass Mscale; DrEnvironm2011, AS
Typical Soil Typ
Depth toGroundw
Groundw
Nearest
3.4 G
An onlin
the NSW
registere
Table 3
attached
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
ttribute
Bay Acid Soil Risk 25,000 scale; 1997)
kville Local nmental Plan lfate Risk
Map (1:1,000 raft Local mental Plan SS_003)
Vadose Zonepes
o water
water Types
Water Body
GROUNDWA
ne search of
W Natural R
ed bores wi
-4. A bore
d in Append
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
Soils are sSoils on cSoils and drainage. fertility.
Subject lacases, acidactivities
The Marrindicates required pground elis likely to
e Silty Clay
Seepage wstanding wsuggested
The grounsilty clay
The neareapproximconsideremarine fea
ATER BORE
f registered
Resource At
thin about
location pl
dix A.
NSW
shallow to mocrests, upper slsoloths on low Limitations i
and lies withind sulfate soilsare not likely
rickville Locathat the site
prior to commevation of belo be lowered b
y
was encounterwater level bed to flow towa
ndwater includstrata.
est water bodieately 2km med to be the neature, which f
RECORDS A
groundwate
las database
1 km of the
an as well
6
oderately deeplopes and welwer slopes andinclude moder
n the map class (ASS) are no
to be affected
al Environmenlies within a
mencing any wlow 5m Austrbelow 1m AH
red during drileing 0.652 to 1ards either the
des intermitten
es are Alexaneters (m) southarest receivinflows east to t
AND LOCAL
er bores wa
e (Ref. http:
e site. A su
as detailed
Descriptio
p (<150cm) Rell-drained aread in drainage rately reactive
ss description ot known or exd by ASS mate
ntal Plan 201a Class 5 ASworks within alian Height D
HD on adjacen
lling at 6.5 m 1.232 m BGL,Cooks River
nt seepage zon
dria Canal andh-east and soug water body he Botany Ba
L GROUNDW
as conducted
://www.nrat
ummary of a
informatio
n
ed Podzolic Sas. Deep (150depressions an
e, highly plasti
of No Knownxpected to occerials”.
11- Acid SulfSS area. Cou500m of ClasDatum (AHD)nt Class 1, 2, 3
below ground, which based or Alexandria
nes is present
d the Cooks Ruth of the site rfor the site, an
ay.
WATER USE
d by EI on 3
tlas.nsw.gov
all registere
n regarding
oils and Brow0-300cm) Yelland localised atic subsoils an
n Occurrence. cur and “land
fate Soils Risuncil consentss 1, 2, 3 or 4) and where th3 or 4 land.
d level (BGL)on local topo
a Canal.
t in groundwat
River which arrespectively, wnd is consider
E
30th April 2
v.au). Ther
ed bores is
g the identi
wn Podzolic low Podzolic areas of poor nd low soil
In such management
sk Class Mapt is therefore4 land, with ahe water table
, with the ography is
ter within the
re located which is red to be a
2014 throug
re were thre
presented i
fied bores i
a
gh
ee
in
is
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 3-
Notes NA = Info
All of th
bore dep
indicated
Bore No
GW11168
GW11168
GW11169
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
-4: Sum
ormation not ava
he registered
pths ranged
d by recorde
o. DateDrille
87 12-01-2
87 12-01-2
92 12-01-2
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
mmary of reg
ailable, * SWL
d bores are
d between
ed standing
e ed
DriDept
2012 4.
2012 3
2012 1
NSW
gistered Gro
L = Standing W
indicated to
1.3m and 4
g water level
illed th (m)
SW
45
.5
.3
7
oundwater B
Water Level, #S
o have been
4.45m below
ls, SWL) be
WL(mBGL)*Salinity#
2.5 / -
1.55 / -
0.5 / -
Bores within
Salinity Units -
n authorised
w ground l
eing betwee
*/
n 1 km of th
not recorded,
d for monito
level (BGL
en 0.5m and
BoA
MONIT
MONIT
MONIT
he site.
oring bores
L), with wa
d 2.5m BGL
ore Purpose Authorised /
Intended
TORING BO
TORING BO
TORING BO
. The drille
ater table (a
L.
ORE
ORE
ORE
ed
as
Environm110-112 AReport No
4.0 S
4.1 S
A histori
relevant
previous
historica
1.
The histo
1
1
1
1L
1
1
2
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
SITE CONT
SITE LAND T
ical land tit
documents
s and curre
al aerial pho
orical aerial
1930: Febru
1943: Sydne
1951: May
1970: Run Lands NSW
1982 : Octo
1994: Octob
2004: Octob
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
TAMINAT
TITLES INF
tles search w
s resulting fr
ent registere
otographs w
l photograp
uary 1930, R
ey 1943 Ima
1951, Run 1
90 Map 19W 3241
ber 1982, R
ber 1994, Ru
ber 2004, Ru
NSW
TION APPR
FORMATION
was conduct
from this sea
ed proprieto
which indica
phs reviewed
Run 17, Map
agery (sour
15, Map 467
909-5010 B
Run 24, Map
un 11, Map
un 7, Map 1
8
RAISAL
N / HISTORIC
ted through
arch are pre
ors along w
ates the site
d as part of
p 3428 B/W
rce : http://m
7 –26 B/W
B/W, Lands
p 3241-113
p 153-164 -
14-25 - Dep
C AERIAL R
h Service Fir
esented in A
with inform
’s potential
this ESA in
W - Common
maps.six.nsw
- Lands Pho
photo, Syd
- Departm
Department
partment of
REVIEW
rst Registra
Appendix B
mation obtain
land uses i
ncluded:
nwealth Au
w.gov.au/)
oto
dney 1909
ent of Land
t of Lands N
Lands NSW
ation Pty Ltd
B. A summa
ined from t
is presented
ustralia Crow
series - De
ds NSW
NSW
W
d. Copies o
ary of all th
the availabl
d in Table 4
wn
epartment o
of
he
le
4-
of
A
As
02.0(1805.(19
2.02(19
16.(19
18.0(19
20.0(19
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 4-
Marrickv
Date of Acquisition
regards the pa
01.1882 82 to 1906) 12.1906 06 to 1907)
2.1907 07 to 1986)
12.1986 86 to 1995)
01.1995 95 to 1995)
09.1995 95 to date)
Leases:
19.04
(See
20.07
11.02
As regar
The earl
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
-1-1: Sum
ville
Registere
art numbered (
William Mee
James Alexan(Transmissio
The New SoCompany LiThen Peters (PropNow Property Ho
Dairy FarmeNow Australian C
Carlovers Ca
# John Fran
-
4.1996 to C
lease dated
7.2012 to C
2.2013 Tran
rds the par
ly title to thi
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
mmary of O
ed Proprietorwhere ava
(1) on the attac
ek (Land Owne
nder Meek (Aron Application
outh Wales Freimited
perty Holdings)
oldings Pty Lim
ers Co-Operati
Co-Operative F
arwash (Aust)
ncis Walsh
Carlovers Ca
d 20.07.2012
Carlovers Ca
nsferred to B
rt highlight
is parcel wa
NSW
Owners –
r(s) & Occupaailable
ched cadastre
er)
rchitect)n not investigat
esh Food and I
) Pty Limited
mited
ive Limited
Foods Limited
Pty Limited
arwash (Au
2)
arwash (Au
Bet The Far
ted yellow a
as found to f
9
Lots 1 in
ations R
(Appendix B)
ted)
Ice
19foalosothsu19un19un19prwilocwhth19un 19un 20reddeshocthsit
ust) Pty Lim
ust) Pty Lim
rm Pty Lim
and numbe
form part o
n D.P. 527
Review of His
930 – The site our rectangularong the northe
outhern boundat the rest of t
urface. 942 – The site nchanged since950 - The site anchanged since970 – The site revious buildinith one larger rcated on the sohat appears to e northern hal
982 - The site anchanged since
994 – The site nchanged since
004 – The appedeveloped. Themolished and haped metal awccupying the soe other occupyte.
mited – expir
mited – expir
mited
ered (2) on
f a road pro
7129 – 11
storical Aeria
appeared to bebuildings loca
ern, western, earies respectivthe site consist
appeared to hae the 1930 phoappeared to hae the 1942 phohad been rede
ngs demolishedrectangular shaouthern half obe a sealed su
lf of the site. appeared to hae the 1970 pho
appeared to hae the 1982 pho
eared to have bhe previous bui
replaced with wnings or buildouthern sectionying the centra
res 29.08.20
res 29.08.20
the attache
ovided for in
10-112 Add
al Photograph
e occupied by ated along the eastern and vely. It appearsted of a grass
ave remained otograph. ave remained otograph. eveloped with d and replacedaped building
of the site withurface occupyin
ave remained otograph.
ave remained otograph.
been uilding was h two rectanguldings, with oneon of the site anal section of th
007, also 10
017, also 10
ed cadastre
n D.P. 718,
dison Road
hs Poten
Land
Unknow
Unknow
s
all
h ng
Commer
lar e nd he
Commer
Commer
0 year optio
0 year option
e
circa 1881
d,
ntial Uses
wn
wn
rcial
rcial
rcial
on
n
Environm110-112 AReport No
We are a
Date of Aand term 26.09.1881(1881 to 11881
18.12.1894(1894 to 1
20.12.1963
07.10.1966
06.04.1967(1967 to 1
Land titl
T
s
th
p
4.2 S
The site
photogra
informat
Table 4-
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
aware of the
Acquisition held
1 963)
4 963)
3
6
7 986)
le and histor
The site was
several ice c
he current o
present day.
SURROUNDI
e history r
aphs source
tion identifi
-2.
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
e following
Registered available
Robert Barc
D.P. 718 – pWilliam Barc(Official AssWallace) Resumed anMarrickville Street
Road closedGracious Ma
Property Ho
rical aerial
s have pred
cream and f
owner Mr F
ING LANDS
review incl
ed from NS
ied at surrou
NSW
events: -
Proprietor(s)
lay Wallace (G
providing for tclay Palmersignee of the E
nd vested in Cofor the purpo
and upon cloajesty Queen E
oldings Pty Lim
photograph
ominately b
food compa
Francis Wals
HISTORICA
uded a sea
SW Land a
unding land
10
) & Occupati
Gentleman)
this land as Ha
Estate of Robe
ouncil of the Mses of extendin
sing vested in Elizabeth the S
mited
hs indicate:
been used a
anies from
sh, who had
AL AERIAL P
arch of su
and Propert
d parcels fro
ons where
andley Street
ert Barclay
Municipality ofng Handley
Her Most Second
and owned f
1907 to 199
d leased the
PHOTOGRA
urrounding
ty Informat
om the revi
Referenand sal
Vol 546
Vol 546
f Gazette
Vol 546Now Crown L(Vide G4238) Vol 105Now Vol 107
for commerc
95. In 1995
property to
APHY REVIE
land uses
tion. A sum
ewed photo
nce to Title ale
6 Fol 65
6 Fol 65
e 20.12.1963 F
6 Fol 65
Land Gazette 07.10.1
526 Fol 44
738 Fol 38
cial purpose
the site wa
o Carlovers
EW
using hist
mmary of t
ographs are
at Acquisition
olio 3797
1966 Folio
es, includin
as bought b
Carwash ti
orical aeria
the pertinen
presented i
n
ng
by
ll
al
nt
in
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 4-
Aerial Ph
February
Run 17, M
CommonwCrown
1943
Sydney 19
http://map
May 1951
Run 15, M
Lands Pho
October 1
Run 90 M
Lands phoseries
Departmen3241
October 1
Run 24, M
Departmen
October 1
Run 11, M
Departmen
2004
Run 7, Ma
Departmen
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
-2: Sum
hotograph
y 1930
Map 3428 B/W
wealth Austra
943 Imagery
ps.six.nsw.gov
1
Map 467 –26 B
oto
1970
Map 1909-5010
oto, Sydney 19
nt of Lands N
1982
Map 3241-113
nt of Lands N
1994
Map 153-164 –
nt of Lands N
ap 14-25 –
nt of Lands N
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
mmary of Su
Sur
W –
lia
Nor
Sou
Sou
Nor
v.au/
Sur
B/W –
Surima
0 B/W,
909
NSW
Surima
Sou(com
-
NSW
Surprev
–
NSW
Surprev
NSW
Surima
NSW
urrounding L
rrounding
rth-East – Add
uth-West – Re
uth-East – Res
rth-West – Illa
rrounding land
rrounding lanage.
rrounding landage with the ex
uth-East – Premmercial).
rrounding landvious aerial.
rrounding landvious aerial.
rrounding landage.
11
Land Aerial
dison Road th
esidential
sidential
awarra Road t
d remained rel
nd appeared
d appeared relxception of:
evious residen
d use appears
d use appears
d appeared rel
l Photograph
hen commercia
then residentia
latively uncha
relatively un
latively uncha
ntial building r
remain relativ
remain relativ
latively uncha
h Review
al (warehouse
al
anged.
nchanged from
anged from the
replaced with
vely unchange
vely unchange
anged from the
e)
m the previo
e previous
a larger build
ed from the
ed from the
e previous
ous
ding
Environm110-112 AReport No
4.3 C
The sear
initiated
The sear
Should t
past site
separate
4.4 W
A search
behalf o
Section
Database
no recor
4.5 H
On 30th
conducte
the NSW
Manage
and to su
4.6 S
Mr Emm
inspectio
Th
va
bu
tot
(so
Th
sit
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
COUNCIL IN
rch of site h
d on the 25th
rch was still
the inspecti
e activities,
cover.
WORKCOVE
h of WorkC
f the client.
received by
e (SCID) an
rds pertainin
HAZARDOU
April, 2014
ed, this bein
W OEH has
ment Act 1
urrounding
SITE WALK
manuel Woe
on of the sit
he site is a s
acated car w
uilding prev
tal area of
outh-east), l
he site was n
te was used
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
NFORMATIO
history reco
March, 201
l in progres
ion of avail
then a for
ER NSW AU
Cover NSW
. Correspon
y EI (Appe
nd the micr
ng to the site
S CHEMICA
4, an on-lin
ng a databa
s no involv
997 for the
proporties w
KOVER INSPE
elders (EI, E
te on 11th A
slightly skew
washing faci
iously used
site is 1,49
low density
not in opera
as a carwas
NSW
ON
ords held by
14.
ss and had n
lable Counc
rmal writte
UTHORITY
W Authority
ndence dated
endix C), co
ofiche reco
e were held
ALS AND RE
ne search of
ase that is m
ements or r
e NSW prop
within a 500
ECTION
Environmen
April 2014, w
wed rectang
ility, with tw
d as toilets a
93.3m2, bou
residential
ation at the
sh business.
12
y Marrickvi
not produce
cil records
en notificati
SEARCH
y records re
d 27th Marc
onfirmed th
ords held by
d.
EGULATORY
f the Conta
maintained b
regulations
perty identi
0m radius.
ntal Scientis
with a summ
gular shape
wo rectangu
and an enclo
und by Add
(south wes
time of the
.
ille Municip
d any result
suggest the
ion to this
lating to th
ch, 2014 fro
hat a search
y WorkCove
Y COMPLIAN
aminated La
by the NSW
under Sect
ified as 110
st) made the
mary of the
ed block wh
ular shaped
osed room f
dison Road
t), and Illaw
e site visit, h
pal Council
ts at the tim
e potential f
effect will
he site was
m the Dang
h of Stored
er was cond
NCE
and – Reco
W OEH. Thi
tion 58 of t
0-112 Addi
e following o
findings pro
hich was fou
d awnings a
for the elect
(north-east
warra Road
however it w
l related to
me of report
for contami
l be submit
requested o
gerous Good
d Chemical
ducted and r
ord of EPA
is search co
the Contam
ison Road,
observation
ovided belo
und to be oc
and small sq
trical switch
t), commerc
(north-west
was unders
the site wa
preparation
ination from
tted under
on by EI, o
ds Licensin
Informatio
revealed tha
Notices wa
onfirmed tha
minated Lan
Marrickvill
ns during an
ow:
ccupied by
quare shape
h board. Th
cial buildin
t).
tood that th
as
n.
m
a
on
ng
on
at
as
at
nd
le
n
a
ed
he
ng
he
Environm110-112 AReport No
Th
the
wa
Mu
wa
No
wa
Th
on
Ov
sou
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
he majority
e north-east
as in relativ
ultiple drain
aste water fr
o chemical
ashing subst
here were n
n the site,
verall the si
uth-east.
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
of the site
tern, south-e
ely good co
ns were obs
from the car
storage was
tances obse
no visible in
ite topograp
NSW
is concrete
eastern and
ondition wit
served throu
wash zones
s observed w
erved on the
ndicators of
phy was rel
13
e sealed wit
north-west
th minimal c
ughout site,
s.
with the exc
e south-west
f undergroun
latively gen
th the excep
ern boundar
cracking an
which are d
ception of c
tern corner
nd storage t
nerally flat,
ption of gar
ries. The co
nd staining o
designed to
car washing
of the site.
tank or abo
with a slig
rden beds lo
oncrete seal
observed.
capture and
g detergent a
oveground s
ght decline t
ocated alon
ed hardston
d recycle th
and other ca
storage tank
to the south
ng
ne
he
ar
ks
h,
Environm110-112 AReport No
5.0 P
In accor
Measure
2013), a
conceptu
of contam
The CSM
the relia
Each mi
provides
5.1 D
With ref
planned
I
lo
g
C
p
S
c
Soil and
risk pose
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd
PRELIMIN
rdance with
e 1999 (Am
and to aid in
ual site mod
mination ca
M provides
ability and u
igration and
s a qualitativ
DATA GAPS
ference to th
to include t
nstallation
ocated acr
groundwater
Conducting
prior to leav
Soil sampl
concentratio
d groundwa
ed by expos
essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014
NARY CON
h the Natio
mendment 2
n the assess
del (CSM) w
an migrate a
a framewo
useability of
d exposure p
ve opinion o
S
he current C
the followin
of dedicate
oss the sit
r flow direc
a single gr
ving the site
ing from
ons with res
ater samplin
sure pathwa
NSW
NCEPTUA
nal Environ
2013) Sched
sment of dat
with an asse
along a give
ork to allow
f the data c
pathway is
of the poten
CSM and th
ng data sear
ed, groundw
te in a tr
ction;
roundwater
; and
various lo
pect to the p
ng across th
ays as identi
14
AL SITE M
nmental Pr
dule B2 –
ata collectio
essment of
en pathway
w for the rev
collected, an
summarise
ntial risk of
he identifie
rches and fie
water monit
riangular p
monitoring
ocations ac
proposed la
he site shall
ified in Tab
ODEL
rotection (A
Guideline
n for the si
plausible p
and have an
view of any
nd to identif
d in Table
each compl
ed data gaps
eld investig
toring bore
attern to a
g event (GM
cross the
and use.
l allow for
ble 5-1.
Assessment
on Site Ch
te, EI has d
ollutant link
n effect on a
y informatio
fy any gaps
5-1 along w
lete exposur
s described
gations:
s, screening
assist with
ME) to asse
site to as
the determ
of Site Con
haracterisat
developed a
kages wher
a particular
on collected
s in field in
with an ass
re pathway
below, the
g the local
the deter
ess groundw
ssess the
mination of t
ntamination
tion (NEPM
a preliminar
eby a sourc
receptor.
d to ascertai
nvestigations
essment tha
.
works wer
aquifer an
rmination o
water qualit
contaminan
the potentia
n)
M
ry
ce
in
s.
at
re
nd
of
ty
nt
al
E1R
T
E
E
Environmental Site A110-112 Addison RoReport No. E22157 A
Table 5-1: Pr
Site S
Entire Site Siteharalluto a0.5msee6.5m
Entire Site Siteharalluto a0.5msee6.5m
Assessment oad, Marrickville NAA 2nd May 2014
reliminary Conc
Subsurface Profi
e covered with concrdstand, underlain uvial soils, with fillia maximum depth om with groundwatepage encountered am BGL.
e covered with concrdstand, underlain uvial soils, with fillia maximum depth om with groundwatepage encountered am BGL.
NSW
ceptual Site Mod
ile PotentiSource
crete
ing of er at
Commerciaactivities, lepaint, termiticidesbuilding materials anstorage of tywith potentiuncontrolledfilling (for levelling purposes)
crete
ing of er at
Vehicle cleaand general maintenance
del
ial es
PotenContam
al ead
s,
nd the yres ial d
Pesticidesmetals, pehydrocarb(includingOCP, OPPand asbest
aning
e.
Heavy mepetroleum Hydrocarb(including
15
ntial minants
M
, heavy troleum ons
g PAHs), P, PCBs tos.
Buildin Soils Ground Air/Soi LNAPL(if prese
etals, m bons g PAHs).
