jet engine fan blade-l--etciu) eeeee~ee~h-c seeeheee~ei · response sensitivity of typical aircraft...

54
7 A-AI19 974 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO CINCINNATI OH AIRCRAFT ENGINE BU--ETC F/G 21/5 RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221 UNCLASSIFIED AFWAL-TR-a2 2045 NL SEEEhEEE~EI EEEEE~EE~h-C

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jun-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

7 A-AI19 974 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO CINCINNATI OH AIRCRAFT ENGINE BU--ETC F/G 21/5RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU)RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361

5 77-C 5221

UNCLASSIFIED AFWAL-TR-a2 2045 NL

SEEEhEEE~EIEEEEE~EE~h-C

Page 2: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

lOwAD All 9974

AFWAL-TR-82-2045

RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FANBLADE-LIKE STRUCTURES TO BIRD IMPACTS

David P. BauerRobert S. Bertke

University of Dayton Research InstituteDayton, Ohio 45469

May 1982

Interim Report for Period 1 October 1977 - 30 January 1979

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

3 AERO PROPULSION LABORATORY D T ICAIR FORCE WRIGHT AERONAUTICAL LABORATORIES

'-.I AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND ELECTEWRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO 45433

D

LA- OC 5.- S.

Page 3: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

Whc'n Covcr':.nont dia. o pctcaj~,or oth7cr dezta tire uor? ror r ')1/

nor c ny ohl- u n haui'''* l lOw f,-(, th71.A hocnir. t';'A'In t c' , fu-li.,h 'd, or in 'm''', zia~ n q ip t /" rc V! r!a'~7 07 1'a ,

othcr c,.at, i.-; wot to i;.' , a' " r~oto or otr~fi 'x'i ri.- i2 m''I !f~

1iCCw '-m'- OIo ho 'P or, r ("11 cj':'o or (!r- !to.O O~tty~r'~?J r Ior pcU.sion~o~~,;,?o, or ocZ 2 any i ~ ?any waq. tc r22!,,'d t. 2

Thir, rporL ihan boon 71vaw 1Y tlkc 0.ffi~r of F'ublic*A;~~ ' AQ' '

Will bca uvailalZ.- to thc g2 ycral pu~lic, inuluding TOrC-.g)1a~in2

This -tch)C'aiLaZ repor'. has- been ravtewac2d mnd i3 a,-prc;; 'd fcr pwi'tcn

SAN'DRA K. DPAKL ISAK J.E R SH QYProject Eii evr Techliic 6 1 Aroii u1;naqc!r,

Propul sion flechuriicol es iyi

FOR !' 4 &Y 9!

j. SI I prIAN , flAd, LISAFDeputy Diractoi-, Turbine Engine Divisionr

"If !jov!P o(chvrOC.-ms chan(ged?, if* -Iu w.iore I(. he V'Cfliool.cY -,'),oa mi 4n

or if A *' Va iso lox;Cr , l )7/ 'd by nl: )zi ion. a o 1:fyAIIA~I~?rA-, vArB 0.1*Y~Jx to hua 1) uo .:a'i ( a cu I722 lit ___*

Vlilica of'Pt 2t:i)vI 1.(! not l'br .(" '17' cC (i~v 1tr i. 1 o(quI4l )' y i 'Icoflc i d1Xi i07.. Coflit) '(201 .I o)Iiat io W, tio' (' lu Oil n vpCo21 t ( 'if

Page 4: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (en De Entered)STRUCTOS

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

AFWAL-TR-82-2045 -AI(' 74. TITLE (ad Subtitle) S. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED

RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT FINAL REPORTJET ENGINE FAN BLADE-LIKE STRUCTURES Oct. 1977 to Jan. 1979TO BIRD IMPACTS s. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

7, AUTHOR(e) I. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMSER(s)

DAVID P. BAUER 200-4BA-14K-47844 (GE)ROBERT S. BERTKE F33615-77-C-5221

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASKUNIVERSITY OF DAYTON RESEARCH INSTITUTE AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS

300 COLLEGE PARK AVENUE 62203F, 3066, 12, 33DAYTON, OHIO 45215

II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE

GENERAL ELECTRIC May 1982ADVANCED ENGINEERING & TECH. PROG. DEPT. 13. NUMBER OF PAGES

EVENDALE, OHIO 4114. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADORESS(I/ dilfere.nt from Controlling Office) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report)

Aero Propulsion Laboratory (AFWAL/POTA) UNCLASSIFIEDAir Force Wright Aeronautical Lab UNCLASSIFIEDAir Force Systems Command IS. DECLASSIFICATION DOWNGRADINGSCHEDULE

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Oh 45433 SCHEDULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

17, DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered In Block 20, if different from Report)

IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Continue on eroer*e aide if neceeary nd identify by block number)

Loading model, engine blade, slicing, onset flow, pressuredistribution

20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse side If neceeeary and identify by block number)

.., The response sensitivity of jet engine fan blade-like structuresto the details of impact loading were studied. In particular,impacts of birds and ice on jet engines are difficult to modelanalytically. This report provides guidance in determining thespatial and temporal loading patameters that must be most accuratellmodeled in a coupled load-response analysis.. .

F0 ORM 17D, AN3 43 UNCLASSIFIED

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Dete Entered)

- - .2...MA

Page 5: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(*'Whn Dote Ontede)

20.

