issue 2019-42 november 8, 2019 › ... · issue 2019-42 november 8, 2019 recommendations from the...

20
Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 IN THIS ISSUE Downtown R-Line Circulator - Route Revision Wake Bus Rapid Transit - New Bern Avenue Corridor - Online Survey SafeLight – Red-Light Camera Program Enhancement Weekly Digest of Special Events Council Follow Up Dix Edge Area Study Lake Preservation Policy List of Stormwater Facilities and Supporting Map (Council Member Cox) INFORMATION: Administrative Offices Closed in Observance of Veterans Day Holiday City administrative offices will be closed on Monday, November 11 in observance of the Veterans Day holiday. Work Session - Tuesday, November 12 - 4:00 P.M. The regularly scheduled monthly second Tuesday work session will be held in the Council Chamber beginning at 4:00 P.M. The agenda for the work session was posted to the electronic agenda management system yesterday. Please note there will be a Closed Session immediately following the work session on Tuesday. Downtown R-Line Circulator - Route Revision Staff Resource: David Eatman, RDOT-Transit, 996-4040, [email protected] Since September 2018, the Raleigh Transit Authority (RTA) and staff from the Department of Transportation, Transit Division have engaged with a revision process for the R-Line route. This process assessed the changing downtown landscape and downtown transportation options. This process included an eight-month assessment with downtown and citywide stakeholder organizations and agencies. Weekly Report Page 1 of 20 November 8, 2019

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 IN THIS ISSUE Downtown R-Line Circulator - Route Revision Wake Bus Rapid Transit - New Bern Avenue Corridor - Online Survey SafeLight – Red-Light Camera Program Enhancement Weekly Digest of Special Events

Council Follow Up

Dix Edge Area Study Lake Preservation Policy List of Stormwater Facilities and Supporting Map (Council Member Cox) INFORMATION: Administrative Offices Closed in Observance of Veterans Day Holiday

City administrative offices will be closed on Monday, November 11 in observance of the Veterans Day holiday. Work Session - Tuesday, November 12 - 4:00 P.M.

The regularly scheduled monthly second Tuesday work session will be held in the Council Chamber beginning at 4:00 P.M. The agenda for the work session was posted to the electronic agenda management system yesterday. Please note there will be a Closed Session immediately following the work session on Tuesday. Downtown R-Line Circulator - Route Revision Staff Resource: David Eatman, RDOT-Transit, 996-4040, [email protected]

Since September 2018, the Raleigh Transit Authority (RTA) and staff from the Department of Transportation, Transit Division have engaged with a revision process for the R-Line route. This process assessed the changing downtown landscape and downtown transportation options. This process included an eight-month assessment with downtown and citywide stakeholder organizations and agencies.

Weekly Report Page 1 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 2: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019

Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation of a new bi-directional route. At the October 2019 RTA meeting, the board approved the proposed route and approved that staff initiate a public comment period. The public comment period will start Monday, November 11 and includes:

Public Meetings on Wednesday, November 20 at RMB, Conference Room 303 Afternoon Session: 11 A.M. to 1 P.M. Evening Session: 4 P.M. to 6:30 P.M.

An online survey located on the City’s R-Line webpage (www.raleighnc.gov/rline) o The survey will include the current and proposed route maps. o A QR code is posted on all public materials (to include placards,

postcards located on the buses and other printed materials for distribution).

Presentations at Local Organizations (to include but not limited to): o Glenwood South Neighborhood Collaborative o Downtown Raleigh Alliance (Quarterly Rundown) o Downtown Living Advocates o Local CACs in the Downtown Area

At the public meetings and when presenting to organizations, staff will conduct a ‘sticker’ map exercise to allow citizens to identify the ‘likes’ and ‘dislikes’ of the proposed route. In addition, staff will be canvassing the current R-Line service area to distribute information as well as riding the R-Line to collect survey information throughout the months of November and December. Following the public comment period, the RTA will schedule a public hearing. Staff will continue to provide periodic updates to Council before a final route implementation is made. (No attachment) Wake Bus Rapid Transit - New Bern Avenue Corridor - Online Survey Staff Resource: Mila Vega, RDOT-Transit, 996-4123, [email protected]

Het Patel, RDOT-Transit, 996-5120, [email protected]

The Raleigh Department of Transportation – Transit Division continues to advance implementation of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) initiatives identified in the 2016 Wake Transit Plan. Staff held a second Design Open House for the Wake BRT: New Bern Avenue project Tuesday, October 29. Approximately 70 people

Weekly Report Page 2 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 3: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019

attended the meeting to learn more about the project. The goal of the Open House was to share updated designs developed using public feedback received at the first Design Open House, held June 25. The public also reviewed information related to station access, runningway design, traffic modifications, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. All meeting materials from the October 29 event are posted under the “Resources” tab on the Wake BRT: New Bern Avenue Webpage. RDOT is also advertising an online survey that corresponds to the two (2) community wall activities that were available during the Design Open House:

• The first activity focused on identifying priorities for BRT station amenities; and • The second activity focused on identifying preferred locations for up to three (3) Raleigh

BikeShare stations. Staff is working on identifying additional pop-up outreach events along the corridor to continue direct engagement with communities and transit riders along the corridor. Below is a link to the survey; the survey instrument will remain active until December 3:

Wake BRT New Bern Avenue - Design Open House Oct.29 - Online Survey (No attachment) SafeLight – Red-Light Camera Program Enhancement Staff Resource: Todd Edwards, RDOT, 996-4088, [email protected]