Soils/B Ground Air/Soi
edia SeRe
ng Fabric
dwater
l Vapour
L/DNAPL ent)
CooksRiver/ACanal Site Wduring and con Future residen
edrock
dwater
l Vapour
Mill PoAlexan Site Wduring and con Future residen
ensitive eceptor
MiEP
Alexandria
Workers demolition nstruction
site nts
Seepsubsbedrgrou Derm Inge Inha
ond / ndria Canal
Workers demolition nstruction
site nts
Seepsubsbedrgrou Derm Inge Inha
igration & Exposure Pathways page into the surface soils, rock and undwater.
mal Contact
estion
alation
Mofur MocontheLow
page into the surface soils, rock and undwater.
mal Contact
estion
alation
Mofur MocontheLow
Potential RiskComplete Expo
Pathway oderate to Low (to brther assessed)
oderate to High (shontamination be presen w (post developmen
oderate to Low (to brther assessed)
oderate to High (shontamination be presen w (post developmen
k of sure
be
ould sent)
nt)
be
ould sent)
nt)
Environm110-112 AReport No
6.0 S
In accor
Objectiv
quality n
applied f
Table 6-
State the ProFor future reto soil land potential ons
Identify the Former land commercial decisions ba
Is site so Do site
purpose
Identify InpThe primary Soil sam Groundw Laborato Observa Assessm
Section Assessm
- Rel- Rel
Define the SThe spatial b Lateral Vertical Tempora
used forcomprom
Develop a DLaboratory t All con All lab
quality QA/QC Labora
Specify LimiSpecific limiquality and available site A decisi
given si(95% Udecision
A decisconfidenhotspot
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
SAMPLING
rdance with
ves (DQO) w
needed for
for this asse
-1: Data
oblem (Step 1) edevelopment puruses and comme
site and offsite re
Decisions (Step 2 uses indicated thuses. To assessed on the follow
oil and groundwasoils or groundws, or to prevent o
uts to the Decisioy inputs to the assmpling at seven (7water sampling frory Analytical reations made durinment of the suitab
6 2 and describement of analyticalevant soil investievant groundwat
Study Boundariesboundaries of the - the geographica
l - from the existial - the findings r commercial/resmise onsite envir
Decision Rule (Stetest results will bentracted laboratorboratory analyticay control (QA/QCC results demonstatory practical qu
its of Decision Eits for this projecstandard procedue data collected. ion can be madeite criteria. This
UCL) on the avern error will be 5%sion can be madnce using a selecmay not be detec
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
G, ANALY
internation
was used b
the specifi
essment is d
a Quality Ob
rposes the site neercial land uses. ceptors, in accord
2) hat the site was suss the environmewing questions:
ater quality suitabwater require furoff-site migration
on (Step 3) essment of soil an7) locations distrifrom three (3) newsults for represen
ng the sampling pbility of the datad in more detail il results against: igation levels (SILer investigation l
s (Step 4) assessment were
al boundary of thng ground level tof this assessmensidential uses anronmental conditi
ep 5) e accepted if: ries are accreditedal data is generallC) policies and DQtrate acceptable rantitation limits (
Errors (Step 6) ct are in accordanures for field samThis should inclu
e based on a probfollows the guidrage site concen
% that a conclusivde based on the cted density of sycted.
NSW 4
YTICAL AN
nal environm
y the EI ass
fic data req
documented
bjectives
Data Q
eeds to be made s The ESA is the
dance with NSW
ubject to contamiental condition o
ble for the intenderther remediationof contaminants?
nd groundwater wbuted in a triangu
wly installed grountative soil and grprogram, which ma obtained from sin Appendix B; a
Ls) (Table 6-4 ), evels (GILs) (Ta
e limited as followe assessment wasto the proposed dnt will hold true
nd there are no ons.
d by NATA for thly within pre-deteQOs, as detailed ireliability and rep(PQL) are below
nce with the apprmpling and handude the followingbability that 95%ance given in NStration for each
ve statement may probability that ystematic data po
16
ND QUALI
mental stand
sessment te
quirements
d in Table 6
Quality Object
suitable for potenherefore required
W EPA guidelines.
ination associatedof the site for the
ed land use? n or treatment an?
will be: ular grid pattern aundwater wells toroundwater samp
may influence the sampling and anand
for soils to remaable 6-5) for the a
ws: s defined by the s
depth of groundwafor as long as thactivities taking
he analyses underermined data accin Appendix B.
presentativeness othe adopted acce
ropriate guidancedling. This step g points to quanti
% of the data, whiSW EPA (1994) respective contabe incorrect. a contamination
oints. The decisio
ITY PLAN
dards, the p
eam to deter
of the proj
6-1.
tives (DQOs)
ntial future redeveto assess risks p
d with the previoue proposed resid
nd special manag
across the site; o assess groundwales for relevant chneed for further a
nalysis against da
ain on the site; andassessment of gro
site boundary, as iater; and
he site use remainplace onsite or
rtaken; ceptance criteria,
of the data set. ptance/assessmen
e made or endorsealso examines th
fy tolerable limitsich is collected ufor site validatio
aminant being be
hotspot of a ceon error will be
N (SAQP)
process of d
rmine the a
ect. The D
elopment into mixposed by contam
us activities, includential uses, the
ement before the
ater conditions unhemicals of potenassessment;
ata quality indica
d undwater quality
illustrated in Figu
ns passive in natuon the immedia
in accordance wi
nt criteria for the
ed by the NSW Ohe certainty of cs: using a systemation contingent upoelow the relevant
ertain circular dialimited to a prob
developing D
appropriate
DQO proce
xed residential wminated soils and/
uding potential imEI team would
e site can be use
nderlying the sitential concern;
ators (DQIs), wh
y.
ure 2;
ure; that is, for asately adjacent pr
ith laboratory qua
tested COPC, wh
OEH, appropriateconclusive statem
ic sampling patteon the upper 95%t criteria. Theref
ameter will be dbability of 5% th
Data Qualit
level of dat
ess that wa
with minimal acce/or groundwater
mported filling anmake the require
ed for the intende
;
ich are outlined
s long as the site roperties that ma
ality assurance an
herever possible.
e indicators of daments based on th
ern, will satisfy th% confidence limfore a limit on th
detected with 95hat a contaminatio
ty
ta
as
ess to
nd ed
ed
in
is ay
nd
ata he
he mit he
% on
Environm110-112 AReport No
Optimise theThis step is procedures th Soil sam Samplin The use
6.1 D
To ensur
procedur
indicator
details o
Table 6-
Ite
EnvironmeConsultant
Sample hanStorage
Transport
Volatile los
QA sample
Laboratory
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
e Design for Obtaintended to defi
hat were implemmpling from the wng from predefine
of established gr
DATA QUAL
re the data c
res were ad
rs (DQI) rel
of the assess
-2: Data
em
ental T9
ndling and Ws
Sil
O
sses Ot
es F
Fcc
y analyses TNw
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
aining Data (Stepfine the data collented to optimise
walls and base of ed, monitoring boroundwater monit
LITY INDICA
collected as
dopted, as pr
lating to bot
sment presen
a Quality As
The Environme9001:2000. Wo
Work should bestandard practic
Australian potentially
Australian
NSW EPANew South
National E2013, Nati
Samples would integrity of the laboratories und
One trip blank p
One spiked samthan 10 percent
Field and labora
intra-labor
inter-labor
Field and Laborcompliance is toconservatively a
The selected labNATA registerewould use appro
NSW 4
Data Q
p 7) lection design, we data collection fthe tank farm exc
ore locations to astoring procedures
ATORS
s part of the
resented in T
th field and
nted in Tab
ssurance Pro
ntal Consultantrk would be un
e undertaken gece and in accord
Standard AS44y contaminated
/ New Zealand
A (March 2004) h Wales; and
Environment Proonal Environm
be stored in ansamples from cder “chain of cu
per sample batc
mple should be ain the trip spik
atory QA sampl
atory duplicate
atory duplicate
ratory acceptabo be documenteadopted.
boratories wouled for the analyopriate detectio
17
Quality Object
which will generafor achieving the cavation; ssess groundwates consistent with
ESA was o
Table 6-2 b
d laboratory
ble 6-3 belo
ocedures
t should maintandertaken by app
eneral in accorddance with:
482.1 (2005) Gsoil – Part 1: N
d Standard AS/N
Approved Met
otection (Assesment Protection C
n ice brick-coolecollection to recustody” (CoC) d
ch sent to labora
analysed per bake.
les will be anal
e samples at a ra
e samples at a ra
le limits are beted in the report
ld comply with ysis to be underton limits for the
tives (DQOs)
ate data to efficiDQOs included t
er conditions at thenvironmental st
of quality, th
below. An a
procedures
w.
Objectives
ain Quality Assupropriately qua
dance with field
uide to the inveNon-volatile and
NZS 5667.11 (1
thods for the sam
ssment of Site CCouncil, May 2
ed esky and tranceipt by the anadescribing samp
atory. Results fo
atch for soils an
lysed as follows
ate of 1 in 10 pr
ate of 1 in 20 pr
tween 30–50% and sample to b
the respective Itaken and perfo
e analyses to be
ently and effectithe following:
he site; and andards.
he following
assessment o
s shall be ca
urance Systemsalified and expe
d procedures ba
estigation and sad semi-volatile c
1998) Guidance
mpling and ana
Contamination) 2013.
nsported to the lytical laboratople preservation
for trip blanks sh
d groundwater.
s:
rimary samples
rimary samples.
RPD as stated be re-analysed
ISO 9001 qualiorm their own in
undertaken.
ively satisfy the
g data quali
of the data q
arried out, w
s certified to ASerienced personn
ased on industry
sampling of sitecompounds;
e on sampling o
alysis of water p
Measure 1999
laboratory. To ory, samples wiln and transport
hould all be non
. Volatile losses
.
by AS 4482.1–or higher level
ity assurance prnternal QA/QC
DQOs. Samplin
ity assuranc
quality
with the
S/NZS ISO nel.
y accepted
es with
of groundwater;
pollutants in
– Amendment
ensure the ll be sent to theduration.
n-detected.
s should be less
–2005. Non-to be
rograms, be C programs, and
ng
ce
;
e
s
d
Environm110-112 AReport No
Ite
LaboratoryControl – Dspikes, blansurrogates –Acceptable
Table 6-
Q
Precision -of the variaof data
Accuracy -of the closethe “true” v
Representaconfidence that data armedium pr
Completenamount of ucollection a
Comparab(expressed may be confor each samevent.
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
em
y Quality Duplicates, nks and –
e Limits
P
-3: Data
A/QC Measur
- A quantitativeability (or repro
- A quantitativeeness of reportevalue
ativeness - The (expressed qua
re representativeesent on Site
ness - A measuruseable data froactivity
bility - The conqualitatively) t
nsidered to be empling and ana
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
Primary laborat
surrogates:
matrix spik
control sam
duplicate s
method bla
a Quality In
res
e measure oducibility)
Pd
Tb
R
R
H
e measure ed data to
M
M
L
e alitatively) e of each
Tt
Bu
Rti
Ttit
re of the om a data
Ip
Wt
C
Id
nfidence that data equivalent alytical
GeSs
Il
NSW 4
tory QA/QC acc
: 70% to 130%
kes: 70% to 130
mples: 70% to 1
samples: <4PQL
anks: zero to <P
dicators (N
Performance of differences (RP
The RPDs will bbe considered w
Results are less
Results are less
Heterogeneous
Method blanks,
Matrix spike an
Laboratory cont
To ensure the dahe field, the fol
Blank samples wunacceptable in
Review of relatio provide an innstances of sign
The appropriateechniques will nterference or dransport metho
In validating theprogram the fol
Whether standao; and
Copies of all CO
It can therefore data collection a
Given that a reepisodes, issueStandard Operastandards on eac
In addition the daboratory meth
18
ceptance limits
recovery
0% recovery fo
130% recovery
L - +/- 2PQL, 4
PQL.
SW DEC, 2
f blind field dupPD); and
be assessed as awhere:
than 10 times t
than 20 times t
materials or vo
which are anal
nd matrix spike
trol samples.
ata produced byllowing steps ar
will be run in pnstances of labo
ive percentage ndication that thnificant sample
eness of collectibe assessed to degradation (i.e
ods).
e degree of comlowing is consi
ard operating pr
OC documentat
be considered wactivities is suff
reported data ss of comparab
ating Procedurech data gatherin
data will be colhodologies will
Objectives
are expected to
r organics or 80
for soil or 80%
4-10PQL – 0.-25
2005)
Data Qualit
plicate sample s
acceptable if le
the limits of rep
the LOR and th
olatile compoun
lysed for the an
duplicate samp
y the laboratoryre taken by the
parallel with fielratory artefacts
differences (RPhe samples are ge matrix heterog
ion methodologensure/confirm
e. volatile loss d
mpleteness of thidered:
rocedures (SOP
tion are reviewe
whether the profficient for the p
set can compribility between s (SOPs) and rng activity.
llected by experbe employed in
o be as follows:
0%-120% recov
% to 120% recov
5 or 50%RPD,
ty Indicators
ets, through cal
ss than 30%. RP
porting (LOR);
he RPD is less th
ds are encounte
nalytes targeted
ple sets; and
y is representatilaboratory:
ld samples to co;
PD) values for fgenerally homogeneities; and
gies, handling, sm there was miniduring transport
he analytical dat
s) for sampling
ed and presente
oportion of “usepurposes of the l
se several datadata sets are egulator-endors
rienced samplern all laboratory
:
very for inorgan
very for waters
>10PQL – 0-10
lculation of rela
RPDs that excee
han 50%; or
ered.
in the primary
ive of condition
onfirm there are
field and laboraogeneous, with n
storage and preimal opportunitt due to incorre
ta sets acquired
g protocols have
ed.
eable data” genland use assess
a sets from sereduced througsed or publishe
rs and NATA-atesting program
nics
0 or 30%RPD
ative percentage
d this range ma
samples;
ns encountered
e no
atory duplicatesno unacceptable
servation ty for sample
ect preservation
d during the
e been adhered
nerated in the sment.
eparate samplingh adherence
ed guidelines an
accredited ms.
e
ay
in
s e
/
ng to nd
Environm110-112 AReport No
6.2 A
6.2.1 S
The Soil
summari
SILs wit
Table Q
The Soilwere the
Noy
Na
N
NH
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
ADOPTED A
Soil Criteri
l Investigati
ised in Tab
th respect to
QC3.
l Investigate:
NEPM (20opportunitieyard space s
NEPM (201and F2, BTE
NEPM (201
NEPM (201HSLs).
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
ASSESSMENT
ia
ion Levels (
ble 6-4. An
o contamina
tion Levels
013) – Hees for soil asuch as high
13) – Soil HEX and Nap
3) – Manag
13) - Healt
NSW 4
T CRITERIA
(SILs) that
nalytical me
ant detectio
(SILs) that
ealth-Basedaccess; whih-rise build
Health Screphthalene);
gement Lim
th Screenin
19
A
would be u
ethods have
on limits and
at would be
d Investigaich includesdings and ap
eening Leve
its for TPH
ng Levels f
used as the a
e been selec
d these are p
used as th
ation Levels dwellings partments (H
els (HSLs) f
H fractions F
for asbestos
action level
cted to be r
presented in
he action lev
ls for resiwith fully a
HIL-B);
for vapour
F1 – F4; and
s contamina
ls for the as
relevant for
n detail in A
vels for the
idential wiand perman
intrusion (f
d
ation in so
sessment ar
r the selecte
Appendix D
e assessmen
ith minimanently pave
for TPHs F
oil (Asbesto
re
ed
D,
nt
al ed
F1
os
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 6-
Metals Arsenic - AsCadmium - Chromium(VCopper - CuLead - Pb Mercury - HNickel - Ni Zinc - Zn Petroleum H
F1*
F2**
F3 (>C16-C3
F4 (>C34-C4
Monocyclic
Benzene Toluene EthylbenzenXylenes (totPolycyclic ANaphthaleneBenzo(α)pyrCarcinogeniTotal PAHs Organochlo
DDT + DDD
Aldrin + DieChlordane Endosulfan Endrin Heptachlor HCB MethoxychlMirex Toxaphene OrganophosChloropyrifo
Other
Total PCBs
Asbestos
Notes SIL are NEPyard space s# - Petroleum(Assessment Schedule (B1* = To obtain** = To obta
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
-4: Sum
Paramet
s Cd VI) – Cr(VI) u
Hg
Hydrocarbons
34)
40)
c Aromatic Hy
ne tal) Aromatic Hyde rene ic PAHs 4 5
orine Pesticide
D + DDE
eldrin
lor
sphorus Pestifos
PM (2013) HIL Bsuch as high-rise m Hydrocarbon of Site Contamin
1). n F1 subtract the ain F2 subtract Na
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
mmary of Sit
ter
s#
ydrocarbons (
drocarbons (P
des (OCPs)
icides (OPPs)
B – Residential wbuildings and apContamination w
nation) Measure
sum of BTEX coaphthalene from
NSW 4
te Assessme
U
mgmgmgmgmgmgmgmg
mg
mg
mg
mg
(BTEX)
mgmgmgmg
PAHs) mgmg
Tmg
mg
mgmgmgmgmgmgmgmgmg
mg
mg
w
with minimal oppoartments unless i
will be assessed a1999 – Amendme
oncentrations fromthe >C10-C16 fract
20
ent Criteria
Unit PQ
g / kg 3g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 1g / kg 0.g / kg 0g / kg 0
g / kg 2
g / kg 2
g / kg 9
g / kg 12
g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0
g / kg 0g / kg 0TEQ 0g / kg 0
g / kg 0
g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0
g / kg 0
g / kg 1
w / w 0.0
ortunities for soiindicated otherwiaccording to the ent 2013 Guidelin
m the C6-C10 fraction.
for Soil Inv
QL
3 .3 .3 .5 1 01 .5 .5
25 45 (0
25 110 (0
90
20
.1
.1 160 (0
.1
.3 40 (
.1
.1
.2
.8
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
1
001
l access; which iise. methodology de
nes i.e. NEPM (2
ction.
vestigation L
0 - <1m) 70 (1
0 - <1m) 240 (
0 - <1m) 220 (55
(0 - <1m) 60 (
ncludes dwelling
scribed in NEPC2013), and presen
Levels (SIL
SILs
5001 150 500
30,000 1,2002 1203 1,200
60,000
1m - <2m) 11
(1m - <2m) 4
2,5007
10,0007
0.56 (1m - <2m) 3
5 (0 - <1m)6 (1m - <2m) 9
36 - 4
4005
600
10 90
400 20 10 15
500 20 30
340
1
<0.001
gs with fully and p
C National Envirnted as a flowchar
Ls)
10 (2 to <4m)6
440 (2 to <4m
310 (2 to <4m
5 (2 to <4m)6
permanently pave
ronment Protectiort in Figure 1 of i
6
m)6
m)6
ed
on its
Environm110-112 AReport No
1 - Arsenic Sschedule B7)2 - Lead SILconsidered. S3 - Elemental4 - SIL is ba
B7 of NEP5 - Total PAapplication oreported in th6 – Value obclays and san7 – Value ob
6.2.2 G
Groundw
in Table
N
The gro
Cooks R
Analytic
to contam
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
SIL assumes 70%)
L is based on blooSite-specific bioal Mercury: SIL dsed on the 8 carcPM 2013)
AHs: HIL is basedof the total PAH he total PAHs sh
btained from NEPnd tained from NEP
Groundwat
water Invest
e 6-5 were:
NEPM (201
undwater w
River is co
cal methods
minant dete
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
% oral bioavailabi
od lead models (Iavailability may bdoes not address ecinogenic PAHs a
d on the sum of tSIL should consiould meet the B(a
PM 2013 Table 1
PM 2013Table 1 B
ter Criteria
tigation Lev
3) – Groun
within the s
onsidered to
s have been
ection limits
NSW 4
ility. Site specific
IEUBK for HILs be important and elemental mercuryand their TEFs (p
the 16 PAHs mosider the presencea)P TEQ SIL. NaA(3)Soil HSLs f
B(7) Managemen
a
vels (GILs)
dwater Inve
site is likel
o be a mar
selected to
s.
21
c bioavailability m
A, B and C and should be considy. A Site specificpotency related to
st commonly repe of carcinogenic apthalene reportedfor vapour intrusi
nt Limits for TPH
that would
estigation L
ly to flow i
rine feature
o be relevan
may be importan
adult lead modeldered where approc assessment shouo B(a)P adopted b
orted for contamPAHs and Napthd in the total PAHion, 0 to <1m in
H fractions F1 – F4
d be used for
Levels Table
into the Co
e, the Mari
nt for the se
t and should be c
l for HIL B whereopriate (refer scheuld be considered by CCME 2008 (
minated sites (Worhalene (the most H should meet thesand, considered
4 in soil for coars
r the investi
e 1C;
ooks River/
ne Water c
elected SILs
considered where
re 50% oral bioavedule B7)
d if elemental mer(Ref. Schedule
rld Health Organvolatile PAH). Ce relevant SIL.
d to be the most c
se grained soil te
igation and
/Alexandria
critera will
s and GILs
e appropriate (ref
vailability has bee
rcury is present.
nisation 1998). ThCarcinogenic PAH
conservative of si
xture
summarise
a Canal. Th
be applied
with respec
fer
en
he Hs
ilt,
ed
he
d.
ct
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 6-
ANAL
Heavy MArsenic IArsenic VCadmium
ChromiuCopper Lead MercuryNickel Zinc PetroleuF1* F2** F3 (>C16
F4 (>C34
PAHs Total PAHNaphthal
Benzo(a)p Notes: NR = no cuGILs are N(2000) 95%* = To obta**= To obt# = PetrolEnvironmepresented a 1 = NEPMconsidered 2 = GIL crmost consegroundwateconsidered
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
-5: Sum
LYTE Un
Metals III gV gm g
um ggg
y ggg
um Hydrocagg
6-C34) g
4 – C40) g
Hs gene g
pyrene g
urrently availabNEPM (2013) G% Freshwater Train F1 subtract tain F2 subtractleum Hydrocar
ent Protection (Aas a flowchart in
M (2013) ANZEbio-accumulati
riteria is NEPMervative of saner, as groundw.