A finite element model of a cantilever plate was subjectedto various spatial and temporal loading details to determineimportant loading parameters. The cantilever plate was 7.62 cm(3-inches) by 24.46 cm (9.63-inches) by 3.81 mm (0.15-inches)thick. Applied loads simulated the impact load levels similarto a 85 g (3 ounce) bird impacting at 244 m/sec (800 ft/sec).The plate response was monitored by observing deflected shapesat several increments of time during and after impact.

The results show that the cantilever plate and presumablya jet engine fan blade are very sensitive to the level of momen-tum transfer. The detailed spatial and temporal loads that mostaffect momentum transfer were found to be of particular impor-tance to the structure response. p

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION Of THIS PAGE(Wha, Dos Etoro

Page 6: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

PREFACE

The effort reported herein was conducted by the Impact

Physics Group of the University of Dayton Research Institute.

Mr. George Roth, Division Head of the Experimental and Applied

Physics Division served as Project Supervisor. Mr. David P.

Bauer, conducted the work with project supervision and technical

assistance provided by Dr. Stephan Bless and Mr. Robert Bertke.

The work was performed on a subcontract basis for the

Aircraft Engine Group at General Electric Company in Evendale,

Ohio under Purchase Order 200-4BA-14K-47844, which is a sub-

contract of F33615-77-C-5221. The General Electric Program

Manager was Mr. Joe McKenzie and the Principal Investigator

was Mr. Al Storace.

This report covers work conducted during the period of

October 1977 to January 1979 and is identified as Task II.

This report covers work conducted for project 3066, task

12, entitled Foreign Object Impact Design Criteria. The

contract was sponsered by the Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Air

Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 under

the direction of Sandra K. Drake (AFWAL/POTA), Project Engineer.

Accession For

NTIS GRA &IDTIC TABUnannouAoed EJustificatio

By - -Distribtion/AvallAblitty Codes

Aviii fl/orDist Peclal

OTIC 3~

Copy

7

Page 7: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

BLANK PAGE

Page 8: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

I INTRODUCTION 1

II APPROACH 3

2.1 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION 3

2.2 FINITE ELEMENT MODEL DESCRIPTION 3

2.2.1 Code Description 32.2.2 Model Description 72.2.3 Load Selection 7

III RESULTS

3.1 MOMENTUM STUDY 10

3.2 TOTAL LOAD-DURATION STUDY 13

3.3 HIGHER ORDER FORCE-TIME STUDY 17

3.4 INITIAL PRESSURE STUDY 18

3.5 LOAD LOCATION STUDY 27

3.6 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION STULY 34

IV -.ONCLUSIONS 39

REFERENCES 41

'p

Page 9: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

F IGURE PAGE

I Cantilever Plate 4

2 3d Element Finite Model of Cantilever Plate 8

3 Effect of Two Levels of Momentum Transfer on 11the Early Time Deflections of a CantileverPlate (t=0.5 is)

4 Effect of Two Levels of Momentum Transfer on 12the Late Time Deflections of a CantileverPlate (t=4.75 ms)

5 Effect of Load-Time Variations on the Deflec- 14tion of a Cantilever Plate - Early Time(t=0.12 ms)

6 Effect of Load-Time Variations on the Deflec- 15tion of a Cantilever Plate - Intermediate Time(t=0.36 ms)

7 Effect of Load-Time Variations on the Deflec- 16tion of a Cantilever Plate - Late Time (t=0.6 ms)

8 Cantilever Plate Response to Step Function Loads 19and to Triangular Function Loads(t=0.12 and 0.24 ms)

9 Cantilever Plate Response to Step Function 20Loads and to Triangular Function Loads(t=0.36 and 0.48 ms)

10 Cantilever Plate Response to Step Function 21Loads and to Triangular Function Loads(t=1.08 ms)

11 Cantilever Plate Response to Step Function 22Loads and to Triangular Function Loads(t=0.12 and 0.36 ms)

12 Cantilever Plate Response to Step Function 23Loads and to Triangular Function Loads(t=0.48 and 1.08 ms)

13 Cantilever Plate Response to Initial Shock 25Pressure Type Load (t=0.24 and 0.40 ms)

vi

Page 10: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (CONT'D)

FIGURE PAGE

14 Cantilever Plate Response to Initial Shock 26Pressure Type Load (t=2.8 ms)

15 Cantilever Plate Response Study of Load 28Location (t=0.12 and 0.48 ms)

16 Cantilever Plate Response Study of Load 29Location (t=0.6 ms)

17 Cantilever Plate Response Study of Load 30Location (t=0.48 and 0.60 ms)

18 Cantilever Plate Response Study of Load 31Location (t=0.12 and 0.24 ms)

19 Cantilever Plate Response Study of Load 32Location (t=0.54 ms)

20 Cantilever Plate Response Study of Load 33Location (t=0.12;0.24;0.36, and 0.54 ms)

21 Cantilever Plate Response Study to Spatial 35Load Distribution (t=0.12)

22 Cantilever Plate Response Study to Spatial 36Load Distribution (t=0.48 and 0.36 ms)

23 Cantilever Plate Response Study to Spatial 38Load Distribution (t=0.12 and 0.24 ms)

vii

Page 11: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

I

BLANK PAGE

Page 12: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

Fan and compressor blades in jet engines are subjected to

damage from foreign objects ingested with the air into the engine.

