international bank fees the next frontier · - rsfn - web banking - host to host ... do manual...
TRANSCRIPT
Paris London Houston New York
CONFIDENTIAL - This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced outside the client organization without prior written approval from Redbridge Debt & Treasury Advisory.
This material was used by Redbridge Debt & Treasury Advisory during an oral presentation. It is not a complete record of the discussion.
INTERNATIONAL BANK FEES – THE NEXT FRONTIER
Helene Shen – Redbridge Debt & Treasury Advisory (New York)
Stephan Ireland -- Redbridge Debt & Treasury Advisory (Houston)
2
SUMMARY
Banks' perspective and corporations' perspective
Cash Management: Local Challenges
Global Bank Fee Monitoring
1
2
3
4
7
17
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]3INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
KPI’s in terms of bank fees
What is at stake?
• Worldwide bank wholesale payment revenues?
• Cash management related costs in comparison to company’s revenues?
• Typical annual variation?
< 50MM$ 50MM$ < X <
250MM$
> 250MM$
1bp < X < 2bps 2bps < X < 5bps > 5bps
< 1% 2% < X < 4% > 5%
4
SUMMARY
Banks' perspective and corporations' perspective
Cash Management: Local Challenges
Global Bank Fee Monitoring
1
2
3
4
7
17
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]5INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Whoslesale Transaction Banking Revenues (Source: BCG)
Payment-related businessess are the lifeblood of banks, making up about 25% of total revenues worldwide
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]6INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
$80m-$100m average “all-in” fees paid to banks
(global fortune 500)
25% average ‘payment-related’ business out of “all-in” fees
paid to banks
KPIs on Banking Relationships & Bank Fees (Redbridge source)
Banking relationship analysis: the importance of transactional banking
Fees Raroc
60%
40%
Split in bank fees
Side Business Credit Business
40 Average number of banking relationships for a Global
Fortune 500 company
60% of fees paid to the top 5 banks
15% RAROC given to banks on average
7
SUMMARY
Banks' perspective and corporations' perspective
Cash Management: Local Challenges
Global Bank Fee Monitoring
1
2
3
4
7
17
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]8INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
A Panoramic View of Major Regulatory Compliance Projects*
Key regulatory and industrial initiatives (KRIIs) are forcing banks to rethink their multi-country approach and adapt their pricing policy
*Extract from the 2016 World Payment Report; source: Capgemini
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]9INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Cash Management Cost in % of Local Domestic Volumes: Example of a Real Situation
Cash Management costs can vary significantly among countries
North America & Canada
UK
Germany
AustraliaNew-Zealand France
Austria
The Netherlands
Belgium
Asia (China, Thailand, Malaysia)
SpainPortugal
Italy
Czech Republic
Israel
Switzerland
0,00%
0,02%
0,04%
0,06%
0,08%
0,10%
0,12%
0,14%
0,16%
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]10INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Asia-Pacific
Pricing and countries specificities are always key challenges
China Hong Kong India Australia
Specific Bank Services
- BAD
- Strong development of eBAD
with paperless process
- Low Value / High Value
- Intra City / Inter City
- Standard Transactions
- Auto Pay
- Low Value / High Value
- Checks, Drafts
- Debit card
- Limited credit cards 1100+
clearing houses
- Strong development of digital
payments (Immediate Payment
Service IMPS 24*7)
- Very few Checks
- Mainly ETF
- Direct Debits
- Debit Crad
Bank Fee Reporting
- Very Paper Based
- Difficult to retrieve
- Not always available in English
- Paper Based & Electronic
- Difficult to retrieve N/A
- Very Paper Based
- Difficult to retrieve
- Not always available in English
Existence of Domestic
proportional feesY Y N N
Float Y N Y N
Cost of Cash ManagementLow Transaction banking cost,
High liquidity management costLow Low Medium
Information Services- Web Banking
- Host to host
- Web Banking
- Host to host
- Web Banking- Web Banking
- Host to host
- SWIFT
Paper Based Services High Medium High Low
Bank Competition High High Low Low
IBAN N N N N
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]11
EMEA & Americas
Pricing and countries specificities are always key challenges
UK France Germany Italy Brazil Canada
Specific Bank Services
- BACS, CHAPS
- Faster Payment
- SEPA Payments (SCT, SDD)
- Checks
- SEPA SCT, SDD
- Checks
- Bill of Exhange (paper &
Electronic)
- TIP
- SEPA SCT,
- SDD
- SEPA SCT, SDD
- RID
- RIBA
- Limited Checks
- Cash mainly
- Checks
- Credit Transfer
- DD bank to bank
- "Bloquetos"
Mostly same as in the US
Bank Fee Reporting Y on card collections
Y (paperbased / electronic file) but
often charged (between €300 and
€ 3k) per year
Y with European banks Y with European banks N/AY equivalent of Account Analysis
Statement
Existence of Domestic
proportional feesN
Y (Commission de Mouvement de
Compte CMC: still charged on
commercial debit volumes)
Y (some banks may charge a fee
per line: "Buchungposten")
Y (fees per lines "Spese di
scrittura": still charged by some
banks).