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
mmary of Sit
nits Fresh
g/L 2g/L 1g/L 0.0
g/LNR (A
1 (Asg/L 1g/L 3g/L 0.0g/L 1g/L
arbons# g/Lg/Lg/Lg/L
g/L Ng/L 1
g/L N
ble published crGroundwater Inrigger values, uthe sum of BTE
t Naphthalene frrbon ContaminAssessment of Sn Figure 1 of itsECC/ARMCANive metals
M (2013) Grounnd, silts and c
water is present
NSW 4
te Assessme
Waters MaWa
24 N13 N06 1 0s Cr III) Cr V1) .4
3.4 406 1 011 8
1,0002 1,0002 NR2 NR2
NR N16
NR N
iteria. vestigation Lev
unless otherwiseEX concentratiofrom the >C10-Cnation will be Site Contaminas Schedule
NZ (2000) 99%
dwater HSLs foclays. This vat above 2m. Sh
22
ent Criteria
Marine Waters
MAHsNR BenzeNR Tolue0.7 Ethyl
27 Total 1.3 VOCs4.4 Aniline0.1 2,4-dic7 3,4-dic
15 1,2- dic1,3- dic1,4- dic1,2,3- t1,2,4- t1,3,5- t
NR 70
NR
vels for Fresh/Me indicated ons from the C6
C16 fraction. assessed acco
ation) Measure
% Freshwater tri
for vapour intrualue has been hould contamin
for GILs
ANALYTE
ene ene
benzene
Xylenes
e chloroanilinechloroanilinechlorobenzenechlorobenzenechlorobenzenetrichlorobenzetrichlorobenzetrichlorobenze
Marine Waters
6-C10 fraction.
ording to the 1999 – Amendm
igger values are
usion, Table 1Aused as an innation be iden
Units
g/Lg/Lg/L
g/L
g/Lg/Lg/L
e g/Le g/Le g/Lene g/Lene g/Lene g/L
(Table 1C), bas
methodology dment 2013 Guid
e used for Cadm
A(4) in Sand 2mnterim measuretified, soil vap
Fresh Wa
8002 NR NR
350 (as o-xy200 (as p-xy
8 7 3
160 260 60 3
85 NR
ased on ANZEC
described in Ndelines i.e. NEP
mium and Merc
m to <4m, consiement, for the pour measurem
aters MariWate
500NRNR
ylene) ylene) NR
NRNR15NRNRNRNRNRNR
CC/ARMCANZ
NEPC NationalPM (2013), and
cury, which are
idered to be theassessment of
ments should be
ine ers
0 R R
R
R R
50 R R R R R R
Z
l d
e
e f e
Environm110-112 AReport No
7.0 A
7.1 S
The wor
Table 7-
Ac
Fieldwor
Bores DrDepth
Rational
Soil Logg
Sample c
Field scr
Laborato
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
ASSESSME
SOIL INVEST
rk objective
-1: Soil
ctivity/Item
rk Date
rilled and Targ
le
ging
collection
reening
ory analyses
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
ENT METH
TIGATION
s and scope
Sampling M
11th Ap
get A total
Five bocapabilBH1, B
In orderthe EPAas well approxi
Seven (systemawalls, u
Stratigrmonitor
Soil cla(USCS)Append
At the f
the
ne
an
whco
Sample
All draiIonisati
Based oanalysebe analy
M
To
Be
Po
OrBi
As
In additthis replaborato
NSW 4
HODOLOG
e of works f
Methodolog
pril, 2014 (Soil a
of seven (7) tes
oreholes were drities until natur
BH2 and BH5 to
r to comply witA (1995) Samplas the EPA (19
imately 7 test lo
(7) separate tesatic, triangular underground an
raphy and any oring wells (if an
assifications and) and Australiandix E.
following depth
e surface of the
ar the top of na
nd lower part of
here any changntamination oc
es will be collec
in outlets in soiion Detector (PI
on the availableed in the laboratysed for a range
etals all
otal Petroleum H
enzene/Toluene
olycyclic Aroma
rgano Chlorinephenyls (OCP/
sbestos all
tion to these priport. The remainory analysis be
23
GY
for the soil i
gy
assessment wor
st boreholes we
drilled with a uteral soils or drillo allow for the i
th the minimumling Design Gu994) Minimum Socations would
st boreholes (Bsampling patter
nd overhanging
other relevant inny) will be reco
d descriptions wn Standard (AS
hs:
e fill material (0
atural;
f natural; or
ges in lithologyccurs or elevated
cted from the au
il samples colleID), to assess if
e PID results antory. At this stae of potential c
lowance 2 samp
Hydrocarbons (
e/Ethyl benzene
atic Hydrocarbo
e Pesticides, O/OPP/PCB)
lowance 1 samp
imary samples,ning soil samplerequired.
investigation
Details
rks).
ere drilled:
e mounted drillrefusal was en
installation of g
m sampling densidelines for a siSoil Sampling Pbe required.
H1 – BH7) wern, with allowaservices and ot
nformation duriorded by approp
were based on US) 4482.1-1997.
0.2-0.3 m)
(i.e. ‘clean’ nad photo-ionisat
uger using dedi
ected during thef volatile contam
nd field observaage, it is anticipontaminants of
ples/hole
(TPH) 1.5
e/Xylene (BTEX
ons (PAH) 1.5
Organo Phospallowance 1
ple/hole
QAQC samplees collected wil
n are summ
rig, and fitted wcountered, to a
groundwater mo
sity requiremenite area of 0.14Protocol for imp
ere selected usiance for structurher physical ob
ing drilling and priately qualifie
Unified Soil Cla Geological bo
atural soils are ion detector (PI
cated sampling
works will be minants are pre
ations, selected ated that selecte
f concern includ
5 samples/hole
X) 1.5 sam
5 sample/hole
horous Pesticisample/hole
es would be anall be kept on ho
marised in T
with push tube maximum dep
onitoring wells.
nts recommende4933 hectares (1
mported fill soils
ing a mixed judral obstacles (e
bstructions).
d the installationed personnel.
assification Sysore logs are pre
encountered), eID) readings ar
g equipement.
screened with aesent.
soil samples wied primary sam
ding:
mple/hole
ides and Poly
alysed as per Seold should furth
able 7-1.
th of 8m at .
ed under 1493.3m2) s,
dgemental / e.g. building
n of the
stem sented in
evidence of ea noted.
a Photo
ill be mples will
ychlorinated
ection 9 of her
Environm110-112 AReport No
Ac
Soil Sam
DecontamProcedur
Sample P
Samplingreinstatesampling
Quality CLaborato
7.2 G
The worTable 7-
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
ctivity/Item
mpling
mination res
Preservation
g locations ement after g
Control & ory Analysis
GROUNDWA
rk objective-2.
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
Soil samsupplie
The solwater, hpush tu
Samplethe labo
Soil cutexcavat
Samplincompac
Any exand remappropr
A numbtesting laboratosubmitt
ATER INVES
s and Scope
NSW 4
mples were colld acid washed,
lid flight drillinhowever the pube location.
es were stored inoratory. All sam
ttings were usedtion or soon to b
ng locations wocted to ensure th
cess spoil that cmoved from siteriate waste clas
ber of soil sampcomprised intraory field duplicted for analysis
STIGATION
e of Works
24
lected using dedsolvent rinsed
ng rods were decush tube capabil
n a refrigeratedmples were subm
d as backfill forbe excavated.
ould be reinstathis condition is
cannot be returne and lawfully dssification.
ples were subma-laboratory ducate tested by En
of previously-i
for the grou
Details
dicated nitrile gglass jars.
contaminated blities used dedic
d (ice-brick fillemitted and anal
r drilled boreho
ted to pre-invest maintained.
ned to the borehdisposed of by a
mitted for analysuplicates (‘field nvirolab Servicidentified PCOC
undwater in
gloves and place
etween samplincated HDPE pu
ed) chest, whilstysed within the
oles as the site w
tigation conditi
hole will be stoa licensed contr
sis by SGS Laboduplicates’) tes
ces (Envirolab).C.
nvestigation
ed into clean, la
ng locations wiush tube liners a
t on-site and in e required holdi
was in the proce
ions and be suff
ored in drums atractor following
oratories (SGS)sted by SGS an. Selected samp
n are summa
aboratory-
th potable at each
transit to ing period.
ess of
ficiently
t the site g
). QA/QC d inter-
ples were
arised in
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 7-
Activ
Date of Fie
Bores DrilDepth
Well Cons
Well Devel
Well Gaug
Well Purgitesting
Groundwa
DecontamiProcedure
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
-2: Grou
vity/Item
eld Work
lled and Targe
struction
lopment
ging
ing & field
ater sampling
ination e
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
undwater Sa
14th April
t InvestigatiMW3 respm BGL.
A total of tas part of tsite. ConstWell const2012. Rela
In summar
The monit
50 m3m w
base
gradeinterv
granucuttin
surfafinish
Well develrecharge premoval ofEnvironmesuspendedbecame drmonitoring
The depth were gaugpresence oPSH was dsampling.
The roundgroundwatbailer for eto the slogroundwatodours ormeasuremwere recorare detaile
Once eithewell was ptaken. Purwell (baserepresentatmeasurembailer to potential lo
Decontamindividual solution of
NSW 4
ampling Me
2014 (Groundw
ion boreholes utpectively) were
three (3) groundthe ESA works,truction details truction was carative locations o
ry, Groundwate
oring wells wer
m, Class 18 PVwell screen seate
and top of each
ed sand filter wval;
ular bentonite wngs were used t
ce completion fhed flush with t
lopment was copost install, thenf water and accuental, model Sup
d sediment was y. No odours org wells MW1, M
to groundwatered for depth to
of phase separatdetected within
d one (1) grounter monitoring weach well. Meaow recovery oter was observe
sheens were ents for Dissolvrded during bord in Section .9.
er three well vopurged dry, the rging continuedd on temperatutive groundwatents were recolaboratory-preposs of volatiles
ination was notwell. The wate
f potable water
25
ethodology
water Sampling
utilised for the sdrilled using a
ndwater monitor, and were utilidocumented by
arried out in genof the groundw
er wells were in
re constructed a
VC threaded, maed from the bas
h well was seale
was used within
was applied aboto backfill the b
for the wells invthe slab level or
onducted for ean agitated usingumulated sedim
uper Twister). Pobserved (i.e. ar sheens were nMW2 and MW3
r (SWL) was mgroundwater an
ted hydrocarbonany of the grou
ndwater monitwells at the site
asurement of waof groundwatered to be orang
noted as preved Oxygen (Dre purging. The.2.
olumes had beenwell was left tod until field paure and EC for ter quality had borded. Groundwpared containeduring samplin
t required on mer level probe anand Decon 90,
Details
)
oil assessment drill rig with so
ring wells instalsed for the purpy EI’s field envineral accordancater monitoring
nstalled at appro
as follows:
achine-slotted sse of well;
ed with a UPVC
bore annulus to
ove annular sandbore annulus to j
volved either a r a stickup pipe
ach well followig a dedicated HDment using a 12Pumping was coafter removal ofnoted as present3.
measured at eachnd a transparenns (PSH) prior tundwater monit
oring event (Ge was undertakeater quality parr within the mge in colour wisent in any o
DO), Electrical Cpurged volume
n purged or in to recover, then rameters indicasimilarities be
been achieved twater samples rs, using a lo
ng.
most sampling eqnd exterior of thfollowed by a r
(BH1, BH2 andolid-flight auger
lled during the pose of assessinironmental sciee with the stand
g wells are illust
oximately 8 m b
screen and casin
C cap;
o approximately
d filter to seal thjust below grou
steel gatic cove.
ing installation.DPE disposableV, HDPE subm
ontinued until nf between 3 andt during the dev
h well prior to snt HDPE bailer wto the commenctoring wells at t
GME) involvingen on 14th Aprilameters was co
monitoring welth poor clarity
of the groundwConductivity (Ee removed from
the instance of sfield groundwaated an influx otween wells), tto a practical exwere then colw flow attach
quipment as it whe water qualityrinse of potable
d BH5 being Mer to depths of a
investigation wng groundwaterentist is presentedards describedstrated in Figur
bgl, seated in si
ng, with slotted
y 500mm above
he screened intund level; and
er set in neat ce
. The wells were bailer, followe
mersible bore puno further reducd 5 well volumevelopment of gr
sampling. Moniwas used to viscement of well the time of deve
g the purging ail 2014 using a onducted post wll. For each mand a high se
water monitoriEC) and pH of tm each well and
slow recoverinater monitoring of fresh groundtherefore it wasxtent, and final llected by direhment (‘nib’) t
was dedicated ty kit probes wee water between
MW1, MW2 andapproximately 8
which occurred r quality at the ed in Table 9-3
d in LWBC, e 2.
ilty clays.
d intervals, with
e top of screen
erval and drill
ement and
re left to ed by the ump (Proactivetion in
es), or the well roundwater
itoring wells sually assess thepurging. No
elopment or
and sampling odedicated HDP
well purging, dumonitoring weldiment load. Ning wells. Fiethe purged wat
d field test resul
g wells, once thparameters wer
dwater within ths considered thphysio-chemic
ect transfer fromto minimise th
o each re washed in a n measurements
d 8
3.
h
e
e
of PE ue ll,
No ld er lts
he re he
hat cal m he
s
Environm110-112 AReport No
Activ
Sample Pr
Sample Tr
Groundw
laborator
contamin
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
vity/Item
reservation
ransport
water samp
ry analyse
nants of con
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
at differen
Sample co one,
two,
one 2
Samples fofilled withtransit to th
After sampChain-of-CEnvirolab Advice (SRof SRA an
ples were c
s on repre
ncern.
NSW 4
t sampling loca
ontainers were s1 litre amber gl
40ml glass vial
250mL, HDPE b
or metals analysample to the b
he laboratory.
pling, refrigeraCustody (COC)
Services Pty LRA) was provid
nd COC certific
collected fr
esentative s
26
ations.
supplied by the lass, acid-washe
ls, pre-preserve
bottle, pre-pres
sis were field-fbrim then cappe
ated sample ch) procedures. Ltd (Envirolabded by each labates are present
rom each g
samples pr
Details
laboratory withed and solvent-
d with dilute hy
served with dilu
filtered using 0.ed and stored in
ests were transInter-laboratory
b) for inter-labboratory to docted in Appendi
groundwate
roposed to
h the following rinsed bottle;
ydrochloric acid
ute nitric acid (1
45 µm pore-sizn ice-brick filled
sported to SGSy duplicate (ILoratory QA/QCument sample ix D.
er monitorin
be conduc
preservatives:
d, Teflon-sealed
1 mL).
ze filters. All cod chests on-site
S Australia PtyLD) samples weC analysis. A condition upon
ng well lo
cted for th
d; and
ontainers were e and during
Ltd using striere forwarded tSample Receip
n receipt. Copie
ocation, wit
he identifie
ict to pt es
th
ed
Environm110-112 AReport No
8.0 D
8.1 Q
For the
samples
laborator
Details o
for the d
Table 8-
Data
Re
Calcula
The RPD
RPD =
CO = ConCR = Con
Calcula
The trip s
X x 100
T
X = Obse
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
DATA QUA
QUALITY C
purpose of
for analys
ry, Envirol
of the field
data presente
-1: Sam
a Quality Obj
Accuracy
Precision
epresentativen
Completenes
tion of Rel
D values were
([CO – CR
(CO +2
ncentration oncentration o
tion of Spik
spike sample
0 %
erved value o
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
ALITY AS
ONTROL PR
f assessing
sis. The pr
lab Service
and laborat
ed in Table
mpling Data
jective
L
ness
ss
ative Perce
e calculated u
R] x 100) + CR) 2
obtained fromobtained from
ke Recover
e recovery va
of measurem
NSW 4
SESSMEN
ROGRAM
the quality
rimary labo
es Pty Ltd
tory QC sam
e 8-1 below.
Quality Ind
Dat
Field – Trip
Laboratory –
Field – Blin
Laboratory – L
Field – Trip
Labo
entage Diffe
using the fol
m the primarym the blind re
ry
alues were ca
ment. T = T
27
NT
y of data p
oratory, SG
(Envirolab
mples are pr
.
dicators
ta Quality In
p spike (labor
– Laboratory c
matrix spik
nd replicate an
Laboratory du
spike duplic
p blank (labor
oratory – Meth
Completion (
ference (RP
llowing equa
y sample. eplicate or sp
alculated usin
True value.
resented in
GS Australi
b) also prep
rovided, wi
dicator
atory prepared
control spike a
ke
nd spilt duplica
uplicate and m
ate
ratory prepared
hod blank
(%)
PD)
ation:
plit sample.
ng the follow
n this ESA,
ia Pty Ltd
pared and
th the allow
d)
and
7
Presc
ate
matrix
< 3
d
Presc
d)
Presc
wing equation
EI collect
(SGS) an
analysed Q
wable accep
Acceptable R
70 – 130 % re
cribed by the
30 % relative p
difference (RP
cribed by the
< laboratory l
reporting (L
cribed by the
-
n:
ted field QC
d secondar
QC samples
ptance range
Range
ecovery
laboratories
percentage
PD [%])
laboratories
limit of
LOR)
laboratories
C
ry
s.
es
Environm110-112 AReport No
8.2 F
The fieldas follow
B
I
T
T
R
The resu
Blind Fi
One (1)
sample B
soil from
sampling
to avoid
metals w
D, Table
respectiv
Addition
sample G
avoid an
metals w
D, Tab
concentr
criteria,
locations
Inter La
One (1)
primary
describe
calculate
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
Field QA/Q
d quality asws:
Blind field d
nter laborat
Trip blank;
Trip spike; a
Rinsate Blan
ults of the Q
ield Duplic
blind field
BH6-1. The
m the same
g vessels. T
d any potent
with the RPD
e QC5), ind
ve sampling
nally one (1
GW1-1. Th
ny potential
with the RPD
le QC5),
rations were
the sample
s.
aboratory D
inter labor
sample BH
ed above, a
ed for the IL
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
QC Data Ev
surance/qua
duplicate;
tory duplica
and
nk.
QA/QC samp
cate
duplicate (B
e preparatio
e sampling
The duplicat
tial analytic
D values ca
dicated that
g locations.
) blind field
e duplicate
l analytical
D values ca
with the e
e at low lev
s collected
Duplicate
ratory dupl
H1-1. The
and analyse
LD sample w
NSW 4
valuation
ality control
ate;
ples includi
BFD) soil s
on of the BF
point with
te sample w
cal bias. The
alculated fou
t the sample
d duplicate w
sample was
bias. The B
alculated fou
exception o
vels and with
were repre
icate (ILD)
preparation
ed for TPH
were found
28
l (QA/QC)
ing the calcu
sample, bein
FD sample
hout mixing
was then pre
e BFD was
und to be w
es collected
water samp
s then prese
BFD was a
und to be w
of copper
h all other R
esentative of
) soil samp
n of samp
H, BTEX a
d to be withi
samples col
ulated RPD
ng sample B
involved th
g, before di
esented blin
analysed fo
within the Da
were repre
ple, being sa
ented blind
analysed for
within the Da
(120%) an
RPD values
f the water
ple, being s
le I1 was
and selected
in the Data
llected durin
D values are
B1, was coll
he collectio
ividing the
nd to the pri
or TPH, BT
ata Accepta
sentative of
ample GW-B
to the prim
r TPH, BTE
ata Accepta
nd nickel (
s were foun
present at t
ample I1, w
identical t
d heavy me
Acceptance
ing the ESA
presented i
lected from
on of a bulk
material in
rimary labor
TEX and se
ance Criteria
f the soils p
B1, was col
mary laborato
TEX and sel
ance Criteria
(67%). How
nd within the
the respecti
was collect
to the BFD
etals. The
e Criteria (A
A works wer
in Table 8-2
m the primar
k quantity o
nto identica
ratory (SGS
lected heav
a (Appendi
present at th
llection from
ory (SGS) t
lected heav
a (Appendi
wever thes
e acceptanc
ive samplin
ted from th
D sample a
RPD value
Appendix D
re
2.
ry
of
al
S)
vy
ix
he
m
to
vy
ix
se
ce
ng
he
as
es
D,
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table Q
homogen
Append
volatiles
represen
Trip Bla
No trip b
laborator
Trip Sp
No trip s
laborator
Rinsate
One (1)
selected
exceptio
unlikely
procedur
Assessm
All soil
observab
Ranking
recorded
The FCR
0 - for s
1 - for s
2 - for s
3 - for s
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
QC5). The
nous, being
dix E). Furth
s within th
ntative of the
ank
blank samp
ry issues. H
ike
spike sampl
ry issues. H
Blank
rinsate blan
heavy met
on of some
to affect
res perform
ment of Fiel
samples w
ble signs of
g (FCR) Sy
d on test bor
R system wa
amples that
amples that
amples that
amples that
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
variance in
g consistent
her to this, s
he sample.
e soils prese
les were su
However, all
les were sub
However all
nk (RB) sam
tals. The RB
metals, how
the quality
med during th
ld QA/QC D
were classi
f contamina
ystem was
re logs.
as assigned
t did not dis
t displayed
t displayed
t display sig
NSW 4
n RPD can
with field
soil sample
Therefore,
ent at the re
ubmitted to t
l the BTEX
bmitted to t
the BTEX
mple was s
B sample re
wever for so
y of result
he field wor
Data
fied in the
ation based
applied to
to samples
splay any vi
slight visua
obvious sig
gnificant sig
29
n be explai
observation
s were plac
, EI conclu
espective sa
the laborato
X results wer
the laborato
results were
submitted to
esults were
oil metals r
ts. It was
rks had bee
e field with
on visual a
o each litho
on the follo
isual signs o
al signs of c
gns of conta
gns of conta
ined as the
ns and as de
ced directly
uded that
ampling loca
ory as part o
re below the
ory as part o
e below the
o the prima
reported b
results were
s therefore
en effective.
h respect t
nd odour as
ological so
owing basis
of contamin
ontaminatio
mination an
amination an
e soil samp
escribed in
into jars so
that the sa
ations.
of this inves
e adopted cr
of this inves
adopted cri
ry laborator
elow the la
e well below
concluded
o soil/fill c
ssessment.
il sample,
s:
nation or det
on and/or de
nd/or detect
nd/or detect
ples were n
the boreho
o as to reduc
amples col
stigation du
riteria.
stigation du
riteria.
ry for TPH
aboratory L
w the SIL a
d that deco
characterist
A Field Co
and FCR
tectable odo
etectable od
table odours
table odours
not perfectl
ole logs (Ref
ce the loss o
llected wer
ue to interna
ue to interna
H, BTEX an
OR with th
and therefor
ontaminatio
tics and an
ontaminatio
values wer
ours;
dours;
s; and
s.
ly
ef.
of
re
al
al
nd
he
re
on
ny
on
re
Environm110-112 AReport No
All sam
laborator
documen
The ove
assessme
the envir
Based on
out durin
8.3 L
To unde
as the s
operate i
the com
National
In relatio
each lab
fall outs
provided
8.3.1 S
All samp
D, Table
8.3.2 T
Practical
presente
8.3.3 M
Concent
laborator
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
mples, inclu
ries under
ntation were
erall compl
ent was con
ronmental c
n the result
ng the ESA
LABORATOR
ertake all an
econdary la
in accordan
mpetence of
l Associatio
on to contin
boratory’s Q
side the DQ
d to this effe
Sample Hol
ple holding
es QC1 and
Test Metho
l Quantitat
ed in Appen
Method Bla
trations of
ry PQLs an
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
uding field
strict Ch
e included i
leteness of
nsidered to b
condition of
ts of the fie
works to b
RY QA/QC
nalytical test
aboratory. S
nce with the
calibration
on Testing A
ngencies, sh
QC policy,
QOs, then sa
ect on the fi
lding Time
g times were
QC2.
ods and Pra
tion Limits
ndix D, Tabl
anks
all parame
nd were ther
NSW 4
QC samp
hain-of-Cust
in the respec
documenta
be adequate
f the site.
ld QA/QC
e appropria
ting, EI com
SGS and E
e guidelines
n and testin
Authorities (
hould the pr
respective t
ample heter
inal laborato
es
e within sta
actical Qua
for the te
les QC3 and
eters in m
refore within
30
ples, were
tody cond
ctive report
ation produ
e for the pur
data, EI co
ate and the r
mmissioned
Envirolab, b
s set out in
ng laborator
(NATA)-re
re-determin
tests are ac
rogeneity m
ory certifica
andard envir
antitation L
ested param
d QC4.
method blan
n the DAC.
transported
itions and
ts.
uced under
rposes of dr
nsidered th
results to be
d SGS as the
both establi
ISO/IEC G
ries”, condu
gistered pro
ed DQOs n
ccordingly r
may be assu
ate.
ronmental p
Limits (PQL
meters duri
nks during
d to the p
appropriat
the field p
rawing valid
e field QA/
acceptable
e primary la
shed analyt
Guide 25 “G
ucted all res
ocedures.
not be achiev
repeated. S
umed and w
protocols as
Ls)
ing the ass
the assess
primary and
ate copies
program of
d conclusio
/QC program
e.
aboratory an
tical labora
General requ
spective an
ved, in acco
Should the
written comm
s tabulated
sessments
sment were
d secondar
of relevan
f the subjec
ons regardin
mme carrie
nd Envirola
atories whic
uirements fo
nalyses usin
ordance wit
results agai
ment will b
in Appendi
of soils ar
e below th
ry
nt
ct
ng
ed
ab
ch
or
ng
th
in
be
ix
re
he
Environm110-112 AReport No
8.3.4 L
The Lab
and conf
8.3.5 L
The Lab
conform
LB0559
Howeve
8.3.6 M
The mat
DAC.