On January 22, 2019 Council approved a new five- year contract with Conduent to provide red light camera services. The City has utilized red light cameras to reduce angle crashes with much success since 2003. The most recent contract expanded the existing program by allowing the number of treated sites to increase to 25, from the previous 15 locations. The 25 sites will be comprised of 12 existing sites and 13 new sites. Existing sites will receive an upgrade in both the photographic as well as the detection equipment. New sites were selected from a list that prepared and developed by the Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE), a research branch of North Carolina State University. ITRE completed a third-party review of the program and developed an objective, data-driven list of potential sites that should experience a reduction in angle crashes with red light cameras. While the ITRE study played the largest role in the selection of new sites, right-of-way constraints and constructability also factored into location selection. Staff further vetted potential site locations by selecting locations that are relatively dispersed throughout the City. A red-light camera program is most effective when cameras are spread throughout a jurisdiction. Included with the Weekly Report materials is map showing existing sites to be upgraded and the new locations. A handful of locations will be deactivated; however, the existing hardware will remain in place. Research studies have shown this is best practice for deactivating a site and still improving compliance. The roll-out of the new sites will not occur at once and may be subject to intersection changes due to unforeseen constructability issues. Staff has worked to balance implementation of the new contract so the cost for new equipment and new locations did not jeopardize the historically cost-neutral status of the

Weekly Report Page 3 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 4: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019

overall program. No action is required from Council; this information is provided to notify of the work that will be occurring throughout the Council districts. (Attachment) Weekly Digest of Special Events Staff Resource: Derrick Remer, Special Events Office, 996-2200, [email protected] 33T

Included with the Weekly Report materials is the special events digest for the upcoming week. (Attachment) Council Member Follow Up Items Follow Up to the September 10 Council Work Session Dix Edge Area Study Staff Resource: Sara Ellis, City Planning, 996-2234, [email protected]

As follow up to the work session, staff is providing information regarding next steps in the Dix Edge Area Study, including a detailed outreach plan and updated timeline. A Request for Qualifications is planned to be issued November 15 to solicit a consultant team to support the planning process. A staff memorandum is included with the Weekly Report materials. (Attachment)

Follow Up from the November 6 City Council Meeting Lake Preservation Policy List of Stormwater Facilities and Supporting Map (Council Member Cox) Staff Resource: Wayne Miles, Engineering Services, 996-3964, [email protected]

During the meeting Council requested staff to provide the list of 102 lakes and related facilities that are beneficial for public stormwater management in the City. This information was developed by staff with engineering consultant support during the mid-2000's to support setting priorities for stormwater capital improvement projects. The Lake Preservation Policy, originally adopted in 1994, was last amended in 2006 to address the need for a "drainage basin by drainage basin" approach to lakes, "rather than a rigid City-wide standard." The list of 102 facilities is largely populated with existing ponds and lakes, although there are several existing wetlands as well as a number of proposed new facilities on the list. Many changes have occurred since this original list and map were developed. To date, staff has completed a number of projects that made improvements to facilities on this list, totaling more than $23 million in capital

Weekly Report Page 4 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 5: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019

expenditures: Upper and Lower Longview Lakes, Beamon Lake, Lower Durant Lake, Carolina Pines Avenue Lake, Laurel Hills Pond, Fletcher Park (wetland), Northshore Lake, Brentwood Today (stream stabilization – note the dam breached during a large storm), and Greystone Lake. White Oak and Brockton lakes are pending construction rehabilitation in the near future. Included with the Weekly Report materials is the listing as well as the associated location map. (Attachment)

Weekly Report Page 5 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 6: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

§̈¦440

£¤401

£¤70

£¤70

£¤64

§̈¦40

§̈¦440

§̈¦440

£¤1

£¤1

£¤401

¬«50

£¤264

£¤1

£¤401

£¤401

£¤1

£¤64B

£¤64£¤64

£¤401

£¤70

¬«50

£¤1

£¤1

¬«50

£¤70

¬«50

§̈¦40§̈¦40

§̈¦540

§̈¦540

99

77

66

55

44

33

22

2424

2323

2222

2121

2020

1919

1818

1717 1616

1515

1414

1313

1212

1111

1010

88112525

I

D i s t r ict AD i s t r ict AD i s t r ict BD i s t r ict B

D i s t r ict CD i s t r ict CD i s t r ict DD i s t r ict D

D i s t r ict ED i s t r ict E

EXISTING/UPGRADED1) SB Dawson @ Morgan2) SB Dawson @ South3) SB Six Forks @ Rowan4) EB New Hope Ch @ Brentwood5) EB New Bern @ Tarboro6) NB Six Forks @ Dartmouth7) SB Wilmington @ Chapanoke8) NB McDowell @ Morgan9) NB Capital @ Buffaloe10) WB MLK Jr. Blvd @ Blount11) WB New Bern @ I-440 WB Ramps12) WB Millbrook @ Old Wake Forest

!(

PROPOSED NEW SITES13) Edwards Mill @ Ed14) New Hope @ Columbus Club15) Edenton @ Wilmington16) MLK Jr. Blvd @ Rock Quarry17) MLK Jr. Blvd @ State18) Gorman @ Thistledown19) Boylan @ Morgan20) Town @ Triangle Town21) Louisburg @ Forestville22) Lead Mine @ Sawmill23) Calvary @ Green24) Lynn @ Hilburn25) Morgan @ Harrington

City of RaleighDepartment of Transportation

Safelight Signal Locations!( Existing/Upgraded!( Proposed New Sites

11

Weekly Report Page 6 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 7: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Special Events Weekly Digest Friday, November 8 – Thursday, November 14