These blades are exposed to potential impacts from a variety of

objects ranging from large birds and ice to small hard particles

such as sand. The engine speed, blade material, blade geometry,

point of impact, and type and size of the impactor all play impor-

tant roles in determining what type, if any, and the severity of

damage which might occur.

There are a great many separate phenomena which cur during

slicing impacts of soft bodies (birds or ice) against target such

as the leading edge of a fan or compressor blade. Bi. ihave

essentially as fluid slugs during impact.1 '2 In these ,udies,

the impact of birds was demonstrated to be a nonsteady fluid dynamic

process consisting of four phases: an initial shock phase in

which very high pressures are generated; a shock release phase

characterized by radial release of the impact shock pressures; a

steady flow phase in which the bird flows onto the target; and,

finally, a termination phase as the end of the bird reaches the

target and the pressure decays to zero. In addition to these basic

physical phenomena, there are effects due to the slice size and

shape, the slicing action, and the nonplanar initial impact. If

all of these effects were incorporated into a loading model, the

effort required to generate and operate the model would be very

complex. It is, therefore, important to conduct an analytic study

to investigate the sensitivity of the response of typical blade-

like structures to the details of impact loading.

This report describes the results of an analytical program

undertaken to investigate the response sensitivity of typical

aircraft jet engine fan blade-like structures to the details of

1

Page 13: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

bird impact loading. A simple cantilever plate with dimensions

similar to a fan blade was modeled analytically. Finite element

techniques were used to study the response of the cantilever

structure to selected arbitrary loading inputs. The main loading

inputs that were studied included momentum transfer, and details

of spatial and temporal load distributions.

2

Page 14: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

SECTION IIAPPROACH

Analytical solutions of the motion of a cantilever plate

loaded dynamically provided the basis for studying impact

loading conditions. This section contains a description of the

analytical techniques utilized for this study.

2.1 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

The complex geometry of a real fan blade was avoided in

this study by using a flat cantilever plate. This simplification

of real jet engine bird impact conditions permitted a less ambig-

uous study of the loading details. A flat plate 7.62 cm (3-inches)

across the chord by 24.46 cm (9.63-inches) span by 3.81 cm (0.15-

inches) thick was chosen as representative of medium sized jet

engine fan blades. The geometry is shown in Figure 1. The material

properties of type 410 stainless steel were employed in the model.

As may be seen in Figure 1, all degrees of freedom of the root

nodes were fixed to establish a cantilever boundary condition.

2.2 FINITE ELEMENT MODEL DESCRIPTION

A finite element code developed at UDRI was employed as the

analysis tool for these studies. A brief description of this

code and its application follow.

2.2.1 Code Description

MAGNA (Materially And Geometrically Nonlinear

Analysis) is a large-scale computer program for the static and

dynamic nonlinear analysis of complex, three-dimensional engineer-3inqg-tructures. The program is based~upon the finite element

method of analysis, to permit the simulation of practical structures

comprised of many different types of elements. MAGNA combines

3

Page 15: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

ew

I-

C41

Cla)

41

4 44

Page 16: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

effective isoparametric modeling techniques with state-of-the-art

numerical analysis and programming methods, to provide accurate and

efficient solutions for problems involving highly nonlinear

response.

The modeling capabilities of MAGNA include structural

elements for truss members, plane stress and plane strain sections,"shear panels," general three-dimensional solids, and thin plates

and shells. All elements are arbitrarily oriented and are fully

compatible in three-dimensional space. Degrees of freedom can be

coupled to represent skewed boundary conditions, rigid regions and

complex structural joints. Uniform mass damping, as well as

structural damping based upon the instantaneous stiffness, can be

applied in the solution. Time history solutions are performed in

MAGNA using an implicit scheme for direct integration of the equa-

tions of motion.

Each of the finite elements in MAGNA includes the

effects of full geometrical nonlinearities (large displacements,

large strains), using a Lagrangian (fixed reference) description

of motion. In shell analysis, arbitrarily large rotations can

also be treated. Material nonlinearities, in the form of elastic-

plastic behavior, are analyzed using a subincremental strategy

which minimizes the error in following the material stress-strain

curve. Isotropic, kinematic and combined strain-hardening rules

are available for use in plastic analysis with MAGNA.

The MAGNA program includes numerous user convenience

features, to aid in the generation of finite element modeling data.

Geometry data may be input in Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical

coordinates, or in arbitrary, user-defined systems. Incremental

generation of nodal coordinates and element connections is also

available, to exploit repetitive patterns in the structural model.

User-written subroutines, which provide for user intervention or

specification of data at several stages of the analysis, can be

supplied for defining mesh geometry, coordinate systems, and incre-

mental applied loading.

5

Page 17: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

Plotting utilities, in both interactive and batch

forms, are also being developed for use in checking data, and for

interpreting results from MAGNA. Geometry plotting, including

exploded views, is currently available for all finite elements.

Post processing functions which are presently provided for most

element types include stress and strain contours and stress relief

plots. Scaled and exploded views, or close-up plots of the deformed

structural model can be generated, with the undeformed geometry

optionally superimposed in the display.