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
Laboratory
boratory Du
formed to th
Laboratory
boratory Con
med to the D
23.002 in S
er the labora
Matrix Spik
trix spikes
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
y Duplicate
uplicate Sam
he DAC.
y Control S
ntrol Sampl
DAC, with
SGS labora
atory results
kes
of the anal
NSW 4
e Samples
mples (LCS
Samples
les (LCS) fo
the except
atory referen
s for OCP w
lysis batche
31
S) for the an
or the analy
tion of Tetr
nce SE1212
were non det
es were wit
nalysis batc
ysis batches
rachloro-m-
26807 in w
tect and we
thin accept
hes were w
were withi
-xylene in l
which raised
ll below the
able ranges
within accep
in acceptabl
laborataory
d the limit
e SIL.
s and confo
ptable range
le ranges an
y QC sampl
of reporting
ormed to th
es
nd
le
g.
he
Enviro110-11Report
Table
Sam
ple
iden
tifi
cati
on
Intra-l
BH6-
B1
Inter-l
BH6-
I1
Intra-l
GW1
GW-B
Rinsat
R1 Note: aNS
onmental Site Assess12 Addison Road, Mt No. E22157 AA 2n
e 8-2: Summarpercenta
Des
crip
tion
laboratory Duplica
-1 Fill
BFD of BH6
RPD
laboratory Duplica
-1 Fill
ILD of BH6
RPD
laboratory Duplica
1 Groundwate
B1 BFD of GW
RPD
te Blanks
De-ionised waall soil analysis is rep
‘Not Sampled’ An
82.35 R
sment Marrickville NSW nd May 2014
ry of laboratoryage differences (
T
F1*
F2*
* ate - Soil
<25 <25
6-1 <25 <25
0 0
ate – Soil
<25 <25
6-1 <25 <50
NA NA
ate - Water
er <50 <60
W1 <50 <60
0.00 0
ater <50 <60ported in mg/kg and walysis was not perform
RPD exceeds 30-50
y results for BFD(% RPD)
TRH
F3
(>C
16 -
C34
)
F4
(>C
34 -
C40
)
5 <90 <120
5 <90 <120
0 0
5 <90 <120
0 <100 <100
A NA NA
0 <500 <500
0 <500 <500
0 0
0 <500 <500 waters are reported in µmed
% range referenced
D samples and I
BTEX
Ben
zene
Tol
uene
Eth
lb
<0.1 <0.1 <0
<0.1 <0.1 <0
0 0 0
<0.1 <0.1 <0
<0.2 <0.5 <
NA NA N
<0.5 <0.5 <0
<0.5 <0.5 <0
0 0 0
<0.5 <0.5 <0µg/L.
d from AS4482.1 (2
32
ILD samples fo
Eth
ylbe
nzen
e
Xyl
ene
(tot
al)
Ars
enic
0.1 <0.3 4
0.1 <0.3 5
0 0 22
0.1 <0.3 4
<1 <2 <4
NA NA NA
0.5 <1.5 <1
0.5 <1.5 <1
0 0 0
0.5 <1.5 <1
2005)
r Soil and Grou
Cad
miu
m
Chr
omiu
m (
Tot
al)
0.3 15
0.3 11
0 31
0.3 15
<0.4 14
NA NA
<1 <1
<1 <1
0 0
<0.1 <1
undwater, field Q
Heavy Metals
Cop
per
Lea
d
26 9 <
29 14 0
11 43
26 9 <
29 15 <
7 11
4 <1 <0
1 <1 <0
120 0
41 <1 <0
QC duplicates,
Mer
cury
Nic
kel
Zi
<0.01 56 4
0.01 52 5
0 7 1
<0.01 56 4
<0.1 61 3
50 NA
0.0001 4 2
0.0001 2 1
0 67 5
0.0001 2 7
with calculated
Zin
c
45
52
14
45
36
9
20
12
50
79
relative
Environm110-112 AReport No
9.0 R
9.1 S
Soil sam
0.2m to
signs of
fragmen
observat
No v
locat
PID
rang
readi
No f
Borehole
in Appen
9.1.1 S On the b
condition
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
RESULTS
SOIL RESUL
mples were
3.5m BGL
f contamina
nts, ash, cha
tions were n
visual and o
tions invest
VOC conc
ing from 0.
ings at each
fibrous boar
e logs were
ndix E.
Sub-Surfac
basis of obs
ns is presen
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
AND DISC
LTS
obtained fr
. All exam
ation (e.g.
arcoal, etc.)
noted.
olfactory ev
igated durin
centrations
.0 – 10 part
h soil sampl
rd, ash, char
e prepared f
ce Conditio
servations m
nted in Tabl
NSW 4
CUSSION
rom the test
ined soils w
hydrocarbo
) if any, an
vidence of
ng this asses
were detect
ts per millio
ing location
rcoal or slag
for all test h
ns
made during
le 9-1.
33
t bores BH
were evalua
on odours,
nd on the ba
hydrocarbo
ssment;
ted from so
on (ppm). A
n was comp
g was obser
holes and in
g the drilling
1 to BH7,
ated on a qu
oil staining
asis of the
on impacts w
oil samples
Analysis of
pleted by the
rved in any o
ncluded sam
g investigat
at various d
ualitative ba
g, petrochem
field-work
were noted
collected f
f soil sample
e laboratory
of the exam
mple descrip
tion, a summ
depths rang
asis for odou
mical filmi
findings, th
d at any of
from the te
es with the
y.
mined fill so
ptions and a
mary of site
ging betwee
ur and visua
ing, asbesto
he followin
the borehol
est borehole
highest PID
ils; and
are presente
e sub-surfac
en
al
os
ng
le
es
D
ed
ce
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 9-
Mater
Fill
Fill
Residual
Notes: 1 A
te Groundw
program
9.1.2 S
Laborat
Table 9-
Table 9-
Heavy M
Results
heavy m
TPHs an
Results o
adopted
PAHs
Results o
either no
Asbestos
No detec
samples.
Other O
Non-det
samples,
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
-1: Sum
rial Dep
0 to 0
0.2 to
Soil 0.5 (in
Approximate dest locations.
water/seepa
m.
Soil Labora
tory analyti
-2 and pres
-2 also inclu
Metals
of soil sam
metals to be b
nd BTEX
of the tested
human hea
of the tested
on-detectabl
s
ctable asbest
Organics
ectable con
, with all lab
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
mmary of Su
pth (m BGL
0.20 (in all bore
0.5 (in all bore
n all boreholes)(BH2)
depth below g
age was visu
atory Resul
ical results
sented in de
udes the ado
mples collect
below the a
d soil samp
alth based SI
d soil samp
le or trace c
tos concentr
ncentrations
boratory qu
NSW 4
ub-Surface C
L) 1
holes) Conc
eholes) SiltySilty
) to 8.0 Silty
ground level. R
ually identif
lts
for the rep
etail in copi
opted soil c
ted from th
adopted hum
les reported
ILs.
ples reported
concentratio
rations or tr
s of the s
uantitation li
34
Conditions
crete slab hards
y sand, coarse gy clay, low plas
y CLAYS, oran
Refer to boreh
fied at 6.5m
presentative
ies of the la
criteria.
he test boreh
man health b
d concentrat
d concentra
ons, being w
races of res
creened OC
imits being
Gener
stand.
grained, yellow ticity with trace
nge/red/grey, low
hole reports in
m in BH1, B
e discrete
aboratory an
holes repor
based SILs.
tions of the
ations of the
within the ad
pirable fibre
CP or OPP
within the
ral Descript
with traces of ses of sandstone
w to high plasti
Appendix B f
BH2 and BH
soil sample
nalytical rep
ted concent
screened fr
e screened P
dopted SILs
es were iden
P compoun
correspondi
tion
sandstone piece pieces.
icity plasticity.
for specific in
H5 during th
es are sum
ports in Ap
trations of
fractions to b
PAH compo
s.
ntified in th
nds were i
ing SILs.
es; or
nformation at
he field wor
mmarised in
ppendix G.
the screene
be below th
ounds to be
he tested so
identified i
rk
ed
he
oil
in
Environm110-112 AReport N
Table 9
Notes: All rBold / highHIL B NE # Th+ ThNL ‘N
risND ‘NN.A. Th
mental Site AssAddison Road
No. E22157 AA
9-2: Soil
results are recordhlighted values exEPC 1999 Ammehresholds are for Che Limit of Repor
Not Limiting’ If thsk for the given sc
Not detected’ i.e. ahe sample was no
Sample ID
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2
BH3-1
BH4-1
BH4-2
BH5-1
BH6-1
BH6-2
BH7-1
HIL B - Reside
HSL A & HSL
Soil tex
MResidential, park
Asbes
B
AsbesNon Bond
sessment d, MarrickvilleA 2nd Mary 20
l Laboratory
ed in mg/kg xceed the SILs endment 2013 ‘HIChromium VI. Itrting (LOR) has bhe derived soil vacenario, thereforeall concentrationst analysed
Sam
pling Depth
(@ m
BG
L)
0.2-0.3
0.6-0.7
0.2-0.3
0.6-0.7
0.2-0.3
0.2-0.3
0.7-0.8
0.2-0.3
0.2-0.3
0.5-0.6
0.1-0.2
ntial with minimal o soil access
B - Low - high dens
xture classification –
Management Limitskland and public opgrained soil texture
stos contamination Residential B
onded ACM (%w/w
tos contamination Hded / Friable Asbesto
e 14
y Results
IL B” Health Bast is assumed all dbeen raised due toapour limit exceede the limit is not ls of the compoun
Sam
pling Date
11/04/2014
7/03/2014
7/03/2014
6/03/2014
6/03/2014
6/03/2014
6/03/2014
6/03/2014
6/03/2014
7/03/2014
7/03/2014
opportunities for
sity residential.
–Sand 1
s – pen space, Coarse e2
HSL –
w)5
HSL for os (%w/w)5
sed Investigation detected Chromiuo inferences in theds the soil concenlimiting. ds within the ana
As Cd
<3 <0.3
5 <0.3
4 <0.3
7 0.3
5 <0.3
4 0.3
4 <0.3
<3 <0.3
4 0.3
4 <0.3
4 <0.3
500 150
Source depths (
Source depths (
Source depth (2
Levels applicablum is Chromium (e sample matrix ntration at which
alyte group were f
Heav
Cr Cu
8.7 3.2
16 3.3
10 9.2
23 3.7
14 13
12 16
18 4.8
7.7 9.2
15 26
18 3.6
15 7.8
500 Cr(VI)
30,000
(0 m to <1 m. BG
(1 m to <2 m. BG
2m to <4 m. BGL
le for residential (VI), as Chromium
the pore water ph
found to be below
vy Metals
Pb Hg
5 <0.01
11 <0.01
30 0.04
15 <0.01
19 0.02
20 0.01
9 <0.01
10 <0.01
9 <0.01
12 0.01
23 0.02
0 1,200 120
GL)
GL)
L)
exposure settingsm (III) would be
hase cannot disso
w the laboratory l
Ni Z
1 8 7
1 1.7 7
4 5.9 5
1 1.5 2
2 15 2
30 3
1 5.2 5
1 19 2
1 56 4
2.8 6
2 7.6 1
0 1,200 60
s with minimal optoo unstable to ex
olve any more of t
limits of detection
Zn
Carcinogenic P
AH
s (as B
(α)P T
EQ
)***
.8 <0.2
.6 <0.2
51 <0.2
23 <0.2
28 <0.2
1 <0.2
.8 <0.2
27 <0.2
45 <0.2
.3 <0.2
9 2.9
,000 4
pportunities for soxist under norma
the individual ch
n
PAHs
Total P
AH
s
Benzo(α)pyrene
<0.8 <
<0.8 <
1.1 0
<0.8 <
1.5 0
<0.8 <
<0.8 <
<0.8 <
<0.8 <
<0.8 <
20
400
35
oil access, includal circumstances.
emical, i.e. where
Benzo(α)pyrene
Naphthalene
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
0.1 <0.1
2 <0.1SILs
3
NL
NL
ding dwellings wit
e the soil vapour
Benzene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
th fully and perm
is at equilibrium
BTEX
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
<0.1 <0
160 5
220 N
310 N
manently paved ya
with the pore wa
Ethylbenzene
Total X
ylenes
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
0.1 <0.3
55 40
NL 60
NL 95
ard space such as
ater, then the soil
F1*
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
45
70
110
700
s high rise buildin
vapour source ca
TPHs
F2**
F3 (>
C16 -C
34 )
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 <90
<25 140
110
240
440
1000 2500
ngs and apartmen
annot exceed a lev
F4 (>
C34 -C
40 )
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
0 10000
nts.
vel that would re
OC
Ps
OPPs
ND ND
N.A. N.A.
ND ND
N.A. N.A.
ND ND
ND ND
N.A. N.A.
ND ND
ND ND
N.A. N.A.
ND ND
NR NR
sult in the maxim
Total P
CB
s
ND
N.A.
ND
N.A.
ND
ND
N.A.
ND
ND
N.A.
ND
1
mum allowable va
A
sbestos
ND
N.A.
ND
N.A.
ND
ND
N.A.
ND
ND
N.A.
ND
0.04
0.001
apour
Environm110-112 AReport No
9.1.3 D
On revie
analytes
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
Discussion
ew of the so
are within
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
of Soil Res
oil results a
the SILs.
NSW 4
ults
as a whole,
36
it appears tthat the conncentrations
s of all of thhe reported
Environm110-112 AReport No
9.2 G
9.2.1 G
During t
groundw
Figure 2
Table 9-
Table 9-
Well ID
MW1
MW2
MW3
9.2.2 G
Groundw
well loc
groundw
field wo
Prior to
standing
well was
sampling
Total di
paramete
Final pu
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
GROUNDWA
Groundwat
the drilling
water monit
2. Constru
-3.
-3: Grou
Ground
Bore D
(m BG
8
8.1
8.04
Groundwat
water purgi
cations MW
water monito
rk was com
the comme
g water leve
s then purge
g. Field me
issolved so
ers were rec
urge results a
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
ATER RESUL
ter Monitor
g works con
toring well
uction detai
undwater M
dwater
Depth
GL)
1
45
ter Field O
ng and sam
W1 to MW
oring wells
mpleted.
encement o
el meter to
ed to remov
asurements
lids (TDS)
corded, foll
are summar
NSW 4
LTS
ring Well C
nducted by
s identified
ils of each
Monitoring W
Screen Interv
(m BGL)
5.0 – 7.0
5.1 – 8.1
5.045 – 8.04
bservation
mpling occu
W3. Groundw
MW1 to M
f sampling,
determine
ve stagnant
for water t
, and pH o
owed by the
rised with a
37
Constructio
y EI, boreho
d as MW1
groundwate
Well Constr
val L
45
ns
urred on the
water mon
MW3 durin
, standing w
the depth
water using
temperature
of the purg
e collection
all field mon
on
oles BH1,
to MW3 r
er monitori
ruction Deta
Lithology Scree
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
e 14th April
itoring wel
ng the 11th A
water level
of local gro
g hand baile
e, Electric C
ged ground
n of represen
nitoring data
BH2 and B
respectively
ng well are
ails
ened
l 2014, at g
ll developm
April 2014
measureme
oundwater w
ers and allow
Conductivity
dwater were
ntative grou
a in Table 9
BH5 were
y, located a
e summaris
groundwater
ment was c
installation
ents were ta
within each
wed to rech
y (EC), Tot
e collected
undwater sa
9-4.
converted t
as shown i
sed below i
r monitorin
conducted a
n works afte
aken using
h well. Eac
harge prior t
tal Dissolve
. Final fiel
mples.
to
in
in
ng
at
er
a
ch
to
ed
ld
Environm110-112 AReport No
Table 9-
Well ID
MW1
MW2
MW3
Overall,
be slight
9.2.3 G
Based o
collected
groundw
was con
site, and
9.2.4 G
Laborato
copies o
relevant
River) i
disturbed
With ref
compoun
assessme
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
-4: Field
SWL (mBTOC)
0.652
0.729
1.232
field groun
tly acidic (p
Groundwat
on the relat
d on 14th A
water flow i
nsidered that
d is consider
Groundwat
ory results
of the labora
groundwat
is marine, m
d systems w
ference to
nds were fo
ent.
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
d-based gro
Temp oC
pH
20.79 5.1
19.97 6.0
21.59 6.5
ndwater para
pH 5.11 to 6
ter Flow Di
tive water
April 2014,
is in an sou
t Cooks Riv
red to be a m
ter Analyti
for the ana
atory analyt
ter investiga
marine wat
were applied
Table 9-5,
ound to be b
NSW 4
undwater m
H EC
(µS/cm
11 3961
01 823
55 742
ameters rev
6.55) and fre
irection
levels obta
and the lo
uth, south e
ver shall be
marine wate
cal Results
alysed grou
tical reports
ation criteri
ter investig
d.
all reporte
below the g
38
measuremen
m) TDS (ppm)
2361
494
466
vealed the gr
esh to brack
ained using
ocal topogr
east towards
e the receiv
er feature.
s
undwater sa
s attached a
ia (GIL). A
gation level
ed concentr
groundwater
nts
DO (ppm)
Pur
0.15
2.77
0.35
roundwater
kish (EC ran
standing w
raphy of th
s Cooks Riv
ving water b
amples are
as Appendix
As the clos
ls applicabl
rations of T
r investigati
rge Vol. (L)
O(
80L No
30L No
25L No
present at t
nging from
water levels
he site, the
ver/Alexand
body of grou
summarise
x G. Table
est receivin
le to typica
TRH fractio
ion levels (G
Odour (Y/N)
o odour se
cla
o odour se
cla
o odour se
cla
the site is co
742 to 3961
s from MW
suggested
dria Canal.
undwater p
ed in Table
e 9-5 also in
ng water bo
al slightly-m
ons, BTEX
GILs) adop
AdditionalComments
Red/brown, lowediment load, pority, high recov
no sheen
Red/brown, lowediment load, poarity, low recov
no sheen
Red/brown, lowediment load, poarity, low recov
no sheen
onsidered to
1 µS/cm).