Y N
Float N N N Y Y N
Cost of Cash Management Low (except on overdraft) One of the highest in Europe Low (except on card collections) One of the highest in Europe High incl. Float High
Information Services- BACSTEL-IP
- SWIFT
- Ebics
- SWIFT
- Ebics
- SWIFT
- Web Banking
- SWIFT
- Web Banking
- RSFN
- Web Banking
- Host to Host
Paper Based Services Low Low Low Medium High Medium
Bank Competition Low, mainly 3 banks High High High Medium Low
IBAN Y Y Y Y Y N
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]12INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Local Banks
• Excellent branch network and
coverage;
• Necessary for over-the-counter
services;
• Best at servicing specific domestic
needs;
• Closer to the regulators
• Local banks are not always able to
provide a single pricing schedule
across the country (e.g. China).
• Regional Banks
• Can cover more than one country
• Very good fit with some local banks
• Mostly for electronic payments,
• Some regional banks can have a
very good domestic networks
• Bank fee pro-forma is less detailed
than that in the domestic US (services
are more bundled);
• Electronic transfers are often charged
a transaction fee and a percentage
fee (usually capped);
• Countries' local specificities:
"Commission de Mouvement" (France),
RID/RIBA (Italy), "Bunchungposten"
(Germany), BACS and CHAPS
payments (UK), Boletino (Brazil),
Stipandi (Italy)
• Sometimes difficult to communicate;
• Adapt your communication to
overcome cultural and language
barrier;
• Understand each country's local
specificities and requirements;
• Beware of currency conversion and
restrictions;
• Something as simple as account
opening in some countries (China,
France, …) can turn into a nightmare.
Negotiating Bank Fees: USA vs. Rest of The World
Never underestimate the cultural gap!!!
What else?What are the cultural gapsWho to bank with?
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]13INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Countries for which there are no legal /
fiscal constraints that can be easily
integrated to a cross-border and notional
pooling:
• France (all currencies)
• The Netherlands (all currencies)
• Germany (EUR)
• Hungary (EUR & HUF)
• Czech Republic (EUR)
• Italy (EUR)
• Spain (EUR)
Countries not used to be integrated to a
cross-border cash pooling due to local
constraints:
• Poland (EUR & PLN): 2% stamp duties
=> the lending / borrowing relationship can
take place outside Poland so as not to be
considered as a « loan agreement » and
avoid 2% stamp duties
• Turkey (EUR & TRY): allowed but
considered as useless because of taxes and
operational workload
=> for the most part, directly integrated in a
cross-border notional pooling
Countries for which there are legal / fiscal
constraints to analyze so that the
integration to the cross-border cash
pooling remains profitable and relevant:
• Belgium (EUR)
• Portugal (EUR)
• Italy (EUR)
• Czech Republic (CZK): only between
accounts of the same legal entities
• Slovakia (EUR): residual exchange
control and reports to the NB?
