jefferson park station area master plan · 2017-05-08 · jefferson park station area master plan...
TRANSCRIPT
JEFFERSON PARK STATION AREA MASTER PLAN
1. PROJECT OBJECTIVES2. MARKET AREA AND STUDY AREA3. ROLE OF TAC, RESIDENT AND
BUSINESS GROUPS4. OUTREACH EFFORTS5. TRANSPORTATION6. MARKET AREA AND
DEMOGRAPHICS7. NEXT STEPS
1
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
TRANSIT CENTER
2
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
IMPROVING ACCESS
3
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERPROMOTE SMALL BUSINESSES
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OLDER BUILDINGS
IMPROVE WALKABILTY
4
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
1. Plan for complementary neighborhoodimprovements for Jefferson Park Transit Centerrehab
2. Improve access to Transit Center Pedestrians Bus/CTA/Metra transfers Neighborhood amenities around Transit Center
3. Improve neighborhood access All modes of transportation
4. Develop a balanced vision for new developmentthat builds on community character
5
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
APPROACH
6 STEPS IN PLAN PREPARATION
1. Data, conditions update, issue identification_________________________________________2. Community visioning, shared values and goals_________________________________________3. Presenting and considering alternatives_________________________________________4. Best alternatives, community consensus building_________________________________________5. Implementation actions and setting priorities_________________________________________6. Adoption and celebration
6
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
STUDY AREA AND MARKET AREA
7
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
OUTREACH GROUPS
1. RESIDENTS RESOURCE GROUP – INPUT INTO THE PLAN, “AMBASSADORS” ANDOUTREACH TO THE LARGER COMMUNITY
- Community Meetings – all residents
- Community Survey
- Web site – all documents
2. BUSINESS RESOURCE GROUP – INPUT INTO THE PLAN, OUTREACH TO BUSINESSCOMMUNITY
3. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE – TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNINGAGENCIES – INPUT INTO THE PLAN, TECHNICAL REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS
8
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
IDENTIFYING GOALS FOR PLAN
1. QUESTION 1: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE THE JEFFERSONPARK STATION AREA NOW?
2. QUESTION 2: DESCRIBE ONE WAY THE AREA CAN BEIMPROVED.
3. QUESTION 3: WHAT IS ONE THING YOU WOULD LIKE TOACHIEVE THROUGH A PLAN FOR THE AREA?
4. QUESTION 4: ARE THERE ANY BUSINESS DISTRICTS NEARBYTHAT YOU BELIEVE OFFER GOOD EXAMPLES FOR JEFF PARK?
9
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS DISTRICT?
1. MARKETING / IDENTITY – “BRAND PROMISE”
2. MIX OF BUSINESSES – BUSINESS ATTRACTION
3. ENVIRONMENT – SIDEWALKS, LIGHTING, GREENERY
4. EVENTS – DRAWING NEW CUSTOMERS
5. WHAT OTHER FACTORS?
10
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
ELEMENTS OF THE PROCESSIncrease knowledge + understanding
__________________________Encourage collaboration + co-creation
_______________________________
Provide choice
_______________________________
Instill transparency + trust
_______________________________
Maintain momentum
_______________________________
Build relationships over time
11
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
outreach
12
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
ELEMENTS OF THE PROCESS
` yPEOPLE DESIGN CONSENSUS
n 0TECHNOLOGY
13
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Honest + RealIt’s Who We Are
Event CalendarCatapult Activity
Workshops + Focus GroupsDive Deep in Local Insight
PEOPLE:INTERVIEWS, COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND EVENTS
14
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
InfographicsExpress Ideas Better
VisualizationsShowcase Potential
DesignClean, Illustrative, Data
Visualization
INFORMATIONCOMMUNICATING THE MESSAGEExisting Conditions will be an informative presentation or handout with infographics as a tool to build a common understanding of the facts.