W1 to MW
direction o
Therefore
present at th
e 9-5, with
ncludes the
ody (Cooks
moderately
X and PAH
pted for this
w oor very,
w oor ery,
w oor ery,
o
W3
of
it
he
Environm110-112 AReport No
The con
reported
copper, n
Although
investiga
includin
concentr
structura
attributa
Furtherm
not exce
are who
within b
metropo
It can b
immedia
as a slig
condition
material
environm
therefore
9.2.4 D
EI notes
be above
separate
to be pre
appropri
consider
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
ncentrations
d to be belo
nickel and z
h no speci
ation, these
g building
rations wer
al metal coa
able to the
more given
eeding the a
olly derived
background
olitan ground
be inferred
ate threat to
ght exceeda
ns, in the ab
s, the ident
mental conc
e considered
Discussion
that the sta
e the screen
d hydrocarb
esent at 6.5
iate at the t
red unlikely
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
of heavy
ow the ado
zinc in all th
ific, potenti
metals are
wirings and
re potential
atings, or w
on-site us
that backgr
adopted SIL
d from the s
fluctuation
dwater catc
that the de
o human hea
ance of the
bsence of c
tified groun
cern and fu
d unwarrant
of Groundw
anding wate
ned interval
bons (PSH)
5m BGL, th
time of inst
y that PSH w
NSW 4
metals repo
opted criteri
he samples.
ial sources
commonly
d pipes. It w
ly the resu
water leakag
es of these
round soil l
L criteria it
subject site
s of natural
hment area
etected grou
alth or the e
trigger val
ontaminate
ndwater con
further grou
ted.
water Resu
er levels wit
ls at 0.652 t
) at this loc
herefore the
allation. Du
would be pr
39
orted within
ia with the
of copper
y found in st
was consid
ult of long-
ge from serv
e materials
levels for th
t is therefor
. The detec
lly occurrin
.
undwater le
environmen
lue, or repr
d fill/soils a
ncentrations
undwater in
ults
thin all the g
to 0.729, wh
cation. Duri
e screening
ue to the ab
resent.
n groundwa
exception
r, zinc or n
tructures an
dered that th
-term weath
vices in the
during th
hese heavy
re considere
cted levels
ng levels for
evels of th
nt. In either
resentative o
and all othe
s are not co
nvestigation
groundwate
hich could r
ng drilling,
level of 4 –
bsence of T
ater sample
of some m
nickel were
nd pipes as w
he identified
hering of m
local area,
e operation
metals acro
ed unlikely
can be also
r these heav
ese heavy
r case, whet
of urban ba
er potential
onsidered to
n for dissol
er monitorin
result in the
groundwat
– 8m BGL
TPH concen
es GW1 – G
minor excee
e identified
well as met
d elevated
metal-based
and are no
nal history
ross the site
that the co
o considere
vy metals in
metals do
ther this res
ackground
on-site sou
o represent
lved heavy
ng wells we
e impairmen
ter seepage
was consid
ntrations at
GW3 were
edances for
d during th
tal materials
groundwate
d paints an
t necessaril
of the site
e were foun
oncentration
d to be we
n the Sydne
not pose a
sult is treate
groundwate
rces of thes
t a cause fo
metals wa
ere found to
nt of phase
was noted
dered to be
MW2, it is
he
s,
er
nd
ly
e.
nd
ns
ll
ey
an
ed
er
se
or
as
Environm110-112 AReport No
In light
confined
phenome
of the str
ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA
of the diffe
d water-bea
enon in wat
rata and the
essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014
erence in wa
aring zone w
ter-bearing
e presence o
NSW 4
ater level el
within the u
zones withi
of structural
40
levations, it
underlying
in the lithol
l discontinui
t is likely th
strata. We
logy of the
ities within
hat groundw
note this is
site, due to
the formati
water is pres
s a common
o differentia
ion.
sent within
nly observe
al weatherin
a
ed
ng
E1R
T
NALN**1 2 3
4
5 6 H
Environmental Site A110-112 Addison RoReport No. E22157 A
Table 9-5: Su
Sample Identification
GW1 GW2 GW3
GIL*
Notes: All GIL values sourceLevels for Soil and GrNR = No current publi = To obtain F1 subtr* = To obtain F2 subt= Values have been c= Figure may not pro= Chemical for which
= NEPM (2013) Tabexceedances be iden= NEPM (2013) Gro= NEPM (1999) Grou
Highlighted Bold indi
Assessment oad, Marrickville AA 2nd May 2014
ummary of Grou
As Cd Cr
<1 <1 <1 <1 <0. <1 <1 0.2 <1
NR 0.7 272 (Cr 4.42 (Cr
ed from National Envroundwater, (NEPC) Iish criterion ract the sum of BTEXtract Naphthalene frocalculated using a harotect key species fromh possible bioaccumu
ble 1A(4) Groundwatentified, soil vapour assoundwater Investigatioundwater Investigatioicate analyte concentr
undwater Labora
Heavy Metals
Cu Pb
4 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <
III) VI)
1.31 4.41
vironment Protection Investigation levels ap
X concentrations from m the >C10-C16 fractio
rdness of 30mg/L CaCm chronic toxicity, refeulation and secondary
er HSLs for vapour insessments should be uon Levels for drinkingon Levels for the proteration value exceedin
atory Analysis R
Hg Ni Zn
<0.0001 4 20 <0.0001 14 34 <0.0001 17 49
0.13 71 152
(Assessment of Site pply to Marine Water
the C6-C10 fraction. on. CO3refer to ANZECCfer to ANZECC & AR
poisoning effects sho
ntrusion at the contamundertaken. g water quality, basedection of freshwater ag the adopted criteria
41
Results – Heavy M
PAHs
Total P
AH
s
Benzo(α)pyrene
Naphthalene
<1 <0.1 <0.<1 <0.1 <0.<1 <0.1 <0.
NR NR 50
Contamination) Mears for typical slightly-m
C & ARMCANZ (200RMCANZ (2000) for fould be considered, re
minant source depth ra
d on Australian Drinkaquatic ecosystems (Na
Metals, PAHs, B
BT
Nh
hl
Benzene
Toluene
1 <0.5 <0.5 1 <0.5 <0.5 1 <0.5 <0.5
0 0.84 NR4 3
sure 1999 – Amendmmoderately disturbed
00) for further guidancfurther guidance
efer to ANZECC & AR
nges in sands 4m to <
king Water GuidelinesNEPM 1999, Schedule
BTEX, TPHs
TEX
Ethylbenzene
o-xylene
m/p-xylene
<0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <1
005 350 200
ment 2013, Schedule systems.
ce on recalculating fo
RMCANZ (2000) for
<8m as groundwater w
s (NHMRC 2011).
e B1).
TPHs
F1* F2**
<50 <60 <<50 <60 <<50 <60 <
10004 10004
(B1) - Guideline on I
or site-specific hardne
r further guidance
was present between 5
F3 (>
C16 -C
34 )
F4 (>
C34 -C
40 )
<500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500
NR NR
Investigation
ss
5.442 and 4.272m BGGL, should
Environm110-112 MReport No
10.0 C
The prop
Site Ass
identifie
Assessm
The
vaca
The
Soil
down
The
natur
Resu
of th
adop
No d
With
TPH
were
asses
copp
Stage 2
risk of h
density r
For futu
appropri
Guidelin
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
CONCLUS
perty locate
sessment in
ed current
ment, it was
site is a sli
ated car was
site was fre
sampling an
n to a maxim
sub-surface
ral silty clay
ults of soil s
he screened
pted human
detectable a
h the except
H fractions,
e found to
ssment. Th
per, zinc and
ESA findin
harm to end
residential l
ure off-site
iate soil d
nes.
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
SIONS AND
ed at 110-11
n order to
and forme
concluded t
ightly skew
shing facility
ee of statuto
nd analysis
mum depth
e layers co
ys;
samples col
d heavy me
health base
sbestos or tr
tion of copp
VOC, BTE
be below
ese minor
d nickel.
ngs indicate
d users. It is
land use wit
disposal of
disposal in
kville NSW 4
D RECOM
12 Addison
assess the
r land use
that:
wed rectangu
y covering a
ory notices i
were condu
of 8m BGL
omprised of
llected from
etals TPH,
ed SILs.
races of res
per, nickel
EX and PA
the groun
exceedance
e that contam
s therefore c
th minimal
f site soils,
accordanc
42
MMENDAT
n Road, Mar
potential fo
es. Based o
ular shaped
a total area
issued by th
ucted at sev
L.
f fill mater
m soil test bo
BTEX, PA
spirable fibr
and zinc, a
AH compou
ndwater inv
es are likel
minants at
considered
access to so
waste class
ce with th
IONS
rrickville w
for on-site c
on the find
d block whi
of approxim
he NSW EPA
ven (7) targe
rials of var
oreholes BH
AH, OCPs,
res were ide
all reported
unds within
vestigation
ly due to th
the site are
that the site
oil.
sification te
he DECCW
as the subje
contaminati
dings of th
ch was foun
mately 1,49
A/DECC;
eted test bor
rious comp
H1 to BH7
OPPs and
ntified in th
concentrati
n groundwa
levels (GI
he natural
unlikely to
e is suitable
esting is rec
W (2009)
ect of an En
ion associa
his Environ
und to be oc
93.3m2.
re locations
position wh
reported co
PCBs to b
he tested soi
ions of Hea
ater sample
ILs) adopte
background
o represent
e for future
commended
Waste Cla
nvironment
ated with th
nmental Sit
ccupied by
(BH1-BH7
ich overlay
oncentration
be below th
il samples.
avy Metals,
s collected
ed for this
d levels of
a significan
proposed h
d to enable
assification
al
he
te
a
7)
ys
ns
he
f
nt
hi
Environm110-112 MReport No
11.0 S
The find
used in
soil sam
condition
investiga
While n
liability
agencies
resulting
Despite
contamin
investiga
natural
spillages
and asse
EI’s ass
program
the prop
nor does
the inves
This rep
any part
report do
This rep
for this
permissi
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
STATEME
dings presen
accordance
mpling from
ns across
ation progra
normal asse
for errors i
s (e.g. Cou
g from situa
all reasonab
nants measu
ated. In ad
conditions,
s of contam
essment.
essment is
m of surface
posal. Neith
s EI assume
stigations.
port was pre
of this repo
oes not purp
port and asso
assessment
ion by EI.
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
ENT OF LIM
nted in this r
with best i
m point loc
a site can
am.
ssments of
in any data
uncil, EPA,
ations outsid
ble care and
ured may no
ddition, site
chemical
minating sub
necessarily
and subsur
her EI, nor
e any liabili
epared for t
ort in any o
port to prov
ociated doc
t. The repo
kville NSW 4
MITATIO
report are th
industry pra
cations, it
nnot be ful
f data reliab
a obtained f
, etc.), stat
de the scope
d diligence,
ot be repres
characteris
reactions a
stances. Th
y based upo
rface sampl
any other r
ity for site
the above n
other contex
vide legal ad
cuments rem
ort shall no
43
NS
he result of
actices and
is conside
lly defined
bility have
from previo
tements fro
e of works o
the ground
sentative of
stics may ch
and other
hese change
on the resu
ing, screeni
reputable c
conditions
named clien
xt or for any
dvice.
main the pro
ot be repro
f discrete an
standards.
ered likely
d, no matte
been made
ous assessm
om sources
of this proje
d conditions
conditions
hange at an
events, e.g
es may occu
ult of the si
ing and che
onsultant, c
not observe
nt and no re
y other purp
operty of EI
oduced exce
nd specific s
Due to the
that all va
er how co
e, EI assum
ments condu
outside of
ect.
encountere
between the
y time in re
. groundwa
ur subsequen
ite investiga
emical testin
can provide
ed or access
esponsibility
pose or by o
I subject to
ept in full
sampling me
e site-speci
ariations in
omprehensiv
mes no resp
ucted on site
f EI, or d
ed and conc
e locations
esponse to
ater movem
nt to EI’s in
ation and t
ng which w
e unqualifie
sible during
y is accepte
other third p
payment of
and with p
ethodologie
fic nature o
n subsurfac
ve the fiel
onsibility o
e, regulator
evelopment
entrations o
sampled an
variations i
ment and o
nvestigation
he restricte
was set out i
ed warrantie
g the time o
ed for use o
parties. Thi
f all fees du
prior writte
es
of
ce
ld
or
ry
ts
of
nd
in
or
ns
ed
in
es
of
of
is
ue
en
Environm110-112 MReport No
REFER AustraliaFresh an DEC (20NSW Sit DECCWand Wat DMR (1Departm EPA (19New Sou EPA (19Wales, C NEPM (1999. Na
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
RENCES
an and Newnd Marine W
006) Soil Inte Auditor S
W (2009) Wter, New So
966) 1:250ment of Mine
994) Guideluth Wales, C
995) SampContaminate
(2013) Natiational Env
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
w Zealand EWater Qual
nvestigationScheme, 2nd
Waste Classifouth Wales,
0,000 Geologeral Resour
lines for AsContaminat
pling Designed Sites Un
ional Envirvironmental
kville NSW 4
Environmentity, Nationa
n Levels for Edn., NSW
ification GuDECCW 2
gical Seriesrces.
ssessing Serted Sites Un
n Guidelinnit, EPA 95/
ronmental PProtection
44
t and Conseal Water Qu
Urban DevW Dept. of E
uidelines. D009/806, D
s Sheet S1 5
rvice Stationnit, EPA 94
es. Enviro/59, Septem
Protection (Council, De
ervation Couuality Mana
velopment SEnvironment
Departmentecember, 20
56-2. Geolo
n Sites. En/119, Decem
onment Promber 1995.
(Assessmenecember 19
uncil, 2000gement Stra
Sites in NSWt and Conse
t of Environ009.
ogical Surve
nvironment mber 1994.
otection Au
t of Site Co999, Ammen
: Guidelinesategy, Octo
W, in Guideervation, DE
nment, Clim
ey of New S
Protection
uthority of
Contaminationdment 201
s for ber 2000.
elines for thEC, 2006.
mate Chang
South Wales
Authority o
New Sout
on) Measur3.
he
ge
s,
of
th
re
Environm110-112 MReport No
ABBRE AAS AHD AST ANZECB(a)P BGL BH BTEX COC DEC DECC DECCWDP DQO EI EIL EPA NSESA GC-ECDGC-FIDGC-MS HIL ICP-AESNATA NEPC NHMRCOCPs OEH PAHs PCBs PID PQL P&T QC RAC RAP RPD SILs SWL TP TPHs USEPA UST VOC UCL
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
EVIATION
AtomAustAbov
CC AustBenzBeloBoreBenzChemDepaDepa
W DepaDepoDataEnviEcol
SW EnviEnvi
D Gas D Gas
Gas Heal
S InduNatioNatio
C NatioOrgaOfficPolyPolyPhotPracPurgQualRemRemRelaSoil StanTest TotaUnitUndeVolaUppe
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
NS
mic Absorpttralian Heigveground Stralian and Nzo(a)Pyreneow Ground Lehole zene, Toluemical of Coartment of Eartment of Eartment of Eosited Plan a Quality Obironmental Ilogical Inveironment Prironmental ChromatogChromatogChromatoglth Based In
uctively Couonal Assocional Enviroonal Healthanochlorinece of Enviro
ycyclic Aromychlorinatedtoionisationtical Quanti
ge & Trap lity Control
mediation Acmediation Acative PercenInvestigatio
nding WaterPit
al Petroleumted States Energround Statile Organier Confiden
kville NSW 4
tion Spectroght Datum torage TankNew Zealane Level
ne, Ethyl beoncern EnvironmenEnvironmenEnvironmen
bjective Investigatio
estigation Lerotection AuSite Assessm
graph-Electrgraph-Flamegraph-Mass nvestigationuple Plasmaiation of Teonmental Prh and Medic Pesticidesonment andmatic Hydrod Biphenylsn Detector itation Limi
l cceptance Cction Plan
ntage Differeon Levels Test
m Hydrocarbnvironmenttorage Tankc Compoun
nce Limit
45
ometry
k nd Environm
enzene, Xyl
nt and Consnt and Climnt, Climate
ons evel uthority, Nement
ron Capturee Ionisation Spectromet
n Level a – Atomic Eesting Authorotection Cocal Research
d Heritage, Nocarbons
it
Criteria
ence
bons tal Protectiok nd
ment Conse
lene
servation, Nmate Change
Change and
ew South W
Detector Detector
ter
Emission Sporities, Austouncil h Council
NSW (form
on Agency
rvation Cou
NSW , NSW (form
d Water, NS
Wales
pectra tralia
merly DECC
uncil
rmerly DECSW (former
CW)
C) rly DECC)
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
kville NSW 4
46
FIGUREES
Mr John Francis Walsh
Stage 2 Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Site Locality Plan
Approved:
Approx Scale:
Date:
Drawn:
02-05-14
N.T.S
E.W.
1
Project: E22157 AA
Figure:
E.G.
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009
Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088
SITE
SITE
0
Approx. Scale (m)
5 10 20 30
MW1/BH1
MW2/BH2
MW3/BH5
BH7
BH6
BH4
BH3
Mr John Francis Walsh
Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville, NSW
Sampling Location Plan
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009
Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088
Approved:
Approx Scale:
Date:
Drawn:
02-05-14
1:250 @ A3
E.W
2
Project: E22157 AA
Figure:
E.G
Approx. site boundary
Figure:
Map Source: Nearmaps 2014
LEGEND
Borehole location
Monitoring well/Borehole location
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
NR A
kville NSW 4
ATLAS GRO
47
APPENDIX
OUNDWAT
X A
TER BORE SEARCH
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
kville NSW 4
LAND
48
APPENDIX
D TITLES S
X B
SEARCH
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
kville NSW 4
NSW W
49
APPENDIX
WORKCOVE
X C
ER SEARCHH
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
QUAL
kville NSW 4
LITY ASSUR
50
APPENDIX
RANCE / Q
X D
QUALITY CCONTROL
QC Sample Type Method of Assessment Acceptable Range
Blind Duplicates andSplit Samples
The assessment of split duplicate is undertaken by calculating the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) of the duplicate concentration compared with the primary sample concentration. The RPD is defined as:
| X1 - X2 |
RPD = 100 x ___________________
mean ( X1, X2)
Where: X1 and X2 are the concentrationsof the primary and duplicate samples.
The acceptable range depends upon the levelsdetected:
- 0-150% RPD (when the average concentration is <5 times the LOR/PQL)
- 0-75% RPD (when the average concentration is 5 to 10 times the LOR/PQL)
- 0-50% RPD (when the average concentration is >10 times the LOR/PQL)
Rinsate &Trip Blanks
Each blank is analysed as per theoriginal samples.
Analytical Result <LOR/PQL
Laboratory preparedTrip Spike
The Trip Spike is analysed afterreturning from the field and the %
recovery of the known spike iscalculated.
70 - 130%
Laboratory Duplicates Assessment of Lab Duplicate RPD as per Blind Duplicates andSplit Samples.
Lab Duplicate RPD < 15% (Inorganics) Lab Duplicate RPD < 30% (Organics) for sample results > 10 LOR
Surrogates
Matrix Spikes Laboratory ControlSamples
Assessment is undertaken by determiningthe percent recovery of the known surrogate spike (SS) or addition to the sample.
C - A
% Recovery = 100 x _______________
B
Where: A = Concentration of analyte determinedin the original sample; B = Added Concentration; and C = Calculated Concentration.
at least 2 SS recoveries to be within 70-130% subject to matrix effects (Organics)
80-120% (Inorganics / Metals)60-140% (Organics)10-140% (SVOC and Speciated Phenols)
If the result is outside the above ranges, theresult must be <3x Standard Deviation of theHistorical Mean (calculated over the past12 months).
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicates
Recovery RPD <30% (Inorganics & Organics)
Calibration Check Standars Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV)CCV must be within ±15% (inorganics) CCV must be within ±25% (inorganics)
Reagent, Method & Calibration Check Blanks
Each blank is analysed as per theoriginal samples.
Analytical Result <LOR/PQL
Note: PQL - Laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) or the minimum detection limit for a particular analyte. LOR = Limit of Reporting
Table QC5 - QC Sample Data Acceptance Criteria
Field QC
Laboratory QC
QA/QC PLAN
Uncontrolled document when printed Ref:MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022 QA QC Plan.doc/ver.6/18.09.2008/Page 1 of 3
AUSTRALIA - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - MANAGEMENT PLAN
QA QC PLAN
Approved: T. Pilbeam
SGS Environmental Services is accredited by NATA for Chemical Testing (Reg.No.2562) and Quality System compliance to ISO/IEC 17025. The QC parameters contained within are designed to meet NEPM 1999 requirements. Quality Control samples included in any analytical run are listed below.
Reagent/Analysis Blank (BLK)
Method Blank (MB)
Sample free reagents carried through the preparation/extraction/digestion procedure and analysed at the beginning of every sample batch analysis. A reagent blank is prepared and analysed with every batch of samples plus with each new batch of solvent prior to use.
Sample Matrix Spike (MS) & Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Sample replicates spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s). The spiking occurs during the sample preparation and prior to the extraction/digestion procedure. They are used to document the precision and bias of a method in a given sample matrix. Where there is not enough sample available to prepare a spiked sample, another known soil/sand or water may be used. A duplicate spiked sample is analysed at least every 20 samples.
Surrogate Spike (SS) At least one but up to three surrogate compounds are added to all samples requiring analysis for organics prior to extraction. Used to determine the extraction efficiency. They are organic compounds which are similar to the target analyte(s) in chemical composition and behaviour in the analytical process, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Where possible they are surrogate compounds recommended by the USEPA.
Control Matrix Spike (CMS)
To ensure spike recoveries can be determined for every batch of samples a control matrix is spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s) and then analysed. These results allow recoveries to be determined in the event that the matrix spikes are unusable (eg. matrix spikes performed on heavily contaminated samples). These are analysed at least every 20 samples.
Internal Standard (IS) Added to all samples requiring analysis for organics (where relevant) after the extraction process; the compounds serve to give a standard of retention time and response, which is invariant from run-to-run with the instruments. Where possible they are standard compounds recommended by the USEPA.
Lab Duplicates (D) A separate portion of a sample being analysed that is treated the same as the other samples in the batch. One duplicate is processed at least every 10 samples.
Lab Control Standards/Samples (LCS)
Prepared from a source independent of the calibration standards. At least one control standard is included in each run to confirm calibration validity. Thereafter they are analysed at least every one in 20 samples plus at the end of each analytical run. This data is not reported.
Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV) or
Calibration Check Standard & Blank
A calibration check standard or CCV and blank are run after every 20 samples of an instrumental analysis run to assess analytical drift.
Calibration Standards are checked old versus new with a criteria of ±10%
QA/QC PLAN
Uncontrolled document when printed Ref:MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022 QA QC Plan.doc/ver.6/18.09.2008/Page 2 of 3
AUSTRALIA - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - MANAGEMENT PLAN
QA QC PLAN
Approved: T. Pilbeam
Quality Assurance Programs are listed below:
Statistical analysis of Quality Control data (SQC)
Quality control data is plotted on control charts using the APHA procedure with warning and control limits at 2 and 3 standard deviations respectively. See also QMS Procedure “Statistical Quality Control”.
Certified Reference Materials (CRM/SRM)
Certified Reference Materials and Standards are regularly analysed. These materials/standards have certified reference values for various parameters.
Proficiency Testing
Regular proficiency test samples are analysed by our laboratories. SGS Environmental participates in a number of programs. Results and proficiency status are compiled and sent to participating laboratory post data interpretation. Failure to comply with acceptable values result in further investigations.
Inter-laboratory & Intra-laboratory Testing
SGS Environmental Services has schedules in the Quality Systems to participate in Inter/Intra laboratory testing conducted internally and by other parties.
Data Acceptance Criteria
Unless otherwise specified in
the method or method manual
the following general criteria
apply to all inorganic tests.
All recoveries are to be
reported to 3 significant
figures.
Failure to meet the internal acceptance criteria will result in sample batch repeats dependent upon investigation outcomes. For data to be accepted:
Inorganics (water samples)
• For all inorganic analytes the Reagent & Method Blanks must be less than the LOR.
• The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV) must be within
+15%.
• Control Standards must be 80-120% of the accepted value.
• The Calibration Check Blanks must be less than the LOR.
• Lab Duplicates RPD to be <15%*. Note: If client field duplicates do not meet this criteria it may indicate heterogeneity and shall be noted on the data reports for QC samples.
• Sample (and if applicable Control) Matrix Spike� Duplicate recovery RPD to be <30%.
• Where CRMs are used, results to be within + 2 standard deviations of
the expected value.
Inorganics (soil samples)
• For all inorganic analytes the Reagent & Method Blanks must be less than the LOR.
