international ip issues federal lab consortium meeting international ip issues dr roisin mcnally -...

15
International IP Issues Federal Lab Consortium Meeting International IP Issues Dr Roisin McNally - European Patent Attorney 20 September 2006

Upload: miles-hall

Post on 27-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

International IP Issues

Federal Lab Consortium MeetingInternational IP Issues

Dr Roisin McNally - European Patent Attorney

20 September 2006

International IP Issues

IP StrategyIP Strategy

Major markets - US and EuropeMajor markets - US and Europe

Practical Advice Practical Advice

Costs

International Patent Protection

GrantedEuropean

Patent

Granted National Patents

12 Months 12 Months

File IndividualOverseas Applications

File IndividualOverseas Application

File EuropeanApplication

File InternationalPCT Application

File EuropeanApplication

File USApplication

International Patent Protection

International (PCT) Application

Individual Overseas Applications

Regional Applications

Different claims/ different scope

Enforceability

International (PCT) Application

Individual Overseas Applications

Regional Applications

Different claims/ different scope

Enforceability

National/ Regional Procedures

National / Regional Applications12/30 months

EP

Search

Examination

Grant

US

Exam

Poss.C.I.Ps

Issue

CA/JP

-

Exam

Issue

AU/NZ

Exam

Issue

-

US / EP Procedural Differences

First to inventGrace periods (prior art, deposits)Must disclose best modeCan with-hold publicationDuty of DisclosureContinuation-in-part practice

EP

US

First to fileNo grace periodEnabling disclosureApplication publishes at 18 monthsNo duty of disclosureNo information can be added

Patentable Subject Matter? US/EP

Methods of Medical TreatmentMethods of Medical Treatment

Methods of DiagnosisMethods of Diagnosis

Computer Programs/Computer related IPComputer Programs/Computer related IP

Plants/Plant varietiesPlants/Plant varieties

Animals/Animal varietiesAnimals/Animal varieties

Contrary to “ordre public”Contrary to “ordre public”

Presentation of InformationPresentation of Information

Technical CharacterTechnical Character

AlgorithmsAlgorithms

Continuation-In-Part Continuation-In-Part (“CIP”) (“CIP”)

Common subject matter – original priority

Added subject matter – priority as of CIP filing

Useful to:cover improvementsadd new experimental data

Dis-incentive – patent term calculated from earliest U.S. filing date

No CIP practice in Europe or other international territories – all material must be derivable from application as filed.

Common subject matter – original priority

Added subject matter – priority as of CIP filing

Useful to:cover improvementsadd new experimental data

Dis-incentive – patent term calculated from earliest U.S. filing date

No CIP practice in Europe or other international territories – all material must be derivable from application as filed.

Best ModeBest Mode

Statutory requirement in US – not elsewhere

Must set forth best mode of carrying out invention known to inventor at time of filing

Failure to disclose best mode invalidates patent; e.g.

no preferred embodiment described

aspects which materially affect claimed invention left out

Not an issue outside US – application must be enabled

Statutory requirement in US – not elsewhere

Must set forth best mode of carrying out invention known to inventor at time of filing

Failure to disclose best mode invalidates patent; e.g.

no preferred embodiment described

aspects which materially affect claimed invention left out

Not an issue outside US – application must be enabled

First to invent First to invent systemsystem

Rights to invention based on earliest date of invention

Proved by corroborated evidence of conception and reduction to practice

Written records that are signed, dated and witnessednotebooksinvention disclosure forms

Priority contest is an “interference”

Rest of world – first to file

Rights to invention based on earliest date of invention

Proved by corroborated evidence of conception and reduction to practice

Written records that are signed, dated and witnessednotebooksinvention disclosure forms

Priority contest is an “interference”

Rest of world – first to file

Grace periods/ Biological Grace periods/ Biological depositsdeposits

Prior art12 month grace period for own disclosureafter 12 months, absolute bar to patentability

Biological deposits (cells, bacteria, plasmids, etc.)can deposit any time during pendency of application

No grace period in Europe, might change soon but not yet.

Deposits required to be identified within 12 months – details within 16 months

Prior art12 month grace period for own disclosureafter 12 months, absolute bar to patentability

Biological deposits (cells, bacteria, plasmids, etc.)can deposit any time during pendency of application

No grace period in Europe, might change soon but not yet.

Deposits required to be identified within 12 months – details within 16 months

Duty of DisclosureDuty of Disclosure

Must disclose to USPTO all known information material to patentability All persons involved with application under duty

inventorsattorneysFailure to disclose invalidates patent

No duty of disclosure in Europe – often recommended to disclose to ensure valid enforceable patent – but not necessary – can be used as defensive mechanism.

Must disclose to USPTO all known information material to patentability All persons involved with application under duty

inventorsattorneysFailure to disclose invalidates patent

No duty of disclosure in Europe – often recommended to disclose to ensure valid enforceable patent – but not necessary – can be used as defensive mechanism.

U.S. Non-U.S. Non-PublicationPublication

Must be requested at time of filing

Foreign filing abrogates request

Otherwise, application publishes 18 months from priority date

In Europe and rest of the world application must be withdrawn to avoid publication at 18 months.

Must be requested at time of filing

Foreign filing abrogates request

Otherwise, application publishes 18 months from priority date

In Europe and rest of the world application must be withdrawn to avoid publication at 18 months.

Practical Tips and Practical Tips and CostsCosts

Consider overseas protection from the beginningRemember first to file and not first to inventFor important inventions consider defensive

patentingConsider using different text for outside USAMinimise translation costs where possibleMinimise claim numbers and categoriesReview US text early for international issuesConsider subject matter and national requirementsConsider markets, competitors and enforceability –

separately and together.

Consider overseas protection from the beginningRemember first to file and not first to inventFor important inventions consider defensive

patentingConsider using different text for outside USAMinimise translation costs where possibleMinimise claim numbers and categoriesReview US text early for international issuesConsider subject matter and national requirementsConsider markets, competitors and enforceability –

separately and together.

International IP Issues

Thank you for your attention.

[email protected]

Belfast, Dublin, Glasgow, Aberdeen, London, Nice Munich

011443078400 or 011442890320441