investigation of reactive intermediates: nitroxyl (hno
TRANSCRIPT
INVESTIGATION OF REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES:
NITROXYL (HNO) AND CARBONYLNITRENES
by
Tyler A. Chavez
A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Baltimore, Maryland
February 2016
© 2016 Tyler A. Chavez
All rights reserved
ii
Abstract
Membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) is a well-established method used to
detect gases dissolved in solution through the use of a semipermeable hydrophobic
membrane that allows the dissolved gases, but not the liquid phase, to enter a mass
spectrometer. Interest in the unique biological activity of azanone (nitroxyl, HNO) has
highlighted the need for new sensitive and direct detection methods. Recently, MIMS has
been shown to be a viable method for HNO detection with nanomolar sensitivity under
physiologically relevant conditions (Chapter 2). In addition, this technique has been used
to explore potential biological pathways to HNO production (Chapter 3).
Nitrenes are reactive intermediates containing neutral, monovalent nitrogen atoms.
In contrast to alky- and arylnitrenes, carbonylnitrenes are typically ground state singlets.
In joint synthesis, anion photoelectron spectroscopic, and computational work we studied
the three nitrenes, benzoylnitrene, acetylnitrene, and trifluoroacetylnitrene, with the
purpose of determining the singlet-triplet splitting (ΔEST = ES – ET) in each case (Chapter
7). Further, triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene and triplet t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene have been
observed following photolysis of sulfilimine precursors by time-resolved infrared (TRIR)
spectroscopy (Chapter 6). The observed growth kinetics of nitrene products suggest a
contribution from both the triplet and singlet nitrene, with the contribution from the singlet
becoming more prevalent in polar solvents.
Advisor: Professor John P. Toscano
Readers: Professor Kenneth D. Karlin
Professor Christopher Falzone
iii
Dedication In honor of all those who loved and supported me through this journey
iv
Acknowledgments
I look back fondly on my time as a graduate student at Johns Hopkins University.
My journey to JHU would not have been possible without the inspiration of my
undergraduate advisor, Dr. Jon M. Fukuto. I must also thank my graduate advisor Professor
John P. Toscano for his support of my scientific curiosity and career development. I would
also like to thank the Toscano lab members: Dr. Yonglin Liu, Dr. Art Sutton, Dr. Meredith
Cline, Dr. Gizem Keceli, Dr. Daryl Guthrie, Christopher Bianco, and Saghar Nourian for
all the lessons, scientific discussions, and friendships. I was fortunate to work with some
great scientists outside of our lab on a variety of interesting collaborative projects. I would
like to thank Dr. Nazarenno Paolocci for both serving as a member of my graduate board
oral committee and collaborating on a variety of HNO related projects. Further, I would
like to thank Dr. Kit Bowen, Dr. Allyson Buytendyk, Dr. Jacob Graham, and Dr. Mark
Pederson for all of their work on the carbonylnitrene project.
I could not have made it through this process without the love, patience, and support
of my wife Justine. She has been my rock and the best teammate that anyone could ask
for. This PhD is just as much hers as it is mine. I also have to thank my entire family,
especially my mother Nancy, for her unconditional love and support. I have also been the
beneficiary of an amazing set of in-laws who have been extremely supportive of Justine
and I through this journey.
v
Table of Contents
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii
Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iii
Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ v
List of Schemes .................................................................................................................. xi
List of Figures .................................................................................................................. xvi
List of Tables ................................................................................................................. xxiii
List of Supporting Figures ............................................................................................. xxiv
List of Supporting Tables............................................................................................... xxvi
Chapter 1: Fundamental Chemistry and Detection of Nitroxyl (HNO) .............................. 1
1.1 Therapeutic Potential................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Chemistry, Reactivity, and Detection of HNO ......................................................... 2
1.2.1 Fundamental Chemistry of HNO ........................................................................ 2
1.2.2 HNO Donor Molecules ....................................................................................... 2
1.2.3 HNO Reactivity .................................................................................................. 4
1.2.4 HNO Detection Methods .................................................................................... 6
1.3 Potential Endogenous Pathways to HNO Production ............................................... 7
1.4 References ............................................................................................................... 10
Chapter 2: Detection of HNO by Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry ............................ 22
vi
2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 22
2.2 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods. .................................................................... 23
2.3 Detection of HNO by MIMS ................................................................................... 24
2.4 Differentiating HNO and NO MIMS Signals ......................................................... 27
2.5 HNO donor comparison .......................................................................................... 29
2.6 Detection of HNO from HOCl mediated oxidation of N-hydroxyarginine (NOHA)
....................................................................................................................................... 30
2.7 Conclusions and future directions ........................................................................... 35
2.8 Experimental Methods ............................................................................................ 35
2.8.1 General Methods............................................................................................... 35
2.8.2 Gas Chromatographic (GC) Headspace Analysis of N2O ................................ 36
2.8.3 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods .............................................................. 37
2.9 References ............................................................................................................... 38
Chapter 3: Heme-mediated Peroxidation of 5-N-Hydroxy-L-glutamine (NHG) to form
Nitroxyl (HNO) ................................................................................................................. 48
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 48
3.2 Utilizing MIMS to Probe Potential Endogenous Pathways to HNO Production .... 50
3.2 Examination of Substrate Specificity ...................................................................... 56
3.2 Examination of Enzyme Specificity ........................................................................ 57
3.3 Potential Reactivity of the Expected Acylnitroso Intermediate .............................. 58
vii
3.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 62
3.5 Experimental Methods ............................................................................................ 63
3.5.1 General Methods............................................................................................... 63
3.5.2 Gas Chromatographic (GC) Headspace Analysis of N2O ................................ 63
3.5.3 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods .............................................................. 64
3.6 References ............................................................................................................... 65
Chapter 4: Application of Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry (MIMS) to the Study of
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Thionitrous Acid (HSNO) .................................................. 73
4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 73
4.2 Detection of H2S by MIMS ..................................................................................... 75
4.3 Detection of HSNO by MIMS ................................................................................ 76
4.4 Examination of Larger Mass Signals from H2S Donors ......................................... 78
4.5 HSNO Isomerization ............................................................................................... 86
4.5.1 Sulfinamide type rearrangement (HONS to HOSN) ........................................ 89
4.5.2 Isomerization of HOSN to HNSO .................................................................... 91
4.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 92
4.7 Experimental Methods ............................................................................................ 93
4.7.1 General Methods............................................................................................... 93
4.7.2 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods .............................................................. 94
4.7.3 Detection of H2S from NaSH ........................................................................... 94
viii
4.7.4 Detection of HSNO from the Reaction of Acidified Nitrite with NaSH .......... 95
4.7.5 MIMS Experiments in the Presence of TCEP .................................................. 95
4.7.6 TCEP 31P NMR Experiments ........................................................................... 95
4.7.7 Computational Methods ................................................................................... 96
4.8 References ............................................................................................................... 97
4.9 Supporting Information Chapter 4 ........................................................................ 102
4.9.1 Optimized Geometries and Energies .............................................................. 102
4.9.2 Supporting Figures ......................................................................................... 129
Chapter 5: Chemistry and Reactivity of Carbonylnitrenes ............................................. 131
5.1 Nitrene Background .............................................................................................. 131
5.2 Nitrene Substituent Effects.................................................................................... 134
5.3 References ............................................................................................................. 139
Chapter 6: Nanosecond Time-Resolved Infrared (TRIR) Studies of Oxycarbonylnitrenes
......................................................................................................................................... 143
6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 143
6.3 Time-Resolved IR Studies of Ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) ..................................... 152
6.4 Time-Resolved IR Studies of t-Butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4) ............................... 159
6.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 168
6.6 Experimental Methods .......................................................................................... 169
6.6.1 General Methods............................................................................................. 169
ix
6.6.2 Procedure for the Synthesis of N-Ethoxycarbonyl Dibenzothiophene
Sulfilimine (6).......................................................................................................... 170
6.6.3 Procedure for the Synthesis of N-t-Butyloxycarbonyl Dibenzothiophene
Sulfilimine (7).......................................................................................................... 171
6.6.4 Steady-State Photolysis of Oxycarbonylnitrene Precursors 6 and 7 .............. 171
6.6.5 Time-Resolved IR Methods............................................................................ 171
6.6.6 Computational Methods ................................................................................. 172
6.7 References ............................................................................................................. 173
6.8 Supporting Information Chapter 5 ........................................................................ 180
6.8.1 Optimized Geometries and Energies .............................................................. 180
6.8.2 Calculated Rotation Barriers .......................................................................... 223
6.8.3 Compound Characterization: 1H and 13C NMR Spectra of Final Compounds
................................................................................................................................. 227
Chapter 7: The Singlet-Triplet Splittings of Benzoylnitrene, Acetylnitrene, and
Trifluoroacetylnitrene ..................................................................................................... 235
7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 235
7.2 Experimental and Computational Analysis of Singlet-Triplet Splittings.............. 237
7.3 Comparison with Solution Reactivity ................................................................... 243
7.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 245
7.5 Experimental ......................................................................................................... 245
7.5.1 Synthesis and Characterization ....................................................................... 245
x
7.5.2 Spectroscopic Measurements ......................................................................... 247
7.5.3 Computational Analysis ................................................................................. 248
7.6 References ............................................................................................................. 253
Chapter 8: Miscellaneous Work...................................................................................... 258
8.1 Photochemical Precursors to HNO ....................................................................... 258
8.1.1 Photochemistry of N, N’, N”-Trihydroxyisocyanuric acid (THICA) ............. 258
8.1.2 Development of o-Quinonemethide-Based Photoprecursors to HNO ........... 264
8.2 Investigation of the Solution Chemistry of Persulfides (RSSH) ........................... 267
8.3 References ............................................................................................................. 275
Curriculum Vitae ............................................................................................................ 282
xi
List of Schemes
Scheme 1.1. Nitrogen oxidation states of various nitrogen oxides .................................... 1
Scheme 1.2. Dimerization of HNO to produce hyponitrous acid, which dehydrates to
ultimately produce N2O and H2O. ...................................................................................... 2
Scheme 1.3. HNO and NO producing pathways of (a-b) Angeli’s salt and (c-e) Piloty’s
acid and its derivatives. ....................................................................................................... 3
Scheme 1.4. Reactivity of HNO with (a) with thiols (RSH) to produce either disulfide
(excess thiol) or the rearranged sulfinamide, (b) with phosphines to form the phosphine
oxide and aza-ylide products, and (c) ferric-heme systems to produce the corresponding
iron-nitrosyl......................................................................................................................... 5
Scheme 1.5. Potential HNO producing pathways generated from (a) oxidation of N-
hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA), (b) peroxidation of hydroxylamine, and (c) reaction of thiol
with S-nitrosothiol. .............................................................................................................. 9
Scheme 2.1. Reactivity of HNO with (a) itself to ultimately produce N2O and H2O, (b)
with thiols (RSH) to produce either disulfide (excess thiol) or the rearranged sulfinamide,
(c) or with phosphines to form the phosphine oxide and aza-ylide products. .................. 23
Scheme 2.2. Oxidation of N-hydroxy-L-arginine to produce HNO and cyanamide
derivative via a nitroso intermediate ................................................................................. 32
Scheme 2.3. Reaction of HOCl with amino acids to produce CO2 and an aldehyde. ...... 33
Scheme 2.4. Oxidation-mediated HNO producing pathways for NH2OH,
acetohydroxamic acid , and hydroxyurea ......................................................................... 34
xii
Scheme 3.1. Potential HNO producing pathways generated from (a) reaction of thiol with
S-nitrosothiol, (b) peroxidation of hydroxylamine, and (c) HOCl-mediated oxidation of
N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA). ....................................................................................... 49
Scheme 3.2. Oxidation of (a) L-arginine, (b) L-glutamine, and (c) L-asparagine to
produce HNO and L-citrulline, L-glutamic acid, and L-aspartic acid, respectively. ........ 50
Scheme 3.3. Potential reactivity of the intermediate acylnitrosos of (a) NHG and (b)
NHA. ................................................................................................................................. 59
Scheme 3.4. Non-HNO producing reactions between (a) hydroxylamine and HNO,
acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) and an acylnitroso via attack from the nitrogen (b) or
oxygen (c), and AHA and HNO via attack from the nitrogen (d) or oxygen (c). ............. 61
Scheme 3.5. Decomposition of N-substituted hydroxamic acid with a pyrazalone leaving
group (PY) to produce the byproduct (BY) and acylnitroso that can either be trapped by
(a) water to produce HNO and the corresponding carboxylic acid, or (b) acetohydroxamic
acid resulting in non-HNO producing trapped products. .................................................. 62
Scheme 4.1. Possible reactions of H2S/HS- with O2 in aqueous solution including further
reactivity and equilibration of polysulfides (HS-(n+1)) where n = 1-9. .............................. 78
Scheme 4.2. Reactivity of tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) with a disulfide
(RSSR) or per/polysulfide (RSSH) in aqueous solution to produce TCEP-oxide
(TCEP=O) and TCEP-sulfide (TCEP=S), respectively. ................................................... 81
Scheme 4.3. Relevant isomers of HSNO with their expected pKa values. ....................... 87
Scheme 4.4. Deprotonation of the SN(H)O (Y-isomer) and HSNO to produce the same –
SNO anion. ........................................................................................................................ 88
xiii
Scheme 4.5. Equilibria between HONS and HOSN involving a three-membered ring
transition state.32 ............................................................................................................... 89
Scheme 4.6. (a) Rearrangement of the putative N-hydroxysulfenamide (RSNHOH) to
sulfinamide (RS(O)NH2). (b) Proposed rearrangement of HONS to HOSN.................... 89
Scheme 5.1. Reactivity of singlet and triplet nitrenes to produce one isomer or a mixture
of isomers, respectively. ................................................................................................. 133
Scheme 5.2. Reactivity of methylnitrene to form methyleneimine. ............................... 134
Scheme 5. 3. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of benzoylnitrene precursor. .......... 135
Scheme 6.1. The photochemistry of ethoxycarbonylazide (1) to generate the singlet
ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2s) which can either react with an alkene to produce a
stereospecific product or intersystem cross to triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t) which
will react with an alkene in a non-stereospecific manner. .............................................. 144
Scheme 6.2. Photolysis of t-butyloxycarbonylazide (3) to produce t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4) that predominantly gives 5,5-dimethyl-2-oxazolidinone (5)
via an intramolecular C-H insertion reaction. ................................................................. 144
Scheme 6.3. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in acetonitrile. ....... 156
Scheme 6.4. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in cyclohexane. ..... 159
Scheme 6.5. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of 7 in acetonitrile, dichloromethane,
and Freon-113. ................................................................................................................ 162
Scheme 6.6. Production of 5 from either (a) direct reaction with singlet and triplet
nitrenes 4s and 4t, or (b) solely through the singlet via thermal repopulation. .............. 168
xiv
Scheme 7.1. Dibenzothiophene (DBT) Sulfilimine-based precursors to carbonylnitrenes.
......................................................................................................................................... 236
Scheme 8.1. Isomerization of oxynitrenes (RON) to the corresponding nitroso (RNO)
species. ............................................................................................................................ 258
Scheme 8.2. Thermolysis and potential photochemistry of N,N’,N’’-
trihydroxyisocyanuric acid (THICA). ............................................................................. 258
Scheme 8.3. Potential products formed via THICA photolysis. .................................... 261
Scheme 8.4. Products resulting from the photogeneration of benzyloxynitrene in the
presence of argon (Ar) or dioxygen (O2). ....................................................................... 262
Scheme 8.5. Potential reactivity of the presumed benzyloxynitrene intermediate resulting
from photolysis of Bn-THICA. ....................................................................................... 263
Scheme 8.6. (a) Mechanism responsible for the photorelease of X from o-
naphthoquinone methide (oNQM) precursors. (b) Potential HNO precursor (6) reactivity
upon photolysis in aqueous solution. .............................................................................. 265
Scheme 8.7. Proposed synthetic methods for the formation of target compound 6. ...... 266
Scheme 8.8. (a) Generation and (b) further reactivity of persulfides (RSSH). .............. 268
Scheme 8.9. Proposed synthesis of potential precursors 23 and 24. .............................. 269
Scheme 8.10. Persulfide precursor scaffold and release mechanism at neutral pH. ...... 271
Scheme 8.11. Reaction of persulfide (RSSH) with HNO to initially produce the
intermediate RSSNHOH. RSSNHOH can react with, (a) RSSH to generate RSSSSR and
hydroxylamine (NH2OH), (b) RSSH to generate disulfide (RSSR) and HNS, (c) RSSH to
generate RSSR and HONS, or (d) rearrange to form sulfiniamide like structure
(RSS(O)NH2). ................................................................................................................. 272
xv
Scheme 8.12. Modification of peptide cysteine residues with methoxycarbonylsulfenyl
chloride to generate protected persulfides that can be released upon exposure to amine
nucleophiles. ................................................................................................................... 274
xvi
List of Figures
Figure 1.1. Common HNO precursors including, Angeli’s salt (AS), N-hydroxybenzene
sulfonfamide (Piloty’s acid, PA), acyloxy nitroso compounds (AcON), bisacylated
hydroxylamines (HA), pyrazolones derivatives, and acyl nitroso compounds (AN). ........ 4
Figure 2.1. Schematic representation of MIMS sample cells and membrane probes. ..... 24
Figure 2.2. The HNO donors, AS, PA, 2-BrPA, and 2-MSPA, and the NO donor,
DEA/NO. .......................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 2.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 30, 31, and 44 following the addition of 50
µM AS to an argon-purged 0.1 M PBS solution containing 100 µM DTPA at pH 7.4 and
37 °C. ................................................................................................................................ 25
Figure 2.4. MIMS signals observed at (a) m/z 30 and (b) m/z 31 following the addition of
100 µM DEA/NO to an argon-purged 0.1 M PBS solution containing 100 µM DTPA at
pH 7.4 and 37 °C, and at (c) m/z 44, 30, and (d) 31 following the addition of 100 µL of
N2O (g) to an argon-purged 0.1 M PBS solution containing 100 µM DTPA at pH 7.4 and
37 °C. ................................................................................................................................ 27
Figure 3.1. Potential endogenous HNO generating scaffolds previously explored. ........ 51
Figure 3.2. MIMS signals observed at (a) m/z 30, m/z 31, and m/z 44 following injection
of NHG (500 µM, 0 min), then H2O2 (100 µM, 1 min), and finally metMb (5 µM, 2 min)
into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C. (b) Zoomed in
version of the m/z 31 signal from experiment (a). (c) Comparison of the m/z 30 signals
observed from reaction (a) with (open circles) and without (solid circles) a liquid nitrogen
trap. ................................................................................................................................... 54
xvii
Figure 3.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 30 following injection of GLN (500 µM), then
either 100 µM H2O2 (red circles) or 2.5 mM H2O2 (red line), followed by metMb (5 µM)
into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C. ...................... 55
Figure 3.4. Structures of L-glutamine (GLN), 5-N-hydroxy-L-glutamine (NHG), and 5-
N-hydroxy-L-asparagine (NHA). ...................................................................................... 56
Figure 3.5. MIMS signals observed at m/z 30 following injection of NHA (500 µM, 0
min), then H2O2 (100 µM, 1 min), and finally metMb (5 µM, 2 min) into a solution of 0.1
M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C with (open circles) and without (solid
circles) a liquid nitrogen trap. ........................................................................................... 56
Figure 3.6. MIMS signals observed following the injection of NHG (500 µM, blue),
NHA (500 µM, red), or NH2OH (500 µM, black) at 0 min, followed by H2O2 (100 µM,
1.5 min), and finally hemin (5 µM, 3 min) into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS
containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C. ................................................................................. 58
Figure 4.1. (a) MIMS spectrum, with 0.1 amu increments, observed following injection
of NaSH into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with metal chelator DTPA (100 µM) 20 °C. (b) MIMS
observed intensity at m/z 34 and m/z 33 as a function of time following 100 µM NaSH
injection at t = 0 min into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 20 °C. (c) Plot of
signal intensity versus initial concentration of NaSH. Inset: m/z 34 signal detected by
MIMS following injection of 250 nM NaSH. ................................................................... 76
Figure 4.2. MIMS observed intensity at m/z 63 as a function of time following injection
of 10 mM of the pre-incubated reaction mixture (see experimental section), of (blue)
sodium nitrite and NaSH in 0.2 M HCl or (red) NaSH alone, into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with
metal chelator DTPA (100 µM) at 20 °C. ......................................................................... 77
xviii
Figure 4.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 34 (red), 33 (blue), 48 (green), 64 (black), 65
(orange), and 66 (purple) following the injection of 500 µM NaSH into 0.1 M pH 7.4
PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. ......................................................................... 79
Figure 4.4. MIMS signals observed at m/z 34 (red), 33 (blue), 48 (green), and 64 (black)
following the injection of 500 µM NaSH (+), Na2S2 (●), or Na2S4 (○) into 0.1 M pH 7.4
PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. ......................................................................... 82
Figure 4.5. 31P NMR spectra resulting from 700 mM TCEP (red), NaSH (70 mM) in the
presence of TCEP (700 mM, blue), and Na2S2 (70 mM) in the presence of TCEP (700
mM, black). All samples were incubated for 30 min at 21 °C in 2 M pH 5 acetic acid
buffer containing 10% D2O. ............................................................................................. 84
Figure 4.6. MIMS signals observed at m/z 34 and 64 upon the addition of NaSH (350
µM) into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C; initially purged
with either argon (red and blue) or dioxygen (green and black). ...................................... 85
Figure 4.7. Plots of the average maximum signal intensity observed at m/z 34 (blue), 33
(red), 64 (black), and 48 (green), upon the consecutive injections (1-7) of 250 µL H2S (g)
into the same solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. Consecutive
injections occurred after plateau of the signals. ................................................................ 86
Figure 4.8. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated energies and barriers, relative to A, for the
transformation of A to C, with explicit water molecules, in the gas phase (red) and with
an SM8 solvation model for aqueous solvation (blue). .................................................... 91
Figure 4.9. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated energies and barriers, relative to D, for the
transformation of D to E, with explicit water molecules, in the gas phase (red) and with
an SM8 solvation model for aqueous solvation (blue). .................................................... 92
xix
Figure 5.1. Electronic configurations of (a) imigoden (NH) and (b) methylene (CH2). 132
Figure 5.2. O-C-N bond angle comparison between triplet and singlet carbonylnitrenes.
......................................................................................................................................... 135
Figure 5.3. Relevant resonance structures for carbonyl- and oxycarbonylnitrenes. ...... 136
Figure 6.1. Relevant resonance structures for carbonyl- and oxycarbonylnitrenes. ..... 146
Figure 6.2. Sulfilimine-based photoprecursors to oxycarbonylnitrenes 2 and 4. ......... 147
Figure 6.3. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated ΔEST values (ΔEST = ES - ET) and energies of
the syn- and anti-forms, including zero-point vibrational energy correction, of (a)
ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) and (b) t-butoxycarbonylnitrene (4). Values in brackets include
the 7 kcal/mol correction to the B3LYP/6-31G(d) values.28 .......................................... 148
Figure 6.4. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated geometries and energies of both syn- and anti-
forms of (a) ethoxycarbonylnitrene and (b) t-butoxycarbonylnitrene. Energies shown in
parentheses include zero-point vibrational energy correction. Values in brackets include
the 7 kcal/mol correction to the B3LYP/6-31G(d) values. ............................................. 151
Figure 6.5. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 (3 mM) in argon-saturated acetonitrile. Blue and
black bars reflect B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequencies and intensities of ylide 8 and
triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t), respectively. ............................................................. 153
Figure 6.6. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in
argon-saturated acetonitrile at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -1 to 9 μs, and (b) 1160 cm-1 from -1 to
9 μs, (c) 1690 cm-1 from -1 to 9 μs, and (d) 1690 cm-1 from -100 to 900 μs. Black curves
are the calculated best fit to a single- or double-exponential function. .......................... 155
xx
Figure 6.7. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 (3 mM) in argon-saturated cyclohexane. Black
bar reflect B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t).
......................................................................................................................................... 157
Figure 6.8. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in
argon-saturated cyclohexane at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -1 to 9 μs, (b) 1728 cm-1 from -1 to 9
μs, and (c) 2180 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated best fit to a
single- or double-exponential function. .......................................................................... 158
Figure 6.9. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 (3 mM) in argon-saturated acetonitrile. The
black bar reflects the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4t). ......................................................................................... 160
Figure 6.10. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7
in argon-saturated acetonitrile at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, (b) 1762 cm-1 from -
0.4 to 3.6 μs, and (c) 2180 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated best fit
to a single- or double-exponential function. ................................................................... 161
Figure 6.11. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 (3 mM) in argon-saturated dichloromethane.
The black bar reflects the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4t). ......................................................................................... 163
Figure 6.12. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7
in argon-saturated dichloromethane at (a) 1638 cm-1 from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, (b) 1752 cm-1
xxi
from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, and (c) 2175 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated
best fit to a single- or double-exponential function. ....................................................... 164
Figure 6.13. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 (3 mM) in argon-saturated Freon-113. The black
bar reflects the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4t). ......................................................................................... 165
Figure 6.14. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7
in argon-saturated Freon-113 at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, (b) 1764 cm-1 from -0.4
to 3.6 μs, and (c) 2180 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated best fit to a
single- or double-exponential function. .......................................................................... 166
Figure 7.1. Singlet carbonylnitrene and its oxazirine-like resonance contributor. ....... 236
Figure 7.2. Anion photoelectron spectra of (a) benzoylnitrene, (b) acetylnitrene, and (c)
trifluoroacetylnitrene anions. The vertical sticks represent the calculated vertical
detachment transitions. ................................................................................................... 239
Figure 7.3. NRMOL calculated bond lengths (Å) and angles for the doublet anion and
the neutral singlet and triplet spin states of benzoyl- (2a), acetyl- (2b), and
trifluroacetylnitrene (2c). ................................................................................................ 241
Figure 7.4. Schematic representation of vertical detachment energy transitions (VDE)
and singlet-triplet energy splittings (EST) for two general cases where (a) the geometry
of the doublet anion (black) is similar to the neutral spin states (blue) and (b) the
geometry of the doublet anion is significantly different from one of the neutral species.
......................................................................................................................................... 242
xxii
Figure 8.1. Experimental setup for MIMS detection of photochemically produced gasses.
......................................................................................................................................... 259
Figure 8.2. MIMS signals observed at m/z 44, 31, and 28 upon photolysis of 1 mM
THICA in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA. ............................................. 260
Figure 8.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 44, 31, and 28 upon photolysis of 1 mM
THICA in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA in the presence of a liquid
nitrogen cold trap. ........................................................................................................... 261
Figure 8.4. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of Bn-THICA (5 mM) in argon-saturated dichloromethane. ... 262
xxiii
List of Tables
Table 3.1. Substrate oxidation by the heme/H2O2 system. .............................................. 52
Table 4. 1. Comparison of the MIMS signals observed following the injection of 500 µM
NaSH, Na2S2, Na2S4, or H2S (g) into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. All
signal intensities are reported relative to the m/z 34 signal for each substrate. ................ 80
Table 4.2. Comparison of the MIMS signals observed following the injection of 500 µM
NaSH in the presence of various concentrations of TCEP into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with
100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. All signal intensities are reported relative to the m/z 34 signal
for each substrate. Samples were incubated for either a30 min, b160 min, or c24 hrs at 21
°C prior to injection into the MIMS. All signal intensities are reported relative to the m/z
34 signal for each substrate. .............................................................................................. 82
Table 7.1. Experimental Observed Transitions and Calculated Values of benzoyl-, acetyl-
, trifluroacetyl-, phenyl-, and methylnitrene. All ΔEST values include zero-point energy
corrections. ...................................................................................................................... 240
xxiv
List of Supporting Figures
Figure S4.1. MIMS observed intensity at m/z 30 following injection of 250 µM at t = 0
min of the pre-incubated reaction mixture, of NaSH with S-nitrosoglutathione, into 0.1 M
pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 20 °C. ..................................................................... 129
Figure S4.2. 31P NMR spectra resulting from TCEP in basic solution (red), acidic
solution (blue), and neutral solution (black). All samples were incubated for 30 min at 21
°C in aqueous solutions containing 10% D2O. ............................................................... 129
Figure S4.3. 31P NMR spectra resulting from TCEP in basic solution alone (red) or in the
presence of H2O2 (blue) to produce TCEP-oxide at 58 ppm. All samples were incubated
for 30 min at 21 °C in aqueous solutions containing 10% D2O. .................................... 130
Figure S4.4. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated energies and barriers, relative to F, for the
transformation of F to H, in the gas phase...................................................................... 130
Figure S6.1. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of singlet ethoxycarbonylnitrene
12. .................................................................................................................................... 223
Figure S6.2. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene
32. .................................................................................................................................... 224
Figure S6.3. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of singlet
t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 14. ............................................................................................. 225
Figure S6.4. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of triplet
t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 34. ............................................................................................. 226
Figure S6.5. Kinetic traces observed at 1640 cm–1 following 266 nm laser photolysis of
of 6 (3 mM) in argon-saturated acetonitrile (a) without or (b) with triethylsilane (TES) in
xxv
presence. The dotted curves are experimental data; the solid curves are best fits to a
single-exponential function. ............................................................................................ 226
Figure S6.6. 1H NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6. .............................. 227
Figure S6.7. 13C NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6. ............................. 228
Figure S6.8. 1H NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7. .............................. 228
Figure S6.9. 13C NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7. ............................. 229
Figure S6.10. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7. .......................... 229
Figure S6.11. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7. .......................... 230
Figure S6.12. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CD3CN. ............................................................... 231
Figure S6.13. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CD2Cl2. ............................................................... 232
Figure S6.14. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CD3CN. ............................................................... 233
Figure S6.15. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CH3CN. ............................................................... 234
xxvi
List of Supporting Tables
Table S4.1. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[SN(H)OH]+. .................................................................................................................. 102
Table S4.2. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [SN(H)OH]+. ........................................................................................... 103
Table S4.3. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[SN(H)OH]+ SN-OH2 TS. ........................................................................................ 103
Table S4.4. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [SN(H)OH]+ SN-OH2 TS. .................................................................. 104
Table S4.5. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-OH2........................................................................................................................... 104
Table S4.6. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-OH2. ................................................................................................... 105
Table S4.7. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-OH2 [HOSN-H]+ TS. ........................................................................................... 105
Table S4.8. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-OH2 [HOSN-H]+ TS. .................................................................... 106
Table S4.9. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HOSN-H]+. .................................................................................................................... 106
Table S4.10. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HOSN-H]+. ............................................................................................. 107
Table S4.11. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+. ............................................................................................................. 107
xxvii
Table S4.12. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+. ...................................................................................... 108
Table S4.13. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS. ..................................................................................... 108
Table S4.14. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS. .............................................................. 109
Table S4.15. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W. ........................................................................................................................... 109
Table S4.16. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W. .................................................................................................... 110
Table S4.17. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W [HOSN(H)-W]+ TS. ..................................................................................... 110
Table S4.18. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W [HOSN(H)-W]+ TS. .............................................................. 111
Table S4.19. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HOSN(H)-W]+. ............................................................................................................. 111
Table S4.20. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HOSN(H)-W]+. ...................................................................................... 112
Table S4.21. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+ (H2O dielectric). ................................................................................. 112
Table S4.22. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+ (H2O dielectric). .......................................................... 113
xxviii
Table S4.23. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS (H2O dielectric). ........................................................... 113
Table S4.24. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS (H2O dielectric). .................................. 114
Table S4.25. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W (H2O dielectric). ............................................................................................... 114
Table S4.26. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W (H2O dielectric). ........................................................................ 115
Table S4.27. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W [HOSN(H)]+ TS (H2O dielectric). ................................................................ 115
Table S4.28. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W [HOSN(H)]+ TS (H2O dielectric). ....................................... 116
Table S4.29. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HOSN(H)]+ (H2O dielectric). ...................................................................................... 116
Table S4.30. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HOSN(H)]+ (H2O dielectric). ............................................................... 117
Table S4.31. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W. ....................................................................................................................... 117
Table S4.32. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W. ................................................................................................ 118
Table S4.33. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W HNSO-W TS. .......................................................................................... 119
xxix
Table S4.34. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W HNSO-W TS. ................................................................... 120
Table S4.35. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HNSO-W ........................................................................................................................ 121
Table S4.36. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HNSO-W. ................................................................................................ 122
Table S4.37. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W (H2O dielectric). ........................................................................................... 123
Table S4.38. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W (H2O dielectric). .................................................................... 124
Table S4.39. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W HNSO-W TS (H2O dielectric). ................................................................. 125
Table S4.40. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W HNSO-W TS (H2O dielectric). ....................................... 126
Table S4.41. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HNSO-W (H2O dielectric). ........................................................................................... 127
Table S4.42. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HNSO-W(H2O dielectric). ..................................................................... 128
Table S6.1. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the syn-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2ssyn (Dipole moment = 4.55 debye) ................. 180
Table S6.2. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2ssyn. ................................................................... 181
xxx
Table S6.3. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tsyn. (Dipole moment = 3.26 debye) ........................ 182
Table S6.4. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tsyn. .................................................................... 183
Table S6.5. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the anti-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2santi. (Dipole moment = 4.75 debye) ............... 184
Table S6.6. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2santi. ................................................................. 185
Table S6.7. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tanti.. (Dipole moment = 3.77 debye) ...................... 186
Table S6.8. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tanti. .................................................................. 187
Table S6.9. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4ssyn. . (Dipole moment = 4.80 debye) ................... 188
Table S6.10. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4ssyn. ................................................................. 189
Table S6.11. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tsyn. (Dipole moment = 3.50 debye) ..................... 190
Table S6.12. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tsyn. .................................................................. 191
Table S6.13. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4santi. (Dipole moment = 5.03 debye) ................... 192
xxxi
Table S6.14. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4santi. ............................................................... 193
Table S6.15. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tanti. (Dipole moment = 4.16 debye) .................... 194
Table S6.16. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tanti. ................................................................ 195
Table S6.17. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the syn-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nsyn. (Dipole moment = 3.46 debye) 196
Table S6.18. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nsyn. .................................................. 196
Table S6.19. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the syn-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nsyn. (Dipole moment = 2.29 debye) 197
Table S6.20. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nsyn. ................................................... 197
Table S6.21. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the anti-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nanti. (Dipole moment = 3.76 debye)
......................................................................................................................................... 198
Table S6.22. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nanti. ................................................ 198
Table S6.23. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the anti-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nanti. (Dipole moment = 2.91 debye) 199
Table S6.24. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nsyn. ................................................... 199
xxxii
Table S6.25. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the singlet formylnitrene 1HC(O)N. (Dipole moment = 3.06 debye) ............................. 200
Table S6.26. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for singlet formylnitrene 1HC(O)N. ............................................................................... 200
Table S6.27. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the triplet formylnitrene 3HC(O)N. (Dipole moment = 1.81 debye) .............................. 201
Table S6.28. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for triplet formylnitrene 3HC(O)N. ................................................................................ 201
Table S6.29. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 12TS. .................................... 202
Table S6.30. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 12TS. ..................................... 203
Table S6.31. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 32TS. ..................................... 204
Table S6.32. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 32TS. ...................................... 205
Table S6.33. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 14TS. .................................. 206
Table S6.34. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 14TS. ................................... 207
Table S6.35. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 34TS. ................................... 208
xxxiii
Table S6.36. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 34TS. .................................... 209
Table S6. 37. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections
for the syn-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9. .................................................. 210
Table S6.38. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for the syn-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9. .................................................. 211
Table S6. 39. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections
for the anti-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9. ................................................. 212
Table S6.40. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for the anti-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9. ................................................. 213
Table S6.41. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene ................................................................ 214
Table S6.42. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
or syn-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 6. ....................................................... 215
Table S6.43. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 6. ........................................................... 216
Table S6.44. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 6. ...................................................... 217
Table S6.45. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7. ......................................................... 218
Table S6.46. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7. ................................................... 219
xxxiv
Table S6. 47. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections
for anti-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7. ................................................... 220
Table S6.48. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7. ................................................... 221
1
Chapter 1: Fundamental Chemistry and Detection of
Nitroxyl (HNO)
1.1 Therapeutic Potential
Nitrogen oxides have been investigated for centuries. Arguably one of the most
prevalent nitrogen oxide to this point has been nitric oxide (NO) which was discovered to
be endogenously generated resulting in in a Nobel prize in 1998.1–3 Nitroxyl (HNO), the
one electron reduced and protonated congener of NO, has garnered much less attention
relative to its other redox siblings (Scheme 1.1). However, in recent years interest in HNO
has increased as it has been shown to be a potential therapeutic for heart failure.4–8 HNO
has the unique ability to modulate both contractility and relaxation by modifying important
cysteine residues on both the Ryanodine receptor 2 (RYR2) and the sarcoplasmic reticulum
Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA2a) regulator phospholamban (PLN).9,10 Further, HNO has been
shown to make myofilaments more sensitive to Ca2+.11 Together, these HNO-derived
effects result in enhancement of myocardial function, and therefore a potent treatment for
heart failure. Even though much of the observed physiology of HNO has been explored
there are still mechanistic elements missing to explain the observed physiological effects.
Scheme 1.1. Nitrogen oxidation states of various nitrogen oxides
2
1.2 Chemistry, Reactivity, and Detection of HNO
1.2.1 Fundamental Chemistry of HNO
HNO is a reactive intermediate with interesting chemical properties. Most notable
is its reactivity with itself to produce hyponitrous acid (HON=NOH), which further
dehydrates to produce nitrous oxide (N2O) and water (k = 8 x 106 M-1 s-1, Scheme 1.2).12,13
The dimerization of HNO requires the use of donor molecules for its in situ generation.
Deprotonation of HNO is slow at neutral pH as the ground state singlet 1HNO must undergo
a forbidden spin inversion to the ground state triplet 3NO- during this process.12 This unique
acid/base relationship made accurate determination of the pKa of HNO difficult.14 Initially,
the pKa of HNO was reported to be 4.7.15 Ultimately, the pKa of HNO was revised to be
11.4 making HNO, not NO-, the relevant species at physiological pH.12
Scheme 1.2. Dimerization of HNO to produce hyponitrous acid, which dehydrates to
ultimately produce N2O and H2O.
1.2.2 HNO Donor Molecules
Due to dimerization, HNO must be generated in situ from donor molecules. The
most common HNO donor is Angeli’s salt (AS) that was developed by Angelo Angeli in
1896.16 AS decomposes upon protonation under physiological pH to produce primarily
HNO and nitrite (NO2-, Scheme 1.3a).17 However, under acidic conditions AS becomes a
NO donor (Scheme 1.3b).18 Another common HNO donor is N-hydroxybenzene
sulfonamide (Piloty’s acid, PA) which was also developed in 1896 by Oskar Piloty.19 PA
3
produces HNO under alkaline anaerobic conditions (Scheme 1.3c). However, under
physiologically relevant conditions PA produces NO via oxidation to produce presumably
the corresponding nitroxide (Scheme 1.3d).20 The Toscano lab and others have produced a
variety of PA derivatives by making substitutions on the aromatic ring.21–23 These
derivatives have led to the development of physiologically useful donors including 2-
bromo-N-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide (2-BrPA, Scheme 1.3e) as well as a small molecule
therapeutic that has shown enhancement of myocardial function in humans.24 The
development of new donor molecules that exclusively release HNO under physiologically
relevant conditions is an active area of research with a variety of new scaffolds and
derivatives being explored (Figure 1.1).25–28
Scheme 1.3. HNO and NO producing pathways of (a-b) Angeli’s salt and (c-e) Piloty’s
acid and its derivatives.
4
Figure 1.1. Common HNO precursors including, Angeli’s salt (AS), N-hydroxybenzene
sulfonfamide (Piloty’s acid, PA), acyloxy nitroso compounds (AcON), bisacylated
hydroxylamines (HA), pyrazolones derivatives, and acyl nitroso compounds (AN).
1.2.3 HNO Reactivity
Much of the physiology observed for HNO stems from its ability to react with thiols
(RSH, k = 105 – 106 M-1 s-1).5 NO, on the other hand, is quite unreactive with thiols under
anaerobic conditions, but in the presence of oxygen undergoes rapid autoxidation to
produce nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and/or dinitrogen trioxide (N2O3), both of which react
rapidly with thiols.29–34 The reaction of HNO with thiols proceeds through an intermediate
N-hydroxysulfenamide (RSNHOH) which can either rearrange to the corresponding
sulfinamide under low thiol concentrations, or in the presence of excess thiol react further
to produce hydroxylamine (NH2OH) and the corresponding disulfide (RSSR, Scheme
1.4a).30,35,36
5
Scheme 1.4. Reactivity of HNO with (a) with thiols (RSH) to produce either disulfide
(excess thiol) or the rearranged sulfinamide, (b) with phosphines to form the phosphine
oxide and aza-ylide products, and (c) ferric-heme systems to produce the corresponding
iron-nitrosyl.
Formation of the sulfinamide has been suggested to be a potential biomarker for
HNO as this modification is unique to other nitrogen oxides.37 Initially sulfinamide
modification was thought to be irreversible, however, recent evidence has confirmed that
the modification is reversible on a physiologically relevant timescale.38,39 Conversely, a
majority of the reported HNO induced modifications of cysteine residues, in particular on
cardiac myofilaments and RYR2, results in the formation of disulfides rather than
sulfinamide.10,11 The identity of the modification is confirmed by facile reduction back to
the free thiol by DTT on a timescale that is faster than sulfinamide reduction.
HNO is also capable of reacting with other nucleophiles such as phosphine to
produce an aza-ylide and phosphine oxide (Scheme 1.4b).40,41 Phosphines are relatively
unreactive towards NO both in the presence or absence of oxygen. However, in the
presence of excess NO, phosphines can react to ultimately produce N2O.42–45 Further,
6
HNO reacts with metal centers, most commonly ferric-heme, to produce metal-nitrosyl
complexes (Scheme 1.4c). 46–51 HNO has also been shown to react with oxygen, however,
due to the spin-forbidden nature of the reaction its relatively slow (k = 3 x 103 M-1 s-1).5,52
Until recently, the products of the reaction of HNO with O2 were not well understood. A
recent report by Smulik et al., suggests that HNO and O2 react to form peroxynitrite
(ONOO-).53 Finally, HNO can also react with NO (k = 5.6 x 106 M-1 s-1) to produce
ultimately N2O and nitrite.12,54
1.2.4 HNO Detection Methods
Detection methods for HNO have been explored for decades, but until recently,
many techniques suffered from lack of sensitivity and the inability to distinguish HNO
from other nitrogen oxides, especially NO. In recent years there have been multiple reports
of new and improved HNO detection strategies. These strategies include thiol
trapping,37,55–58 phosphine trapping,40,41 fluorescent methods,41,59–61 electrochemical
methods,62 amongst others. The most commonly used method for the detection of HNO is
gas chromatography (GC) headspace analysis to detect N2O, the product of HNO
dimerization and dehydration. The N2O generated equilibrates between the liquid phase
and gas phase which is determined by its partition coefficient and Henry’s law. Although
this method can be extremely sensitive with proper instrumentation, detecting N2O can
lead to misinterpretation of results, especially when other direct N2O producing pathways
are possible.8 For example, only N2O would be observed in the event a small amount NO
was produced in the presence of HNO. However, additional experiments employing HNO
specific traps (i.e., phosphines and thiols) can aid in confirming that the N2O observed is
HNO derived.
7
Membrane inlet (or introduction) mass spectrometry (MIMS) is a technique that
has been in use since the early 1960’s. MIMS was first reported by Hoch and Kok as a
method for the detection of hydrophobic gases dissolved in aqueous solution by mass
spectrometry.63 Analytes partition from the liquid phase through a membrane and into the
vapor phase via pervaporation.64 Pervaporation is a process that occurs in three stages:
First, the species of interest is adsorbed at the surface of the membrane, it then permeates
through the membrane, and finally desorbs into vacuum where it is detected by mass
spectrometry. Factors that influence MIMS sensitivity include the diffusability and
solubility of the gas in the membrane material, membrane surface area, and membrane
thickness. MIMS has been used in a wide variety of applications including the detection
of nitric oxide (NO) in both aqueous and blood solutions.65,66 Recently, MIMS has been
shown to be a viable method for HNO detection with nanomolar sensitivity under
physiologically relevant conditions.67 In addition, this technique has been used to explore
potential biological pathways to HNO production.68
1.3 Potential Endogenous Pathways to HNO Production
The profound effects of HNO on the cardiovascular system has led to interest in the
potential endogenous generation of HNO. For the reasons outlined above, detection of
endogenously produced HNO has been unsuccessful. However, researchers have explored
a variety of HNO producing pathways that are physiologically relevant. The simplest
method to produce HNO would be the conversion of endogenously produced NO.