The chree-dimensional solid element was used to

model the cantilever plate. The three-dimensional solid finite

element in MAGNA is a compatible, isoparametric brick element

with full nonlinear and dynamic solution capability. The geometry

and deformations of the element are represented by a variable

order of interpolation, which is controlled by the nodal pattern

specified by the user. From 8 to 27 nodes can be used to describe

the element, for maximum flexibility in specifying mesh-grading

and transitions between coarse and refined regions in the model.

A separate eight-node version of the element, based upon linear

interpolation, is also provided for computational speed.

The MAGNA three-dimensional element can be used with

reduced numerical integration, to model moderately thin shell

structures, or with higher-order integration to model regions in

which material nonlinearities are predominant. The order of

numerical integration is controlled by the user. Consistent mass

effects are included for dynamic analysis.

Full three-dimensional geometrical nonlinearities,

including both large displacements and finite strains, can be

analyzed using the solid continuum element. The large-displacement

analysis is based upon a Lagrangian description of motion, in

which all kinematic variables referred to the undeformed

geometry of the structure material nonlinearities can also be

considered, in the form of strain-hardening elastic-plastic flow.

The uniaxial stress-strain curve of a material is represented by

a number of piecewise linear segments. The plastic analysis is

based upon the von Mises yield condition, and a generalized

6

Page 18: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

Prandtl-Reuss flow rule. Strain-hardening materials can be

modeled using isotropic, kinematic, or special combined hardening

descriptions.

2.2.2 Model Description

The finite element model of the cantilever plate is

shown in Figure 2. The 21 node version of the solid element with

second order integration was used with the 21st node located at

the center of the loaded face. The additional node on this face

permitted more accurate load definition over the loaded elements.

Analyses were performed accounting for both geometric and material

nonlinearities. The nonlinear dynamic analysis requires considerable

computing time for small time steps where a long response calcula-

tion is desired. The time step for most analyses was fifteen micro-

seconds. This short time step dictated by solution accuracy made

only early time, local response analysis practicable for the large

number of analyses performed. The local response, as opposed to

overall late time deflections, was determined to be more valuable

as a measure of sensitivity to loading function details. The over-

all maximum late-time deflection of the cantilever plate was

always directly proportional to the projectile momentum at impact.

Thus, either bird size or impact velocity, not the details of

spatial or temporal load distribution, affected the overall de-

flection.

2.2.3 Load Selection

The loads applied to the plate in all calculations

were chosen to allow study of the effects of a particular param-

eter. These loads were somewhat arbitrarily chosen to provide

the most advantageous analysis of the parameters in question.

However, the magnitude of the momentum transfer to the plate was

chosen based on real jet engine fan blade-bird impact conditions.

Bertke4 performed an analysis in which he calculated the approximate

bird s'ice mass, relative impact velocities, and impact orientation

for a bird impact into an operating jet engine. Specifically the

calculations were performed for a J-79 engine operating at 7460

rpm. The forward velocity of the engine was chosen as 62.3 m/sec

7

Page 19: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

1 1k~.zC

Page 20: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

(200 ft/sec)and this was used as the axial impact velocity. The

calculations then determined the true relative impact velocity,

orientation and maximum bird slice mass that any single fan blade

could see at the stated operating conditions. A J-79 engine oper-

ating at the above stated conditions struck by a 85 g (3 ounce)

starling size bird gives a slice mass of 57.153 g (0.126 pound).

This is the mass that impacts the fan blade and flows off the

trailing edge. During the impact, the bird velocity is changed

resulting in momentum transfer to the blade. The speed at which

the bird flows off the blade trailing edge is usually almost equal1

to the impact velocity. Thus, the momentum transfer to the fan

blade results from the change in direction of the bird mass that

occurs. Bertke's calculations determined this angle for a 70

percent span location on the J-79 blade to be 41.9 degrees.

Assuming that the speed of the bird mass is constant the momentum

transfer (H) to the plate may be determined from

H = m(V 1 -V2 )

where: V1 is the impact velocity, V2 is the velocity of the material

flowing off the trailing edge, and m is the bird mass. For the

material turning through an angle V2 = V1 cos 0

H = mV1 (l - cos 0)

For the case described above the momentum transfer to the plate

is approximately 25.7 M or 0.8 lbfCsec since impulse

equals momentum transfer. The momentum transfer occurs in approx-

imately the time required for the bird to travel its own length.

From Bertke, the relative impact velocity in this case is 242.3 m/sec

(795 ft/bec) and the bird length is about 9.14 cm (3.6-inches).

Therefore, the time required for the bird to transfer the momentum

to the plate is 0.38 msec.

The loads applied during the finite element calcula-

tions were based on the above considerations. The next section will

describe these applied loads in detail and the subsequent results.

9

Page 21: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

SECTION III

RESULTS

Cantilever plate response to the details of impact loading

was studied by carefully varying only one parameter while holding

all others constant. For most cases, at least two computer simu-

lations were performed on a problem with but one parameter differingbetween them. This technique minimized the number of ambiguities

in the comparisons of results.

The various analyses may be subdivided into six basic

studies: (1) momentum study; (2) total load-duration study;

(3) a force-time detail study; (4) an initial pressure study;

(5) spatial distribution study; and (6) a load location study.

These six studies were designed to investigate the most important

elements of the impact loading process. Each study was designed

to show the significance of the details of spatially and tempo-

rally resolved impact loads on a cantilever plate. The results

of each of the studies will be described in the following sections.