City of Raleigh Special Events Office

[email protected] | (919) 996-2200 | www.raleighnc.gov/specialevents

Permitted Special Events NC State Homecoming Parade Hillsborough Street and NC State University Campus Friday, November 8 Event Time: 6:00pm - 7:30pm Associated Road Closures: Roads will be closed from 6:00pm until 8:00pm to facilitate the parade route. Note that additional roads on NC State Campus will be closed for the event and all cross-streets one block in each direction will be detoured, and see below for turn-by-turn details: Start on Ferndell Lane; Right onto Pullen Road; Enter Pullen Road roundabout; Take first exit onto Hillsborough Street; Left onto Dan Allen Drive; Finish on NC State University property. NC Veterans Day Parade Fayetteville Street District Saturday, November 9 Event Time: 8:30am - 12:00pm Associated Road Closures: S. Salisbury Street between Davie Street and South Street, Cabarrus Street between S. Salisbury Street and McDowell Street, and Lenoir Street between Fayetteville Street and McDowell Street will be closed from 8:00am until 10:30am. Edenton Street between N. Salisbury Street and N. Wilmington Street will be closed from 9:30am until 12:00pm. The following roads will be closed from 8:30am until 10:30am to facilitate the parade route (parade starts at 9:30am). Note that all cross-streets one block in each direction will be detoured during the parade, and see below for turn-by-turn details: Start within the staging area on S. Salisbury Street between Davie Street and Cabarrus Street; Head north on Salisbury Street; Right onto Edenton Street; Left onto Wilmington Street; Right into the State parking lot for disassembly. Market Hall Wedding City Market Saturday, November 9 Event Time: 1:00pm - 10:00pm Associated Road Closures: Wolfe Street between Blake Street and Parham Street will be closed from 1:00pm until 10:00pm. Downtown Raleigh Food Truck Rodeo Fayetteville Street District Sunday, November 10 Event Time: 12:00pm - 6:00pm Associated Road Closures: Fayetteville Street between Morgan Street and Lenoir Street, and Hargett Street, Martin Street, and Davie Street between S. Salisbury Street and S. Wilmington Street will be closed from 6:00am until 11:59pm. The 500 block of Fayetteville Street will remain open for local traffic only. 2019 Annual Veterans Day Run at NC State University Pullen Road and NC State University Campus Monday, November 11 Event Time: 6:00am - 7:30am

Weekly Report Page 7 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 8: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Associated Road Closures: Pullen Road between Hillsborough Street and Cates Avenue will be closed from 6:15am until 7:00am. Note that additional roads will be impacted on NC State Campus and all cross-streets one block in each direction will be detoured. Raleigh Night Market City Market Thursday, November 14 Event Time: 5:30pm - 10:30pm Associated Road Closures: Parham Street between Martin Street and Wolfe Street, Wolfe Street between Blount Street and Blake Street, and Blake Street between Martin Street and Davie Street will be closed from 2:00pm until 11:59pm.

Other Events This Weekend The Black Keys Friday, November 8 PNC Arena Having Our Say – North Carolina Theatre Friday, November 8 – Sunday, November 10 Fletcher Opera Theater Darwin Day Saturday, November 9 North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences Stream Monitoring Workshop Saturday, November 9 Walnut Creek Wetland Center Made and Found at Moore Square Saturday, November 9 Moore Square Roy Orbison & Buddy Holly: The Rock ‘n’ Roll Dream Tour Saturday, November 9 Memorial Auditorium The Music of Harry Potter – North Carolina Symphony Saturday, November 9 Meymandi Concert Hall NC State Football vs. Clemson Saturday, November 9 Carter-Finley Stadium Bead Mercantile Show Saturday, November 9 – Sunday, November 10 Raleigh Convention Center CHEERSPORT Raleigh Grand Championship Sunday, November 10 Raleigh Convention Center

Weekly Report Page 8 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 9: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Special Events Weekly Digest Friday, November 8 – Thursday, November 14

City of Raleigh Special Events Office

[email protected] | (919) 996-2200 | www.raleighnc.gov/specialevents

NC State Basketball vs. Detroit Mercy Sunday, November 10 PNC Arena Wagner – Siegfried Act III in Concert – North Carolina Opera Sunday, November 10 Meymandi Concert Hall

Public Resources Event Feedback Form: Tell us what you think about Raleigh events! We welcome citizen and participant feedback and encourage you to provide comments or concerns about any events regulated by the Special Events Office. We will use this helpful information in future planning. Temporary Road Closures: A resource providing current information on street closures in Raleigh. Online Events Calendar: View all currently scheduled events that are regulated by the City of Raleigh Special Events Office.

Weekly Report Page 9 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 10: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Council Member Follow Up

Weekly Report Page 10 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 11: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Municipal Building 222 West Hargett Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 One Exchange Plaza 1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 1020 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 City of Raleigh Post Office Box 590 • Raleigh North Carolina 27602-0590 (Mailing Address)

TO: Ruffin L. Hall, City Manager

THRU: Ken Bowers AICP, Director

FROM: Sara Ellis, Planner II Matt Klem, Planner II

DEPARTMENT: City Planning

DATE: November 8, 2019

SUBJECT: Dix Edge Area Study

Purpose

To provide information on the next steps in the Dix Edge Area Study; including an detailed outreach plan and updated timeline.

At the September 10, 2019 Council Work Session, staff provided information regarding the Dix Edge Area Study. Council Member Crowder requested the draft scope of the Dix Edge Area Study be amended to provide additional detail on the outreach and engagement plan for the study to ensure equitable and holistic community participation is at the foundation of the planning process. This memo is a supplemental document to the enhanced scope and RFQ that provide a more robust outreach effort and outline proposed next steps in the planning process. At the September 10, 2019 City Council Work Session, City Planning staff provided an overview of the draft scope and outlined stakeholder guidance options to receive direction from Council on the desired format. Traditional small area and corridor planning processes utilize one of three options; a confirmation group whose role is to confirm that the process is on the right track and that staff are asking the right questions and holding meetings at times and locations appropriate for the community; an advisory group who would provide input throughout the process that will shape and guide the outcome; or a land/business owner focus that provides roundtable discussion and planning charette opportunities for this particular group of stakeholders. In response to Council guidance, Planning staff revised the draft scope for the planning process and have detailed below a more robust outreach process for this area (see supplemental attachment). The outreach and engagement plan for this study will be different from what has been done through previous planning processes. The process includes community led walking or bus tours, a monthly newsletter, a storefront office space for the community to engage and a variety of other elements detailed below and in the project scope. The process will also approach outreach for the full study area by focusing on smaller communities within the study area; we understand the needs of the community vary across intersections and likely

Weekly Report Page 11 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 12: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

from door to door and this process is designed to meet this challenge and turn it into an opportunity for authentic and diverse engagement.

