international standards and best practice in political finance dr marcin walecki ecp workshop...
TRANSCRIPT
International Standards and Best International Standards and Best Practice in Political Finance Practice in Political Finance
Dr Marcin WaleckiDr Marcin WaleckiECP WorkshopECP Workshop
IslamabadIslamabadNovember 2010November 2010
”What needs to be said, and which in any case everyone knows, is that the greater part of political funding is irregular or
illegal”Bettino Craxi, Former Italian Prime Minister
Key Key UnderstandingsUnderstandings
The financing of political life is a necessity – and a problemDEMOCRACY NEEDS TO CONTROL MONEY OR MONEY WILL CONTROL DEMOCRACY
•In the long run improper and illegal funds contribute to de-legitimize parties in particular and undermine democratic system in general
•A strong democracy requires healthy political life. Political parties need healthy funding to fulfil their core functions, both during and between election periods. Funding of political parties through private contributions is a form of political participation
•The regulation of political finance is essential to guarantee politicians independence from undue influence and to ensure the principle of equal opportunity
Why to regulate Money Why to regulate Money Politics?Politics?
STATE AGENCIES / STATE-OWNED ENTRPRISES
PUBLIC CONTRACTS IN EXCESS OF REGULAR PRICE /
PRIVATISATION
POLITICALY CONTROLLED COMPANIES
OR NARROW BUSINESSGROUPS
POLITICAL PARTIES
ELECTIONS
DONATIONS IN-KIND/MONEY/BRIBES TO INDIVIDUAL POLITICIANS
OLIGARCHS (AIDS)
Effective Regulatory FrameworkEffective Regulatory Framework& Sequence of Reforms& Sequence of Reforms
1. Full Disclosure (systematic and detailed reporting, public access to records and publicity)
2. Strong and independent enforcement supported by effective and proportional sanctions
3. Controlling donations (ban on anonymous donations and contribution limits, regulating loans, assets disclosure)
4. Transparent, meaningful, and fair Public Funding System
5. Controlling costs of elections (Spending Limits)
7
Political Finance Political Finance DisclosureDisclosure
•Disclosure is based on comprehensive and regular exposure of the financial details (parties, candidates, MPs)
•Who gives, how much, to whom, and for what, and when?
•Timing of disclosure and access to information (newspapers, web sites)
•Promoted by the UN Convention Against Corruption Art. 7 (3):
Each State Party shall also consider taking appropriate legislative and administrative measures to enhance transparency in the funding of candidates for elected public office and, where applicable the funding of political parties.
ChallengeChallenge
While disclosure is an important element of a While disclosure is an important element of a fair democratic process, its significance is fair democratic process, its significance is
reduced in the absence of effective audit and reduced in the absence of effective audit and enforcement mechanismsenforcement mechanisms
Independent Political Finance Regulator
Party’s Internal Control
Civil Society/Media Voters
Effective Control of Political FinanceEffective Control of Political Finance
Independent Enforcement Independent Enforcement
National Electoral
Management Body
Regulatory Body Specially Created for this
Purpose
Government Department
Other
45 countries (63%)
9 countries(13%)
20 countries(28%)
19 countries(27%)
What body is responsible for administration and enforcement of the regulations?
Total = 71 countries
Effective ControlEffective Control
1. Non-partisan enforcement agency willing to be unpopular, supported by good appointments and adequate budget,
2. Aggressive enforcement policy (REAL time disclosure , audits and enforcement action),
3. Full post-election disclosure of ALL financial information,4. Conduct AUDITS, including random audits during the
election5. Receives external complaints, investigative powers, go to
court, assess penalties6. Independence and Operational Integrity: professionalism,
efficiency, good services to candidate and public. 7. Website, searchable database, training for parties and
candidates,
Means of changing behavior: (A) Education, (B) Monitoring (C) Fair penalties as deterrent
Is strong control an optimal formula?Is strong control an optimal formula?