However, H-N bond strengths (HNO BDE = ~50 kcal/mol)69 and unfavorable reduction
potentials under physiological conditions (-0.68 V at pH 7, NHE)70 makes H-atom
8
abstraction and electron transfer unlikely mechanisms for HNO production under
physiological conditions.
It is well established that NO is generated by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) mediated
oxidation of arginine. However, in the absence of the tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor, HNO
production is observed.71–76 It has also been shown that an intermediate in the endogenous
production of NO, N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA),77 is capable of being oxidized to
produce HNO by a variety of oxidants including hypochlorus acid (HOCl, Scheme
1.5a).68,78 Hydroxylamine (NH2OH) has also been shown to be a potential precursor to
HNO production via heme-mediated peroxidation (Scheme 1.5b).79,80 In addition to
oxidative mechanisms, HNO has been shown to be produced from the reaction of thiols
with S-nitrosothiols (RSNO) resulting in the corresponding disulfide (Scheme 1.5c).30,81
Continued examination of potential endogenous HNO production pathways using
improved detection methods will be important in validating the proposed endogenous
generation and biochemical roles of HNO.
In the first section of this thesis we investigate the use of MIMS for the detection
of HNO, as well as its ability to explore potential endogenous pathways to HNO
production. Further, we extend our use of the MIMS system to the study of hydrogen
sulfide (H2S) and related species.
9
Scheme 1.5. Potential HNO producing pathways generated from (a) oxidation of N-
hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA), (b) peroxidation of hydroxylamine, and (c) reaction of thiol
with S-nitrosothiol.
10
1.4 References
(1) Murad, F. Discovery of Some of the Biological Effects of Nitric Oxide and Its
Role in Cell Signaling (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1856–
1868.
(2) Ignarro, L. J. Nitric Oxide: A Unique Endogenous Signaling Molecule in Vascular
Biology (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1882–1892.
(3) Furchgott, R. F. Endothelium-Derived Relaxing Factor: Discovery, Early Studies,
and Identifcation as Nitric Oxide (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 1870–1880.
(4) Paolocci, N.; Katori, T.; Champion, H. C.; St John, M. E.; Miranda, K. M.; Fukuto,
J. M.; Wink, D. A.; Kass, D. A. Positive Inotropic and Lusitropic Effects of
HNO/NO- in Failing Hearts: Independence from Beta-Adrenergic Signaling. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 5537–5542.
(5) Miranda, K. M.; Paolocci, N.; Katori, T.; Thomas, D. D.; Ford, E.; Bartberger, M.
D.; Espey, M. G.; Kass, D. A.; Feelisch, M.; Fukuto, J. M.; Wink, D. A. A
Biochemical Rationale for the Discrete Behavior of Nitroxyl and Nitric Oxide in
the Cardiovascular System. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 9196–9201.
(6) Tocchetti, C. G.; Wang, W.; Froehlich, J. P.; Huke, S.; Aon, M. A.; Wilson, G. M.;
Di Benedetto, G.; O’Rourke, B.; Gao, W. D.; Wink, D. A.; Toscano, J. P.;
Zaccolo, M.; Bers, D. M.; Valdivia, H. H.; Cheng, H.; Kass, D. A.; Paolocci, N.
Nitroxyl Improves Cellular Heart Function by Directly Enhancing Cardiac
Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Cycling. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 96–104.
11
(7) Paolocci, N.; Jackson, M. I.; Lopez, B. E.; Miranda, K.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Wink, D.
A.; Hobbs, A. J.; Fukuto, J. M. The Pharmacology of Nitroxyl (HNO) and Its
Therapeutic Potential: Not Just the Janus Face of NO. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007,
113, 442–458.
(8) Fukuto, J. M.; Bartberger, M. D.; Dutton, A. S.; Paolocci, N.; Wink, D. a; Houk,
K. N. The Physiological Chemistry and Biological Activity of Nitroxyl (HNO):
The Neglected, Misunderstood, and Enigmatic Nitrogen Oxide. Chem. Res.
Toxicol. 2005, 18, 790–801.
(9) Froehlich, J. P.; Mahaney, J. E.; Keceli, G.; M, C.; Goldstein, R.; Redwood, A. J.;
Sumbilla, C.; Lee, D. I.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Kass, D. a; Paolocci, N.; Toscano, J. P.
Phospholamban Thiols Play a Central Role in Activation of the Cardiac Muscle
Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Pump by Nitroxyl. Biochemistry 2008, 13150–
13152.
(10) Fukuto, J. M.; Bianco, C. L.; Chavez, T. a. Nitroxyl (HNO) Signaling. Free Radic.
Biol. Med. 2009, 47 (9), 1318–1324.
(11) Gao, W. D.; Murray, C. I.; Tian, Y.; Zhong, X.; DuMond, J. F.; Shen, X.; Stanley,
B. A.; Foster, D. B.; Wink, D. A.; King, S. B.; Van Eyk, J. E.; Paolocci, N.
Nitroxyl-Mediated Disulfide Bond Formation Between Cardiac Myofilament
Cysteines Enhances Contractile Function. Circ. Res. 2012, 111, 1002–1011.
(12) Shafirovich, V.; Lymar, S. V. Nitroxyl and Its Anion in Aqueous Solutions: Spin
States, Protic Equilibria, and Reactivities toward Oxygen and Nitric Oxide. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 7340–7345.
12
(13) Fehling, C.; Friedrichs, G. Dimerization of HNO in Aqueous Solution: An
Interplay of Solvation Effects, Fast Acid-Base Equilibria, and Intramolecular
Hydrogen Bonding? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17912–17922.
(14) Bartberger, M. D.; Fukuto, J. M.; Houk, K. N. On the Acidity and Reactivity of
HNO in Aqueous Solution and Biological Systems. PNAS 2001, 98 (5), 2194–
2198.
(15) Grätzel, M.; Henglein, A.; Taniguchi, S. Pulse Radiolytic Studies on Nitrate Ion
Reduction, and on Formation and Decomposition of Pernitrous Acid in Aqueous
Solutions. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 292–298.
(16) Angeli, A. Nitrohydroxylamine. gazzetta 1986, 26, 17–25.
(17) Miranda, K. M.; Dutton, A. S.; Ridnour, L. A.; Foreman, C. A.; Ford, E.; Paolocci,
N.; Katori, T.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Mancardi, D.; Thomas, D. D.; Espey, M. G.;
Houk, K. N.; Fukuto, J. M.; Wink, D. a. Mechanism of Aerobic Decomposition of
Angeli’s Salt (sodium Trioxodinitrate) at Physiological pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127 (2), 722–731.
(18) Dutton, A. S.; Fukuto, J. M.; Houk, K. N. Mechanisms of HNO and NO
Production from Angeli’s Salt: Density Functional and CBS-QB3 Theory
Predictions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (12), 3795–3800.
(19) Piloty, O. Oxidation of Hydroxylamine by Benzenesulphonic Chloride. Ber. Dtsch.
Chem. Ges. 1896, 29, 1559–1567.
(20) Zamora, R.; Grzesiok, A.; Weber, H.; Feelisch, M. Oxidative Release of Nitric
13
Oxide Accounts for Guanylyl Cyclase Stimulating, Vasodilator and Anti-Platelet
Activity of Piloty’s Acid: A Comparison with Angeli's Salt. Biochem. J. 1995,
312, 333–339.
(21) Porcheddu, A.; De Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G. A Straightforward Route to Piloty’s
Acid Derivatives: A Class of Potential Nitroxyl-Generating Prodrugs. Synlett
2009, 2009, 2149–2153.
(22) Sirsalmath, K.; Suárez, S. A.; Bikiel, D. E.; Doctorovich, F. The pH of HNO
Donation Is Modulated by Ring Substituents in Piloty’s Acid Derivatives:
Azanone Donors at Biological pH. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 118, 134–139.
(23) Aizawa, K.; Nakagawa, H.; Matsuo, K.; Kawai, K.; Ieda, N.; Suzuki, T.; Miyata,
N. Piloty’s Acid Derivative with Improved Nitroxyl-Releasing Characteristics.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 2340–2343.
(24) Sabbah, H. N.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Wang, M.; Daya, S.; Gupta, R. C.; Tunin, R. S.;
Mazhari, R.; Takimoto, E.; Paolocci, N.; Cowart, D.; Colucci, W. S.; Kass, D. A.
Nitroxyl (HNO): A Novel Approach for the Acute Treatment of Heart Failure.
Circ. Heart Fail. 2013, 6, 1250–1258.
(25) DuMond, J. F.; King, S. B. The Chemistry of Nitroxyl-Releasing Compounds.
Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 1637–1648.
(26) Nakagawa, H. Controlled Release of HNO from Chemical Donors for Biological
Applications. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 118, 187–190.
(27) Guthrie, D. A; Kim, N. Y.; Siegler, M. A; Moore, C. D.; Toscano, J. P.
14
Development of N-Substituted Hydroxylamines as Efficient Nitroxyl (HNO)
Donors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1962–1965.
(28) Guthrie, D. A.; Ho, A.; Takahashi, C. G.; Collins, A.; Morris, M.; Toscano, J. P.
“Catch-and-Release” of HNO with Pyrazolones. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 1338–
1348.
(29) Pryor, W.; Church, D.; Govindan, C. Oxidation of Thiols by Nitric Oxide and
Nitrogen Dioxide: Synthetic Utility and Toxicological Implications. J. Org. Chem.
1982, 47, 156–159.
(30) Wong, P. S.; Hyun, J.; Fukuto, J. M.; Shirota, F. N.; DeMaster, E. G.; Shoeman, D.
W.; Nagasawa, H. T. Reaction between S-Nitrosothiols and Thiols: Generation of
Nitroxyl (HNO) and Subsequent Chemistry. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 5362–5371.
(31) Folkes, L. K.; Wardman, P. Kinetics of the Reaction between Nitric Oxide and
Glutathione: Implications for Thiol Depletion in Cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med.
2004, 37, 549–556.
(32) Wink, D. A.; Nims, R. W.; Darbyshire, J. F.; Christodoulou, D.; Hanbauer, I.; Cox,
G. W.; Laval, F.; Laval, J.; Cook, J. A.; Krishna, M. C. Reaction Kinetics for
Nitrosation of Cysteine and Glutathione in Aerobic Nitric Oxide Solutions at
Neutral pH. Insights into the Fate and Physiological Effects of Intermediates
Generated in the NO/O2 Reaction. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1994, 7, 519–525.
(33) Keshive, M.; Singh, S.; Wishnok, J. S.; Tannenbaum, S. R.; Deen, W. M. Kinetics
of S-Nitrosation of Thiols in Nitric Oxide Solutions. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9,
988–993.
15
(34) Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G. Mechanism of the Nitrosation of Thiols and Amines by
Oxygenated •NO Solutions: The Nature of the Nitrosating Intermediates. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3419–3425.
(35) Doyle, M. P.; Mahapatro, S. N.; Broene, R. D.; Guy, J. K. Oxidation and
Reduction of Hemoproteins by Trioxodinitrate (II). The Role of Nitrosyl Hydride
and Nitrite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 593–599.
(36) Sherman, M. P.; Grither, W. R.; McCulla, R. D. Computational Investigation of
the Reaction Mechanisms of Nitroxyl and Thiols. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75 (12),
4014–4024.
(37) Donzelli, S.; Espey, M. G.; Thomas, D. D.; Mancardi, D.; Tocchetti, C. G.;
Ridnour, L. A.; Paolocci, N.; King, S. B.; Miranda, K. M.; Lazzarino, G.; Fukuto,
J. M.; Wink, D. A. Discriminating Formation of HNO from Other Reactive
Nitrogen Oxide Species. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 1056–1066.
(38) Keceli, G.; Toscano, J. P. Reactivity of Nitroxyl-Derived Sulfinamides.
Biochemistry 2012, 51, 4206–4216.
(39) Keceli, G.; Moore, C. D.; Labonte, J. W.; Toscano, J. P. NMR Detection and
Study of Hydrolysis of HNO-Derived Sulfinamides. Biochemistry 2013, 52 (42),
7387–7396.
(40) Reisz, J. A.; Klorig, E. B.; Wright, M. W.; King, S. B. Reductive Phosphine-
Mediated Ligation of Nitroxyl (HNO). Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2719–2721.
(41) Reisz, J. A.; Zink, C. N.; King, S. B. Rapid and Selective Nitroxyl (HNO)
16
Trapping by Phosphines: Kinetics and New Aqueous Ligations for HNO Detection
and Quantitation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11675–11685.
(42) Kuhn, L. P.; Doali, J. O.; Wellman, C. The Reaction of Nitric Oxide with Triethyl
Phosphite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 4792–4794.
(43) Longhi, B. Y. R.; Ragsdale, R.; Drago, R. S. Reactions of Nitrogen(II) Oxide with
Miscellaneous Lewis Bases. Inorg. Chem. 1962, 1, 786–770.
(44) Lim, M. D.; Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford, P. C. Kinetics of the Oxidation of
Triphenylphosphine by Nitric Oxide. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1026–1028.
(45) Bakac, A.; Schouten, M.; Johnson, A.; Song, W.; Pestovsky, O.; Szajna-Fuller, E.
Oxidation of a Water-Soluble Phosphine and Some Spectroscopic Probes with
Nitric Oxide and Nitrous Acid in Aqueous Solutions. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48,
6979–6985.
(46) Doctorovich, F.; Bikiel, D. E.; Pellegrino, J.; Suárez, S. A.; Martí, M. A. Reactions
of HNO with Metal Porphyrins: Underscoring the Biological Relevance of HNO.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2907–2916.
(47) Immoos, C. E.; Sulc, F.; Farmer, P. J.; Czarnecki, K.; Bocian, D. F.; Levina, A.;
Aitken, J. B.; Armstrong, R. S.; Lay, P. a. Bonding in HNO-Myoglobin as
Characterized by X-Ray Absorption and Resonance Raman Spectroscopies. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 814–815.
(48) Sulc, F.; Immoos, C. E.; Pervitsky, D.; Farmer, P. J. Efficient Trapping of HNO by
Deoxymyoglobin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1096–1101.
17
(49) Lin, R.; Farmer, P. J. The HNO Adduct of Myoglobin : Synthesis and
Characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2393–2394.
(50) Farmer, P. J.; Kumar, M. R.; Almaraz, E. The Coordination Chemistry of Hno:
From Warren Roper To Hemoglobin. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2010, 31, 130–143.
(51) Kumar, M. R.; Fukuto, J. M.; Miranda, K. M.; Farmer, P. J. Reactions of HNO
with Heme Proteins: New Routes to HNO-Heme Complexes and Insight into
Physiological Effects. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 6283–6292.
(52) Liochev, S. I.; Fridovich, I. The Mode of Decomposition of Angeli’s Salt
(Na2N2O3) and the Effects Thereon of Oxygen, Nitrite, Superoxide Dismutase, and
Glutathione. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 34, 1399–1404.
(53) Smulik, R.; Debski, D.; Zielonka, J.; Michałowski, B.; Adamus, J.; Marcinek, A.;
Kalyanaraman, B.; Sikora, A. Nitroxyl (HNO) Reacts with Molecular Oxygen and
Forms Peroxynitrite at Physiological pH: Biological Implications. J. Biol. Chem.
2014, 289, 35570–35581.
(54) Poskrebyshev, G. a.; Shafirovich, V.; Lymar, S. V. Hyponitrite Radical, a Stable
Adduct of Nitric Oxide and Nitroxyl. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 891–899.
(55) Pino, R. Z.; Feelisch, M. Bioassay Discrimination between Nitric Oxide (NO·) and
Nitroxyl (NO−) Using L-Cysteine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 201,
54–62.
(56) Shoeman, D. W.; Shirota, F. N.; DeMaster, E. G.; Nagasawa, H. T. Reaction of
Nitroxyl, an Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitor, with N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine.
18
Alcohol 2000, 20, 55–59.
(57) Johnson, G. M.; Chozinski, T. J.; Salmon, D. J.; Moghaddam, A. D.; Chen, H. C.;
Miranda, K. M. Quantitative Detection of Nitroxyl upon Trapping with
Glutathione and Labeling with a Specific Fluorogenic Reagent. Free Radic. Biol.
Med. 2013, 63, 476–484.
(58) Johnson, G. M.; Chozinski, T. J.; Gallagher, E. S.; Aspinwall, C. a.; Miranda, K.
M. Glutathione Sulfinamide Serves as a Selective, Endogenous Biomarker for
Nitroxyl after Exposure to Therapeutic Levels of Donors. Free Radic. Biol. Med.
2014, 76, 299–307.
(59) Rosenthal, J.; Lippard, S. J. Direct Detection of Nitroxyl in Aqueous Solution
Using a Tripodal copper(II) BODIPY Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
5536–5537.
(60) Zhou, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, J. Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, T. C.; Yao, C. Visualization of
Nitroxyl in Living Cells by a Chelated copper(II) Coumarin Complex. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 1290–1293.
(61) Rivera-Fuentes, P.; Lippard, S. J. Metal-Based Optical Probes for Live Cell
Imaging of Nitroxyl (HNO). Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2927–2934.
(62) Suárez, S. A.; Bikiel, D. E.; Wetzler, D. E.; Martí, M. A.; Doctorovich, F. Time-
Resolved Electrochemical Quantification of Azanone (HNO) at Low Nanomolar
Level. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10262–10269.
(63) Hoch, G.; Kok, B. A Mass Spectrometer Inlet System for Sampling Gases
19
Dissolved in Liquid Phases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1963, 101, 160–170.
(64) Johnson, R. C.; Cooks, R. G.; Allen, T. M.; Cisper, M. E.; Hemberger, P. H.
Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry: Trends and Applications. Mass
Spectrom. Rev. 2000, 19, 1–37.
(65) Tu, C.; Swenson, E. R.; Silverman, D. N. Membrane Inlet for Mass Spectrometric
Measurement of Nitric Oxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 1453–1457.
(66) Tu, C.; Scafa, N.; Zhang, X.; Silverman, D. N. A Comparison of Membrane Inlet
Mass Spectrometry and Nitric Oxide (NO) Electrode Techniques to Detect NO in
Aqueous Solution. Electroanalysis 2010, 22, 445–448.
(67) Cline, M. R.; Tu, C.; Silverman, D. N.; Toscano, J. P. Detection of Nitroxyl
(HNO) by Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50,
1274–1279.
(68) Cline, M. R.; Chavez, T. A.; Toscano, J. P. “Oxidation of N-Hydroxy-L-Arginine
by Hypochlorous Acid to Form Nitroxyl (HNO).” J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 118,
148–154.
(69) Dixon, R. N. The Heats of Formation of HNO and of DNO. J. Chem. Phys. 1996,
104, 6905.
(70) Bartberger, M. D.; Liu, W.; Ford, E.; Miranda, K. M.; Switzer, C.; Fukuto, J. M.;
Farmer, P. J.; Wink, D. a; Houk, K. N. The Reduction Potential of Nitric Oxide
(NO) and Its Importance to NO Biochemistry. PNAS 2002, 99, 10958–10963.
(71) Schmidt, H. H.; Hofmann, H.; Schindler, U.; Shutenko, Z. S.; Cunningham, D. D.;
20
Feelisch, M. No NO from NO Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1996, 93, 14492–
14497.
(72) Rusche, K. M.; Spiering, M. M.; Marletta, M. a. Reactions Catalyzed by
Tetrahydrobiopterin-Free Nitric Oxide Synthase. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 15503–
15512.
(73) Adak, S.; Wang, Q.; Stuehr, D. J. Arginine Conversion to Nitroxide by
Tetrahydrobiopterin-Free Neuronal Nitric-Oxide Synthase: Implications for
Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 33554–33561.
(74) Wei, C.-C.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Meade, A. L.; McDonald, J. F.; Stuehr, D. J. Why Do
Nitric Oxide Synthases Use Tetrahydrobiopterin? J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002, 91,
618–624.
(75) Wei, C.-C.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Hemann, C.; Hille, R.; Stuehr, D. J. A
Tetrahydrobiopterin Radical Forms and Then Becomes Reduced during Nomega-
Hydroxyarginine Oxidation by Nitric-Oxide Synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278,
46668–46673.
(76) Tejero, J.; Stuehr, D. Tetrahydrobiopterin in Nitric Oxide Synthase. IUBMB Life
2013, 65, 358–365.
(77) Santolini, J. The Molecular Mechanism of Mammalian NO-Synthases: A Story of
Electrons and Protons. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 127–141.
(78) Fukuto, J. M.; Wallace, G. C.; Hszieh, R.; Chaudhuri, G. Chemical Oxidation of
N-Hydroxyguanidine Compounds. Release of Nitric Oxide, Nitroxyl and Possible
21
Relationship to the Mechanism of Biological Nitric Oxide Generation. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 1992, 43, 607–613.
(79) Donzelli, S.; Espey, M. G.; Flores-Santana, W.; Switzer, C. H.; Yeh, G. C.; Huang,
J.; Stuehr, D. J.; King, S. B.; Miranda, K. M.; Wink, D. a. Generation of Nitroxyl
by Heme Protein-Mediated Peroxidation of Hydroxylamine but Not N-Hydroxy-L-
Arginine. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 578–584.
(80) Reisz, J. A.; Bechtold, E.; King, S. B. Oxidative Heme Protein-Mediated Nitroxyl
(HNO) Generation. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 5203–5212.
(81) Filipovic, M. R.; Miljkovic, J. L.; Nauser, T.; Royzen, M.; Klos, K.; Shubina, T.;
Koppenol, W. H.; Lippard, S. J.; Ivanović-Burmazović, I. Chemical
Characterization of the Smallest S-Nitrosothiol, HSNO; Cellular Cross-Talk of
H2S and S-Nitrosothiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12016–12027.
22
Chapter 2: Detection of HNO by Membrane Inlet
Mass Spectrometry
2.1 Introduction
Membrane inlet (or introduction) mass spectrometry (MIMS) is a technique that
has been in use since the early 1960’s. MIMS was first reported by Hoch and Kok as a
method for the detection of hydrophobic gases dissolved in aqueous solution by mass
spectrometry.1 Analytes partition from the liquid phase through a membrane and into the
vapor phase via pervaporation.2 Pervaporation is a process that occurs in three stages:
First, the species of interest is adsorbed at the surface of the membrane, it then permeates
through the membrane, and finally desorbs into vacuum where it is detected by mass
spectrometry. Factors that influence MIMS sensitivity include the diffusability and
solubility of the gas in the membrane material, membrane surface area, and membrane
thickness.
The MIMS technique has been used in a variety of applications including the
monitoring of biological reactions and industrial processes.2,3 The application of MIMS
for the detection of the small hydrophobic gas, nitric oxide (NO),3,4 suggested the
possibility to use MIMS to detect the closely related gas, azanone (HNO, nitroxyl). HNO,
the protonated one-electron reduced form of NO, has been recently recognized for its
unique biological activity, especially as a potential therapeutic for heart failure.5–9
Detection of HNO is difficult due to its facile reactivity with itself to produce hyponitrous
acid (HON=NOH, k = 8 x 106 M-1s-1), which subsequently dehydrates to form nitrous oxide
23
(N2O) (Scheme 2.1a).10 As a result of this reactivity, HNO must be generated in situ by
the use of donor molecules. It is hoped that the development of the MIMS technique for
HNO detection and investigation of the aqueous chemistry of this potentially new gaseous
signaling agent will ultimately shed light on its potential mechanisms of action in vivo.
Scheme 2.1. Reactivity of HNO with (a) itself to ultimately produce N2O and H2O, (b)
with thiols (RSH) to produce either disulfide (excess thiol) or the rearranged sulfinamide,
(c) or with phosphines to form the phosphine oxide and aza-ylide products.
2.2 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods.
The MIMS setup originally used for HNO detection,11 based on a design reported
by Silverman and co-workers,3 consists of a membrane probe that includes a piece of
silastic tubing attached to glass tubing at one end and sealed at the other by a glass bead
(Figure 2.1a). The glass tubing is attached via an ultra-torr Swagelok connection to an
external vacuum chamber containing a dosing line that leads to a quadrupole mass
spectrometer where ions are detected following electron ionization (EI). The membrane
24
probe is immersed in an aqueous solution in a sealable 4-mL glass sample cell fit with a
sample injection port.
Recently, our laboratory has begun to use a Hiden HRP-40 MIMS system with a
sample cell and membrane probe that have been optimized to detect gases dissolved in
aqueous solution. The modified cell contains rotary blades with an imbedded magnet for
efficient stirring past the silastic membrane. The sample cell is fit with an interior
heating/cooling jacket for temperature regulation, as well as multiple ports for sample
injection (Figure 2.1b). As described below, with this optimized setup we can reliably
detect the HNO m/z 30 NO+ fragment ion signal at precursor concentrations as low as 25
nM. Given the first-order rate constant for HNO donor decomposition (t1/2 at 25 °C = ca.
15 minutes, kd = 7.7 x 10-4 s-1) and the bimolecular rate constant for HNO dimerization, we
estimate a detection limit of approximately 1 nM HNO.12
Figure 2.1. Schematic representation of MIMS sample cells and membrane probes.
2.3 Detection of HNO by MIMS
MIMS has been used to examine HNO production from a variety of donors,
including disodium diazen-1-ium-1,2,2-triolate (Angeli’s salt, AS), N-
25
hydroxybenzenesulfonamide (Piloty’s acid, PA), and 2-bromo-N-
hydroxybenzenesulfonamide (2-BrPA) (Figure 2.2). Typical MIMS traces observed at m/z
30 (NO+), 31 (HNO+/15NO+), and 44 (N2O+) after addition of AS to an argon-purged
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4 containing the metal chelator,
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) are shown in Figure 2.3. Aliquots of HNO
donor solutions are injected after a flat baseline is established and ion current intensities
are measured as a function of time.
Figure 2.2. The HNO donors, AS, PA, 2-BrPA, and 2-MSPA, and the NO donor,
DEA/NO.
Figure 2.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 30, 31, and 44 following the addition of 50 µM
AS to an argon-purged 0.1 M PBS solution containing 100 µM DTPA at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.
Although the m/z 44 signal is easily assigned to N2O, the ultimate product of HNO
dimerization, assignments of the m/z 30 and 31 signals can be more complicated.
Depending on the donor, its concentration, and conditions of the MIMS experiment, the
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
12840
Time (min)
m/z 31
500
400
300
200
100
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
20151050 Time (min)
m/z 44 m/z 30
26
m/z 30 signal can contain contributions from NO, HNO, and/or N2O. The EI mass spectra
of NO, HNO, and N2O all contain strong NO+ signals at m/z 30 due to either the parent ion
(NO) or major fragment ions (HNO and N2O). The HNO parent ion m/z 31 signal is very
weak with an intensity less than 2.8% that of the m/z 30 fragment ion in the reported EI
mass spectrum.13 Due to this weak intensity, the detection of HNO+ can also be
complicated by natural abundance 15NO+. For example, small m/z 31 MIMS signals from
the NO donor, DEA/NO, and from standard N2O gas can be observed (Figure 2.4). The
intensity ratio of the m/z 31 to m/z 30 signals in each of these cases matches well with that
expected from natural abundance 15N (0.4%). In light of the potential complications
surrounding identification of the m/z 30 and 31 MIMS signals, additional experiments must
be performed to determine the relative contributions of HNO, NO, and N2O to these
signals.
27
Figure 2.4. MIMS signals observed at (a) m/z 30 and (b) m/z 31 following the addition of
100 µM DEA/NO to an argon-purged 0.1 M PBS solution containing 100 µM DTPA at pH
7.4 and 37 °C, and at (c) m/z 44, 30, and (d) 31 following the addition of 100 µL of N2O
(g) to an argon-purged 0.1 M PBS solution containing 100 µM DTPA at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.
2.4 Differentiating HNO and NO MIMS Signals
HNO and NO can be differentiated by their reactivity with chemical traps. For
example, HNO reacts readily with thiols (e.g., glutathione (GSH)) and phosphines (e.g.,
tris-(4,6-dimethylphenyl)phosphine-3,3′,3″-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (TXPTS)) under
both anaerobic and aerobic conditions (Scheme 2.1b,c).14,15 NO, on the other hand, is quite
unreactive with thiols under anaerobic conditions, but in the presence of oxygen undergoes
rapid autoxidation to produce nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and/or dinitrogen trioxide (N2O3),
both of which react rapidly with thiols.14,16–20 In addition, NO is relatively unreactive with
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 31
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 44 m/z 30
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 30
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 I
on
Cu
rre
nt
(pA
)
121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 31
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
28
phosphines, both in the presence or absence of oxygen. However, at high TXPTS
concentrations NO can react to produce ultimately N2O.21–24
Consistent with the above reactivity, the m/z 30 signal generated from the NO
donor, sodium 1-(N,N-diethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DEA/NO, Figure 2.2) is
unaffected by the addition of 250 µM GSH under anaerobic conditions; however, when the
solution is purged with oxygen, the signal is diminished.11 In addition, the DEA/NO m/z
30 MIMS signal is unaffected by up to 250 µM TXPTS. In comparison, the m/z 30 signal
produced from the HNO donor, 2-BrPA, is completely quenched by 250 µM GSH under
anaerobic conditions or by 250 µM TXPTS under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
Another method that has been used to distinguish MIMS signals originating from
NO from those due to HNO and/or N2O is the use of liquid nitrogen cold trap.25 Although
the boiling point of HNO is unknown, it is likely higher than that of NO (bp = -152 °C at
1 atm). If this is the case, it should be possible to trap HNO and N2O (bp = -88 °C at 1
atm) selectively using an appropriate cold trap. Since the MIMS system is under vacuum,
a liquid nitrogen (bp = -196 °C at 1 atm) cold trap was found to trap HNO (derived from
2-BrPA) and N2O gas effectively, but not NO (produced from DEA/NO).25 In addition,
the m/z 31 signal (15NO+) from DEA/NO (Figure 2.4b) persists in the presence of a liquid
nitrogen cold trap, indicating that this signal is not due to HNO.
The contribution of N2O to the m/z 30 MIMS signal observed following
decomposition of HNO donors can be determined by analysis of the m/z 44 to m/z 30 signal
intensity ratio. In MIMS experiments using relatively high donor concentrations (typically
greater than 100 µM), dimerization is favored and primarily N2O is observed. Under these
conditions the m/z 30 signal originates solely from N2O, and the 44:30 ratio is identical to
29
that of a standard N2O sample. However, at lower donor concentrations (typically less than
5 µM), the m/z 44 signal is not observed, and the m/z 30 signal is due to the NO+ fragment
ion of HNO alone. Between these two extremes, the m/z 30 signal arises from contributions
from both HNO and N2O. The relative contribution of these two species can be calculated
using the 44:30 ratio observed for a standard N2O sample.11
2.5 HNO donor comparison
MIMS has been used to compare the HNO donors, AS, PA, and 2-BrPA.11 The m/z
30 MIMS signals produced from either 50 µM AS or 2-BrPA were examined as function
of GSH and TXPTS concentration. For 2-BrPA, the m/z 30 signal was completely
quenched with 50 µM and above GSH or TXPTS. In the case of AS, although the intensity
of the m/z 30 signal was reduced in presence of either GSH or TXPTS, it was not
completely quenched even at high concentrations of trap (100 – 250 µM). Since N2O is
not observed at m/z 44 and all the HNO produced should be quenched at high trap
concentrations, the residual m/z 30 signal was attributed to NO. The intensity of this
residual signal arising from 50 µM AS was identical to that observed from 2 µM DEA/NO.
Because the NO-forming pathways of both DEA/NO and AS produce 2 moles of NO from
each mole of precursor, this result indicates that approximately 2% of AS decomposes to
NO at pH 7.4. This minor production of NO would normally not be observed since HNO
is an effective trap of NO,10 and is only revealed when the HNO is removed by a selective
trap. The generation of a small amount of NO by AS at neutral pH is a possibility that has
recently been considered.26
The decomposition of PA at physiological pH is slow, leaving it susceptible to
oxidation, which ultimately leads to NO production.27,28 This oxidation requires both trace
30
metals and oxygen.29 The TXPTS quenching of the m/z 30 MIMS signal derived from PA
was examined at pH 7.4 under aerobic conditions in the presence or absence of the metal
chelator, DTPA.11 In the presence of DTPA, slow production of the m/z 30 signal is
observed. Addition of TXPTS results in near complete quenching of this signal, indicating
mostly HNO, but some NO production under these conditions. In absence of DTPA, the
growth kinetics of the m/z 30 signal become much faster and the addition of TXPTS results
in only modest quenching of the signal, indicating the production of more NO under these
conditions. In contrast, analogous MIMS analysis of the decomposition of 2BrPA, which
has a much shorter half-life (t1/2 = ca. 2 min at pH 7.4 and 37 °C), indicates that 2-BrPA is
less susceptible to oxidation and HNO production remains the dominant pathway
regardless of the presence of a metal chelator or oxygen.11
2.6 Detection of HNO from HOCl mediated oxidation of N-
hydroxyarginine (NOHA)
The positive pharmacological profile of HNO has led to interest in elucidating
potential endogenous pathways to HNO generation. Oxidation of hydroxylamine
(NH2OH), hydroxamic acids (RC(O)NHOH), and its derivatives (e.g., N-
hydroxyguanidines) have been explored previously.30–36 Recent work by Donzelli et al.
has investigated the oxidation of NH2OH by horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in the presence
of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).34 Generation of HNO is observed from a variety of FeIII
containing enzymes including HRP, the globins (metmyoglobin (metMb) and
methemoglobin (metHb)), catalase, myeloperoxidase (MPO), lactoperoxidase (LPO), and
hemin. HNO generation appears to be affected by the identity of the axial ligand, with
histidine ligands producing the highest yields. Hydroxamic acid derivatives have their own
31
history in applications as metal chelators,37 and treatments for cancer.38 Similar to the
results of hydroxylamine, oxidation of hydroxamic acids by H2O2/FeIII systems have the
ability to generate HNO.39–41 The amount of HNO that is able to avoid trapping in the
enzyme pocket by the resulting FeIII formed is dependent on the enzyme.
N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA) is an established biosynthetic intermediate
involved in the endogenous production of NO from arginine by nitric oxide synthase
(NOS). NOS has also been shown to oxidize NOHA to HNO, rather than NO, in the
absence of the biopterin cofactor.30,31,42–45 The detection of an iron nitrosyl species in NOS,
rather than the typical FeIII resting state further suggests the generation of HNO.43,46
Recently, it has been suggested that that the biopterin radical intermediate oxidizes the
{FeNO}7 by one electron to produce {FeNO}6, which can then release NO. In the absence
of the biopterin cofactor, HNO may be released from the {FeNO}7 species.47–49
It is well established that N-hydroxyguanadines have the ability to produce NO,
HNO, or both, from a variety of chemical oxidants.32,35,44,50 This process is presumed to
involve a nitroso intermediate that leads to the production of the corresponding cyanamide
derivative (Scheme 2.2). A biologically relevant oxidant potentially capable of oxidizing
NOHA to produce HNO is hypochlorous acid (HOCl). HOCl is a strong oxidant that is
generated in vivo by MPO from the reaction of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with chloride
ion. MPO is released by neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and has been proposed to
play a role in cardiovascular disease.51–53 Activated neutrophils have been shown to
produce HOCl at concentrations up to 100 µM in vitro, which may be a concentration that
is attainable at inflammatory sites in vivo.54–56
32
Scheme 2.2. Oxidation of N-hydroxy-L-arginine to produce HNO and cyanamide
derivative via a nitroso intermediate
Investigation of the biologically relevant oxidation of NOHA has demonstrated that
MIMS is a viable technique for the study of possible endogenous pathways for HNO
production.25 Consistent with the experiments performed by Donzelli et al., 500 µM
NH2OH or NOHA with 10 µM HRP and 100 µM H2O2 led to increases in MIMS signal
intensities at m/z 30 and m/z 44 for NH2OH, but not for NOHA. The oxidation of NOHA
by HOCl was initially monitored by GC headspace analysis to quantify the amount of N2O
produced.25 NOHA (100 µM) was incubated with varying concentrations of HOCl at 37
°C in 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.4. Significant N2O production was observed only with excess
HOCl, and a ratio of HOCl to substrate 5:1 was chosen for subsequent experiments. This
ratio of oxidant to substrate is potentially plausible in a biological setting since HOCl can
be generated up to concentrations of 100 µM and NOHA has been observed at
concentrations of 15 µM in blood samples.57,58
MIMS experiments following the injection of 500 µM HOCl into a PBS solution
of 100 µM NOHA resulted in observation of signals at m/z 30 and m/z 44.25 The observed
44:30 intensity ratio was higher than that observed for authentic N2O. A portion of the m/z
44 signal was determined to be due to CO2 production that occurs via HOCl-mediated
chlorination of the amine terminus to form ultimately the corresponding aldehyde and CO2
33
(Scheme 2.3). Previous work has shown that HOCl can oxidize amino acids to produce
CO2 and the corresponding aldehydes,59,60 and this was confirmed by MIMS experiments
with L-arginine (CO2 observed) and L-arginine methyl ester (no CO2 observed).25
Scheme 2.3. Reaction of HOCl with amino acids to produce CO2 and an aldehyde.
To confirm that the N2O observed following HOCl oxidation of NOHA is due to
HNO dimerization rather than from a direct N2O-producing pathway, MIMS experiments
were performed at lower concentrations (< 5 µM NOHA).25 Previous MIMS work has
demonstrated that at HNO donor concentrations below 5 µM, N2O dimerization is not
observed and the m/z 30 signal observed under these conditions is derived from HNO.
Reducing the concentration of NOHA to 2.5 µM or below results in the loss of the m/z 44
signal, while still maintaining the m/z 30 signal, corresponding to the direct detection of
HNO. The possibility that this signal could be due to the parent ion of NO, rather than
HNO fragmentation, was ruled out with the use of a liquid nitrogen cold trap. In the
presence of this cold trap, a MIMS signal at m/z 30 is not observed, indicated that NO is
not produced.25
In addition to NOHA, the HOCl oxidation of NH2OH, hydroxyurea, and
acetohydroxamic acid were also examined.25 All of these species have been shown capable
of producing HNO upon oxidation (Scheme 2.4).33,36 The oxidation of these substrates
were monitored by MIMS and GC headspace analysis. MIMS experiments revealed the
typical m/z 44 and m/z 30 signals for each substrate, albeit weaker ones for
34
acetohydroxamic acid. GC headspace analysis was consistent with these MIMS
observations, showing significant production of N2O, relative to AS, from both NH2OH
(90%) and hydroxyurea (91 %), and relatively little from acetohydroxamic acid (8%)
Scheme 2.4. Oxidation-mediated HNO producing pathways for NH2OH,
acetohydroxamic acid , and hydroxyurea
The MPO-mediated HOCl oxidation of NOHA was examined to validate the
biological relevance of this HNO producing pathway.25 For comparison, oxidation of both
NH2OH and NOHA (100 µM) was monitored in the presence of 15 or 75 nM MPO with
excess chloride ion (143 mM) and 500 µM H2O2. HOCl generation was initiated by the
addition of H2O2 to a solution of MPO and chloride ion in the presence of substrate. The
reactions were examined by GC headspace analysis of N2O. With 15 nM MPO, only a
small percentage of N2O (25%, relative to AS) is observed for the oxidation of NH2OH.
Under the same conditions, NOHA produces very little N2O (2%, relative to AS).
Increasing the concentration of MPO to 75 nM led to much larger yields of N2O from
NH2OH (73%, relative to AS); however, NOHA oxidation still produced only a small
percentage of N2O (8%, relative to AS). These results differ from those using HOCl itself
where both NH2OH and NOHA produce high yields of N2O. It was suggested that this
35
difference can be accounted for based on the slow production of HOCl from MPO and the
reaction of N-hydroxyguanidines with HNO.25,61
2.7 Conclusions and future directions
The MIMS technique is a sensitive and selective detection method for HNO. It can
be used to detect HNO under physiologically relevant conditions by both its parent ion
(HNO+, m/z 31) and its primary fragment ion (NO+, m/z 30), as well as its dimerization
product, N2O (m/z 44). Reliable HNO detection down to precursor concentrations as low
as 25 nM can be achieved. Distinguishing HNO from N2O and NO is possible by the use
of chemical (thiols or phosphines) or physical (liquid nitrogen) traps. The versatility of
this technique allows for investigation of possible HNO producing pathways that have the
potential to be physiologically relevant.
Future MIMS work should involve exploring other potential chemical reactions that
can produce HNO. For example, recent work has shown that H2S can react with S-
nitrosothiols (RSNO) to generate thionitrous acid (HSNO), a potential precursor to HNO.62
HSNO has also been proposed to be an intermediate in the reaction of H2S and NO.
Further, H2S and NO have been shown to react to ultimately generate HNO.63 Exploration
of these reaction by MIMS could shed light on potential mechanisms of HNO formation
from biologically relevant reactions.
2.8 Experimental Methods
2.8.1 General Methods
36
Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company,
Fisher Scientific, or Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and were used without further
purification. N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA) was purchased from Cayman Chemical.
Hydrogen peroxide (30 % v/v) was quantified by absorbance at 240 nm using a molar
absorption coefficient of 39.4 M-1 cm-1.64 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz FT-NMR operating at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively.
All resonances are reported in parts per million, and are referenced to residual CHCl3 (7.26
ppm, for 1H, 77.23 ppm for 13C). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained on a VG
Analytical VG-70S Magnetic Sector Mass Spectrometer operating in fast atom
bombardment ionization mode. Masses were referenced to a 10% PEG-200 sample.
Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were obtained using a Hewlett Packard
8453 diode array spectrometer. Infrared (IR) absorption spectra were obtained using a
Bruker IFS 55 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer.
2.8.2 Gas Chromatographic (GC) Headspace Analysis of N2O
Gas chromatographic headspace analysis of N2O was performed using a Varian CP-
3800 gas chromatograph instrument equipped with a 1041 manual injector, electron
capture detector, and a Restek packed column. Samples were prepared in 15 mL vials with
volumes pre-measured for uniformity. Vials were filled with 5 mL PBS buffer, sealed with
a rubber septum, and then purged with argon for 10 min. The vials were equilibrated at 37
°C for 10 min in a block heater. An aliquot of an HNO donor solution or other relevant
substrate species was then introduced into the thermally equilibrated headspace vial using
a gastight syringe. Samples were then incubated overnight, unless otherwise stated, to
ensure complete production and equilibration of N2O in the headspace. Headspace (60 μL)
37
was then sampled three successive times using a gastight syringe with a sample lock. HNO
yields are reported relative to the HNO donor, 2-bromo-N-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide
(2BrPA), which by comparison to standard N2O samples we find provides quantitative
production of HNO.
2.8.3 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods
The MIMS cell used is a Hiden HRP40 membrane inlet MS cell. The cell contains
rotary blades with an imbedded magnet for efficient stirring across the silastic membrane.
The membrane is immersed in, unless stated otherwise, 20 mL of 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) containing 100 µM diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA).
The sample cell is fitted with an interior heating/cooling jacket for temperature regulation,
as well as multiple ports for sample injection. All samples were argon-purged prior to the
experiments. Injections of samples are performed using gas-tight syringes after background
signals stabilize. Mass spectra were obtained by electron impact (EI) ionization (70 eV) at
an emission current of 1 mA; source pressures were approximately 5 x 10-7 – 1 x 10-6 Torr.
Relevant ion currents were measured after the system had reached a stable baseline.
38
2.9 References
(1) Hoch, G.; Kok, B. A Mass Spectrometer Inlet System for Sampling Gases Dissolved
in Liquid Phases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1963, 101, 160–170.
(2) Johnson, R. C.; Cooks, R. G.; Allen, T. M.; Cisper, M. E.; Hemberger, P. H.
Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry: Trends and Applications. Mass
Spectrom. Rev. 2000, 19, 1–37.
(3) Tu, C.; Swenson, E. R.; Silverman, D. N. Membrane Inlet for Mass Spectrometric
Measurement of Nitric Oxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 1453–1457.
(4) Tu, C.; Scafa, N.; Zhang, X.; Silverman, D. N. A Comparison of Membrane Inlet
Mass Spectrometry and Nitric Oxide (NO) Electrode Techniques to Detect NO in
Aqueous Solution. Electroanalysis 2010, 22, 445–448.
(5) Paolocci, N.; Katori, T.; Champion, H. C.; St John, M. E.; Miranda, K. M.; Fukuto,
J. M.; Wink, D. A.; Kass, D. A. Positive Inotropic and Lusitropic Effects of
HNO/NO- in Failing Hearts: Independence from Beta-Adrenergic Signaling. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 5537–5542.
(6) Miranda, K. M.; Paolocci, N.; Katori, T.; Thomas, D. D.; Ford, E.; Bartberger, M.
D.; Espey, M. G.; Kass, D. A.; Feelisch, M.; Fukuto, J. M.; Wink, D. A. A
Biochemical Rationale for the Discrete Behavior of Nitroxyl and Nitric Oxide in the
Cardiovascular System. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 9196–9201.
