isolated cervical lympadenopathy: unusual presentation of localised brucellosis

2
CASE CORRESPONDENCE Isolated cervical lympadenopathy: unusual presentation of localised brucellosis Introduction Neck masses are critical diagnostic and thera- peutic challenges in the practise of otolaryn- gology. Although there are numerous congenital, infectious, benign and malignant conditions that can cause a neck mass, the most common cause is infection. Brucellosis is a zoonosis transmitted from animals to humans. The portal of entry is usually the gastrointestinal tract through ingestion of unpasteurised milk. Brucellosis is a protean disease (1). That is, it can mimic any other disease. This condition leads to a diagnostic difficulty. Isolated neck mass because of brucellar infection is rare, and this is the second case reported to date. Case report A 63-year-old farmer admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology with a swell- ing on the right side of his neck for 6 weeks. His systemic and otolaryngologic examinations were normal except for a 3 · 4-cm painful mass on the right side of the neck (Fig. 1). Computed tomography of the neck showed the mass in the right submandibular region, which had hypodense centre and thin and contrast enhanced wall. These radiologic find- ings were suggestive of an abscess or a lymph- adenopathy with central necrosis. Full blood count and blood chemistry were normal. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the mass was consistent with an infectious or inflammatory process. Purified protein deriv- ative (PPD) or Mantoux test was negative, and chest X-ray was normal. According to his history, he was living in a rural area, and there were some other people in his neighbourhood who had similar com- plaints including neck mass. Although they had been operated on for their neck masses, their complaints recurred or persisted after operations. Therefore, brucella agglutination test was performed, and a very high titre of 1 320 was found. Becasue of that high anti- body titre suggestive for brucellar infection, blood or bone marrow culture was not per- formed. With a presumptive diagnosis of cer- vical brucellar lymphadenopathy, antibrucellar treatment was started with doxicyline 2 · 100 mg and rifampicin 1 · 600 mg per day for 6 weeks. Close follow-up of the patient was per- formed. After initiation of the treatment, the size of the mass decreased progressively. The antibody titre decreased to 1 40, and there was no mass in the neck at the end of 2 months follow-up. Discussion Brucellar infection is protean in its manifesta- tions. Therefore, it can mimic any other dis- ease. In general, the symptoms are non- specific and include fever, sweats, malaise, anorexia, headache and back pain. Brucellosis can cause disease in any system or organ in the body as well (2). These symptoms or other organ or disease manifestations were absent in our patient. Thus, the cervical lymphadenopathy was considered to be a localised brucellar disease rather than a sys- temic disease. Brucellar infections can mimic malignancy. On admission, the patient was considered to have a malignant neck mass because of his advanced age and size of the mass. However, presence of people with similar complaints in his neighbourhood and short duration of his symptoms was suggestive for an infectious process. This presumption was supported with the results of fine need aspiration cytol- ogy, which also revealed an infectious process. Considering the increase in the mycobacterial infections in the worldwide, PPD Mantoux and chest X-ray were obtained, which were unremarkable. However, the Grubbel-Widal test revealed a high antibody titre suggesting brucellar infection. Blood and bone marrow cultures were not performed because of the absence of systemic sings and symptoms of brucellosis as well as presence of very high antibody titres. An antigen titre >1 160 is 92% sensitive and 100% specific for brucello- sis (3). Despite this fact, coincidence of a malignancy and brucellar disease might be possible, and close follow-up of the patient was necessary, as biopsy might have been needed. However, the entire neck mass disap- peared in a short time after antibrucellar Figure 1 Postcontrast computerised tomography reveals an enhancing thick-walled cystic mass (asterisk) consistent with the enlarged and necrotic right anterior jugular lymph node. The skin is thickened (white arrow), the subcutaneous fat is infiltrated and the platysma muscle is thickened (arrowhead) because of inflammation. There is also right retropharyngeal lymph node with effacement of the right pyriform sinus (black arrow) 674 Isolated cervical lympadenopathy ª 2009 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, April 2009, 63, 4, 672–675

Upload: m-yilmaz

Post on 21-Jul-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CASE CORRESPONDENCE

Isolated cervical lympadenopathy: unusual presentation of localisedbrucellosis

Introduction

Neck masses are critical diagnostic and thera-peutic challenges in the practise of otolaryn-gology. Although there are numerouscongenital, infectious, benign and malignantconditions that can cause a neck mass, themost common cause is infection.

Brucellosis is a zoonosis transmitted fromanimals to humans. The portal of entry isusually the gastrointestinal tract throughingestion of unpasteurised milk. Brucellosis isa protean disease (1). That is, it can mimicany other disease. This condition leads to adiagnostic difficulty. Isolated neck massbecause of brucellar infection is rare, and thisis the second case reported to date.

Case report

A 63-year-old farmer admitted to theDepartment of Otolaryngology with a swell-ing on the right side of his neck for

6 weeks. His systemic and otolaryngologicexaminations were normal except for a3 · 4-cm painful mass on the right side ofthe neck (Fig. 1).

Computed tomography of the neck showedthe mass in the right submandibular region,which had hypodense centre and thin andcontrast enhanced wall. These radiologic find-ings were suggestive of an abscess or a lymph-adenopathy with central necrosis.