Equitable and Holistic Community Outreach

At the September 10, 2019 Council work session Council Member Crowder made a request for planning staff to amend the draft scope for the Dix Edge Area Study that would provide additional detail on the outreach and engagement plan for the study to ensure equitable and holistic community participation is at the foundation of the planning process. The outreach and engagement plan for this study will be different from what has been done through previous planning processes. The process includes community led walking or bus tours, a monthly newsletter, a storefront office space for the community to engage and a variety of other elements detailed below and in the project scope.

The scale of investments in and adjacent to the study area, combined with the barriers to affordable housing and real estate demand in the area necessitate a comprehensive and different approach to outreach that encompasses all members of the community. The engagement plan will begin with smaller conversations that focus on the unique communities within the study area. Staff recommends five subcommunities be identified to allow opportunities for engagement to be evenly spread throughout the region. These smaller community conversations will allow for intimate conversations about the complex and challenging topics of growth, change, affordability and equity in the area. These conversations will build a strong base for understand across communities with the goal of not only hearing from community members but letting them hear from and understand one another.

Weekly Report Page 12 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 13: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

o Community led walking/biking/bus tours. Ideally led by a community leader a tourof the area would kick off the process and help build the community asset book.These tours will take place using multiple modes of transportation; walking, biking orbus for those for whom walking or biking pose a mobility challenge.

How will we communicate? Monthly newsletter. This will be a publication available on the project page,

sent out via GovDelivery and mailed out to interested stakeholders once amonth. The newsletter will contain background information on the project,

Weekly Report Page 13 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 14: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

and updates so stakeholders can easily pick up a copy and see what’s going on. This can also be distributed to interested area businesses.

Bi-lingual materials will be available throughout the process, and at leastone meeting will be held entirely in Spanish.

Branded swag. At the beginning of the planning process we will work withthe community to create a logo or other iconic image that will be used on allour materials. We will use a portion of the budget to purchase materials suchas stickers, yard signs and other materials designed to enhance visibility.

Billboard Rental. I-40 runs through the study area, and has a number ofbillboards that are highly visible. The study would rent advertising space on abillboard. S. Saunders Street also has billboards.

Press Releases. We will provide press releases in English and in Spanish tothe local area papers, as well as to local radio stations.

How will we ensure everyone has an opportunity to participate?

Pop-up office space located in the study area. An area store front will besecured for the duration of the study that will be staffed during regularintervals and serve as a location for the public to drop in to provide feedback,look at project materials and talk to planning staff. This space will rotatethroughout the study area to allow for a greater ease of accessibility.

• Potential locations can include the Washington Terrace communityroom, the Washington Elementary Boys & Girls Club, Oak City Cares,area churches and others.

Childcare and meals. Meetings will all have childcare and full mealsprovided, to lower the barriers to participation for the public.

Free bus or Citrix cycle passes will be provided to community membersinterested in attending the meetings.

Drop boxes for public comments in public locations throughout the studyarea. The locations will be determined based on space availability, but lockeddrop boxes will be located in area parks or other public spaces for the publicto anonymously drop input on the project off at convenient locations wherethey will already be.

Planning with youth. will be an additional element to gather input from agroup who is traditionally left out of the planning process. This element willrely heavily on the availability of the staff at Washington Elementary Schooland the Washington Elementary Boys & Girls Club. Youth are often the onlystakeholders who are not at the table but may benefit from the planrecommendations that are often years out. This element will include planningcharette type activities where the youth drive the conversation.

How will we reach the community? Door to door outreach, the planning team will partner with an area

university to solicit and train volunteers for door to door canvassing to ensurethat every person in the study area is aware of the project and feels that theiropinion and needs are important.

Weekly Report Page 14 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 15: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Survey bus riders, planning staff will ride the bus lines that pass through thestudy area (GoRaleigh routes 7 & 21) and offer the opportunity to take thesurvey using Ipads.

Greenway outreach via bicycle, project staff will conduct outreach alongthe greenway trails in the study area.

Community led meetings. Training for community leaders to run themeetings and facilitate the conversations. While City Staff traditionallyfacilitates the public meetings, this process will have a training element forcommunity leaders to empower them to lead the conversation around theplanning in the area.

For the Community by the Community, what will we create? • Community asset book. This will be one of the first deliverables in the

planning process, and a foundation on which we will continue our process.We will create an asset book that highlights all the elements the communitylove about where they live and what makes it home.

• Community Led History. This area has a number of unique assets, and weunderstand will likely undergo significant change with the cominginvestments. A community led history project can take place through oralstorytelling and culminate in a document or video that documents the richhistory of the area through the eyes and ears of the community.

Project Background

Planning staff were directed in August of 2018 to provide options for a planning study that would address the neighborhoods and major development sites surrounding Dix Park. In June of 2019 a budget note was approved to authorize a planning study.