• The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV) must be within
+15%.
• Control Standards must be 80-120% of the accepted value.
• The Calibration Check Blanks must be less than the LOR.
• Lab duplicate RPD to be <30%* for sample results greater than 10 times LOR.
• Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS�/MSD) recovery RPD to be <30%. In the event that the matrix spike has been applied to samples whose matrix or contamination is problematic to the method then these acceptance criteria apply to the Control Matrix Spike (CMS/D).
• Where CRMs are used, results to be within ± 2 standard deviations of the expected value.
QA/QC PLAN
Uncontrolled document when printed Ref:MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022 QA QC Plan.doc/ver.6/18.09.2008/Page 3 of 3
AUSTRALIA - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - MANAGEMENT PLAN
QA QC PLAN
Approved: T. Pilbeam
Data Acceptance Criteria
Unless otherwise specified in
the method or method manual
the following general criteria
apply to all organic tests.
All recoveries are to be
reported to 3 significant
figures.
Organics
• Volatile & extractable Reagent & Method Blanks must contain levels less than or equal to LOR.
• The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV) must be within
+25%. Some analytes may have
specific criteria.
• Control Standards (LCS/CMS) and Certified Reference Materials (CRM) recoveries are to be within established control limits or as a default 60-140% unless compound specific limits apply.
• Retention times are to vary by no more than 0.2 min.
• At least two of three routine level soil sample Surrogate Spike (SS) recoveries are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as acceptance criterion. Any recoveries outside these limits will have comment.
• Water sample Surrogates Spike (SS) recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions, surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion. Any recoveries outside these limits will have comment.
• Lab Duplicates (D) must have a RPD <30%*.
• Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS�/MSD) recovery RPD to be <30%. In the event that the matrix spike has been applied to samples whose matrix or contamination is problematic to the method then these acceptance criteria apply to the Control Matrix Spike (CMS/D).
*Only i f resu l t s are a t leas t 10 t imes the LOR otherwise no acceptance c r i te r ia fo r RPD’s app ly . App l i ca t ion o f more s t r ingent c r i te r ia sha l l be app l ied for c lean water sample f rom water boards and any o ther nom inated c l ien t cont rac ts . Nom ina l 10xLOR c r i te r ia are dropped to 5xLOR where spec i f ied . �
Mat r ix do not read i l y equate to def in i t i ve recovery due to inherent mat r i x in ter ferences and thus do not
have recovery compl iance va lues set . As a gu ide inorgan ic recover ies shou ld be between 70-130% and for organ ics 60-130%
Batch Structure Summary An analytical batch is nominally considered as 20 samples or smaller. As a standard template the following should be used as a guide according to the above Quality Control Types:
1 MB 16 UNK_DUP 2 STD1 17 MS 3 STD2 18 MS_DUP 4 STD3 19 UNK 11
5 LCS 20 UNK 12
6 BLK 21 UNK 13
7 UNK 1 22 UNK 14
8 UNK 2 23 UNK 15
9 UNK 3 24 UNK 16
10 UNK 4 25 UNK 17
11 UNK 5 26 UNK 18
12 UNK 6 27 UNK 19
13 UNK 7 28 UNK 20 (SS if applicable) 14 UNK 8 29 UNK_DUP 15 UNK 9 30 CCV 16 UNK 10 (SS if applicable) 31 CRM / SRM / CMS / LCS
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
kville NSW 4
BO
51
APPENDIX
OREHOLE
X E
LOGS
-
-
F
VSt
F
0.20
0.50
2.30
6.50
8.00
-
-
M
M
W
-
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.50
2.30
6.50
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Sand, coarse grained, yellow with traces of gravel, noodour.
Silty CLAY, low to medium plasticity orange, with red mottling,no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, grey with red mottling,no odour.
Silty CLAY, low plasticity, pale gray, no odour.
Hole Terminated at 8.00 mTarget depth reached, converted in to a monitoring well
-
CI-ML
CI-CH
CL
BH1-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.8 ppm
BH1-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm
BH1-3 ES3.50-3.60 mPID = 0 ppm
14/0
5/14
Gatic cover inConcrete
Sand
50mm uPVCCasing
Bentonite
Sand50mm uPVCScreen
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH1/MW1Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
5 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
PIEZOMETER DETAILSID
MW1
Static Water Level
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MW
1
-
-
F
VSt
F
0.20
0.50
2.30
6.50
8.00
-
-
M
M
W
-
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.50
2.30
6.50
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Sand, coarse grained, yellow with traces of gravel, noodour.
Silty CLAY, low to medium plasticity orange, with red mottling,no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, grey with red mottling,no odour.
Silty CLAY, low plasticity, pale gray, no odour.
Hole Terminated at 8.00 mTarget depth reached, converted in to a monitoring well
-
CI-ML
CI-CH
CL
BH2-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.5 ppm
BH2-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm
BH2-3 ES3.50-3.60 mPID = 0 ppm
14/0
5/14
Gatic cover inConcrete
Sand
50mm uPVCCasing
Bentonite
Sand50mm uPVCScreen
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH2/MW2Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
5 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
PIEZOMETER DETAILSID
MW2
Static Water Level
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MW
2
-
-
St
0.20
0.40
2.00
-
-
M
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.40
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Silty CLAY, low plasticity, brown with traces ofsandstone gravel, no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, grey with red mottling,no odour.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 mTarget depth reached, backfrilled with drilling spoil.
-
CI-CH
BH3-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.5 ppm
BH3-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm
BH3-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH3Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
5 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
STRUCTURE ANDADDITIONAL
OBSERVATIONS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
-
-
St
0.20
0.40
2.00
-
-
M
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.40
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Gravelly Sand, medium grained, dark brown, with slighthydrocarbon odour.
Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, orange with redmottling, no odour.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 mTarget depth reached, backfrilled with drilling spoil.
-
CI-CH
BH4-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.4 ppm
BH4-2 ES0.70-0.80 mPID = 0 ppm
BH4-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH4Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
5 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
STRUCTURE ANDADDITIONAL
OBSERVATIONS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
-
-
F
VSt
F
0.20
0.50
2.30
6.50
8.00
-
-
M
M
W
-
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.50
2.30
6.50
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Sand, coarse grained, yellow with traces of gravel, noodour.
Silty CLAY, low to medium plasticity orange, with red mottling,no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, grey with red mottling,no odour.
Silty CLAY, low plasticity, pale gray, no odour.
Hole Terminated at 8.00 mTarget depth reached, converted in to a monitoring well
-
CI-ML
CI-CH
CL
BH5-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.2 ppm
BH5-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm
BH5-3 ES3.50-3.60 mPID = 0 ppm
14/0
5/14
Gatic cover inConcrete
Sand
50mm uPVCCasing
Bentonite
Sand50mm uPVCScreen
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH5/MW3Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
5 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
PIEZOMETER DETAILSID
MW3
Static Water Level
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MW
3
-
-
St
VSt
0.20
0.40
1.20
2.00
-
-
M
M
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.40
1.20
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Clayey Sand, dark brown, medium grained, with gracesof gravel, no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium plasticity, brown with red mottling, noodour.
Silty CLAY, high plasticity, grey with red mottling, no odour.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 mTarget depth reached, backfrilled with drilling spoil.
-
CI
CH
BH6-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 0.8 ppm
BH6-2 ES0.50-0.60 mPID = 0 ppm
BH6-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH6Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
5 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
STRUCTURE ANDADDITIONAL
OBSERVATIONS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
-
-
St
VSt
0.20
0.40
1.20
2.00
-
-
M
M
DT
AD
/T
0.20
0.40
1.20
Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.
FILL: Clayey Sand, medium grained, dark brown with tracesof gravel, no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium plasticity, brown, no odour.
Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, no odour.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 mTarget depth reached, backfrilled with drilling spoil.
-
CI
CI-CH
BH7-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.5 ppm
BH7-2 ES0.70-0.80 mPID = 0 ppm
BH7-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
GR
AP
HIC
LOG
PE
NE
TR
AT
ION
RE
SIS
TA
NC
E
RE
CO
VE
RE
D
ME
TH
OD
Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling
WA
TE
R
RLDEPTH
DE
PT
H(m
etre
s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
US
CS
SY
MB
OL
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST
TEST: BH7Environmental Site Assessment
110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW
Refer to figure 2
E22157 AA
Mr John Francis Walsh
Project
Location
Position
Job No.
Client
Contractor GEOHART
Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig
Inclination -90°
This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.
Sheet 1 OF 1
Date Started 11/4/14
Date Completed 11/4/14
Logged EW Date: 2/4/14
Checked EG Date: 2/4/14
EIA
LIB
1.0
1.G
LB
Log
IS
AU
BO
RE
HO
LE 3
E
2215
7 A
A B
OR
EH
OLE
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<Dra
win
gFile
>>
02/
05/2
014
16:2
6 8
.30.
003
Dat
gel
Lab
and
In S
itu
Too
l -
DG
D |
Lib
: E
IA 1
.01
2014
-01-
15 P
rj: E
IA 1
.01.
1 20
14-0
1-17
STRUCTURE ANDADDITIONAL
OBSERVATIONS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
SAMPL
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
LE RECEIP
kville NSW 4
PT ADVICE
52
APPENDIX
E & CHAIN
X F
N-OF-CUSTOODY CERT
TIFICATESS
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE
Client:
Environmental Investigations 9516 0722ph:
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street 9518 5088Fax:
Pyrmont NSW 2009
Attention: Emmanuel Woelders
Sample log in details:
Your reference: E22157, Marrickville
Envirolab Reference: 108161
Date received: 14/04/14
Date results expected to be reported: 23/04/14
Samples received in appropriate condition for analysis: YES
No. of samples provided 1 Soil
Turnaround time requested: Standard
Temperature on receipt (°C) 18.3
Cooling Method: Ice Pack
Sampling Date Provided: YES
Comments:
If there is sufficient sample after testing, samples will be held for the following time frames from date of receipt of samples:
Water samples - 1 month
Soil and other solid samples - 2 months
Samples collected in canisters - 1 week. Canisters will then be cleaned.
All other samples are not retained after analysis
If you require samples to be retained for longer periods then retention fees will apply as per our pricelist.
Contact details:
Please direct any queries to Aileen Hie or Jacinta Hurst
ph: 02 9910 6200 fax: 02 9910 6201
email: [email protected] or [email protected]
Page 1 of 1
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126867
CLIENT DETAILS
02 9516 0741
Email Email
Address
Project
Order Number
SGS Reference SE126867
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd -Marrickville
Client
Contact
Environmental Investigations
Administration Manager
Address Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
LABORATORY DETAILS
Laboratory
Manager
Telephone
Facsimile
Report Due Tue 22/4/2014
Facsimile
Telephone
Samples 4
02 9516 0722
Samples Received
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Tue 15/4/2014
SUBMISSION DETAILS
This is to confirm that 4 samples were received on Tuesday 15/4/2014. Results are expected to be ready by Tuesday 22/4/2014. Please quote
SGS reference SE126867 when making enquiries. Refer below for details relating to sample integrity upon receipt.
Sample counts by matrix 4 Waters Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 15/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.7°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes
Samples will be held for one month for water samples and two months for soil samples from date of report, unless otherwise instructed.
COMMENTS
To the extent not inconsistent with the other provisions of this document and unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing by SGS, all SGS services are rendered in
accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx as at the date of this document.
Attention is drawn to the limitations of liability and to the clauses of indemnification.
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126867
CLIENT DETAILS
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd -MarrickvilleEnvironmental Investigations ProjectClient
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Me
rcu
ry (
dis
so
lve
d)
in
Wa
ter
PA
H (
Po
lyn
ucle
ar
Aro
ma
tic H
yd
roca
rbo
ns)
in
Tra
ce M
eta
ls (
Dis
so
lve
d)
in W
ate
r b
y I
CP
MS
TR
H (
To
tal R
eco
ve
rab
le
Hyd
roca
rbo
ns)
in W
ate
r
VO
Cs
in W
ate
r
Vo
latil
e P
etr
ole
um
Hyd
roca
rbo
ns in
Wa
ter
001 GW1-1 1 22 7 9 12 8
002 GW2-1 1 22 7 9 12 8
003 GW3-1 1 22 7 9 12 8
004 GW-B1 1 - 7 9 12 8
No. Sample ID
The above table represents SGS Environmental Services' interpretation of the client-supplied Chain Of Custody document.
The numbers shown in the table indicate the number of results requested in each package.
Please indicate as soon as possible should your request differ from these details.
Testing as per this table shall commence immediately unless the client intervenes with a correction.
Page 2 of 216/04/2014
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126807
CLIENT DETAILS
02 9516 0741
Email Email
Address
Project
Order Number
SGS Reference SE126807
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-Marrickville
Client
Contact
Environmental Investigations
Administration Manager
Address Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
LABORATORY DETAILS
Laboratory
Manager
Telephone
Facsimile
Report Due Thu 17/4/2014
Facsimile
Telephone
Samples 13
02 9516 0722
Samples Received
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Mon 14/4/2014
SUBMISSION DETAILS
This is to confirm that 13 samples were received on Monday 14/4/2014. Results are expected to be ready by Thursday 17/4/2014. Please quote
SGS reference SE126807 when making enquiries. Refer below for details relating to sample integrity upon receipt.
Sample counts by matrix 12 Soils & 1 Water Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 14/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.6°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes
10 soil samples, which were not marked for analyses on the COC, have been placed on hold. These samples will not be processed.
Samples will be held for one month for water samples and two months for soil samples from date of report, unless otherwise instructed.
COMMENTS
To the extent not inconsistent with the other provisions of this document and unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing by SGS, all SGS services are rendered in
accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx as at the date of this document.
Attention is drawn to the limitations of liability and to the clauses of indemnification.
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126807
CLIENT DETAILS
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-MarrickvilleEnvironmental Investigations ProjectClient
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
OC
Pe
stic
ide
s in
So
il
OP
Pe
stic
ide
s in
So
il
PA
H (
Po
lyn
ucle
ar
Aro
ma
tic H
yd
roca
rbo
ns)
in
PC
Bs
in S
oil
To
tal R
eco
ve
rab
le M
eta
ls
in S
oil
by I
CP
OE
S f
rom
TR
H (
To
tal R
eco
ve
rab
le
Hyd
roca
rbo
ns)
in S
oil
VO
C’s
in S
oil
Vo
latil
e P
etr
ole
um
Hyd
roca
rbo
ns in
So
il
001 BH1-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
002 BH1-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8
003 BH2-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
004 BH2-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8
005 BH3-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
006 BH4-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
007 BH4-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8
008 BH5-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
009 BH6-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
010 BH6-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8
011 BH7-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8
012 B1 - - - - 7 9 12 8
No. Sample ID
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
The above table represents SGS Environmental Services' interpretation of the client-supplied Chain Of Custody document.
The numbers shown in the table indicate the number of results requested in each package.
Please indicate as soon as possible should your request differ from these details.
Testing as per this table shall commence immediately unless the client intervenes with a correction.
Page 2 of 414/04/2014
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126807
CLIENT DETAILS
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-MarrickvilleEnvironmental Investigations ProjectClient
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Fib
re I
de
ntif
ica
tion
in s
oil
Me
rcu
ry in
So
il
Mo
istu
re C
on
ten
t
TR
H (
To
tal R
eco
ve
rab
le
Hyd
roca
rbo
ns)
in W
ate
r
VO
Cs
in W
ate
r
Vo
latil
e P
etr
ole
um
Hyd
roca
rbo
ns in
Wa
ter
001 BH1-1 2 1 1 - - -
002 BH1-2 - 1 1 - - -
003 BH2-1 2 1 1 - - -
004 BH2-2 - 1 1 - - -
005 BH3-1 2 1 1 - - -
006 BH4-1 2 1 1 - - -
007 BH4-2 - 1 1 - - -
008 BH5-1 2 1 1 - - -
009 BH6-1 2 1 1 - - -
010 BH6-2 - 1 1 - - -
011 BH7-1 2 1 1 - - -
012 B1 - 1 1 - - -
013 R1 - - - 9 12 8
No. Sample ID
CONTINUED OVERLEAF
The above table represents SGS Environmental Services' interpretation of the client-supplied Chain Of Custody document.
The numbers shown in the table indicate the number of results requested in each package.
Please indicate as soon as possible should your request differ from these details.
Testing as per this table shall commence immediately unless the client intervenes with a correction.
Page 3 of 414/04/2014
SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126807
CLIENT DETAILS
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-MarrickvilleEnvironmental Investigations ProjectClient
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Me
rcu
ry (
dis
so
lve
d)
in
Wa
ter
Tra
ce M
eta
ls (
Dis
so
lve
d)
in W
ate
r b
y I
CP
MS
013 R1 1 7
No. Sample ID
The above table represents SGS Environmental Services' interpretation of the client-supplied Chain Of Custody document.
The numbers shown in the table indicate the number of results requested in each package.
Please indicate as soon as possible should your request differ from these details.
Testing as per this table shall commence immediately unless the client intervenes with a correction.
Page 4 of 414/04/2014
Environm110-112 MReport No
ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA
essment Road, Marrick
2nd May 2014
LA
kville NSW 4
ABORATOR
53
APPENDIX
RY ANALYT
X G
TICAL REPPORTS
SE126867 R0
Date Reported
0000080723Report Number
Contact
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
4
SGS Reference
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Manager
Laboratory
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd -Marrickville
02 9516 0741
02 9516 0722
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
Environmental Investigations
Emmanuel Woelders
Samples
Order Number
Project
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Client
CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS
22 Apr 2014
STATEMENT OF QA/QC
PERFORMANCE
SE126867 R0
COMMENTS
All the laboratory data for each environmental matrix was compared to SGS Environmental Services' stated
Data Quality Objectives (DQO). Comments arising from the comparison were made and are reported below.
The data relating to sampling was taken from the Chain of Custody document and was supplied by the Client.
This QA/QC Statement must be read in conjunction with the referenced Analytical Report.
The Statement and the Analytical Report must not be reproduced except in full.
All Data Quality Objectives were met (within the SGS Alexandria Environmental laboratory).
Sample counts by matrix 4 Waters Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 15/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.7°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
Page 1 of 1022/4/2014
SE126867 R0
SGS holding time criteria are drawn from current regulations and are highly dependent on sample container preservation as specified in the SGS “Field Sampling Guide for
Containers and Holding Time” (ref: GU-(AU)-ENV.001). Soil samples guidelines are derived from NEPM "Schedule B(3) Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially
Contaminated Soils". Water sample guidelines are derived from "AS/NZS 5667.1 : 1998 Water Quality - sampling part 1" and APHA "Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater" 21st edition 2005.
Extraction and analysis holding time due dates listed are calculated from the date sampled, although holding times may be extended after laboratory extraction for some
analytes. The due dates are the suggested dates that samples may be held before extraction or analysis and still be considered valid.
Extraction and analysis dates are shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria. If the sampled
date is not supplied then compliance with criteria cannot be determined. If the received date is after one or both due dates then holding time will fail by default.
HOLDING TIME SUMMARY
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312Mercury (dissolved) in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056229 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW2-1 SE126867.002 LB056229 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW3-1 SE126867.003 LB056229 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056229 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW2-1 SE126867.002 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW3-1 SE126867.003 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056051 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW2-1 SE126867.002 LB056051 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW3-1 SE126867.003 LB056051 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056051 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW2-1 SE126867.002 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW3-1 SE126867.003 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW2-1 SE126867.002 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW3-1 SE126867.003 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW2-1 SE126867.002 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW3-1 SE126867.003 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056062 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
22/4/2014 Page 2 of 10
SE126867 R0
Surrogate results are evaluated against upper and lower limit criteria established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). At least two of three routine level soil
sample surrogate spike recoveries for BTEX/VOC are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted
surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as an acceptance criterion. Water sample surrogate spike recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions,
surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion.
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end
of this report for failure reasons.
SURROGATES
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 70
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 70
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 76
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 80
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 84
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 92
d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 74
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 70
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 80
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 77
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 78
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 74
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 75
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 119
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 122
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 122
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 117
d8-toluene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 89
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 93
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 87
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 91
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 121
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 118
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 119
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 115
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 77
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 78
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 74
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 75
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 119
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 122
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 122
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 117
d8-toluene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 89
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 93
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 87
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 91
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 121
GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 118
GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 119
GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 115
22/4/2014 Page 3 of 10
SE126867 R0
Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined
method detection limit (MDL).
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
METHOD BLANKS
Mercury (dissolved) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056229.001 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001
LB056229.025 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056047.001 Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Fluorene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chrysene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) % - 98
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 96
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) % - 104
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056051.001 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5
LB056051.025 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056047.001 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200
VOCs in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056062.001 Monocyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 106
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 111
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 101
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 80
22/4/2014 Page 4 of 10
SE126867 R0
Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined
method detection limit (MDL).
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
METHOD BLANKS
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056062.001 TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 106
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 111
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 101
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 80
22/4/2014 Page 5 of 10
SE126867 R0
Duplicates are calculated as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit
(SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of
this report for failure reasons.
DUPLICATES
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126781.004 LB056051.014 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 -0.003 -0.014 200 0
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.005 0.004 200 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 0.174 0.182 200 0
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 0.582 0.558 190 0
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 1.188 0.972 108 17
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 -0.312 -0.332 200 0
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 2.305 2.05 200 0
SE126867.003 LB056051.028 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.2 0.2 65 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 2 2 76 2
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 10 10 25 5
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 55 56 24 2
SE126867.004 LB056051.029 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 1 1 112 1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 2 2 74 5
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 12 12 58 1
22/4/2014 Page 6 of 10
SE126867 R0
Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) results are evaluated against an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into the control during the sample
preparation stage, producing a percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For
more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB056047.002 Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 38 40 60 - 140 95
Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 40 40 60 - 140 99
Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 46 40 60 - 140 114
Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 36 40 60 - 140 89
Anthracene µg/L 0.1 36 40 60 - 140 89
Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 34 40 60 - 140 85
Pyrene µg/L 0.1 40 40 60 - 140 101
Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 41 40 60 - 140 103
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 82
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 82
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 78
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB056051.002 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 95
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 100
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 20 20 80 - 120 102
LB056051.026 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 94
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 103
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 100
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 99
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 104
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 20 20 80 - 120 101
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB056047.002 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 1200 1200 60 - 140 96
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 97
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 100
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 1100 1200 60 - 140 95
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 1200 1200 60 - 140 99
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 620 600 60 - 140 104
VOCs in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB056062.002 Monocyclic
Aromatic
Benzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115
Toluene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 100 90.9 60 - 140 115
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 93
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 95
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.0 5 60 - 140 101
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.4 5 60 - 140 109
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB056062.002 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 1000 946.63 60 - 140 110
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 850 818.71 60 - 140 104
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 93
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 95
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.0 5 60 - 140 101
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.4 5 60 - 140 109
VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 730 639.67 60 - 140 114
22/4/2014 Page 7 of 10
SE126867 R0
Matrix Spike (MS) results are evaluated as the percentage recovery of an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into a field sub -sample during the
sample preparation stage. The original sample's result is subtracted from the sub -sample result before determining the percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the
percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA/QC plan (ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the
end of this report for failure reasons.