(7) Tocchetti, C. G.; Wang, W.; Froehlich, J. P.; Huke, S.; Aon, M. A.; Wilson, G. M.;
Di Benedetto, G.; O’Rourke, B.; Gao, W. D.; Wink, D. A.; Toscano, J. P.; Zaccolo,
39
M.; Bers, D. M.; Valdivia, H. H.; Cheng, H.; Kass, D. A.; Paolocci, N. Nitroxyl
Improves Cellular Heart Function by Directly Enhancing Cardiac Sarcoplasmic
Reticulum Ca2+ Cycling. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 96–104.
(8) Paolocci, N.; Jackson, M. I.; Lopez, B. E.; Miranda, K.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Wink, D.
A.; Hobbs, A. J.; Fukuto, J. M. The Pharmacology of Nitroxyl (HNO) and Its
Therapeutic Potential: Not Just the Janus Face of NO. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 113,
442–458.
(9) Fukuto, J. M.; Bartberger, M. D.; Dutton, A. S.; Paolocci, N.; Wink, D. a; Houk, K.
N. The Physiological Chemistry and Biological Activity of Nitroxyl (HNO): The
Neglected, Misunderstood, and Enigmatic Nitrogen Oxide. Chem. Res. Toxicol.
2005, 18, 790–801.
(10) Shafirovich, V.; Lymar, S. V. Nitroxyl and Its Anion in Aqueous Solutions: Spin
States, Protic Equilibria, and Reactivities toward Oxygen and Nitric Oxide. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 7340–7345.
(11) Cline, M. R.; Tu, C.; Silverman, D. N.; Toscano, J. P. Detection of Nitroxyl (HNO)
by Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 1274–
1279.
(12) Suárez, S. A.; Bikiel, D. E.; Wetzler, D. E.; Martí, M. A.; Doctorovich, F. Time-
Resolved Electrochemical Quantification of Azanone (HNO) at Low Nanomolar
Level. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10262–10269.
(13) Lambert, R. M. Mass-Spectrometric Study of the System Hydrogen + NO. Chem.
Commun. 1966, 23, 850–851.
40
(14) Wong, P. S.; Hyun, J.; Fukuto, J. M.; Shirota, F. N.; DeMaster, E. G.; Shoeman, D.
W.; Nagasawa, H. T. Reaction between S-Nitrosothiols and Thiols: Generation of
Nitroxyl (HNO) and Subsequent Chemistry. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 5362–5371.
(15) Reisz, J. A.; Klorig, E. B.; Wright, M. W.; King, S. B. Reductive Phosphine-
Mediated Ligation of Nitroxyl (HNO). Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2719–2721.
(16) Pryor, W.; Church, D.; Govindan, C. Oxidation of Thiols by Nitric Oxide and
Nitrogen Dioxide: Synthetic Utility and Toxicological Implications. J. Org. Chem.
1982, 47, 156–159.
(17) Folkes, L. K.; Wardman, P. Kinetics of the Reaction between Nitric Oxide and
Glutathione: Implications for Thiol Depletion in Cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004,
37, 549–556.
(18) Wink, D. A.; Nims, R. W.; Darbyshire, J. F.; Christodoulou, D.; Hanbauer, I.; Cox,
G. W.; Laval, F.; Laval, J.; Cook, J. A.; Krishna, M. C. Reaction Kinetics for
Nitrosation of Cysteine and Glutathione in Aerobic Nitric Oxide Solutions at
Neutral pH. Insights into the Fate and Physiological Effects of Intermediates
Generated in the NO/O2 Reaction. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1994, 7, 519–525.
(19) Keshive, M.; Singh, S.; Wishnok, J. S.; Tannenbaum, S. R.; Deen, W. M. Kinetics
of S-Nitrosation of Thiols in Nitric Oxide Solutions. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9,
988–993.
(20) Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G. Mechanism of the Nitrosation of Thiols and Amines by
Oxygenated •NO Solutions: The Nature of the Nitrosating Intermediates. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3419–3425.
41
(21) Kuhn, L. P.; Doali, J. O.; Wellman, C. The Reaction of Nitric Oxide with Triethyl
Phosphite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 4792–4794.
(22) Longhi, B. Y. R.; Ragsdale, R.; Drago, R. S. Reactions of Nitrogen(II) Oxide with
Miscellaneous Lewis Bases. Inorg. Chem. 1962, 1, 786–770.
(23) Lim, M. D.; Lorkovic, I. M.; Ford, P. C. Kinetics of the Oxidation of
Triphenylphosphine by Nitric Oxide. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1026–1028.
(24) Bakac, A.; Schouten, M.; Johnson, A.; Song, W.; Pestovsky, O.; Szajna-Fuller, E.
Oxidation of a Water-Soluble Phosphine and Some Spectroscopic Probes with Nitric
Oxide and Nitrous Acid in Aqueous Solutions. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 6979–6985.
(25) Cline, M. R.; Chavez, T. A.; Toscano, J. P. “Oxidation of N-Hydroxy-L-Arginine
by Hypochlorous Acid to Form Nitroxyl (HNO).” J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 118,
148–154.
(26) Zeller, A.; Wenzl, M. V.; Beretta, M.; Stessel, H.; Russwurm, M.; Koesling, D.;
Schmidt, K.; Mayer, B. Mechanisms Underlying Activation of Soluble Guanylate
Cyclase by the Nitroxyl Donor Angeli’s Salt. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 76, 1115–
1122.
(27) Bonner, F.; Ko, Y. Kinetic, Isotopic, and Nitrogen-15 NMR Study of N-
Hydroxybenzenesulfonamide Decomposition: An Nitrosyl Hydride (HNO) Source
Reaction. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 744, 2514–2519.
(28) Zamora, R.; Grzesiok, A.; Weber, H.; Feelisch, M. Oxidative Release of Nitric
Oxide Accounts for Guanylyl Cyclase Stimulating, Vasodilator and Anti-Platelet
42
Activity of Piloty’s Acid: A Comparison with Angeli's Salt. Biochem. J. 1995, 312,
333–339.
(29) Wilkins, P. C.; Jacobs, H. K.; Johnson, M. D.; Gopalan, A. S. Mechanistic
Variations in the Oxidation of Piloty’s Acid by Metal Complexes. Inorg. Chem.
2004, 43, 7877–7881.
(30) Rusche, K. M.; Spiering, M. M.; Marletta, M. A. Reactions Catalyzed by
Tetrahydrobiopterin-Free Nitric Oxide Synthase. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 15503–
15512.
(31) Tejero, J.; Stuehr, D. Tetrahydrobiopterin in Nitric Oxide Synthase. IUBMB Life
2013, 65, 358–365.
(32) Fukuto, J. M.; Stuehr, D. J.; Feldman, P. L.; Bova, M. P.; Wong, P. Peracid
Oxidation of an N-Hydroxyguanidine Compound: A Chemical Model for the
Oxidation of N-Hydroxyl-L-Arginine by Nitric Oxide Synthase. J. Med. Chem.
1993, 36, 2666–2670.
(33) Donzelli, S.; Espey, M. G.; Flores-Santana, W.; Switzer, C. H.; Yeh, G. C.; Huang,
J.; Stuehr, D. J.; King, S. B.; Miranda, K. M.; Wink, D. a. Generation of Nitroxyl by
Heme Protein-Mediated Peroxidation of Hydroxylamine but Not N-Hydroxy-L-
Arginine. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 578–584.
(34) Donzelli, S.; Espey, M. G.; Thomas, D. D.; Mancardi, D.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Ridnour,
L. A.; Paolocci, N.; King, S. B.; Miranda, K. M.; Lazzarino, G.; Fukuto, J. M.; Wink,
D. A. Discriminating Formation of HNO from Other Reactive Nitrogen Oxide
Species. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 1056–1066.
43
(35) Fukuto, J. M.; Wallace, G. C.; Hszieh, R.; Chaudhuri, G. Chemical Oxidation of N-
Hydroxyguanidine Compounds. Release of Nitric Oxide, Nitroxyl and Possible
Relationship to the Mechanism of Biological Nitric Oxide Generation. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 1992, 43, 607–613.
(36) Reisz, J. A.; Bechtold, E.; King, S. B. Oxidative Heme Protein-Mediated Nitroxyl
(HNO) Generation. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 5203–5212.
(37) Codd, R. Traversing the Coordination Chemistry and Chemical Biology of
Hydroxamic Acids. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 1387–1408.
(38) Grant, S.; Easley, C.; Kirkpatrick, P. Vorinostat. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6,
21–22.
(39) Huang, J.; Sommers, E. M.; Kim-Shapiro, D. B.; King, S. B. Horseradish Peroxidase
Catalyzed Nitric Oxide Formation from Hydroxyurea. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
3473–3480.
(40) Huang, J.; Kim-Shapiro, D. B.; King, S. B. Catalase-Mediated Nitric Oxide
Formation from Hydroxyurea. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3495–3501.
(41) Samuni, Y.; Flores-Santana, W.; Krishna, M. C.; Mitchell, J. B.; Wink, D. A. The
Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylase Suberoylanilide Hydroxamate and Trichostatin A
Release Nitric Oxide upon Oxidation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 419–423.
(42) Adak, S.; Wang, Q.; Stuehr, D. J. Arginine Conversion to Nitroxide by
Tetrahydrobiopterin-Free Neuronal Nitric-Oxide Synthase: Implications for
Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 33554–33561.
44
(43) Schmidt, H. H.; Hofmann, H.; Schindler, U.; Shutenko, Z. S.; Cunningham, D. D.;
Feelisch, M. No NO from NO Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1996, 93, 14492–
14497.
(44) Ishimura, Y.; Gao, Y. T.; Panda, S. P.; Roman, L. J.; Masters, B. S. S.; Weintraub,
S. T. Detection of Nitrous Oxide in the Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Reaction by
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005,
338, 543–549.
(45) Clague, M. J.; Wishnok, J. S.; Marletta, M. A. Formation of N-Cyanoornithine from
N-Hydroxy-L-Arginine and Hydrogen Peroxide by Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase:
Implications for Mechanism. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 14465–14473.
(46) Hobbs, A. J.; Fukuto, J. M.; Ignarro, L. J. Formation of Free Nitric Oxide from L-
Arginine by Nitric Oxide Synthase: Direct Enhancement of Generation by
Superoxide Dismutase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1994, 91, 10992–10996.
(47) Woodward, J. J.; Nejatyjahromy, Y.; Britt, R. D.; Marletta, M. a. Pterin-Centered
Radical as a Mechanistic Probe of the Second Step of Nitric Oxide Synthase. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5105–5113.
(48) Stoll, S.; Nejatyjahromy, Y.; Woodward, J. J.; Ozarowski, A.; Marletta, M. A.; Britt,
R. D. Nitric Oxide Synthase Stabilizes the Tetrahydrobiopterin Cofactor Radical by
Controlling Its Protonation State. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11812–11823.
(49) Doctorovich, F.; Bikiel, D.; Pellegrino, J.; Suárez, S. A.; Larsen, A.; Martí, M. a.
Nitroxyl (azanone) Trapping by Metalloporphyrins. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255,
2764–2784.
45
(50) Yoo, J.; Fukuto, J. M. Oxidation of N-Hydroxyguanidine by Nitric Oxide and the
Possible Generation of Vasoactive Species. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 50, 1995–
2000.
(51) Nicholls, S. J.; Hazen, S. L. Myeloperoxidase and Cardiovascular Disease.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 1102–1111.
(52) Reichlin, T.; Socrates, T.; Egli, P.; Potocki, M.; Breidthardt, T.; Arenja, N.;
Meissner, J.; Noveanu, M.; Reiter, M.; Twerenbold, R.; Schaub, N.; Buser, A.;
Mueller, C. Use of Myeloperoxidase for Risk Stratification in Acute Heart Failure.
Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 944–951.
(53) Cook, N. L.; Viola, H. M.; Sharov, V. S.; Hool, L. C.; Schöneich, C.; Davies, M. J.
Myeloperoxidase-Derived Oxidants Inhibit Sarco/endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-
ATPase Activity and Perturb Ca2+ Homeostasis in Human Coronary Artery
Endothelial Cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 951–961.
(54) Aruoma, O. I.; Halliwell, B. Action of Hypochlorous Acid on the Antioxidant
Protective Enzymes Superoxide Dismutase , Catalase and Glutathione Peroxidase.
Biochem. J. 1987, 248, 973–976.
(55) Weiss, S. J.; Klein, R.; Slivka, A.; Wei, M. Chlorination of Taurine by Human
Neutrophils. Evidence for Hypochlorous Acid Generation. J. Clin. Invest. 1982, 70,
598–607.
(56) Agarwall, R.; Mohan, R. R.; Ahmad, N.; Mukhtar, H. Protection Against Malignant
Conversion in SENCAR Mouse Skin by All Trans Retinoic Acid : Inhibition of the
Ras p21 -Processing Enzyme Farnesyltransferase and Ha-Ras p21 Membrane
46
Localization. Mol. Carcionogenes. 1996, 17, 13–22.
(57) Hecker, M.; Schott, C.; Bucher, B.; Busse, R.; Stoclet, J. Increase in Serum N-
Hydroxy-L-Arginine in Rats Treated with Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide. Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 1995, 275, 1–3.
(58) Garlichs, C. D.; Beyer, J.; Zhang, H.; Schmeisser, A.; Plötze, K.; Mügge, A.;
Schellong, S.; Daniel, W. G. Decreased Plasma Concentrations of L-Hydroxy-
Arginine as a Marker of Reduced NO Formation in Patients with Combined
Cardiovascular Risk Factors. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2000, 135, 419–425.
(59) Hazen, S.L., Hsu, F.F., d’Avignon, A., Heinecke, J. W. Human Neutrophils Employ
Myeloperoxidase To Convert R -Amino Acids to a Battery of Reactive Aldehydes :
A Pathway for Aldehyde Generation at Sites of. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 6864–6873.
(60) Hazen, S. L., d’Avignon, A., Anderson, M.M., Hsu, F.F., Heinecke, J. W. Human
Neutrophils Employ the Myeloperoxidase-Hydrogen Peroxide-Chloride System to
Oxidize -Amino Acids to a Family of Reactive Aldehydes. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273,
4997–5005.
(61) Cho, J. Y.; Dutton, A.; Miller, T.; Houk, K. N.; Fukuto, J. M. Oxidation of N-
Hydroxyguanidines by copper(II): Model Systems for Elucidating the Physiological
Chemistry of the Nitric Oxide Biosynthetic Intermediate N-Hydroxyl-L-Arginine.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 417, 65–76.
(62) Filipovic, M. R.; Miljkovic, J. L.; Nauser, T.; Royzen, M.; Klos, K.; Shubina, T.;
Koppenol, W. H.; Lippard, S. J.; Ivanović-Burmazović, I. Chemical
Characterization of the Smallest S-Nitrosothiol, HSNO; Cellular Cross-Talk of H2S
47
and S-Nitrosothiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12016–12027.
(63) Eberhardt, M.; Dux, M.; Namer, B.; Miljkovic, J.; Cordasic, N.; Will, C.; Kichko,
T. I.; de la Roche, J.; Fischer, M.; Suárez, S. A.; Bikiel, D.; Dorsch, K.; Leffler, A.;
Babes, A.; Lampert, A.; Lennerz, J. K.; Jacobi, J.; Martí, M. A.; Doctorovich, F.;
Högestätt, E. D.; Zygmunt, P. M.; Ivanovic-Burmazovic, I.; Messlinger, K.; Reeh,
P.; Filipovic, M. R. H2S and NO Cooperatively Regulate Vascular Tone by
Activating a Neuroendocrine HNO-TRPA1-CGRP Signalling Pathway. Nat.
Commun. 2014, 5, 4381.
(64) Nelson, D. P.; Kiesow, L. A. Enthalpy of Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide by
Catalase at 25 °C (with Molar Extinction Coefficients of H2O2 Solutions in the UV).
Anal. Biochem. 1972, 49, 474–478.
48
Chapter 3: Heme-mediated Peroxidation of 5-N-
Hydroxy-L-glutamine (NHG) to form Nitroxyl (HNO)
3.1 Introduction
Nitroxyl (azanone, HNO) has become a molecule of interest in recent years as it
has been shown to be involved in positive effects on the cardiovascular system, making it
a potential therapeutic for heart failure.1–6 HNO is a reactive intermediate that rapidly (k =
8 x 106 M-1 s-1) reacts with itself to produce hyponitrous acid (HON=NOH) that further
dehydrates to form nitrous oxide (N2O).7 As a result of this reactivity, HNO must be
produced in solution via donor molecules. Interest in the unique biological activity of HNO
has highlighted the need for new sensitive and direct detection methods. Recently, new
methods have been developed for the detection of HNO.8–17 Membrane inlet mass
spectrometry (MIMS) is a well-established method used to detect gases dissolved in
solution through the use of a semipermeable hydrophobic membrane that allows the
dissolved gases, but not the liquid phase, to enter a mass spectrometer.18,19 MIMS has been
used in a wide variety of applications including the detection of nitric oxide (NO) in both
aqueous and blood solutions.20,21 Recently, MIMS has been shown to be a viable method
for HNO detection with nanomolar sensitivity under physiologically relevant conditions.13
In addition, this technique has been used to explore potential biological pathways to HNO
production.22
To this point HNO has yet to be observed in vivo, however, its potent effects on the
cardiovascular system and its close relationship to NO suggests the potential for its
endogenous generation. There have been multiple reports of possible HNO producing
49
pathways including, reaction of thiols with S-nitrosothiols to form HNO and the
corresponding disulfide,23,24 ferric-heme peroxidation of hydroxylamine (NH2OH),25 and
oxidation of N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA) by hypochlorus acid (HOCl) (Scheme 3.1).22
In addition, HNO can be produced from nitric oxide synthases (NOS) under conditions
where the tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor is absent or in low concentrations.26–31
Scheme 3.1. Potential HNO producing pathways generated from (a) reaction of thiol with
S-nitrosothiol, (b) peroxidation of hydroxylamine, and (c) HOCl-mediated oxidation of N-
hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA).
Another potential substrate for endogenous HNO production is glutamine (GLN).
Glutamine is one of the most abundant amino acids in plasma playing roles in several
cellular processes.32–34 Recent reports have suggested that glutamine is linked to
cardioprotection, however, the mechanism for the observed effects is not well
understood.35–38 In a similar fashion to NOS-mediated oxidation of arginine, glutamine’s
amide functional group has the potential to be oxidized to generate 5-N-hydroxy-L-
glutamine (NHG, Scheme 3.2). NHG could then be further oxidized to produce an
acylnitroso species can be hydrolyzed to produce HNO and the corresponding carboxylic
acid.39 Therefore, we have examined the heme-mediated peroxidation of NHG to generate
50
HNO. To our knowledge, the oxidation of GLN or NHG as a potential pathway for
endogenous HNO production has not yet been reported. HNO production via heme-
mediated peroxidation is confirmed by both membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS)
and N2O analysis by gas chromatography (GC).
Scheme 3.2. Oxidation of (a) L-arginine, (b) L-glutamine, and (c) L-asparagine to produce
HNO and L-citrulline, L-glutamic acid, and L-aspartic acid, respectively.
3.2 Utilizing MIMS to Probe Potential Endogenous Pathways to
HNO Production
Membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) is a method used to detect dissolved
gases in solution through the use of a semipermeable hydrophobic membrane.18,19 We have
previously demonstrated that the MIMS system has the ability to detect HNO generated
either by substrate oxidation or decomposition of donor molecules.13,22 Hydroxylamine
51
(NH2OH),25 N-hydroxyguanadines,22,27,40 and hydroxamic acid scaffolds22 have been
shown previously to serve as potential substrates for HNO production (Figure 3.1). In
recent years, glutamine (GLN) has been shown to be cardioprotective, however, the
chemistry responsible for the observed physiology has yet to be defined.37,38 Inspired by
the ability of L-arginine to be oxidized to produce HNO, we explored glutamine oxidation
as a potential endogenous pathway to HNO production (Scheme 3.2).
Figure 3.1. Potential endogenous HNO generating scaffolds previously explored.
Initial attempts at oxidizing GLN (500 µM) with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 100
µM) did not produced any observable HNO, or HNO-derived N2O by MIMS or GC
headspace analysis, respectively. Further, with five equivalents of H2O2 (2.5 mM) we were
unable to detect HNO signals. Similar attempts at oxidizing 5-N-hydroxy-L-glutamine
(NHG) (500 µM) with H2O2 (100 µM) did not produced any observable HNO or HNO
derived N2O by MIMS or GC headspace analysis, respectively. Again, in the presence of
five equivalents of H2O2 we were unable to detect HNO signals by MIMS. However, GC
headspace analysis revealed small amounts (10%) of detectable HNO derived N2O at these
concentrations (Table 3.1). As mentioned in Chapter 1, our detection limit of HNO (1 nM)
under physiologically relevant conditions should be more than sufficient to detect the
estimated 10 µM HNO produced during the course of this reaction. A slow rate of
production and a small yield of detectable gases makes detection by MIMS difficult as the
52
gaseous species constantly permeate through the membrane, not allowing for accumulation
and detection in a similar fashion to the GC headspace experiments.
Table 3.1. Substrate oxidation by the heme/H2O2 system.
All substrates (500 µM) were incubated in the presence of H2O2 (100 µM) and with the
specified enzyme (5 µM) in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM diethylene triamine
pentaacetic acid (DTPA) at 37 °C overnight unless stated otherwise. HNO yields are
reported relative to HNO donor, 2-bromo-N-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide (2BrPA), as
determined by GC headspace analysis of N2O (SEM ± 5%; n ≥ 3). aSubstrates (500 µM)
were incubated under the same conditions in the presence of H2O2 (2.5 mM) only. b
Experiment was performed under same conditions as outlined above with the exception of
the use of 2.5 mM H2O2.
Interestingly, upon the addition of 1% metmyoglobin (metMb) to NHG (500 µM)
and H2O2 (100 µM), we were able to successfully detect MIMS signals resulting from HNO
at m/z 31 and HNO-derived N2O at m/z 44 and m/z 30 (Figure 3.2). It is important to note
that nearly 50% of the m/z 31 signal observed here is a result of the natural abundance
15NO+ that has fragmented from 15N2O. Nevertheless, detection of a m/z 31 signal beyond
natural abundance 15N (0.4%) confirms HNO production. Similar to what was observed by
Donzelli et al.,25 in the presence of 200 µM glutathione no MIMS signals were observed,
therefore providing further evidence for HNO production. As discussed previously, the m/z
30 (NO+) signal has the potential to also be due to NO production. However, the lack of
MIMS signals at m/z 30 in the presence of a liquid nitrogen cold trap confirmed NO (BP =
-152 °C, 1 atm) was not produced during the course of this reaction (Figure 3.1c). GC
53
headspace analysis of a reaction mixture at the same concentrations indicated a nearly
fourfold increase in HNO derived N2O compared to H2O2 alone (Table 3.1). A similar
phenomenon was observed previously by Donzelli et al. using nearly identical reaction
concentrations (500 µM substrate with 100 µM H2O2 and 5 µM heme).25 In their work,
hydroxylamine produced a significant amount of HNO in the presence of both H2O2 and
various ferric heme-containing enzymes. We were also able to detect MIMS signals under
analogous conditions with the substitution of NH2OH as a substrate (data not shown).
54
Figure 3.2. MIMS signals observed at (a) m/z 30, m/z 31, and m/z 44 following injection
of NHG (500 µM, 0 min), then H2O2 (100 µM, 1 min), and finally metMb (5 µM, 2 min)
into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C. (b) Zoomed in
version of the m/z 31 signal from experiment (a). (c) Comparison of the m/z 30 signals
observed from reaction (a) with (open circles) and without (solid circles) a liquid nitrogen
trap.
Similar experiments performed with glutamine (GLN, 500 µM) in the presence of
H2O2 (100 µM) and metMb (5 µM) did not result in any detectable MIMS signals (Figure
3.3). This is not surprising as GLN would require a minimum of two equivalents of oxidant
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
20151050 Time (min)
m/z 30
m/z 30 (LN2)
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
20151050 Time (min)
m/z 31
150
100
50
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
20151050 Time (min)
m/z 44
m/z 31
m/z 30
(a)
(b)
(c)
55
to produce the expected acylnitroso species (Scheme 3.2). Similar experiments with GLN
(500 µM), using excess H2O2 (2.5 mM), and metMb (5 µM) produces modest MIMS
signals at m/z 30 (Figure 3.3). The 5% HNO-derived N2O observed in the presence of five
equivalents (2.5 mM) of H2O2 suggests that the initial oxidation of GLN to produce NHG
is not as facile, potentially making GLN a non-ideal candidate for an oxidative precursor
to HNO. However, NHG could be produced when NH2OH is substituted for ammonia
(NH3) in glutamine synthetase.41–43 The efficient substitution of NH2OH into the glutamine
synthetase (GS) system has been utilized to develop a colorimetric assay for measurement
of activity that results in NHG production.44 Although there has not been definitive
evidence to support this process occurring in vivo, it is an interesting possibility given that
NH2OH substitutes well for the endogenous substrate (NH3) in GS, and the roles that
hydroxylamine plays in vivo have yet to be fully determined. Further, HNO donor Angeli’s
salt has been shown to have effects on glutamate levels by modulating GS activity
suggesting that HNO could play a regulatory role in GS activity providing a potential
feedback loop to NHG-mediated HNO production.45
Figure 3.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 30 following injection of GLN (500 µM), then
either 100 µM H2O2 (red circles) or 2.5 mM H2O2 (red line), followed by metMb (5 µM)
into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C.
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
1086420-2
Time (min)
m/z 30 (100 µM H2O2)
m/z 30 (2.5 mM H2O2)
56
3.2 Examination of Substrate Specificity
Donzelli et al. demonstrated that the enzyme systems studied showed a level of
substrate specificity for HNO production.25 Substitution of NOHA resulted in zero
detectable HNO. We are also unable to detect any observable signals from NOHA under
our conditions by MIMS or GC headspace analysis. Therefore, we wanted to explore in
greater detail the substrate specificity of these systems. Experiments with 5-N-hydroxy-L-
asparagine (NHA, 500 µM), the structural analog to NHG (Figure 3.4), in the presence of
H2O2 (100 µM) and metMb (5 µM) produce very small MIMS signals (Figure 3.5) and
minimal (< 5%) HNO derived N2O quantified by GC headspace analysis (Table 3.1).
Again, in the presence of a liquid nitrogen trap the m/z 30 signal disappeared indicating
that NO is not produced under these conditions (Figure 3.5).
Figure 3.4. Structures of L-glutamine (GLN), 5-N-hydroxy-L-glutamine (NHG), and 5-N-
hydroxy-L-asparagine (NHA).
Figure 3.5. MIMS signals observed at m/z 30 following injection of NHA (500 µM, 0 min),
then H2O2 (100 µM, 1 min), and finally metMb (5 µM, 2 min) into a solution of 0.1 M pH
7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 37 °C with (open circles) and without (solid circles)
a liquid nitrogen trap.
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
151050
Time (min)
m/z 30
m/z 30 (LN2)
57
The small signals observed were puzzling, as we did not anticipate the loss of one
methylene to have significant effect on HNO production in this system. Surely, the
reduction potential of NHA should nearly identical to that of NHG. Similar to the
observations of Donzelli et al.,25 it is possible the enzyme used could play a role in the
amount of HNO observed.
3.2 Examination of Enzyme Specificity
To test for enzyme specificity for the substrates NHG and NHA, we examined
substrate (500 µM) oxidation by H2O2 (100 µM) in the presence of another heme enzyme,
horseradish peroxidase (HRP, 5 µM). Similar to observations using metMb, NHG
produced significant MIMS signals while NHA did not produce any detectable MIMS
signals. GC headspace analysis shows a similar trend to that observed with metMb (Table
3.1). To confirm that the composition of the enzyme pocket is not resulting in specificity
for NHG, we substituted hemin as a simple model for ferric porphyrin without an enzyme
pocket. In the presence of 5 µM hemin we observe MIMS signals at m/z 30 from NHA,
NHG, and NH2OH (Figure 3.6). However, NHG and NH2OH produce significantly more
HNO-derived N2O compared to NHA (Table 3.1). Consistent with experiments using
metMb, the signals observed by MIMS are not due to the production of NO as confirmed
by identical experiments in the presence of a liquid nitrogen cold trap. Successful detection
of HNO by MIMS, resulting from the hemin-mediated oxidation of NHA, still does not
explain the difference in HNO production relative to NHG.
58
Figure 3.6. MIMS signals observed following the injection of NHG (500 µM, blue), NHA
(500 µM, red), or NH2OH (500 µM, black) at 0 min, followed by H2O2 (100 µM, 1.5 min),
and finally hemin (5 µM, 3 min) into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM
DTPA at 37 °C.
3.3 Potential Reactivity of the Expected Acylnitroso Intermediate
The expected intermediate involved in the heme-meditated oxidation of NHG and
NHA is an acylnitroso species (Scheme 3.2). Acylnitroso compounds are reactive
intermediates known to be precursors to HNO following hydrolysis.39 They are also known
to react similarly with primary amines in organic solvent (N-butylamine, k = 2.8 x 10-4 M-
1 s-1).46 Therefore, it is likely that the small amount of the neutral amine of NHG could
react through an intramolecular cyclization mechanism to produce HNO and the
corresponding pyrrolidone (Scheme 3.3a). NHA on the other hand, would be less prone to
an analogous cyclization as this would require the formation of an unfavorable 4-
membered ring (Scheme 3.3b). Any observed effect would be kinetic by nature, as the
NHA-derived acylnitroso would be expected to hydrolyze eventually in the presence of
water to produce HNO and aspartic acid. Samples incubated for 2 hours or overnight
produce different amounts of N2O by GC headspace analysis, however, the relative
proportions are not significantly affected. These results indicate that the differences
observed in HNO-derived N2O is not a direct result of the kinetic competition between
25
20
15
10
5
0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
151050
Time (min)
m/z 30 (NH2OH)
m/z 30 (NHG)
m/z 30 (NHA)
59
intramolecular cyclization and hydrolysis as the relative N2O production is not affected by
incubation time.
Scheme 3.3. Potential reactivity of the intermediate acylnitrosos of (a) NHG and (b) NHA.
There remains the possibility that the excess NHG/NHA is reacting with the
acylnitroso through a non-HNO producing pathway. In this case, the ability of NHG to
produce significant amounts of HNO even in the presence of excess NHG is explained by
its ability to cyclize to produce HNO. This intramolecular reaction could be faster than a
second-order reaction with excess hydroxamic acid allowing for some HNO production
prior to reaction between acylnitroso and NHG. In the case of NHA, the majority of
acylnitroso produced would be trapped by excess NHA as it is less prone to cyclize. The
60
hydroxamic acid could also be trapping the HNO that is being generated at potentially
different rates by either intramolecular cyclization of NHG, or hydrolysis of NHA. It is
possible that HNO that is more rapidly generated, by the intramolecular cyclization in
NHG, is able to either permeate the MIMS membrane for detection or dimerize and
dehydrate to produce N2O, avoiding being trapped by the hydroxamic acid. This
mechanism would also account for the differences between observed HNO/N2O signals of
NHG and NHA.
These non-HNO producing reactions could mimic the known reaction between
NH2OH and HNO to produce ultimately N2 and H2O (Scheme 3.4a).47–49 In the case of
acylnitroso trapping, the reaction could take place between the hydroxamic acid nitrogen
and the acylnitroso nitrogen (Scheme 3.4b). However, this would require the presumably
less nucleophilic site of AHA to attack. Reaction could also take place between the
hydroxamic acid oxygen and acylnitroso nitrogen potentially producing nitrite, acetamide,
and the corresponding carboxylic acid (Scheme 3.4c). Both mechanims would require
avoiding reactivity at the carbonyl carbon. This is not entirely impossible as acylnitroso
species are known to be trapped through reactivity at the nitrogen.50 Similarly, reactivity
between HNO and AHA could proceed via nucleophilic attack of the hydroxamic acid
nitrogen or oxygen on the nitrogen of HNO (Scheme 3.4d-e). Ultimately, this observed
effect is a function of hydroxamic acid concentrations and are likely not relevant in a
physiological setting.
61
Scheme 3.4. Non-HNO producing reactions between (a) hydroxylamine and HNO,
acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) and an acylnitroso via attack from the nitrogen (b) or oxygen
(c), and AHA and HNO via attack from the nitrogen (d) or oxygen (c).
To test this hypothesis, we incubated an N-substituted hydroxamic acid with a
pyrazalone leaving group (100 µM, Scheme 3.5), a donor that releases the acylnitroso at
physiological pH, in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA with and without the
addition of excess acetohydroxamic acid (AHA). The presence of excess AHA resulted in
a significant reduction (75%) in the N2O observed by GC headspace analysis. This result
confirms the possibility of hydroxamic acid trapping of either the acylnitroso or HNO that
is generated accounting for the differences in HNO production by NHG and NHA. Further
62
product studies will be required to confirm which of the possible mechanisms is responsible
for the observed difference in reactivity.
Scheme 3.5. Decomposition of N-substituted hydroxamic acid with a pyrazalone leaving
group (PY) to produce the byproduct (BY) and acylnitroso that can either be trapped by (a)
water to produce HNO and the corresponding carboxylic acid, or (b) acetohydroxamic acid
resulting in non-HNO producing trapped products.
3.4 Conclusions
We have shown that both GLN and NHG have the potential to serve as endogenous
precursors to HNO via heme-mediated peroxidation. The systems studied revealed unique
HNO production differences between NHG’s amino acid analog, NHA. Unexpectedly,
compared with NHA, NHG produced significantly more HNO in every system tested.
Enzyme specificity did not appear to the reason for the observed difference in HNO
production as experiments performed with hemin as the metal catalyst did not significantly
alter the ratios of HNO production. The only significant difference between NHG and NHA
in terms of reactivity is their potential to undergo an intramolecular cyclization with the
anticipated acylnitroso intermediate. NHG and NHA would form 5- and 4-membered rings,
respectively, via attack by the amine nitrogen. The 4-membered ring formation being less
likely leaves the NHA derived acylnitroso vulnerable to further reactivity with excess NHA
resulting in considerably less observable HNO. This is observed result is likely not
63
physiologically relevant. There are multiple potential non-HNO producing reactions that
could account for the significant difference in HNO production between NHA and NHG.
Future product studies will be required to definitively establish the mechanism involved.
3.5 Experimental Methods
3.5.1 General Methods
Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company,
Fisher Scientific, or Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and were used without further
purification. N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA) was purchased from Cayman Chemical.
Hydrogen peroxide (30 % v/v) was quantified by absorbance at 240 nm using a molar
absorption coefficient of 39.4 M-1 cm-1.51 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz FT-NMR operating at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively.
All resonances are reported in parts per million, and are referenced to residual CHCl3 (7.26
ppm, for 1H, 77.23 ppm for 13C). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained on a VG
Analytical VG-70S Magnetic Sector Mass Spectrometer operating in fast atom
bombardment ionization mode. Masses were referenced to a 10% PEG-200 sample.
Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were obtained using a Hewlett Packard
8453 diode array spectrometer. Infrared (IR) absorption spectra were obtained using a
Bruker IFS 55 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer.
3.5.2 Gas Chromatographic (GC) Headspace Analysis of N2O
Gas chromatographic headspace analysis of N2O was performed using a Varian CP-
3800 gas chromatograph instrument equipped with a 1041 manual injector, electron
64
capture detector, and a Restek packed column. Samples were prepared in 15 mL vials with
volumes pre-measured for uniformity. Vials were filled with 5 mL PBS buffer, sealed with
a rubber septum, and then purged with argon for 10 min. The vials were equilibrated at 37
°C for 10 min in a block heater. An aliquot of an HNO donor solution or other relevant
substrate species was then introduced into the thermally equilibrated headspace vial using
a gastight syringe. Samples were then incubated overnight, unless otherwise stated, to
ensure complete production and equilibration of N2O in the headspace. Headspace (60 μL)
was then sampled three successive times using a gastight syringe with a sample lock. HNO
yields are reported relative to the HNO donor, 2-bromo-N-hydroxybenzenesulfonamide
(2BrPA), which by comparison to standard N2O samples we find provides quantitative
production of HNO.
3.5.3 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods
The MIMS cell used is a Hiden HRP40 membrane inlet MS cell. The cell contains
rotary blades with an imbedded magnet for efficient stirring across the silastic membrane.
The membrane is immersed in, unless stated otherwise, 20 mL of 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) containing 100 µM diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA).
The sample cell is fitted with an interior heating/cooling jacket for temperature regulation,
as well as multiple ports for sample injection. All samples were argon-purged prior to the
experiments. Injections of samples are performed using gas-tight syringes after background
signals stabilize. Mass spectra were obtained by electron impact (EI) ionization (70 eV) at
an emission current of 1 mA; source pressures were approximately 5 x 10-7 – 1 x 10-6 Torr.
Relevant ion currents were measured after the system had reached a stable baseline.
65
3.6 References
(1) Paolocci, N.; Saavedra, W. F.; Miranda, K. M.; Martignani, C.; Isoda, T.; Hare, J.
M.; Espey, M. G.; Fukuto, J. M.; Feelisch, M.; Wink, D. A.; Kass, D. A. Nitroxyl
Anion Exerts Redox-Sensitive Positive Cardiac Inotropy in Vivo by Calcitonin
Gene-Related Peptide Signaling. PNAS 2001, 98, 10463–10468.
(2) Paolocci, N.; Katori, T.; Champion, H. C.; St John, M. E.; Miranda, K. M.; Fukuto,
J. M.; Wink, D. A.; Kass, D. A. Positive Inotropic and Lusitropic Effects of
HNO/NO- in Failing Hearts: Independence from Beta-Adrenergic Signaling. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 5537–5542.
(3) Paolocci, N.; Jackson, M. I.; Lopez, B. E.; Miranda, K.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Wink, D.
A.; Hobbs, A. J.; Fukuto, J. M. The Pharmacology of Nitroxyl (HNO) and Its
Therapeutic Potential: Not Just the Janus Face of NO. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 113,
442–458.
(4) Tocchetti, C. G.; Wang, W.; Froehlich, J. P.; Huke, S.; Aon, M. A.; Wilson, G. M.;
Di Benedetto, G.; O’Rourke, B.; Gao, W. D.; Wink, D. A.; Toscano, J. P.; Zaccolo,
M.; Bers, D. M.; Valdivia, H. H.; Cheng, H.; Kass, D. A.; Paolocci, N. Nitroxyl
Improves Cellular Heart Function by Directly Enhancing Cardiac Sarcoplasmic
Reticulum Ca2+ Cycling. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 96–104.
(5) Froehlich, J. P.; Mahaney, J. E.; Keceli, G.; Pavlos, C. M.; Goldstein, R.; Redwood,
A. J.; Sumbilla, C.; Lee, D. I.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Kass, D. A.; Paolocci, N.; Toscano,
J. P. Phospholamban Thiols Play a Central Role in Activation of the Cardiac Muscle
Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Pump by Nitroxyl. Biochemistry 2008, 47 (50),
66
13150–13152.
(6) Kemp-Harper, B. K. Nitroxyl (HNO): A Novel Redox Signaling Molecule.
Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 1609–1613.
(7) Shafirovich, V.; Lymar, S. V. Nitroxyl and Its Anion in Aqueous Solutions: Spin
States, Protic Equilibria, and Reactivities toward Oxygen and Nitric Oxide. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 7340–7345.
(8) Reisz, J. A.; Klorig, E. B.; Wright, M. W.; King, S. B. Reductive Phosphine-
Mediated Ligation of Nitroxyl (HNO). Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2719–2721.
(9) Suárez, S. A.; Fonticelli, M. H.; Rubert, A. a; de la Llave, E.; Scherlis, D.;
Salvarezza, R. C.; Martí, M. a; Doctorovich, F. A Surface Effect Allows HNO/NO
Discrimination by a Cobalt Porphyrin Bound to Gold. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 6955–
6966.
(10) Rosenthal, J.; Lippard, S. J. Direct Detection of Nitroxyl in Aqueous Solution Using
a Tripodal copper(II) BODIPY Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5536–5537.
(11) Zhou, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, J. Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, T. C.; Yao, C. Visualization of Nitroxyl
in Living Cells by a Chelated copper(II) Coumarin Complex. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
1290–1293.
(12) Reisz, J. A.; Zink, C. N.; King, S. B. Rapid and Selective Nitroxyl (HNO) Trapping
by Phosphines: Kinetics and New Aqueous Ligations for HNO Detection and
Quantitation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11675–11685.
(13) Cline, M. R.; Tu, C.; Silverman, D. N.; Toscano, J. P. Detection of Nitroxyl (HNO)
67
by Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 1274–
1279.
(14) Cline, M. R.; Toscano, J. P. Detection of Nitroxyl (HNO) by a Prefluorescent Probe.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2011, 24, 993–998.
(15) Boron, I.; Suárez, S. a; Doctorovich, F.; Martí, M. a; Bari, S. E. A Protective Protein
Matrix Improves the Discrimination of Nitroxyl from Nitric Oxide by MnIII
Protoporphyrinate IX in Aerobic Media. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 1044–1049.
(16) Doctorovich, F.; Bikiel, D.; Pellegrino, J.; Suárez, S. A.; Larsen, A.; Martí, M. a.
Nitroxyl (azanone) Trapping by Metalloporphyrins. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255,
2764–2784.
(17) Doctorovich, F.; Bikiel, D. E.; Pellegrino, J.; Suárez, S. A.; Martí, M. A. Reactions
of HNO with Metal Porphyrins: Underscoring the Biological Relevance of HNO.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2907–2916.
(18) Hoch, G.; Kok, B. A Mass Spectrometer Inlet System for Sampling Gases Dissolved
in Liquid Phases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1963, 101, 160–170.
(19) Johnson, R. C.; Cooks, R. G.; Allen, T. M.; Cisper, M. E.; Hemberger, P. H.
Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry: Trends and Applications. Mass
Spectrom. Rev. 2000, 19, 1–37.
(20) Tu, C.; Swenson, E. R.; Silverman, D. N. Membrane Inlet for Mass Spectrometric
Measurement of Nitric Oxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 1453–1457.
(21) Tu, C.; Scafa, N.; Zhang, X.; Silverman, D. N. A Comparison of Membrane Inlet
68
Mass Spectrometry and Nitric Oxide (NO) Electrode Techniques to Detect NO in
Aqueous Solution. Electroanalysis 2010, 22, 445–448.
(22) Cline, M. R.; Chavez, T. A.; Toscano, J. P. “Oxidation of N-Hydroxy-L-Arginine
by Hypochlorous Acid to Form Nitroxyl (HNO).” J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 118,
148–154.
(23) Wong, P. S.; Hyun, J.; Fukuto, J. M.; Shirota, F. N.; DeMaster, E. G.; Shoeman, D.
W.; Nagasawa, H. T. Reaction between S-Nitrosothiols and Thiols: Generation of
Nitroxyl (HNO) and Subsequent Chemistry. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 5362–5371.
(24) Arnelle, D. R.; Stamler, J. S. NO+, NO., and NO− Donation by S-Nitrosothiols:
Implications for Regulation of Physiological Functions by S-Nitrosylation and
Acceleration of Disulfide Formation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1995, 318, 279–285.
(25) Donzelli, S.; Espey, M. G.; Flores-Santana, W.; Switzer, C. H.; Yeh, G. C.; Huang,
J.; Stuehr, D. J.; King, S. B.; Miranda, K. M.; Wink, D. a. Generation of Nitroxyl by
Heme Protein-Mediated Peroxidation of Hydroxylamine but Not N-Hydroxy-L-
Arginine. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 578–584.
(26) Schmidt, H. H.; Hofmann, H.; Schindler, U.; Shutenko, Z. S.; Cunningham, D. D.;
Feelisch, M. No NO from NO Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1996, 93, 14492–
14497.
(27) Rusche, K. M.; Spiering, M. M.; Marletta, M. A. Reactions Catalyzed by
Tetrahydrobiopterin-Free Nitric Oxide Synthase. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 15503–
15512.
69
(28) Adak, S.; Wang, Q.; Stuehr, D. J. Arginine Conversion to Nitroxide by
Tetrahydrobiopterin-Free Neuronal Nitric-Oxide Synthase: Implications for
Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 33554–33561.
(29) Wei, C.-C.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Meade, A. L.; McDonald, J. F.; Stuehr, D. J. Why Do
Nitric Oxide Synthases Use Tetrahydrobiopterin? J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002, 91, 618–
624.
(30) Wei, C.-C.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Hemann, C.; Hille, R.; Stuehr, D. J. A Tetrahydrobiopterin
Radical Forms and Then Becomes Reduced during Nomega-Hydroxyarginine
Oxidation by Nitric-Oxide Synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 46668–46673.