3.1 MOMENTUM STUDY

The response of the cantilever plate to momentum transfer

was studied by applying a nodal load at the 75 percent span and

50 percent chord locations. Two calculations were performed, bothusing step function force-time relationships. The time duration

of the applied load was held at 0.4 msec for both calculations.

The force magnitudes were 1000 and 2000 lb corresponding respec-

tively to impulses of 0.4 lbf-sec and 0.8 lbf-sec impacting the

plate. Figures 3 and 4 show the deflected shapes of the plate at

early and late times in the deflection. The 0.8 lbf-sec impulse

resulted in a slight plastic deformation of the plate beneath the

applied load point. The von Mises equivalent stresses in close

vicinity to the load point reached approximately 1.1 times the

10

"jjL -t

Page 22: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

00

4

0

ON

0 a0x0

U 4

00Uc4'

E _

z Ub

(94 I)OLn

Z -. 4 -44-

0 144

0J~

oc LJCD0

o~\ 0' 4L

4-

'4-441

00 - O' n~a

ifcl 0 A 0 n 0 'A o* ~ -'-4 M

N K) -? v A ~ ) r

a I I r

11 JNO13-.3

Page 23: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

00

00-4-)

4

C~C)

0cc

a 04-)

P4 )

a03L (4-

CN -44 >

03 >

on 01

cC4-

Q~0 Mew 4

(/W 0)

404

0 c

r~C)

(WW J)No1LD31:13a

12

Page 24: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

tensile yield strength for the material. AS may be observed in

Figures 3 and 4 the plate deflection due to the higher impulse

is twice that of the lower impulse. In general, both local and

overall plate deflection was directly proportional to the total

momentum transfer. It may be initially concluded that any bird

impact load prediction technique must accurately predict the correct

momentum transfer. A failure to predict the time vs momentum transfer

will certainly lead to errors in the response calculation.

The remaining sections of the report will attempt to describe

the load/response effects of specific temporal and spatial paramn-

eters. This section has already shown that the overall parameters

of bird mass and impact velocity must be accurately determined

because these directly affect momentum transfer. The next sections

will discuss the effects of load-duration on plate response.

3.2 TOTAL LOAD-DURATION STUDY

The previous section showed that momentum transfer effects

on plate response for one particular load duration are important.

Pressure magnitude-time duration variations that result in a

certain momentum transfer, may also be important in determining

plate response. The load-duration study investigated plate response

by performing three calculations with the load uniformly distri-

buted over a rectangular a'-ia 3.81 cm (1.5-inches) by 5.44 cm

(2.14-inches) in each case. The center of the rectangular area

was located at 78 percent span and 25 percent chord locations.

This asymmetric loading was used to simulate more closely the time

situation in a real jet engine during bird impact. Two of the

calculations resulted in a momentum transfer to the plate of

0.8 lb f-sec. However, in one calculation a 2000 pound load was

applied for 0.4 msec while in the other a 8000 pound load was

applied for 0.1 msec. The third calculation resulted in momentum

transfer of 1.6 lb f-sec with a 6000 pound load applied for

0.267 msec. The results of these calculations are shown in the

deflected shape plots of Figures 5, 6 and 7 for the respective

ti.mes of 0.12 msec, 0.36 msec and 0.60 msec after load application.

13

Page 25: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

oi* x

x

0 0

C) C)"4

C))

000 C) 0

'D 0 4-4

44t-S

u

4

C.)) N013i4.4L

14~T0 ~J4

Page 26: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

Xe

40 ~ x

-)

x

0>ao X a)

44

x. 0 4-

UrI- EE-4 E- a)

z Q

00O 0

z 0

0 0 4-) -i II Irai

W 44U Q)-

m E--4

0a)

00 0 a 4-4 -H

0 ra~

)00 X,4-)

go 0

(WW) 441L3.1)15 r

Page 27: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

N

'zlx 0

004-)

C)

4 4

0< E-4

CiL 0

br 0z CD )

00

>0E

0 C2OZ E

o0 4 0

00CC1 Pc).o C)

C)~CCC-4 D0

00

00

(WW)NO103-1013

16H

Page 28: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

Figure 5 shows that at early times the larger loads cause the

greatest deflection as would be expected. Figures 6 and 7 show

that the higer momentum transfer case again predominates in

deflection by a factor of about two. The factor is slightly less

than two because of plastic deformation. However, Figure 7 (late

time after load application) shows that momentum transfer of

0.8 lbf-sec resulted in the same deflected shape for two cases

where the maximum load or pressure and load duration varied

significantly.

The results discussed above and in following sections are

rendered slightly ambiguous due to the nature of the cantilever

plate. None of the cantilever plates modeled during this task

exhibited curl-back of the "leading edge" as occurs in the case of

real birds impacting real jet engine fan blades. Mainly, curl-

back, more or less, did not occur because of the local-to-overall

stiffness of the modeled structure. The overall stiffness of real

blades is much higher than simple cantilevers due to the stiffness

produced as a result of rotation (centrifugal stiffening) and also

due to the camber and twist of real blades. However, the results

of this study are useful in guiding further investigations.