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
WEBSITEInteractiveIt’s Who We Are
Concepts / ChoicesCatapult Activity
Workshops + Focus GroupsDive Deep in Local Insight
DESIGN
16
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
WEBSITEStop & LearnFind Information
Responsive DesignLinks to Resources
Simple + InformativeIntuitive, User Friendly Format
TECHNOLOGYWEBSITE – CENTRAL LOCATION FOR THE PROJECT’S RESOURCES TO STAY ON MESSAGE
17
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
WEB SITE -- WWW.ACCESSJEFFPARK.ORG18
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
WEBSITETrust and support for processReinforce Project as a Resource for All
Inform + EngageCanvas, Amplify, Celebrate Events
Results + RemindersPosts, Follow Button, Updates
CONSENSUSBUILD + MAINTAIN
19
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Safe Access to Transit Center Safe opportunities to cross roads on foot Opportunities exist to create new
pedestrian crossings Several intersections see large
concentrations of crashes The on-street bicycle network is
disconnected and incomplete Opportunity to implement more elements
of CDOT Streets for Cycling Plan
20
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
LONGEST PEDESTRIAN GAPS
2,150 ftMilwaukee Ave from Foster to
Gale
740 ftMilwaukee Ave from Gale to
Higgins
940 ftHiggins Rd
from Linder to Milwaukee
750 ftMilwaukee Ave from Giddings
to Laramie21
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIESOpportunity: CDOT Planned Milwaukee Ave Streetscape Improvements (Lawrence to Huntington) Replace pavement markings and signage Add some pedestrian refuge islands and bike
sharrows Provide new crosswalks at Foster Ave and
Transit Center entrance
22
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIESOther Access Issues For residents north of I-90, station access
is very indirect Understand parking issues Opportunity to enhance wayfinding
signage
Street Network I-90 and Union Pacific Railroad divide
the community How could we enhance connectivity and
access?23
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
9,141
1,328
12,158
1,616
10,373
721
1,262
7,001
6,953
167
707
3,006
0 5,000 10,000 15,000
56 Milwaukee
68 Northwest Highway
81 Lawrence
81W West Lawrence
85 Central
85A North Central
88 Higgins
91 Austin
92 Foster
225 Central - Howard
226 Oakton St
270 Milwaukee Ave
Average daily boardings (2015)
Bus Routes Serving Jefferson Park Transit Center
TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIESPublic Transit Options CTA Blue Line station averages 6,935
boardings daily (2014) Metra UP-NW station averages 599
boardings daily (2014) Twelve Pace and CTA bus routes serve
Jefferson Park StationPace adding Pulse service to Milwaukee Avenue in late 2017Could buses move more quickly through traffic with transit priority treatments?
SOURCE: RTAMS 24
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIESAt the Transit Center Conflicts occur when pedestrians
cross through bus facility Real-time bus arrival information
could enhance experience Passenger pickup and drop-off
locations are unclear How to accommodate taxis and ride
services? (Lyft, Uber)
25
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
STUDY AREA AND MARKET AREA
26
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
DEMOGRAPHICS OF STUDY AREA AND MARKET AREA
Study Area Market Area Chicago
2010 Population 4,262 30,369 2,695,598
2016 Population 4,491 30,983 2,772,357
2010-2016 Population Change 5.4% 2.0% 2.8%
2016 Median Age 40.2 40.0 33.9
SOURCE: 2010 U.S. CENSUS AND ESRI
27
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
DEMOGRAPHICS
Market Area Chicago
2016 Average Household Size 2.51 2.52
2016 Median Household Income $61,766 $49,531
2016 Population 55-64 13.4% 10.6%
2016 Population 65+ 15.3% 11.7%
2016 Owner-Occupied Housing 55.8% 41.8%
2010-2014 Households w/child under18 31.6% 29.1%SOURCE: 2010-2014 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY, U.S. CENSUS
28
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
HOME SALES 2015-2016
Jefferson Park Portage Park Forest Glen
Single Family Detached
Median Home Price $297,000 $280,000 $445,000
Increase since 2015 8% 10% 11%