(31) Tejero, J.; Stuehr, D. Tetrahydrobiopterin in Nitric Oxide Synthase. IUBMB Life
2013, 65, 358–365.
(32) Wu, G. Amino Acids: Metabolism, Functions, and Nutrition. Amino Acids 2009, 37,
1–17.
(33) Curi, R. Glutamine, Gene Expression, and Cell Function. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12,
344.
(34) Newsholme, P.; Procopio, J.; Lima, M. M. R.; Pithon-Curi, T. C.; Curi, R.
Glutamine and Glutamate--Their Central Role in Cell Metabolism and Function.
Cell Biochem. Funct. 2003, 21, 1–9.
(35) Khogali, S. E.; Harper, A. A.; Lyall, J. A.; Rennie, M. J. Effects of L-Glutamine on
Post-Ischaemic Cardiac Function: Protection and Rescue. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
1998, 30, 819–827.
70
(36) Khogali, S. E. O.; Pringle, S. D.; Weryk, B. V; Rennie, M. J. Is Glutamine Beneficial
in Ischemic Heart Disease? Nutrition 2002, 18, 123–126.
(37) Wischmeyer, P.; Vanden Hoek, T.; Li, C.; Shao, Z.; Ren, H.; Riehm, J.; Becker, L.
Glutamine Preserves Cardiomyocyte Viability and Enhances Recovery of
Contractile Function after Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr.
2003, 27, 116–122.
(38) Lauzier, B.; Vaillant, F.; Merlen, C.; Gélinas, R.; Bouchard, B.; Rivard, M.-E.;
Labarthe, F.; Dolinsky, V. W.; Dyck, J. R. B.; Allen, B. G.; Chatham, J. C.; Des
Rosiers, C. Metabolic Effects of Glutamine on the Heart: Anaplerosis versus the
Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2013, 55, 92–100.
(39) DuMond, J. F.; King, S. B. The Chemistry of Nitroxyl-Releasing Compounds.
Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 1637–1648.
(40) Fukuto, J. M.; Stuehr, D. J.; Feldman, P. L.; Bova, M. P.; Wong, P. Peracid
Oxidation of an N-Hydroxyguanidine Compound: A Chemical Model for the
Oxidation of N-Hydroxyl-L-Arginine by Nitric Oxide Synthase. J. Med. Chem.
1993, 36, 2666–2670.
(41) Shapiro, B. M.; Stadtman, E. R. Glutamine Synthetase (Escherichia Coli). In
Methods in Enzymology; 1970; pp 910–922.
(42) Boehlein, S. K.; Schuster, S. M.; Richards, N. G. Glutamic Acid Gamma-
Monohydroxamate and Hydroxylamine Are Alternate Substrates for Escherichia
Coli Asparagine Synthetase B. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 3031–3037.
71
(43) Geisseler, D.; Doane, T. A.; Horwath, W. R. Determining Potential Glutamine
Synthetase and Glutamate Dehydrogenase Activity in Soil. Soil Biol. Biochem.
2009, 41, 1741–1749.
(44) Minet, R.; Villie, F.; Marcollet, M.; Meynial-Denis, D.; Cynober, L. Measurement
of Glutamine Synthetase Activity in Rat Muscle by a Colorimetric Assay. Clin.
Chim. acta 1997, 268, 121–132.
(45) Knott, M. E.; Dorfman, D.; Chianelli, M. S.; Sáenz, D. A. Effect of Angeli’s Salt on
the Glutamate/glutamine Cycle Activity and on Glutamate Excitotoxicity in the
Hamster Retina. Neurochem. Int. 2012, 61, 7–15.
(46) Evans, A. S.; Cohen, A. D.; Gurard-Levin, Z. a.; Kebede, N.; Celius, T. C.; Miceli,
A. P.; Toscano, J. P. Photogeneration and Reactivity of Acyl Nitroso Compounds.
Can. J. Chem. 2011, 89, 130–138.
(47) Bonner, F. T.; Dzelzkalns, L. S.; Bonucci, J. A. Properties of Nitroxyl as
Intermediate in the Nitric Oxide-Hydroxylamine Reaction and in Trioxodinitrate
Decomposition. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2487–2494.
(48) Bonner, F. T.; Wang, N.-Y. Reduction of Nitric Oxide by Hydroxylamine. 1.
Kinetics and Mechanism. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 1858–1862.
(49) Doctorovich, F.; Bikiel, D. E.; Pellegrino, J.; Suárez, S. A.; Martí, M. A. How to
Find an HNO Needle in a (Bio)-Chemical Haystack. In Progress in Inorganic
Chemistry; Karlin, K. D., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014; Vol. 58, pp 145–184.
(50) Palmer, L.; Frazier, C.; Read de Alaniz, J. Developments in Nitrosocarbonyl
72
Chemistry: Mild Oxidation of N-Substituted Hydroxylamines Leads to New
Discoveries. Synthesis. 2013, 46, 269–280.
(51) Nelson, D. P.; Kiesow, L. A. Enthalpy of Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide by
Catalase at 25 °C (with Molar Extinction Coefficients of H2O2 Solutions in the UV).
Anal. Biochem. 1972, 49, 474–478.
73
Chapter 4: Application of Membrane Inlet Mass
Spectrometry (MIMS) to the Study of Hydrogen
Sulfide (H2S) and Thionitrous Acid (HSNO)
4.1 Introduction
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), as with several other small molecule signaling agents (e.g.,
carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO)), was initially known for its inherent
toxicity,1–3 but is now known to be endogenously generated and to serve many important
physiological roles.4–6 In mammals, H2S is generated by three enzymes, cystathionine-β-
synthase (CBS), cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase
(3-MST).7 The physiological effects of H2S, including its impact on the cardiovascular
system and inflammation,8 have been well documented; however, the chemical
mechanisms responsible for these effects remain largely undefined. To investigate the
chemistry of H2S, reliable detection methods are required and a number of techniques
including fluorescence imaging, chemiluminescence, and colorimetric assays have been
reported.9–11 Since membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) is a useful technique for
the detection of small hydrophobic gases dissolved in aqueous solution with high
sensitivity and selectivity,12–15 we have applied this technique to detect H2S directly in
aqueous solution.
Recent work by Filipovic et al. has suggested that HSNO is an important small
molecule signaling agent.16 In these studies, HSNO was generated by either pulse
radiolysis of Na2S and NaNO2 to generate HS and NO, from the reaction of acidified nitrite
with NaSH, or from the reaction of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) with NaSH. In addition,
74
Feelisch and co-workers have provided evidence for the production of nitrosopersulfide
(SSNO-) as a stable species derived from the reaction of S-nitrosothiols in the presence of
excess H2S.17 Filipovic et al. acknowledged that SSNO- production could be a result of
polysulfides reaction with either acidified nitrite or GSNO; however, it was not reported
under the conditions of their experiments. The pKa of HSNO has anticipated to be
approximately 3.2, analogous to nitrous acid (HONO).18 Interestingly, Filipovic et al. were
able to detect a mass corresponding to HSNO by ESI-TOF mass spectrometry at
physiological pH, suggesting at a significant amount of the neutral species at pH 7.4. Their
work also demonstrated that HSNO can permeate cell membranes and nitrosate cysteine
residues. With the exception of a specific transport mechanism, this process would rely on
diffusion of the neutral species across the cell membrane, requiring HSNO to be the
predominant species at physiological pH.
If we compare HSNO with the structurally similar HONO, we would anticipate a
pKa less than three, given that thiols are generally more acidic than alcohols. If the pKa of
HSNO is less than three, only a limited amount of HSNO (vs SNO-) would be present at
physiological pH. Isomerization of HSNO to other neutral species could account for its
ability to cross membranes. Isomers of HSNO (i.e., HONS, SN(H)O, HOSN, and HNSO)
have been previously investigated by computational and matrix-isolation studies.19–21
Access to isomeric species may allow for an equilibrium mixture that would have an
overall pKa higher than that anticipated for HSNO itself. Unraveling the potential
contributions of HSNO isomers will be important to understand the mechanisms involved
in HSNO mediated nitrosation across cellular membranes.
75
4.2 Detection of H2S by MIMS
We have examined H2S production from the donor molecule, sodium hydrogen
sulfide (NaSH), by MIMS. MIMS signals are observed at m/z 34 (H2S+), m/z 33 (HS+),
and m/z 32 (S+/O2+) (Figure 4.1a) and compare well with the reported mass spectrum of
H2S.22,23 Complications due to residual dioxygen results in high background intensity and
unstable baseline for the m/z 32 signal, making reliable detection of this signal difficult.
As a result, our discussion will focus on the m/z 33 and m/z 34 signals. Upon injection of
100 µM NaSH into a solution of 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4, we
observe an immediate increase in MIMS signal intensities for the parent H2S+ (m/z 34) and
its primary fragment HS+ (m/z 33) (Figure 4.1b). The intensity of the m/z 34 signal is
linearly dependent on the concentration of NaSH (Figure 4.1c). Under the current
conditions of our experiment, we can detect H2S at concentrations as low as 250 nM NaSH.
Based on the pKa of H2S (pKa = 6.98 at 20 °C),24 at pH 7.4 nearly two-thirds of the H2S
generated is expected to be in its anionic form (HS-). Consequently, the H2S concentration
is approximately one-third that of the NaSH injected, and the observed detection limit of
H2S under the conditions of our experiment is approximately 85 nM.
76
Figure 4.1. (a) MIMS spectrum, with 0.1 amu increments, observed following injection
of NaSH into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with metal chelator DTPA (100 µM) 20 °C. (b) MIMS
observed intensity at m/z 34 and m/z 33 as a function of time following 100 µM NaSH
injection at t = 0 min into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 20 °C. (c) Plot of
signal intensity versus initial concentration of NaSH. Inset: m/z 34 signal detected by
MIMS following injection of 250 nM NaSH.
4.3 Detection of HSNO by MIMS
We have examined the generation of HSNO from the reaction of acidified nitrite
with NaSH. We attempted to generate HSNO in a similar fashion to Filipovic et al.16 from
the reaction of sodium nitrite (10 mM) with NaSH (10 mM) in acidic solution that was
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Ion
Cu
rre
nt
(pA
)
100806040200
[NaSH] (M)
m/z 34
200
150
100
50
0
Ion
Cu
rre
nt
(pA
)
20151050
Time (min)
m/z 34m/z 33
500
400
300
200
100
0
Ion
Cu
rre
nt
(pA
)
36353433323130
m/z
(a)
(b)
(c)
0.8
0.4
0.0
Ion
Cu
rre
nt
(pA
)
840Time (min)
77
subsequently injected into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA.
Although we do observe very small MIMS signals corresponding to the parent ion (m/z 63,
HSNO+), these signals appear to be complicated by unknown species that are detected at
the same mass from samples of NaSH itself (Figure 4.2). In the event the observed MIMS
signal are indeed a result of HSNO, they are significantly smaller than those observed from
100 µM H2S (i.e., m/z 34, Figure 4.1b). We believe that reactivity of HSNO with multiple
species in solution and homolysis of the weak S-N bond (29.4 kcal/mol)25 to generate NO
and HS likely hinders its detection.21,26 Consistent with this expected reactivity, we
observe NO (m/z 30) by MIMS via the reaction of NaSH (10 mM) with S-
nitrosoglutathione (GSNO, 10 mM) (Figure S4.1). Feelisch and co-workers have also
observed NO formation from the reaction of S-nitrosothiols with excess H2S, with the
proposed intermediacy of SSNO-.17 HSSNO/SSNO- may play an important role in the
chemistry of HSNO; however, its investigation by MIMS will require more detailed studies
in the future.
Figure 4.2. MIMS observed intensity at m/z 63 as a function of time following injection
of 10 mM of the pre-incubated reaction mixture (see experimental section), of (blue)
sodium nitrite and NaSH in 0.2 M HCl or (red) NaSH alone, into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with
metal chelator DTPA (100 µM) at 20 °C.
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
20151050
Time (min)
m/z 63 (H2S + H2NO2
+)
m/z 63 (H2S alone)
78
4.4 Examination of Larger Mass Signals from H2S Donors
After observing signals from NaSH at m/z 63, larger than H2S itself (m/z 34), we
further investigated the identity of these larger mass signals. The initial hypothesis of the
source of these signals was oxidation of H2S to produce a variety of species including
polysulfides, thiosulfate, sulfate, etc. (Scheme 4.1).27,28 Upon injection of 500 µM of
NaSH into a MIMS cell containing 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA we observed
additional MIMS signals at m/z 48, 64, 65, and 66 (Figure 4.3). These masses were
investigated as they have the potential to be parent ions or primary fragment ions of
oxidized sulfur species (Scheme 4.1).
Scheme 4.1. Possible reactions of H2S/HS- with O2 in aqueous solution including further
reactivity and equilibration of polysulfides (HS-(n+1)) where n = 1-9.
79
Figure 4.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 34 (red), 33 (blue), 48 (green), 64 (black), 65
(orange), and 66 (purple) following the injection of 500 µM NaSH into 0.1 M pH 7.4
PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C.
Nagy et al. has reported that sodium salts of H2S (i.e., Na2S and NaSH) inherently
contain polysulfide contaminants (HS-(n+1), n ≥ 1).28 Therefore, we investigated various H2S
donors for their ability to produce pure H2S. Similar to what was found by Nagy et al., the
amount of oxidized sulfur species was independent of the sodium salt source of H2S;
including anhydrous NaSH (Strem chemical and Alfa Aesar) and Na2S (Strem chemical).28
Further, various handling and sample preparation methods were tested in attempt to
determine the cause of these signals. Variables tested included stock solution pH (4-13),
metal chelator (DTPA and Chelex 100), and inert storage of commercial samples.
However, none of the variables had a significant effect on the signals observed by MIMS.
250
200
150
100
50
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
14121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 64 m/z 48
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
14121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 66 m/z 65
800
600
400
200
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
14121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 34 m/z 33
(a) (b)
(c)
80
Next, we turned to H2S gas, which presumably should be a pure source of H2S. However,
the observed MIMS signals are nearly identical to NaSH-derived signals (Table 4.1).
Table 4. 1. Comparison of the MIMS signals observed following the injection of 500 µM
NaSH, Na2S2, Na2S4, or H2S (g) into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. All
signal intensities are reported relative to the m/z 34 signal for each substrate.
Signals Monitored (m/z)
34 33 48 64 66
NaSH 1 0.38 0.13 0.28 0.013
Na2S2 1 0.38 0.13 0.28 0.013
Na2S4 1 0.38 0.11 0.22 0.011
H2S (g) 1 0.38 0.17 0.37 0.018
To probe the possibility that we are detecting polysulfide contaminants in our H2S
donors, we examined the sodium salts of the polysulfides H2S2 and H2S4 using donors
Na2S2 and Na2S4, respectively. Interestingly, injection of NaSH, Na2S2, and Na2S4 produce
nearly identical MIMS signals (Figure 4.4). These results suggested that upon injection of
the donor into the MIMS cell a rapid equilibration between polysulfides in solution
occured. Small amounts of polysulfide contaminants have the potential to start a chain
reaction to produce an equilibrium mixture of polysulfides of various lengths (Scheme 4.1).
Therefore, we turned to phosphine nucleophiles as established traps for oxidized sulfur
species.29,30 In the presence of disulfides (RSSR) tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP)
reacts to produce two equivalents of thiol (RSH) and TCEP oxide (TCEP=O) (Scheme
4.2).29–31 In the presence of per- or polysulfides, TCEP reacts to produce the same two
equivalents of thiol and TCEP sulfide (TCEP=S). (Scheme 4.2).30,31
81
Scheme 4.2. Reactivity of tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) with a disulfide
(RSSR) or per/polysulfide (RSSH) in aqueous solution to produce TCEP-oxide
(TCEP=O) and TCEP-sulfide (TCEP=S), respectively.
Experiments performed with NaSH (500 µM) in the presence of excess TCEP (5
mM) did not result in significant differences in the observed MIMS signals (Table 4.2).
Again, a variety of conditions were tested in an attempt to improve trapping of oxidized
sulfur species including, increasing the equivalents of TCEP (10 eq. – 50 eq.), changing
the pH of the reactions (pH 4-8), and increasing reaction time between NaSH and TCEP
prior to injecting the sample into the MIMS cell. However, none of these changes had any
effect on the observed MIMS signals (Table 4.2). One explanation for this observation is
that after trapping of the oxidized species by TCEP, the fully reduced H2S remaining reacts
again with small amounts of residual oxygen in the sample cell, again restarting the
equilibration of oxidized species. This process could continue until all the TCEP has been
consumed. However, under such great excess of TCEP (50 eq.) this process is unlikely to
explain the observations.
82
Figure 4.4. MIMS signals observed at m/z 34 (red), 33 (blue), 48 (green), and 64 (black)
following the injection of 500 µM NaSH (+), Na2S2 (●), or Na2S4 (○) into 0.1 M pH 7.4
PBS containing 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C.
Table 4.2. Comparison of the MIMS signals observed following the injection of 500 µM
NaSH in the presence of various concentrations of TCEP into 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with
100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. All signal intensities are reported relative to the m/z 34 signal
for each substrate. Samples were incubated for either a30 min, b160 min, or c24 hrs at 21
°C prior to injection into the MIMS. All signal intensities are reported relative to the m/z
34 signal for each substrate.
Signals Monitored (m/z)
34 33 48 64 66
NaSH+TCEP(5 mM)a 1 0.38 0.32 0.70 0.033
NaSH+TCEP(25 mM)a 1 0.38 0.29 0.63 0.029
NaSH+TCEP(5 mM)b 1 0.38 0.28 0.61 0.028
NaSH+TCEP(5 mM)c 1 0.37 0.33 0.72 0.034
There is also the possibility that TCEP is not reacting with the species responsible
for the observed MIMS signals. To confirm TCEP is indeed reacting with oxidized sulfur
species in solution, we monitored reactions under similar conditions by 31P NMR. Control
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)14121086420-2
Time (min)
m/z 64 (NaSH)
m/z 64 (Na2S2)
m/z 64 (Na2S4)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
14121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 48 (NaSH)
m/z 48 (Na2S2)
m/z 48 (Na2S4)
400
300
200
100
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
14121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 33 (NaSH)
m/z 33 (Na2S2)
m/z 33 (Na2S4)
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
14121086420-2 Time (min)
m/z 34 (NaSH)
m/z 34 (Na2S2)
m/z 34 (Na2S4)
(a) (b)
(d)(c)
83
experiments with TCEP alone indicated that there is a significant effect of pH on the
observed 31P NMR signals. Under acidic conditions, TCEP-HCl is observed at 17 ppm,
and in basic solution only TCEP itself is observed at -27 ppm (Figure S4.2). However, at
neutral pH, the signals at -27 and 17 ppm significantly broaden (Figure 4.2). For this reason
all NMR experiments were performed at pH 5 to afford sharp signals and facilitate
reactivity between polysulfides and TCEP. In all pH solutions tested, a signal at 58 ppm is
present. This signal is due to TCEP=O, which is confirmed by the addition of H2O2 to a
sample of TCEP alone (Figure S4.3). Since the analogous MIMS experiments were not
affected by pH, we believe the NMR experiments performed at pH 5 are an accurate
comparison to our MIMS observations.
Reaction between NaSH (70 mM) and TCEP (700 mM) in 2M pH 5 acetic acid
buffer containing 10% D2O, incubated for 30 minutes at 21 °C, produced a new signal at
52 ppm. The small chemical shift difference between the 52 and 58 ppm (TCEP=O) signals
is analogous to what is reported for other R3P=O/R3P=S chemical shift differences.30,31
Therefore, we assign the 52 ppm signal to TCEP=S (Scheme 4.2). If there were quantitative
trapping of sulfur a maximum 9:1 ratio of TCEP-HCl (17 ppm) to TCEP=S (52 ppm) is
expected. The observed ratio translates to a ca. 9% yield of TCEP=S. By comparison,
reaction between Na2S2 (70 mM) and TCEP (700 mM) in 2M pH 5 acetic acid buffer
containing 10% D2O, incubated for 30 minutes at 21 °C, produced a much larger TCEP=S
signal. This signal corresponds to ca. 85% yield of TCEP=S. These results confirm that
TCEP is indeed reacting with the oxidized sulfur species in solution. In addition, by 31P
NMR analysis, there is a significant difference in the amount of polysulfides from NaSH
and Na2S2 that is not observed by MIMS. These results are not surprising, as it was initially
84
anticipated that Na2S2 would produce much more oxidized sulfur species compared to
NaSH. Nonetheless, this suggests there is further reactivity inherent to the MIMS system
that is responsible for the signals observed.
Figure 4.5. 31P NMR spectra resulting from 700 mM TCEP (red), NaSH (70 mM) in the
presence of TCEP (700 mM, blue), and Na2S2 (70 mM) in the presence of TCEP (700
mM, black). All samples were incubated for 30 min at 21 °C in 2 M pH 5 acetic acid
buffer containing 10% D2O.
The observation that Na2S2 produces significantly more TCEP=S compared to
NaSH is not surprising from a chemical perspective. However, the stark differences from
85
our MIMS observations is puzzling. The only noteworthy difference between the NMR
and MIMS experiments is the silastic membrane used in the MIMS system. It is unlikely
there is any direct reaction between the sulfur samples and the membrane, however, it is
possible that it is facilitating a reaction with residual dioxygen within the hydrophobic
membrane. After this reaction takes place, the oxidized species could complete their
permeation into vacuum for detection. To test the oxygen dependence of these larger mass
signals we performed identical MIMS experiments under an atmosphere of dioxygen.
Under these conditions, we observe an increased in larger mass signals (i.e., m/z 64) and a
decrease in the m/z 34 signal (Figure 4.6).
Figure 4.6. MIMS signals observed at m/z 34 and 64 upon the addition of NaSH (350
µM) into a solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C; initially purged
with either argon (red and blue) or dioxygen (green and black).
Additionally, consecutive injections of H2S (g) into the MIMS cell reveals a
decrease in the average maximum intensity of larger mass signals while the intensities of
m/z 33 and 34 increase as a function of injection (Figure 4.7). Each injection likely results
in consumption of residual oxygen in our system, therefore, the sample is exposed to less
O2 upon each additional injection. This effect plateaus after 4 injections as we are likely
reaching a competition between consumption of O2 and its permeation into our system.
400
300
200
100
0
Io
n C
urr
en
t (p
A)
151050
Time (min)
m/z 34 (Ar) m/z 64 (Ar) m/z 34 (O2) m/z 64 (O2)
86
Together these results suggest that the observed larger mass signals are dependent on
oxygen concentration. As we are vulnerable to small amounts of residual oxygen
penetrating our system, the potential for a membrane-facilitated oxidation process will be
important in future MIMS studies.
Figure 4.7. Plots of the average maximum signal intensity observed at m/z 34 (blue), 33
(red), 64 (black), and 48 (green), upon the consecutive injections (1-7) of 250 µL H2S (g)
into the same solution of 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. Consecutive
injections occurred after plateau of the signals.
4.5 HSNO Isomerization
Although reliable detection of HSNO by our MIMS system was unsuccessful, its
ability to cross a membrane, as was observed by Filipovic et al.,16 with an anticipated low
pKa suggests other factors must be at play. Isomerization of HSNO to a variety of species
has been investigated previously by both computational and matrix-isolation studies.19–21
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Avg.
Max I
nte
nsity (
pA
)
76543210
Injection Number
m/z 34
m/z 33
400
300
200
100
Avg.
Max I
nte
nsity (
pA
)
76543210
Injection Number
m/z 64
m/z 48
(a)
(b)
87
HSNO isomers include HONS, HOSN, SN(H)O (Y-isomer), and HNSO, along with the
corresponding cis and trans isomers where relevant (Scheme 4.3). Energies for transitions
between these isomers have been previously investigated in the gas-phase by Bharatam et
al.32 With the exception of rotational barriers between cis and trans isomers, all transitions
between species involve barriers >25 kcal/mol in the gas phase. Recent work by
Timerghazin and co-workers, examined HSNO isomerization in an aqueous
environment.25 Their work suggests that HSNO can isomerize to both HONS and the Y-
isomer through a water-assisted proton transfer mechanism. This water-assisted
mechanism brings barriers of isomerization from gas phase values of >25 kcal/mol to <10
kcal/mol, making these reactions kinetically feasible under physiologically relevant
conditions
Scheme 4.3. Relevant isomers of HSNO with their expected pKa values.
The HONS isomer can be accessed from HSNO through a water-assisted proton
transfer with a calculated barrier of 8 kcal/mol.25 This isomer is also be expected to have
a pKa similar to that of HONO. Timerghazin and co-workers have shown the Y-isomer is
88
the most stable isomer in an aqueous environment by 3.1 kcal/mol.25 Since deprotonation
of the Y-isomer generates the same anion involved in the HSNO acid/base equilibrium
(Scheme 4.4), we can approximate the pKa of the Y-isomer by comparing the reported
energy difference between HSNO and the Y-isomer. Given this energy difference and pKa
near 3 for HSNO, a Y-isomer pKa near 5 is estimated. Thus, neither HONS nor the Y-
isomer can account for the anticipated higher overall pKa.
Scheme 4.4. Deprotonation of the SN(H)O (Y-isomer) and HSNO to produce the same –
SNO anion.
The closest structural analog of HOSN with a known pKa is cyanic acid (HOCN),
which has a pKa of 3.5.33 Similar to HONS, the HOSN isomer does not appear to be an
important factor in the equilibrium mixture as it pertains to the pKa. HNSO, on the other
hand, likely has a considerably higher pKa relative to its other isomers. Although we are
not aware of any structural comparison with an established pKa value, we assume that
HNSO, an amine with an electron withdrawing group substituent, would have a pKa
significantly higher than 7.
HNSO is reported to be the most stable isomer in the gas phase,32 however the
contribution of this isomer to HSNO chemistry will be dependent on the barrier(s) to its
formation. A likely path to HNSO is the isomerization of HOSN. Therefore, generation
of HOSN needs to be feasible (Scheme 4.3). The barrier from HONS to HOSN has been
calculated by Bharatam et al. to be >90 kcal/mol in the gas phase. The reason for such a
high barrier is likely due to a strained transition state structure involving a three membered
ring (Scheme 4.5). A similarly high barrier (50.3 kcal/mol) was calculated by Timerghazin
89
and co-workers for generation of the cyclic isomer (cycl-SONH) from the Y-isomer, which
was also suggested to involve a three-membered ring transition state (Scheme 4.3).
Timerghazin and co-workers conclude that the barrier to generate the cycl-SONH is too
high to be kinetically feasible.
Scheme 4.5. Equilibria between HONS and HOSN involving a three-membered ring
transition state.32
4.5.1 Sulfinamide type rearrangement (HONS to HOSN)
McCulla and co-workers recently reported a thorough computational investigation
of the reaction between HNO and thiols.34 The reaction from a putative N-
hydroxysulfenamide (RSNHOH) intermediate to the corresponding sulfinamide
(RS(O)NH2) product was shown to proceed through physiologically surmountable barriers.
With structural similarity between RSNHOH and HONS, it seems plausible that a
“sulfinamide type” rearrangement pathway may lead to the structurally analogous product,
HOSN (Scheme 4.6).
Scheme 4.6. (a) Rearrangement of the putative N-hydroxysulfenamide (RSNHOH) to
sulfinamide (RS(O)NH2). (b) Proposed rearrangement of HONS to HOSN.
90
Our B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated barriers for the two-step reaction from HONS to
HOSN (Scheme 4.6b) in the gas phase are 53.2 kcal/mol and 39.1 kcal/mol, respectively
(Figure S4.4). However, with the addition of explicit water molecules, the gas phase
barriers for HONS to HOSN drop to 14.4 kcal/mol and 7.7 kcal/mol, respectively. Further,
performing the calculation with an SM8 solvation model for aqueous environment drops
the barriers to 10.5 kcal/mol and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively (Figure 4.8). As observed by
Timerghazin and co-workers, addition of explicit water molecules to the reaction
significantly lowers the barriers making them accessible under physiologically relevant
conditions.
91
Figure 4.8. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated energies and barriers, relative to A, for the
transformation of A to C, with explicit water molecules, in the gas phase (red) and with
an SM8 solvation model for aqueous solvation (blue).
4.5.2 Isomerization of HOSN to HNSO
The isomerization of HOSN to HNSO has been investigated computationally by
Bharatam et al. in the gas phase.32 A gas phase barrier of >30 kcal/mol involving a proton
transfer with a four-membered ring transition state is calculated. Analogous to the water-
assisted proton transfer mechanisms described by Timerghazin and co-workers, addition
of explicit water molecules is expected to lower the gas phase barriers. Indeed, when we
calculate the barrier for the transition from HOSN to HNSO in the presence of explicit
water molecules the barrier drops to 8.1 kcal/mol (Figure 4.9). Similar to the
92
transformation of HONS to HOSN, calculations performed with the SM8 solvation model
for aqueous solvation decreases the barrier to 7.5 kcal/mol. With barriers to formation of
less than 10 kcal/mol, we predict that HNSO is accessible under physiologically relevant
conditions. Thus, the combination of these isomers, in particular the anticipated weakest
acid HNSO, may account for anticipated higher pKa required for the permeation of
membranes.
Figure 4.9. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated energies and barriers, relative to D, for the
transformation of D to E, with explicit water molecules, in the gas phase (red) and with
an SM8 solvation model for aqueous solvation (blue).
4.6 Conclusions
We have used MIMS to observe H2S with a detection limit of 85 nM under
physiologically relevant conditions. We were unable to detect HSNO MIMS signals
93
reliably as a result of an unanticipated contribution NaSH alone. Upon investigation of
larger mass signals it appears that we are observing an array of oxidized species that result
from reaction of H2S with O2 that occurs within the membrane prior to full permeation into
vacuum for detection. This observation is important in the interpretation of future
applications of MIMS for the detection of H2S. Nonetheless, the reported ability for HSNO
to cross membranes suggests a pKa that is inconsistent with that expected for HSNO itself.
Therefore, isomerization of HSNO to its corresponding isomers was examined. Water-
assisted isomerization of HSNO to the Y-isomer, HONS, HOSN, and HNSO are calculated
to be kinetically accessible under physiologically relevant conditions, with barriers <10
kcal/mol. We propose that these isomers are in equilibrium resulting in a higher pKa.
Based on our analysis, HNSO is the only isomer of HSNO that will be predominantly
neutral at physiological pH. Nitrosation of cysteine residues would presumably involve
HSNO itself, or potentially the Y-isomer. HSNO and the Y-isomer have been previously
investigated experimentally and computationally, respectively, to react with thiols.16,25
However, the potential biological reactivity of the other isomers remains to be determined.
The described work will offer a chemical perspective to a proposed biochemical
mechanism of this potentially important signaling agent.
4.7 Experimental Methods
4.7.1 General Methods
Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company,
Fisher Scientific, or Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and were used without further
purification. Anhydrous sodium hydrogen sulfide was purchased from Strem Chemicals
Inc. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz FT-
94
NMR operating at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively. All resonances are reported in
parts per million, and are referenced to residual CHCl3 (7.26 ppm, for 1H, 77.23 ppm for
13C). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained on a VG Analytical VG-70S Magnetic
Sector Mass Spectrometer operating in fast atom bombardment ionization mode. Masses
were referenced to a 10% PEG-200 sample. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption
spectra were obtained using a Hewlett Packard 8453 diode array spectrometer. Infrared
(IR) absorption spectra were obtained using a Bruker IFS 55 Fourier transform infrared
spectrometer.
4.7.2 Membrane Inlet Design and Methods
The MIMS cell used is a Hiden HRP40 membrane inlet MS cell. The cell contains
rotary blades with an imbedded magnet for efficient stirring across the silastic membrane.
The membrane is immersed in, unless stated otherwise, 20 mL of 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) containing 100 µM diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA).
The sample cell is fitted with an interior heating/cooling jacket for temperature regulation,
as well as multiple ports for sample injection. All samples were argon-purged prior to the
experiments. Injections of samples are performed using gas-tight syringes after background
signals stabilize. Mass spectra were obtained by electron impact (EI) ionization (70 eV) at
an emission current of 1 mA; source pressures were approximately 5 x 10-7 – 1 x 10-6 Torr.
Relevant ion currents were measured after the system had reached a stable baseline.
4.7.3 Detection of H2S from NaSH
Samples of anhydrous NaSH were dissolved in argon-purged 0.1 M NaOH. The
NaSH solution was injected into an argon-purged 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) solution, with 100 μM of the metal chelator diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
95
(DTPA) at 21 °C with a gas-tight syringe. MIMS signals at m/z 33 and m/z 34 were
monitored over time.
4.7.4 Detection of HSNO from the Reaction of Acidified Nitrite with NaSH
The reaction between acidified nitrite and NaSH was carried out in a separate sealed
vial purged with argon. Equimolar amounts of NaNO2 and NaSH were incubated in 0.2 M
HCl for 10 minutes prior to injection into the MIMS cell (final concentration of 10 mM).
Following pre-incubation, these samples were immediately injected into solution of 0.1 M
pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. MIMS signals at m/z 63, m/z 62, m/z 34, m/z 33,
and m/z 30 were monitored over time after establishing a flat baseline.
4.7.5 MIMS Experiments in the Presence of TCEP
The reaction of TCEP with NaSH, H2S (g), Na2S2, or Na2S4 was carried out in a
separate sealed vial purged with argon. Excess TCEP and sulfur species were incubated in
buffered solutions for 30 minutes, unless otherwise stated, prior to injection into the MIMS
cell. Following pre-incubation, these samples were immediately injected into solution of
0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 21 °C. MIMS signals were monitored over time
after establishing a flat baseline.
4.7.6 TCEP 31P NMR Experiments
The reaction between TCEP and NaSH or Na2S2 was carried out in a separate sealed
vial purged with argon. TCEP (700 mM) and sulfur species (70 mM) were incubated in 2
M pH 5 acetic acid buffer containing 10% D2O for 30 minutes at 21 °C prior to acquisition.
Following pre-incubation, these samples were immediately analyzed by 31P NMR.
Estimation of TCEP-sulfide (TCEP=S) yield were made by comparing the ratio of TCEP=S
96
to TCEP-HCl in the collected data relative to the maximum ratio possible if quantitative
trapping occurred.
4.7.7 Computational Methods
Calculations were performed with Spartan 14.35 Geometries were fully optimized
at the B3LYP level of theory with the 6-31G(d) basis set. Vibrational frequencies were
also calculated to verify minimum energy structures (no imaginary frequencies) or
transition states (one imaginary frequency) and to provide zero-point vibrational energy
corrections.
97
4.8 References
(1) Fukuto, J. M.; Carrington, S. J.; Tantillo, D. J.; Harrison, J. G.; Ignarro, L. J.;
Freeman, B. a; Chen, A.; Wink, D. a. Small Molecule Signaling Agents: The
Integrated Chemistry and Biochemistry of Nitrogen Oxides, Oxides of Carbon,
Dioxygen, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Their Derived Species. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012,
25, 769–793.
(2) di Masi, A.; Ascenzi, P. H2S: A “Double Face” Molecule in Health and Disease.
BioFactors 2013, 39, 186–196.
(3) Li, L.; Hsu, A.; Moore, P. K. Actions and Interactions of Nitric Oxide, Carbon
Monoxide and Hydrogen Sulphide in the Cardiovascular System and in
Inflammation--a Tale of Three Gases! Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 123, 386–400.
(4) Wang, R. Two’s Company, Three's a Crowd: Can H2S Be the Third Endogenous
Gaseous Transmitter? FASEB J. 2002, 16, 1792–1798.
(5) Szabó, C. Hydrogen Sulphide and Its Therapeutic Potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.
2007, 6, 917–935.
(6) Wang, R. Physiological Implications of Hydrogen Sulfide: A Whiff Exploration
That Blossomed. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92, 791–896.
(7) Shibuya, N.; Tanaka, M.; Yoshida, M.; Ogasawara, Y.; Togawa, T.; Ishii, K.;
Kimura, H. 3-Mercaptopyruvate Sulfurtransferase Produces Hydrogen Sulfide and
Bound Sulfane Sulfur in the Brain. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 703–714.
(8) Li, L.; Rose, P.; Moore, P. K. Hydrogen Sulfide and Cell Signaling. Annu. Rev.
98
Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2011, 51, 169–187.
(9) Lin, V. S.; Chang, C. J. Fluorescent Probes for Sensing and Imaging Biological
Hydrogen Sulfide. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 595–601.
(10) Shen, X.; Pattillo, C. B.; Pardue, S.; Bir, S. C.; Wang, R.; Kevil, C. G. Measurement
of Plasma Hydrogen Sulfide in Vivo and in Vitro. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50,
1021–1031.
(11) Bailey, T.; Pluth, M. Chemiluminescent Detection of Enzymatically Produced
Hydrogen Sulfide: Substrate Hydrogen Bonding Influences Selectivity for H2S over
Biological Thiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16697–16704.
(12) Cline, M. R.; Chavez, T. A.; Toscano, J. P. “Oxidation of N-Hydroxy-L-Arginine
by Hypochlorous Acid to Form Nitroxyl (HNO).” J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 118,
148–154.
(13) Cline, M. R.; Tu, C.; Silverman, D. N.; Toscano, J. P. Detection of Nitroxyl (HNO)
by Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 1274–
1279.
(14) Tu, C.; Swenson, E. R.; Silverman, D. N. Membrane Inlet for Mass Spectrometric
Measurement of Nitric Oxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 1453–1457.
(15) Johnson, R. C.; Cooks, R. G.; Allen, T. M.; Cisper, M. E.; Hemberger, P. H.
Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry: Trends and Applications. Mass
Spectrom. Rev. 2000, 19, 1–37.
(16) Filipovic, M. R.; Miljkovic, J. L.; Nauser, T.; Royzen, M.; Klos, K.; Shubina, T.;
99
Koppenol, W. H.; Lippard, S. J.; Ivanović-Burmazović, I. Chemical
Characterization of the Smallest S-Nitrosothiol, HSNO; Cellular Cross-Talk of H2S
and S-Nitrosothiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12016–12027.
(17) Cortese-Krott, M. M.; Fernandez, B. O.; Santos, J. L. T.; Mergia, E.; Grman, M.;
Nagy, P.; Kelm, M.; Butler, A.; Feelisch, M. Nitrosopersulfide (SSNO(-)) Accounts
for Sustained NO Bioactivity of S-Nitrosothiols Following Reaction with Sulfide.
Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 234–244.
(18) da Silva, G.; Kennedy, E. M.; Dlugogorski, B. Z. Ab Initio Procedure for Aqueous-
Phase pKa Calculation: The Acidity of Nitrous Acid. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110,
11371–11376.
(19) Nonella, M.; Huber, J. R. Photolytic Preparation and Isomerization of HNSO,
HOSN, HSNO, and HONS in an Argon Matrix. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 5203–
5209.
(20) Fazaeli, R.; Solimannejad, M.; Seif, A. Analysis of Torsional Barrier Height of
HSNO as the Simplest. J. Chem. Sci. 2013, 125, 913–917.
(21) Timerghazin, Q. K.; English, A. M.; Peslherbe, G. H. On the Multireference
Character of S-Nitrosothiols: A Theoretical Study of HSNO. Chem. Phys. Lett.
2008, 454, 24–29.
(22) Carney, T. E. The Mechanism for Multiphoton Ionization of H2S. J. Chem. Phys.
1981, 75, 4422.
(23) Dibeler, V. H.; Rosenstock, H. M. Mass Spectra and Metastable Transitions of H2S,
100
HDS, and D2S. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 3106.
(24) Olson, K. R. A Practical Look at the Chemistry and Biology of Hydrogen Sulfide.
Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 17, 32–44.
(25) Ivanova, L. V; Anton, B. J.; Timerghazin, Q. K. On the Possible Biological
Relevance of HSNO Isomers: A Computational Investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2014, 16, 8476–8486.
(26) Timerghazin, Q. K.; Peslherbe, G. H.; English, A. M. Structure and Stability of
HSNO, the Simplest S-Nitrosothiol. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 1532–
1539.
(27) Chen, K.; Morris, J. Kinetics of Oxidation of Aqueous Sulfide by O2. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 1972, 6, 529–537.
(28) Nagy, P.; Pálinkás, Z.; Nagy, A.; Budai, B.; Tóth, I.; Vasas, A. Chemical Aspects
of Hydrogen Sulfide Measurements in Physiological Samples. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta - Gen. Subj. 2014, 1840, 876–891.
(29) Burns, J. a; Butler, J. C.; Moran, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Selective Reduction of
Disulfides by tris(2-Carboxyethyl)phosphine. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2648–2650.
(30) Liu, C.; Zhang, F.; Munske, G.; Zhang, H.; Xian, M. Isotope Dilution Mass
Spectrometry for the Quantification of Sulfane Sulfurs. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014,
76, 200–207.
(31) Cumnock, K.; Tully, T.; Cornell, C.; Hutchinson, M.; Gorrell, J.; Skidmore, K.;
Chen, Y.; Jacobson, F. Trisulfide Modification Impacts the Reduction Step in
101
Antibody–Drug Conjugation Process. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 1154–1160.
(32) Bharatam, P. V.; Kaur, D.; Senthil Kumar, P. Potential Energy Surface of
Thionylimide. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2006, 106, 1237–1249.
(33) Muñoz, F.; Schuchmann, M. N.; Olbrich, G.; von Sonntag, C. Common
Intermediates in the OH-Radical-Induced Oxidation of Cyanide and Formamide . J.
Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2. 2000, 2, 655–659.
(34) Sherman, M. P.; Grither, W. R.; McCulla, R. D. Computational Investigation of the
Reaction Mechanisms of Nitroxyl and Thiols. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4014–4024.
(35) Shao, Y.; Molnar, L. F.; Jung, Y.; Kussmann, J.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Brown, S. T.;
Gilbert, A. T. B.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Levchenko, S. V.; O?Neill, D. P.; DiStasio Jr,
R. A.; Lochan, R. C.; Wang, T.; Beran, G. J. O.; Besley, N. A.; Herbert, J. M.; Yeh
Lin, C.; Van Voorhis, T.; Hung Chien, S.; Sodt, A.; Steele, R. P.; Rassolov, V. A.;
Maslen, P. E.; Korambath, P. P.; Adamson, R. D.; Austin, B.; Baker, J.; Byrd, E. F.
C.; Dachsel, H.; Doerksen, R. J.; Dreuw, A.; Dunietz, B. D.; Dutoi, A. D.; Furlani,
T. R.; Gwaltney, S. R.; Heyden, A.; Hirata, S.; Hsu, C.-P.; Kedziora, G.; Khalliulin,
R. Z.; Klunzinger, P.; Lee, A. M.; Lee, M. S.; Liang, W.; Lotan, I.; Nair, N.; Peters,
B.; Proynov, E. I.; Pieniazek, P. A.; Min Rhee, Y.; Ritchie, J.; Rosta, E.; David
Sherrill, C.; Simmonett, A. C.; Subotnik, J. E.; Lee Woodcock III, H.; Zhang, W.;
Bell, A. T.; Chakraborty, A. K.; Chipman, D. M.; Keil, F. J.; Warshel, A.; Hehre,
W. J.; Schaefer III, H. F.; Kong, J.; Krylov, A. I.; Gill, P. M. W.; Head-Gordon, M.
Advances in Methods and Algorithms in a Modern Quantum Chemistry Program
Package. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3172.
102
4.9 Supporting Information Chapter 4
4.9.1 Optimized Geometries and Energies
Table S4.1. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[SN(H)OH]+.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -528.964303 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.027692596 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.033338912 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
N 7 0.3935644 -0.4520881 0.0001668
S 16 -1.0731173 0.1148629 -0.0000343
H 1 0.6155341 -1.4607745 -0.0000378
O 8 1.5534697 0.2016073 -0.0001565
H 1 1.3716338 1.1747257 0.000671
103
Table S4.2. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [SN(H)OH]+.
Frequency Intensity
465 11.27
545 83.69
875 185.32
926 24.01
1165 262.44
1308 94.79
1501 21.68
3255 156.48
3372 199.86
Table S4.3. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[SN(H)OH]+ SN-OH2 TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -528.871012 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.023238091 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.028648376 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.1337102 -0.1400224 0.0074507
N 7 -0.1958262 0.5497227 -0.0247676
O 8 -1.71843 -0.2124034 0.1115696
H 1 -1.782487 -0.8951857 -0.5998393
H 1 -1.2386527 0.9867118 -0.2385562
104
Table S4.4. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [SN(H)OH]+ SN-OH2 TS.
Frequency Intensity
-1786 164.93
253 72.12
289 41.47
543 273.01
905 49.07
998 142.83
1135 163.47
2241 286.33
3429 195.29
Table S4.5. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-OH2.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -528.970161 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.027692596 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.033338912 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.15988 -0.228774 -0.0035095
N 7 0.1273082 0.8013489 0.0125049
O 8 -1.8442697 -0.258718 -0.0112359
H 1 -2.3641534 0.1317251 -0.7396902
H 1 -2.330927 -0.0110385 0.7981941
105
Table S4.6. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-OH2.
