james larcombe sedgefield co durham - fitwise · james larcombe sedgefield ... and recontact 999 if...

22
Recognising sepsis in primary care James Larcombe Sedgefield Co Durham

Upload: lamdang

Post on 05-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Recognising sepsis in primary care

James Larcombe

Sedgefield

Co Durham

Recognising sepsis in primary care

• Background and Context

• Sepsis Trust and Primary Care

• Investigations

• Children and fever

• Prevention

• Future audit, guidance

• Vignettes

Context of primary care 1

• Age-variable presentation

• First to decipher narrative of illness

• Multimorbidity, psychosocial, and holistic care

• Diversity of care settings

• Access to technology

Context of Primary Care 2

• High prevalence self-limiting illness

• Low prevalence of serious illness

• Non-specific presentations

• Sequential development of symptoms/signs

• Potential for rapid deterioration

Incidence all infections

ICU

IP

A&E

OOH

1ry Care

Community

Prevalence serious infections

ICU

IP

A&E

OOH

1ry Care

Community

Presence of amber/red flags

ICU

IP

A&E

OOH

1ry Care

Community

Antibiotic stewardship

• Resistance related to prescribing rates

• Dip in late 1990s (SMAC); rise in 2000s

• Median - Abs 54% adult (18-59) RTI consults1

• Amoxicillin no benefit for non-pneumonia LRTI2

• Broad spectrum Abs and C diff

• Drug allergy, side-effects and spurious allergy

• 53% patients attending with LRTI expect Abs3

• Guideline knowledge increases Ab Pxing4

1) Gulliford, BMJ Open, 2014; 2) GRACE; 3) McNulty, BJGP, 2013; 4) Linder ,Int J QHC, 2010

GP screening for sepsis

More than a self-limiting infection?

• Temp >38.3 (or <36) oC

• Resps >20

• HR > 90

• Confusion etc

• Glucose > 7.7

• SBP <90

• Resps >25

• HR >130

• O2 sats < 91%

• Purpuric rash

• Poorly responsive

Infection symptoms, acute deterioration, unexplained illness (esp. if high risk)

Sepsis Six in primary care

• High flow O2

• Consider infective source/ blood cultures

• Empirical IV antibiotics

• Lactate and FBC

• IV fluids

• Urine output measurement

Lactate?

• Point-of-care machines

• Significant lactate values for 1ry Care decision-making?

• Different purpose – spectrum bias possible

• Machine cost

• Infrequent use - upkeep / sticks out-of-date?

Spectrum bias in sore throat

Study Site Ages Pop % strep

LR+ Post-test

Centor 1981 ED All 17 2.3 32%

Dagnelie 1998 GP All 33 1.8 47%

McIsaac 2004 GP 3-17 34 4.1 68%

Willis BH, Family Practice, 2008

CRP?

• Performance alone insufficient to rule in/ out serious illness in children1 and adults2

• Doesn’t help CURB-65 to predict mortality3

• Reduces antibiotics for respiratory infections4

• Cost-effective5

• CRP (+ O2 sats) an additional marker in GP6?

1) Freyne, Clin.Ped 2013; Limper J.Inf 2010; NICE UTIC- CG 54; 2) Engel, Fam Pract 2012; 3) Yamamoto, BMJ Open, 2015 ; 4) Huang, BJGP, 2013; 5) Hunter, Adv ther, 2015; 6) ERNIE2

Childhood infections

• 45% child admissions due to infection

• <1/4 in previously healthy children

• 20% childhood deaths infective esp. under-5s

• 1150 infection related admissions/100,000/yr

• Serious acquired invasive infection

– child < 15: 6/100,000/yr

– Child < 1 : 38/100,000/yr

Performance of NICE traffic light

Prevalence infection

Typical setting

Sensitivity Specificity LR+

Low GP 100% 1.0% 1.01

Intermediate ED 97.3% 26.7% 1.33

High Inpatient 87.1% 28.7% 1.22 Based on Verbakel, BMC Med, 2013

Amber/Red

Sensitivity Specificity LR+

Amber 100% 0.12% 1.00

Red 62% 74.5% 2.43 Based on Verbakel, Paed Emerg Care, 2014

Self-diagnosis and clinical acumen?

Symptom/ sign LR+

Cyanosis 2.7 – 52

Rapid breathing 1.3 – 9.8

Shortness of breath 1.1 - 9.3

Poor peripheral circulation 2.4 - 39

Petechial rash 6.2 - 84

LR+

Parental concern 14.4

Clinician instinct 23.5

Van den Bruel Lancet 2010 (Systematic review) / DARE

Vaccination

• Childhood regime

• HiB and S pneum < 1% childhood infections

• Pneumococcal/ flu >65 + high-risk <65

• High incidence pneumonia in elderly

• Multimorbidity – IDDM; COPD highest risk serious infections1

1) Van de Nadort BJGP, 2009

Audit and guidelines

• In GP toolkit:

• ‘Clinical guidelines’ (recommendations) based on GP screening document

• Exemplar standards – audit • Appropriate serious infection

• Appropriate self-limiting illness

• Coding issues

Patient 1: Female aged 63 D1: Own GP triage- unwell 4/7 cough & fever. Usually fit & active D1 pm: T 38.3oC, P 92, BP 120/60, RR 14, sats 97%, chest clear. Diagnosis: viral? Supportive Px D1 2200: Confusion and headache = stroke? 999-> obs as before and recontact 999 if worse - husband rang 999 but none available D2 0030: barely able to get out of bed, ‘like an old woman’, disoriented?, bluey lips? D2 04:30: Visit P 96 BP105/60 T36.6oC (on paracet+ibuprofen), chest clear, abdo NAD. BM (ambulance) 8.7. Urine: + Bld, + Prot, L+N- Px Nitrofurantoin. D3 06:30: Felt worse+ pain in chest D3 0700: T39.1oC; R chest pain not PE like. Adv visit own GP D3 0830: admitted - pneumonia requiring ventilation on ITU.

Patient 2: Male aged 35 D1: Very sore throat. Viral? Supportive management. D7: Bad ear pain, fever, D&V T38oC, bulging R ear drum, chest clear. Viral? Px codeine See own GP if no better. D9 0100: D&V, new confusion. 02:45 (tel consult) as D7 + fever, D&V, dizzy on standing, urine dark. Visit ENP: T 37.5oC, P 115, BP 110/60, sats 96%, RR 16, urine NAD but concentrated, ear disch +++, chest/throat NAD. Diagnosis: ASOM+vomiting. Px: amoxicillin; IM +buccal antiemetic . Review own GP if no better. D10: 999- worse, barely able to get out of bed, ‘like an old man’, more D and V. Obs: P 110, BP 110/60, temp 37.5oC, sats OK. OOH GP called: diarrhoea due to antibiotics. Px: supportive. D11: Own GP- visit P115, BP 105/60, unable to get out of bed. Uncertain diagnosis, but “clearly not right”. Admitted. Eventual diagnosis = mastoiditis with transverse sinus thrombosis.

Recognising sepsis in primary care

• Background and Context

• Sepsis Trust and Primary Care

• Investigations

• Children and fever

• Prevention

• Future audit, guidance

• Vignettes

[email protected]

We need more research!

especially in primary care