3.3 HIGHER ORDER FORCE-TIME STUDY

Responsiveness of typical blade-like structures to change in

loading will largely determine whether the force-time relationship

applied for bird impact need include all the detail of true impact

conditions. Thus, responsiveness could be determined in general

terms by considering the inertial forces in a continuous model

relative to the applied loads. However, a study of this nature is

far beyond the scope of the present task. The response of a

cantilever plate to the details of temporal force distributions

was investigated by applying triangular shaped force-time loads

to the structures. Two cases were investigated in this study. A

force-time function which at zero time was zero, linearly increased

to a maximum at 0.2 msec, then linearly decreased to zero at 0.4 msec.

This triangular distribution is compared to a step function load in

17

Page 29: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

which at time zero the load was at half the triangular peak, stayed

constant to 0.4 msec,then immediately decreased to zero load. In

each case, a point load was applied at 78 percent span and 25 per-

cent chord locations, and total momentum transfer was equal. The

results of these calculations are shown in Figures 8, 9 and 10.

A triangular force-tirne function with the maximum force at

time zero, then linearly falling to zero at time 0.4 msec was applied.

While in the first case a linear rise in force occurred, the second

had a infinitesimally short rise time. This record case was also

compared to a step function applied load as above. The loads for

both the triangular and step calculations were distributed over an

area 5.44 cm (2.14-inches) span by 3.81 cm (1.5-inches) chord. The

exact triangular spatial distributions of the load is shown in the

Figures 11 and 12.

In general, the results shown in Figures 8 through 12 exhibit

the same characteristics. One may observe from the results shown

that the plate inertia is low enough relative to the applied loads

to c .use a high degree of responsiveness to the form of the applied

loads. As previously mentioned, the overall to local stiffness of

a real blade will be higher than the simple cantilever plate. The

results shown in this section indicate that due to the responsive-

ness of the plate (and blade) plastic deformations could quickly

occur in the plate and thus subsequently affect the remainder of

the bird flow. In a case where these deformations affect the flow,

a substantial change in the momentum transfer may occur. Whether

or not the blade can react to the initial shocks produced at the

onset of impacL (as described in Reference 1) will be investigated

in the next section. If these shocks can produce substantial

deformations, thus changing subsequent bird flow and momentum

transfer, then the loads due to the shocks must be incorporated

into the coupled load-response calculations.

3.4 INITIAL PRESSURE STUDY

References 1 and 2 show that very high shock pressures occur

at the bird-target interface during the initial phases of bird

18

A, ...-. ,,.t ,'

Page 30: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

+ x

00

XOXo E4)

0 0'

+a +a_

C.) 0II 0

0,0-

4 C.)X. CNR0 C

UU

0 00 C)

fr-~av ra rcfTQL

a)-

0 lk A

Nuw NOI OTIA

19~

Page 31: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

Dl- xN

00

00oa'1

o0 fu

0 U)

+ X0

4>X0 0

4-)

z X0

ODC5l

w Ea

0 U0

Cl R)

cnC' E- cocCyK KO

4j

LO 2 -ON - N 41

a4 U)

00OD 44(

to 0 (0

0 Nv 0

20

Page 32: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

0000

00-4

00

000'0

13D

0O 0

coo

fo0

ui~

4J

0l o

00

0 7 4Jj

0 6 0 I

,-4u N0133--43

21)'

Page 33: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

0 x 0

0x+ U4

0O 0x +

"-4

O x +0(00

0-0

0-)0

E UO

44zc

00

*04_ 00

00

z CNix- U)~ C) C>)-

Cfl~> 4J

-4( 0)

0~J 0 -

C(N * ~ 0

(WUJ o*) 0743

22

ji-Aim

Page 34: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

4

C~C

00

0 E0

00 X< +0

x .0 400

i) 02

Er x I 4.)40

0.0z Q) E

x +0 nc

0 0 U2

0 N~ E- (

+0C-1 r,4 r.r

JI

+0 41~

C.) 4001 w acy+0 u~ o

40

-4

C~l OD

ui U)0T

(WW)NO1331-.3

(02N

Page 35: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

impact. However, these references also point out that the shock

pressure duration is only 10 to 15 percent of the total loading

duration. Less than 10 percent of the total momentum is trans-

ferred in this shock phase. A question arises regarding the shock

pressure importance on fan-blade deformation during the impact.

A study of shock pressure effects on blade deformation

required the application of short duration pulses on the canti-

lever plate. One calculation was performed with short duration

high pressure applied loads. A point load (0.4 lb f- sec impulse)

was applied in the calculation. The results are compared to a

similarly applied load (spatially) with step functions temporal

distribution (0.4 lb f-sec impulse). The results are shown in

Figures 13 and 14. The initial high pressure load applied for 20

percent of the total duration contained about 50 percent of the

totz±l momentum transfer. This initial momentum transfer represents

a significant increase over .:hat may actually occur in the real

situation. The results show a 20 percent increase in deflection

2 ompared to the step function applied load at early time. The

deflections converge at later times. Although the deflections

differ at earlier times, the magnitude is small, and no apparent

plastic response has occurred. These two facts lead one to believe

that the early, time effects on subsequent plate behavior are small

when comjared to the other factors already discussed. In drawing

this conclusion, one must consider two other factors. In the

calculation performed only one finite element is used through the

plate 1-hickness. Although the element is a higher order solid (as

opposed to a shell element), it is questionable whether through-

the-thickness effects of shocks could be accurately modeled. Some

of the effects of the initial high pressure load may not have been

detected in the analysis performed.