Frequency Intensity
172 33.62
190 77.82
247 36.33
431 15.55
545 206.07
1332 139.37
1623 80.14
3513 254.2
3617 126.75
Table S4.7. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-OH2 [HOSN-H]+ TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -528.903754 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.023602441 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.028544091 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 0.384911 -0.536087 0.0002323
O 8 -1.268352 0.1804338 -0.0875777
H 1 -2.0164532 -0.0643826 0.5145229
H 1 -0.4488604 1.1918912 0.0150994
N 7 0.9219361 0.858059 0.0238974
106
Table S4.8. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-OH2 [HOSN-H]+ TS.
Frequency Intensity
-1883 312.81
396 143.09
489 108.8
683 32.47
956 118.05
1174 29.18
1180 76.14
1686 191.71
3383 268.92
Table S4.9. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HOSN-H]+.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -528.987532 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.028965915 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.033582027 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 0.0754326 -0.4638552 0.0000045
O 8 -1.2299383 0.4662736 -0.0001287
H 1 -2.0765891 -0.0413098 0.000757
N 7 1.3296072 0.3380947 -0.0000376
H 1 1.4019226 1.366141 0.000464
107
Table S4.10. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HOSN-H]+.
Frequency Intensity
365 47.11
423 200.95
790 42.11
804 153.85
839 228.15
1031 179.21
1234 4.21
3299 233.16
3420 349.39
Table S4.11. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.418283 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.055005683 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.061687230 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.3014786 -0.7868882 -0.0009116
N 7 0.1487411 0.2854712 0.0012659
O 8 0.2904405 1.6108092 0.0013554
H 1 1.2554371 1.8267745 -0.000618
H 1 -0.9322863 0.039179 0.0017419
O 8 -2.3378655 -0.4400599 -0.0020757
H 1 -2.9095469 -0.2979724 -0.775123
H 1 -2.8990499 -0.3420637 0.7854859
108
Table S4.12. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
82 27.4 1147 260.61
90 2.86 1290 124.75
228 29.98 1329 114.54
276 54.56 1499 40.3
323 255.3 1636 31.71
469 91.57 2173 2917.99
501 12.83 3370 130.72
589 98.17 3579 76.49
924 116.52 3673 167.27
Table S4.13. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.394669 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.054276565 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.061055731 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.7878143 0.246847 0.0145063
N 7 0.2246916 0.234735 -0.0690594
O 8 -0.4256899 -1.0143973 -0.0253074
H 1 0.2108608 -1.760365 0.107953
H 1 -1.8118311 1.1051764 0.0005035
O 8 -2.5049748 0.3996547 0.1096591
H 1 -1.9606616 -0.4662442 0.0796424
H 1 -3.1709209 0.4466768 -0.6115973
109
Table S4.14. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-145 6.56 1016 88.35
109 35.12 1123 424.46
282 112.62 1297 118.18
300 48.01 1590 96.54
331 117.74 1687 616.66
386 98.38 2818 1117.77
475 35.5 3306 311.8
529 118.79 3331 54.18
788 217.78 3504 397.6
Table S4.15. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.431644 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.052226517 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.059787858 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.3930512 0.1797914 0.0021321
O 8 -0.5108232 1.1397578 -0.0812104
H 1 -0.6338071 1.9350274 0.4714803
N 7 1.3384529 -1.2649718 0.0108579
H 1 -1.3342169 0.5258834 0.0002121
O 8 -2.4452505 -0.540673 0.0096146
H 1 -3.0343894 -0.6674582 0.7711557
H 1 -3.0069862 -0.6079901 -0.7802008
110
Table S4.16. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
53 0.48 730 50.28
57 4.61 991 115.59
141 38.46 1381 26.65
225 25.12 1578 60.93
252 127.91 1647 35.52
318 93.12 2635 2358.49
354 148.51 3567 190.02
404 131.18 3583 58.99
416 72.03 3678 140.27
Table S4.17. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W [HOSN(H)-W]+ TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.419974 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.052843999 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.059704674 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.1934323 -0.0192048 -0.008756
O 8 -0.074194 1.2505797 0.059708
H 1 0.2084695 2.1499396 -0.2057121
N 7 0.5143956 -1.3163605 0.0232937
H 1 -1.421561 0.5791173 -0.0419629
O 8 -2.0800554 -0.241085 -0.1037721
H 1 -1.4860808 -1.0440762 -0.0236745
H 1 -2.7625187 -0.2391373 0.6009029
111
Table S4.18. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W [HOSN(H)-W]+ TS.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-133 30.48 975 83.17
156 34.83 1163 369.15
228 106.09 1281 21.18
300 94.04 1562 92.23
355 85.71 1715 467.8
422 119.79 2329 1215.14
461 31.52 3165 425.94
523 133.07 3522 272.36
586 72.25 3525 232.65
Table S4.19. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HOSN(H)-W]+.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.437067 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.052526421 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.059363330 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.1187912 -0.4483959 -0.0013443
O 8 1.2038954 1.1695574 0.0024698
H 1 2.1330787 1.4941787 0.0063879
N 7 -0.2738282 -0.9437026 -0.0010191
H 1 -3.1265638 0.2147339 0.7634988
O 8 -2.5361497 0.3541816 0.0034438
H 1 -1.2379016 -0.4003052 0.0008453
H 1 -3.0944404 0.2817322 -0.7893979
112
Table S4.20. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HOSN(H)-W]+.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
62 35.51 1009 86.54
69 9.61 1039 297.57
165 44.81 1256 87.18
285 89.18 1263 111.7
379 126.08 1624 9.38
406 142.21 2160 3320.54
452 128.67 3454 278.39
488 20.76 3570 68.78
790 132.99 3665 148.03
Table S4.21. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+ (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.533046 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.055398332 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.062080755 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.0592232 -0.9951836 -0.0084128
N 7 0.2642896 0.3838617 -0.0046085
O 8 1.0178616 1.5065307 0.0110097
H 1 0.366771 2.2469057 0.0138651
H 1 -1.556834 0.2253276 0.0084378
O 8 -2.5361224 -0.0247705 0.0434301
H 1 -2.6228421 -0.8474004 0.5781318
H 1 -2.8386079 -0.2430084 -0.8690886
113
Table S4.22. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+ (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
74 113.42 970 679.77
90 6.74 1122 385.33
135 78.29 1384 66.73
176 3.68 1632 117.45
381 17.85 1668 94.54
485 89.91 2882 1808.03
505 88.56 3424 485.04
553 163.48 3441 236.71
936 32.14 3484 461.94
Table S4.23. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.508951 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.048013680 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.055032687 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 -1.9154929 -0.1041355 0.1525391
N 7 -0.5379623 -0.4258455 -0.4004419
O 8 0.5888109 0.8246881 -0.2135724
H 1 0.3388358 1.3634498 0.5734014
H 1 2.7268151 -1.1561514 -0.2874917
O 8 2.6989254 -0.3307421 0.2356718
H 1 1.5939988 0.2870708 -0.0109045
H 1 3.4520828 0.2011492 -0.0893324
114
Table S4.24. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HON(H)S-W]+ SN-2W TS (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-643 5275.23 736 987.54
57 51.59 1036 1150.74
72 48.68 1145 88.1
96 22.62 1300 170.1
328 188.26 1577 197.44
407 529.55 1635 167.34
472 52.84 3101 193.93
522 75.26 3518 117.24
640 166.93 3588 279.26
Table S4.25. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.543300 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.051102350 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.058312901 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.2942739 0.204771 0.2033492
O 8 -0.4736751 0.9760929 -0.3198033
H 1 -0.6169848 1.8442471 0.1206529
N 7 1.481123 -1.1545928 -0.2611831
H 1 -1.3240578 0.3506093 -0.1283883
O 8 -2.4200376 -0.5537799 0.1059763
H 1 -2.9152032 -0.3020569 0.9087069
H 1 -3.070295 -0.4654884 -0.6156604
115
Table S4.26. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
54 3.52 832 50.43
95 14.38 1189 111.07
115 86.82 1356 120.85
156 329.41 1554 121.52
277 62.39 1617 20.94
356 20.43 1880 4225.08
443 37 3475 416.76
464 221.93 3537 100.32
522 227.74 3612 219.89
Table S4.27. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
SN-2W [HOSN(H)]+ TS (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.543388 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.053164624 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.060346571 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.1989674 -0.0492394 0.0086672
O 8 0.0691308 1.2387527 0.0047421
H 1 0.5102821 2.1157702 -0.0267301
N 7 0.5033523 -1.3461238 -0.0011238
H 1 -1.6353124 0.6480604 -0.0468154
O 8 -2.2187099 -0.167285 -0.0939413
H 1 -1.5846695 -0.9350243 -0.0470009
H 1 -2.8006124 -0.1898509 0.7033308
116
Table S4.28. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for SN-2W [HOSN(H)]+ TS (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-173 3.58 1004 135.65
84 92.61 1130 523.97
115 100.67 1259 45.07
257 128.42 1608 126.07
316 10.29 1664 403.89
360 148.56 3084 707.65
378 167.89 3213 525.91
418 46.64 3447 455.36
592 189.18 3474 398.33
Table S4.29. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
[HOSN(H)]+ (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.549586 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.052298427 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.059153236 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.1285758 -0.41927 0.0057536
O 8 1.0876966 1.1902671 0.0050712
H 1 2.0051239 1.5618792 0.0277535
N 7 -0.2284587 -1.0188362 -0.0134765
H 1 -2.4489344 1.2155496 0.0305427
O 8 -2.5522169 0.2531544 -0.0914246
H 1 -1.1755507 -0.4699898 -0.0179423
H 1 -3.1224779 -0.0146362 0.6527508
117
Table S4.30. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for [HOSN(H)]+ (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
63 93.08 1056 201.07
136 2.88 1068 223.84
148 43.18 1154 154.78
250 113.64 1299 77.32
400 27.55 1598 88.66
408 108.88 2191 3567.09
441 293.2 3376 610.53
506 1.59 3539 74
787 231.87 3618 199.95
Table S4.31. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.109362 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.043023621 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.049506577 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.1204264 0.0037714 0.0112354
O 8 -2.1531422 0.1283083 -0.0917039
H 1 -2.6358347 0.2079502 0.7457375
H 1 -1.5448807 0.9002635 -0.10819
N 7 0.480741 1.3372783 -0.0033635
O 8 0.1186511 -1.3197111 -0.0028101
H 1 -0.835365 -0.9982829 -0.0376573
118
Table S4.32. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W.
Frequency Intensity
142 11.36
179 5.31
245 37.82
290 96.5
361 73.46
438 6.13
684 269.06
727 173.61
847 155.48
1223 3.54
1302 91.67
1649 71.33
3003 652.44
3396 253.66
3644 60.16
119
Table S4.33. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W HNSO-W TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.091808 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.038429943 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.044210442 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.0428705 0.0002599 -0.0127275
H 1 -1.1021347 0.7601021 0.0497887
O 8 -1.8916913 -0.0882934 0.0959128
H 1 -2.3965656 -0.1078025 -0.7362575
H 1 -1.0985077 -0.8878749 0.0546115
O 8 0.109683 1.2671667 0.004295
N 7 0.309621 -1.3142244 0.0048335
120
Table S4.34. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W HNSO-W TS.
Frequency Intensity
-1321 26.05
230 16.44
412 10.62
504 73.04
522 66.67
599 55.7
606 287.91
903 162.38
1157 18.62
1271 579.11
1352 843.9
1539 1568.97
1613 367.06
1894 370.65
3592 58.56
121
Table S4.35. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HNSO-W
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.122301 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.041940017 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.048796008 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
O 8 1.3124224 -1.1820162 -0.0097823
S 16 1.231344 0.299708 0.0043391
N 7 -0.1246304 1.0120092 0.0031467
H 1 -0.9824637 0.4261297 -0.0101129
H 1 -3.2599348 0.0998917 -0.6961875
O 8 -2.7382131 -0.3525017 -0.0155945
H 1 -3.1803671 -0.12927 0.817863
122
Table S4.36. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HNSO-W.
Frequency Intensity
18 73.82
60 9.59
120 1.43
175 5.19
256 298.37
319 4.01
461 23.5
956 149.31
983 56.45
1099 108.53
1196 131.01
1634 72.79
3120 532.46
3581 14.67
3693 47.35
123
Table S4.37. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.129570 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.041940017 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.048796008 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 -1.185197 0.1403456 0.0168951
O 8 2.3386044 -0.244622 -0.0918584
H 1 2.8508607 -0.1363071 0.7313967
H 1 1.9766858 -1.1470547 -0.0176518
N 7 -0.9047551 -1.3111803 -0.0076659
O 8 0.0973111 1.1868283 -0.0186756
H 1 0.981567 0.6784434 -0.0461328
124
Table S4.38. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity
34 33.32
121 16.04
170 96.91
254 79.77
385 178.53
411 40.32
488 99.32
718 281.46
898 162.39
1236 25.42
1302 147.09
1601 112.67
2748 1842.78
3531 49.3
3616 169.84
125
Table S4.39. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HOSN-W HNSO-W TS (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.115930 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.039878391 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.045847959 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
S 16 1.0605573 0.0273983 -0.0124347
H 1 -1.2273172 0.6940851 0.0383328
O 8 -1.9550532 -0.1159123 0.0969059
H 1 -2.4924088 -0.1262946 -0.726523
H 1 -1.2647969 -0.891781 0.0418228
O 8 0.0959412 1.2646427 0.0051752
N 7 0.4126432 -1.3291752 0.0040962
126
Table S4.40. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HOSN-W HNSO-W TS (H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity
-393 146
192 29.06
292 315.04
476 281.76
508 174.22
536 44.25
631 199.54
874 178.97
1151 66.06
1284 873.69
1430 376.71
1604 905.92
1868 289.67
2486 1508.82
3472 240.78
127
Table S4.41. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
HNSO-W (H2O dielectric).
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -605.147028 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.041847578 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.048552168 Hartrees
Atom Atomic Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
Number X Y Z
O 8 1.2246722 -1.2035573 -0.0044357
S 16 1.2156144 0.2872387 0.0001002
N 7 -0.1099963 1.0518501 0.0067996
H 1 -1.0029536 0.5044714 0.0065028
H 1 -3.1922582 0.0560541 -0.711364
O 8 -2.6436345 -0.3466807 -0.0133534
H 1 -3.1329447 -0.1173913 0.7979726
128
Table S4.42. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, scaled by 0.96) and
intensities for HNSO-W(H2O dielectric).
Frequency Intensity
70 11.27
78 78.15
143 9.7
190 23.53
320 313.93
370 4.46
468 24.58
991 51.53
1002 147.9
1095 291.88
1176 147.45
1607 100.35
2958 1103.08
3540 50.2
3624 126.52
129
4.9.2 Supporting Figures
Figure S4.1. MIMS observed intensity at m/z 30 following injection of 250 µM at t = 0
min of the pre-incubated reaction mixture, of NaSH with S-nitrosoglutathione, into 0.1 M
pH 7.4 PBS with 100 µM DTPA at 20 °C.
Figure S4.2. 31P NMR spectra resulting from TCEP in basic solution (red), acidic solution
(blue), and neutral solution (black). All samples were incubated for 30 min at 21 °C in
aqueous solutions containing 10% D2O.
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Ion C
urr
ent
(pA
)
86420-2
Time (min)
m/z 30
130
Figure S4.3. 31P NMR spectra resulting from TCEP in basic solution alone (red) or in the
presence of H2O2 (blue) to produce TCEP-oxide at 58 ppm. All samples were incubated
for 30 min at 21 °C in aqueous solutions containing 10% D2O.
Figure S4.4. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated energies and barriers, relative to F, for the
transformation of F to H, in the gas phase.
131
Chapter 5: Chemistry and Reactivity of
Carbonylnitrenes
5.1 Nitrene Background
Nitrenes are reactive intermediates containing neutral, monovalent nitrogen atoms.1
Nitrenes are most commonly generated from the corresponding azide. However, there are
other precursors including phenanthrene- and sulfilimine-based compounds that have been
shown to generate the nitrenes photochemically.2–4 These compounds have the added
advantage of being more stable for storage and handling compared to azide precursors.
Aliphatic and aromatic nitrenes typically favor triplet ground states by a wide margin. The
nitrene nitrogen is sp hydridized with two degenerate p-orbitals that can be occupied in
three electronic configurations. The parent nitrene (imidogen, NH) triplet state (3Σ’) is
formed by the two valence electrons occupying each of the degenerate p-orbitals in a spin-
parallel fashion (Figure 5.1a). The singlet states (1Δ) have two possibilities, the open shell
or closed shell singlets, where the electrons are paired in two p-orbitals or in the same
orbital, respectively (Figure 5.1a). The energetic difference between triplet and singlet
nitrenes arises from the distribution and spin of the electrons in the p-orbital. In the triplet
case, the electrons are spin parallel, and therefore, pay minimal energetic costs due to
repulsion. Although the singlet states benefit from being spin paired, the energetic benefit
does not outweigh the cost of electron-electron repulsion.
132
Figure 5.1. Electronic configurations of (a) imigoden (NH) and (b) methylene (CH2).
Aliphatic carbenes are also typically ground state triplets, however, usually by
smaller margins. The carbene carbon is sp2 hybridized, resulting in two energetically
different orbitals (sp2- and p-orbitals) for the valence electrons to occupy (Figure 5.1b).
Therefore, there is a higher energetic cost for carbenes to access the triplet state. Further,
the singlet states of carbenes are not degenerate as both the open- and closed-shell species
occupy orbitals of different energies.
133
Commonly, ground state electronics can be deciphered by reactivity with alkenes
to generate either a mixture of isomers, representative of triplet reactivity, or stereospecific
products that are indicative of singlet reactivity (Scheme 5.1). Rapid reactions of the
singlet state and slow intersystem crossing rates have made direct detection of the triplet
nitrene difficult. However, observation of triplet nitrenes has been successful by low
temperature EPR, matrix-isolation, and time-resolved spectroscopy methods.2,3,5–13
Scheme 5.1. Reactivity of singlet and triplet nitrenes to produce one isomer or a mixture
of isomers, respectively.
134
5.2 Nitrene Substituent Effects
The identity of the nitrene substituent has a significant effect on reactivity.
Alkylnitrenes like methylnitrene (CH3N) are ground state triplets by a large margin (31.2
kcal/mol);14 however, the triplet is difficult to detect due a low barrier of isomerization to
methyleneimine (Scheme 5.2). Substitution of methyl for trifluromethyl slows the rate of
isomerization, therefore allowing for isc to the triplet for observation by low temperature
UV-vis and EPR spectroscopy.15 Phenylnitrene (PhN) is another example that is a ground
state triplet, by a smaller margin of 18.5 kcal/mol.16 Similar to CH3N, rapid reaction of the
initially generated singlet nitrene results in complicated product mixtures limiting further
applications.12,17 A variety of other nitrenes have been explored including oxygen-
substituted, sulfur-substituted, nitrogen-substituted, phosphorus-substituted nitrenes.2,18
Scheme 5.2. Reactivity of methylnitrene to form methyleneimine.
In contrast to alkyl- and arylnitrenes, carbonylnitrenes (RC(O)N) have
demonstrated primarily singlet reactivity.19 For example, photolysis of azide precursors in
the presence of alkenes produced stereospecific products, indicative of singlet reactivity.19
Computational and matrix isolation studies has shown that the ground state of
carbonylnitrenes is a closed-shell singlet. This state is stabilized by the interaction between
the in-plane carbonyl oxygen lone pair and the empty in-plane orbital on the nitrene
135
nitrogen.10,19–22 This bonding interaction leads to an oxazirine-like structure for the singlet
carbonylnitrene that has a much smaller O-C-N bond angle compared to the corresponding
triplet carbonylnitrene (Figure 5.2). This significant geometry difference affords unique
infrared (IR) signatures for singlet and triplet nitrenes.
Figure 5.2. O-C-N bond angle comparison between triplet and singlet carbonylnitrenes.
Time-resolved infrared (TRIR) spectroscopy has been successful at detecting and
probing reactivity of carbonylnitrenes in solution.4,10,23 Photolysis of the sulfilimine
precursor produced signals representative of both singlet (1760 cm-1) and triplet (1488 cm-
1) benzoylnitrene along with the corresponding isocyanate. When the photolysis was
performed in acetonitrile the singlet nitrene reacted with solvent resulting in the growth of
an ylide, followed by cyclization to the oxadiazole (Scheme 5.3). TRIR spectroscopy was
also applied to investigate other nitrenes including acetyl- and trifluroacetylnitrenes.4
Scheme 5. 3. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of benzoylnitrene precursor.
136
Oxycarbonylnitrenes, on the other hand, are computed to be ground state triplets
since this oxazirene stabilization is now less important (Figure 5.3). The oxygen
conjugation into the carbonyl stabilizes the triplet more than the corresponding closed-shell
singlet state.22,24 Sherman and Jenks recently reported a thorough computational
investigation of the effect of fluorination on the ground state multiplicity of acylnitrenes.25
They found that the electron withdrawing effect of fluorine substitution reduces the
stabilization of the singlet configuration, which could also be important for the
electronegative substituent of oxycarbonynitrenes. This effect is observed with the
increasing of the calculated O-C-N bond angle that correlates with the increase in electron
withdrawing magnitude of the substituent.
Figure 5.3. Relevant resonance structures for carbonyl- and oxycarbonylnitrenes.
Although standard B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations give optimized geometries for
oxycarbonyl- and carbonylnitrenes in very good agreement with those calculated by higher
levels of theory (CCSD(T) with complete basis set extrapolation or CBS-QB3
calculations), singlet-triplet energy gaps (ΔEST = ES – ET) are overestimated.10,22,24 For
example, B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations overestimate ΔEST by approximately 9 kcal/mol
for formylnitrene (HC(O)N) and approximately 7 kcal/mol for carboxynitrene
(HOC(O)N).24 Despite the extensive study of nitrenes and the fundamental importance of
137
their ground state multiplicity and singlet-triplet splitting on reactivity, only three ΔEST
values have been determined experimentally. Negative ion photoelectron spectroscopy has
been used to determine ΔEST for imidogen (NH),26 methylnitrene (CH3N),27 and
phenylnitrene (PhN).16,28 Negative ions are generated under high-vacuum then irradiated
to eject electrons. The measured kinetic energy (Ek) of the ejected electrons, in combination
with the known photon energy (h), are used to determine the binding energy (EB) of each
electron (h = Ek – EB). The difference in energy between the observed transitions, when
the geometries of anions and neutrals as similar, represents the singlet-triplet energy gaps
(ΔEST = ES – ET, Scheme 5.4).
Scheme 5.4. ΔEST measured by negative ion photoelectron spectroscopy (PES).
138
In the carbonylnitrene section of this thesis we investigate the solution reactivity of
oxycarbonylnitrenes by TRIR spectroscopy. We combine computational analysis with our
observed results to interpret the observed chemistry of ethoxy- and t-
butyloxycarbonynitrenes. Further, in collaboration with Bowen, Pederson, and co-workers
(JHU), we explore the application of negative ion PES in effort to obtain experimental
ΔEST values for benzoyl-, acetyl-, and trifluroacetylnitrene to corroborate our
computational results.
139
5.3 References
(1) W. Lwowski. Nitrene. In Nitrenes; Lwowski, W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, 1920; p 1.
(2) Wasylenko, W. a; Kebede, N.; Showalter, B. M.; Matsunaga, N.; Miceli, A. P.;
Liu, Y.; Ryzhkov, L. R.; Hadad, C. M.; Toscano, J. P. Generation of Oxynitrenes
and Confirmation of Their Triplet Ground States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
13142–13150.
(3) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of Sulfilimine-
Based Nitrene Precursors: Generation of Both Singlet and Triplet Benzoylnitrene.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6848–6859.
(4) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N- Acetyl-,
N- Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N- Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4398–4414.
(5) Wasserman, E.; Smolinsky, G.; Yager, W. a. Electron Spin Resonance of Alkyl
Nitrenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 3166–3167.
(6) Ferrante, R. F. Spectroscopy of Matrix-Isolated Methylnitrene. J. Chem. Phys.
1987, 86, 25.
(7) Leyva, E.; Platz, M. S.; Persy, G.; Wirz, J. Photochemistry of Phenyl Azide: The
Role of Singlet and Triplet Phenylnitrene as Transient Intermediates. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 108, 3783–3790.
(8) Sigman, M. E.; Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. Aroylnitrenes with Singlet Ground
140
States: Photochemistry of Acetyl-Substituted Aroyl and Aryloxycarbonyl Azides.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4297–4305.
(9) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N- Acetyl-,
N- Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N- Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4398–4414.
(10) Pritchina, E. A.; Gritsan, N. P.; Maltsev, A.; Bally, T.; Autrey, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang,
Y.; Toscano, J. P. Matrix Isolation, Time-Resolved IR, and Computational Study
of the Photochemistry of Benzoyl Azide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 1010–
1018.
(11) Buron, C.; Platz, M. S. Laser Flash Photolysis Study of Carboethoxynitrene. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 3383–3385.
(12) Borden, W. T.; Gritsan, N. P.; Hadad, C. M.; Karney, W. L.; Kemnitz, C. R.; Platz,
M. S. The Interplay of Theory and Experiment in the Study of Phenylnitrene. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 765–771.
(13) Gritsan, N. P.; Platz, M. S. Kinetics, Spectroscopy, and Computational Chemistry
of Arylnitrenes. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3844–3867.
(14) Travers, M. J.; Cowles, D. C.; Clifford, E. P.; Ellison, G. B.; Engelking, P. C.
Photoelectron Spectroscopy of the CH3N− Ion. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 5349.
(15) Gritsan, N. P.; Likhotvorik, I.; Zhu, Z.; Platz, M. S. Observation of
Perfluoromethylnitrene in Cryogenic Matrixes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 3039–
3041.
141
(16) Travers, M. J.; Cowles, D. C.; Clifford, E. P.; Ellison, G. B. Photoelectron
Spectroscopy of the Phenylnitrene Anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8699–
8701.
(17) Platz, M. S. Comparison of Phenylcarbene and Phenylnitrenel. Acc. Chem. Res.
1995, 28, 487–492.
(18) Platz, M. S. Nitrenes. In Reactive Intermediate Chemistry; Moss, Robert A., Platz,
Matthew S., Jones, M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004; pp 501–559.
(19) Sigman, M. E.; Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. Aroylnitrenes with Singlet Ground
States: Photochemistry of Acetyl-Substituted Aroyl and Aryloxycarbonyl Azides.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4297–4305.
(20) Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. Are Aroylnitrenes Ground-State Singlets?
Photochemistry of β-Naphthoyl Azide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109 (19), 5814–
5820.
(21) Gritsan, N. P.; Pritchina, E. A. Are Aroylnitrenes Species with a Singlet Ground
State? Mendeleev Commun. 2001, 11, 94–95.
(22) Liu, J.; Mandel, S.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz, M. S. A Comparison of Acetyl- and
Methoxycarbonylnitrenes by Computational Methods and a Laser Flash Photolysis
Study of Benzoylnitrene. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8583–8593.
(23) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of Sulfilimine-
Based Nitrene Precursors: Generation of Both Singlet and Triplet Benzoylnitrene.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6848–6859.
142
(24) Pritchina, E. a.; Gritsan, N. P.; Bally, T. Ground State Multiplicity of Acylnitrenes:
Computational and Experimental Studies. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 525–532.
(25) Sherman, M. P.; Jenks, W. S. Computational Rationalization for the Observed
Ground-State Multiplicities of Fluorinated Acylnitrenes. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79,
8977–8983.
(26) Engelking, P. C. Laser Photoelectron Spectrometry of NH−: Electron Affinity and
Intercombination Energy Difference in NH. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 65, 4323.
(27) Travers, M. J.; Cowles, D. C.; Clifford, E. P.; Ellison, G. B.; Engelking, P. C.
Photoelectron Spectroscopy of the CH3N- Ion. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 23–25.
(28) Wijeratne, N. R.; Fonte, M. Da; Ronemus, A.; Wyss, P. J.; Tahmassebi, D.;
Wenthold, P. G. Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Chloro-Substituted Phenylnitrene
Anions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 9467–9473.
143
Chapter 6: Nanosecond Time-Resolved Infrared
(TRIR) Studies of Oxycarbonylnitrenes
6.1 Introduction
Oxycarbonylnitrenes (ROC(O)N) have a rich history in the development of our
modern mechanistic understanding of nitrene chemistry.1 Seminal studies by Lwowski
and co-workers on ethoxycarbonylazide (1) demonstrated ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2)
undergoes intermolecular insertion reactions into C-H bonds and adds to double bonds with
partial stereospecificity that suggested reaction from both singlet 2s and presumably lower
energy triplet nitrene 2t (Scheme 6.1).2–5 Similar work in Germany also demonstrated that
photochemical decomposition of t-butyloxycarbonylazide (3) produces t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4) that predominantly gives 5,5-dimethyl-2-oxazolidinone (5)
via an intramolecular C-H insertion reaction in a variety of solvents (Scheme 6.2).6–8 More
recent synthetic and spectroscopic studies on oxycarbonylnitrenes have confirmed the
above reactivity and provided additional insight into these interesting reactive
intermediates.9–12
144
Scheme 6.1. The photochemistry of ethoxycarbonylazide (1) to generate the singlet
ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2s) which can either react with an alkene to produce a
stereospecific product or intersystem cross to triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t) which
will react with an alkene in a non-stereospecific manner.
Scheme 6.2. Photolysis of t-butyloxycarbonylazide (3) to produce t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4) that predominantly gives 5,5-dimethyl-2-oxazolidinone (5)
via an intramolecular C-H insertion reaction.
Lwowski and co-workers were also the first to suggest that the classic photo-
Curtius rearrangement of acyl azides to isocyanates does not occur from the nitrene
intermediate, but rather directly from the azide.13–15 Subsequent low-temperature matrix
infrared and solution nanosecond time-resolved infrared (TRIR) spectroscopic studies
confirmed that the isocyanate is not formed from a relaxed nitrene intermediate.16–18
Recently, ultrafast IR and UV-Vis studies of Platz and co-workers have provided
spectroscopic evidence for this pathway, demonstrating directly that the first singlet excited
state (S1) of the acyl azide is the isocyanate precursor.19–22
145
Low-temperature ESR spectroscopic studies confirmed the suspected triplet ground
state for ethoxycarbonylnitrene and related species,23 consistent with the observed non-
stereospecific trapping of alkenes. These observations are in contrast to those found for
carbonylnitrenes (RC(O)N), which have been shown to be ground state singlets that are
not detectable by ESR spectroscopy and show retention of configuration when adding to
alkenes.10,24
The singlet and triplet state structures and energies of both oxycarbonyl- and
carbonylnitrenes have been thoroughly investigated by computational methods, which
provide insight into their different ground states.11,18,25–29 High-level theory indicates that
carbonylnitrenes are closed-shell ground state singlets owing to a significant bonding
interaction between a carbonyl oxygen lone pair and an empty orbital on the nitrene
nitrogen.18,26–29 Indeed, computed structures of singlet carbonylnitrenes have significant
cyclic oxazirene character (Figure 6.1). Oxycarbonylnitrenes, on the other hand, are
computed to be ground state triplets since this oxazirene stabilization is now less important
(Figure 6.1) and oxygen conjugation into the carbonyl stabilizes the triplet more than the
corresponding closed-shell singlet state.27,28 Inductive effects have also been suggested to
play a role in reducing the stabilization of the singlet by limiting the carbonyl oxygen’s
nucleophilicity/basicity, as well as by increasing the O-C-N bond angle in accord with
Bent’s rule.30–32
146
Figure 6.1. Relevant resonance structures for carbonyl- and oxycarbonylnitrenes.
Although standard B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations give optimized geometries for
oxycarbonyl- and carbonylnitrenes in very good agreement with those calculated by higher
levels of theory (CCSD(T) with complete basis set extrapolation or CBS-QB3
calculations), singlet-triplet energy gaps (ΔEST = ES – ET) are overestimated.18,27,28 For
example, B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations overestimate ΔEST by approximately 9 kcal/mol
for formylnitrene (HC(O)N) and approximately 7 kcal/mol for carboxynitrene
(HOC(O)N).28
To gain additional insight into the chemistry and reactivity of oxycarbonylnitrenes,
we are pleased to report herein nanosecond TRIR studies of ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) and
t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4) in a variety of solvents. Although azides are standard
photoprecursors for nitrenes, recent work has demonstrated that these intermediates also
can be efficiently generated from analogous sulfilimine precursors.29,33–36 Thus, we have
utilized the sulfilimine photoprecursors 6 and 7 for these studies (Figure 6.2).
147
Figure 6.2. Sulfilimine-based photoprecursors to oxycarbonylnitrenes 2 and 4.
6.2 Computational Analysis of Ethoxy- and t-
Butyloxycarbonylnitrenes
The B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated ΔEST values of the syn- and anti-rotamers of
ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) are 12.8 and 8.8 kcal/mol, respectively, and 13.1 and 9.3
kcal/mol, respectively, with the inclusion of zero-point vibrational energy correction
(Figure 6.3a). Given that B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations overestimates the ΔEST of
carboxynitrene (HOC(O)N) by 7 kcal/mol,28 we estimate that the ΔEST values of the syn-
and anti-rotamers of ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) are 6.1 and 2.3 kcal/mol, respectively
(Figure 6.3a). Similar to HOC(O)N,28 the syn- and anti-rotamers of singlet nitrene 2s are
very close in energy, but the syn-rotamer of triplet nitrene 2t is 3.7 kcal/mol lower in energy
than the corresponding anti-rotamer (Figure 6.3a). The barrier to rotation from syn- to anti-
forms of 2s is calculated to be 6.1 kcal/mol, while that of triplet 2t is 9.4 kcal/mol.
In comparison, the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated ΔEST values of the syn- and anti-
rotamers of t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4) were found to be 11.0 and 7.2 kcal/mol,
respectively, and 11.4 and 7.8 kcal/mol, respectively, with the inclusion of zero-point
vibrational energy correction. Taking into account the 7 kcal/mol B3LYP/6-31G(d)
correction,28 the ΔEST values of the syn- and anti-rotamers of t-butoxycarbonylnitrene are
148
estimated to be 4.4 and 0.8 kcal/mol respectively (Figure 6.3b). These ΔEST values match
well with CBS-QB3 calculated values for methoxycabonylnitrene that have been
previously reported.27
Figure 6.3. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated ΔEST values (ΔEST = ES - ET) and energies of
the syn- and anti-forms, including zero-point vibrational energy correction, of (a)
ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) and (b) t-butoxycarbonylnitrene (4). Values in brackets include
the 7 kcal/mol correction to the B3LYP/6-31G(d) values.28
149
As with ethoxycarbonylnitrene, the syn- and anti-rotamers of singlet nitrene 4s are
very close in energy, while the syn- and anti-rotamers of triplet nitrene 4t are separated by
3.2 kcal/mol in favor of the syn-form (Figure 6.3b). The B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated
barriers to rotation from syn- to anti-forms of 4s is calculated to be 4.7 kcal/mol, while that
for triplet 4t is 7.5 kcal/mol (Supporting Information).
Analysis of the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated geometries of both ethoxy- and t-
butoxycarbonylnitrene show a contribution from the oxazirine resonance form in the
singlet states of both nitrenes. This effect is observed in the significantly smaller O-C-N
bond angles of 91.5° and 91.1° in the singlet syn- and anti-ethoxycarbonylnitrenes (2s),
respectively, relative to 120.4° and 117.8° for triplet syn- and anti-ethoxycarbonylnitrene
(2t), respectively (Figure 6.4a). The same effect is also observed for t-
butoxycarbonylnitrenes with O-C-N bond angles of 89.9° for both the syn- and anti- forms
of the singlet (4s), while the syn- and anti-triplets (4t) have calculated angles of 119.2° and
116.8°, respectively. However, calculated triplet ground states (positive ΔEST values)
suggests a less important role of this resonance form compared to that in
carbonylnitrenes.30–32
Significant differences in the geometries of the two nitrene spin states results in
considerably different IR signatures. The singlet nitrenes are calculated to have strong
vibrations at ca. 1750 cm-1, while the triplets are calculated to appear at ca. 1605 cm-1
(scaled by 0.96).37 Therefore, both singlet and triplet oxycarbonylnitrenes can be
distinguished by their frequencies in solution if their lifetimes are sufficiently long enough.
150
Previous TRIR work on other carbonylnitrenes has shown that they can be detected in
solution at frequencies similar to those calculated.29,33,38
151
Figure 6.4. B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated geometries and energies of both syn- and anti-
forms of (a) ethoxycarbonylnitrene and (b) t-butoxycarbonylnitrene. Energies shown in
parentheses include zero-point vibrational energy correction. Values in brackets include
the 7 kcal/mol correction to the B3LYP/6-31G(d) values.
152
6.3 Time-Resolved IR Studies of Ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2)
Upon 266 nm laser photolysis of N-ethoxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine
(6) in argon-saturated acetonitrile (CH3CN), the TRIR difference spectrum shown in Figure
6.5 is obtained. A transient species observed at 1640 cm-1, grows in within the time
resolution of our experiment (50 ns, k ≥ 2.0 x 10-7 s-1) and decays with a first-order rate
constant of 5.5 x 105 s-1. Photolysis in oxygen-saturated acetonitrile does not affect the
rate of decay of this signal. Platz and Buron detected triplet ethoxycabonylnitrene (2t),
upon photolysis of carboethoxyazide (1), and did not observe reactivity with O2.11 We
assign the observed 1640 cm-1 signal to triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t), which is a
reasonable match with its calculated frequency (ca. 1605 cm-1). By comparison, the
calculated IR frequency of singlet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2s) is at 1752cm-1. Similar to
previous work,11 the lifetime of the 1640 cm-1 signal is shortened in the presence of the H-
atom donor triethylsilane (TES) further suggesting that the triplet nitrene is responsible for
the signal observed (Supporting Information).
153
Figure 6.5. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following 266
nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 (3 mM) in argon-saturated acetonitrile. Blue and black
bars reflect B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequencies and intensities of ylide 8 and triplet
ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t), respectively.
Triplet nitrene 2t decays at the same rate as the growth of signals at 1690, 1285,
and 1160 cm-1 (Figure 6.6). These bands match well with the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated
frequencies of ylide 8 (Supporting Information). Therefore, we assign these signals to
ylide 8, the product of reaction of the nitrene with acetonitrile (Scheme 3). The observed
rate of ylide growth fits well to a biexponential function, indicative of kinetics comprised
of a fast component, produced within the instrumental time resolution (k = 2 x 107 s-1), and
a slower, resolvable component (k = 5.5 x 105 s-1). The slow component of the ylide growth
matches the decay of the triplet nitrene, indicating that this portion of the observed kinetics
is due to 2t, although carbonylnitrene reactivity with acetonitrile has typically been
associated with the singlet. The fast component is likely the result of reactivity of the
-1.5x10-3
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
A
bso
rba
nce
1800 1750 1700 1650
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
1300 1250 1200 1150
ylide 8
1690 cm-1
triplet nitrene 2t
1640 cm-1
ylide 8
1285 cm-1
ylide 8
1160 cm-1
0.0 - 0.2 µs 0.2 - 0.4 µs 0.4 - 0.6 µs 0.6 - 0.8 µs 0.8 - 1.2 µs 1.2 - 2.0 µs 2.0 - 2.8 µs 2.8 - 3.6 µs
154
singlet nitrene 2s, consistent with the reported growth of 2s within 10 ns in Freon-113 by
Platz and Buron.11 The ylide further decays with an observed first-order rate of 3.5 x 105
s-1 to produce oxadiazole 9 (Scheme 3), which is confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopic
analysis of the reaction (Supporting Information).
155
Figure 6.6. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in
argon-saturated acetonitrile at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -1 to 9 μs, and (b) 1160 cm-1 from -1 to
9 μs, (c) 1690 cm-1 from -1 to 9 μs, and (d) 1690 cm-1 from -100 to 900 μs. Black curves
are the calculated best fit to a single- or double-exponential function.
150x10-6
100
50
0
-50
Inte
nsity
8µs6420Time
ylide 8
1160 cm-1
kobs1 = 2.0 x 107 s
-1
kobs2 = 5.5 x 105 s
-1
Fast : Slow = 2 : 1
300x10-6
200
100
0Inte
nsity
800µs6004002000
Time
ylide 8
1690 cm-1
kobs = 3.5 x 103 s
-1
300x10-6
200
100
0
-100
In
ten
sity
8µs6420
Time
ylide 8
1690 cm-1
kobs1 = 2.0 x 107 s
-1
kobs2 = 4.7 x 105 s
-1
Fast : Slow = 1.1 : 1
-40x10-6
-20
0
20
40
In
ten
sity
8µs6420
Time
triplet nitrene 2t
1640 cm-1
kobs = 5.5 x 105 s
-1
(c)
(a)
(d)
(b)
156
Scheme 6.3. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in acetonitrile.
Upon 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in argon-saturated cyclohexane, the
TRIR difference spectrum shown in Figure 7 is observed. Analogous to TRIR experiments
in acetonitrile, we detect 2t at 1640 cm-1(Figure 6.8a). Here, the product of reaction with
solvent is presumably amide 11 (Scheme 6.4). The triplet nitrene decays (k = 7.1 x 105 s-
1) at the same rate as the growth of the slow component of amide 11, which is observed at
1728 cm-1, in excellent agreement with its reported frequency (1730 cm-1).39 We also
observe a fast component for the growth of the 1728 cm-1 signal, suggesting reactivity from
singlet nitrene 2s (Figure 6.8b). In addition, we observe a very weak positive band at 2180
cm-1, produced within the instrumental time resolution (Figure 6.8c). This species is
assigned to ethoxyisocyanate (9, Scheme 6.4), which is in reasonable agreement with the
reported literature frequency of 2204 cm-1. Since this species is formed within the
instrumental time resolution (50 ns), the source of the isocyanate is either an excited state
of precursor 6 or singlet nitrene 2s (Scheme 6.4).
157
Figure 6.7. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following 266
nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 (3 mM) in argon-saturated cyclohexane. Black bar
reflect B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2t).
1.0x10-3
0.5
0.0
-0.5
A
bsorb
ance
1800 1750 1700 1650 1600 1550
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
0.0 - 0.2 µs 0.2 - 0.4 µs 0.4 - 0.6 µs 0.6 - 0.8 µs 0.8 - 1.2 µs 1.2 - 2.0 µs 2.0 - 2.8 µs 2.8 - 3.6 µs
amide 10
1728 cm-1
triplet nitrene 2t
1640 cm-1
158
Figure 6.8. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in
argon-saturated cyclohexane at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -1 to 9 μs, (b) 1728 cm-1 from -1 to 9
μs, and (c) 2180 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated best fit to a
single- or double-exponential function.
600x10-6
400
200
0Inte
nsity
8µs6420
Time
amide 10
1728 cm-1
kobs1 = 2 x 107s
-1
kobs2 = 6.8 x 105s
-1
Fast : Slow = 2 : 1
-100x10-6
-50
0
50
In
tensity
8µs6420
Time
triplet nitrene 2t
1640 cm-1
kobs = 7.1 x 105s
-1
100x10-6
50
0
-50Inte
nsity
40µs3020100
Time
isocyanate 11
2180 cm-1
kobs > 2 x 107s
-1
(a)
(b)
(c)
159
Scheme 6.4. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of sulfilimine 6 in cyclohexane.
6.4 Time-Resolved IR Studies of t-Butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4)
Upon 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 in argon-saturated acetonitrile, the
TRIR difference spectrum shown in Figure 6.9 is observed. Triplet nitrene 4t is detected
at 1640 cm-1 (Figures 6.9, 6.10a); however, in contrast to the chemistry observed with
nitrene 2 in acetonitrile, formation of the corresponding acetonitrile ylide is not observed.
Triplet nitrene 4t instead decays at the same observed rate as the growth of an intense signal
at 1762 cm-1 (Figures 6.9, 6.10b). This 1762 cm-1 band matches reasonably well with the
reported literature frequency of oxazolidinone 5 (1740 cm-1),40 formed via an
intramolecular C-H insertion reaction (Scheme 5). 1H NMR product analysis following
254 nm Rayonet photolysis in both acetonitrile-d3 and dichloromethane-d2, confirms the
production of 5 in ca. 90% yield (Supporting Information). The growth of oxazolidinone
5 displays biexponential kinetics (Figure 6.10b) with the fast component presumably due
to production from singlet nitrene 4s. We also observe the production of t-butoxyisocyante
(12) at 2180 cm-1, which grows within the instrumental time-resolution (Figure 6.10c).
160
Figure 6.9. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following 266
nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 (3 mM) in argon-saturated acetonitrile. The black bar
reflects the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene
(4t).