During the August 21, 2018 City Council meeting Council Member Crowder requested that staff report back on a planning process that would address the neighborhoods and major development sites surrounding Dorothea Dix Park, anticipating increased development pressures as the park redevelops. Staff reported back to Council at the November 20, 2018 meeting and presented background information on the proposed study area as well as a draft scope of work outlining options for a study. The options outlined for a study included the authorization of a consultant-led process and an estimated cost of $300,000. During the November meeting Council requested a budget note which was subsequently funded as part of the Fiscal Year 2020 budget. At the September 10, 2019 City Council Work session, City Planning staff provided a presentation and overview of the draft scope and outlined some stakeholder guidance options with the request that Council direct staff on which option to solicit applications for. Traditional small area and corridor planning processes utilize one of three options; a confirmation group whose role is to confirm that the process is on the right track and that staff are asking the right questions and holding meetings at times and locations appropriate for the community; an advisory group who would provide input throughout the process that will shape and guide the outcome; or a land/business owner focus that provides roundtable discussion and planning charette opportunities for this particular group of stakeholders. Per the request of Council, Planning staff revised the draft scope for the planning process and have detailed below a more robust outreach process for this area. This enhanced

Weekly Report Page 15 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 16: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

outreach process will utilize a variety of channels with the goal of not only letting community members know the process is happening and inviting them to the meetings but taking the process directly to their front door and placing them at the center of the planning process. Below is a detailed outline of options to build on the outreach process included in the project scope, this is intended to act as a supplement. Project Timeline To-Date and Proposed

Next Steps in the Planning Process

As the budget note has been approved, Planning staff has drafted a scope of work and a timeline to provide as supplements to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that will be tentatively released in November with a timeline leading to a public kickoff of the project tentatively in early April of 2020. This timeline is intended to move the study forward in conjunction with the implementation of the Dix Park Master Plan and to address the reality that displacement and neighborhood change are inevitable in the neighborhoods surrounding Dix Park. However, a comprehensive community-lead planning effort can provide policy direction for future growth that can shape equitable development and planning, regardless of income, land ownership, or tenure in the area.

Completed Tasks City Council requests options for study August 21, 2018 Study options presented to City Council November 20, 2018 Dorothea Dix Park Master Plan Adopted February 19, 2019 City Council adopts FY20 Budget, includes $300,000 in project funding

June 3, 2019 Draft scope and options for stakeholder engagement presented to City Council

September 10, 2019

Proposed Timeline RFQ Release November 15, 2019 Deadline for questions November 29, 2019 Questions answered and available December 6, 2019 Deadline for proposal submission January 10, 2020 Review of proposals January 13, 2020 – January 20, 2020 Consultant shortlist contacted, Interviews (if needed), and selection January 20, 2020 – January 27, 2020

Recommendation to City Council February 2020 Contract negotiations March 2020 Award contract March 2020 Public kickoff Early April 2020

Weekly Report Page 16 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 17: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Hazard Class7 Condition8

1 2 Walnut Creek 4,390 Existing Pond Lake Johnson Raleigh P $2 City Yes High Good Yes No No ‐2 CT‐5 Crabtree 688 Existing Pond Longview Lakes Raleigh I $9 City/Private No High Fair No ‐ Yes Yes3 Ma‐8 Marsh 972 Existing Pond Beaman Lake Raleigh P $16 City Yes CDM ‐ Intermediate Good No ‐ N/A Yes4 S76 Perry Creek 735 Existing Pond Durant Park Lake Upper Raleigh P N/A City Yes City‐Low N/A No No Yes ‐5 S73 Perry Creek 851 Existing Pond Durant Park Lake Lower Raleigh P N/A City Yes City‐Low N/A No No N/A ‐6 72 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 625 Existing Pond Carolina Pines Raleigh P $146 City/Private Yes City ‐ High N/A No No No Yes7 BB‐2 Big Branch 230 Existing Pond Eastgate Park Lake Raleigh I $28 City No High Fair No ‐ N/A ‐8 CT‐15 Crabtree 135 Existing Pond Laurel Hills Pond Raleigh I $62 City/Private Yes Intermdediate Fair No ‐ N/A ‐9 18 Lake Johnson 119 Proposed Pond Smith Pond (Breached) Raleigh P $52 City Yes Low Poor Yes No No ‐10 P‐4 Pigeon 57 Proposed Pond Fred Fletcher Park Pond Raleigh I $47 City Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A Yes11 CT‐13 Crabtree 155 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $42 City Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐12 24 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 79 Proposed Pond Walnut Softball Complex Raleigh P $58 City Yes N/A N/A Yes No No ‐13 P‐3 Pigeon 65 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $71 City Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐14 WC‐06E Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 73 Proposed Pond Rock Quarry Road B Raleigh I $71 City Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐15 H‐1 House 30 Existing Pond Eden Pond Raleigh E $31 City Yes Intermediate Fair No ‐ N/A ‐16 S‐12 Sycamore 4,600 Existing Pond Big Lake Raleigh P $2 State Yes Low Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐17 CT‐22* Crabtree 33,178 Existing Pond Crabtree Lake Cary/RDU‐ETJ P $2 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ N/A ‐18 LB‐1* Little Brier 7,376 Existing Pond Little Brier Creek Reservoir RDU‐ETJ P $3 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐19 SI‐2* Stirrup Iron 5,664 Existing Pond Page Lake Cary‐ETJ, RDU, Durham P $3 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐20 S‐11 Sycamore 6,100 Existing Pond Sycamore Lake Raleigh P $4 State Yes Low Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐21 R‐1* Richland 3,320 Existing Pond Richland Lake Raleigh‐ETJ P $6 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐22 CT‐27* Crabtree 1,607 Existing Pond Coles Branch Reservoir Morrisville‐ETJ P $6 Wake County Yes Low Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐23 SI‐1* Stirrup Iron 1,318 Existing Pond Sorrellʹs Grove Lake Morrisville‐ETJ P $6 Wake County Yes Intermediate Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐24 M‐2* Mine 5,219 Existing Pond Shelley Lake Raleigh P $7 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ N/A ‐25 HS‐4* Haresnipe 2,390 Existing Pond Lake Lynn Raleigh P $8 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ N/A ‐26 CT‐26* Crabtree 916 Existing Pond Hatcherʹs Grove Reservoir Cary I $10 Wake County Yes Intermediate Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐27 CT‐28* Crabtree 1,491 Existing Pond Bond Lake Cary P $11 Wake County Yes High Good Yes ‐ Yes ‐28 CT‐18* Crabtree 2,800 Existing Pond Reedy Creek Lake Raleigh P $13 State Yes CDM ‐ Low Good No ‐ N/A ‐29 1 Walnut Creek 7,622 Existing Pond Lake Raleigh Raleigh P $31 State Yes High Good Yes No No ‐30 H‐10 House 109 Existing Pond NCSU Hillsborough St Pond Raleigh E $30 State Yes Low Fair No ‐ N/A ‐31 WCLAKR‐A Lake Raleigh 79 Existing Pond Lake Raleigh A Raleigh I $54 State Yes N/A Good No No No ‐32 13 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 868 Existing Pond Dorothy Dix Farm Pond Raleigh P $97 State Yes Low Fair No No No ‐33 WC‐22B Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 137 Wetland Lake Wheeler Road Raleigh I $45 State Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐34 1002 Simmons Branch 336 Existing Pond White Oak Lake Raleigh P $73 Private Yes Intermediate Poor Yes Yes No Yes35 Ma‐5 Marsh 426 Existing Pond Northshore Lake Raleigh P $44 Private Yes High Poor Yes ‐ Yes Yes36 P52 Perry Creek 2,448 Existing Pond Gresham Lake Raleigh‐ETJ P N/A Private Yes High N/A No No N/A ‐37 BE‐1 Beaverdam East 1,790 Wetland Buffaloe Road Raleigh P N/A Private No N/A N/A No No N/A ‐38 BE‐2 Beaverdam East 1,790 Existing Pond River Bend Pond Raleigh‐ETJ P N/A Private No City‐Low N/A No No No ‐39 P115 Perry Creek 1,079 Existing Pond North Ridge Lake Lower Raleigh P N/A Private Yes High Poor No No Yes ‐40 P132 Perry Creek 616 Existing Pond North Ridge Lake Upper Raleigh P N/A Private Yes High Poor No No Yes ‐