MATRIX SPIKES
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126758.001 LB056051.004 Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 <0.1 20 98
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 19 <1 20 94
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 22 2 20 98
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 19 <1 20 93
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 25 <5 20 102
22/4/2014 Page 8 of 10
SE126867 R0
Matrix spike duplicates are calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The original result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike. The Duplicate result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike duplicate.
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit (SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of this report for failure reasons.
MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES
No matrix spike duplicates were required for this job.
22/4/2014 Page 9 of 10
SE126867 R0FOOTNOTES
Samples analysed as received.
Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.
QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QA/QC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:
http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf
① At least 2 of 3 surrogates are within acceptance criteria.
② RPD failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
③ Results less than 5 times LOR preclude acceptance criteria for RPD.
④ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to matrix interference.
⑤ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to the presence of significant concentration of analyte (i.e. the
concentration of analyte exceeds the spike level).
⑥ LOR was raised due to sample matrix interference.
⑦ LOR was raised due to dilution of significantly high concentration of analyte in sample.
⑧ Reanalysis of sample in duplicate confirmed sample heterogeneity and inconsistency of results.
⑨ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
⑩ LOR was raised due to high conductivity of the sample (required dilution).
† Refer to Analytical Report comments for further information.
*
-
^
IS
LNR
LOR
QFH
QFL
Non-accredited analysis.
Sample not analysed for this analyte.
Analysis performed by external laboratory.
Insufficient sample for analysis.
Sample listed, but not received.
Limit of reporting.
QC result is above the upper tolerance.
QC result is below the lower tolerance.
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service, available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx . The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of
liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained herein reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and
within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a
transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
22/4/2014 Page 10 of 10
Date Reported
0000080722Report Number
Contact
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
4
SGS Reference
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Manager
Laboratory
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd -Marrickville
02 9516 0741
02 9516 0722
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
Environmental Investigations
Emmanuel Woelders
Samples
Order Number
Project
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Client
CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS
22/4/2014
ANALYTICAL REPORT
SE126867 R0
Date Received 15/4/2014
COMMENTS
TRACE METALS: The Limit of Reporting (LOR) has been raised for sample #1 due to interferences from the sample matrix.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. NATA accredited laboratory 2562(4354).
Andy Sutton
Senior Organic Chemist
Huong Crawford
Production Manager
Jaimie Cheung
Metals Chemist
Ly Kim Ha
Organic Section Head
SIGNATORIES
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOCs in Water [AN433/AN434]
GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1
WATER WATER WATER WATER
14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00
SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004
Benzene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Total Xylenes µg/L 1.50 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5
Total BTEX µg/L 3.0 <3 <3 <3 <3
Naphthalene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 2 of 822/04/2014
SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water [AN433/AN434/AN410]
GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1
WATER WATER WATER WATER
14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00
SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 <40 <40 <40
Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 3 of 822/04/2014
SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN403]
GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1
WATER WATER WATER WATER
14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00
SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004
TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60 <60 <60 <60
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500 <500
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500 <500
TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450 <450 <450 <450
TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650 <650 <650 <650
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 4 of 822/04/2014
SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN420]
GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1
WATER WATER WATER
14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00
SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003
Naphthalene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Anthracene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Pyrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chrysene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total PAH (18) µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 5 of 822/04/2014
SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS [AN318]
GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1
WATER WATER WATER WATER
14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00
SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004
Arsenic, As µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.10 <1.0↑ <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1.0 4 1 2 1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1.0 <2↑ 2 10 2
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5.0 17 10 55 12
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 6 of 822/04/2014
SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Mercury (dissolved) in Water [AN311/AN312]
GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1
WATER WATER WATER WATER
14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00
SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004
Mercury mg/L 0.00010 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 7 of 822/04/2014
SE126867 R0METHOD SUMMARY
METHOD METHODOLOGY SUMMARY
Unpreserved water sample is filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and acidified with nitric acid similar to
APHA3030B.
AN020
Separatory funnels are used for aqueous samples and extracted by transferring an appropriate volume (mass) of
liquid into a separatory funnel and adding 3 serial aliquots of dichloromethane. Samples receive a single extraction
at pH 7 to recover base / neutral analytes and two extractions at pH < 2 to recover acidic analytes. QC samples
are prepared by spiking organic free water with target analytes and extracting as per samples.
AN083
Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Waters: Mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution
to elemental mercury. This mercury vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption
spectrometer or mercury analyser. Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration
standards. Reference APHA 3112/3500.
AN311/AN312
Determination of elements at trace level in waters by ICP-MS technique, in accordance with USEPA 6020A.AN318
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons: Determination of Hydrocarbons by gas chromatography after a solvent
extraction. Detection is by flame ionisation detector (FID) that produces an electronic signal in proportion to the
combustible matter passing through it. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) are routinely reported as four
alkane groupings based on the carbon chain length of the compounds: C6-C9, C10-C14, C15-C28 and C29-C36
and in recognition of the Draft NEPM 2011, >C10-C16 (F2), >C16-C34 (F3) and >C34-C40 (F4). F2 is not
corrected for Naphthalene.
AN403
(SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH, Phthalates and Speciated Phenols (etc) in soils, sediments
and waters are determined by GCMS/ECD technique following appropriate solvent extraction process (Based on
USEPA 3500C and 8270D).
AN420
VOCs and C6-C9 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is
presented to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with
a Mass Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are
processed directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.
AN433/AN434
VOCs and C6-C9 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is
presented to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with
a Mass Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are
processed directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.
AN433/AN434/AN410
FOOTNOTES
*
**
^
Analysis not covered by the
scope of accreditation.
Indicative data, theoretical
holding time exceeded.
Performed by outside
laboratory.
-
NVL
IS
LNR
Not analysed.
Not validated.
Insufficient sample for analysis.
Sample listed, but not received.
Samples analysed as received.
Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.
Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.
The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:
http://www.sgs.com.au.pv.sgsv3/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of
liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only
and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to
a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This report must not be reproduced, except in full.
UOM
LOR
↑↓
Unit of Measure.
Limit of Reporting.
Raised/lowered Limit of
Reporting.
Page 8 of 822/04/2014
Date Reported
0000080663Report Number
Contact
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
13
SGS Reference
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Manager
Laboratory
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-Marrickville
02 9516 0741
02 9516 0722
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
Environmental Investigations
Emmanuel Woelders
Samples
Order Number
Project
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Client
CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS
COMMENTS
17 Apr 2014
ANALYTICAL REPORT
SE126807 R0
Date Received 14 Apr 2014
No respirable fibres detected in all samples using trace analysis technique.
A portion of the sample supplied has been sub-sampled for asbestos according to SGS In-house procedures.
We therefore cannot guarantee that the sub-sample is representative of the entire sample supplied.
SGS Environmental Services recommends supplying approximately 50-100g of sample in a separate container.
Asbestos analysed by Approved Identifier Yusuf Kuthpudin and Ravee Sivasubramaniam.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. NATA accredited laboratory 2562(4354).
SIGNATORIES
Andy Sutton
Senior Organic Chemist
Huong Crawford
Production Manager
Jaimie Cheung
Metals Chemist
Kamrul Ahsan
Senior Chemist
Ly Kim Ha
Organic Section Head
Ravee Sivasubramaniam
Asbestos Analyst
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
Page 1 of 317/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL REPORT
RESULTS
Method AN602Fibre Identification in soil
Est.%w/wFibre IdentificationClient
Reference
Laboratory
ReferenceMatrix Date Sampled
Sample
Description
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014370g clay, sand,
rocks
SoilBH1-1SE126807.001
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014197g clay, soil,
rocks
SoilBH2-1SE126807.003
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014348g clay, soil,
rocks
SoilBH3-1SE126807.005
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014420g clay, soil,
rocks
SoilBH4-1SE126807.006
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014300g clay, soil,
rocks
SoilBH5-1SE126807.008
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014310g clay, soil,
rocks
SoilBH6-1SE126807.009
No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014307g clay, soil,
rocks
SoilBH7-1SE126807.011
Page 2 of 317/04/2014
SE126807 R0
METHOD METHODOLOGY SUMMARY
METHOD SUMMARY
AN602 Qualitative identification of chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite in bulk samples by polarised light microscopy (PLM)
in conjunction with dispersion staining (DS). AS4964 provides the basis for this document. Unequivocal
identification of the asbestos minerals present is made by obtaining sufficient diagnostic `clues`, which provide a
reasonable degree of certainty, dispersion staining is a mandatory `clue` for positive identification. If sufficient
`clues` are absent, then positive identification of asbestos is not possible. This procedure requires removal of
suspect fibres/bundles from the sample which cannot be returned.
AN602 Fibres/material that cannot be unequivocably identified as one of the three asbestos forms, will be reported as
unknown mineral fibres (umf).
AN602 AS4964.2004 Method for the Qualitative Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Samples, Section 8.4, Trace Analysis
Criteria, Note 4 states:"Depending upon sample condition and fibre type, the detection limit of this technique has
been found to lie generally in the range of 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 parts by weight, equivalent to 1 to 0.1 g/kg."
FOOTNOTES
Amosite - Brown Asbestos
Chrysotile - White Asbestos
Crocidolite - Blue Asbestos
Amphiboles - Amosite and/or Crocidolite
This report does not comply with the analytical reporting recommendations in the Western Australian Department of Health Guidelines for the
Assessment and Remediation and Management of Asbestos Contaminated sites in Western Australia - May 2009.
Sampled by the client.
Where reported: 'Asbestos Detected': Asbestos detected by polarized light microscopy, including dispersion staining.
Where reported: 'No Asbestos Found': No Asbestos Found by polarized light microscopy, including dispersion staining.
Where reported: 'UMF Detected': Mineral fibres of unknown type detected by polarized light microscopy, including dispersion staining. Confirmation
by another independent analytical technique may be necessary.
Even after disintegration it can be very difficult, or impossible, to detect the presence of asbestos in some asbestos -containing bulk materials using
polarised light microscopy. This is due to the low grade or small length or diameter of asbestos fibres present in the material, or to the fact that very
fine fibres have been distributed intimately throughout the materials.
The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here :
http://www.sgs.com.au.pv.sgsv3/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx . The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of
liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only
and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to
a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
NA - Not Analysed
LNR - Listed, Not Required
* - Not Accredited
** - Indicative data, theoretical holding time exceeded.
Page 3 of 317/04/2014
SE126807 R0
Date Reported
0000080662Report Number
Contact
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
13
SGS Reference
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Manager
Laboratory
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-Marrickville
02 9516 0741
02 9516 0722
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
Environmental Investigations
Emmanuel Woelders
Samples
Order Number
Project
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Client
CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS
17 Apr 2014
STATEMENT OF QA/QC
PERFORMANCE
SE126807 R0
COMMENTS
All the laboratory data for each environmental matrix was compared to SGS Environmental Services' stated
Data Quality Objectives (DQO). Comments arising from the comparison were made and are reported below.
The data relating to sampling was taken from the Chain of Custody document and was supplied by the Client.
This QA/QC Statement must be read in conjunction with the referenced Analytical Report.
The Statement and the Analytical Report must not be reproduced except in full.
All Data Quality Objectives were met with the exception of the following:
LCS OC Pesticides in Soil 1 item
Sample counts by matrix 12 Soils & 1 Water Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 14/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.6°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
Page 1 of 1917/4/2014
SE126807 R0
SGS holding time criteria are drawn from current regulations and are highly dependent on sample container preservation as specified in the SGS “Field Sampling Guide for
Containers and Holding Time” (ref: GU-(AU)-ENV.001). Soil samples guidelines are derived from NEPM "Schedule B(3) Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially
Contaminated Soils". Water sample guidelines are derived from "AS/NZS 5667.1 : 1998 Water Quality - sampling part 1" and APHA "Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater" 21st edition 2005.
Extraction and analysis holding time due dates listed are calculated from the date sampled, although holding times may be extended after laboratory extraction for some
analytes. The due dates are the suggested dates that samples may be held before extraction or analysis and still be considered valid.
Extraction and analysis dates are shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria. If the sampled
date is not supplied then compliance with criteria cannot be determined. If the received date is after one or both due dates then holding time will fail by default.
HOLDING TIME SUMMARY
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN602Fibre Identification in soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312Mercury (dissolved) in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
R1 SE126807.013 LB056130 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 17 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312Mercury in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002Moisture Content
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OC Pesticides in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OP Pesticides in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
17/4/2014 Page 2 of 19
SE126807 R0
SGS holding time criteria are drawn from current regulations and are highly dependent on sample container preservation as specified in the SGS “Field Sampling Guide for
Containers and Holding Time” (ref: GU-(AU)-ENV.001). Soil samples guidelines are derived from NEPM "Schedule B(3) Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially
Contaminated Soils". Water sample guidelines are derived from "AS/NZS 5667.1 : 1998 Water Quality - sampling part 1" and APHA "Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater" 21st edition 2005.
Extraction and analysis holding time due dates listed are calculated from the date sampled, although holding times may be extended after laboratory extraction for some
analytes. The due dates are the suggested dates that samples may be held before extraction or analysis and still be considered valid.
Extraction and analysis dates are shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria. If the sampled
date is not supplied then compliance with criteria cannot be determined. If the received date is after one or both due dates then holding time will fail by default.
HOLDING TIME SUMMARY
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OP Pesticides in Soil (continued)
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420PCBs in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
R1 SE126807.013 LB055964 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014
17/4/2014 Page 3 of 19
SE126807 R0
SGS holding time criteria are drawn from current regulations and are highly dependent on sample container preservation as specified in the SGS “Field Sampling Guide for
Containers and Holding Time” (ref: GU-(AU)-ENV.001). Soil samples guidelines are derived from NEPM "Schedule B(3) Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially
Contaminated Soils". Water sample guidelines are derived from "AS/NZS 5667.1 : 1998 Water Quality - sampling part 1" and APHA "Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater" 21st edition 2005.
Extraction and analysis holding time due dates listed are calculated from the date sampled, although holding times may be extended after laboratory extraction for some
analytes. The due dates are the suggested dates that samples may be held before extraction or analysis and still be considered valid.
Extraction and analysis dates are shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria. If the sampled
date is not supplied then compliance with criteria cannot be determined. If the received date is after one or both due dates then holding time will fail by default.
HOLDING TIME SUMMARY
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
R1 SE126807.013 LB055992 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 18 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 25 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOC’s in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
R1 SE126807.013 LB055969 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 18 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 25 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH1-2 SE126807.002 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-1 SE126807.003 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH2-2 SE126807.004 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH3-1 SE126807.005 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-1 SE126807.006 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH4-2 SE126807.007 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH5-1 SE126807.008 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-1 SE126807.009 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH6-2 SE126807.010 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
BH7-1 SE126807.011 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
B1 SE126807.012 LB055917 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water
Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed
R1 SE126807.013 LB055969 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 18 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 25 May 2014 16 Apr 2014
17/4/2014 Page 4 of 19
SE126807 R0
Surrogate results are evaluated against upper and lower limit criteria established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). At least two of three routine level soil
sample surrogate spike recoveries for BTEX/VOC are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted
surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as an acceptance criterion. Water sample surrogate spike recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions,
surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion.
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end
of this report for failure reasons.
SURROGATES
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OC Pesticides in Soil
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 124
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 128
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 127
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 123
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 119
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 125
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 129
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OP Pesticides in Soil
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 80
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 84
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 82
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 84
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 88
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 92
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 88
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 92
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 100
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 96
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 76
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 80
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 80
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 84
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 84
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 82
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 84
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 84
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 88
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 78
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 84
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 92
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 88
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 86
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 92
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 100
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 94
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 96
d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 86
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 82
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 86
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 84
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 84
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 88
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 80
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 80
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 88
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 82
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 84
17/4/2014 Page 5 of 19
SE126807 R0
Surrogate results are evaluated against upper and lower limit criteria established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). At least two of three routine level soil
sample surrogate spike recoveries for BTEX/VOC are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted
surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as an acceptance criterion. Water sample surrogate spike recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions,
surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion.
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end
of this report for failure reasons.
SURROGATES
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420PCBs in Soil
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 124
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 128
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 127
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 123
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 119
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 125
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 129
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOC’s in Soil
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 93
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 88
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 88
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 80
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 97
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 88
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 84
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 83
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 93
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 95
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 97
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 93
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 95
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 101
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 101
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 86
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 93
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 85
d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 117
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 94
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 94
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 89
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 101
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 89
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 121
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 108
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 101
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 112
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 95
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 91
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 99
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 86
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 92
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 92
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 85
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 92
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 100
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 87
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 95
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 79
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter
17/4/2014 Page 6 of 19
SE126807 R0
Surrogate results are evaluated against upper and lower limit criteria established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). At least two of three routine level soil
sample surrogate spike recoveries for BTEX/VOC are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted
surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as an acceptance criterion. Water sample surrogate spike recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions,
surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion.
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end
of this report for failure reasons.
SURROGATES
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water (continued)
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 79
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 94
d8-toluene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 101
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 121
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 93
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 88
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 88
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 80
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 97
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 88
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 84
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 83
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 93
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 95
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 97
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 93
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 95
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 101
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 101
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 86
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 93
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 85
d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 117
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 94
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 94
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 89
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 101
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 89
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 121
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 108
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 101
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 112
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 95
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 91
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 99
BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 86
BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 92
BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 92
BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 85
BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 92
BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 100
BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95
BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 87
BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 95
BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88
B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 79
Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water
UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 79
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 94
d8-toluene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 101
Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 121
17/4/2014 Page 7 of 19
SE126807 R0
Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined
method detection limit (MDL).
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
METHOD BLANKS
Mercury (dissolved) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB056130.001 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001
Mercury in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055936.001 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 <0.01
OC Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055923.001 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) % - 105
OP Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055923.001 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 90
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) % - 84
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055923.001 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
17/4/2014 Page 8 of 19
SE126807 R0
Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined
method detection limit (MDL).
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
METHOD BLANKS
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055923.001 Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 <0.8
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) % - 84
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 82
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) % - 98
PCBs in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055923.001 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) % - 105
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055933.001 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 <3
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 <0.3
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 <1
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 <0.5
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055964.001 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055923.001 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055992.001 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200
VOC’s in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR
17/4/2014 Page 9 of 19
SE126807 R0
Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined
method detection limit (MDL).
Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
METHOD BLANKS
VOC’s in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055917.001 Monocyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 113
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 86
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 116
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 107
Totals Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 <0.6
VOCs in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055969.001 Monocyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 100
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 103
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 100
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 84
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055917.001 TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 113
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 86
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 116
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result
LB055969.001 TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 100
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 103
d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 100
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 84
17/4/2014 Page 10 of 19
SE126807 R0
Duplicates are calculated as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit
(SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of
this report for failure reasons.
DUPLICATES
Mercury in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.010 LB055936.014 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 0.01 0.02 200 0
SE126816.001 LB055936.018 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 <0.05 0.05 134 5
Moisture Content Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.010 LB055959.011 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 21 21 35 2
SE126823.007 LB055959.022 % Moisture % 0.5 16 16 36 2
SE126823.010 LB055959.026 % Moisture % 0.5 16 16 36 2
OC Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.001 LB055923.006 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.186 30 0
OP Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.008 LB055923.013 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.41 30 0
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.48 30 4
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.008 LB055923.015 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
17/4/2014 Page 11 of 19
SE126807 R0
Duplicates are calculated as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit
(SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of
this report for failure reasons.
DUPLICATES
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.008 LB055923.015 Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0
Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 0 200 0
Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)-assume results
<LOR=0*
TEQ 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.41 30 2
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.41 30 0
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.48 30 4
PCBs in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.001 LB055923.006 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 0 200 0
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.186 30 0
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.010 LB055933.014 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 4 6 50 29
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 168 0
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 18 23 32 26
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 3.6 4.0 43 9
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 12 13 38 12
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 2.8 3.8 45 28
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 6.3 7.4 59 16
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.013 LB055964.024 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 41 40 17 1
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 166 0
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 2 2 69 1
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 79 79 21 0
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.008 LB055923.015 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 0 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 0 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 0 200 0
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 0 200 0
17/4/2014 Page 12 of 19
SE126807 R0
Duplicates are calculated as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit
(SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of
this report for failure reasons.