3x10-3
2
1
0
-1
A
bsorb
ance
1850 1800 1750 1700 1650 1600
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
0.0 - 0.2 s
0.2 - 0.4 s
0.4 - 0.6 s
0.6 - 0.8 s
0.8 - 1.2 s
1.2 - 2.0 s
2.0 - 2.8 s
2.8 - 3.6 s
oxazolidinone 5
1762 cm-1
triplet nitrene 4t
1640 cm-1
161
Figure 6.10. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7
in argon-saturated acetonitrile at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, (b) 1762 cm-1 from -
0.4 to 3.6 μs, and (c) 2180 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated best fit
to a single- or double-exponential function.
-60x10-6
-40
-20
0
20
40
Inte
nsity
3µs210
Time
triplet nitrene 4t
1640 cm-1
kobs = 2.3 x 106 s
-1
800x10-6
600
400
200
0Inte
nsity
3µs210
Time
oxazolidinone 5
1762 cm-1
kobs1 = 2 x 107 s
-1
kobs2 = 2.6 x 106 s
-1
Fast : Slow 9 : 1
200x10-6
100
0
-100
In
tensity
40µs3020100
Time
isocyanate 12
2180 cm-1
kobs > 2 x 107s
-1
(a)
(b)
(c)
162
Scheme 6.5. Reactivity observed upon photolysis of 7 in acetonitrile, dichloromethane,
and Freon-113.
Laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 in argon-saturated dichloromethane results in the
TRIR difference spectrum shown in Figure 6.11. Again, we observe triplet nitrene 4t and
oxazolidinone 5 at 1638 cm-1 and 1752 cm-1, respectively (Figure 6.12). Rapid production
of isocyanate 12 is also observed at 2175 cm-1 (Figure 6.12). Interestingly, the ratio of fast
component to slow component for growth of oxazolidinone 5 in dichloromethane (1:1.4,
Figure 6.12b) is significantly different from that observed in acetonitrile (9:1, Figure
6.10b). TRIR experiments in Freon-113 reveal analogous signals (Figure 6.13). In this
solvent, the ratio of fast to slow component for the growth of oxazolidinone 5 is now 1:1.3
(Figure 6.14b). The greater contribution of the fast component to the observed
oxazolidinone growth kinetics in acetonitrile (dielectric constant, ε = 35.9) compared to
that in either dichloromethane (ε = 8.9) or Freon-113 (ε = 2.4) suggests a solvent effect on
the relative stabilities of the singlet and triplet states of nitrene 4. The singlets for both
nitrenes are calculated to have higher dipole moments relative to their corresponding triplet
(Supporting Information). Given that more polar solvents are expected to stabilize the
single nitrene due to its zwitterionic character, these results point to a greater contribution
from singlet nitrene reactivity in acetonitrile vs. dichloromethane or Freon-113.
163
Figure 6.11. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 (3 mM) in argon-saturated dichloromethane. The
black bar reflects the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet t-
butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4t).
3x10-3
2
1
0
-1
A
bso
rba
nce
1850 1800 1750 1700 1650 1600 1550
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
0.0 - 0.2 µs 0.2 - 0.4 µs 0.4 - 0.6 µs 0.6 - 0.8 µs 0.8 - 1.2 µs 1.2 - 2.0 µs 2.0 - 2.8 µs 2.8 - 3.6 µs
oxazolidinone 5
1752 cm-1
triplet nitrene 4t
1638 cm-1
164
Figure 6.12. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7
in argon-saturated dichloromethane at (a) 1638 cm-1 from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, (b) 1752 cm-1
from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, and (c) 2175 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated
best fit to a single- or double-exponential function.
200x10-6
100
0
-100In
ten
sity
40µs3020100
Time
isocyanate 12
2175 cm-1
kobs > 2 x 107s
-1
-300x10-6
-200
-100
0
100
200
In
tensity
3µs210
Time
triplet nitrene 4t
1638 cm-1
kobs = 1.8 x 106s
-1
2.0x10-3
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Inte
nsity
3µs210
Time
oxazolidinone 5
1752 cm-1
kobs1 = 2 x 107s
-1
kobs2 = 1.9 x 106s
-1
Fast : Slow = 1 : 1.4
(a)
(b)
(c)
165
Figure 6.13. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following
266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7 (3 mM) in argon-saturated Freon-113. The black
bar reflects the B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculated frequency of triplet t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene
(4t).
3x10-3
2
1
0
-1
A
bsorb
ance
1850 1800 1750 1700 1650 1600 1550
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
0.0 - 0.2 µs 0.2 - 0.4 µs 0.4 - 0.6 µs 0.6 - 0.8 µs 0.8 - 1.2 µs 1.2 - 2.0 µs 2.0 - 2.8 µs 2.8 - 3.6 µs
oxazolidinone 5
1764 cm-1
triplet nitrene 4t
1640 cm-1
166
Figure 6.14. Kinetic traces observed following 266 nm laser photolysis of sulfilimine 7
in argon-saturated Freon-113 at (a) 1640 cm-1 from -0.4 to 3.6 μs, (b) 1764 cm-1 from -0.4
to 3.6 μs, and (c) 2180 cm-1 from -5 to 45 μs. Black curves are the calculated best fit to a
single- or double-exponential function.
The observation of a solvent effect on the relative contributions of the singlet and
triplets states of nitrene 4 implies a very small ΔEST value (ca. 1 kcal/mol or less), which
is consistent with our B3LYP/6-31(d) calculations (Figure 6.3b). This solvent effect is
reminiscent of our previous TRIR studies of carbonylcarbenes where singlet
carbonylcarbenes were found to be favored in polar solvents, the result of their increased
dipole moment.41 The singlet and triplet carbonylcarbenes in these previous studies were
1.5x10-3
1.0
0.5
0.0Inte
nsity
3µs210Time
oxazolidinone 5
1764 cm-1
kobs1 = 2 x 107s
-1
kobs2 = 9.6 x 105s
-1
Fast : Slow 1 : 1.3
150x10-6
100
50
0
-50
Inte
nsity
40µs3020100
Time
isocyanate 11
2180 cm-1
kobs > 2.0 x 107s
-1
200x10-6
100
0
-100Inte
nsity
3µs210
Time
triplet nitrene 4t
1640 cm-1
kobs = 9.8 x 105s
-1
(a)
(b)
(c)
167
in equilibrium, with distinct TRIR bands displaying identical kinetics. In contrast, we find
no evidence that singlet 4s and triplet 4t are in equilibrium. Indeed, we do not observe
singlet 4s in our TRIR experiments and the observed growth kinetics of product 5 indicate
a separate kinetic contribution from the singlet nitrene (fast) and the triplet nitrene (slow).
These observed growth kinetics may be explained by two potential mechanisms: (1)
Separate production of 5 from singlet 4s and triplet 4t (Scheme 6.6a); or (2) production of
5 from only singlet 4s, with the slow component the result of thermal repopulation of 4s
from 4t (Scheme 6.6b).
More polar solvents are expected to lower the energy of singlet 4s relative to that
of triplet 4t, resulting in the decrease of the EST, and therefore facilitating the potential
reactivity of the triplet (Scheme 6.6a). However, increasing solvent polarity results in a
decrease in contribution from the triplet nitrene, therefore, the formation of oxazolidinone
5 is likely not due to direct reaction of the triplet. Enhanced reactivity through singlet
nitrene 4s could be accomplished in the event triplet nitrene 4t was thermally repopulating
the singlet (Scheme 6.6b), which is feasible small ΔEST values.42 In this case, the observed
kinetics of the triplet nitrene would be representative of triplet its repopulation of the
singlet. These mechanisms may also similarly account for the observed growth kinetics of
ylide 8 (Figure 6.6b,c) and amide 10 (Figure 6.8b).
168
Scheme 6.6. Production of 5 from either (a) direct reaction with singlet and triplet
nitrenes 4s and 4t, or (b) solely through the singlet via thermal repopulation.
6.5 Conclusions
N-substituted dibenzothiophene sulifilimine-based precursors 6 and 7 are efficient
photoprecursors to ethoxycarbonylnitrene (2) and t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene (4),
respectively. Computational analysis indicates that both of these nitrenes are ground state
triplets, albeit by small margins. TRIR spectroscopy was used to detect triplet nitrenes 2t
and 4t in several solvents. Ethoxycarbonylnitrene reacts with acetonitrile to form ylide 8
169
and with cyclohexane to form amide 10. Conversely, t-butyloxycarbonylnitrene
exclusively forms the intramolecular C-H insertion product oxazolidinone 5, independent
of solvent. The observed product growth kinetics for ylide 8, amide 10, and oxazolidinone
5 suggest a contribution from both the triplet and singlet nitrene. In addition, solvent
effects on the observed growth kinetics for oxazolidinone 5 indicate that single nitrene 4s
is stabilized relative to triplet nitrene 4t in polar solvent.
6.6 Experimental Methods
6.6.1 General Methods
Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company,
Fisher Scientific, or Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and were used without further
purification. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz
FT-NMR operating at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively. All resonances are reported
in parts per million, and are referenced to residual CHCl3 (7.26 ppm, for 1H, 77.23 ppm for
13C). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained on a VG Analytical VG-70S Magnetic
Sector Mass Spectrometer operating in fast atom bombardment ionization mode. Masses
were referenced to a 10% PEG-200 sample. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption
spectra were obtained using a Hewlett Packard 8453 diode array spectrometer. Infrared
(IR) absorption spectra were obtained using a Bruker IFS 55 Fourier transform infrared
spectrometer.
170
6.6.2 Procedure for the Synthesis of N-Ethoxycarbonyl Dibenzothiophene
Sulfilimine (6)
This compound was prepared by two methods. Method A is analogous to that
reported by Nakayama et al.43 To a solution of trifluroacetic anhydride (0.735g, 3.5 mmol)
in dichloromethane at -78 °C was added dibenzothiophene S-oxide (0.350g, 1.75 mmol)
slowly in dichloromethane, and stirred for 1h. Solid urethane (0.405g, 4.55 mmol) was
added and stirred for an additional 2h at -78 °C, at which point the solution was allowed to
warm slowly to room temperature and quenched with ice-water. The solution was then
washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, dried, filtered, and then evaporated to give the
crude product. The crude product was purified by column chromatography with 90:10
dichloromethane to ethyl acetate to give 0.17 g of 6 as an off-white solid in 37% yield.
Method B began with the synthesis of N-p-tosyldibenzothiophene sulfilimine following a
literature procedure.44 N-p-tosyldibenzothiophene sulfilimine (1.0 g, 2.8 mM) was then
dissolved in 1 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (95%) at room temperature for
approximately 2 hours, and the resulting solution was poured into 100 mL of cold diethyl
ether. After removal of solvent, the oil mixture was dissolved in 100 mL chloroform,
washed with ammonium hydroxide (2x), followed by water (5x), dried with sodium sulfate,
and the solvent was removed. The resulting white solid was then dissolved in 50 mL
benzene, to which diethyl pyrocarbonate (0.45 g, 2.8 mmol) was added. The solution was
allowed to stir for one hour and the benzene was then evaporated, and the residue was
dissolved in 50 mL dichloromethane, washed with water (5x), dried with sodium sulfate,
and the solvent was removed. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel using 10%
ethyl acetate/hexane as an eluent to give 0.38 g (50%) of 6. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.02 (d, J
171
= 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H),
4.10 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 165.76, 138.79,
138.14, 132.48, 129.88, 127.61, 122.30, 62.14, 14.72; HR-MS (FAB): m/z found =
272.07309 (MH+); calc. for C15H14NO2S: 272.07453 (MH+).
6.6.3 Procedure for the Synthesis of N-t-Butyloxycarbonyl Dibenzothiophene
Sulfilimine (7)
The compound was prepared following procedures similar to those used for the
synthesis of 6, where either di-t-butyldicarbonate or t-butyl carbamate was used instead of
diethyl pyrocarbonate or urethane, respectively. Chromatographic purification resulted in
a white solid, 50% yield. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.03 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J = 7.8 Hz,
2H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9 H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 165.39, 139.22, 138.07,
132.37, 129.83, 127.80, 122.26, 79.64, 28.42. HR-MS (FAB): m/z found = 300.10546
(MH+); calc. for C17H18NO2S: 300.10583 (MH+).
6.6.4 Steady-State Photolysis of Oxycarbonylnitrene Precursors 6 and 7
Photolysis of 12 mM solutions of precursors 6 and 7 in deuterated solvent
(dichloromethane or acetonitrile) was performed in a Rayonet reactor (254 nm). After 4
h of photolysis, samples were analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
6.6.5 Time-Resolved IR Methods
TRIR experiments were conducted (with 16 cm-1 spectral resolution) following the
method of Hamaguchi and co-workers,45,46 as has been described previously.47 Briefly, the
172
broadband output of a MoSi2 IR source (JASCO) is crossed with excitation pulses from a
Continuum Minilite II Nd:YAG laser (266 nm, 5 ns, 2 mJ) operating at 15 Hz. Changes in
IR intensity are monitored using an AC-coupled mercury/cadmium/tellurium (MCT)
photovoltaic IR detector (Kolmar Technologies, KMPV11-J1/AC), amplified, digitized
with a Tektronix TDS520A oscilloscope, and collected for data processing. The
experiment is conducted in dispersive mode with a JASCO TRIR 1000 spectrometer.
6.6.6 Computational Methods
Calculations were performed with Spartan ’14.48 Geometries were fully optimized
at the B3LYP level of theory with the 6-31G(d) basis set. Vibrational frequencies were
also calculated to verify minimum energy structures (no imaginary frequencies) or
transition states (one imaginary frequency) and to provide zero-point vibrational energy
corrections.
173
6.7 References
(1) Gritsan, N. P. Properties of Carbonyl Nitrenes and Related Acyl Nitrenes. In Wiley
Series on Reactive Intermediates in Chemistry and Biology, Vol. 6, Nitrenes and
Nitrenium Ions; Falvey, D. E., Gudmundsdottir, A. D., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., 2013; pp 481–548.
(2) Lwowski, W.; Mattingly Jr., T. W. The Decomposition of Ethyl Azidoformate in
Cyclohexene and in Cyclohexane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1947–1958.
(3) Lwowski, W.; Mattingly, T. W. Photodecomposition of Ethyl Azidoformate.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1962, 461, 277–280.
(4) Lwowski, W.; McConaghy, J. S. Carbethoxynitrene. Control of the
Stereospecificity of an Addition to Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5490–
5491.
(5) McConaghy, J. S.; Lwowski, W. Singlet and Triplet Nitrenes. II.
Carbethoxynitrene Generated from Ethyl Azidoformate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967,
89, 2357–2364.
(6) Hafner, K.; Kaiser, W.; Puttner, R. Stereoselectivity of Addition of
Alkoxycarbonylnitrenes to Olefins. Tetrahedron Lett. 1964, 5, 3953–3956.
(7) Kreher, R.; Bockhorn, G. H. The Photodecomposition of Ethylazidoformate in
Aliphatic Alcohols. Angew. Chemie 1964, 76, 681–682.
(8) Puttner, Reinhold, Hafner, K. Dehydrogenation Reactions with Acyl Nitrenes.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1964, 5, 3119–3125.
174
(9) Meth-Cohn, O. New Synthetic Applications of Oxycarbonylnitrenes. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1987, 20, 18–27.
(10) Sigman, M. E.; Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. Aroylnitrenes with Singlet Ground
States: Photochemistry of Acetyl-Substituted Aroyl and Aryloxycarbonyl Azides.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4297–4305.
(11) Buron, C.; Platz, M. S. Laser Flash Photolysis Study of Carboethoxynitrene. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 3383–3385.
(12) Murthy, R. S.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Rajam, S.; Mandel, S. M.; Ault, B. S.;
Gudmundsdottir, A. D. Triplet-Sensitized Photolysis of Alkoxycarbonyl Azides in
Solution and Matrices. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2009, 201, 157–167.
(13) Lwowski, W.; DeMauriac, R. Curtius-Rearrangement of “Rigid” Azides.
Tetrahedron … 1964, 205, 3285–3288.
(14) Tisue, G. T.; Linke, S.; Lwowski, W. Pivaloylnitrene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
6303–6307.
(15) Linke, S.; Tisue, G. T.; Lwowski, W. Curtius and Lossen Rearrangements. II.
Pivaloyl Azide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 6308–6310.
(16) Wilde, R. E.; Srinivasan, T. K. K.; Lwowski, W. Infrared Spectroscopic Study of
the Photolytic Decomposition of Methyl Azidoformate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971,
93, 860–863.
(17) Teles, J. H.; Maier, G. Methoxy- and Aminoisocyanate. Chem. Ber. 1989, 122,
745–748.
175
(18) Pritchina, E. A.; Gritsan, N. P.; Maltsev, A.; Bally, T.; Autrey, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang,
Y.; Toscano, J. P. Matrix Isolation, Time-Resolved IR, and Computational Study
of the Photochemistry of Benzoyl Azide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 1010–
1018.
(19) Kubicki, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Luk, H. L.; Peng, H.-L.; Vyas, S.; Platz, M. S.
Direct Observation of Acyl Azide Excited States and Their Decay Processes by
Ultrafast Time Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
4212–4213.
(20) Kubicki, J.; Zhang, Y.; Vyas, S.; Burdzinski, G.; Luk, H. L.; Wang, J.; Xue, J.;
Peng, H. L.; Pritchina, E. a.; Sliwa, M.; Buntinx, G.; Gritsan, N. P.; Hadad, C. M.;
Platz, M. S. Photochemistry of 2-Naphthoyl Azide. An Ultrafast Time-Resolved
UV-Vis and IR Spectroscopic and Computational Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 9751–9761.
(21) Vyas, S.; Kubicki, J.; Luk, H. L.; Zhang, Y.; Gritsan, N. P.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz,
M. S. An Ultrafast Time-Resolved Infrared and UV-Vis Spectroscopic and
Computational Study of the Photochemistry of Acyl Azides. J. Phys. Org. Chem.
2012, 25, 693–703.
(22) Kubicki, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, J.; Ling Luk, H.; Platz, M. Ultrafast Time Resolved
Studies of the Photochemistry of Acyl and Sulfonyl Azides. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2012, 14, 10377.
(23) Wasserman, E. Electron Spin Resonance of Nitrenes. In Progress in Physical
Organic Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1971; pp 319–336.
176
(24) Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. Are Aroylnitrenes Ground-State Singlets?
Photochemistry of β-Naphthoyl Azide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5814–5820.
(25) Gritsan, N. P.; Pritchina, E. A. Are Aroylnitrenes Species with a Singlet Ground
State? Mendeleev Commun. 2001, 11, 94–95.
(26) Faustov, V.; Baskir, E.; Biryukov, A. Thermal Isomerization of Acetylnitrene: A
Quantum-Chemical Study. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2003, 52, 2328–2333.
(27) Liu, J.; Mandel, S.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz, M. S. A Comparison of Acetyl- and
Methoxycarbonylnitrenes by Computational Methods and a Laser Flash Photolysis
Study of Benzoylnitrene. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8583–8593.
(28) Pritchina, E. a.; Gritsan, N. P.; Bally, T. Ground State Multiplicity of Acylnitrenes:
Computational and Experimental Studies. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 525–532.
(29) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N- Acetyl-,
N- Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N- Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4398–4414.
(30) Zeng, X.; Beckers, H.; Willner, H.; Grote, D.; Sander, W. The Missing Link:
Triplet Fluorocarbonyl Nitrene FC(O)N. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3977–3984.
(31) Sherman, M. P.; Jenks, W. S. Computational Rationalization for the Observed
Ground-State Multiplicities of Fluorinated Acylnitrenes. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79,
8977–8983.
(32) Sun, H.; Zhu, B.; Wu, Z.; Zeng, X.; Beckers, H.; Jenks, W. S. Thermally Persistent
Carbonyl Nitrene: FC(O)N. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 2006–2009.
177
(33) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of Sulfilimine-
Based Nitrene Precursors: Generation of Both Singlet and Triplet Benzoylnitrene.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6848–6859.
(34) Fujita, T.; Kamiyama, H.; Osawa, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Kim, B. J.; Tatami, A.;
Kawashima, W.; Maeda, T.; Nakanishi, A.; Morita, H. Photo SN-Bond Cleavage
and Related Reactions of Thianthrene Sulfilimine Derivatives. Tetrahedron 2007,
63, 7708–7716.
(35) Fujita, T.; Maeda, T.; Kim, B. J.; Tatami, A.; Miyamoto, D.; Kawaguchi, H.;
Tsuchiya, N.; Yoshida, M.; Kawashima, W.; Morita, H. Photolytic Aziridination
by Thianthrene Sulfilimine Derivatives. J. Sulfur Chem. 2008, 29, 459–465.
(36) Morita, H.; Tatami, A.; Maeda, T.; Kim, B. J.; Kawashima, W.; Yoshimura, T.;
Abe, H.; Akasaka, T. Generation of Nitrene by the Photolysis of N-Substituted
Iminodibenzothiophene. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7159–7163.
(37) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of
Hartree−Fock, Møller−Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density
Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100,
16502–16513.
(38) Liu, Y.; Evans, A. S.; Toscano, J. P. Nanosecond Time-Resolved IR Study of
Thiobenzoylnitrene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 10438–10444.
(39) Pandey, R. K.; Dagade, S. P.; Dongare, M. K.; Kumar, P. Synthesis of Carbamates
Using Yttria-Zirconia Based Lewis Acid Catalyst. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33,
4019–4027.
178
(40) Huard, K.; Lebel, H. N-Tosyloxycarbamates as Reagents in Rhodium-Catalyzed
C-H Amination Reactions. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2008, 14, 6222–6230.
(41) Geise, C. M.; Wang, Y.; Mykhaylova, O.; Frink, B. T.; Toscano, J. P.; Hadad, C.
M. Computational and Experimental Studies of the Effect of Substituents on the
Singlet−Triplet Energy Gap in Phenyl(carbomethoxy)carbene. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 3079–3088.
(42) Douglas, Peter, Burrows, H.D., Evans, R. C. Foundations of Photochemistry: A
Background on the Interaction Between Light and Molecules. In Applied
Photochemistry; Evans, R. C., Douglas, P., Burrow, H. D., Eds.; Springer
Netherlands, 2013; pp 1–88.
(43) Nakayama, J.; Yu, T.; Sugihara, Y.; Ishii, A. Synthesis and Characterization of
Thiophene 1-Oxides Kinetically Stabilized by Bulky Substituents at the 3- and 4-
Positions. Chem. Lett. 1997, 26, 499–500.
(44) Svoronos, P.; Horak, V. Sulfilimines from Sulfides Using P -Toluenesulfonyl
Azide and Thermal Copper Catalysis. Synthesis (Stuttg). 1979, 1979, 596–597.
(45) Iwata, K.; Hamaguchi, H.-O. Construction of a Versatile Microsecond Time-
Resolved Infrared Spectrometer. Appl. Spectrosc. 1990, 44, 1431–1437.
(46) Yuzawa, T.; Kato, C.; George, M. W.; Hamaguchi, H. Nanosecond Time-Resolved
Infrared Spectroscopy with a Dispersive Scanning Spectrometer. Appl. Spectrosc.
1994, 48, 684–690.
(47) Wang, Y. H.; Yuzawa, T.; Hamaguchi, H. O.; Toscano, J. P. Time-Resolved IR
179
Studies of 2-Naphthyl(carbomethoxy)carbene: Reactivity and Direct Experimental
Estimate of the Singlet/triplet Energy Gap. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2875–
2882.
(48) Shao, Y.; Molnar, L. F.; Jung, Y.; Kussmann, J.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Brown, S. T.;
Gilbert, A. T. B.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Levchenko, S. V.; O’Neill, D. P.; DiStasio Jr,
R. A.; Lochan, R. C.; Wang, T.; Beran, G. J. O.; Besley, N. A.; Herbert, J. M.; Yeh
Lin, C.; Van Voorhis, T.; Hung Chien, S.; Sodt, A.; Steele, R. P.; Rassolov, V. A.;
Maslen, P. E.; Korambath, P. P.; Adamson, R. D.; Austin, B.; Baker, J.; Byrd, E.
F. C.; Dachsel, H.; Doerksen, R. J.; Dreuw, A.; Dunietz, B. D.; Dutoi, A. D.;
Furlani, T. R.; Gwaltney, S. R.; Heyden, A.; Hirata, S.; Hsu, C.-P.; Kedziora, G.;
Khalliulin, R. Z.; Klunzinger, P.; Lee, A. M.; Lee, M. S.; Liang, W.; Lotan, I.;
Nair, N.; Peters, B.; Proynov, E. I.; Pieniazek, P. A.; Min Rhee, Y.; Ritchie, J.;
Rosta, E.; David Sherrill, C.; Simmonett, A. C.; Subotnik, J. E.; Lee Woodcock III,
H.; Zhang, W.; Bell, A. T.; Chakraborty, A. K.; Chipman, D. M.; Keil, F. J.;
Warshel, A.; Hehre, W. J.; Schaefer III, H. F.; Kong, J.; Krylov, A. I.; Gill, P. M.
W.; Head-Gordon, M. Advances in Methods and Algorithms in a Modern
Quantum Chemistry Program Package. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3172.
180
6.8 Supporting Information Chapter 5
6.8.1 Optimized Geometries and Energies
Table S6.1. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the syn-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2ssyn (Dipole moment = 4.55 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -322.402226 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.082710276 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.089593919 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.1849282 -0.5839627 0.0000000
O 8 -1.5846722 0.9877074 0.0000000
N 7 -2.2155665 -0.7373761 0.0000000
C 6 2.5444169 -0.1759165 0.0000000
C 6 1.1834965 0.4882771 0.0000000
C 6 -1.0634316 -0.1905919 0.0000000
H 1 1.0243431 1.1051511 -0.8891371
H 1 1.0243431 1.1051511 0.8891371
H 1 3.3244967 0.5926194 0.0000000
H 1 2.6734220 -0.8009292 -0.8887391
H 1 2.6734220 -0.8009292 0.8887391
181
Table S6.2. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2ssyn.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
34 1.63 1311 0.53
118 0.21 1411 77.13
181 2.35 1413 25.43
250 0.23 1452 34.43
353 15.40 1514 6.70
448 10.67 1528 3.45
581 0.24 1546 8.25
627 29.38 1826 369.21
825 0.76 3069 9.78
854 7.11 3086 11.13
1020 5.08 3131 1.83
1100 200.99 3142 16.78
1141 3.83 3155 30.15
1188 4.55
182
Table S6.3. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tsyn. (Dipole moment = 3.26 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -322.4225538 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.082232539 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.089074246 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.1059323 -0.5089712 -0.0081129
O 8 -1.4622653 1.1535638 0.0069326
N 7 -2.1171029 -1.0235922 0.0016209
C 6 2.4870834 -0.2676857 0.0098588
C 6 1.1702556 0.4820998 -0.0115201
C 6 -1.1410471 -0.0259254 0.0008665
H 1 2.5818281 -0.9174423 -0.8655912
H 1 2.5717111 -0.8839294 0.9102334
H 1 3.3163549 0.4477312 0.0013852
H 1 1.0590366 1.1031920 -0.9062782
H 1 1.0437024 1.1279209 0.8631153
183
Table S6.4. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tsyn.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
58 0.88 1280 326.72
150 0.35 1305 0.80
193 0.96 1413 4.18
267 0.18 1453 14.03
361 16.10 1517 6.21
430 4.28 1525 1.82
630 5.79 1541 7.48
682 36.00 1672 201.41
820 0.42 3066 12.37
870 7.15 3076 11.14
989 6.95 3118 5.55
1062 86.94 3138 19.06
1146 5.22 3148 30.89
1188 4.46
184
Table S6.5. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the anti-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2santi. (Dipole moment = 4.75 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -322.402280 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.082765276 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.089640424 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.1845572 -0.5205227 0.0055243
O 8 -2.1431315 -0.7176314 -0.0023593
N 7 -1.6730702 1.0481120 -0.0027249
C 6 2.5622626 -0.2057985 -0.0045926
C 6 1.2265364 0.5065796 0.0037296
C 6 -1.0399068 -0.0594773 0.0011224
H 1 1.0868542 1.1315926 -0.8844323
H 1 1.0948411 1.1262961 0.8968483
H 1 3.3705360 0.5328990 -0.0038490
H 1 2.6640873 -0.8305381 -0.8969632
H 1 2.6704131 -0.8396231 0.8805927
185
Table S6.6. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2santi.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
41 1.63 1312 0.95
129 0.04 1403 83.40
169 2.75 1434 22.57
257 0.13 1458 23.55
348 11.64 1515 6.90
472 7.52 1528 3.60
562 0.84 1546 9.41
628 28.75 1817 394.75
828 0.97 3070 8.61
865 13.79 3073 12.59
1022 12.70 3118 8.25
1101 156.69 3143 15.43
1149 13.03 3152 25.03
1190 4.64
186
Table S6.7. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tanti.. (Dipole moment = 3.77 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -322.4162641 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.081918123 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.088766571 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.1178635 -0.5002564 -0.0053311
O 8 -2.0998488 -0.8458674 0.0017670
N 7 -1.4251950 1.2888565 0.0033517
C 6 2.4956771 -0.2715079 0.0050174
C 6 1.1843073 0.4891813 -0.0050299
C 6 -1.1504205 -0.0711407 0.0000248
H 1 2.5786505 -0.9124753 -0.8779128
H 1 2.5731221 -0.8990422 0.8980353
H 1 3.3325569 0.4348759 0.0023927
H 1 1.0891711 1.1175667 -0.8972161
H 1 1.0813633 1.1268736 0.8796785
187
Table S6.8. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene 2tanti.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
51 0.39 1279 345.68
129 0.45 1314 0.61
197 0.24 1412 22.05
268 0.42 1450 29.49
353 8.63 1516 6.31
508 10.92 1526 4.70
551 11.17 1542 9.09
656 39.12 1634 216.30
826 0.77 3063 18.54
842 14.32 3067 10.82
984 2.82 3107 12.98
1069 56.67 3140 19.04
1139 41.41 3149 26.61
1186 4.55
188
Table S6.9. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4ssyn. . (Dipole moment = 4.80 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -401.037929 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.138609656 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.147923845 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 -0.2371798 -0.8614080 0.0000000
O 8 -1.8493200 0.9000120 0.0000000
N 7 -2.6312507 -0.7387603 0.0000000
C 6 0.9832474 0.0100739 0.0000000
C 6 0.9882699 0.8533212 1.2755995
C 6 0.9882699 0.8533212 -1.2755995
C 6 2.1150022 -1.0142107 0.0000000
C 6 -1.4245733 -0.3229676 0.0000000
H 1 0.9284562 0.2104678 2.1599027
H 1 0.1527961 1.5573965 1.2967731
H 1 1.9220404 1.4233166 1.3307840
H 1 0.1527961 1.5573965 -1.2967731
H 1 0.9284562 0.2104678 -2.1599027
H 1 1.9220404 1.4233166 -1.3307840
H 1 2.0616005 -1.6502424 0.8886284
H 1 3.0796701 -0.4966156 0.0000000
H 1 2.0616005 -1.6502424 -0.8886284
189
Table S6.10. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4ssyn.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
73 0.05 1287 17.48
104 0.44 1297 12.34
171 3.03 1393 78.13
212 0.06 1428 14.66
262 0.00 1432 16.61
275 0.13 1458 12.39
308 4.07 1501 0.36
343 0.45 1517 0.27
361 6.62 1521 0.02
418 3.65 1526 2.58
451 1.27 1530 4.90
459 15.63 1553 5.62
582 1.36 1822 397.13
630 30.38 3062 6.46
745 7.84 3062 13.57
833 18.99 3070 8.99
937 0.07 3131 5.02
941 0.21 3132 7.39
986 0.07 3142 32.89
1061 29.32 3144 19.63
1067 0.60 3152 4.22
1094 133.36 3155 16.50
1211 92.92
190
Table S6.11. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tsyn. (Dipole moment = 3.50 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -401.055453 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.138014188 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.147310667 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 -0.3428895 -0.7469401 0.0000000
O 8 -1.7121645 1.1060193 0.0000000
N 7 -2.5990977 -0.9772631 0.0000000
C 6 1.9708044 -1.1637659 0.0000000
C 6 0.9556666 -0.0210388 0.0000000
C 6 1.0666436 0.8209539 -1.2738815
C 6 1.0666436 0.8209539 1.2738815
C 6 -1.5081790 -0.1007254 0.0000000
H 1 2.9873225 -0.7574348 0.0000000
H 1 1.8463332 -1.7910808 -0.8881016
H 1 1.8463332 -1.7910808 0.8881016
H 1 2.0685093 1.2610015 -1.3294038
H 1 0.3327918 1.6291523 -1.2841589
H 1 0.9210249 0.1946154 -2.1603947
H 1 2.0685093 1.2610015 1.3294038
H 1 0.9210249 0.1946154 2.1603947
H 1 0.3327918 1.6291523 1.2841589
191
Table S6.12. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tsyn.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
84 0.28 1281 16.02
105 0.10 1284 163.88
184 1.53 1300 42.34
185 0.08 1433 16.37
234 0.01 1435 14.38
268 0.09 1459 9.33
314 1.60 1501 0.83
330 8.80 1517 0.13
351 0.52 1519 1.43
427 0.46 1526 12.11
456 0.76 1532 1.50
459 13.90 1552 8.36
623 1.36 1672 215.45
681 38.13 3062 18.09
758 9.72 3062 5.73
839 18.14 3070 14.22
935 0.13 3125 7.00
938 0.42 3127 12.28
988 0.14 3142 33.35
1000 41.86 3143 24.14
1069 0.50 3165 1.30
1071 4.86 3169 13.09
1207 210.37
192
Table S6.13. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4santi. (Dipole moment = 5.03 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -401.038454 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.138535308 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.147842908 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 -0.2534488 -0.8054490 0.0038519
O 8 -2.5802651 -0.7059322 0.0002841
N 7 -1.9175779 0.9822184 -0.0001882
C 6 1.0025075 0.0070112 -0.0005382
C 6 1.0396760 0.8597119 1.2683846
C 6 1.0394668 0.8454868 -1.2788467
C 6 2.0921441 -1.0613689 0.0062179
C 6 -1.4007152 -0.1848331 0.0016673
H 1 0.9596714 0.2278842 2.1587200
H 1 0.2285068 1.5942245 1.2904215
H 1 1.9900416 1.4018821 1.3162592
H 1 0.2272309 1.5783537 -1.3074743
H 1 0.9595943 0.2035490 -2.1619311
H 1 1.9892788 1.3879378 -1.3328696
H 1 2.0091345 -1.6912604 0.8970262
H 1 3.0775265 -0.5847827 0.0065926
H 1 2.0132968 -1.6983150 -0.8798245
193
Table S6.14. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4santi.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
50 0.05 1285 16.66
112 0.44 1298 23.26
168 3.10 1405 75.01
201 0.06 1432 17.96
255 0.03 1438 16.05
268 0.16 1461 8.01
307 3.94 1501 0.63
345 0.14 1516 0.02
359 3.08 1516 0.32
424 3.73 1525 1.77
453 0.65 1529 9.07
469 7.03 1549 5.39
574 3.36 1810 379.44
639 29.67 3060 10.05
754 7.75 3062 7.52
842 29.00 3069 5.46
936 0.07 3132 0.93
944 0.24 3134 7.01
988 0.00 3138 5.00
1056 24.75 3141 23.29
1068 1.01 3145 31.56
1095 93.59 3146 24.24
1213 90.75
194
Table S6.15. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tanti. (Dipole moment = 4.16 debye)
UB3LYP/6-31G* energy -401.049860 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.137551343 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.146845346 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 -0.3325283 -0.7490762 0.0002323
O 8 -2.5680307 -0.7957221 -0.0000714
N 7 -1.6505805 1.2338505 0.0001032
C 6 1.9758952 -1.1619497 -0.0011845
C 6 0.9574946 -0.0205840 0.0000005
C 6 1.0759895 0.8211867 -1.2738821
C 6 1.0770784 0.8195362 1.2748557
C 6 -1.5260984 -0.1470822 0.0000536
H 1 1.8492832 -1.7886676 -0.8891079
H 1 1.8498704 -1.7896301 0.8861259
H 1 2.9926207 -0.7561986 -0.0013079
H 1 2.0814419 1.2512416 -1.3384585
H 1 0.3571225 1.6465716 -1.2833189
H 1 0.9117293 0.1999088 -2.1603208
H 1 2.0817384 1.2516488 1.3377632
H 1 0.9160914 0.1965777 2.1607175
H 1 0.3564817 1.6433390 1.2868393
195
Table S6.16. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 4tanti.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
76 0.05 1268 60.80
92 0.02 1281 16.32
186 0.15 1299 120.53
186 0.06 1436 16.16
233 0.04 1436 11.68
269 0.00 1462 11.01
311 2.79 1502 0.80
351 0.53 1510 0.03
360 2.21 1515 0.41
402 3.48 1529 7.12
457 2.31 1530 1.42
515 15.99 1545 5.22
562 5.87 1616 240.38
659 37.40 3057 11.21
757 8.46 3060 7.44
837 15.30 3069 7.28
933 0.10 3127 0.25
936 1.03 3130 17.56
984 0.00 3134 7.09
1006 40.34 3136 29.06
1064 0.17 3144 33.78
1067 1.18 3146 24.63
1202 228.38
196
Table S6.17. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the syn-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nsyn. (Dipole moment = 3.46 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -243.773552 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.025526570 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.030307679 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 1.3445373 -0.1534703 0.0000000
O 8 -0.7592090 0.9264737 0.0000000
N 7 -0.9357988 -0.9174864 0.0000000
C 6 0.0284869 -0.0862276 0.0000000
H 1 1.6970436 0.7557431 0.0000000
Table S6.18. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nsyn.
Frequency Intensity
422 11.39
433 137.39
490 24.40
622 33.58
1027 47.30
1181 94.13
1485 142.75
1845 227.83
3699 100.97
197
Table S6.19. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the syn-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nsyn. (Dipole moment = 2.29 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -243.794368 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.025213944 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.029846852 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 1.2043522 -0.3416958 0.0000000
O 8 -0.4979783 1.1764682 0.0000000
N 7 -0.9798527 -1.0446951 0.0000000
C 6 -0.0882084 0.0263958 0.0000000
H 1 1.7372279 0.4763113 0.0000000
Table S6.20. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nsyn.
Frequency Intensity
428 3.56
534 54.35
562 44.28
701 104.83
923 1.37
1169 257.92
1394 29.57
1678 208.65
3679 76.53
198
Table S6.21. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the anti-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nanti. (Dipole moment = 3.76 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -243.772572 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.025567362 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.030325771 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 1.3422017 0.1459845 0.0000000
O 8 -0.8792331 0.8454853 0.0000000
N 7 -0.8183908 -0.9907199 0.0000000
C 6 0.0375852 -0.0470615 0.0000000
H 1 1.7994753 -0.7143500 0.0000000
Table S6.22. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-singlet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 1HOC(O)Nanti.
Frequency Intensity
434 120.71
438 21.36
498 7.83
625 42.12
1022 34.80
1179 138.76
1501 39.67
1818 287.42
3706 90.39
199
Table S6.23. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the anti-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nanti. (Dipole moment = 2.91 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -243.790114 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.024870581 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.029566144 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 1.1850682 0.4237265 0.0000000
O 8 -1.0366096 0.7940118 0.0000000
N 7 -0.3378040 -1.3540614 0.0000000
C 6 -0.0995243 0.0148493 0.0000000
H 1 1.7741055 -0.3525722 0.0000000
Table S6.24. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-triplet hydroxycarbonylnitrene 3HOC(O)Nsyn.
Frequency Intensity
410 25.08
492 154.17
571 5.96
658 17.53
921 23.38
1160 1.02
1335 358.49
1674 111.34
3697 70.58
200
Table S6.25. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the singlet formylnitrene 1HC(O)N. (Dipole moment = 3.06 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -168.538743 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.020070961 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.024151556 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.8817724 0.2823347 0.0000000
N 7 -0.9003836 0.4049873 0.0000000
C 6 -0.1052069 -0.5721507 0.0000000
H 1 -0.1202531 -1.6606852 0.0000000
Table S6.26. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for singlet formylnitrene 1HC(O)N.
Frequency Intensity
507 11.21
936 2.08
1080 42.63
1350 14.90
1719 13.82
3217 5.01
201
Table S6.27. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the triplet formylnitrene 3HC(O)N. (Dipole moment = 1.81 debye)
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -168.551707 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.018805068 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.022925351 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 1.0607928 0.2492620 0.0000000
N 7 -1.2046797 0.2580159 0.0000000
C 6 -0.0029283 -0.3848547 0.0000000
H 1 -0.0360151 -1.4910790 0.0000000
Table S6.28. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for triplet formylnitrene 3HC(O)N.