Currently CIP‐Listed12

Ranking Parameters

Ranking

CITY OF RALEIGHSTORMWATER FACILITY RANKING

Pond in Series11

Facility NameNitrogen 

Cost/Benefit4

($/lb)

NCDWQ 303(d)‐Listed6

Ownership5Dam Safety Flood 

Control Benefit9

Downstream Flooding Potential10

Stream Type3

Drainage BasinSite ID1 Drainage 

Area (acres) Facility Type2

Site Characteristics

Community

Weekly Report Page 17 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 18: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Hazard Class7 Condition8

Currently CIP‐Listed12

Ranking Parameters

Ranking

CITY OF RALEIGHSTORMWATER FACILITY RANKING

Pond in Series11

Facility NameNitrogen 

Cost/Benefit4

($/lb)

NCDWQ 303(d)‐Listed6

Ownership5Dam Safety Flood 

Control Benefit9

Downstream Flooding Potential10

Stream Type3

Drainage BasinSite ID1 Drainage 

Area (acres) Facility Type2

Site Characteristics

Community

41 Ma‐3B Marsh 554 Existing Pond Brockton Lake Raleigh P $11 Private Yes CDM ‐ High Poor Yes ‐ N/A Yes42 15 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 975 Existing Pond Ileagnes Raleigh P $116 Private Yes N/A Poor No No No ‐43 T‐4 Turkey 1,079 Existing Pond Lake Anne Raleigh‐ETJ P $8 Private Yes Low Fair No ‐ Yes ‐44 HS‐2 Haresnipe 194 Existing Pond Summer Lake Raleigh I $10 Private Yes High Good No ‐ N/A ‐45 BB‐3 Big Branch 634 Existing Pond Cedar Hills Lake Raleigh P $11 Private No High Good No ‐ N/A ‐46 T‐6 Turkey 672 Existing Pond Dunnaway Pond Raleigh P $12 Private Yes Intermediate Good Yes ‐ No ‐47 R‐8 Richland 563 Existing Pond Camp Pond Raleigh‐ETJ P $13 Private Yes High Fair No ‐ Yes ‐48 M‐4 Mine 1,533 Existing Pond Greystone Lake Raleigh P $14 Private Yes High Good Yes ‐ Yes Yes49 CT‐25 Crabtree 126 Existing Pond Unknown Cary I $15 Private Yes CDM ‐ Intermediate Poor No ‐ Yes ‐50 CT‐17 Crabtree 1,575 Existing Pond Goodnight Pond Cary‐ETJ P $15 Private Yes Intermdediate Good No ‐ N/A ‐51 CT‐1 Crabtree 396 Existing Pond Carolina Lake Raleigh‐ETJ I $16 Private No CDM ‐ Low Poor No ‐ N/A ‐52 CT‐4 Crabtree 441 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh P $17 Private No N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐53 CT‐2D Crabtree 607 Existing Pond Turfgrass Lake Raleigh‐ETJ P $19 Private No CDM ‐ High Fair No ‐ Yes ‐54 Ma‐10B Marsh 440 Existing Pond Pews Pond Raleigh‐ETJ I $20 Private Yes Intermediate Fair No ‐ Yes ‐55 Ma‐10 Marsh 561 Existing Pond Pews Pond Raleigh‐ETJ P $21 Private Yes Intermediate Poor Yes ‐ N/A ‐56 E18 Perry Creek 107 Existing Pond Remington Park Lake Raleigh E N/A Private Yes High Good No No N/A ‐57 E27 Perry Creek 146 Existing Pond Lake Linda Raleigh‐ETJ P N/A Private Yes Intermediate N/A No No N/A ‐58 S‐1 Sycamore 122 Existing Pond Poole Pond Raleigh‐ETJ I $22 Private Yes Low Fair No ‐ Yes ‐59 CT‐16 Crabtree 153 Existing Pond Olde Raleigh Pond #3 Raleigh P $24 Private Yes High Good No ‐ N/A ‐60 CT‐21 Crabtree 539 Proposed Pond N/A Cary P $24 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ Yes ‐61 LB‐4 Little Brier 1,375 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh‐ETJ P $25 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ Yes ‐62 CT‐7 Crabtree 90 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $26 Private No N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐63 S‐8 Sycamore 90 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $26 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ Yes ‐64 Ma‐10A Marsh 78 Existing Pond Pews Pond Raleigh‐ETJ E $27 Private Yes CDM ‐ Intermediate Fair No ‐ Yes ‐65 SI‐3 Stirrup Iron 593 Existing Pond Lake Shore Pond Durham P $29 Private Yes Intermediate Good No ‐ Yes ‐66 T‐11 Turkey 131 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $30 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐67 CT‐3 Crabtree 567 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh‐ETJ P $32 Private No N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐68 T‐3 Turkey 115 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh‐ETJ I $33 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐69 H‐9 House 376 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh P $36 State Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐70 CT‐32 Crabtree 47 Existing Pond Delta Lake Raleigh E $36 Private Yes High Poor No ‐ N/A ‐71 H‐2 House 32 Existing Pond Unknown Raleigh E $36 Private Yes CDM ‐ High Fair No ‐ N/A ‐72 WC‐17A Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 627 Wetland South Saunders Street Raleigh P $37 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐73 M‐5 Mine 159 Existing Pond Shaw Lake Raleigh I $38 Private Yes Intermdediate Fair No ‐ Yes ‐74 WC‐06C Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 295 Wetland Rock Quarry Road A Raleigh P $47 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐75 LB‐3 Little Brier 699 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh P $47 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ Yes ‐76 S‐5 Sycamore 67 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $47 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ Yes ‐77 WC‐35A Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 144 Wetland Jones Franklin Road Raleigh P $49 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐78 R‐5 Richland 516 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh‐ETJ I $53 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ Yes ‐79 BB‐1 Big Branch 288 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $58 Private No N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐80 Ma‐6 Marsh 802 Existing Pond Brentwood Today Lake Raleigh P $72 Private Yes High Poor No ‐ Yes Yes