Coupling effects must also be considered when evaluating the

results shown in Figures 13 and 14. Although only small differ-

ences of deflection are shown, it is possible that subsequent

changes of bird flow result. For example, if the initial shock

tends to turn the fan blade such that a large bird slice results,

24

Page 36: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

qY.+

0)00)0

N

OD 00 OD

*+ x 0

CN U)

E 0T .

z -+X0

0+.4

C',N

0X -+ E-

a'or

U))

z~- C14

+~x 1 X:0 Ii0 N 104i

LO) tc D - r-- NM r- rf)

O~ 0 \ 0l 0 -~ - r-

(WW) NOII33Q

25

Page 37: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

O

r44

o 404

0 Q0

z 0

0

0 In(

a) 0~* 04

00CN 00 0 C

10 +4 0O

- r

o N+ 6O -- 0< A N

CN ~~ N C

14 ---8*. +

Page 38: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

then more momentum would be transferred to the blade and increased

damage could result. These effects may only be studied with a

fully coupled load-response model.

3.5 LOAD LOCATION STUDY

As shown in the previous section, high initial loads tended

to rotate the plate in the direction of impact. It was postulated

that a real fan blade exhibiting this turning action would actually

result in higher momentum transfer to the structure. The turning

or twisting of the plate about a span-wise axis may also be affected

by the location of the load on the plate. A study was performed to

compare the deflections as a result of load location on the plate.

Two sets of calculations were performed for this study. In

the first study, a point load applied to 3.81 mm (0.15-inch) canti-

lever plates at each of two chordwise locations (i.e., load locations

at 78 percent span, 0 percent chord and at 78 percent span, 25 per-

cent chord) resulted in deflections as shown in Figures 15, 16 and

17. Figures 15 and 16 show deflected shapes at 0.12 msec, 0.48 msec

and 0.60 msec along the plate span. Figure 17 shows the plate de-

flected shape across the chord at a span location directly under

the applied loads (i.e. 78 percent span). The impulse in each case

was 0.8 lb f- sec and the both loads were applied with the same step

force-time function. The figures show that application of the load

closest to the edge of the plate causes a significant increase of

up to 42 percent in the twisting and the span-wise local deflections.

The difference in chordwise location between the two calculations is

fairly large but the study does demonstrate the effect. A study

that more closely simulates actual loading was also performed.

In the second investigation of response to load location, a

uniformly distributed load was compared to a distributed load that

linearly decreased from a maximum at the plate edge to zero at the

plate chord centerline. The distributions along with results are

shown in Figures 18, 19 and 20. The applied load to half-thickness

1.905 mm (0.075-inch) cantilever plates had a step function force-

time distribution. The impulse in each case was 1.6 lbf-sec. As

27

Page 39: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

3. 0

Vx

+ + x o1clJ C

0 +0

O 3 + 0 x

r4-)

0l+ 0X00

3+x0

U')'0E 0~ 0

U)

0 z

30 x

- 0 x w)

G Dx

C 100 4-)

x~ II 1 I I

I-(, a) ~ 2(icc

040

0 w 0 ~

(UJW)NOi31lJ328

Page 40: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

0 l

0

0 xo 0

0i0(0 x 0

440 0)

0 x a)00

z0 X 4x

ox. 004

o40 x Ci r -,-

Ci

-0 U

r-

0- r-. re-(1-4 R R CLQN (

Cx~eU]

00

LD O

c'm Uir:Ci U) r

29

..........................

Page 41: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

0 0 10D cc c

(n N 00 r

0 0 o

X+ K 0

N-n

4 '1

00

LO X L'0.- X0

4 -

4.)1

0 '

0400

00w 4

Wa)l 0+ X Q

z>

4

+ + + I I I I I ~ r'H

30-

Page 42: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

++

x 03 +

x 0l + C>0- 0

0 x 1 + II

0 C0L) x E-+

o t6

4~J

+ 0

0)U

+ 0

/ r

0J 0 o-Z .j~N

4 -- 4 -

-. 44

LOIVO

cvari, f

0 -3

0 Ni

(Ww) NOI11.3a331

Page 43: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

x E0

x 0

x E0

N

0 X E

00x x EcL)

x El

4-

x0 "0

Z xO 04 4

>1

OD x00

-j x 0)

00

LO tx Ell

U 4Jz/

0 N 04r'n u t

0 0 99 4 0N C) uIq -. .. I

(W ) OJ.r3C~32

Page 44: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

00

// (N

1-4 CN 14 (

XE .0 0+ /

4~~L 00+ E4

4po +exeopp__ .4-J

00

o (a0

so>0)~. 0

r0-4

0IL so-4 +

4

U,

u 0

D24

0N 0o 90 r- OUU OD ODI I

(WW) NO01133G333

Page 45: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

may be seen in the figures, a 13 percent increase in deflection

occurs for the skew distributed load. Due to this skewed load,

plastic deformation takes place resulting in very high shear

stresses at the plate root. In a real fan blade this effect

would result in extra momentum transfer to the blade, increasing

the likelihood of failure.

