introduction goal: to make conservation planning more accessible for planners, farmers and...
TRANSCRIPT
INTRODUCTION
Goal: To make conservation planning more accessible for planners, farmers and landowners
The “BIG PICTURE”
overview
Development of a planning tool to assist with conservation planning.
LATIS / FarmLATIS
•Hydrologic modeling tool
•Interface with GIS
•Grocery list of conservation practices (BMPs)
•Grocery list of incentive programs
The “BIG PICTURE”
overview
Wha
t
Why
A G R I C U L T U R E U R B A N
METHOD
survey design
METHOD
survey design
The Survey•Survey design followed Dillman’s Tailored Design Method (Dillman 2007)
•32 total questions (plus sub-questions)
METHOD
survey implementation
The Survey•Web-based survey following Dillman’s Tailored Design Method (Dillman 2007)
1) Prenotice e-mail
2) Questionnaire
3) Replacement Questionnaire (Reminder 1)
4) Replacement Questionnaire/Thank You Letter (Reminder 2)
•QuestionPro: Web-based survey software (www.questionpro.com)
Chosen as the host Web site for the questionnaire
METHOD
survey implementation
The Survey•Distributed to 253 Mississippi NRCS employees
•187 Started
•156 Completed
•61.6% Completion
•Average completion time: 21 minutes
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
web-based survey
DEMOGRAPHICS
gender & age range
DEMOGRAPHICS
education
DEMOGRAPHICS
nrcs
DEMOGRAPHICS
conclusion
“Soil conservation is multidisciplinary and relies on numerous specialists…to develop mutually supporting soil and water conservation measures” (Helms 1992)
–Hugh Hammond Bennettfounder SES, SCS, & NRCS
+All educational degrees
+Over 13 educational backgrounds
+Over 13 job positions
-Low gender diversity
-Heavy emphasis on ‘soil’
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
overview
CCPICooperative Conservation Partnership
Initiative
a voluntary program established to foster conservation partnerships that focus technical and financial resources on conservation priorities in watersheds and air sheds of special significance
CRP Conservation Reserve Programencourages farmers to convert highly erodible cropland or other environmentally sensitive
acreage to vegetative cover
CSP Conservation Security Programidentifies and rewards those farmers and ranchers who are meeting the highest standards of
conservation and environmental management on their operations
CTAConservation Technical Assistance
Programa voluntary program that provides technical assistance supported by science-based technology
and tools to help people conserve, maintain, and improve their natural resources
EQIPEnvironmental Quality Incentives
Programa voluntary program that provides assistance to farmers and ranchers who face threats to soil,
water, air, and related natural resources on their land
12 incentive programs included in survey
Comprehensive (Broad Scope)
overview
GLCIGrazing Lands Conservation Initiative
collaborative process of individuals and organizations working to maintain and improve the management, productivity, and health of the Nation's privately owned grazing land by providing technical assistance to help the landowners use the latest and best technology to make grazing land management decisions
GRP Grassland Reserve Programa voluntary program that helps landowners and operators restore and protect grassland, while maintaining the areas as grazing lands
HFRP Healthy Forests Reserve Programa voluntary program established for the purpose of restoring and enhancing forest ecosystems to promote the recovery of threatened and endangered species, to improve biodiversity, and enhance carbon sequestration
RC & D
Resource Conservation and Development Program
encourage and improve the capability of volunteer local elected and civic leaders in designated RC & D areas to plan and carry out projects for resource conservation and community development
WHIP Wildlife Habitat Initiatives Programa voluntary program that encourages the creation of high quality wildlife habitats that support wildlife populations, and provides technical and financial assistance to landowners and others to develop upland, wetland, riparian, and aquatic habitat areas on their property
WRP Wetlands Reserve Programlandowners receive financial incentives to restore, protect, and enhance wetlands in exchange for retiring marginal land from agriculture
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS12 incentive programs included in survey
EWP Emergency Watershed Program
to undertake emergency measures, including the purchase of flood plain easements, for runoff retardation and soil erosion prevention to safeguard lives and property from floods, drought, and the products of erosion on any watershed whenever fire, flood or any other natural occurrence is causing or has caused a sudden impairment of the watershed
Specific
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
ccpi: cooperative conservation partnership initiative
How often are the following incentive programs recommended vs
How often do the farmers enroll
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
crp: conservation reserve program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
csp: conservation security program
cta: conservation technical assistance program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
eqip: environmental quality incentives program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
ewp: emergency watershed program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
glci: grazing lands conservation initiative
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
grp: grassland reserve program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
hfrp: healthy forests reserve program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
rc&d: resource conservation & development
program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
whip: wildlife habitat initiatives program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
wrp: wetlands reserve program
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
Cultural
Economic
Social
Variables
17.78%
64.44%
17.78%
Reasons farmers do not enroll in Incentive ProgramsINCENTIVE PROGRAMS
What are the farmers’ reasons for choosing not to participate in the incentive programs?