Weekly Report Page 18 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 19: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

Hazard Class7 Condition8

Currently CIP‐Listed12

Ranking Parameters

Ranking

CITY OF RALEIGHSTORMWATER FACILITY RANKING

Pond in Series11

Facility NameNitrogen 

Cost/Benefit4

($/lb)

NCDWQ 303(d)‐Listed6

Ownership5Dam Safety Flood 

Control Benefit9

Downstream Flooding Potential10

Stream Type3

Drainage BasinSite ID1 Drainage 

Area (acres) Facility Type2

Site Characteristics

Community

81 T‐2 Turkey 82 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $72 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐82 H‐11 House 48 Existing Pond Unknown Raleigh I $73 Private Yes CDM ‐ High Good No ‐ Yes ‐83 WC‐08B Watson Branch 104 Proposed Pond Martin Luther King Raleigh I $74 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐84 WC‐36A Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 285 Proposed Pond Capital Center Drive Raleigh P $76 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐85 S‐4 Sycamore 178 Existing Pond Unknown Raleigh I $76 Private Yes CDM ‐ Low Fair No ‐ Yes ‐86 WC‐14A Wildcat Branch 99 Proposed Pond Durham Drive Raleigh I $79 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐87 M‐3 Mine 94 Existing Pond Unknown Raleigh I $79 Private Yes CDM ‐ Intermediate Fair No ‐ Yes ‐88 H‐3 House 63 Existing Pond Unknown Raleigh E $79 Private Yes CDM ‐ Low Poor No ‐ N/A ‐89 WC‐04B Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 580 Proposed Pond Glenbrook Drive Raleigh I $84 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐90 M‐6 Mine 83 Existing Pond Valley Lake Raleigh E $84 Private Yes CDM ‐ High Poor No ‐ Yes ‐91 WC‐32B Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 249 Proposed Pond Gorman Street Raleigh I $99 Private Yes N/A N/A No No No ‐92 P‐1 Pigeon 43 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh E $99 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐93 1001 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 841 Existing Pond Underwood Pond Raleigh‐ETJ I $101 Private Yes High N/A No No No ‐94 P‐6 Pigeon 51 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh I $103 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐95 P‐5 Pigeon 35 Proposed Pond N/A Raleigh E $103 Private Yes N/A N/A No ‐ N/A ‐96 H‐6 House 209 Existing Pond Unknown Raleigh P $123 Private Yes CDM ‐ High Good No ‐ N/A ‐97 23 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 270 Existing Pond Golf Course C Raleigh I $290 Private Yes N/A Good No No No ‐98 36 Unnamed Tributary to Walnut Creek 181 Existing Pond Golf Course A Raleigh P $470 Private Yes N/A Fair No No No ‐99 S84 Perry Creek 47 Existing Pond Heathrow Dam Raleigh E N/A Private Yes High N/A No No No ‐100 S70 Perry Creek 31 Existing Pond Alyson Pond Raleigh E N/A Private Yes High N/A No No No ‐101 S42 Perry Creek 43 Existing Pond Cheviot Golf Lake Raleigh‐ETJ I N/A Private Yes City‐Low N/A No No N/A ‐102 E32 Perry Creek 47 Existing Pond Anne Lake Raleigh‐ETJ E N/A Private Yes Intermediate Poor No No Yes ‐

Notes:1.)  Site ID:  * indicate NRCS‐constructed facility 7.)  Hazard Classification ‐ The NCDENR ‐ Dam Safety Program classification for the existing dam?2.)  Facility Type Low ‐ Class A, minimal structural damage

Existing ‐ Existing Wet Pond Intermediate ‐ Class B, road damage or minor structural damageProposed ‐ Proposed Wet Pond High ‐ Class C, loss of life and/or serious structural damageWetland ‐ Proposed Stormwater Wetland * Note:  If the site is proposed or existing and not included in the NCDENR dam database, a determination

3.)  Stream Type ‐ As defined by a USGS 7.5‐minute series topographic map was made on the hazard classificaiton.E ‐ Ephemeral 8.)  Condition ‐ A conceptual assessment of the condition of the existing dam and spillwayI ‐ Intermittent Good ‐ No trees, sinkholes, settlement, erosion, seepage.  Spillway in good conditionP ‐ Perennial Fair ‐ Small trees/brush, minor erosion, minor spillway repair.