Most European countries can be centralized via notional or ZBA cash pooling structure
European Cash Pooling Landscape
Without constraints With constraints to analyze Not practiced
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]14INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Regional cash pooling in Asia - myth and reality on domestic cash pooling
APAC Cash Pooling Landscape
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]15INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Regional cash pooling in Asia - myth and reality on cross-border cash pooling
APAC Cash Pooling Landscape
1
6
SUMMARY
Banks' perspective and corporations' perspective
Cash Management: Local Challenges
Global Bank Fee Monitoring
1
2
3
4
7
17
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]17INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
• ~2800 different ways of charging a
client
• On average, 250 service lines billed to
a client
• EVERYTHING is passed through to the
client
• Main costs: Information reporting (bank
communication) & Lockboxes
• FDIC fees
• B2B credit cards
• No proportionnal fees
• ECR is unique to US market
• Outsourcing payables and receivables
conversion
• Main sources of revenues derive from
balances and interests, commission on
transactions under development
• Bank fee holiday is a trend to acquire
new businesses
• Information reporting is not always
available (even less in English), very
paper based.
• Pricing models are not standardized
• Bank fee pro-forma is less detailed
than that in the US (services are more
bundled);
• Electronic transfers are often charged
a transactional fee and a percentage
fee (usually capped);
• Local banks are not always able to
provide a single pricing schedule
across the country (e.g. China).
• Billing structure can be confusing
• ~300 different ways of charging a client
• ~ 50/80 service lines billed to a client
• Multi bank portal & communication
tools (EBICs, SWIFT bureau..) are the
most common market practices
(Significantly minimizing bank
communication cost)
• No bank account remuneration
• Existence of proportional fees
• Bank account structure is the most
expensive service
• Recent trend of charging high
deposits/balances on big corporations
• No account statements analysis
• Lack of transparency
Different Bank Fee Structure
A wide variety of billing cash management services
AsiaEuropeUSA
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]18INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Bank Fee Reporting Offer
18 global banks are now able to provide bank fee reporting for their clients
40 Countries
18 banks
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]19
80% of an average corporation’s needs could be met using the existing bank monitoring standards
Global Picture of Bank Offerings in Terms of Global Standard
International Banks offer
a Standardized AAS
18
Banks using Global AFP
codes*
65%
Banks ready to accept
other codes
20%
Banks have developed
TWIST BSB standard*
80%
Countries covered40
80%
Banks have developed
Camt.086 (ISO 20022)
standard*
50%Coverage rate of an
average
corporation’s needs
*Source: Redbridge
INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]20INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
Corporations Behavior and Habits Around Bank Fees
Corporations don’t take all the benefits of this opportunity
Monthly50%
Quarterly22%
Specific frequency
28%
How often do you analyse bank fees?
22%
17%
50%
11%
How do you analyse the data?
Use predefined dashboards of a TMS market solutionUse your own automated solutionDo manual analysisOther
47%
26%
53%
32%
53%
53%
Paper
CSV
EDI 822
BSB
.xls
Formats of electronic statements
38%
44%
13%
6%
Preferred methodology to classify bank services
Bank classifications
Other (internal, external supplier, Swift referential, etc.)
AFP Global Codes
AFP Standard Codes
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]21INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
The Main Reasons to Ask your Bank for a Standardized File
Corporations want to increase their global visibility into cash management fees and bank relationships
7%
7%
14%
71%
7%
7%
29%
14%
36%
7%
7%
21%
14%
14%
21%
21%
7%
43%
21%
29%
7%
29%
64%
79%
21%
Volumes checking
Volume validation
Account management
Electronic invoicing mandated and expected from all vendors
Pricing reconciliation
Global visibility into cash management fees and bank relationships
Primary purpose for wanting a BSB?
Ranking 1 Ranking 2 Ranking 3 Ranking 4 Ranking 5 Ranking 6
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]22INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS
How do Corporations Use Standardized Files?
Most Corporations are happy with the level of details from standardized files
ISO 20022 camt.086
46%TWIST BSB45%
I do not know9%
In which format do you receive BSB?
Bank fee analysis
module of my TMS
46%Excel
conversion27%
Other27%
How are you using BSB files?
Yes67%
No33%
Are you statisfied with BSB level of details?
Client logo
[To be modified in master
view]
Join the CGI-MP Task Force
Ask your bank for Electronic Files
Join LinkedIn Discussion Group (coming very soon)
Participate in industrial surveys
Raise your voice!!
Let’s make the banks more accountable for their billing structure and invoices
INTERNATIONAL BANK FEE ANALYSIS