• Simple answer is – NO
• Political domination by a single party
• Selective enforcement and targeted anti-corruption campaigns
• Political harassment, raiding taxes and customs inspections against entrepreneurs
• Political repression may seriously constrain resources available to an opposition
Public FundingPublic Funding
•At least 104 different countries classified by Freedom House as “free” or “partly free,” have some form of public funding. Public funding is predominant in the Europe and Latin America. In Africa public funding is not available to political parties in a majority (56 %) of states•Strengthen the autonomy of politicians, provide more fairness to opposition parties (limiting advantage of incumbency)•Provide political actors with resources for essential democratic activities, increasing the institutionalization and stability of parties; and •Be a powerful lever to secure compliance with other political finance regulationsBUT … it is not a magical solution to the problem of political corruption and illegal funding of politics
Forms of Forms of PublicPublic Funding Funding
• Direct State Funding, i.e. cash grants disbursed to parties and/or candidates
• Indirect State Funding, i.e. any law-enacted subvention delivered in kind to political actors, such as access to state-owned broadcasters, public buildings or publicly printed material; tax incentives for private political contributors, parties or candidates,
• Specific political subsidies, for example cash grants earmarked for
party-related or party-controlled organizations such as parliamentary caucuses, ancillary groups (women’s and youth, mainly), newspapers, and research institutes
Wednesday 19 April 2023
14
Public FundingPublic Funding – International – International StandardsStandards
Wednesday 19 April 2023
Organization Recommendation
World Bank Consider public funding. Public funding reduces the scope for private interests to “buy influence” and can also help reinforce limits on spending because the electorate is resistant to excessive public expenditure
The Carter Center/OAS
Mixed funding systems with a substantial public component are recommended. Public funds should be provided as a substitute for or a complement to private donations at all phases of the political and electoral process. Public funding for ongoing party activities and campaigns should be allocated by a mix of proportional rules and flat subsidies to all parties that meet reasonable thresholds.
Council of Europe
The state should provide support to political parties. State support should be limited to reasonable contributions. State support may be financial. Objective, fair and reasonable criteria should be applied regarding the distribution of state support. States should ensure that any support from the state and/or citizens does not interfere with the independence of political parties
Spending Limits – Best PracticeSpending Limits – Best Practice
• Free choice of voters can be undermined and the democratic process distorted by the disproportionate expenditure
• Conflict between two fundamental principles of modern democracy – political equality and political liberty
• • Spending Limits once introduced should be realistic to ensure that all parties are able to
run an effective campaign, recognizing the high expense of modern electoral campaigns
• Imposing low and strict spending limits might marginalize opposition
• Limits should be designed against inflation. Limits should be based on a form of indexation rather than absolute amounts
Spending LimitsSpending Limits – International – International StandardsStandards
UN General Comment No. 25
Reasonable limitations on campaign expenditure may be justified where this is necessary to ensure that the free choice of voters is not undermined or the democratic process distorted by the disproportionate expenditure on behalf of any candidate or party
INTER-AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC CHARTER Article 5
The strengthening of political parties and other political organizations is a priority for democracy. Special attention will be paid to the problems associated with the high cost of election campaigns and the establishment of a balanced and transparent system for their financing
SADC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR ELECTIONS IN THE SADC REGION
The funding of election campaigns is an area where the misuse of public funds is common and the playing field is not even. Experience in most countries is that the ruling party is well resourced (financially and assets wise) while opposition parties are poorly funded. Ceilings on political expenditure are either not there or ignored by all. The rich engaged in lavish expenditure to win votes. The Electoral Commission should therefore be legally empowered to prohibit certain types of expenditures
COUNCIL OF EUROPERec (2003)4
States should consider adopting measures to prevent excessive funding needs of political parties, such as, establishing limits on expenditure on electoral campaigns
Key Key FindingsFindings
Wednesday 19 April 2023
• Money is never an unproblematic part of political system but is necessary for democratic politics
• Regulation is desirable and it must not curb healthy competition
• Right sequencing is the key Public Control First –Public Funding Second
• Too many rules, too little enforcement – focus on disclosure and effective control
• Effective oversight depends on cooperation and interactions of several stakeholders