3.6 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION STUDY

The effects of spatial load distribution have already been

shown to some extent. This section describes a more detailed study

of the subject. For these studies step function force-time loads

were applied. Two levels of response both elastic and plastic were

investigated. For elastic response an 0.8 lb f-sec impulse was

applied to the full 3.81 cm (0.15-inch) thickness cantilever plate.

The step function load was applied from zero to 0.4 msec. In one

calculation the load was applied at a single point located at 78

percent span and 25 percent chord position. These results were

compared to a calculation with the applied load uniformly distrib-

uted over an area 5.44 cm (2.14-inches) along span, by 3.81 cm

(1.5-inches) along the chord. The center of this rectangular area

was located at the 78 percent span and 25 percent chord position.

Figures 21 and 22 present the results of these calculations. As

may be seen in the figures, the only significant differences between

the two calculations occur at early time in the deflections. Near

the end of load application (0.4 msec) the two calculations result

in similar plate deflections. Due to the local stiffness of the

plate, the concentrated load has only a slight tendency to produce

increased local deformation over the evenly distributed loads.

In another calculation a higher impulse (1.6 lbf-sec) was

applied to a half-thickness 1.905 mm (0.075-inch) cantilever plate.

The load was applied in step function form, from zero to 0.267 msec.

This load was applied at a point again located at 78 percent span

and 25 percent chord position. The results of the calculation are

compared to the same load function applied evenly over an area

5.44 cm (2.14-inches) span, 3.81 cm (1.5-inches) chord with center

34

Page 46: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

(Dc

C3I

.0

a)a

1340

-44

ci xi

0

V 0)

4 4I)

C', ,

Cn C

x Ii0 44

(ww) N0110o31J3035

Page 47: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

C~CO

00X4C14

0 0

c'J0

4.)

00

.) 4Ji

(I X 4

cic

ZP 04

W 00 44-'

oi H

4 Y Z-4 N

z 0~ 0d-

(D -7

(ww) N0133)-43

36.

Page 48: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

at 78 percent span and 25 percent chord location. The results of

these two calculations are shown in Figure 23. Comparison of the

results shows that the point load causes plastic deformation in the

region of the applied load. The point load does result in higher

deflections but not to the extent that have been observed as a

result of other factors as shown in previous sections.

The cantilever plate appears less sensitive to variations in

spatial load distributions than to the temporal variations of load.

Generalizing these results to the real fan blade situation is some-

what difficult due to the stiffness effects that both fan blade

rotation and tip shrouds will provide. This stiffening will almost

certainly magnify the effects of spatial load distribution because

of the decrease in local to overall stiffness.

37

Page 49: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

(0x

Ox 0 +

000

Orx 0 3I

0 xO +

I 4JC) OXl 0+

cnn

0- r-00

w c6 0

N co

U) C)R -0,4

> )-

I,--I

kc). 0 U"

CY'

T(

(ww) N01331.43

I I I 38

Page 50: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

SECTION IV

CONCLUSIONS

This sensitivity study has been conducted by investigating

the response of a cantilever plate to various temporal and spatial

load distributions. Although the jet engine fan blade has a higher

overall to local stiffness than the cantilever I .ate most of the

results found in this study should apply. These results are fully

described in the previous section and are briefly summarized in the

following paragraphs.

Deflections and stresses are directly proportional to momentum

transfer to the structure. This result requires that a coupledload-response computer program accurately predict the momentum

transfer.

The form of the applied load-duration has a direct effect on

momentum transfer. The magnitude of the load must be correctly

predicted especially at the beginning of impact. With incorrect

initial loads on the structure, the resulting deflection will lead

to further incorrect load prediction in a coupled analysis. The

result will be an incorrect prediction of momentum transfer and

overall deflection. The details of the force-time distribution,

including the initial shock loads are the elements of the load-

duration. Therefore, these details must at least be closely

approximated.

The details of the spatial load distribution also have a

direct effect on momentum transfer. It is very important to

correctly predict the load location on the structure because the

eccentric loads can cause severe twisting of the plate. The

details of the spatial pressure distribution seem to have little

effect on the response of the cantilever plate due to the high

overall-to-local stiffness ratio. However, it was postulated that

39

Page 51: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

response of a real jet engine fan blade would be much more sensi-

tive to spatial distribution due to rotational and tip shroud

stiffening.

40

Page 52: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

REFERENCES

1. "Experimental Investigation of Impact Pressures Caused ByGelatin Simulated Birds and Ice," David P. Bauer and JohnP. Barber, Final Technical Report, UDR-TR-78-114, March 1979.

2. "Bird Impact Forces and Pressures on Rigid and CompliantTargets," Technical Report AFFDL-TR-77-60, May 1978.

3. "MAGNA: A Finite Element Program for the Materially andGeometrically Nonlinear Analysis of Three-DimensionalStructures Subjected to Static and Transient Loading",R. A. Brockman, UDR-TR-79-45, October 1979.

4. "Foreign Object Impact Design Criteria," R & D Status ReportNo. 7 for Contract F 33615-77-C-5221, April 1978.

41

Page 53: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

BLANK PAGE

Page 54: JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) EEEEE~EE~h-C SEEEhEEE~EI · RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF TYPICAL AIRCRAFT JET ENGINE FAN BLADE-L--ETCIU) RAY 82 0 P BAUER! A S BERTKE F3361 5 77-C 5221

FILMED

DIC