Frequency Intensity
474 34.46
900 5.48
1034 9.38
1380 2.84
1474 33.12
2992 49.76
202
Table S6.29. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 12TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -322.391856 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.082009077 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.088946423 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 -0.2022552 0.0254922 0.5407753
O 8 1.8880580 0.8949285 -0.1414016
N 7 1.9374485 -0.9439754 -0.0370750
C 6 -2.5630977 0.0670042 0.1159209
C 6 -1.2027368 -0.1222912 -0.5194385
C 6 1.0604425 -0.0465543 0.1541921
H 1 -1.0015728 0.6325078 -1.2870332
H 1 -1.0903275 -1.1182631 -0.9604677
H 1 -3.3401540 -0.0355668 -0.6490800
H 1 -2.6461325 1.0610433 0.5651179
H 1 -2.7380235 -0.6842104 0.8919511
203
Table S6.30. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for singlet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 12TS.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-127 1.15 1307 2.12
29 0.72 1375 115.17
172 4.58 1415 13.59
262 0.14 1447 29.74
335 14.39 1512 7.16
438 4.46 1529 2.99
507 6.72 1545 6.49
687 4.42 1804 313.78
824 1.28 3067 20.77
845 24.93 3067 8.45
1014 6.81 3114 10.16
1087 237.53 3140 17.18
1141 7.51 3151 24.79
1183 4.42
204
Table S6.31. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 32TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -322.406497 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.081190566 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.088100374 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 -0.1365246 -0.0311651 0.5132095
O 8 1.8242503 -1.0294335 -0.0860061
N 7 1.7171471 1.2320259 -0.0495643
C 6 -2.5041736 -0.0228614 0.1464102
C 6 -1.1481864 0.0205148 -0.5286150
C 6 1.1585924 -0.0213163 0.0985252
H 1 -2.6340254 0.8375033 0.8099689
H 1 -2.6103459 -0.9382758 0.7361532
H 1 -3.2949606 -0.0012761 -0.6112882
H 1 -1.0184863 0.9428507 -1.1085146
H 1 -1.0014113 -0.8382181 -1.1949186
205
Table S6.32. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for triplet Ethoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 32TS.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-122 2.47 1200 309.77
63 0.26 1312 1.25
187 2.60 1417 19.62
246 0.28 1450 32.76
335 8.94 1512 6.43
436 1.65 1530 2.42
579 15.80 1548 8.55
693 13.28 1610 143.90
832 2.56 3046 26.63
839 20.77 3067 11.01
975 18.16 3092 18.84
1061 116.29 3139 19.88
1138 26.15 3149 23.25
1185 8.75
206
Table S6.33. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 14TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -401.029715 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.137859437 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.147244089 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.2061566 -0.0025986 0.8602736
O 8 2.2221037 0.8748164 -0.0167456
N 7 2.2390164 -0.9566874 -0.0362335
C 6 -0.9927710 0.0012238 -0.0429245
C 6 -1.0650218 -1.3538514 -0.7452097
C 6 -0.8640247 1.1630065 -1.0277721
C 6 -2.1470461 0.2030776 0.9324694
C 6 1.4029820 -0.0677014 0.3162345
H 1 -1.1397269 -2.1647983 -0.0139120
H 1 -0.1810307 -1.5255437 -1.3677193
H 1 -1.9479560 -1.3887423 -1.3925644
H 1 -0.0127745 1.0295064 -1.7028397
H 1 -0.7363814 2.1096966 -0.4943243
H 1 -1.7721562 1.2275101 -1.6368100
H 1 -2.1738032 -0.6063582 1.6679653
H 1 -3.0957684 0.2087446 0.3860131
H 1 -2.0443103 1.1545234 1.4628163
207
Table S6.34. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for singlet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 14TS.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-74 0.09 1284 13.95
52 0.08 1299 23.24
158 5.00 1363 87.86
206 0.04 1435 14.92
260 0.04 1437 13.95
270 0.08 1461 9.23
301 6.39 1503 0.28
322 0.58 1509 0.41
376 6.02 1513 0.08
422 3.09 1528 2.71
427 3.88 1532 6.24
463 0.47 1542 6.67
528 10.14 1799 311.22
637 7.85 3059 9.21
767 16.15 3062 8.61
836 47.61 3069 6.62
933 0.03 3130 0.32
939 0.58 3134 7.89
985 0.01 3139 10.30
1049 103.11 3141 22.88
1066 0.85 3145 25.02
1078 69.95 3147 24.16
1207 96.44
208
Table S6.35. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
the triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 34TS.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -401.042161 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.136692230 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.146075625 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
O 8 0.2779540 -0.0905718 0.7973229
O 8 2.2010301 -1.0026846 -0.0118119
N 7 1.9970753 1.2450350 -0.0052340
C 6 -0.9517879 -1.1819694 -1.0150273
C 6 -0.9493680 -0.0093622 -0.0316406
C 6 -2.0692200 -0.1382267 0.9988137
C 6 -1.0026430 1.3419064 -0.7485921
C 6 1.5037401 -0.0248348 0.2267034
H 1 -1.8911628 -1.1916496 -1.5788074
H 1 -0.8536890 -2.1317352 -0.4816151
H 1 -0.1289065 -1.1064467 -1.7334256
H 1 -3.0434602 -0.1056514 0.4998173
H 1 -2.0221535 0.6803986 1.7237292
H 1 -1.9857141 -1.0855953 1.5400783
H 1 -1.9497468 1.4354780 -1.2911735
H 1 -0.1906521 1.4464267 -1.4766552
H 1 -0.9302420 2.1645007 -0.0309412
209
Table S6.36. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for triplet t-butoxycarbonylnitrene rotation transition state 34TS.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
-66 1.27 1234 26.58
37 0.29 1278 16.22
165 1.86 1295 20.05
198 0.04 1424 15.80
254 0.01 1431 13.09
264 0.06 1455 7.99
296 2.74 1500 0.21
318 1.58 1507 0.47
380 2.45 1513 0.07
404 0.56 1523 3.93
440 5.70 1528 4.50
476 0.99 1542 4.76
570 16.58 1601 165.48
667 7.62 3056 8.38
756 23.09 3059 15.03
834 30.34 3066 4.75
927 0.12 3122 4.86
935 3.02 3128 28.68
978 2.28 3135 18.22
983 87.39 3140 3.48
1055 1.25 3142 27.47
1066 2.01 3146 27.15
1176 346.59
210
Table S6. 37. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections
for the syn-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -455.230639 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.133213464 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.142894936 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
C 6 0.3523481 -0.0898696 0.0000000
O 8 1.5868383 0.4585713 0.0000000
C 6 2.6726596 -0.4866861 0.0000000
H 1 2.5890821 -1.1301190 0.8826815
H 1 2.5890821 -1.1301190 -0.8826815
C 6 3.9644716 0.3098778 0.0000000
H 1 4.0289178 0.9483600 0.8870024
H 1 4.0289178 0.9483600 -0.8870024
H 1 4.8230558 -0.3708331 0.0000000
O 8 0.1296893 -1.2899111 0.0000000
N 7 -0.5819369 0.9453118 0.0000000
N 7 -1.7793356 0.4945702 0.0000000
C 6 -2.8975220 0.1811652 0.0000000
C 6 -4.3015387 -0.2053898 0.0000000
H 1 -4.8143333 0.1747462 0.8908718
H 1 -4.3762147 -1.2981820 0.0000000
H 1 -4.8143333 0.1747462 -0.8908718
211
Table S6.38. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for the syn-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
25 2.04 1193 4.17
31 0.20 1288 1151.09
74 7.45 1301 0.28
78 6.13 1335 600.69
116 0.09 1416 51.98
168 0.36 1444 19.77
188 3.27 1452 7.87
269 1.53 1493 10.56
274 0.41 1502 9.63
363 13.08 1517 4.62
449 2.46 1527 1.71
491 3.86 1547 4.81
491 1.15 1768 255.51
755 24.17 2441 359.24
763 0.56 3050 15.11
818 0.03 3059 20.59
825 16.67 3064 22.19
920 7.11 3101 13.49
1004 11.92 3116 2.69
1060 2.12 3128 2.70
1060 11.19 3130 29.91
1092 96.15 3139 40.28
1150 8.31
212
Table S6. 39. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections
for the anti-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -455.226370 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.133374386 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.143041193 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
C 6 -0.3551402 -0.6890410 0.0006956
O 8 -1.7021155 -0.5839471 0.0008247
C 6 -2.3325364 0.7120337 0.0025093
H 1 -2.0172880 1.2714107 0.8898792
H 1 -2.0106817 1.2769062 -0.8788564
C 6 -3.8325710 0.4740399 -0.0030553
H 1 -4.1379832 -0.0963266 0.8799342
H 1 -4.1333520 -0.0861660 -0.8940882
H 1 -4.3641576 1.4323226 0.0010826
O 8 0.1824679 -1.7787926 -0.0001094
N 7 0.2865589 0.5588257 0.0010641
N 7 1.5591100 0.4274010 0.0002814
C 6 2.7186744 0.3819762 -0.0011667
C 6 4.1739302 0.3327050 -0.0007562
H 1 4.5840640 0.8280349 -0.8880230
H 1 4.4993995 -0.7131845 -0.0083984
H 1 4.5833559 0.8150507 0.8939689
213
Table S6.40. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for the anti-ethoxycarbonylnitrene-acetonitrile ylide 9.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
49 2.41 1190 3.87
71 0.59 1272 1133.02
81 6.80 1301 0.11
88 2.75 1324 405.94
129 0.00 1407 33.02
169 0.29 1443 15.39
188 0.24 1448 2.67
269 1.53 1494 11.08
286 0.44 1502 9.74
335 0.84 1518 4.55
486 2.55 1529 4.92
497 3.19 1548 0.60
544 14.67 1797 368.23
658 1.82 2445 339.15
745 25.61 3052 12.61
823 0.22 3060 24.42
860 8.19 3062 19.92
895 0.19 3103 15.01
996 9.60 3119 2.31
1060 11.35 3130 2.05
1061 2.29 3131 29.00
1089 57.08 3141 38.72
1149 90.43
214
Table S6.41. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -1182.779443 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.248654539 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.263385183 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
H 1 0.8073731 -2.6454561 -0.7004214
C 6 -0.2102720 -2.5018047 -0.3537613
C 6 -2.8505430 -2.0460356 0.5547557
C 6 -0.7515278 -1.2241001 -0.2972131
C 6 -1.0126904 -3.5654987 0.0706302
C 6 -2.3199920 -3.3368979 0.5142633
C 6 -2.0577178 -0.9673578 0.1525418
H 1 -0.6162677 -4.5765617 0.0523204
H 1 -2.9331401 -4.1752833 0.8328485
H 1 -3.8683512 -1.8844373 0.8991991
C 6 -2.3889964 0.4637118 0.1332233
C 6 -2.5767061 3.2583145 0.0260297
C 6 -1.3273555 1.2569649 -0.3311952
C 6 -3.5703345 1.0969473 0.5313870
C 6 -3.6556162 2.4886373 0.4747061
C 6 -1.3938895 2.6415070 -0.3901477
H 1 -4.4116543 0.5126600 0.8931832
H 1 -4.5713032 2.9805116 0.7904748
H 1 -0.5434761 3.2233263 -0.7303921
H 1 -2.6554613 4.3410816 0.0018010
S 16 0.0700215 0.2814714 -0.8829485
N 7 1.2777348 0.8356163 0.1121213
C 6 2.4164788 0.1552327 -0.2199942
O 8 2.5099072 -0.8437529 -0.9480833
O 8 3.4889718 0.7115747 0.3938449
C 6 4.7384205 0.0278791 0.1968831
H 1 4.6346302 -1.0155328 0.5147167
H 1 4.9851180 0.0210713 -0.8705651
215
C 6 5.7865480 0.7648968 1.0115466
H 1 5.5211418 0.7694088 2.0737419
H 1 5.8802041 1.8035163 0.6779616
H 1 6.7608302 0.2758866 0.8994338
Table S6.42. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
or syn-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 6.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
35 0.61 1049 1.10
55 0.47 1057 2.21
61 0.07 1074 3.55
89 1.32 1094 4.23
95 1.95 1127 88.14
119 3.92 1148 8.42
132 1.73 1151 6.90
160 5.05 1160 0.87
185 2.37 1196 2.75
199 0.86 1196 1.55
234 10.18 1198 0.64
285 1.44 1259 3.19
286 0.12 1308 56.40
302 11.47 1309 7.78
374 13.23 1321 1268.37
400 0.76 1335 49.70
416 0.58 1350 2.35
421 3.38 1384 0.27
443 5.91 1422 91.81
480 3.44 1452 19.67
497 8.67 1475 14.76
509 21.53 1493 26.92
548 12.67 1511 10.47
569 0.36 1518 4.41
629 5.33 1523 1.29
700 1.10 1528 2.22
711 0.64 1550 4.44
726 11.92 1629 2.66
740 1.87 1637 0.26
759 2.09 1645 0.50
769 88.09 1652 0.32
772 69.16 1675 201.94
777 15.70 3058 23.38
792 3.90 3062 25.99
809 29.08 3099 14.92
824 1.76 3129 31.91
882 0.03 3138 40.39
894 0.09 3190 3.99
911 4.75 3193 0.69
950 0.71 3203 4.93
968 1.41 3205 13.43
216
992 0.06 3214 21.26
1003 0.67 3215 19.72
1018 0.02 3226 8.78
1031 24.90 3237 7.00
Table S6.43. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
anti-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 6.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -1182.776940 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.248537685 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.263284060 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
H 1 0.2843726 -2.9759812 -0.6885767
C 6 -0.6517286 -2.6058961 -0.2853915
C 6 -3.0608709 -1.5590988 0.7693662
C 6 -0.9171112 -1.2424965 -0.2840770
C 6 -1.6163534 -3.4527635 0.2696223
C 6 -2.8085394 -2.9322823 0.7849056
C 6 -2.1013946 -0.6936168 0.2364920
H 1 -1.4365621 -4.5234690 0.2980344
H 1 -3.5507694 -3.6054427 1.2048126
H 1 -3.9920424 -1.1699972 1.1716519
C 6 -2.1354485 0.7714462 0.1381629
C 6 -1.7686110 3.5335086 -0.1700769
C 6 -0.9752767 1.2996306 -0.4511379
C 6 -3.1304249 1.6569443 0.5637439
C 6 -2.9397018 3.0304297 0.4071306
C 6 -0.7703216 2.6623955 -0.6142062
H 1 -4.0415184 1.2812181 1.0207286
H 1 -3.7110688 3.7179165 0.7424031
H 1 0.1464930 3.0363122 -1.0585823
H 1 -1.6326009 4.6057047 -0.2752986
S 16 0.1485134 0.0236353 -1.0192149
N 7 1.5103730 0.3465965 -0.1163687
C 6 2.4369512 -0.5982204 -0.4700490
217
O 8 2.2390426 -1.5978089 -1.1696569
O 8 3.6777104 -0.3981752 0.0373888
C 6 3.9355996 0.7745118 0.8304317
H 1 3.7139717 1.6712180 0.2406752
H 1 3.2713044 0.7797609 1.7014835
C 6 5.3974728 0.7235619 1.2398866
H 1 6.0472179 0.7167791 0.3587960
H 1 5.6051702 -0.1778701 1.8254138
H 1 5.6477365 1.5990582 1.8498036
Table S6.44. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-5-ethoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 6.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
27 0.73 1049 1.79
51 0.99 1057 1.71
60 0.35 1073 4.85
72 4.77 1094 5.49
96 1.27 1116 52.22
127 2.05 1148 73.69
151 0.48 1152 3.95
158 4.89 1160 0.62
184 7.69 1191 3.25
202 1.68 1197 0.43
229 10.07 1198 0.57
267 0.62 1259 4.61
287 0.38 1305 35.23
295 2.99 1308 62.15
364 1.12 1315 999.07
401 0.33 1335 15.75
420 1.77 1350 2.48
434 6.33 1384 0.16
461 9.07 1413 46.35
480 9.32 1445 6.22
497 2.19 1475 13.94
536 15.13 1493 28.25
564 32.55 1510 10.77
569 0.72 1515 4.34
629 4.82 1524 1.37
641 16.70 1527 4.70
701 1.42 1549 1.51
715 2.90 1628 2.74
728 12.07 1637 0.26
750 4.39 1644 0.63
773 74.43 1652 0.77
775 33.02 1692 273.54
778 13.17 3058 27.30
793 3.26 3061 15.84
822 0.18 3098 14.52
835 23.26 3128 27.69
884 0.31 3139 37.65
218
895 0.13 3191 3.48
910 3.88 3194 0.79
952 0.83 3203 5.74
970 1.60 3206 10.31
991 0.06 3215 19.86
1006 1.02 3215 20.18
1018 0.05 3225 11.42
1025 11.60 3242 7.59
Table S6.45. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections for
syn-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -1182.776940 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.248537685 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.263284060 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
H 1 0.3674791 -2.5810075 -0.7669593
C 6 -0.6513278 -2.4713672 -0.4119692
C 6 -3.2975116 -2.1061672 0.5176281
C 6 -1.2272896 -1.2103149 -0.3303495
C 6 -1.4206305 -3.5646438 -0.0018345
C 6 -2.7309968 -3.3805929 0.4530352
C 6 -2.5379356 -0.9986345 0.1299217
H 1 -0.9958755 -4.5636000 -0.0396646
H 1 -3.3183076 -4.2409720 0.7615302
H 1 -4.3176906 -1.9798094 0.8697259
C 6 -2.9102145 0.4223580 0.1352472
C 6 -3.1816682 3.2110979 0.0691315
C 6 -1.8730117 1.2534521 -0.3181732
C 6 -4.1091129 1.0139644 0.5447033
C 6 -4.2362122 2.4030710 0.5082916
C 6 -1.9814313 2.6361159 -0.3568753
H 1 -4.9321640 0.3997848 0.8989228
H 1 -5.1656997 2.8627089 0.8321959
H 1 -1.1493752 3.2479853 -0.6896967
219
H 1 -3.2932521 4.2912181 0.0598805
S 16 -0.4475838 0.3287219 -0.8863514
N 7 0.7399711 0.8944939 0.1286155
C 6 1.9014410 0.2585879 -0.2187511
O 8 2.0035974 -0.7177516 -0.9807072
O 8 2.9418760 0.8442881 0.4154573
C 6 4.2930924 0.2820122 0.3413747
C 6 5.0916881 1.2237134 1.2480915
H 1 4.6858752 1.2147146 2.2648214
H 1 5.0464011 2.2502590 0.8702271
H 1 6.1413011 0.9125541 1.2874455
C 6 4.8168175 0.3463792 -1.0979730
H 1 5.8664211 0.0303079 -1.1265143
H 1 4.7603960 1.3740957 -1.4738141
H 1 4.2324756 -0.3016398 -1.7527135
C 6 4.3091906 -1.1454899 0.9006117
H 1 5.3415380 -1.5094132 0.9596904
H 1 3.7338930 -1.8200137 0.2647073
H 1 3.8850193 -1.1617229 1.9108648
Table S6.46. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for syn-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
35 0.60 761 3.57 1384 2.96
50 0.21 772 75.04 1418 15.37
56 0.43 777 11.06 1423 40.71
79 2.65 785 33.26 1448 30.72
98 1.24 792 4.24 1475 14.47
119 1.74 818 35.69 1493 27.39
136 1.25 881 0.17 1501 0.50
150 1.43 894 0.04 1511 11.43
187 1.59 898 15.86 1521 0.86
190 1.23 935 0.83 1523 3.03
228 0.21 938 0.02 1524 1.02
239 8.65 950 0.85 1525 22.35
258 11.40 968 1.36 1536 0.76
267 3.19 979 0.26 1559 14.52
290 3.82 991 0.06 1629 2.59
304 0.11 1003 0.63 1637 0.61
329 14.53 1018 0.02 1645 1.66
348 2.70 1050 1.38 1652 2.36
360 1.12 1057 2.41 1657 166.53
400 0.69 1064 0.29 3054 12.68
419 1.68 1067 0.30 3055 22.41
426 4.56 1073 3.61 3063 37.42
437 8.22 1093 7.83 3116 11.02
220
451 11.49 1099 13.07 3118 22.87
461 2.16 1152 0.97 3133 53.01
480 4.17 1160 0.89 3136 30.94
498 2.95 1196 0.61 3169 5.10
518 12.18 1198 3.61 3173 12.07
547 10.03 1221 618.44 3190 3.81
569 0.38 1259 0.98 3193 0.80
629 5.30 1282 17.19 3202 5.55
699 1.04 1290 113.58 3205 12.33
709 5.93 1308 8.20 3214 22.65
726 7.89 1334 39.13 3214 19.79
738 74.09 1349 564.01 3226 8.83
742 4.85 1351 400.28 3239 6.70
Table S6. 47. B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries, energies, and thermal corrections
for anti-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7.
B3LYP/6-31G* energy -1261.406954 Hartrees
Zero-point correction 0.304068068 Hartrees
Thermal correction to energy 0.321273556 Hartrees
Atom Atomic
Number
Cartesian Coordinates (Angstroms)
X Y Z
H 1 -0.4047087 -3.0644583 -0.7825513
C 6 -1.2854578 -2.6187402 -0.3340611
C 6 -3.5451799 -1.3805848 0.8363096
C 6 -1.4370463 -1.2379560 -0.3233485
C 6 -2.2876449 -3.3846115 0.2696428
C 6 -3.4061495 -2.7696924 0.8427405
C 6 -2.5456927 -0.5956142 0.2544348
H 1 -2.1949317 -4.4665355 0.2905645
H 1 -4.1789788 -3.3804436 1.3010799
H 1 -4.4202699 -0.9169207 1.2831714
C 6 -2.4682785 0.8673847 0.1510573
C 6 -1.9109962 3.5908501 -0.2009598
C 6 -1.3017319 1.3012237 -0.4996275
221
C 6 -3.3700496 1.8277882 0.6197624
C 6 -3.0850045 3.1819846 0.4412224
C 6 -1.0052010 2.6441701 -0.6867689
H 1 -4.2816071 1.5237996 1.1261456
H 1 -3.7834807 3.9282265 0.8091055
H 1 -0.0891603 2.9470524 -1.1837433
H 1 -1.7004879 4.6490180 -0.3245976
S 16 -0.3113583 -0.0612930 -1.1156498
N 7 1.1150792 0.1581968 -0.2749591
C 6 1.9368053 -0.8660443 -0.6674834
O 8 1.5904126 -1.8321678 -1.3606099
O 8 3.2199537 -0.8327823 -0.2400378
C 6 3.8385215 0.2297984 0.5586220
C 6 5.2805992 -0.2729633 0.6941721
H 1 5.7404463 -0.3855601 -0.2928264
H 1 5.2995138 -1.2457685 1.1956777
H 1 5.8774339 0.4344474 1.2799819
C 6 3.1728848 0.3257458 1.9357531
H 1 3.1847917 -0.6528836 2.4281072
H 1 2.1392862 0.6648503 1.8471585
H 1 3.7263119 1.0316577 2.5661547
C 6 3.8098980 1.5638946 -0.1952539
H 1 4.2401250 1.4426020 -1.1956300
H 1 4.4083562 2.3060732 0.3460077
H 1 2.7889521 1.9379531 -0.2907987
Table S6.48. B3LYP/6-31G* calculated IR frequencies (cm-1, unscaled) and intensities
for anti-5-t-butoxycarbonyliminodibenzothiophene 7.
Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity Frequency Intensity
22 1.37 773 69.44 1384 0.17
41 0.05 776 31.47 1422 12.87
50 0.72 778 15.69 1422 8.85
80 2.05 783 1.76 1451 44.45
99 1.08 793 3.46 1474 14.81
111 1.99 836 30.70 1493 27.92
136 1.85 883 1.91 1497 0.70
149 1.85 891 12.94 1509 11.14
179 7.02 895 0.26 1516 0.98
185 3.14 931 0.12 1518 0.70
210 0.98 932 1.90 1522 17.84
227 10.06 952 1.02 1523 1.99
245 1.02 970 1.81 1532 0.43
266 0.92 976 0.08 1556 7.90
267 0.12 992 0.05 1628 2.79
289 1.16 1006 1.41 1637 0.50
222
345 2.36 1018 0.01 1644 1.86
351 0.69 1049 2.39 1651 0.52
365 4.65 1057 2.02 1671 271.7
401 0.37 1061 0.52 3053 22.30
405 1.41 1063 6.52 3054 9.36
419 2.47 1072 6.07 3063 38.37
435 9.44 1087 32.26 3116 10.03
461 3.09 1094 1.69 3118 15.61
466 18.25 1151 0.94 3132 45.50
479 7.68 1159 1.45 3135 29.27
497 1.44 1196 1.11 3163 1.09
540 9.29 1197 5.07 3166 26.05
562 20.61 1214 460.09 3192 3.22
569 0.72 1259 0.65 3195 0.85
625 35.50 1277 15.03 3204 6.28
629 5.52 1287 2.68 3206 9.24
700 1.32 1307 10.05 3215 19.18
713 2.97 1331 528.45 3215 22.83
727 12.77 1336 241.63 3224 11.54
749 4.95 1350 3.25 3244 7.71
223
6.8.2 Calculated Rotation Barriers
Figure S6.1. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of singlet ethoxycarbonylnitrene 12.
12anti 12syn 12anti
224
Figure S6.2. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of triplet ethoxycarbonylnitrene 32.
32syn
32anti
32syn
225
Figure S6.3. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of singlet
t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 14.
14anti 14syn 14anti
226
Figure S6.4. Energy profile for the rotation of C-O bond of triplet
t-butoxycarbonylnitrene 34.
Figure S6.5. Kinetic traces observed at 1640 cm–1 following 266 nm laser photolysis of
of 6 (3 mM) in argon-saturated acetonitrile (a) without or (b) with triethylsilane (TES) in
presence. The dotted curves are experimental data; the solid curves are best fits to a
single-exponential function.
34syn
34anti
34syn
227
6.8.3 Compound Characterization: 1H and 13C NMR Spectra of Final
Compounds
Figure S6.6. 1H NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6.
N-ethoxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_6.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
3.142.042.022.052.032.00
1.1
91.2
11.2
31.2
4
1.7
6
4.0
44.0
64.0
84.1
0
7.2
57.4
7
7.4
97.6
17.6
1
7.6
37.8
57.9
77.9
7
7.9
9
N-ETHOXYCARBONYL DIBENZOTHIOPHENE SULFILIMINE_1H.ESP
8.10 8.05 8.00 7.95 7.90 7.85 7.80 7.75 7.70 7.65 7.60 7.55 7.50 7.45 7.40 7.35
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
228
Figure S6.7. 13C NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6.
Figure S6.8. 1H NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7.
N-ethoxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_6_13C.esp
220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
14.7
2
62.1
4
76.8
477.1
577.4
7122.3
0
127.6
2129.8
8132.4
8
138.1
4138.7
9
165.7
7
N-t-butyloxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_1H.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
9.112.072.052.012.00
1.4
2
1.6
4
7.2
57.4
97.5
07.5
17.6
27.6
27.8
67.8
78.0
18.0
18.0
38.0
3
229
Figure S6.9. 13C NMR (CDCl3) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7.
Figure S6.10. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7.
N-t-butyloxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_13C.esp
220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
28.4
2
76.8
3
77.4
679.6
4
122.2
7
127.8
0129.8
3132.3
7
139.2
2
165.4
0
N-t-butyloxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_CD3CN.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
9.232.062.092.002.00
1.2
7
1.9
31.9
31.9
41.9
51.9
52.1
4
7.5
97.6
07.6
07.7
07.7
27.7
47.9
57.9
78.0
68.0
8
230
Figure S6.11. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7.
N-t-butyloxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_CD2Cl2.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
9.172.052.044.00
1.3
3
1.5
5
5.3
2
7.5
57.5
67.5
77.6
57.6
67.6
77.9
47.9
67.9
77.9
9
231
Figure S6.12. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CD3CN.
N-T-BUTYLOXYCARBONYL DIBENZOTHIOPHENE SULFILIMINE_CD3CN_4HR PHOTOLYSIS.ESP
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
5.801.851.104.001.942.08
1.1
71.2
71.3
9
1.9
31.9
31.9
41.9
51.9
52.1
7
3.2
6
7.5
07.5
17.5
2
7.5
27.9
37.9
47.9
57.9
68.2
68.2
78.2
78.2
8
232
Figure S6.13. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 7 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CD2Cl2.
N-t-butyloxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_CD2Cl2_4hr photolysis.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
5.721.950.974.001.862.06
1.4
31.4
51.5
7
3.3
1
5.3
2
7.4
6
7.4
77.4
87.4
87.4
97.8
77.8
87.8
88.1
88.2
08.2
0
233
Figure S6.14. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CD3CN.
N-ethoxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_CD3CN_4hr photolysis.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
2.751.634.001.842.09
1.3
81.4
01.4
2
1.9
41.9
41.9
52.1
7
4.4
44.4
5
7.5
07.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
27.9
37.9
47.9
47.9
58.2
58.2
68.2
78.2
8
234
Figure S6.15. 1H NMR (CD3CN) of oxycarbonylnitrene precursor 6 after 4 hour
photolysis at 254nm in argon-purged CH3CN.
N-ethoxycarbonyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine_CH3CN_4hr photolysis.esp
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
2.152.131.424.001.982.01
1.3
61.3
81.4
01.8
21.9
11.9
21.9
4
2.1
32.3
0
4.3
94.4
14.4
34.4
5
7.4
6
7.4
77.4
87.4
97.5
0
7.8
97.9
07.9
1
7.9
38.2
38.2
38.2
48.2
5
235
Chapter 7: The Singlet-Triplet Splittings of
Benzoylnitrene, Acetylnitrene, and
Trifluoroacetylnitrene
7.1 Introduction
Nitrenes are reactive intermediates containing neutral, monovalent nitrogen atoms.1
Alkyl- and arylnitrenes typically favor triplet ground states by a wide margin.2 The ground
state multiplicity of nitrenes is often determined experimentally by stereospecific trapping
reactions with alkenes. Rapid rearrangement reactions of the singlet state and slow
intersystem crossing rates, however, have made direct detection of the triplet nitrene
difficult. Nonetheless, the direct observation of triplet nitrenes by low temperature EPR,
matrix-isolation, and time-resolved spectroscopy methods has been reported.3–13
Nitrenes are most commonly generated from the corresponding azides. However,
other precursors, including phenanthrene- and sulfilimine-based compounds have been
shown to generate nitrenes efficiently.9,14,15 These compounds have the added advantage
of being more stable for storage and handling compared to the corresponding azide
precursor. Thus, we have chosen to use N-substituted dibenzothiophene sulfilimine
photoprecursors 1a-c for these studies (Scheme 7.1).
236
Scheme 7.1. Dibenzothiophene (DBT) Sulfilimine-based precursors to carbonylnitrenes.
In contrast to alkyl- and arylnitrenes, recent experimental and computational
studies have indicated that carbonylnitrenes (RC(O)N) have singlet ground states.9,10,16,17
The carbonylnitrene singlet state is stabilized by the interaction between the in-plane
carbonyl oxygen lone pair and the empty in-plane orbital on the nitrene nitrogen. This
bonding interaction leads to an oxazirine-like structure for the singlet carbonylnitrene that
is very different from that of the corresponding triplet carbonylnitrene (Figure 7.1).
Figure 7.1. Singlet carbonylnitrene and its oxazirine-like resonance contributor.
Despite the extensive study of nitrenes and the fundamental importance of their
ground state multiplicity and singlet-triplet splitting (ΔEST = ES – ET) on reactivity, only
three ΔEST values have been determined experimentally. Negative ion photoelectron
spectroscopy has been used to determine ΔEST for imidogen (NH),18 methylnitrene
(CH3N),19 and phenylnitrene (PhN).20,21 Herein, we are pleased to report the generation of
the anions of benzoylnitrene, acetylnitrene, and trifluoroacetylnitrene from their N-
substituted dibenzothiophene sulfilimine precursors (Scheme 1) and present for the first
time anion photoelectron spectra of these carbonylnitrenes. In addition, we report
237
calculations, which are validated by the spectra, and are used to derive a ΔEST value for
each of the three carbonylnitrenes.
7.2 Experimental and Computational Analysis of Singlet-Triplet
Splittings
To verify the accuracy of the theoretical methods in calculating the singlet-triplet
splitting for the three carbonylnitrenes, the same methods were used to calculate the VDEs
and the adiabatic energy difference between the singlet and triplet states (i.e. the energy
difference between the relaxed ground state singlet and relaxed ground state triplet) for the
previously studied nitrenes, phenylnitrene (PhN)20 and methylnitrene (CH3N)19. In the
previous experimental and theoretical work on phenylnitrene anion, the relaxed ground
states of the singlet and triplet were both observed in the PES and the singlet-triplet splitting
was determined from the spectrum.20 Our theoretical methods accurately reproduce the
observed transitions from the photoelectron spectrum of phenylnitrene and found the
relaxed ground state triplet is 0.57 eV lower in energy than the relaxed ground state singlet
(Table 7.1). Our calculations are in good agreement with both the previous experimental
and theoretical results. For this case we find two nearly-degenerate closed-shell singlets at
2.47 eV and an open-shell singlet at 2.1 eV, which is in good agreement with the
experimentally measured PES peak at 2.1 eV by Ellison et al.20 We find the lowest triplet
state to be at 1.52 eV, which agrees with the experimentally measured peak by Ellison et
al. at 1.45 eV.20
238
To corroborate our theoretical method further, another nitrene system previously
explored by PES was examined. The experimentally observed transitions of the relaxed
ground states of the singlet and triplet of CH3N were calculated. We find that the triplet
neutral energy is essentially degenerate with the doublet anion. PBE-GGA predicts that the
neutral triplet is 0.046 eV more stable than the doublet anion in contrast to Ellison’s result,
where the neutral triplet is 0.023 eV less stable than the doublet anion.19 With the inclusion
of zero-point energy correction, however, the neutral triplet lies 0.0027 eV above the anion
doublet of CH3N, which is consistent with Ellison’s experiment. For the singlet neutral, we
find that the lowest energy is 1.33 eV above the doublet anion, which is also in good
agreement with Ellison’s value. Our theoretical methods accurately reproduce the observed
transitions from the photoelectron spectrum of methylnitrene and we find the adiabatic
singlet-triplet energy difference to be 1.45 eV (Table 7.1). The calculated structure of
CH3N corresponds to the fractionally occupied “metallic” case (discussed in
Computational Methods) which is also in good agreement with Ellison’s description of this
state in terms of two real determinants. Based on an analysis of the Kohn-Sham
eigenvalues, the next electronic levels should be approximately 3.93 eV above the doublet
anion, which is also in good agreement with Ellison’s measurements of 3.95 eV.19
We relied on theory to assign the observed transitions in the PES of each
carbonylnitrene studied in this work. The spectra of the anions of benzoylnitrene,
acetylnitrene, and trifluoroacetylnitrene are presented in Figure 7.2. Two distinct
transitions are present in the benzoylnitrene and acetylnitrene spectra (Figure 7.2 (a) and
(b), respectively), while in the spectrum of the trifluroacetylnitrene (Figure 7.2 (c)), a broad
239
low intensity peak between 2.0 and 3.0 eV along with three more intense transitions at
higher EBE are observed.
Figure 7.2. Anion photoelectron spectra of (a) benzoylnitrene, (b) acetylnitrene, and (c)
trifluoroacetylnitrene anions. The vertical sticks represent the calculated vertical
detachment transitions.
The experimental and calculated values are reported in Table 7.1. From the
theoretical calculations, the most intense observed transitions in the photoelectron spectra
of all three nitrene anions are assigned as vertical detachment transitions (VDE) from the
relaxed ground state anion to either the singlet or triplet neutral states, in the geometry of
the anion. The broad low intensity peak in the CF3CON- spectrum at ~2.4 eV could be a
240
transition from the anion of a structural isomer, isocyanate (CF3NCO-). Photoisomerization
of the anion from a photon (hυ) followed by the photodetachment of the structural isomer
from another photon is plausible. Our calculations reveal a transition at 2.36 eV from the
ground state doublet isocyanate anion to the neutral singlet isocyanate. A large difference
in cohesive energies between the doublet nitrene and isocyanate structures (which we find
to be 0.95 eV within PBE-GGA) is indicative of broadening in the observed peak.
Table 7.1. Experimental Observed Transitions and Calculated Values of benzoyl-, acetyl-
, trifluroacetyl-, phenyl-, and methylnitrene. All ΔEST values include zero-point energy
corrections.
a: zero-point energy corrected value
The origin containing transitions, i.e., the ν′= 0 ← ν′′ = 0 transition (electron
affinity, EA), for both the neutral singlet and triplet states in benzoylnitrene, acetylnitrene,
and trifluoroacetylnitrene are not observed due to significant geometry changes between
the relaxed ground state doublet anion and the relaxed ground state neutral singlet and
triplet (Figures 7.3 and 7.4). This was not the case for the previously studied phenyl- and
methylnitrene, which do not show significant differences in geometries between the
relaxed neutrals and the doublet anions (Figure 7.4a). Thus, the adiabatic energy difference
PhC(O)N CH3C(O)N CF3C(O)N PhN 20 CH3N 19
Experimentally
Observed
Transitions
3.15
3.68
2.85
3.30
3.75
4.25, 4.45
1.45
2.10
0.022
1.35
Calculated
Vertical
Transitions
3.06
(triplet)
3.4, 3.7
(singlet)
2.80
(triplet)
3.42
(singlet)
3.86
(triplet)
4.54, 4.58
(singlet)
1.52
(triplet)
2.1, 2.47
(singlet)
0.0027a
(triplet)
1.33
(singlet)
Calculated ΔEST
eV
(kcal/mol)
-0.124
(-2.86)
-0.186
(-4.29)
-0.0123
(-0.284)
0.568
(13.09)
1.447
(33.37)
241
between the singlet and the triplet states of benzoylnitrene, acetylnitrene, and
trifluoroacetylnitrene cannot be directly measured from the PES as shown schematically in
Figure 7.4b.
Figure 7.3. NRMOL calculated bond lengths (Å) and angles for the doublet anion and
the neutral singlet and triplet spin states of benzoyl- (2a), acetyl- (2b), and
trifluroacetylnitrene (2c).
Ph 1.532
N
O1.284
1.308
126.4° Ph 1.448
132.1°
N
O1.323
1.27385.6°
1.7642.314
117.7°
Ph 1.483
N
O1.251
1.375
114.6°
2.211
117.7°
H3C 1.555
N
O1.284
1.306
128.1°
2.328
117.3°
H3C 1.473
N
O1.319
1.26886.8°
1.778
131.2°
H3C 1.504
N
O1.248
1.371
115.3°
2.214
124.5°
F3C 1.573
N
O1.271
1.302
130.9°
2.341
115.8°
F3C 1.517
N
O1.304
1.26589.7°
1.813
130.9°
F3C 1.559
N
O1.238
1.362
119.4°
2.246
121.7°
22a 12a 32a
22b 12b 32b
22c 12c 32c
242
Figure 7.4. Schematic representation of vertical detachment energy transitions (VDE)
and singlet-triplet energy splittings (EST) for two general cases where (a) the geometry
of the doublet anion (black) is similar to the neutral spin states (blue) and (b) the
geometry of the doublet anion is significantly different from one of the neutral species.
Given that the theoretical methods in this work accurately reproduce the observed
transitions in the photoelectron spectrum of five experimentally studied nitrenes, we are
confident our calculations can correctly determine the singlet-triplet splitting (ΔEST) in the
carbonylnitrenes. Thus, we find the singlet state to be lower in energy than the triplet state
for benzoylnitrene, acetylnitrene, and trifluoroacetylnitrene where the ΔEST values are -
0.146 eV, -0.220 eV, - 0.0324 eV, respectively. When zero point vibrational effects are
included the the ΔEST values for benzoylnitrene and acetylnitrene are -0.124 (-2.86
kcal/mol) and -0.186 eV (-4.29 kcal/mol), respectively, and for trifluoroacetynitrene, the
singlet and triplet states are nearly degenerate with a splitting of -0.0123 eV (-0.284
kcal/mol).
243
7.3 Comparison with Solution Reactivity
The geometries and singlet-triplet energy splitting of the carbonylnitrenes reported
here have been previously investigated computationally.10,15–17,22–24 Carbonylnitrene
geometries have been shown to be relatively insensitive to the computational method
employed.10,17 Indeed, the NRMOL calculated geometries of benzoyl-, acetyl-, and
trifluroacetylnitrene correlate well with previously reported work (Figure 7.3).9,10,15,23 As
expected, the singlet geometries show structural similarity to an oxazirine, with the O-C-
N fragment having significant three-membered ring character, i.e., much smaller O-C-N
bond angles and smaller O-N distances compared to the triplet species (Figure 7.3), the
result of a stabilizing interaction between the carbonyl oxygen lone pair electrons and the
empty p-type orbital on the nitrene nitrogen.
Sherman and Jenks recently reported a thorough computational investigation of the
effect of fluorination on the ground state multiplicity of acylnitrenes.23 They found that
the inductive electron withdrawing effect of fluorine substitution reduces the stabilization
of the singlet configuration, via the oxazirine-like resonance contributor (Figure 7.1). For
example, similar to the work of Jenks and co-workers our calculated O-C-N bond angles
of both singlet and triplet trifluroacetylnitrene are larger relative to benzoyl- and
acetylnitrene (Figure 7.3).
In contrast to calculated geometries, calculated energies of carbonylnitrenes, and
therefore EST values, vary considerably with computational method.10,23 However,
Sherman and Jenks found that the EST value between acetyl- and trifluroacetylnitrene
was approximately 4 kcal/mol, independent of computational method.23 This matches well
244
with our calculated EST values. Previous time-resolved infrared (TRIR) spectroscopy
studies and product analysis suggested a very small (ca. -1 kcal/mol) EST value for
acetylnitrene, and indicated that tifluroacetylnitrene also has a small singlet-triplet
splitting, but is likely a ground state triplet.15
In the anion photoelectron spectra of benzoylnitrene, acetylnitrene, and
trifluoroacetylnitrene, the peaks observed are vertical detachment transitions. The adiabatic
energy transitions are not observed due to significant geometry differences between the
anions and neutral nitrenes (Figure 7.3). This results in an observed splitting that is not an
accurate reflection of the EST value (Figure 7.4). Thus, the adiabatic energy difference
between the singlet and triplet cannot be directly determined from the photoelectron
spectra. Benzoyl-, and acetylnitrene are calculated by the NRLMOL method to be ground
state singlets with EST values of -2.86 and -4.29 kcal/mol, respectively. The singlet and
triplet states for trifluroacetylnitrene are nearly degenerate (EST = -0.284 kcal/mol). By
comparison, high-level CBS-QB3 calculations estimate a EST value of -4 kcal/mol for
acetylnitrene, which is in close agreement to our calculated EST value.22
For trifluoroacetylnitrene, in the neutral geometry, PBE-GGA, with NRLMOL,
finds that the singlet state is 0.75 kcal/mole (0.0324 eV) more stable (lower energy) than
the triplet state (without zero-point energy correction). However, because the triplet has
slightly softer vibrational frequencies, when zero-point corrections are included the
energies are essentially degenerate such that EST is -0.284 kcal/mol (-0.0123 eV). Several
vibrational calculations show that the triplet zero-point energy is 0.7 kcal/mole smaller than
the singlet zero-point energy. Singlet-triplet splittings, or more generally high-spin/low-
spin splittings, are known to be sensitive to the self-interaction error in density-functional
245
theory. Trifluoroacetynitrene, which experimentally has been suggested to have a triplet
ground state, will be an excellent test case for the new unitarily-invariant self-interaction-
corrected density-functional approach.25
7.4 Conclusions
We have shown that N-substituted dibenzothiophene sulfilimine based precursors
1a-c are efficient precursors to carbonylnitrenes 2a-b. Unlike previously studied alkyl- and
arylnitrenes, the observed transitions in the PES spectra do not reflect the energy difference
between the relaxed singlet and triplet nitrenes (EST) due to significant geometry
differences between the doublet anions and neutral species. Computational analysis, which
is validated by the spectra, indicates that benzoyl- and acetylnitrene are ground state
singlets, albeit by small margins, and the energies of singlet and triplet trifluroacetylnitrene
are nearly degenerate (EST = -0.284 kcal/mol, -0.0123 eV).
7.5 Experimental
7.5.1 Synthesis and Characterization
Dibenzothiophene oxide was prepared using a modified literature procedure.26 A
solution of 3-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) in CHCl3 was added slowly to a solution
of dibenzothiophene (1g, 5.4 mmol) in CHCl3 at -30-35 °C. The reaction was stirred at -
30-35 °C for 1 hour, then allowed to return to room temperature and stirred for an additional
1 hour. The reaction mixture was then filtered through celite and neutralized with saturated
NaHCO3. The organic layer was washed with NaHCO3 and brine, dried with MgSO4,
246
filtered, and evaporated. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography (80:20
dichloromethane:hexanes) to give a white solid final product (870 mg, 80%). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48-7.52 (dt, 2H), 7.58-7.62 (dt, 2H), 7.81 (dd, 2H), 7.99 (dd, 2H);
13C (CDCl3) δ 122.0, 127.7, 129.7, 132.7, 137.2, 145.2.
N-benzoyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine,9 1a. A solution of dibenzothiophene oxide
(243 mg, 1.21 mmol) in dichloromethane was added slowly to a solution of trifluoroacetic
anhydride (509 mg, 2.42 mmol) in dichlormethane at -78 °C. The reaction was stirred at -
78 °C for 30 min at which point solid benzamide (294 mg, 2.42 mmol) was added and
allowed to stir for an additional 90 min at -78 °C. After 90 min the reaction was warmed
to room temperature. The organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO3 and brine,
dried over MgSO4, filtered, evaporated. The crude material was purified by flash column
chromatography (gradient, 70:30 dichloromethane:hexanes to 100% dichloromethane) to
give a white solid (80 mg, 22%). 1H NMR (400 Mhz, CDCl3) δ 7.36-7.45 (m, 3H), 7.56 (t,
2H), 7.68 (t, 2H), 7.95 (d, 2H), 8.13 (d, 2H), 8.25 (d, 2H); 13C (CDCl3) δ 122.4, 127.9,
128.8, 128.9, 129.9, 131.1, 132.5, 135.9, 138.2, 138.4, 178.6.
N-acetyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine,15 1b. This compound was prepared as was
1a with substitution of acetamide for benzamide. The crude material was purified by flash
column chromatography (gradient, dichloromethane 100% – ethylacetate 100%) to give a
white solid: 18% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.14 (s, 3H), 7.50 (t, 2H), 7.62 (t,
2H), 7.87 (d, 2H), 8.11 (d, 2H); 13C (CDCl3) δ 24.1, 122.4, 128.8, 130.0, 132.5, 137.9,
138.4, 183.9.
N-trifluoroacetyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine,15 1c. This compound was prepared
as was 1a with substitution of trifluoroacetamide for benzamide. The crude material was
247
purified by flash column chromatography (gradient, dichloromethane 100% – ethylacetate
100%) to give a white solid: 34% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (t, 2H), 7.73
(t, 2H), 7.94 (d, 2H), 8.17 (d, 2H); 13C (CDCl3) δ 117.21 (q, J = 287.8 Hz), 122.8, 129.1,
130.5, 133.5, 135.8, 138.7, 169.0 (q, J = 35.4 Hz).
Benzoyl azide,22 3a. A solution of NaN3 (105 mg, 1.62 mmol) in H2O (10 mL) was
added slowly to a solution of benzoyl chloride (200 mg, 1.42 mmol) in anhydrous acetone
(12.5 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction was allowed to stir at 0 °C for 30 minutes. At this time the
product was extracted with ethylacetate. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered,
and evaporated. The crude material was run through a short silica plug (90:10
hexane:ethylacetate) to give the desired product (167 mg, 80%). 1H NMR (400 Mhz,
CDCl3) δ 7.42 (m, 2H), 7.58 (t, 1H), 8.01 (d, 2H); 13C (CDCl3) δ 128.8, 129.6, 130.8, 134.5,
172.7.