4.)  Nitrogen Cost/Benefit is the total program cost (including capital cost and operation and Poor ‐ Existence of large trees, sinkholes, seepage, etc.  Major repair to spillway required.        maintenance cost) divided by the pounds of total nitrogen removed over a 30‐year planning period. 9.)  Flood Control Benefit ‐ Is the existing dam or will the proposed dam provide flood control benefit?5.)  Ownership ‐ Who owns the existing facility or land for a proposed facility? 10.)  Downstream Flooding ‐ Has flooding been reported downstream of an existing/proposed facility?

Private ‐ Privately owned 11.)  Pond in Series ‐ Does the facility downstream meet the NCDENR surface area to drainage area (SA/DA) ratio?Public ‐ Publicly owned including State, Wake County, and City of Raleigh         For example, if Pond A is located upstream of Pond B, can Pond B meet the SA/DA requirements without Pond A in place?

6.)  Is the stream located on or upstream of a NCDWQ 303(d)‐listed stream? No ‐  The downstream pond can meet the SA/DA requirements.Yes ‐  The downstream pond cannot meet the SA/DA requirements.

12.)  Facility currently included in the City of Raleigh list of Capital Improvement Program Phase I Stormwater Projects

Weekly Report Page 19 of 20 November 8, 2019

Page 20: Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 › ... · Issue 2019-42 November 8, 2019 Recommendations from the stakeholders were brought to the RTA for evaluation, yielding the final recommendation

!.!.

!.

!.!.

"/

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

"/

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

"/

!.

!.

"/

"/

!.

!.

"/

"/ !.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

"/

"/

"/

!.

!.

"/

!.

!.

!.

!.

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

!.

"/

"/!.

"/"/

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

!. !.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

2

8

7

3

64

54

19

17

20

16

58

18

85

22

70

53

51

59

73

87

48

90

24

43

46

21

47

45

55

80

35

41

50

28

23

49

26

27

65

44

25

30

8296

88

7115

63 76

61

75

94

95

13

92

10

62

52

67

11

81

68

66

78

79

60

69

9

12

33

89

86

14

74

83

72

91

77

84

6

1

93

31

34

98

97

42

3229

37

38

45

40

39

36

57

56

99

102

100

101

§̈¦440

§̈¦540

§̈¦40

Durant Rd

NEUSE RIVER B

ASIN

CAPEN FEAR

RIVER

BA

SIN

Stirrup Iron Creek

Little Brie

r Cree

k

Syca

mor

e C

reek

Turkey Creek

Haresnipe Creek

Min

e Creek

Big

Bra

nch

Marsh Creek

Crabtree Creek

Walnut Creek

Pigeon House Branch

SE B

eave

rdam

Cre

ek

SW Beaverdam

Cre

ek

Hou

se C

reek

Ric

hlan

d C

reek

Crabtree Creek

Rocky BranchBushy Creek

Wild

cat B

ranc

h

Big B

ranch

Little Arm Branch

STIRRUP IRON CREEK

LITTLE BRIER CREEK

SYCAMORE CREEK

TURKEY CREEK

HARESNIPE CREEK

MINE CREEK

BIG BRANCH

MARSH CREEK

PIGEON HOUSE BRANCH

BEAVERDAM CREEKHOUSE CREEK

RICHLAND CREEK

CRABTREE CREEK

WALNUT CREEK

DURHAM COUNTYWAKE COUNTY

CH

ATH

AM

CO

UN

TY

§̈¦40

tu1

tu401

tu70

tu1

tu64

tu264

tu401

tu70

55

54

50

50

Westgate Rd

Lynn Rd

Leesville Rd

Lead

Min

e Rd

Six Forks Rd

Durant Rd

Spring Forest Rd

Buffa

loe

Rd

Wak

e Fo

rest

Rd

New B

ern

Ave

Wade Ave

Edwards Mill Rd

Trinity Rd

N. H

arri s

on A

ve

Aviat

ion

Pkwy

Airport Blvd

High House Rd

Olive Chapel Rd

Kildaire Farm

Rd

SW Maynard Rd

Tryon Rd

Hol

ly S

prin

gs R

d

Western Blvd

Avent Ferry Rd

Yates Mill Pond Rd

Lake

Whe

eler

Rd

Rock Quarry Rd

Poole Rd

Hodge R

d

Jones

Sausa

ge Rd

Ten Ten Rd

Millbrook Rd

Falls of Neuse Rd

Davis Dr

Glenwood Ave

Cre

edm

oor R

d

LegendCandidate Stormwater Facilities

!. Existing Facility

"/ Proposed Facility

Roads

Streets

State Roads

NC Highways

US Highways

Interstates

Streams

River Basin Boundary

Drainage Basin Boundary

County Boundary

Municipal Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction

Town of Apex

Town of Cary

Town of Knightdale

Town of Morrisville

City of Raleigh

RDU

RTP

Town of Wake Forest

NCDWQ 303(d)-Listed Stream

NCDWQ 303(d)-Listed Lake

2,500 0 2,500 5,000 7,500Feet

4PERRY CREEK

BEAVERDAM EAST CREEK

999

999

Existing Stormwater Facility Ranking

Proposed Stormwater Facility Ranking

Weekly Report Page 20 of 20 November 8, 2019