conclusion
•“Some programs are not funded in our county and others are not adequately funded such as EQIP and WHIP”
•“No funding available in the County”
•“The cost share rates are not up-dated to reflect the actual cost of the material”
•“Some mistrust of the Government”•“Not totally trusting in the Government”
•“Don't want to get involved with the Government”•“Some are afraid of the government”
•“Distrust or indifference by office managers”•“Some folks just don't trust the government still”
conclusion
INCENTIVE PROGRAMSReasons for correlation:
•Increased recommendations = increased enrollment
•High financial incentive = high enrollment
vs Small financial incentive = low enrollment
•“Umbrella” programs
•Are the real enrollment numbers similar to the NRCS agents’ estimation?
ConclusionHigh Rec/Enrollment rate Low Rec/Enrollment rate
CRP CCPICTA CSPEQIP GLCIWHIP GRP
HFRP
conservation practices
RESOURCE CONCERNSList of multiple Conservation Practices (BMPs) summarized by the NRCS into 20 Resource Concerns1. Soil Erosion
2. Soil Health
3. Soil Contaminants
4. Soil Structure
5. Water Quantity (non-irrigated land)
6. Water Quantity (irrigated land)
7. Water Quality
8. Plant Condition (Productivity, Health & Vigor)
9. Plant Condition (Wildfire Hazard)
10.Plant Pests
11.Fish & Wildlife (Inadequate Habitat Quality)
12.Plants, Fish, & Wildlife (Declining Species- Species of Concern)
13.Livestock Nutrition & Husbandry
14.Air Quality (Particulate Matter)
15.Air Quality (Ozone Precursors)
16.Air Quality (Greenhouse Gasses)
17.Air Quality (Ammonia)
18.Air Quality (Odor)
19.Depletion of Fossil Fuel Resources
20.Energy Production
RESOURCE CONCERNS
soil
With what regularity are the conservation practices related to the following resource concerns recommended to farmers/landowners whom you have advised?
water quantity
RESOURCE CONCERNS
water quality
RESOURCE CONCERNS
Water quality testing associated with non-point source pollution
plant condition
RESOURCE CONCERNS
wildlife
RESOURCE CONCERNS
livestock
RESOURCE CONCERNS
air quality
RESOURCE CONCERNS
air quality (continued)
RESOURCE CONCERNS
fossil fuels & energy production
RESOURCE CONCERNS
conclusion
RESOURCE CONCERNSThe SCS was reorganized into the NRCS:
“ to focus on the fact that the agency’s [NRCS] mission encompassed water, air, plants, and animals in addition to soil”
(Helms 1992)
•Soil and water are the primary resources of concern
•Through increased awareness by the NRCS, other resource concerns will receive more attention in the future
•NRCS employees identified the importance of water quality testing, but how can we implement more monitoring programs?
CONCLUSIONS
FarmLATIS should:
•(Demographics) meet the needs of end users who are not likely to be familiar with advanced digital technologies such as GIS and hydrologic modeling
•(Incentive Programs) promote the less common comprehensive programs in order to encompass a broader range of natural resources
-promote the use of water quality testing
-streamline the enrollment process for farmers/landowners
•(Resource Concerns) increase the awareness of conservation practices associated with the less common resource concerns (beyond soil and water)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank:
•Mississippi Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
•Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES)
•Mississippi State University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
•Mississippi State University Department of Landscape Architecture
•Advisor: Dr. Tim Schauwecker