Townhome, Condo
Median Home Price $150,000 $140,000 $255,000
Increase since 2015 9% 6% 42%
SOURCE: MRED (MIDWEST REAL ESTATE DATA)
29
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
TRAVEL TO WORK 2010-2014
Market Area Chicago
Drove Alone 64.0% 49.9%
Carpooled 10.1% 8.9%
Public Transit 18.1% 27.2%
Bus 6.3% 14.1%
‘L’ 8.6% 11.1%
Metra 3.2% 1.8%
Bike 1.1% 1.4%
Walk 2.4% 6.7%
Work from Home 3.0% 4.4%SOURCE: 2010-2014 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY, U.S. CENSUS 30
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
MARKET AREA RESIDENT EMPLOYMENT 2014
Top Industries Employees (%)
Health Care and Social Assistance 13.1%
Retail 10.4%
Education 9.0%
Accommodations and Food Services 8.6%
Manufacturing 8.4%
Administrative and Support 7.5%SOURCE: U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, 2014 ONTHEMAP
31
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
STUDY AREA JOBS 2014
Major Industry Sectors Employees
Total Employment 2,254
Accommodations and Food Services 17.9%
Retail 13.7%
Education 12.8%
Administrative and Support 12.2%
Construction 7.7%
Manufacturing 7.3%SOURCE: U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, 2014 ONTHEMAP
32
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
RESIDENT SPENDING OUTSIDE MARKET AREA SELECTED RETAIL CATEGORIES 2016
Retail Categories Dollars (Millions)
General Merchandise $79.2
Restaurants $20.4
Food and Beverage $18.5
Electronics and Appliances $14.0
Hardware $11.3
Clothing $10.2SOURCE: ESRI AND INFOGROUP
33
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
NEXT STEPS
1. Stakeholder Interviews – this summer; suggestions welcome
2. Community Meeting #1 – June
3. Community Events – farmers market, Field House, Library, Jefferson Memorial Park events
4. Existing Conditions Analysis – completion this summer
5. Next Meetings – Residents Resource Group, Business Resource Group, and TAC in September to review input from Community Meeting, Existing Conditions Analysis, and set goals for Plan
6. Community Meeting #2 – October
34
DRAFT - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC20182017
JAN FEB MAR
G
pMONTHLY PROGRESS CALL W/ RTATECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)RESIDENT RESOURCE GROUP (RRG)uBUSINESS RESOURCE GROUP (BRG)S INTERIM PLAN DELIVERABLESJ
FINAL PLAN REVIEW & ADOPTIOND
SYMBOLS KEY
PROJECT INITIATION MEETINGCONCEPT PLANS WORKSHOPa
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EVENTs
TRANSIT AGENCIES MEETINGb
COMMUNITY MEETINGh
STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWSi
TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATIONTASK 2: DATA COLLECTIONTASK 3: PUBLIC OUTREACHTASK 4: LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT MARKET ANALYSISTASK 5: TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
TASK 6: CONCEPT PLANSTASK 7: URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
TASK 8: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES & APPROACHTASK 9: FINAL PLAN
PUBL
IC EN
GAGE
MENT
EVEN
T #2
RESO
URCE
GROU
P (RR
G & BR
G) ME
ETIN
GS #
2Re
view
of Dr
aft St
rateg
ies &
Projec
ts
S
u
DEVE
LOPE
R & RE
AL ES
TATE
BROK
ER IN
TERV
IEWS
i
TAC &
RESO
URCE
GROU
P (RR
G & BR
G) ME
ETIN
GS #
1Sco
pe &
Vision
Deve
lopme
nt
p
PROJ
ECT I
NITIA
TION M
EETIN
GMe
eting
w/ A
lderm
an &
RTA
G G G G G G G G G Gh
COMM
UNITY
MEE
TING #
1Lis
tening
Sessi
on
TAC M
EETIN
G #2
Revie
w of
Data
& Exis
ting C
ondit
ions
TAC M
EETIN
G #3
Revie
w of
Conce
pt Pla
ns
h
COMM
UNITY
MEE
TING #
3Op
en Ho
use
TAC M
EETIN
G #4
Revie
w of
Draft
Plan
S
PUBL
IC EN
GAGE
MENT
EVEN
T #1
s s
STAKE
HOLD
ER IN
TERV
IEWS
i
J EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY
b
TRAN
SIT AG
ENCIE
S MEE
TING
Revie
w of
Conce
pt Pla
ns
u
sPU
BLIC
ENGA
GEME
NT EV
ENT #
3Jef
f Fes
t: Aug
ust 4
-6h
COMM
UNITY
MEE
TING #
2Re
view
of Dr
aft St
rateg
ies &
Projec
ts
RESO
URCE
GROU
P (RR
G & BR
G) ME
ETIN
GS #
3Re
view
of Dr
aft Pl
an
S
u
J DRAFT CONCEPT PLANS J DRAFT URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES J DRAFT PLAN DFINAL PLAN
S
u
RESO
URCE
GROU
P (RR
G & BR
G) WA
LKIN
G TOU
R
G
PRELIMINARY PROJECT TIMELINEDATES SUBJECT TO CHANGE
JEFFERSON PARK TOD PLAN