Full blood count and blood chemistry werenormal. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of themass was consistent with an infectious orinflammatory process. Purified protein deriv-ative (PPD) or Mantoux test was negative,and chest X-ray was normal.

According to his history, he was living in arural area, and there were some other peoplein his neighbourhood who had similar com-plaints including neck mass. Although theyhad been operated on for their neck masses,their complaints recurred or persisted afteroperations. Therefore, brucella agglutinationtest was performed, and a very high titre of

1 ⁄ 320 was found. Becasue of that high anti-body titre suggestive for brucellar infection,blood or bone marrow culture was not per-formed. With a presumptive diagnosis of cer-vical brucellar lymphadenopathy, antibrucellartreatment was started with doxicyline2 · 100 mg and rifampicin 1 · 600 mg perday for 6 weeks.

Close follow-up of the patient was per-formed. After initiation of the treatment, thesize of the mass decreased progressively. Theantibody titre decreased to 1 ⁄ 40, and therewas no mass in the neck at the end of 2months follow-up.

Discussion

Brucellar infection is protean in its manifesta-tions. Therefore, it can mimic any other dis-ease. In general, the symptoms are non-specific and include fever, sweats, malaise,anorexia, headache and back pain. Brucellosiscan cause disease in any system or organ inthe body as well (2). These symptoms orother organ or disease manifestations wereabsent in our patient. Thus, the cervicallymphadenopathy was considered to be alocalised brucellar disease rather than a sys-temic disease.

Brucellar infections can mimic malignancy.On admission, the patient was considered tohave a malignant neck mass because of hisadvanced age and size of the mass. However,presence of people with similar complaints inhis neighbourhood and short duration of hissymptoms was suggestive for an infectiousprocess. This presumption was supportedwith the results of fine need aspiration cytol-ogy, which also revealed an infectious process.Considering the increase in the mycobacterialinfections in the worldwide, PPD ⁄ Mantouxand chest X-ray were obtained, which wereunremarkable. However, the Grubbel-Widaltest revealed a high antibody titre suggestingbrucellar infection. Blood and bone marrowcultures were not performed because of theabsence of systemic sings and symptoms ofbrucellosis as well as presence of very highantibody titres. An antigen titre >1 ⁄ 160 is92% sensitive and 100% specific for brucello-sis (3). Despite this fact, coincidence of amalignancy and brucellar disease might bepossible, and close follow-up of the patientwas necessary, as biopsy might have beenneeded. However, the entire neck mass disap-peared in a short time after antibrucellar

Figure 1 Postcontrast computerised tomography reveals an enhancing thick-walled cystic mass (asterisk)consistent with the enlarged and necrotic right anterior jugular lymph node. The skin is thickened (whitearrow), the subcutaneous fat is infiltrated and the platysma muscle is thickened (arrowhead) because ofinflammation. There is also right retropharyngeal lymph node with effacement of the right pyriform sinus(black arrow)

674 Isolated cervical lympadenopathy

ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, April 2009, 63, 4, 672–675

treatment. This suggested that there was nocoexisting malignancy, and the mass was alocalised form of brucellar infection manifest-ing with cervical lymphadenopathy.

Involvement of neck because of brucellarinfection is uncommon. Three cases of bru-cella infection of the thyroid gland werereported who presented with fever, chills andpainful swelling in the neck (4). Cervicallymphadenopathy because of brucellar infec-tion is also rare, and only one case has beenreported to date who had a chronic drainingbrucellar neck mass in the supraclavicularregion as well as systemic symptoms ofbrucellosis such as fever, erythema and pain(5).

In conclusion, brucellar cervical adenopa-thy should be considered in differential diag-nosis of neck masses in patients who liveor come from regions where brucellosis isendemic.

M. Yilmaz,1 N. Bayazit,2 L. Gurbuzler,1

N. Ercan,3 A. Ceylan,1 Y. Bayazit1

1Department of Otolaryngology,Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University,

Besevler, Ankara, Turkey2Department of Infectious Diseases and

Clinical Microbiology,Siteler Outpatient Clinic Ankara

Numune Hospital, Altindag,Ankara, Turkey

3Department of Radiology,Gazi University, Besevler,

Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence to:Metin Yilmaz

Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakultesi,Kulak Burun Bogaz Hastaliklari AD,

14. kat, Besevler, Ankara, TurkeyFax: + 90 312 2150589

Email: [email protected]

References1 Young JE. Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennet

JE. Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious

Diseases, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone,

2000: 2386–93.

2 Bayazit YA, Namiduru M, Bayazit N, Ozer E,

Kanlikama M. Hearing status in brucellosis.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 127: 97–100.

3 Sauret JM, Vilissova N. Human brucellosis. Am

Board Fam Pract 2002; 5: 401–6.

4 Azizi F, Katchoui A. Brucella infection of the thyroid

gland. Thyroid 1996; 6: 461–3.

5 Varona JF, Guerra JM, Guillen V, Guillen S, Menassa

A, Palenque E. Isolated cervical lymphadenopathy as

unique manifestation of brucellosis. Scand J Infect Dis

2002; 34: 538–40.

Paper received March 2005, accepted December 2005

doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00812.x

Isolated cervical lympadenopathy 675

ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, April 2009, 63, 4, 672–675