DUPLICATES
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.008 LB055923.015 TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 0 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 0 200 0
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 0 200 0
SE126807.012 LB055923.021 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 200 0
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 200 0
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 200 0
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 200 0
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 200 0
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 200 0
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 200 0
VOC’s in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.010 LB055917.014 Monocyclic
Aromatic
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Polycyclic
VOCs
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.8 3.9 50 20
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.3 4.1 50 6
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.6 4.2 50 30
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.2 3.8 50 11
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 200 0
Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0
SE126807.012 LB055917.017 Monocyclic
Aromatic
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Polycyclic
VOCs
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 3.9 3.7 50 7
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.3 4.0 50 7
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.5 4.4 50 3
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.1 3.8 50 9
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 200 0
Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.010 LB055917.014 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.8 3.9 30 20
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.3 4.1 30 6
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.6 4.2 30 30
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.2 3.8 30 11
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
SE126807.012 LB055917.017 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 3.9 3.7 30 7
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.3 4.0 30 7
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.5 4.4 30 3
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.1 3.8 30 9
VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0
17/4/2014 Page 13 of 19
SE126807 R0
Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) results are evaluated against an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into the control during the sample
preparation stage, producing a percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For
more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES
Mercury in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055936.002 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 0.21 0.2 70 - 130 104
OC Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055923.002 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 135
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 135
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 125
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 130
Endrin mg/kg 0.2 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 135
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 80
Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.15 40 - 130 113†
OP Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055923.002 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 1.7 2 60 - 140 87
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 1.5 2 60 - 140 76
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 1.7 2 60 - 140 84
Ethion mg/kg 0.2 1.6 2 60 - 140 80
Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 80
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 84
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055923.002 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 3.6 4 60 - 140 89
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 3.6 4 60 - 140 89
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 3.4 4 60 - 140 85
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 3.5 4 60 - 140 87
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 3.3 4 60 - 140 82
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 3.6 4 60 - 140 90
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 3.1 4 60 - 140 79
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 3.8 4 60 - 140 95
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 84
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 86
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.5 40 - 130 96
PCBs in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055923.002 Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.4 60 - 140 115
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055933.002 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 45 50 80 - 120 91
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 47 50 80 - 120 93
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 46 50 80 - 120 93
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 47 50 80 - 120 94
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 47 50 80 - 120 93
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 46 50 80 - 120 93
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 47 50 80 - 120 93
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055964.002 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 95
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 101
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 105
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 21 20 80 - 120 105
17/4/2014 Page 14 of 19
SE126807 R0
Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) results are evaluated against an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into the control during the sample
preparation stage, producing a percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For
more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055923.002 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 36 40 60 - 140 90
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 90
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 73
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 35 40 60 - 140 88
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 60 - 140 88
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 20 60 - 140 75
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055992.002 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 1100 1200 60 - 140 91
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 1100 1200 60 - 140 96
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 101
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 1100 1200 60 - 140 92
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 1200 1200 60 - 140 100
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 620 600 60 - 140 104
VOC’s in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055917.002 Monocyclic
Aromatic
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.9 2.9 60 - 140 99
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 2.9 2.9 60 - 140 100
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 2.6 2.9 60 - 140 88
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 5.1 5.8 60 - 140 87
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.6 2.9 60 - 140 89
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 5 60 - 140 88
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.4 5 60 - 140 107
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.7 5 60 - 140 113
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.5 5 60 - 140 111
VOCs in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055969.002 Monocyclic
Aromatic
Benzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115
Toluene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115
m/p-xylene µg/L 1 100 90.9 60 - 140 115
o-xylene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 93
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 95
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.0 5 60 - 140 101
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.4 5 60 - 140 109
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055917.002 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 24.65 60 - 140 89
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 22 23.2 60 - 140 95
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 5 60 - 140 88
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.4 5 60 - 140 107
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.7 5 60 - 140 113
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.5 5 60 - 140 111
VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 7.25 60 - 140 83
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %
LB055969.002 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 1000 946.63 60 - 140 110
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 850 818.71 60 - 140 104
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 93
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 95
d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.0 5 60 - 140 101
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.4 5 60 - 140 109
VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 730 639.67 60 - 140 114
17/4/2014 Page 15 of 19
SE126807 R0
Matrix Spike (MS) results are evaluated as the percentage recovery of an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into a field sub -sample during the
sample preparation stage. The original sample's result is subtracted from the sub -sample result before determining the percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the
percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA/QC plan (ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the
end of this report for failure reasons.
MATRIX SPIKES
Mercury (dissolved) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126698.001 LB056130.004 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 0.0082 0.0002 0.008 100
Mercury in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.001 LB055936.004 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 0.19 <0.01 0.2 90
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.007 LB055923.012 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 94
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 95
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 92
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 103
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 98
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 108
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 96
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 103
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -
Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 - -
Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)-assume results
<LOR=0*
TEQ 0.2 <0.2 - -
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 86
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 82
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 92
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.001 LB055933.004 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 46 <3 50 88
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 46 <0.3 50 92
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 52 8.7 50 86
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 50 3.2 50 93
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 50 5 50 91
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 51 8.0 50 86
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 53 7.8 50 91
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126699.001 LB055964.004 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 20 <1 20 97
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 <0.1 20 100
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 21 2 20 95
Copper, Cu µg/L 1 20 2 20 93
Lead, Pb µg/L 1 19 <1 20 95
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 22 4 20 90
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 37 17 20 98
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.001 LB055923.006 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 40 90
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 83
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 75
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 - -
17/4/2014 Page 16 of 19
SE126807 R0
Matrix Spike (MS) results are evaluated as the percentage recovery of an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into a field sub -sample during the
sample preparation stage. The original sample's result is subtracted from the sub -sample result before determining the percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the
percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA/QC plan (ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.
Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the
end of this report for failure reasons.
MATRIX SPIKES
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.001 LB055923.006 TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 - -
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 - -
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 40 85
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 80
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 - -
VOC’s in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.001 LB055917.004 Monocyclic
Aromatic
Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.5 <0.1 2.9 86
Toluene mg/kg 0.1 2.9 <0.1 2.9 98
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 <0.1 2.9 78
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.5 <0.2 5.8 77
o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 <0.1 2.9 78
Polycyclic
VOCs
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - -
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 5.0 5 87
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 4.6 5 88
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.0 5.8 5 100
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.6 4.2 5 92
Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 6.7 <0.3 - -
Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 14 <0.6 - -
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410
QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%
SE126807.001 LB055917.004 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 24.65 88
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 22 <20 23.2 93
Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 5.0 5 87
d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 4.6 5 88
d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.0 5.8 5 100
Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.6 4.2 5 92
VPH F
Bands
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 2.5 <0.1 - -
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 7.25 102
17/4/2014 Page 17 of 19
SE126807 R0
Matrix spike duplicates are calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean
The original result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike. The Duplicate result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike duplicate.
The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit (SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR
Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.
RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of this report for failure reasons.
MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420
QC Sample Units LORSample Number Parameter Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.007 LB055923.013 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 1
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 3
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 7
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 10
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 6
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 32 12
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 5
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 32 4
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -
Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 - - 33 -
Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)-assume results
<LOR=0*
TEQ 0.2 - - 15 -
Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - - - 30 5
2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - - - 30 2
d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - - - 30 0
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403
QC Sample Units LORSample Number Parameter Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %
SE126807.001 LB055923.007 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 - - 85 3
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 - - 162 6
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 - - 178 3
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 - - 200 -
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 - - 139 -
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 - - 200 -
TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 - - 101 6
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 - - 200 9
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 - - 200 -
17/4/2014 Page 18 of 19
SE126807 R0FOOTNOTES
Samples analysed as received.
Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.
QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QA/QC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:
http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf
① At least 2 of 3 surrogates are within acceptance criteria.
② RPD failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
③ Results less than 5 times LOR preclude acceptance criteria for RPD.
④ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to matrix interference.
⑤ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to the presence of significant concentration of analyte (i.e. the
concentration of analyte exceeds the spike level).
⑥ LOR was raised due to sample matrix interference.
⑦ LOR was raised due to dilution of significantly high concentration of analyte in sample.
⑧ Reanalysis of sample in duplicate confirmed sample heterogeneity and inconsistency of results.
⑨ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
⑩ LOR was raised due to high conductivity of the sample (required dilution).
† Refer to Analytical Report comments for further information.
*
-
^
IS
LNR
LOR
QFH
QFL
Non-accredited analysis.
Sample not analysed for this analyte.
Analysis performed by external laboratory.
Insufficient sample for analysis.
Sample listed, but not received.
Limit of reporting.
QC result is above the upper tolerance.
QC result is below the lower tolerance.
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service, available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx . The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of
liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained herein reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and
within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a
transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
17/4/2014 Page 19 of 19
Date Reported
0000080661Report Number
Contact
SGS Alexandria Environmental
Unit 16, 33 Maddox St
Alexandria NSW 2015
Huong Crawford
+61 2 8594 0400
+61 2 8594 0499
13
SGS Reference
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Manager
Laboratory
E22157
E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-Marrickville
02 9516 0741
02 9516 0722
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
NSW 2009
Environmental Investigations
Emmanuel Woelders
Samples
Order Number
Project
Facsimile
Telephone
Address
Client
CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS
17/4/2014
ANALYTICAL REPORT
SE126807 R0
Date Received 14/4/2014
COMMENTS
No respirable fibres detected in all samples using trace analysis technique.
A portion of the sample supplied has been sub-sampled for asbestos according to SGS In-house procedures.
We therefore cannot guarantee that the sub-sample is representative of the entire sample supplied.
SGS Environmental Services recommends supplying approximately 50-100g of sample in a separate container.
Asbestos analysed by Approved Identifier Yusuf Kuthpudin and Ravee Sivasubramaniam.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. NATA accredited laboratory 2562(4354).
Andy Sutton
Senior Organic Chemist
Huong Crawford
Production Manager
Jaimie Cheung
Metals Chemist
Kamrul Ahsan
Senior Chemist
Ly Kim Ha
Organic Section Head
Ravee Sivasubramaniam
Asbestos Analyst
SIGNATORIES
Member of the SGS Group
www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia
Australia
Alexandria NSW 2015
Alexandria NSW 2015
Unit 16 33 Maddox St
PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC
Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 44 000 964 278
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOC’s in Soil [AN433/AN434]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
Benzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.60 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012
Benzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Toluene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o-xylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.60 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 2 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil [AN433/AN434/AN410]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 3 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN403]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 84 <45
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 62 <45
TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 140 <90
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120
TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 150 <110
TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 4 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN420]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.3 <0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total PAH mg/kg 0.80 <0.8 <0.8 1.1 <0.8 1.5 <0.8
Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)
-assume results <LOR=0*
TEQ 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.3
Anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 3.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 3.0
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.3
Chrysene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.4
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.2
Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.0
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.0
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.7
Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.2
Total PAH mg/kg 0.80 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 20
Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)
-assume results <LOR=0*
TEQ 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 2.9
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 5 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
OC Pesticides in Soil [AN400/AN420]
BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00
SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 6 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
OC Pesticides in Soil [AN400/AN420] (continued)
PARAMETER UOM LOR
BH7-1
SOIL
11/4/14 16:30
SE126807.011
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Lindane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Beta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Delta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Endrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Isodrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
Mirex mg/kg 0.10 <0.1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 7 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
OP Pesticides in Soil [AN400/AN420]
BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00
SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Malathion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Methidathion mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Ethion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH7-1
SOIL
11/4/14 16:30
SE126807.011
Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.50 <0.5
Dimethoate mg/kg 0.50 <0.5
Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.50 <0.5
Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Malathion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Methidathion mg/kg 0.50 <0.5
Ethion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 8 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PCBs in Soil [AN400/AN420]
BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00
SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH7-1
SOIL
11/4/14 16:30
SE126807.011
Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2
Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1.0 <1
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 9 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest [AN040/AN320]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
Arsenic, As mg/kg 3.0 <3 5 4 7 5 4
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3 0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.30 8.7 16 10 23 14 12
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.50 3.2 3.3 9.2 3.7 13 16
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1.0 5 11 30 15 19 20
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.50 8.0 1.7 5.9 1.5 15 30
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.50 7.8 7.6 51 23 28 31
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012
Arsenic, As mg/kg 3.0 4 <3 4 4 4 5
Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3
Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.30 18 7.7 15 18 15 11
Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.50 4.8 9.2 26 3.6 7.8 29
Lead, Pb mg/kg 1.0 9 10 9 12 23 14
Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.50 5.2 19 56 2.8 7.6 52
Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.50 5.8 27 45 6.3 19 52
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 10 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Mercury in Soil [AN312]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
Mercury mg/kg 0.010 <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 0.02 0.01
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012
Mercury mg/kg 0.010 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 11 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Fibre Identification in soil [AN602]
BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00
SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009
Asbestos Detected No unit - No No No No No No
Estimated Fibres %w/w 0.010 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH7-1
SOIL
11/4/14 16:30
SE126807.011
Asbestos Detected No unit - No
Estimated Fibres %w/w 0.010 <0.01
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 12 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Moisture Content [AN002]
BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30
SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006
% Moisture % 0.50 13 19 18 19 19 15
UOMPARAMETER LOR
BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014
SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012
% Moisture % 0.50 20 8.3 16 21 16 17
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 13 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOCs in Water [AN433/AN434]
R1
WATER
11/4/2014
SE126807.013
Benzene µg/L 0.50 <0.5
Toluene µg/L 0.50 <0.5
Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.50 <0.5
m/p-xylene µg/L 1.0 <1
o-xylene µg/L 0.50 <0.5
Total Xylenes µg/L 1.50 <1.5
Total BTEX µg/L 3.0 <3
Naphthalene µg/L 0.50 <0.5
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 14 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water [AN433/AN434/AN410]
R1
WATER
11/4/2014
SE126807.013
TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40
Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.50 <0.5
TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50
TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 15 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN403]
R1
WATER
11/4/2014
SE126807.013
TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50
TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200
TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60
TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500
TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500
TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450
TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 16 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS [AN318]
R1
WATER
11/4/2014
SE126807.013
Arsenic, As µg/L 1.0 <1
Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.10 <0.1
Chromium, Cr µg/L 1.0 <1
Copper, Cu µg/L 1.0 41
Lead, Pb µg/L 1.0 <1
Nickel, Ni µg/L 1.0 2
Zinc, Zn µg/L 5.0 79
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 17 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Mercury (dissolved) in Water [AN311/AN312]
R1
WATER
11/4/2014
SE126807.013
Mercury mg/L 0.00010 <0.0001
UOMPARAMETER LOR
Page 18 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0METHOD SUMMARY
METHOD METHODOLOGY SUMMARY
The test is carried out by drying (at either 40°C or 105°C) a known mass of sample in a weighed evaporating
basin. After fully dry the sample is re-weighed. Samples such as sludge and sediment having high percentages of
moisture will take some time in a drying oven for complete removal of water.
AN002
Unpreserved water sample is filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and acidified with nitric acid similar to
APHA3030B.
AN020
A portion of sample is digested with Nitric acid to decompose organic matter and Hydrochloric acid to complete the
digestion of metals and then filtered for analsysis by ASS or ICP as per USEPA Method 200.8.
AN040
A portion of sample is digested with nitric acid to decompose organic matter and hydrochloric acid to complete the
digestion of metals. The digest is then analysed by ICP OES with metals results reported on the dried sample
basis. Based on USEPA method 200.8 and 6010C.
AN040/AN320
Separatory funnels are used for aqueous samples and extracted by transferring an appropriate volume (mass) of
liquid into a separatory funnel and adding 3 serial aliquots of dichloromethane. Samples receive a single extraction
at pH 7 to recover base / neutral analytes and two extractions at pH < 2 to recover acidic analytes. QC samples
are prepared by spiking organic free water with target analytes and extracting as per samples.
AN083
Orbital rolling for Organic pollutants are extracted from soil /sediment by transferring an appropriate mass of
sample to a clear soil jar and extracting with 1:1 Dichloromethane/Acetone. Orbital Rolling method is intended for
the extraction of semi-volatile organic compounds from soil /sediment samples, and is based somewhat on USEPA
method 3570 (Micro Organic extraction and sample preparation). Method 3700.
AN088
Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Waters: Mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution
to elemental mercury. This mercury vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption
spectrometer or mercury analyser. Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration
standards. Reference APHA 3112/3500.
AN311/AN312
Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Soils: After digestion with nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid,
mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution to elemental mercury. This mercury
vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption spectrometer or mercury analyser .
Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration standards. Reference APHA
3112/3500
AN312
Determination of elements at trace level in waters by ICP-MS technique, in accordance with USEPA 6020A.AN318
OC and OP Pesticides by GC-ECD: The determination of organochlorine (OC) and organophosphorus (OP)
pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soils, sludges and groundwater. (Based on USEPA methods
3510, 3550, 8140 and 8080.)
AN400
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons: Determination of Hydrocarbons by gas chromatography after a solvent
extraction. Detection is by flame ionisation detector (FID) that produces an electronic signal in proportion to the
combustible matter passing through it. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) are routinely reported as four
alkane groupings based on the carbon chain length of the compounds: C6-C9, C10-C14, C15-C28 and C29-C36
and in recognition of the Draft NEPM 2011, >C10-C16 (F2), >C16-C34 (F3) and >C34-C40 (F4). F2 is not
corrected for Naphthalene.
AN403
(SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH, Phthalates and Speciated Phenols (etc) in soils, sediments
and waters are determined by GCMS/ECD technique following appropriate solvent extraction process (Based on
USEPA 3500C and 8270D).
AN420
VOCs and C6-C9 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is
presented to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with
a Mass Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are
processed directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.
AN433/AN434
VOCs and C6-C9/C6-C10 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is
presented to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with
a Mass Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are
processed directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.
AN433/AN434/AN410
Qualitative identification of chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite in bulk samples by polarised light microscopy (PLM)
in conjunction with dispersion staining (DS). AS4964 provides the basis for this document. Unequivocal
identification of the asbestos minerals present is made by obtaining sufficient diagnostic `clues`, which provide a
reasonable degree of certainty, dispersion staining is a mandatory `clue` for positive identification. If sufficient
`clues` are absent, then positive identification of asbestos is not possible. This procedure requires removal of
suspect fibres/bundles from the sample which cannot be returned.
AN602
Page 19 of 2017/04/2014
SE126807 R0FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTES
*
**
^
Analysis not covered by the
scope of accreditation.
Indicative data, theoretical
holding time exceeded.
Performed by outside
laboratory.
-
NVL
IS
LNR
Not analysed.
Not validated.
Insufficient sample for analysis.
Sample listed, but not received.
Samples analysed as received.
Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.
Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.
The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:
http://www.sgs.com.au.pv.sgsv3/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf
This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service available on request and accessible at
http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of
liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.
Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only
and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to
a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.
This report must not be reproduced, except in full.
UOM
LOR
↑↓
Unit of Measure.
Limit of Reporting.
Raised/lowered Limit of
Reporting.
Page 20 of 2017/04/2014
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 108161
Client:
Environmental Investigations
Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street
Pyrmont
NSW 2009
Attention: Emmanuel Woelders
Sample log in details:
Your Reference: E22157, Marrickville
No. of samples: 1 Soil
Date samples received / completed instructions received 14/04/14 / 14/04/14
Analysis Details:
Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.
Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.
Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.
Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.
Report Details:
Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 23/04/14 / 17/04/14
Date of Preliminary Report:
NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.
Results Approved By:
Page 1 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Our Reference: UNITS 108161-1
Your Reference ------------- I1
Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014
Type of sample Soil
Date extracted - 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 16/04/2014
TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg <25
TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg <25
vTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1) mg/kg <25
Benzene mg/kg <0.2
Toluene mg/kg <0.5
Ethylbenzene mg/kg <1
m+p-xylene mg/kg <2
o-Xylene mg/kg <1
naphthalene mg/kg <1
Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene % 80
Page 2 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Our Reference: UNITS 108161-1
Your Reference ------------- I1
Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014
Type of sample Soil
Date extracted - 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 15/04/2014
TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg <50
TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg <100
TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg <100
TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg <50
TRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene
(F2)
mg/kg <50
TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg <100
TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg <100
Surrogate o-Terphenyl % 97
Page 3 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Our Reference: UNITS 108161-1
Your Reference ------------- I1
Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014
Type of sample Soil
Date digested - 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 15/04/2014
Arsenic mg/kg <4
Cadmium mg/kg <0.4
Chromium mg/kg 14
Copper mg/kg 29
Lead mg/kg 15
Mercury mg/kg <0.1
Nickel mg/kg 61
Zinc mg/kg 36
Page 4 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
Moisture
Our Reference: UNITS 108161-1
Your Reference ------------- I1
Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014
Type of sample Soil
Date prepared - 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 16/04/2014
Moisture % 16
Page 5 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
Method ID Methodology Summary
Org-016 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.
Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1
Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.
Org-014 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.
Org-003 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by
GC-FID.
F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater
(HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.
Metals-020 ICP-
AES
Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.
Metals-021 CV-
AAS
Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.
Inorg-008 Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 deg C for a minimum of 12 hours.
Page 6 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate
Sm#
Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %
Recovery
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in
Soil
Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Date extracted - 15/04/2
014
[NT] [NT] LCS-2 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 16/04/2
014
[NT] [NT] LCS-2 16/04/2014
TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg 25 Org-016 <25 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%
TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg 25 Org-016 <25 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%
Benzene mg/kg 0.2 Org-016 <0.2 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%
Toluene mg/kg 0.5 Org-016 <0.5 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 78%
m+p-xylene mg/kg 2 Org-016 <2 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%
o-Xylene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%
naphthalene mg/kg 1 Org-014 <1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]
Surrogate aaa-
Trifluorotoluene
% Org-016 87 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 79%
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate
Sm#
Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %
Recovery
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Date extracted - 15/04/2
014
[NT] [NT] LCS-2 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 15/04/2
014
[NT] [NT] LCS-2 15/04/2014
TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 Org-003 <50 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 80%
TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 97%
TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 109%
TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg 50 Org-003 <50 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 80%
TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 97%
TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg 100 Org-003 <100 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 109%
Surrogate o-Terphenyl % Org-003 99 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 88%
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate
Sm#
Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %
Recovery
Acid Extractable metals
in soil
Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Date digested - 15/04/2
014
[NT] [NT] LCS-6 15/04/2014
Date analysed - 15/04/2
014
[NT] [NT] LCS-6 15/04/2014
Arsenic mg/kg 4 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<4 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 102%
Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<0.4 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 109%
Chromium mg/kg 1 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 107%
Copper mg/kg 1 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 103%
Lead mg/kg 1 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 107%
Mercury mg/kg 0.1 Metals-021
CV-AAS
<0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 100%
Page 7 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate
Sm#
Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %
Recovery
Acid Extractable metals
in soil
Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD
Nickel mg/kg 1 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 107%
Zinc mg/kg 1 Metals-020
ICP-AES
<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 108%
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank
Moisture
Date prepared - [NT]
Date analysed - [NT]
Moisture % 0.1 Inorg-008 [NT]
Page 8 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00
Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville
Report Comments:
Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job
Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job
INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested
NA: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required
<: Less than >: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample
Quality Control Definitions
Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,
glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.
Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample
selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.
Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix
spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.
LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank
sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.
Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds
which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria
Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency
to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix
spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is
generally extracted during sample extraction.
Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.
For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.
Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.
Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%
for organics and 10-140% for SVOC and speciated phenols is acceptable.
In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been
reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, the sample
volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy
laboratory QA/QC protocols.
When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of
recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis has
proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs,
every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as
soon as practicable.
Page 9 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161
Revision No: R 00