7.5.2 Spectroscopic Measurements
Anion photoelectron spectroscopy is conducted by crossing a mass-selected beam
of negative ions with a fixed-frequency photon beam and energy-analyzing the resultant
photodetached electrons. Photodetachment transitions occur between the ground state of a
mass-selected negative ion and the ground and energetically accessible excited states of its
neutral counterpart. This process is governed by the energy-conserving relationship hν =
EBE + EKE, where hν is the photon energy, EBE is the electron binding energy, and EKE
is the electron kinetic energy. Measuring electron kinetic energies and knowing the photon
energy provide electron binding (photodetachment transition) energies. Because these are
vertical transitions, their relative intensities are determined by the extent of
Franck−Condon overlap between the anion and its corresponding neutral. Our apparatus
248
consists of a laser photoemission/oven anion source, a linear time-of-flight mass
spectrometer for mass analysis and mass selection, a momentum decelerator, a magnetic
bottle electron energy analyzer, and an Nd:YAG laser. The magnetic bottle has a resolution
of ∼50 meV at an EKE of 1 eV. In these experiments, photoelectron spectra (PES) were
recorded with 266 nm (4.66 eV) photons. The photoelectron spectra were calibrated against
the well-known transitions of atomic Cu−.27
To produce the benzoylnitrene (C7H5ON-), acetyl nitrene (CH3CON-) and
trifluoroacetylnitrene- (CF3CON-) anions, ~0.25 g of sample (N-benzoyl dibenzothiophene
sulfilimine, N-acetyl dibenzothiophene sulfilimine, or N-trifluoroacetyl dibenzothiophene
sulfilimine, respectively,) was placed in a small oven (40-55 °C) attached to the front of a
pulsed (10 Hz) valve (General Valve Series 9), where helium (85-120 psi) was expanded
over the sample in a high vacuum chamber (10−6 Torr). Just outside the orifice of the oven,
low-energy electrons were produced by laser/photoemission from a pulsed Nd:YAG laser
beam (10 Hz, 532 nm) striking a translating, rotating, copper rod (6.35 mm diameter).
Negatively charged anions were then pulse-extracted into the spectrometer prior to mass
selection and photodetachment. Benzoylnitrene anion was also produced from
benzoylazide under similar experimental conditions (Supporting Information). The PES
was identical to the benzoyl nitrene anion spectrum from the N-benzoyl dibenzothiophene
sulfilimine sample.
7.5.3 Computational Analysis
The electronic structure calculations discussed here used NRLMOL to perform
density-functional based calculations, using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE)
generalized-gradient approximation (GGA). Large Gaussian-orbital all-electron basis sets,
249
which satisfy the Z(10/3) theorem,28 and are roughly of quadruple-zeta quality, were used for
representing the Kohn-Sham Orbitals. Discussions on the NRLMOL methodology and its
use in problems with multiple unpaired electrons, relevant to the most of the systems in
this work, have been discussed previously.29–31 An early use of NRLMOL for the
calculation of vertical detachment energies, on systems with pure singlet-states has been
reported.32 In all cases, the geometry of the doublet anion molecule has been relaxed. Once
the doublet anion geometry has been found, the vertical electron detachment energies are
determined by calculating the energy of the neutral triplet (at the anion geometry) and by
calculating the energies of the singlet states.
For doublet anions that are well approximated by a single reference state, but have
two nearly degenerate HOMO levels, the lowest energy triplet neutral state that occurs
when an electron is removed is relatively straightforward to construct in terms of a single
determinantal wavefunction for the high-spin case (Ms=1), and standard methods may be
used to determine the energetically degenerate Ms=0 triplet wavefunctions once the high-
spin case is known. However, the representation of the lowest singlet state(s) is more
complicated especially when the doublet anion paired state (referred to as |P>) and unpaired
state (referred to as |U>) are energetically nearly degenerate. Several possible neutral
singlet states that can be constructed from theses orbitals are explained further.
We first discuss the case where a closed-shell singlet is the lowest-energy geometry
in density functional theory (DFT). For such cases, the singlet-triplet energy splitting is
determined by the energy difference between the spin-unpolarized singlet and the high-
spin triplet (ΔEST = ES – ET). There are several possible singlet states that are effectively
considered during an SCF calculation. First, there are a continuous range closed-shell
250
singlet solutions of the form, |RR,00>= R(1)R(2) [21/2 (with |R>=
cos()|P>+sin()|U>) that can be determined from the optimal combination of the two
nearly-degenerate orbitals. Generally, due to Koopmans’ theorem, one expects that the
lowest singlet would be closely approximated by the |PP,00> wavefunction(e.g. =0).
However, Koopmans theorem is not even exact in Hartree-Fock so violations could occur
in cases where the |P> and |U> states are nearly or exactly degenerate. In such cases, the
lowest closed-shell singlet could in principle be more closely represented as |UU,00> (e.g.
=/2). In the limit of exact degeneracy one must also consider the complex singlet state
that is constructed by equally weighted complex admixtures of the |U> and |P> orbitals
given by |C+>= (|P> + i|U>)/21/2. The wavefunction for this case can be constructed as a
single determinant given by |CC,00> = [C+(1)C+(2)] [21/2which, with a
bit of algebra, may be re-represented in terms of the two real determinants, discussed
above, and the di-radical system, discussed below, according to
[P(1)P(2)+U(1)U(2)+i{P(1)U(2)+U(1)P(2)}] [23/2. In a density-
functional-based picture this state can either be treated as a real solution with two half-
occupied degenerate orbitals, for both and spin, or as a complex solution with fully
occupied orbitals. This generalization of this to closed-shell singlets, with |C>= (|P> +
i|U>)/21/2 is relevant in at least one case studied here. Within DFT, there are further
generalizations of this with complex Kohn-Sham orbitals of the form
|C>={cos()|P>+isin()}|U>. This orbital leads unpolarized spin densities with degenerate
real orbitals showing occupations of cos2() and sin2() respectively for both and spins.
The first discussions on these so-called fractionally occupied or metallic singlets was by
Janak,33 and then later within the context of the carbon dimer by Pederson et al.25
251
In molecular magnets, and in dissociated molecules, it is generally the states with
di-radical character that dominate in the ground-state wavefunction. But this type of open-
shell singlet appears whenever the frontier orbitals are relatively localized. For such cases
the broken spin-symmetry case, U(1)P(2)is much lower in energy than the closed
shell singlet solutions and is exactly half way between the singlet energy and the triplet
energy. In cases where this state is lowest in energy, the singlet-triplet energy splitting can
be determined by doubling the energy difference between this broken symmetry state and
the pure triplet state EST = 2[ES() - ET()]. Most of the results reported in this paper
require this sort of analysis for the determination of the lowest singlet state.
In a multi-configurational picture, the lowest neutral singlet state would be an
arbitrary linear combination of |PP,00>, |UU,00> and |UP,00> and would not necessarily
coincide with any of the density-functional configurations discussed above. Further, an
experiment over the entire energy range would pick up three different singlet energy peaks
assuming each peak is observable from the standpoint of optical selection rules. For cases
where these states are nearly degenerate a broader singlet PES is expected and this
broadening would be due to electronic effects rather than vibrational effects.
Since there is no a priori reason for knowing whether the lowest-energy singlet
state is indeed a di-radical state, we have also calculated energies of the spin-restricted
singlet states (ΔEST = ES – ET) and the di-radical states (EST = 2[ES() - ET()]). In
some cases these states are only slightly higher in energy. The energy splitting, and sign
of the energy splitting, between the closed-shell singlet states and the open-shell di-radical
states indicates the degree to which these system is an ideal di-radical. For cases where
the splitting is small, one expects level-repulsion to push the states apart and further reduce
252
the singlet-triplet splitting. As mentioned above, pure di-radical systems are cousins of
inorganic molecular magnets.30,31 However, since the spin-orbit coupling is small in first
row elements and since the spin-ordering-energetics in the systems studied here are driven
by coulomb rather than kinetic exchange, they do not exhibit the same type of collective
magnetic signatures and the spin-splittings are much larger.
In addition, to the experimentally measurable vertical detachment transitions that
are calculated at the doublet anion geometry, the adiabatic transitions from the relaxed
doublet anion to the relaxed neutral singlet or triplet are calculated to determine the
adiabatic singlet-triplet energy splitting.
253
7.6 References
(1) W. Lwowski. Nitrene. In Nitrenes; Lwowski, W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, 1920; p 1.
(2) Platz, M. S. Nitrenes. In Reactive Intermediate Chemistry; Moss, Robert A., Platz,
Matthew S., Jones, M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004; pp 501–559.
(3) Wasserman, E.; Smolinsky, G.; Yager, W. a. Electron Spin Resonance of Alkyl
Nitrenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 3166–3167.
(4) Ferrante, R. F. Spectroscopy of Matrix-Isolated Methylnitrene. J. Chem. Phys.
1987, 86, 25.
(5) Leyva, E.; Platz, M. S.; Persy, G.; Wirz, J. Photochemistry of Phenyl Azide: The
Role of Singlet and Triplet Phenylnitrene as Transient Intermediates. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 108, 3783–3790.
(6) Sigman, M. E.; Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. Aroylnitrenes with Singlet Ground
States: Photochemistry of Acetyl-Substituted Aroyl and Aryloxycarbonyl Azides.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4297–4305.
(7) Wasylenko, W. a; Kebede, N.; Showalter, B. M.; Matsunaga, N.; Miceli, A. P.;
Liu, Y.; Ryzhkov, L. R.; Hadad, C. M.; Toscano, J. P. Generation of Oxynitrenes
and Confirmation of Their Triplet Ground States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
13142–13150.
(8) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N- Acetyl-,
254
N- Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N- Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4398–4414.
(9) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of Sulfilimine-
Based Nitrene Precursors: Generation of Both Singlet and Triplet Benzoylnitrene.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6848–6859.
(10) Pritchina, E. A.; Gritsan, N. P.; Maltsev, A.; Bally, T.; Autrey, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang,
Y.; Toscano, J. P. Matrix Isolation, Time-Resolved IR, and Computational Study
of the Photochemistry of Benzoyl Azide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 1010–
1018.
(11) Buron, C.; Platz, M. S. Laser Flash Photolysis Study of Carboethoxynitrene. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 3383–3385.
(12) Borden, W. T.; Gritsan, N. P.; Hadad, C. M.; Karney, W. L.; Kemnitz, C. R.; Platz,
M. S. The Interplay of Theory and Experiment in the Study of Phenylnitrene. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 765–771.
(13) Gritsan, N. P.; Platz, M. S. Kinetics, Spectroscopy, and Computational Chemistry
of Arylnitrenes. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3844–3867.
(14) Wasylenko, W. a.; Kebede, N.; Showalter, B. M.; Matsunaga, N.; Miceli, A. P.;
Liu, Y.; Ryzhkov, L. R.; Hadad, C. M.; Toscano, J. P. Generation of Oxynitrenes
and Confirmation of Their Triplet Ground States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
13142–13150.
(15) Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N- Acetyl-,
255
N- Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N- Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4398–4414.
(16) Gritsan, N. P.; Pritchina, E. A. Are Aroylnitrenes Species with a Singlet Ground
State? Mendeleev Commun. 2001, 11, 94–95.
(17) Pritchina, E. a.; Gritsan, N. P.; Bally, T. Ground State Multiplicity of Acylnitrenes:
Computational and Experimental Studies. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 525–532.
(18) Engelking, P. C. Laser Photoelectron Spectrometry of NH−: Electron Affinity and
Intercombination Energy Difference in NH. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 65, 4323.
(19) Travers, M. J.; Cowles, D. C.; Clifford, E. P.; Ellison, G. B.; Engelking, P. C.
Photoelectron Spectroscopy of the CH3N- Ion. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 23–25.
(20) Travers, M. J.; Cowles, D. C.; Clifford, E. P.; Ellison, G. B. Photoelectron
Spectroscopy of the Phenylnitrene Anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8699–
8701.
(21) Wijeratne, N. R.; Fonte, M. Da; Ronemus, A.; Wyss, P. J.; Tahmassebi, D.;
Wenthold, P. G. Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Chloro-Substituted Phenylnitrene
Anions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 9467–9473.
(22) Liu, J.; Mandel, S.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz, M. S. A Comparison of Acetyl- and
Methoxycarbonylnitrenes by Computational Methods and a Laser Flash Photolysis
Study of Benzoylnitrene. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8583–8593.
(23) Sherman, M. P.; Jenks, W. S. Computational Rationalization for the Observed
Ground-State Multiplicities of Fluorinated Acylnitrenes. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79,
256
8977–8983.
(24) Zeng, X.; Beckers, H.; Willner, H.; Grote, D.; Sander, W. The Missing Link:
Triplet Fluorocarbonyl Nitrene FC(O)N. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3977–3984.
(25) Pederson, M. R.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Perdew, J. P. Communication: Self-Interaction
Correction with Unitary Invariance in Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Phys.
2014, 140, 121103.
(26) Nakayama, J.; Yu, T.; Sugihara, Y.; Ishii, A. Synthesis and Characterization of
Thiophene 1-Oxides Kinetically Stabilized by Bulky Substituents at the 3- and 4-
Positions. Chem. Lett. 1997, 26, 499–500.
(27) Thomas, O. C.; Zheng, W.; Bowen, K. H. Magic Numbers in Copper-Doped
Aluminum Cluster Anions. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 5514.
(28) Porezag, D.; Pederson, M. Optimization of Gaussian Basis Sets for Density-
Functional Calculations. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 60, 2840–2847.
(29) Pederson, M. R.; Porezag, D. V; Kortus, J.; Patton, D. C. Strategies for Massively
Parallel Local-Orbital-Based Electronic Structure Methods. Phys. Status Solidi
2000, 217, 197–218.
(30) Pederson, M. R. Density-Functional-Based Prediction of a Spin-Ordered Open-
Shell Singlet in an Unpassivated Graphene Nanofilm. Phys. Status Solidi Basic
Res. 2012, 249, 283–291.
(31) Nossa, J. F.; Islam, M. F.; Canali, C. M.; Pederson, M. R. First-Principles Studies
of Spin-Orbit and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interactions in the {Cu3} Single-
257
Molecule Magnet. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85, 1–10.
(32) Ashman, C.; Khanna, S.; Pederson, M.; Porezag, D. Thermal Isomerization in
Cs4Cl3-. Phys. Rev. A. 1998, 58, 744–747.
(33) Janak, J. F. Proof That dE/ni = Ei in Density-Functional Theory. Phys. Rev. B.
1978, 18, 7165–7168.
258
Chapter 8: Miscellaneous Work
8.1 Photochemical Precursors to HNO
8.1.1 Photochemistry of N, N’, N”-Trihydroxyisocyanuric acid (THICA)
Although recent generation of alkoxy- and aryloxynitrenes from photoprecursors
has been reported, analogous precursors to the parent hydroxynitrene (HON) have
remained elusive.1 Since HON is expected to isomerize to nitroxyl (HNO, Scheme 8.1),2
we have investigated N,N’,N’’-trihydroxyisocyanuric acid (THICA, Scheme 8.2) as a
potential photochemical precursor to HON. The photochemistry of THICA has yet to be
investigated, however, thermolysis of THICA has been shown to produce N-
hydroxyisocyante (Scheme 8.2),3 which can be considered the carbon monoxide (CO)
adduct of HON.4,5
Scheme 8.1. Isomerization of oxynitrenes (RON) to the corresponding nitroso (RNO)
species.
Scheme 8.2. Thermolysis and potential photochemistry of N,N’,N’’-trihydroxyisocyanuric
acid (THICA).
Photochemical experiments were performed in quartz cuvettes containing 0.1 M
pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 100 µM diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid
259
(DTPA). Samples were irradiated in a Rayonet reactor, fitted with eight 254 nm bulbs.
Simultaneously, the irradiated solutions were passed through our membrane inlet mass
spectrometry (MIMS) sample cell for the detection of photoproduced gasses (Figure 8.1).
Presumed decomposition of N-hydroxyisocyanate generated via THICA photolysis, has
led to the detection of carbon monoxide (CO m/z 28), HNO (m/z 31), and HNO- or HON-
derived N2O (m/z 44) by MIMS (Figure 8.2).
Figure 8.1. Experimental setup for MIMS detection of photochemically produced gasses.
260
Figure 8.2. MIMS signals observed at m/z 44, 31, and 28 upon photolysis of 1 mM THICA
in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA.
The m/z 44 MIMS signal may also contain contribution from CO2 (m/z 44) that
results from hydrolysis of N-hydroxyisocyante (Scheme 8.3). This is evident in the increase
in the m/z 44 to 30 ratio (~12:1) relative to N2O standards (~5:1). Sampling of the
headspace of this reaction by GC analysis confirms CO2 production with a ca. yield of
76%. CO2 also has a fragment at m/z 28, therefore to confirm CO production we performed
MIMS experiments in the presence of a liquid nitrogen cold trap that would trap CO2 (bp
= -78.5 °C) and not CO (bp = -191.5 °C, Figure 8.3). This experiment also confirms that
NO (bp = -152 °C) is not produced during this reaction as a m/z 30 signal is not observed.
GC headspace analysis experiments also revealed a ca. 14% yield of HNO-derived N2O.
261
Scheme 8.3. Potential products formed via THICA photolysis.
Figure 8.3. MIMS signals observed at m/z 44, 31, and 28 upon photolysis of 1 mM THICA
in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PBS containing 100 µM DTPA in the presence of a liquid nitrogen cold
trap.
Due to solubility limitations of THICA in solvents that are ideal for IR
spectroscopy, we examined the benzyl derivative of THICA (Bn-THICA, Scheme 8.4) for
spectroscopic analysis. Time-resolved infrared (TRIR) spectroscopy of the benzyl
derivative revealed evidence for the formation of benzyl-isocyanate at 2250 cm-1, which is
formed within the time resolution of our experiment (50 ns) and is stable on the
microsecond time scale (Figure 8.4). Further reactivity of benzyl-isocyanate was not
observed on the TRIR timescale (10’s of milliseconds). Unfortunately, we were unable to
detect the same isocyanate signal by FTIR spectroscopy suggesting the lifetime is between
milliseconds and seconds.
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Ion C
urr
ent (p
A)
151050Time (Minutes)
m/z 28m/z 44m/z 30m/z 31
LN2 Cold Trap
262
Scheme 8.4. Products resulting from the photogeneration of benzyloxynitrene in the
presence of argon (Ar) or dioxygen (O2).
Figure 8.4. TRIR difference spectra averaged over the time scales indicated following 266
nm laser photolysis of Bn-THICA (5 mM) in argon-saturated dichloromethane.
If the fate of the observed benzylisocyante leads to similar products to that observed
by THICA photolyis, benzyloxynitrene (BnON) should be the intermediate involved.
BnON has been observed previously following the photolysis of a phenanthrene
1.2x10-3
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
A
bso
rba
nce
2300 2250 2200 2150 2100 2050 2000
Wavenumber
0.0 - 50.0 s
50.0 - 100.0 s
100.0 - 150.0 s
150.0 - 200.0 s
200.0 - 300.0 s
300.0 - 500.0 s
500.0 - 700.0 s
700.0 - 900.0 s
263
photoprecursor (Scheme 8.4). Photolysis resulted in the production of benzaldehyde oxime
(PhCHNOH), or benzylnitrate (PhCH2ONO2) and benzaldehyde (PhCHO) in argon- or
oxygen-saturated solvents, respectively (Scheme 8.4).1 HPLC analysis of Bn-THICA
photolysis samples revealed the primary products are benzaldehyde and benzylalcohol.
These results suggest that benzyloxynitrene is not involved. Mass spectrometry, following
photolysis of solid samples of Bn-THICA, analysis suggests both CO and N2 production
and therefore the intermediacy of benzyloxynitrene. Nitrene production, dimerization, and
further decomposition to the observed prodcuts is possible (Scheme 8.5).
Scheme 8.5. Potential reactivity of the presumed benzyloxynitrene intermediate resulting
from photolysis of Bn-THICA.
264
On the basis of these observations we suggest that THICA may potentially be a
precursor to HON through secondary photolysis of N-hydroxyisocyanate, which can be
considered as a CO adduct of HON. Observation of HNO and HNO-derived N2O by both
MIMS and GC headspace analysis confirms that THICA has the potential to serve as a
photochemical precursor to HNO, albeit with small yields. However, HPLC product
analysis of Bn-THICA photolysis suggests that a limited amount of the nitrene intermediate
is involved. Further studies will be require to confirm the fate of N-hydroxyisocyante and
the source of the observed HNO.
8.1.2 Development of o-Quinonemethide-Based Photoprecursors to HNO
A handful of photochemical precursors to HNO have been explored, however,
restrictions including thermal stability, solubility, and the requirement of UV irradiation
for release have limited further application of these precursors.6 Recent work by Popik and
co-workers has established o-naphthoquinone methide (oNQM) precursors as a viable
photochemical protecting group for alcohols and amines.7–9 The oNQM scaffold has the
ability to release leaving groups such as alcohols (pKa ~15) and amines (pKa ~12),
therefore, its application to HNO (pKa 11.4) may be a viable option. Photolysis of these
compounds produce an excited state where the acidity of the O-H proton increases
significantly (pKa ~ 1).10 Once deprotonated, formation of the quinone-methide leads to
release of the leaving group (Scheme 8.6a). Compound 6 is a candidate for HNO
production via the mechanism described above (Scheme 8.6b).
265
Scheme 8.6. (a) Mechanism responsible for the photorelease of X from o-naphthoquinone
methide (oNQM) precursors. (b) Potential HNO precursor (6) reactivity upon photolysis
in aqueous solution.
The dimethyl substitution of photoprecursor 6 is necessary to prevent the rapid
tautomerization of the nitroso to the corresponding oxime. This requirement has made
synthesis of photoprecursor 6 difficult. However, successful production of amine 11 or
hydroxylamine 13 would allow for further oxidation to the desired nitroso in a similar
fashion to what was reported by Quek et al.11 We have tested a variety of synthetic methods
to reach these anticipated intermediate products without success (Scheme 8.7). However,
other routes remain including the use of the in situ generated CeCl2Me to react with nitrile
10 to generate amine 11, which has worked for analogous scaffolds.12 Comparable to the
work of Nikitin et al.,13 reaction of a tertiary alcohol using Ritter reaction conditions could
266
afford 11. Further synthetic methodology will be required in order to test the viability of
these scaffolds as photochemical precursors to HNO.
Scheme 8.7. Proposed synthetic methods for the formation of target compound 6.
267
8.2 Investigation of the Solution Chemistry of Persulfides (RSSH)
Persulfides (RSSH) are well known in literature,14 but only recently gained
attention as a proposed post-translational modification of cysteine.15,16 Snyder and co-
workers suggested that H2S was responsible for the modification of cysteine;15,16 however,
the species responsible for production of RSSH was found not to be H2S.17,18 Persulfide
modifications have potentially unique effects on enzyme reactivity,16,19,20 leading to many
questions regarding its fundamental chemistry in solution, which is still poorly
understood.21,22 Persulfides are expected to be better nucleophiles due to the alpha
effect,23 better reductants due to a resonance-stabilized radical, and more acidic by ca. 2
pKa units compared with their corresponding thiols.21 In many ways this expected
reactivity is analogous that of selenocysteine and one might anticipate that persulfides can
serve as analogues of selenols whose reactivity can easily be controlled by simple reduction
of the persulfide to the corresponding thiol. Persulfides are also interesting in that they
have the potential to react either as a nucleophile or an electrophile. Characterizing the
reactivity of persulfides relative to that of thiols will be critical to understanding their
biochemistry. Unfortunately, persulfides are inherently difficult to study, as they are
unstable and decompose to a variety of species. Therefore, long-term storage of persulfides
is an issue that necessitates their generation in situ. Several reports of small molecule
persulfide generation using a variety of methods have appeared in the literature,22 however
there is still an unmet need for precursors that generate persulfides efficiently without the
addition of exogenous nucleophiles.
Currently, the most common method for RSSH generation involves the reaction
between a disulfide and H2S or reaction of a thiol with a protected disulfide (PG-SSR in
268
Scheme 8.8a).21,24 However, production of persulfides in the presence of other thiols and
disulfides can lead to a complicated mixture of species (see Scheme 8.8b). The
development of photoprecursors to persulfides would allow unwanted reactions between
persulfides and thiols, disulfides, or potentially persulfides to be avoided and the chemistry
of persulfides to be studied without these complications. In addition, such precursors
would allow for spatial and temporal control of persulfide release, unlike other currently
available precursors. For reactivity comparison, we also propose to develop and analyze
photoprecursors to thiols, H2S, and selenols.
Scheme 8.8. (a) Generation and (b) further reactivity of persulfides (RSSH).
A variety of scaffolds can potentially be implemented for the photochemical release
of persulfides (and thiols, H2S, and selenols). We have begun to synthesize and study o-
napthoquinone methide derivative 23 and p-hydroxyacetophenone derivative 24, inspired
by the work of Popik and Givens, respectively, who have used these scaffolds to
photorelease a variety of species including thiols (Scheme 8.9).25–29 Synthesis of proposed
o-napthoquinone methide precursors will mainly follow established literature procedures
(see reaction sequence below).27–30 Synthesis of the H2S, thiol, and selenol precursors will
involve simple substitution of alkylbromide 18 with the corresponding nucleophile.
However, synthesis of the persulfide precursor will be more involved. We envision
269
reaction of the initially generated thiol 19 in the presence of base with ethanesulfenyl
chloride (ClSEt) to generate the mixed disulfide 20, which will serve as the persulfide
photoprecursor (23, X = SSEt). The synthetic strategy for the p-hydroxyacetophenone
derivatives will involve the same alkylbromide derivative 18 and analogous approaches to
the synthesis of thiol, H2S, selenol, and presulfide photoprecursors 24. In preliminary
studies, we have synthesized the thiol precursor utilizing both scaffolds, and have
successfully shown by reaction with 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) to generate
the observed TNB at 412 nm, that p-hydroxyacetophenone 24 (X = SEt) releases
ethanethiol following 254 nm Rayonet photolysis.
Scheme 8.9. Proposed synthesis of potential precursors 23 and 24.
270
With efficient photochemical precursors in hand we propose to probe the relative
reactivity of thiols, H2S, selenols, and persulfides with TRIR spectroscopy. Using well-
established electrophilic traps for thiols, we will derive relative trapping kinetics for each
of these species. For example, isocyantes (νNCO ca. 2200 cm-1) are known to react with
thiols to produce the corresponding S-thiocarbamates (νCO ca. 1650 cm-1).31 In the presence
of excess trap, we hope to be able to eliminate the potential issue of the self-reactivity of
persulfides discussed above. We anticipate that these fundamental reactivity studies will
help to clarify the chemistry of H2S, selenols, and persulfides relative to the well-
established reactivity of thiols. In doing so, we hope to shed light on the biochemical roles
of these species.
Following our recent work investigating HNO modifications of thiols,32–36 we are
interested in probing the reactivity of HNO with persulfides. Considering the known
reactivity of thiols with HNO, we would expect persulfides to be efficient traps for HNO
as well; however, the reaction between HNO and persulfides has not yet been investigated.
Recent reports suggest that persulfides could be produced in vivo at micomolar
concentrations,37 making an understanding of their potential reactivity with HNO
important. We have begun to investigate several outstanding questions regarding HNO
reactivity with persulfides: (1) Are persulfides more efficient traps for HNO compared to
their corresponding thiols? (2) What are the products of HNO reaction with persulfides?
(3) Does the local environment (e.g., in peptide or protein) affect persulfide reactivity?
Initial studies have been performed using the recently reported thermal precursor
to penicillamine persulfide,38 which was based on the work of Xian and co-workers.39,40
The synthesis of this compound is a simple one-step process from commercially available
271
starting materials.38 Precursor 26 releases persulfide in neutral aqueous solutions through
neutralization of the HCl-salt followed by an intramolecular S-N methoxycarbonyl transfer
to produce 28 (Scheme 8.10). We propose to explore the scope of this strategy by
synthesizing derivatives of 26 with various R groups to tune the persulfide release rate. For
example, by modifying R1 we should be able to modulate the rate of intramolecular S-N
carbonyl transfer. Further, substituting R2 with various alkyl substituents has the potential
to slow the rate of reaction at the carbonyl resulting in a slower release rate of persulfide.
Generation of the persulfide in the presence of an HNO donor would allow for investigation
of HNO induced modifications of persulfides. Initial GC headspace experiments measuring
HNO-derived N2O in the presence or absence of persulfide (generated from 26) or thiol,
suggest that persulfides are better traps for HNO compared to their corresponding thiols.
Scheme 8.10. Persulfide precursor scaffold and release mechanism at neutral pH.
Product studies of the reaction between persulfide (e.g, derived from precursor 26)
and HNO will be beneficial in predicting its reactivity in a protein environment. A variety
outcomes for the reaction of HNO with persulfides are possible. Presumably, the initial
reaction of the persulfide with HNO will proceed though an N-hydroxysulfinamide
intermediate (RSSNHOH), similar to the reaction with thiols. Under high concentrations
of persulfide, we expect further reactivity with RSSNHOH to generate polysulfide
(RSSSSR) and hydroxylamine (Scheme 8.11a). However, since there are two available
272
sulfurs in the proposed RSSNHOH intermediate, the reactivity with a second equivalent of
persulfide could occur at the internal sulfur (Scheme 8.11b). This pathway would
ultimately lead to the production of disulfide (RSSR) and potentially HNS. In the presence
of low concentrations of persulfide rearrangement of RSSNHOH to what would resemble
a persulfide analog of a sulfinamide (RSS(O)NH2, Scheme 8.11c) is possible. If generated,
it is plausible that, unlike the related thiol derivative, this species would not be stable.
Heterolytic cleavage of the S-S bond would generate the corresponding thiol and HNSO.
Lastly, decomposition of RSSNHOH could lead to loss of thiol and generation of HONS
(Scheme 8.11d).
Scheme 8.11. Reaction of persulfide (RSSH) with HNO to initially produce the
intermediate RSSNHOH. RSSNHOH can react with, (a) RSSH to generate RSSSSR and
hydroxylamine (NH2OH), (b) RSSH to generate disulfide (RSSR) and HNS, (c) RSSH to
generate RSSR and HONS, or (d) rearrange to form sulfiniamide like structure
(RSS(O)NH2).
Following incubation of persulfides with HNO donors samples can by
chromatographic and mass spectrometry techniques. Similar to methods reported in
literature, we will attempt to separate and characterize thiols, disulfides, and polysulfides
by HPLC and MS techniques. Previous work by Filipovic et al. suggested the ability of
thionitrous acid (HSNO) to permeate cell membranes,41 and so should be detectable by
273
MIMS at m/z 63. Further, recent computational analysis has suggested the possibility of
HSNO isomerization in aqueous environmentsm 42 and we expect that HNSO and HONS
could also be detected by MIMS at m/z 63 (Chapter 4). To distinguish HNSO from HONS,
we will have to correlate the observed MIMS signal to the accompanying product (i.e.,
RSH for HNSO, and RSSR for HONS). In addition, we also expect to be able to detect
HNS (m/z 47) and N2S (m/z 60) by MIMS.
After gaining an understanding of small molecule persulfide reactivity with HNO
we will to move onto small peptide systems to investigate the effects of a peptide
environment on reactivity with HNO, similar to our previous investigations with
thiols.33,35,43 Modification of cysteine containing peptides can be accomplished using
methoxycarbonylsulfenyl chloride (ClSC(O)OMe) in a reaction analogous to that used to
generate persulfide precursor 26 (Scheme 8.12). The cysteine residue is anticipated to be
the best nucleophile in the peptide (e.g., VYPCLA),35 and will outcompete other
nucleophiles present in the peptide for reactivity with methoxycarbonylsulfenyl chloride.
This strategy has potential for success as the thiol of penicillamine reacted exclusively over
the amine and carboxylic acid functional groups in methanol in synthesis of 26. As shown
below, in the case of a peptide system, we would rely on release of the persulfide by the
addition of exogenous amine. Initially, we will confirm that this approach successfully
releases the persulfide by applying the “Tag-Switch” technique, developed by Xian and
co-workers, to detect and quantify persulfide modifications of cysteine residues.44
274
Scheme 8.12. Modification of peptide cysteine residues with methoxycarbonylsulfenyl
chloride to generate protected persulfides that can be released upon exposure to amine
nucleophiles.
275
8.3 References
(1) Wasylenko, W. a.; Kebede, N.; Showalter, B. M.; Matsunaga, N.; Miceli, A. P.;
Liu, Y.; Ryzhkov, L. R.; Hadad, C. M.; Toscano, J. P. Generation of Oxynitrenes
and Confirmation of Their Triplet Ground States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
13142–13150.
(2) Maier, G.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Marco, M. De. Isonitroso Hydrogen (Hydroxy
Nitrene, HON). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 108–110.
(3) Takač, M. J.-M.; Kos, I.; Biruš, M.; Butula, I.; Gabričević, M. A Study of the
Physico-Chemical Properties of 1,3,5-Trihydroxy-1,3,5-Triazin-2,4,6[1H,3H,5H]-
Trione. J. Mol. Struct. 2006, 782, 24–31.
(4) Risi, F.; Pizzala, L.; Carles, M.; Verlaque, P.; Aycard, J. Photolysis of Matrix-
Isolated 4-R-1,2,4-Triazoline-3,5-Diones: Identification of Aziridine-2,3-Dione
Transients. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 666–670.
(5) Pasinszki, T.; Krebsz, M.; Tarczay, G.; Wentrup, C. Photolysis of
Dimethylcarbamoyl Azide in an Argon Matrix: Spectroscopic Identification of
Dimethylamino Isocyanate and 1,1-Dimethyldiazene. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78,
11985–11991.
(6) Nakagawa, H. Photocontrollable Nitric Oxide (NO) and Nitroxyl (HNO) Donors
and Their Release Mechanisms. Nitric Oxide 2011, 25, 195–200.
(7) Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Photochemical Generation and the Reactivity of O-
Naphthoquinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
276
11892–11899.
(8) Kulikov, A.; Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Photolabile Protection of Alcohols,
Phenols, and Carboxylic Acids with 3-Hydroxy-2-Naphthalenemethanol. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 7611–7615.
(9) Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Dual Reactivity of Hydroxy- and Methoxy-
Substituted O-Quinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions: Hydration versus
Tautomerization. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7338–7346.
(10) Basarić, N.; Cindro, N.; Hou, Y.; Žabčić, I.; Mlinarić-Majerski, K.; Wan, P.
Competing Photodehydration and Excited-State Intramolecular Proton Transfer
(ESIPT) in Adamantyl Derivatives of 2-Phenylphenols. Can. J. Chem. 2011, 89,
221–234.
(11) Quek, S. K.; Lyapkalo, I.; Huynh, H. New Highly Efficient Method for the
Synthesis of Tert -Alkyl Nitroso Compounds. Synthesis (Stuttg). 2006, 9, 1423–
1426.
(12) Huang, S.; Li, R.; Connolly, P. J.; Emanuel, S.; Fuentes-Pesquera, A.; Adams, M.;
Gruninger, R. H.; Seraj, J.; Middleton, S. a; Davis, J. M.; Moffat, D. F. C.
Synthesis and Biological Study of 2-Amino-4-Aryl-5-Chloropyrimidine Analogues
as Inhibitors of VEGFR-2 and Cyclin Dependent Kinase 1 (CDK1). Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2179–2183.
(13) Nikitin, K. V; Andryukhova, N. P. Synthesis of N-(5-Oxo-2,5-Dihydro-1H-Pyrrol-
2-Yl)acetamides Using the Ritter Reaction. Mendeleev Commun. 2000, 10, 31–32.
277
(14) Mueller, E. G. Trafficking in Persulfides: Delivering Sulfur in Biosynthetic
Pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 185–194.
(15) Mustafa, A. K.; Gadalla, M. M.; Snyder, S. H. Signaling by Gasotransmitters. Sci.
Signal. 2009, 2, 1–8.
(16) Mustafa, A. K.; Gadalla, M. M.; Sen, N.; Kim, S.; Mu, W.; Gazi, S. K.; Barrow, R.
K.; Yang, G.; Wang, R.; Snyder, S. H. H2S Signals Through Protein S-
Sulfhydration. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, 1–8.
(17) Nagy, P.; Pálinkás, Z.; Nagy, A.; Budai, B.; Tóth, I.; Vasas, A. Chemical Aspects
of Hydrogen Sulfide Measurements in Physiological Samples. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 2014, 1840, 876–891.
(18) Greiner, R.; Pálinkás, Z.; Bäsell, K.; Becher, D.; Antelmann, H.; Nagy, P.; Dick,
T. P. Polysulfides Link H2S to Protein Thiol Oxidation. Antioxid. Redox Signal.
2013, 19, 1749–1765.
(19) Massey, V.; Edmondson, D. On the Mechanism of Inactivation of Xanthine
Oxidase by Cyanide. J. Biol. Chem. 1970, 245, 6595–6598.
(20) Edmondson, D.; Massey, V.; Palmer, G.; Lowrie, M .B.; Elion, G. B. The
Resolution of Active and Inactive Xanthine Oxidase by Affinity Chromatography.
J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 1597–1604.
(21) Ono, K.; Akaike, T.; Sawa, T.; Kumagai, Y.; Wink, D. A.; Tantillo, D. J.; Hobbs,
A. J.; Nagy, P.; Xian, M.; Lin, J.; Fukuto, J. M. Redox Chemistry and Chemical
Biology of H2S, Hydropersulfides, and Derived Species: Implications of Their
278
Possible Biological Activity and Utility. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 77, 82–94.
(22) Park, C.; Weerasinghe, L.; Day, J. J.; Fukuto, J. M.; Xian, M. Persulfides: Current
Knowledge and Challenges in Chemistry and Chemical Biology. Mol. BioSyst.
2015, 11, 1775–1785.
(23) Edwards, J. O.; Pearson, R. G. The Factors Determining Nucleophilic Reactivities.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 16–24.
(24) Francoleon, N. E.; Carrington, S. J.; Fukuto, J. M. The Reaction of H2S with
Oxidized Thiols: Generation of Persulfides and Implications to H2S Biology. Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 2011, 516, 146–153.
(25) Klán, P.; Šolomek, T.; Bochet, C. G.; Blanc, A.; Givens, R.; Rubina, M.; Popik,
V.; Kostikov, A.; Wirz, J. Photoremovable Protecting Groups in Chemistry and
Biology: Reaction Mechanisms and Efficacy. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 119–191.
(26) Specht, A.; Loudwig, S.; Peng, L.; Goeldner, M. P-Hydroxyphenacyl Bromide as
Photoremoveable Thiol Label: A Potential Phototrigger for Thiol-Containing
Biomolecules. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8947–8950.
(27) Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Photochemical Generation and the Reactivity of O-
Naphthoquinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
11892–11899.
(28) Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Dual Reactivity of Hydroxy- and Methoxy-
Substituted O- Quinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions: Hydration versus
Tautomerization. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7338–7346.
279
(29) Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Light-Induced Hetero-Diels-Alder Cycloaddition: A
Facile and Selective Photoclick Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5573–
5579.
(30) Kulikov, A.; Arumugam, S.; Popik, V. V. Photolabile Protection of Alcohols,
Phenols, and Carboxylic Acids with 3-Hydroxy-2-Naphthalenemethanol. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 7611–7615.
(31) Li, H.; Yu, B.; Matsushima, H.; Hoyle, C. E.; Lowe, A. B. The Thiol-Isocyanate
Click Reaction: Facile and Quantitative Access to W-End-Functional poly(N,N-
Diethylacrylamide) Synthesized by RAFT Radical Polymerization.
Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6537–6542.
(32) Froehlich, J. P.; Mahaney, J. E.; Keceli, G.; Pavlos, C. M.; Goldstein, R.;
Redwood, A. J.; Sumbilla, C.; Lee, D. I.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Kass, D. a; Paolocci,
N.; Toscano, J. P. Phospholamban Thiols Play a Central Role in Activation of the
Cardiac Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Pump by Nitroxyl. Biochemistry
2008, 47, 13150–13152.
(33) Keceli, G.; Moore, C. D.; Labonte, J. W.; Toscano, J. P. NMR Detection and
Study of Hydrolysis of HNO-Derived Sulfinamides. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 7387–
7396.
(34) Keceli, G.; Moore, C. D.; Toscano, J. P. Comparison of HNO Reactivity with
Tryptophan and Cysteine in Small Peptides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24,
3710–3713.
(35) Keceli, G.; Toscano, J. P. Reactivity of Nitroxyl-Derived Sulfinamides.
280
Biochemistry 2012, 51, 4206–4216.
(36) Sivakumaran, V.; Stanley, B. A.; Tocchetti, C. G.; Ballin, J. D.; Caceres, V.; Zhou,
L.; Keceli, G.; Rainer, P. P.; Lee, D. I.; Huke, S.; Ziolo, M. T.; Kranias, E. G.;
Toscano, J. P.; Wilson, G. M.; O’Rourke, B.; Kass, D. a; Mahaney, J. E.; Paolocci,
N. HNO Enhances SERCA2a Activity and Cardiomyocyte Function by Promoting
Redox-Dependent Phospholamban Oligomerization. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013,
19, 1185–1197.
(37) Ida, T.; Sawa, T.; Ihara, H.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Kumagai, Y.; Suematsu,
M.; Motohashi, H.; Fujii, S.; Matsunaga, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Ono, K.; Devarie-
Baez, N. O.; Xian, M.; Fukuto, J. M.; Akaike, T. Reactive Cysteine Persulfides
and S-Polythiolation Regulate Oxidative Stress and Redox Signaling. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 2014, 111, 7606–7611.
(38) Artaud, I.; Galardon, E. A Persulfide Analogue of the Nitrosothiol SNAP:
Formation, Characterization and Reactivity. ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 2361–2364.
(39) Zhao, Y.; Bhushan, S.; Yang, C.; Otsuka, H.; Stein, J. D.; Pacheco, A.; Peng, B.;
Devarie-Baez, N. O.; Aguilar, H. C.; Lefer, D. J.; Xian, M. Controllable Hydrogen
Sulfide Donors and Their Activity against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion
Injury. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 1283–1290.
(40) Zhao, Y.; Biggs, T. D.; Xian, M. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Releasing Agents:
Chemistry and Biological Applications. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11788–11805.
(41) Filipovic, M. R.; Miljkovic, J. L.; Nauser, T.; Royzen, M.; Klos, K.; Shubina, T.;
Koppenol, W. H.; Lippard, S. J.; Ivanović-Burmazović, I. Chemical
281
Characterization of the Smallest S-Nitrosothiol, HSNO; Cellular Cross-Talk of
H2S and S-Nitrosothiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12016–12027.
(42) Ivanova, L. V; Anton, B. J.; Timerghazin, Q. K. On the Possible Biological
Relevance of HSNO Isomers: A Computational Investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2014, 16, 8476–8486.
(43) Keceli, G.; Toscano, J. P. Reactivity of C-Terminal Cysteines with HNO.
Biochemistry 2014, 53, 3689–3698.
(44) Zhang, D.; MacInkovic, I.; Devarie-Baez, N. O.; Pan, J.; Park, C. M.; Carroll, K.
S.; Filipovic, M. R.; Xian, M. Detection of Protein S-Sulfhydration by a Tag-
Switch Technique. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 575–581.
282
Curriculum Vitae
Tyler Alexander Chavez [email protected] linkedin.com/in/tylerachavez
Education
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD
Ph.D., Organic Chemistry (February 2016)
Dissertation Title: Investigation of Reactive Intermediates: Nitroxyl (HNO) and
Carbonylnitrenes.
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD
M.A., Chemistry (September 2013)
Sonoma State University Rohnert Park, CA
B.A., Chemistry (June 2011)
Experience
John Hopkins Technology Ventures Baltimore, MD
Commercialization Academy Intern (October 2014 – Present)
Completed a thorough analysis of 22 invention disclosures.
Developed a reputation for quality and efficient analysis of technologies.
Collaborate with intellectual property management teams and technology licensing
associates to develop technology transfer paths.
Mentored junior interns in the use of software and approach to technology analysis.
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD
Graduate Researcher (August 2011 - Present)
Perform organic chemistry research, applied to biologically relevant questions, under the
advisement of Professor John P. Toscano.
Apply a wide variety of experimental and computational techniques.
Successfully communicated with collaborators in a diverse set of technical fields leading to
manuscripts to be submitted in the near future.
Managed and trained three undergraduates to be independent researchers.
Key accomplishments:
Primary author of an invited book chapter in In The Chemistry and Biology of Azanone
(HNO) and published a peer-reviewed journal article in The Journal of Inorganic
Biochemistry.
Presented research at the National Organic Chemistry Symposium and the Reaction
Mechanisms Conference.
Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship Honorable Mention (2013)
Organic Chemistry Head Teaching Assistant (August 2012 – May 2014)
Prepared and delivered lectures on organic chemistry to more than 50 students.
Proficient in motivating and teaching others to successfully complete delegated tasks.
Key accomplishments:
Ernest M. Marks Award for Teaching Excellence (2013)
Organic Chemistry Teaching Assistant (August 2011 – May 2012)
Key accomplishments:
Krieger School of Arts and Sciences Teaching Assistant Award (2012)
283
Sonoma State University Rohnert Park, CA
Research Assistant (February 2009 – May 2011)
Performed organic chemistry research under Professor Jon M. Fukuto.
Synthesized novel thermal release precursors to nitroxyl (HNO).
Key accomplishments:
Published a peer-reviewed article in Free Radical Biology and Medicine.
Presented research at the ACS Undergraduate Research Symposium.
Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (2010)
McNair Scholarship Recipient (2010)